# Changelog

> **This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.**

## Score

- CAI 28 → 59 (+30.4)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.18 → rubric-2026.08.19) — scores are not directly comparable.

## Lenses

- Code Health 88 (new)
- Architecture 69 (new)
- Maturity 13 → 77 (+63.8)
- Readiness 15 → 39 (+23.8)
- Security 100 → 78 (-22.0)
- Domain Modelling 100 (new)

## Resolved (6)

- Dependency hygiene not measured — no supported dependency manifest was read
- No automated tests
- No tests found
- bus factor not measured — no commits were sampled
- early-stage repository — too little history to judge knowledge freshness
- single-commit history — no usable git history window to measure hotspots

## New (17)

- Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (bun.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (bun.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (bun.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- LLM evaluation failed
- Low vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- Medium vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (apps/web/bun.lock)
- Small-team knowledge concentration