{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:27-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:27-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:27-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:27-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:27-51 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1c2bcc30d3596eb778e7d99220a9425a011c633eab4fc897a0edb0ec16dd0ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:61-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:61-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:61-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:61-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:61-98 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99177fe1b69fe3b5676e5722734c91f50cdf82f47bcb4fcfdf5b1c71c6520677"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 3): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:71-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:71-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:71-98 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 90 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:71\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25fd938f3ed8fdf3f3d90f5b21238f066a79f682c297bd852d30eb2e0ed6c2fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 5): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:61-85 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:61-85 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:61-85 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:61-85 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:61-85 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:61\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0d49cc5f24c49059cd84471d97bae09b451e38ff19761d18c66fa4387671132"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:32-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:32-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:32-51 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 90 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:32\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e054728f638a280783fda9d667b000cdfc1ab2a19f97f72746d786c1c7885d8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:32-51 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:32-51 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:32\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"973cd2a8706daeeb713d13682392fc16f037be61c6f8f4f7a9444566916c735a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 5): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:27-43 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterEventListeners.php:27-43 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProcessManagers.php:27-43 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterProjectors.php:27-43 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:27-43 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:27\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"feea89c39c27c527414ee0da59e49ae506ffb6b43ad098bb4ffc43981c6c8635"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:81-93 | src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:102-114 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:81\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"987429f5a4ec4d6c21ef13858406ac6e9f9bdcb68b1aa89f3864298f7a025530"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:88-98 | src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php:88-98 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php\u0060 and \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterQueryHandlers.php\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php:88\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CompilerPass/RegisterCommandHandlers.php"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87d24cda58a49616ef592a42ede131413d3ba2b974624b800ee7ee81f646ee32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:63-68 | src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:88-93 | src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php:109-114 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/DependencyInjection/CqrsExtension.php"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3e4753606a54923b01802223bde1988cae24ccb7f23e8261bb924cb40366bdb"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (PHPUnit or Pest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (PHPUnit or Pest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: Install instructions are present but thin: only Composer require is shown; no build/run commands or prerequisites. Add a short setup section covering dependencies, any required configuration keys, and how to run the bundle (e.g. a \u0027php bin/console ...\u0027 command)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Thin README: The root README is 44 words, against a bar of 120. Of the three newcomer-critical sections this check looks for by heading, it found no a testing section, no an architecture or project-map section. Sections are matched on HEADING text only, so material written under a heading this check does not recognise \u2014 or with no heading at all \u2014 is not seen and this row may understate what the document covers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fc8f78bec0b6b3daab9d9139ba49b687f61b54f8310b64c159df9616f47e38e"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests/ separation: No test surface was found \u2014 this check walked the tree for authored source in the languages it models (\u0060.cs\u0060, \u0060.vb\u0060, \u0060.fs\u0060, \u0060.java\u0060, \u0060.kt\u0060, \u0060.scala\u0060, \u0060.py\u0060, \u0060.php\u0060, \u0060.rb\u0060, \u0060.ex\u0060, \u0060.exs\u0060, \u0060.go\u0060, \u0060.erl\u0060, \u0060.hrl\u0060, \u0060.swift\u0060, \u0060.dart\u0060, \u0060.rs\u0060, \u0060.ts\u0060, \u0060.tsx\u0060, \u0060.mts\u0060, \u0060.cts\u0060) and found none of it test-shaped. \u2605 \u0060.js\u0060, \u0060.jsx\u0060, \u0060.mjs\u0060 and \u0060.cjs\u0060 are NOT in that walk, so a Jest or Mocha suite written in plain JavaScript is invisible to it and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than moving anything. Otherwise there are no tests here to separate from production code, so the folder question hasn\u0027t been reached yet."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"999e0c784909c76b6346a705ee63961fe363ed1cd6a94e3f80e2ebe7820ccd5d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: Install command and enable-tagging described but no Composer dependency or service-configuration YAML present \u2014 searched for: \u0060composer require\u0060, \u0060Symfony DI configuration\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add phpstan or psalm (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}