{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (36 shared lines): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:189-233 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:60-104 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 36 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98efe7e34ce7f8cdbeff608eada776fa34917a52526631834326893455b92ab0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (33 shared lines): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:55-93 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:235-299 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 33 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"059ce5f16081accdf5de326684cce4c868472b2e14e3220101b9930a04fc807a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (83 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:16-58 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:61-100 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:103-148 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:151-218 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:222-255 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:259-289 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:317-351 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:353-412 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:414-448 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:15-81 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:84-149 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:152-199 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:202-248 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:251-320 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:323-373 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:376-409 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:412-443 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:534-566 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:569-602 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:605-634 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:636-665 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:668-696 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:698-736 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:738-775 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:19-64 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:66-113 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:116-160 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:162-245 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:247-284 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:287-318 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:320-349 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:389-423 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:426-467 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:470-503 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:505-534 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:537-565 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:568-602 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:604-643 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:646-695 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:697-750 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:752-802 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:101-154 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:156-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:223-286 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:288-348 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:350-409 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:412-441 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:443-480 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:482-516 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/ManagerDB.java:67-96 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:15-61 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:64-136 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:138-164 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:166-210 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:213-243 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:246-291 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:293-341 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:14-72 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:74-130 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:132-191 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:194-302 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:305-349 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:352-413 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:416-446 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:503-541 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:16-60 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:62-105 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:107-165 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:167-198 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:200-230 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:232-278 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:306-344 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:346-403 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:405-439 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:16-88 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:90-161 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:163-211 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:213-290 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:292-324 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:326-356 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:390-428 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:430-464 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:466-527 \u2014 These 83 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 83 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 83 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9bef18297b78994ade2eccd3617b781c0502bf24d22410c267af866dee5b2dc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (40 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:41-67 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:69-96 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:98-125 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:220-248 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:250-277 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:181-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:209-239 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:241-268 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:86-113 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:115-141 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:143-179 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:181-208 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:127-153 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:123-149 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:178-204 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:180-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:209-236 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:100-126 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:128-155 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:674-703 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:705-733 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:198-225 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:227-254 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:159-186 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:77-104 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:136-163 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:165-192 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:194-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:253-280 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:82-108 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:110-137 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:384-411 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:413-436 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:218-245 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:247-280 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:65-95 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:184-211 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:213-240 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:247-274 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:276-303 \u2014 These 40 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 40 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 40 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e686c1e99dc78e47284089e5cb50a04d2dd2a2965610bc09fdea357de88f7ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (17 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:138-152 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:280-294 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:271-285 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:211-225 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:156-170 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:207-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:239-253 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:158-172 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:736-750 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:257-271 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:189-203 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:140-154 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:439-453 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:283-297 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:98-112 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:243-257 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:306-320 \u2014 These 17 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 17 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 17 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f120b12f61f6e1fd1a3736116c49e6499cf56b1ebb9a6bd6ad48c05faaeed9f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:169-199 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:218-248 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:169\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:168\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:217\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bce3d26134b5d924c796ff4d74abac2179bf0431dc2ad3852205674bbf9485b0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:510-538 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:313-341 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:397-425 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 286 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:510\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":510}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c77ec2f685d31f388c8d5073b81d65526de929a27cace5a4afa9d5e89644e5c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:320-347 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:571-598 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 290 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:320\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56c7db4e1ecf5aeab9f651f4cbc35016741abbd76b64566644916be99767ae3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:387-412 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:378-403 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:502-527 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 20 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 313 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:387\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":387}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9210dd9ef971103a40a4af66317861b8d433f992c582890f6fd82aa8f3149543"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201326 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:91-113 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:777-802 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:91\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:776\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:90\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cca931a05f592892cfa8a3c1ca21ce206d2ec72a9b4a4452322c00567bbf4cab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:167-192 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:358-383 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc486dbc85b3a059b1af6c35abae92a95a69939db092df6b052d51220f560705"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:262-286 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:216-240 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:419-443 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:203-227 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:329-353 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 12 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 201 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:262\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":262}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4b42d0bc4036fbec661fca52d72d7ebf04042931f75aab7a77b3f4b6e66c18c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:55-79 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:123-147 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:55\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acbf5cdf245979d9ca7d1d0c2d39434be68790ae22e40b4bdfee5c178fbff872"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:60-84 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:133-157 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:60\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0553290f71e4a13bfead776ebff6adba98065787c14b4629f89b4bcba6491314"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:413-436 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:288-311 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:413\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":413}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f74033af1150494df4cc60c13f30e3a00b2274d898b662d84f27a3b9cab0676"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201324 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:508-531 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:461-479 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 25 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 377 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:508\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":508}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e658ee22cf9ebeb077a71639a2f6abe0d64e9eaca28380fbc8740152d1d1968"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:711-732 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:750-771 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:493-512 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 25 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 377 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:711\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":711}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55bcde3f520c0b308ada084da0139ea7cda77016a19b07e0d355146ee7439f59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:254-275 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:449-470 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aed2c462b067670068ea8b14bd48939fc1a7367df58dcfd7011e8b0fc2784aba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (1\u201322 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:224-245 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:263-284 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:725-725 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:224\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"493725224b4d08651bd01977f86d4b5ad2134b3ad370107ba040c5481e8583af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:190-211 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:61-82 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d565954535ac9d834b117481b3c7cfbb9360594cbb522e54d57b0942a9d9322c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201321 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:585-602 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:447-467 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:486-503 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:585\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":585}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f48fc70554f66c5cf4c7f0a5e04782cec1cc3833d9666de85e905b8a303d594f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:32-52 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:90-110 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:148-168 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:30\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:89\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fb002f7ddf0d45ef665f98742f02eeb7b6ddac55ac6be976d195d8d624ae687"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:225-245 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:354-374 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:225\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:247\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:376\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ee381fe2f036ac5516379dd7106cb3d11fa2ecca9ecca91b647a474f9a86e26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:34-54 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:79-99 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:34\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:32\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:77\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a7e19ef1492deca714033f9dcef06de7602692866619ffa94c89f26d28e05d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:56-76 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:236-256 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"711680474e92b431035c74574661a3485fd0cc5bf23e3b41673d25b6609fe94f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:92-112 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:78-95 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:92\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:97\u0060 calls \u0060parseInt\u0060, \u0060getText\u0060, \u0060openPopup\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:114\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c548b477aed0c15c60dd50aeeab745f5dd6514165fe5b7cad3a115526c98d331"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201320 lines \u00D7 12): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:177-195 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:279-297 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:326-344 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:199-217 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:700-718 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:105-124 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:90-108 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:169-186 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:257-275 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:368-386 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:125-143 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:247-265 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:177\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:171\u0060 calls \u0060Catering_Service\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:121\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a906273ea5e4b123723d3f4105adc33444a5af444fcdff951b9ca05d0e4f879"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201320 lines \u00D7 9): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:84-100 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:48-64 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:144-160 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:42-61 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:272-291 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:53-72 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:111-130 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:41-60 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:86-105 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 290 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:84\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:141\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:45\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c19bdf6e702dd0bbba5bb7dbc24ddd7025ab30e7c6b90fa62d282f7701486c22"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201320 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:132-148 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:69-88 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:142-161 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 25 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 370 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:132\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:129\u0060 calls \u0060Catering_Service\u0060, \u0060display\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:67\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b23e7a48fad7830f5d35e1366c47c3e7d377b2f8cc9b454ed60270a8c5d47f02"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:639-658 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:508-527 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:415-434 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:639\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":639}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5575994efc436e9aef4bd972b8788f363d8f9573d18302f40cbee5b770a4fd41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:302-321 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:49-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 50 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:69\u0060 calls \u0060setText\u0060, \u0060toString\u0060, \u0060getCost\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:324\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":302}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edb663b1fa1af7d6282b9d18c1db832f82fce0bf2d82d90e947b25244607d99f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201319 lines \u00D7 18): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:271-289 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:433-448 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:428-443 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:551-566 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:619-634 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:650-665 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:303-318 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:334-349 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:408-423 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:519-534 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:426-441 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/ManagerDB.java:81-96 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:225-243 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:428-446 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:212-230 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:424-439 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:338-356 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:449-464 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:271\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:425\u0060 calls \u0060executeUpdate\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:270\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edfa1d8ee592db7d835183d3623dd340a27721408fd6f7e39870690a6c6908b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201319 lines \u00D7 11): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:202-217 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:304-319 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:680-695 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:549-564 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:133-151 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:153-163 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:333-348 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:149-164 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:182-197 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:274-289 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:308-323 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:202\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a803ae19ed64f656ef1d703227ade5be011a60116247eec04c4e4a4ee8adb66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:306-324 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:353-371 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:306\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9f73cd01ae02082078f006fb8265659d9d336a290bd38f5f94b525874ad1cc9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:242-260 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:87-105 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f9023349b97ee4c300ca531da11d90fe0840642c3ca1505f03e97dca41187c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201318 lines \u00D7 7): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:221-238 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:199-215 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:111-127 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:385-401 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:219-235 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:185-201 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:248-264 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 7 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f407ce2c03414a76f2ce397be0151e9a8e136bd9e31b19300e572d73d452e703"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201317 lines \u00D7 6): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:356-372 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:733-749 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:119-135 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:197-209 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:285-301 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:396-412 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:356\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:354\u0060 calls \u0060addPasswordRecord\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:117\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":356}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3690a10d47c03915fd1bdf8e340a62e2483078448818a3ca06c6a7d1fb03c8ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:54-70 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:52-67 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"069b98c0d648206d1246531732a54862e850d71fb85cccc0fcb217f3e57e7f62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 14): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:39-54 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:177-195 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:226-244 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:94-109 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:780-798 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:267-282 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:391-406 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:319-337 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:169-187 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:520-538 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:256-274 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:323-341 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:189-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:407-425 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:39\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:56\u0060 calls \u0060Catering_Service\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:408\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d117a3ae0a619e4d7c3766dae190be5643b16b357d519e49fe8560d4848f923"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:66-81 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:134-149 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:206-221 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 25 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 377 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:66\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f1ea7425119e2774591f0d590ab7e79b5c827c96c87f53701882812976074c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:124-139 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:101-116 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:83-98 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 46 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30bcf7261cb83f64cf32cbf0d08319b150e89fce6bf9e3ffd8a95d86cc6a021b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:677-692 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:330-345 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 24 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:677\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":677}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40ec8cf60ee3020f84b701a92c5a79cc80cb1683d76a0c016227d7b398575e96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:253-268 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:300-315 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:253\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f42cb0937996e06cff102afe7ee87b2e24db8e3d3c147cbec4571b61921131b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:182-197 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:128-143 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 46 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b873fe4b277a3ba926309c677efb0b0ff1e286b144274d9193fac180f7f1d54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:243-258 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:291-306 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:243\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:240\u0060 calls \u0060Employee\u0060, \u0060setEmployee_id\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:289\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b3c65775f4c4d23597a7b92cb27b9562a4b6ae1f38d412ad140c91829714d94"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 13): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:19-33 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:64-78 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:87-101 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:155-169 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:69-83 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:119-133 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:159-173 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:77-91 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:135-149 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:65-79 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:235-249 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:93-107 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:166-180 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:19\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:175\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:103\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f58a7dbfc96e142db345fcd7b30e4eb11d78b99a5093abb5e784e8f8bdf4841b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 8): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:337-351 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:719-736 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:758-775 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:588-602 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:502-516 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:524-541 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:327-344 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:411-428 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:337\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f58396c84eb20cd6bd17f8cd8755245e3bbacc4e85359df1ffbd46505a6f294"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:214-228 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:679-693 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_view_Controller.java:249-263 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:70-84 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 4 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":214}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba2571074a7a3bede7b85b7a57b1cac7f3e720bdfcf28e922402d0a5363f8fb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:515-532 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:629-643 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:466-480 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:515\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":515}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51e10424d15af417129a6e0fcf080534d457cbfeaf9ebe9ad857662e63d2baff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:681-695 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:334-348 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:395-409 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 24 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:681\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":681}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c69c95e2e9a660495035497fb31b1c6027d7ad609e49478c952008e0b4c56be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:205-219 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:755-769 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:205\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9cc0eef3f6a84d26aa400a6d877091ebb349a595211824087228e96141da822"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:252-266 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:315-329 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"127fe1ea1bb29b93b58d179ffaa23a2ed54789c9e61746ec043c035b01714b5a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 11): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:106-119 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:18-31 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:22-35 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:607-620 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:651-664 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:293-306 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:446-459 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:18-31 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:17-30 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:19-32 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:19-32 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:106\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:120\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:32\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51509d4c9455fc84756c6df34ec2f7838c1daf9934acd5c594f708ab20824378"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:249-262 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:296-309 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:506-519 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:309-322 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:393-406 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 250 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:249\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0003f9d7d020ce05ceefcd61eb4fb619292ccd2845b5252d6b21839df822c54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:392-408 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:356-369 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:383-399 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:507-523 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:392\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":392}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2be62f642ea6a2a368dcc62982348d26f8b5091013828e56b0df2ac463c0e5ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:34-47 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:102-115 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:31\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:99\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cc308ba1430848e3b771f6c0010476045d1727a288decd9bee243a54ed27ff2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:538-551 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:473-484 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:538\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":538}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9743ac198fab2198b2ee725fa5af4922d3a33e2c654b614c22c94340037f5823"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:47-60 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:64-77 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:47\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a075c7a6e01e3765f04f0ddb920d8d7e7244f6dcc09bd61d68959bf8ee6453"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 20): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:19-31 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:64-76 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:320-332 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:87-99 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:155-167 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:69-81 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:119-131 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:571-583 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:159-171 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:249-261 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:296-308 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:77-89 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:135-147 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:506-518 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:65-77 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:235-247 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:309-321 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:93-105 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:166-178 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:393-405 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:19\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:32\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:262\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b32a5a506c790fa5fd852e2e131ebea08f788b3bf3a790dbaa673901f5f5dc71"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 17): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:140-152 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:282-294 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:273-285 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:213-225 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:158-170 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:209-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:241-253 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:160-172 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:738-750 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:259-271 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:191-203 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:142-154 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:441-453 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:285-297 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:100-112 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:245-257 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:308-320 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 17 call sites, so a change lands once. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fba660496ca76891507b3f5b8409490e1bfffacdab84c10ba6dd27c00aa378cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:205-217 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:755-767 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:485-497 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:205\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec19bfa2068e3d35e479df64dc0d25576f08d646dd90ff6abc2039018cf9ac38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201312 lines \u00D7 26): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:104-115 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:175-185 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:359-370 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:16-27 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:277-287 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:324-334 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:20-31 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:197-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:605-616 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:649-660 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:698-708 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:103-114 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:291-302 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:444-455 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:16-27 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:88-98 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:167-176 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:15-26 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:255-265 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:366-376 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:17-28 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:123-133 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:352-363 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:17-28 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:245-255 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:472-483 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:104\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:171\u0060 calls \u0060Catering_Service\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:121\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5d0436178d27629445552b9af5e4f9dc0b699e568543c90b7557099bdb61873"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 8): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:136-147 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:337-348 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:719-733 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:758-772 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:588-599 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:502-513 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:73-87 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:146-160 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:136\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2760ea868f8364e5e7ab443b55ee4325535141342a979609ca85cdefb8eb659"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 7): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:359-373 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:736-750 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:137-154 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:122-136 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:199-210 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:288-302 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:399-413 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:359\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:354\u0060 calls \u0060addPasswordRecord\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:117\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a3407e95092aa37ffb6b96744970ad5b447fb4a3cb8cbf97a34b7acbd91a3e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:66-80 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:134-148 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:681-692 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:206-220 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:334-345 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:66\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7431d6f52b38a6f7cd6fa802c4003593f57a5196f6a48eb60855dca4817a1f5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:210-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:153-164 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:675-686 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_view_Controller.java:245-256 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:66-77 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 5 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a69591024dc16f71b1a28f61dd1430583643ba1c43e9d3521296cb60b1ce1a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:157-168 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:229-240 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 25 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 370 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93255a54761fd3acf1a22e1783b2a8f5e6e85c8da84edf20eb9551453ea2dc7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Customer.java:186-197 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:291-302 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Customer.java"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d02444e38cd2ddf3eced88396ee1cf27d64a54fd46acf4ebab8be81b97c1b1b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:38-49 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:111-122 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a616d5c9205361c70669ae7a8d88de84f9b61b87323e9db9057c2112d0e61b30"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:147-157 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:166-177 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:147\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd0083199ae6c8895f852687ee4c6db0e05f58182f28163bfc3126f95f78b769"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 29): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:17-27 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:62-72 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:260-270 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:318-328 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:85-95 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:153-163 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:637-646 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:67-77 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:117-127 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:427-437 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:506-515 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:569-579 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:157-167 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:413-422 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:214-224 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:247-257 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:294-304 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:75-85 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:133-143 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:417-427 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:504-514 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:63-73 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:201-211 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:233-243 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:307-317 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:91-101 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:164-174 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:327-337 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:391-401 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:17\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0672733662bd53c0a15d62e549e162ff048045065f2ad822c065a9782e7fe466"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201311 lines \u00D7 9): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:223-232 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:377-386 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:669-676 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:251-260 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:538-545 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:139-147 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:319-328 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:169-178 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:293-303 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:223\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae6ead5c3e44b468704505f0f24723e898dde30291429d1bdfb095a3e47cf607"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 9): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:392-409 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:356-370 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:733-747 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:119-133 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:197-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:285-299 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:396-410 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:383-400 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:507-524 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:392\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:354\u0060 calls \u0060addPasswordRecord\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:117\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":392}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9918127f49414d6049e3597457df048c54513add28d57700ef41131b56ff120"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:40-50 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:108-118 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:42-52 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:115-125 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 20 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 277 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:40\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:38\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ab70709582884c36ce32e7cda7f452f57a7572002971247bef6f0effe569399"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:203-213 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:753-763 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:483-493 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/ManagerDB.java:68-77 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:203\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96730862a41fbc98f3078a9955687876697614eacf1440a9041d5ec65f369812"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:118-128 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:235-245 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccde494130b997301d95f7593b3b3753f4df2e7fc024f9b3ec529531feb8ad6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 14): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:114-122 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:26-34 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:95-103 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:163-171 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:30-38 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:77-85 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:127-135 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:659-667 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:763-771 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:301-309 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:368-376 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:25-34 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:27-35 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:101-109 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:114\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:310\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:35\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69a4254f1c134bd35aa3f0b50812f6553ca2384debc22aca2e1b562f0e2b56fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 13): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:27-34 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:72-79 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:95-102 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:163-170 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:77-84 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:127-134 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:167-174 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:237-246 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:366-375 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:85-92 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:143-150 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:101-108 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:174-181 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:27\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:175\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:103\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6e91455b2d90ba46a0ef62c4d1cbc88131f90852145133e394f5523ccf1c660"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:156-165 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:201-210 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:219-228 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 273 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c12aaeaa390cb22c8bdcd7c6308d587d213fffc2ee658b5c6aef94652188ba3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:172-181 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:244-253 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:307-316 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:306\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:171\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4985c8ceee8e3a979351cc8f9becd36eb579841128d071ba28e861c6615737c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:32-41 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:262-271 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:309-318 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:31\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:261\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c1d9d37e4f10ea4a3292823cded64a1e2f93fc1a697edd40c3c90cbc42e6229"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:699-708 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:739-748 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:699\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":699}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41bdfb039afbb9f1855c9f118759ceede997258e01d2b49b028a6095230fe975"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:177-186 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:489-498 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:177\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1c0008592eceab2f0db55862daf8a517a20f0a8315e168d4687d9e93ae2f597"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 7): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:27-35 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:72-80 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:213-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:167-175 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:239-247 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:27-35 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:174-182 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:27\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:176\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:183\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7e9781cf2863585ede5ccbe3f36ccb33240f9cdbc7fe827a6457e6d70a0bdde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:259-267 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:218-226 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:236-244 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:222-230 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:285-293 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 5 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dfb893878d97a10abef401a821abc2a2133372a3e49c688cb134d100da96ca1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:81-89 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java:252-260 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Employee.java"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b222811af84e469f47a7e6368146141e92265ca0791d74e46e5d7aff25d87bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:167-176 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:269-277 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:167\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:278\u0060 calls \u0060openPopup\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:178\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84b2f0516490007124d6acec45a3f98627dc69f959b946e5d7b0c1a98b8ab3b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 40): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:60-67 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:89-96 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:118-125 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:241-248 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:270-277 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:200-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:232-239 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:261-268 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:106-113 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:134-141 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:165-172 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:201-208 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:146-153 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:142-149 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:197-204 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:200-207 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:229-236 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:119-126 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:148-155 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:697-703 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:727-733 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:218-225 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:247-254 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:179-186 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:97-104 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:156-163 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:185-192 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:214-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:273-280 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:101-108 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:130-137 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:404-411 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:429-436 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:238-245 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:267-274 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:88-95 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:204-211 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:233-240 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:267-274 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:296-303 \u2014 there are 40 copies across 18 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 40 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java:60\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:278\u0060 calls \u0060openPopup\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:178\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Main_Menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4569fa76c37a253a2b79b8aa952db37835dba6e843744235ec542a91ab52d925"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 17): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:232-240 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:192-199 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:224-231 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_register_Controller.java:138-145 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_signin_Controller.java:134-141 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_signin_Controller.java:111-118 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:689-696 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:210-217 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:89-96 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:265-272 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:93-100 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_signin_Controller.java:122-129 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_emp_Controller.java:396-403 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_view_events_Controller.java:230-237 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/payment_Controller.java:80-87 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:196-203 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:259-266 \u2014 there are 17 copies across 14 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 17 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:229\u0060 calls \u0060setName\u0060, \u0060getEmp\u0060, \u0060getName\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_edit_Controller.java:189\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":232}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"543f312c814204ebd8a2075e7ac42dd7bbdf2a9498bc7d3b93734bf65694f3ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 10): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:114-121 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:26-33 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:213-220 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:30-37 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:659-666 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:763-770 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:301-308 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:25-33 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:27-34 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:27-34 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:114\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:221\u0060 calls \u0060getInt\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:122\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"647a64f2af55ca9e3b036f9c97a5df0e82f1436ed8788f7dda0d8f3b2d544800"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 6): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:262-269 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:221-228 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:239-246 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_emp_Controller.java:171-178 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/studio_edit_Controller.java:225-232 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:288-295 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 6 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":262}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26137af97a751e1333214457a5815f99b42ec73e6f1d753dece8d7cfbf896bd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:415-422 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:224-232 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:353-361 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:406-413 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:431-438 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 246 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:415\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":415}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e68a117fe381d1ff1bf7b5aa6ba6fec18e482d0f90484512f077b1256620dea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 5): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:415-422 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:390-397 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:224-232 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:406-413 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:431-438 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 290 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:415\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":415}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69fd09be357b3f9f3ab6de3e76c8d23d699541006dc4742eccc83a47d4edd53f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:117-124 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:376-383 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:304-311 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 246 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:117\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d33c59ba12d584e7eca39e84f0400d6ad4b938d58851d2d7d4cdd4c86c7076b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:181-188 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:36-43 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:109-116 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 245 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a003d2aaaa1b32137992b093c278812293a5cc1f838fef6643134f3903d1172f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:33-40 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:78-85 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:248-255 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:32\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java:77\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/StudioDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"320f6b5129a7b2bc564e0b326b718f5544b23062a0473f26c562c31a4ab9ed94"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:126-133 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:192-199 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:189\u0060 calls \u0060disableManagerButton\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java:123\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/cust_menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"950b72794683a765b97a3bd4043c1738cfb510de952adec17082caf328a375a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:117-123 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:376-382 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:166-172 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:304-310 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 266 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:117\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05f445d0ba462b08a04234538d97a9d75b1dca5345565e571e04f867f7b252d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:32-38 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:77-83 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:379-385 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:378\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:31\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17beb0cc3a7bbabebd5a9e0566db1c57c319102653ab24a9d4f741debdc1f93a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:216-222 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:177-183 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:489-495 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 20 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 277 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:216\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccff3a638e3f18ac272b65533056fb5d89ee30001a8604007db393128a6235e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:348-354 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:388-394 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6f7412563bda5e7f7387eff6c775dec17e128997a4c9e7fdd77e0cab3e25f0c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:214-220 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:85-91 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":214}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f73b084cf62b8c7aefd7897379efb407eae98b37559fe16a7ef4c6260ef5a4e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:223-229 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:94-100 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23e577e15df346e288f987f25bc60f5c6491c17cac11530848ad3f2e7e0def06"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 10): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:40-45 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:85-90 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:135-140 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:669-674 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:770-775 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:180-185 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:251-256 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java:314-319 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:35-40 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:108-113 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EventDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 24 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:141\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:47\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e021da2c9d9ae2bcab276d4cacebda6802197ce97c792acf1f827405f8061f06"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:168-173 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:86-91 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:136-141 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:771-776 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:768\u0060 calls \u0060getString\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:167\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d48d1bda8510663b8dbca96057b7ab43e497a5537c7ec2078d02ad7dfa188a8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:536-541 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:570-575 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:606-611 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:471-476 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:536\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":536}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64eb742b5c92cf106dcfde009170b165e774cc3ff3c1ade8c675228f7dc36e3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:570-575 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:606-611 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:321-326 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:471-476 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 30 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 437 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:570\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":570}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5e34f6845e2ea6b1036a05a10da3c3c632b8fe0530f6477d3588a0b33c00fef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java:772-777 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:179-184 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java:491-496 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/VenueDB.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 19 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 254 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/EmployeeDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":772}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df12ac951ddeb3ac012b11b0d95fb8cd303dc2094a0cad4a7a5a7ef252b2eef2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:112-117 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:149-154 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java:190-195 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/Media_RequirementsDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8135beb9f79658fa1bad8d432705ad9941663a6a0b0a4650b8b7658b03c9824"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:78-83 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:258-263 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f7565c4215b0576b2ccb6e1d2555a2e3c2870c2771cb297b31eb48de2da4d6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java:85-90 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java:265-270 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/event_book_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/catering_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5a18c02b111979361006be170352965fae72ba7abb5fabd0b80810f073b4629"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:142-147 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:159-164 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_edit_Controller.java:165\u0060 calls \u0060editEmployeeAccountField\u0060, \u0060getAccount_number\u0060, \u0060getEmployee_id\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java:150\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/emp_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aad83aa11286c90917214d379b9ac0021e59e31a4a903758c87e40044d07529f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:129-134 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:246-251 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java:129\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/mgr_menu_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9378f277ed907a06cc03f321a85b3dd2c29eca8842689d42828b57e076714f75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:301-305 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:348-352 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:388-392 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:354\u0060 calls \u0060addPasswordRecord\u0060 and \u0060Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java:306\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CustomerDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"893d14072114c89983f495f84eb298b82cf52cf15c2ef5342bb70e98e7d29395"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:279-283 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:330-334 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java:390-394 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/MenuDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":279}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c2bd9fb5ed84e454e4ae8cce2d3050ece594ade1b1c8f796237dafe1de5e5af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:199-203 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java:234-238 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/CateringServicesDB.java"},"region":{"startLine":199}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c63919930a1239e75b353cc09d70f27013a261246fbd473bffef319b804210d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:198-203 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:216-221 | Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java:234-239 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Project/EMS/InterfaceMain/src/sample/venue_edit_Controller.java"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"509117e541292846a58ded2a3f74410bb544120d05b2d5066f5a48acd3439e9b"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (JUnit (with Kotest or MockK on Kotlin)), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (JUnit (with Kotest or MockK on Kotlin)) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: The body states \u0027You can run queries...\u0027 but provides no runnable example of how to execute a query or open the MySql console, leaving usage unshown. Add an example showing how to paste a single query into the MySql console and confirm it runs."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no architecture or design documentation: The document outline lists Interface: and Contact Info: but neither is present in the visible text. Add a short architecture overview or contact info section as per the outline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"086460f2da112d94904fac5439f54a7780bc7778ff9375a067e428a1cc9a8a4c"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84791490bc79a9d247f5c5fb3c02cf0424fc0391d32961b160683bd5c612e9f6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea93fbc2b654e6ecec2e1766b2a08f05e5f2270c24c486f44858e5d907bf07fe"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82e3f63d5f5b58ce67671e0622252d6721831fe63d6b69e97e21acc97081f54c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"452756a101947a6a1e7f87e2eaded02ea7e7d8e717a474951895f57c0faeeae7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef96b070272a4647b040c7fe148754a02679fb7d9624226552dc7fda0baf76ca"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a664afcefe07e4b0c9f607607fa0ac22c56bb951c56ada29f0328fcd52975ffa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c50ea10eadc3f8d924182744a12fc372c4f0a2de1083b9f85981fa00172bfd76"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8048bb4ac06ba134fefbe3170abe6a087c533a6d8f04b4592b023fb2f56d0c3a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c91c1bbd6ced87d2e32beb5196857e9979cf323657ffcf13c496a23a068fa12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46e7cadf652487b4396402fdacbbf7737a50d536741d5232de495323b1b28ed0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ff47a4ce5d6b3c05f800424c60052ef6cd06e4fc875f0f559eb566ff4177384"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3e9321165d021d0389d244f7368ede4cc8ee25abb8925ca660ed911da24fa00"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edc81862d32fe5d28b38657200ded89e9bd0bd1b520e9520d480bc844af6667f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2510bd52352f140ca27040a49ae23c69dc6e14b998fe86632fd9d268a59b92d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a63e4daa599c88be5bd817733ab71861ca10faa926896489bd57a1e971383e55"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61092ade1aa8b51d3f909676f6792c1f6a6554d8e7286aef56a1f4fad14993b2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6e768e3b8b0cad662c2ba523a83a58358939ae2a768b8e1bd963e2d2cbcbe36"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5456dd8834b82163b827989492cad091c8d1db9f8df8acd029e7053782ea1314"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7420ebd9afffd8c90cd86410fc40e93552cd77a221ef00afa9256d97d58422a0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af313b80199b109597edd9ad25e4355262a46f957f7e4cb52474be19e12f593e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"911eabe2c8e17234d1b67b323060a09243d6fe1858b1e4d135fe0aa2aa9de29d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"395aeaf666c260fe755caa54fbe9e6a1b72aa48962c4ef0f2a9341f240b85838"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e7a471a0a98340de6cebefa3562fe1b06176b6a75c46e30ebd6affc34780fcf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6e4d8be6b712c23cc02ea1de9631ed5f5468abf697033c4a9641d2b9aab1e68"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5d7e8761e893e938136d60d372aead20f11a92aaf18f26dc6530b7f93cf3334"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60679849c1309f0bf9d5f2d3b8ac900cd285a047650b21d7a230f5a8f4064122"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c82ebe48434252c84cddc21c78163e2c7537739fe74f476e9396a769a1e4486"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb59c7ddcb29a4570e3976d052eeb5d9e2ab9dd9a616ba0a55031aeb5be51bce"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"428e9918fafd511d7f2e8938defe2e475a2ddc42fe4de4b07dffbd4089490677"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef1d14cf5f8d83638e701ac9d5de0bbe3837a31bb263eeadbeb5bec09275fa44"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfe737b2cbca8dfdb2e7d259cea514b6bbdfc2618a17b2c70d0a3e0737a002c1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5818b93f89bcb4936cf71db1a3c93e099f238d45e86334c6fdc63272172e8b2b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6849a33acdb53062dfee1702e8f16a44d442381a06a534de6f71a2f6a4393a2b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a691264d6581d1972876f0068de4238894670823a5d2743d3d2782c0384424a1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b2ddfa71814b699414ba332d3a4f8f71439adcdf7247cda41a16dda72e1038d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"812445ea06c41f30be4b153a983d0767d37dfb4f8a655c61b9f1b424eb1b5edc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"496fa48d33d4241dc62dec0efc6918d94c1347e152fa63bc49c66e8c1ae94808"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10706cdddfa9736989d7bfebeb2178bdc29d87cb52d0527437ca28159f3f2a68"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94ee7f18d60f602a29330e8da1b4fc237622070090465690b7a9a16b06ad0050"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"285c96072af34704bd1168395fac440d0979c16b09602d0111eeb60f648185a9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eca80a5317f35e62134294d5261bbed43d2476736cdb6dae08e1117b0f64265"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfdc990b446ca63f8cc2a6cdda50339c9eeffd274c5a18104525ad30831affe8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91b6c376e45f4949e7cb45d77102baf96ccf2650aaa5ca3a70bbeb7962dc6019"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35495ee69421c6957a55ebaf97f8fb2c4ea0ccc04a6e1a5584a28387d58545f7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"773e2f5b11dd3545ed076ae74b316017b1ad023c01811e04fce77c13f846594c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fb37a4605e6a2b0f2a1454bc2457fe59592ff2051fe90d19e0153bd34b6217a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb801410bbc4e42d47f88370625823f283f6e9ad46dd7d0153048ce48d390fe2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"849ba5cbcafc9663a3db32b735ab8f7a8f370fc19599be75839084e72ca7beea"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13ad0f37da81c2e0ca31114363ee13178a2494d107fde7deb8d51bc2f89d7c42"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb0651558d52c4553ad5c3a8effe5524add6e12f1e2bad53518f68ac444f3bac"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"303bda223d5a0210595d682bc683a2edc390b3a6b9e6d036d9193413ecbdfa2e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"708c3b2cfd6bf0d5ce497f8104e6341243f4e53e49138f4fe1d6cc65a19bc056"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b0d3571d5217d0db758c2b476930a75152ec176253e67579552400f49e4c02d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37454cb5ef4a0c6658e2c7909b42af119da0d5198d62207780144860b882b27a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d128c94d9e646b7232948d22fb0331429b50f8caa434b58982ae3e3a7cdd439"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b22a2d4207352c865095ca5c6b5efdf68304bdbce97ed573ae69d9c67666a38"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9bd6500533ca6fc05d4b3f8a6b932e9d8453b9bb91c94cd8060e0c73629e144c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"835ddec34eafe5aeee5ea80f0efc59ba8a079e35f1faf4ba89783fda4bdfa217"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9d558c8980ef5ae8bbec67a23cb93610e03cf9f4ffa1b9dcfd254c7517f8c04"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it all sits under Project/, so the conventional src/ boundary between the product and its tooling isn\u0027t drawn."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests/ separation: No test surface was found \u2014 this check walked the tree for authored source in the languages it models (\u0060.cs\u0060, \u0060.vb\u0060, \u0060.fs\u0060, \u0060.java\u0060, \u0060.kt\u0060, \u0060.scala\u0060, \u0060.py\u0060, \u0060.php\u0060, \u0060.rb\u0060, \u0060.ex\u0060, \u0060.exs\u0060, \u0060.go\u0060, \u0060.erl\u0060, \u0060.hrl\u0060, \u0060.swift\u0060, \u0060.dart\u0060, \u0060.rs\u0060, \u0060.ts\u0060, \u0060.tsx\u0060, \u0060.mts\u0060, \u0060.cts\u0060) and found none of it test-shaped. \u2605 \u0060.js\u0060, \u0060.jsx\u0060, \u0060.mjs\u0060 and \u0060.cjs\u0060 are NOT in that walk, so a Jest or Mocha suite written in plain JavaScript is invisible to it and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than moving anything. Otherwise there are no tests here to separate from production code, so the folder question hasn\u0027t been reached yet."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"999e0c784909c76b6346a705ee63961fe363ed1cd6a94e3f80e2ebe7820ccd5d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README describes an interface (EMS.gif) and contact info but there is no UI component in the evidence \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":59,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}