Public report of EdwinVW/pitstop, published 22 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive report Measured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey → Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 22 October 2026, 09:29 UTC · Survey ID cd_7a04127e1e234815a59a7d30ba90e402

EdwinVW/pitstop

Measured 22 October 2026, 09:26 UTC, at code version 4d6ffc4

Code coverage: not measured

Code coverage is not measured: .NET and JavaScript/TypeScript suite (CouldNotMeasureNoCollector, CouldNotMeasureNoRunner).

CAI score 40out of 100 Adequate
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 4 since the last survey

The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.

Security and Compliance 62 Adequate Performance 60 Strong Architecture 58 Adequate Domain Modelling 58 Adequate Maturity 55 Adequate Production Readiness 52 Adequate Code Health 46 Adequate Accessibility 28 Weak

A small codebase: 5,052 lines of product code in 15 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.1 person-years · Weakest lens: Accessibility, 28

Findings by how serious they are

184 critical 531 serious 154 minor

5 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.

This survey was produced by

Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
22 October 2026, 09:26 UTC

A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.

The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸

92of 99 dimensions measured by tools. The other 7 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
852of 869 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 17 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
99dimensions across 8 lenses, read from 5,052 lines of product code in 15 projects.
Chapters

Executive summary

EdwinVW/pitstop scores 40 out of 100 and is rated Adequate, while seven of its eight lenses score higher still: Security and Compliance at 62, Domain Modelling and Architecture at 58, Maturity at 55, Production Readiness at 52 and Code Health at 46, all rated Adequate, and Performance at 60, rated Strong. Watchdog judged it as a template, sample or demo, meant to be read or copied, so the dimensions about building, releasing and running a product don't apply, and its lenses are rated against a lower bar. The score itself is worked out as for any repository.

The score is lower than those seven because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Accessibility, which scores 28 and is rated Weak. Its Text alternatives dimension scores 1 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Accessibility can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video and to make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href, and if Accessibility rose to 70, the score would rise from 40 to about 51.

184 findings are critical: 60 in REDACTED Scanning, 42 in Dependency Vulnerabilities, 32 in Secrets (history), 27 in IaC & Container Security, five in Captive dependencies, four in Explicit Debt, four in Page structure, three in Keyboard semantics, three in Text alternatives, two in Forms & labels, one in Aggregate boundaries and one in Project dependency cycles.

Watchdog couldn't measure Dependency Hygiene, IL Efficiency and Runtime accessibility in this code, so those dimensions are left out of the score. The product code is 5,052 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €10,000, to rebuild.

Code Health 46 Adequate, capped by Structured logging and Nullable reference types Architecture 58 Adequate, capped by Captive dependencies Maturity 55 Adequate, capped by Documentation accuracy Production Readiness 52 Adequate, capped by REDACTED Scanning and Outbound HTTP resilience Security and Compliance 62 Adequate, capped by Secrets (history), Static Analysis (SAST), Dependency Vulnerabilities and IaC & Container Security Domain Modelling 58 Adequate, capped by Aggregate boundaries and Strongly-typed ids Accessibility 28 Weak, capped by Text alternatives and Keyboard semantics Performance 60 Strong

A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.

How the score is built: what each lens counts for The lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Accessibility 28 · counts for 45%Code Health 46 · counts for 25%Production Readiness 52 · counts for 14%Maturity 55 · counts for 8%Domain Modelling 58 · counts for 4%Architecture 58 · counts for 2%Performance 60 · counts for 1%Security and Compliance 62 · counts for 1%

If Accessibility rose from 28 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 40 to about 51.

Code composition: what the lines of code are
Business logic 11%Supporting code 48%Tests 35%Generated by tools 5%
New since the last survey: 113 findings

These 113 critical or serious findings weren't in the previous survey, on 8 October 2026. The first 100 are listed here, and the findings file in the download package lists them all.

Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.

Fixed since the last survey: 6 findings

These 6 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 8 October 2026, and are gone from this one.

  • Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs
  • Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField src/NotificationService/NotificationChannels/SMTPEmailNotifier.cs
  • Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs
  • Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField src/NotificationService/NotificationChannels/SMTPEmailNotifier.cs
  • Dependency Vulnerabilities · Critical CVE: [GHSA redacted] REDACTED
  • Dependency Vulnerabilities · High CVE: [GHSA redacted] REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €10,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild€3,300 to €17,000, for 56 to 176 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problemHigh, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor×0.7 at a score of 40. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
SizeSmall: 5,052 lines of product code

How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty.

Top priorities

The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.

1
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Raises the score by about 6 points · Medium effort · Text alternatives
2
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
Raises the score by about 6 points · Medium effort · Keyboard semantics
3
Resolve the 4 WriteOnlyPrivateField finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs, SMTPEmailNotifier.cs, TimeWorker.cs.
Raises the score by about 2 points · Low effort · Explicit Debt

Diagnosis: what the measurements show together

Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.

Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €10,000 to build again, about 0.1 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Accessibility, at 28 (Weak). Accessibility is about whether the interface is built so that everyone can use it, including people who can't see the screen or can't use a mouse. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Accessibility also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Accessibility grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Accessibility actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 6 points for medium effort. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort

Architecture — module dependency graph

Project dependencies, layered top-to-bottom; arrows show direction. Any dashed red edge points upward or sideways — a layering smell or cycle. A clean layered graph has none.

arch AuditlogService AuditlogService CustomerManagementAPI CustomerManagementAPI Infrastructure.Messaging Messaging InvoiceService InvoiceService NotificationService NotificationService TestUtils TestUtils TimeService TimeService VehicleManagementAPI VehicleManagementAPI WebApp WebApp WorkshopManagementAPI WorkshopManagementAPI WorkshopManagementEventHandler WorkshopManagementEventHandler

Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which

The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.

69 modules, with 79 dependencies between them. One loop runs through 3 of the modules, marked above the diagonal.

The table shows the 40 modules with the most connections; 29 more are left out to keep it readable.

Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
uses →1 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Model2 Pitstop.Infrastructure.Messaging3 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Model4 Pitstop.WebApp.Models5 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Commands6 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.DataAccess7 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Events8 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Events9 Pitstop.NotificationService.Events10 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Commands11 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.DataAccess12 Pitstop.WebApp.Commands13 Pitstop.WebApp.ViewModels14 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Commands15 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Core16 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Events17 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess18 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Events19 Pitstop.Application.CustomerManagementAPI.Controllers20 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Mappers21 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Model22 Pitstop.NotificationService.Model23 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Controllers24 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Events25 Pitstop.VehicleManagementAPI.Mappers26 Pitstop.WebApp.Mappers27 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.ValueObjects28 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler29 WebApp.RESTClients30 PitStop.WebApp.Controllers31 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Repositories32 Pitstop.NotificationService.Repositories33 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Entities34 Pitstop.InvoiceService35 Pitstop.NotificationService36 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.BusinessRules37 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Mappers38 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Repositories39 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.CommandHandlers40 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Controllers
1 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Model
2 Pitstop.Infrastructure.Messaging
3 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Model
4 Pitstop.WebApp.Models
5 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Commands1
6 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.DataAccess1
7 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Events1
8 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Events4
9 Pitstop.NotificationService.Events4
10 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Commands1
11 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.DataAccess1
12 Pitstop.WebApp.Commands5
13 Pitstop.WebApp.ViewModels8
14 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Commands2
15 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Core1
16 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Events3
17 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess1
18 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Events4
19 Pitstop.Application.CustomerManagementAPI.Controllers111
20 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Mappers111
21 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Model2
22 Pitstop.NotificationService.Model2
23 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Controllers111
24 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Events11
25 Pitstop.VehicleManagementAPI.Mappers11
26 Pitstop.WebApp.Mappers22
27 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.ValueObjects3
28 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler214
29 WebApp.RESTClients1210
30 PitStop.WebApp.Controllers44
31 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Repositories6
32 Pitstop.NotificationService.Repositories4
33 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Entities12432
34 Pitstop.InvoiceService2421
35 Pitstop.NotificationService241
36 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.BusinessRules22
37 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Mappers224
38 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Repositories21
39 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.CommandHandlers2442
40 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Controllers2132
Uses a module listed above itPart of a loopThe module itself
1 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Model2 Pitstop.Infrastructure.Messaging3 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Model4 Pitstop.WebApp.Models5 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Commands6 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.DataAccess7 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Events8 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Events9 Pitstop.NotificationService.Events10 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Commands11 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.DataAccess12 Pitstop.WebApp.Commands13 Pitstop.WebApp.ViewModels14 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Commands15 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Core16 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Events17 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess18 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Events19 Pitstop.Application.CustomerManagementAPI.Controllers20 Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Mappers21 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Model22 Pitstop.NotificationService.Model23 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Controllers24 Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Events25 Pitstop.VehicleManagementAPI.Mappers26 Pitstop.WebApp.Mappers27 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.ValueObjects28 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler29 WebApp.RESTClients30 PitStop.WebApp.Controllers31 Pitstop.InvoiceService.Repositories32 Pitstop.NotificationService.Repositories33 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Entities34 Pitstop.InvoiceService35 Pitstop.NotificationService36 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.BusinessRules37 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Mappers38 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Repositories39 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.CommandHandlers40 Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.ControllersPitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Model1Pitstop.Infrastructure.Messaging2Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Model3Pitstop.WebApp.Models4Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Commands5Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.DataAccess6Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Events7Pitstop.InvoiceService.Events8Pitstop.NotificationService.Events9Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Commands10Pitstop.VehicleManagement.DataAccess11Pitstop.WebApp.Commands12Pitstop.WebApp.ViewModels13Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Commands14Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Core15Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Events16Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess17Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Events18Pitstop.Application.CustomerManagementAPI.Controllers19Pitstop.CustomerManagementAPI.Mappers20Pitstop.InvoiceService.Model21Pitstop.NotificationService.Model22Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Controllers23Pitstop.VehicleManagement.Events24Pitstop.VehicleManagementAPI.Mappers25Pitstop.WebApp.Mappers26Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.ValueObjects27Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler28WebApp.RESTClients29PitStop.WebApp.Controllers30Pitstop.InvoiceService.Repositories31Pitstop.NotificationService.Repositories32Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.Entities33Pitstop.InvoiceService34Pitstop.NotificationService35Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Domain.BusinessRules36Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Mappers37Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Repositories38Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.CommandHandlers39Pitstop.WorkshopManagementAPI.Controllers401114411582131411111122111111122321412104464124322421241222242124422132+29 more modules (most-connected shown)

At a glance — Code Health · 46% · Adequate · gated by X4, X5 ·

The Good
D1 · .NET / C# Cyclomatic Complexity 10.0 D2 · .NET / C# Cognitive Complexity 10.0 D3 · .NET / C# God Classes 10.0 D4 · .NET / C# Code Duplication 9.3 D17 · .NET / C# Explicit Debt 6.7 D18 · .NET / C# Solution Shape 10.0 GD1 · Repo Unfinished & placeholder code 10.0 IC1 · Repo Incompleteness & stubs 10.0 X12 · Repo Unreachable branch 10.0 X13 · Repo Undrained process stream 10.0 X16 · Repo Unfloored truncation loop 10.0 X19 · Repo Unrestored process-global state 10.0 X20 · Repo Mistyped argument guard 10.0 X21 · Repo Side-effecting pattern guard 10.0 X22 · Repo Contradicted release guard 10.0 X23 · Repo Unguarded diagnostic materialisation 10.0 X25 · Repo Inert configuration knob 10.0 X26 · Repo Unsynchronised callback handoff 10.0 X27 · Repo Collection changed while being enumerated 10.0 X28 · Repo Index access outside its own emptiness guard 10.0 X29 · Repo Per-element action decided by a fixed element 10.0 X3 · Repo Exception handling 10.0 X30 · Repo Support guard that admits what it rejects 10.0 X32 · Repo Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly 10.0
The Bad
X1 · Repo Async correctness 6.1 X18 · Repo Disposal-pattern correctness 6.0
The Ugly
X2 · Repo Cancellation propagation 4.0 X4 · Repo Structured logging 2.7 X5 · Repo Nullable reference types 2.0

At a glance — Architecture · 58% · Adequate · gated by AX1 ·

The Good
D5 · .NET / C# Coupling 10.0 D6 · .NET / C# Cohesion (LCOM4) 10.0 D7 · .NET / C# Architectural Integrity 10.0 D26 · .NET / C# Project Cohesion 10.0 D27 · .NET / C# Navigability 9.0 D35 · .NET / C# Change Coupling 10.0 AX3 · Repo Project dependency cycles 10.0 AX4 · Repo Dependency direction 10.0 AX5 · Repo Architecture & structure 10.0 AX6 · Repo Interface segregation 10.0 AX8 · Repo Test isolation 10.0
The Bad
AX10 · Repo Code composition 6.1 AX2 · Repo Stateful singletons 5.0
The Ugly
AX1 · Repo Captive dependencies 1.0

At a glance — Maturity · 55% · Adequate · gated by M4 ·

The Good
D15 · .NET / C# Churn × Complexity Hotspots 10.0 D19 · .NET / C# Documentation Quality 9.0 D20 · .NET / C# ADR Quality 9.7 D21 · .NET / C# Naming Consistency 9.0 D24 · .NET / C# Comment Value 8.8 D25 · .NET / C# ADR Conformance 10.0 D34 · .NET / C# Knowledge Freshness 10.0 M1 · Repo Documentation (README) 6.3 M2 · Repo Architecture documentation 8.5 M3 · Repo Folder & project structure 10.0
The Ugly
M4 · Repo Documentation accuracy 0.0

At a glance — Readiness · 52% · Adequate · gated by D13, P7 ·

The Good
D9 · .NET / C# Test Distribution 9.7 D10 · .NET / C# Test Quality 10.0 D11 · .NET / C# Test Reliability 10.0 D14 · .NET / C# License Compliance 10.0 ED5 · Repo Idempotency 7.7 P1 · Repo CI/CD gates 8.0 P2 · Repo Observability 8.0 P4 · Repo Deployment & Rollback 8.0 P8 · Repo Schema migrations 10.0
The Bad
P5 · Repo DR & Backup 4.0 P6 · Repo Release Hygiene 5.0
The Ugly
D13 · .NET / C# REDACTED Scanning 0.0 P7 · Repo Outbound HTTP resilience 3.0

At a glance — Security · 62% · Adequate · gated by D28, D29, D30, D31 ·

The Good
D43 · .NET / C# Malicious Dependencies 10.0 D44 · .NET / C# Platform End-of-Life 10.0 C3 · Repo Audit Trail 7.5 S1 · Repo Web-Security Posture 8.0 X14 · Repo Bypassable address classification 10.0 X15 · Repo Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader 10.0 X17 · Repo Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document 10.0
The Bad
D40 · .NET / C# Network Egress Confinement 6.0 D41 · .NET / C# Kernel & Syscall Confinement 6.0
The Ugly
D28 · .NET / C# Secrets (history) 0.0 D29 · .NET / C# Static Analysis (SAST) 2.3 D30 · .NET / C# Dependency Vulnerabilities 0.0 D31 · .NET / C# IaC & Container Security 0.0 X24 · Repo Document value interpolated into markup unescaped 3.5

At a glance — Domain Modelling · 58% · Adequate · gated by DM1, DM2 ·

The Good
DM10 · Repo One transaction, one aggregate 10.0 DM11 · Repo Constructible invalid state 6.5 DM12 · Repo Ambient inputs in the domain 10.0 DM4 · Repo Rich vs anemic model 6.5 DM5 · Repo Encapsulated state 9.2 DM6 · Repo Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary 10.0 DM7 · Repo Repository granularity 10.0 DM8 · Repo Value-object opportunities 10.0 DM9 · Repo Scattered domain decisions 10.0
The Ugly
DM1 · Repo Aggregate boundaries 3.5 DM2 · Repo Strongly-typed ids 3.0

At a glance — Accessibility · 28% · Weak · gated by AC1, AC4 ·

The Good
AC2 · Repo Forms & labels 6.9
The Bad
AC3 · Repo Page structure 4.6 AC6 · Repo Visual & motion safety 4.8 AC7 · Repo A11y enforcement 4.0
The Ugly
AC1 · Repo Text alternatives 1.0 AC4 · Repo Keyboard semantics 1.0

At a glance — Performance · 60% · Strong ·

The Good
PF3 · Repo Async & latency hygiene 6.0

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).

OWASP categoryFindingsSeverity
A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration458High / Critical
A07:2025 — Authentication Failures93High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures68High / Critical
A05:2025 — Injection28Medium

Roadmap

First, ensure all media elements have appropriate text alternatives and make custom controls fully keyboard-operable with proper semantic roles. Second, integrate automated accessibility checks into the CI pipeline to enforce standards across server-rendered pages. Finally, reduce technical debt by removing dead code and unused private fields, prioritizing the identified builders and communicators.

Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.

Do thisHelpsEffortDimension
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.+5.6 ptsMediumText alternatives
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.+5.6 ptsMediumKeyboard semantics
Resolve the 4 WriteOnlyPrivateField finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs, SMTPEmailNotifier.cs, TimeWorker.cs.+2.3 ptsLowExplicit Debt
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.+2.5 ptsMediumA11y enforcement
Resolve the 27 Dead code finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs (5), CustomerBuilder.cs (4), CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs (4).+2.4 ptsMediumExplicit Debt
Where a method uses `?.` on a symbol and then dereferences it directly, settle the question once: test it before the first use and handle null, or drop the `?.`.+2.2 ptsMediumNullable reference types
Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.+2.0 ptsMediumPage structure
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging+2.0 ptsMediumStructured logging

File quality

Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 97 files carrying findings, judged against the Template bar: 30% slop · 16% mixed · 54% near-clean.

FileScoreBandWorst signal
REDACTED0.0SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.0SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.0SlopDependency Vulnerabilities: Critical CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED0.4SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.4SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.4SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.4SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.4SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.6SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.6SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.9SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.9SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.9SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.9SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED0.9SlopREDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED
REDACTED1.6SlopIaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED
REDACTED1.6SlopIaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED
REDACTED1.6SlopIaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED
REDACTED1.6SlopIaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED
REDACTED1.6SlopIaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED

How the grades work

Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.

Critical — 184

A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.

Serious — 531

Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.

Minor — 154

Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.

Could not be resolved — 5

Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.

Methodology & how to trust this report

Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 92 of 99 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 7 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.

Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.

What we checked — 99 dimensions across the health lenses
D1D2D3D4D5D6D7D9D10D11D13D14D15D17D18D19D20D21D24D25D26D27D28D29D30D31D34D35D40D41D43D44AC1AC2AC3AC4AC6AC7AX1AX10AX2AX3AX4AX5AX6AX8C3DM1DM10DM11DM12DM2DM4DM5DM6DM7DM8DM9ED5GD1IC1M1M2M3M4P1P2P4P5P6P7P8PF3S1X1X12X13X14X15X16X17X18X19X2X20X21X22X23X24X25X26X27X28X29X3X30X32X4X5

Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.

How to trust any code-health report — three questions
  1. Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 852 of 869 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
  2. Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
  3. Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.

This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.

Tools & methods

The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.

MethodBacksVersionEvaluator
Roslyn static analysisComplexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering5.3.0✓ deterministic
Native secret scannerHardcoded secrets / credentials1.0.0✓ deterministic
Watchdog duplication detector (in-process)Code duplication1.0.0✓ deterministic
Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage)Line & branch coverage10.0.400✓ deterministic
NuGet / dotnetOutdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies10.0.400✓ deterministic
git / LibGit2SharpChurn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history2.43.0 · 0.31.0✓ deterministic
gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkovSecrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533✓ deterministic
LLM (sampled · advisory)Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurementLocal LLM◐ LLM · sampled · advisory

Every finding is locatable in findings.md. Run 01a162ee-add2-722b-9516-0c6e2009eae0.

The exact command behind every deep-scan dimension — tool, version, invocation and retained raw output — is in Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail.

Run transparency — what happened this run

What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.

  • D10 Test Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The 45 test(s) behind this row are the ones the C# collector could read, and this repository also carries at least 1 test source file(s) (.js) that it cannot: it parses C# syntax and matches C# test attributes, so a vitest/jest/JUnit/pytest-style suite is invisible to it. Skipped tests, zero-assertion tests and the other quality signals on this row are UNMEASURED in that suite — their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's language coverage, not a finding that those tests are sound.
  • D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `dotnet list package` did not return usable output (restore or query failed); no outdated/vulnerable/deprecated data to assess. The tool said: `dotnet list package` exited 1 with no output.
  • D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (18 contributor(s) across 505 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 94% of the history; the other 17 hold 0.4% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. The loaded project set declares no packable project and no `.Contracts` project, so there is no intentionally-exposed surface for API consistency to be judged over.
  • D28 Secrets (history) — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. D28's config-credential rule (WD-SECRET-0002) parses each committed `.json` config as a document and reads credential-named values; `src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/appsettings.json`, `REDACTED`, `REDACTED`, `src/WorkshopManagementAPI/appsettings.json`, `REDACTED` and 23 more did not parse (JSON5, a template, several concatenated documents), so a credential bound there is UNMEASURED by that rule. gitleaks still scanned the same files as text.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. IL NOT MEASURED: the analyzer's own build of this repository failed for an ENVIRONMENT reason (exit 1) — MSBuild's engine or the CLR gave up, or our image does not carry the SDK band/targeting pack this repository needs. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo, and it is not a statement that this repository fails to build. D18 owns the question of whether this repository builds; it was not answered here.
  • AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DockerCompose (REDACTED). compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — mailserver Error context canceled vehiclemanagementapi Warning context canceled invoiceservice Warning context canceled rabbitmq Error context canceled timeservice Warning context canceled workshopmanagementeventhandler Warning Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: vehiclemanagementapi Warning context canceled WARNING: Some service image(s) must be built from source by running: docker compose build timeservice workshopmanagementapi customermanagementapi workshopmanagementeventhandler auditlogservice webapp invoiceservice notificationservice vehiclemanagementapi Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped.
  • X2 Cancellation propagation — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 30 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 70.

Repo exclusion declarations: 7 pattern(s) declared (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code) excluded 0 source file(s) from code-quality scoring. Declarations are the repo's own visible statement that a tree is machine-written or vendored — auditable in any diff, honored by GitHub the same way.

Limitations & what we did not check

Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.

Per-dimension blind spots

For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.

  • D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
  • D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
  • D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
  • D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
  • D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
  • D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
  • D7 Architectural Integrity: Layering is checked against detected/declared rules — an architecture whose boundaries live in convention or in code review, not in a rule a scanner can read, is not enforced here.
  • D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
  • D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
  • D11 Test Reliability: Flakiness is inferred from history/markers — Watchdog runs the suite once (for coverage), not the repeated runs under varied conditions that reveal nondeterminism, so a flaky test never recorded as failing is invisible here.
  • D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
  • D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
  • D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
  • D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
  • D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
  • D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
  • D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
  • D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
  • D24 Comment Value: Comment value (WHY vs WHAT) is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it is advisory and cannot weigh a comment against the precise code change it was written to explain.
  • D25 ADR Conformance: ADR conformance is the LLM-scored fraction of sampled code that follows recorded decisions — it checks the decisions that were written down and the slices it sampled, not unrecorded rules or the whole tree.
  • D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
  • D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
  • D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
  • D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
  • D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
  • D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
  • D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
  • D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
  • D40 Network Egress Confinement: Egress confinement is read from committed Kubernetes manifests — a policy applied out-of-band (cluster-default deny, a service mesh, or a cloud firewall/security group off-repo) is invisible, and a present NetworkPolicy is declared config, not proof the cluster admission-controller actually enforces it at runtime.
  • D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement: Syscall/MAC confinement is read from committed manifests — a profile applied by a cluster-wide PodSecurity default or a mutating webhook off-repo isn't seen, and a declared seccomp/AppArmor profile is config presence, not proof the node's kernel actually loaded and enforced it.
  • D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
  • D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
  • AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
  • AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
  • AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
  • AC4 Keyboard semantics: Keyboard semantics are inferred from markup attributes — interactivity wired purely in script, focus managed at runtime, and component-level handlers are invisible. A clean result means "no static keyboard-trap shape", not a keyboard-operability proof.
  • AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
  • AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
  • AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
  • C3 Audit Trail: This control is scored from in-repo evidence only — a working control configured outside the repository leaves no signal a static scan can credit.
  • DM4 Rich vs anemic model: Behaviour is detected as state mutation inside a method body — a method that enforces an invariant by validating-and-throwing without mutating reads as a query, and mutation delegated through an interface the scan can't resolve isn't credited; entities with zero public properties still drop out of the population. It detects that state changes, not whether the rule is correct.
  • DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
  • ED5 Idempotency: Idempotency is judged from the handler body's visible writes and guards — a guard enforced by a database unique constraint, a broker's exactly-once delivery, or a domain method whose no-op-when-applied logic the scan can't follow may read as at-risk; the at-risk candidates are confirmed by a SAMPLED LLM verdict (advisory, not exhaustive) and degrade to heuristic-only when no model is configured. It flags the at-least-once double-apply SHAPE, not a runtime proof of a duplicate effect.
  • M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
  • P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
  • P5 DR & Backup: Backup/restore and disaster-recovery readiness is judged from in-repo evidence — a config that exists is not a tested restore, so the absence of positive evidence is reported as "not evidenced", never scored as present.
  • P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.

The LLM boundary

LLM-set scores this run (7): D19, D20, D21, D24, D25, ED5, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.

Dimensions

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.

Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.

Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md.

D3 · God Classes10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").

Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 god class(es) detected.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md.

D4 · Code Duplication9.3 / 10Stronggated by 10 serious findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.

Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.3 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

10 duplicated block group(s) detected.

Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) · ×2src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:70
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) · ×2REDACTED:26
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2)src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:31
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2)src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/FinishMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:27
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2)src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:9

+ 3 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs, CustomerManagementDBContext.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with InvoiceWorker.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.

Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

15 projects, 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on project(s).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md.

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.

Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 17 classes have LCOM4 above 3.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md.

D7 · Architectural Integrity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the code respects its intended layering / architecture rules.

Method: Enforcement rung (Prevented/Verified/Documented) per checkable ADR via Roslyn, plus dependency cycles via the engine shared with D5/AX3. Deterministic, exact.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

All 1 mechanizable ADR(s) are enforced: 1 by analyzers, 0 by tests. Cycles found: 0.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d7_recommendation.md.

D9 · Test Distribution9.7 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.

Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.7 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

45 test methods: 44 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 1 e2e.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.

D10 · Test Quality10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.

Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 skipped, 0 zero-assertion, 3 mock references across 45 tests. Measured on the C# suite only — at least 1 test source file(s) (.js) went unread, so its test quality is unmeasured and is not in these counts.

Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_CustomerRegistered_Should_Register_Customer_In_Repository · ×8src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/InvoiceWorkerTests/HandleCustomerRegisteredTests.cs:6
Mock framework: Moq · ×3

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D11 · Test Reliability10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the tests pass reliably, with no flakiness.

Method: Suite re-run N times within tiered wall-clock budgets (unit to e2e); tests failing non-deterministically across runs flagged; guarded tests retried when #if guards detected.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 flaky across 3 measured tier(s). unit: measured (0 flaky); e2e: measured (0 flaky); other: measured (0 flaky).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d11_recommendation.md.

D13 · REDACTED Scanning0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.

Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

36 secret(s) detected.

REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 60 Leaked secret finding(s) in REDACTED Scanning — start with REDACTED (29), REDACTED (27), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (60 issue-level).
  2. Enforce REDACTED Scanning in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d13_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D14 · License Compliance10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.

Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 105 packages use a banned license. ★ DEPTH: this repository's MSBuild projects declare 37 direct `PackageReference`(s), and 99 further package(s) were reached beyond them by closing the graph over nuget.org's own nuspec dependency graph — so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is inside this verdict. A package whose licence nuget.org could not be asked for is not graded, and version ranges are taken at their lower bound, so this is the closure as that graph states it rather than a restored consumer's exact resolution.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d14_recommendation.md.

D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.

Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md.

D17 · Explicit Debt6.7 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.

Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.7 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

5 deducted debt markers + 27 dead symbols across 4683 LoC in the .NET projects (1.6/KLoC) → score 6.7.

WriteOnlyPrivateField · ×4src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs:7
Dead code: ClearEvents · ×27src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Core/AggregateRoot.cs:86
CommentedOutCodesrc/CustomerManagementAPI/Model/Customer.cs:14

What to do

  1. Resolve the 27 Dead code finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs (5), CustomerBuilder.cs (4), CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (27 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 4 WriteOnlyPrivateField finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs, SMTPEmailNotifier.cs, TimeWorker.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 CommentedOutCode finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with Customer.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D18 · Solution Shape10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.

Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

15 projects, 222 source files, 7492 hand-written lines of code (4683 production / 2809 test — the split is derived per file: test is what its project, its own path, or a compile-guarded region marks as test, and a file carrying no test signal counts as production), plus 435 generated (machine-written code — designer, scaffolded and tool-emitted files — excluded from quality), 7 inter-project edges.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d18_recommendation.md.

D19 · Documentation QualityExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

The Pitstop repository is well documented: the READMEs for each of the four main projects (CustomerManagementAPI, VehicleManagementAPI, WorkshopManagementAPI, NotificationService) describe what they do and how to run them. The ADR/ADR series documents a cohesive set of design decisions (e.g. Seq as centralized logging, custom Infrastructure.Messaging abstraction library), with Status/date/context, rationale, consequences, alternatives considered for each topic. There is no single missing document; the XML-doc coverage figures reflect only 5% of the referenced projects being documented while the ADRs are complete and well-structured. The repository's documentation is comprehensive and well-structured across READMEs, architecture/Docs markdown files, and XML-doc coverage (Infrastructure.Messaging at 5%, CustomerManagementAPI and VehicleManagementAPI zero). The READMEs for each directory describe what the directory contains and how to use its contents; none lacks an overview, installation, usage, or contribution guidance. The cross-cutting concepts document is a single long file that is well-organized into topics like messaging/event-driven communication, persistence (database-per-service), logging/observability, health monitoring, resilience, and API documentation with quality scenarios. Architecture decisions are recorded as ADRs in the ADRs folder, and risks plus technical debt appear in dedicated files. Glossary defines DDD terms for readers to look up. (10 of 25 sampled documents could not be assessed: 1 of 3 evaluation groups failed.)

XML-doc coverage: Infrastructure.Messaging · ×11src/Infrastructure.Messaging/Infrastructure.Messaging.csproj

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D20 · ADR QualityExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).

Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Evaluated 10 ADR(s) individually; mean quality 9.7/10 (consistently complete and clear). 0 flagged with a specific gap.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d20_recommendation.md.

D21 · Naming ConsistencyExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

1 naming inconsistencies across 200 sampled symbols.

Inconsistent naming for the same concept (user identifier) across different infrastructure components. One uses the noun 'username' and the other uses the adjective 'userName' (camelCase vs PascalCase within the compound word).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D24 · Comment ValueStrong◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether comments are worth it — explaining WHY (valuable) rather than WHAT (redundant).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on deterministically sampled inline comments with surrounding code; findings verified back to sampled comments by substring match. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Strong / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

46 valuable / 0 redundant across 200 sampled comments.

What to do

  1. Improve Comment Value — currently 8.8/10. — 46 valuable / 0 redundant across 200 sampled comments.

Detailed fixes: d24_recommendation.md.

D25 · ADR ConformanceExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether the code actually follows the decisions recorded in the project's ADRs.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature against ADRs plus a deterministic structural code summary; findings linked to repo-rooted ADR paths for traceability. Advisory.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

8 conform / 0 violate across 10 ADRs.

ADR not followed: ADR-0009: Custom Infrastructure.Messaging Abstraction Librarydocs/ADRs/0009-infrastructure-messaging-abstraction.md:19detected by adr-prohibition

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d25_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D26 · Project Cohesion10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether each project is a focused, coherent unit rather than an oversized grab-bag.

Method: Project size overshoot penalties (LoC / public-type count / namespace count, 2-of-3 flag) weighted by log magnitude. Exhaustive across projects, deterministic, LLM-independent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0 of 15 projects flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md.

D27 · Navigability9.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How far you must trace to follow a call — low indirection and co-located slices read easier.

Method: Call indirection (interface hops, cross-namespace calls, slice-locality scaled) over a sampled set of method invocations, size-aware baseline. Sampled; confidence discounted by symbol-resolution gaps. C# also names each pass-through layer (a class whose every public method only forwards its own parameters to one collaborator) as a located finding; the score is not affected.

Coverage: Slice locality from the first namespace segments, SAMPLED (≤400 methods) — not exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

90 % of calls cross a namespace and 12 % go through an interface, but 91 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.

What to do

  1. Improve Navigability — currently 9.0/10. — 90 % of calls cross a namespace and 12 % go through an interface, but 91 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.

Detailed fixes: d27_recommendation.md.

D28 · Secrets (history)0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.

Method: REDACTED scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

32 finding(s): 0 critical, 32 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 30 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED (14), REDACTED (14), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (30 issue-level).
  2. Resolve the 2 High secret finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)2.3 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.

Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.

Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.3 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

28 finding(s): 0 critical, 0 high, 28 medium, 0 low. semgrep hit a parse error in 7 file(s) — `src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/_includes/bugify.html`, `src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/_includes/docs-navbar.html` (line 9, line 12, line 15), `src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/_includes/docs-sidebar.html` (line 34), `src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/_includes/header.html` (line 16), `src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/_layouts/examples.html` (lines 1–3), … (+2 more) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them.

REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 25 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (25 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.

Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no REDACTED is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

68 finding(s): 10 critical, 32 high, 23 medium, 3 low.

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

+ 1 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 32 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (25), REDACTED (3), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (32 issue-level).
  2. Resolve the 9 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (8), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 Critical vulnerability finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).

Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D31 · IaC & Container Security0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether Dockerfiles / Terraform / Kubernetes config follow security best practices.

Method: IaC/container misconfiguration scan via trivy config (REDACTED/Terraform/K8s/Helm/CloudFormation); severity rules to 0-10 moderate normalizer. NotApplicable without manifests. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

458 finding(s): 0 critical, 27 high, 361 medium, 70 low.

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 361 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (27), REDACTED (25), REDACTED (24). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (361 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 27 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (11), REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (27 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 70 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (5), REDACTED (5), REDACTED (5). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (70 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D34 · Knowledge Freshness10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.

Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked. Counted over 19 of the 179 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md.

D35 · Change Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.

Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.

Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md.

D40 · Network Egress Confinement6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether Kubernetes workloads restrict network EGRESS with a NetworkPolicy (or Cilium policy), limiting where a compromised pod can send data or reach a command-and-control server. Presence of committed egress-restricting policy, not runtime enforcement.

Method: Deterministic YAML-manifest inspection (no external tool, no Roslyn — language-agnostic): Kubernetes workloads gate applicability; credits a NetworkPolicy / Cilium policy that restricts egress (policyTypes: [Egress] / egress rules). Reward-leaning (neutral floor climbing to 10, never a deduction — baseline misconfigs stay with D31). Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0/2 network-egress controls present (network policy, egress restriction).

No network policy

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No network policy finding(s) in Network Egress Confinement. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d40_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether Kubernetes workloads confine the kernel boundary — a seccomp profile (RuntimeDefault/Localhost) plus an AppArmor/SELinux mandatory-access-control layer — shrinking the syscall attack surface a container escape would use. Presence of committed confinement config, not runtime enforcement.

Method: Deterministic YAML-manifest inspection (no external tool, no Roslyn): on Kubernetes workloads, credits a seccomp profile (RuntimeDefault/Localhost) and an AppArmor/SELinux MAC layer. Reward-leaning (neutral floor climbing to 10); NotApplicable without workloads. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0/25 workload(s) run every container under a seccomp profile; 0/25 declare an AppArmor/SELinux profile.

No seccomp profile · ×25REDACTED:2

What to do

  1. Resolve the 25 No seccomp profile finding(s) in Kernel & Syscall Confinement — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (25 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d41_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D43 · Malicious Dependencies10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.

Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d43_recommendation.md.

D44 · Platform End-of-Life10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.

Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 15 platform declaration(s) and 4 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.

AC1 · Text alternatives1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.

Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.

Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.

  • An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative. (×3) — src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Details.cshtml:38, src/WebApp/Views/Home/About.cshtml:2, src/WebApp/Views/Home/Index.cshtml:6

What to do

  • Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
AC2 · Forms & labels6.9 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.

Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.

Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.

  • This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it. — src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/New.cshtml:30
  • This <label> has no for and wraps no form control, so it names nothing: assistive tech never announces it, and clicking the caption focuses no field. Note that an id on the label is not an association — it is the TARGET of one, so a control still has to point at it. Give the label for="<the control's id>", move the control inside the label, or point the control's aria-labelledby at this label's id. — src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/New.cshtml:15

What to do

  • Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
AC3 · Page structure4.6 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.

Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.

Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.

  • The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). (×4) — src/CustomerManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2, src/VehicleManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2, src/WebApp/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml:2, …
  • No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. (×4) — src/CustomerManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2, src/VehicleManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2, src/WebApp/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml:2, …
  • A <table> with data cells but no <th> gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as <th> (with a scope). (×3) — src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Details.cshtml:7, src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/Details.cshtml:8, src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/Details.cshtml:8

What to do

  • Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
AC4 · Keyboard semantics1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether interactive behaviour is keyboard-reachable — no click handler on a non-interactive element lacking a role, tabindex and key handler, no element the repo's own CSS styles `cursor: pointer` without giving it any of the three, no unfocusable element whose only binding is a mouse enter/leave pair or a double-click, no positive tabindex, no href-less anchor, no placeholder-href (#/javascript) link acting as a button. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.

Method: Static markup-model scan: click handlers on non-interactive elements lacking role+tabindex+key handler, positive tabindex values, and href-less anchors. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.

Coverage: Population: elements that pose a keyboard-semantics question, in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx) — a non-natively-interactive element carrying a click handler, a double-click or hover enter/leave binding, a pointer-only gesture on a tabindex="0" element, or `cursor: pointer` from the repo's own CSS; an href-less or placeholder-href (#, javascript:) anchor; and any element with a positive tabindex. Natively interactive elements used correctly (<button>, <a href>, form controls) are NOT in the population — there is nothing to judge — so a page of nothing but correct controls gives AC4 nothing to measure. Keyboard reachability is judged from the markup, never from a rendered page. ★ An interactive element declared in a tagged-template (html`…`) or hyperscript frontend is NOT in this population — no producer reads either — so an empty population is reported as an analyzer gap, never as "this repository has no interactive elements".

  • A click handler on a plain element isn't keyboard-operable. Use a <button>, or add role + tabindex="0" + a key handler. (×3) — src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Index.cshtml:19, src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/Index.cshtml:18, src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/Index.cshtml:27

What to do

  • Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety4.8 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.

Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.

Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.

  • `#skippy` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/assets/scss/_skiplink.scss:8
  • `.btn.focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_buttons.scss:25
  • `.carousel-control-prev` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_carousel.scss:131
  • `.custom-range:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_custom-forms.scss:322
  • `.modal` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_modal.scss:29
  • `.modal-content` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_modal.scss:80
  • `a:not([href]):not([tabindex]):focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_reboot.scss:226
  • `.offcanvas-collapse` moves (`transition-property: left, visibility`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/examples/offcanvas/offcanvas.css:24
  • `.progress-bar-animated` moves (`animation: progress-bar-stripes $progress-bar-animation-timing`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_progress.scss:33

What to do

  • Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.

Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.

Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.

  • No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 21 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.

What to do

  • Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
AX1 · Captive dependencies1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether any singleton service captures a scoped/transient dependency — a silent lifetime/threading bug.

Method: Roslyn scan: DI registrations parsed from AddSingleton/Scoped/Transient; each singleton checked for captured shorter-lifetime dependencies. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • `EventHandlerWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `WorkshopManagementDBContext dbContext`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `WorkshopManagementDBContext` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes. — src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:8
  • `InvoiceWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IInvoiceRepository repo`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IInvoiceRepository` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes. — src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:10
  • `InvoiceWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IEmailCommunicator emailCommunicator`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IEmailCommunicator` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes. — src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:10
  • `NotificationWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `INotificationRepository repo`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `INotificationRepository` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes. — src/NotificationService/NotificationWorker.cs:9
  • `NotificationWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IEmailNotifier emailNotifier`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IEmailNotifier` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes. — src/NotificationService/NotificationWorker.cs:9

What to do

  • Don't inject scoped/transient services into singletons; resolve them per-use via IServiceScopeFactory or a factory delegate, or align the lifetimes.
AX10 · Code composition6.1 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does.

Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.

Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.

What to do

  • The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
AX2 · Stateful singletons5.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether singleton services avoid mutable shared instance state that concurrent callers would race on.

Method: Roslyn scan: singleton field mutations unguarded by lock or Interlocked, per type; syntax-based guard detection. Deterministic, traceable per field.

  • `TimeWorker` is a singleton (one shared instance) but mutates instance state outside any lock (_lastCheck; e.g. `_lastCheck` at line 36). — src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:3

What to do

  • Keep singletons stateless or back their state with thread-safe types (Concurrent*/Immutable*); otherwise concurrent callers race.
AX3 · Project dependency cycles10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).

Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • The namespaces Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler ↔ Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess ↔ Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Model depend on each other. The lightest dependency in the cycle is Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler → Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess (Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker → Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess.WorkshopManagementDBContext, 1 type pair(s)); cut that one first, e.g. by moving the shared type to a namespace both can use or inverting it behind an interface. — src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:3

What to do

  • Break namespace cycles inside a project by moving the shared type to a namespace both sides can use, or by inverting the back edge behind an interface.
AX4 · Dependency direction10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.

Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.

AX5 · Architecture & structure10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.

Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.

AX6 · Interface segregation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').

Method: Roslyn scan: public interface declared-member counts (accessors fold into their property/event); fat-interface threshold (over 15 declared members) flagged per type. Each finding also reports the distinct-OPERATION count — members counted by name, so an overload group counts once — which decides whether it states the caller-side ISP harm or the implementer-side burden of an overload set. TypeScript: exported interfaces that declare behaviour, counted over their REQUIRED operations (method signatures and function-typed properties with no `?`, once per signature) — data-shape interfaces and ambient .d.ts declarations are outside the population; JavaScript declares no interfaces and is not applicable. Deterministic, type-level.

AX8 · Test isolation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether production projects stay free of references to test projects — tests may depend on production, never the reverse.

Method: Csproj graph: each production project checked for references to test projects (identified by test-framework presence, not name). Zero violations is clean. Deterministic.

C3 · Audit Trail7.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Whether changes to sensitive data are recorded (who, what, when) for compliance + incident response.

Method: Roslyn scan: audit-trail mechanism graded (SaveChanges interceptor/immutable AuditLog/[Audited] strong; bare IAuditable/AddAuditing weak). Deterministic.

  • An audit mechanism is present, but the trail is not yet complete — missing: an EF SaveChanges interceptor (or equivalent write-side hook, e.g. an event-store append every change flows through), [Audited] per-entity coverage.

What to do

  • Back the audit convention with a structural mechanism: an EF SaveChanges interceptor (or equivalent) writing every sensitive change to an immutable audit log, and apply [Audited] to the entities that need a who-changed-what trail.
DM1 · Aggregate boundaries3.5 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether aggregates reference each other by identity (id) rather than by direct object reference — the core DDD consistency-boundary rule.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): aggregate roots identified by convention; each aggregate field checked for direct references to other aggregates versus id-only. Deterministic, DDD-native.

Coverage: Population: aggregate roots identified by AggregateRoot/IAggregateRoot base/interface NAME convention; reference-by-identity then checked exhaustively within that set — a root not using those names is invisible.

  • `WorkshopPlanning` references the aggregate root `MaintenanceJob` directly (via `Jobs`) — hold its `MaintenanceJobId` instead. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/WorkshopPlanning.cs:8

What to do

  • Reference other aggregates by their strongly-typed id, never by object reference, so each aggregate stays an independent consistency boundary.
DM10 · One transaction, one aggregate10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether a single operation mutates more than one aggregate root. An aggregate is a consistency boundary, so saving two together fuses them into one — the second's invariants come to depend on the first's transaction, and the pair can no longer be separated. Reads of other aggregates are not counted.

Method: Neutral body surface (DDD-gated): every method body scanned for repository WRITE calls (Add/Update/Save/Remove/Delete/Insert/Store and their async forms), keyed on the ARGUMENT type rather than the repository type — three `IRepository<T>` writes collapse to one repository but are three distinct aggregates. Reads (Get/Find/Load/Query) are excluded, so loading another aggregate for context never counts. Score is offending methods over methods that write at all. Deterministic.

DM11 · Constructible invalid state6.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether an aggregate can be constructed in a state its own rules forbid — a public constructor that takes a raw primitive, stores it, and validates nothing, with no factory beside it. A constructor taking only value objects is not counted: each parameter has already validated itself.

Method: Neutral surface (DDD-gated): each non-abstract entity/aggregate checked for a PUBLIC constructor taking at least one RAW PRIMITIVE parameter whose body contains no guard token (throw / Guard. / Ensure. / ArgumentException / CheckRule), on a type that also offers no static Create/Of/From/New factory. A constructor taking only value objects is never charged -- measured: 64 of 87 unguarded public constructors on the C# corpus take value objects only, so ignoring parameter types would be 73% false positives. One finding per entity. Deterministic.

  • `Customer`'s public constructor takes `customerId`, `name`, `telephoneNumber` as raw primitives, and neither of the two things that would make that safe was found. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: for VALIDATION, the constructor body was scanned for `throw`, `Guard.`, `Ensure.`, `ArgumentNullException`, `ArgumentException`, `CheckRule` or `Requires.` — a guard reached through a helper method those tokens do not name is not seen; for a FACTORY, only this type's OWN static members were read, and only names beginning `Create`, `Of`, `From`, `New` or `Build` — one inherited from a base type, one on a companion builder, or one called `Parse`, `Make` or `Rehydrate` is not seen. If either exists, this row is wrong. If neither does, a caller can build a `Customer` that breaks the rules it exists to enforce, and every rule downstream then has to cope with a state the model said was impossible. Guard in the constructor, take value objects that validate themselves, or make the constructor private behind a `Create` that can refuse. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Customer.cs:8
  • `Vehicle`'s public constructor takes `brand`, `type`, `ownerId` as raw primitives, and neither of the two things that would make that safe was found. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: for VALIDATION, the constructor body was scanned for `throw`, `Guard.`, `Ensure.`, `ArgumentNullException`, `ArgumentException`, `CheckRule` or `Requires.` — a guard reached through a helper method those tokens do not name is not seen; for a FACTORY, only this type's OWN static members were read, and only names beginning `Create`, `Of`, `From`, `New` or `Build` — one inherited from a base type, one on a companion builder, or one called `Parse`, `Make` or `Rehydrate` is not seen. If either exists, this row is wrong. If neither does, a caller can build a `Vehicle` that breaks the rules it exists to enforce, and every rule downstream then has to cope with a state the model said was impossible. Guard in the constructor, take value objects that validate themselves, or make the constructor private behind a `Create` that can refuse. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:9

What to do

  • Give each aggregate one way in that can refuse — a guarded constructor, value-object parameters that validate themselves, or a private constructor behind a factory that returns a failure.
DM12 · Ambient inputs in the domain10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether domain types receive the time and randomness their rules depend on, rather than reading the process clock or a global random source directly — an ambient read makes the rule it feeds untestable at the instant that matters and lets two reads inside one operation disagree.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated, C#/VB only): domain-layer types scanned for ambient reads — DateTime/DateTimeOffset.Now/UtcNow/Today, Random.Shared, new Random(), Stopwatch.GetTimestamp — resolved against the semantic model, with a comment/string-stripped token fallback only where resolution fails. Body reads are scored; field/property initialisers are surfaced unscored. Apply/When folds excluded (ES1 owns them). Deterministic, symbol-resolved.

DM2 · Strongly-typed ids3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — How much of the domain uses strongly-typed ids vs raw Guid/string/int — adoption curve, not all-or-nothing.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): strongly-typed id adoption on domain entities/events; raw Guid/int/string ids counted versus wrapped types. An id wrapper is recognised by VALUE SEMANTICS, not by being a struct — a record struct, a record class (`record ApartmentId(Guid Value)`) or a class declared by a typed-id base (`class MemberId : TypedIdValueBase`) all count, while a plain mutable class (reference equality) and a verb-phrase query record (`GetCustomerById`) do not. Deterministic, adoption percentage.

Coverage: Population: id-like members by *Id/*Key NAME suffix; strongly-typed-ID shape then checked semantically — non-suffixed identifiers are not seen.

  • `Vehicle.OwnerId` is a raw `String` — give it a strongly-typed id: a dedicated single-field type wrapping the `String`, in whatever form your language spells that. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:7

What to do

  • Adopt strongly-typed ids across the domain — finish the migration or document the boundary; primitive ids invite transposed-argument bugs.
DM4 · Rich vs anemic model6.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether aggregates/entities carry the behaviour that protects their invariants, rather than being data bags driven by external services.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): entity method BODIES classified mutator-vs-query — only methods that mutate the entity's own declared state count as invariant-protecting behaviour, so a getter/passthrough doesn't rescue an anemic class. Deterministic, exhaustive over domain-layer entities.

Coverage: Population: entities by name/base convention; rich-vs-anemic judged by classifying each method body mutator-vs-query — logic-bearing domain types outside the convention are invisible.

  • `Customer` is an aggregate/entity with 2 data propert(ies) but no state-changing behaviour (only data and queries) — the business logic lives in a service. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Customer.cs:3
  • `Vehicle` is an aggregate/entity with 3 data propert(ies) but no state-changing behaviour (only data and queries) — the business logic lives in a service. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:3

What to do

  • Move business rules onto the aggregates/entities they govern so invariants are enforced at the source, not in anemic services.
DM5 · Encapsulated state9.2 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether entities protect their state — private/init-only setters, and collections handed out as read-only views rather than the mutable backing collection — instead of exposing writable state that bypasses invariants. Softened when a rehydration framework (Marten/EF) is present.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): entities scanned for publicly writable state — public setters, and (C#/VB) own mutable collections handed out through an auto-property, a public field or a bare-field expression getter, where a computed/copying getter is never charged. One finding per entity; score softened when Marten/EF rehydration frameworks present. Deterministic, framework-aware.

Coverage: Population: entities by convention; encapsulation (setter shape) checked exhaustively within the set.

  • `WorkshopPlanning` exposes its own state through a mutable collection (Jobs) — a caller can add to or remove from it directly, without passing through the methods that enforce the invariants. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/WorkshopPlanning.cs:3

What to do

  • Make entity setters private/init-only and hand collections out as IReadOnlyList/IReadOnlyCollection over a private backing field; change state only through methods that enforce the invariants (Marten/EF can bind via constructor or private setters).
DM6 · Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether the domain layer stays free of infrastructure dependencies (EF/Marten/HTTP/ASP.NET) — the clean-architecture dependency rule.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): domain-layer types scanned for infrastructure usage in member SIGNATURES and inside method/accessor BODIES — resolved calls and object-creations into EF/Marten/HTTP/Mongo/Redis/message-bus types (not just a namespace allowlist). Deterministic, symbol-resolved, exhaustive over domain-layer bodies, DDD-native.

Coverage: Domain layer identified by NAMESPACE heuristic; infrastructure then resolved by symbol in member SIGNATURES and method/accessor BODIES — rename the layer and the check evaporates.

DM7 · Repository granularity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether repositories are per aggregate root (not per child entity) and keep the persistence query handle behind the contract, so the root's invariants can't be bypassed.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): repository abstraction detection; repositories over non-aggregate-root entities flagged, and (C#/VB) repository INTERFACES whose members return a live persistence query handle (IQueryable/DbSet/IMongoQueryable) — implementations and specification evaluators are out of population by design, since composing a query internally is what an implementation is for. Deterministic, DDD-native.

Coverage: Population: repositories + aggregate roots by NAME convention; per-root repository rule checked within the set.

DM8 · Value-object opportunities10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether clusters of primitives that travel together (a missing value object) are extracted — a low-weight suggestion, LLM-confirmed when configured.

Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): primitive parameter clusters recurring three or more times across signatures extracted, then confirmed by language model when configured. Advisory, low-weight.

DM9 · Scattered domain decisions10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Domain Modelling — Whether one domain rule is decided — or one measurement produced — in more than one place, rather than living on the type that owns it.

Method: Neutral body surface plus Roslyn (DDD-gated), two arms. DECISION (Roslyn only): a predicate over a domain type's members judged in two or more types, where none of those decisions live on the owning type — operands of comparisons and relational property patterns only, so a member merely passed as an argument is not judged. DERIVATION: a plain all-numeric carrier of ≥2 members, with no base type and exactly one constructor, CONSTRUCTED as the result of a method (returned or assigned, never inline as an argument) in two or more types other than its own — the same measurement produced twice, which centralising the judgement does not fix. DERIVATION runs on every language whose frontend declares the produced-or-passed fact per construction (Roslyn and the Java sidecar today); a target with only the derivation arm carries an engine gap naming the decision arm as not assessed, and a frontend that declares nothing keeps the dimension not measured rather than clean. Single-member rules, test code and generated code are out of population for both. Advisory.

ED5 · Idempotency7.7 / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

Other · Readiness — Whether retry-prone mutations (command handlers + message/event consumers) are idempotent so an at-least-once redelivery or client retry doesn't double-apply the effect — heuristic at-risk detection confirmed by language model, advisory.

Method: Roslyn heuristic (any mutation, ungated): command handlers and message/event consumers that mutate persistent state without a visible idempotency guard (exists/dedup check, upsert, idempotency-key/inbox, conditional/versioned write, fixed-value set) flagged as at-risk; each at-risk candidate then confirmed or cleared by a language model as genuinely non-idempotent versus naturally-idempotent. Advisory without a model (heuristic-only, degraded), per-candidate judged with one.

Coverage: Population: retry-prone mutations — command handlers (CQRS write side) + message/event consumers (IConsumer/I*EventHandler) — that mutate persistent state; runs on any repo with mutations, not only event-driven ones. The at-risk subset (no obvious guard) is a HEURISTIC candidate set, each then LLM-JUDGED non-idempotent vs safe; a handler outside those conventions, or a guard the LLM can't confirm, is bounded by the sample. Degrades to heuristic-only when no model is configured.

  • `WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker.HandleAsync` mutates persistent state (a database save) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write. (×2) — src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:67, src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:91

What to do

  • Make retry-prone mutations idempotent — guard each write with an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write, so a re-run doesn't double-apply.
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.

IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords: members that only throw a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant, async methods that never await, dead `if (false)` / `#if false` branches, and skeleton types most of whose members are holes. A real, objective slice of technical debt.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.

  • A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers). (×2) — src/WebApp/Program.cs:3, src/WebApp/Program.cs:40

What to do

  • Clear the softer debt: remove commented-out code and dead branches, re-enable or delete skipped tests, and replace blanket warning suppressions with targeted ones.
M1 · Documentation (README)6.3 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.

Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.

What to do

  • Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
  • Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
  • Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
  • Add a README to the 13 of 15 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1.7 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation8.5 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.

Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.

What to do

  • Grow the ADR log (currently 10) — reach 20 to raise the maturity tier; document significant decisions as they're made.
M3 · Folder & project structure10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.

Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.

M4 · Documentation accuracy0.0 / 10Critical◐ Sampled · advisory

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.

  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md:102
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md:102
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/collapse.md names `.collapse.show`, but no file or folder `.collapse.show` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/collapse.md:136
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/navbar.md names `.collapse.navbar-collapse`, but no file or folder `.collapse.navbar-collapse` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/navbar.md:31
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md:13
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md:13
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md:13
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md:13
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md:41
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md:41
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md:40
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md:40
  • src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/javascript.md names `bootstrap.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/javascript.md:11

What to do

  • Reconcile the README with reality: src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists; src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists; src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/collapse.md names `.collapse.show`, but no file or folder `.collapse.show` exists; src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/navbar.md names `.collapse.navbar-collapse`, but no file or folder `.collapse.navbar-collapse` exists; src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists.
P1 · CI/CD gates8.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.

Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • A CI pipeline exists but no build step was matched — changes may merge without the build ever running. A build step may be invoked directly as a command, or declared as a task that a runner named in the pipeline resolves.

What to do

  • Add an explicit build step to your CI pipeline — your stack's own build command, or, if the pipeline delegates to a task runner, a build task that runner executes in CI — so every change is built before merge.
P2 · Observability8.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: structured-logging frameworks (Serilog, NLog), OpenTelemetry, and health-check endpoint patterns. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • `src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs` reports through `Console.Write…` at line 85 although other files in its project log through a logger. Console lines carry no level, category or structured properties and never reach the log pipeline or its exporters. — src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:85

What to do

  • Replace `Console.Write…` in service code with the project's injected `ILogger<T>` (message templates with named properties), so delivery outcomes and failures reach the log pipeline with a level and a category.
  • Add OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (ActivitySource / AddMetrics) so requests are traceable across the system, not just health-probable.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback8.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.

Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.

What to do

  • Add an approval/environment gate (required reviewers / protection rules) before production promotion.
P5 · DR & Backup4.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether disaster recovery is planned and codified — backups, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees — from IaC + container manifests + docs, never the live cloud.

Method: Filesystem scan: disaster recovery, backup, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees from IaC, manifests, and docs. Exhaustive, deterministic, never a live environment.

What to do

  • Document RTO/RPO and a tested restore procedure (a backup config alone isn't disaster recovery).
  • No persistence guard on critical data stores — use Docker named volumes (or your orchestrator's persistent-volume equivalent) so the data store can't be wiped by a container recreate (or, in cloud, set purge-protection / soft-delete / prevent_destroy).
P6 · Release Hygiene5.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.

Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)

What to do

  • Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether outbound HTTP calls are wrapped in resilience (retry/timeout/circuit-breaker) so a failing dependency doesn't cascade.

Method: Source scan: outbound HTTP clients and what bounds them — resilience handlers (Polly, AddStandardResilienceHandler) on .NET; on Go, the JVM, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Elixir, Swift, Dart and Erlang, a timeout, deadline, retry or breaker beside each call, or a process-wide client default (a framework-wide deadline such as Drupal core's, Laravel's or actix's awc counts). Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<ICustomerManagementAPI, CustomerManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default). — src/WebApp/Program.cs:22
  • `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<IVehicleManagementAPI, VehicleManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default). — src/WebApp/Program.cs:23
  • `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<IWorkshopManagementAPI, WorkshopManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default). — src/WebApp/Program.cs:24

What to do

  • Add `AddStandardResilienceHandler()` (or a Polly policy and an explicit timeout) to each client registration flagged here, so a flaky dependency can't take the app down.
P8 · Schema migrations10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Readiness · Readiness — Whether EF Core schema changes go through versioned migrations rather than the un-evolvable EnsureCreated().

Method: Roslyn scan: EF Core DbContext for a versioned migrations directory versus bare EnsureCreated usage; off .NET, a file scan of dependency manifests, migration histories (Flyway, Liquibase, Alembic, Django, Rails, Prisma, TypeORM, Knex/Sequelize, golang-migrate, goose, Laravel, Doctrine, Diesel/sqlx) and schema auto-create in production source or config. Exhaustive, deterministic.

PF3 · Async & latency hygiene6.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.

Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.

  • 3 blocking call(s) on async work (.Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult()) — these waste a thread and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one). (×3) — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:32, src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:18, src/NotificationService/Repositories/SqlServerNotificationRepository.cs:18

What to do

  • Make the call chain async end-to-end and await it — never block on a Task with .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult().
S1 · Web-Security Posture8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Transport security, security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order and crypto hygiene (presence, not runtime).

Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.

  • None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. (−2.0 on this card.)
  • This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves. (×4) — src/CustomerManagementAPI/Program.cs:1, src/VehicleManagementAPI/Program.cs:1, src/WebApp/Program.cs:1, …

What to do

  • Add security response headers (Content-Security-Policy first, then Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options and a frame policy) — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them.
X1 · Async correctness6.1 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.

  • `async void` can't be awaited and its exceptions crash the process instead of propagating. Return `Task` — or, where the delegate contract requires void (timer/event/callback registrations), make this a thin void shim that awaits a Task-returning inner method inside try/catch so exceptions are contained. (×2) — src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:102, src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:29
  • Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process. (×3) — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:28, src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:14, src/NotificationService/Repositories/SqlServerNotificationRepository.cs:14
  • `Thread.Sleep` parks the thread for the whole delay: no other work runs on it, and under load the pool must grow to make up for it. `await Task.Delay(…)` suspends only this method. — src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:41

What to do

  • async void method: Stop
X12 · Unreachable branch10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X14 · Bypassable address classification10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X16 · Unfloored truncation loop10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

  • `RabbitMQMessagePublisher` declares a finalizer (line 110), but nothing in the type is unmanaged: no `IntPtr`/`UIntPtr` or pointer field, no `SafeHandle`, no `HandleRef`, no `extern`/`DllImport` member and no `Marshal`/`GCHandle`/`NativeMemory` use. A finalizer can only release what the garbage collector cannot, so on a purely-managed type it releases nothing and costs something: every instance is put on the finalizer queue, survives at least one extra collection, and is then finalized on a thread that is NOT the disposing one — where the managed objects it touches may already have been finalized themselves. Delete the finalizer (and the `GC.SuppressFinalize` that exists to defuse it); if a handle is added later, wrap it in a `SafeHandle`, which brings its own correct finalization. — src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:110

What to do

  • Each finding names the value and the span that decides who owns it — the `new` that created it, or the constructor parameter that handed it over. Confirm ownership from that span, then make the disposal match it: release what this type created, leave what it was injected with to whoever created THAT, and drop a finalizer whose type holds nothing unmanaged to release.
X19 · Unrestored process-global state10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X2 · Cancellation propagation4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether async methods accept a CancellationToken so work can be cancelled (adoption curve).

Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.

  • Only 0/69 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can't be stopped early when the caller gives up — whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against your hosting model.
  • No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started. (×39) — src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:102, src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:109, src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:73, …

What to do

  • Thread a CancellationToken through async methods so work stops promptly on cancellation.
X20 · Mistyped argument guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `ArgumentNullException` tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X22 · Contradicted release guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.

Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped3.5 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.

Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

  • `body.ToString()` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through an HTML e-mail body with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:221

What to do

  • Each finding names the expression, the attribute it lands in and the line. Confirm the value's origin from the read this analyzer traced, then escape it at the sink or validate it against the shape the attribute accepts before interpolating.
X25 · Inert configuration knob10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.

Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.

Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a `foreach` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is enumerating invalidates the enumerator it is holding, so the next `MoveNext` throws `InvalidOperationException` and the remaining items are never seen.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X3 · Exception handling10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.

X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X32 · Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a plugin lookup names the type it means — searching every assembly loaded into the process for a candidate whose SIMPLE name equals a string supplied at runtime, and taking the first one found, is decided by assembly LOAD ORDER rather than by this source, so the same name can resolve to a different type on the next run.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every invocation of `First`/`FirstOrDefault`/`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` whose OWN expression subtree contains both a `GetAssemblies()` call and a `GetTypes()`/`GetExportedTypes()` call — a single-element pick out of every type loaded into the process. A nested selector in the same chain sees no `GetAssemblies()` in its own subtree and is outside the population, so one lookup counts once however many links its chain has. A finding additionally needs both remaining halves: the selector must be `First`/`FirstOrDefault` (`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` reports the ambiguity rather than resolving it, and is counted and never reported), and the chain must carry an `==` comparison of `<lambda parameter>.Name` against something that is not a literal. The receiver must be a plain identifier bound by one of the chain’s own lambdas, which places `assembly.GetName().Name == "X"` outside the rule by construction. One exemption: a `.Name` test joined by `&&` to a `FullName`/`AssemblyQualifiedName` test on the same identifier is spared; joined by `||` it is not. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X4 · Structured logging2.7 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal`/`verbose`/`silly`/`http`/`log` call on a receiver named for a logger, in a package whose own or an enclosing `package.json` declares a logger that carries values as fields (pino, pino-http, nestjs-pino, Fastify, winston, bunyan, tslog, LogTape, roarr), whose first deciding argument is a template literal with substitutions; an object-literal fields argument is stepped over, a plain string message clears the call. Python is read the same way: a `debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error`/`exception`/`critical`/`log` call on a logger in a file that imports the standard library’s `logging` or structlog (loguru, which formats at the call, is not judged), whose message is a whole f-string with a non-constant field; a `%`-formatted, `.format()`-ed or concatenated message is not convicted, as in C#. PHP is read the same way: a PSR-3 level call (`emergency`…`debug`, `log`) on a logger (`$logger`, `$this->logger`, Laravel’s `Log::`, `logger()`, `\Drupal::logger()`) in a package whose `composer.json` requires a PSR-3 logger or a framework that hands one out (psr/log, Monolog, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, CakePHP), or a file that imports one, whose message is a double-quoted string interpolating a variable; a single-quoted message clears the call, and `sprintf` or `.` concatenation is not convicted, as in C#. Dart is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on Sentry’s structured logger (`Sentry.logger`) whose message is a whole string literal interpolating a value (`$name`, `${…}`); the `Sentry.logger.fmt` template API clears the call. Dart that logs only through loggers with one message and no fields (package:logging, package:logger, talker, dart:developer) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Ruby is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on the console gem’s `Console` (declared by a Gemfile, gemspec or REDACTED, or required) or, where SemanticLogger, Ougai or dry-logger is declared or required, on a receiver named for a logger (`logger`, `@logger`, `Rails.logger`, `log`), whose first deciding argument is, as the whole argument, a double-quoted string interpolating a non-constant value (`#{…}`, `#@ivar`); a plain literal clears the call, keyword arguments are the fields, and a block, `%`-format or `+` concatenation is not convicted. Ruby that logs only through the standard Logger (Rails.logger) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Deterministic.

  • Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it. (×2) — src/WebApp/Controllers/ResiliencyHelper.cs:17, src/WebApp/Controllers/ResiliencyHelper.cs:26

What to do

  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging
X5 · Nullable reference types2.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether nullable reference types are enabled and not undermined by heavy `!` suppression.

Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.

  • This method contradicts itself about `source`: line 40 writes `source?.ActualTimeslot`, which says `source` can be null, but line 34 then dereferences it directly as `source.Id` with no null test between them and no guard around it. If the `?.` is right, that dereference throws NullReferenceException on the input it was written for; if `source` truly cannot be null here, the `?.` is misleading. Settle it one way — test `source` once before the first use and handle the null case, or drop the `?.` — rather than leaving the two readings side by side. — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Mappers/Mappers.cs:34
  • 0/11 NRT-eligible project(s) enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> (projects targeting a pre-C#-8 framework are excluded — NRTs aren't available there). NRTs catch a whole class of null-deref bugs at compile time.

What to do

  • Where a method uses `?.` on a symbol and then dereferences it directly, settle the question once: test it before the first use and handle null, or drop the `?.`.
  • Enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> across all projects and resolve warnings rather than suppressing with `!`.

WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed

Statically assessed 15 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (27%; ≈30% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 40 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).

DimensionWCAG 2.2 A/AA criteriaCoverage
AC1 · Text alternatives1.1.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.5Partial signal
AC2 · Forms & labels1.3.1, 3.3.2, 4.1.2Partial signal
AC3 · Page structure1.4.4, 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 3.1.1, 4.1.2Partial signal
AC4 · Keyboard semantics2.1.1, 2.4.3Partial signal
AC6 · Visual & motion safety1.4.3, 2.4.7Partial — literal CSS only
AC7 · A11y enforcementenforcement — no page criterionEnforcement posture (process)

Not statically assessed — these 40 Level A/AA criteria need runtime or manual evaluation (WCAG-EM): 1.2.1, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.5, 1.4.10, 1.4.11, 1.4.12, 1.4.13, 2.1.2, 2.1.4, 2.2.2, 2.3.1, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.11, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.5.7, 2.5.8, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.6, 3.3.1, 3.3.3, 3.3.4, 3.3.7, 3.3.8, 4.1.3.

Reference — by lens

The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.

LensScoreRatingImpact
Code Health46%Adequate — gated by X4, X5Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Architecture58%Adequate — gated by AX1Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Maturity55%Adequate — gated by M4Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Readiness52%Adequate — gated by D13, P7Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Security62%Adequate — gated by D28, D29, D30, D31Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Domain Modelling58%Adequate — gated by DM1, DM2Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Accessibility28%Weak — gated by AC1, AC4Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Performance60%StrongStrongest area.
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score

These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.

  • P12 CI test-gate honesty — 1 observation(s) recorded · Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
Not evidenced — 2 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for

These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.

  • C4 Data Retention — Repo shows no data-retention / TTL / cleanup mechanism for personal data — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Define retention periods and a purge/cleanup job (or TTL) in code, or document where retention is enforced, so this dimension can be scored.
  • C5 Data-Subject Rights — Repo shows no corroborated data-subject-rights mechanism (erasure / export-portability / consent) tied to a subject id or GDPR vocabulary — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Implement erasure, data export/portability and consent tracking over the subject's records.
Not included — 29 check(s) not relevant to this codebase

These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.

  • AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
  • AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
  • AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
  • AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • AXR1 Runtime accessibility — compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — mailserver Error context canceled vehiclemanagementapi Warning context canceled invoiceservice Warning context canceled rabbitmq Error context canceled timeservice Warning context canceled workshopmanagementeventhandler Warning Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: vehiclemanagementapi Warning context canceled WARNING: Some service image(s) must be built from source by running: docker compose build timeservice workshopmanagementapi customermanagementapi workshopmanagementeventhandler auditlogservice webapp invoiceservice notificationservice vehiclemanagementapi Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
  • C1 Data Protection — This is a dotnet-new template — at-rest encryption and key-vaulting are deferred to the application you build from it. Add ASP.NET Data Protection / column encryption + a key vault for your real data store when you productionise.
  • C2 Access Controls — This is a dotnet-new template — authorization is deferred to the application you build from it. Add [Authorize]/policies (or imperative guards) when you wire up real users; until then there are no real endpoints to protect.
  • D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured
  • D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — No intentionally-exposed public API to evaluate for consistency.
  • D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — small single-context codebase (4,683 production LoC in the .NET projects) — bounded contexts are not needed at this size No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Aggregate roots were found in only one source directory (WorkshopManagementAPI), which is a layered codebase, not two contexts. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
  • D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — IL not measured — the analyzer's build of the target did not succeed
  • D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess.
  • D8 Code Coverage — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the .NET half could not be measured — the repository wires up no coverage collector for `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` to use; the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the JavaScript/TypeScript suite(s) run through a browser-driven runner the coverage collector does not drive — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/ (karma) — a gap in the analyzer, not something this repository is missing. This repository's production source spans both ecosystems, and no partial figure is published as if it were the whole: coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
  • DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
  • ED1 Event-Driven — applicable but not scored (2 of 3 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): 3 event handler(s); a message-bus package
  • ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows only 1 of the 3 signals this lens looks for (1 aggregate(s) with Apply/When folds)
  • P3 Security & performance tooling — This repo declares itself a template / kata / sample / demo — code meant to be read or copied, not operated. SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarks are deferred to the application you build from it, so their absence is not a defect here. The dimension reactivates once the repo becomes a real app.
  • P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Cobertura — `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` with a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
  • PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.

Critical — 184 finding(s)
D13 · REDACTED Scanning · Leaked secret · ×60
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 35 more in this group — see findings.md.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · High CVE · ×32
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 7 more in this group — see findings.md.
D28 · Secrets (history) · REDACTED · ×30
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 5 more in this group — see findings.md.
D31 · IaC & Container Security · High IaC · ×27
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 2 more in this group — see findings.md.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Critical CVE · ×9
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
AX1 · Captive dependencies · Captive dependency · ×5
  • Captive dependency: singleton EventHandlerWorker captures transient WorkshopManagementDBContext src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:8 — `EventHandlerWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `WorkshopManagementDBContext dbContext`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `WorkshopManagementDBContext` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes.
  • Captive dependency: singleton InvoiceWorker captures transient IInvoiceRepository src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:10 — `InvoiceWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IInvoiceRepository repo`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IInvoiceRepository` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes.
  • Captive dependency: singleton InvoiceWorker captures transient IEmailCommunicator src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:10 — `InvoiceWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IEmailCommunicator emailCommunicator`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IEmailCommunicator` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes.
  • Captive dependency: singleton NotificationWorker captures transient INotificationRepository src/NotificationService/NotificationWorker.cs:9 — `NotificationWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `INotificationRepository repo`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `INotificationRepository` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes.
  • Captive dependency: singleton NotificationWorker captures transient IEmailNotifier src/NotificationService/NotificationWorker.cs:9 — `NotificationWorker` is registered as a SINGLETON but its constructor takes `IEmailNotifier emailNotifier`, which is registered as Transient. The singleton captures one instance of the transient dependency forever — defeating its lifetime (a per-request DbContext shared across all requests is a classic data-corruption/threading bug). Make the singleton resolve `IEmailNotifier` per-use (inject `IServiceScopeFactory` or a factory func), or align the lifetimes.
AC3 · Page structure · <html> without a lang · ×4
  • <html> without a lang src/CustomerManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
  • <html> without a lang src/VehicleManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
  • <html> without a lang src/WebApp/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml:2 — The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
  • <html> without a lang src/WorkshopManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
D17 · Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField · ×4
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs:7 — private string _userName — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/NotificationService/NotificationChannels/SMTPEmailNotifier.cs:7 — private string _userName — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:7 — private Task _task — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:8 — private Dictionary<DateTime, string> _store — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
AC1 · Text alternatives · <img> without a text alternative · ×3
  • <img> without a text alternative src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Details.cshtml:38 — An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative.
  • <img> without a text alternative src/WebApp/Views/Home/About.cshtml:2 — An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative.
  • <img> without a text alternative src/WebApp/Views/Home/Index.cshtml:6 — An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt — alt="" if it's purely decorative.
AC4 · Keyboard semantics · Click handler on a non-interactive <tr> · ×3
  • Click handler on a non-interactive <tr> src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Index.cshtml:19 — A click handler on a plain element isn't keyboard-operable. Use a <button>, or add role + tabindex="0" + a key handler.
  • Click handler on a non-interactive <tr> src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/Index.cshtml:18 — A click handler on a plain element isn't keyboard-operable. Use a <button>, or add role + tabindex="0" + a key handler.
  • Click handler on a non-interactive <tr> src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/Index.cshtml:27 — A click handler on a plain element isn't keyboard-operable. Use a <button>, or add role + tabindex="0" + a key handler.
D28 · Secrets (history) · High secret · ×2
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
AC2 · Forms & labels · <select> without a programmatic label · ×1
  • <select> without a programmatic label src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/New.cshtml:30 — This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
AC2 · Forms & labels · <label> that labels no control · ×1
  • <label> that labels no control src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/New.cshtml:15 — This <label> has no for and wraps no form control, so it names nothing: assistive tech never announces it, and clicking the caption focuses no field. Note that an id on the label is not an association — it is the TARGET of one, so a control still has to point at it. Give the label for="<the control's id>", move the control inside the label, or point the control's aria-labelledby at this label's id.
AX3 · Project dependency cycles · Namespace dependency cycle · ×1
  • Namespace dependency cycle src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:3 — The namespaces Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler ↔ Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess ↔ Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.Model depend on each other. The lightest dependency in the cycle is Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler → Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess (Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker → Pitstop.WorkshopManagementEventHandler.DataAccess.WorkshopManagementDBContext, 1 type pair(s)); cut that one first, e.g. by moving the shared type to a namespace both can use or inverting it behind an interface.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Critical vulnerability · ×1
  • REDACTED
DM1 · Aggregate boundaries · Aggregate holds a reference to another aggregate · ×1
  • Aggregate holds a reference to another aggregate: WorkshopPlanning.Jobs src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/WorkshopPlanning.cs:8 — `WorkshopPlanning` references the aggregate root `MaintenanceJob` directly (via `Jobs`) — hold its `MaintenanceJobId` instead.
Serious — 531 finding(s)
D31 · IaC & Container Security · Medium IaC · ×361
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 336 more in this group — see findings.md.
X2 · Cancellation propagation · Async method without CancellationToken · ×39
  • Async method without CancellationToken: Stop src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:102 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: Consumer_Received src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:109 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PublishMessageAsync src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:73 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetAllAsync src/CustomerManagementAPI/Controllers/CustomersController.cs:16 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByCustomerId src/CustomerManagementAPI/Controllers/CustomersController.cs:23 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: RegisterAsync src/CustomerManagementAPI/Controllers/CustomersController.cs:34 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetAllAsync src/VehicleManagementAPI/Controllers/VehiclesController.cs:17 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByLicenseNumber src/VehicleManagementAPI/Controllers/VehiclesController.cs:24 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: RegisterAsync src/VehicleManagementAPI/Controllers/VehiclesController.cs:35 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleCommandAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/FinishMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:14 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleCommandAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/PlanMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:14 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetCustomers src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/RefDataController.cs:17 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetCustomerByCustomerId src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/RefDataController.cs:24 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetVehicles src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/RefDataController.cs:36 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetVehicleByLicenseNumber src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/RefDataController.cs:43 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByDate src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/WorkshopPlanningController.cs:22 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetMaintenanceJobAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/WorkshopPlanningController.cs:44 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PlanMaintenanceJobAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/WorkshopPlanningController.cs:76 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: FinishMaintenanceJobAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Controllers/WorkshopPlanningController.cs:117 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByIdAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:35 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: SaveAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:73 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: InitializeDatabaseAsync src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:150 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleAsync src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:67 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleAsync src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:91 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleAsync src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:114 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • + 14 more in this group — see findings.md.
D17 · Explicit Debt · Dead code · ×27
  • Dead code: ClearEvents src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Core/AggregateRoot.cs:86 — Method ClearEvents — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including WorkshopManagementAPI, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: SetStartTime src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/ValueObjects/Timeslot.cs:19 — Method SetStartTime — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including WorkshopManagementAPI, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: SetEndTime src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/ValueObjects/Timeslot.cs:25 — Method SetEndTime — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including WorkshopManagementAPI, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: GetAggregateEvents src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:192 — Method GetAggregateEvents — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including WorkshopManagementAPI, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithStatus src/WorkshopManagement.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs:38 — Method WithStatus — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including WorkshopManagement.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: HomeAsync src/UITest/PageModel/MainMenu.cs:12 — Method HomeAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: AboutAsync src/UITest/PageModel/MainMenu.cs:36 — Method AboutAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: IsActiveAsync src/UITest/PageModel/Pages/PitstopPage.cs:28 — Method IsActiveAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: GetActivePageTitleAsync src/UITest/PageModel/Pages/PitstopPage.cs:39 — Method GetActivePageTitleAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: SubmitExpectingErrorAsync src/UITest/PageModel/Pages/WorkshopManagement/RegisterMaintenanceJobPage.cs:32 — Method SubmitExpectingErrorAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: GetErrorMessageAsync src/UITest/PageModel/Pages/WorkshopManagement/RegisterMaintenanceJobPage.cs:42 — Method GetErrorMessageAsync — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including UITest, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithAddress src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerBuilder.cs:33 — Method WithAddress — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithPostalCode src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerBuilder.cs:39 — Method WithPostalCode — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithCity src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerBuilder.cs:45 — Method WithCity — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithAddress src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs:30 — Method WithAddress — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithPostalCode src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs:36 — Method WithPostalCode — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithCity src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs:42 — Method WithCity — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithDescription src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs:43 — Method WithDescription — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithFinished src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs:61 — Method WithFinished — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithInvoiceSent src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs:67 — Method WithInvoiceSent — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithCustomerName src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobPlannedEventBuilder.cs:36 — Method WithCustomerName — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithDescription src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobPlannedEventBuilder.cs:48 — Method WithDescription — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including InvoiceService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithEmailAddress src/NotificationService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerBuilder.cs:35 — Method WithEmailAddress — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including NotificationService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithEmailAddress src/NotificationService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/CustomerRegisteredEventBuilder.cs:35 — Method WithEmailAddress — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including NotificationService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • Dead code: WithDescription src/NotificationService.UnitTests/TestdataBuilders/MaintenanceJobBuilder.cs:46 — Method WithDescription — Roslyn's SymbolFinder walked every project the solution loads, including NotificationService.UnitTests, and found no reference to it. That walk cannot see three kinds of caller, so check them before removing it: code outside the solution file (a solution is a curated list, not the repository — a sibling test tree with its own .sln is invisible), a call resolved by reflection or dependency injection from the symbol's name, and any project the workspace could not load. This is 'no caller found by this walk', not a verdict that the symbol is unused.
  • + 2 more in this group — see findings.md.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE · ×22
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
AC6 · Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a · ×7
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/assets/scss/_skiplink.scss:8 — `#skippy` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_buttons.scss:25 — `.btn.focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_carousel.scss:131 — `.carousel-control-prev` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_custom-forms.scss:322 — `.custom-range:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_modal.scss:29 — `.modal` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_modal.scss:80 — `.modal-content` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
  • Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_reboot.scss:226 — `a:not([href]):not([tabindex]):focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
AC3 · Page structure · Page without a main landmark · ×4
  • Page without a main landmark src/CustomerManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
  • Page without a main landmark src/VehicleManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
  • Page without a main landmark src/WebApp/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml:2 — No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
  • Page without a main landmark src/WorkshopManagementAPI/wwwroot/index.html:2 — No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene · Sync-over-async blocking · ×4
  • Sync-over-async blocking — 3 blocking call(s) on async work (.Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult()) — these waste a thread and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • Sync-over-async blocking src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:32 — `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • Sync-over-async blocking src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:18 — `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • Sync-over-async blocking src/NotificationService/Repositories/SqlServerNotificationRepository.cs:18 — `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
AC3 · Page structure · Data table has no header cells · ×3
  • Data table has no header cells src/WebApp/Views/CustomerManagement/Details.cshtml:7 — A <table> with data cells but no <th> gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as <th> (with a scope).
  • Data table has no header cells src/WebApp/Views/VehicleManagement/Details.cshtml:8 — A <table> with data cells but no <th> gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as <th> (with a scope).
  • Data table has no header cells src/WebApp/Views/WorkshopManagement/Details.cshtml:8 — A <table> with data cells but no <th> gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as <th> (with a scope).
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience · Outbound HTTP without resilience · ×3
  • Outbound HTTP without resilience src/WebApp/Program.cs:22 — `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<ICustomerManagementAPI, CustomerManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default).
  • Outbound HTTP without resilience src/WebApp/Program.cs:23 — `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<IVehicleManagementAPI, VehicleManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default).
  • Outbound HTTP without resilience src/WebApp/Program.cs:24 — `builder.Services.AddHttpClient<IWorkshopManagementAPI, WorkshopManagementAPI>()` registers an outbound HTTP client with no resilience handler, retry policy or timeout of its own in its builder chain. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection — and cascade — until the call gives up on its own (100 s for HttpClient's default).
X1 · Async correctness · Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) · ×3
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:28 — Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process.
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:14 — Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process.
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) src/NotificationService/Repositories/SqlServerNotificationRepository.cs:14 — Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard · ×2
  • Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/examples/offcanvas/offcanvas.css:24 — `.offcanvas-collapse` moves (`transition-property: left, visibility`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
  • Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/scss/_progress.scss:33 — `.progress-bar-animated` moves (`animation: progress-bar-stripes $progress-bar-animation-timing`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:70 — src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:70-74 | src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:56-60 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:75` calls `AppendLine` and `src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:61` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) src/CustomerManagementAPI/DataAccess/CustomerManagementDBContext.cs:21 — src/CustomerManagementAPI/DataAccess/CustomerManagementDBContext.cs:21-25 | src/VehicleManagementAPI/DataAccess/VehicleManagementDBContext.cs:20-24 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) REDACTED:26 — REDACTED:26-41 | REDACTED:79-94 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
  • Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) REDACTED:25 — REDACTED:25-40 | REDACTED:103-118 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
DM11 · Constructible invalid state · Constructible in an invalid state · ×2
  • Constructible in an invalid state: Customer src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Customer.cs:8 — `Customer`'s public constructor takes `customerId`, `name`, `telephoneNumber` as raw primitives, and neither of the two things that would make that safe was found. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: for VALIDATION, the constructor body was scanned for `throw`, `Guard.`, `Ensure.`, `ArgumentNullException`, `ArgumentException`, `CheckRule` or `Requires.` — a guard reached through a helper method those tokens do not name is not seen; for a FACTORY, only this type's OWN static members were read, and only names beginning `Create`, `Of`, `From`, `New` or `Build` — one inherited from a base type, one on a companion builder, or one called `Parse`, `Make` or `Rehydrate` is not seen. If either exists, this row is wrong. If neither does, a caller can build a `Customer` that breaks the rules it exists to enforce, and every rule downstream then has to cope with a state the model said was impossible. Guard in the constructor, take value objects that validate themselves, or make the constructor private behind a `Create` that can refuse.
  • Constructible in an invalid state: Vehicle src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:9 — `Vehicle`'s public constructor takes `brand`, `type`, `ownerId` as raw primitives, and neither of the two things that would make that safe was found. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: for VALIDATION, the constructor body was scanned for `throw`, `Guard.`, `Ensure.`, `ArgumentNullException`, `ArgumentException`, `CheckRule` or `Requires.` — a guard reached through a helper method those tokens do not name is not seen; for a FACTORY, only this type's OWN static members were read, and only names beginning `Create`, `Of`, `From`, `New` or `Build` — one inherited from a base type, one on a companion builder, or one called `Parse`, `Make` or `Rehydrate` is not seen. If either exists, this row is wrong. If neither does, a caller can build a `Vehicle` that breaks the rules it exists to enforce, and every rule downstream then has to cope with a state the model said was impossible. Guard in the constructor, take value objects that validate themselves, or make the constructor private behind a `Create` that can refuse.
DM4 · Rich vs anemic model · Anemic entity · ×2
  • Anemic entity: Customer src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Customer.cs:3 — `Customer` is an aggregate/entity with 2 data propert(ies) but no state-changing behaviour (only data and queries) — the business logic lives in a service.
  • Anemic entity: Vehicle src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:3 — `Vehicle` is an aggregate/entity with 3 data propert(ies) but no state-changing behaviour (only data and queries) — the business logic lives in a service.
ED5 · Idempotency · Non-idempotent mutation · ×2
  • Non-idempotent mutation: WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker.HandleAsync src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:67 — `WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker.HandleAsync` mutates persistent state (a database save) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write.
  • Non-idempotent mutation: WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker.HandleAsync src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:91 — `WorkshopManagementEventHandler.EventHandlerWorker.HandleAsync` mutates persistent state (a database save) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write.
X1 · Async correctness · async void method · ×2
  • async void method: Stop src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessageHandler.cs:102 — `async void` can't be awaited and its exceptions crash the process instead of propagating. Return `Task` — or, where the delegate contract requires void (timer/event/callback registrations), make this a thin void shim that awaits a Task-returning inner method inside try/catch so exceptions are contained.
  • async void method: Worker src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:29 — `async void` can't be awaited and its exceptions crash the process instead of propagating. Return `Task` — or, where the delegate contract requires void (timer/event/callback registrations), make this a thin void shim that awaits a Task-returning inner method inside try/catch so exceptions are contained.
AC7 · A11y enforcement · Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
  • Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 21 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
AX2 · Stateful singletons · Stateful singleton · ×1
  • Stateful singleton: TimeWorker src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:3 — `TimeWorker` is a singleton (one shared instance) but mutates instance state outside any lock (_lastCheck; e.g. `_lastCheck` at line 36).
D17 · Explicit Debt · CommentedOutCode · ×1
  • CommentedOutCode src/CustomerManagementAPI/Model/Customer.cs:14 — 15 consecutive commented-code lines
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium vulnerability · ×1
  • REDACTED
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:31 — src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:31-47 | src/NotificationService/NotificationWorker.cs:30-46 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:31` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/FinishMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:27 — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/FinishMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:27-40 | src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/PlanMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:27-40 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/WorkshopManagementAPI/CommandHandlers/FinishMaintenanceJobCommandHandler.cs:27` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:9 — src/InvoiceService/Repositories/SqlServerInvoiceRepository.cs:9-19 | src/NotificationService/Repositories/SqlServerNotificationRepository.cs:9-19 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:38 — src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:38-45 | src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:75-82 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:38` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:84` calls `BeginTransaction` and `src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/SqlServerWorkshopPlanningEventSourceRepository.cs:47` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs:24 — src/InvoiceService/CommunicationChannels/SMTPEmailCommunicator.cs:24-30 | src/NotificationService/NotificationChannels/SMTPEmailNotifier.cs:30-36 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 3) src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:16 — src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:16-23 | src/CustomerManagementAPI/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:16-23 | src/WebApp/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:16-23 — before extracting anything, compare `src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs` and `src/CustomerManagementAPI/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
D8 · Code Coverage · Coverage not measured · ×1
  • Coverage not measured — .NET and JavaScript/TypeScript suite — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the .NET half could not be measured — the repository wires up no coverage collector for `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` to use; the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the JavaScript/TypeScript suite(s) run through a browser-driven runner the coverage collector does not drive — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/ (karma) — a gap in the analyzer, not something this repository is missing. This repository's production source spans both ecosystems, and no partial figure is published as if it were the whole: coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
P12 · CI test-gate honesty · Coverage collected but not gated · ×1
  • Coverage collected but not gated — CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum — coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool's minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository's CI files AND its coverage configuration — the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited — matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service's web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
X1 · Async correctness · Blocking `Thread.Sleep` inside an `async` method · ×1
  • Blocking `Thread.Sleep` inside an `async` method src/TimeService/TimeWorker.cs:41 — `Thread.Sleep` parks the thread for the whole delay: no other work runs on it, and under load the pool must grow to make up for it. `await Task.Delay(…)` suspends only this method.
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness · Finalizer on a type that owns no unmanaged resource · ×1
  • Finalizer on a type that owns no unmanaged resource src/Infrastructure.Messaging/RabbitMQMessagePublisher.cs:110 — `RabbitMQMessagePublisher` declares a finalizer (line 110), but nothing in the type is unmanaged: no `IntPtr`/`UIntPtr` or pointer field, no `SafeHandle`, no `HandleRef`, no `extern`/`DllImport` member and no `Marshal`/`GCHandle`/`NativeMemory` use. A finalizer can only release what the garbage collector cannot, so on a purely-managed type it releases nothing and costs something: every instance is put on the finalizer queue, survives at least one extra collection, and is then finalized on a thread that is NOT the disposing one — where the managed objects it touches may already have been finalized themselves. Delete the finalizer (and the `GC.SuppressFinalize` that exists to defuse it); if a handle is added later, wrap it in a `SafeHandle`, which brings its own correct finalization.
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped · Untrusted text written into markup unescaped · ×1
  • Untrusted text written into markup unescaped src/InvoiceService/InvoiceWorker.cs:221 — `body.ToString()` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through an HTML e-mail body with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
X5 · Nullable reference types · Symbol treated as nullable, then dereferenced unguarded · ×1
  • Symbol treated as nullable, then dereferenced unguarded src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Mappers/Mappers.cs:34 — This method contradicts itself about `source`: line 40 writes `source?.ActualTimeslot`, which says `source` can be null, but line 34 then dereferences it directly as `source.Id` with no null test between them and no guard around it. If the `?.` is right, that dereference throws NullReferenceException on the input it was written for; if `source` truly cannot be null here, the `?.` is misleading. Settle it one way — test `source` once before the first use and handle the null case, or drop the `?.` — rather than leaving the two readings side by side.
Minor — 140 finding(s)
D31 · IaC & Container Security · Low IaC · ×70
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • + 45 more in this group — see findings.md.
D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement · No seccomp profile · ×25
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:14 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
  • No seccomp profile REDACTED:2 — The workload runs a container with no seccomp profile in force (neither RuntimeDefault nor a Localhost profile, on the container or the pod), so Kubernetes runs it Unconfined. Seccomp blocks the syscalls a container never needs, shrinking the kernel attack surface a container escape would use.
M4 · Documentation accuracy · README/code drift · ×13
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md:102 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md:102 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/README.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/collapse.md:136 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/collapse.md names `.collapse.show`, but no file or folder `.collapse.show` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/navbar.md:31 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/navbar.md names `.collapse.navbar-collapse`, but no file or folder `.collapse.navbar-collapse` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md:13 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md:13 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/popovers.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md:13 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md:13 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/components/tooltips.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md:41 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md:41 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/contents.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md:40 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md names `bootstrap.bundle.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md:40 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/introduction.md names `bootstrap.bundle.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.bundle.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
  • README/code drift src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/javascript.md:11 — src/WebApp/wwwroot/lib/bootstrap/site/docs/4.1/getting-started/javascript.md names `bootstrap.min.js`, but no file or folder `bootstrap.min.js` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
D10 · Test Quality · Mock-dominated test · ×8
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_CustomerRegistered_Should_Register_Customer_In_Repository src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/InvoiceWorkerTests/HandleCustomerRegisteredTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_DayHasPassed_And_No_Uninvoiced_Jobs_Should_Not_Send_Any_Invoice src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/InvoiceWorkerTests/HandleDayHasPassedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_MaintenanceJobFinished_Should_Mark_Job_As_Finished_In_Repository src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/InvoiceWorkerTests/HandleMaintenanceJobFinishedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_MaintenanceJobPlanned_Should_Register_Job_In_Repository src/InvoiceService.UnitTests/InvoiceWorkerTests/HandleMaintenanceJobPlannedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_CustomerRegistered_Should_Register_Customer_In_Repository src/NotificationService.UnitTests/NotificationWorkerTests/HandleCustomerRegisteredTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_DayHasPassed_And_No_Jobs_Today_Should_Not_Send_Any_Notification src/NotificationService.UnitTests/NotificationWorkerTests/HandleDayHasPassedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_MaintenanceJobFinished_Should_Remove_Job_From_Repository src/NotificationService.UnitTests/NotificationWorkerTests/HandleMaintenanceJobFinishedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
  • Mock-dominated test: HandleMessage_With_MaintenanceJobPlanned_Should_Register_Job_In_Repository src/NotificationService.UnitTests/NotificationWorkerTests/HandleMaintenanceJobPlannedTests.cs:6 — This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `new Mock<IMessageHandler>()`) against 2 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 3 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
S1 · Web-Security Posture · No security response headers detected · ×5
  • No security response headers detected — None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. (−2.0 on this card.)
  • No security response headers detected src/CustomerManagementAPI/Program.cs:1 — This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves.
  • No security response headers detected src/VehicleManagementAPI/Program.cs:1 — This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves.
  • No security response headers detected src/WebApp/Program.cs:1 — This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves.
  • No security response headers detected src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Program.cs:1 — This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Low CVE · ×3
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs · Commented-out code · ×2
  • Commented-out code src/WebApp/Program.cs:3 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/WebApp/Program.cs:40 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
X4 · Structured logging · Interpolated log message defeats structured logging · ×2
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/WebApp/Controllers/ResiliencyHelper.cs:17 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/WebApp/Controllers/ResiliencyHelper.cs:26 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
C3 · Audit Trail · Partial audit-trail evidence · ×1
  • Partial audit-trail evidence — An audit mechanism is present, but the trail is not yet complete — missing: an EF SaveChanges interceptor (or equivalent write-side hook, e.g. an event-store append every change flows through), [Audited] per-entity coverage.
D21 · Naming Consistency · Inconsistent naming for the same concept (user identifier) across different infrastructure components. One uses the noun 'username' and the other uses the adjective 'userName' (camelCase vs PascalCase within the compound word). · ×1
  • Inconsistent naming for the same concept (user identifier) across different infrastructure components. One uses the noun 'username' and the other uses the adjective 'userName' (camelCase vs PascalCase within the compound word). — Standardize to 'UserName' or 'Username' consistently across all infrastructure fields. (symbols: Field: private string Pitstop.Infrastructure.Messaging.RabbitMQMessageHandler._username, Field: private string Pitstop.InvoiceService.CommunicationChannels.SMTPEmailCommunicator._userName)
D25 · ADR Conformance · ADR not followed · ×1
  • ADR not followed: ADR-0009: Custom Infrastructure.Messaging Abstraction Library docs/ADRs/0009-infrastructure-messaging-abstraction.md:19 — docs/ADRs/0009-infrastructure-messaging-abstraction.md:19 rules out `RabbitMQ.Client`, but production code uses it: src/Infrastructure.Messaging/GlobalUsings.cs:8, src/Infrastructure.Messaging/GlobalUsings.cs:9
D28 · Secrets (history) · Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
  • REDACTED
D40 · Network Egress Confinement · No network policy · ×1
  • No network policy — No Kubernetes NetworkPolicy (or Cilium policy) found. Without one, every pod can talk to every other pod and reach out to the internet by default. Add a default-deny policy and open only the flows you need.
DM2 · Strongly-typed ids · Primitive id on a domain type · ×1
  • Primitive id on a domain type: Vehicle.OwnerId src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Vehicle.cs:7 — `Vehicle.OwnerId` is a raw `String` — give it a strongly-typed id: a dedicated single-field type wrapping the `String`, in whatever form your language spells that.
DM5 · Encapsulated state · Mutable entity · ×1
  • Mutable entity: WorkshopPlanning src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/WorkshopPlanning.cs:3 — `WorkshopPlanning` exposes its own state through a mutable collection (Jobs) — a caller can add to or remove from it directly, without passing through the methods that enforce the invariants.
P1 · CI/CD gates · CI build step not evidenced · ×1
  • CI build step not evidenced — A CI pipeline exists but no build step was matched — changes may merge without the build ever running. A build step may be invoked directly as a command, or declared as a task that a runner named in the pipeline resolves.
P2 · Observability · Console output used as the logging channel · ×1
  • Console output used as the logging channel src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs:85 — `src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/EventHandlerWorker.cs` reports through `Console.Write…` at line 85 although other files in its project log through a logger. Console lines carry no level, category or structured properties and never reach the log pipeline or its exporters.
P6 · Release Hygiene · No changelog · ×1
  • No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
X2 · Cancellation propagation · Not all async methods take a CancellationToken · ×1
  • Not all async methods take a CancellationToken — Only 0/69 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can't be stopped early when the caller gives up — whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against your hosting model.
X5 · Nullable reference types · Nullable reference types not enabled everywhere · ×1
  • Nullable reference types not enabled everywhere — 0/11 NRT-eligible project(s) enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> (projects targeting a pre-C#-8 framework are excluded — NRTs aren't available there). NRTs catch a whole class of null-deref bugs at compile time.
Minor — 14 finding(s)
D19 · Documentation Quality · XML-doc coverage · ×11
  • XML-doc coverage: Infrastructure.Messaging src/Infrastructure.Messaging/Infrastructure.Messaging.csproj — Infrastructure.Messaging: 10 % XML-doc coverage (5/48).
  • XML-doc coverage: CustomerManagementAPI REDACTED — CustomerManagementAPI: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/39).
  • XML-doc coverage: VehicleManagementAPI src/VehicleManagementAPI/VehicleManagementAPI.csproj — VehicleManagementAPI: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/30).
  • XML-doc coverage: WorkshopManagementAPI src/WorkshopManagementAPI/WorkshopManagementAPI.csproj — WorkshopManagementAPI: 5 % XML-doc coverage (11/205).
  • XML-doc coverage: WorkshopManagementEventHandler src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/WorkshopManagementEventHandler.csproj — WorkshopManagementEventHandler: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/61).
  • XML-doc coverage: AuditlogService src/AuditlogService/AuditlogService.csproj — AuditlogService: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/7).
  • XML-doc coverage: InvoiceService REDACTED — InvoiceService: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/62).
  • XML-doc coverage: NotificationService src/NotificationService/NotificationService.csproj — NotificationService: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/49).
  • XML-doc coverage: TimeService src/TimeService/TimeService.csproj — TimeService: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/6).
  • XML-doc coverage: WebApp src/WebApp/WebApp.csproj — WebApp: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/158).
  • XML-doc coverage: TestUtils src/TestUtils/TestUtils.csproj — TestUtils: 31 % XML-doc coverage (4/13).
D10 · Test Quality · Mock framework · ×3
  • Mock framework: Moq — WorkshopManagement.UnitTests references Moq.
  • Mock framework: Moq — InvoiceService.UnitTests references Moq.
  • Mock framework: Moq — NotificationService.UnitTests references Moq.

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.

DimensionToolVersionCommandFindingsRaw output
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-4a0eee4dee6342c590beea02acfe2605/history.json --exit-code 0 --source .82artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-4a0eee4dee6342c590beea02acfe2605/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source .17artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)semgrep—semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off .28artifacts/raw/semgrep.json
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilitiesdotnet—dotnet list src/pitstop.sln package --vulnerable --include-transitive --format json68artifacts/raw/dotnet-vulnerable.json
D31 · IaC & Container Securitytrivy—trivy config --format json --quiet .458artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json
D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR)semgrep—semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.0—
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signingprovenance—provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.0—
D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policydisclosure—disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.0—
D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcementruntime-hardening—runtime-hardening: not applicable — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess.0—
D43 · Malicious Dependenciestrivy—trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs **/bin/** --skip-dirs **/obj/** . --skip-db-update0artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json

Run 01a162ee-add2-722b-9516-0c6e2009eae0 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.

Appendix C — Personal-data map

Every field, property and record parameter whose name is conventional personal data — 26 field(s) across 3 categories, each with an exact repo-relative file:line. This is the data inventory a compliance review starts from — right-to-erasure, retention, minimisation. Detected by NAME, from the C# syntax tree, with a deliberately specific identifier classifier — the same one the C1–C5 compliance cards use to decide whether personal data is present, so CardDefinition or FileName don't trip. Two caveats stated rather than glossed: those cards additionally require corroboration (a persistence/account signal, or two distinct PII categories) that this inventory deliberately does not, so it lists more than they gate on; and D32 Data Compliance shares nothing with it — that dimension is a separate semgrep ruleset for personal data leaking into logs, URLs and browser storage, and a clean D32 result says nothing about this list. Informational — it feeds no score.

Phone — 12 field(s)
  • RegisterCustomer.TelephoneNumber src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:10
  • CustomerRegistered.TelephoneNumber src/CustomerManagementAPI/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:10
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/CustomerManagementAPI/Model/Customer.cs:10
  • CustomerRegistered.TelephoneNumber src/NotificationService/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:7
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/NotificationService/Model/Customer.cs:7
  • RegisterCustomer.TelephoneNumber src/WebApp/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:10
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/WebApp/Models/Customer.cs:25
  • CustomerDTO.TelephoneNumber src/WorkshopManagementAPI/DTOs/CustomerDTO.cs:7
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Domain/Entities/Customer.cs:6
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/WorkshopManagementAPI/Repositories/Model/Customer.cs:7
  • CustomerRegistered.TelephoneNumber src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:7
  • Customer.TelephoneNumber src/WorkshopManagementEventHandler/Model/Customer.cs:7
Address — 7 field(s)
  • RegisterCustomer.PostalCode src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:8
  • CustomerRegistered.PostalCode src/CustomerManagementAPI/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:8
  • Customer.PostalCode src/CustomerManagementAPI/Model/Customer.cs:8
  • CustomerRegistered.PostalCode src/InvoiceService/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:8
  • Customer.PostalCode src/InvoiceService/Model/Customer.cs:8
  • RegisterCustomer.PostalCode src/WebApp/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:8
  • Customer.PostalCode src/WebApp/Models/Customer.cs:17
Email — 7 field(s)
  • RegisterCustomer.EmailAddress src/CustomerManagementAPI/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:11
  • CustomerRegistered.EmailAddress src/CustomerManagementAPI/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:11
  • Customer.EmailAddress src/CustomerManagementAPI/Model/Customer.cs:11
  • CustomerRegistered.EmailAddress src/NotificationService/Events/CustomerRegistered.cs:8
  • Customer.EmailAddress src/NotificationService/Model/Customer.cs:8
  • RegisterCustomer.EmailAddress src/WebApp/Commands/RegisterCustomer.cs:11
  • Customer.EmailAddress src/WebApp/Models/Customer.cs:30

Issues: 184 · Warnings: 531 · Recommendations: 140 · Info: 14 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 22-10-2026 @ 09:26 UTC.

Downloadable artifacts

Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.

⬇ Findings, MITRE CWE-tagged .sarif⬇ Health changelog .md