Executive summary
MossPiglets/WizardWorldAPI scores 45 out of 100, but it is rated At risk while a critical security finding is open; the score itself is unchanged.
The weakest lens counts most in the score, and here that is Security and Compliance, which scores 32 and is rated Weak. Its Supply-chain Provenance & Signing dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Security and Compliance can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to protect endpoints by default-deny: [Authorize] + role/policy authorization, or imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) called from every handler and to resolve the 1 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life, and if Security and Compliance rose to 70, the score would rise from 45 to about 54.
13 findings are critical: six in Static Analysis (SAST), five in Dependency Vulnerabilities, one in IaC & Container Security and one in Project dependency cycles.
Watchdog couldn't measure Dependency Hygiene, IL Efficiency and Runtime accessibility in this code, so those dimensions are left out of the score. The product code is 1,422 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €2,800, to rebuild.
If Security and Compliance rose from 32 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 45 to about 54.
New since the last survey: 30 findings
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Access Controls · No authorization REDACTED
- Cancellation propagation · Async method without CancellationToken: SendFeedbackEmailAsync WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Services/EmailProviders/MailgunEmailProvider.cs
- Cancellation propagation · Async method drops its ambient CancellationToken: InvokeAsync WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/Middlewares/CounterMiddleware.cs
Fixed since the last survey: 2 findings
- Coupling · Off the main sequence: WizardWorld.Persistance
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €2,800 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €960 to €4,700, for 16 to 49 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.7 at a score of 45. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Very small: 1,422 lines of product code, of which 53% is declarations and boilerplate, 45% straight logic and 3% logic with branches |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture — module dependency graph
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 (global) | 2 WizardWorld.Application | 3 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback | 4 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients | 5 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards | 6 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters | 7 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses | 8 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures | 9 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells | 10 WizardWorldApi | 11 WizardWorldApi.Extensions | 12 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses | 13 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures | 14 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells | 15 WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders | 16 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures | 17 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients | 18 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards | 19 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback | 20 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs | 21 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs | 22 WizardWorld.Persistance | 23 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations | 24 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById | 25 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs | 26 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById | 27 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses | 28 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById | 29 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients | 30 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById | 31 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures | 32 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById | 33 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells | 34 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById | 35 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards | 36 WizardWorldApi.Middlewares | 37 WizardWorldApi.Controllers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (global) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 WizardWorld.Application | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 WizardWorldApi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 WizardWorldApi.Extensions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 WizardWorld.Persistance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 WizardWorldApi.Middlewares | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37 WizardWorldApi.Controllers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
12→7 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.TraitDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.TraitName
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→8 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.CreatureClassificationByMinistryOfMagicWizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.CreatureDangerousnessLevelWizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.CreatureStatus
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→9 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.SpellDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.SpellLightWizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.SpellDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.SpellType
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→3 WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders.FeedbackEmail→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.FeedbackType
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback can break WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→8 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureWizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureRelationConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.CreatureRelation
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.MagicalCreatures uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→20 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.Ingredient→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
18→20 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.Wizard→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
19→3 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback.SendFeedbackCommand→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.FeedbackType
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→15 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback.SendFeedbackCommandHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders.IEmailProvider
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback can't break WizardWorld.Application.Services.EmailProviders.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→17 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.Ingredient
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→18 WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.Wizard
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→4 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.ElixirDto→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.IngredientDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→20 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.ElixirDto→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.ElixirDifficulty
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→6 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.Counter
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→7 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.House
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→8 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreature
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→9 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.Spell
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→17 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.Ingredient
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→18 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.Wizard
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→20 WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Persistance, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→6 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.CounterConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.Counter
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Counters.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→7 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.HouseConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.House
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→9 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.SpellConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.Spell
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→17 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.IngredientConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.Ingredient
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→18 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.WizardConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.Wizard
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→20 WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations.ElixirConfiguration→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations, while a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Persistance.Configurations uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→21 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById.GetElixirByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.ElixirDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById.GetElixirByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→20 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.GetElixirsQuery→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.ElixirDifficulty
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→21 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.GetElixirsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.ElixirDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.GetElixirsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→12 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById.GetHouseByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.HouseDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById.GetHouseByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouseById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→12 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses.GetHousesQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.HouseDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses.GetHousesQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→4 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById.GetIngredientByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.IngredientDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById.GetIngredientByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredientById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→4 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients.GetIngredientsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.IngredientDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients.GetIngredientsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→13 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById.GetMagicalCreatureByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById.GetMagicalCreatureByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatureById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→13 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures.GetMagicalCreaturesQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures.GetMagicalCreaturesQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→14 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById.GetSpellByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.SpellDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById.GetSpellByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpellById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→9 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.GetSpellsQuery→WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.SpellType
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→14 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.GetSpellsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.SpellDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.GetSpellsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→5 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById.GetWizardByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.WizardDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById.GetWizardByIdQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizardById uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→5 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards.GetWizardsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.WizardDto
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→22 WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards.GetWizardsQueryHandler→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards, while a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→22 WizardWorldApi.Middlewares uses WizardWorld.Persistance✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Middlewares uses a type in WizardWorld.Persistance.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Middlewares.CounterMiddleware→WizardWorld.Persistance.ApplicationDbContext
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Middlewares uses WizardWorld.Persistance, so a change to WizardWorld.Persistance can break WizardWorldApi.Middlewares, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Middlewares can't break WizardWorld.Persistance.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Middlewares uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→4 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.IngredientsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.IngredientDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→5 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.WizardsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.WizardDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→12 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.HousesController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.HouseDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→13 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.MagicalCreatureController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.MagicalCreatureDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→14 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.SpellsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.SpellDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→19 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.FeedbackController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback.SendFeedbackCommand
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Feedback.Commands.SendFeedback.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→21 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.ElixirsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.ElixirDto
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→25 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.ElixirsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.GetElixirsQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Elixirs.Queries.GetElixirs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→27 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.HousesController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses.GetHousesQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Houses.Queries.GetHouses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→29 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.IngredientsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients.GetIngredientsQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Ingredients.Queries.GetIngredients.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→31 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.MagicalCreatureController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures.GetMagicalCreaturesQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.MagicalCreatures.Queries.GetMagicalCreatures.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→33 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.SpellsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.GetSpellsQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Spells.Queries.GetSpells.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→35 WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a type in WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards.
- The types involved
WizardWorldApi.Controllers.WizardsController→WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards.GetWizardsQuery
- Direction
- WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards, so a change to WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards can break WizardWorldApi.Controllers, while a change to WizardWorldApi.Controllers can't break WizardWorld.Application.Requests.Wizards.Queries.GetWizards.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: WizardWorldApi.Controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Performance
Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping
| OWASP category | Findings | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| A05:2025 — Injection | 24 | High / Critical |
| A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures | 13 | High / Critical |
| A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration | 4 | High / Critical |
Roadmap
First, enforce strict access controls by applying default-deny policies and imperative guards to all endpoints, while simultaneously encrypting sensitive data at rest and managing keys securely. Second, integrate automated security scanning into the CI pipeline to prevent regressions and document key architectural decisions to ensure long-term maintainability. Finally, address the identified end-of-life runtime issues to ensure platform stability and compliance.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protect endpoints by default-deny: [Authorize] + role/policy authorization, or imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) called from every handler. | +8.0 pts | Medium | Access Controls |
| Resolve the 1 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with WizardWorldApi.csproj. | +3.1 pts | Low | Platform End-of-Life |
| Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. | +3.0 pts | Low | ADR Quality |
| Encrypt sensitive data at rest (ASP.NET Core Data Protection / column encryption) and manage keys in a vault. Skip if delegated to infra (Postgres TDE, KMS, etc.). | +5.7 pts | Medium | Data Protection |
| Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. | +2.2 pts | Low | Supply-chain Provenance & Signing |
| Resolve the 1 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md. | +2.1 pts | Low | Documentation Quality |
| Resolve the 4 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4). | +2.0 pts | Low | Dependency Vulnerabilities |
| Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing. | +3.7 pts | Medium | Security & performance tooling |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | 1.6 | Slop | Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.9 | Slop | Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 2.5 | Slop | Dependency Vulnerabilities: Critical CVE: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 4.1 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi.csproj | 7.9 | Mixed | Platform End-of-Life: End-of-life runtime: .NET net9.0 |
| WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Houses/HouseDto.cs | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) |
| WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Elixirs/ElixirDto.cs | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) |
| WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Spells/SpellDto.cs | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) |
| REDACTED | 9.3 | Near-clean | Static Analysis (SAST): Low: REDACTED |
| README.md | 9.5 | Near-clean | Documentation Quality: Documentation: no installation or build instructions |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 71 of 75 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 75 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 77 of 98 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkov | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `dotnet list package` did not return usable output (restore or query failed); no outdated/vulnerable/deprecated data to assess. The tool said: `dotnet list package` exited 1 with no output.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. All 87 production source file(s) in this repository were read, and every one is under the ~2,400-byte (~100-line) size floor this dimension measures over (or declares itself generated), so there is no significant file to judge and knowledge concentration is not applicable. This is the size of the repository's files, not a file the engine failed to read.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. The loaded project set declares no packable project and no `.Contracts` project, so there is no intentionally-exposed surface for API consistency to be judged over.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. All 87 production source file(s) in this repository were read, and every one is under the ~2,400-byte (~100-line) size floor this dimension measures over (or declares itself generated), so there is no significant file to judge and knowledge freshness is not applicable. This is the size of the repository's files, not a file the engine failed to read.
- D39 IL Efficiency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. IL NOT MEASURED: the analyzer's own build of this repository failed for an ENVIRONMENT reason (exit 1) — MSBuild's engine or the CLR gave up, or our image does not carry the SDK band/targeting pack this repository needs. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo, and it is not a statement that this repository fails to build. D18 owns the question of whether this repository builds; it was not answered here.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DockerCompose (REDACTED). compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — database Pulling database Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: database Pulling database Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
- D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
- D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
- D11 Test Reliability: Flakiness is inferred from history/markers — Watchdog runs the suite once (for coverage), not the repeated runs under varied conditions that reveal nondeterminism, so a flaky test never recorded as failing is invisible here.
- D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
- D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
- D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D24 Comment Value: Comment value (WHY vs WHAT) is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it is advisory and cannot weigh a comment against the precise code change it was written to explain.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
3 duplicated block group(s) detected.
What to do
- Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with HouseDto.cs, SpellDto.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ElixirDto.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D5 · Coupling
6 projects, 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on project(s).
D9 · Test Distribution
44 test methods: 44 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e.
D10 · Test Quality
0 skipped, 0 zero-assertion, 1 mock references across 44 tests.
D11 · Test Reliability
0 flaky across 1 measured tier(s). unit: measured (0 flaky).
D13 · Secret Scanning
Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D14 · License Compliance
0 of 254 packages use a banned license. ★ DEPTH: this repository's MSBuild projects declare 22 direct `PackageReference`(s), and 228 further package(s) were reached beyond them by closing the graph over nuget.org's own nuspec dependency graph — so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is inside this verdict. A package whose licence nuget.org could not be asked for is not graded, and version ranges are taken at their lower bound, so this is the closure as that graph states it rather than a restored consumer's exact resolution.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
0 deducted debt markers + 0 dead symbols across 1422 LoC in the .NET projects (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0.
D18 · Solution Shape
6 projects, 118 source files, 2669 hand-written lines of code (1422 production / 1247 test — the split is derived per file: test is what its project, its own path, or a compile-guarded region marks as test, and a file carrying no test signal counts as production), plus 1413 generated (machine-written code — designer, scaffolded and tool-emitted files — excluded from quality), 7 inter-project edges.
D19 · Documentation Quality
The repository's single README is a thin one-file overview of the WizardWorldAPI project: it states what data is returned and lists tech stack, development guidance, and a license link; it names no endpoints or how to invoke them, gives no installation/build steps, and omits any architecture/design docs. It does not yet show any commands in a fenced block (the README itself is unstructured), so the absence of an overview and usage examples falls under 'missing-overview' and 'unstructured'.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D20 · ADR Quality
No architecture decision records were found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 200 sampled symbols.
D24 · Comment Value
0 valuable / 0 redundant across 94 sampled comments.
What to do
- Improve Comment Value — currently 3.0/10. — 0 valuable / 0 redundant across 94 sampled comments.
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 6 projects flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D27 · Navigability
100 % of calls cross a namespace and 3 % go through an interface, but 100 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.
D28 · Secrets (history)
gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
24 finding(s): 0 critical, 6 high, 17 medium, 1 low. 4 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 4 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities
6 finding(s): 1 critical, 4 high, 1 medium, 0 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 4 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
D31 · IaC & Container Security
4 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 3 medium, 0 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 3 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing
0/4 supply-chain integrity signals present (provenance, signing, SBOM, pinned actions).
What to do
- Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
1 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 6 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with WizardWorldApi.csproj. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AX1 · Captive dependencies
AX10 · Code composition
What to do
- The domain core is a small share of production code — check that business logic isn't leaking into the application/infrastructure layers (a thin domain is the anemic-domain smell).
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
- The namespaces WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs ↔ WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients ↔ WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Wizards depend on each other. The lightest dependency in the cycle is WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs → WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients (WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Elixirs.Elixir → WizardWorld.Persistance.Models.Ingredients.Ingredient, 1 type pair(s)); cut that one first, e.g. by moving the shared type to a namespace both can use or inverting it behind an interface. — WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Elixirs/Elixir.cs:3
What to do
- Break namespace cycles inside a project by moving the shared type to a namespace both sides can use, or by inverting the back edge behind an interface.
AX5 · Architecture & structure
AX6 · Interface segregation
AX8 · Test isolation
AX9 · CQS / query purity
C1 · Data Protection
- No data-protection or encryption usage (ASP.NET Data Protection, AES, column encryption, PBKDF2) was found — sensitive data at rest may be unprotected. If TDE/KMS/vault is delegated to infrastructure, ignore.
What to do
- Encrypt sensitive data at rest (ASP.NET Core Data Protection / column encryption) and manage keys in a vault. Skip if delegated to infra (Postgres TDE, KMS, etc.).
C2 · Access Controls
- No [Authorize]/policies and no imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) were found — endpoints may be unprotected.
- `ElixirsController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:19
- `ElixirsController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:24
- `FeedbackController.Post` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:17
- `HousesController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:21
- `HousesController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:26
- `IngredientsController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:20
- `IngredientsController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:25
- `MagicalCreatureController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:21
- `MagicalCreatureController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:26
- `SpellsController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:21
- `SpellsController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:26
- `WizardsController.Get` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:19
- `WizardsController.GetById` serves requests and nothing authorizes it: no [Authorize] or RequireAuthorization on it or its controller/group, no fallback policy, no auth-gate middleware and no imperative guard in this codebase. — REDACTED:24
What to do
- Protect endpoints by default-deny: [Authorize] + role/policy authorization, or imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) called from every handler.
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
- Add a README to the 6 of 6 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
- No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
- Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- README.md names .NET 5, but the projects target .NET 9. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:19
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: README.md names .NET 5, but the projects target .NET 9.
P1 · CI/CD gates
P2 · Observability
What to do
- Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics and a health-check endpoint for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling
- No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 1333 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
- Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback
- Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a `healthcheck:` and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to — the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse.
What to do
- Add a `healthcheck:` to the served compose service — probing the endpoint it already answers on where it has one — with `depends_on: condition: service_healthy` on whatever waits for it, and keep the deployed image tag immutable and recorded so rolling back is re-pointing at the previous tag rather than rebuilding.
- Add an approval/environment gate (required reviewers / protection rules) before production promotion.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience
- The app makes outbound HTTP calls but no resilience handler was detected (Polly / AddStandardResilienceHandler / circuit-breaker). A slow or failing dependency will cascade — add timeouts, retries with back-off, and a circuit breaker.
What to do
- Add `AddStandardResilienceHandler()` (or Polly policies) to your HttpClient registrations so a flaky dependency can't take the app down.
P8 · Schema migrations
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene
S1 · Web-Security Posture
- None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. (−2.0 on this card.)
- This web host's pipeline is composed here and adds no security response header (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, a frame policy) to what it serves. — REDACTED:15
What to do
- Add security response headers (Content-Security-Policy first, then Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options and a frame policy) — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them.
X1 · Async correctness
X12 · Unreachable branch
X13 · Undrained process stream
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
- `client` is a `RestClient`, which implements `IDisposable`, and it is created here (line 24). Every use of it in `SendFeedbackEmailAsync` reads a member through it — it is never returned, never stored, never handed to anything else, and never disposed — so this method both creates the value and is the last thing that can release it, and does not. Nothing announces the leak: the object holds its resource until finalization if its type has a finalizer, and until the process ends if it does not, so the cost accumulates once per CALL rather than showing up as a failure. Declare it with `using` (`using var client = …;`), which releases it at the end of the scope on every path including a throw. — WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Services/EmailProviders/MailgunEmailProvider.cs:24
What to do
- Each finding names the value and the span that decides who owns it — the `new` that created it, or the constructor parameter that handed it over. Confirm ownership from that span, then make the disposal match it: release what this type created, leave what it was injected with to whoever created THAT, and drop a finalizer whose type holds nothing unmanaged to release.
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X2 · Cancellation propagation
- Only 13/29 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can't be stopped early when the caller gives up — whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against your hosting model.
- No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started. (×15) — REDACTED:19, REDACTED:24, REDACTED:17, …
- 1 async method(s) await work their caller's cancellation cannot reach: a CancellationToken they hold (a parameter, or the one a framework-fixed signature carries) is never passed on, or the call is handed CancellationToken.None, default or an already-cancelled token. Forward the caller's token to that call.
- Its signature is fixed by the framework, and the token it carries (`context.RequestAborted`) reaches none of the calls here that take one — so an aborted request or a stopping host still waits for that work. Pass `context.RequestAborted` to them. — WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/Middlewares/CounterMiddleware.cs:14
What to do
- Thread a CancellationToken through async methods so work stops promptly on cancellation.
X20 · Mistyped argument guard
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X32 · Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly
X4 · Structured logging
X5 · Nullable reference types
- 0/3 NRT-eligible project(s) enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> (projects targeting a pre-C#-8 framework are excluded — NRTs aren't available there). NRTs catch a whole class of null-deref bugs at compile time.
What to do
- Enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> across all projects and resolve warnings rather than suppressing with `!`.
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 71% | Adequate — gated by X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 96% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Maturity | 54% | Adequate — gated by M2 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 41% | Weak — gated by P3, P7 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 32% | Weak — gated by D29, D36, C1, C2 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Performance | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Not evidenced — 4 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- C3 Audit Trail — Repo shows no audit-logging mechanism (IAuditable, an immutable audit log, an EF SaveChanges interceptor) for sensitive changes — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Record an audit trail in code (or document where it lives) so this dimension can be scored.
- C4 Data Retention — Repo shows no data-retention / TTL / cleanup mechanism for personal data — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Define retention periods and a purge/cleanup job (or TTL) in code, or document where retention is enforced, so this dimension can be scored.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — Repo shows no corroborated data-subject-rights mechanism (erasure / export-portability / consent) tied to a subject id or GDPR vocabulary — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Implement erasure, data export/portability and consent tracking over the subject's records.
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 40 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
- AX4 Dependency direction — not applicable to a CQRS architecture (the inward-dependency rule is for layered/clean styles)
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — database Pulling database Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: database Pulling database Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured
- D16 Bus Factor — every production source file is under the ~100-line size floor — too little code for knowledge concentration to be judged
- D22 Internal API Consistency — No intentionally-exposed public API to evaluate for consistency.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — small single-context codebase (1,422 production LoC in the .NET projects) — bounded contexts are not needed at this size No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness — every production source file is under the ~100-line size floor — too little code for knowledge freshness to be judged
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — IL not measured — the analyzer's build of the target did not succeed
- D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4) — Cohesion (LCOM4) was not measured: of the 86 type(s) found, none both holds instance state and has two or more methods whose shared use of it could be read (73 with fewer than two methods, 7 stateless, 6 holding only inherited state), so LCOM4 is undefined for every type in this repository. Not scored — the metric does not apply here, and this is not a finding about this repository.
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage NOT MEASURED: `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` names a data collector that ships in the `coverlet.collector` package, and this repository wires up none — no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, `--collect` produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect.
- DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- ED1 Event-Driven — applicable but not scored (2 of 3 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): a message-bus package; 13 CQRS handler(s)
- ED5 Idempotency — 1 mutating command handler(s)/consumer(s) detected and 1 handler method(s) walked, but no persistent write was recognised in any of them — idempotency not assessed
- ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Cobertura — `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` with a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
- X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 13 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Namespace dependency cycle WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Elixirs/Elixir.cs:3
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
Serious — 63 finding(s)
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:19
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:24
- Async method without CancellationToken: Post REDACTED:17
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:21
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:26
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:20
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:25
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:21
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:26
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:21
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:26
- Async method without CancellationToken: Get REDACTED:19
- Async method without CancellationToken: GetById REDACTED:24
- Async method without CancellationToken: MigrateAsync WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/Extensions/HostExtensions.cs:13
- Async method without CancellationToken: SendFeedbackEmailAsync WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Services/EmailProviders/MailgunEmailProvider.cs:17
- No authorization
- No authorization REDACTED:19
- No authorization REDACTED:24
- No authorization REDACTED:17
- No authorization REDACTED:21
- No authorization REDACTED:26
- No authorization REDACTED:20
- No authorization REDACTED:25
- No authorization REDACTED:21
- No authorization REDACTED:26
- No authorization REDACTED:21
- No authorization REDACTED:26
- No authorization REDACTED:19
- No authorization REDACTED:24
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Houses/HouseDto.cs:6
- Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Spells/SpellDto.cs:6
- No data-protection/encryption
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Elixirs/ElixirDto.cs:8
- End-of-life runtime: .NET net9.0 WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi.csproj:4
- Coverage not measured — no coverage collector is wired up
- Outbound HTTP without resilience
- NuGet dependencies are not locked
- Disposable created and abandoned in the method that made it WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Services/EmailProviders/MailgunEmailProvider.cs:24
- Async method drops its ambient CancellationToken: InvokeAsync WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/Middlewares/CounterMiddleware.cs:14
Minor — 18 finding(s)
- No security response headers detected
- No security response headers detected REDACTED:15
- Documentation: no installation or build instructions README.md
- No ADRs found
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- No ADRs
- No architecture diagram/doc
- README/code drift README.md:19
- No SAST
- No rollback/health safety
- No changelog
- Not all async methods take a CancellationToken
- Some async methods drop the CancellationToken they accept
- Nullable reference types not enabled everywhere
Minor — 4 finding(s)
- XML-doc coverage: WizardWorldApi WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi.csproj
- XML-doc coverage: WizardWorld.Application REDACTED
- XML-doc coverage: WizardWorld.Persistance WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/WizardWorld.Persistance.csproj
- Mock framework: Moq
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-a14725fe89044c3eb7dbd4a408854af7/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-a14725fe89044c3eb7dbd4a408854af7/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 24 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | dotnet | — | dotnet list WizardWorldApi/WizardWorldApi.sln package --vulnerable --include-transitive --format json | 6 | artifacts/raw/dotnet-vulnerable.json |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy config --format json --quiet . | 4 | artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D40 · Network Egress Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | none (no readable dependency manifest) | — | none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |
Appendix C — Personal-data map
Name — 13 field(s)
- ElixirInventorDto.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Elixirs/ElixirInventorDto.cs:6
- ElixirInventorDto.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Elixirs/ElixirInventorDto.cs:7
- GetElixirsQuery.InventorFullName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Elixirs/Queries/GetElixirs/GetElixirsQuery.cs:10
- HouseHeadDto.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Houses/HouseHeadDto.cs:6
- HouseHeadDto.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Houses/HouseHeadDto.cs:7
- GetWizardsQuery.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Wizards/Queries/GetWizards/GetWizardsQuery.cs:6
- GetWizardsQuery.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Wizards/Queries/GetWizards/GetWizardsQuery.cs:7
- WizardDto.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Wizards/WizardDto.cs:8
- WizardDto.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Application/Requests/Wizards/WizardDto.cs:9
- HouseHead.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Houses/HouseHead.cs:6
- HouseHead.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Houses/HouseHead.cs:7
- Wizard.FirstName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Wizards/Wizard.cs:9
- Wizard.LastName WizardWorldApi/WizardWorld.Persistance/Models/Wizards/Wizard.cs:10