{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ThrowError.swift.throwError (cognitive 23): ThrowError.swift.throwError has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (22 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77a28be915959b69210da2418ca234f769a1f5d88bfdd57b924d3d7b732c7c4d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RaisesException.swift.exceptionMatchesNonNilFieldsOrClosure (cognitive 16): RaisesException.swift.exceptionMatchesNonNilFieldsOrClosure has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/RaisesException.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"674a3376766cd9e252f633b137374fbe0d6c33e62e0aaa16c1eaca5f7ca34579"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (8 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:353-373 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:443-463 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:477-497 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:567-587 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:458-478 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:548-568 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:582-602 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:672-692 \u2014 These 8 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":353}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee4cd5d33b0a6cd7864cb72af278cd4a9638a3c0e4c1b4a391fed20e9a5d9fb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (8 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:377-397 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:410-430 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:501-521 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:534-554 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:482-502 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:515-535 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:606-626 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:639-659 \u2014 These 8 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"363febb182a4799fc9d62f7541b8e79bcb22b81aaa9e0450b75fb529c29b0f3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift:4-18 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift:23-39 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ElementsEqual.swift:5-20 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ElementsEqual.swift:26-42 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f777837f1c2f80e239b608bebc92c83ddc9fefc40d5c33763a64b815f23acdc5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:9-38 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:57-87 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:9-38 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:57-87 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2a6bc0540a3cf4f4728a92c32a29b449efcec369fdd3f9ded203d9a2b978ef7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:68-88 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:134-154 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:68\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc727f4b438cf899bf266cce445f0d732beceb7008ef41a8ff6249c53ae39aea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/AllPass.swift:46-64 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/AsyncAllPass.swift:46-64 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/AllPass.swift:46\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/AllPass.swift"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46e47ff5ecdc65ac26297cafd896d1c906539c433d761489a01d14bb9f7264a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:100-117 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:100-117 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:100\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09004acfde98058b4fff7ddde0e899a7932852481a8fb98ee9c2bf2d6b19709e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:18-34 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:105-121 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift:18\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeResult.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afd0b615cc51442d82a83e591ad0343cf9eb099f5d4b91bf7c116e004bec8210"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:47-62 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:93-108 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:47\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c6ad8998a5b712b6cf444f6ebd5a96dce4fab01667a172158b2758de09bd12d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:355-368 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:479-492 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:460-473 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:584-597 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:355\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6db57eeae2c4a78b2fc82872962b5082d5ce95326abbffd7a0337d7593f1b620"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:379-392 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:503-516 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:484-497 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:608-621 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:379\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":379}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35f6974459c2aafdb2c56601fae128ec865fc745bca739bbbce367d5e93a97d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:412-425 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:536-549 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:517-530 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:641-654 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:412\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":412}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29c4de95ade7c6a4fd03a8308d8d9071efca60a903411182e979648eb7f23f05"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:445-458 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:569-582 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:550-563 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:674-687 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:445\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":445}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e45c93d9bb229e93fb8bcceb0177bf3a18803938f7b19660036d4f043d662a52"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:95-108 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:225-238 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:330-343 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:95\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b25275ebc160bd5c6666ca81742c63f2befee5bd379b159bc31b27d4c999da2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:121-134 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:251-264 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:356-369 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:121\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e689bbf093a4c9db900643f2a93e9b7586aaa316e3de09431ec2b8f64bd08b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:155-168 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:285-298 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:390-403 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:155\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e493a06caa6fc8910578c72d7dfc58e7808b39b57dcfba286cf8f757893c35cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:189-202 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:319-332 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:424-437 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:189\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"716bda4dcb1f030096aa2409ab4d6c203030cd37892e1f0fe2dde30e1a03310c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:26-38 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:75-87 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:26-38 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:75-87 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:26\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46865eb0b1d5a64b255b91b7d03badf8739c928acc2e7ae1185a3f164fc291cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Adapters/AssertionRecorder\u002BAsync.swift:25-33 | Sources/Nimble/Adapters/AssertionRecorder.swift:82-94 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Adapters/AssertionRecorder\u002BAsync.swift:25\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Adapters/AssertionRecorder\u002BAsync.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0171629e196acf843b1e17d306089d7e01f3cbc1d8b4ecfa13ea7714e9af5242"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 6): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:93-104 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:188-198 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:223-234 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:318-328 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:328-339 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:423-433 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:93\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32ef0056dafa9d56bd645c1d65f7fca835d439e578acd60f7172fa1fcb9c0cc4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 6): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:119-130 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:154-164 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:249-260 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:284-294 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:354-365 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:389-399 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:119\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7f8426e42d69de7260f48fd5aab354ae437605b96d7e85853daa2643e4d420c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/Equal.swift:29-40 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/Equal.swift:121-132 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/Equal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69e89363df9d52b01de877f65ab0c5d7a14fc43987f6b4e8c81d2d17894e4d08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:201-211 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:236-246 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift:201\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ThrowError.swift"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5c394207127e9331d1bc7f06fe0249cefe98eee69091af4f8a7ac6bf7299862"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:355-364 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:445-454 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:479-488 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:569-578 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:355\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8a42300e01a8553767941b5b401d193d8a9d267c2bfbc06f7b5dbe7cdcba65c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:379-388 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:412-421 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:503-512 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:536-545 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:379\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":379}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"919f876e22c056e68bd0f82ef1388371168a9a5b712a2d3accd2ebe9a9533f32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:460-469 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:550-559 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:584-593 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:674-683 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:460\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":460}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e633ccd7e820194285f3d32af5849f5d73ec5b4e43ebafdcde9e7736a5b05de2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:484-493 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:517-526 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:608-617 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:641-650 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:484\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060style\u0060 to \u0060.toMatch\u0060 in one and \u0060.toNotMatch\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":484}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a181636ad8a5f1065244f389ae05cdffd1fcc53c4dc069422c60c8c87765eea1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift:42-51 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:13-22 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift:42\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54f83418677ea544cb09536855c82af08d189256aebb7d73e9faee40f91ff4d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift:27-36 | Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift:63-72 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift:27\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33ca9783445311cfbf2367ab9a2ae83861f87578ce54ac8867dcb17a889c6d4b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:16-24 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:65-73 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift:16\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAllOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f983c0f94b4164bcd2eff0fedb367b0a41731439f067890288a1b56f5dd972b0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:16-24 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:65-73 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift:16\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7707559ebe75d2d7581c5975260c9a22c8d094cb9d8d8677be4dd61b092e304c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeWithin.swift:3-10 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeWithin.swift:14-21 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeWithin.swift"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76ceb6c7932182976ff73b2f300450a33be9fed618a7e654f3b1491d61ce8af9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift:7-13 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift:28-34 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ElementsEqual.swift:9-15 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/ElementsEqual.swift:31-37 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift:7\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeginWithPrefix.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7ed6bdfcb7902458a9e068f4e5dfacafde7646a68cef52b52bf8ccee110dc7f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift:89-95 | Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift:158-164 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Requirement.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7438976eb77361290ac7a3adfb2dcdfee4b5b76b082682fe6a7936b5bdc66a79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:7-13 | Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:65-71 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:7\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9fbeb44e7a27d2cccc67bc267eeb94e1e28a181b3c79bc10cefde69c66858c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:21-27 | Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:81-87 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:21\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"146c0937b20867589827907213b1a236dc393a54901572dc66e7aa1ebd299ccd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:35-41 | Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:97-103 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:35\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d9ff9449e104e0c131b5c828f00e09f5776bf41348292a917d8e708358a0cea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:49-55 | Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:113-119 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift:49\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"153b9c77e1182bcc095f66fcff306f2ccc096d0523b500fbe7b94aef2ad831fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:93-98 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:119-124 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:223-228 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:249-254 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:93\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a631d8afe100f420b6b3c7ee20d7659ebf594290c7280e95e61c8aeaa9c4b65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:3-8 | Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:40-45 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:3\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"729ad15442fa80387d016d917786591802b6594bf6d3958a75b8da42841f758a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:12-17 | Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:50-55 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:12\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c3c341c4fc9172f52e7e66ee1a359e8c89d42d56d5420c2c4d0f897ad29849a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:21-26 | Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:60-65 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:21\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b13ecd52d6699094f83ac35128023905117a47d5a4dca71eb3d98d23c58f4cbe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:30-35 | Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:70-75 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift:30\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0ccdc128401ca24e7af9ba40d904046d6411a587867836178bbd832c280a8d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:328-333 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:354-359 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:328\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":328}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6382bbef124d55fdc42af86d8579ee3a096fbf0131b4e48eb38162dcb2486d8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:154-158 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:188-192 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:284-288 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:318-322 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift:154\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91fb1bb83537255bb7917470d670cb7b76e42617878427f7d7d6a36f50675d7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift:188-192 | Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift:283-287 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Expectation.swift"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08dea8290653ae544b05bdaf765783daa1711f537f6fb29730e3ed408caeb924"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:389-393 | Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:423-427 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift:389\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":389}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf758fc4616cd66cd84070efe312d5167c7af6ab2a6f0b7071490e802f7d430f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleSwiftTestingHandler.swift:11-15 | Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleXCTestHandler.swift:17-21 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleSwiftTestingHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2d803bde3f053419d7c0981ec85fedaf53feded8aab1ef4e3a61cc9b5e8f6fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeAKindOf.swift:60-64 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOf.swift:50-54 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeAKindOf.swift"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68231ed802c67fe001e73f005608abd22ac9bde25572c02f51b3737b432ad8a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeGreaterThan.swift:42-47 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeGreaterThanOrEqualTo.swift:43-48 | Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeLessThan.swift:41-46 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/BeGreaterThan.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c71acec0af6ee72521ec136df676d49c1a085079b5c9445540aa947e4d95c71f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:23-40 | Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:131-146 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:23\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf8112a83e8989f08206b5bb672ca9506aed27f60f092624ddad4f363b4b9f50"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:45-59 | Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:151-165 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift:45\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/NimbleSharedTestHelpers/utils.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27dde6611fd6147b1f27db924db6181dfdbec3acd5206889ebf0d960cf7a8d4f"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: Nimble: Nimble: abstractness 0.11, instability 0.00, distance 0.89 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5898470203db53237f63705d20364ec2242f769d2e15b49646ecacb7e583020"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low coverage: Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleXCTestHandler.swift: 30.3% line coverage (10/33)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleXCTestHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46df72aa3fe9f23fc956b4c8a3c6627cb7f545a15682891f540e19ef158e6f20"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low coverage: Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BAsyncAwait.swift: 45.0% line coverage (49/109)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/DSL\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6087788106c9ce2812c6ae506c6c863194694d0f5f782fa3498d63330aad87d8"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low coverage: Sources/Nimble/Matchers/Equal\u002BTuple.swift: 40.0% line coverage (30/75)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/Equal\u002BTuple.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cde0d375e38f4448e74fae7ba573a984034cd0d0640a7020ec9eead8dc738af"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low coverage: Sources/Nimble/Matchers/HaveCount.swift: 48.4% line coverage (30/62)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/HaveCount.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6a5083c2bc5353621f78b146a996869289a3d1f27cb0058b8c035805635ff33"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low coverage: Sources/Nimble/Utils/AsyncTimerSequence.swift: 49.2% line coverage (29/59)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Utils/AsyncTimerSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3caa57a6b1a3fd306f82d37b7e7b574f852ea39ed7350d522aed2b000180d3d8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42e13c22c10c28cbc8d5112d6ba9d1be193119b9a062a8b935aa42e9c7631fae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46cc440fa33097aebc4d4d48bdab103bb8b0393f2bf7c65c8645ec79e70adbcc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f586794f29ee35931ffc5853371a1a10734283b0ee38773c5b64d805d0242633"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapPositiveCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b26783b76daed2388249ca0b1064947a926498c0af46705a8fd11541cee48f6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapNegativeCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0101b3f4439a2e8e01e1ac1ced4a260bc096cabe4f9071aaa1293cc6e1b8c655"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpressions: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bf72843e1d9d9c2b373f3a1bda3e96863374deb9814d73c8265ab1cf863da2d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallySyncCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"630b1f33936e1769a67804d87991f7c5d261cdf94e51e809b85b5c0511bee518"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWaitingOnMainTask: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03a8292af551ca0e5ca7a1a82bd12eb4484509cb28ee316ca94692f1ac2298b4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyOnMain: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ae78ebe609a2c97908e83e62527aece662bc024d89a08dfe091750862e3acb2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyMatcherIsAlwaysExecutedOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cc2aad15b4a53ce29f5d13f7b5e957fd3781e2c6ee562a24c93935bbd7b9ed7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithSyncExpectationAlwaysExecutesExpressionOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c03b6309df7bcb2d7c0bbab4cd26886a3aa0fac5735a595689897b9ebb89a39"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpectationDoesNotNecessarilyExecutesExpressionOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28d370808d16cb64a7f3bd6b03cd6d2df00213bf2993f3f3b1940a97c56b1b56"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpectationDoesExecuteExpressionOnMainActorWhenTestRunsOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a476115a76d4fe4b03f6cc9ff45dbd87839b7a801b128476f1c16d6be227eb91"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithCustomDefaultTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24358eeae89eede0abe8b0d3852839cc8a619cf9d594b9d92bd264cc83924dd9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSubjectUnderTestIsReleasedFromMemory: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0775e736a34b084f2f88e9a469969ce82d529f245b41d5a9a989ecb5e131f403"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1944e25f80faa08115f008d58313759808f23bdac99c527eb50147c11b25c35f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f593f33fe7d295ce9238798fbcfaeef2c1fe78827c7c11c9d336368df8aad98"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":251}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30d9646cf168535565712973b50a5b862b302a7431c2216c7af09788d9042a3d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6745af38de84387db06919540fc3d21d4d20a8bdd33435fe5473fc957d50a2f7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bb6838dec593d4918c4f7601872d85ee72e42db710f7e5ace290d1cab147315"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67ef16a93bc84a6de0deb81139f4d03ec842707667d218a2f4d6e558384094ed"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccc895780336c26ca137a15b84f30b5692fcc3ecc35cd90be349a6a8b20cd19c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpressions: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b15cab86e5b6db1cc6ea661b173e037f5a913ebb0cabd07847ba225a9366dad"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallySyncCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f418af0318ebcafce05ddfe2cce1b1efab70956467ff23b54293d94aab85a92"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWaitingOnMainTask: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15483e05ed116e58b487922d504c5fda2769101fc11add6b8fe3776d0e54bca6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyOnMain: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5893a5aeca5abf2b5e75b1547aeb77597acbeb472802ed9649df599e55fe02ca"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyMatcherIsAlwaysExecutedOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ac883378b20f00d9d72e61cf3aecc8fdc17d419ca868d3f6fc7e76d89eda35a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithSyncExpectationAlwaysExecutesExpressionOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"653bf61786ad071dd43800c5b7bd2823fbd00657c4d6e99193fb7a83f04e1b78"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpectationDoesNotNecessarilyExecutesExpressionOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97dcb52866109e3b318d564c44e26c6165505a99685e967130d733fefc216a75"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithAsyncExpectationDoesExecuteExpressionOnMainActorWhenTestRunsOnMainActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"295b84d9a1f77e2350464b419e268c649c0c91cff698144c4d1b5d4afd435526"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithCustomDefaultTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d34618667c6d1f7996dd44790b19d13d5881bec4a447f2bb4571ec796bcc7f9d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilWithCustomDefaultsTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f25d021f33d258f8da1b24fc126c4f0e146709c6d8abc053abb6ae5b27092365"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"705c15aed304b841e4df7ce0fa14fc21836f0fd615b0fc1c1177a5a5ab4e0cdf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilUsingSendable: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f223d24ba8ed575dbcf33b8745b6e179c3471503394f81569fbfa3e799192fb3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilTimesOutIfNotCalled: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1de97d454bc7f6d656c646c3f59f87ed5c12b8c9c608df3e1d01fb3814b734f5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilTimesOutWhenExceedingItsTime: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c84314f09219b8b2647f153ce2c74ccc410a24afa8521d11041a71e3638de1b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":234}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ea5056c070eb6dd96d38625f69bf396694bda4fe368866f360b93c50751a442"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilDetectsStalledMainThreadActivity: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3effee5b20439bc801b43ce74258f735708263b951d62ef857c7bc4bb6360e5c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilErrorsIfDoneIsCalledMultipleTimes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13e68c582bfb327e3a256b6fc3f49772c77e2785b584bd9a80665fb042462ff0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilDoesNotCompleteBeforeRunLoopIsWaiting: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":265}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca3603085a94b8a6dfeaba8289626f66491680d0f526ec0d0bd126e9dcc130ae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilNestedMainQueueAsyncCalls: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14dfba71033e99606287db618ddf338083b3a566a7d0e9d1e27f2d5f324e6f51"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilOperationQueueWithMainUnderlyingQueueAndBarrier: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":313}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f33d67f8ab7698b1150d49f4c6a92c24e1e1a7d1396eb730e3c341360672445"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedMainAsyncWithOperationQueue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":327}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d87dee23921c019bdaf9b8f8a9c565aa41926fe63119a8391b594018451b2cb3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedBackgroundAsyncWithOperationQueue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01f79e07a3f7dea4fdf83aed0bc565985bded70d9b2fe56b096550770832a94d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSubjectUnderTestIsReleasedFromMemory: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":375}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f98297e99d6209b9ddc8e6af81abc6c39736218e36905767f70b3e32d4d0ee2c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":392}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22eea9b4b5df160c9d0c17eebeff4baa6fbba917e6bbfdf2e8fb230a5499740d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":401}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ab90a054a41d64f0a42ac5f4c6d0e481eb86f41b4b539ad7a8d019edb211583"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":425}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"554a55ee9a6db259951934a9cd2d6f0e262f5c81c0a2e912d6932469a8407c6d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncAwaitTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":434}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6241c8ff13d18aeefb385a391ba0cee2b47b08e564d9c4c3cbfbf2814092bc37"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOutputsVoidAtSpecifiedIntervals: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncTimerSequenceTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe24d44b3abdbac4e4273f2006d530bcf54c4ddc63d7b15a15d5e7be92e82526"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOutputsVoidAtSpecifiedIntervals2: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncTimerSequenceTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17bc1081ce8ffbe7c3b606051e6df7bdf464111ddcd07174022220edfdf65f1c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOutputsVoidAtSpecifiedIntervals3: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/AsyncTimerSequenceTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d66534db07a39f7eefb31b981f9333d1cdb4c9483dbbe875e7f3dad52af42de"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectAutoclosureNonThrowing: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b8102ca122f731d5d8897c0eeee3ceff961f347378f54bddd71969a645dc8c2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectAutoclosureThrowing: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7b11509dff3bf6079b0b90384fa6fbcbf06f57e8882b5ff91f619478edd1caa"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0aa42b888c1df30c78eb4cde241b61cfd2279ab92d3efc4a5c97e1f5d41b7e5d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectAsyncClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4458294024394b988eef485f684d0def2332b926443e52b311ce594360e0fb0b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectCombinedSyncAndAsyncExpects: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed8511a460299ad37478dd9faa6020646208105dddd43d716072011948371a9b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireAutoclosureNonThrowing: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2f1aa0d6c10b867a9589e90107986a7f3b17c1d8c0c4d4ee97eada650475655"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireAutoclosureThrowing: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e4e67a092158c1370fab7a1184b8a98fe0f8fb8346b1b94372a059439d1c03c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fd77c68491567bc225b094796cb7e85826efb471b456c29f4ab4f1a917036e5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireAsyncClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dea387a5df8f2ab4e786b6a5077aeefdd90aa06d30a94fe83fbb2560813a6e18"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testExpectCombinedSyncAndAsyncRequirements: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa54703d7895594de46376b6134737aa913da061d521447ffad3ff01a5adf823"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequire: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41091b1a4486f3e7343420751ad39f70dafbb8cc8a451e16e8846cf21e0c867d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireWithCustomError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51f0577c10ccd3d8be733980b5d25b7c6911803df5b251ddc20f075f9f80169a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncRequireWithCustomError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f4b89e73c19f7bc3f21b4e25a8a3f9392f2e2412fc9c3fc35eeaa541f72b89f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testUnwrap: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d7f989acda76001c27771281edcf7307aaff768b7661eb6e75a85db05da3369"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testUnwrapAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71502cd67f3eeaa7ce5c760ceb9ec531681d296e230eed0f5ea799555a1f05a7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testRequireFail: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/DSLTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5ae1f3b0f8dde53bfc0f345315db3dac3e6a985d251e051f082fd7480013b9b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testUnexecutedLogsAnError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/OnFailureThrowsTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e99118e930ec82a79967a5c2055664a60e0bc245d209ddf060bca2e38186a450"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassedDoesNotThrow: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/OnFailureThrowsTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c58807c21cb351fc5d3356bea23927f5514b7cdd2edc48df477c9affc4fcdc3c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailedThrowsAnError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/OnFailureThrowsTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb616972593269738d8daed472a333eb73fa5c21ca2930045493e91ab146c501"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMixedThrowsAnError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/OnFailureThrowsTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35f326835df6224c957a79a0074c452b77f33a94adc21989ed13a548f0e0b409"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8dacd10e4dd89a56d0ff7c5a263bd2929c3cb65938de9472fb32230fbdc98b8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55f38115f123b619d353ce90155136f56497136cb57261321f832168e297351d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapPositiveCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6df310ca02baee9e78cf3c26985644d0e0e49a32b0111269821bbbcec38f1b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapNegativeCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0ca6a0212085f0e132cdfb326912ddca813ef84078d64d03754cf401903f3d0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallySyncCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"703d1e401fe38fc709657d137b52f727eccab46cca6084bda7d77632f0b77d68"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithCustomDefaultTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd20b873e340c67012800d1484896daf55bb1de89c6fd05fc9db8a83517a66b2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyAllowsInBackgroundThread: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35db15299289e24be18b74682e103b2e51ffad6be57fcf0aac9e22689de4f5d5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSubjectUnderTestIsReleasedFromMemory: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9689491fda9446932623b58536235f8ce3b65c19031240ef04447c9eaa0baf7d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f808235d9f570cf3d87d957fa4f0bc7791ffcf37db31e6c49bfb7dd8d04bd6a9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"383c830d00ff78d2c27c6871e81ee3acc1e9371cb92622a9ae5453d8d56092ac"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5dea35d656ca216502cbb0e13b84ac2c4adae3554564427397d27fc47116b815"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afdfcda6f156876048c6f437962b4308c59e7e71ff2fcef4192a87f879354853"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"049b8a22924efe508179ee8278c49b37042b1d3cc3a7ff84785a8bbc67068569"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPollUnwrapMessageAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efc98f38281b7704b81c61ebb4f3037ecbcb26a50d4186d8e04b7c6aec613835"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c297feecf93c03d4246057a67a956141b525f28bb2e7915055f2820979893a8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c832f527a277bc24773bcc54c3d3f7fa430b22e1ededf59c6006bb6016ee946f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallySyncCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35796fb09dcd9a2643c2515130e33a031f9cf7b45b7d59c268128bcc06caa067"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyWithCustomDefaultTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e63feba12687f41ea0beabf0264d48adc9945809ca91df308908b1d52b4d513b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilWithCustomDefaultsTimeout: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff67695f993014bde69dcc303145a71e963b0577e66f1e986edd23458c51c6a7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4c41c3c34291c6e4412c5f7e8aee1226dfd3317ec9588159ff4cddf0882ca5c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilTimesOutIfNotCalled: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"695e237d04a1e20b16e65faaa6b79abc5ff1f5985e33e82afcb5e6ba68d7a6dd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilTimesOutWhenExceedingItsTime: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"421225d84b0780bb832d8388dbced5ab2c4d0cc179c09ea4f51ba11642cdb33a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"136597056799830b75c0a57a4692e10d0bdb2ca4329b21a3f3198c93c467cc34"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverDoesNotFailStalledMainThreadActivity: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79c4ac9aa05b6fae41433b07258c6edc7634f24f7f6bce051707fa2fe09e7c04"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysDetectsStalledMainThreadActivity: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22edd95f4e7d49fce1c2f345a3bcc244ed9e631d76ccd8092a4b887512a0ce7a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCombiningAsyncWaitUntilAndToEventuallyIsNotAllowed: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b227c2bd7e3e56dddb53625c279e0567fe806567584179b99326202e2a6a12a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilErrorsIfDoneIsCalledMultipleTimes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46967c885b61e2ab002612cb992512bfac829b45ba168d27c1dc93b8c82d82d1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilDoesNotCompleteBeforeRunLoopIsWaiting: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":187}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a91785fefa9baffcc39a15e740166efa83b3982828eb72976d0eb0edc1e2275"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilNestedMainQueueAsyncCalls: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":222}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53cda154bb270eb41a0858c085d78ed82da37135d293ce94fd144b939a4ed9ae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilOperationQueueWithMainUnderlyingQueueAndBarrier: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":234}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c6f73b00caa80740e812de2f1d9c85e416a4eddcacf012ae6a21dda90b28543"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedMainAsyncWithOperationQueue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0642bd5b8015f7f7f73aa3e80a36754fa1482c14665b9d9186a6425c1c1065f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedBackgroundAsyncWithOperationQueue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d47692b3fb3443ba1aa21fb2b03c57bdbebe291efd99a9855f7964246450d451"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testWaitUntilAllowsInBackgroundThread: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":290}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e4762e857665d5ab023c01c7265fbaa83c584520f40793d216ac5532f818fd3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyAllowsInBackgroundThread: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6cd9b28b0fb9b4f258535fba3cff27a4decb04bcd125c86703edb823af95d90"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSubjectUnderTestIsReleasedFromMemory: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":324}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cba06e0e9dbcdb8cad8e852ed8db0816c7e6b8d497e1e3fd825f965eec30594a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":341}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4042c943b8e3115a5ff62e1dc135d218f83f2f55aeb176f7d53eca06a374ba60"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNeverNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":350}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2f697d672fa186b29b437c1eefbb36c955d7cc4002f018ffa4abe0442232b0c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65d54fba53fa2e2b6a1f1e896601156ea0fbcfb30ef8cca04e19e01e1adad0f0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToAlwaysNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PollingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d933c3837a435ebdf7b6c73991c1a3663d28ffbd107f6875191dbf0837be4fe"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDefineDefaultMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61b3122595ecdce025b9b0128d6159921afbd13a88da25b761fbb8eb1364fd00"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDefineNilableDefaultMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5469eb3049d4a1cb6cb51b2de2258771e869bcd3186085a50c356d98e41078ed"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSimpleDefaultMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ce7b6e37cdc5ed89c250b408e4979745dc85f0ed598dd0601195efb581d7d0f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSimpleNilableDefaultMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/PredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76898b957472ebb4ddee8e94eb656d19141f86274437b86131b060ac5db00597"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testUnexecuted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/StatusTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83448635bed1e57873b747e388796acf6fd3a8bf6fb6447b9dc0997790fdcfa7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSingleExecution: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/StatusTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c06a505e2cd20551da93b502ad4bd09ae6f6532a0b87b8c0c4ad308f269d180d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChainedExecution: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/StatusTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a52da2ee2decda2c19bd6e853ada410ebf98aeb77218ddd910533f728f6bdbb9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/StatusTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78cf8ea144b4cb448998c2e8c1b46dd0fc643df4d59e0529f47ca334893f8973"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAlsoRecordsErrorsToXCTest: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SwiftTestingSupportTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e901ea60043fd5c8f657033a16eeb252a84940a69b511a6ca9a807ed68654cdc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAlsoRecordsRequireErrorsToXCTest: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SwiftTestingSupportTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08ea61b1b7f992e56c94ad088ee5999d8054da3e2639c329b8a291768955f9ee"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailAlwaysFails: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9d6b4577ccb787b41de5cabda6dfa29494733ac5572d5b15aa318d67e21eddd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testUnexpectedErrorsThrownFails: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ac335279899bbab82c6ac56d301da4f8f0838de7a7ea7bce90d2301fd3ddd9c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToMatchesIfMatcherReturnsTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94c0c93b7342fa3d0140639bfd409c1b9d89cf478fd41eb9b83d490eb256c95d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToProvidesActualValueExpression: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f554b527e27a155cc262a9b5d641bdf44ab6dbc679646b7e0ef48755a8222a9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToProvidesAMemoizedActualValueExpression: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8d899757fd6acca5190d9df41b0ce0512d1fa4574a06b6cbcab6ef8c69cf5ef"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToProvidesAMemoizedActualValueExpressionIsEvaluatedAtMatcherControl: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16faff905f38f5295fa86921c81a6d8880c53aa63085405f5ed242ed4d91320c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToMatchAgainstLazyProperties: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9701577505dc78f47e84b676ceaff0329373271abecfea97d632eefa85da12f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotMatchesIfMatcherReturnsTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04a5149cbaa5492b2395982090de846b7105687e53ad8f9b74eb5fe4878063dc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotProvidesActualValueExpression: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcb43dca07dd0c31b6a7067e6742e8dca2fa425fb8e7eb650e6cddaf0cf462cb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotProvidesAMemoizedActualValueExpression: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c274c0b5883724c09f063cab648144a3ee3728581bca33e014c28a59195c401b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotProvidesAMemoizedActualValueExpressionIsEvaluatedAtMatcherControl: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e36442137e1b091629f6adb707846ac8cbc3ef7ff671c0475cc6b07d91c6974"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3898980e9e21f8e1969f4a99221ce5b057d85ee06bb4b1cc28f43ac1304caae1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd263faeb6459acf6fc270401c130d5530993d0329bba18436e346d93b5633f4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNotToMatchesLikeToNot: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f2c8eefaa247c0f5b902988f29eff9e5ba6a28aa8ef21c1e15ed54a93669cbf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChain: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8df38d107fd2be0e12f433e2270a78199e9fdd77a25247d17a50fea2f6ffb573"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChainFail: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/SynchronousTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5037bee64850b4de09f457d7bf03a5fbe21206881ce0feb8695069bd27901c09"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToMatcher_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"305733b078f0d742ab2a54e36ddc2d59db24aaab47e5975d04b1604b0b565af7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNotToMatcher_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1165da70691c25d4810440468f43a60c1362c21b8ed43cd2b0066137e1b00f0c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotMatcher_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331f44c6dc5ed9544c7c340e7ead8832d14d61e385566d84037042d88f86abcf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyMatch_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"401149e5d0511172b6552602cd03d6c69c4a3a9c56663f3a7e920082a2954319"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToEventuallyNotMatch_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd277ca07f4588c11f86d67f0698fcb5ddd22325e05759b1c91b8f9639a4d3c6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToNotEventuallyMatch_CustomFailureMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/UserDescriptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce545af29d2eab35b0fe2305e47302d7aafd445b959b28a561d5b75f0e82a24a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncEqual: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Helpers/AsyncHelpers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4ce7cbee77bce801e09a3087a5370df8c480f09322ae469e5ce9cae6d305965"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContain: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Helpers/AsyncHelpers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"390cc0da984b6db1076b2e500189e3a3ee1194d95a81878ee8afa803b2fc40f9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncBeCloseTo: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Helpers/AsyncHelpers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24407de9d0185741a463aa9609a8eb114eb95633b6294a54a887ded6d7912e01"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassArray: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c7261f7dafe69791fd74721ccef799dbc69ef30dcb77e3666de8202baf71201"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassMatcher: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88a4ee477c4d9b70976b4f0afa012b96193e000babe7007c6ff2032f3965f360"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassCollectionsWithOptionals: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6ffefd54638b28ed8b9e5ccab9604c39445701d788474af0d85c7bb236de5f8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassSet: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ea7c0eaf7e09ab963744d962b5978a6ad4708dd360cbfde30725541e348e6af"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassWithNilAsExpectedValue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3b26c6e7f8fe8edee9f799bf775ff12fc36b5528a216e501a9379b6cb3a410b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAlwaysFail: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AlwaysFailMatcher.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00ad8a9a806f5e0e64a128c8c15c847de3a781e5135df60142ccbc318ab72570"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncAlwaysFail: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AlwaysFailMatcher.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"061cd30704b2e31dc09ee6f905d613ed140f714a1e30b929b6b8d313af59b661"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassArray: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncAllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a51822775183ca8958e00b7f4b2b2ec543613a61fb9c9846ac989221d25ba8f7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassMatcher: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncAllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d79f88fdba6720b325efad2322befc442888d0c12baf11e5bc157283ff9ea692"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassCollectionsWithOptionals: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncAllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3396377f13065f33b4320f72ae7ae6ec1278d2f80a3ef707262333671179ab24"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassSet: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncAllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62262858640ca0d0eac6076f655e648a7de2a5094d94da8ccea6ca661d0d7519"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAllPassWithNilAsExpectedValue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncAllPassTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63c1d1152f4153ff98687c6c6b6cd87415474afcb993ac02c28d0841c4c446c4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncMatchersWithAsyncExpectations: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncPredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce32240b1fd48c5ca304fb53bc69fd509214fcd177b7549fc36d423f34e72390"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncMatchersWithSyncExpectations: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncPredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c311c9b4a53441603ed1b4737a3ee826e8f702161d80758f5c60bdbd438ddda2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncPollingWithAsyncMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncPredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c71a0d275cbc68a9522d6648c9984806b21c7c306900b70b5cc6b92a03a85e2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSyncPollingWithAsyncMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/AsyncPredicateTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1933e64c29a5fc0b6b8a99053c00424602f5be7e4ad0df884b93a8201a21d194"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAKindOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db3ef62112e2938715387fa1c4211dbc47a5bbde5d4c79f69f393d0384a6eb91"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAKindOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcd0ecade99ccf618b47884b0971c101d87870fc5bf61823bf194300c1efa838"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailureMessages: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAKindOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"159f49850dc424f3f9bef305f9dad28f351b5d82528ff38448f287ec4df2c765"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAKindOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb92befc421bea406acb4865dd39548dd869947d360df3ea974b4e0fbd518154"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailureMessages: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAKindOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86ef6fbf79d36d99aaa20bc99e2bc65e686327f955b82d5578e527a5a9fa3266"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca10cf07e4f57a3a8a97db37cf666dbc4f7c7c31a13a77047c47965ace30a460"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatchSwiftTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33c37efaf5df3a1dc2ea5fb32aa6e920c1dcaffb7083e107137da79bc6d71b29"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNestedMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df6e6d24529db5371b78519eb0ce7f956793c7fb5c4cb74e2a5f05410e5f9a86"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailureMessages: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e984cf4b1228a992a4056390eeccb61ba16d1dd19dc6b52978dd7786b4ae07f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailureMessagesSwiftTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeAnInstanceOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"088f0bb712ed1b7b1b072a7dc8c142c56883fcd2862b4bdd7c9ff545a2c19113"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseTo: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4e8e11a6b47987bb0022b062f2c904d50a9767bf95c5df1e5c982d1dc355df4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithin: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9873d52eb59b3b89a27024b07b911154bed18120e0b048b2939bb87969477a6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithNSNumber: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37e4b7a376922a1eb49c7bd013850d85f3cfefc7c779ec5733039aba0bcac284"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithCGFloat: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bafec7ec00a251c3225aa3f840c00e7c6d35dec7fd16e989b6bb551d10cf4de"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithDate: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31ad4e14c43dbb306319722e21b063b2ae3cfe5105a8a54806b3c64c40c3f72a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithNSDate: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11dca2579acb2f3c548ccf220915f7eae3d45605e32b1ce39c65223de20b7625"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe5ac4d04511c4a9a08315efe32993e70c1f0441fd39c7a5ccd96e24caea3c4f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithinOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09af93639ece88ba0c4943c1b8b07905ad5f5508650fc2c4e4541e26a741d10e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPlusMinusOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dbc6cd1b764352efd7f547a7bdfbd63568ce02768708225456a875a463fd833"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToOperatorWithDate: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdfbb4e2b70680e9935b5743b1cb6cabd5c4f0dcb74d2172888aacf75a058cb7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToWithinOperatorWithDate: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56b93a698a90ff5cfead0b5d46ee2fa52fe71a834d77ffdaccfb072c9e098614"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPlusMinusOperatorWithDate: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c838d45857c1ec1c6469bf1a8cd6c3d5cbb52822895ddce27668fa68eddd59c9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeCloseToArray: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4fa2520debfef33f2c965b6f456476044f8bce4eb1073433e181fe1ddc967cf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCombinationWithAllPass: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeCloseToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ff984a147ebdf65106506df4c78b445c53f8d74d04d0014d2a5cc4f4b55ae14"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeEmptyPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeEmptyTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc84b314afa599f8655830c0c7190015ed725b6a5192b15ab9dbffd564fc8a3a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeEmptyNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeEmptyTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ea5bdefab6bdd46febf653d66ea39bd91a7a993888a63bfa50ad45e1e87eec2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNilMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeEmptyTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec927c238d5797e0080d828cc45393335db6f39d79fe4942dfbcd0791522ad9b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testGreaterThanOrEqualTo: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeGreaterThanOrEqualToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bfb8a3eb74e1c31fc847250642d40acadea7ab57439c41f35242b8e6a8670db"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testGreaterThanOrEqualToOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeGreaterThanOrEqualToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57340d1288d765fb2e6e0c55aeb22475718a890d795ad7eb599ac5946048e8b5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testGreaterThan: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeGreaterThanTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fc4788ec7011d98c8f540c9386db16dd2e9312f8a7eaf590c45414c789a2906"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testGreaterThanOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeGreaterThanTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fb1024c6173ecf54d984f270f642c0cdf32926db874dd5551cae3e2a3405eae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a32a0308d93afbef66f1a799c14338909ff9955fbe8c3cab48d5d0cf119cc08"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testbeIdenticalToAsSubmatcher: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"815a61ee4d50ab4333ccc08fab96f152b74456fa798433a98ff61fef04fbe83e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToAnyObjectProtocol: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3e7345a3d515e65b912002894caebe4000701b3903384c415b0f3f3c52a4bd3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e13f1c6037390a47346bef7b65c460b6f65bec25f10719f00aeb7a9b79ffc8b8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToPositiveMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9235780440d2b2169b591bf7ef0b725ae860ba5ded54cce69fa25eab59e6dde1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToNegativeMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"680a0350ae5288636a1ddf246a51a17863020521caa5d5865a3fba1e59544b07"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailsOnNils: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca42c69564325360d6066a201d55a07898f1f34b585a7d77a87c6cbbd43f1ffb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperators: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToObjectTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fa4572d43131da4509c393231643fbe05b162772bbc14265bf7cbceb3939007"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6587fdc62f1e196fcfeb718977ce0191324eead2bb0459882e2c7e5428c4553"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6e11c188e211af6084759a5baf3d3e7ff0039428c245c245fd0a6b9ea59bb1c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToPositiveMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2763568259e899f26503feb9c1bc8fd50ca58e6cb4476acac0fc96493d9a65a2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeIdenticalToNegativeMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c33e2597c596b3e4fe213f63fb6e0d536622f426a039e1e466980fb59664487f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperators: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4d0ccc58493746418da98fb948764bb315d4422fa34b565bce37c704e59feef"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeAlias: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeIdenticalToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fd3f2cde050905fd50624f37486e7718e78e6dd5a95ea373f5522c88e523f01"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testLessThanOrEqualTo: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLessThanOrEqualToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06b7143e345dcaea73c37963d5271365ed04a1594ae881df1289b291745c6ccb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testLessThanOrEqualToOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLessThanOrEqualToTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89a87bffa064cf249da947bfaea20cee7e0585db0c51dcd5a19f12de847ab304"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testLessThan: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLessThanTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4642bf21c0f1fed5c3304d3488acb835af1af273de0b1bf959f543ebdcbb1e2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testLessThanOperator: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLessThanTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1792d75471a33f7c4d9586f068854828939e23bed66b6696f0d56a3412e79b34"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchNonNilTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47cf33be288aa4dd1e80b1b7b9d957afee6ee75b652d01409fec60f1940ea791"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f762e638f148a5c8061bb6427aaf4288629afb01662724153fc3c9b3aebde6ce"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchNilTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cfbf13da443b6e09dfe8ffd7f3c2c2e43d08e907f773276da47aa479ceb5b7c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchFalse: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bda3f0174de9a5618b2f54355528f66bb2e66fe0b4de2b512e4edc44b03dfb2d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchNilBools: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"599b04849d627424b399e9bc2eae5ae45add4647ed05c2d2b4f105f1de299016"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchBoolConvertibleTypesThatConvertToTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b72a00fb7b3c9518298df08fcc7bf285954c9d6dc89752ccb57632a0bf0c497"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchBoolConvertibleTypesThatConvertToFalse: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab3c79d36bda04120dd4eab1b75c27ffab05c6c74bc672c327e866fc64df2fb0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1564a5f3fb9c434bc15f9645df7913fed4edab7dcc025f18e3640b1ef3b961ca"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchFalse: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c0ce993081d2fa451de9b31dff26aafbd7615f843e7e3c8ac7cef991f1e807d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchNilBools: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a99613dcfd1067fa6f526438dc463e63577a7b74e13e6045daf631958d6153f0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchNilTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab1ce92bc869a153ba2c80c827eaca69a267981a94d63574547daed7da648024"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92fcf431414f88e81dfb1d586eaf6582ed9b1ef379d11c96d545c560d401f84f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchNonNilTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26bd62b30b403cfea7f3d6f6ae389ab758d193cd62bd153c35c0e21e2fe5c526"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchFalse: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0a8c05e9c2de68424e01dd3e4a762454823946d9f0f05391f0380adf3720363"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchNilBools: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f5b388a8e07a59d03bf8d19246dd61a51022996d3d27b17aa7f76a63a9a6977"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchTrue: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55bd2a6caad8dbf90a4acdb71fa5333beaa121cac6b32982ccbcb77ff1c1e350"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldMatchFalse: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29970bffc5ebe168bee193f7be34a95b87808d39894d51c41324846443989b7b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testShouldNotMatchNilBools: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeLogicalTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faeb6d07c104defebc592a13ce6efba6b4fce834cf6e9dbbfe989a0cb06d76d8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeNil: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeNilTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c5a9672d6e27e14b4ac75c98e54bdaf3095d93e0d0d1a020278f4284204e24e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5e261f4ffb330fd1ecaeba2804f3adbebfbe1fdd075fbb45c58a2dd89973558"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatchWithClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2ba2cffea034afb90e7c3895362d18df9ab08de1ffcb8a586505ea514fc5162"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f18487244033258fb476fac50401c95ff2f66793731aedef7d3f7957a1a22ffa"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48fc22d04f28f75e042f6d0d143bf362a09032a463be7b7248fb12edc07ed6f9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6b26deb9af0c0151c5beb90d99f02a270e0220ad7030371377a8fa42a6bfaa3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cf96e22f375f1a3d8bf92317b86a3e62d0c03b212f081d7a02adabb242dd3aa"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"247e1820c02eef96fe329cb4b1b7959427183554b6988745ce5c737adb95312c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19bfb982290be39bbe2fd5729227528152f827c3f3404d19124a88f7cc4091b6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b38635f629af259dc19e660bd4b2184f4e8b72f768cd797a5fbcd03d5a55d8a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3ed0c3efc4b07f1fed7fc40929017e166772ac85fd795faa04281fdbdf93d14"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad15b92b8d25efa3f8be857c08a49eb1247fee0b0dd91418dd2b8d00edd08892"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatchWithClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c9dd98514ad123b43ec59aeebe21993ba60bee93d1ef1cb43b2c18f94f60e67"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"857be39107b4f3ba76c82413762c1f85b4d14fd736d42c518ef28860fd2adc99"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd3b7616dbe81d00305bb9e552f30d7e009d8d187bd34ccb1ee43547bbdf8996"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"887e127eac65ad927225b4c4aea2b8a42d144594e73d3a8b5a468195c7bfd443"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b27da6c3b477e4ce4b13723ba20da88398da2a3d8aa235b843785cf66dd0208f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeResultTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b9edebc728ef0cc715005869d116f667e0e330aaf6236e37502d4f175fd0e51"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeVoid: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeVoidTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b9cf7e7999a748608f915b771b0e07a87f63254d18c38189a948a648282752f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeWithinPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeWithinTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb5295bb2367049dbc0b53ccafda5726a3282cf0a57d1d356ad189437192025c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeWithinNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeWithinTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3216685b678848f6066a6430358af4ea62d09d5a3e42060129b2baacc9694a1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeginWithSequencePrefix: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeginWithPrefixTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"380e697300345db85cfafccd0082a691ae06d598b5eb07a009f11b1463a598d3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeginWithSequencePrefixUsingMatcherClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeginWithPrefixTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af3c64ab6e8bf5874f82d4e8bf99ecf1027e815bb266c9d2ba09e8bfc3dd814b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testBeginWithSequencePrefixWithDifferentSequenceTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeginWithPrefixTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b44ba7572c210f6eac048a2809975403c56bc18323411c120a7dc25a88b55c8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeginWithTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35d03f32df8b9c8156a491e6d4ed7fffe3ed6e93beccb2a2b25734e11967f4c7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/BeginWithTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d6b957fdc84a5095dc961d52d3a887eb72d0129e7107bd242f77da4ecdffab9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfying: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1593ed6c249d9b4aa8c1e5a4b49d89daccec2e2d251266b29b1a7906c8db85b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfyingDefaultErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72f7a58309536dd814107ddd2ef432c88507b57e49e7337685f56f7f372fbe2f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfyingSpecificErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90dda9c98637e696873be698093dee50bd2f258c94364d78a77744a9abf870fb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"197ddcb57f6af509be904617934e886c81a55fc24d2bbf49ca01229c2635c097"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCaseDefaultErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14e5d9ef798d40f97c4db8fdb7c7b683d07d5b0c5bccfbfcc55db40973975ac9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCaseSpecificErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"833111e867b19552d2be38c193136a9bc10e9b0812782b219dcfd017b33a40fb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfying: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90d8e71b72bdb288286916825541130796e9c0accde5fc004160e32127a5d971"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfyingDefaultErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d372666ce708da55634aabe333e127381534bb8c5fddedb9aba2a53b30fb85f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfyingSpecificErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ceadab85e54fe3b749f12229ca7eeda1d6fbf8e0beea22cc774b98e52127988c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCase: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1d745cfb3b711af329870d3670ef27ee91167b1a49497ffd06c6e395f8ba13c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCaseDefaultErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b44f592c16df307e244d50efc9638d2d7100189353355ea85c8c0eee2586edd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncContainElementSatisfyingNegativeCaseSpecificErrorMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainElementSatisfyingTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3752a57d09ec9af785b14d6cc3fd1ac49b46902480b1d6baba13fa08930dae0c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainSequence: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecffa0cafd8735aec3e010265c9fe4a32f1b3bf1c149460466913fde8e08186c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainSetAlgebra: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e600b8be05f31ca79ad79f9796592a4c62cb180fd6ceb44f7190af0ee62fc1c3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainSequenceAndSetAlgebra: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fa2285d985adda57f08f60d28ad18b9a5b9e5d3f5644fdc2cebae96447a07d7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainSubstring: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2eac037269a21b45f95c07113a49ab5a97b223fec570d0fe2f3fb7572fd12915"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testContainNSStringSubstring: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5acdde124defdfaa5403aa55c1224da05b552492480ed5901c761e1e32e7c36e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testVariadicArguments: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b1b6653c55ebe17c233a789c656e0a004840fdce660df2d243a4027da0abbe2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCollectionArguments: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ContainTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca12ad5cc032cf0ce168d4211d25c4c4551401743024ef67f1421db645146dbc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSequenceElementsEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ElementsEqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a15548f8c7f1f7582391882481fa76c8f3e3619ecb56af5bb035d97350e31b5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSequenceElementsEqualityUsingMatcherClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ElementsEqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1386cb8ea8c670e215f5ce7f547aad66371f37312983ce60cf19ee9055d3148e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testElementsEqualDifferentSequenceTypes: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ElementsEqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fb11843c32035e191e7b0dc183a673c1d421bdf0c1ccfb0d827ef9e581c84ca"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testEndWithPositives: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EndWithTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"713dff6ddee3d0f54db4aa39af0e4423e4d6a26559a3a92d1534146ab981b2b6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testEndWithNegatives: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EndWithTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d57118f0c751e8f181ca11ade96e60c1aecc58e94029292f304d6d47e760136"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3f6f098936f13c5a3a7bf7e2e6f54bc261c8dd46642984b282c629cb6866695"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testArrayEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8daeb939908305dfab81d83e99c829cdbc825e86f70dde85aa8850f3ad7dce7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testArrayEqualityWithOptionalElement: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e393f93f9eccc0c0ba9008e27e704196849e4952876719d598caccc29303c767"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDictEqualityWithOptionalElement: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51ad7c31dda2fb5f87f1cffaf32aa7fefda527215aa401dd0d0f80ea494f64b3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSetEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a27e839a4ed0bd31a9cc82d2aa51539303c81ef100993e43b0b3b460256cae7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDoesNotMatchNils: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd5a57603bb9a59a4b9ac8915a50da2e62e3c41de8407990abef0e4452f394a5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDictionaryEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17e50e9ea9e96b1114f9d2d495652899613715e6fef573b069b03d1cb17c2310"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDataEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59c9a41a4eadbaa4f2456f00d0e2574a11d89fc9adb38f49e0511b4aa2dc02fd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNSObjectEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b1ba1cc840928614665171a5584c0f649de64b529e10705d804118461c1340b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCustomNSObjectEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7ed848d4b703e34d8e08a8512e9b478c76181ce40f936dd4700c516f27c7ebe"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperatorEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5091fe118d59916fea6be4b4973cbf5f65071387b803f0ced1012e585aae0e51"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperatorEqualityWithArrays: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8b59063db9401de7f2e5bdc3f0835b9274136e53cafb7d05679b7df5d353ce7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperatorEqualityWithDictionaries: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5849b72a9c55c0faa4127786758ccc6326f5ae9522cf2ad9c4decbefc224ed2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOptionalEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f4e5e042b95cecb4b0742e486df1e9c4a8e1b2ed214e8964b08647444ac428a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testArrayOfOptionalsEquality: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b225cc71016b1c0cf8e6a96fdb5246d3c6ec702b60d687b170d79eb8a5f5b6ae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDictionariesWithDifferentSequences: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83b284fa95bc12e318df6e6faa0d0656995ec6a331be1b82781b3afe2cf8eabf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f910d3b4d0b5a8b95aae135dc3b5207f0f237844ae94927c554563c0459ec69b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple2Array: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0a682c112765bb5b13f04e548a92a4b1e7e723626d5e7d27ae5a25cf879a291"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple3Array: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":350}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad1a3cb1a478cd0bc6c6c3a2584cb68cc0834988485df8d0b6d059222b8dc5ea"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple4Array: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":383}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f5fc8f6c94ad5dd3e1711270a9f18b4270efaacee1e6827045eced7b2e544fe"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple5Array: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":416}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faeb65ab3b5f3db90506b006a297488f62e953007fcb3bac883e6a424335a938"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testTuple6Array: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98237cc288eefe6a48aa4ecd2669dc185f047e4055d1dfe6c886072bc09dc40e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testImplicitMemberSyntax: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/EqualTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":484}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2a280b2881d1c02890a847e41fc9cf3b00c2062a580fab006ba98e22e38d02e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testHaveCountForArray: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/HaveCountTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b533e6e76705fc78f93144edcd235177d0ca94c3255986d884e7c4e74701ab7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testHaveCountForDictionary: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/HaveCountTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31e7ce624211485ba646b660acf3b6af600c1e5e63a8766bbdaffb590cc8ea88"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testHaveCountForSet: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/HaveCountTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a833e4c137ed44c47eae9bbb0999caaf9fea8da94946388076678596b7e5f718"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMap: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f54f87c4d33358b491cc225ab8787e359c47823ca143264cc3392f0d5eafd2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMapAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d8ab5c084586ea5506dbc5b555e4dea113b993ff7eed934321f3da962d538d8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMapWithAsyncFunction: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ebeca0bc5b8371783420bfbb736e10132b247cfdebbe5416b89833a3df1a77f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMapWithActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a53291242723c875985275c2133f4c8f970308d997febf4d652858e06160c7d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailableMap: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d3c8eba59f623e1fc63a836605466bda8d3ca24c19d6fea7333c18b57490c6a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailableMapAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"065372377a9543aebb279a66ff5511c918f08037a44b4c7a41c2424ef1405841"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailableMapWithAsyncFunction: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a088e93700ee1bb2f8dd902a663856a43940ad854fb6e913288dc05c080a9b8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailableMapWithActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"137e7cca03c1428119525f037cf71625e0bdd8b7799d070dcfc9c419bd0d875f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCompactMap: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1297922007d22d7f38d0f55df24afb34059d0a1e12d39ef8d9c0b87ec9068d94"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCompactMapAsync: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"962108387887691fc960d93562bb996efc6de812f19660850af6f954baf7e165"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCompactMapWithAsyncFunction: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":196}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c7396360df6a103bfa051481138499ddcc9bd056287a0deb1918a690c41d214"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testCompactMapWithActor: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MapTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4835ce7aef3dc1d30727afae4217fb66f39dc77901fcc44ecfa746221e1b4f7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchErrorPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d34c73d973983aed4c46bce15cf884f7cc1fc6e4a5dbabcc1e58e64c1799c23"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchErrorNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1800b0dd734698ca4f53bc8e130736f28efa563f2735db55e37f956fd0a0f08d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNSErrorPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38b812e47a71b9d6be3b6979c63fba6a06cecc2340d87291cfc77903da70bd31"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNSErrorNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"962c0c2b22912b34eaf4e5fd1f44304123c7b6fde0518aa12c10b59b09c56a95"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchPositiveMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdaf04e36c949f6d33ff5424aee3874806d93c11b3d566ce767a0207127d2f10"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNegativeMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3169cc899cb6d4e8aeb539b613b0510bd1ebd8073bf5d5b48221b4d46347c57d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testDoesNotMatchNils: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2290c4c8357cadaf2ec871404cf5443cd959c731138bed346dbb88fc4ec0345a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchPositive: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecafbe8fbf064ebf25c50d141dd619fbf9e0fb19f7495882f0ae6eab8b16b321"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNegative: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57ee091fb6ff59152518594c11501d9122e8abbb51f7681ffa4f2fa4dc4031b6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchPositiveMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5845d309472c07621681a1e4d8d646afa7cd0918c3e04a0e952198338aa79f0d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNegativeMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"280196c5bd93b2c43d0f304b6caded83fe702c4c4203465242d95c6f6912134c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testMatchNils: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/MatchTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74a1a992c4ca0ad9ccab68a1f257e036d1e7579cacc198af6a288f8ec537c7f9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSyncNil: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/NegationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bd4e64b7dfa133a13e2f2f53d596595adc5de9dc1e0d2c177a03343220c7213"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSyncNonNil: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/NegationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ad8f844d1ec07a4d2618d851b1411e4c82234be8de271355700c5abd654a1e9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncNil: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/NegationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4fe21bb311d898dd785a88c98df6d1ceefee5ff2ca4c178aba7e13091687aba"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncNonNil: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/NegationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a84813cc3ec9ecbbf5440b3ec31bcdbf4033d6987a691c2b4a24dd76443b95fd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenNoNotificationsArePosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a917e05a7a5270ff10c3e747051d59c5ce0fb5eda2c5900b0fe719b807fbfb38"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenExpectedNotificationIsPosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b9ee518e1a337e6f05363e668afa8eccaaeea3bcb75cd23443e73ea0ae04025"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenAllExpectedNotificationsArePosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5684d2148fb853970e2c5efe5410793151b5383f520d4483dc488f06d731627f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailsWhenNoNotificationsArePosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b9968065dc1b0b22c03fc9899540d6f8a672ea91f42561b23251f7cb4b727a3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailsWhenNotificationWithWrongNameIsPosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51f99524a2a1387f82fbb2a4546feb968f78625db9c228e3dc039d9badcf4503"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailsWhenNotificationWithWrongObjectIsPosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91f397a83e930d88ddd8036831dab796e5a66deb519f5553d204c7fe12fea580"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenExpectedNotificationEventuallyIsPosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9495a7f2f11c5f8d0155cf123c4c0677d5a889d41d1d19de832929b89a535116"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testFailsWhenNotificationIsPostedUnexpectedly: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33333493f6c37a41f0f7b74626a1f5d0f9564999a32ba3fe2d3e1d5a2ee9bc61"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenNotificationIsNotPosted: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44711293edace52bdcdbaaf6215891326ef75657c6c13ada6d291f6ebae94456"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenNotificationIsPostedFromADifferentThread: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3efbd83542d138c9322cdd08ab4e46ac72781af1eed6f71c42f8c6af14f3131e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenNotificationIsPostedFromADifferentThreadAndToNotCalled: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"293207a9ab7393377d6e551b8073d4c8c53abc67137979a692f7aa8340c4852e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPassesWhenAllExpectedNotificationsarePostedInDistributedNotificationCenter: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/PostNotificationTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b31a05a3e18f9d31abd44fee0f0eb457cbc6eaede2911a22cefdd4d069a69d6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1161ac2bc433b12264ccade0caea311ecc10a195170f068d13d6c43c03995f4b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatchesWithClosures: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78e6fb174ed4214e2d4a8dd529af951bec1dc8f7bdee7668024e62af54e822e9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a5e3c96d2917852181c5e7509904146b3fd1723b4edf833a6b8722a0db36a2d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatchesDoNotCallClosureWithoutException: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d36ad992e46956da2c4e657772710362e26bf3098bea360bac8b9f92f9bcf3a5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatchesWithClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdff3a32e1ececd2b98656dd7d7e959d2e862e84445e0890cb87a67cac903fd3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNSExceptionName: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fab7698587b16796a850888877e1d702a7c09b4c7e4ec90129263190c4b09950"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNonVoidClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39dc2dca881d8d1d7f51dc36ea13745c04cd550a4a3af28eb6def585aec13dfc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChainOnRaiseException: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/RaisesExceptionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca771fdd22382792cd3b02c1d669ec3103a665c0fae824962c36bef2fc079760"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSatisfyAllOf: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa14496c445e2345cb7a34f5b2dbfde66e6671fd2972805c493e8ed8734e7715"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperatorAnd: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20fa0276c4d3a6103a48484adfdfaf36b2510a497229e328812a3a1404a58bb0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSatisfyAllOfCachesExpressionBeforePassingToMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59c77cc059089af56758b9e55053c51f9ccdb7515ff41411764ebc9225d965df"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncSatisfyAllOf: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d74964e5687ffaedb49e66473056894ff6c0b32ab20875e439874f24f1caba69"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncOperatorAnd: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e28f8a29db42d91b31b35a4813261c3ad7177199dda7b61efd92c75dda75405c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncSatisfyAllOfCachesExpressionBeforePassingToMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAllOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5a0d07f980860e593531157a61f18310cc0616a3269d6a2ebdf9a580718063f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSatisfyAnyOf: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a52134df1d95d217abafc8489e060f4df725326374d956a418eb88e9c2c816d3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testOperatorOr: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"637aa5ff4c2074c0ec9b49bc6c7b2e9cd0e38d1a159624bf756059d69b58357a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testSatisfyAllOfCachesExpressionBeforePassingToMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"817a95fe4eb2b18810a48a2450787af11dbf0c4d006a9fed534b305c142b22c2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncSatisfyAnyOf: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a323b85422efb2e083e898961fd9396447487973ee3f2cb724d213245e51e791"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncOperatorOr: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ecafd7d021dff5251b95319035b5348b0113f5936812559d2a00e391ae20289"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testAsyncSatisfyAllOfCachesExpressionBeforePassingToMatchers: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/SatisfyAnyOfTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8ecb73a2715cbf92dfaed93c321d60c8ffe63d30c034a13878e861e668b9e11"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c39de0772477658df32a14e033a67249f4c9b45377ba75b2a99d36f6fc455aee"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testErrorThrown: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd90609746a6ef3db593f589ef74b689ab10184949865dbfcf10ded2f5dd503e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPostAssertionCodeNotRun: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a9c028b9d9bdc8a0c605f62599acbcb8c5a63595886e641bffcc064a9c2c793"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatch: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79dc8f124539acf41fcf0505065bd105376abdfcf90c1894eda95003b5dc43e3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc21d5dbe85e0d22220f0b07411c6d2620de5b38ae0cd5d2c9fc16a0c6b4db39"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMessage: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c31e124011d82c465f2cb1fcd639b1f2cf23abf1555b2a9697549a936ec49379"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNonVoidClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60b6ec5cdfc1c59c063f1a577288cf74e781f2177f4b3491d5cc3d8294542552"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChainOnThrowAssertion: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowAssertionTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b9a7596f4c1a35ff697c00aeafc62a6d8b0c071a4b8a7a1a272ed084a195e08"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c4893ea41620b12a6a5a821dbc86ab59e2df124f6a87014b8bd250aadabaab7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveMatchesWithClosures: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bbaa9af51cd404e336daf12299d3ac89abf67d5e761af0877c01a57d3972650"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ea41ea2b2eeace832fd3d7ea05b5131383442173c747e4b2dfc94bdef45a09e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testPositiveNegatedMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"169260c0815329b8fbe2ac3e6a07ed90c57429a4eff54d878dcca826605a33a3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeNegatedMatches: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee3566bf2fbf949ebeb5262a09b85a8e10bb22253bd7bb587f32369ed9ba915c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatchesDoNotCallClosureWithoutError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1131630c217b2791b711e7342c1b381f6e1338e852df5002bec7dc812d6c3888"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNegativeMatchesWithClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0890f127e346160fadd03a68e007f1bd986704bac5b393482ffed0a12879deb5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testNonVoidClosure: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9f71c6f7f2ddd7d218cf533dfd16257015075676c050bab3755cd0521266a39"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testChainOnThrowError: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ThrowErrorTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82f8151ae3184e8f49369ad320e6c08d1102edf0cdb67bf29a379e15b1ea35c0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No direct assertions: testToSucceed: No conventional assertion call was detected, and 383 of 387 tests in \u0060NimbleTests\u0060 read the same way \u2014 so this is treated as that project\u0027s convention rather than a broken test, and it does not drag the score. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a project of runnable samples compiled as tests, where a run that does not throw is the only check. If it is the latter, these methods genuinely verify nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/NimbleTests/Matchers/ToSucceedTest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"264e66b99bb9628bc2da03bac28ea01f80151f2a4db9fd40d08e390d3ee3155f"}},{"ruleId":"D11","level":"error","message":{"text":"Flaky test: .::NimbleTests.AsyncAwaitTest.testWaitUntilErrorsIfDoneIsCalledMultipleTimes: Passed 2\u00D7, failed 1\u00D7 across repeated runs."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa926e2e253bf86d73c69020d6f99039af62722c1689ebba4d842bed54cba357"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: test \u0026 verify correct behavior \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/ExpectationMessage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fb7adf8aad291fe20b078dd8b82908b2bfc799fdbf44bc16574d539db9a867d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: eventually migrate the global to this environment value \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Adapters/NimbleEnvironment.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfc2ff01713285a134ba583e5dcb58be046c75aa28c666f4b523360670b28994"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: NSHashTable can not conform to NMBContainer since swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2016-04-25-a"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Matchers/MatcherProtocols.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2445e0f9a473c1201472c73fdd6ff08484c5bc951606cd845a2c9618f3636be"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b8f11381d61a58459ffc7c595fd52d09c03c711894a63a9578043d2338412b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2ade5304f09f4ec09d9a67666532d66c70e533787c0bf5bb62d01dd1dbfa397"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5007fc3c88c0055a7e21202e31eb14631f9e06d6e6cbabf804a90fa91f1a6ed1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de930da33637db34d652dcde113bacfc22e37f5cc5f910936cd757b2f3df5941"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad059624092bae48323b38fd3145c021a6869e41faf92720cd62c26e9c7c9dd4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb4e9e8961f2819de66e02bf7af3019e2e1cf39d7a56b4ffd4526f6b84a45020"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"819f168af4ea778230e31f8b6d1ebd7abd20b341f738019c6e256acd754951c1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a70dd4c8f6018a0480684bd179662889530357eed81066a97f8bdeec8bc0f7b6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a10686b8560583e3594fc6a7f1a1c3f2c4e305c7713f4c1d155a3b2313cadf1c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7c181c1b5a9c9b50a1f60947391121ad45f2f2c03559aafb85a4378abe3c448"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14bbbac5405411ba98b956fa289c513e993315c4a204c5f30899c0be845a9542"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9168d5be563c3890c9088e19707b725ed91f1ad0d435a970738b6b988bddbd0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cef0afc6f15d43f9042d60030671121a7b3b36ad0117c9373cb46197356fefb1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d339850501bb575a80a220487b923eb1c2229a170ec9aad0664b5a6dd92070c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1773b06fe6ac851a103b8090a89046f0c67aa134f559cc372d7db468a4d8d878"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d466fc03b6054df628c34a1950647b75262d54eea270a5b18d41a2ac9de62f07"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31e15292ee7781495cff3025f3779e23aded0d07be93120b45c65e1d6518c389"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"957b150e90b8de065e3fab913d6db8aa84cc38085b4826b482eaabde0c4cf347"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f8e8779775e61d1b0c2d7681b102c9a7332eaca95c810934cdbc357334bf75"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b881bddfc74f2a174affaadf3f8e558af4989187619ebd81ca12f4c9a37e83a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5f96f42fedf9a0a976da71e97661850acd0c2c178c4468bf752061ee54439b9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3224ba94c2a92b3fb276e98d65bae58e285fa867db0e99a29c9594da202d7cf1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae5226fc492343f6c867f4a7694ecefd62aee0166aee8371ac495d79873411c6"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"addressable","version":"2.8.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"833a7185174858706a151949e08a56b5367b07ea17a6c5b8941f64f85991be16"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"concurrent-ruby","version":"1.3.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8da59893e7db7f85f71ff14b7297eb4ac8a664dbad474303c724918638abe12"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"activesupport","version":"7.2.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f56e8c64a5a07409b219f9d064e24b32d3838f9d390845e64c1914b98d0078c"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"sqlite3","version":"1.7.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01421633dd1567594fad9e7062df66aceca67a5a842f4bf043f1df5331f03991"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66b9242c56776a797d20b7f10d02c213b531d29761bbc7a6f27dcbc0a735bde1"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3bbfacae1424112de04485d2c0dc97e0af4e20447f601681bc1ae28e236b81a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-527","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-538","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 43 of 48 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 43 separate risks. Counted over 48 of the 72 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BRequire.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5c3aaf70efac41afc0c104d636c2e127ec2e086f25ea6b4634a8a38e5f5f0ca"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Nimble/Polling\u002BAsyncAwait.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04f18996e12183b3d1c9753819d44c675caed232c9f352177188b3f837ab6eb5"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"759dca709f1a032fb6f624ce672e6afb5558fce53ecf01fb73618c4d33923164"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0752d0df7434000fcabf1048e2de30a7a1a8b982b3db9a19898c4dec199856b4"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bdd4cc8bc9daa17b484ebc3110c93822e162bc790a47d1c0ea9b9018f462d28"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35f64a0396611dfd8e0191313b0d7cdc759890497b52affaaa727cf6ce876cfd"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 5370 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-527","guid":"79b27cde-9d04-1a54-b64b-d5bb9b4a8ee7","name":"CWE-527","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-527"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/527.html"},{"id":"CWE-538","guid":"3baa1f05-df1b-ae58-9ee0-1d790ff4a989","name":"CWE-538","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-538"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/538.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"CWE-829","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-829"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":37,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}