Public report — FFmpegFreeUI, published 8 Aug 2026. Concrete security findings (CVE IDs, secret matches, dependency versions) are hidden in this version; ask the repo owner for the full report.
Watchdogby Canine Development 08-08-2026 @ 00:06 UTC Public
Code Health Audit

Lake1059/FFmpegFreeUI

no automated tests
38% Weak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
middle
Code Health 70% Adequate Architecture 63% Adequate Maturity 50% Adequate Security 42% Weak Readiness 25% Weak

— · 2 projects · weakest lens: Readiness (25%)

Grounded in facts. Every number here is computed, not narrated — reproducible, tool-backed, and traceable to a line of code. How to trust this ▸

32/34dimensions tool-verifieddeterministic · confidence 1.0 · 2 LLM-assisted, advisory
291findings with an exact file:lineof 302 — the remainder are repo-wide signals (a dimension-level measurement, not a single line); open any file:line and verify
34/90dimensions across the health lenses · 2 projects — wide & deep

Executive summary

Read through the Production lens — the standard calibration. *Green* means good enough to run in production. The score is absolute and comparable across repos.

Lake1059/FFmpegFreeUI carries serious gaps (38%). Several issues below can materially affect correctness, security, or the cost of changing it — and propagate to everything that depends on it.

The area that most needs attention is Readiness (25%) — releases are harder to depend on — versioning, release notes and dependency hygiene are thin, so consumers can't easily tell what changed or trust an upgrade. Security (42%) is the next concern — exposure to security and compliance incidents is elevated.

Leadership focus, highest impact first: ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across… (Observability); SAST step (e.g. CodeQL) or a security analyzer package (Security & performance tooling); 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage (Code Coverage).

For scale: — (~0 production lines); rebuilding it from scratch would take roughly — (—). Approximate, ±~30%.

Code Health 70% Adequate · gated by D18 Architecture 63% Adequate · gated by D26, AX5 Maturity 50% Adequate · gated by M2 Readiness 25% Weak · gated by D8, D9, P2, P3 Security 42% Weak · gated by D29, D36
How the score is built — each lens's share of the headline Width is the lens's weight in the worst-heaviest fold (the weakest area pulls hardest); colour is that lens's own band. A lens fixes the score in proportion to its width.
Readiness 25% · 47% weightSecurity 42% · 26% weightMaturity 50% · 14% weightArchitecture 63% · 8% weightCode Health 70% · 4% weight

Raise Readiness 25 → 70 (the Healthy floor) ⇒ headline 38 → ~50.

Code composition — where the lines go
Generated 100%
New since the last scan (42+)

42 finding(s) are new versus the previous scan (2026-08-03) — surfaced by this scheduled scan itself, no pull request required.

  • D1 · 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cyclomatic 120) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb
  • D2 · 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cognitive 177) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb
  • D2 · 设置_v6.启动时加载设置 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/设置_v6.vb
  • D2 · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.从FFmpeg运行库提取Vmaf模型列表 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb
  • D2 · 预设管理_v6.构造缩放滤镜 (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_准备文件.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_视频编码器.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_降噪.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb
  • D19 · LLM evaluation failed
  • D35 · Change coupling: FormMain_v6.vb ↔ Form_v6_参数面板.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: FormMain_v6.vb ↔ Form_v6_支持者.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb
  • P2 · No structured logging

A full-fidelity diff against the previous run's complete recorded findings — line-move tolerant: a finding that only shifted line counts as unchanged, only genuinely new titles/files surface here.

Top priorities

The highest-leverage moves; the full ranked list is in the Roadmap below.

1
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
+12.6 pts · Low effort · Code Coverage
2
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.
+12.6 pts · Low effort · Test Distribution
3
Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.
+13.7 pts · Medium effort · Observability

Diagnosis — what's actually going on

Highest-leverage move · Medium · Leverage
Of everything flagged, the best return on effort is: Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects. The rest can wait behind it.
Evidence: priority ranking: top of 5 ranked by impact/effort
→ Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.

At a glance — Code Health · 70% · Adequate · gated by D18

The Good
D4 · .NET / C# Code Duplication 9.1 GD1 · Repo Unfinished & placeholder code 10.0 X1 · Repo Async correctness 10.0 X3 · Repo Exception handling 10.0 X4 · Repo Structured logging 10.0
The Bad
D1 · .NET / C# Cyclomatic Complexity 5.8 D3 · .NET / C# God Classes 5.9
The Ugly
D2 · .NET / C# Cognitive Complexity 4.9 D17 · .NET / C# Explicit Debt 4.0 D18 · .NET / C# Solution Shape 2.0

At a glance — Architecture · 63% · Adequate · gated by D26, AX5

The Good
D5 · .NET / C# Coupling 10.0 D6 · .NET / C# Cohesion (LCOM4) 10.0 D35 · .NET / C# Change Coupling 9.9 AX6 · Repo Interface segregation 10.0
The Ugly
D26 · .NET / C# Project Cohesion 0.0 AX5 · Repo Architecture & structure 3.0

At a glance — Maturity · 50% · Adequate · gated by M2

The Good
D15 · .NET / C# Churn × Complexity Hotspots 10.0 D16 · .NET / C# Bus Factor 10.0 D21 · .NET / C# Naming Consistency 10.0 D34 · .NET / C# Knowledge Freshness 10.0 M4 · Repo Documentation accuracy 10.0
The Bad
M1 · Repo Documentation (README) 6.0 M3 · Repo Folder & project structure 6.0
The Ugly
M2 · Repo Architecture documentation 0.0

At a glance — Readiness · 25% · Weak · gated by D8, D9, P2, P3

The Good
D12 · .NET / C# Dependency Hygiene 10.0 D13 · .NET / C# Secret Scanning 10.0
The Bad
P1 · Repo CI/CD gates 6.5
The Ugly
D8 · .NET / C# Code Coverage 0.0 P2 · Repo Observability 0.0 P3 · Repo Security & performance tooling 0.0

At a glance — Security · 42% · Weak · gated by D29, D36

The Good
D28 · .NET / C# Secrets (history) 10.0
The Ugly
D29 · .NET / C# Static Analysis (SAST) 2.5 D36 · .NET / C# Supply-chain Provenance & Signing 0.0

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).

OWASP categoryFindingsSeverity
A03:2021 — Injection8High / Critical

Roadmap

Begin by implementing structured logging using ILogger or Serilog across all projects to establish baseline observability. Next, integrate static application security testing tools to identify vulnerabilities and improve code coverage by addressing the single missing automated test. Finally, enforce quality gates in the CI/CD pipeline by running the test suite on every merge to ensure stability.

Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.

Do thisHelpsEffortDimension
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.+12.6 ptsLowCode Coverage
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.+12.6 ptsLowTest Distribution
Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.+13.7 ptsMediumObservability
Add a SAST step (e.g. CodeQL) or a security analyzer package.+13.7 ptsMediumSecurity & performance tooling
Run the test suite in CI via an explicit runner step (e.g. `dotnet test`) and gate merges on it.+11.4 ptsMediumCI/CD gates
Resolve the 8 High finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with mirrorchyan_release.yml (4), mirrorchyan_release_note.yml (4).+4.3 ptsLowStatic Analysis (SAST)
Resolve the 1 No artifact signing finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing.+2.2 ptsLowSupply-chain Provenance & Signing
Resolve the 1 No build provenance finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing.+2.2 ptsLowSupply-chain Provenance & Signing

File quality

Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 60 files carrying findings, judged against the Production bar: 20% slop · 62% mixed · 18% near-clean.

FileScoreBandWorst signal
FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb2.2SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb2.2SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb2.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
Updater/Program.vb2.4SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb2.4SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb2.5SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb2.7SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/设置_v6.vb2.9SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb3.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb3.1SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_调试播放器.vb3.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.vb3.8SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb4.6MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
.github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml4.8MixedStatic Analysis (SAST): High: run-shell-injection
.github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release_note.yml4.8MixedStatic Analysis (SAST): High: run-shell-injection
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb4.8MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/用户使用统计_v6.vb5.5MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/端口监听_v6.vb5.8MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_性能监控.vb6.1MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent会话存储_v6.vb6.4MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock

Methodology & how to trust this report

Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 32 of 34 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 2 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.6 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.

Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.

What we checked — 34 dimensions across the health lenses
D1D2D3D4D5D6D8D9D12D13D15D16D17D18D21D26D28D29D34D35D36AX5AX6GD1M1M2M3M4P1P2P3X1X3X4

Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.

How to trust any code-health report — three questions
  1. Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 291 of 302 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
  2. Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
  3. Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.

This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.

Tools & methods

The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.

MethodBacksVersionEvaluator
Roslyn static analysisComplexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering5.3.0✓ deterministic
Native secret scannerHardcoded secrets / credentials1.0.0✓ deterministic
jscpdCode duplication—✓ deterministic
Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage)Line & branch coverage10.0.301✓ deterministic
NuGet / dotnetOutdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies10.0.301✓ deterministic
git / LibGit2SharpChurn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history2.43.0 · 0.31.0✓ deterministic
gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkovSecrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR1.86.0 · 0.69.3✓ deterministic
LLM (sampled · advisory)Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurementLocal LLM◐ LLM · sampled · advisory

Every finding is locatable in findings.md. Run 019fdeb0-fade-776c-8948-0789e56a0530.

The exact command behind every deep-scan dimension — tool, version, invocation and retained raw output — is in Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail.

Run transparency — what happened this run

What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.

  • D19 Documentation Quality — LLM provider failed — The model provider returned an unusable result, so this LLM-assisted dimension fell back to a measurement gap (confidence 0) rather than a penalty. Re-run with a reachable provider to score it.
  • D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D31 IaC & Container Security — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D33 JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D38 OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.

Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.

Limitations & what we did not check

Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.

Per-dimension blind spots

For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.

  • D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
  • D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
  • D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
  • D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity (jscpd) — it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (EF migration scaffolds, *.Designer.cs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only; the generated footprint is reported separately under Solution Shape.
  • D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
  • D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
  • D8 Code Coverage: Coverage is measured by building and running the suite (`dotnet test --collect`) inside Watchdog's isolated image — the target repo is never modified, and nothing on your systems runs. So coverage exists only when the suite builds and runs within the inline time budget; one that needs external services, can't build, or exceeds the budget yields no coverage (D8 then degrades to not-measured, not a low score). Line coverage also says nothing about assertion quality.
  • D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
  • D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
  • D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
  • D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
  • D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
  • D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (EF migrations, designer files, snapshots) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
  • D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
  • D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
  • D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
  • D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
  • D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
  • D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
  • D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
  • M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.

The LLM boundary

LLM-set scores this run (2): D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score (documentation, ADR quality, naming, comment value, onboarding) — D25 sets the ADR-conformance fraction over sampled code, D22 judges API accuracy over a sample. These are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.

Dimensions

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity5.8 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.

Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 5.8 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

35 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 at 120.

预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cyclomatic 120)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:75
预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cyclomatic 114)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb:9
AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 58)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:663
Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async (cyclomatic 42)FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:939
预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 (cyclomatic 29)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设滤镜排序_v6.vb:217

+ 30 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cyclomatic 120) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with 预设面板总览_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cyclomatic 114) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with 预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 58) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with Agent本地工具_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity4.9 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.

Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 4.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

63 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 at 177.

预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cognitive 177)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:75
预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cognitive 150)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb:9
AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 54)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:663
AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement (cognitive 44)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1226
预设管理_v6.生成命令行 (cognitive 41)FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行核心_v6.vb:114

+ 58 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cognitive 177) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with 预设面板总览_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cognitive 150) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with 预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 54) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with Agent本地工具_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D3 · God Classes5.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").

Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 5.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

25 god class(es) detected.

TooManyMethods: Agent工具封装_v6 · ×22FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:0
FileTooLong: Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb · ×12FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:0
ClassTooLong: 预设数据_v6 · ×2FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设数据_v6.vb:0

What to do

  1. Resolve the 22 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with 编码队列_v6.vb (2), Agent工具封装_v6.vb, Agent本地工具_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (22 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 12 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with Agent本地工具_v6.vb, Agent端点客户端_v6.vb, Form_v6_Agent.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (12 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 2 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb, 预设数据_v6.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
  4. Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D4 · Code Duplication9.1 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.

Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.1 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

53 duplicated block group(s) detected.

Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) · ×10FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:381
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) · ×9FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:96
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) · ×5FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:64
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) · ×5FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:87
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) · ×4FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:160

+ 11 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.

Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

2 projects, 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on project(s).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md.

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.

Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 12 classes have LCOM4 above 3.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md.

D8 · Code Coverage0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How much of the code is actually exercised by tests.

Method: Coverage from coverlet runs or committed reports (Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov), computed per-file with structured exclusions for generated, trivial, and glue code. When the suite can't be built/run in-image AND no report is committed, coverage is reported NOT-MEASURED (excluded from the score) with the precondition to make it measurable — never a LoC-ratio proxy folded in as if measured. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

No automated tests — the solution has no test code.

No automated tests

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
  2. Enforce Code Coverage in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d8_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D9 · Test Distribution0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.

Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No test projects found.

No tests found

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D12 · Dependency Hygiene10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.

Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 outdated, 0 vulnerable, 0 deprecated packages.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md.

D13 · Secret Scanning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.

Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d13_recommendation.md.

D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.

Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md.

D16 · Bus Factor10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").

Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No source file's living knowledge is concentrated in a single author.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md.

D17 · Explicit Debt4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.

Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 4.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

92 deducted debt markers + 0 dead symbols across 28783 LoC (3.0/KLoC) → score 4.0.

EmptyCatchBlock · ×92FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent会话存储_v6.vb:26

What to do

  1. Resolve the 92 EmptyCatchBlock finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb (15), Agent本地工具_v6.vb (8), Program.vb (8). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (92 issue-level).
  2. Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D18 · Solution Shape2.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.

Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

2 projects, 0 .cs files, 28783 hand-written lines of code (28783 production / 0 test), plus 28785 generated (EF migrations / designer / snapshots, excluded from quality), 0 inter-project edges (build status unknown — did not finish).

Shell project: FFmpegFreeUI · ×2FFmpegFreeUI/FFmpegFreeUI.vbproj
Build status unknown

What to do

  1. Resolve the 2 Shell project finding(s) in Solution Shape — start with FFmpegFreeUI.vbproj, Updater.vbproj. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d18_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D21 · Naming Consistency / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.

D26 · Project Cohesion0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether each project is a focused, coherent unit rather than an oversized grab-bag.

Method: Project size overshoot penalties (LoC / public-type count / namespace count, 2-of-3 flag) weighted by log magnitude. Exhaustive across projects, deterministic, LLM-independent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

1 of 2 projects flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.

Projects may be oversized for their cohesion

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D28 · Secrets (history)10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.

Method: Git-history secret scan via gitleaks detect over full history in an isolated checkout; each match flagged High. Exhaustive; degrades cleanly when tool absent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)2.5 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.

Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.

Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.5 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

8 finding(s): 0 critical, 8 high, 0 medium, 0 low.

High: run-shell-injection · ×8.github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml:30detected by semgrep finding

What to do

  1. Resolve the 8 High finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with mirrorchyan_release.yml (4), mirrorchyan_release_note.yml (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 issue-level).

Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D34 · Knowledge Freshness10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.

Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md.

D35 · Change Coupling9.9 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.

Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.

Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling; coupling through a build step, config, or non-source file isn't seen.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Strongest change-coupling: FormMain_v6.vb↔Form_v6_参数面板.vb 60%; FormMain_v6.vb↔Form_v6_支持者.vb 57%

Change coupling: FormMain_v6.vb ↔ Form_v6_参数面板.vb · ×2FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.

Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0/4 supply-chain integrity signals present (provenance, signing, SBOM, pinned actions).

Unpinned build actions
No build provenance
No artifact signing
No SBOM

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Unpinned build actions finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 No build provenance finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 No artifact signing finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.

AX5 · Architecture & structure3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.

Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.

  • ~28.8k production LoC (237 types) across 2 project(s) / 4 namespace(s) with no recognised architectural style or layering — at this size, deliberate module boundaries would help. No DDD/clean/vertical-slice/CQRS/transaction-script organisation was detected — code is likely organised ad hoc, which makes change and onboarding harder as it grows.

What to do

  • Introduce deliberate module boundaries — by feature (vertical slices) if your team prefers, or by layer (domain/application/infrastructure). Even splitting into a few cohesive projects with a clear dependency direction would help.
AX6 · Interface segregation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').

Method: Roslyn scan: public interface member counts; fat-interface threshold (over 15 members) flagged per type. Deterministic, type-level.

GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.

M1 · Documentation (README)6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.

Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.

What to do

  • Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
  • Add a 'Testing' section to the root README — how to run the test suite.
  • Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
  • Add a README to the 2 of 2 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.

Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No Architecture Decision Records found — decisions aren't captured for future maintainers.
  • No C4/PlantUML/Mermaid diagram or architecture.md — the high-level shape isn't documented.

What to do

  • Start an ADR log (docs/adr/) recording significant decisions and their rationale.
  • Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
M3 · Folder & project structure6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.

Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.

  • Projects aren't grouped under a src/ folder — production and tooling code are mixed at the root.
  • Test projects aren't grouped under a tests/ folder — the test surface isn't separable from production code at a glance.

What to do

  • Group production code under src/ (or split deliberately, e.g. backend/ + frontend/) so production and tooling code aren't mixed at the root.
  • Group test projects under tests/ (or test/, spec/) so the test surface is discoverable and CI can scope it.
M4 · Documentation accuracy10.0 / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.

P1 · CI/CD gates6.5 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.

Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • A CI pipeline exists and the word "test" appears, but no explicit test-runner invocation (dotnet test / npm test / pytest / a test job) was matched — the gate may be running tests, or "test" may be incidental (a path, "latest", a reporter). Make the test step explicit so the gate is unambiguous.
  • A CI pipeline exists but no build invocation (dotnet build / dotnet publish / a build step) was matched — changes may merge without being compiled.

What to do

  • Run the test suite in CI via an explicit runner step (e.g. `dotnet test`) and gate merges on it.
  • Add an explicit build step to your CI pipeline (e.g. dotnet build / dotnet publish) so every change is compiled before merge.
P2 · Observability0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: structured-logging frameworks (Serilog, NLog), OpenTelemetry, and health-check endpoint patterns. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No ILogger/Serilog usage found — production issues will be hard to diagnose.

What to do

  • Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.
  • Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics and a health-check endpoint for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: CodeQL, Dependabot, secret-scanning, and BenchmarkDotNet presence in pipelines and projects. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No static application security testing (CodeQL / security analyzers / codehealth) detected.

What to do

  • Add a SAST step (e.g. CodeQL) or a security analyzer package.
  • Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
  • Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
X1 · Async correctness10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.

X3 · Exception handling10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.

X4 · Structured logging10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. Deterministic.

Reference — by lens

The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.

LensScoreRatingImpact
Code Health70%Adequate — gated by D18Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Architecture63%Adequate — gated by D26, AX5Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Maturity50%Adequate — gated by M2Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Readiness25%Weak — gated by D8, D9, P2, P3Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Security42%Weak — gated by D29, D36Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Not included — 57 check(s) not relevant to this codebase

These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.

  • AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
  • AX10 Code composition — no source files detected — code composition not applicable
  • AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
  • AX3 Project dependency cycles — no csproj graph available
  • AX4 Dependency direction — no csproj graph available
  • AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
  • AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
  • AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
  • C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — no web/app surface to authorize (no HTTP API or web-UI project) and no authorization code at all (no [Authorize]/policies, no imperative guard methods). Access control is therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI, which is authorized by its CALLER, not by itself. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
  • C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • D10 Test Quality — No tests in the analyzed solution to assess for quality.
  • D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included
  • D14 License Compliance — license scan produced no result — the tool ran but its JSON output could not be parsed; the offline NuGet fallback resolved nothing
  • D19 Documentation Quality — LLM evaluation failed
  • D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — No exposed public API
  • D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — At only 28783 LoC the codebase is small despite two projects, so its size alone makes it not yet large enough to require explicit boundaries.
  • D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
  • D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
  • D27 Navigability — symbol resolution incomplete — navigability not assessed
  • D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — the solution did not restore on the analyzer's .NET SDK (an SDK/target-framework/restore mismatch, common for an older codebase), so there was no restored dependency graph to scan for NuGet CVEs — excluded rather than scored; re-run on an SDK that can restore this solution
  • D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No PII/GDPR ruleset is bundled (the public p/gdpr semgrep pack was retired) — data compliance is not assessed in this scan.
  • D33 JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside bin/obj (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md, .github/SECURITY.md, docs/SECURITY.md, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
  • D38 OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities — No JS/npm lockfile found outside bin/obj (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); nothing for OSV to scan.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — The target did not build, so no IL was available to measure.
  • D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
  • DM1 Domain Modelling — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • ED1 Event-Driven — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
  • ES1 Event Sourcing — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — no C# methods found
  • P12 CI test-gate honesty — no data
  • P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
  • P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
  • P6 Release Hygiene — not evidenced — no changelog, version stamp or semver release tag in the repo
  • P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — this isn't a service/API/worker
  • P8 Schema migrations — no EF Core usage detected
  • P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — run tests with `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` (or in CI) to enable this cross-layer check
  • PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • S1 Web-Security Posture — No web surface detected in the analyzed source — no HTTP API or web-UI project (no controllers/minimal-API endpoints, no Razor/Blazor views) and no web middleware (HTTPS redirection, HSTS, security headers, cookies). Transport security, security headers, secure cookies, CSRF/input-validation and middleware-order controls are therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI/worker, not a web app. Crypto hygiene was still checked and found nothing to flag. If this codebase becomes web-facing, the dimension reactivates automatically.
  • SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — no data
  • X2 Cancellation propagation — no async methods found
  • X5 Nullable reference types — no NRT-eligible projects

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.

Issue — 101 finding(s)
D17 · Explicit Debt · EmptyCatchBlock · ×92
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent会话存储_v6.vb:26 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent会话存储_v6.vb:160 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:460 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:474 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:492 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:233 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:237 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:241 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:383 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:391 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:400 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:406 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:410 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:792 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent能力缓存_v6.vb:202 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent能力缓存_v6.vb:210 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:99 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:284 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:289 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:307 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:318 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:376 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:504 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/任务性能统计_v6.vb:68 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb:141 — empty catch block
  • + 67 more in this group — see findings.md.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · High · ×8
  • High: run-shell-injection .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml:30 — Using variable interpolation `${{...}}` with `github` context data in a `run:` step could allow an attacker to inject their own code into the runner. This would allow them to steal secrets and code. `github` context data can have arbitrary user input and should be treated as untrusted. Instead, use an intermediate environment variable with `env:` to store the data and use the environment variable in the `run:` script. Be sure to use double-quotes the environment variable, like this: "$ENVVAR".
  • High: github-actions-mutable-action-tag .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml:46 — GitHub Actions step uses a mutable tag or branch reference. Tags and branch names can be silently repointed by the action owner, enabling supply-chain attacks — as seen in the trivy-action and kics-github-action compromises. Pin the reference to a full 40-character commit SHA instead, e.g. `uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608`.
  • High: run-shell-injection .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml:82 — Using variable interpolation `${{...}}` with `github` context data in a `run:` step could allow an attacker to inject their own code into the runner. This would allow them to steal secrets and code. `github` context data can have arbitrary user input and should be treated as untrusted. Instead, use an intermediate environment variable with `env:` to store the data and use the environment variable in the `run:` script. Be sure to use double-quotes the environment variable, like this: "$ENVVAR".
  • High: github-actions-mutable-action-tag .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release.yml:98 — GitHub Actions step uses a mutable tag or branch reference. Tags and branch names can be silently repointed by the action owner, enabling supply-chain attacks — as seen in the trivy-action and kics-github-action compromises. Pin the reference to a full 40-character commit SHA instead, e.g. `uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608`.
  • High: run-shell-injection .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release_note.yml:23 — Using variable interpolation `${{...}}` with `github` context data in a `run:` step could allow an attacker to inject their own code into the runner. This would allow them to steal secrets and code. `github` context data can have arbitrary user input and should be treated as untrusted. Instead, use an intermediate environment variable with `env:` to store the data and use the environment variable in the `run:` script. Be sure to use double-quotes the environment variable, like this: "$ENVVAR".
  • High: github-actions-mutable-action-tag .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release_note.yml:39 — GitHub Actions step uses a mutable tag or branch reference. Tags and branch names can be silently repointed by the action owner, enabling supply-chain attacks — as seen in the trivy-action and kics-github-action compromises. Pin the reference to a full 40-character commit SHA instead, e.g. `uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608`.
  • High: run-shell-injection .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release_note.yml:60 — Using variable interpolation `${{...}}` with `github` context data in a `run:` step could allow an attacker to inject their own code into the runner. This would allow them to steal secrets and code. `github` context data can have arbitrary user input and should be treated as untrusted. Instead, use an intermediate environment variable with `env:` to store the data and use the environment variable in the `run:` script. Be sure to use double-quotes the environment variable, like this: "$ENVVAR".
  • High: github-actions-mutable-action-tag .github/workflows/mirrorchyan_release_note.yml:76 — GitHub Actions step uses a mutable tag or branch reference. Tags and branch names can be silently repointed by the action owner, enabling supply-chain attacks — as seen in the trivy-action and kics-github-action compromises. Pin the reference to a full 40-character commit SHA instead, e.g. `uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608`.
D8 · Code Coverage · No automated tests · ×1
  • No automated tests — No automated tests — the solution has no test code. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely.
Warning — 191 finding(s)
D3 · God Classes · TooManyMethods · ×22
  • TooManyMethods: Agent工具封装_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 463 lines, 40 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: AgentLocalTools FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 1830 lines, 77 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: AgentEndpointClient FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 703 lines, 44 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Module1 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 527 lines, 45 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: 编码队列_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 889 lines, 75 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: 编码任务_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 635 lines, 39 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: 视频编码器数据库_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 650 lines, 31 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: 预设管理_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行工具_v6.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 3999 lines, 250 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_Agent FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 1774 lines, 131 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_准备文件 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_准备文件.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 369 lines, 36 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_编码队列 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 439 lines, 60 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 470 lines, 32 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_调试播放器 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_调试播放器.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 374 lines, 36 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_参数面板_烧录字幕 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_烧录字幕.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 282 lines, 35 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_参数面板_画面区域选择窗口 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_画面区域选择窗口.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 294 lines, 32 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 591 lines, 56 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕 FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 444 lines, 36 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_集成工具_合并 FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 275 lines, 33 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_集成工具_抽流 FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 808 lines, 57 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_集成工具_混流 FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 461 lines, 51 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测 FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 1795 lines, 139 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: Program Updater/Program.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 725 lines, 49 methods.
D3 · God Classes · FileTooLong · ×12
  • FileTooLong: Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1837 lines.
  • FileTooLong: Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 709 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 功能/Module1.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 536 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 功能/编码队列_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1706 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 650 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 923 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 预设系统/预设面板映射_v6.vb FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板映射_v6.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 705 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1777 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 594 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 814 lines.
  • FileTooLong: 集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1802 lines.
  • FileTooLong: Updater/Program.vb Updater/Program.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 728 lines.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) · ×10
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:381 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:381-386 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:387-392
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1755 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1755-1760 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:755-760
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:548 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:548-553 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_画面区域选择窗口.vb:168-172
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:173 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:173-178 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:218-223
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:198 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:198-203 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:268-273
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:236 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:236-241 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:343-348
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:326 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:326-331 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:361-366
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:124 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:124-129 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:131-136
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:182 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:182-187 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:219-224
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:29 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:29-34 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:35-40
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) · ×9
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:96 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:96-102 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:103-108
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:138 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:138-144 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:367-373
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:147 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:147-153 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:197-203
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:188 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:188-194 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:245-251
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:222 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:222-228 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:292-298
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:107 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:107-113 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:119-125
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行编码_v6.vb:294 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行编码_v6.vb:294-300 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:739-745
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_视频编码器.vb:227 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_视频编码器.vb:227-233 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_视频编码器.vb:234-239
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_降噪.vb:32 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_降噪.vb:32-38 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_降噪.vb:44-50
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) · ×5
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:64 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:64-73 | Updater/Program.vb:732-741
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:565 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:565-574 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_媒体信息.vb:59-68
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:72 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:72-81 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_软件本体更新.vb:61-70
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb:482 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb:482-491 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_查看参数.vb:64-73
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:162 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:162-171 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:221-230
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) · ×5
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:87 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:87-95 | Updater/Program.vb:755-763
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:156 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:156-164 | Updater/Program.vb:824-832
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:100 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:100-108 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_软件本体更新.vb:97-105
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_支持者.vb:33 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_支持者.vb:33-41 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_支持者.vb:46-54
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:510 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:510-518 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1925-1932
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) · ×4
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:160 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:160-167 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:280-287
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:390 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:390-397 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:410-417
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行编码_v6.vb:283 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行编码_v6.vb:283-290 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:728-735
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb:75 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_任务日志.vb:75-82 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_编码队列_查看参数.vb:39-46
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:99 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:99-111 | Updater/Program.vb:767-779
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:73 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:73-85 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:87-99
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:236 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:236-248 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:413-425
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:117 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:117-127 | Updater/Program.vb:785-795
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:141 — FFmpegFreeUI/ApplicationEvents.vb:141-151 | Updater/Program.vb:809-819
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:157 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:157-166 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/音频编码器数据库_v6.vb:197-207
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:130 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:130-136 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:243-249 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:252-258
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_准备文件.vb:395 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_准备文件.vb:395-401 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:510-516 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1925-1930
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:317 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:317-323 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:534-540 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1944-1950
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:304 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:304-308 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:322-326
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:310 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:310-314 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:363-367
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1456 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1456-1460 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1465-1469
D3 · God Classes · ClassTooLong · ×2
  • ClassTooLong: 预设数据_v6 FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设数据_v6.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 411 lines, 0 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: Form_v6_媒体流选择器 FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 401 lines, 21 methods.
D35 · Change Coupling · Change coupling · ×2
  • Change coupling: FormMain_v6.vb ↔ Form_v6_参数面板.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb — `FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb` and `FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_参数面板.vb` change together 60% of the time (6 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: FormMain_v6.vb ↔ Form_v6_支持者.vb FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb — `FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb` and `FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_支持者.vb` change together 57% of the time (8 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:113 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_更新器更新.vb:113-124 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/网络功能/网络功能_v6_软件本体更新.vb:122-133
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:87 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:87-98 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:112-123
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cyclomatic 120) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cyclomatic 120) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:75 — 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 has cyclomatic complexity 120 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cyclomatic 114) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cyclomatic 114) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb:9 — 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 has cyclomatic complexity 114 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 58) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 58) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:663 — AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync has cyclomatic complexity 58 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async (cyclomatic 42) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async (cyclomatic 42) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:939 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async has cyclomatic complexity 42 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 (cyclomatic 29) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 (cyclomatic 29) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设滤镜排序_v6.vb:217 — 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 (cyclomatic 28) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 (cyclomatic 28) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行核心_v6.vb:114 — 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 (cyclomatic 28) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 (cyclomatic 28) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:243 — 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 (cyclomatic 28) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 (cyclomatic 28) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行输入输出_v6.vb:139 — 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget (cyclomatic 26) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget (cyclomatic 26) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1496 — AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult (cyclomatic 26) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult (cyclomatic 26) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:677 — AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync (cyclomatic 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:54 — ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement (cyclomatic 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1226 — AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 (cyclomatic 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:361 — 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 编码任务_v6.开始Async (cyclomatic 22) · ×1
  • 编码任务_v6.开始Async (cyclomatic 22) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:1357 — 编码任务_v6.开始Async has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 (cyclomatic 21) · ×1
  • 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 (cyclomatic 21) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:903 — 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing (cyclomatic 20) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb:214 — FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors (cyclomatic 20) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.vb:122 — Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 媒体信息解析器.解析 (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • 媒体信息解析器.解析 (cyclomatic 20) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb:304 — 媒体信息解析器.解析 has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 (cyclomatic 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb:31 — 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 (cyclomatic 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/设置_v6.vb:287 — 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 (cyclomatic 19) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb:102 — Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 (cyclomatic 19) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.vb:302 — Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult (cyclomatic 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:707 — AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 编码队列_v6.移动任务 (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • 编码队列_v6.移动任务 (cyclomatic 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:525 — 编码队列_v6.移动任务 has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:311 — Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:635 — AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:1811 — 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板映射_v6.vb:290 — 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:230 — Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.EnsureContextSummaryAsync (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.EnsureContextSummaryAsync (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:1423 — Form_v6_Agent.EnsureContextSummaryAsync has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async (cyclomatic 17) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:717 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync (cyclomatic 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:128 — AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 (cyclomatic 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb:204 — 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 (cyclomatic 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:617 — 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async (cyclomatic 16) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:649 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D19 · Documentation Quality · LLM evaluation failed · ×1
  • LLM evaluation failed — JSON parse error: Expected end of string, but instead reached end of data. Path: $.findings[0].docPath | LineNumber: 0 | BytePositionInLine: 1004.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cognitive 177) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 (cognitive 177) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:75 — 预设管理_v6.显示参数总览 has cognitive complexity 177 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cognitive 150) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 (cognitive 150) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb:9 — 预设管理_v6.生成滤镜图 has cognitive complexity 150 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 54) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 54) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:663 — AgentLocalTools.ExecuteAsync has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement (cognitive 44) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement (cognitive 44) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1226 — AgentLocalTools.DeserializeJsonElement has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 (cognitive 41) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 (cognitive 41) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行核心_v6.vb:114 — 预设管理_v6.生成命令行 has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 媒体信息解析器.解析 (cognitive 40) · ×1
  • 媒体信息解析器.解析 (cognitive 40) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb:304 — 媒体信息解析器.解析 has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async (cognitive 40) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async (cognitive 40) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:939 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.获取视频流信息Async has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult (cognitive 38) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult (cognitive 38) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:677 — AgentEndpointClient.ParseChatResult has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 (cognitive 38) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 (cognitive 38) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:361 — 预设管理_v6.构造色彩转换滤镜 has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 (cognitive 35) · ×1
  • 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 (cognitive 35) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb:204 — 启动参数响应_v6.拆分命令行 has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 (cognitive 33) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 (cognitive 33) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行输入输出_v6.vb:139 — 预设管理_v6.生成元数据章节附件片段 has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing (cognitive 33) · ×1
  • FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing (cognitive 33) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/FormMain_v6.vb:214 — FormMain_v6.FormMain_v6_Closing has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget (cognitive 31) · ×1
  • AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget (cognitive 31) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:1496 — AgentLocalTools.ResolveQueueTarget has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 编码任务_v6.开始Async (cognitive 31) · ×1
  • 编码任务_v6.开始Async (cognitive 31) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:1357 — 编码任务_v6.开始Async has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async (cognitive 30) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:649 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.开始评测Async has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta (cognitive 29) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta (cognitive 29) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:635 — AgentEndpointClient.AccumulateChatMessageDelta has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 28) · ×1
  • ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync (cognitive 28) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:54 — ConsoleRunSession.ExecuteAsync has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult (cognitive 27) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult (cognitive 27) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:707 — AgentEndpointClient.ParseResponsesResult has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 (cognitive 27) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 (cognitive 27) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:243 — 预设管理_v6.构造烧字幕滤镜 has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 (cognitive 27) · ×1
  • Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 (cognitive 27) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_媒体流选择器.vb:102 — Form_v6_媒体流选择器.开始读取 has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 (cognitive 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent工具封装_v6.vb:311 — Agent工具封装_v6.扫描控件递归 has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromParameterDefinitions (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromParameterDefinitions (cognitive 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:417 — AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromParameterDefinitions has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 (cognitive 24) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设滤镜排序_v6.vb:217 — 预设管理_v6.获取预设启用的内置滤镜标识符 has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 (cognitive 23) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/启动参数响应_v6.vb:31 — 启动参数响应_v6.处理接收的参数 has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync (cognitive 23) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:230 — Form_v6_Agent.RefreshModelsAsync has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Program.等待主程序退出 (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • Program.等待主程序退出 (cognitive 23) Updater/Program.vb:206 — Program.等待主程序退出 has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · ConsoleRunSession.EnsureProcessStarted (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • ConsoleRunSession.EnsureProcessStarted (cognitive 21) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent本地工具_v6.vb:202 — ConsoleRunSession.EnsureProcessStarted has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.获取未引用滤镜标签 (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.获取未引用滤镜标签 (cognitive 21) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜图_v6.vb:330 — 预设管理_v6.获取未引用滤镜标签 has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.构建主文本 (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.构建主文本 (cognitive 21) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:308 — Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.构建主文本 has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.解析VMAFJson (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.解析VMAFJson (cognitive 21) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1359 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.解析VMAFJson has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromContainer (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromContainer (cognitive 20) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:389 — AgentEndpointClient.AddReasoningEffortsFromContainer has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 编码队列_v6.移动任务 (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • 编码队列_v6.移动任务 (cognitive 20) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:525 — 编码队列_v6.移动任务 has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 (cognitive 20) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/设置_v6.vb:287 — 设置_v6.迁移旧设置字段 has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造超分滤镜 (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造超分滤镜 (cognitive 20) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:72 — 预设管理_v6.构造超分滤镜 has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.RunAgentLoopAsync (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.RunAgentLoopAsync (cognitive 20) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:1249 — Form_v6_Agent.RunAgentLoopAsync has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:1811 — 编码进度_v6.解析FFmpeg输出 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 设置_v6.启动时加载设置 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • 设置_v6.启动时加载设置 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/设置_v6.vb:142 — 设置_v6.启动时加载设置 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.规范化Agent排序项 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.规范化Agent排序项 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设滤镜排序_v6.vb:183 — 预设管理_v6.规范化Agent排序项 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.vb:122 — Form_v6_性能监控_LHM.ReadGpuSensors has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.刷新预设列表 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.刷新预设列表 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.vb:40 — Form_v6_参数面板_预设管理.刷新预设列表 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_混流.Agent配置 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_混流.Agent配置 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:118 — Form_v6_集成工具_混流.Agent配置 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:717 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.运行单项指标Async has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.标记未完成项为已取消 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.标记未完成项为已取消 (cognitive 19) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1567 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.标记未完成项为已取消 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Program.主流程 (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Program.主流程 (cognitive 19) Updater/Program.vb:46 — Program.主流程 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:128 — AgentEndpointClient.TryCreateChatCompletionStreamingAsync has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AgentEndpointClient.BuildChatMessages (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • AgentEndpointClient.BuildChatMessages (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Agent 智能体/Agent端点客户端_v6.vb:281 — AgentEndpointClient.BuildChatMessages has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 编码队列_v6.添加来自参数面板的文件 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • 编码队列_v6.添加来自参数面板的文件 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:255 — 编码队列_v6.添加来自参数面板的文件 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/编码队列_v6.vb:903 — 编码队列_v6.生成自动命名后缀 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板映射_v6.vb:290 — 预设管理_v6.储存滤镜子窗口 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.StartAgentRunAsync (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.StartAgentRunAsync (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:1153 — Form_v6_Agent.StartAgentRunAsync has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_准备文件.获取文件夹中的所有文件 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • Form_v6_准备文件.获取文件夹中的所有文件 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_准备文件.vb:95 — Form_v6_准备文件.获取文件夹中的所有文件 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.从FFmpeg运行库提取Vmaf模型列表 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.从FFmpeg运行库提取Vmaf模型列表 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:161 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.从FFmpeg运行库提取Vmaf模型列表 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.刷新评分颜色 (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.刷新评分颜色 (cognitive 18) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1615 — Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.刷新评分颜色 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Module1.LoadImageFromFile (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • Module1.LoadImageFromFile (cognitive 17) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/Module1.vb:265 — Module1.LoadImageFromFile has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_性能监控.Timer1_Tick (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_性能监控.Timer1_Tick (cognitive 17) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_性能监控.vb:86 — Form_v6_性能监控.Timer1_Tick has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_调试播放器.播放 (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_调试播放器.播放 (cognitive 17) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_调试播放器.vb:97 — Form_v6_调试播放器.播放 has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_参数面板_滤镜排序.移动选中项 (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_参数面板_滤镜排序.移动选中项 (cognitive 17) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_滤镜排序.vb:205 — Form_v6_参数面板_滤镜排序.移动选中项 has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 (cognitive 17) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.vb:302 — Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.验证任务参数 has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.构造缩放滤镜 (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.构造缩放滤镜 (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设命令行滤镜_v6.vb:6 — 预设管理_v6.构造缩放滤镜 has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/预设面板总览_v6.vb:617 — 预设管理_v6.添加字幕容器兼容性总览 has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_Agent.ModernTextBox1_KeyDown (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_v6_Agent.ModernTextBox1_KeyDown (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 主页面/Form_v6_Agent.vb:958 — Form_v6_Agent.ModernTextBox1_KeyDown has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_合并.移动选中项 (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_合并.移动选中项 (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_合并.vb:145 — Form_v6_集成工具_合并.移动选中项 has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_v6_集成工具_混流.移动选中项 (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_v6_集成工具_混流.移动选中项 (cognitive 16) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_混流.vb:204 — Form_v6_集成工具_混流.移动选中项 has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · Unpinned build actions · ×1
  • Unpinned build actions — CI references GitHub Actions by a floating ref (@main / @tag) rather than a pinned commit SHA, weakening build integrity.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:722 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:722-741 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_质量评测.vb:1278-1297
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.vb:134 — FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_Whisper生成字幕.vb:134-150 | FFmpegFreeUI/集成工具/Form_v6_集成工具_抽流.vb:106-122
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:32 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:32-44 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:46-58 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:61-73 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/预设系统/开发者内置预设_v6.vb:76-88
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:92 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:92-103 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_胶片颗粒.vb:86-97 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_锐化.vb:74-85
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 4) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 4) FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:3 — FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_平滑断层.vb:3-10 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_胶片颗粒.vb:3-10 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_锐化.vb:3-10 | FFmpegFreeUI/界面 v6 参数面板/Form_v6_参数面板_降噪.vb:3-10
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:124 — FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:124-129 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:189-194 | FFmpegFreeUI/功能/视频编码器数据库_v6.vb:246-251
Recommendation — 8 finding(s)
D18 · Solution Shape · Shell project · ×2
  • Shell project: FFmpegFreeUI FFmpegFreeUI/FFmpegFreeUI.vbproj — `FFmpegFreeUI` contributes only 0 significant line(s) — an empty/placeholder project is structural noise. Remove it or fold its contents into a real project.
  • Shell project: Updater Updater/Updater.vbproj — `Updater` contributes only 0 significant line(s) — an empty/placeholder project is structural noise. Remove it or fold its contents into a real project.
D11 · Test Reliability · Test reliability not included · ×1
  • Test reliability not included — No test projects found, so reliability couldn't be assessed.
D26 · Project Cohesion · Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
  • Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 2 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `FFmpegFreeUI` (28017 LoC, 187 public types across 2 namespaces). Review these for cohesion — split a project that spans unrelated responsibilities.
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · No build provenance · ×1
  • No build provenance — No SLSA provenance generation or build attestation found in CI (e.g. slsa-github-generator, actions/attest-build-provenance).
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · No artifact signing · ×1
  • No artifact signing — No artifact signing found in CI (e.g. cosign / sigstore / gitsign).
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · No SBOM · ×1
  • No SBOM — No SBOM generation or committed SBOM found (e.g. syft / anchore/sbom-action / *.spdx.json / *.cdx.json).
D9 · Test Distribution · No tests found · ×1
  • No tests found — No test projects found in the repository.
Info — 2 finding(s)
D18 · Solution Shape · Build status unknown · ×1
  • Build status unknown — The build did not finish within its budget on this run; structural metrics are reported, build/warning status is unknown.
D22 · Internal API Consistency · No exposed public API · ×1
  • No exposed public API — No intentionally-exposed types (IsPackable or .Contracts) to evaluate.

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.

DimensionToolVersionCommandFindingsRaw output
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-banner --report-format json --report-path /dev/stdout --exit-code 0 --source .0artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)semgrep—semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --json --quiet --timeout 0 --metrics off .8artifacts/raw/semgrep.json
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilitiesdotnet—dotnet: not applicable — the solution did not restore on the analyzer's .NET SDK (an SDK/target-framework/restore mismatch, common for an older codebase), so there was no restored dependency graph to scan for NuGet CVEs — excluded rather than scored; re-run on an SDK that can restore this solution0—
D31 · IaC & Container Securitytrivy—trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.0—
D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR)semgrep—semgrep: not applicable — No PII/GDPR ruleset is bundled (the public p/gdpr semgrep pack was retired) — data compliance is not assessed in this scan.0—
D33 · JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilitiestrivy—trivy: not applicable — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside bin/obj (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.0—
D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policydisclosure—disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md, .github/SECURITY.md, docs/SECURITY.md, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.0—
D38 · OSV Dependency Vulnerabilitiesosv-scanner—osv-scanner: not applicable — No JS/npm lockfile found outside bin/obj (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); nothing for OSV to scan.0—

Run 019fdeb0-fade-776c-8948-0789e56a0530 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.

Issues: 101 · Warnings: 191 · Recommendations: 8 · Info: 2 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 08-08-2026 @ 00:06 UTC.

Downloadable artifacts

Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.

⬇ Findings, MITRE CWE-tagged .sarif⬇ Health changelog .md