{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D7","name":"Architectural Integrity","shortDescription":{"text":"Architectural Integrity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D7"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"DM1","name":"Aggregate boundaries","shortDescription":{"text":"Aggregate boundaries"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM1"},{"id":"DM11","name":"Constructible invalid state","shortDescription":{"text":"Constructible invalid state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM11"},{"id":"DM12","name":"Ambient inputs in the domain","shortDescription":{"text":"Ambient inputs in the domain"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM12"},{"id":"DM6","name":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary","shortDescription":{"text":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM6"},{"id":"DM8","name":"Value-object opportunities","shortDescription":{"text":"Value-object opportunities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM8"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P5","name":"DR \u0026 Backup","shortDescription":{"text":"DR \u0026 Backup"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P5"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Settings._validate_environment_safety (cyclomatic 101): Settings._validate_environment_safety has cyclomatic complexity 101 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":551}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac880e4dd3315805d78444e0f52eb7f968a85da6403b63a3c5aa420942c6d3b8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"work_ledger.build_session_summary (cyclomatic 24): work_ledger.build_session_summary has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".agents/shared/work_ledger.py"},"region":{"startLine":372}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc432d144b3e99194b487df96a7e2196053e5e403f5ce75a882fcf610c3b68ae"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_governor_footer.parse_footer (cyclomatic 22): check_governor_footer.parse_footer has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_governor_footer.py"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f63006869b107cfe0a9e28d9d4bcbf3cec5df5cf17a4b3e7a27774ab87c48c3a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"post-tool-format._extract_exit_code (cyclomatic 19): post-tool-format._extract_exit_code has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"155632c373b3de89c0013d68d7317eb8f1e4fd187b8b08b0769e793cf879ab59"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"env_utils.load_models (cyclomatic 16): env_utils.load_models has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/env_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de41c1c99c21415dff092b2982d713e9e84d82c056b35a96737280f36b215a5d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseDynamoRepository.query_items (cyclomatic 16): BaseDynamoRepository.query_items has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d5a6d56ced84956702d08021b2f761e8a971932870440c7b9a993ddc468316f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_language_policy.find_violations (cyclomatic 16): check_language_policy.find_violations has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_language_policy.py"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4605e46153e87455cbd1b11d3f1e57de0731ba1490e8e4061c68c5f653788269"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Settings._validate_environment_safety (cognitive 122): Settings._validate_environment_safety has cognitive complexity 122 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 63 (83 pts), boolean chains 35, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":551}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29be6fe80eb00c6d53116825565cb851d3ed9a2b0e108e72c8fa50d07e45cdae"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"post-tool-format._extract_exit_code (cognitive 36): post-tool-format._extract_exit_code has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (24 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a93a749f3b321581a49fea729136280da6988adcb25296f17dd5e35cee6620c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_language_policy.find_violations (cognitive 32): check_language_policy.find_violations has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), ternaries 2 (8 pts), error handling 2, boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_language_policy.py"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb99913852762689a3bb46db1e0235399fb2edf2daaf4d8ba8bf1385885243d9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"work_ledger.build_session_summary (cognitive 27): work_ledger.build_session_summary has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12, ternaries 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".agents/shared/work_ledger.py"},"region":{"startLine":372}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"241e490ac92b7e8e51dd8c4b18a8cc2a7e05a064ad48d3068ff55beb22e4a930"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"env_utils.load_models (cognitive 27): env_utils.load_models has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (10 pts), if/else 5 (9 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/env_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"608810ce550347e2b7abc17a172e989aab4ecd29ed43459e5518c2b66d73ef4e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_governor_footer.parse_footer (cognitive 27): check_governor_footer.parse_footer has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (20 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_governor_footer.py"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41641af9a5f619aafff14504beb978aa836630c753464e08724544649b69e2d9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"scanner.scan_dynamo_models (cognitive 25): scanner.scan_dynamo_models has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/dynamodb/scanner.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e6c355cb45306a03ee34093f9a805860cc4230a3b16dc3b7ba20728f38565f6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"scanner.scan_s3vector_models (cognitive 25): scanner.scan_s3vector_models has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/s3vectors/scanner.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7bc8e21db1ba1fd38300211817614996e158f3b4f9c8875ac2feecc4f089d518"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"governor_state_doctor.check_hook_command_canaries (cognitive 24): governor_state_doctor.check_hook_command_canaries has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), error handling 4 (8 pts), loops 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":583}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83714fb60b555de7e965b2a9b5fefed0b87c1455deb1ccbe1c3dc23605ce8858"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_harness_hook_surface.check_root (cognitive 23): check_harness_hook_surface.check_root has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_harness_hook_surface.py"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3723eb153a0ebc895d670f5ffbaaac85c2ce0b83bda037257f88d53fc5d2741"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_doc_links.extract_links (cognitive 22): check_doc_links.extract_links has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (12 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_doc_links.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d70e6d132063202822c14f7e52b244d09b5b4eb1175b61b4b3b75f68db772644"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_governor_footer._validate_value (cognitive 22): check_governor_footer._validate_value has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_governor_footer.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f64872eadb38d5f4ca947fa8e4a310d4d8625df3196b5e9a82d39109454abdc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"post-tool-format._extract_exit_code (cognitive 21): post-tool-format._extract_exit_code has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), ternaries 2 (7 pts), loops 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".codex/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c66c1deddc75f992d64e30a3f0757f2a095ee83369b3a861b90d07a3f4e43f0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseDynamoRepository.query_items (cognitive 21): BaseDynamoRepository.query_items has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (17 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5ed32e0f29af553f4822537ad753b54a1bc585e900392dca69605320ec70218"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"code_safety.check_code_safety (cognitive 20): code_safety.check_code_safety has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".agents/shared/governor/code_safety.py"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7673c431e3019d15fa12d12097d23747dd78c08c16b5a4032f8df477dfb323fb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_harness_hook_surface._json_hook_commands (cognitive 20): check_harness_hook_surface._json_hook_commands has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), loops 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_harness_hook_surface.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfb9faacee48e221337eedd33615b49f6fd8b5358ed0715236cab8387a7e76ba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"governor_state_doctor.check_hook_interpreter (cognitive 20): governor_state_doctor.check_hook_interpreter has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":356}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7884d4d3dc2692f66b86b458c1ab4cf143737689e366b6ea82970ae7e0f0e5e6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"user-prompt-submit._extract_prompt (cognitive 19): user-prompt-submit._extract_prompt has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/user-prompt-submit.py"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ce495de6d04639526af381244c45794ef5457bfa2253529ca960e94e92f396b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"governor_state_doctor._collect_hook_commands (cognitive 19): governor_state_doctor._collect_hook_commands has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 4 (10 pts), if/else 2 (7 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":332}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52c7b4d45a1fb0e89d59ccb14dd96ab8f4fc292561bc3be23d8c9ca71b788449"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DynamoDBMigrator._create_table (cognitive 18): DynamoDBMigrator._create_table has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/dynamodb/migrator.py"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d2bbbcd5b7583912da50d4c392b468471755d8d3376bb42d52b4735f3d46e5b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DocLinkChecker._check_link (cognitive 18): DocLinkChecker._check_link has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_doc_links.py"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e14f8eca14b5ba294125b9e2e71066ba3aaa41862caa995ad123bda7b482187"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"post-tool-format._shell_text_outcome (cognitive 16): post-tool-format._shell_text_outcome has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d2516b6ccf7a49d570741da666553ab0bf1a5ce9f7ecb3d4c396d043fb976fa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"layout.admin_layout (cognitive 16): layout.admin_layout has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/admin/layout.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c32434478997b1275b4f1df58fe229f970725e1313379303f9d59f6b8f2b71c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: _core/config.py: FileTooLong \u2014 697 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 197 over it, 1.39\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d464fd928517624e30bacd3c77c30050dbb73dcb7774c80dcb4af12eb72644ce"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: tools/governor_state_doctor.py: FileTooLong \u2014 569 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 69 over it, 1.14\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb1cc3b6554f00ac9763cd6598a42ae598f707f9b1838d4e76927fc7c637a97c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): migrations/versions/0004_add_auth_refresh_tokens.py:22-44 | migrations/versions/0009_admin_identity_realm.py:27-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/versions/0004_add_auth_refresh_tokens.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ffe0051dff3a6dfd6de0ae579df029e792b431326d79416af44aa1f55d0ee68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:74-93 | .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:104-128 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:131-175 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:186-220 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fae84f30ff4a475ba7bf69537d274a7326429941fce764c0efa92c87e0a922b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201346 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:138-183 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:268-298 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:138\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:300\u0060 calls \u0060suppress\u0060 and \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:185\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a8129a4b5119c2eb0528213c1b2adc37fd35aacc66af10c5adbd5ee19551ace"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201345 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:132-176 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:231-246 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:231\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:226\u0060 calls \u0060changed_files\u0060 and \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:131\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c10296c3cf8dd87cbdd5d7d0ebcdcb1b3a0002b2b904af54f88a3941a07bc368"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201340 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:216-252 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:345-384 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb95d906f981c4b86d4a06601905022aa0d1a29791b9c3e7b79b1cc9f10192e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25\u201335 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:104-128 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:186-220 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:186\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e95b827ad254d4365bebde6d385b61e7934251e80d50983d1a30017875db5639"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201334 lines \u00D7 3): .antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py:100-129 | .claude/hooks/completion_gate.py:179-212 | .codex/hooks/completion_gate.py:164-196 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c2d8f74c03af20715aaf92f31ac96664c32f40bf2f36ff15222ac89527f2edd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28\u201331 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:185-212 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:301-331 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:300\u0060 calls \u0060suppress\u0060 and \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:183\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22f342dec9cd2df085440f28b8358a0af79196db26612ab336aa7ae60b679c7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/dynamodb/scanner.py:29-53 | migrations/s3vectors/scanner.py:29-53 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/dynamodb/scanner.py"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c0aefbdbc8aded5f1f472c8b0b3527cd6a3dfedb8cf716058cb5f97bcbe8afe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201323 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:74-93 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:153-175 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36149e98f34206739b69b5b289a16c481dd912fcb413fdd61ffb2829efb7f421"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/verify_first.py:77-95 | .codex/hooks/verify_first.py:138-156 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060.codex/hooks/verify_first.py:133\u0060 calls \u0060session_id\u0060 and \u0060.antigravity/hooks/verify_first.py:76\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/verify_first.py"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"325990fe7aee2042d6e87c85e845687672191e209a80a0d9fca80a83e974e78f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py:21-38 | .codex/hooks/post-tool-format.py:31-48 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f608e6ff0b4b5e74f8fb956aaafbdb0174b239d8d9225782251da8a94dba343e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/versions/0004_add_auth_refresh_tokens.py:29-44 | migrations/versions/0009_admin_identity_realm.py:62-79 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060migrations/versions/0004_add_auth_refresh_tokens.py:29\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/versions/0004_add_auth_refresh_tokens.py"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e50768e3f210c75d4483025c88ee701f91cbc09c53db2a9b5eed57efbe42ba53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/infrastructure/rag/pydantic_ai_answer_agent.py:135-152 | src/classification/infrastructure/classifier/pydantic_ai_classifier.py:99-113 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/rag/pydantic_ai_answer_agent.py"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b228004e73aab4a79d07e56e8f56bfc58777ce916492df19738996a18daab17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/_shared.py:117-133 | .codex/hooks/_shared.py:71-87 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/_shared.py"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98c7f114976232eb934e7820f97594808f59e4173604ddc5083aa283296f6226"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/versions/0002_add_ai_usage_log.py:98-114 | migrations/versions/0007_add_admin_audit_log.py:52-73 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060migrations/versions/0002_add_ai_usage_log.py:98\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/versions/0002_add_ai_usage_log.py"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4c09e1f4ef7791e81e9af1b4a96a718a6d4665f92a8735527379bd89210c68e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/config.py:801-815 | src/_core/config.py:828-844 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/_core/config.py:828\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":801}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfd5dc9b1f134018eb6e2858e4ac968165247c4dbef47a1c038415b8b5ff97e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py:178-191 | .codex/hooks/post-tool-format.py:81-96 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8a654b92f933568f0d4be988f4c38d37247d7c1582a8db5f5d1654fb80c5ba8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/versions/0006_user_admin_permissions.py:24-39 | migrations/versions/0009_admin_identity_realm.py:126-140 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/versions/0006_user_admin_permissions.py"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c543a85b1170b478b39f68bf0170ccafe38042d49e58ddc18d1dba5f8b3c6a4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py:149-164 | src/_apps/worker/bootstrap.py:174-188 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py:149\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"139ed8f39e7e4d76b499d203d96cb24c9b792a71ab7287851f032ac8ea5a847f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/dynamodb/cli.py:36-50 | migrations/s3vectors/cli.py:45-57 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060migrations/dynamodb/cli.py:36\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/dynamodb/cli.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76aff66620dd0d65525b46c101566637191cf552d842ee17a9c33bd85e83d94f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/env_utils.py:50-64 | migrations/env_utils.py:74-85 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/env_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9cbbc6f669148dbdc97e45f0033550856c15f408de683f64100047fe009cf8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/config.py:671-684 | src/_core/config.py:710-721 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/_core/config.py:671\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":671}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50f2000d915fd18c85bcf32deff8d85ab135331068a6059515da583e4c8aaa80"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): src/_apps/admin/pages/accounts.py:74-85 | src/_apps/admin/pages/setup.py:53-65 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/_apps/admin/pages/setup.py:53\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_apps/admin/pages/accounts.py"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8ca612095c2a1e6f86f0c44372e462b51c74fe41e20c08eb1f3ba20d9d94c01"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/config.py:656-669 | src/_core/config.py:672-684 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/_core/config.py:656\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":656}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d719ca843400341b30946234d308d525efee8bd54f5028e796d11252015473e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 4): .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:79-90 | .antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:114-125 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:158-169 | .codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:205-216 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 and \u0060.codex/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 232 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060.antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py:79\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/stop-sync-reminder.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eab4ec439ae0539c78f9c50011d412a339d8359aeb3d9ba66fe76c39da962814"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/verify_first.py:62-73 | .codex/hooks/verify_first.py:116-127 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/verify_first.py"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"997dea21514ede29b6c894536d182e5e2b168d98a69219c67b0d36adcd66c536"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/domain/value_objects/agent_usage_record.py:75-86 | src/ai_usage/interface/server/schemas/ai_usage_schema.py:65-76 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/domain/value_objects/agent_usage_record.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb1f73b6c44442c6dbeaf45efa69feb35a0e932b1bb95bdac1d172f9501057d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): tools/governor_state_doctor.py:470-480 | tools/governor_state_doctor.py:484-494 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":470}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffd9ffc3d983f2af03aade05840a3aa572d72bb46a5df3d3af3f282779743af5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/rdb/base_repository.py:98-107 | src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/rdb/base_repository.py:238-247 | src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/rdb/base_repository.py:255-264 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/rdb/base_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44731822ec7cb6a8f98e72b65190327cfdc2de892c78a8c1a2fd5bdd179cc5b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): .antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py:82-91 | .codex/hooks/completion_gate.py:141-150 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9b474c09adab31cce14934e1c30a25e43d4074a842986fb6c7873de51e6f649"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/docs/infrastructure/vectors/document_chunk_in_memory_store.py:31-40 | src/docs/infrastructure/vectors/document_chunk_s3_store.py:29-38 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/docs/infrastructure/vectors/document_chunk_in_memory_store.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"003ac9a2fc953cd0de9c4cf5a9011507bef1f70e1de31ee38b6618fa1df85d31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): tools/check_harness_hook_surface.py:97-104 | tools/check_harness_hook_surface.py:108-117 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_harness_hook_surface.py"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23fcc9d85c64001f75c29e7f128e1bc35d05944f12c1e403637cec3ac83055ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u201310 lines \u00D7 3): tools/governor_state_doctor.py:171-180 | tools/governor_state_doctor.py:182-191 | tools/governor_state_doctor.py:192-198 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c96a35e6f452ce8eea7dd8dd1b6a1616b771e36ff4d4ad7ac15906ec0f618ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): tools/governor_state_doctor.py:679-687 | tools/governor_state_doctor.py:716-724 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060tools/governor_state_doctor.py:679\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":679}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3150b75464b63702171e372bd2157f426dba37ab7ab4f4074d6840ef96b2c52"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20138 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/dynamodb/migrator.py:56-63 | migrations/dynamodb/migrator.py:131-136 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060migrations/dynamodb/migrator.py:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/dynamodb/migrator.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a93d50410c52fa7db5502662a1c02ee36ecc72a47b428193529ab7d317bfb55a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): tools/governor_state_doctor.py:661-668 | tools/governor_state_doctor.py:691-698 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":661}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17e75c5bf3fdabadfc2acc9c5dfdebfa008460cec5b624ccf9719c53af789118"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py:300-309 | src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py:351-357 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":300}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4190b1c780cce435ba1d30b3a9caace2367527ef572371b8de3d2741d4c510ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/infrastructure/notification/discord_notification_adapter.py:13-21 | src/_core/infrastructure/notification/slack_notification_adapter.py:13-21 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/notification/discord_notification_adapter.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c45295d071196bd0c855b40fc4406787bd0bcb4c90bb6c8ae5aa7b34c2dfa63"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/infrastructure/embedding/exceptions.py:30-39 | src/_core/infrastructure/vectors/s3/exceptions.py:12-21 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/embedding/exceptions.py"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cd2b057689eaf949d7fd57342616ecade25b65f0cc783593e2c2633c63dc7a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/dynamodb_client.py:57-67 | src/_core/infrastructure/storage/object_storage_client.py:26-36 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/dynamodb_client.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51a256fbc3d63aab2f433cc6995dd82a40c4cddd574e6a39563b8d546ae4c917"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/application/use_cases/admin_auth_use_case.py:96-102 | src/auth/application/use_cases/auth_use_case.py:62-68 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/application/use_cases/admin_auth_use_case.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4a0e0afd5ff48177c1722b8317bbfb5494c0c1f778896d9eedff7b3d16c50a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py:57-62 | src/auth/domain/services/auth_service.py:48-57 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"143c3037bf0b898f970162af3cddf74b79440e7e804b12c6ce6dfd06af9b88f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py:88-93 | src/auth/domain/services/auth_service.py:79-84 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8688a4013c90baba777c7833f5fc936bff8a1ded05dc21bf38bce07f20f26f25"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py:145-150 | src/auth/domain/services/auth_service.py:139-144 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/domain/services/admin_auth_service.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1398099223c1c879db3f8e8fc2ececf433c9c4fdf92ff38d76aaffb6e6bc38c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py:37-45 | src/user/infrastructure/repositories/user_repository.py:41-49 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd3e07f6eeb419732c926fb6b42c638a01060419c6b5f055c1645d993f887c70"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py:48-57 | src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_refresh_token_repository.py:22-29 | src/auth/infrastructure/repositories/refresh_token_repository.py:22-29 | src/user/infrastructure/repositories/user_repository.py:52-59 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02885ded3a2b61575fd37219070f34203598a8ef91d7087bbbc35b9e7cbf75cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py:110-119 | src/user/infrastructure/repositories/user_repository.py:68-77 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/admin_identity/infrastructure/repositories/admin_identity_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13b12ec9524b3b944bd4a1cf82672d95c14311ca42f2497e94159d169e5772e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): src/ai_usage/interface/admin/pages/ai_usage_page.py:47-51 | src/docs/interface/admin/pages/docs_page.py:22-26 | src/user/interface/admin/pages/user_page.py:16-20 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/ai_usage/interface/admin/pages/ai_usage_page.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73576b66e157b614ebb8748ce695b5657660eeebfadc3fac92af2a1493de7642"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): src/ai_usage/interface/admin/pages/ai_usage_page.py:98-102 | src/docs/interface/admin/pages/docs_page.py:101-105 | src/user/interface/admin/pages/user_page.py:26-30 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/ai_usage/interface/admin/pages/ai_usage_page.py"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b07073853268db1891129501b95458102fb99c56c0e63706efe0b226f608d980"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): migrations/versions/0001_baseline_current_rdb_schema.py:33-37 | migrations/versions/0009_admin_identity_realm.py:27-31 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060migrations/versions/0001_baseline_current_rdb_schema.py:33\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"migrations/versions/0001_baseline_current_rdb_schema.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78c85f76e6f49dbb3a85413a538b618bb8b321a310ebe00148e66d9f3797c6b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201327 lines \u00D7 3): examples/chatbot_with_guardrails/domain/services/chatbot_service.py:31-47 | examples/simple_chatbot/domain/services/chatbot_service.py:29-55 | examples/web_search_chatbot/domain/services/chatbot_service.py:29-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/simple_chatbot/domain/services/chatbot_service.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/web_search_chatbot/domain/services/chatbot_service.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 100% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/chatbot_with_guardrails/domain/services/chatbot_service.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e1d0b620e9670f5493c0022a8eaaedc11b98061040fbbcd631992fea5f80b55"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): examples/url_shortener/infrastructure/repositories/link_repository.py:23-32 | examples/url_shortener/infrastructure/repositories/link_repository.py:36-45 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/url_shortener/infrastructure/repositories/link_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15aa70833ea710e88a4f7f68f513c0ba24e4aa7602b2293f980fb11e3b29d787"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 3): examples/chatbot_with_guardrails/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py:34-68 | examples/simple_chatbot/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py:34-68 | examples/web_search_chatbot/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py:34-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/simple_chatbot/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/web_search_chatbot/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 92% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/chatbot_with_guardrails/interface/server/routers/chatbot_router.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f75812afed2ca961e0ee52884c6a21ea63966260931d379eaf5b597ac3524c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): examples/simple_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/stub_chatbot.py:28-41 | examples/web_search_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/stub_chatbot.py:28-41 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060examples/simple_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/stub_chatbot.py\u0060 and \u0060examples/web_search_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/stub_chatbot.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 100% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/simple_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/stub_chatbot.py"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"103774cbf4778c76f0ff1aef96f5ad0b289765029ae0e91db3c82ca53a8fd65c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): examples/chatbot_with_memory/infrastructure/chatbot/pydantic_ai_chatbot_memory.py:17-29 | examples/simple_chatbot/infrastructure/chatbot/pydantic_ai_chatbot.py:14-26 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: \u0060ChatReply\u0060 names \u0060...domain.dtos.chatbot_dto\u0060 in one and \u0060...domain.dtos.chatbot_memory_dto\u0060 in another \u2014 different types that share a simple name, which is why the text matched. A single extracted unit cannot be given a parameter type that fits both, so unifying those types (or introducing a shared abstraction over them) is the step that has to come BEFORE the extraction above; if they are deliberately separate, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/chatbot_with_memory/infrastructure/chatbot/pydantic_ai_chatbot_memory.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab8e32bf3e9ccbe267948f5f4228b6f6f3332fbbe1c588f3bf591baca8b93e78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): examples/blog/author/interface/server/routers/author_router.py:43-47 | examples/todo/interface/server/routers/todo_router.py:43-47 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/blog/author/interface/server/routers/author_router.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2729983acb6bf08809f3dbe21595b49f41866e0c7cbb5e8f67acd8ec39fc488b"}},{"ruleId":"D14","level":"error","message":{"text":"Banned license: psycopg: \u0060psycopg\u0060 3.3.6 is published on PyPI under \u0060LGPL-3.0-only\u0060, which this policy bans, and it is in the SHIPPED closure of this repository \u2014 so it is installed by everything that depends on this repository, not just by its test environment. A distribution offering SEVERAL licences is a choice and is only charged when every one of them is banned. Replace the package, or record an accepted exception."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57e0195d284ef3fb0f29fa195d135277e5d941641db63632b6ec32fc013a89a1"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/_core/config.py: src/_core/config.py changed 10 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 101 in Settings._validate_environment_safety at line 551. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 5 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_core/config.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/config.py"},"region":{"startLine":551}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d1773904ab2277a14c55f210fd9c5a6d6ec16159e1ed4d85093b38ad9be6b28"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: tools/check_doc_links.py: tools/check_doc_links.py changed 5 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in DocLinkChecker._check_link at line 408. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- tools/check_doc_links.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_doc_links.py"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d0e4c12e3f35f6e96ac38370f20666d766e70aafb885a968c167e5b1bbb46f5"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: tools/governor_state_doctor.py: tools/governor_state_doctor.py changed 5 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in governor_state_doctor.check_hook_command_canaries at line 583. 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- tools/governor_state_doctor.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/governor_state_doctor.py"},"region":{"startLine":583}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67884c6429ac48607acfca38db675834f538a3897b6384d7064c22baf3af29e5"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: .agents/shared/work_ledger.py: .agents/shared/work_ledger.py changed 3 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 24 in work_ledger.build_session_summary at line 372. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- .agents/shared/work_ledger.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".agents/shared/work_ledger.py"},"region":{"startLine":372}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5264830c41cf19c7ea1154c8ea5f4bcd4132af28237097e0b76892f22dbd1a5f"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py: src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 16 in BaseDynamoRepository.query_items at line 150. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/persistence/nosql/dynamodb/base_dynamo_repository.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"540a6fceec32e8129b30eda60854022f92f3cf794bff3ef2ec2a3ce2eb21a8b4"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: .claude/hooks/completion_gate.py: .claude/hooks/completion_gate.py changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in completion_gate.governor_changing_segment at line 168. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- .claude/hooks/completion_gate.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".claude/hooks/completion_gate.py"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87dcbd666ce6e276f86455486b7faf17e4ef3d64f2c2caa4469c05b2e4cc0b13"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: tools/check_governor_footer.py: tools/check_governor_footer.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 22 in check_governor_footer.parse_footer at line 208. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- tools/check_governor_footer.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/check_governor_footer.py"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcb6574dd426d8f707a10f4614a24ac06a5d7fd6886030ac57600c5985f36aea"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: .antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py: .antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 19 in post-tool-format._extract_exit_code at line 124. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- .antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/post-tool-format.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9266ae257e7cef9c72db75a37be400e78e02179501fbc402aa4c2a1a184d13ad"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: .antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py: .antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in completion_gate.governor_changing_segment at line 94. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- .antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".antigravity/hooks/completion_gate.py"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08a8dff8b1acbb60406007e842cde8dce59fd1f3283adc87c517c7a4c656770f"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: .codex/hooks/completion_gate.py: .codex/hooks/completion_gate.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in completion_gate.governor_changing_segment at line 153. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- .codex/hooks/completion_gate.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".codex/hooks/completion_gate.py"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5501b1f89640363765b8dd5413c00684862de08075a7fa0ecb123df280072c5d"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py: src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py changed 7 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 3 (its worst body is bootstrap._bootstrap_domains at line 148), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(core): terminate the cut-short response, and stop overstating the guarantee\u201D; \u201Cfix(core): close three review findings on the body-size limit\u201D; \u201Cfix: close four post-merge review findings on the inline task runtime\u201D; \u201Cfix(server): install the task runtime on the inline broker\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_apps/server/bootstrap.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"201da5e370dc9b6a488a1bb45d83dae22395bfbf72b16727adbd5e35e4db01a7"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: src/_apps/admin/pages/dashboard.py: src/_apps/admin/pages/dashboard.py changed 6 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 6 (its worst body is dashboard._render_ai_usage at line 143), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(admin): recompose the dashboard into two columns\u201D; \u201Cfix(admin): gate the infrastructure panel on the accounts permission\u201D; \u201Cfix(admin): size the dashboard activity grid to its rows\u201D; \u201Cfix(admin): drop the dashboard\u0027s Quick Actions section\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_apps/admin/pages/dashboard.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_apps/admin/pages/dashboard.py"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1c9c866a387d3339afa39a04872c6edd4ed76b0e42e86a4b58b64f50041537b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: src/_core/infrastructure/http/body_size_middleware.py: src/_core/infrastructure/http/body_size_middleware.py changed 6 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 7 (its worst body is BodySizeLimitMiddleware.__call__ at line 132), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(core): only synthesize a terminal frame when no length was declared\u201D; \u201Cfix(core): terminate the cut-short response, and stop overstating the guarantee\u201D; \u201Cfix(core): close three review findings on the body-size limit\u201D; \u201Cfix(core): close two bypasses in the body-size limit\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_core/infrastructure/http/body_size_middleware.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/http/body_size_middleware.py"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"785e2f3d7c333308843e9ec77160058ccb3660658eeee6e15e3ecdb797d684bc"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: src/_core/infrastructure/admin/theme.py: src/_core/infrastructure/admin/theme.py changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 2 (its worst body is theme.install_admin_theme_css at line 586), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(admin): recompose the dashboard into two columns\u201D; \u201Cfix(admin): size the dashboard activity grid to its rows\u201D; \u201Cfix(admin): restore dark-drawer hierarchy and narrow two over-broad test guards\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-06-14..2026-09-12, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-14 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-12 15:58:42 \u002B09:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/_core/infrastructure/admin/theme.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/_core/infrastructure/admin/theme.py"},"region":{"startLine":586}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ad09ebcce835bad866c15ccf7399cad8455c6b5d93e4201569e837fcefbd52f"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no project overview: The banner header states the project but no one-line description of what it does or its purpose appears in the text. Add a one-line summary line stating the blueprint\u0027s role (modular backend, shared collaboration harness) so readers can skip past the banner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66dbf18d06aa983c06246108610908ba99aae6784280b3aacd1a6655733d71be"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: The visible content does not show any install/build or setup steps. Add a short Install section covering cloning, requirements, and the first example run."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40eacf4c9661dde5370cef87da9c1e9ecbd3e4c37321ed6a3eee0061349745e5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1f31e3fc38e806c632551480508ae27b2701acddad0a9d80c648ba1fc9463b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a4694634fcc293590fee9e2191767b55a632013523e5569a7db2972085e85fc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9545660e6add0322e3f7b23092a9bdb2b9ecacff6395f93e694cf9dc97bdaaa2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1bb7814097052b3b9e49cf20adb5ffa3c94da3abc00863955683dc4725b2e91"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7d0141152c5300ba863d47573fe0b6384121aac3afaa70381eea83bdc15cefe"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee6da1b051ddff31eece62e737e90827fa671274985f5a26bd0f59d7c044006f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae4b19a624088a80ae967fa19fc6e2d3b4d86bf95f6afb9918729adad8224e32"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d07e15baa39ee5cdf7c003e36a9f051ab49f0febe1db421a9f914243272717a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9efc61085c90fbe1ede50aca3f9690f82fe1c1cc9bd1ace2abe757c1e913f452"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82a1893f62fe8dee3fcdaad2e3da3e94b86729172346ee8d336b86cb9d8780c6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2903fa9664e2d196228e6564cf156160d4e6d6702304b78c69ad819fad43a630"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49423b6754fd89d4f177efe19a91488e8e6b0e174dc46f41bec86e14f72877cf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b562a86ba4fad32d6ccdcd6ca2d4c34c2236a59e5d8276adbfb83a1790cdee0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4ff10b766749098bd981e7882278c3a0659e4f6f1ab25d3f29128806a0dd03e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c92107f92612c817c486377def33d41825f5a95565ee3c603aaac89e8b80cfba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab979ab2dc46515c14a5a4f004fc991e04e40404eedb88f91aeaa5242f0df4a2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd4bf7a62f6d2c22bf84dfd8591b1f2a57b3b164cc910a82c327ac795762fd8f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9607c41e2efdec713e91c6465be74f11d53838472a9a6b1b4b4662cc3f635cba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3af8daa749197b141ee1eb74512c642258ce2bed50a9fff166fa2900e8093107"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76446773b4151abbb43716ef9907fcc2e7fed5eac5d50a304623c4e6b0267c9e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88431143d4810c664dfe7f6e46452df4314b1db2fa7e0f96336593c0c39beb4e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bccaba17502ddc9276d7a509fabef99d1a5ad6ab568d3ac9ad1c73579129cc05"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d546733b9ca45c1bd162da0b0b01ea42af530b6ed35676e28a14281b1424acd0"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b42495425cc5ea69b18531af4fd1021c9500e5b9d35e4a0c146b2747b243857"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abac10a499356b847991f0d172c057cad21061f6dd09aab0b03a77e9ad78206a"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55dafb5dd1a9bfa0286572041c83230db1fdbb3e170dceaf78ee18fc0f94ae0f"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b15eb4d07b66f3b83d597e3dc6b3e2953a8473357bf9c7a44640164ceeedc9d8"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27e162474dde2c9361a105b038933373cd874345b54fa8c92f26cb908472d9c6"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cc8c1e8fbe43e9d06bb21c79783255cb1dca7d7de7d018e16bf75ade6dd1f1e"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4c1c6cdc449165258340d785bf0717bb47ce7c0b28550828b8de1d6598a8e79"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa16e0029eb24f49934ed209164dcc113c02a19e405289d0ad7833365677904f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff5a54a16e06f9cac231f76d19e4f83272d883403315080b28e8336ee0c1859b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"134c979c736eb53259532e4b1be41898b3b046bca75f9c739d4bad230fa58634"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f7f7fc220d5edadfbc8a6c67f6dd8aa2862b8536c4007822986049ce5976d8f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f7ee835b117e891116a6b070465c97fa878d7c2974a05b8837150d64f10f716"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"626450b65b7cd18e824c48a9398374912cd385c40536a0fb3d6b5b9adce5dd7e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fe3ceb118485835ea2b5ea4262a085db7f0df536d2f2991a7bd82b8620db7a3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dd71011988da19a27bf52ac3143601c745ef9e9e78313f5c710a05a946df1e4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce7fac69e63fab70d6426f03a31c200d70cc369911b00f91f8a438440f6de2ad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25e8710581ee35a1d4ba9e715669e4fe5b245389df568159b34ead9e8cc8eaf3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e9bca1326d9faaf1aea4a6d9144792e357a2953d6c6abc01f4b427310f6604d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eb0a3b1ee91e5f909e0714c7bfb0c7d825788fc2414437ae0b98e3c6e91282c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5ef70568fc87175615b83f1647757297c20bb8d453da84de9cac4557ea02a06"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0752d0df7434000fcabf1048e2de30a7a1a8b982b3db9a19898c4dec199856b4"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c593d4dbd23724f337bfb8d2c1653812f143ae255bd9b59d4b3e9c37779fa6f4"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add bandit, \u0060semgrep --config=p/python\u0060, or CodeQL\u0027s python pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 15273 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No DR/backup evidence: A persistence guard (data volume / purge-protection) was found, but no backup, geo-recovery or RTO/RPO controls were evidenced \u2014 a volume that survives a container recreate is not a tested restore from catastrophic loss."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5daabb38c90b07af65b8738cf94ce884e90a7d8fef810d341de5c186188c8fe0"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":46,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}