Public report of Anxcye/anx-reader, published 22 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 23 October 2026, 00:13 UTC · Survey ID cd_0d2940de22104431a96270766004c9dc
Anxcye/anx-reader
Measured 22 October 2026, 23:56 UTC, at code version 0c7fc1a
No regression since the last survey
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
CAI scoreWeak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 1 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 56,136 lines of product code in 8 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.3 person-years · Weakest lens: Security and Compliance, 26
Findings by how serious they are
91 critical268 serious40 minor
9 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
22 October 2026, 23:56 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
70of 74 dimensions measured by tools. The other 4 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
381of 399 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 18 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
74dimensions across 8 lenses, read from 56,136 lines of product code in 8 projects.
Anxcye/anx-reader scores 37 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while six of its eight lenses score higher still: Domain Modelling at 100 and Architecture at 96, both rated Exemplary, Code Health at 74, rated Strong, Performance at 62 and Maturity at 51, both rated Adequate, and Production Readiness at 49, rated Weak.
The score is lower than those six because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Security and Compliance, which scores 26 and is rated Weak. Its Web-Security Posture dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Security and Compliance can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to stop accepting every TLS certificate: delete the `badCertificateCallback` / `onBadCertificate` / `validateCertificate` that returns `true` so the chain, hostname and expiry are verified, and trust a self-signed or private server by loading its CA into a `SecurityContext` — never by switching verification off and to resolve the 7 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST), and if Security and Compliance rose to 70, the score would rise from 37 to about 46.
91 findings are critical: 71 in Static Analysis (SAST), eight in Dependency Vulnerabilities, seven in Change Coupling, two in Page structure, two in Web-Security Posture and one in Text alternatives.
Watchdog couldn't measure 9 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Internal API Consistency, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 56,136 lines, which would take an estimated 0.3 person-years, around €48,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 2 findings
These 2 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 8 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
€16,000 to €80,000, for 267 to 846 hours of work, about 0.3 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 37. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 56,136 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Stop accepting every TLS certificate: delete the `badCertificateCallback` / `onBadCertificate` / `validateCertificate` that returns `true` so the chain, hostname and expiry are verified, and trust a self-signed or private server by loading its CA into a `SecurityContext` — never by switching verification off.
This repository constructs a TLS client that accepts any certificate at 2 sites, not one: `lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:32` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`), `lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:49` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`). Each is a separate decision — fixing only the line this row cites leaves the others in place.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €48,000 to build again, about 0.3 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Security and Compliance, at 26 (Weak). Security and Compliance is about how well the product is protected, and how it handles personal data. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Security and Compliance also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Security and Compliance grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Security and Compliance actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Stop accepting every TLS certificate: delete the `badCertificateCallback` / `onBadCertificate` / `validateCertificate` that returns `true` so the chain, hostname and expiry are verified, and trust a self-signed or private server by loading its CA into a `SecurityContext` — never by switching verification off. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 9 points for medium effort. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
Architecture — module dependency graph
Project dependencies, layered top-to-bottom; arrows show direction. Any dashed red edge points upward or sideways — a layering smell or cycle. A clean layered graph has none.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
34 modules, with 34 dependencies between them. One loop runs through 7 of the modules, marked above the diagonal.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
repository.widgets uses repository.constants, so a change to repository.constants can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.constants.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.widgets uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.widgets uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.widgets uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→28 repository.widgets uses repository.providerspart of a loop✕
Connections
6 pairs of types, where a type in repository.widgets uses a type in repository.providers.
repository.widgets uses repository.providers, so a change to repository.providers can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.providers.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
26→29 repository.widgets uses repository.modelspart of a loop✕
Connections
24 pairs of types, where a type in repository.widgets uses a type in repository.models.
repository.widgets uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.models.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
26→32 repository.widgets uses repository.servicepart of a loop✕
Connections
4 pairs of types, where a type in repository.widgets uses a type in repository.service.
repository.widgets uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.service.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
26→33 repository.widgets uses repository.utilspart of a loop✕
Connections
7 pairs of types, where a type in repository.widgets uses a type in repository.utils.
repository.widgets uses repository.utils, so a change to repository.utils can break repository.widgets, while a change to repository.widgets can't break repository.utils.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
repository.config uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.config, while a change to repository.config can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.config uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.config uses repository.widgets, so a change to repository.widgets can break repository.config, while a change to repository.config can't break repository.widgets.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.config uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→29 repository.config uses repository.modelspart of a loop✕
Connections
10 pairs of types, where a type in repository.config uses a type in repository.models.
repository.config uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.config, while a change to repository.config can't break repository.models.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
27→32 repository.config uses repository.servicepart of a loop✕
Connections
2 pairs of types, where a type in repository.config uses a type in repository.service.
repository.config uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.config, while a change to repository.config can't break repository.service.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
repository.providers uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.providers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.providers uses repository.src, so a change to repository.src can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.src.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.providers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.providers uses repository.widgets, so a change to repository.widgets can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.widgets.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.providers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.providers uses repository.config, so a change to repository.config can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.config.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.providers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→29 repository.providers uses repository.modelspart of a loop✕
Connections
21 pairs of types, where a type in repository.providers uses a type in repository.models.
repository.providers uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.models.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
28→32 repository.providers uses repository.servicepart of a loop✕
Connections
4 pairs of types, where a type in repository.providers uses a type in repository.service.
repository.providers uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.providers, while a change to repository.providers can't break repository.service.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
repository.models uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.models, while a change to repository.models can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.models uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.models uses repository.providers, so a change to repository.providers can break repository.models, while a change to repository.models can't break repository.providers.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.models uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→32 repository.models uses repository.servicepart of a loop✕
Connections
1 pair of types, where a type in repository.models uses a type in repository.service.
repository.models uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.models, while a change to repository.models can't break repository.service.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
repository.dao uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.dao, while a change to repository.dao can't break repository.models.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.dao uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.page uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.page uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.page uses repository.widgets, so a change to repository.widgets can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.widgets.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.page uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.page uses repository.providers, so a change to repository.providers can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.providers.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.page uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.page uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.models.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.page uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→32 repository.page uses repository.servicepart of a loop✕
Connections
3 pairs of types, where a type in repository.page uses a type in repository.service.
repository.page uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.service.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
31→33 repository.page uses repository.utilspart of a loop✕
Connections
2 pairs of types, where a type in repository.page uses a type in repository.utils.
repository.page uses repository.utils, so a change to repository.utils can break repository.page, while a change to repository.page can't break repository.utils.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
repository.service uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.service, while a change to repository.service can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.service uses repository.src, so a change to repository.src can break repository.service, while a change to repository.service can't break repository.src.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.service uses repository.providers, so a change to repository.providers can break repository.service, while a change to repository.service can't break repository.providers.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.service uses repository.models, so a change to repository.models can break repository.service, while a change to repository.service can't break repository.models.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.service uses repository.page, so a change to repository.page can break repository.service, while a change to repository.service can't break repository.page.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.utils uses repository.enums, so a change to repository.enums can break repository.utils, while a change to repository.utils can't break repository.enums.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.utils uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
repository.utils uses repository.service, so a change to repository.service can break repository.utils, while a change to repository.utils can't break repository.service.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.utils uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
71
High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
30
High / Critical
Roadmap
Immediately disable the global TLS certificate bypasses in the HTTP proxy and WebDAV client to enforce strict certificate validation, ensuring the application trusts only verified chains. Concurrently, resolve the ten shell injection vulnerabilities identified in the static analysis, prioritizing the build configuration files for macOS, Windows, and Android. Finally, address accessibility gaps by adding text alternatives for media elements and correct the page structure by defining language, title, and main landmarks.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Stop accepting every TLS certificate: delete the `badCertificateCallback` / `onBadCertificate` / `validateCertificate` that returns `true` so the chain, hostname and expiry are verified, and trust a self-signed or private server by loading its CA into a `SecurityContext` — never by switching verification off. This repository constructs a TLS client that accepts any certificate at 2 sites, not one: `lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:32` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`), `lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:49` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`). Each is a separate decision — fixing only the line this row cites leaves the others in place.
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 91
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 268
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 40
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 9
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 70 of 74 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 74 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 381 of 399 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.swift, .dart) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `swift test --enable-code-coverage` (SwiftPM) or `xcodebuild test -scheme <YourScheme> -enableCodeCoverage YES` (an .xcodeproj/.xcworkspace suite), then `xcrun llvm-cov export -format=lcov`, or lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `swift test --enable-code-coverage` (SwiftPM) or `xcodebuild test -scheme <YourScheme> -enableCodeCoverage YES` (an .xcodeproj/.xcworkspace suite), then `xcrun llvm-cov export -format=lcov`, or lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.swift, .dart) but the built-in reliability runner does not support this repository's ecosystem, so flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts), but the licence verdict published here was taken over its pub package dependencies. Nothing was read about its Gradle dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems), but the licence verdict published here was taken over its pub package dependencies. Nothing was read about its Bundler dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (34 contributor(s) across 2416 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 95% of the history; the other 33 hold 0.2% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is a COLLECTOR gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (assets/foliate-js/package.json), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here, so this ecosystem's public API has no collector, and the remedy is to write one — no change to the scan image can close it.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository also uses Provider, whose singleton and shorter-lived bindings can capture one another the same way, but this check does not read them yet. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that those bindings are free of it.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DevServer (dev). the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' is imported (lib/dao/database.dart:13), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' is imported (lib/dao/database.dart:13), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' is imported (lib/dao/database.dart:13), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' is imported (lib/dao/database.dart:13), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
Repo exclusion declarations: 2 pattern(s) declared (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code) excluded 0 source file(s) from code-quality scoring. Declarations are the repo's own visible statement that a tree is machine-written or vendored — auditable in any diff, honored by GitHub the same way.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P5 DR & Backup: Backup/restore and disaster-recovery readiness is judged from in-repo evidence — a config that exists is not a tested restore, so the absence of positive evidence is reported as "not evidenced", never scored as present.
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (4): D19, D21, D26, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 19 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 24 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally (cyclomatic 36), CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent (cyclomatic 34), ReadingPageState.build (cyclomatic 33). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 24 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 7.2 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 45 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 1 body over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent (cognitive 84). — Refactoring it lifts Cognitive Complexity from 6.2 to about 6.5/10.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes7.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 29 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with book_detail.dart, reading_settings.dart, bookshelf_page.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (29 warning-level).
Resolve the 11 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with shared_preference_provider.dart, epub_player.dart, ai_chat_stream.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (11 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with shared_preference_provider.dart, epub_player.dart, ai_chat_stream.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
42 duplicated block group(s) detected. A further 3 rows report members as variants of one another; they aggregate block groups already counted above and are not themselves counted.
+ 28 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 3 Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with translate.dart, sync.dart, ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 3 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with database.dart, epub_player.dart, sync_status.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 3 Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ai_chat_stream.dart, aliyun_tts_backend.dart, book_note.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
7 production modules (Gradle+pub), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; edges a convention plugin adds from buildSrc or build-logic are not visible there; 0 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 2 of the 7 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 11 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with shared_preference_provider.dart, tts_handler.dart, online_tts.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (11 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.
Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.
1 outdated direct gem(s), 0 pinning defect(s). 5 declaration(s) graded against rubygems.org, 3 of them against a version resolved in a committed REDACTED. 2 declaration(s) carry a requirement that EXCLUDES the current release; that is a deliberate constraint (a supported-version ceiling or a held-back CI pin) and is counted, not charged. Whether any of these gems is DEPRECATED or YANKED is not graded — rubygems.org publishes no deprecation marker, and a yank removes a version rather than flagging it. Whether any is UNMAINTAINED is not graded either: no registry publishes a maintenance status, and release age does not stand in for one. Whether any is UNUSED is a source question, not a registry one. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question, read from the manifest there.
Outdated: fastlane
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 259 resolved pub package(s) use a banned license. Licences were read from pub.dev's analysis of each package's licence file, over every package this repository's pubspec.lock resolves from pub.dev, direct and transitive, at the locked version; the 7 package(s) the lock marks direct dev are excluded, and SDK, path and git packages have no registry release to read. pub.dev analyses only recent releases, so for 122 package(s) locked at an older version the licence read is that of the package's latest analysed release, not of the locked one. 2 of them carry no licence pub.dev recognises; that is missing data, not a violation, and none of them is charged. ★ COVERAGE OF THIS VERDICT: it grades this repository's pub package dependencies and nothing else. The repository also declares a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) and a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems), and the licences of those dependency graphs were NOT read by this pass — a gap in this engine's coverage, not a statement about them. So this result says the graded closure carries no banned licence; it does NOT say this repository's licensing is clear.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 4 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with reading_page.dart, epub_player.dart, book_bottom_sheet.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Repeated repair finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with main.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
0 deducted task-comment markers across 56136 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository's READMEs and architecture/Docs files are mostly focused on a single topic: the Google AI Dart client library. The troubleshooting.md file is an excellent problem-reproducing guide with concrete steps (reproduce, click right bottom -> Settings -> Logs) plus a log-sample snippet that explains what to look for; it also contains a Chinese translation of the same content and a companion untranslated_messages.txt listing 21 translated terms keyed to the design docs. The architecture/Docs spec is comprehensive: #googleai_dart Specification with Contents, Design Goals (Minimal Dependencies, Interceptor-Driven Architecture, Resource-Based API Organization), Configuration, Serialization, Error Handling, Critical Requirements, Development Guidelines, and a clipped outline that confirms all listed sections exist. (12 of 15 sampled documents could not be assessed: 1 of 2 evaluation groups failed.)
Documentation: no project overviewdocs/troubleshooting.md
What to do
Resolve the 1 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with troubleshooting.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
1 of 8 build units (Bundler, Gradle, pub) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
71 finding(s): 0 critical, 71 high, 0 medium, 0 low. 50 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 2 file(s) — `assets/foliate-js/debug.html` (line 233), `flutter_launcher_icons.yaml` — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 10 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 10 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 issue-level).
Resolve the 7 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 50 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (50 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no REDACTED is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
Resolve the 7 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 issue-level).
Resolve the 7 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 High vulnerability finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
1 of 201 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is lib/utils/book_metadata/epub_metadata.dart. Counted over 201 of the 421 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 7 Boundary-crossing change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with epub_player.dart (4), sync.dart, home_page.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 issue-level).
Resolve the 7 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with library_totals_tile.dart (2), period_summary_tile.dart, notes_page.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Change-coupling hub finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with total_time_tile.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
+ 2 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 5 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 2 platform declaration(s) and 5 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC1 · Text alternatives1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.
An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative. — assets/foliate-js/src/pdf.js:555
What to do
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC2 · Forms & labels10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.
Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC3 · Page structure3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). — assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216
A page with no <title> gives no name in the tab, history or screen-reader page list. Add a descriptive <title> in <head>. — assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216
No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. — assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216
What to do
Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
`#footnote-dialog` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. (×2) — assets/foliate-js/debug.html:30, assets/foliate-js/index.html:34
What to do
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 8 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Other · Architecture — Whether any singleton service captures a scoped/transient dependency — a silent lifetime/threading bug.
Method: Roslyn scan: DI registrations parsed from AddSingleton/Scoped/Transient; each singleton checked for captured shorter-lifetime dependencies. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether read (query) handlers stay side-effect-free — a query that writes persistent state or raises events breaks CQS and makes reads unsafe to retry, cache, or route to a read replica.
Method: Roslyn scan: CQRS handlers classified query-vs-command by interface (IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler<TQuery,TResult>) and name convention (*Query/Get*/Find* vs *Command); each query handler's body checked for persistent-state writes (SaveChanges/repository Add-Update) or event publishes by resolved invocation. Deterministic, type-level, exhaustive over the detected handlers.
Coverage: Population: CQRS handlers identified by IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler interface + *Query/Get*/Find*/*Command NAME convention; query purity then checked exhaustively within that set — a query handler using neither convention is invisible, and mutation is a resolved persistence/publish CALL, not full dataflow.
Other · Domain Modelling — Whether an entity protects its own invariants — a class whose identity is derived from its fields (value equality) but whose fields are publicly mutable bypasses that invariant. Encapsulated state keeps identity-bearing fields immutable.
Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): entities scanned for publicly writable state — public setters, and (C#/VB) own mutable collections handed out through an auto-property, a public field or a bare-field expression getter, where a computed/copying getter is never charged. One finding per entity; score softened when Marten/EF rehydration frameworks present. Deterministic, framework-aware.
Coverage: Population: entities by convention; encapsulation (setter shape) checked exhaustively within the set.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue in this repository's Dart: methods whose whole body still throws UnimplementedError or a "not implemented" error, and placeholder text (lorem ipsum, changeme/replace_me…) left in strings of non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's Dart: methods that only throw UnimplementedError or a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
`initData` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method. — lib/widgets/settings/about.dart:40
What to do
Clear the softer debt: re-enable or delete tests marked `skip:`, decide whether each empty method or UnsupportedError is deliberate (and say so in a comment), and replace `// ignore_for_file: type=lint` with targeted, justified ignores.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
188 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched — it may no longer reflect the system.
What to do
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 2 of 3 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1.3 pts.
Review the README against recent changes; refresh the parts that drifted.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
CONTRIBUTING.md names `README_код_языка.md`, but no file or folder `README_код_языка.md` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — CONTRIBUTING.md:264
docs/issue-triage.md documents the environment variable `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/issue-triage.md:88
docs/issue-triage.md names `lib/path/file.dart`, but no file or folder `lib/path/file.dart` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/issue-triage.md:117
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: CONTRIBUTING.md names `README_код_языка.md`, but no file or folder `README_код_языка.md` exists; docs/issue-triage.md documents the environment variable `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; docs/issue-triage.md names `lib/path/file.dart`, but no file or folder `lib/path/file.dart` exists.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability5.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
Only 1/3 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `ios`, `macos`.
What to do
Extend structured logging to the remaining runnable modules so everything you run is diagnosable in production.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 51456 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release.
What to do
Nothing pauses a release for a human: publish as a draft release (or gate the release job on a protected tag/manual dispatch) so a bad build can be stopped before users can download it.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P5 · DR & Backup4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether disaster recovery is planned and codified — backups, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees — from IaC + container manifests + docs, never the live cloud.
Method: Filesystem scan: disaster recovery, backup, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees from IaC, manifests, and docs. Exhaustive, deterministic, never a live environment.
What to do
Document RTO/RPO and a tested restore procedure (a backup config alone isn't disaster recovery).
Readiness · Performance — Whether the code is written to minimise allocations so it doesn't pressure its host's memory manager — buffer/slice views over copies, object pooling, stack or value-type allocation, and buffer writers. Reward-only: credited where present, never penalised where a simpler style is fine.
Method: Production-source scan: density (per 1k LoC) of allocation-aware APIs — in .NET Span/Memory, ArrayPool/ObjectPool, stackalloc, ValueTask, value-type structs, IBufferWriter, string.Create, SkipLocalsInit; off .NET, with comments and strings blanked, Go's sync.Pool, preallocated slices/maps, Grow, strconv.Append* and buf[:0] reuse; the JVM's NIO buffer views, MemorySegment, primitive collections, pools and literal presizes (plus Kotlin primitive arrays and value classes, Scala AnyVal and @specialized); Swift's reserveCapacity, ContiguousArray, withUnsafe* access and ~Copyable. Activated off .NET on the same floor (400 lines, and benchmarks or 8 uses); Rust and garbage-collected scripting languages are not applicable. Reward-only. Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
What to do
Raise allocation-aware density on the hot paths — currently 46 use(s) across 61,605 production line(s) (~0.7/1k). More of the idioms below on the allocation-heavy paths climbs this toward 10.
Dart: on hot paths, hold numbers in dart:typed_data lists (Int32List, Float64List …) instead of boxed List<int>/List<double>, read through views (sublistView, buffer.asInt32List, asByteData) instead of copying, make lists that never grow growable: false, compute in the SIMD types (Float32x4List …), and build bytes with BytesBuilder(copy: false).
Kotlin: on hot paths, use primitive arrays (IntArray, LongArray …) and @JvmInline value classes instead of boxed values, primitive collections (androidx.collection, fastutil) instead of boxed ones, and presize collections and StringBuilders.
Swift: on hot paths, reserveCapacity before appending, use ContiguousArray for class-element arrays, work in place with withUnsafeBufferPointer/withUnsafeTemporaryAllocation, and make large values ~Copyable with borrowing/consuming parameters.
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
`onUpgradeDatabase` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/dao/database.dart:316
`initData` is async and calls readAsLinesSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/page/settings_page/subpage/log_page.dart:27
`loadFonts` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/providers/font_list.dart:19
`startDownload` is async and calls createSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/providers/fonts.dart:90
`clearCache` is async and calls deleteSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/providers/storage_info.dart:31
`syncFiles` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/providers/sync.dart:363
`_cleanupOldBackups` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/service/database_sync_manager.dart:268
`getAvailableBackups` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — lib/service/database_sync_manager.dart:349
`wdReadWithStream` is async and calls createSync, openSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs. — third_party/webdav_client/lib/src/webdav_dio.dart:287
What to do
Dart: await the async dart:io API (readAsString, writeAsString, Process.run, Future.delayed) instead of the *Sync variant or sleep(), or move heavy synchronous work to another isolate with Isolate.run.
Other · Security — Read from this repository's Dart source: cryptographic hygiene (weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source) and outbound TLS certificate validation — facts about code that hold whether or not it serves anything itself. The TLS protocol version is not read: `dart:io` leaves the protocol floor to the platform's TLS library and has no switch that admits an obsolete version. This repository serves HTTP itself (pubspec.yaml:35 — depends on `shelf`), so its Dart source was also read for the server controls: TLS served or HSTS set, security response headers, cookie flags and inbound validation — each credited where its Dart spelling appears in production source, not proven on every route. Every server it binds listens on the loopback interface only, so its traffic never leaves the device and HTTPS enforcement is N/A, as it is for a native app's loopback redirect listener (RFC 8252 §7.3).
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
`badCertificateCallback` returning `true` is set on a TLS client, so every peer certificate is accepted — including one an attacker presents. Chain, expiry, revocation and hostname are all skipped, so an attacker on the network path can present any certificate and read or rewrite the traffic — the connection is encrypted to the attacker, not to the intended host. Remove the callback so `dart:io` validates the peer. If the server presents a self-signed or privately-issued certificate, trust THAT issuer rather than every certificate: load its CA into a `SecurityContext` (`setTrustedCertificatesBytes`) and pass it as `HttpClient(context: …)` / `SecureSocket.connect(…, context: …)`, which keeps the chain and hostname checks on. A callback that must exist should compare the presented certificate with a pinned fingerprint, never return `true`. (×2) — lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:32, lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:49
MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`sha256.convert(…)` from `package:crypto`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call. — lib/service/md5_service.dart:19
None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is set on a response this repository's Dart server sends — defense in depth, even when a proxy could set them. (−2.0 on this card.) The server: pubspec.yaml:35 — depends on `shelf`.
No handler of this repository's Dart server answers 400, 413 or 422 (`Response.badRequest`, `HttpStatus.badRequest`, `statusCode = 400`) and no validation package (luthor, acanthis, ez_validator, json_schema, …) is imported — nothing shows inbound requests being checked, and refused, before a handler acts on them. A check that answers its failure with 200 and an error body is not seen. (−2.0 on this card.) The server: pubspec.yaml:35 — depends on `shelf`.
What to do
Stop accepting every TLS certificate: delete the `badCertificateCallback` / `onBadCertificate` / `validateCertificate` that returns `true` so the chain, hostname and expiry are verified, and trust a self-signed or private server by loading its CA into a `SecurityContext` — never by switching verification off. This repository constructs a TLS client that accepts any certificate at 2 sites, not one: `lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:32` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`), `lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:49` (`badCertificateCallback` returning `true`). Each is a separate decision — fixing only the line this row cites leaves the others in place.
Review each MD5/SHA1 use by what it protects: replace it with SHA-256+ (or a KDF for passwords) where the digest is security-relevant, and switch it to a non-cryptographic hash (xxhash, murmurhash) where it only derives an identifier such as a cache key.
Set security response headers on what the server sends — `response.headers.set('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff')` in a `dart:io` handler, or a shelf middleware that adds `Content-Security-Policy`, `X-Content-Type-Options` and a frame policy to every `Response`.
Validate what the server reads from a request — path, query, headers, body size and shape — and answer what fails with 400 (413 for an oversized body) before a handler acts on it, so a client and a proxy can tell a refusal from a success.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether functions that make a cancellable request accept or pass on a CancelToken (adoption curve).
Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.
Only 1/2 functions that make a cancellable request (Dio, AbortableRequest) accept a CancelToken or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a screen navigated away from, a disposed widget, a superseded search. Take a `CancelToken? cancelToken` and hand it to the request as `cancelToken:` (or hold one and cancel it in `dispose`); where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
`checkUpdate` calls `Dio(…).get(…)` but takes no CancelToken and hands the request none its caller can reach, so its caller cannot cancel the request once it has started. Take `CancelToken? cancelToken` and pass it on as `cancelToken: cancelToken` — or, in a widget's State or a notifier, hold one and cancel it in `dispose`. — lib/utils/check_update.dart:14
What to do
Thread a CancelToken through functions that make requests, so the work stops when its caller gives up.
Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `NullPointerException` (Java, Kotlin, Scala), `ArgumentError.notNull` (Dart) or `ArgumentNullException` (F#'s `nullArg`) tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `for … in` loop leaves the `List`, `Map` or `Set` it is walking alone — Dart's collection iterators check that the collection has not changed since the loop began, so a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is walking (or the map whose `keys`, `values` or `entries` it walks) makes the next step throw `ConcurrentModificationError` and the remaining elements are never seen. Whether a `for (x in c)` or `c.forEach { … }` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a `mutableListOf`/`ArrayList`, `mutableMapOf`/`HashMap` or `mutableSetOf`/`HashSet` is a `java.util` collection on the JVM and is walked by its own fail-fast iterator, so a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is walking makes the next step throw `ConcurrentModificationException` and the remaining elements are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
`catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. (×10) — release.dart:257, lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:515, lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:889, …
`catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. (×20) — lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:366, lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1750, lib/models/reading_time.dart:29, …
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. (×8) — lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:761, lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:772, lib/service/ai/langchain_ai_config.dart:188, …
What to do
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether Dart's sound null safety is on and is not undermined by null assertions — a package whose `environment: sdk:` lower bound is 2.12 or above is null safe, so `String` cannot hold null and `String?` must be checked before use, and each postfix `!` is a run-time `Null check operator used on a null value` the author has told the analyzer cannot happen.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 13 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (24%; ≈26% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 42 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 3 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 10 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — 2 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 4 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 3 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' (lib/dao/database.dart:13) but declares no persisted model this check reads (Drift tables, ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, Isar @collection and Hive @HiveType classes, Serverpod table models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether its changes need an audit trail could not be established, and the trail's absence is not scored.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' (lib/dao/database.dart:13) but declares no persisted model this check reads (Drift tables, ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, Isar @collection and Hive @HiveType classes, Serverpod table models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether a retention limit applies here could not be established, and its absence is not scored.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' (lib/dao/database.dart:13) but declares no persisted model this check reads (Drift tables, ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, Isar @collection and Hive @HiveType classes, Serverpod table models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether data-subject rights apply here could not be established, and their absence is not scored.
Not included — 48 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No interactive element found in the parsed markup — AC4 not applicable here.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
AX2 Stateful singletons — No container singleton was found, so there is no shared instance for concurrent requests to race on. No class in this Kotlin code is a Spring, JSR-330 or CDI singleton bean. No Swift request handler (a Vapor, Hummingbird, Kitura, Swifter or Perfect route handler, as a method or a registered closure) is declared, so no state is shared between request threads. Dart isolates share no mutable memory, so no two requests write one object at the same instant. TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — no exported interface declares behaviour
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'package:sqflite_common_ffi' (lib/dao/database.dart:13) but declares no persisted model this check reads (Drift tables, Isar/ObjectBox/Floor/Hive entities, Serverpod table models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so the absence of a personal-data field here is not evidence that none is stored, and encryption at rest is not scored over a subject that could not be established.
C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — this repository stands up no server another machine can reach (no HttpServer or shelf server bound beyond loopback, no dart_frog route, no Serverpod endpoint, no Conduit, Alfred or Angel application) and keeps no data in a hosted backend. Access control is therefore N/A here — a Flutter app or pub package is authorized by the server it calls, not by itself; hiding a screen authorizes nothing. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
D10 Test Quality — ~484 lines of test source are present (.swift, .dart) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no .dart test runner
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.dart), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
DM1 Aggregate boundaries — not scored for Dart: aggregate-vs-value-object classification cannot be told apart in source (every class-holding-class reads alike), and a child COLLECTION (legitimate membership) vs a single embedded aggregate is indistinguishable — reported as guidance rather than measured
DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no in-repo typed-id idiom — primitive-obsession recorded as advisory DM8, DM2 not gated
DM3 Integration-event coupling — not scored for Dart: a cross-package domain leak cannot be told apart in source from a legitimate shared-kernel package, and most repositories ship a single package — reported as guidance rather than measured
DM4 Rich vs anemic domain model — this Dart repository declares no domain-layer entity carrying stored data (every type is a typed-id wrapper, DTO/config, ORM row or presentation container), so DM4's rich-vs-anemic read has no population to be taken over
DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary — this Dart repository maps no type to a persistence framework (drift/floor/isar/objectbox/hive), so DM6's domain↔infrastructure fusion read has no population to be taken over
DM7 Repository granularity — not scored for Dart: 'a repository per CHILD entity' needs the aggregate-root structure, which is not source-resolvable — reported as guidance rather than measured
ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, and this analysis resolves a call's owner only where the receiver's type is written down in the source. Reported as guidance rather than measured
ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, which this analysis does not build from source alone for this language. Reported as guidance rather than measured
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the Dart, JVM, JavaScript/TypeScript, Swift source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for classes extending benchmark_harness's `BenchmarkBase`, `AsyncBenchmarkBase` or `PerfBenchmarkBase` (directly or through a base of your own), `benchmark(…)` calls under the pub `benchmark` package, Flutter's `benchmarkWidgets`, `watchPerformance` or `traceAction` in a test importing flutter_test, integration_test or flutter_driver, or benchmark_harness, benchmark or web_benchmarks in a pubspec.yaml, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — This check asks whether log calls keep a message's values apart from its text, which needs a logger that can carry them as fields. This repository's Dart was read, and it logs through none: package:logging, package:logger, talker and dart:developer take one finished message and no template arguments or fields (as log4net does in C#), so an interpolated message there loses nothing the API could have kept. Sentry's structured logs (`Sentry.logger`) would be judged.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: sync.dart ↔ webdav_client.dart lib/providers/sync.dart:1— `lib/providers/sync.dart` (context providers) and `lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart` (context service) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 70% of the time (7 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `008b14d1` fix: refactor directory creation methods to use mkdirAll for improved…; `47ea25af` Fix: Fix sync failure when WebDAV is empty; `64c25a6b` feat: enhance sync functionality with improved status tracking and We… — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: epub_player.dart ↔ webview_initial_variable.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:1— `lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart` (context page) and `lib/utils/webView/webview_initial_variable.dart` (context utils) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 64% of the time (14 of the 22 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 14 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `72c18eb3` fix: cannot open book android sometimes; `e6bb5bcc` feat: Add font weight slider; `fccf3cb1` Feat: Add auto background color(#78) — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: home_page.dart ↔ test_webdav.dart lib/page/home_page.dart:1— `lib/page/home_page.dart` (context page) and `lib/utils/webdav/test_webdav.dart` (context utils) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 64% of the time (7 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `4a6597bf` feat: update sync methods for auto/manual triggers; `f0946c90` reafctor: rename anxwebdav to sync; `e103fbfb` Fix: enhance Webdav sync stability — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: epub_player.dart ↔ bgimg_selector.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:1— `lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart` (context page) and `lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/bgimg_selector.dart` (context widgets) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 58% of the time (7 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `1a318d19` feat(reader): add background image fit mode setting; `903b74e8` feat(reader): support background image blur and opacity controls; `df4ce47e` feat(reader): support manually selecting and remembering day/night ba… — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: epub_player.dart ↔ style_settings.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:1— `lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart` (context page) and `lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/style_settings.dart` (context widgets) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 53% of the time (10 of the 19 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 10 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `5677d18e` chore: bump Flutter to 3.47.2; `791c409b` feat(reader): add heading font size adjustment with proportional scaling; `25d8d78a` feat(reader): add 'Use Book Styles' toggle to preserve original book … — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: epub_player.dart ↔ reading_settings.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:1— `lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart` (context page) and `lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart` (context widgets) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (12 of the 24 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 12 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `5677d18e` chore: bump Flutter to 3.47.2; `bf6b0eb1` feat(reader): support header and footer section styling (#791); `460c53cc` feat(reader): add customizable column threshold for auto single/doubl… — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: gererate_url.dart ↔ bgimg_selector.dart lib/utils/webView/gererate_url.dart:1— `lib/utils/webView/gererate_url.dart` (context utils) and `lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/bgimg_selector.dart` (context widgets) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `1a318d19` feat(reader): add background image fit mode setting; `903b74e8` feat(reader): support background image blur and opacity controls; `df4ce47e` feat(reader): support manually selecting and remembering day/night ba… — run `git show` on any of them.
TLS certificate validation disabled lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:32— `badCertificateCallback` returning `true` is set on a TLS client, so every peer certificate is accepted — including one an attacker presents. Chain, expiry, revocation and hostname are all skipped, so an attacker on the network path can present any certificate and read or rewrite the traffic — the connection is encrypted to the attacker, not to the intended host. Remove the callback so `dart:io` validates the peer. If the server presents a self-signed or privately-issued certificate, trust THAT issuer rather than every certificate: load its CA into a `SecurityContext` (`setTrustedCertificatesBytes`) and pass it as `HttpClient(context: …)` / `SecureSocket.connect(…, context: …)`, which keeps the chain and hostname checks on. A callback that must exist should compare the presented certificate with a pinned fingerprint, never return `true`.
TLS certificate validation disabled lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:49— `badCertificateCallback` returning `true` is set on a TLS client, so every peer certificate is accepted — including one an attacker presents. Chain, expiry, revocation and hostname are all skipped, so an attacker on the network path can present any certificate and read or rewrite the traffic — the connection is encrypted to the attacker, not to the intended host. Remove the callback so `dart:io` validates the peer. If the server presents a self-signed or privately-issued certificate, trust THAT issuer rather than every certificate: load its CA into a `SecurityContext` (`setTrustedCertificatesBytes`) and pass it as `HttpClient(context: …)` / `SecureSocket.connect(…, context: …)`, which keeps the chain and hostname checks on. A callback that must exist should compare the presented certificate with a pinned fingerprint, never return `true`.
AC1 · Text alternatives· <img> without a text alternative · ×1
<img> without a text alternative assets/foliate-js/src/pdf.js:555— An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative.
<html> without a lang assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
AC3 · Page structure· Document without a <title> · ×1
Document without a <title> assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216— A page with no <title> gives no name in the tab, history or screen-reader page list. Add a descriptive <title> in <head>.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities· High vulnerability · ×1
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) release.dart:257— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:366— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:515— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:889— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1750— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/models/reading_time.dart:29— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/models/chapter_split_presets.dart:77— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:390— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/tags.dart:17— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/random_highlight_provider.dart:34— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/iap.dart:520— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/book_list.dart:43— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/book_list.dart:48— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/providers/ai_providers.dart:103— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/vibration_service.dart:206— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/vibration_service.dart:214— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/vibration_service.dart:222— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/vibration_service.dart:230— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/ai/index.dart:146— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:260— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/network/http_proxy_overrides.dart:54— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/notes/notes_json.dart:60— `catch (_)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:204— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/translate/index.dart:60— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/service/tts/tts_service.dart:43— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
MethodTooLong: _BookDetailState.build lib/page/book_detail.dart:73— MethodTooLong — build runs 571 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 471 over it, 5.71× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ReadingMoreSettingsState.build lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:26— MethodTooLong — build runs 456 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 356 over it, 4.56× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: BookshelfPageState.build lib/page/home_page/bookshelf_page.dart:111— MethodTooLong — build runs 382 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 282 over it, 3.82× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ReadingPageState.build lib/page/reading_page.dart:708— MethodTooLong — build runs 262 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 162 over it, 2.62× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _OtherSettingsState.build lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/other_settings.dart:22— MethodTooLong — build runs 246 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 146 over it, 2.46× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _OnboardingScreenState._buildAppearanceSettings lib/page/onboarding_screen.dart:182— MethodTooLong — _buildAppearanceSettings runs 228 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 128 over it, 2.28× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: BookBottomSheet.build lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart:38— MethodTooLong — build runs 209 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 109 over it, 2.09× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AiChatStreamState.build lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:563— MethodTooLong — build runs 207 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 107 over it, 2.07× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: EpubPlayerState.setHandler lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:657— MethodTooLong — setHandler runs 204 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 104 over it, 2.04× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _StyleSettingsState.build lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/style_settings.dart:69— MethodTooLong — build runs 204 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 104 over it, 2.04× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _StorageSettingsState.build lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:161— MethodTooLong — build runs 195 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 95 over it, 1.95× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _AISettingsState.build lib/page/settings_page/ai.dart:48— MethodTooLong — build runs 180 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 80 over it, 1.80× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ExcerptShareBottomSheetState.build lib/widgets/book_share/excerpt_share_bottom_sheet.dart:151— MethodTooLong — build runs 175 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 75 over it, 1.75× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ServiceConfigFormState._buildConfigItem lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:71— MethodTooLong — _buildConfigItem runs 174 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 74 over it, 1.74× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _BgimgSelectorState._buildDayNightItem lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/bgimg_selector.dart:119— MethodTooLong — _buildDayNightItem runs 168 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 68 over it, 1.68× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _TtsWidgetState.build lib/widgets/reading_page/tts_widget.dart:61— MethodTooLong — build runs 166 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 66 over it, 1.66× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _AppearanceSettingState.build lib/page/settings_page/appearance.dart:42— MethodTooLong — build runs 161 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 61 over it, 1.61× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent lib/service/ai/langchain_runner.dart:102— MethodTooLong — streamAgent runs 160 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 60 over it, 1.60× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:230— MethodTooLong — _parseReceiptLocally runs 155 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 55 over it, 1.55× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _AdvancedSettingState.build lib/page/settings_page/advanced.dart:49— MethodTooLong — build runs 147 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 47 over it, 1.47× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _HomePageState.build lib/page/home_page.dart:131— MethodTooLong — build runs 138 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 38 over it, 1.38× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ExcerptMenuState.build lib/widgets/context_menu/excerpt_menu.dart:244— MethodTooLong — build runs 131 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 31 over it, 1.31× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _BookTocState.build lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/book_toc.dart:241— MethodTooLong — build runs 131 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 31 over it, 1.31× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _AiProviderDetailPageState.build lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:72— MethodTooLong — build runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _SubMoreSettingsState.build lib/page/settings_page/more_settings_page.dart:56— MethodTooLong — build runs 117 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.17× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
ClassTooLong: Prefs lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:58— ClassTooLong — 1036 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 264 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 636 over it, 2.59× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: EpubPlayerState lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:82— ClassTooLong — 864 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 66 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 464 over it, 2.16× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: AiChatStreamState lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:52— ClassTooLong — 768 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 36 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 368 over it, 1.92× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ReadingPageState lib/page/reading_page.dart:68— ClassTooLong — 671 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 33 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 271 over it, 1.68× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _BookDetailState lib/page/book_detail.dart:44— ClassTooLong — 592 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 4 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 192 over it, 1.48× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: Sync lib/providers/sync.dart:34— ClassTooLong — 536 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 28 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 136 over it, 1.34× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _NarrateSettingsState lib/page/settings_page/narrate.dart:28— ClassTooLong — 514 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 114 over it, 1.29× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _AiProviderDetailPageState lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:30— ClassTooLong — 484 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 10 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 84 over it, 1.21× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _AISettingsState lib/page/settings_page/ai.dart:30— ClassTooLong — 466 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 9 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 66 over it, 1.17× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _ReadingMoreSettingsState lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:22— ClassTooLong — 459 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 1 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.15× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: BookshelfPageState lib/page/home_page/bookshelf_page.dart:47— ClassTooLong — 427 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 5 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 27 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Low cohesion: Prefs (LCOM4 14) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:58— Prefs's methods fall into 14 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 14 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: TtsHandler (LCOM4 8) lib/service/tts/tts_handler.dart:9— TtsHandler's methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: OnlineTts (LCOM4 6) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:15— OnlineTts's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: EpubPlayerState (LCOM4 5) lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:82— EpubPlayerState's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: Sync (LCOM4 5) lib/providers/sync.dart:34— Sync's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: AliyunTtsProvider (LCOM4 5) lib/service/tts/aliyun/aliyun_tts_backend.dart:15— AliyunTtsProvider's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: _ExcerptShareBottomSheetState (LCOM4 5) lib/widgets/book_share/excerpt_share_bottom_sheet.dart:43— _ExcerptShareBottomSheetState's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: _StatisticChartState (LCOM4 5) lib/widgets/statistic/statistic_chart.dart:19— _StatisticChartState's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: DashboardTilesNotifier (LCOM4 4) lib/providers/dashboard_tiles_provider.dart:34— DashboardTilesNotifier's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: PlayStoreIAPService (LCOM4 4) lib/service/iap/play_store_iap_service.dart:9— PlayStoreIAPService's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: SystemTts (LCOM4 4) lib/service/tts/system_tts.dart:14— SystemTts's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
FileTooLong: config/shared_preference_provider.dart lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart— FileTooLong — 1096 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 95% of them inside a single declaration: Prefs (58-1778). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 596 over it, 2.19× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: book_player/epub_player.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart— FileTooLong — 881 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 98% of them inside a single declaration: EpubPlayerState (82-1311). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 381 over it, 1.76× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: ai/ai_chat_stream.dart lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart— FileTooLong — 859 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 89% of them inside a single declaration: AiChatStreamState (52-1188). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 359 over it, 1.72× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: page/reading_page.dart lib/page/reading_page.dart— FileTooLong — 728 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 92% of them inside a single declaration: ReadingPageState (68-1067). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 228 over it, 1.46× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: page/book_detail.dart lib/page/book_detail.dart— FileTooLong — 629 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: _BookDetailState (44-886). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 129 over it, 1.26× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: providers/sync.dart lib/providers/sync.dart— FileTooLong — 568 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: Sync (35-857). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 68 over it, 1.14× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: settings_page/narrate.dart lib/page/settings_page/narrate.dart— FileTooLong — 537 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 96% of them inside a single declaration: _NarrateSettingsState (28-768). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 37 over it, 1.07× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: settings_page/ai.dart lib/page/settings_page/ai.dart— FileTooLong — 530 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 88% of them inside a single declaration: _AISettingsState (30-767). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 30 over it, 1.06× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart— FileTooLong — 507 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 95% of them inside a single declaration: _AiProviderDetailPageState (30-716). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 7 over it, 1.01× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/dao/database.dart:316— `onUpgradeDatabase` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/page/settings_page/subpage/log_page.dart:27— `initData` is async and calls readAsLinesSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/providers/font_list.dart:19— `loadFonts` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/providers/fonts.dart:90— `startDownload` is async and calls createSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/providers/storage_info.dart:31— `clearCache` is async and calls deleteSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/providers/sync.dart:363— `syncFiles` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/service/database_sync_manager.dart:268— `_cleanupOldBackups` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/service/database_sync_manager.dart:349— `getAvailableBackups` is async and calls listSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking third_party/webdav_client/lib/src/webdav_dio.dart:287— `wdReadWithStream` is async and calls createSync, openSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the isolate's event loop — every other event, on Flutter the next frame, waits for as long as it runs.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:761— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:772— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/service/ai/langchain_ai_config.dart:188— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/service/ai/index.dart:153— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/service/ai/index.dart:292— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:413— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:425— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:62— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
TooManyMethods: Prefs lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:58— TooManyMethods — 264 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 234 over it, 8.80× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: EpubPlayerState lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:82— TooManyMethods — 66 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 36 over it, 2.20× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: VibrationService lib/service/vibration_service.dart:6— TooManyMethods — 41 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 11 over it, 1.37× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: AiChatStreamState lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:52— TooManyMethods — 36 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 6 over it, 1.20× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ReadingPageState lib/page/reading_page.dart:68— TooManyMethods — 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: OnlineTts lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:15— TooManyMethods — 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: SystemTts lib/service/tts/system_tts.dart:14— TooManyMethods — 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Change coupling: library_totals_tile.dart ↔ period_summary_tile.dart lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/library_totals_tile.dart:1— `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/library_totals_tile.dart` and `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/period_summary_tile.dart` change together 91% of the time (10 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 10 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `ea42594d` refactor: reorganize statistics dashboard tile structure and update i…; `f3e0789b` refactor: simplify StatisticsDashboardTileBase and its implementation…; `28ae0ef1` feat: update StatisticDataModel and AsyncSkeletonWrapper to support m… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: period_summary_tile.dart ↔ top_book_tile.dart lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/period_summary_tile.dart:1— `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/period_summary_tile.dart` and `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/top_book_tile.dart` change together 82% of the time (9 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `ea42594d` refactor: reorganize statistics dashboard tile structure and update i…; `f3e0789b` refactor: simplify StatisticsDashboardTileBase and its implementation…; `c7c2b648` feat: enhance dashboard tiles layout and content structure for improv… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: library_totals_tile.dart ↔ top_book_tile.dart lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/library_totals_tile.dart:1— `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/library_totals_tile.dart` and `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/top_book_tile.dart` change together 75% of the time (9 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `ea42594d` refactor: reorganize statistics dashboard tile structure and update i…; `f3e0789b` refactor: simplify StatisticsDashboardTileBase and its implementation…; `c7c2b648` feat: enhance dashboard tiles layout and content structure for improv… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: notes_page.dart ↔ statistics_page.dart lib/page/home_page/notes_page.dart:1— `lib/page/home_page/notes_page.dart` and `lib/page/home_page/statistics_page.dart` change together 59% of the time (24 of the 41 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 24 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `8692df38` refactor: replace bookCover function calls with BookCover widget for …; `f56a4c60` fix: disable bottom padding in SafeArea for Notes and Statistics pages; `72c44af0` refactor: replace Padding with SafeArea in NotesPage and StatisticsPa… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: dashboard_tile_base.dart ↔ statistics_dashboard.dart lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/dashboard_tile_base.dart:1— `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/dashboard_tile_base.dart` and `lib/widgets/statistic/statistics_dashboard.dart` change together 54% of the time (7 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `ea42594d` refactor: reorganize statistics dashboard tile structure and update i…; `36e08459` refactor: update dashboard tile structure to use WidgetRef and simpli…; `fabb387c` refactor: remove StatisticsDashboardSnapshot usage and simplify dashb… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ai_chat_stream.dart ↔ ai_stream.dart lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1— `lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart` and `lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart` change together 50% of the time (8 of the 16 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `99b2ec6d` feat(ai): support collapsible reasoning display; `07626da3` feat: implement Ai tag management features including fetching, creati…; `826bbc5a` feat: add mindmap tool and related components for visualizing book st… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: appearance.dart ↔ settings_page.dart lib/page/settings_page/appearance.dart:1— `lib/page/settings_page/appearance.dart` and `lib/page/settings_page/settings_page.dart` change together 50% of the time (5 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 5 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `ec4a4b5f` fix: some epub render problem; `b5e6c538` feat: add theme mode switch at appearance page (at that commit the files were still `lib/page/settinds_page/appearance.dart` and `lib/page/settinds_page/settings_page.dart`); `c626bce1` feat: dark light auto mode (at that commit the files were still `lib/page/settinds_page/appearance.dart` and `lib/page/settinds_page/settings_page.dart`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Hotspot: lib/page/reading_page.dart lib/page/reading_page.dart:235— lib/page/reading_page.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in ReadingPageState._handleReaderKeyEvent at line 235. 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-19..2026-10-17, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-19 20:54:44 +08:00' --until='2026-10-17 20:54:44 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/page/reading_page.dart`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:657— lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart changed 10 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 17 in EpubPlayerState.setHandler at line 657. 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-19..2026-10-17, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-19 20:54:44 +08:00' --until='2026-10-17 20:54:44 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart:38— lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 19 in BookBottomSheet.build at line 38. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-19..2026-10-17, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-19 20:54:44 +08:00' --until='2026-10-17 20:54:44 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/page/book_detail.dart lib/page/book_detail.dart:73— lib/page/book_detail.dart changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in _BookDetailState.build at line 73. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-19..2026-10-17, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-19 20:54:44 +08:00' --until='2026-10-17 20:54:44 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/page/book_detail.dart`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) lib/page/settings_page/translate.dart:163— lib/page/settings_page/translate.dart:163-176 | lib/page/settings_page/translate.dart:240-253 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) lib/providers/sync.dart:449— lib/providers/sync.dart:449-462 | lib/providers/sync.dart:497-510 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:206— ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:206-219 | ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:224-237 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:206` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/dao/database.dart:359— lib/dao/database.dart:359-368 | lib/dao/database.dart:369-378 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:730— lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:730-739 | lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:784-793 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/providers/sync_status.dart:73— lib/providers/sync_status.dart:73-82 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:106-115 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1081— lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1081-1088 | lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart:132-139 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart` and `lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 72 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/service/tts/aliyun/aliyun_tts_backend.dart:296— lib/service/tts/aliyun/aliyun_tts_backend.dart:296-303 | lib/service/tts/openai_tts_backend.dart:174-181 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/dao/book_note.dart:58— lib/dao/book_note.dart:58-65 | lib/dao/theme.dart:41-48 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Focus outline removed in CSS without a · ×2
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement assets/foliate-js/debug.html:30— `#footnote-dialog` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement assets/foliate-js/index.html:34— `#footnote-dialog` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) lib/widgets/tips/bookshelf_tips.dart:15— lib/widgets/tips/bookshelf_tips.dart:15-27 | lib/widgets/tips/notes_tips.dart:15-27 | lib/widgets/tips/statistic_tips.dart:15-27 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) lib/dao/book.dart:42— lib/dao/book.dart:42-54 | lib/dao/book_note.dart:67-80 | lib/dao/theme.dart:50-62 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) lib/service/ai/ai_cache.dart:38— lib/service/ai/ai_cache.dart:38-50 | lib/service/ai/ai_history.dart:57-69 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) lib/service/ai/tools/repository/notes_repository.dart:58— lib/service/ai/tools/repository/notes_repository.dart:58-70 | lib/service/ai/tools/repository/reading_history_repository.dart:38-50 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) lib/providers/sync_status.dart:143— lib/providers/sync_status.dart:143-154 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:163-174 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1164— lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1164-1175 | lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart:222-233 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart` and `lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 72 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1246— lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1246-1252 | lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1265-1271 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) lib/service/tts/aliyun/aliyun_tts_backend.dart:305— lib/service/tts/aliyun/aliyun_tts_backend.dart:305-311 | lib/service/tts/openai_tts_backend.dart:183-189 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:50— lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:50-54 | lib/service/iap/play_store_iap_service.dart:31-35 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) lib/page/settings_page/advanced.dart:430— lib/page/settings_page/advanced.dart:430-434 | lib/page/settings_page/advanced.dart:517-521 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) lib/service/translate/deepl.dart:40— lib/service/translate/deepl.dart:40-51 | lib/service/translate/google_api.dart:21-32 | lib/service/translate/microsoft_api.dart:21-32 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/books_total_tile.dart:13— lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/books_total_tile.dart:13-24 | lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/notes_total_tile.dart:13-24 | lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/reading_days_tile.dart:13-24 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once.
AC3 · Page structure· Page without a main landmark · ×1
Page without a main landmark assets/foliate-js/src/fb2.js:216— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 8 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally (cyclomatic 36) lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:230— AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent (cyclomatic 34) lib/service/ai/langchain_runner.dart:102— CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ReadingPageState.build (cyclomatic 33) lib/page/reading_page.dart:708— ReadingPageState.build has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
BookshelfPageState.build (cyclomatic 26) lib/page/home_page/bookshelf_page.dart:111— BookshelfPageState.build has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_BookTocState.build (cyclomatic 26) lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/book_toc.dart:241— _BookTocState.build has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_BookDetailState.build (cyclomatic 24) lib/page/book_detail.dart:73— _BookDetailState.build has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
BookStyle.fromJson (cyclomatic 23) lib/models/book_style.dart:110— BookStyle.fromJson has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
AiChatStreamState.build (cyclomatic 23) lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:563— AiChatStreamState.build has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ReadingPageState._handleReaderKeyEvent (cyclomatic 22) lib/page/reading_page.dart:235— ReadingPageState._handleReaderKeyEvent has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ApplyBookTagsStepTileState._applyPlan (cyclomatic 22) lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/apply_book_tags_step_tile.dart:211— _ApplyBookTagsStepTileState._applyPlan has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ServiceConfigFormState._buildConfigItem (cyclomatic 22) lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:71— _ServiceConfigFormState._buildConfigItem has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AndroidSettingsTile.build (cyclomatic 20) lib/widgets/settings/settings_tile.dart:126— AndroidSettingsTile.build has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
BookBottomSheet.build (cyclomatic 19) lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart:38— BookBottomSheet.build has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AnxButton.build (cyclomatic 19) lib/widgets/common/anx_button.dart:89— AnxButton.build has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_HeadlessSearchSession.ensureInitialized (cyclomatic 18) lib/service/ai/tools/repository/book_content_search_repository.dart:224— _HeadlessSearchSession.ensureInitialized has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
DBHelper.onUpgradeDatabase (cyclomatic 17) lib/dao/database.dart:316— DBHelper.onUpgradeDatabase has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EpubPlayerState.setHandler (cyclomatic 17) lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:657— EpubPlayerState.setHandler has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Sync.determineSyncDirection (cyclomatic 17) lib/providers/sync.dart:129— Sync.determineSyncDirection has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Sync.syncDatabase (cyclomatic 17) lib/providers/sync.dart:435— Sync.syncDatabase has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Prefs.applyPrefsBackupMap (cyclomatic 16) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:136— Prefs.applyPrefsBackupMap has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Sync.syncData (cyclomatic 16) lib/providers/sync.dart:271— Sync.syncData has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
BookshelfOrganizeTool.run (cyclomatic 16) lib/service/ai/tools/bookshelf_organize_tool.dart:94— BookshelfOrganizeTool.run has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SyncConnectionTester.getErrorMessage (cyclomatic 16) lib/service/sync/sync_connection_tester.dart:67— SyncConnectionTester.getErrorMessage has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
WebdavClient.testFullCapabilities (cyclomatic 16) lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:75— WebdavClient.testFullCapabilities has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Repeated repair: lib/main.dart lib/main.dart:267— lib/main.dart changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 7 (its worst body is _MyAppState._resolveLocale at line 267), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix: close the window immediately instead of freezing for seconds”; “revert: drop forui UI; restore alpha.20 issue-fix tree”; “fix: address easy issues for alpha batch”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-19..2026-10-17, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-19 20:54:44 +08:00' --until='2026-10-17 20:54:44 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/main.dart`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent (cognitive 84) lib/service/ai/langchain_runner.dart:102— CancelableLangchainRunner.streamAgent has cognitive complexity 84 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (53 pts), error handling 3 (10 pts), loops 5 (9 pts), ternaries 2 (8 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 49). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ReadingPageState.build (cognitive 44) lib/page/reading_page.dart:708— ReadingPageState.build has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 15 (27 pts), if/else 12 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ApplyBookTagsStepTileState._applyPlan (cognitive 44) lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/apply_book_tags_step_tile.dart:211— _ApplyBookTagsStepTileState._applyPlan has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (24 pts), loops 6 (14 pts), boolean chains 5, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally (cognitive 41) lib/service/iap/app_store_iap_service.dart:230— AppStoreIAPService._parseReceiptLocally has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (21 pts), error handling 6 (12 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OnlineTts._startPrefetcher (cognitive 41) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:184— OnlineTts._startPrefetcher has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (27 pts), loops 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AndroidSettingsTile.build (cognitive 41) lib/widgets/settings/settings_tile.dart:126— AndroidSettingsTile.build has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (20 pts), ternaries 9 (19 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Sync.syncDatabase (cognitive 39) lib/providers/sync.dart:435— Sync.syncDatabase has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (35 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
BookshelfPageState.build (cognitive 35) lib/page/home_page/bookshelf_page.dart:111— BookshelfPageState.build has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (21 pts), loops 7 (8 pts), ternaries 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OnlineTts._fetchAudioForSegment (cognitive 32) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:283— OnlineTts._fetchAudioForSegment has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (27 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
WebdavClient.testFullCapabilities (cognitive 31) lib/service/sync/webdav_client.dart:75— WebdavClient.testFullCapabilities has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), error handling 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
BookBottomSheet.build (cognitive 30) lib/widgets/bookshelf/book_bottom_sheet.dart:38— BookBottomSheet.build has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (26 pts), error handling 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_BookDetailState.build (cognitive 29) lib/page/book_detail.dart:73— _BookDetailState.build has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (20 pts), ternaries 7 (8 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
_BookTocState.build (cognitive 28) lib/widgets/reading_page/widgets/book_toc.dart:241— _BookTocState.build has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (12 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 7 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ReadingPageState._handleReaderKeyEvent (cognitive 27) lib/page/reading_page.dart:235— ReadingPageState._handleReaderKeyEvent has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (19 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_NarrateSettingsState._buildVoiceModelList (cognitive 27) lib/page/settings_page/narrate.dart:633— _NarrateSettingsState._buildVoiceModelList has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (20 pts), if/else 4 (6 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OnlineTts._startPlayer (cognitive 27) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:339— OnlineTts._startPlayer has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (13 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Prefs.applyPrefsBackupMap (cognitive 26) lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:136— Prefs.applyPrefsBackupMap has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (22 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_NarrateSettingsState._testSpeak (cognitive 26) lib/page/settings_page/narrate.dart:47— _NarrateSettingsState._testSpeak has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (25 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_StorageSettingsState.build (cognitive 25) lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:161— _StorageSettingsState.build has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), ternaries 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
FontDownloads.startDownload (cognitive 25) lib/providers/fonts.dart:90— FontDownloads.startDownload has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (21 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AiChatStreamState.build (cognitive 25) lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:563— AiChatStreamState.build has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (13 pts), ternaries 8 (9 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
BookNotesList._header (cognitive 25) lib/widgets/book_notes/book_notes_list.dart:86— BookNotesList._header has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), loops 1 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
ApplyBookTagsTool.run (cognitive 24) lib/service/ai/tools/apply_book_tags_tool.dart:90— ApplyBookTagsTool.run has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), loops 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DatabaseSyncManager._validateDatabase (cognitive 24) lib/service/database_sync_manager.dart:111— DatabaseSyncManager._validateDatabase has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (22 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_OrganizeBookshelfStepTileState._syncFromStep (cognitive 24) lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/organize_bookshelf_step_tile.dart:57— _OrganizeBookshelfStepTileState._syncFromStep has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ServiceConfigFormState._buildConfigItem (cognitive 23) lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:71— _ServiceConfigFormState._buildConfigItem has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
BookStyle.fromJson (cognitive 22) lib/models/book_style.dart:110— BookStyle.fromJson has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 18, boolean chains 2, if/else 2. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
EpubPlayerState.setHandler (cognitive 22) lib/page/book_player/epub_player.dart:657— EpubPlayerState.setHandler has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), ternaries 5, boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
Sync.determineSyncDirection (cognitive 22) lib/providers/sync.dart:129— Sync.determineSyncDirection has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Sync.syncData (cognitive 21) lib/providers/sync.dart:271— Sync.syncData has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), error handling 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ReadingMoreSettingsState.build (cognitive 21) lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:26— _ReadingMoreSettingsState.build has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), ternaries 4 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShareHandlerIosViewController.handleInputItems (cognitive 21) ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:64— ShareHandlerIosViewController.handleInputItems has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 1 (4 pts), loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DBHelper.onUpgradeDatabase (cognitive 20) lib/dao/database.dart:316— DBHelper.onUpgradeDatabase has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (8 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
BookshelfOrganizeTool.run (cognitive 20) lib/service/ai/tools/bookshelf_organize_tool.dart:94— BookshelfOrganizeTool.run has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AnxButton.build (cognitive 20) lib/widgets/common/anx_button.dart:89— AnxButton.build has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (10 pts), if/else 4, boolean chains 3, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_OtherSettingsState.build (cognitive 20) lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/other_settings.dart:22— _OtherSettingsState.build has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Sync.syncFiles (cognitive 19) lib/providers/sync.dart:363— Sync.syncFiles has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 4, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CancelableLangchainRunner.stream (cognitive 19) lib/service/ai/langchain_runner.dart:17— CancelableLangchainRunner.stream has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
IAPPage._buildContent (cognitive 18) lib/page/iap_page.dart:52— IAPPage._buildContent has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 5, if/else 4 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_NarrateSettingsState._updateCurrentModelDetails (cognitive 18) lib/page/settings_page/narrate.dart:155— _NarrateSettingsState._updateCurrentModelDetails has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Server._handleRequests (cognitive 18) lib/service/book_player/book_player_server.dart:77— Server._handleRequests has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (17 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
BookshelfOrganizeService.applyPlan (cognitive 18) lib/service/bookshelf/bookshelf_organize_service.dart:14— BookshelfOrganizeService.applyPlan has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_HomePageState.build (cognitive 17) lib/page/home_page.dart:131— _HomePageState.build has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ReadingPageState.onLoadEnd (cognitive 17) lib/page/reading_page.dart:490— ReadingPageState.onLoadEnd has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), match/switch 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
_HeadlessSearchSession.ensureInitialized (cognitive 17) lib/service/ai/tools/repository/book_content_search_repository.dart:224— _HeadlessSearchSession.ensureInitialized has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, boolean chains 6. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_CustomCSSEditorState._validateCSS (cognitive 17) lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/custom_css_editor.dart:48— _CustomCSSEditorState._validateCSS has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DBHelper.fixDatabaseHeader (cognitive 16) lib/dao/database.dart:253— DBHelper.fixDatabaseHeader has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_AdvancedSettingState._calculateMd5 (cognitive 16) lib/page/settings_page/advanced.dart:251— _AdvancedSettingState._calculateMd5 has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
LastReadBook._load (cognitive 16) lib/providers/last_read_book_provider.dart:25— LastReadBook._load has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShareHandlerIosViewController.handleImages (cognitive 16) ios/Models/Classes/ShareHandlerIosViewController.swift:135— ShareHandlerIosViewController.handleImages has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Change-coupling hub: total_time_tile.dart → library_totals_tile.dart, period_summary_tile.dart, top_book_tile.dart, statistics_dashboard.dart lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/total_time_tile.dart— `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/total_time_tile.dart` changes together with 4 other files — `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/library_totals_tile.dart`, `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/period_summary_tile.dart`, `lib/widgets/statistic/dashboard_tiles/tiles/top_book_tile.dart`, `lib/widgets/statistic/statistics_dashboard.dart` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4.
D4 · Code Duplication· Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines) · ×1
Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines) lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:601— lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:601-644 | lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:646-715 — These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below — the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart.
D4 · Code Duplication· Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines) · ×1
Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines) lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:51— lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:51-116 | lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:148-199 — These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below — the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×1
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) lib/providers/sync_status.dart:141— lib/providers/sync_status.dart:141-159 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:161-179 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:181-201 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:203-222 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Duplicated block (52 lines × 2) lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1111— lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1111-1162 | lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart:169-220 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart` and `lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 72 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (34–37 lines × 2) lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:606— lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:606-642 | lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:663-696 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (27–31 lines × 2) lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:80— lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:80-106 | lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart:162-192 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:636— lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:636-657 | lib/widgets/reading_page/more_settings/reading_settings.dart:661-682 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10–21 lines × 2) lib/providers/font_list.dart:24— lib/providers/font_list.dart:24-33 | lib/widgets/reading_page/style_widget.dart:115-135 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (20–21 lines × 2) lib/providers/sync.dart:468— lib/providers/sync.dart:468-487 | lib/providers/sync.dart:513-533 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 3) lib/dao/reading_time.dart:131— lib/dao/reading_time.dart:131-148 | lib/dao/reading_time.dart:161-178 | lib/dao/reading_time.dart:192-209 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:501— lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_detail_page.dart:501-518 | lib/page/settings_page/ai_provider_list_page.dart:147-164 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (17–18 lines × 2) lib/widgets/book_share/excerpt_share_card.dart:292— lib/widgets/book_share/excerpt_share_card.dart:292-308 | lib/widgets/book_share/excerpt_share_card.dart:363-380 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) lib/page/settings_page/subpage/chapter_split_rules_page.dart:225— lib/page/settings_page/subpage/chapter_split_rules_page.dart:225-241 | lib/page/settings_page/subpage/chapter_split_rules_page.dart:538-554 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 3) lib/providers/storage_info.dart:80— lib/providers/storage_info.dart:80-93 | lib/providers/storage_info.dart:97-110 | lib/providers/storage_info.dart:114-127 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (13–14 lines × 2) lib/page/book_notes_page.dart:215— lib/page/book_notes_page.dart:215-227 | lib/widgets/book_notes/book_notes_list.dart:239-252 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (12–13 lines × 2) lib/providers/sync_status.dart:183— lib/providers/sync_status.dart:183-195 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:205-216 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11–12 lines × 2) lib/widgets/context_menu/search_menu.dart:35— lib/widgets/context_menu/search_menu.dart:35-45 | lib/widgets/context_menu/translation_menu.dart:115-126 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 4) lib/providers/sync_status.dart:142— lib/providers/sync_status.dart:142-152 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:162-172 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:182-192 | lib/providers/sync_status.dart:204-214 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8–11 lines × 3) lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:392— lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:392-402 | lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:408-418 | lib/page/settings_page/storege.dart:424-431 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) lib/service/ai/tools/repository/chapter_content_repository.dart:25— lib/service/ai/tools/repository/chapter_content_repository.dart:25-35 | lib/service/ai/tools/repository/chapter_content_repository.dart:50-60 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (9–10 lines × 2) lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:79— lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:79-87 | lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:102-111 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) lib/models/book.dart:101— lib/models/book.dart:101-109 | lib/models/book_style.dart:60-68 | lib/service/ai/langchain_ai_config.dart:140-148 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times.
Duplicated block (8–9 lines × 2) lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:197— lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:197-205 | lib/service/tts/online_tts.dart:236-243 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:80— lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:80-85 | lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:104-109 | lib/widgets/settings/service_config_form.dart:121-127 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
M1 · Documentation (README)· README may be stale · ×1
README may be stale — 188 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched — it may no longer reflect the system.
Weak hash algorithm lib/service/md5_service.dart:19— MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`sha256.convert(…)` from `package:crypto`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call.
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Function without a CancelToken · ×1
Function without a CancelToken: checkUpdate lib/utils/check_update.dart:14— `checkUpdate` calls `Dio(…).get(…)` but takes no CancelToken and hands the request none its caller can reach, so its caller cannot cancel the request once it has started. Take `CancelToken? cancelToken` and pass it on as `cancelToken: cancelToken` — or, in a widget's State or a notifier, hold one and cancel it in `dispose`.
Duplicated predicate lib/service/iap/iap_service.dart:72— `AnxPlatform.isIOS || AnxPlatform.isMacOS` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/service/iap/iap_service.dart, lib/utils/webView/webview_console_message.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/service/ai/tools/repository/book_content_search_repository.dart:225— `Platform.isWindows && webViewEnvironment == null` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/service/ai/tools/repository/book_content_search_repository.dart, lib/utils/webView/anx_headless_webview.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/apply_book_tags_step_tile.dart:63— `data['requiresConfirmation'] == true || data['requires_confirmation'] == true` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/apply_book_tags_step_tile.dart, lib/widgets/ai/tool_tiles/organize_bookshelf_step_tile.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart:1087— `entry.text != null && entry.text!.trim().isNotEmpty` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/widgets/ai/ai_chat_stream.dart, lib/widgets/ai/ai_stream.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/service/notes/export_notes.dart:171— `note.readerNote != null && note.readerNote!.isNotEmpty` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/service/notes/export_notes.dart, lib/widgets/book_notes/book_note_tile.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js:49— `doc.lookupNamespaceURI(null) === ns || doc.lookupPrefix(ns)` appears character-identically in 2 files — assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js, assets/foliate-js/src/opds.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js:51— `el.namespaceURI === ns && el.localName === name` appears character-identically in 2 files — assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js, assets/foliate-js/src/opds.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js:885— `p === 'page-spread-left' || p === 'rendition:page-spread-left'` appears character-identically in 2 files — assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js, assets/foliate-js/src/mobi.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js:887— `p === 'page-spread-right' || p === 'rendition:page-spread-right'` appears character-identically in 2 files — assets/foliate-js/src/epub.js, assets/foliate-js/src/mobi.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate assets/foliate-js/src/overlayer.js:109— `writingMode === 'vertical-rl' || writingMode === 'vertical-lr'` appears character-identically in 2 files — assets/foliate-js/src/overlayer.js, assets/foliate-js/src/paginator.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Silent fallback default in catch lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:515— `getOnlineTtsConfig` turns every thrown error into `{}` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or rethrow it. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the `catch` or in the `///` doc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:889— `getAiProviders` turns every thrown error into `[]` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or rethrow it. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the `catch` or in the `///` doc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch lib/config/shared_preference_provider.dart:1750— `customSearchEngines` turns every thrown error into `[]` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or rethrow it. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the `catch` or in the `///` doc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch lib/service/tts/system_tts.dart:316— `getVoices` turns every thrown error into `[]` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or rethrow it. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the `catch` or in the `///` doc, and the row stops firing.
README/code drift CONTRIBUTING.md:264— CONTRIBUTING.md names `README_код_языка.md`, but no file or folder `README_код_языка.md` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/issue-triage.md:88— docs/issue-triage.md documents the environment variable `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/issue-triage.md:117— docs/issue-triage.md names `lib/path/file.dart`, but no file or folder `lib/path/file.dart` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/ai_reasoning_parser.dart:80— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This Dart code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/ai_reasoning_parser.dart:110— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This Dart code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Documentation: no project overview docs/troubleshooting.md— The English troubleshooting guide is an actionable reproduction path with no overview of what the project does or its scope. Add a one-line description stating the purpose (e.g. "This library enables importing/exporting AI-generated content via a webview") so readers can find it without reading through the log-sample.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 8 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 7.5/10. The most over is `(repository root)` (55950 LoC, 498 module-visible types across 69 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Orphaned files with no living knowledge · ×1
Orphaned files with no living knowledge — 1 of 201 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left — their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 201 of the 421 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each — most significant first: lib/utils/book_metadata/epub_metadata.dart. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway.
Orphaned file lib/utils/book_metadata/epub_metadata.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
Logging is not universal — Only 1/3 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `ios`, `macos`.
No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 51456 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
No release approval gate — The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release.
No security response headers detected — None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is set on a response this repository's Dart server sends — defense in depth, even when a proxy could set them. (−2.0 on this card.) The server: pubspec.yaml:35 — depends on `shelf`.
No inbound request validation detected — No handler of this repository's Dart server answers 400, 413 or 422 (`Response.badRequest`, `HttpStatus.badRequest`, `statusCode = 400`) and no validation package (luthor, acanthis, ez_validator, json_schema, …) is imported — nothing shows inbound requests being checked, and refused, before a handler acts on them. A check that answers its failure with 200 and an error body is not seen. (−2.0 on this card.) The server: pubspec.yaml:35 — depends on `shelf`.
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Not all functions that make a request accept a CancelToken · ×1
Not all functions that make a request accept a CancelToken — Only 1/2 functions that make a cancellable request (Dio, AbortableRequest) accept a CancelToken or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a screen navigated away from, a disposed widget, a superseded search. Take a `CancelToken? cancelToken` and hand it to the request as `cancelToken:` (or hold one and cancel it in `dispose`); where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
Outdated: fastlane — `fastlane` is resolved to 2.228.0 in the committed REDACTED but 2.241.1 is the current release on rubygems.org, and android/Gemfile declares no version requirement for it, so nothing but the lockfile is holding it back. This build is therefore missing every fix published since, including any security fix. Run `bundle update fastlane` and commit the updated REDACTED.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a1660b-c78e-76b2-97aa-76958baa0b77 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 91 · Warnings: 268 · Recommendations: 39 · Info: 1 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 22-10-2026 @ 23:56 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.