Executive summary
CS151512/STREMO scores 48 out of 100, but it is rated At risk while a critical security finding is open; the score itself is unchanged.
The weakest lens counts most in the score, and here that is Accessibility, which scores 38 and is rated Weak. Its Keyboard semantics dimension scores 1 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Accessibility can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href and to enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI, and if Accessibility rose to 70, the score would rise from 48 to about 56.
93 findings are critical: 29 in IaC & Container Security, 22 in Static Analysis (SAST), 15 in Keyboard semantics, 14 in Dependency Vulnerabilities, 12 in Forms & labels and one in Page structure.
Watchdog couldn't measure 13 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Documentation Quality, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 7,041 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €9,000, to rebuild.
If Accessibility rose from 38 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 48 to about 56.
New since the last survey: 13 findings
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · REDACTED
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · REDACTED
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · REDACTED
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED
- Large Files · frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx: 430 lines of code frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx
- Large Files · frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx: 404 lines of code frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx
- Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed inline frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx
- Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed inline frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx
- Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css
- Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css
- Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css
- Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css
Fixed since the last survey: 5 findings
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · Critical vulnerability: REDACTED REDACTED
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE: GO-2026-5841 REDACTED
- Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE: GO-2026-5841 REDACTED
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
- Large Files · Large Files
Rebuild cost: about €9,000 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €3,000 to €15,000, for 50 to 158 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | High, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.7 at a score of 48. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Small: 7,041 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture — module dependency graph
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 analytics_service.api.ws.hub | 2 analytics_service.service.aggregator | 3 backend.service.ml-spam-filter.app.api | 4 bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client | 5 chat_service.models.domain | 6 frontend.src.lib.i18n | 7 ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer | 8 stremo/smtp-service/internal/models | 9 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models | 10 stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service | 11 stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models | 12 analytics_service.service.manager | 13 bff_service.utils.state | 14 chat_service.repository.postgres | 15 chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub | 16 frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView | 17 frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView | 18 frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView | 19 frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid | 20 frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner | 21 frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView | 22 frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView | 23 frontend.src.components.layout.Footer | 24 frontend.src.components.layout.Header | 25 frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay | 26 frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar | 27 frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner | 28 ingest_service.service.manager | 29 moderation_service.service.moderator | 30 stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository | 31 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository | 32 stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers | 33 stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service | 34 chat_service.service.manager | 35 frontend.src.components.features.home | 36 frontend.src.components.layout | 37 stremo/smtp-service/internal/service | 38 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service | 39 stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers | 40 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 analytics_service.api.ws.hub | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 analytics_service.service.aggregator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 backend.service.ml-spam-filter.app.api | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 chat_service.models.domain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 frontend.src.lib.i18n | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 stremo/smtp-service/internal/models | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 analytics_service.service.manager | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 bff_service.utils.state | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 chat_service.repository.postgres | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 frontend.src.components.layout.Footer | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 frontend.src.components.layout.Header | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 ingest_service.service.manager | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 moderation_service.service.moderator | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33 stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34 chat_service.service.manager | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35 frontend.src.components.features.home | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 frontend.src.components.layout | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37 stremo/smtp-service/internal/service | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39 stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers | 2 |
12→1 analytics_service.service.manager uses analytics_service.api.ws.hub✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in analytics_service.service.manager uses a type in analytics_service.api.ws.hub.
- The types involved
analytics_service.service.manager.AnalyticsManager→analytics_service.api.ws.hub.WsHub
- Direction
- analytics_service.service.manager uses analytics_service.api.ws.hub, so a change to analytics_service.api.ws.hub can break analytics_service.service.manager, while a change to analytics_service.service.manager can't break analytics_service.api.ws.hub.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: analytics_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
12→2 analytics_service.service.manager uses analytics_service.service.aggregator✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in analytics_service.service.manager uses a type in analytics_service.service.aggregator.
- The types involved
analytics_service.service.manager.AnalyticsManager→analytics_service.service.aggregator.AnalyticsAggregator
- Direction
- analytics_service.service.manager uses analytics_service.service.aggregator, so a change to analytics_service.service.aggregator can break analytics_service.service.manager, while a change to analytics_service.service.manager can't break analytics_service.service.aggregator.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: analytics_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→4 bff_service.utils.state uses bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bff_service.utils.state uses a type in bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.
- The types involved
bff_service.utils.state.AppState→bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.AuthGrpcClient
- Direction
- bff_service.utils.state uses bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client, so a change to bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client can break bff_service.utils.state, while a change to bff_service.utils.state can't break bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bff_service.utils.state uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→5 chat_service.repository.postgres uses chat_service.models.domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in chat_service.repository.postgres uses a type in chat_service.models.domain.
- The types involved
chat_service.repository.postgres.PostgresBatcher→chat_service.models.domain.ChatMessage
- Direction
- chat_service.repository.postgres uses chat_service.models.domain, so a change to chat_service.models.domain can break chat_service.repository.postgres, while a change to chat_service.repository.postgres can't break chat_service.models.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: chat_service.repository.postgres uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→5 chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub uses chat_service.models.domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub uses a type in chat_service.models.domain.
- The types involved
chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub.RedisPubSub→chat_service.models.domain.ChatMessage
- Direction
- chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub uses chat_service.models.domain, so a change to chat_service.models.domain can break chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub, while a change to chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub can't break chat_service.models.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→6 frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView.BrowseViewProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.browse.BrowseView uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→6 frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView.DashboardViewProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.dashboard.DashboardView uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→6 frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView.FollowingViewProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.following.FollowingView uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→6 frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid.CategoryGridProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→6 frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner.HeroBannerProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→6 frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView.SearchViewProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.search.SearchView uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→6 frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView.StreamViewProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.stream.StreamView uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→6 frontend.src.components.layout.Footer uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Footer uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Footer.FooterProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout.Footer uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.layout.Footer, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Footer can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout.Footer uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→6 frontend.src.components.layout.Header uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Header uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Header.HeaderProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout.Header uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.layout.Header, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Header can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout.Header uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→6 frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay.SearchOverlayProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→6 frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar.SidebarProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→6 frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner uses frontend.src.lib.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner uses a type in frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner.CookieBannerProps→frontend.src.lib.i18n.Language
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner uses frontend.src.lib.i18n, so a change to frontend.src.lib.i18n can break frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner, while a change to frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner can't break frontend.src.lib.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.ui.CookieBanner uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→4 ingest_service.service.manager uses bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in ingest_service.service.manager uses a type in bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.
- The types involved
ingest_service.service.manager.StreamManager→bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.AuthGrpcClient
- Direction
- ingest_service.service.manager uses bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client, so a change to bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client can break ingest_service.service.manager, while a change to ingest_service.service.manager can't break bff_service.grpc_clients.auth_client.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: ingest_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→7 ingest_service.service.manager uses ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in ingest_service.service.manager uses a type in ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.
- The types involved
ingest_service.service.manager.StreamManager→ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.KafkaProducer
- Direction
- ingest_service.service.manager uses ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer, so a change to ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer can break ingest_service.service.manager, while a change to ingest_service.service.manager can't break ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: ingest_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→7 moderation_service.service.moderator uses ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in moderation_service.service.moderator uses a type in ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.
- The types involved
moderation_service.service.moderator.ModeratorManager→ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.KafkaProducer
- Direction
- moderation_service.service.moderator uses ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer, so a change to ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer can break moderation_service.service.moderator, while a change to moderation_service.service.moderator can't break ingest_service.infrastructure.kafka.producer.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: moderation_service.service.moderator uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→8 stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/models✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository uses a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.
- The types involved
stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository.RedisQueue→stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.EmailTask
- Direction
- stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/models, so a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/models can break stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository, while a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository can't break stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→9 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository uses a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.
- The types involved
stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.PostgresRepo→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.StreamMetastremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.PostgresRepo→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.UpdateMetaRequest
- Direction
- stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models, so a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models can break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository, while a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository can't break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→10 stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers uses a type in stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service.
- The types involved
stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers.ProfileHandler→stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service.ProfileServicestremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers.handlers→stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service.ProfileService
- Direction
- stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service, so a change to stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service can break stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers, while a change to stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers can't break stremo/user-profile-service/internal/service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/user-profile-service/internal/handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→11 stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service uses stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service uses a type in stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models.
- The types involved
stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service.VODService→stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models.ClipRequeststremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service.VODService→stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models.VOD
- Direction
- stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service uses stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models, so a change to stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models can break stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service, while a change to stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service can't break stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/vod-manager-service/internal/service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→5 chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.models.domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in chat_service.service.manager uses a type in chat_service.models.domain.
- The types involved
chat_service.service.manager.ChatManager→chat_service.models.domain.ChatMessage
- Direction
- chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.models.domain, so a change to chat_service.models.domain can break chat_service.service.manager, while a change to chat_service.service.manager can't break chat_service.models.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: chat_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→14 chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.repository.postgres✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in chat_service.service.manager uses a type in chat_service.repository.postgres.
- The types involved
chat_service.service.manager.ChatManager→chat_service.repository.postgres.PostgresBatcher
- Direction
- chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.repository.postgres, so a change to chat_service.repository.postgres can break chat_service.service.manager, while a change to chat_service.service.manager can't break chat_service.repository.postgres.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: chat_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→15 chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in chat_service.service.manager uses a type in chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub.
- The types involved
chat_service.service.manager.ChatManager→chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub.RedisPubSub
- Direction
- chat_service.service.manager uses chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub, so a change to chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub can break chat_service.service.manager, while a change to chat_service.service.manager can't break chat_service.repository.redis_pubsub.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: chat_service.service.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→19 frontend.src.components.features.home uses frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.home uses a type in frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid→frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid.CategoryGridProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.home uses frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid, so a change to frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid can break frontend.src.components.features.home, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.home can't break frontend.src.components.features.home.CategoryGrid.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.home uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→20 frontend.src.components.features.home uses frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.features.home uses a type in frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner→frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner.HeroBannerProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.features.home uses frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner, so a change to frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner can break frontend.src.components.features.home, while a change to frontend.src.components.features.home can't break frontend.src.components.features.home.HeroBanner.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.features.home uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→23 frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Footer✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout uses a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Footer.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Footer→frontend.src.components.layout.Footer.FooterProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Footer, so a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Footer can break frontend.src.components.layout, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout can't break frontend.src.components.layout.Footer.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→24 frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Header✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout uses a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Header.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Header→frontend.src.components.layout.Header.HeaderProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Header, so a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Header can break frontend.src.components.layout, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout can't break frontend.src.components.layout.Header.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→25 frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout uses a type in frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay→frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay.SearchOverlayProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay, so a change to frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay can break frontend.src.components.layout, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout can't break frontend.src.components.layout.SearchOverlay.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→26 frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in frontend.src.components.layout uses a type in frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar.
- The types involved
frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar→frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar.SidebarProps
- Direction
- frontend.src.components.layout uses frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar, so a change to frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar can break frontend.src.components.layout, while a change to frontend.src.components.layout can't break frontend.src.components.layout.Sidebar.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: frontend.src.components.layout uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→8 stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/models✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.
- The types involved
stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.SMTPService→stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.EmailTask
- Direction
- stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/models, so a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/models can break stremo/smtp-service/internal/service, while a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/service can't break stremo/smtp-service/internal/models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→30 stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository.
- The types involved
stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.SMTPService→stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository.RedisQueuestremo/smtp-service/internal/service.service→stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository.RedisQueue
- Direction
- stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository, so a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository can break stremo/smtp-service/internal/service, while a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/service can't break stremo/smtp-service/internal/repository.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/smtp-service/internal/service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→9 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.
- The types involved
stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaService→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.LiveStreamDTOstremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaService→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.UpdateMetaRequest
- Direction
- stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models, so a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models can break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service, while a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service can't break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→31 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.
- The types involved
stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaService→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.PostgresRepostremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaService→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.RedisRepostremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.service→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.PostgresRepostremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.service→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.RedisRepo
- Direction
- stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository, so a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository can break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service, while a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service can't break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/repository.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→37 stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/service✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers uses a type in stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.
- The types involved
stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers.SMTPHandler→stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.SMTPServicestremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers.handlers→stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.SMTPService
- Direction
- stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/smtp-service/internal/service, so a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/service can break stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers, while a change to stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers can't break stremo/smtp-service/internal/service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/smtp-service/internal/handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→38 stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers uses a type in stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.
- The types involved
stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers.MetaHandler→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaServicestremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers.handlers→stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.MetaService
- Direction
- stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers uses stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service, so a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service can break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers, while a change to stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers can't break stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: stremo/stream-meta-service/internal/handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Domain Modelling
At a glance — Event Sourcing
At a glance — Accessibility
At a glance — Performance
Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping
| OWASP category | Findings | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration | 227 | High / Critical |
| A05:2025 — Injection | 31 | High / Critical |
| A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures | 31 | High / Critical |
Roadmap
First, ensure all custom controls and anchors are fully keyboard-operable and accessible, while simultaneously enforcing accessibility standards through linting and CI gates. Next, address visual and motion safety by maintaining visible focus styles, respecting reduced motion preferences, and improving color contrast. Finally, complete the remediation by adding programmatic labels to all form controls and buttons, and expand test coverage to include previously unreached production modules.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href. | +5.9 pts | Medium | Keyboard semantics |
| Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI. | +3.0 pts | Medium | A11y enforcement |
| Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. | +1.4 pts | Low | ADR Quality |
| Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1. | +2.8 pts | Medium | Visual & motion safety |
| Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry). | +2.7 pts | Medium | Test Coverage |
| Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label. | +2.4 pts | Medium | Forms & labels |
| Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh. | +2.0 pts | Medium | Page structure |
| Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate. | +1.4 pts | Medium | Security & performance tooling |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | 0.6 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 0.7 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.4 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.4 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.6 | Slop | Dependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.0 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.3 | Slop | Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.4 | Slop | Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 84 of 87 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 87 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 404 of 427 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkov | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT READ here — but this repository measures it: a coverage step in CI (`cargo llvm-cov`) shows that coverage is collected and tracked in your own CI. The built-in collector has no runner for this ecosystem (.rs), so the analyzer could not read the number — a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not an unmeasured repo. Not scored. To have the real number read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `cargo install cargo-llvm-cov`, then `cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path lcov.info`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `cargo install cargo-llvm-cov`, then `cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path lcov.info`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
- D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.rs) and this repository declares a Cargo test suite (backend, 4 test files), but it was not re-run: the analyzer environment could not run it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares REDACTED, but the licence verdict published here was taken over its crate dependencies. Nothing was read about its npm dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable (1 contributor(s) across 269 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). Concentration needs a team to concentrate: with one contributor there is nobody to spread the knowledge to, so there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
- D19 Documentation Quality — LLM provider failed — The model provider returned an unusable result, so this LLM-assisted dimension fell back to a measurement gap (confidence 0) rather than a penalty. Re-run with a reachable provider to score it.
- D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check's reader does not cover the language this repository's product is written in, so it had nothing of the product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding about this repository.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via REDACTED (REDACTED). docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit: https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped.
- C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
- C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
- C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
- C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Go, Python, Rust, cpp is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Go, Python, Rust, cpp is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
- X4 Structured logging — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 27 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 67.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
- D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D22 Internal API Consistency: API-surface coherence is an LLM judgement over a sample of the public surface — consistency of intent across the whole API is approximated, not exhaustively verified.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement: Egress confinement is read from committed Kubernetes manifests — a policy applied out-of-band (cluster-default deny, a service mesh, or a cloud firewall/security group off-repo) is invisible, and a present NetworkPolicy is declared config, not proof the cluster admission-controller actually enforces it at runtime.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement: Syscall/MAC confinement is read from committed manifests — a profile applied by a cluster-wide PodSecurity default or a mutating webhook off-repo isn't seen, and a declared seccomp/AppArmor profile is config presence, not proof the node's kernel actually loaded and enforced it.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (REDACTED, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
- AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
- AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics: Keyboard semantics are inferred from markup attributes — interactivity wired purely in script, focus managed at runtime, and component-level handlers are invisible. A clean result means "no static keyboard-trap shape", not a keyboard-operability proof.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
- AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
- DM4 Rich vs anemic domain model: Behaviour is detected as state mutation inside a method body — a method that enforces an invariant by validating-and-throwing without mutating reads as a query, and mutation delegated through an interface the scan can't resolve isn't credited; entities with zero public properties still drop out of the population. It detects that state changes, not whether the rule is correct.
- DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
1 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay at 20.
What to do
- Bring the 1 body over 15 down to 15 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay (cyclomatic 20). — Refactoring it lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 9.6 to about 10.0/10.
- Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
2 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay at 24.
What to do
- Bring the 2 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay (cognitive 24), chat_service::api::ws::handle_socket (cognitive 16). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 9.4 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
- Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D3 · God Classes
7 over-large unit(s) detected — types, modules or files that carry too much.
What to do
- Resolve the 7 FunctionTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with DashboardView.tsx, StreamView.tsx, SearchOverlay.tsx. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
- Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D4 · Code Duplication
8 duplicated block group(s) detected. Measured on part of this repository only: .tsx (33% of production source) was not exposed to THIS dimension's token comparison and is not in this count; duplication there is measured by R10 Code Duplication, the frontend lens's card running the same clone algorithm over the JS/TS token stream.
What to do
- Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with producer.rs, main.go. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with manager.rs, jwt.go. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (40–41 lines × 3) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with jwt.go. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D5 · Coupling
13 production modules (Cargo+npm+Go+CMake), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; 0 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 11 of the 13 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 19 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D9 · Test Distribution
15 test methods: 15 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e. The Rust suite contributes 15 `#[test]` function(s) across 4 file(s) declaring at least one; its unit/integration split is Cargo's own — 0 of those file(s) are integration-test targets under a crate's tests/ directory, and the rest are #[test] functions compiled into the crate they test.
D12 · Dependency Hygiene
7 outdated, 0 author-deprecated direct Go module(s), 0 pinning or checksum defect(s). Whether any of these modules is UNMAINTAINED is not graded — proxy.golang.org publishes no maintenance status, and release age does not stand in for one. Whether any is UNUSED is not graded either: that is a source question, not a registry one. Known CVEs in this module graph are D30's question, read from REDACTED and go.sum there.
D13 · Secret Scanning
Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D14 · License Compliance
0 of 221 shipped crate(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from crates.io over the crates a consumer compiles — this repository's REDACTED closed over its manifests' `[dependencies]` and `[build-dependencies]`. Crates it asks for ONLY under `[dev-dependencies]` are excluded: they are not compiled by anything that depends on this repository. ★ COVERAGE OF THIS VERDICT: it grades this repository's crate dependencies and nothing else. The repository also declares REDACTED, and the licences of those dependencies were NOT read by this pass — a gap in this engine's coverage, not a statement about them. So this result says the graded closure carries no banned licence; it does NOT say this repository's licensing is clear.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
3 deducted task-comment markers across 7041 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 9.9. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What to do
- Resolve the 3 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with logic.rs, consumer.rs, crypto.rs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
- Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D20 · ADR Quality
No architecture decision records were found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D22 · Internal API Consistency
3 API inconsistencies across 41 exposed types.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Inconsistent constructor parameter naming and return types for… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicate functionality across different services/modules. Both… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Inconsistent naming for validation methods. One is a free function… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 13 build units (Cargo, Go, Python, npm) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D28 · Secrets (history)
gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
31 finding(s): 0 critical, 22 high, 8 medium, 1 low. 21 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens.
What to do
- Resolve the 8 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (6), REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 21 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (21 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities
24 finding(s): 2 critical, 12 high, 9 medium, 1 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 12 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (10), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (12 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Critical vulnerability finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
D31 · IaC & Container Security
227 finding(s): 0 critical, 29 high, 180 medium, 18 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 180 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (119), REDACTED (22), REDACTED (20). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (180 warning-level).
- Resolve the 29 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (20), REDACTED (7), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (29 issue-level).
- Resolve the 18 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (10), REDACTED (6), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (18 recommendation-level).
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked. Counted over 24 of the 171 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing
0/4 supply-chain integrity signals present (provenance, signing, SBOM, pinned actions).
What to do
- Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D40 · Network Egress Confinement
0/2 network-egress controls present (network policy, egress restriction).
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No network policy finding(s) in Network Egress Confinement. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement
0/8 workload(s) run every container under a seccomp profile; 0/8 declare an AppArmor/SELinux profile.
What to do
- Resolve the 8 No seccomp profile finding(s) in Kernel & Syscall Confinement — start with REDACTED (6), REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 recommendation-level).
D43 · Malicious Dependencies
No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 4 platform declaration(s) and 6 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AC1 · Text alternatives
AC2 · Forms & labels
- A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one). (×9) — frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:134, frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:137, frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:271, …
- This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label htmlFor>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label. (×2) — frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:266, frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:109
- This <div> carries a click handler, which makes it a control, but it has no text, aria-label or labelled child (the icon-only case), so assistive tech has no name to announce for it. Note that switching it to <button type="button"> — the right fix for its keyboard operability — does not give it a name either: an icon-only button still needs one. Add visible text or an aria-label. — frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:162
What to do
- Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
AC3 · Page structure
- The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). — backend/service/smtp-service/templates/welcome.html:2
- No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. — backend/service/smtp-service/templates/welcome.html:2
- Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don't jump levels — increase by at most one. (×3) — frontend/src/components/features/browse/BrowseView.tsx:38, frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:287, frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:94
What to do
- Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
AC4 · Keyboard semantics
- A click handler on a plain element isn't keyboard-operable. Use a <button>, or add role + tabIndex={0} + a key handler. (×15) — frontend/src/components/features/following/FollowingView.tsx:45, frontend/src/components/features/following/FollowingView.tsx:69, frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:137, …
What to do
- Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety
- <input> takes keyboard focus, and its outline-none utility removes the focus ring with no focus-state ring, shadow, border or outline utility in its place. Add one (e.g. focus-visible:ring-2). (×2) — frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:266, frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:109
- `.animate-dropdown` moves (`animation: dropdownSlide 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1) forwards`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — frontend/src/app/globals.css:37
- `.animate-cookie-in` moves (`animation: cookiePopIn 0.6s cubic-bezier(0.2, 0.8, 0.2, 1) forwards`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — frontend/src/app/globals.css:48
- `.animate-cookie-out` moves (`animation: cookieFadeOut 0.3s cubic-bezier(0.2, 0.8, 0.2, 1) forwards`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — frontend/src/app/globals.css:57
- `.animate-slideUp` moves (`animation: slideUp 0.4s cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1) forwards`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — frontend/src/app/globals.css:84
What to do
- Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
AC7 · A11y enforcement
- No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 15 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
- Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
AX10 · Code composition
What to do
- The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
AX2 · Stateful singletons
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX5 · Architecture & structure
AX9 · CQS / query purity
DM4 · Rich vs anemic domain model
DM6 · Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary
ES1 · Fold determinism
ES2 · Immutable events
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
- Add a README to the 13 of 14 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1.9 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- README claims Terraform CI/CD but no infra/monitoring/Terraform project exists — searched for: `Terraform`. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest and configuration files (REDACTED and other *.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.sln/*.slnx, *.yml, *.toml, *.config, tool configs such as eslint.config.js, REDACTED); the README's own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read — a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — Readme.md:1
- README advertises Terraform / IaC, but no Terraform configuration exists — searched for: `terraform`, `.tf`. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest and configuration files (REDACTED and other *.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.sln/*.slnx, *.yml, *.toml, *.config, tool configs such as eslint.config.js, REDACTED); the README's own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read — a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — Readme.md:17
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: README claims Terraform CI/CD but no infra/monitoring/Terraform project exists; README advertises Terraform / IaC, but no Terraform configuration exists.
P1 · CI/CD gates
P10 · Library API & versioning
- 35/36 types (97%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API.
What to do
- Keep implementation types off the public surface (Rust: `pub(crate)`, or keep the module private) so internals can change without breaking consumers.
P2 · Observability
- Only 11/12 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `frontend`.
What to do
- Extend structured logging to the remaining runnable modules so everything you run is diagnosable in production.
P3 · Security & performance tooling
What to do
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback
What to do
- Nothing pauses a release for a human: publish as a draft release (or gate the release job on a protected tag/manual dispatch) so a bad build can be stopped before users can download it.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience
P8 · Schema migrations
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene
R1 · Type Safety
R10 · Code Duplication
- frontend/src/components/features/browse/BrowseView.tsx:36 · frontend/src/components/features/home/CategoryGrid.tsx:38 · frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:119 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — frontend/src/components/features/browse/BrowseView.tsx:36
- frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:36 · frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:56 · frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:76 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. — frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:36
- frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:293 · frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:327 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:293
- frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:31 · frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:61 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:31
What to do
- Act on each finding's own remediation rather than one rule: the move depends on what recurs. Where the copies are executable blocks, give the shared part one home and call it from each site; where they are declarations, a listing, a specialisation already delegating to its base, or one shape repeated per entity, there is no call site and the move is a shared type, a generated set or a factory — sometimes there is nothing to extract.
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity
- SearchOverlay has cyclomatic complexity 14 and cognitive complexity 12; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:31
- Header has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 10; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:32
- (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 9; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx:85
R3 · Large Files
- frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx has 430 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:1
- frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx has 404 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx:1
What to do
- Split each oversized file along the responsibilities already in it, into smaller focused modules in the same package.
R4 · Test Coverage
- 0% of 14 production file(s) reachable from 0 test file(s) via the import graph — 'production' here is the RESIDUE: every source file left once tests, tooling, generated output, config, declarations and declaration-only modules, fixture corpora, type fixtures, behaviour-free data modules, re-export barrels, registration/constant data modules and service workers are set aside, so the percentage is taken over a smaller denominator than the workspace's file count
What to do
- Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).
R5 · Dependency Freshness
What to do
- Bump outdated dependencies to current versions to limit upgrade debt.
R6 · Tooling
- test ✓ · lint ✓ · typecheck ✗ — read from this repository's REDACTED scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: `test` for the suite, `lint` or `prettier` for linting, `typecheck`/`type-check`/`tsc` for type checking. ✗ therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline — a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A ✓ means the wiring is DECLARED — a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite.
What to do
- Add `tsc --noEmit` as REDACTED scripts and run them in CI.
R7 · Dead Code
R8 · Dependency Hygiene
- Every import is type-only — move it to devDependencies. — frontend/next.config.ts:1
What to do
- Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.
R9 · Circular Imports
X1 · Async correctness
X12 · Unreachable branch
X13 · Undrained process stream
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X4 · Structured logging
- `info` at line 24 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: `logger.info("order %s moved to %s", order_id, status)` with the standard library's `logging`, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or `log.info("order moved", order_id=order_id, status=status)` with structlog. — backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/api/routes.py:24
- `error` at line 33 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: `logger.error("order %s moved to %s", order_id, status)` with the standard library's `logging`, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or `log.error("order moved", order_id=order_id, status=status)` with structlog. — backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/api/routes.py:33
- `info` at line 19 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: `logger.info("order %s moved to %s", order_id, status)` with the standard library's `logging`, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or `log.info("order moved", order_id=order_id, status=status)` with structlog. — backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/services/classifier.py:19
- `info!` at line 55 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:55
- `info!` at line 56 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:56
- `error!` at line 60 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:60
- `error!` at line 63 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:63
- `error!` at line 38 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. (×2) — backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/grpc_server.rs:38, backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/http/routes.rs:38
- `error!` at line 58 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/grpc_server.rs:58
- `debug!` at line 28 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `debug!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/repository/clickhouse.rs:28
- `error!` at line 80 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/analytics-service/src/service/aggregator.rs:80
- `info!` at line 64 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/main.rs:64
- `error!` at line 39 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:39
- `error!` at line 52 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:52
- `warn!` at line 57 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:57
- `error!` at line 45 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/jwt_auth.rs:45
- `warn!` at line 56 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/jwt_auth.rs:56
- `error!` at line 37 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/utils/errors.rs:37
- `error!` at line 56 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/bff_service/src/utils/errors.rs:56
- `info!` at line 36 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. (×2) — backend/service/chat-service/src/main.rs:36, backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:36
- `warn!` at line 43 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/api/ws.rs:43
- `error!` at line 90 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/api/ws.rs:90
- `error!` at line 35 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/api/http/routes.rs:35
- `warn!` at line 39 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/infrastructure/grpc_client.rs:39
- `debug!` at line 32 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `debug!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/repository/redis_pubsub.rs:32
- `debug!` at line 41 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `debug!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/repository/redis_pubsub.rs:41
- `error!` at line 92 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/repository/postgres.rs:92
- `debug!` at line 94 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `debug!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/repository/postgres.rs:94
- `warn!` at line 28 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/service/manager.rs:28
- `error!` at line 59 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/chat-service/src/service/manager.rs:59
- `warn!` at line 27 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/main.rs:27
- `info!` at line 30 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/main.rs:30
- `error!` at line 64 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `error!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/main.rs:64
- `info!` at line 8 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:8
- `info!` at line 14 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:14
- `info!` at line 27 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:27
- `info!` at line 54 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:54
- `warn!` at line 58 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `warn!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — backend/service/ingest-service/src/api/tcp_rtmp.rs:58
What to do
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging
X5 · Nullable reference types
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
| Dimension | WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| AC1 · Text alternatives | 1.1.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.5 | Partial signal |
| AC2 · Forms & labels | 1.3.1, 3.3.2, 4.1.2 | Partial signal |
| AC3 · Page structure | 1.4.4, 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 3.1.1, 4.1.2 | Partial signal |
| AC4 · Keyboard semantics | 2.1.1, 2.4.3 | Partial signal |
| AC6 · Visual & motion safety | 1.4.3, 2.4.7 | Partial — literal CSS only |
| AC7 · A11y enforcement | enforcement — no page criterion | Enforcement posture (process) |
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 67% | Adequate — gated by X4 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 91% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Maturity | 64% | Adequate — gated by M2 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 48% | Weak — gated by R4 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 53% | Adequate — gated by D30, D31, D36 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Domain Modelling | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
| Event Sourcing | 100% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Accessibility | 38% | Weak — gated by AC4 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Performance | 100% | Exemplary | Solid. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- X10 Duplicated predicate — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 5 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
- P6 Release Hygiene — not evidenced — no changelog, version stamp or semver release tag in the repo
Not included — 46 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
- AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's Go imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's; this repository's Python imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's; Rust with no dependency-injection crate has no container to hand one lifetime's instance to another — every value is owned by the code that builds it, and the borrow checker rejects a longer-lived value keeping a borrow of a shorter-lived one; this repository's TypeScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
- AX6 Interface segregation — no exported interface declares behaviour
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
- AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit: https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
- C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D10 Test Quality — ~235 lines of test source are present (.rs) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
- D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — the .rs suite was found but not re-run
- D16 Bus Factor — single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D19 Documentation Quality — LLM evaluation failed
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D27 Navigability — D27 reads resolved call sites in the languages it reads only — this repository's production source is .cpp, .go, .py, .ts, .tsx, which was left unread. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess.
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- DM1 Aggregate boundaries — this Rust crate declares no domain aggregate (a struct with private state and its own command methods), so DM1's aggregate-boundary read has no population to be taken over
- DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no in-repo typed-id idiom — primitive-obsession recorded as advisory DM8, DM2 not gated
- DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
- DM5 Encapsulated state — this Rust crate declares no type implementing a hand-rolled Hash/PartialEq, so DM5's value-identity encapsulation read has no population to be taken over
- DM7 Repository granularity — no repository abstraction detected (e.g. uses a document session)
- ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, and a call made through an inferred or generic receiver has no resolvable owner in the source. Reported as guidance rather than measured
- ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `#[bench]`, criterion's `bench_function`/`bench_with_input`, `#[divan::bench]` or `#[library_benchmark]` in any `.rs` file, or criterion, divan, iai or a `[[bench]]` target in a Cargo.toml, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Go code has 1,843 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
- R11 Import Boundaries — No recognizable feature-sliced/layered src layout — boundary rules not applicable.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Python and Rust were read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Python request takes no token: asyncio cancels the task and trio or anyio the scope that made it, from outside the call, and requests, httpx, aiohttp and gRPC take a timeout, not a cancellation; a Rust request takes no token: a future is cancelled by dropping it, from outside the call (select!, a timeout, an aborted task), and reqwest, hyper and tonic take none
- X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check asks whether an argument guard reports an EMPTY value as a NULL one, which needs a language that throws a null-specific argument exception — .NET's ArgumentNullException, the JVM's NullPointerException, Dart's ArgumentError.notNull. This repository contains none of those languages: the ones it is written in have a single exception for a bad argument, so there is no pair of exceptions to confuse and nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 93 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/features/following/FollowingView.tsx:45
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/features/following/FollowingView.tsx:69
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:137
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:68
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:60
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:162
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:255
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:277
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:92
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:211
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:246
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:288
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:325
- Click handler on a non-interactive <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx:86
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:134
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:137
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:271
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:109
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx:175
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:133
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:137
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:118
- <button> with no accessible text frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:127
- <input> without a programmatic label frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:266
- <input> without a programmatic label frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:109
- Custom control with no accessible name on <div> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:162
- <html> without a lang backend/service/smtp-service/templates/welcome.html:2
- Click handler on a non-interactive <img> frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:150
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
Serious — 246 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- FunctionTooLong: DashboardView.DashboardView frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:34
- FunctionTooLong: StreamView.StreamView frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx:37
- FunctionTooLong: SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:31
- FunctionTooLong: Header.Header frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:32
- FunctionTooLong: HeroBanner.HeroBanner frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:13
- FunctionTooLong: SearchView.SearchView frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:19
- FunctionTooLong: Footer.Footer frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:11
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css:37
- Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css:48
- Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css:57
- Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard frontend/src/app/globals.css:84
- Heading level jumps from h1 to h3 frontend/src/components/features/browse/BrowseView.tsx:38
- Heading level jumps from h1 to h3 frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:287
- Heading level jumps from h1 to h3 frontend/src/components/features/home/HeroBanner.tsx:94
- TodoComment backend/service/analytics-service/src/service/logic.rs:5
- TodoComment backend/service/ingest-service/src/infrastructure/kafka/consumer.rs:43
- TodoComment backend/service/ingest-service/src/utils/crypto.rs:2
- Focus outline removed inline frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:266
- Focus outline removed inline frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:109
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) backend/service/ingest-service/src/infrastructure/kafka/producer.rs:10
- Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) backend/service/smtp-service/cmd/server/main.go:21
- Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) backend/service/ingest-service/src/service/manager.rs:84
- Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) backend/service/stream-meta-service/internal/middleware/jwt.go:63
- Page without a main landmark backend/service/smtp-service/templates/welcome.html:2
- Accessibility enforcement below the top rung
- SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay (cyclomatic 20) frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:31
- SearchOverlay.SearchOverlay (cognitive 24) frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:31
- chat_service::api::ws::handle_socket (cognitive 16) backend/service/chat-service/src/api/ws.rs:54
- Inconsistent constructor parameter naming and return types for repository initialization. 'url' vs 'database_url' vs 'dns' for connection strings. 'Self' vs 'Result' for return types (some constructors return errors, others do not).
- Duplicate functionality across different services/modules. Both analytics and ingest services have their own Postgres/DB repositories with identical 'get_stream' or 'get_stream_meta' signatures. This suggests shared infrastructure code is missing or duplicated.
- Inconsistent naming for validation methods. One is a free function 'validate_stream_id', the other is a method on a validator struct 'validator_key_format'. Additionally, the intent differs slightly (stream ID vs stream key), but the pattern inconsistency is notable.
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Duplicated block (40–41 lines × 3) backend/service/stream-meta-service/internal/middleware/jwt.go:19
- Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) backend/service/stream-meta-service/cmd/server/main.go:20
- Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) backend/service/stream-meta-service/internal/routers/router.go:14
- Duplicated block (7 lines × 4) backend/service/smtp-service/internal/config/config.go:34
- Duplicated block (22 lines × 3 locations) frontend/src/components/features/browse/BrowseView.tsx:36
- Duplicated block (14 lines × 3 locations) frontend/src/components/layout/Footer.tsx:36
- Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:293
- Duplicated block (8 lines × 2 locations) frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:31
- Complex function SearchOverlay (cyclomatic 14, cognitive 12) frontend/src/components/layout/SearchOverlay.tsx:31
- Complex function Header (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 10) frontend/src/components/layout/Header.tsx:32
- Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 9) frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx:85
- frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx: 430 lines of code frontend/src/components/features/dashboard/DashboardView.tsx:1
- frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx: 404 lines of code frontend/src/components/features/stream/StreamView.tsx:1
- Test Coverage
- No typecheck script
Minor — 81 finding(s)
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/api/routes.py:24
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/api/routes.py:33
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/ml-spam-filter/app/services/classifier.py:19
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:55
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:56
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:60
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/main.rs:63
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/grpc_server.rs:38
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/grpc_server.rs:58
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/api/http/routes.rs:38
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/repository/clickhouse.rs:28
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/analytics-service/src/service/aggregator.rs:80
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/main.rs:64
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:39
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:52
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/rate_limiter.rs:57
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/jwt_auth.rs:45
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/middleware/jwt_auth.rs:56
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/utils/errors.rs:37
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/bff_service/src/utils/errors.rs:56
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/chat-service/src/main.rs:36
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/chat-service/src/api/ws.rs:43
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/chat-service/src/api/ws.rs:90
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/chat-service/src/api/http/routes.rs:35
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging backend/service/chat-service/src/infrastructure/grpc_client.rs:39
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:11
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:12
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:35
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:32
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- README/code drift Readme.md:1
- README/code drift Readme.md:17
- No ADRs found
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- No network policy
- No ADRs
- Large public API surface
- Logging is not universal
- Type-only dependency 'next' in production deps frontend/next.config.ts:1
- Duplicated predicate frontend/src/components/features/search/SearchView.tsx:37
Minor — 7 finding(s)
- Outdated: github.com/gin-contrib/cors
- Outdated: github.com/gin-contrib/cors
- Outdated: github.com/jackc/pgx/v5
- Outdated: github.com/jackc/pgx/v5
- Outdated: github.com/minio/minio-go/v7
- Outdated: github.com/redis/go-redis/v9
- Outdated: github.com/segmentio/kafka-go
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-156fafd244434452985419c0dca35d19/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-156fafd244434452985419c0dca35d19/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 31 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | trivy | — | trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs **/bin/** --skip-dirs **/obj/** . --skip-db-update | 24 | artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy config --format json --quiet . | 227 | artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | trivy | — | trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs **/bin/** --skip-dirs **/obj/** . --skip-db-update | 0 | artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json |