Public report of Brionjv/Miitopia-Save-Editor, published 21 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 21 October 2026, 23:52 UTC · Survey ID cd_3d2702f692834096a29b27dfcea7b616
Brionjv/Miitopia-Save-Editor
Measured 21 October 2026, 23:49 UTC, at code version d1a1b00
Test distribution is not measured: No automated tests.
CAI scoreWeak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 1 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A small codebase: 19,970 lines of product code in 1 project, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.1 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 12
Findings by how serious they are
12 critical186 serious11 minor
41 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
21 October 2026, 23:49 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
30of 33 dimensions measured by tools. The other 3 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
198of 209 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 11 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
33dimensions across 5 lenses, read from 19,970 lines of product code in 1 project.
Brionjv/Miitopia-Save-Editor scores 37 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while three of its five lenses score higher still: Architecture and Security and Compliance at 100, both rated Exemplary, and Code Health at 76, rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those three because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 12 and is rated Critical. The project has no automated tests and no test distribution, so its Code Coverage and Test Distribution dimensions score 0 out of 10, and until those reach 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. Resolving the lack of automated tests and the lack of tests found are therefore the first actions, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 37 to about 56.
Twelve findings are critical: eight EmptyCatchBlock issues in Explicit Debt, three Orphaned knowledge items in Knowledge Freshness, and one No automated tests issue in Code Coverage.
Watchdog couldn't measure Dependency Hygiene, License Compliance, IL Efficiency, Platform End-of-Life, Data Protection, Access Controls, Audit Trail, or Data Retention because the repository is written in a language the analyzer does not yet model or its projects failed to load, which means these dimensions are left out of the score. The product code is 19,970 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €18,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
If Production Readiness rose from 12 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 37 to about 56.
Code composition: what the lines of code are
Product code 100%
Rebuild cost: about €18,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€5,900 to €30,000, for 99 to 313 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 37. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Small: 19,970 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
Raises the score by about 17 points · Low effort · Code Coverage
2
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.
Raises the score by about 17 points · Low effort · Test Distribution
3
Resolve the 3 Orphaned knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Form1.vb, Grub_editor.vb, Repair_save.vb.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €18,000 to build again, about 0.1 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 12 (Critical). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 17 points for low effort, because it clears the 1 Code Coverage findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 5.6 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 6% to 13% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 394 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 1,598 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 0.2 to 1.4 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Code Duplication · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
At a glance — Code Health · 76% · Adequate · gated by D1, D2 ·
Begin by addressing the lack of automated tests and test distribution to ensure code reliability. Next, update the three orphaned knowledge files to maintain current technical understanding. Finally, establish a structured repository for architecture decision records to document significant design choices and their consequences.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 4 files carrying findings, judged against the Production bar: 25% slop · 50% mixed · 25% near-clean.
File
Score
Band
Worst signal
Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb
2.5
Slop
Explicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb
4.3
Mixed
Explicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb
4.7
Mixed
Explicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
README.md
9.3
Near-clean
Documentation Quality: Documentation: no installation or build instructions
How the grades work
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 12
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 186
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 11
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 41
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 30 of 33 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 33 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 198 of 209 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `dotnet list package` did not return usable output (restore or query failed); no outdated/vulnerable/deprecated data to assess. The tool said: `dotnet list package` exited 1 with no output.
D14 License Compliance — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. License scan produced no result — the tool ran but wrote no JSON report (no package reference resolved); the offline NuGet fallback resolved nothing.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (2 contributor(s) across 66 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 98% of the history; the other 1 hold 2% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. The loaded project set declares no packable project and no `.Contracts` project, so there is no intentionally-exposed surface for API consistency to be judged over.
D39 IL Efficiency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. IL NOT MEASURED: the analyzer's own build of this repository failed for an ENVIRONMENT reason (exit 1) — MSBuild's engine or the CLR gave up, or our image does not carry the SDK band/targeting pack this repository needs. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo, and it is not a statement that this repository fails to build. D18 owns the question of whether this repository builds; it was not answered here.
D44 Platform End-of-Life — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This dimension reads a project's own statement about the platform it runs on: a TargetFramework in a .NET project file, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain file or Cargo.toml rust-version, a .go-version, .java-version, .ruby-version, .tool-versions or .sdkmanrc, a go.mod go directive, a Maven or Gradle Java level or toolchain, a Gemfile's ruby directive, a mix.exs elixir requirement, a rebar.config minimum_otp_vsn, a pubspec.yaml SDK constraint, a build.sbt scalaVersion, or a framework major pinned by a dependency constraint. This repository carries none of them, so nothing about its platform was established. That is a gap in this analyzer's coverage, NOT a finding that the platform is supported — a language whose runtime is declared elsewhere (Package.swift, a Dockerfile) is simply not read here yet.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. No function of a language this check models was read, so there was no async code to examine. That is a limit of the analyzer on this repository, not a finding about it.
S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X10 Duplicated predicate — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X14 Bypassable address classification — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X20 Mistyped argument guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X22 Contradicted release guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X25 Inert configuration knob — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X3 Exception handling — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X5 Nullable reference types — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin/Scala, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Swift, Erlang, Elixir and Dart source only, and no C# was loaded and none of those languages was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C#, Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Rust, Go, Java, Kotlin, Scala, PHP, Ruby, Swift and Dart syntax only, and no C#, Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Rust, Go, Java, Kotlin, Scala, PHP, Ruby, Swift or Dart was loaded for this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D8 Code Coverage: Coverage is measured by building and running the test suite inside Watchdog's isolated image — the target repo is never modified, and nothing on your systems runs. So coverage exists only when the suite builds and runs within the inline time budget; one that needs external services, can't build, or exceeds the budget yields no coverage (D8 then degrades to not-measured, not a low score). Line coverage also says nothing about assertion quality.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 31 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 2 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with Miitopia_SE.readequipements (cyclomatic 326), Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance (cyclomatic 326). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 2.0 to about 2.8/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Cyclomatic Complexity in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 32 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 2 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with Miitopia_SE.readequipements (cognitive 386), Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance (cognitive 386). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 2.0 to about 3.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Cognitive Complexity in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes9.3 / 10Stronggated by 47 serious findings✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 42 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with Form1.vb (39), Grub_editor.vb (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (42 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with Form1.vb, Grub_editor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with Form1.vb, Repair_save.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate God Classes in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
+ 20 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 14 Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with Form1.vb (14). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Resolve the 14 Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with Form1.vb (14). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Resolve the 3 Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with Form1.vb (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Code Duplication in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
What it measures: How much of the code is actually exercised by tests.
Method: Coverage from coverlet runs or committed reports (Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov), computed per-file with structured exclusions for generated, trivial, and glue code. When the suite can't be built/run in-image AND no report is committed, coverage is reported NOT-MEASURED (excluded from the score) with the precondition to make it measurable — never a LoC-ratio proxy folded in as if measured. Deterministic.
No automated tests — no test code was found in this repository.
No automated tests
What to do
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Code Coverage in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d8_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
Resolve the 8 EmptyCatchBlock finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with Form1.vb (4), Repair_save.vb (3), Grub_editor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 issue-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Explicit Debt in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.
Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.
1 projects, 5 source files, 19970 hand-written lines of code (19970 production / 0 test — the split is derived per file: test is what its project, its own path, or a compile-guarded region marks as test, and a file carrying no test signal counts as production), plus 29688 generated (machine-written code — designer, scaffolded and tool-emitted files — excluded from quality), 0 inter-project edges.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository's single README is a one-page guide for an Miitopia save editor that describes the UI (an image of main screen), the steps to extract and edit saves, features listed in bullet points, releases, and links to external sources. It gives no installation/build instructions, no usage examples beyond the described steps, no architecture or design docs, and no licence statement; it is a thin README with only an overview and a link list.
Documentation: no installation or build instructions · ×2README.md
What to do
Resolve the 2 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
3 of 3 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb. Counted over 3 of the 5 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Resolve the 3 Orphaned knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Form1.vb, Grub_editor.vb, Repair_save.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
The root README is 106 words, against a bar of 120. Of the three newcomer-critical sections this check looks for by heading, it found no a build/run or getting-started section, no a testing section, no an architecture or project-map section. Sections are matched on HEADING text only, so material written under a heading this check does not recognise — or with no heading at all — is not seen and this row may understate what the document covers.
What to do
Expand the README with getting-started, architecture overview and a project map.
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 1 of 1 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.
Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.
Production code isn't grouped under a src/ folder — it all sits under Miitopia-Save-Editor/ alongside the root build files, so the conventional src/ boundary between the product and its tooling isn't drawn.
What to do
Group production code under src/ (or split deliberately, e.g. backend/ + frontend/) so production and tooling code aren't mixed at the root.
Start a test surface where your build system looks for one (tests/, test/, spec/, or your ecosystem's test source set) — the separation follows from putting the first tests in the right place.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
README claims extract/save with homebrew but no save-loading component exists — searched for: `homebrew`. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest and configuration files (package.json and other *.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.sln/*.slnx, *.yml, *.toml, *.config, tool configs such as eslint.config.js, Dockerfile); the README's own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read — a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:1
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: README claims extract/save with homebrew but no save-loading component exists.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P1 · CI/CD gates0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, …) — changes aren't gated by an automated build/test.
What to do
Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
No logging or diagnostics emission found. This repository ships a binary its users launch rather than a service you operate, so there is no operator to page — but when a run fails on a user's machine, neither they nor you have anything to read.
What to do
Write a diagnostic trail the user can hand back with a bug report: a log file under the platform's per-user data directory, switchable with a `--verbose`/`--debug` flag. Start with the `catch` blocks that emit nothing — a discarded exception is the failure the user cannot describe and you cannot reproduce.
For more than a log file, an `ActivitySource`/`EventSource` the user can switch on gives you a structured trace to attach to a bug report. A health-check endpoint does not apply here: nothing orchestrates or load-balances a binary the user launches.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets — CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean — this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
Run what this repository's stack ships: a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets — CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Reference — by lens
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Not evidenced — 5 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 79 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
AX5 Architecture & structure — no elaborate style needed at this size (~20k production LoC (15 types) across 1 project(s) / 4 namespace(s) with no recognised architectural style or layering — at this size, deliberate module boundaries would help.)
AX6 Interface segregation — no public interfaces
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — This repository has nothing the runtime tiers could boot or serve — no markup, no UI framework or web-server dependency, no UI component source, no native UI project and no API definition — nothing here is a surface to boot — so runtime a11y/egress/header evidence has no subject here. Not applicable: this is neither a gap in the scan nor a finding about your code.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D10 Test Quality — No tests were found in the analyzed repository to assess for quality.
D11 Test Reliability — No test suite was found to re-run, so reliability couldn't be assessed. Two searches produced that zero and both came back empty: the classifier that reads the loaded workspace recognised no suite it could run, and a walk of the source on disk — which covers the JS/TS `*.test.*` and `*.spec.*` conventions and probes for a Pester suite — found no test source in any other ecosystem either. Neither search reaches a suite that is missing from the loaded workspace and carries no name either walk recognises, so this is 'no suite found by those two searches', not a verdict that the repository has none.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured
D14 License Compliance — Licence collector did not produce a result
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D22 Internal API Consistency — No intentionally-exposed public API to evaluate for consistency.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — small single-context codebase (19,970 production LoC in the .NET projects) — bounded contexts are not needed at this size No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — symbol resolution incomplete — navigability not assessed
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — nuget: `dotnet list package --vulnerable` could not read this solution's dependency graph — it reported an error for at least one project and returned no package data at all (typically a packages.config / non-PackageReference project, which the command cannot read). An unreadable dependency graph is not a clean one; migrate the project(s) to PackageReference to enable this scan
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — IL not measured — the analyzer's build of the target did not succeed
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
D44 Platform End-of-Life — Platform end-of-life not assessed — this repository declares no platform this pass reads
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P12 CI test-gate honesty — no CI workflow found
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — this isn't a service/API/worker
P8 Schema migrations — no EF Core usage detected
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Cobertura — `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` with a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for a BenchmarkDotNet reference in an .fsproj or .vbproj, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Visual Basic code has 20,512 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X10 Duplicated predicate — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X12 Unreachable branch — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X13 Undrained process stream — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X14 Bypassable address classification — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X22 Contradicted release guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X25 Inert configuration knob — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X3 Exception handling — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X5 Nullable reference types — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X7 Silent fallback defaults — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7447— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7524— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7757— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7937— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb:415— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb:110— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb:213— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb:316— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
Orphaned knowledge Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
Orphaned knowledge Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
Orphaned knowledge Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
No automated tests — No automated tests — no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9908— MethodTooLong — Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged runs 4382 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 4282 over it, 43.82× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.readequipements Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:919— MethodTooLong — readequipements runs 3079 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2979 over it, 30.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4024— MethodTooLong — readequipappearance runs 3079 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2979 over it, 30.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Grub_editor.savegrub Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb:419— MethodTooLong — savegrub runs 401 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 301 over it, 4.01× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Grub_editor.readgrub Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb:20— MethodTooLong — readgrub runs 398 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 298 over it, 3.98× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.readrelationship Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:165— MethodTooLong — readrelationship runs 320 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 220 over it, 3.20× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.selectlanguage Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:552— MethodTooLong — selectlanguage runs 313 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 213 over it, 3.13× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Setting_hidden_CheckedChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7952— MethodTooLong — Setting_hidden_CheckedChanged runs 199 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 99 over it, 1.99× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Grub_editor.Panel_setall_Click Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb:897— MethodTooLong — Panel_setall_Click runs 198 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 98 over it, 1.98× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.writehero Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7548— MethodTooLong — writehero runs 190 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 90 over it, 1.90× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.writecommon Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7275— MethodTooLong — writecommon runs 153 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 53 over it, 1.53× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.readfilecommon Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7127— MethodTooLong — readfilecommon runs 147 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 47 over it, 1.47× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_fea_roulette_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18678— MethodTooLong — Select_fea_roulette_SelectedIndexChanged runs 129 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 29 over it, 1.29× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_rela_gMii_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17667— MethodTooLong — Select_rela_gMii_SelectedIndexChanged runs 111 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 11 over it, 1.11× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14382— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14486— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14590— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14694— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14798— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14902— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15006— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15110— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15214— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15318— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15422— MethodTooLong — Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14383— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14383-14390 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14391-14398 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14399-14406 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14407-14414 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14415-14422 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14423-14430 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14431-14438 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14439-14446 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14447-14454 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14455-14462 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14463-14470 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14471-14478 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14487— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14487-14494 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14495-14502 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14503-14510 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14511-14518 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14519-14526 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14527-14534 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14535-14542 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14543-14550 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14551-14558 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14559-14566 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14567-14574 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14575-14582 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14486` calls `Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14494` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14591— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14591-14598 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14599-14606 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14607-14614 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14615-14622 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14623-14630 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14631-14638 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14639-14646 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14647-14654 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14655-14662 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14663-14670 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14671-14678 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14679-14686 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14590` calls `Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14598` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14695— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14695-14702 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14703-14710 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14711-14718 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14719-14726 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14727-14734 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14735-14742 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14743-14750 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14751-14758 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14759-14766 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14767-14774 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14775-14782 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14783-14790 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14694` calls `Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14702` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14799— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14799-14806 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14807-14814 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14815-14822 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14823-14830 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14831-14838 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14839-14846 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14847-14854 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14855-14862 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14863-14870 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14871-14878 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14879-14886 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14887-14894 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14798` calls `Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14806` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14903— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14903-14910 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14911-14918 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14919-14926 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14927-14934 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14935-14942 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14943-14950 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14951-14958 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14959-14966 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14967-14974 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14975-14982 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14983-14990 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14991-14998 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14902` calls `Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14910` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15007— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15007-15014 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15015-15022 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15023-15030 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15031-15038 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15039-15046 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15047-15054 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15055-15062 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15063-15070 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15071-15078 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15079-15086 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15087-15094 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15095-15102 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15006` calls `Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15014` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15111— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15111-15118 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15119-15126 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15127-15134 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15135-15142 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15143-15150 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15151-15158 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15159-15166 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15167-15174 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15175-15182 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15183-15190 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15191-15198 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15199-15206 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15110` calls `Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15118` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15215— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15215-15222 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15223-15230 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15231-15238 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15239-15246 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15247-15254 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15255-15262 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15263-15270 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15271-15278 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15279-15286 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15287-15294 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15295-15302 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15303-15310 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15214` calls `Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15222` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15319— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15319-15326 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15327-15334 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15335-15342 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15343-15350 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15351-15358 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15359-15366 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15367-15374 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15375-15382 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15383-15390 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15391-15398 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15399-15406 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15407-15414 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15318` calls `Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15326` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15423— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15423-15430 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15431-15438 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15439-15446 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15447-15454 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15455-15462 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15463-15470 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15471-15478 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15479-15486 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15487-15494 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15495-15502 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15503-15510 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15511-15518 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15422` calls `Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15430` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15527— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15527-15534 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15535-15542 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15543-15550 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15551-15558 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15559-15566 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15567-15574 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15575-15582 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15583-15590 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15591-15598 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15599-15606 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15607-15614 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15615-15622 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15526` calls `Select_exp_scientist_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15534` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15631— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15631-15638 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15639-15646 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15647-15654 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15655-15662 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15663-15670 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15671-15678 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15679-15686 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15687-15694 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15695-15702 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15703-15710 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15711-15718 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15719-15726 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15630` calls `Select_exp_cat_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15638` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 12) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15735— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15735-15742 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15743-15750 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15751-15758 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15759-15766 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15767-15774 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15775-15782 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15783-15790 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15791-15798 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15799-15806 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15807-15814 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15815-15822 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15823-15830 — all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15734` calls `Select_exp_elf_SelectedIndexChanged` and `Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15742` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15839— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15839-15844 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15845-15850 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15851-15856 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15857-15862 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15863-15868 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15869-15874 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15875-15880 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15881-15886 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15887-15892 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15893-15898 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15899-15904 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15905-15910 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15911-15916 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15917-15922 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15923-15928 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15929-15934 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15943— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15943-15948 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15949-15954 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15955-15960 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15961-15966 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15967-15972 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15973-15978 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15979-15984 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15985-15990 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15991-15996 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15997-16002 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16003-16008 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16009-16014 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16015-16020 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16021-16026 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16027-16032 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16033-16038 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16047— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16047-16052 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16053-16058 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16059-16064 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16065-16070 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16071-16076 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16077-16082 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16083-16088 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16089-16094 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16095-16100 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16101-16106 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16107-16112 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16113-16118 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16119-16124 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16125-16130 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16131-16136 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16137-16142 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16151— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16151-16156 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16157-16162 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16163-16168 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16169-16174 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16175-16180 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16181-16186 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16187-16192 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16193-16198 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16199-16204 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16205-16210 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16211-16216 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16217-16222 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16223-16228 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16229-16234 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16235-16240 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16241-16246 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16255— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16255-16260 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16261-16266 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16267-16272 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16273-16278 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16279-16284 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16285-16290 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16291-16296 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16297-16302 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16303-16308 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16309-16314 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16315-16320 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16321-16326 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16327-16332 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16333-16338 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16339-16344 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16345-16350 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16359— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16359-16364 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16365-16370 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16371-16376 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16377-16382 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16383-16388 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16389-16394 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16395-16400 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16401-16406 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16407-16412 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16413-16418 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16419-16424 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16425-16430 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16431-16436 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16437-16442 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16443-16448 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16449-16454 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16463— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16463-16468 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16469-16474 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16475-16480 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16481-16486 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16487-16492 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16493-16498 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16499-16504 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16505-16510 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16511-16516 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16517-16522 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16523-16528 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16529-16534 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16535-16540 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16541-16546 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16547-16552 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16553-16558 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16567— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16567-16572 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16573-16578 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16579-16584 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16585-16590 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16591-16596 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16597-16602 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16603-16608 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16609-16614 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16615-16620 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16621-16626 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16627-16632 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16633-16638 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16639-16644 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16645-16650 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16651-16656 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16657-16662 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16671— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16671-16676 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16677-16682 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16683-16688 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16689-16694 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16695-16700 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16701-16706 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16707-16712 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16713-16718 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16719-16724 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16725-16730 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16731-16736 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16737-16742 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16743-16748 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16749-16754 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16755-16760 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16761-16766 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16775— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16775-16780 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16781-16786 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16787-16792 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16793-16798 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16799-16804 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16805-16810 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16811-16816 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16817-16822 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16823-16828 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16829-16834 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16835-16840 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16841-16846 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16847-16852 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16853-16858 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16859-16864 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16865-16870 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16879— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16879-16884 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16885-16890 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16891-16896 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16897-16902 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16903-16908 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16909-16914 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16915-16920 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16921-16926 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16927-16932 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16933-16938 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16939-16944 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16945-16950 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16951-16956 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16957-16962 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16963-16968 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16969-16974 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16983— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16983-16988 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16989-16994 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16995-17000 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17001-17006 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17007-17012 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17013-17018 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17019-17024 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17025-17030 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17031-17036 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17037-17042 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17043-17048 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17049-17054 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17055-17060 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17061-17066 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17067-17072 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17073-17078 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17087— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17087-17092 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17093-17098 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17099-17104 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17105-17110 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17111-17116 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17117-17122 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17123-17128 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17129-17134 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17135-17140 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17141-17146 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17147-17152 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17153-17158 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17159-17164 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17165-17170 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17171-17176 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17177-17182 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17191— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17191-17196 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17197-17202 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17203-17208 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17209-17214 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17215-17220 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17221-17226 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17227-17232 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17233-17238 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17239-17244 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17245-17250 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17251-17256 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17257-17262 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17263-17268 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17269-17274 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17275-17280 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17281-17286 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14311— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14311-14318 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14319-14326 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17295— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17295-17302 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17303-17310 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17321— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17321-17328 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17329-17336 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
FileTooLong: Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb— FileTooLong — 18432 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 17932 over it, 36.86× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb— FileTooLong — 1078 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 578 over it, 2.16× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
TooManyMethods: Miitopia_SE Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb— TooManyMethods — 18429 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 446 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 416 over it, 14.87× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Repair_save Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb— TooManyMethods — 420 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 44 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 14 over it, 1.47× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (37 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1066— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1066-1102 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2599-2635 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (37 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4171— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4171-4207 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5704-5740 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (29 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1225— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1225-1253 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1378-1406 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1531-1559 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1684-1712 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1837-1865 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1990-2018 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2143-2171 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2296-2324 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2758-2786 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2911-2939 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3064-3092 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3217-3245 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3370-3398 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3523-3551 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3676-3704 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3829-3857 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (29 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4330— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4330-4358 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4483-4511 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4636-4664 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4789-4817 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4942-4970 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5095-5123 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5248-5276 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5401-5429 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5863-5891 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6016-6044 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6169-6197 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6322-6350 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6475-6503 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6628-6656 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6781-6809 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6934-6962 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (28 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:923— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:923-950 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2456-2483 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (28 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4028— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4028-4055 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5561-5588 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 4) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:936— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:936-943 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1079-1086 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2469-2476 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2612-2619 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 4) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4041— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4041-4048 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4184-4191 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5574-5581 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5717-5724 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 40) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:946— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:946-953 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:956-963 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:966-973 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:976-983 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:986-993 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:996-1003 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1006-1013 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1016-1023 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1026-1033 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1036-1043 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1046-1053 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1056-1063 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1232-1239 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1385-1392 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1538-1545 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1691-1698 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1844-1851 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1997-2004 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2150-2157 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2303-2310 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2479-2486 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2489-2496 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2499-2506 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2509-2516 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2519-2526 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2529-2536 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2539-2546 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2549-2556 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2559-2566 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2569-2576 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2579-2586 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2589-2596 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2765-2772 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2918-2925 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3071-3078 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3224-3231 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3377-3384 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3530-3537 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3683-3690 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3836-3843 — all 40 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 40) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4051— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4051-4058 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4061-4068 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4071-4078 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4081-4088 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4091-4098 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4101-4108 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4111-4118 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4121-4128 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4131-4138 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4141-4148 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4151-4158 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4161-4168 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4337-4344 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4490-4497 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4643-4650 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4796-4803 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4949-4956 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5102-5109 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5255-5262 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5408-5415 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5584-5591 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5594-5601 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5604-5611 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5614-5621 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5624-5631 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5634-5641 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5644-5651 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5654-5661 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5664-5671 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5674-5681 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5684-5691 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5694-5701 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5870-5877 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6023-6030 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6176-6183 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6329-6336 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6482-6489 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6635-6642 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6788-6795 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6941-6948 — all 40 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 26) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1095— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1095-1103 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1105-1113 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1115-1123 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1125-1133 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1135-1143 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1145-1153 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1155-1163 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1165-1173 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1175-1183 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1185-1193 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1195-1203 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1205-1213 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1215-1223 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2628-2636 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2638-2646 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2648-2656 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2658-2666 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2668-2676 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2678-2686 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2688-2696 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2698-2706 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2708-2716 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2718-2726 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2728-2736 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2738-2746 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2748-2756 — all 26 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 26) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4200— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4200-4208 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4210-4218 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4220-4228 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4230-4238 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4240-4248 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4250-4258 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4260-4268 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4270-4278 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4280-4288 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4290-4298 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4300-4308 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4310-4318 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4320-4328 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5733-5741 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5743-5751 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5753-5761 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5763-5771 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5773-5781 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5783-5791 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5793-5801 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5803-5811 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5813-5821 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5823-5831 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5833-5841 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5843-5851 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5853-5861 — all 26 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1373— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1373-1381 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1526-1534 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1679-1687 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1832-1840 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:1985-1993 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2138-2146 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2291-2299 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2444-2452 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:2906-2914 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3059-3067 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3212-3220 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3365-3373 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3518-3526 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3671-3679 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3824-3832 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:3977-3985 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 16) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4478— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4478-4486 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4631-4639 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4784-4792 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4937-4945 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5090-5098 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5243-5251 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5396-5404 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:5549-5557 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6011-6019 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6164-6172 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6317-6325 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6470-6478 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6623-6631 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6776-6784 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:6929-6937 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7082-7090 — all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 11) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8622— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8622-8629 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8630-8637 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8638-8645 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8646-8653 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8654-8661 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8662-8669 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8670-8677 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8678-8685 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8686-8693 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8694-8701 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8702-8709 — all 11 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 11) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8714— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8714-8721 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8722-8729 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8730-8737 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8738-8745 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8746-8753 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8754-8761 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8762-8769 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8770-8777 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8778-8785 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8786-8793 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8794-8801 — all 11 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 8) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17377— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17377-17384 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17385-17392 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17393-17400 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17401-17408 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17409-17416 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17417-17424 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17425-17432 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17433-17440 — all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 8) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17447— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17447-17454 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17455-17462 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17463-17470 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17471-17478 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17479-17486 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17487-17494 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17495-17502 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17503-17510 — all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 3) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9696— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9696-9703 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9704-9711 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9712-9719 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 3) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9726— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9726-9733 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9734-9741 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9742-9749 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Miitopia_SE.readequipements (cyclomatic 326) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:919— Miitopia_SE.readequipements has cyclomatic complexity 326 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance (cyclomatic 326) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4024— Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance has cyclomatic complexity 326 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.readequipements) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14382— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14486— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14590— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14694— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14798— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14902— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15006— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15110— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15214— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15318— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15422— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_scientist_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15526— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_scientist_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cat_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15630— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cat_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_elf_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15734— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_elf_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_warrior_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15838— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_warrior_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_mage_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15942— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_mage_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cleric_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16046— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cleric_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_thief_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16150— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_thief_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_popstar_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16254— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_popstar_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_vampire_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16358— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_vampire_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_chef_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16462— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_chef_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_tank_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16566— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_tank_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_imp_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16670— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_imp_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_princess_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16774— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_princess_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_flower_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16878— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_flower_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_scientist_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16982— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_scientist_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cat_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17086— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cat_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_elf_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 51) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17190— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_elf_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 45) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8621— Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 45) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8713— Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 34) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17376— Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 34) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17446— Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 26) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9908— Miitopia_SE.Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
Miitopia_SE.valu_job_ValueChanged (cyclomatic 18) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9585— Miitopia_SE.valu_job_ValueChanged has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
Miitopia_SE.readequipements (cognitive 386) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:919— Miitopia_SE.readequipements has cognitive complexity 386 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance (cognitive 386) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:4024— Miitopia_SE.readequipappearance has cognitive complexity 386 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.readequipements) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14382— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14486— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14590— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14694— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_thief_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14798— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_popstar_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14902— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_vampire_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15006— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_chef_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15110— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_tank_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15214— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_imp_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15318— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_princess_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15422— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_flower_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_scientist_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15526— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_scientist_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cat_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15630— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cat_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_elf_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15734— Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_elf_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_warrior_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15838— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_warrior_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_mage_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:15942— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_mage_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cleric_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16046— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cleric_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_thief_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16150— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_thief_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_popstar_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16254— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_popstar_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_vampire_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16358— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_vampire_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_chef_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16462— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_chef_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_tank_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16566— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_tank_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_imp_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16670— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_imp_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_princess_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16774— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_princess_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_flower_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16878— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_flower_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_scientist_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:16982— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_scientist_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cat_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17086— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_cat_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_elf_ValueChanged (cognitive 50) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17190— Miitopia_SE.valu_exp_elf_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 27 other methods here (Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_warrior_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_mage_SelectedIndexChanged, Miitopia_SE.Select_exp_cleric_SelectedIndexChanged, …) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written 28 times rather than 28 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 27 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 28 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 46) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9908— Miitopia_SE.Select_Mii_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged (cognitive 44) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8621— Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 44) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:8713— Miitopia_SE.Select_world_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.valu_world_ValueChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 33) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17376— Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged (cognitive 33) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:17446— Miitopia_SE.valu_interac_activity_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Miitopia_SE.Select_interac_activity_SelectedIndexChanged) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
Miitopia_SE.writehero (cognitive 18) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7548— Miitopia_SE.writehero has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
Miitopia_SE.valu_job_ValueChanged (cognitive 18) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9585— Miitopia_SE.valu_job_ValueChanged has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ClassTooLong: Grub_editor Miitopia-Save-Editor/Grub_editor.vb— ClassTooLong — 1078 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 18 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 678 over it, 2.70× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (440 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9929— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9929-10368 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:12112-12551 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9778— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9778-9804 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:9808-9834 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:592— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:592-604 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:747-759 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 6) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18681— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18681-18691 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18702-18712 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18723-18733 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18744-18754 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18765-18775 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:18786-18796 — all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 4) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:234— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:234-245 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:310-321 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:386-397 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:409-471 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7876— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7876-7886 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7888-7898 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 14) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:10573— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:10573-10581 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:10791-10799 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:11009-11017 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:11227-11235 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:11445-11453 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:11663-11671 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:11881-11889 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:12756-12764 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:12974-12982 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:13192-13200 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:13410-13418 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:13628-13636 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:13846-13854 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14064-14072 — all 14 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 4) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:170— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:170-180 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:246-256 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:322-332 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:398-408 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7812— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7812-7820 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7823-7831 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:12099— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:12099-12108 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:14282-14291 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7800— Miitopia-Save-Editor/Form1.vb:7800-7806 | Miitopia-Save-Editor/Repair_save.vb:360-366 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
No structured logging — No logging or diagnostics emission found. This repository ships a binary its users launch rather than a service you operate, so there is no operator to page — but when a run fails on a user's machine, neither they nor you have anything to read.
Documentation: no installation or build instructions README.md— No setup or build commands are shown anywhere in the document. Add install instructions for the editor (dependencies, homebrew tools) so readers can run it without external software.
Documentation: no usage examples README.md— The 'How to use' section is a procedural list but gives no concrete example of running the tool. Add an invocation example (e.g. `./Miitopia-Save-Editor common.sav`) and a short run-through showing how one feature works.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
No tests found — No test suite could be collected — no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here.
Thin README — The root README is 106 words, against a bar of 120. Of the three newcomer-critical sections this check looks for by heading, it found no a build/run or getting-started section, no a testing section, no an architecture or project-map section. Sections are matched on HEADING text only, so material written under a heading this check does not recognise — or with no heading at all — is not seen and this row may understate what the document covers.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
M2 · Architecture documentation· No architecture diagram/doc · ×1
No architecture diagram/doc — No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
No src/ separation — Production code isn't grouped under a src/ folder — it all sits under Miitopia-Save-Editor/ alongside the root build files, so the conventional src/ boundary between the product and its tooling isn't drawn.
README/code drift README.md:1— README claims extract/save with homebrew but no save-loading component exists — searched for: `homebrew`. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest and configuration files (package.json and other *.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.sln/*.slnx, *.yml, *.toml, *.config, tool configs such as eslint.config.js, Dockerfile); the README's own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read — a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets — CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean — this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
nuget: not applicable — nuget: `dotnet list package --vulnerable` could not read this solution's dependency graph — it reported an error for at least one project and returned no package data at all (typically a packages.config / non-PackageReference project, which the command cannot read). An unreadable dependency graph is not a clean one; migrate the project(s) to PackageReference to enable this scan
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
0
—
Run 01a160de-ae91-7204-b36a-d6eff40f2f18 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 12 · Warnings: 186 · Recommendations: 11 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 21-10-2026 @ 23:49 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.