{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ServerRuntime._handle_request (cyclomatic 17): ServerRuntime._handle_request has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b51a02c48f53764759791a43d4e116639b50bf89c4b85f3139e5febd43233b1b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ServerRuntime._handle_request (cognitive 30): ServerRuntime._handle_request has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (29 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3feeee28512a0bfe852f347b991b69ed5abafb03282447efaca90bdbd02c9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimulationPayload.forbid_overlapping_server_outages (cognitive 22): SimulationPayload.forbid_overlapping_server_outages has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (17 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/schemas/payload.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"067d1302525533d3289f26ee27771418534e36bc7b53599c583d699f5302033f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:270-347 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:351-419 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:424-479 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:482-533 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:538-589 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6404a8986fb78ac77c8756c069bef9c4145ab9838cb5f2526a31b8dc4503baf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22\u201323 lines \u00D7 2): src/asyncflow/samplers/gaussian_poisson.py:72-94 | src/asyncflow/samplers/poisson_poisson.py:61-82 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/asyncflow/samplers/gaussian_poisson.py:72\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/samplers/gaussian_poisson.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee466571c9800069d1b35f6290645c55e9caf82cf68748e6b4b5d0b214533b88"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:457-477 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:511-531 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:457\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":457}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36c82efe3f6324f3dbe7a435b86c1982705cb0ef5dc363d1fc3220130e3686d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201317 lines \u00D7 3): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:430-446 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:488-501 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:544-557 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":430}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"049f9690cdc018db46416c5c0c9c95ad5dd92f351630a48239bfad2960a889a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201312 lines \u00D7 5): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:313-324 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:389-400 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:451-459 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:505-513 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:561-569 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:313\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":313}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"173c89379ccf5e46b7278e94a124ebb01fbffb0fdd089ce736eb69ebca400212"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:467-478 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:521-532 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:577-588 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":467}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4481f338d64fa854355f2bee35075a13b9a112160224f279674f89b7af352a2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:409-419 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:469-479 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:523-533 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:579-589 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":409}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48950921ba60e605ce50b524b1248706c906cf3abcfc2641017f14fa9370d4c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:326-331 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:398-403 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:457-462 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:511-516 | src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:567-572 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py:326\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/metrics/analyzer.py"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39a822ddcac9ef752154fd7343219ce918cc1bb838958365714b5ce71fca0082"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 16 shared lines): examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:27-78 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:23-74 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/single_server.py:27-78 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:55-107 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 16 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c702344af6004a666adf1d0e4bddceb6875e2ef995e63186242ad47b3ca2f603"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (41\u201343 lines \u00D7 2): examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:196-236 | examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:141-183 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 93 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py"},"region":{"startLine":196}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab32dd838943147ab7599c8f2873dd8664dd0457b0545491f45fef540c7a6166"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (39 lines \u00D7 2): examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:53-91 | examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py:48-86 \u2014 \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 115 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:53\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5490a356b718815c841a5a4d0590469718a5790f18b930a28bb5be4fc538b687"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37 lines \u00D7 3): examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:42-78 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:38-74 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/single_server.py:42-78 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:39\u0060 calls \u0060mkdir\u0060 and \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:35\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b009e1d99c1a82c978f086f7b471ae12552199f141cfbf3d3cd8b181ea33b01"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:110-139 | examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:89-118 | examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py:84-113 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 93 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:110\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0690d67c27cdbcdfef899d3ac191321fa3a02bde57e6861bb56a03afec43e254"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25\u201326 lines \u00D7 3): examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:55-79 | examples/builder_input/load_balancer/two_servers.py:61-86 | examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py:50-74 \u2014 \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 115 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8de6b7a37e15f84c8a63c0f63936116ef37dc12bfefac5511a1e0487519ca396"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:60-80 | examples/builder_input/load_balancer/two_servers.py:75-96 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:60\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dfe384c4fbaf08b79725c9e71352a2fb503664c899b60595be78e32f727a786"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:82-101 | examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py:79-98 | examples/builder_input/single_server/single_server.py:74-93 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/single_server.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 93 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py:82\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/builder_input/event_injection/lb_two_servers.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74ecfb31f67f2de002953b6fedbaa2c682a41d7d064eec3250e1dec93fe50c39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): examples/yaml_input/load_balancer/two_servers.py:37-45 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:64-72 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/load_balancer/two_servers.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f6445027f2c75cec2dc66702f582e80896ce71c61f792b60dc1ff64f1a0c9dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:88-94 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:96-102 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26c0efdcd4086a2c4726d60471cd5839131ec678efb8f5346aad8f6a74f6828e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:47-52 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:43-48 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/single_server.py:47-52 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:75-80 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bf0cbfd69116c2be2f5d00c77f654a14bcaf987218548753ee017774eb5c927"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:65-69 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:61-65 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/single_server.py:65-69 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:94-98 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49ba74448748c8b7b792dca60a561a012ae52fe93c6ce8d34bce116359ccaa7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py:73-77 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py:69-73 | examples/yaml_input/event_injections/single_server.py:73-77 | examples/yaml_input/single_server/single_server.py:102-106 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/yaml_input/event_injections/lb_two_servers.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/yaml_input/event_injections/heavy_single_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1aca822db2071e6391956d77033fceb00e6d215021235f2a55675e7ec0faabc"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py: src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 17 in ServerRuntime._handle_request at line 79. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 3 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2025-06-20..2025-09-18, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272025-06-20 17:21:29 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272025-09-18 17:21:29 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/asyncflow/runtime/actors/server.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba13d67302609b7eddc7ef8b38dc6ca3d84fe61c073e08161a555295e3fcccda"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: No install/build/run instructions for installing AsyncFlow from source or running the first example. Add an Install/Requirements section covering Python, pip, and the prerequisites, plus a Quick Start that runs the 10-second YAML scenario."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: The README describes what AsyncFlow does but provides no runnable usage examples. Add a Usage section with code for running the minimal YAML example and interpreting results, or link to the Quick Start in the existing docs."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d074061b7a18e86f5f84be2c55d3a3e7342ddb40ba4d7a8407ae980acab5bdd5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f29ede59e546979ab62c0886245b97edd640e414c9ea7c950774e14ff59574f8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d58aae47b24173b05c622f8f09a08545ac96949d277eea621ca0ec50139a018"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbaf004eb80e30d545f12b70bc24fffd9428a41f62cca66a9000b26771118159"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffd5daf3ff83453f5c6db6e135bc58487e9c902d8fe5cbd4c3e8a3012e89f92b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc7e6f9b9d2c11ad14fe5a1ab9073c34a28d0d2968ad18fdb425af92dcb5dbe0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"444a698a8c4af6dc73985d2f3bd98f7f3c984241d073d8370a292e023d298f5d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1b9c9a7b5c3c61833e5ac349de50951d5c0c48c4005935a28fd9616473823ff"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96ab094df4896e9137a1c530568bbdd1ae64d478bcb6b58579fd27d491f153e4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb763524237e1a5e8736848e69d9185d5736f4981142c3139a284f4b6bb0e6e9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30275e361e30f9a986bbe5681bd5e975f5a4108c3a8ba2d06c58a76b17f0c941"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0c8a0b25535e258d64739343fcbae98e5819e874b468846b32841d85646917c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"478e15394c1555bb5c3a2f2eaee822f44a07baef03f70c9c90fa1ef31782a033"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce3ce78384c84c03d3d39d447c53eebbd6b8235592929f67a4487ec97af8e456"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"105f29c80da87b16300447007b556047bff8b71cf7455c2e9b83a341d1dec140"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e394f5fc396f38aa19b4c5f02dc243c99bda7f40525d04fd7dbf09ac14d80bc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a1871e433fc8832186024809a26243940865a5bcfc5b9bc57dc90f6dcb0162c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"954702681bb67adbcaae63375c82e10e9d20b46c9676a2ae76c439eff5715bb8"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"828d4099c97229d263ea70ee20741ff2c4ac7fa33aab1a2196e30b7caef1b7e2"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b49563991adfa9353c0b07a1fe651f05489bdc7f024e1f9bf4ef85e75be9ef34"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90c7215895c9a5ca81d07f7f1634f067013e0fed1edf375a30f91762c923961e"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23677277cf33c87dd087fa6711f736cee37153e475bb8b3d8c63a44a64533c98"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e4dbe7e9695515a0d7a1e102cfd6f945ff78be9b32a034e39af4fa75cf9c1c3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"P12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage collected but not gated: CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum \u2014 coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool\u0027s minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository\u0027s CI files AND its coverage configuration \u2014 the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited \u2014 matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f63c06044cf998d9a0698692df30d8873e29bc9b0c98ee829255017c1193d33"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add bandit, \u0060semgrep --config=p/python\u0060, or CodeQL\u0027s python pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 4184 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No deployment automation: No release automation was found in CI \u2014 neither a deploy stage (Helm/Kubernetes/compose manifests, an orchestrated rollout) nor a publish job that ships the built artifact. Releases appear to be run by hand, which is slower, less repeatable and harder to reverse."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a7f38718309412c2d2c2c0663260a3d160de9a5a60f3915755be16386d3f1e8"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"CWE-1104","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1104"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"CWE-1329","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1329"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"CWE-522","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-522"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"CWE-829","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-829"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":25,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}