{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC4","name":"Keyboard semantics","shortDescription":{"text":"Keyboard semantics"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC4"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"run.main (cyclomatic 78): run.main has cyclomatic complexity 78 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/run.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e702aa40a89f150dddae1cbc8ff1ade768e68f67c17ece9a1b1ec225c1ef4ca"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt (cyclomatic 36): MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7573a1551912b65e096000b0d59444ae48dadff68262606d1185adead941b26c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt (cyclomatic 36): MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":549}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"911f38964106b5f8592517f2ecb805a48cecc25c5da36d7b291b891b97bdb6ce"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference_video.infer_data (cyclomatic 27): inference_video.infer_data has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6db2bc32423e43f900d0fcbd1c3886b12aed3ec576d662f6ab83e1e1ffb2e16"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CPMTrainer.prediction_step (cyclomatic 26): CPMTrainer.prediction_step has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/trainer.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b296ab8fef1d97d0ae702614880bfdbe5b06577f5868af3ea149703aff40a8a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tools.RUN (cyclomatic 25): tools.RUN has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"beac7026c6a59156bb97c9f1002155fdff163c474274e8a7b9e2c53a208446fc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt (cyclomatic 24): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f649dd59da385080fb842601e188f3583cac6fd1cab9a48ff71c8b69535664c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt (cyclomatic 24): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a744b6c77023b2550ef50f37a2caca50dbc564182957d54f1097f7056a743d53"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.post_process (cyclomatic 22): cgbench.post_process has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d426f62b600688bdbf333d8db0d5662944de073ee20d1402babe91657f057e12"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_Llama3_V.build_prompt (cyclomatic 22): MiniCPM_Llama3_V.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fa77a3cef503b010aa6d7d300da1b2d2f2ef39d7cc97929e41631a46696fb98"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OlympiadBench.evaluate (cyclomatic 21): OlympiadBench.evaluate has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":537}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ec69f51da68e8201f8e7f5efac8ee75454838fbdcb7d41f2e8732708a8534e9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageYORNDataset.evaluate (cyclomatic 21): ImageYORNDataset.evaluate has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1ac89d2715c4b10a5cfc8cf7616d4426f9ad02e2e177eaf2ffff3154d0882b9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dataset.preprocess (cyclomatic 21): dataset.preprocess has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b12df68151a71359e31a436e8067bcc084c33eccaf3d08ecf267a16206ffd40"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"finetune.train (cyclomatic 21): finetune.train has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/finetune.py"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83f6fb571cf0152f4627f58f7e6fd8acdc2b77e0f5b952b2fb74bf33a27429c9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OpenAIWrapper.__init__ (cyclomatic 20): OpenAIWrapper.__init__ has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/gpt.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d1631f166ce7fecdb91add84370440debad17ecb76d32a4dc8527a13ce1018a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mp_util.track_progress_rich (cyclomatic 19): mp_util.track_progress_rich has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/utils/mp_util.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bddf0e9f26271e447b341ddb1378e3c26cdf75fba18d9d5f43e4eaa63ad4b06"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames (cyclomatic 18): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ded8b46300a0b71fdc0b0d24e9c9576e5fefcb05eb89d5f15d54a1531ccab7fa"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames (cyclomatic 18): CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967a3c12c184f20baf1beb5cdaade063159ec119e3b06837c422a4c2ed975214"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames (cyclomatic 18): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ada9637b1acad67149f6cd8d827cead1e8d4e1c0b79fc6d957c78e2476ad296"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames (cyclomatic 18): CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1555}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fc16acbb1d8a6866ec97a2a1ab2d6ba0bd81e58009104964ee158fe8fe2c2ab"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"common.summary_multi_exp (cyclomatic 18): common.summary_multi_exp has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/common.py"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dff599d61e96bd106923a731d1ec2c27a2609742dabdfc08283aea7234f8e6b1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"file.ls (cyclomatic 18): file.ls has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcbda2f114d9a9cc47c187627fd6e26f33f4ebf1a20d36c56cf69e692f4eb63a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tools.cli (cyclomatic 18): tools.cli has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py"},"region":{"startLine":391}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84b9a8fb162105d2aec139daf5013e726ed9bc24a6ddd236158cc683a375c388"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"train_utils.omni_preprocess (cyclomatic 18): train_utils.omni_preprocess has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/train/train_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53fab0e3b38d6934e54faf938fa9e5cb930551e4c924ec8e93010284fb22d716"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DUDE.dump_image (cyclomatic 17): DUDE.dump_image has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"178a6c67291c0e52087148f8fad7e4dc4687b2d376439048ba6e3de8064cc1f4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.get_dimention_rating_mcq_grouding (cyclomatic 17): cgbench.get_dimention_rating_mcq_grouding has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8d10fd23e72f6883d12801781cfacce7e6653ad805f639eaaa908658f268fd9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.unzip_hf_zip (cyclomatic 17): cgbench.unzip_hf_zip has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":585}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1482d1a96defbbfb9204cfb57969ab2fbaf3d614bc2cdb2312f794eb59f92199"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"eval.main (cyclomatic 17): eval.main has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31b0b9ed8285ad2cc79a9dbea1ff6bcca39394cc1965506e55923da24c1c4fa1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CMMMU.evaluate (cyclomatic 16): CMMMU.evaluate has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07ec2832d3e1aa6b37dcb8f491a9846fb2baa61a2833eef4f27e2bc2cfebdaa2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMNIAH.build_prompt (cyclomatic 16): MMNIAH.build_prompt has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1420}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6c64afb135758a944334216a954ea42e1bf8374c2283a3dc596aefa6d56e718"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMLongBench.dump_image (cyclomatic 16): MMLongBench.dump_image has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":460}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfe86099d71b19d327291cd9e16fd6c6fc080d9c2c4371da2bec3cee8dff8818"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mmlongbench.eval_score (cyclomatic 16): mmlongbench.eval_score has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbca72e15bec3a23e33493cd0623f393e4253f4c38b819f7c9da3324e6ca37e0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AutoScoringJudge.expression_equal (cyclomatic 16): AutoScoringJudge.expression_equal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c6019c00a3f47c0473beb34403bf81e5045e8eaa0dc587cae513a69fcc331f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MathJudger.expression_equal (cyclomatic 16): MathJudger.expression_equal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92fda7d62177915f60cb87e48a1756f744db506e8afd9aab42a7ae7c156005a5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference.infer_data_api (cyclomatic 16): inference.infer_data_api has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fffc0ed96100f47846785c5420528e8855c904803089bd3dc5289564dea0b9f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"run.main (cognitive 199): run.main has cognitive complexity 199 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 52 (165 pts), loops 6 (18 pts), boolean chains 10, error handling 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 129). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/run.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"307d06349ca78a97bc975c242a0addd8457d188c68a43345dd8b3b7c572d48b7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt (cognitive 79): MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 79 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (61 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 2 (6 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de283d2bc61a91a080a7ab4814cf18b8419c2bcd9669ef941a052e8a3717b4a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt (cognitive 79): MiniCPM_o_2_6.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 79 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (61 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 2 (6 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_V_2_6.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":549}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3dd71bb80591a06d1a121c70f49e92d1f75582e4a3fd8fc364e0498ffb08d3d4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.post_process (cognitive 62): cgbench.post_process has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (48 pts), ternaries 2 (9 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 41). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"125d985229fa2c3a7708534af0e35801f1103dc62957c0793d22cc519e5dad65"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dataset.preprocess (cognitive 57): dataset.preprocess has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (39 pts), loops 6 (17 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 31). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f843a6afcf5e48b09abdc9ca8ecb118806ef5b73aaec7c8651f60bc31e80d2bd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OlympiadBench.evaluate (cognitive 55): OlympiadBench.evaluate has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (27 pts), loops 9 (22 pts), ternaries 1 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 34). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":537}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdba5691fb9169c802347d62f0c1a11769cd51b83a3a99b9463448174ce725b8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CPMTrainer.prediction_step (cognitive 52): CPMTrainer.prediction_step has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (46 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/trainer.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"667d5203fe4e299f00e9ad1d473002c2f4647d854c261eb8b9f8cf40b9a2c1a6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt (cognitive 51): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (46 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 25). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c87377d1a37897345c449c9549b2c3a41ef1fb9a57cd845ed88857842a32f9d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt (cognitive 51): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (46 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 25). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.build_prompt) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"397409159af0d185f7d484cf0c1e142f331612d2dba9c300cee1920bda221820"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tools.RUN (cognitive 51): tools.RUN has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (27 pts), ternaries 5 (19 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2984c49fa12163c30fbd5cd65d840203aa120b45bb75f5f29b3871b3c4bd27c0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OmniLMMModel.forward (cognitive 49): OmniLMMModel.forward has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (34 pts), loops 3 (12 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 32). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7325f0d1af3859a3f8d07849f58de30debd6592d06bc8491dc1ab0d9352f91fa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference_video.infer_data (cognitive 47): inference_video.infer_data has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (37 pts), ternaries 4, boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8a6241ac754ec90ce133427fae6bce225404347ea60c43a09891324eab7f423"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CMMMU.evaluate (cognitive 45): CMMMU.evaluate has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (29 pts), loops 4 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 31). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f3d0431f4b25e1f2063818fb53ab6f885410f905b9bbcb94d94ecf2477e0fdd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"common.summary_multi_exp (cognitive 41): common.summary_multi_exp has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (18 pts), loops 7 (14 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/common.py"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4042fde4d8f92b763204520d4f964990022bfda200f2d2279e3eee9e0317673"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"train_utils.omni_preprocess (cognitive 41): train_utils.omni_preprocess has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), ternaries 4 (12 pts), loops 5 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/train/train_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3e47e44effaf510bb6382c4492761deba056e43ce48f063f66e01330032ed22"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"file.ls (cognitive 39): file.ls has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (32 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e61cb6fdb3a01c73a8354da257d34b87593126a8b20f3e70f7ff6f9cf08a306"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.get_subtitles (cognitive 35): CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.get_subtitles has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (25 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_OpenEnded.get_subtitles) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":519}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67e6c1e8bf2ca289670a2635d51ef6418d3f95c95e166b8abf5264a7ba6b98ba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded.get_subtitles (cognitive 35): CGBench_OpenEnded.get_subtitles has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (25 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.get_subtitles) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1399}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31b27476cd4820d97ccf980423da63ae0a8c3437c191afb7b197ee1b5f904e07"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.get_subtitles (cognitive 34): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.get_subtitles has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (24 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.get_subtitles) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"477ce367f889f1e2dd56b0badfb236e467d4d2082ec48b10b4621b6d76a3cd03"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames (cognitive 34): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 3 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2d42e3ecf9d5080b9a25a70850dae27d7884197a5b1b896731e97cfd2d3a2ac"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames (cognitive 34): CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 3 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2e7399e973277debf30f4a61fc37f5dd53d3fe6e08b2c1e953a7bbab5d855cf"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.get_subtitles (cognitive 34): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.get_subtitles has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (24 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.get_subtitles) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":978}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e51b56c532356e48456d091b1426b184b52a776452a1386fa4762ba58f4c6d91"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames (cognitive 34): CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 3 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ff964fcea3c62a81e4626a29ce76acfc533a3422e713dfeddbe01d41164c093"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames (cognitive 34): CGBench_OpenEnded.save_video_frames has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 3 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (CGBench_MCQ_Grounding_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_OpenEnded_Mini.save_video_frames, CGBench_MCQ_Grounding.save_video_frames) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1555}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5426b17027ea4240aef550913e96db7905e07718999c7a0fd5aab439ae3cc538"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DUDE.dump_image (cognitive 34): DUDE.dump_image has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (24 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6129755ed72a3ff994afe3b97a82c10f15f4a087759fe1e849b401f1fe006cb9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageYORNDataset.evaluate (cognitive 34): ImageYORNDataset.evaluate has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (22 pts), loops 2 (7 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5aec88af0c736cfc9012788c67f286122f14f71bd1ee8d1307d04c19964560d4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"QSpatial.evaluate (cognitive 33): QSpatial.evaluate has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), loops 5 (10 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe7a4a35b270edc0c13a534367bfbbe78972f3935bffc83b60983d742ffc3ceb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MLVU_MCQ.evaluate (cognitive 33): MLVU_MCQ.evaluate has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (23 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dae8e8dbd4db55a510747e63919f1fac30e820944014564a0b6a35ea3783d91e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMLongBench.dump_image (cognitive 33): MMLongBench.dump_image has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (23 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":460}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"134da586153fd648574c24560b511529e0286391b569ab4374f5fe4edfeabe52"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MVBench.evaluate (cognitive 33): MVBench.evaluate has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (23 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MVBench_MP4.evaluate) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d63a55442155034fb89852c74af38dc0badcabecb8354cc36951d8d8cb4b691"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MVBench_MP4.evaluate (cognitive 33): MVBench_MP4.evaluate has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (23 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MVBench.evaluate) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":601}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41533172f087f7991ffaea4dc473503b510d6bad9a0b4f4cc7e06d27129572ab"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"multiple_choice.report_acc_MMT (cognitive 33): multiple_choice.report_acc_MMT has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 8 (24 pts), if/else 4 (5 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69bc12a56d92955ba7c3cba97ce49afcce19c04548266e76cc733437f3be14c4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mp_util.track_progress_rich (cognitive 33): mp_util.track_progress_rich has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (24 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/utils/mp_util.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45ec44d0ee7ee8939b433d4fd7f98cdda5a95c6f09335f95621980a830daf44b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"finetune.train (cognitive 30): finetune.train has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (21 pts), ternaries 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/finetune.py"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bee40e9da57764b743b2695c708c4a517f76973a4f240f03cf285b2782827d0b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OmniLMMModel.get_vllm_embedding (cognitive 30): OmniLMMModel.get_vllm_embedding has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (23 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f9476af1cf91b74fe330c8acfc1839548bed39f532a46a2ef37b7092b3e778b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OlympiadBench.build_prompt (cognitive 29): OlympiadBench.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (24 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0917cc25ad90316193ada3c6f34999e4ec87fa2c74a758827ddab12f1e21a87a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OpenAIWrapper.__init__ (cognitive 28): OpenAIWrapper.__init__ has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (25 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/gpt.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af17cd8dab3d7267363fedeea1dfbe6dd40afde72045bcadc63707b7000232ba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LongVideoBench.prepare_dataset (cognitive 27): LongVideoBench.prepare_dataset has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b87f54255e4c969c8ed3a93ed5f1a2dff6a96a18aa2e3c63c539567082a04d93"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mmlongbench.eval_score (cognitive 27): mmlongbench.eval_score has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (20 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c945ff37f149479c46d0b6bfa2055ddadd765447cb97f96d8c013728d5f31b0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AutoScoringJudge.expression_equal (cognitive 27): AutoScoringJudge.expression_equal has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d1a5e8640784dd4e93599a4673425767eb02989ab98ed574980bc5c98429719"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MathJudger.expression_equal (cognitive 27): MathJudger.expression_equal has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"725aafe936f3db2446a8db14b07945a1bbe33a83efd87e61697fd26e8606abb5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MathVerse.evaluate (cognitive 26): MathVerse.evaluate has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":284}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fce221993b5741110d35a21a8c7d20e6cdb1a119f0b64cbb48dfcbd1c52d19f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SlideVQA.dump_image (cognitive 26): SlideVQA.dump_image has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acde609660b8b1f03e74dde7ed49b7467cd24a9d78b0613ac7ef2a616c7a7a43"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"multiple_choice.mcq_circular_eval (cognitive 26): multiple_choice.mcq_circular_eval has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (16 pts), loops 5 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py"},"region":{"startLine":400}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc0515cf5e85888f0981ea1d32373333110beb0f6aa5f7af95b51bb98cbe1145"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_Llama3_V.build_prompt (cognitive 26): MiniCPM_Llama3_V.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (17 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1def043c84899dbf42333b02437482ead19e68f3adab90b1df7f5326b8752497"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"longvideobench.insert_subtitles_into_frames (cognitive 25): longvideobench.insert_subtitles_into_frames has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3443e7dc02ed1f5711a7c99b61a1c1b5f618560f9b13562d0bc07c512b056823"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"kie_evaluator.normalize_dict (cognitive 25): kie_evaluator.normalize_dict has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (19 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/kie_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f0459d4edaea974c7e832dda3e1cb5f58e717f0c279d82142fd7cc00b33a42c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.get_dimention_rating_mcq_grouding (cognitive 25): cgbench.get_dimention_rating_mcq_grouding has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 13 (16 pts), ternaries 3 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ee2ddadf7def882e555a7edf29afa4582462d24c9f1c3d3248c9cc450c23a05"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.post_process_eval_open (cognitive 25): cgbench.post_process_eval_open has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":459}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69830a10b6566c5dba682fce73985ea7b14075613bb0ba4b59e7221365bbb1bc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"multiple_choice.get_dimension_rating (cognitive 25): multiple_choice.get_dimension_rating has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), loops 6 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py"},"region":{"startLine":497}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fd2e4b0b1c8867c87bb99405b13438649fb0bf64ad1a81a77ca8341dff9f16c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMNIAH.build_prompt (cognitive 24): MMNIAH.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (14 pts), if/else 8 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1420}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be65e52bae2928668b84e1dc6d93a418b29bd9fea79c892e1184acd40394c307"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseAPI.generate (cognitive 23): BaseAPI.generate has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (12 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b617d1908c0aa3ee87990c514c28987eef384069d4c174cb100755b9591dfb3a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dynamath.parse_answer (cognitive 23): dynamath.parse_answer has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), loops 1 (4 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"615da3cf167fdd3fe786abfdec3f4586ebd7dadbe8085e6c5ee9970c641458a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference.infer_data_job (cognitive 23): inference.infer_data_job has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), loops 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbc5d0ec4192f06e82ece546ae25efcbeaa2ecf8ae70d5628d6d0cff352e5392"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dataset.conversation_to_ids_qwen2 (cognitive 23): dataset.conversation_to_ids_qwen2 has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d0f2305d89460299575da28506af138d1cb2f13427c66f2d64a9143c2f74591"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dataset.slice_image (cognitive 23): dataset.slice_image has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (12 pts), loops 4 (9 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":438}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c785afa7ceac38abb265b2dce1213c0659c2b8711f99a3cf2865836d287376f6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseAPI.chat (cognitive 22): BaseAPI.chat has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2df5805fd5f2e246c092d2ee5748e330c0f44fb5fc4033a0ad7120906bcee286"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"VideoMME.build_prompt (cognitive 22): VideoMME.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5dab69c9f2a6a3cac74c5a3e76ef52478a050d95fcf2106ace527b4531e57a3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference.infer_data (cognitive 22): inference.infer_data has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), ternaries 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"743250fe03291ed7eb6917078735f146f9ce635a59974a77222178e5d8bde09a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseModel.message_to_promptvideo_withrole (cognitive 22): BaseModel.message_to_promptvideo_withrole has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cdbe5e3b32f34a5f3af858bfee5b37cb6e48413d92944aff59ff122079f113a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Conversation.get_prompt (cognitive 22): Conversation.get_prompt has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/conversation.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5992ef0ac43bda8c176deec230e6fa7ca952a9dc55745da434b60bb3d74d120"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mmlongbench.frame2img (cognitive 21): mmlongbench.frame2img has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 5 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7306ca42930e591af0008547f4a63403992800164aa8d932d4f10d174dc681af"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference.infer_data_api (cognitive 21): inference.infer_data_api has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (17 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e77ad1adaac83208a5e53f32b710549f448c204382989c5917c2efa28bb4e6bc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference_mt.infer_data (cognitive 21): inference_mt.infer_data has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d750a7847671466e66cb3499604abec96f50cecc31764a96fc2d28ac03ec26e6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Conversation.get_images (cognitive 21): Conversation.get_images has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (20 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/conversation.py"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af1b7aef5eea38903bf2543f1c6957a4a8c83f8d37f24c7558c952cb8c50da2e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseAPI.message_to_promptimg (cognitive 20): BaseAPI.message_to_promptimg has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":267}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4665761b226d33b39a3a41fcab08c258868f62b0ed7222b998f939e799356cb7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cmmmu.get_multi_choice_prediction (cognitive 20): cmmmu.get_multi_choice_prediction has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), loops 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56908d535a9c1b7b42209ed72f2073c1f9a91e2a9a3aa245b8be21c4047c69c9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LogicVista.evaluate (cognitive 20): LogicVista.evaluate has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":723}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd327336579c181cc988281c4eee106c10bcbdf50aea83d3e10b25c55b7c6df4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"kie_evaluator.cal_f1_all (cognitive 20): kie_evaluator.cal_f1_all has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), loops 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/kie_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0163af56133f6cf314e6bcf087a47c79d1ac548517fc285fa99f05d13957d425"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mmniah.is_correct (cognitive 20): mmniah.is_correct has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (16 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbf7537f37a59ce8260c3934282537b0131c94d6ea715189781ba7638b6db899"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"videomme.get_dimension_rating (cognitive 20): videomme.get_dimension_rating has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 6 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bebb1ed5fb5e7a4c323c7fc2dd9e2d52c83cdd96060c8ffe8863050784f15bb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"eval.main (cognitive 20): eval.main has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"554d061d1b3069f9924c8e81f2cbda8b4a6a87dd5700789a06fbde0944492cc7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GMAIMMBenchDataset.load_data (cognitive 19): GMAIMMBenchDataset.load_data has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":441}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b53117ca1043bb2eace14f7ed36790ea546f3d391a9487dddf497a490f438c42"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageMTDataset.build_prompt (cognitive 19): ImageMTDataset.build_prompt has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mt.py"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f462cc382fb34edb92849045ced7be5b4e4db119f12bb74b954883326fd461c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageVQADataset.evaluate (cognitive 19): ImageVQADataset.evaluate has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"471fbcdaf6cb503fa972c0690ee3cbce4bfc93dd1e536f17b9414fed1d414c58"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LongVideoBench.evaluate (cognitive 19): LongVideoBench.evaluate has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65d29a1475d12af8b77d97fbb9bdddbef46d80c2c2c544f0013b7a6aa0b1523d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mmlongbench.concat_images (cognitive 19): mmlongbench.concat_images has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), loops 4 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8670a64b1b54f459f64c156f513f700e2ae68f14901c941d148bec21449d440a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"mathvista.MathVista_acc (cognitive 19): mathvista.MathVista_acc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 5 (10 pts), if/else 3 (7 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b8a4a698c335ac736e2f06acef17e37cf40b753f083014b13ae0d79f13aa45d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ocrbench.OCRBench_eval (cognitive 19): ocrbench.OCRBench_eval has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 4 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ocrbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74e76dce0c20296cdb1bbba412e35738bc79c55f78b481ce4b22b813845ccb56"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"VideoMME.evaluate (cognitive 19): VideoMME.evaluate has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41f230635240c57ad7d654d18472cc2871454f7543996f0148777ccb3def71f5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WildVision.evaluate (cognitive 19): WildVision.evaluate has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa91710b5ed2fbc15e65e5469457441fa1920b4e1364d176eb793b8ca84cdc18"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tools.cli (cognitive 19): tools.cli has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), loops 3 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py"},"region":{"startLine":391}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac5a40de2968225b48b4881378da0da7c409ce2f7d553f9760d97cc474a0b4b0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dataset.conversation_to_ids (cognitive 19): dataset.conversation_to_ids has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (17 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5665a53b58fa1962bc707524cd6361335b84cec1247e970c411e530bfed94d8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dynamath.DynaMath_auxeval (cognitive 18): dynamath.DynaMath_auxeval has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b680e72b33197bc5e4116ab5f3ffd7ba2aabf0d7f9526cebeb7860304897fc2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OCRBench.evaluate (cognitive 18): OCRBench.evaluate has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 3 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb2f0185acb12dda883560f6aa36c54d69808eb65d3ac33ec050fbff3953ec62"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WeMath.evaluate (cognitive 18): WeMath.evaluate has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":653}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b2ae8bb81549b41d6313713001fe53c0811e8b3cd25dd7a147eefa0988f50ef"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMNIAH.prepare_tsv (cognitive 18): MMNIAH.prepare_tsv has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1323}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50be8c46defecdadeaae64ee6854233eace77fec1d906b8e1c5506df9f8f3b8f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"file.MMBenchOfficialServer (cognitive 18): file.MMBenchOfficialServer has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d39e383e40262398f756e9139baa6ef0fa29379fb132a7e495d7fb3fe44edef8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseAPI.preproc_content (cognitive 17): BaseAPI.preproc_content has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92c1cd77c35c9dbb09f175ad5643b8c9d3978fbc1808ca9cf47aa7a2eabb4646"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dynamath.evaluate (cognitive 17): Dynamath.evaluate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), loops 6 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a52a6531f7de5ce29429210df8415f018fed1eddd5f3559ca65bfd8745c66636"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageMCQDataset.evaluate (cognitive 17): ImageMCQDataset.evaluate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71256a1e8f9afa29cc9de77fbc47ce59d8e0d75d0b566fd742031effb1e6ee8f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMBenchVideo.robust_json_load (cognitive 17): MMBenchVideo.robust_json_load has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (11 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmbench_video.py"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"700b8477e55302c95022fe07bc22ad3c9f9de3b2867498206b0fec9beded31b8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"multiple_choice.extract_answer_from_item (cognitive 17): multiple_choice.extract_answer_from_item has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py"},"region":{"startLine":262}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75680a9336b05f5edd3279f0ba7b278265a333dfb8f179c5ad45ec66ebb44fe7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tempcompass.eval_rule_caption_matching (cognitive 17): tempcompass.eval_rule_caption_matching has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be8738b72a8659b26aba70b6cd164b8b44d939322e0b189cf54977156be3a4b4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"inference_video.infer_data_job_video (cognitive 17): inference_video.infer_data_job_video has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (9 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d64db8e738f6210e236d2808238251d7d760559273619141104421d1ffb73c72"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseModel.preproc_content (cognitive 17): BaseModel.preproc_content has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8412d3a4243c1ebc2857d461540f2f4dbd6be3751a1e9a96683da2a8cbb606a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPMV2_6.chat (cognitive 17): MiniCPMV2_6.chat has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"chat.py"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f806373f2128e07d738365289d48e11c0642e4ee07b341b36ee7944e395bbdf1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MMDUDataset.calculat_metric (cognitive 16): MMDUDataset.calculat_metric has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 3 (6 pts), error handling 1 (5 pts), if/else 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mt.py"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e55920060e2c97175572e1e67a4a3ee4f94dfcc4d23c72153e905c1d3c735a30"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AutoScoringJudge.is_equal (cognitive 16): AutoScoringJudge.is_equal has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (7 pts), error handling 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbd9af80a48ec3a321d7e63c0446e21365456e649c0cd8750e38b81111ff4db1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cgbench.unzip_hf_zip (cognitive 16): cgbench.unzip_hf_zip has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5, loops 5, boolean chains 3, error handling 3. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":585}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2091cc608be2d483b63a8b896cfa5075346bc418d318c6cf01dda88429c5b76a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MathJudger.is_equal (cognitive 16): MathJudger.is_equal has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (7 pts), error handling 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b759053f3889e029b8f649b1d0ab827d3bbb1eebd492698c857d7762434d8622"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"olympiadbench.get_answer_type_text (cognitive 16): olympiadbench.get_answer_type_text has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a382ab02292ef8970fc104c96a455b4314f846f1e5e4be07763e84292cab133d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"VideoBaseDataset.save_video_frames (cognitive 16): VideoBaseDataset.save_video_frames has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/video_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cddb9c53a2302a7654b81799ffbaed419e2906fad607c7cfba9f0d65bde971b7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"vlm.circular_pred (cognitive 16): vlm.circular_pred has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/vlm.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28babff9c1e210e291d0bc073604efc4e19c124ba9d16a392356b38c6fc8f2b1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"matching_util.can_infer_option (cognitive 16): matching_util.can_infer_option has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/utils/matching_util.py"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68051751cc7fd5153a213ae86466791800a41e8c2c91eac8ba37589a93c3e934"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BaseModel.message_to_promptvideo (cognitive 16): BaseModel.message_to_promptvideo has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79cdd5fc3fdd4d9cd85ad26ec112d1ea97e4cf7008a156c0210f8751316dd988"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_V_2_6.generate_inner (cognitive 16): MiniCPM_V_2_6.generate_inner has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_o_2_6.generate_inner) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":419}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c080e016aaf91513d692405036602d5efa14bcbea4022e5431771d61e00de024"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MiniCPM_o_2_6.generate_inner (cognitive 16): MiniCPM_o_2_6.generate_inner has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (MiniCPM_V_2_6.generate_inner) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":670}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b55a9994edf1aaa79afe7a4dfe526b9bb36cb990f63685011bdeb047e433888a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: dataset/cgbench.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1324 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 824 over it, 2.65\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"483bcf98752b6f312e2a90e9b4cf727ff424d6cddb0d85e51d7f1e150c46904f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: dataset/image_vqa.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1190 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 690 over it, 2.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"312749d2be5bb7ed80371e3803d027bcc089cd08c14b3f1c5be5770e21bbb52e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: dataset/image_mcq.py: FileTooLong \u2014 679 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 179 over it, 1.36\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78123b3985e7f2d05e6f1db6da167886f89dda03e5054cb9500ffa441e8e8e84"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: vlm/minicpm_v.py: FileTooLong \u2014 611 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 111 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67676efee365e4f0e7c24ca08b61795d2a39feea0c8fee70e08990dec9e6a8c3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: dataset/tempcompass.py: FileTooLong \u2014 523 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 23 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"074031aadf52709750242dec4077874c02377d05991bdf8c4e19fec6a7fac950"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 32 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:272-328 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:211-272 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:360-423 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:603-666 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:228-283 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 32 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c0f1715d640250899d89e11283e42b9a9c3cb1494985823ceab1756904f61cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 28 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:202-283 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:502-553 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:770-824 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:654-713 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:43-109 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 28 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83818e7b4b13fb158d78fc12bde0b1650cfd8e980338be976116834801ceeb71"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 21 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:216-260 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:285-365 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:382-429 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:724-788 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1207-1306 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 21 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ef327c8f52d9de77891cdfb255c93e9cafc69060c983fed4bb9b93e423fb254"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 19 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:216-260 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:285-365 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:382-429 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:840-883 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1207-1306 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 19 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba255154dc252fbb8a2ece06835a999b597978c54e7f7fe6804dadf6bfa6e9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 42 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:142-238 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:558-622 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1017-1118 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1438-1501 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 42 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e629a560ce6544e877826c8fc9e539498d6eac7744ac27691a41c3096f50864"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 24 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:242-347 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:626-669 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1122-1227 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1505-1548 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 24 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ecdc2bc6b8eb09ceb39be7e153b8b2963b40983a29b867797b214541c26a562"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 13 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:166-199 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:125-183 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:321-417 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:550-646 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 13 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"685d49112a1bcd89be481a8af6785fa64a9c21edc58a6361abf086db70ed76bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (65 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:72-142 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:78-148 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 65 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3ad28ca8ee861a41ac9c0c8fbf5ea32b86ad12483f380000444a944936715ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (24 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:105-174 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:144-222 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 24 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d7847bbd9ee71293f4c7e8d38a087f649ca018afdf50276e4db22026b482bde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (23 shared lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:22-68 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:41-74 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 23 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a89055745c6e9cd4756d4ed6330526d68c3ba30eb68ceee5a511b80d8b64690d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py:179-204 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py:207-232 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49d3e6043a90a139fb5669ea48490d182186cd5bb441b1f25a061997d93b01a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (8 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:200-227 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:156-185 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:359-388 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:152-179 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:347-374 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:539-566 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:549-574 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:157-184 \u2014 These 8 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"975e95029abdcf716c1d3c7f0d547ddc0aad5e179b838d61138592cedd9d375b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:343-361 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:125-141 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathverse.py:129-142 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:105-121 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/qspatial.py:109-123 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":343}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b03860a17ce5a6d20c5420e6ad73a4a5d5b95a0db80ba90dad3e59b5e07665c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:105-138 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:521-554 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:980-1013 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1401-1434 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"610764c763c56774189b260eebb78e043a812fe44c880d527f2fa7a32395d1ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:351-430 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:678-755 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1231-1310 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1557-1634 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":351}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"917723d34f6560e15d50f34b8d8d4fc3ef70268f95390b441c5df41a0e2eed8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:434-473 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:759-883 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1314-1353 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1638-1760 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":434}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3565966e077a5f2b000951b2a79ea84e60248d94b3ac38ad69e974101ef82611"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:89-161 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:106-126 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:461-534 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:96-139 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc370a2ab6b78c1a09e505bd88eb4a0b7f939e01b088013d36a757089f8c837d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:150-203 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1013-1061 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1363-1418 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ocrbench.py:5-65 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efa36be6113b3f521ec4e60f691dc69cc3925196b05a15cb2ce949f0d5b4ec9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (78\u201380 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:351-430 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:678-755 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1231-1310 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1557-1634 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":351}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abdb930e247f7e29cbbded563c572d04a649952df3d0628eca6c6360c8e008f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (61 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:823-883 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1700-1760 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":823}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4cd4aa67f7b6f619bcf8c30bed635373f6a01763ec51118335355c17e115360"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (60 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:175-234 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1055-1114 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bb7ec372081185d140373053d1cb37fc0c5d0d75f3ccf578d30c6b675305347"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (53\u201355 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:77-130 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:271-325 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:465-517 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2aaa37c60d61537ca96fc53fcbfd67fc7c3e026987b283dba088cc8253fae69"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (46\u201354 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:210-255 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:269-322 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30267ecc9b88ac77e5bee887caa0d2ed1ff57bf14f5fb01605df0b1806ee6a0f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (47 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:280-326 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1160-1206 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:280\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b0976a91d3e37575ad64b293a740d9311ab52ffd5cc69704a55fb5b9a0b2f6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:83-125 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:294-336 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7760c2c0f379878a5db8056be515a60080aafacc9a63e15cd97427be33f143ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36\u201341 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:320-355 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:405-445 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:320\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:357\u0060 calls \u0060replace\u0060, \u0060strip\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:446\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8bd1a56393f11ca132670de5a70b784f41a7d3a00ee1b1b6c7a3513731326c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (40 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:434-473 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1314-1353 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":434}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f133ed57bdca1453c49f4dee71cc059f515a33a50961b08b072ef340fc0f97fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (40 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:339-378 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:568-607 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1d088a34f28546858515f6beb5d2582685b9219c047f386998c6fdfe631281c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201338 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:153-189 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:199-236 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c80d32ac4060459fdb5da26cb4ed7ba78deea5c616152b1bec77943cb62a9f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:596-630 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:632-666 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":596}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf9b6972e5a01a58ad42af85fa24e42648b7650af4febfb1d6f291b2d14ca1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:379-413 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:608-642 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":379}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a3d9baa73e29bed3ecc34d0b2c6c71b19f143b92b4286756b81fec6a17ded3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:105-138 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:521-554 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:980-1013 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1401-1434 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dd00521d12a1a3b751ead7f65f00bc0a48ccd311110800f62cf8d7d418a3dd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33\u201334 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:105-137 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:155-188 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4f4a336d2c24df6e70d8c78f8f26da251abd29f1b14d4e1fcb13582b0f4e523"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201334 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:286-316 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:367-400 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":286}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c263334cdfdaf2b6d4f01aa471a2cdf807bc7e33f1e5cd8124d58c8ac807f76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:242-273 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1122-1153 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:242\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aba8c4d48b8ed5fb4f61c1f1a3fbbbe5c508608fe63fbaf3685f7d3327be1de6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:99-130 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:469-500 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:97\u0060 calls \u0060isinstance\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:468\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49cfde73a97ea5bea5121ef687b75d2ccd25f287d61f45e1ded0d880a08256fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201332 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:164-194 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ocrbench.py:21-52 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27f86522541fb5611130520efea18fe6f135477eee3685e8055b8aa720c021d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26\u201332 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1016-1041 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1366-1397 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1016}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"811241498ba6c7e1602ecef2c7c65b95e9a62a554867704bcad57624dfce8381"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201331 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:588-618 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1468-1497 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":588}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c4de07104711ca4f2b3aa0c0706fb6325e052bca874a5a5a3ce37ded73801b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:105-131 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:65-92 \u2014 \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 64 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7334ef4e0850f403194b52719447b30206f736ab15d80e5491c4eb9900e0a93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:792-819 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1671-1698 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":792}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f2895132ab6d06e54bd631807c91dc4fe5a37fe07eb2f347bf9712175eacbe4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:101-128 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:107-134 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:105\u0060 calls \u0060hasattr\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:99\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"936b2befddd9ec48ed7cd631eeac55f1365d898ddb1157199ac76c7024cf57b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201327 lines \u00D7 12): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:219-221 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:291-293 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:388-390 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:844-846 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1213-1215 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:120-124 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:419-421 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:205-231 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:399-425 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:592-618 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:108-110 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:147-149 \u2014 there are 12 copies across 6 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 12 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:221\u0060 calls \u0060replace\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:846\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 5 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":219}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d92d9a410c27668ef8d077bc4d769fc9bc075de9019592b77598165acd4ea92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:75-101 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/qspatial.py:64-90 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6a0c157008bd04aa574c9461d74a825fff1b8a10fd6a16976c336ad7ba9e129"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:759-783 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1638-1662 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":759}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a6591d9ac36675afffea2293764907763d30be287c2c2be3012760c0e204999"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:75-99 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:80-104 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:105\u0060 calls \u0060hasattr\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:101\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0705e65f05301bc5746a6b6d78b0f50e1ee5c970e7a8096dd4a504bd1bde3e65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:220-242 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:505-527 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:775-797 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:56-78 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"324f4263702c6c8e55dbb1deace10f40b188b7c8db807ed5776209c8ad369f1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u201323 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:249-271 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:543-544 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:815-816 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:85-107 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59de852216bf053b87972ff6753096f9e13a935e8b8a50d62165566e57675c0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:113-132 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:324-343 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:117-137 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:311-332 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:505-524 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 104 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7baa7d55997f74bf0fefa9d17f92a518acb14db1aad8091d4ef13030b59e622a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:213-234 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:251-271 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:213\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":213}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fdb29cfc33389510b1dc250b23e0cfa3f6c028c3922949300373a475d03eab6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201321 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:731-734 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:282-302 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:218-238 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:368-388 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:611-631 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:238-258 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:303\u0060 calls \u0060chr\u0060, \u0060ord\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:259\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":731}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2d5164931d346cb72a8fb269778a4d117d0ae47e0b19c3b10db0d02d351ec7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201321 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:134-153 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:504-524 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:112-131 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:134\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c98b28d13d27b67c8a12e63e08a6bcc8954a6efef0102e95e9732c524191c0e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:247-267 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:397-417 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:640-660 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35b0be547b5abd7aafd2197f4af1c13c4696825b5b96ab5305d0a9a316cf6d47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201321 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:153-173 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:583-586 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1033-1053 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1463-1466 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c659a69f80d67822499999d8a1a62d9a0ca519c70e9d75a861898119b9be80df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:649-669 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1528-1548 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:649\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":649}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afda0cff5b35eff9630b636021accfd261d5ab960b7b4f177d98e0f4212aabf1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:122-142 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:168-188 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:121\u0060 calls \u0060extend\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:167\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5ae53ec7edf9fb70bd38a5fd708bb2ec7dd6dcef6b4775903194294c0f4f671"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:260-276 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:333-353 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6742eae607f77ec9ba9d5f8e810ca849cc0509e1f4dc8a6ec322922af8e60f12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py:60-80 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py:130-150 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 60 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed5e81158811a6887568d76b3e0d1da05b2384c4c5b3fdfee9d4b94b83a48767"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:57-77 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:148-168 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8588265f3d1b572ded63668b4f70adbab4eb9caf6ed774ec4a872d3be9167dba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201320 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py:59-78 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:472-489 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py:129-148 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 60 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:491\u0060 calls \u0060lower\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py:79\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e53e4747ea109451f1d1789288352ba3e1d3d84e4bc2bff3ff51aa3056c7723"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201320 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:163-176 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:158-171 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py:150-169 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b423c802f15c97b18333ed2a58411bbf99315f755c6cdd4537ef7712211ad1be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:176-195 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:246-265 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d4ccdee758d2ca3b2a52767f7d700a197d381b913b46441652fd8400633b962"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:152-171 | omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:229-248 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:152\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40a34ef505ece046a206d4e862f0bdb65fc6cc80d4c17cb1239ebbdb50fcebfa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201319 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:114-130 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:325-341 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:474-488 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:118-135 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:312-330 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:506-522 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43a29dbfabbf1d450e359b6cdad3a518b1ad3aa4b32819b94fe3115eb04ce86e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201319 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:145-163 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:561-579 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1441-1459 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:65-81 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb6e18b16df11deef3ef44f5483e664da7d8d8627e70be0f0abb31e31b0d3e81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:84-102 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:50-62 \u2014 \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 64 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"335c1e6b0e8a3791f88f7636b7f55af985088f5e52c470fe786c2ddce66c9e57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:150-168 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1030-1042 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04744577441bc923d734b948a7fb561c68be28a6e3bac01ee37b7a9f31285ebe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:658-676 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:727-745 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:746\u0060 calls \u0060replace\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:677\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":658}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85570993d39d3416669681c4939c5dd7f4e92590e17f69552aefbdd9a4f8cd8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:304-322 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:259-277 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:303\u0060 calls \u0060chr\u0060, \u0060ord\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:258\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76e5a698cd8252d937847a9d2f61c03244c77a13bfa4f2ba3c04eff6da323f72"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:434-452 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:686-704 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:434\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":434}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"198e0d8b36149558f0ab71f7167895e51d54cae85f0c498ec0fc11c537048eec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:36-54 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:127-145 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00175091cb92a6c6587d34acef6e28fce8ccfcf95d1616f7018e4519aba00f6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:156-174 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:268-286 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:156\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d15b98cebfec4fd5f4c2076de3419b8b5de5941f42aae4dc0e98864303ef8d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:183-200 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:556-573 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:161-178 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5959edd476a054774e7a0b2a57dd605644cb39178051ad8450334e924b0ec937"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mlvu.py:78-95 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mlvu.py:112-129 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dbdc8ceae1c4b62d810cac85e2972b7b6295c70d9d1bbdc2f2e4da3c16388e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:125-141 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:108-124 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:495-511 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:103-119 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad65b935f67edf6c9bfc91189dc6acecfa506de4df75916cd015211ef3d1b96b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:447-463 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:699-715 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:169-185 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:281-297 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 36 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:447\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":447}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12ecb3d025974dd69f6457013ca796efb35ef67e80ce5645aaf0c4a7bf9d1613"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmbench_video.py:13-29 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:11-27 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmbench_video.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c748e89eee8633da3bb4097ae5ffe6c58f3dab611f42fd695820f38e2558933a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py:179-195 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py:208-223 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45cfa33631940e482df9ce181c2596272751c2bc63f8fe0796c9769dfd2b0c33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:435-451 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:461-477 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":435}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e59b76d7d33983a906adfd11c6906d40f50d2bb2af45f61fafe01c80152a1119"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:321-337 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:550-566 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01092a5e873977e3a9b2a56b498aea5c639bf6e6161cf5c60509eb2c4a65ed31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:119-135 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:225-240 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:119\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71c03f10d23da8575a23a1cb753e2047f928465118994898f0713ca302ea9476"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:183-198 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:225-240 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:262-277 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f445163f9846e6e47dbf791c10ebb812fc7a55d0530cbe11289ab7dfb8258e8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:626-641 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1505-1520 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":626}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0890299b73471d7a97a274fe0790fff0372395667dc0b58c94df07ea66a95d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): omnilmm/model/utils.py:24-39 | omnilmm/model/utils.py:62-77 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a750e3bdd0d842348a955a0498e3a2c87254014f70883e06fce72e212ebf04ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:224-238 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:608-622 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1104-1118 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1488-1501 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:222\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:606\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40ae9812d5982a666d61d2af47ac6f89193f87320556fd916c982a45b34a7fd3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:85-99 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_base.py:30-44 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4678d8bac93d883fdef8207cc9bf16b8e255a3876d20e7144cb94b5d254dab1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:166-180 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:368-381 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37bfbf4b055a8be489e154f484e09dc0133237de987b6279dfcc54d1ea48cbc8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:148-161 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:564-577 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1444-1457 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmbench_video.py:72-83 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:68-79 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:65\u0060 calls \u0060exists\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmbench_video.py:71\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef4db002bdab2fa461759829ffe8fc898a4529cce0df253c7fffa8584f0b0c0d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:152-165 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:568-581 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1032-1045 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1448-1461 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"402adc3535430b499e517ba59dcf5e1843150a8eb8b3ccee62afaf9054a39102"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:166-179 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:369-382 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:165-178 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"478c1d7b779e64d8be91c100ce4add7d81c60feca05d596047b64b2916c83595"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:160-173 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:355-368 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:547-560 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef7db054789caddd4c3adfa6a83eebe27715d5ea4cf3148546de8249ed1d0ed6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:186-199 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:381-394 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:573-586 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:200\u0060 calls \u0060dict\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:395\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"437df91e4aaf75babf1f0c893a8dec8d3bb8f9be0c43801f06ccf0d57f8c65af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:151-164 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:108-121 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"817d7529bfedeeeab46eb9593e6e788ad75793d90ba2dc4da3ec223c72f97fe3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:89-100 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:131-144 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:89\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0b24db9fa17d79fd095c63e220ace535ee1865f9cdca5f6ebda2e8de7ce5c1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:200-209 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:68-81 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 36 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:200\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32f48b496308fead642cb52a93bfb76bdfb4448e77545d60e833ce39007b23bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:191-204 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:429-442 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8478b39bec8a8e10979da37fe639878ec1db9887645451807bd3156fb7c09b16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:224-236 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:509-521 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:779-791 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:661-673 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:730-742 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:60-72 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:746\u0060 calls \u0060replace\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:677\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ce208c6f8713b6280f9299ad4fd5f8ffd0fe744956fb4ce75655eeef206aff2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:271-283 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:640-652 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1151-1163 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1519-1531 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49c72d3857e8a6966bc015a4ba26283526fff39ba0bdeb051804763508058194"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:170-182 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:543-555 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:148-160 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6aa6b0e36c1e0502fa0e5fe7ea5ce7813ea52b1663064578fa9739bc01f43544"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:240-252 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:434-446 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:627-639 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:240\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0314aae0653cf475e0d21e84102fb8cc3921384a5390c66d473256740ec08933"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:78-90 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:178-190 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:290-302 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d841e6397c7ebc6b2289f98db110363680e5ffbe4162fdf5e47765da8cc4b45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:254-266 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:557-569 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:555\u0060 calls \u0060frame_paths_fps\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:252\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d01e3f69f4a583f5f88fd101d23fe57f03bc7d97645e618e6a268df5e926f78a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py:23-34 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py:75-87 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 60 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eae81db991d161ca83887d71d1441dedd63851cd12a1b08087e4fd52e4226c4a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:126-138 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:106-118 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 38 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1898867bd262a08036f27587bd9c2c0bbc83befdc6145b478dd2618f2fc2bfc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/vqa_eval.py:215-227 | eval_mm/vqaeval/eval_utils/vqa_evaluate.py:70-82 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/vqa_eval.py"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c06aa05d6eab61d9b6b2d22cade7aade3b51a1066ffe1de10c94770e1266c57e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:142-153 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:558-569 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1017-1028 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1438-1449 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:62-73 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7d5be7c3326b7df4906a876db3ba38f66723ef10b96e7e0ec7c8f90f8cbbd41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:92-103 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1348-1359 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_base.py:37-48 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:92\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1862f5d88a8685dc896fce918bc804bdd5359fb5b156fcd4af13de1c4cb8b480"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:194-205 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:397-408 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:584-595 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:206\u0060 calls \u0060dict\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:409\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80702a4f85cfab6d741b66c24440d391de85ceda02ce10dc3389d1c4ee2fa7b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:131-142 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:137-148 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py:118-129 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d88a4e2cd9502dc8dbf7305b674ec74ef85caf4a3b2ad10be3bc6f1b770f172"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:94-105 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:112-123 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0495fb2c7f87b36f929e29fec6f45c4774172c60f3fc3b22e0be0e55175909d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:118-129 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:158-166 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c2799a4985b28b05006501b4d6a98b56d9cf0ca6f924f1f638be5a2a277b310"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): omnilmm/conversation.py:88-99 | omnilmm/conversation.py:118-129 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/conversation.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b7c67f22c309ab5ce5b051fc5cb29f1f3bcf47af5609ec1aebf59ace3797492"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201311 lines \u00D7 9): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:226-231 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:297-302 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:331-336 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:395-400 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:751-756 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:849-855 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1219-1225 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:120-130 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:160-167 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:225\u0060 calls \u0060load\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1218\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8671f06b317d6af411326f250f12a6dd41fcc4c4af564b97cc7b87b7905edbee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:316-326 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:261-271 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:411-421 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:654-664 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:271-281 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":316}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c9c5cd78db699d62196c9480a9560147b01e8ac7841b5634802abd6e532044f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:325-335 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:655-665 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1205-1215 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1534-1544 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:337\u0060 calls \u0060eval\u0060, \u0060chr\u0060, \u0060ord\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:667\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39b46dab369bcb6a88366ad2184d6081371aa0253724690e52dbd6a6788d9041"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:143-153 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:269-279 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:507-517 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3c8b63d19ae920dc84ee9ea7cebdd84cc8f3cf48619c9752b5110d36fc1e478"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:615-625 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:651-661 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:672-682 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":615}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"222dd4da8d87f95b41770db0581fbda698b7ea2eaba00f667a05161762b9389e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:131-141 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:111-121 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/qspatial.py:113-123 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 38 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:128\u0060 calls \u0060post_check\u0060, \u0060dict\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/qspatial.py:112\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41e3d91711781b0e03870bd92186c4d591da562ce496e3eaa0cf6618aec9f30a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:196-205 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:433-443 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:685-695 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:196\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":196}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78d9405700659b1a339d32f9fb08a1cde1eca036ca670a87451d35c575e6c0ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py:232-242 | eval_mm/vqaeval/eval_utils/vqa_evaluate.py:309-319 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py:244\u0060 calls \u0060str\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/eval_utils/vqa_evaluate.py:320\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py"},"region":{"startLine":232}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cb92baf15bf7cc9f1aaa3a86ed6242ed66c87fb96709d7613ab02b17b62917d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:72-81 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:102-112 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:113\u0060 calls \u0060extend\u0060, \u0060mean\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py:82\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7db4db9d42bc89c37a346d29676253816f538bf2ebe83526d0260dcdc4e37f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:123-133 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:152-162 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f388012a3a437418182089f868963dfa7cb0818b4c0f6a887b7d1502cb18e0e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:139-149 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:176-186 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:139\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:187\u0060 calls \u0060pop\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:151\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e2d2d4a90da7bd4e27ece39f8770a7eeaa6b74154cd754e1e1da8f2528dbb8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:21-30 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:270-280 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34b382f38ed6f3f15baed47f8c1ff9d44cb012aed4edfbcc92d6d877a5065c17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:413-423 | omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:430-440 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":413}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2aa26f4eabd40e2eb2d5866317358635ef66a461077443c88cafcc20b2ee0d8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 13): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:177-185 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mt.py:100-109 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:228-236 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:299-307 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:333-341 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:397-405 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:753-761 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1222-1230 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:550-558 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:155-163 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:226-234 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:420-428 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:613-621 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:227\u0060 calls \u0060working\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:176\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7de0355c15564b7a7229092fedb8eadfce851f942c3bf4ddb83108af6f382ee9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 7): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:242-251 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:313-322 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:347-356 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:411-420 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:767-775 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:864-873 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1236-1245 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:242\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9283b1c408e882dc30f3fa82bb1392b4e5d3917b27737c0ac822e7e4569d86ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:271-280 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:303-312 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:640-649 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1151-1160 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1183-1192 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1519-1528 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4fa067a4bd8154299aa1bbd42354c98f9a61b958d090aa1ba2d1371bfe93f3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:238-247 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:523-532 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:793-802 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:681-690 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:74-83 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3af34f11d703e715f3d740b3287aeee80bad9a86eac0ca9af0e45aa29bd62465"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:830-838 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:986-995 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:115-123 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: \u0060LOCALIZE\u0060 names \u0060..tools\u0060 in one and \u0060vlmeval.tools\u0060 in another \u2014 different types that share a simple name, which is why the text matched. A single extracted unit cannot be given a parameter type that fits both, so unifying those types (or introducing a shared abstraction over them) is the step that has to come BEFORE the extraction above; if they are deliberately separate, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":830}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eb21c1a4edd742b01af58fade72dd6b85b31aaea0f469cef16b477a708e5f07"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:90-99 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:301-310 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:450-459 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a582e454f1f489a1a343f615dcb6d265f750de7d618510d95d7b0849cb010e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:344-354 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathverse.py:130-139 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/qspatial.py:111-120 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":344}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8047ca81b6c1ea1d839e7eadf117ea12472e9cb0c29a02d29bbeb8df45ef4c4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/__init__.py:106-115 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/video_concat_dataset.py:62-71 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/__init__.py"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68bff822742417e289428bc354e1b7c9b741cd2dd5f514f4ec766f969c0fccbb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:212-221 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:451-460 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90cfa21725b25f5c37cc45d7a7739e59318a24efc7554328c9b5aff365e191a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:200-209 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:221-230 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1993acf2339e53444d662b09ab16c04a749e8224b5029af03260248d1dc308cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py:156-165 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py:167-176 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dcd5759e3d5638b027a18daffa812de7db030f7cf63ee9e82f516e65a902466"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:265-272 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:481-490 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:481\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":265}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"824a652651a0a6a827b24d1933f89eefa870bb3f824fc08d13a4a6edaad21588"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:132-140 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:330-338 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:371-379 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:559-567 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:600-608 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f05676403157f28479e0d3bd3427342d134addfae8185b933cf73415073fbd77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:436-444 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:765-773 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1316-1324 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1644-1652 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":436}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59b37c7f3d960a162af208e2a9ff25eb45f9a8000e1a2cc59b01363c43abe8a0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:798-806 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:844-852 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1677-1685 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1721-1729 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:798\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":798}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5149ec45e1c46d39b09cbe7e26b24804d1208e93cedf37cd8d07e85833e2d4b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:157-165 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:83-89 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py:114-122 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/wildvision.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:155\u0060 calls \u0060toliststr\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/vl_rewardbench.py:82\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ed45341f2549b977cf3851ed83dd1a1658c97f01ef3a148a46fc26d0add2d03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:174-182 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:18-26 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:44-52 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d55909961d51417f19a8b9c6ead481283cf6219da4cd76013d10ec6b91570ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:366-375 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:438-447 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:465-473 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":366}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f0a786494980f9819f5837ac1dcc5550bfaa9786e5632c7abd40c6e4e458006"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:339-347 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1219-1227 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5a95dcee2a2b84133f80ea3376a32fb6c5bd7c3015bea91d56b21e42030a8e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:188-196 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:390-398 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1a469d89d94d59afbd90f18130e584b2ccda7e0138490267455b81bc96d592e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:184-192 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:28-36 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:141-144 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"613d5003d71afe985a2391af9a48fc97244eb0b36e8c55236ef4d26798e91a8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:157-165 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:360-368 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e372a1f87675b20d5f64deea2897d090b5db5b319bd0cb35970e14699131951e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:22-30 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:41-49 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86874476234befe0b6d6580d4675433fe501c4ac78dec494b3069a48c799af66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:48-56 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:55-63 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"085f4fbd653c206978c9df196571af96ca057b9c09c025085bf3679e36d4363e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:177-185 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py:174-182 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6933439ac560d6596b73832de280f3810b038300fba411648d890bab8eee56a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 14): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:180-186 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mt.py:103-110 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:231-237 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:302-308 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:336-342 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:400-406 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:756-762 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1225-1231 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:433-439 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:553-559 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:158-164 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:229-235 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:423-429 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:616-622 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fdc923de495bd47d661caecaa991b3b0c4fd963991066291bf2f5d715a20fda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 8): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:175-182 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:19-26 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:45-52 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:133-140 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:331-338 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:372-379 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:560-567 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:601-608 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a56d3c30bba93daa126ec9a555eafeb270768cf46223838313005c242e39d62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 7): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:201-208 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:159-166 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:362-369 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:153-160 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:348-355 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:540-547 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:158-165 \u2014 there are 7 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 7 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55c97bd92ded7e27fea4623b7738fb85117817725943476d4c0125496e43deef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:286-293 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:325-332 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:655-662 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1166-1173 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1205-1212 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py:1534-1541 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":286}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dede13b8066e59d31f4a939c5dc27717af5ddb765d61414bf65331f862536130"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20138 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:178-185 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:381-388 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:172-179 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:367-374 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:559-566 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/cgbench.py:567-572 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 104 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c536e001e630175b2e671b9caf62404d88371eab928f656ea924a55a35187f1d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:86-93 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:297-304 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:84-91 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b068cdc4042ff9416bcab8b616ca9d58368504fc2be8b81ff316f224be3ddb8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:226-233 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:113-120 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc33ed9edd0876f83abd52e3172e50d3579a49123ba0a8a54f5367587c0c100"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:220-227 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:177-184 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06b8e36f4808ae18fec6301e765946b6a5e9e2399a96a8e25062169df5eca21c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:160-167 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:153-160 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 38 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a948588310c1eca688bb9ca8ad82dcae548a60ed8cb755b041477331d4431a77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:39-46 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:57-64 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aea8ab4979d3f45a1bb5a63b95180e77944eb6202c8b992611e73745fc0bb91e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/wemath.py:50-57 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/wemath.py:273-280 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/wemath.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bf30bfd2828e0e912b561bc13e2cc763e60677f0ae0dbab9b81e7b0f190666a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:173-180 | omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:250-257 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py:173\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a27f9ac641c9a31c0b8477d8d0c78233a7f46c1aa447b929db1d7548729eec1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:192-198 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:395-401 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:339-345 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:582-588 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:338\u0060 calls \u0060ValueError\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:191\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"261ca43c61ada8954ef4eb48f61a4c2fc70320fd3da7a5bcbabfb3f10bcf5cc8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:175-181 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:408-414 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:637-643 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb7f05d3bbf8fbfa9d5e4edc7859fd75fe0f9891b735cb5077cde6474c3ae10a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:271-277 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:139-145 \u2014 \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 64 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f24960c7214f464e0733b2312668d6ab103a4065473e5e742357d7d44ccb4180"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:534-540 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:692-697 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":534}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf4f16bad53660719740f22e551132fb64eb73ac72aa1ebeabc0762b01a86f1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:349-355 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:592-598 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:349\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d8002b47d939ba141f74dde98f16b7442c7a8f284ac9da8194cdd52e073563a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:118-124 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:127-133 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2a2e99694c08e25b8ce2f361cf552423bb1d0a18d2efa67302aac3d30f6aa98"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:189-195 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:196-202 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25c85d22a21d4964f01fe1d6e695552f28120b9e02892af95a1a9befd5ea534f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 7): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:210-215 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:168-173 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:371-376 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:162-167 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:357-362 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:549-554 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/videomme.py:167-172 \u2014 there are 7 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 7 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:210\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a99d5f7c751ed2ef7abc97e077d39d835db1e0e6ef13c7b7bcc44183d73e9c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:201-206 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:348-353 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:591-596 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:195-200 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:582-587 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:354\u0060 calls \u0060dict\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:207\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2fbb9604cdb9eed361ef55bc6a46d569f34d595a67d2cc127338ad6e181ed89"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:163-168 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1037-1042 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ocrbench.py:20-25 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e21b43233700d804a08d3fbe8ed8c9b7bc5d19ae303019ad664da0533fbea3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py:240-245 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:390-395 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py:633-638 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mvbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 132 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27418172ce753b11f73916c0150e0c2459ce135d0ab1369fcb119777a5b64a38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/logicvista.py:143-148 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py:162-167 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py:155-160 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathvista.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 38 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/logicvista.py"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b9cff5663ef866c475831dbe4f8379e18962b11df05b9957db26f360a30fa3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/__init__.py:86-91 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/video_concat_dataset.py:42-47 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/__init__.py"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8bc04b664a2cc65602134f9839394e54a8483e0538f7d4e8b87da29d49ef1ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:165-170 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:114-119 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:171\u0060 calls \u0060replace\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:120\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e0884c2ad4aee1e25ee4a877c7a2cd438fc105c1758ef5d45186ef7b9e95c5a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:142-147 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:157-162 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a08e8067cf288ae4f6cd3e3e9f818ba42f79c46d198c1930e3648184ade8e5f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:20-25 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:103-108 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c56eff4a91fa60d8ee9cc2a68db7b7e373dc771060a0c0c9d23b0baddafacb57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 10): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:336-340 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:157-161 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:162-166 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:193-197 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:395-399 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:707-711 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:869-873 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:178-182 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:411-415 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:640-644 \u2014 there are 10 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 10 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":336}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e977fcb8986695cb0429ddb4301fcacb7e106bec7fd589ce0add8ca69f10dfc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 8): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:335-339 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py:156-160 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py:161-165 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:192-196 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:394-398 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:706-710 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:868-872 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:1116-1120 \u2014 there are 8 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 8 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1faf064c7bee85f1aa16a6f0d78029b7ed21c2c1a9c19ac8f4de85da428678d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:451-455 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py:703-707 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:121-125 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:173-177 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:227-231 | eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py:285-289 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 36 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py"},"region":{"startLine":451}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a29b20414a43c826562d4f9cf85534aee168fe0192a7c88389870de2cd928960"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 5): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:249-253 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:534-538 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:804-808 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:692-696 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py:85-89 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:256\u0060 calls \u0060mcq_circular_eval\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py:540\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49558ce56e4cae5e6c39c12fc0cd1e4865668942b19fdb2b564f1d5166cedf6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py:218-222 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:170-174 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:365-369 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/tempcompass.py:557-561 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11679078762d75937e6a3971fee941d6c19a7434a135172148667d14c722769a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py:165-169 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py:538-542 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py:143-147 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f5473958747f9fe1835dace2ce213bccde0dc7d4f1599170f933813e9d4fa6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:34-38 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:52-56 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py:84-88 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a2ae90c7fb96e7f9f7f9944a7c4e2ecf6e2e6db264edee0ab880d3c964535d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:13-17 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:13-17 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py:13-17 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d3364be7e3648dc2e6629e2f025ae3e055e244e067600a4250edf84479e2277"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:156-160 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:118-122 \u2014 \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 64 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:156\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edd0f18df7c21f35e0a1ad6b51571165dbac9d55d65905c5d148fd9c68c9109d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py:207-211 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:446-450 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"643eb6c4a8200f08759b3e0e1bf3ee84746960fc9f67564a4bedc5950231f6c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:53-57 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py:118-123 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccb3c7a616cae8b7bc2daf8488a59d43d6b026dc0ac928f25a794446c8f47120"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:33-37 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:42-46 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py:33\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bc6f00e569a5003858112c53d60029a5ff0950cbb976a39f91ea23e82681ed4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:92-96 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py:100-104 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fc343a7fa9e6d910e21f86a972db3eab20114f1a60ff70349038773b615e253"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py:64-68 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py:70-74 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03b63afeba9ea09163ab11a7d7bfe1cf6eb3ec6f5efdb0421f3dadaaba76e470"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_caption.py:52-58 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmgenbench.py:57-62 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_caption.py"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bdbdacbfebf34ada4ba378a1f1538504e62bc658f72710bec0deff13e3daf63"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py:72-80 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py:129-137 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 231 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8467fc269144f23523a235125b8f9c3d6d0a1f731c2cde10bc374b2a89928ef2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py:6-11 | eval_mm/vqaeval/eval_utils/cal_metric.py:6-11 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ba2327975df0f3e5a92dc312a19821857017da38ffb61244dc7b16e2cc7b93d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py:228-232 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py:110-114 \u2014 \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 64 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"679615243e668433f34e28571a4e9efec1dae08cf23d8462eaaa3c06acbdc036"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py:50-55 | eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py:120-125 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py\u0060 and \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/videomme.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 60 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef36c12412df5cdc23522b384782c8268994761152041d9f73659775c78eca16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py:62-66 | eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py:70-74 | eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py:78-82 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vqaeval/eval.py"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f86fcccb77b6f052acd2c7b72a9d0bdab1c9ea1e8d583e26e79bc0bf4aa93a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:95-115 | web_demos/web_demo.py:118-138 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:111-131 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:102-122 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f958bdb89d593333ce3b49e2e8b0f4e60638409dbe5ebbacc9d72f09e3bfe1b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:127-145 | web_demos/web_demo.py:142-165 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:135-157 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:132-150 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65064d22c05b7493c3f84044685ad225d272316d49ec5ac054d09b86244610a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (47 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:260-306 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:265-311 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b008f74be815023363e6e7d21acf1dc011f19fa74663470a7a9effd5a4fd1f1b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (45 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:333-377 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:338-382 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":333}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab5c8ddf1af28404c05f7080bf72f82c601407cdafbe463e22743509f4335793"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/web_demo.py:179-214 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:171-206 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/web_demo.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 95 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/web_demo.py"},"region":{"startLine":179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fe87e72273884a60d565a9ce026de77babbf1f526c03e432cee4005108b10fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:381-408 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:386-413 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7ffff382e980c5b1c95db0887e4405f461b1856011b232748e9dde880e01e99"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 4): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:95-115 | web_demos/web_demo.py:118-138 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:111-131 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:102-122 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e7d4d8cb45c4cb57933b5adc9f4712d56ac245e3659d956ad068c1eed8980d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:310-329 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:315-334 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d44f3afb702658ad08ea164e9cbb1773adb6f7ad52f5b9354c43a5da91d9eb9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:127-145 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:132-150 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf20df7cdf10501c0cbcb82c04e253e24afcd563c50c031f056fb208409d48ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:174-191 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:179-196 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"badab36ee7d7c0b2b3e191bb846be8ab4ab088ec0fddc89d38ec5929d8078e78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:218-235 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:223-240 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9913980ef03e047ed370154ad27bda98c0934bad91a6520d67b7314e2a1ff36d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:149-165 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:154-170 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad3693a50f7cb815e36d70baff44844cbb0ba6163391fbf225137422de0c5080"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/web_demo.py:153-165 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:145-157 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/web_demo.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 95 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060web_demos/web_demo.py:153\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/web_demo.py"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e66d95071ef79d310ffffcfef5fa6def8cfeb29326dfb6a7b952821e069b112"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/model_server.py:218-228 | web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/model_server.py:235-245 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/model_server.py"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18d86e8be4bc89fbf8712940d4cd656d19b6251f061bf25330eaaf16581cae33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/web_demo.py:218-227 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:210-219 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/web_demo.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 95 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/web_demo.py"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45b9d4aa920c4a3292a9bd065f75cb37bdba2b006c3a59f375a4ec7d82ce1d15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:132-139 | web_demos/web_demo.py:153-160 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:145-152 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:137-144 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:132\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"437fd66348229a70908df07af2ea412355ffad38f95603374170d741525dd1da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:195-203 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:200-208 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":195}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce732ac937e37db91684e79243482632bcdf23fe1117f3659c72a4ebfe370d44"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:207-211 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:212-216 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd82ba6a30ba4b23cffe7c709dd1249b317d09c3e376a72f20da61092418b2be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:239-246 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:244-251 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fe44bb09ecd263b28d408c13e2982168b9d3a702f851d3650509189d830bfa8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:250-256 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:255-261 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecd071d24a0729619bc8fadd2125f51aedcc183cedfb9fc83922e522bc08f002"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py:418-425 | web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py:423-430 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 278 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":418}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddbfb78ae50d2c3420a206f5115d49f7d29d9527a93d6433e6b2f662a21d2d38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): web_demos/web_demo.py:169-175 | web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py:161-167 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060web_demos/web_demo.py\u0060 and \u0060web_demos/web_demo_2.5.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 95 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/web_demo.py"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5b2de14254bb95d558ea1c2d8130b29acada4b5babcef1c819ae5bf2e9016c6"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: BaseModel (LCOM4 4): BaseModel\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5b804050e860100b824134f57094531c943fa045569e50d81928d6376a6bf28"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (pytest or unittest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (pytest or unittest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D14","level":"error","message":{"text":"Banned license: frozendict: \u0060frozendict\u0060 2.4.7 is published on PyPI under \u0060LGPL-3.0\u0060, which this policy bans, and it is in the SHIPPED closure of this repository \u2014 so it is installed by everything that depends on this repository, not just by its test environment. A distribution offering SEVERAL licences is a choice and is only charged when every one of them is banned. Replace the package, or record an accepted exception."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eabaddc5ace4df0a4a80aedb35b4fd43e6e12a49965a667944eb8cfdda09c895"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 1 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: web_demos/web_demo_streamlit-minicpmv2_6.py. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"caf5ae31e0efd369300b80817b5a3d95f1be3398225e88aac9c28924e5b0ee7d"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 1 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (2 single-owned of 96 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 96 of the 118 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #2 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above. The files folded here: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/vad_utils.py."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: make efficient \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa183d9779ce62930baa848a8c8809f259f702a508900f9798670f4f42eb680d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: this needs to be fixed and made cleaner later. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/trainer.py"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f05ed466b88f929046303a922181854eb15a9ac5f7fbe90c1054dc685953b16"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: for FSDP \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"323527ee63f25e52107405ea14b7f4e33d412055b344095e8a23dc01dadc2fc8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: for FSDP \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee80670b318b7f796bff24b731ea3d35fe940d256861c7086db28bf531b4b626"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: replace back original embeddings for LLaVA pretraining \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3fcb3fbe885aad0c51d68ce8942acd75476d1a81113bbea06339300cce08758"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: replace back original embeddings for LLaVA pretraining \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca12242b2043293b97d3c1edd08f624429c593e3026d2462b081fdcc1e3cf488"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO could be removed for generate_vllm() \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/model/omnilmm.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"218142e0372f1b1222fb77e3201b43f2fd84c71b5c7fa7155eda61f427dea354"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: this automatically add \u0027\\n\u0027 to the end \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"omnilmm/train/train_utils.py"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76a2686cca64c94236a53bb87aa36e938881d7bd1343a5872f08adef62cfd9cd"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 4 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 5.0/10. The most over is \u0060eval_mm/vlmevalkit\u0060 (19549 LoC, 160 module-visible types across 9 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82a52bedbec3b162f41c3691956777b3cbaf7dd86ac34d6f229e9ea109765c3b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d7e80dca9692d802ddd0bb86a99204f398cace9d5efc3afdc9d624d5641f2e2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52bc9d71ffe5c2a9e8718a54b4e5054721dc4c7571fe3d247dfc4ec08fa3950f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddc820e33cc324ec16a1c22895cd2914fe1b6272064a61f2f1b986e6e67f4f51"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b11f5e1768dcac18c52a40c9af194c1915e55e77372b9f7dd619a5426c09f302"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1685196d9ada2888605c27d80983d92cff2c0f6bae6f13281d884b6efaaa0bfa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c7f150d63e8b52b55e52220735bfb78191890cf59bdca51575aa2650d69ad78"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2b7a8a5fd375fbeee3fb24d2de6ebb04c9c5077c6de5e16b9fa02dbcdfd3fc8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18e24e1b82c5f51bedacb12ecf5057ab3f8cd509991c637b21d91e3e1bbe4f13"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0061462083cfe8171e74cff644a0f3e3ececea27899304419e5b285796ef541b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"339bfd2e14d40c459fa1037221ab2f0096c52ebcc5f2ab8aec367fd98a8e9c85"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffa04e9e813081d705eff0a1f3e79a0a6475437e0a49386bf8b2a0890caa7388"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95158b6273571c2db9846f8138c3afeb0a8cf2f6ef07baaa70b41d34b7a20f99"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2be21892e227bb5445c598057ba6ac671dc965d163530992011b1e78ff1162eb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"990e05b0d18cb03fe82d6f6f3c4da38209cc0a04243acff4d07bea165709e4ba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"608f5708c033dbf219ae1d7bf7f39e6f853cb21eaef49c6128e1541ccd9d8a26"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5e6276fad570fb250928ae26904e014cc8429b53ae2535331580482f2658f35"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24b57d0d8ce3c1cd11d7f34422aa389b15d9957f615b1008e52aea22f0cb74e0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ce3825aa14944bdd17a70ff04ff5f064ccea29ad3362e4e404e10fd91e5def9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd66e2744037a2cdb8afd84f9cd2919327edac14665aec2b190c0176da9b2c74"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4652d3f13d170bbc1b3582a7cde181fc50965ca8174bfdc44d00948e35dcc21"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53a5f41d6f7aebf71b5cbeeaea42c283a782d6597c5c3d520dc61197e2248de2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0706dbdf31d8d7674e649fc3bdf75a6f7341f046607ac04544c8451404267798"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1e212aa982717286713ba3ad65c1d5caa807e763a061f8c53ff0c4dd53a93f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57fcd756fe960babb94406d32f2afed56bad80a88d5bd9c0d58a255a4ab4a245"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"873d335baf16c643abefb23370c4ffa833d0cd135e395aaf67827779ccd7e9ca"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd4e79b320b8974e15518d5dfb7b18e9827553a6e597736d2ca5912f17ef2b1a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0facf29694d26f81f01de778dcc4f37b20f7a400a287db1badcb2c84fc77799e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9d6a5efda5870c52b339d5bc38e191f383fe55b66256b1758974d5908863ffc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c00d264fdc56be51c6f3752059dae640651c6068ef361ea91c0e2273c7cdf205"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"831f330dc1e5b4d0c0ba0ca344c03b6eea1635401ebb1703b47fcdbfa4e8785d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c9bd7aed60a79ac6cca4f7d0ba194f81c1bcbe5c40bc2e299bd2a1623803778"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ac5ed16d516e868ce2059703603384f9c2fc6f28bf11cd36c1ea5734536f7ec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee1f678e20cafe13ce62f9607802d6f88b2076003a8b29c2a1b5ecae70b2807c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ff778aef973dafdfce2d8c630abcf0a9881ffddbc36e6be41bbe860bafd9d52"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0291199120ee517ebd42a3d59ed8e58fee640d1269216ee749bbee62296ba51"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"447aee209543a0fe74f68c51fa49724c6fa234e4c875ab9db79773ec9dd70034"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e083b88c942e1c0328481bbecda3e955bf28466b6635ec3f805821daddbaa31"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"797fd17daf4711ce870e50eac18ffd0a2ed78d6934e05ecfe1baf57af3e0d558"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e04a08f608c673aaac2b97137b388ef33cace707d4bbd18ecc6f26b19d9eb9c7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1fa7378d63839c34a99d306dfdcab56c2ade5032fe38d78fec6c6114bbdc3b2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42d36167efb8f9e883292da6bd157b3d7635d35be50d25572fe777bb0a8aead3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e17a968cdf13b2b5839aab9c41b578385df8733fdb6bc27c4b69ce3d3c4527"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"359eb0149564ca991780b57af3f90649b309f989e88cf39574e17a9dc7856d6f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e43c82dff4aae73add249ca85deb5f8da88d67e6c1fb0c33c108bdb92baba681"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1a1bb22d3fd4b59bc1ce6afbd128a702a0815f53f75edd4cf4c929ca428af86"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"392ff577158ef1ed32a33d8d39e7c3d3b7469541fb8e207ea73016932944cbd8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf7d3059b975f7504aee67aa5e3b76fbb6dbf1ab8a59429b3c45664ac62a3c20"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"139a9d0ae7d33324efe5e5cf15ec5c7cb4c18c5fe9ce5f29f75f0f0e61a60d13"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"897229e7ac551fb37d7c1dd4be95182ba9e30e5d868fa99d63807cf6553c8830"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d78d06f5660d0b5a9d0ba502cb2cd818652c68ca544345b0d3d2198dde497ed4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0307fb2bf20d80af4f4ae64e7063607238c58086b716780c3779fc449cf6f14f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7282934875798da00ed2ba0be29b246b8e9a72843237243a9f075f4fdde930b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07983cb95405258b7209b026bf130502be98a7bf8f43a446d7cbea2dfe61cde7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3db3a2c368ad3d79c5910036619ab87558354af67b12f853d50d4c1f5b93034"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c237c8b945ae22a68ae9be2679148539f8704b96d5848128ef7d0ef9c7cb4027"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc6847722b7d94a600d7aef0720a9aa7e3e2d226de6382838821e2031a294227"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db7a1bad281aa892587bac151bbe5b4aab6dc1e566c62742ada4a6e9cef35b20"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f41be615bd22906d952ee9c2bb75ec18d83df2aa0628661e5f433ec0cd3c9c74"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7217f4ade670f9b188a2b957585cfcb9b4c694f5bafd80bc21978d60fcbef0fe"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"356ad1c7ade721ab0ad4650ede391f04e0fe5b3f3871b94884a62162ef71b009"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b993efaa99b9d1ab9829ef5ffce6a943f644292399c4e750154b9e82a309927c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-327","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be3dc5f440105981da8449a9def811571fe668b789d7822215b5bb03a2686f28"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a520b9824279a7f452875147e5e6ead144e330588edba386e6e102d0152f33e0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95ebf29deedec109e0ab0675b7f61949e927d987fd1f012aa47c409dc8bfd215"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-326","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"274ae58fc4a1053320cb80ab8b8ab6b1533974ddd7cb0ee1c5a0ef9977df68ca"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-939","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f53de3007d0e6da7da5f97f38e9dac3d504315ba1a73dfec0c32571a3e10b4f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-444","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24999e46d9f718b9d201917539377accbd719b4fea6c6bf623a4feaea5ef7754"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"gradio","version":"3.24.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2023-249","PYSEC-2023-255","PYSEC-2023-90","PYSEC-2024-184","PYSEC-2024-196","PYSEC-2024-197","PYSEC-2024-198","PYSEC-2024-199","PYSEC-2024-213","PYSEC-2024-214","PYSEC-2024-215","PYSEC-2024-216","PYSEC-2024-217","PYSEC-2024-218","PYSEC-2024-219","PYSEC-2024-220","PYSEC-2024-255","PYSEC-2024-261","PYSEC-2024-274","PYSEC-2024-321","PYSEC-2025-118","PYSEC-2025-119","PYSEC-2026-1407","PYSEC-2026-1408","PYSEC-2026-1409","PYSEC-2026-1410","PYSEC-2026-1411","PYSEC-2026-1413","PYSEC-2026-1414","PYSEC-2026-1415","PYSEC-2026-1416","PYSEC-2026-1418","PYSEC-2026-1419","PYSEC-2026-1420","PYSEC-2026-1422","PYSEC-2026-211","PYSEC-2026-2178","PYSEC-2026-2179","PYSEC-2026-345","PYSEC-2026-64","PYSEC-2026-65","PYSEC-2026-66"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ce0c0b085b84e20535f0f6d5555dd9ab5943c630e8e03f45d913d313e2890c8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"pillow","version":"10.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["BIT-pillow-2023-50447","BIT-pillow-2024-28219","BIT-pillow-2026-42308","BIT-pillow-2026-42310","BIT-pillow-2026-54058","BIT-pillow-2026-54059","BIT-pillow-2026-54060","BIT-pillow-2026-55379","BIT-pillow-2026-55380","BIT-pillow-2026-55798","BIT-pillow-2026-59197","BIT-pillow-2026-59198","BIT-pillow-2026-59199","BIT-pillow-2026-59200","BIT-pillow-2026-59204","BIT-pillow-2026-59205","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2026-165","PYSEC-2026-1793","PYSEC-2026-2253","PYSEC-2026-2254","PYSEC-2026-2255","PYSEC-2026-2256","PYSEC-2026-2257","PYSEC-2026-2874","PYSEC-2026-3451","PYSEC-2026-3453","PYSEC-2026-3454","PYSEC-2026-3493","PYSEC-2026-3494","PYSEC-2026-3495","PYSEC-2026-3496","PYSEC-2026-457"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"finetune/dataset.py","line":13}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e175f61915600dc30cc74256a6f71ef52b913b8f855ae48e28b2d89c99a06c7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"torch","version":"2.2.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["BIT-pytorch-2024-48063","BIT-pytorch-2025-2148","BIT-pytorch-2025-2149","BIT-pytorch-2025-2953","BIT-pytorch-2025-2998","BIT-pytorch-2025-2999","BIT-pytorch-2025-3000","BIT-pytorch-2025-3001","BIT-pytorch-2025-32434","BIT-pytorch-2025-3730","BIT-pytorch-2025-46148","BIT-pytorch-2025-55551","BIT-pytorch-2025-55552","BIT-pytorch-2025-55553","BIT-pytorch-2025-55554","BIT-pytorch-2025-55557","BIT-pytorch-2025-55558","BIT-pytorch-2025-55560","BIT-pytorch-2026-24747","BIT-pytorch-2026-4538","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-259","PYSEC-2025-189","PYSEC-2025-190","PYSEC-2025-191","PYSEC-2025-192","PYSEC-2025-193","PYSEC-2025-194","PYSEC-2025-195","PYSEC-2025-198","PYSEC-2025-203","PYSEC-2025-204","PYSEC-2025-205","PYSEC-2025-206","PYSEC-2025-207","PYSEC-2025-208","PYSEC-2025-209","PYSEC-2025-41","PYSEC-2026-139","PYSEC-2026-1856","PYSEC-2026-1970","PYSEC-2026-2286"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"finetune/dataset.py","line":12}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3f0ef7a20fcd642355e6ab5bf9ae31499096db4adc6bb87394ed2c54b853f1a"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"nltk","version":"3.8.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-167","PYSEC-2026-2078","PYSEC-2026-2085","PYSEC-2026-2235","PYSEC-2026-2236","PYSEC-2026-2237","PYSEC-2026-3581","PYSEC-2026-3582","PYSEC-2026-3583","PYSEC-2026-3584","PYSEC-2026-3657","PYSEC-2026-3722","PYSEC-2026-3723","PYSEC-2026-3724","PYSEC-2026-3728","PYSEC-2026-3729","PYSEC-2026-3730","PYSEC-2026-3731","PYSEC-2026-3732","PYSEC-2026-3733","PYSEC-2026-3734","PYSEC-2026-3735","PYSEC-2026-3736","PYSEC-2026-3737","PYSEC-2026-3738","PYSEC-2026-3739","PYSEC-2026-3740","PYSEC-2026-3741","PYSEC-2026-3748","PYSEC-2026-3749","PYSEC-2026-3750","PYSEC-2026-3751","PYSEC-2026-3752","PYSEC-2026-3868","PYSEC-2026-3869","PYSEC-2026-3870","PYSEC-2026-3871","PYSEC-2026-3954","PYSEC-2026-3955","PYSEC-2026-4318","PYSEC-2026-597","PYSEC-2026-96","PYSEC-2026-97","PYSEC-2026-98","PYSEC-2026-99"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60e549dd749875889a6763dcbdac56b3f214e93f9570c66cfa4c22d2a160ab00"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"torch","version":"2.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["BIT-pytorch-2024-31580","BIT-pytorch-2024-31583","BIT-pytorch-2024-31584","BIT-pytorch-2024-48063","BIT-pytorch-2025-2148","BIT-pytorch-2025-2149","BIT-pytorch-2025-2953","BIT-pytorch-2025-2998","BIT-pytorch-2025-2999","BIT-pytorch-2025-3000","BIT-pytorch-2025-3001","BIT-pytorch-2025-32434","BIT-pytorch-2025-3730","BIT-pytorch-2025-46148","BIT-pytorch-2025-55551","BIT-pytorch-2025-55552","BIT-pytorch-2025-55553","BIT-pytorch-2025-55554","BIT-pytorch-2025-55557","BIT-pytorch-2025-55558","BIT-pytorch-2025-55560","BIT-pytorch-2026-24747","BIT-pytorch-2026-4538","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-250","PYSEC-2024-251","PYSEC-2024-252","PYSEC-2024-259","PYSEC-2024-328","PYSEC-2025-189","PYSEC-2025-190","PYSEC-2025-191","PYSEC-2025-192","PYSEC-2025-193","PYSEC-2025-194","PYSEC-2025-195","PYSEC-2025-198","PYSEC-2025-203","PYSEC-2025-204","PYSEC-2025-205","PYSEC-2025-206","PYSEC-2025-207","PYSEC-2025-208","PYSEC-2025-209","PYSEC-2025-41","PYSEC-2026-139","PYSEC-2026-1856","PYSEC-2026-1970","PYSEC-2026-2286"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"chat.py","line":2}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91a40263b7f1aec13520bb44c3e2abdf1dc9d5c47588adabc3c8e00d75483d78"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"gradio","version":"4.41.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-196","PYSEC-2024-197","PYSEC-2024-198","PYSEC-2024-199","PYSEC-2024-213","PYSEC-2024-214","PYSEC-2024-215","PYSEC-2024-216","PYSEC-2024-217","PYSEC-2024-218","PYSEC-2024-219","PYSEC-2024-220","PYSEC-2025-118","PYSEC-2025-119","PYSEC-2026-1408","PYSEC-2026-1410","PYSEC-2026-1412","PYSEC-2026-1417","PYSEC-2026-1418","PYSEC-2026-1421","PYSEC-2026-211","PYSEC-2026-2178","PYSEC-2026-2179","PYSEC-2026-63","PYSEC-2026-64","PYSEC-2026-65","PYSEC-2026-66"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py","line":6}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0035575774c6e0b66bf37704ce4b11fe983352861a4164014b4e4c086dd6f33e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"torch","version":"2.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["BIT-pytorch-2024-48063","BIT-pytorch-2025-2148","BIT-pytorch-2025-2149","BIT-pytorch-2025-2953","BIT-pytorch-2025-2998","BIT-pytorch-2025-2999","BIT-pytorch-2025-3000","BIT-pytorch-2025-3001","BIT-pytorch-2025-32434","BIT-pytorch-2025-3730","BIT-pytorch-2025-46148","BIT-pytorch-2025-55551","BIT-pytorch-2025-55552","BIT-pytorch-2025-55553","BIT-pytorch-2025-55554","BIT-pytorch-2025-55557","BIT-pytorch-2025-55558","BIT-pytorch-2025-55560","BIT-pytorch-2026-24747","BIT-pytorch-2026-4538","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-259","PYSEC-2025-189","PYSEC-2025-190","PYSEC-2025-191","PYSEC-2025-192","PYSEC-2025-193","PYSEC-2025-194","PYSEC-2025-195","PYSEC-2025-198","PYSEC-2025-203","PYSEC-2025-204","PYSEC-2025-205","PYSEC-2025-206","PYSEC-2025-207","PYSEC-2025-208","PYSEC-2025-209","PYSEC-2025-41","PYSEC-2026-139","PYSEC-2026-1856","PYSEC-2026-1970","PYSEC-2026-2286"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d286edb1f6712bd891811f46d62788994f4a4e1c19b6c9b53a50182eff1ff772"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"gradio","version":"4.44.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-213","PYSEC-2024-214","PYSEC-2024-215","PYSEC-2024-216","PYSEC-2024-217","PYSEC-2024-218","PYSEC-2024-219","PYSEC-2024-220","PYSEC-2025-118","PYSEC-2025-119","PYSEC-2026-1410","PYSEC-2026-1412","PYSEC-2026-1417","PYSEC-2026-1418","PYSEC-2026-1421","PYSEC-2026-211","PYSEC-2026-2178","PYSEC-2026-2179","PYSEC-2026-63","PYSEC-2026-64","PYSEC-2026-65","PYSEC-2026-66"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"637bed3587709d619deb091093e4d872ffc3134586c98c55c2ffc3bc71d62829"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"form-data","version":"4.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66bbfd7c3253a85dcf042c6d1d0c4fbacfb9c7ae10905074e29733d227d3c183"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"protobufjs","version":"6.11.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bf94b0edcce117c324e524205dbc07466745f8acfb6b4d4dcf872d62cd25b16"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"transformers","version":"4.44.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-227","PYSEC-2024-228","PYSEC-2024-229","PYSEC-2025-211","PYSEC-2025-212","PYSEC-2025-213","PYSEC-2025-214","PYSEC-2025-215","PYSEC-2025-216","PYSEC-2025-217","PYSEC-2025-218","PYSEC-2025-40","PYSEC-2026-1977","PYSEC-2026-1980","PYSEC-2026-1981","PYSEC-2026-1982","PYSEC-2026-1983","PYSEC-2026-1984","PYSEC-2026-1985","PYSEC-2026-1986","PYSEC-2026-1987","PYSEC-2026-1988","PYSEC-2026-2288","PYSEC-2026-2289","PYSEC-2026-2290","PYSEC-2026-3929"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"eval_mm/vqaeval/models/MiniCPM/minicpmv.py","line":4}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eee20cdaf972b35b8046e7450b788cc4d805935cc3fb0fdfd84548c11dc50126"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"fonttools","version":"4.38.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2026-1388","PYSEC-2026-1389"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27d94a44c39f7d6dd6fa196be475898568e3d26b6f6920da2d8f4bf142df790c"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"aiohttp","version":"3.8.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2023-120","PYSEC-2023-246","PYSEC-2023-250","PYSEC-2023-251","PYSEC-2024-24","PYSEC-2024-26","PYSEC-2026-1097","PYSEC-2026-1098","PYSEC-2026-1099","PYSEC-2026-1100","PYSEC-2026-1101","PYSEC-2026-1102","PYSEC-2026-1103","PYSEC-2026-1104","PYSEC-2026-1105","PYSEC-2026-1106","PYSEC-2026-1107","PYSEC-2026-1109","PYSEC-2026-2094","PYSEC-2026-2095","PYSEC-2026-2096","PYSEC-2026-2097","PYSEC-2026-2098","PYSEC-2026-2099","PYSEC-2026-2100","PYSEC-2026-2101","PYSEC-2026-2102","PYSEC-2026-2103","PYSEC-2026-2104","PYSEC-2026-2105","PYSEC-2026-2106","PYSEC-2026-2107","PYSEC-2026-2108","PYSEC-2026-2109","PYSEC-2026-2110","PYSEC-2026-2111","PYSEC-2026-2112","PYSEC-2026-2113","PYSEC-2026-237","PYSEC-2026-3545","PYSEC-2026-3546","PYSEC-2026-3547"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5f9ad0a0b909968c8b2c971f433d8573e5be2c5bc7a32af413bb12a6c001b2f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"opencv-python","version":"4.7.0.72","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["PYSEC-2023-183"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbfe09f65c7b22968ec7f24de06a3af27e727f61c8b9c920d4a16dd2c758a9ae"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"transformers","version":"4.51.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2025-211","PYSEC-2025-212","PYSEC-2025-213","PYSEC-2025-214","PYSEC-2025-215","PYSEC-2025-216","PYSEC-2025-217","PYSEC-2025-218","PYSEC-2026-1977","PYSEC-2026-1980","PYSEC-2026-1981","PYSEC-2026-1983","PYSEC-2026-1986","PYSEC-2026-1988","PYSEC-2026-2288","PYSEC-2026-2289","PYSEC-2026-2290","PYSEC-2026-3929","PYSEC-2026-4174"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"finetune/dataset.py","line":16}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79943948d4574908d09ed35cbb2f3cb4ab196957c4e72330732e87eaf8c46c83"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"sentencepiece","version":"0.1.99","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2026-1909"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f823c5786449e25dc1a2cabb5b77c077fdca5d77792965307243242ec9cfa09b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"protobuf","version":"4.25.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2026-1805","PYSEC-2026-1806"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99f35bc046b6fffc89ab52128103cb1c2e78b86c2b2eddab13277cd0a2505ea5"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"opencv-python-headless","version":"4.5.5.64","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["PYSEC-2023-184"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60d31a051760159631eaa9ba0e90c965120cf2c230f2b5ca78fdc144cd48fdda"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"transformers","version":"4.40.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2024-227","PYSEC-2024-228","PYSEC-2024-229","PYSEC-2025-211","PYSEC-2025-212","PYSEC-2025-213","PYSEC-2025-214","PYSEC-2025-215","PYSEC-2025-216","PYSEC-2025-217","PYSEC-2025-218","PYSEC-2025-40","PYSEC-2026-1977","PYSEC-2026-1980","PYSEC-2026-1981","PYSEC-2026-1982","PYSEC-2026-1983","PYSEC-2026-1984","PYSEC-2026-1985","PYSEC-2026-1986","PYSEC-2026-1987","PYSEC-2026-1988","PYSEC-2026-2288","PYSEC-2026-2289","PYSEC-2026-2290","PYSEC-2026-3929"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"chat.py","line":8}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57743385c2fce629413e03038268394efcad3027e63fdba6c55fb25ef15aeec0"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"sentencepiece","version":"0.2.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2026-1909"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07079b91cc291167ea303c0141171f0892e3a776aaa97967af1d6e1e1e665982"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"3.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27d0a9456a63370dc3080f6e93ce3b946e50b4e1c22660625e105a1ef440e809"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"9.0.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6621565ac2cf3b07bf42a97a6b142e14921951f76d29e9a559576224268437e5"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"flatted","version":"3.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b39662728520e5dc3fca647fe587dec7eee87f7216979648be182f2c5164a532"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"js-yaml","version":"4.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b85a8451fdba573a2643dc65a438b32038ff8919eacedca8da41ef82d16f3f46"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"nanoid","version":"3.3.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57f7ef3443e38560e6b9251d399e1840cdf5e7e19e7d23d94ef1de0811e0e789"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"axios","version":"1.7.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343dd514af457bc29188c46aca8c475766742bd3d2d7faa584d9c2e3bceb4249"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"1.1.11","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88adee8e6b47fe3f4d3f8c68f13631d1bdd5d38c2fd7d7be9dca2c3ac56baa0e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"2.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"583c6d7236a778bc630f10347052b57cc13293861167590d603d54481e95ad94"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"cross-spawn","version":"7.0.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eb675582684ab9e7f44f7885470c4ecc4ce02eb7a17277bb367ebcd028f67cb"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"source-map-js","version":"1.2.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"132d856e94d10f32178ed9d267d17998e35e3d32b914156ab33ddc9d5f7e0fa8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"postcss","version":"8.4.44","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10e2be8fc090fb97e6ad75947fb31f43b890ca6acda92545d9fce20f21c1568b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"browserslist","version":"4.23.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b6aeed466457a0cd922f7a17bc5c5e27c39f6428928f2e9b6963a45ef07e184"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"vite","version":"5.4.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"test-or-tooling","file":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/vite.config.js","line":3}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"033f7da038f6861dcda1001b23a68fb5d5bf2dbc88df6c1dac420e052a0f87d8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"picomatch","version":"2.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b25a504676c31eda611128c7e21655fb55b1ed8ab17708432f16a31291a0261c"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"rollup","version":"4.21.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b0821130294c3e595e9bd1b9fbc2e4869f7e56f1fbd2ae6c50e6cffe53297e0"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"vue-i18n","version":"11.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/main.js","line":6}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"011ed583a9b3452b5af09e76710c9edc640a24d3200840b0edbf30ae184d00a9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"lodash","version":"4.17.21","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25d99b81088c52ac35eec5a16b9172937171a63c11cbbf34dca9f177b478e445"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"lodash-es","version":"4.17.21","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faaae30327e8e1fef727dd4d38145d23e4e70226aa9b05fbf6e68e3df3dabca0"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"braces","version":"3.0.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"052ee71a9b8f0a383240fe2c536837cf3a2c9a04c1ac1501d34b333fe26a11dd"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@vue/server-renderer","version":"3.5.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c87cb7a8ad2f53bed86ae8104afeab7dc050686a0cdaf626ef356a4ea39f87d"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"zipp","version":"3.14.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2026-2074"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9505eb26d572a8b144136fc66080cf8099a6b365347e3c6fdb11367fb7964d1"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"scikit-learn","version":"1.2.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2024-110"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d11a95bbc4da7a73ac0ff4b96dbda127fd2b947c0e63d913323ec68b14f09fd"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"filelock","version":"3.9.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2026-1374","PYSEC-2026-1375"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15f799a64bc8121c87d21c800c78112ff2bfe1014a865bb78e7bec91f49c82d8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"tqdm","version":"4.64.1","advisory":"PYSEC-2026-1976","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"eval_mm/vqaeval/eval_utils/vqa_evaluate.py","line":8}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57a99743e09436de5515295324a63f53354b95b5e62941d5f50ed623c183cd8d"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"accelerate","version":"0.30.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2026-3804"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"finetune/finetune.py","line":13}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"528294d89c8ff0919075bfc1e73a3d4c3ac1ebc3193d9add34f7d374ecb45b95"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"tqdm","version":"4.66.1","advisory":"PYSEC-2026-1976","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a83e25d7f275c1ba639b23ebc8211b5e429269ceb7de71c17aa04b9009c6473"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"accelerate","version":"1.2.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","PYSEC-2026-3804"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89955613616d533e8e5d79c99937686089046f3704dc29bece6c131419c34c0c"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ajv","version":"6.12.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7302d3ed68b1ae4f802454a15b758dcbc7a205f613c0f9137122c12636fa9e7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"element-plus","version":"2.8.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"test-or-tooling","file":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/components.d.ts","line":10}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c327a1560067464295f6951bb4b534f73a1aa1100d733e5558bcbfcb4a817e27"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/helpers","version":"7.25.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55ba36ce3884931326d134fbfcd235085aa7cb5d2a249384c85db98bb2373f54"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@protobufjs/utf8","version":"1.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cbd19aa0e4daf24579059bf4f9204e9b9608e0469be71a11302c5fa7b234128"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"postcss-selector-parser","version":"6.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f33afe9aa1e1c0dd53c236de53192637f4d889e6f732b836e43d1137a0d02d8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@intlify/core-base","version":"11.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f074544337c5cb42b9456085c029ef858d00d3e951541a43cefaa96366a4d5"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"esbuild","version":"0.21.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffc06612936d450bbbeff89b2ae6e0408d485bc0b00ae64c0198e6062793f35b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"follow-redirects","version":"1.15.8","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1219e2277c971015e33d872ead21c25194158b0b0ffea9acf701fcbb3d47b8e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/core","version":"7.25.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cce936f63cb43a98ebe12a90718971e3e8e2434d992360a251a7a6b428b6479b"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5b212b9445f7aa4c4a897b10577976f005f03aab9c4e558fd1a509ceb306198"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f163f30d31f36bb486fa8822152b31f0cbb370e6fe960a1faa5f645fc3f6ee7b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93aa4bf2064a88848d20298a35f18aea8e0c31b33828956e0b712b2249eee503"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"721617717723f6d6538f40f824fee6e3aa8ce0a6153a54f82e3565a8f16ec457"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/IdeasList/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5340947d858bafdd1c3b8fa94d8fa0e736e79d866f8d090597ecb9e7238de9cd"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9c8d66cb80bd192b284f2dfce5a7ebc466cd44e3155e97e418b3f72901cbfe9"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4e2685747eda9cd6ebdefa419515683193063f0c4cc8bd578cb3354ff5f622f"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e21dcd6313e29249d0247d5a6a9316ea3f0caae70cf68d2ef9fd437329f371b"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bb876fc91f33fd2a743e8818900572aeebc6dee8f704ce025e3f696fe440e33"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"273f6ecf72d4a89e7d89eac5c08eb1682909aded0c887e6e8de48abd63871ac0"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc5f3f628f6655041dbe1baef42aad161f149c3800f22fe1b9a45edb5e325ffe"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. This document\u0027s body is only the mount point \u003Cdiv id=\u0022app\u0022\u003E, so there is no content here to wrap \u2014 render the \u003Cmain\u003E from the component mounted into it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"344c57bdf5d9a667b7d5754d064c6d3651f3d9747684663e280166028a910c0f"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"error","message":{"text":"Viewport restricts zoom: user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77612e74169d58e3979910de66aebc832d3a37a9cad2e3bb9294a9b0cf590379"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Ciframe\u003E without a title: An iframe with no title (or an empty one) is announced only as \u0022frame\u0022. Add a non-empty title describing its content, or an aria-label."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"558d05399857e742bbda779836adacdf3bc74f0a8f4fc24a0d53e10573d5a294"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"error","message":{"text":"Click handler on a non-interactive \u003Cdiv\u003E: A click handler on a plain element isn\u0027t keyboard-operable. Use a \u003Cbutton\u003E, or add role \u002B tabindex=\u00220\u0022 \u002B a key handler."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e0333e05ef85a8ee2cc3b987653ce2da2570d4f3e4b982e46e656ef4264bf33"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"error","message":{"text":"Click handler on a non-interactive \u003Cdiv\u003E: A click handler on a plain element isn\u0027t keyboard-operable. Use a \u003Cbutton\u003E, or add role \u002B tabindex=\u00220\u0022 \u002B a key handler."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af68752e18bddbf43f2570704f843740403e417576343ca83eff287e84355afb"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"error","message":{"text":"Click handler on a non-interactive \u003Cdiv\u003E: A click handler on a plain element isn\u0027t keyboard-operable. Use a \u003Cbutton\u003E, or add role \u002B tabindex=\u00220\u0022 \u002B a key handler."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5145f76c01329ac2a8cc3a8e8ff62c0844df12e574f9d80bac52817ce2f2c760"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"error","message":{"text":"Click handler on a non-interactive \u003Cdiv\u003E: A click handler on a plain element isn\u0027t keyboard-operable. Use a \u003Cbutton\u003E, or add role \u002B tabindex=\u00220\u0022 \u002B a key handler."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba731412f84b7c19104591c76ec234ead9ba9600a25dfa227c212ce8fb094cf3"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"error","message":{"text":"Click handler on a non-interactive \u003Cdiv\u003E: A click handler on a plain element isn\u0027t keyboard-operable. Use a \u003Cbutton\u003E, or add role \u002B tabindex=\u00220\u0022 \u002B a key handler."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d2e88f5840e2dc0f0a0e195970ad6454d12aa65f3843b47177c56af2b061722"}},{"ruleId":"AC6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement: \u0060:focus-visible\u0060 sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/styles/main.css"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68d1c47d77b2396decf94c4ac11f4b060ab0cfc33da8e65a8ea5b0865da03a26"}},{"ruleId":"AC6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard: \u0060.bar\u0060 moves (\u0060transition: height 0.1s,\n            background-color 0.1s\u0060) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it \u2014 no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads \u2014 so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/Voice/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ccc00a7364b3266fdb2a61f697a738a1890221bdad3217a267f3a6dc38ba467"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-vuejs-accessibility) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 22 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/deployment_en.md documents the environment variable \u0060USE_FLAGOS\u0060, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/deployment_en.md"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4430221499791636d1ef831cee9b924aa0e7b0f07e4a614adfa999644e7680ed"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/deployment_zh.md documents the environment variable \u0060USE_FLAGOS\u0060, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/deployment_zh.md"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8f3cc667ee0f5edfd232cb055ffc37d7f0e9f0ed8dd386d798d71d401f9f94b"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README.md runs \u0060./scripts/run_inference.sh $MODELNAME $DATALIST\u0060, but \u0060scripts/run_inference.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README.md"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1557a374ed0243354ecb205e7122a68758883d547cc6ce4543d6444a469f423b"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README.md names \u0060vlmeval/utils/dataset_config.py\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060vlmeval/utils/dataset_config.py\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README.md"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5b43b8103b6af4dcd24849a3a820e292505e30a276e02df647989252dcb202a"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README.md runs \u0060./shell/run_inference.sh\u0060, but \u0060shell/run_inference.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README.md"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27e11ffb15e2dee9138377121ef74252f91762987de49851208c51d2bd1f8824"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README.md runs \u0060./shell/run_transform.sh\u0060, but \u0060shell/run_transform.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README.md"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c47df1c16f2503933800dd96db88131854581bad4e7161e253a0b53911b5752b"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README_zh.md runs \u0060./scripts/run_inference.sh $MODELNAME $DATALIST\u0060, but \u0060scripts/run_inference.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README_zh.md"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"091e0761c13e8b51df93de8494dd7e35106e0704cb73e9f72dc471c9c4172fbd"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README_zh.md names \u0060vlmeval/utils/dataset_config.py\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060vlmeval/utils/dataset_config.py\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README_zh.md"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e45a256ef80f6316fe022a53f9cef37def7a12e9f87b2dbda991f85bf302674d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README_zh.md runs \u0060./shell/run_inference.sh\u0060, but \u0060shell/run_inference.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README_zh.md"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d824e3c5eb9083c237d9bdca5b28a8d90af7211eea3c839859a8c62a510ecaee"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/README_zh.md runs \u0060./shell/run_transform.sh\u0060, but \u0060shell/run_transform.sh\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/README_zh.md"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed18b3fbde26951a27311cb562f1cdec29e07c9c8cda03666c28bbb8b8887432"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/README.md documents the environment variable \u0060SUB_OUTPUT_DIR\u0060, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/README.md"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bbe149caa48cc977132d9d6ef76e7d8d03c9287924f710bad30eb58d916c029"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P2","level":"note","message":{"text":"Logging is not universal: Only 3/4 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded \u2014 they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: \u0060eval_mm/vqaeval\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91a94e21d6d4d0e6a2003f94505b0b02b157176f0b24c4820f3f82b4447a97fe"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add bandit, \u0060semgrep --config=p/python\u0060, or CodeQL\u0027s python pack \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 37 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/App.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/apis/index.js, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/CallHeader/index.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/CountDown/index.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/DelayTips/index.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ExtraInfo/index.vue (\u002B31 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (485 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue:63 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue:68 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 485 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98a33de1fa76484528abc0d32938cd2269a61f461b078cea9f5df53c8d4541fd"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (414 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue:50 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue:54 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 414 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7e49e6e1dceeff0beb03c16c0c29f12d09119c8012175b2736f396b1c812ec1"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (266 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue:77 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue:64 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 1701 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b41977cf74735df24381058e5ef5e87acf2dfc13358b8759d9fae339c0b67f63"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (67 lines \u00D7 2 locations): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index copy.vue:184 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue:215 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index copy.vue"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d9eb283ff2f94d43a5fdfeb7da45f5bc52363c70c2dd38875cd221a61da7222"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3 locations): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index copy.vue:215 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue:246 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/SelectTimbre/index.vue:53 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index copy.vue"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11f5ba4637e2afc97035ccf7b3119cefff9ca03019ccd56c29111dc2914b1ef5"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useVoice.js:21 \u00B7 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/merge.js:44 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useVoice.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26204d2a49ee030ea450ae7efc189e2c83e47cd03787f0abb76f154cfc2a64d4"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function onmessage (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 14): onmessage has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44a96c05a522901cb6b28387f5cdb425a0c57497cf8038a12fb7c459c925d152"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function onmessage (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 14): onmessage has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":442}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"528aeff5c8a7a25a953c344d646bfdc9e416a9ade007a0e397867f776f8e65f0"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function onmessage (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 14): onmessage has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":367}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0daa3a6933c672919258a321aebc59596f7be3ee999e53c69091a42f9dd7e2d0"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function onmessage (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 14): onmessage has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":367}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b4831cec96bd4fb1b641988789a54fc1332ac3c7ac03c4d0f7a46a2e20010a1"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function stopRecording (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 9): stopRecording has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 9; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":368}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa2c0e57f69926318cfdb1ca65fd1f793a12041fbeafac25f556b9e9ba7aa73d"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function stopRecording (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 9): stopRecording has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 9; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"917937e9f0b030856e025aa896d271dc23c576b1272296c6b0d93c455a2620cc"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue: 950 lines of code: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue has 950 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bdd01ae48cc18f35c2119c6cb5137409a0c1845e42563c96d41b43668318fc2"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue: 945 lines of code: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue has 945 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc1e3c7dc409a80ba521cf1b2fa2d685a49a41a4df7bfada169912550ba17a6c"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue: 813 lines of code: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue has 813 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4923a7a1bbe8aa228399ebe8f00798088b1f4fb7e4271e8b848f47cb1c75608"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue: 810 lines of code: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue has 810 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5fddb3adca23b58dfb943011f3ffdad2163f322ec5675cd48d230503f094768"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue: 450 lines of code: web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue has 450 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"765c5032db2326f0801f1c156e636e2163839d610751ba8b7ff63e0970479d6c"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Test Coverage: 0% of 36 production file(s) reachable from 0 test file(s) via the import graph \u2014 \u0027production\u0027 here is the RESIDUE: every source file left once tests, tooling, generated output, config, declarations and declaration-only modules, fixture corpora, type fixtures, behaviour-free data modules, re-export barrels, registration/constant data modules and service workers are set aside, so the percentage is taken over a smaller denominator than the workspace\u0027s file count"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64e0e3511eb969fb4720b196e7d3799e1714077217351c3c56a27b50e3e21220"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test or typecheck script: test \u2717 \u00B7 lint \u2713 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53484d7d02bbf1aa1fb3d1163371a5b52fa0aa7301d11eed5ec2dc836c72924b"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~814 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"689b1965460866da35b5b903e1cf180b971747464e0fedb999b214e7a7dd89c2"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~800 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2737e95ecee03628ed348da13e6a47151e808759e9597516642b4508956e492e"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~705 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d4e62f8cc94cca9f1293e84080a28fb010eff74c77c277fc05f337d94ce10d9"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~701 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall_0105.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30dd23322c1075ed7fc9e0b34608d556d84c9d9d6c7f8f2d9a99949e0f31748e"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~288 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a02c9fcd515b216b2d277e2ab6d673253282add95b943b6d2bde00328a466f0a"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~260 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelConfig/index copy.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e72aa62469b1890aae974a9153bd2630aff88728c29ebb6229d39048e001c17"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~132 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 4 in-repo import(s) from 4 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VideoCall_0105.vue, web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/VoiceCall.vue and 1 more) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/merge.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbe529414b536d7769a919317499af9f8007a0cf59d2b6a44049b6cbdf98f95a"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~128 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44ed1b0e5b228a500244238ecf422b19dfe7c3400cb65c7cccb8b673afeee608"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~120 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/Voice/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41eeeab46b60e91853a8a770a422a9bd55cf17c1bf29fbf3cb1b7c043961cbc2"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~95 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useQueue.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"871c9279027b48e82f128f3f2ec1ccec7d0d1e3387e5bd737352ddb8eeec802d"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~91 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/utils/websocket.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05748407619785f2ba67078d0922e31e01f4fdfcedd10c6aab49cc72af5033d4"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~71 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/SelectTimbre/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d05f5c18057c5b4a89ecbe34e3f728e756e1305dbdb76e58fb63df3b5b3ba8a3"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~70 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/LikeAndDislike/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"771f4cccaf32bf83287443b8f7c138c82f6965f8160375ac07746b66fa2f3aec"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~62 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/CountDown/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c224ba03fec613b411ceb2aa228627fbdbaf3390c623ef9a9ee3b79a3e0cc7e"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~61 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useHttp.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f42dab7c36d4c1940e7c1aaaab34393a93fbf5c42894f850efd9c38dcf6d47f9"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~44 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/utils/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f27767a4af5626c4439f5f5d9609a8e8b9777373df9d13a24c28ecd66950a1d6"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~43 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ModelOutput/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8964f6e200247608fd0f4dfe8ff7dd15200466405c5cd75f63ff73c3f76c88d3"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~38 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useVoice.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61a7ec1a08bd9a5223ae05db767f50765b6a9455b9b66955157557fe153cba52"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~36 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/audioBufferToMp3Base64.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0db5e805a9a8a1eba89ebb88caae8a7715c13640d7fa7d46970c79faf6989d11"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~32 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/SvgIcon/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"376fdc4c59f0e81746cb6c5f524bc4afe54a88b7cdb28dfb8bc4fd122e292543"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~29 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/mergeMp3Base64.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7207bb788461c4fde3c1c11bf8a872d41b161804210f5bb843af1148acbfccd"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~21 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/apis/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"983fd1a9466ba2578051de929e44954503094742efbfefc3131901376a14e8de"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~19 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/IdeasList/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fd103c6f9727eb2de83621f45cc79269db6ec9e621d61bb803a7376cf24c8c0"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~18 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/ExtraInfo/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33444ec1641a3f9cf04ea701ff09ab74ce9f226eba81dbc260345de89f2dd5ab"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~18 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/SkipBtn/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fc372ff2b212bc46f9c5994905b8c6d41120b2118b047468cc511c25b07d7ed"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~18 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/enums/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af17f4a2526bc996e1ff9da73eda6cd48b83cd60a3636bdceec3dc00443bf1f4"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~16 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/DelayTips/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f5bc4ef206dcd591f0e1e8ec5a4b558e4a098aa647dfaacf2ea3a67543cae16"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~16 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b385feba9671c9ca5ec207e23670c1c8d718de6637c3340eafe68a7b22e57b29"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~10 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/index.js) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/menu/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57037b9d9f8ad0c8760a7a7166f7264d92cc01420ee1be40bcc5324501d49372"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~9 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useHttp.js) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/hooks/useRandomId.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5567448e5e3fa5a64898cc146325796534ac1094d246aa1593af652efbb32d7"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~8 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/directives/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49186348bfbcc0ba1fbcdf102134de3053ca8a61b56fdc8d7c3ef2085106f090"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~5 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/guard/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"028e50931604ee078fd59daa78e4acc1120b1743536e2a1a6a422f4b59c1be05"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~1 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/guard/index.js) \u2014 every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/router/guard/stateGuard.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cc1456972204feaa9a2c4be6db4b266a702aac093a0016b792f438c1a801f6d"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~0 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/components/CallHeader/index.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3adadbe1856d6e740e808026e341790e7be51ee71c7f724e2512bd831e592ef7"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~0 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 3 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/src/views/home/components/Chatbot.vue"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d010781abcef536a19a2e7e7a986075a9850535bc9ca64a642d1d66354b5987"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@element-plus/icons-vue\u0027: Declared in web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28a96a1eb691be8a37b03954ca5a4acf930fb75349da37e9b1c1c2d79c78b539"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@iconify-json/fluent\u0027: Declared in web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c540249e0401ac33aa7f31bfbfc0380fe2e1afda13d94640d3b8de90b5605c8"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@iconify-json/material-symbols\u0027: Declared in web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b40d8ec7305e26e3eb26f6bea3baa9e5f1171a0196734f059e87dbb387efbc07"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"note","message":{"text":"No security response headers detected: None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, \u2026) is configured \u2014 defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because \u0060nginx.conf\u0060 is committed to this repository and declares the server that serves it, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (\u22122.0 on this card.)"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/web_server/nginx.conf"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76c122a84231576d322be558cfc12cb86cba996930e8cfd17c11aa6f7656cc92"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060\u0022=\u0022 in expression1 and \u0022=\u0022 in expression2\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41aa804c45adfe06fd063d19229217a0937f60002e887fbf0533a25e9d1570f3"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060\u0027answer\u0027 in data and \u0027prediction\u0027 in data\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cmmmu.py"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63201203dc1ba844e544552da0206d468740f8d19d362eb7ab8eaeeab2c53de4"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060\u0027hint\u0027 in line and not pd.isna(line[\u0027hint\u0027])\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38a17e34f7ebdd058d48fb2f3f3e63ec0a3e31540b4d51c627c61313dc8e8e7a"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060cache_path is not None and check_integrity(cache_path)\u0060 appears character-identically in 8 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/longvideobench.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mlvu.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c701d2eec98d4adac64e75c0f778b5fc510498c8dc122685465b317b20d113fe"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060cand in line and not pd.isna(line[cand])\u0060 appears character-identically in 4 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_mcq.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/utils/result_transfer.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_mcq.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf140db178f04bc605c089897a5d57acc27aedeb905f9dbe368b1bb020812469"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060dataset is not None and listinstr([\u0027MME\u0027], dataset)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_yorn.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/minicpm_v.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_yorn.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f96376fa8e30d707e8d5bfa625778e4a72f9e9410c6053fb97eeb178cc776dfc"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060division_result_1.is_Integer and division_result_1 != 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b02e1e81fe069ced94dcefb0235e985ad0f9d53ea8a574123249aea05d4e109d"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060division_result_2.is_Integer and division_result_2 != 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":279}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ab15f57bbc2b31494df28e26c7c5f62cc29ba3f6bf3abe2113ca8add82023b2"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060expr1_sym.has(sp.Symbol) and not expr2_sym.has(sp.Symbol)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f162ff5afd6032eb145d8b297978e23cf76d65549d141469f7dd45e646dfed01"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060expression1 == expression2 and expression1 != \u0022\u0022 and expression2 != \u0022\u0022\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6c130f727545beb0377ada8f02f95b17cce395dfc22e0938b891440a459d0a0"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060file_md5 is None or md5(data_path) == file_md5\u0060 appears character-identically in 4 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_vqa.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_base.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60f4781325fd589a38f7a59b0255e02031a368030050e99ae4e1b789c366309b"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060files_cnts[1] \u002B videos_cnt == 1 and files_cnts[0] \u002B images_cnt \u003E 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py, web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":266}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2910a7d1973f44ae7d777b460fae235c9ee4690dbadf03992239273c0c2954ce"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060hasattr(model, \u0027use_custom_prompt\u0027) and model.use_custom_prompt(dataset_name)\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_mt.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference_video.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/inference.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df373fe7049f7309b2d868e292e38184a300a7cb8b10a31a178d82d314956e25"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060idx in image_map and len(image_map[idx]) \u003E 64\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc52fa004ebea3016585303fcfb993181d3d276083c04fa53b3aecbcc9407e88"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060inter1[0] != inter2[0] or inter1[-1] != inter2[-1]\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":287}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90e606748e335d9e604392c08c6def8acbc47b3590c96021b3d4f1ba4759e1d2"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060isinstance(eval_results, dict) or isinstance(eval_results, pd.DataFrame)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/run.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/tools.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/run.py"},"region":{"startLine":385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd79f152dfb0c18bce2539a69625a9f912fcf342a602a4f5b355a399c085789f"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060isinstance(item[\u0027answer\u0027], float) and math.isnan(item[\u0027answer\u0027])\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/slidevqa.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dude.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1714b7f65ffbaad909ba528f9c95ed26ae47ddcf65378124380c6f687aa656c9"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060isinstance(line, pd.Series) or isinstance(line, dict)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/text_base.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/image_base.py"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"339f0d9b78a6fbad9d20f17c15555cc251a3aaafb5c8864b5204c1d9ea1a3b81"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060isinstance(msg, dict) and \u0027role\u0027 in msg and \u0027content\u0027 in msg\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eecc670d248b796feae05721ff7e1f6a01c15dee558a22dac8f6378dbd0c1494"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060len(_chat_bot) \u003C= 1 or not _chat_bot[-1][1]\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py, web_demos/web_demo_2.6.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/minicpm-o_2.6/chatbot_web_demo_o2.6.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d758eabf93aaea8b853988087339739585b223183d8feb413fa3ca8baacc1e1"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060len(s.split()) \u003E 10 and not re.search(\u0027[ABCDE]\u0027, s)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/multiple_choice.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/longvideobench.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c5218db762fede9e2375d1ee2bd2ee10795950e0c25ec8c081ca4f164d3e9b4"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060len(st.session_state.chat_history) \u003E 1 and st.session_state.chat_history[-2][\u0022image\u0022] is not None\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 web_demos/web_demo_streamlit-2_5.py, web_demos/web_demo_streamlit.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"web_demos/web_demo_streamlit-2_5.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec7dd97e39c6e9202b007b3765c7612cdd5edc1159b0b74db6216398de787e73"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060message is not None and self.check_content(message) == \u0027listdict\u0027\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/vlm/base.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/api/base.py"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2863ad642d961fee78e047a2c484cac2bbbb14c605fe2bcf75071e8007729a3c"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060not expr1_sym.has(sp.Symbol) and expr2_sym.has(sp.Symbol)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8220a817d5857f2ef0d9f02b3f0c36692471b20d7438f0fa4bb620f0dde3c8c4"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060not expr1_sym.has(sp.Symbol) and not expr2_sym.has(sp.Symbol)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py, eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d53d157e7f0fb77a0408346624915c60f3a8f2ee79c95c35ef535dc5a47947a9"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"chat.py"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3421a05abcaeb984083e088d2994fc78b0d8a8cb59a2242b1c04fc081620e0aa"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"chat.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d4a11c4c7ba0e9f5781796a6fd98657d60fab016039fce91c0037500a5cabce"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"chat.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c1970f751e4a8759ef6d0af1ef25fdbdf08f0d111d04ab00b7838ba5a02dc9d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"chat.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a54b85738d2b23ee97ccb8cd826f215de15defe6daedfc4708b56f4fd2ad3c61"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2423fb0f39bbbe06fac581e720a277658d6e2efd727b7a0886d0e2e03d2e3b4d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1319be25c9fbbaeeb0e1bf732159b2c3536ecd72ab1b808eede2014a80a9a606"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a3d7d1772b83ad049e042b2b70f2cec236dcf280616473b1e4bc3ac4fb0aef5"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9186effaf4afc9cef848038fa0b1a23e31f6db2235f32d6e9c0efc5712168851"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28aab51ec6c0a2ce986a5465824d1d8d12b546a963b1a09da7f7d06e273961fc"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71e4b1b70b34673a0ef7909fe3e9bb64be6da0d4f6d2ed6dc49bca68b3fa35fe"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eec473aa68a088d4a43ec7dea58c7a4ac7fcaa7e28b943f32112eb0b342d3c18"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1687698a5221d0c1cac6809ce3dc08375990f3af242ea0a85003a282984cdaba"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b11db02bd2085c016ffd22cabafb56de235dc53d55f3a469e5e4f63776de0a63"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6933e917a28223ccd1a3ba66187ae8db81f3afd77e905b5bf900e1bca8eb9922"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c7e147a9ea93945ba17f2d1945fff7ff34213ed772f3bd135c9d1d331d5228b"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":357}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c1374ba1495e4181ffb0c2e8ebcf1f5aeea55c101ff4b71fa17ba3fec67e346"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmlongbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":380}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0185350fa7774a41d97099f54120bc1e5fb01a429800553e84f434635a5da74"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/miabench.py"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05c1ad318358e5f3254f1fcb1518b9ade4876c3238cab2bc0a9bc4926c2ee90f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/dynamath.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"396aa37d0589c7b4e341334ea936bae5e50c3e6a0a2ce7b5ffa2d783220802bb"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":409}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2416a9f8da7bf5f8a210efeb988d255afde04a153abe978a6d58832adeab4b21"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":418}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"363e035fca817f1fbbb8b357262758590b3bb867f5c1b33dffbcaf3174d60b24"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":427}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02b1e4308937548be049e31c01d67dadb6f4f4d2099314111583693779a6591c"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":734}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"810ca76b2f50d9d328357933fa5fe92d05ebb62a35124447a0334d4e6b060581"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5d240bf960fa149399814c44b3f5f5ad0909769f8ba097d232ddc8a13686f3f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":752}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6961dd70ac3440b42a0ec6441316b701e569b90d36cae5db775cae4d5ad3baed"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1289}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35f7325d1a0c488e99a685f649af1e3f39bc24888a9ba3ae1668c519e31e80ce"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44d8db9aa7a8ae5db2e25a0a031453480d29396a0204d52317915e5864f5d380"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1307}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5aae68b67cd8d4e5fe758c0ee01d4d6164b4365a7c7536453bc9b0df61eaa43f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1613}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e45c4142c8f67b96df9b053a1f5fa56ad5a0b92d86bf6c6f9ab353ed9f25696d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1622}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a00b56ab95e07c34507125987609b0ff11ec7dad257270116169333bc045b9a0"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/cgbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":1631}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a15121f9a7a3c39a70a75872755c88ba58cae97b2a1a0ef4a8da1ecd23d730d4"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/tablevqabench.py"},"region":{"startLine":401}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ef55d1fb6669aaceed9c325cce17b7abfcbc361292674492b58f04603232a86"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93ea9d643aee345c5217dcf7ee1e9bf40d5f2553c6e4ad1518a0df7dbd135b2b"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1082fc7302419e603719735c9afd2fb9b7e8c340b92de0d807843fc883681f53"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":217}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dab35cc23d984cc215d1f7945190d8890de9e06b6b1af71f046fa918c948a139"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b689634a2580a8419431030574f250e8da10d89358e2ce71c7b77dc125772046"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":233}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1962b072db6a2c645d26651039e11a830ccbd65824fb4133d65cfb39a43a498f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b34c5f9dbc6a69402c6bcf6f1a2dcbbde9494f291f6e4c1127af2df9776a4119"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f59178f381d47b0a7c7f3bba3b8e000457568d9416680faa3bb93ce7ea72df51"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mvbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1734aabb7f065518890e86d7668547b1dbea0a965876d2363b81fedbc4446fe3"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d121f37ed3b5412202fbf59b12c72091a4b37fe456f50b40cea3cb93a8b6da88"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0b1581ab50ec7bbe46c8abb8747fad1e2f4bce0bae8921b8de2d73f877411de"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mathv.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afc9888cdefcfa949bd6790b0a23e17f5ab8fc38efbc551dc819020bb0c8c2cc"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/kie_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d92612eb02c25ef437777b2537ded5b61a4f16f650f06706a673353786aeab12"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bf2d5697647919e62c0c91c13ef61db88462064048fec1e624ccd4200fddaeb"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/ccocr_evaluator/doc_parsing_evaluator.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f355a531beb4c78d64512bad57b480cff249abcfb82f0fa2d52f281cdad7510"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/vlm.py"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44324de2e3c78600c96d784836d2a102365cc5228897f0bb2e68d9d9e6ca4d6c"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7484969cab9ac0a4fe0885a92fb0f91c6527989a84b9f6b6ec96269438c72a2e"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":290}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2e445e0001310a1466a4155039d655ff9d9e8c60d67f81fc7a0aae3e769c315"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warning\u0060 at line 102 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.warning(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.warning(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdad2c870afcf32aeead7c262c7337b036c538d597f3dd5d547e1124677ddd93"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060error\u0060 at line 170 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.error(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.error(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"403fdfd5fd8905ec98c1e095c6feb043d3c4fa500274ac936b4fa863c558e72d"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060error\u0060 at line 212 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.error(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.error(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fc9e6796dd23ee5368cd4e6f77c7eb4b06732cc081e5007b96bea32d8a06e87"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 220 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.info(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.info(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29ea5c5c1044f275a04af3c7a3ca31ab5a00e29e3a7834be613dbdd4eb824ec0"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warning\u0060 at line 212 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.warning(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.warning(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7e632c9ad70dc054c91ed6205d8cf5e1ac9812cda8714aaa87c1e95f32366b5"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warning\u0060 at line 220 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.warning(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.warning(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/file.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f740ede7dfc4c3fcfe69612ef71382c91bdd409fc39e3969dead8079229260ad"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warning\u0060 at line 150 is handed an f-string as its message, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the record is filtered out. Pass the values beside a constant message instead: \u0060logger.warning(\u0022order %s moved to %s\u0022, order_id, status)\u0060 with the standard library\u0027s \u0060logging\u0060, which keeps the message and its arguments apart on the record, or \u0060log.warning(\u0022order moved\u0022, order_id=order_id, status=status)\u0060 with structlog."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"finetune/dataset.py"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e00e28da24f21d590e1a21f059c6081685835db3e308ade2aab49bd6d75ab694"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060expression_equal\u0060 swallows every exception into \u0060return False\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/mmmath.py"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a68b12480735a9ef630906dda9b149b5f9b0042dd6b332f2e1c0d6f6e90b4204"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060is_correct\u0060 swallows every exception into \u0060return 0\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/mmniah.py"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"937fc60a54c7e9517f2d824b9f2dc5c5621af337780530ae2bba5eaea32fbbdd"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060expression_equal\u0060 swallows every exception into \u0060return False\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/dataset/utils/olympiadbench.py"},"region":{"startLine":309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19a3ab291d57d0186fda11979481915f8bd5b3bb86dd8d8263297160a7f0889d"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060istype\u0060 swallows every exception into \u0060return False\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eval_mm/vlmevalkit/vlmeval/smp/misc.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b63c3c5d9829e00a6e84724b9542fd626f850f35e0088e3d7238d6b186649f5"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-326","guid":"7ee78bef-7589-f65f-a9d7-619f3485e844","name":"Inadequate Encryption Strength","shortDescription":{"text":"Inadequate Encryption Strength"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/326.html"},{"id":"CWE-327","guid":"e51910ff-67b5-3c51-aa3d-92837d9eab90","name":"Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-444","guid":"8989da48-caaf-a955-b9ef-53767db527d8","name":"Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request Smuggling\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request Smuggling\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/444.html"},{"id":"CWE-502","guid":"f7d3b296-aac0-5c5a-b706-e07faba26c36","name":"Deserialization of Untrusted Data","shortDescription":{"text":"Deserialization of Untrusted Data"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/502.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-939","guid":"12397742-f2c4-8254-8012-482c3356c551","name":"CWE-939","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-939"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/939.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"},{"id":"CWE-95","guid":"400bba4e-483c-5c50-a695-114fa9168003","name":"Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code (\u0027Eval Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code (\u0027Eval Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/95.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":128,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}