testcafe — Watchdog Audit

Executive summary

This system presents a fragile operational standing with an overall health score of 46%. While the underlying code is maintainable and performs well, the platform is carrying significant risk due to weak operational safeguards. For a business asset of this size, this gap between development quality and production readiness creates a tangible threat to delivery speed and reliability.

The system represents a medium-sized investment, comprising over 140,000 lines of code across backend and frontend. Rebuilding this logic from scratch would require approximately 0.7 person-years, costing roughly €97,000. This substantial value is currently protected by strong engineering practices in code structure and performance, but it is exposed by a lack of automated safety nets in the deployment pipeline.

The primary risk lies in operational readiness, which scores only 34%. This low score indicates that the system lacks the necessary testing, observability, and security checks to be safely operated at scale. Without these safeguards, changes are more likely to introduce defects or outages, increasing the cost of maintenance and reducing team velocity. The architecture and maturity levels are moderate, suggesting that while the code is understandable, the team cannot yet rely on it for rapid, safe iteration.

Conversely, the system’s performance and code health are genuine strengths. The code is clean, well-structured, and efficient, providing a solid foundation for future work. This means that remediation efforts can focus on process and tooling rather than rewriting core logic, offering a high return on investment for any improvements made.

To address the most critical vulnerabilities, the team should prioritize adding static application security testing to the continuous integration pipeline. Implementing automated security scans that fail the build on regression will immediately reduce exposure to security threats and improve confidence in deployments. This single action offers the highest leverage, protecting the existing investment while the team addresses other readiness gaps in subsequent phases.

Code Health 76% Strong Architecture 49% Weak · gated by D26, R11, R9 Maturity 55% Adequate · gated by D34, M2 Readiness 34% Weak · gated by D10, R5, R6, P3 Security 61% Adequate · gated by D29, D30, D36 Performance 85% Strong

How the score is built — each lens's share of the headline Width is the lens's weight in the worst-heaviest fold (the weakest area pulls hardest); colour is that lens's own band. A lens fixes the score in proportion to its width.

Readiness 34% · 46% weightArchitecture 49% · 25% weightMaturity 55% · 14% weightSecurity 61% · 8% weightCode Health 76% · 4% weightPerformance 85% · 2% weight

Raise Readiness 34 → 70 (the Healthy floor) ⇒ headline 46 → ~56.

Code composition — where the lines go

Tests 100%

New since the last scan (13+)

13 finding(s) are new versus the previous scan (2026-09-17) — surfaced by this scheduled scan itself, no pull request required.

D6 · Low cohesion: Fixture (LCOM4 8) src/api/structure/fixture.ts
D6 · Low cohesion: Test (LCOM4 6) src/api/structure/test.ts
D6 · Low cohesion: RunnerMock (LCOM4 5) test/server/live-test.js
D29 · REDACTED
D29 · REDACTED
D29 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
D30 · REDACTED
PF3 · Sync-over-async blocking src/video-recorder/recorder.js

A full-fidelity diff against the previous run's complete recorded findings — line-move tolerant: a finding that only shifted line counts as unchanged, only genuinely new titles/files surface here.

Rebuild cost & value ~ Modeled — €32,000–€160,000

Cost to rebuild	€32,000–€160,000 (0.3–1.0 person-years (535–1,698 h), ~1–2 engineers)
Domain complexity	Standard — harder problems cost more per line
Quality factor	0.7× (at 46% quality) — the last 20% of quality is most of the work
Size & shape	Medium · effort split not classified (source measured from disk; the effort-tier breakdown is a C#-only syntax walk)

This codebase represents roughly ~0.7 person-years of build effort (about ~€97,000 to rebuild). Its weakest lens is Readiness at 34% — the part of that asset most exposed by the findings below.

How we model this: boilerplate at a scaffolding rate + logic × domain Standard (×1.0) — standard service × a 0.7× quality factor, at €60–95/h; indicative, ±~30% · size measured directly from source · effort from total production LoC as straight-line logic (the tier split is a C#-only syntax walk), a conservative lower bound. Indicative only — most sensitive to the hourly rate and the domain tier (both tunable in config).

Top priorities

The highest-leverage moves; the full ranked list is in the Roadmap below.

Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.

+10.9 pts · Medium effort · Security & performance tooling

Bump outdated dependencies to current versions to limit upgrade debt.

+10.9 pts · Medium effort · Dependency Freshness

Add eslint and `tsc --noEmit` as package.json scripts and run them in CI.

+10.9 pts · Medium effort · Tooling

Diagnosis — what's actually going on

Value concentrated against a weak lens · High · Value at risk

This is a Medium asset (~0.7 person-years to rebuild), and its weakest lens is Readiness at 34%. The operational and business risk on an asset this size concentrates there — that's where remediation buys the most protection.

Evidence: valuation: Medium, ~0.7 person-years rebuild (41,852 LoC) · weakest lens: Readiness 34%

→ Direct remediation budget at Readiness first — highest risk-reduction per euro on an asset this size.

Highest-leverage move · Medium · Leverage

Of everything flagged, the best return on effort is: Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing. The rest can wait behind it.

Evidence: priority ranking: top of 5 ranked by impact/effort

→ Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.

Architecture — module dependency matrix

Rows and columns are the same modules, ordered so that a module only depends on ones above it. A cell means the row depends on the column, and its number is how many type pairs create that dependency. Read one thing: is anything above the diagonal? A mark there is a dependency cycle. (A cycle is all this shows — an unusual but cycle-free dependency sits below the diagonal like any other.)

579 modules, 482 dependencies. 4 dependency cycles across 36 modules, marked above the diagonal.

Showing the 40 most-connected modules; 539 more are not drawn.

Module dependency matrix. The row depends on the column; the number is how many type pairs create the dependency. A cell above the diagonal is part of a dependency cycle.
depends on →	1 src.api.request-hooks.hook	2 src.api.structure.test-file	3 src.client.core.utils.values.axis-values	5 src.configuration.types	6 src.native-automation.types	7 src.test-run.commands.base	8 src.test-run.commands.options	9 src.utils.async-event-emitter	10 src.api.structure.testing-unit	11 src.client.automation.visible-element-automation	12 src.configuration.interfaces	13 src.notifications.warning-log	14 src.test-run.commands.assertion	15 src.utils.message-bus	17 src.api.structure.test	19 src.client.core.utils.event-emitter	20 src.configuration.configuration-base	21 src.video-recorder.videos	22 src.configuration.testcafe-configuration	24 src.role.role	25 src.runner.fixture-hook-controller	26 src.browser.connection.gateway	27 src.runner.interfaces	29 src.runner.test-run-controller	30 src.runner.browser-job	31 src.browser.connection	32 src.runner.task	33 src.native-automation.request-pipeline.test-run-bridge	34 src.reporter	35 src.native-automation.request-pipeline	36 src.reporter.plugin-host	37 src.test-run
1 src.api.request-hooks.hook
2 src.api.structure.test-file
3 src.client.core.utils.values.axis-values
4 src.compiler.test-file.formats.dev-tools.commands.execute-expression-base
5 src.configuration.types
6 src.native-automation.types
7 src.test-run.commands.base
8 src.test-run.commands.options
9 src.utils.async-event-emitter
10 src.api.structure.testing-unit		1
11 src.client.automation.visible-element-automation			1				1
12 src.configuration.interfaces				1
13 src.notifications.warning-log																																1
14 src.test-run.commands.assertion						1
15 src.utils.message-bus								1
16 src.api.request-hooks.request-logger	1										1
17 src.api.structure.test		2							1
18 src.client.automation.playback.click							1			2
19 src.client.core.utils.event-emitter											1
20 src.configuration.configuration-base				1							1
21 src.video-recorder.videos											1	1
22 src.configuration.testcafe-configuration											1	1					1					1				1
23 src.live.controller																1
24 src.role.role																1																1
25 src.runner.fixture-hook-controller															1																	1
26 src.browser.connection.gateway											1					1			1							1						1
27 src.runner.interfaces				4		1					4	5		4	2				1		2	1				1						1
28 src.runner.bootstrapper				1								1		1					2			1	2
29 src.runner.test-run-controller				1				1			1	1		1	1						1		2			1
30 src.runner.browser-job				1				1			1	1		1	1						1		1	1		1
31 src.browser.connection					1							1		1		1						1	1		1
32 src.runner.task				1				1			1	1		1				1			1		1		1
33 src.native-automation.request-pipeline.test-run-bridge					1																					1						1
34 src.reporter						1					2			2	2												1				1	4
35 src.native-automation.request-pipeline					7																							1
36 src.reporter.plugin-host																													2
37 src.test-run	1			2		3		1			2	2	1	2	2					1			1			2				1	1
38 src.api.test-controller																																1
39 src.utils											2															1						1
40 test.server.helpers.base-test-run-mock																																1

Dependency, pointing down the layeringAbove the diagonal — part of a cycleThe module itself

At a glance — Code Health · 76% · Strong ·

The Good

D1 · JavaScript Cyclomatic Complexity 7.4 D3 · JavaScript God Classes 8.2 D17 · JavaScript Explicit Debt 9.8 R10 · React / TS Code Duplication 9.5 R2 · React / TS Cyclomatic Complexity 9.4 R3 · React / TS Large Files 9.2 R7 · React / TS Dead Code 9.7 X25 · Repo Inert configuration knob 10.0 X29 · Repo Per-element action decided by a fixed element 10.0

The Bad

D2 · JavaScript Cognitive Complexity 6.9

The Ugly

R1 · React / TS Type Safety 4.6

At a glance — Architecture · 49% · Weak · gated by D26, R11, R9 ·

The Good

D6 · JavaScript Cohesion (LCOM4) 9.8 D35 · JavaScript Change Coupling 9.9 AX10 · Repo Code composition 9.2 AX3 · Repo Project dependency cycles 10.0 AX4 · Repo Dependency direction 10.0 AX8 · Repo Test isolation 10.0

The Ugly

D26 · JavaScript Project Cohesion 0.0 R11 · React / TS Import Boundaries 3.9 R9 · React / TS Circular Imports 0.0

At a glance — Maturity · 55% · Adequate · gated by D34, M2 ·

The Good

D15 · JavaScript Churn × Complexity Hotspots 10.0 D16 · JavaScript Bus Factor 10.0 D19 · JavaScript Documentation Quality 10.0 D21 · JavaScript Naming Consistency 10.0 M1 · Repo Documentation (README) 7.5 M3 · Repo Folder & project structure 10.0 M4 · Repo Documentation accuracy 10.0

The Ugly

D20 · JavaScript ADR Quality 0.0 D34 · JavaScript Knowledge Freshness 0.3 M2 · Repo Architecture documentation 0.0

At a glance — Readiness · 34% · Weak · gated by D10, R5, R6, P3 ·

The Good

D9 · JavaScript Test Distribution 10.0 D12 · JavaScript Dependency Hygiene 8.0 D13 · JavaScript Secret Scanning 10.0 D14 · JavaScript License Compliance 10.0 P1 · Repo CI/CD gates 10.0 P10 · Repo Library API & versioning 10.0 P2 · Repo Observability 7.0 P4 · Repo Deployment & Rollback 7.0 P6 · Repo Release Hygiene 10.0

The Bad

R4 · React / TS Test Coverage 5.7

The Ugly

D10 · JavaScript Test Quality 2.6 P3 · Repo Security & performance tooling 0.0 R5 · React / TS Dependency Freshness 2.0 R6 · React / TS Tooling 3.4 R8 · React / TS Dependency Hygiene 4.0

At a glance — Security · 61% · Adequate · gated by D29, D30, D36 ·

The Good

D28 · JavaScript Secrets (history) 10.0 D31 · JavaScript IaC & Container Security 9.9 D43 · JavaScript Malicious Dependencies 10.0 D44 · JavaScript Platform End-of-Life 10.0 X24 · Repo Document value interpolated into markup unescaped 10.0

The Ugly

D29 · JavaScript Static Analysis (SAST) 0.0 D30 · JavaScript Dependency Vulnerabilities 2.5 D36 · JavaScript Supply-chain Provenance & Signing 0.0

At a glance — Performance · 85% · Strong ·

The Good

PF3 · Repo Async & latency hygiene 8.5

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).

OWASP category	Findings	Severity
A03:2021 — Injection	119	High / Critical
A06:2021 — Vulnerable & Outdated Components	15	High / Critical
A05:2021 — Security Misconfiguration	2	Medium

Roadmap

First, integrate a SAST step into the CI pipeline to automatically fail builds on security regressions. Next, update outdated dependencies to reduce upgrade debt and remove unused packages while ensuring all imports are explicitly declared. Then, add eslint and type-checking scripts to package.json and run them in CI to enforce code quality. Finally, increase test coverage by adding tests for currently unreached production modules.

Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.

Do this	Helps	Effort	Dimension
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.	+10.9 pts	Medium	Security & performance tooling
Bump outdated dependencies to current versions to limit upgrade debt.	+10.9 pts	Medium	Dependency Freshness
Add eslint and `tsc --noEmit` as package.json scripts and run them in CI.	+10.9 pts	Medium	Tooling
Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.	+10.8 pts	Medium	Dependency Hygiene
Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).	+10.2 pts	Medium	Test Coverage
Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (@opentelemetry/sdk-node) and a health-check endpoint (@godaddy/terminus or a /health route) for operability.	+9.3 pts	Medium	Observability
Improve Dependency Hygiene — currently 8.0/10.	+8.1 pts	Medium	Dependency Hygiene
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion.	+3.8 pts	Low	Project Cohesion

File quality

Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 614 files carrying findings, judged against the Production bar: 1% slop · 39% mixed · 60% near-clean.

File	Score	Band	Worst signal
REDACTED	0.0	Slop	Dependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED	0.8	Slop	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	1.3	Slop	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	2.3	Slop	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	3.7	Slop	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	4.0	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED	4.4	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	4.4	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	4.4	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	4.8	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-test.js	5.0	Mixed	Test Quality: No assertions (empty test): concurrent test ${i}
test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2568/testcafe-fixtures/index.js	5.0	Mixed	Test Quality: No assertions (empty test): custom methods
test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/skip-only/testcafe-fixtures/only-test.js	5.0	Mixed	Test Quality: No assertions (empty test): Fixture5Test5
test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/skip-only/testcafe-fixtures/skip-test.js	5.0	Mixed	Test Quality: No assertions (empty test): Fixture5Test5
src/client/driver/driver.js	5.1	Mixed	Change Coupling: Boundary-crossing change coupling: driver.js ↔ input.ts
REDACTED	5.1	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	5.1	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	5.8	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	5.8	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED	5.8	Mixed	Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED

How the grades work

Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.

Critical — 231

A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.

Serious — 1774

Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.

Minor — 112

Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.

Could not be resolved — 33

Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.

Methodology & how to trust this report

Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 51 of 54 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.

Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.

What we checked — 54 dimensions across the health lenses

D1D2D3D6D9D10D12D13D14D15D16D17D19D20D21D26D28D29D30D31D34D35D36D43D44AX10AX3AX4AX8M1M2M3M4P1P10P2P3P4P6PF3R1R10R11R2R3R4R5R6R7R8R9X24X25X29

Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.

How to trust any code-health report — three questions

Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 2046 of 2117 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.

This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.

Tools & methods

The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.

Method	Backs	Version	Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis	Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering	5.3.0	✓ deterministic
Native secret scanner	Hardcoded secrets / credentials	1.0.0	✓ deterministic
Watchdog duplication detector (in-process)	Code duplication	1.0.0	✓ deterministic
Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage)	Line & branch coverage	10.0.400	✓ deterministic
NuGet / dotnet	Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies	10.0.400	✓ deterministic
git / LibGit2Sharp	Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history	2.43.0 · 0.31.0	✓ deterministic
gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkov	Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR	1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533	✓ deterministic
LLM (sampled · advisory)	Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement	Local LLM	◐ LLM · sampled · advisory

Every finding is locatable in findings.md. Run 01a0fa8b-7ed7-7594-ab3d-229d659dba6f.

The exact command behind every deep-scan dimension — tool, version, invocation and retained raw output — is in Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail.

Run transparency — what happened this run

What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.

D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the JavaScript/TypeScript suite(s) run through a browser-driven runner the coverage collector does not drive — examples/basic/ (testcafe), examples/running-tests-in-chrome-using-bitbucket-pipelines-ci/ (testcafe), examples/running-tests-in-firefox-and-chrome-using-travis-ci/ (testcafe) — a gap in the analyzer, not something this repository is missing. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo. In the meantime, commit (or publish into the working tree) the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and the real number is read on the next scan. You can widen what we reach: optional: commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces, and the real number is read on the next scan.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.ts, .js, .mjs, .tsx, .jsx) and the reliability runner does support this ecosystem — it drives jest, vitest, mocha and egg-bin — but every JavaScript/TypeScript test package this repository declares runs its suite in a real browser, which the re-runner has no way to launch. `examples/basic` declares `testcafe` and its `scripts.test` is `testcafe all test.js`; `examples/running-tests-in-chrome-using-bitbucket-pipelines-ci` declares `testcafe` and its `scripts.test` is `testcafe 'chromium:headless --disable-setuid-sandbox --window-size=1920x1080' tests/index-test.js --app "node server.js"`; `examples/running-tests-in-firefox-and-chrome-using-travis-ci` declares `testcafe` and its `scripts.test` is `testcafe chrome,firefox tests/index-test.js --app "node server.js"`; `examples/running-tests-using-travis-and-saucelabs` declares `testcafe` and its `scripts.test` is `testcafe "saucelabs:Chrome@beta:Windows 10" tests/index-test.js --app "node server.js"`; `examples/using-assertions` declares `testcafe` and its `scripts.test` is `testcafe all test.js`. So flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's browser-driven test support, not a missing .ts/.js/.mjs/.tsx/.jsx runner and not a finding about this repository.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is a COLLECTOR gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (package.json), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here, so this ecosystem's public API has no collector, and the remedy is to write one — no change to the scan image can close it.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `@types/indent-string/index.d.ts`, `@types/promisify-event/index.d.ts`, `@types/time-limit-promise/index.d.ts`, `@types/unquote/index.d.ts`, `src/configuration/types.ts` produced a parse error, so every rule in this engine's `gdpr.yml` was absent there. That absence is NOT a clean result: these rules detect personal data crossing a boundary into a log sink, a URL or browser storage, and a file that was never parsed cannot report any of the three. The rest of the tree analysed normally and its rows above stand; only these files are unaccounted for. You can widen what we reach: fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover it.
AX6 Interface segregation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the public interfaces this run's compilations declare, and none was loaded, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
ED5 Idempotency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check finds retry-prone mutations by walking the repository's declared types, and NONE was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to look at. That is a limit of the analyzer's reach — it reads .NET projects — not a finding that this repository has no command handlers or message consumers.
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
R10 Code Duplication — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 4 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 44.
R11 Import Boundaries — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 54 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 94.
R4 Test Coverage — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 175 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 215.
S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X14 Bypassable address classification — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X20 Mistyped argument guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X22 Contradicted release guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Java and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded and no Java or Rust was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X28 Index access outside its own emptiness guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Scala source only, and no C# was loaded and no Scala was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X3 Exception handling — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Scala source only, and no C# was loaded and no Scala was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X5 Nullable reference types — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.

Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.

Limitations & what we did not check

Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.

Per-dimension blind spots

For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.

D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.

The LLM boundary

LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.

Dimensions

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity7.4 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.

Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 7.4 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

23 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was addHierarchicalSelectors at 31. A further 2 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being add-api.addHierarchicalSelectors at 31 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score. 2 files carry no cyclomatic complexity row at all for this reason — every one of their over-threshold methods was excluded, so the exclusion is disclosed nowhere in the file itself: REDACTED (add-api.addHierarchicalSelectors at 31), src/assertions/get-fn.ts (get-fn.getFn at 17). They are named here because the per-file figures other dimensions report are taken BEFORE this exclusion, so such a file can show a high maximum complexity elsewhere in this report and nothing here, with nothing to reconcile the two.

addHierarchicalSelectors (cyclomatic 31)REDACTED:551

Driver._executeCommand (cyclomatic 28)src/client/driver/driver.js:1701

text-selection.correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic 26)src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64

utils.focusAndSetSelection (cyclomatic 23)src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:56

position.getEventPageCoordinates (cyclomatic 21)src/client/core/utils/position.ts:154

+ 10 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

Resolve the 1 addHierarchicalSelectors (cyclomatic 31) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Driver._executeCommand (cyclomatic 28) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with driver.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 text-selection.correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic… finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with text-selection.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D2 · Cognitive Complexity6.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.

Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

36 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete at 41.

correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cognitive 41)src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64

addHierarchicalSelectors (cognitive 36)REDACTED:551

Driver._executeCommand (cognitive 28)src/client/driver/driver.js:1701

utils.focusAndSetSelection (cognitive 23)src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:56

content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition (cognitive 23)src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:425

+ 20 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

Resolve the 1 correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cognitive 41) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with text-selection.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 addHierarchicalSelectors (cognitive 36) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Driver._executeCommand (cognitive 28) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with driver.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D3 · God Classes8.2 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").

Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 8.2 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

11 god class(es) detected.

TooManyMethods: Driver · ×6src/client/driver/driver.js:169

ClassTooLong: Driver · ×2src/client/driver/driver.js:169

FileTooLong: driver/driver.js · ×2src/client/driver/driver.js

FunctionTooLong: add-api.addHierarchicalSelectorsREDACTED:551

What to do

Resolve the 6 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with REDACTED (3), driver.js, index.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with driver.js, index.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with driver.js, index.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)9.8 / 10Stronggated by 3 serious findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.

Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.8 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

3 of 152 classes have LCOM4 above 3.

Low cohesion: Fixture (LCOM4 8) · ×3src/api/structure/fixture.ts:22

What to do

Resolve the 3 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with fixture.ts, test.ts, live-test.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.

Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

3532 test methods: 3532 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e. The JavaScript/TypeScript suite contributes 3532 `it`/`test` case(s) across 860 test file(s) declaring at least one; its tier split is read from package names and paths only.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D10 · Test Quality2.6 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.

Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.6 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

32 skipped (32 with a documented reason), 1631 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 3531 tests.

No assertions (empty test): test · ×112test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/compiler-options/testcafe-fixtures/typescript/index.ts:3

No assertions: Stringify element · ×1519test/client/fixtures/automation/utils-test.js:29

Skipped (documented): Test4 · ×32test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/hooks/testcafe-fixtures/fixture-hooks.js:61

What to do

Resolve the 1519 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with test.js (735), api-test.js (80), index.js (65). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1519 warning-level).
Resolve the 112 No assertions (empty test) finding(s) in Test Quality — start with testfile.js (47), index.js (7), execution-timeout-test.js (5). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (112 issue-level).
Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D12 · Dependency Hygiene8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.

Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 8.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

53 outdated direct production npm dependency(ies) of 98 graded, 0 pinning defect(s), across 6 package.json (1 of them the product) and 6 committed lockfile(s). Development dependencies are deliberately not graded: this dimension grades what SHIPS. Whether any of these packages is DEPRECATED or UNMAINTAINED is not graded — registry.npmjs.org's latest-version answer carries neither, and release age does not stand in for a maintenance status. Whether any is UNUSED is not graded either: that is a source question, and the frontend dependency lens (R8) answers it in this same run. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question, read from the manifest there.

Outdated (npm): @babel/core · ×53

What to do

Improve Dependency Hygiene — currently 8.0/10. — 53 outdated direct production npm dependency(ies) of 98 graded, 0 pinning defect(s), across 6 package.json (1 of them the product) and 6 committed lockfile(s). Development dependencies are deliberately not graded: this dimension grades what SHIPS. Whether any of these packages is DEPRECATED or UNMAINTAINED is not graded — registry.npmjs.org's latest-version answer carries neither, and release age does not stand in for a maintenance status. Whether any is UNUSED is not graded either: that is a source question, and the frontend dependency lens (R8) answers it in this same run. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question, read from the manifest there.

Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D13 · Secret Scanning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.

Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d13_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D14 · License Compliance10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.

Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 98 shipped npm package(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from registry.npmjs.org over the 98 production dependency(ies) this repository's committed lockfile resolves, across 1 product package.json manifest(s). Its 75 `devDependencies` declaration(s) are excluded: a consumer installs none of them. ★ DEPTH: this is the DIRECT production set the lockfile resolves, NOT the transitive closure — only one of the four lock dialects this pass reads states a full graph, so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is outside this verdict, exactly as the JVM arm's declaration-site verdict is. ★ Each licence is the one the registry publishes for the package's CURRENT release rather than for the pinned version, which is the same caveat the Hex and RubyGems arms carry. 1 of them publish no licence this pass can read on registry.npmjs.org — an absent field, `UNLICENSED`, or a `SEE LICENSE IN <file>` pointer into a tarball this pass does not download; that is missing data, not a violation, and none of them is charged. This repository publishes itself under MIT, which is its own choice and is not judged here.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d14_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.

Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D16 · Bus Factor10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").

Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

1 source file(s) have their living knowledge concentrated in one author (≥90% of recent, decayed contribution). The largest is src/api/test-page-url.ts. Counted over 187 of the 616 production source files in this repository: 417 are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over, and the remaining 12 have no attributable history left to measure.

Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D17 · Explicit Debt9.8 / 10Stronggated by 16 serious findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.

Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.8 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

16 deducted task-comment markers across 17337 LoC (0.1/KLoC) → score 9.8. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.

TodoComment · ×12src/api/structure/test-file.ts:24

HackComment · ×4src/browser/provider/index.ts:67

What to do

Resolve the 12 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with REDACTED (10), test-file.ts, re-executable-promise.ts. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (12 warning-level).
Resolve the 4 HackComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with marker-symbol.ts (2), REDACTED, function-transform.ts. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D19 · Documentation QualityExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

The repository's root README is a clear, well-structured overview of TestCafe as an open-source Node.js framework with links to the homepage, documentation, FAQ, support, and a bulleted list of features (free, 1-2-3 ease-of-use). It also includes a clipped architecture/design docs outline. The examples/READMEs are focused on specific test-cases directories rather than the repository's root.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).

Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No architecture decision records were found.

No ADRs found

What to do

Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d20_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D21 · Naming ConsistencyExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D26 · Project Cohesion0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether each project is a focused, coherent unit rather than an oversized grab-bag.

Method: Project size overshoot penalties (LoC / public-type count / namespace count, 2-of-3 flag) weighted by log magnitude. Exhaustive across projects, deterministic, LLM-independent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

1 of 1 build units (npm) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.

Projects may be oversized for their cohesion

What to do

Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D28 · Secrets (history)10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.

Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.

Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.

Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

119 finding(s): 0 critical, 98 high, 21 medium, 0 low. 66 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 5 file(s) — `@types/indent-string/index.d.ts` (line 2), `@types/promisify-event/index.d.ts` (line 4), `@types/time-limit-promise/index.d.ts` (line 2), `@types/unquote/index.d.ts` (line 2), `src/configuration/types.ts` (line 34, line 35) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 2 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing.

REDACTED

+ 10 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

Resolve the 10 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (3), REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 issue-level).
Resolve the 7 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 66 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (66 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).

Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities2.5 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.

Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.5 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

15 finding(s): 0 critical, 11 high, 3 medium, 1 low.

REDACTED

What to do

Resolve the 10 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (10). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 High vulnerability finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D31 · IaC & Container Security9.9 / 10Stronggated by 1 serious finding✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether Dockerfiles / Terraform / Kubernetes config follow security best practices.

Method: IaC/container misconfiguration scan via trivy config (REDACTED/Terraform/K8s/Helm/CloudFormation); severity rules to 0-10 moderate normalizer. NotApplicable without manifests. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

2 finding(s): 0 critical, 0 high, 1 medium, 1 low.

REDACTED

What to do

Resolve the 1 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D34 · Knowledge Freshness0.3 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.

Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.3 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

192 of 199 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/client/driver/driver.js. Counted over 199 of the 616 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.

Most significant orphaned file · ×3src/client/driver/driver.js

Concentrated knowledge decay

What to do

Resolve the 3 Most significant orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with driver.js, REDACTED, index.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Concentrated knowledge decay finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D35 · Change Coupling9.9 / 10Adequategated by 3 critical findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.

Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.

Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Strongest change-coupling: REDACTED↔option-names.ts 80%; base.js↔REDACTED 80%; index.js↔plugin-host.js 61%

Boundary-crossing change coupling: REDACTED ↔ option-names.ts · ×3src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts

Change coupling: base.js ↔ REDACTED · ×2src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/base.js

What to do

Resolve the 3 Boundary-crossing change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with REDACTED, capturer.js, driver.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 2 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with base.js, index.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.

Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0/4 supply-chain integrity signals present (provenance, signing, SBOM, pinned actions).

REDACTED

+ 3 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D43 · Malicious Dependencies10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.

Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d43_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

D44 · Platform End-of-Life10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.

Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 0 platform declaration(s) and 96 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.

Do you agree with this assessment?

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.

AX10 · Code composition9.2 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.

Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.

Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.

What to do

The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.

Do you agree with this assessment?

AX3 · Project dependency cycles10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).

Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

AX4 · Dependency direction10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.

Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

AX8 · Test isolation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether production projects stay free of references to test projects — tests may depend on production, never the reverse.

Method: Csproj graph: each production project checked for references to test projects (identified by test-framework presence, not name). Zero violations is clean. Deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

M1 · Documentation (README)7.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.

Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.

38 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched — it may no longer reflect the system.

What to do

Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 1 of 6 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 0.3 pts.
Review the README against recent changes; refresh the parts that drifted.

Do you agree with this assessment?

M2 · Architecture documentation0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.

Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.

No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.

What to do

Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form).
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.

Do you agree with this assessment?

M3 · Folder & project structure10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.

Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

M4 · Documentation accuracy10.0 / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P1 · CI/CD gates10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.

Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P10 · Library API & versioning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.

Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P2 · Observability7.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: structured-logging frameworks (Serilog, NLog), OpenTelemetry, and health-check endpoint patterns. Exhaustive, deterministic.

What to do

Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (@opentelemetry/sdk-node) and a health-check endpoint (@godaddy/terminus or a /health route) for operability.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P3 · Security & performance tooling0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).

Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.

No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 37256 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.

What to do

Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P4 · Deployment & Rollback7.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.

Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

P6 · Release Hygiene10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.

Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Do you agree with this assessment?

PF3 · Async & latency hygiene8.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.

Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.

`_saveFiles` is async and calls copyFileSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — src/video-recorder/recorder.js:194

What to do

TypeScript/JavaScript: use the promise APIs (fs/promises, a promisified child_process.execFile, the async zlib/crypto functions) and await them instead of the *Sync variants.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R1 · Type Safety4.6 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Code Health — How much of the frontend is typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript.

Method: Frontend file inventory: the share of typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript across the source tree. Deterministic, exhaustive over frontend files.

321 typed · 378 plain JS — the untyped files are gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js, gulp/constants/functional-test-globs.js, gulp/docker/ensure-docker-environment.js, REDACTED, gulp/docker/get-publish-info.js, gulp/docker/get-publish-tags.js (+372 more). 0 production file(s) opt out entirely with @ts-nocheck · 125 @ts-ignore suppression(s).

What to do

Migrate the remaining .js/.jsx files to TypeScript.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R10 · Code Duplication9.5 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Code Health — Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm over JS/TS tokens, D-386): a block is reported only where its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or were renamed as they were pasted but kept most of their constants, and where the copies carry enough code to stand on their own or the copied extent reaches 30 lines — so a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are both found and deliberately not reported, and a clean R10 is not a claim that nothing was copied.

Method: Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm run over JS/TS tokens). Masking finds the candidates; a block is reported when its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or when a renamed copy still agrees on most of its constants, AND the copies carry enough code to stand on their own — or when the copied extent reaches 30 lines. So a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are deliberately not counted. Deterministic.

6 duplicated blocks under src/client/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories automation, core, driver, ui — 0 of them are reported below, and 6 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 6 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 6 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 6 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — src/client/automation/playback/click/browser-click-strategy.ts:7
5 duplicated blocks under src/client/ui/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories cursor, progress-panel, status-bar — 1 of them are reported below, and 4 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 5 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 5 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 5 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — src/client/ui/progress-panel/index.js:10
src/client/driver/barriers/request.ts:43 · src/client/driver/barriers/script-execution.ts:29 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 258 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/driver/barriers/request.ts:43
src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:131 · src/client/automation/playback/rclick.js:66 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 116 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:131
src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:244 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:286 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:244
src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:45 · src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:112 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 93 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:45
src/reporter/index.ts:632 · src/reporter/index.ts:651 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/reporter/index.ts:632
src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:340 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:377 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:340
REDACTED:361 · REDACTED:379 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — REDACTED:361
src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:12 · src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:7 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 82 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:12
REDACTED:587 · REDACTED:614 · REDACTED:646 · REDACTED:683 · +1 more site(s) not listed — all 5 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — REDACTED:587
src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:161 · src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:176 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:161
src/api/structure/fixture.ts:103 · src/api/structure/fixture.ts:117 · src/api/structure/test.ts:100 · src/api/structure/test.ts:114 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. — src/api/structure/fixture.ts:103
src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:111 · src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:127 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:111
src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:139 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:176 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:139
REDACTED:663 · REDACTED:741 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — REDACTED:663
src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:178 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:200 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:178
src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:367 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:407 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:367
src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:171 · src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:203 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:171
REDACTED:319 · REDACTED:345 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — REDACTED:319
src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:257 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:273 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:316 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. — src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:257
src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:96 · src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:66 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 77 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:96
src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/drag-and-drop-first-move.js:3 · src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/move-event-sequence.js:4 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 66 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/drag-and-drop-first-move.js:3
src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:211 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:232 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:258 — all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:211
src/browser/provider/built-in/locally-installed.js:1 · src/browser/provider/built-in/path.js:2 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 52 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/browser/provider/built-in/locally-installed.js:1
REDACTED:642 · REDACTED:679 · REDACTED:720 · REDACTED:760 — all 4 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — REDACTED:642
src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:9 · src/client/automation/playback/rclick.js:10 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:9
src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:227 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:266 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:227
src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:95 · src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:105 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:95
src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:83 · src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:92 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:83
src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:72 · src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:113 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:72
src/client/driver/driver.js:394 · src/client/driver/driver.js:817 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/driver/driver.js:394
src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:76 · src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:107 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:76
src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:79 · src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:93 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 52 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:79
src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:289 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:298 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:307 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. — src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:289
REDACTED:481 · REDACTED:552 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — REDACTED:481
src/client/core/utils/position.ts:329 · src/client/core/utils/position.ts:377 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/client/core/utils/position.ts:329
src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:4 · src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:22 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:4
src/utils/replicator/index.js:538 · src/utils/replicator/index.js:555 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/utils/replicator/index.js:538
src/assertions/get-fn.ts:29 · src/assertions/get-fn.ts:38 · src/assertions/get-fn.ts:47 — all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/assertions/get-fn.ts:29

What to do

Act on each finding's own remediation rather than one rule: the move depends on what recurs. Where the copies are executable blocks, give the shared part one home and call it from each site; where they are declarations, a listing, a specialisation already delegating to its base, or one shape repeated per entity, there is no call site and the move is a shared type, a generated set or a factory — sometimes there is nothing to extract.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R11 · Import Boundaries3.9 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Architecture — Conformance to the detected frontend architecture layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules (D-386).

Method: Conformance to the detected frontend layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules, over the module graph. Deterministic.

REDACTED:17 imports test/functional/config.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — REDACTED:17
REDACTED:19 imports test/dependency-licenses-checker.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — REDACTED:19
gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js:23 imports test/client/config-qunit-server-app.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js:23
src/api/exportable-lib/index.js:64 imports src/api/test-controller/proxy.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/api/exportable-lib/index.js:64
src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts:11 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts:11
src/api/skip-js-errors/index.ts:5 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/api/skip-js-errors/index.ts:5
REDACTED:3 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — REDACTED:3
src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:2 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:2
src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:5 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:5
src/assertions/executor.ts:4 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/assertions/executor.ts:4
src/assertions/executor.ts:7 imports src/test-run/commands/assertion.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/assertions/executor.ts:7
src/assertions/get-fn.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/assertion.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/assertions/get-fn.ts:3
src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:18 imports src/test-run/commands/validations/initializers.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:18
src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:19 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:19
src/browser/connection/index.ts:32 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/browser/connection/index.ts:32
src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:5 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:5
src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:12 imports src/test-run/marker-symbol.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:12
src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:13 imports src/errors/test-run/templates.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:13
src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:9 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:9
src/client/automation/index.js:17 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/index.js:17
src/client/automation/move.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/move.ts:3
src/client/automation/playback/click/index.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/click/index.ts:3
src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:5 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:5
src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:3
src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:11 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:11
src/client/automation/playback/move/move.js:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/move/move.js:3
src/client/automation/playback/scroll-into-view.ts:2 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/scroll-into-view.ts:2
src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:7 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:7
src/client/automation/playback/set-scroll.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/set-scroll.ts:3
src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:3
src/client/automation/visible-element-automation.ts:16 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/automation/visible-element-automation.ts:16
src/client/core/barriers/page-unload-barrier.ts:4 imports src/test-run/client-messages.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/core/barriers/page-unload-barrier.ts:4
src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:8 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:8
src/client/driver/client-browser-console-messages.js:1 imports src/test-run/browser-console-messages.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/client-browser-console-messages.js:1
src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:39 imports src/test-run/commands/type.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:39
src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:40 imports src/test-run/commands/base.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:40
src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/elements-retriever.ts:1 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/elements-retriever.ts:1
src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:5 imports src/test-run/commands/base.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:5
src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/index.js:26 imports src/test-run/client-messages.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/index.js:26
src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/index.js:27 imports src/test-run/commands/type.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on. — src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/index.js:27

What to do

Fix the listed violations: move the shared test helper into a source directory production code may depend on (94 rows).

Do you agree with this assessment?

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity9.4 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Code Health — Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from the token-level function scanner (D-386) — real branching, not a regex heuristic.

Method: Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from a token-level function scanner (real branching, not a regex heuristic), computed over every frontend function. Deterministic.

_internalExecuteCommand has cyclomatic complexity 28 and cognitive complexity 30; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/test-run/index.ts:1134
_executeCommand has cyclomatic complexity 28 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/driver/driver.js:1701
correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete has cyclomatic complexity 26 and cognitive complexity 41; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64
getHiddenReason has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/position.ts:308
getEventPageCoordinates has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/position.ts:154
runTests has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — test/functional/setup.js:252
isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:91
analyzeMemberExp has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 32; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/compiler/test-file/formats/es-next/get-test-list.js:87
checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:431
press has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/automation/playback/press/key-press-simulator.js:78
(anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:57
checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:482
checkScreenshotsCreated has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 16; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — test/functional/assertion-helper.js:239
selectContentEditable has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:18
_typeChar has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:289
ensureCropOptions has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/ensure-crop-options.js:38
constructor has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:18

What to do

Break down the listed branch-heavy functions; aim P95 cyclomatic ≤ 5.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R3 · Large Files9.2 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Code Health — How many source files exceed the large-file threshold.

Method: Components/modules exceeding the large-file threshold, counted exhaustively across the frontend source tree. Deterministic.

What to do

Split each oversized file along the responsibilities already in it, into smaller focused modules in the same package.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R4 · Test Coverage5.7 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Readiness — Static test reachability (D-386): the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything.

Method: Static test reachability: the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything. Deterministic.

test/functional/setup.js:9 imports './site', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — test/functional/setup.js
test/server/data/test-suites/live/test-external-unexisting-module.js:1 imports './non-existing-module', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — test/server/data/test-suites/live/test-external-unexisting-module.js
test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-dep/dep.js:1 imports './yo', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-dep/dep.js
test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-testfile/testfile.js:1 imports './yo', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-testfile/testfile.js
No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one. (×36) — src/client/driver/driver.js, src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js, src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js, …

What to do

Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).

Do you agree with this assessment?

R5 · Dependency Freshness2.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Readiness — How outdated the npm dependencies are (a maturity signal). JS/npm CVEs are scored separately in D30 (JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities).

Method: npm dependency staleness from manifest/registry metadata (a maturity signal; JS/npm CVEs are scored separately in D30, which answers dependency vulnerabilities for every ecosystem). Deterministic.

96 outdated package(s); JS/npm CVEs scored in D30

What to do

Bump outdated dependencies to current versions to limit upgrade debt.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R6 · Tooling3.4 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Readiness — Whether the project wires up test, lint and typecheck — detected from each package.json script's COMMAND (eslint / tsc / vitest / jest / playwright), not just its name, and corroborated against CI-workflow invocations so a tool run only in CI still counts.

Method: package.json scanned for test/lint/typecheck script wiring. Deterministic presence check.

This repository declares test tooling, and the ✓ above records that declaration — but test/functional/setup.js and 3 other test file(s) in this workspace cannot be loaded at all: it imports a module that names no file in this repository, so the runner throws while collecting it and none of its cases execute. The wiring is present and the suite it points at does not run as written, which is why the tooling tick must not be read as a statement that the tests pass. Fix the unloadable file(s) — each one is reported with its failing import under Test Coverage — then the declared script exercises what it claims to. — test/functional/setup.js

What to do

Add eslint and `tsc --noEmit` as package.json scripts and run them in CI.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R7 · Dead Code9.7 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Code Health — Files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point, and exports nothing imports (module-graph reachability, D-386).

Method: Dead code: files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point plus exports nothing imports, via module-graph reachability. Deterministic, exhaustive over the import graph.

1 file(s) (~34 LoC) were excluded from dead-code analysis — declare main/module/exports or a conventional entry (src/index.*, an index.html script) so reachability can see this package. — test/functional/esm-utils
Unreachable from the 164 application, 55 tooling and 1287 test entry point(s) detected in this repo. Gate removals on `npm run build` — an undetected custom entry would make these reachable.
no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make (×11) — REDACTED, src/utils/check-is-vm.ts, src/compiler/esm-loader.ts, …
no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (src/utils/diff/index.ts) — every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it — src/utils/diff/util.ts
Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal. (×4) — src/client/driver/utils/ensure-elements.js:67, src/compiler/babel/preset-stage-2.ts:1, src/native-automation/request-pipeline/safe-api.ts:73, …

What to do

Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R8 · Dependency Hygiene4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Readiness — npm dependency truthfulness (D-386): unused dependencies, imports not declared anywhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps.

Method: npm dependency truthfulness: unused dependencies, imports declared nowhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps — from the manifest + import graph. Deterministic.

Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident. (×3) — eslint.config.js:5, eslint.config.js:4, test/server/browser-connection-test.js:2

What to do

Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.

Do you agree with this assessment?

R9 · Circular Imports0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

React / JS · Architecture — Import cycles in the module graph (D-386) — files that can only be understood and changed together.

Method: Import cycles in the module graph, detected exhaustively over JS/TS imports (the same cycle detection as the .NET coupling dimension). Deterministic.

src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts → src/notifications/warning-log.ts → src/test-run/index.ts → src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 85 files) — src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts
src/errors/error-list.js → src/errors/process-test-fn-error.js → src/errors/error-list.js — src/errors/error-list.js
src/live/controller.ts → src/live/keyboard-observer.ts → src/live/controller.ts (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 3 files) — src/live/controller.ts

What to do

Break each cycle by extracting the shared piece into a module both sides can import.

Do you agree with this assessment?

X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.

Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

Do you agree with this assessment?

X25 · Inert configuration knob10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.

Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

Do you agree with this assessment?

X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

Do you agree with this assessment?

Reference — by lens

The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.

Lens	Score	Rating	Impact
Code Health	76%	Strong	Solid.
Architecture	49%	Weak — gated by D26, R11, R9	Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Maturity	55%	Adequate — gated by D34, M2	Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Readiness	34%	Weak — gated by D10, R5, R6, P3	Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Security	61%	Adequate — gated by D29, D30, D36	Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Performance	85%	Strong	Strongest area.

Unscored — 2 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score

These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.

X10 Duplicated predicate — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 7 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.

Not evidenced — 4 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for

These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.

C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control

Not included — 72 check(s) not relevant to this codebase

These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.

AC1 Text alternatives — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC2 Forms & labels — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC3 Page structure — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC5 ARIA correctness — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC7 A11y enforcement — Frontend below the scale floor (21 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's JavaScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's; this repository's TypeScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
AX2 Stateful singletons — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit: https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entity, a Mongoose schema, a Sequelize or Drizzle table, a Knex migration or a Prisma model — and no database or data-store client in the source either, so this repository keeps no data at rest for these controls to protect. If it does persist personal data (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the controls belong to wherever that data is stored.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no browser-driven test runner (testcafe)
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — symbol resolution incomplete — navigability not assessed
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — 5 file(s) were not parsed by semgrep — the PII/GDPR ruleset never ran over them
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D4 Code Duplication — This repository's production source (.js, .ts) is not read by D4's token comparison, which compares .NET source: duplication in it is measured by R10 Code Duplication, the frontend lens's card running the same clone algorithm over the JS/TS token stream. Not scored here — read the R10 card for this repository's duplication.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D5 Coupling — Not applicable — this npm build ships 1 production module(s), so there is no coupling BETWEEN modules to measure. (Its test and non-production modules are not part of the shipped graph.)
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured — JavaScript/TypeScript suite
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — This check finds retry-prone mutations (command handlers and message/event consumers) by walking the repository's declared types, and none was loaded here, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C# syntax, and none was loaded for this repository. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JavaScript/TypeScript source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for tinybench, mitata, benchmark.js, benny or vitest `bench(...)` calls in files that import them (or `*.bench.*` files), or one of those in a package.json, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript runs on a garbage-collected runtime that gives a program no allocation-control idiom to choose on a hot path — no pools, stack allocation or value types — so allocation awareness is not something this code can be rated on.
S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X12 Unreachable branch — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X13 Undrained process stream — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X14 Bypassable address classification — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X22 Contradicted release guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — Not applicable: this check looks for a collection written by a callback on one thread while the body waiting on it touches it on another, and in this repository's languages no collection is reachable from two threads at once. TypeScript/JavaScript runs every callback on the one thread that owns its objects: a callback runs only when the body waiting on it has yielded, never alongside it, and a worker thread receives a COPY of what it is sent. A SharedArrayBuffer carries raw bytes, never an Array, Map or Set, so no collection is reachable from two threads at once. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X28 Index access outside its own emptiness guard — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X3 Exception handling — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X5 Nullable reference types — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.

Critical — 231 finding(s)

D10 · Test Quality · No assertions (empty test) · ×112

No assertions (empty test): test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/compiler-options/testcafe-fixtures/typescript/index.ts:3 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/custom-client-scripts/testcafe-fixtures/wrong-module-name.js:4 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/custom-client-scripts/testcafe-fixtures/error-in-script-from-module.js:4 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/custom-client-scripts/testcafe-fixtures/error-in-script-from-file.js:4 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/execution-timeout/testcafe-fixtures/execution-timeout-test.js:3 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/execution-timeout/testcafe-fixtures/execution-timeout-test.js:6 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/execution-timeout/testcafe-fixtures/execution-timeout-test.js:11 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Feature with before hook test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/execution-timeout/testcafe-fixtures/execution-timeout-test.js:36 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Feature with after hook test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/execution-timeout/testcafe-fixtures/execution-timeout-test.js:45 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test1 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/hooks/testcafe-fixtures/fixture-before-fail.js:6 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test2 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/hooks/testcafe-fixtures/fixture-before-fail.js:9 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test3 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/hooks/testcafe-fixtures/fixture-before-fail.js:12 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): test1 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/roles/testcafe-fixtures/error-on-switching-to-clean-run-test.js:12 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): test2 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/roles/testcafe-fixtures/error-on-switching-to-clean-run-test.js:14 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Fixture5Test5 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/skip-only/testcafe-fixtures/skip-test.js:43 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Fixture5Test5 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/skip-only/testcafe-fixtures/only-test.js:44 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): Test hooks test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/test-info/testcafe-fixtures/test-hooks.js:16 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): wait test/functional/fixtures/browser-provider/job-reporting/testcafe-fixtures/index-test.js:3 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): ${i} test/functional/fixtures/live/testcafe-fixtures/smoke.js:13 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): concurrent test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-test.js:25 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): no concurrent test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-test.js:44 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): concurrent test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-test.js:64 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): fixture 1 - test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-all-test.js:39 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): fixture 2 - test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-all-test.js:56 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
No assertions (empty test): fixture 3 - test ${i} test/functional/fixtures/regression/gh-2011/testcafe-fixtures/concurrency-mode-with-disable-concurrency-fixture-all-test.js:73 — Test method has an empty body — it asserts nothing and exercises no code.
+ 87 more in this group — see findings.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
+ 41 more in this group — see findings.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · High CVE · ×10

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D35 · Change Coupling · Boundary-crossing change coupling · ×3

Boundary-crossing change coupling: REDACTED ↔ option-names.ts src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts — `src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts` (context cli) and `src/configuration/option-names.ts` (context configuration) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 80% of the time (12 of the 15 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 12 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `51b54c77` feat: Added path-pattern-on-fails for screenshots (closes #7014) (#8055); `b7d8c8d6` add logging for reporting, remove dashboard leftovers (#7829); `bfe24e0a` feat: moved esm mode from experimental (#7574) — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: capturer.js ↔ browser-manipulation-queue.js src/screenshots/capturer.js — `src/screenshots/capturer.js` (context screenshots) and `src/test-run/browser-manipulation-queue.js` (context test-run) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 53% of the time (9 of the 17 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `51ad3bcb` feat: added pathPattern parameter to takeScreenshot method (#8093); `4d902068` fix: added creating screenshots even crop fails (#7267); `ed551fb7` feat: added `actionId` to the screenshot information (#7122) — run `git show` on any of them.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: driver.js ↔ input.ts src/client/driver/driver.js — `src/client/driver/driver.js` (context driver) and `src/native-automation/client/input.ts` (context native-automation) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (5 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 5 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `170eed7f` added "dispatch touch event" in native automation (#8042); `31b74bed` fix scroll position for cdp events (#7559) (at that commit the file was still `src/proxyless/client/input.ts`); `a78a0f9a` proxyless: mouse move automation (#7554) (at that commit the file was still `src/proxyless/client/input.ts`) — run `git show` on any of them.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×2

REDACTED
REDACTED

R9 · Circular Imports · Import cycle (2 files) · ×2

Import cycle (2 files) src/errors/error-list.js — src/errors/error-list.js → src/errors/process-test-fn-error.js → src/errors/error-list.js
Import cycle (2 files) src/live/controller.ts — src/live/controller.ts → src/live/keyboard-observer.ts → src/live/controller.ts (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 3 files)

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · High vulnerability · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

R8 · Dependency Hygiene · Unlisted import '@eslint/eslintrc' · ×1

Unlisted import '@eslint/eslintrc' eslint.config.js:5 — Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.

R8 · Dependency Hygiene · Unlisted import '@eslint/js' · ×1

Unlisted import '@eslint/js' eslint.config.js:4 — Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.

R8 · Dependency Hygiene · Unlisted import 'node-fetch' · ×1

Unlisted import 'node-fetch' test/server/browser-connection-test.js:2 — Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.

R9 · Circular Imports · Import cycle (3 files) · ×1

Import cycle (3 files) src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts — src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts → src/notifications/warning-log.ts → src/test-run/index.ts → src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 85 files)

Serious — 1774 finding(s)

D10 · Test Quality · No assertions · ×1519

No assertions: Stringify element test/client/fixtures/automation/utils-test.js:29 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: getShortcutsByKeyCombination test/client/fixtures/automation/press-shortcuts-test.js:103 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: GH2169 - SelectText action sometimes raise error in Safari test/client/fixtures/automation/select-test/index-test.js:547 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: hasScroll (GH-2511) test/client/fixtures/core/style-utils-test.js:4 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: contains test/client/fixtures/core/dom-utils-test.js:44 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: filter() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:10 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: map() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:20 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: slice() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:30 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: splice() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:38 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: unshift() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:49 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: forEach() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:58 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: indexOf() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:72 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: some() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:81 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: reverse() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:95 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: reduce() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:103 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: concat() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:115 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: join() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:123 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: isArray() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:131 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: from() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:136 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: find() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:144 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: remove() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:154 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: equals() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:162 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: getCommonElement() test/client/fixtures/core/array-utils-test.js:167 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: T162970 - Delays between steps are very long on the github.com page test/client/legacy-fixtures/step-iterator-test.js:312 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: DOM element test/client/legacy-fixtures/runner-base-test.js:114 — This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
+ 1494 more in this group — see findings.md.

R11 · Import Boundaries · Boundary violation [package · ×40

Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] REDACTED:17 — REDACTED:17 imports test/functional/config.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] REDACTED:19 — REDACTED:19 imports test/dependency-licenses-checker.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js:23 — gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js:23 imports test/client/config-qunit-server-app.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/api/exportable-lib/index.js:64 — src/api/exportable-lib/index.js:64 imports src/api/test-controller/proxy.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts:11 — src/api/request-hooks/hook.ts:11 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/api/skip-js-errors/index.ts:5 — src/api/skip-js-errors/index.ts:5 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] REDACTED:3 — REDACTED:3 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:2 — src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:2 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:5 — src/api/wrap-test-function.ts:5 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/assertions/executor.ts:4 — src/assertions/executor.ts:4 imports src/errors/test-run/index.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/assertions/executor.ts:7 — src/assertions/executor.ts:7 imports src/test-run/commands/assertion.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/assertions/get-fn.ts:3 — src/assertions/get-fn.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/assertion.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:18 — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:18 imports src/test-run/commands/validations/initializers.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:19 — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:19 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/browser/connection/index.ts:32 — src/browser/connection/index.ts:32 imports src/test-run/index.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:5 — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:5 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:12 — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:12 imports src/test-run/marker-symbol.ts, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:13 — src/client-functions/client-function-builder.js:13 imports src/errors/test-run/templates.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:9 — src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:9 imports src/test-run/commands/execute-client-function.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/index.js:17 — src/client/automation/index.js:17 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/move.ts:3 — src/client/automation/move.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/playback/click/index.ts:3 — src/client/automation/playback/click/index.ts:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:5 — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:5 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:3 — src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:3 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
Boundary violation [package:test-suite-dependency] src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:11 — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:11 imports src/test-run/commands/options.js, a module inside the test suite — test helpers carry no compatibility contract and are maintained for the suite, not as an API, so production code that depends on one is coupled to a module nobody keeps stable. Move the shared helper into a source directory both layers may depend on.
+ 15 more in this group — see findings.md.

R4 · Test Coverage · No test reaches this file · ×36

No test reaches this file src/client/driver/driver.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/ui/status-bar/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/core/utils/dom.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/core/utils/position.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/visible-element-automation.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/move.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/type/type-text.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/core/scroll/index.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/browser/idle-page/status-indicator.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/browser/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/press/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/ui/select-element.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/driver/native-dialog-tracker/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/click/browser-click-strategy.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/cli/cli.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/client/ui/progress-panel/index.js — No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
+ 11 more in this group — see findings.md.

D17 · Explicit Debt · TodoComment · ×12

TodoComment src/api/structure/test-file.ts:24 — // TODO: add index signature to the Test and Fixture classes — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:54 — // TODO: move it to the server — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:66 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:70 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:91 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:99 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:122 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:126 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:128 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:130 — // @ts-ignore TODO — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/index.ts:201 — // TODO: I think that this check is unnecessary here. It checks only a key sequence of the pressKey command. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment src/utils/re-executable-promise.ts:1 — // TODO: Fix https://github.com/DevExpress/testcafe/issues/4139 to get rid of Pinkie

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×7

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D3 · God Classes · TooManyMethods · ×6

TooManyMethods: Driver src/client/driver/driver.js:169 — TooManyMethods — 127 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 97 over it, 4.23× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Runner src/runner/index.js:53 — TooManyMethods — 59 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 29 over it, 1.97× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: BrowserProvider src/browser/provider/index.ts:57 — TooManyMethods — 50 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 20 over it, 1.67× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: BrowserConnection src/browser/connection/index.ts:100 — TooManyMethods — 49 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 19 over it, 1.63× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: CLIArgumentParser src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:95 — TooManyMethods — 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: BrowserProviderPluginHost src/browser/provider/plugin-host.js:10 — TooManyMethods — 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) · ×5

Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:139 — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:139 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:176 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:663 — REDACTED:663 · REDACTED:741 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:178 — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:178 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:200 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:367 — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:367 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:407 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:171 — src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:171 · src/client/automation/playback/select/utils.js:203 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

D17 · Explicit Debt · HackComment · ×4

HackComment src/browser/provider/index.ts:67 — // HACK: The browser window has different border sizes in normal and maximized modes. So, we need to be sure that the window is — a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there.
HackComment src/client/driver/command-executors/client-functions/replicator/transforms/function-transform.ts:18 — // HACK: UglifyJS + TypeScript + argument destructuring can generate incorrect code. — a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there.
HackComment src/role/marker-symbol.ts:1 — // HACK: used to validate that UseRoleCommand argument value — a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there.
HackComment src/test-run/marker-symbol.ts:1 — // HACK: used to validate that ClientFunction `boundTestRun` option value — a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×4

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

R4 · Test Coverage · This test file cannot be loaded · ×4

This test file cannot be loaded test/functional/setup.js — test/functional/setup.js:9 imports './site', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded test/server/data/test-suites/live/test-external-unexisting-module.js — test/server/data/test-suites/live/test-external-unexisting-module.js:1 imports './non-existing-module', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-dep/dep.js — test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-dep/dep.js:1 imports './yo', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-testfile/testfile.js — test/server/data/test-suites/require-error-in-testfile/testfile.js:1 imports './yo', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×3

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×3

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE · ×3

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4) · Low cohesion · ×3

Low cohesion: Fixture (LCOM4 8) src/api/structure/fixture.ts:22 — Fixture's methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: Test (LCOM4 6) src/api/structure/test.ts:24 — Test's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: RunnerMock (LCOM4 5) test/server/live-test.js:87 — RunnerMock's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2 locations) · ×3

Duplicated block (8 lines × 2 locations) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:83 — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:83 · src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:92 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2 locations) src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:72 — src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:72 · src/client/driver/command-executors/action-executor/actions-initializer.ts:113 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2 locations) src/client/driver/driver.js:394 — src/client/driver/driver.js:394 · src/client/driver/driver.js:817 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2 locations) · ×3

Duplicated block (6 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:481 — REDACTED:481 · REDACTED:552 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2 locations) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:329 — src/client/core/utils/position.ts:329 · src/client/core/utils/position.ts:377 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2 locations) src/utils/replicator/index.js:538 — src/utils/replicator/index.js:538 · src/utils/replicator/index.js:555 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×2

REDACTED
REDACTED

D3 · God Classes · ClassTooLong · ×2

ClassTooLong: Driver src/client/driver/driver.js:169 — ClassTooLong — 1064 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 127 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 664 over it, 2.66× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: Runner src/runner/index.js:53 — ClassTooLong — 462 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 59 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.16× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.

D3 · God Classes · FileTooLong · ×2

FileTooLong: driver/driver.js src/client/driver/driver.js — FileTooLong — 1210 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 88% of them inside a single declaration: Driver (169-1989). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 710 over it, 2.42× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: runner/index.js src/runner/index.js — FileTooLong — 509 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 91% of them inside a single declaration: Runner (53-819). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 9 over it, 1.02× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.

D35 · Change Coupling · Change coupling · ×2

Change coupling: base.js ↔ REDACTED src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/base.js — `src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/base.js` and `src/browser/provider/index.ts` change together 80% of the time (8 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `5d5bf6f9` update: resize using CDP setWindowBounds (#8169); `2fd5a5e5` fix: avoid browser hanging on close window while video is recording (…; `127787f6` Improve iframe switching via CDP (#6500) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: index.js ↔ plugin-host.js src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/chrome/index.js — `src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/chrome/index.js` and `src/browser/provider/plugin-host.js` change together 61% of the time (14 of the 23 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 14 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `1faa391c` feat: add method which return current cdp (#8159); `003e0f28` proxyless: refactoring (#7560); `76e8e9f0` fix: 'Memory leak on running more than 11 tests' (close #7188) (#7199) — run `git show` on any of them.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×2

Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:96 — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:96 · src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:66 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 77 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/drag-and-drop-first-move.js:3 — src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/drag-and-drop-first-move.js:3 · src/client/automation/playback/move/event-sequence/move-event-sequence.js:4 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 66 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (9 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×2

Duplicated block with local edits (9 matched lines × 2 locations) src/browser/provider/built-in/locally-installed.js:1 — src/browser/provider/built-in/locally-installed.js:1 · src/browser/provider/built-in/path.js:2 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 52 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block with local edits (9 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:9 — src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:9 · src/client/automation/playback/rclick.js:10 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 2 locations) · ×2

Duplicated block (9 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:227 — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:227 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:266 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2 locations) src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:95 — src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:95 · src/client/ui/status-bar/progress-bar/indeterminate-indicator.js:105 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · addHierarchicalSelectors (cyclomatic 31) · ×1

addHierarchicalSelectors (cyclomatic 31) REDACTED:551 — addHierarchicalSelectors has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 31 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 22 function items inside it that branch (nextSibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), sibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), prevSibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Driver._executeCommand (cyclomatic 28) · ×1

Driver._executeCommand (cyclomatic 28) src/client/driver/driver.js:1701 — Driver._executeCommand has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · text-selection.correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic 26) · ×1

text-selection.correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic 26) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64 — text-selection.correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · utils.focusAndSetSelection (cyclomatic 23) · ×1

utils.focusAndSetSelection (cyclomatic 23) src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:56 — utils.focusAndSetSelection has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 23 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 57, 111). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · position.getEventPageCoordinates (cyclomatic 21) · ×1

position.getEventPageCoordinates (cyclomatic 21) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:154 — position.getEventPageCoordinates has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · position.getHiddenReason (cyclomatic 21) · ×1

position.getHiddenReason (cyclomatic 21) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:308 — position.getHiddenReason has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cyclomatic 20) · ×1

content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cyclomatic 20) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:91 — content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · KeyPressSimulator.press (cyclomatic 18) · ×1

KeyPressSimulator.press (cyclomatic 18) src/client/automation/playback/press/key-press-simulator.js:78 — KeyPressSimulator.press has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition (cyclomatic 18) · ×1

content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition (cyclomatic 18) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:425 — content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset (cyclomatic 18) · ×1

content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset (cyclomatic 18) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:478 — content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition · ×1

calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition::checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:431 — calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition::checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset · ×1

calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset::checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:482 — calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset::checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TypeAutomation._typeChar (cyclomatic 17) · ×1

TypeAutomation._typeChar (cyclomatic 17) src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:289 — TypeAutomation._typeChar has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · text-selection.selectContentEditable (cyclomatic 17) · ×1

text-selection.selectContentEditable (cyclomatic 17) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:18 — text-selection.selectContentEditable has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions (cyclomatic 17) · ×1

ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions (cyclomatic 17) src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/ensure-crop-options.js:38 — ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cognitive 41) · ×1

correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cognitive 41) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64 — correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (28 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · addHierarchicalSelectors (cognitive 36) · ×1

addHierarchicalSelectors (cognitive 36) REDACTED:551 — addHierarchicalSelectors has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (20 pts), ternaries 7 (8 pts), loops 6, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 36 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 22 function items inside it that branch (nextSibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), prevSibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), sibling::selectorFn::(anonymous), …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Driver._executeCommand (cognitive 28) · ×1

Driver._executeCommand (cognitive 28) src/client/driver/driver.js:1701 — Driver._executeCommand has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · utils.focusAndSetSelection (cognitive 23) · ×1

utils.focusAndSetSelection (cognitive 23) src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:56 — utils.focusAndSetSelection has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (11 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 57, 111). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition (cognitive 23) · ×1

content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition (cognitive 23) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:425 — content-editable.calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition · ×1

calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition::checkChildNodes (cognitive 23) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:431 — calculateNodeAndOffsetByPosition::checkChildNodes has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · home (cognitive 21) · ×1

home (cognitive 21) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:343 — home has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (13 pts), if/else 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · end (cognitive 21) · ×1

end (cognitive 21) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:380 — end has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (13 pts), if/else 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · position.getHiddenReason (cognitive 20) · ×1

position.getHiddenReason (cognitive 20) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:308 — position.getHiddenReason has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, boolean chains 6, ternaries 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · getSelectedPositionInParentByOffset (cognitive 20) · ×1

getSelectedPositionInParentByOffset (cognitive 20) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:287 — getSelectedPositionInParentByOffset has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cognitive 19) · ×1

content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cognitive 19) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:91 — content-editable.isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 9 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · text-selection.selectByNodesAndOffsets (cognitive 19) · ×1

text-selection.selectByNodesAndOffsets (cognitive 19) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:231 — text-selection.selectByNodesAndOffsets has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), boolean chains 5, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 254, 269). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · selectContentEditable (cognitive 19) · ×1

selectContentEditable (cognitive 19) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:18 — selectContentEditable has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 6, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · position.getEventPageCoordinates (cognitive 18) · ×1

position.getEventPageCoordinates (cognitive 18) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:154 — position.getEventPageCoordinates has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 16, if/else 1, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · KeyPressSimulator.press (cognitive 18) · ×1

KeyPressSimulator.press (cognitive 18) src/client/automation/playback/press/key-press-simulator.js:78 — KeyPressSimulator.press has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 6 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · shortcuts.submitFormOnEnterPressInInput (cognitive 18) · ×1

shortcuts.submitFormOnEnterPressInInput (cognitive 18) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:142 — shortcuts.submitFormOnEnterPressInInput has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TypeAutomation._typeChar (cognitive 18) · ×1

TypeAutomation._typeChar (cognitive 18) src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:289 — TypeAutomation._typeChar has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 5 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · position.getClientDimensions (cognitive 17) · ×1

position.getClientDimensions (cognitive 17) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:16 — position.getClientDimensions has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), ternaries 4, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset (cognitive 17) · ×1

content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset (cognitive 17) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:478 — content-editable.calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions (cognitive 17) · ×1

ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions (cognitive 17) src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/ensure-crop-options.js:38 — ensure-crop-options.ensureCropOptions has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (9 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · (anonymous) (cognitive 17) · ×1

(anonymous) (cognitive 17) REDACTED:18 — (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset · ×1

calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset::checkChildNodes (cognitive 17) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:482 — calculatePositionByNodeAndOffset::checkChildNodes has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · shortcuts.right (cognitive 16) · ×1

shortcuts.right (cognitive 16) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:269 — shortcuts.right has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · select-element.clickOnOption (cognitive 16) · ×1

select-element.clickOnOption (cognitive 16) src/client/ui/select-element.js:54 — select-element.clickOnOption has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7, ternaries 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity · switchOptionsByKeys (cognitive 16) · ×1

switchOptionsByKeys (cognitive 16) src/client/ui/select-element.js:192 — switchOptionsByKeys has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 6, if/else 3 (6 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D3 · God Classes · FunctionTooLong · ×1

FunctionTooLong: add-api.addHierarchicalSelectors REDACTED:551 — FunctionTooLong — addHierarchicalSelectors runs 121 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 21 over it, 1.21× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.

D31 · IaC & Container Security · Medium IaC · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

M1 · Documentation (README) · README may be stale · ×1

README may be stale — 38 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched — it may no longer reflect the system.

PF3 · Async & latency hygiene · Sync-over-async blocking · ×1

Sync-over-async blocking src/video-recorder/recorder.js:194 — `_saveFiles` is async and calls copyFileSync — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.

R1 · Type Safety · Type Safety · ×1

Type Safety — 321 typed · 378 plain JS — the untyped files are gulp/constants/client-test-settings.js, gulp/constants/functional-test-globs.js, gulp/docker/ensure-docker-environment.js, REDACTED, gulp/docker/get-publish-info.js, gulp/docker/get-publish-tags.js (+372 more). 0 production file(s) opt out entirely with @ts-nocheck · 125 @ts-ignore suppression(s).

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplication concentrated across 4 sibling directories (6 clone groups) · ×1

Duplication concentrated across 4 sibling directories (6 clone groups) src/client/automation/playback/click/browser-click-strategy.ts:7 — 6 duplicated blocks under src/client/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories automation, core, driver, ui — 0 of them are reported below, and 6 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 6 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 6 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 6 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (5 clone groups) · ×1

Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (5 clone groups) src/client/ui/progress-panel/index.js:10 — 5 duplicated blocks under src/client/ui/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories cursor, progress-panel, status-bar — 1 of them are reported below, and 4 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 5 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 5 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 5 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (37 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (37 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/driver/barriers/request.ts:43 — src/client/driver/barriers/request.ts:43 · src/client/driver/barriers/script-execution.ts:29 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 258 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (20 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (20 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:131 — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:131 · src/client/automation/playback/rclick.js:66 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 116 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (19 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (19 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:244 — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:244 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:286 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (18 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (18 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:45 — src/client/automation/playback/drag/base.js:45 · src/client/automation/playback/select/base.js:112 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 93 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (18 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (18 lines × 2 locations) src/reporter/index.ts:632 — src/reporter/index.ts:632 · src/reporter/index.ts:651 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:340 — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:340 · src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:377 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:361 — REDACTED:361 · REDACTED:379 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (15 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (15 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:12 — src/client/automation/playback/click/select-child.js:12 · src/client/automation/playback/dblclick.js:7 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 82 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (14 lines × 5 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (14 lines × 5 locations) REDACTED:587 — REDACTED:587 · REDACTED:614 · REDACTED:646 · REDACTED:683 · +1 more site(s) not listed — all 5 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:161 — src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:161 · src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:176 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 4 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (13 lines × 4 locations) src/api/structure/fixture.ts:103 — src/api/structure/fixture.ts:103 · src/api/structure/fixture.ts:117 · src/api/structure/test.ts:100 · src/api/structure/test.ts:114 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:111 — src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:111 · src/client/core/scroll/index.ts:127 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (10 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:319 — REDACTED:319 · REDACTED:345 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 3 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (10 lines × 3 locations) src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:257 — src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:257 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:273 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:316 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 3 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (9 lines × 3 locations) src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:211 — src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:211 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:232 · src/browser/connection/gateway/index.ts:258 — all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 4 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (9 lines × 4 locations) REDACTED:642 — REDACTED:642 · REDACTED:679 · REDACTED:720 · REDACTED:760 — all 4 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (7 lines × 2 locations) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:76 — src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:76 · src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:107 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (7 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (7 matched lines × 2 locations) src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:79 — src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:79 · src/runner/fixture-hook-controller.ts:93 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 52 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (6 lines × 3 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (6 lines × 3 locations) src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:289 — src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:289 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:298 · src/cli/argument-parser/index.ts:307 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (6 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block with local edits (6 matched lines × 2 locations) src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:4 — src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:4 · src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-selector.js:22 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.

R10 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (5 lines × 3 locations) · ×1

Duplicated block (5 lines × 3 locations) src/assertions/get-fn.ts:29 — src/assertions/get-fn.ts:29 · src/assertions/get-fn.ts:38 · src/assertions/get-fn.ts:47 — all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function _internalExecuteCommand (cyclomatic 28, cognitive 30) · ×1

Complex function _internalExecuteCommand (cyclomatic 28, cognitive 30) src/test-run/index.ts:1134 — _internalExecuteCommand has cyclomatic complexity 28 and cognitive complexity 30; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function _executeCommand (cyclomatic 28, cognitive 28) · ×1

Complex function _executeCommand (cyclomatic 28, cognitive 28) src/client/driver/driver.js:1701 — _executeCommand has cyclomatic complexity 28 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic 26, cognitive 41) · ×1

Complex function correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete (cyclomatic 26, cognitive 41) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:64 — correctContentEditableSelectionBeforeDelete has cyclomatic complexity 26 and cognitive complexity 41; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function getHiddenReason (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 20) · ×1

Complex function getHiddenReason (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 20) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:308 — getHiddenReason has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function getEventPageCoordinates (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 17) · ×1

Complex function getEventPageCoordinates (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 17) src/client/core/utils/position.ts:154 — getEventPageCoordinates has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function runTests (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 20) · ×1

Complex function runTests (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 20) test/functional/setup.js:252 — runTests has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 19) · ×1

Complex function isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 19) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:91 — isNodeAfterNodeBlockWithBreakLine has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function analyzeMemberExp (cyclomatic 19, cognitive 32) · ×1

Complex function analyzeMemberExp (cyclomatic 19, cognitive 32) src/compiler/test-file/formats/es-next/get-test-list.js:87 — analyzeMemberExp has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 32; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 23) · ×1

Complex function checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 23) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:431 — checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function press (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 18) · ×1

Complex function press (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 18) src/client/automation/playback/press/key-press-simulator.js:78 — press has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 18) · ×1

Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 18) src/client/automation/utils/utils.js:57 — (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 17) · ×1

Complex function checkChildNodes (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 17) src/client/core/utils/content-editable.js:482 — checkChildNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function checkScreenshotsCreated (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 16) · ×1

Complex function checkScreenshotsCreated (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 16) test/functional/assertion-helper.js:239 — checkScreenshotsCreated has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 16; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function selectContentEditable (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 19) · ×1

Complex function selectContentEditable (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 19) src/client/core/utils/text-selection.js:18 — selectContentEditable has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function _typeChar (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 18) · ×1

Complex function _typeChar (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 18) src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js:289 — _typeChar has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function ensureCropOptions (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 17) · ×1

Complex function ensureCropOptions (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 17) src/client/driver/command-executors/browser-manipulation/ensure-crop-options.js:38 — ensureCropOptions has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Complex function constructor (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 15) · ×1

Complex function constructor (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 15) src/client-functions/selectors/selector-builder.js:18 — constructor has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.

R5 · Dependency Freshness · Dependency Freshness · ×1

Dependency Freshness — 96 outdated package(s); JS/npm CVEs scored in D30

R6 · Tooling · The declared test suite includes a file that cannot be loaded · ×1

The declared test suite includes a file that cannot be loaded test/functional/setup.js — This repository declares test tooling, and the ✓ above records that declaration — but test/functional/setup.js and 3 other test file(s) in this workspace cannot be loaded at all: it imports a module that names no file in this repository, so the runner throws while collecting it and none of its cases execute. The wiring is present and the suite it points at does not run as written, which is why the tooling tick must not be read as a statement that the tests pass. Fix the unloadable file(s) — each one is reported with its failing import under Test Coverage — then the declared script exercises what it claims to.

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~68 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~68 LoC) REDACTED — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~63 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~63 LoC) src/utils/check-is-vm.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~50 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~50 LoC) src/compiler/esm-loader.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~38 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~38 LoC) src/configuration/types.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~33 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~33 LoC) src/utils/diff/index.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~28 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~28 LoC) src/utils/diff/util.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (src/utils/diff/index.ts) — every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~25 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~25 LoC) src/utils/prerender-callsite.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~21 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~21 LoC) src/client/driver/command-executors/execute-child-window-selector.js — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~15 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~15 LoC) src/utils/get-options/dashboard.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~10 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~10 LoC) REDACTED — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~9 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~9 LoC) src/browser/provider/built-in/dedicated/firefox/interfaces.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

R7 · Dead Code · Dead file (~7 LoC) · ×1

Dead file (~7 LoC) src/api/request-hooks/hook-method-names.ts — no import path from any entry point (164 application, 55 tooling, 1287 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make

Minor — 27 finding(s)

X7 · Silent fallback defaults · Silent fallback default in catch · ×7

Silent fallback default in catch REDACTED:25 — `detectDockerDaemon` swallows every exception into `return false` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch src/utils/render-callsite-sync.js:33 — `renderCallsiteSync` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch REDACTED:134 — `runWMIC` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch src/utils/detect-ffmpeg.js:15 — `findFFMPEGinPath` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch src/utils/detect-ffmpeg.js:26 — `requireFFMPEGModuleFromCwd` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch src/utils/detect-ffmpeg.js:35 — `requireFFMPEGModule` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch test/functional/utils/file-storage.js:29 — `getData` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.

D34 · Knowledge Freshness · Most significant orphaned file · ×3

Most significant orphaned file src/client/driver/driver.js — One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Most significant orphaned file src/test-run/index.ts — One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Most significant orphaned file src/runner/index.js — One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.

D16 · Bus Factor · Off-boarding risk · ×1

Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 — If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 1 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: src/api/test-page-url.ts. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.

D20 · ADR Quality · No ADRs found · ×1

No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.

D26 · Project Cohesion · Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1

Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `(repository root)` (41657 LoC, 872 public types across 116 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Low CVE · ×1

REDACTED

D31 · IaC & Container Security · Low IaC · ×1

REDACTED

D34 · Knowledge Freshness · Concentrated knowledge decay · ×1

Concentrated knowledge decay — 192 of 199 significant files have no living knowledge, while the repository is still being changed at a low rate (1 commit(s) in the last 90 days) — so this is one repo-wide knowledge-decay state, not 192 separate risks. Counted over 199 of the 616 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. The code moved on without the people who understood these files: document them or schedule a read-through before the next change lands in them.

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1

REDACTED

M2 · Architecture documentation · No ADRs · ×1

No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.

M2 · Architecture documentation · No architecture diagram/doc · ×1

No architecture diagram/doc — No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.

P3 · Security & performance tooling · No SAST · ×1

No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/typescript`, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 37256 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.

R7 · Dead Code · Unused export 'createAdditionalElementDescriptor' · ×1

Unused export 'createAdditionalElementDescriptor' src/client/driver/utils/ensure-elements.js:67 — Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.

R7 · Dead Code · Unused export 'default' · ×1

Unused export 'default' src/compiler/babel/preset-stage-2.ts:1 — Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.

R7 · Dead Code · Unused export 'safeFailRequest' · ×1

Unused export 'safeFailRequest' src/native-automation/request-pipeline/safe-api.ts:73 — Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.

R7 · Dead Code · Unused export 'fromBase64String' · ×1

Unused export 'fromBase64String' src/native-automation/utils/string.ts:27 — Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.

X10 · Duplicated predicate · Duplicated predicate · ×1

Duplicated predicate src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js:128 — `domUtils.isInputElement(element) && element.type === 'number'` appears character-identically in 3 files — src/client/automation/playback/press/shortcuts.js, src/client/automation/playback/type/index.js, src/client/automation/playback/type/type-text.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.

Minor — 85 finding(s)

D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Outdated (npm) · ×53

Outdated (npm): @babel/core — @babel/core is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.6 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-proposal-decorators — @babel/plugin-proposal-decorators is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.2 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-async-generator-functions — @babel/plugin-transform-async-generator-functions is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.6 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-async-to-generator — @babel/plugin-transform-async-to-generator is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-class-properties — @babel/plugin-transform-class-properties is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-class-static-block — @babel/plugin-transform-class-static-block is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.5 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-exponentiation-operator — @babel/plugin-transform-exponentiation-operator is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-for-of — @babel/plugin-transform-for-of is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-object-rest-spread — @babel/plugin-transform-object-rest-spread is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-private-methods — @babel/plugin-transform-private-methods is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/plugin-transform-runtime — @babel/plugin-transform-runtime is pinned at 7.23.3; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.6 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/preset-env — @babel/preset-env is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.6 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/preset-flow — @babel/preset-flow is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/preset-react — @babel/preset-react is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @babel/runtime — @babel/runtime is pinned at 7.29.7; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.5 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @types/node — @types/node is pinned at 20.14.5; registry.npmjs.org publishes 26.6.4 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): async-exit-hook — async-exit-hook is pinned at 1.1.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 2.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): babel-plugin-module-resolver — babel-plugin-module-resolver is pinned at 5.0.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 5.0.3 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): chai — chai is pinned at 4.3.4; registry.npmjs.org publishes 6.3.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): chalk — chalk is pinned at 2.4.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 6.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): chrome-remote-interface — chrome-remote-interface is pinned at 0.32.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 0.34.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): commander — commander is pinned at 8.3.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 15.0.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): dedent — dedent is pinned at 0.4.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 1.7.2 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): del — del is pinned at 3.0.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): devtools-protocol — devtools-protocol is pinned at 0.0.1109433; registry.npmjs.org publishes 0.0.1707781 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
+ 28 more in this group — see findings.md.

D10 · Test Quality · Skipped (documented) · ×32

Skipped (documented): Test4 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/hooks/testcafe-fixtures/fixture-hooks.js:61 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Fixture5Test1 test/functional/fixtures/api/es-next/skip-only/testcafe-fixtures/skip-test.js:27 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Skipped test 1 test/functional/fixtures/reporter/testcafe-fixtures/skipped-tests.js:7 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Skipped test 2 test/functional/fixtures/reporter/testcafe-fixtures/skipped-tests.js:11 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Skipped test 3 test/functional/fixtures/reporter/testcafe-fixtures/skipped-tests.js:14 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Skipped test 4 test/functional/fixtures/reporter/testcafe-fixtures/skipped-tests.js:17 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): Test report should contains correct duration time (GH-22) test/functional/legacy-fixtures/page-js-errors/test.js:69 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by it.skip
Skipped (documented): Should compile test defined in separate module if option is enabled test/server/compiler-test.js:649 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by it.skip
Skipped (documented): (unnamed test) test/server/data/custom-client-scripts/utils.js:1 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): Pending test/server/data/mocha-reporter-spec-with-retries/suite2.js:26 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): Pending test/server/data/mocha-reporter-spec-with-retries/suite1.js:26 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 2 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:6 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 3 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:14 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 4 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:20 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 5 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:26 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 6 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:33 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): test 1 test/server/data/test-suites/call-fixture-from-async-function/testfile.js:38 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture2test3 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:17 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture2test4 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:18 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
Skipped (documented): fixture3test1 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:22 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture3test2 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:23 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture9test1 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:93 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture10test1 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:102 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): fixture11test1 test/server/data/test-suites/fixture-and-test-hooks/testfile.js:106 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: declared with no body — a pending test the runner lists but never runs
Skipped (documented): 2 test/server/data/test-suites/live/test-with-skipped.js:4 — Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: switched off by test.skip
+ 7 more in this group — see findings.md.

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.

Dimension	Tool	Version	Command	Findings	Raw output
D28 · Secrets (history)	gitleaks	—	gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-c0438f90a8ba460aa6a505bd004c5fc2/history.json --exit-code 0 --source .	0	artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json
D28 · Secrets (history)	gitleaks	—	gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-c0438f90a8ba460aa6a505bd004c5fc2/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source .	0	artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)	semgrep	—	semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off .	119	artifacts/raw/semgrep.json
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities	trivy	—	trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs /bin/ --skip-dirs /obj/ . --skip-db-update	15	artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json
D31 · IaC & Container Security	trivy	—	trivy config --format json --quiet .	2	artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json
D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR)	semgrep	—	semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. semgrep could not parse 5 file(s) — `@types/indent-string/index.d.ts`, `@types/promisify-event/index.d.ts`, `@types/time-limit-promise/index.d.ts`, `@types/unquote/index.d.ts`, `src/configuration/types.ts` — so the PII/GDPR sweep did not cover the unparsed regions of them; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real.	0	—
D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy	disclosure	—	disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.	0	—
D40 · Network Egress Confinement	runtime-hardening	—	runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.	0	—
D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement	runtime-hardening	—	runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.	0	—
D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement	runtime-hardening	—	runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.	0	—
D43 · Malicious Dependencies	trivy	—	trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs /bin/ --skip-dirs /obj/ . --skip-db-update	0	artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json

Run 01a0fa8b-7ed7-7594-ab3d-229d659dba6f · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.

DevExpress/testcafe

Findings by grade

This survey was produced by

Executive summary

Top priorities

Diagnosis — what's actually going on

Architecture — module dependency matrix

At a glance — Code Health · 76% · Strong ·

At a glance — Architecture · 49% · Weak · gated by D26, R11, R9 ·

At a glance — Maturity · 55% · Adequate · gated by D34, M2 ·

At a glance — Readiness · 34% · Weak · gated by D10, R5, R6, P3 ·

At a glance — Security · 61% · Adequate · gated by D29, D30, D36 ·

At a glance — Performance · 85% · Strong ·

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Roadmap

File quality

How the grades work

Methodology & how to trust this report

Tools & methods

Run transparency — what happened this run

Limitations & what we did not check

Per-dimension blind spots

The LLM boundary

Dimensions

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

Reference — by lens

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Downloadable artifacts