{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ListViewColumnSorter.Compare (cyclomatic 19): ListViewColumnSorter.Compare has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/ListViewColumnSorter.vb"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50c843cd77ffacc24617d06f683fcf3c28baf97b234649bb78138da7aa6547b2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HostsTools.GetMappings (cyclomatic 19): HostsTools.GetMappings has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":410}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2c4a1ea558297ce5c82b067a6aa90006e906cad9f3dd2c1189a7fbb1ebfe827"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HostsTools.GetMappings (cognitive 68): HostsTools.GetMappings has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb holds 3 of the 5 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 69 of the 83 points over it (83%), 5.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (Source/HostsMan/Tools/ListViewColumnSorter.vb at 13). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":410}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"043c316867c7c6b000e5564f3a4899f5cdfc5d7d40541a9e048af7422770ab84"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ListViewColumnSorter.Compare (cognitive 28): ListViewColumnSorter.Compare has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/ListViewColumnSorter.vb"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbf276bf6fdca644b6438dd9a2c0013a4e70d236a92e005446fc6e89b1b53b55"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HostsTools.GetMappingFromHostname (cognitive 23): HostsTools.GetMappingFromHostname has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (HostsTools.GetMappingsFromIP) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb holds 3 of the 5 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 69 of the 83 points over it (83%), 5.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (Source/HostsMan/Tools/ListViewColumnSorter.vb at 13). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":475}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df215c30a444c9f8c3ed0fa9536de0bbf023944e509dcae69717935640586ef5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HostsTools.GetMappingsFromIP (cognitive 23): HostsTools.GetMappingsFromIP has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (HostsTools.GetMappingFromHostname) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb holds 3 of the 5 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 69 of the 83 points over it (83%), 5.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (Source/HostsMan/Tools/ListViewColumnSorter.vb at 13). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":526}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67beae2234723afe348f419c8722ced9cf3cbf0f56c846990af325b4a96accc8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WindowSticker.SnapToDesktopBorder (cognitive 16): WindowSticker.SnapToDesktopBorder has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/WindowSticker.vb"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d17c1b6b4514d1991b4b45f7e4ebae3e231b6e33c39c923c1fea0eaf98cfb934"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Main: TooManyMethods \u2014 424 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/UserInterface/Main.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b60ff36b363c58ed769dfd9a4e52fa390428641474786d097e5a6dc8926eae3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:301-337 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:359-392 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:477-516 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:580-605 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:629-659 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80e164a730bda8f3938d201e4eb1991fa959f0ba1d61001cac66ed82d9296a29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:308-326 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:363-381 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:305\u0060 calls \u0060Exception\u0060, \u0060Format\u0060, \u0060IsDisabled\u0060 and \u0060Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:362\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b25b943932240f57807c81484de578bc4c5dbf7371f9121d3d2f499f2d60ac12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 3): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:308-323 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:363-378 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:581-595 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:305\u0060 calls \u0060Exception\u0060, \u0060Format\u0060, \u0060IsDisabled\u0060 and \u0060Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:362\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b214885f7716497f286a3edee62af0dcb230d79d5fd33b59f387b39d2fb5b7eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:477-487 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:629-638 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":477}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95939c95a29d51053b9d9505ba033d534b5fd43d8c0a491a3ca61aba3b8d8b22"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:316-326 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:371-381 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:641-649 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":316}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09fa77a7c4ee979de577cb4ac762c4c2ffab519aa81518a140746ad3fccde342"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:359-368 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:477-486 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:629-637 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96a81f887371ae725b0553d207ebf74bea56b6930b57b532c49ab9efbc433864"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:316-323 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:371-378 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:588-595 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:641-648 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":316}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6b1afb5b280f9597554c2675d67989c5d97b49b8cdc12232e11fd4db427dc3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:499-504 | Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb:551-556 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Source/HostsMan/Tools/HostsTools.vb"},"region":{"startLine":499}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"891c6cad8da9fbd38c291f905f4bc8653bed29b03c5217628a6d1474ca1a0743"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"D37","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2baf56be81cee4fea57b9fbc0bcca4df8426c883fe2356827c7e968782d68617"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims WinForms and VB.NET but the evidence shows no source directory \u2014 searched for: \u0060source directory\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"Changelog looks stale/thin: The changelog this check read carries 2 versioned entries, against a bar of 3. Counted as either an \u0060x.y.z\u0060 string or a version-shaped section heading (\u0060## [1.2.0]\u0060, \u0060## V14.x.x\u0060, \u0060## Updates in 8.0.x\u0060), whichever is the larger \u2014 so a log sectioned by minor series counts its sections, not its individual patch numbers. Entries recorded somewhere this check does not read \u2014 release notes generated at tag time from a generator config it did not recognise, or a log kept outside the repository \u2014 are not counted here, and this row is about what is re-findable in the tree rather than about how often you release."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9a74c249fe67853238d9c15085f7f97d31f51bb82455046aa10c2cef82f67b8"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NuGet dependencies are not locked: No packages.lock.json and no central package management \u2014 restores aren\u0027t reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable \u003CRestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003Etrue\u003C/RestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003E (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a97b4f69ccac509400ece7eedefb06d3ede0522cd4d8bcb5c068bea719545a6"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":3,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}