# Changelog

> **This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.**

## Score

- CAI 52 → 24 (-27.9)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.18 → rubric-2026.08.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

## Lenses

- Code Health 100 → 99 (-1.2)
- Architecture 100 → 69 (-31.0)
- Maturity 49 → 38 (-10.7)
- Readiness 55 → 27 (-28.0)
- Security 38 → 4 (-34.2)

## Resolved (7)

- Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1
- PR-triggered workflow without a permissions block
- Scanner failed to run — not a clean result
- The tutorial explains the three URL formats but does not show how to send a push using the actual Bark API (the example uses 'https://api.day.app/your_key' instead of the real endpoint). (docs/tutorial.md)
- complexity unreadable for .py, .swift — churn × complexity hotspots could not be measured

## New (5)

- Dimension evaluation failed
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- No automated tests
- No tests found
- Secret: generic-api-key (Podfile.lock)