Executive summary
RedElastic/reactive-stock-trader scores 35 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while four of its six lenses score higher still: Architecture at 92, rated Exemplary, and Security and Compliance at 73, Accessibility at 59 and Maturity at 55, all rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those four because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 18 and is rated Critical. Its Test Coverage dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No assertions (empty test) finding(s) in Test Quality and to resolve the 1 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 35 to about 49.
14 findings are critical: four in IaC & Container Security, three in Dependency Hygiene, two in Change Coupling, two in Page structure, one in Forms & labels, one in Secrets (history) and one in Test Quality.
Watchdog couldn't measure 13 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Internal API Consistency, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 3,889 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €3,700, to rebuild.
If Production Readiness rose from 18 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 35 to about 49.
New since the last survey: 2 findings
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
- Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €3,700 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €1,200 to €6,200, for 21 to 65 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.7 at a score of 35. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Small: 3,889 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture — module dependency graph
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 com.redelastic | 2 com.redelastic.it | 3 com.redelastic.stocktrader | 4 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.migrations | 5 controllers.forms.transfer | 6 ui.src | 7 ui.src.common | 8 (global) | 9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api | 10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order | 11 com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api | 12 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote | 13 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api | 14 models | 15 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer | 16 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade | 17 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl | 18 controllers.forms.portfolio | 19 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl | 20 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order | 21 controllers | 22 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 com.redelastic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 com.redelastic.it | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 com.redelastic.stocktrader | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.migrations | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 controllers.forms.transfer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 ui.src | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 ui.src.common | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 (global) | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api | 10 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 models | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer | 9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 16 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade | 4 | 8 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 17 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl | 27 | 10 | 4 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 18 controllers.forms.portfolio | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl | 1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 20 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order | 13 | 20 | 16 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 21 controllers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 22 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
8→3 (global) uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in (global) uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeTypeFormattersProvider→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeType
- Direction
- (global) uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break (global), while a change to (global) can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: (global) uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
9→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 11 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.BrokerService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Fulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Fulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResult→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResult→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummary→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummary→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummary→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeTypecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Trade→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeType
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
10→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Order→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Order→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetails→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeType
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
11→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.DepositRequest→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Portfolio→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.WireTransferService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.WithdrawlRequest→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
12→9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.IexQuoteServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.DetailedQuotesResponsecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.IexQuoteServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Quotecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.QuoteService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.DetailedQuotesResponsecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.QuoteService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Quote
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 10 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.Deposit→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioSummary→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioView→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioView→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.Refund→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.Withdrawl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetails
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→3 models uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in models uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
models.CompletedOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeType
- Direction
- models uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break models, while a change to models can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: models uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→9 models uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in models uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
models.EquityHolding→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.DetailedQuote
- Direction
- models uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break models, while a change to models can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: models uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→3 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 9 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.CouldNotSecureFunds→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.DeliveryConfirmed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.FundsRetrieved→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.RefundDelivered→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferEntity→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferEvent→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferInitiated→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→11 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferDetails→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Accountcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferEntity→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.TransferCompletedcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferFunds→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Account
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→13 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferProcess→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1160→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResult
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order✕
- Connections
- 8 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Limitcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Marketcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Visitorcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1160→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Limitcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1160→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Marketcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.1160→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Visitorcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeService→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Order
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→12 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.QuoteService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 27 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader. Showing 25 of them; the rest are in namespace-graph.json in this report's bundle.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.AcceptRefund→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.Closed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.CompleteTrade→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.FundsCredited→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.FundsDebited→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.LiquidationStarted→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.Opened→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderFailed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderFailed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderFulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderFulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PlaceOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioAlreadyOpened→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioEntity→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioEvent→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.RefundAccepted→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.RefundAccepted→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 10 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.5227→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.5227→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Fulfilledcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.5227→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Visitorcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.AcknowledgeOrderFailure→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.CompleteTrade→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Tradecom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Tradecom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.BrokerServicecom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.BrokerServicecom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResult
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PlaceOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetails
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→13 com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api✕
- Connections
- 13 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.Holdings→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.Holdingcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.OrderPlaced→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlacedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioViewcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OpenPortfolioDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlacedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OpenPortfolioDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlacedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.FundsTransfercom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OpenPortfolioDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlacedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioServicecom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioSummarycom.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl.PortfolioServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioView
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→3 controllers.forms.portfolio uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in controllers.forms.portfolio uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
controllers.forms.portfolio.Order→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TradeType
- Direction
- controllers.forms.portfolio uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break controllers.forms.portfolio, while a change to controllers.forms.portfolio can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers.forms.portfolio uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→13 controllers.forms.portfolio uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in controllers.forms.portfolio uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- The types involved
controllers.forms.portfolio.OpenPortfolioForm→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OpenPortfolioDetails
- Direction
- controllers.forms.portfolio uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can break controllers.forms.portfolio, while a change to controllers.forms.portfolio can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers.forms.portfolio uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→3 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.TransferId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→11 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.TransactionSummarycom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Transfercom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.TransferRequestcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.WireTransferService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→15 com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.FundsRetrievedcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferEventcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferInitiatedcom.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.WireTransferServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.TransferRepositoryImpl
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer, so a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer can break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl can't break com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl.transfer.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stockbroker.wireTransfer.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 13 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Failed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.FailedOrderBehavior→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Fulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.FulfilledOrderBehaviorBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderEntity→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModelImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderState→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Pending→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.PendingBehaviorBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioIdcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.PlaceOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.PortfolioId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 20 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Fulfilledcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.1→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Visitorcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.5996→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Failedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.5996→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Fulfilledcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.5996→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Visitorcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.CompleteOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Failed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Fulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderBehaviourBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderBehaviourBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummarycom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderFulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Tradecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummarycom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModelImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModelImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummarycom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepository→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderState→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatuscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Pending→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderStatus
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→10 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order✕
- Connections
- 16 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Failed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.FailedOrderBehavior→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Fulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.FulfilledOrderBehaviorBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderBehaviourBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderEvent→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderFailed→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderFulfilled→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModel→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModelImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderReceived→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Ordercom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderState→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.Pending→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.PendingBehaviorBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.PlaceOrder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.OrderDetailscom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.UninitializedBehaviorBuilder→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.Order
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.order.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→16 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderModelImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeServicecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepositoryImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.TradeService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.trade.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→3 controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
controllers.PortfolioController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderId
- Direction
- controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→5 controllers uses controllers.forms.transfer✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in controllers.forms.transfer.
- The types involved
controllers.WireTransferController→controllers.forms.transfer.AccountTypecontrollers.WireTransferController→controllers.forms.transfer.TransferForm
- Direction
- controllers uses controllers.forms.transfer, so a change to controllers.forms.transfer can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break controllers.forms.transfer.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→9 controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
controllers.PortfolioController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.BrokerServicecontrollers.PortfolioController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummary
- Direction
- controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→11 controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- The types involved
controllers.WireTransferController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Accountcontrollers.WireTransferController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.Transfercontrollers.WireTransferController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.WireTransferService
- Direction
- controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.wiretransfer.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→13 controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- The types involved
controllers.PortfolioController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.Holdingcontrollers.PortfolioController→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService
- Direction
- controllers uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→14 controllers uses models✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in models.
- The types involved
controllers.PortfolioController→models.CompletedOrder
- Direction
- controllers uses models, so a change to models can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break models.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→18 controllers uses controllers.forms.portfolio✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in controllers uses a type in controllers.forms.portfolio.
- The types involved
controllers.PortfolioController→controllers.forms.portfolio.OpenPortfolioFormcontrollers.PortfolioController→controllers.forms.portfolio.PlaceOrderForm
- Direction
- controllers uses controllers.forms.portfolio, so a change to controllers.forms.portfolio can break controllers, while a change to controllers can't break controllers.forms.portfolio.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→3 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.OrderId
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→9 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.BrokerServicecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.DetailedQuotesResponsecom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderResultcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.OrderSummarycom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.Quote
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→12 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.QuoteService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.quote.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→13 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.OrderPlacedcom.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.PortfolioService
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.portfolio.api.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→20 com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a type in com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.
- The types involved
com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.BrokerServiceImpl→com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.OrderRepository
- Direction
- com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order, so a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order can break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl, while a change to com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl can't break com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl.order.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: com.redelastic.stocktrader.broker.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Accessibility
Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping
| OWASP category | Findings | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration | 104 | High / Critical |
| A05:2025 — Injection | 6 | Medium |
| A07:2025 — Authentication Failures | 2 | High / Critical |
Roadmap
Begin by fixing empty tests in HoldingsTest.java and OrderEntityTest.java to ensure assertions are properly validated. Next, establish a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push or pull request to enforce quality gates. Integrate static analysis tools like SpotBugs or Semgrep into this pipeline to automatically fail builds on security regressions. Finally, expand test coverage to include all unreached production modules by adding tests that import them directly or through their public entry points.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolve the 1 No assertions (empty test) finding(s) in Test Quality — start with HoldingsTest.java. | +4.7 pts | Low | Test Quality |
| Resolve the 1 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with OrderEntityTest.java. | +4.7 pts | Low | Test Quality |
| Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. | +2.3 pts | Low | ADR Quality |
| Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR. | +3.3 pts | Medium | CI/CD gates |
| Run what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing. | +3.3 pts | Medium | Security & performance tooling |
| Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry). | +3.3 pts | Medium | Test Coverage |
| Adopt TypeScript for the frontend: add a typecheck step to the build, then either type-check the existing JavaScript in place (`checkJs`/JSDoc types) or convert the highest-traffic modules first — no file is typed today, so this is an adoption, not a clean-up. | +3.2 pts | Medium | Type Safety |
| Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value. | +3.2 pts | Medium | Dead Code |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | 1.7 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.7 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.7 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 1.8 | Slop | IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED |
| portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java | 6.0 | Mixed | Explicit Debt: TodoComment |
| broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java | 6.2 | Mixed | Change Coupling: Boundary-crossing change coupling: TradeServiceImpl.java ↔ PortfolioServiceImpl.java |
| portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java | 6.7 | Mixed | Explicit Debt: TodoComment |
| REDACTED | 6.9 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): REDACTED: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 79 of 82 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 82 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 193 of 214 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkov | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.java) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report` or the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report` or the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
- D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.java) but the built-in reliability runner does not support this repository's ecosystem, so flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares package.json, but the licence verdict published here was taken over its sbt dependencies. Nothing was read about its npm dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. All 22 significant source file(s) were last meaningfully changed so long ago that no living knowledge remains — nothing since has been substantial enough to re-establish ownership (a broad, mechanical sweep that touches many files shallowly does not count, and neither does no activity at all). There is no concentration to measure, so the bus factor is not scored. This is not a clean bill: nobody currently holds working knowledge of this code (see D34 Knowledge Freshness). Counted over 7 of the 88 production source files in this repository: 66 are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over, and the remaining 15 have no attributable history left to measure.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is a COLLECTOR gap, not an environment fault: no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here, so this ecosystem's public API has no collector, and the remedy is to write one — no change to the scan image can close it.
- D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
- AX1 Captive dependencies — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection registrations in C# and Spring beans in Java/Kotlin only, and this repository's container is Guice, whose lifetimes are not modelled yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DevServer (serve). the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence.
- C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
- C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
- C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
- C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Java, Vue components is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
- D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
- D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
- D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling: Boundary leakage is detected from type references across detected contexts — leaks that flow through primitives, serialization or shared infrastructure may not surface as a typed reference.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement: Egress confinement is read from committed Kubernetes manifests — a policy applied out-of-band (cluster-default deny, a service mesh, or a cloud firewall/security group off-repo) is invisible, and a present NetworkPolicy is declared config, not proof the cluster admission-controller actually enforces it at runtime.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement: Syscall/MAC confinement is read from committed manifests — a profile applied by a cluster-wide PodSecurity default or a mutating webhook off-repo isn't seen, and a declared seccomp/AppArmor profile is config presence, not proof the node's kernel actually loaded and enforced it.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
- AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
- AC5 ARIA correctness: ARIA correctness is checked against the static role/attribute shape — roles/attributes set dynamically aren't seen, a valid role says nothing about whether it matches the element's real behaviour, and required-state checks are suppressed when a JSX spread could supply them. The two-branch toggle check (a control whose state is conveyed only by which of two mutually exclusive branches renders) reads CONDITIONALS THAT ARE ATTRIBUTES — Vue v-if/v-else/v-show and Alpine x-if/x-show — so the same toggle written as a Svelte {#if} block or a JSX ternary is control flow the markup model never projects as a branch and is not seen at all.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
- AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
- P5 DR & Backup: Backup/restore and disaster-recovery readiness is judged from in-repo evidence — a config that exists is not a tested restore, so the absence of positive evidence is reported as "not evidenced", never scored as present.
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
3 duplicated block group(s) detected.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with IexQuoteServiceImpl.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (9–10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with PortfolioEntity.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (63 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with FundsTransfer.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Code Duplication in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D5 · Coupling
10 production modules (npm+sbt), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; a dependsOn spread (deps: _*) and a project whose directory a helper computes are not visible there; 2 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 9 of the 10 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Off the main sequence finding(s) in Coupling. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Coupling in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 17 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D9 · Test Distribution
11 test methods: 11 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e.
D10 · Test Quality
0 skipped, 2 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 11 tests.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No assertions (empty test) finding(s) in Test Quality — start with HoldingsTest.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with OrderEntityTest.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Test Quality in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D12 · Dependency Hygiene
2 outdated direct sbt declarations. An sbt declaration names an EXACT version, so the remedy is an edit to the build file — there is no lockfile refresh that would move it. Test-, Provided- and it-scoped declarations are excluded, because a consumer of this project never receives them. A version held in a Scala val is read only when the val is one string literal: sbt is a program rather than a manifest, and evaluating a computed version would invent the measurement rather than take it. Whether any artifact is DEPRECATED or ABANDONED is not graded and cannot be — Maven Central publishes no such marker, and release age does not stand in for one: the most widely depended-upon libraries are routinely the stalest, being finished rather than abandoned. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question.
D13 · REDACTED Scanning
REDACTED scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D14 · License Compliance
0 of 2 declared sbt dependency artifact(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from the POMs Maven Central publishes, over the production coordinates this repository's 1 sbt build file(s) (build.sbt and project/*.scala) declare with a literal version, directly or through a string-literal val — `%%` resolved to the Scala binary suffix Central publishes under, test-scoped declarations excluded — the same declaration-site closure this analysis reads for dependency currency. sbt has no lockfile a checkout carries, so this is deliberately NOT the transitive closure. 2 further production coordinate(s) are declared with a version the build computes rather than writes as a literal — sbt is a program, and this pass does not run it — and are NOT graded: this verdict covers what the build pins literally or through a string-literal val, not the full graph. ★ COVERAGE OF THIS VERDICT: it grades this repository's sbt dependencies and nothing else. The repository also declares package.json, and the licences of those dependencies were NOT read by this pass — a gap in this engine's coverage, not a statement about them. So this result says the graded closure carries no banned licence; it does NOT say this repository's licensing is clear.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
11 deducted task-comment markers across 3889 LoC (0.2/KLoC) → score 9.6. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What to do
- Resolve the 9 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with PortfolioEntity.java (4), CustomHttpErrorHandler.java, OrderEvent.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
- Resolve the 2 FixmeComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with OrderRepositoryImpl.java, OrderModelImpl.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Explicit Debt in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D19 · Documentation Quality
The repository's root README is a strong overview (12-part Reactive in Practice series, IBM publisher link) plus an extensive published-units list that anchors the project and shows intent; it also links to local development steps such as setting up an IDE, testing with CURL, deploying to Kubernetes. The wire-transfer-impl README documents its own directory rather than the repository root (an internal dir), so it is not judged against the root's overview/installation/usage/contributing sections. However the wire-transfer-impl README does not show any installation or usage content and lacks a contribution section — both are present in the root README, so they fall under its scope.
What to do
- Improve Documentation Quality — currently 6.0/10. — The repository's root README is a strong overview (12-part Reactive in Practice series, IBM publisher link) plus an extensive published-units list that anchors the project and shows intent; it also links to local development steps such as setting up an IDE, testing with CURL, deploying to Kubernetes. The wire-transfer-impl README documents its own directory rather than the repository root (an internal dir), so it is not judged against the root's overview/installation/usage/contributing sections. However the wire-transfer-impl README does not show any installation or usage content and lacks a contribution section — both are present in the root README, so they fall under its scope.
D20 · ADR Quality
No architecture decision records were found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D23 · Boundary Type-Coupling
No domain types leak across context boundaries (3 contexts).
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 2 build units (npm, sbt) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D28 · Secrets (history)
1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
6 finding(s): 0 critical, 0 high, 6 medium, 0 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 4 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
- Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities
No known-vulnerable dependencies in any ecosystem this repository declares.
D31 · IaC & Container Security
104 finding(s): 0 critical, 4 high, 88 medium, 12 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 88 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (18), REDACTED (18), REDACTED (18). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (88 warning-level).
- Resolve the 4 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
- Resolve the 12 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (3), REDACTED (3), REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (12 recommendation-level).
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
22 of 22 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java. Counted over 22 of the 88 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What to do
- Resolve the 22 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with PortfolioEntity.java, TransferEntity.java, PortfolioController.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (22 recommendation-level).
- Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
Strongest change-coupling: BrokerService.java↔PortfolioService.java 70%; PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java↔PortfolioServiceImpl.java 58%; TradeServiceImpl.java↔PortfolioServiceImpl.java 50%
What to do
- Resolve the 2 Boundary-crossing change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with BrokerService.java, TradeServiceImpl.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
D40 · Network Egress Confinement
0/2 network-egress controls present (network policy, egress restriction).
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No network policy finding(s) in Network Egress Confinement. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement
0/3 workload(s) run every container under a seccomp profile; 0/3 declare an AppArmor/SELinux profile.
What to do
- Resolve the 3 No seccomp profile finding(s) in Kernel & Syscall Confinement — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
D43 · Malicious Dependencies
No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AC2 · Forms & labels
- This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it. — ui/src/components/pages/Home.vue:12
What to do
- Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
AC3 · Page structure
- The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). — ui/public/index.html:2
- A page with no <title> gives no name in the tab, history or screen-reader page list. Add a descriptive <title> in <head>. — ui/public/index.html:2
- No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. This document's body is only the mount point <div id="app">, so there is no content here to wrap — render the <main> from the component mounted into it. — ui/public/index.html:2
- Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don't jump levels — increase by at most one. (×3) — ui/src/components/pages/Portfolio.vue:52, ui/src/components/pages/trades/New.vue:128, ui/src/components/pages/transfers/New.vue:83
What to do
- Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
AC5 · ARIA correctness
AC6 · Visual & motion safety
AC7 · A11y enforcement
- No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-vuejs-accessibility) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 11 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
- Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-vuejs-accessibility, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
AX10 · Code composition
What to do
- The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
AX2 · Stateful singletons
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX6 · Interface segregation
AX8 · Test isolation
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
- Add a README to the 1 of 1 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- README advertises a microservices architecture, but the repo is a single project with no service manifests — searched for: `microservice`, `service-mesh`, `istio`. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest and configuration files (package.json and other *.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.sln/*.slnx, *.yml, *.toml, *.config, tool configs such as eslint.config.js, Dockerfile); the README's own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read — a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:86
- README.md documents the environment variable `PID`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:90
- README.md runs `npm run test`, but no package.json declares a `test` script. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:140
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: README advertises a microservices architecture, but the repo is a single project with no service manifests; README.md documents the environment variable `PID`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; README.md runs `npm run test`, but no package.json declares a `test` script.
P1 · CI/CD gates
- No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, …) — changes aren't gated by an automated build/test.
What to do
- Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
P2 · Observability
What to do
- Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (opentelemetry-java or Micrometer) and a health-check endpoint (Spring Boot Actuator's /actuator/health, or a /health route) for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling
- No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) — this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
- Run what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback
What to do
- Add an approval/environment gate (required reviewers / protection rules) before production promotion.
P5 · DR & Backup
What to do
- Document RTO/RPO and a tested restore procedure (a backup config alone isn't disaster recovery).
- Enable purge protection / soft-delete (and prevent_destroy on critical resources) so data stores can't be lost to an accidental or malicious delete.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
R1 · Type Safety
- 0 typed · 15 plain JS — the untyped files are ui/src/App.vue, ui/src/common/config.js, ui/src/common/http.js, ui/src/common/portfolio.js, ui/src/common/transfers.js, ui/src/components/components/portfolio/EquityRow.vue (+9 more).
What to do
- Adopt TypeScript for the frontend: add a typecheck step to the build, then either type-check the existing JavaScript in place (`checkJs`/JSDoc types) or convert the highest-traffic modules first — no file is typed today, so this is an adoption, not a clean-up.
R10 · Code Duplication
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity
- formatOrderType has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — ui/src/components/pages/trades/New.vue:286
R3 · Large Files
R4 · Test Coverage
- 0% of 13 production file(s) reachable from 0 test file(s) via the import graph — 'production' here is the RESIDUE: every source file left once tests, tooling, generated output, config, declarations and declaration-only modules, fixture corpora, type fixtures, behaviour-free data modules, re-export barrels, registration/constant data modules and service workers are set aside, so the percentage is taken over a smaller denominator than the workspace's file count
What to do
- Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).
R6 · Tooling
- test ✗ · lint ✓ · typecheck ✗ — read from this repository's package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: `test` for the suite, `lint` or `prettier` for linting, `typecheck`/`type-check`/`tsc` for type checking. ✗ therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline — a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A ✓ means the wiring is DECLARED — a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite.
What to do
- Add a test runner (vitest / jest / playwright) and type checking (adopt TypeScript, or type-check the existing JavaScript with `checkJs`) as package.json scripts and run them in CI.
R7 · Dead Code
- Unreachable from the 1 application, 2 tooling and 0 test entry point(s) detected in this repo. Gate removals on `npm run build` — an undetected custom entry would make these reachable.
- no import path from any entry point (1 application, 2 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make (×8) — ui/src/components/components/quote/QuoteChart.vue, ui/src/components/components/portfolio/EquityRow.vue, ui/src/common/portfolio.js, …
- This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module — not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it. — ui/src/components/pages/Portfolio.vue:81
What to do
- Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value.
R8 · Dependency Hygiene
- Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident. (×3) — ui/src/components/pages/Home.vue:70, ui/src/App.vue:14, ui/src/main.js:16
- Declared in ui/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members — no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it. (×3)
What to do
- Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.
R9 · Circular Imports
X1 · Async correctness
X12 · Unreachable branch
X13 · Undrained process stream
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X20 · Mistyped argument guard
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X4 · Structured logging
- `info` at line 50 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderRepositoryImpl.java:50
- `info` at line 41 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:41
- `info` at line 45 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:45
- `info` at line 88 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderEntity.java:88
- `info` at line 112 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:112
- `info` at line 118 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:118
- `info` at line 30 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:30
- `error` at line 40 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.error("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:40
- `info` at line 67 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java:67
- `info` at line 69 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:69
- `info` at line 186 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:186
- `info` at line 220 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:220
- `info` at line 286 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:286
- `info` at line 290 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:290
- `info` at line 294 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:294
What to do
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging
X5 · Nullable reference types
- 0/22 of this repository's Java package directories are under a non-null default: a `package-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked` (JSpecify) or `@NonNullApi`, `@ParametersAreNonnullByDefault`, `@NonNullByDefault`, `@DefaultQualifier(NonNull.class)`; a `module-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked`; every type in it `@NullMarked`; or a build that runs NullAway with the package in `AnnotatedPackages`, or the Checker Framework's `NullnessChecker`. Elsewhere every reference admits null and no checker warns on the dereference that throws a `NullPointerException`.
What to do
- Declare the default where Java declares it: `@NullMarked` (org.jspecify.annotations) in each package's `package-info.java`, or once in `module-info.java`, and run NullAway (Error Prone) or the Checker Framework so the declaration is enforced. Then annotate the real exceptions `@Nullable` and resolve the suppressions rather than adding to them: a `@SuppressWarnings("NullAway")` or `castToNonNull(x)` on a value the checker could show to be null is a `NullPointerException` waiting for the path that makes it true — where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (a null check, `Objects.requireNonNull`, a non-null field initialised in the constructor).
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
| Dimension | WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| AC2 · Forms & labels | 1.3.1, 3.3.2, 4.1.2 | Partial signal |
| AC3 · Page structure | 1.4.4, 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 3.1.1, 4.1.2 | Partial signal |
| AC5 · ARIA correctness | 4.1.2 | Partial signal |
| AC6 · Visual & motion safety | 1.4.3, 2.4.7 | Partial — literal CSS only |
| AC7 · A11y enforcement | enforcement — no page criterion | Enforcement posture (process) |
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 34% | Weak — gated by R1, R7, X4, X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 92% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
| Maturity | 55% | Adequate — gated by D34 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 18% | Critical — gated by R4, R6, R8, P1, P3 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 73% | Adequate — gated by D31 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Accessibility | 59% | Adequate | Acceptable, with room to improve. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Not evidenced — 3 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
Not included — 45 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No image/media element found in the parsed markup — AC1 not applicable here.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No interactive element found in the parsed markup — AC4 not applicable here.
- AX1 Captive dependencies — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
- AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
- C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no .java test runner
- D16 Bus Factor — dormant codebase — no living knowledge left to concentrate
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.java), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess.
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- DM1 Domain Modelling — applicable but not scored (2 of 3 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): 3 aggregate root(s) (types guarding their own state behind command methods — this language has no AggregateRoot base to inherit); 11 value object(s)
- ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
- ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — no CI workflow found
- P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JVM, JavaScript/TypeScript source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
- P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report` or the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a pom.xml, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Java code has 4,745 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
- PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Not applicable: this repository declares no async functions, so there is no asynchronous code for a blocking call to stall.
- R11 Import Boundaries — No recognizable feature-sliced/layered src layout — boundary rules not applicable.
- R5 Dependency Freshness — no package-lock.json — dependency freshness not measured (would require an npm lockfile); JS/npm CVEs are scored in D30 (Dependency Vulnerabilities), which answers every ecosystem
- S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Java was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Java request off Android takes no token: it is cancelled through the handle it returns (Future.cancel, Call.cancel, a Disposable), ambiently (io.grpc.Context) or by interrupting its thread, not through a parameter
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 14 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Boundary-crossing change coupling: BrokerService.java ↔ PortfolioService.java broker-api/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/api/BrokerService.java:1
- Boundary-crossing change coupling: TradeServiceImpl.java ↔ PortfolioServiceImpl.java broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:1
- <input> without a programmatic label ui/src/components/pages/Home.vue:12
- <html> without a lang ui/public/index.html:2
- Document without a <title> ui/public/index.html:2
- No assertions (empty test): asSequence portfolio-impl/src/test/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/HoldingsTest.java:36
- REDACTED
- Unlisted import '@/common' ui/src/components/pages/Home.vue:70
- Unlisted import '@/components' ui/src/App.vue:14
- Unlisted import 'bootstrap' ui/src/main.js:16
Serious — 133 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- TodoComment bff/src/main/java/CustomHttpErrorHandler.java:35
- TodoComment broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderEvent.java:13
- TodoComment broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:42
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java:42
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:18
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:194
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:252
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:253
- TodoComment portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioAlreadyOpened.java:7
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Heading level jumps from h2 to h4 ui/src/components/pages/trades/New.vue:128
- Heading level jumps from h2 to h4 ui/src/components/pages/transfers/New.vue:83
- FixmeComment broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderRepositoryImpl.java:38
- FixmeComment broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:36
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Page without a main landmark ui/public/index.html:2
- Heading level jumps from h2 to h5 ui/src/components/pages/Portfolio.vue:52
- Accessibility enforcement below the top rung
- No assertions: startOrder broker-impl/src/test/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderEntityTest.java:31
- Change coupling: PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java ↔ PortfolioServiceImpl.java portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java:1
- Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:65
- Duplicated block (9–10 lines × 2) portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:28
- Duplicated block (63 lines × 2) portfolio-api/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/api/FundsTransfer.java:1
- Off the main sequence: utils
- No CI pipeline
- Type Safety
- Complex function formatOrderType (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 18) ui/src/components/pages/trades/New.vue:286
- Test Coverage
- No test or typecheck script
- Dead file (~158 LoC) ui/src/components/components/quote/QuoteChart.vue
- Dead file (~109 LoC) ui/src/components/components/portfolio/EquityRow.vue
- Dead file (~84 LoC) ui/src/common/portfolio.js
- Dead file (~55 LoC) ui/src/common/transfers.js
- Dead file (~28 LoC) ui/src/components/layout/MainNav.vue
- Dead file (~17 LoC) ui/src/components/layout/MainFooter.vue
- Dead file (~9 LoC) ui/src/common/http.js
- Dead file (~3 LoC) ui/src/common/config.js
- Unused dependency '@vue/cli-plugin-babel'
- Unused dependency '@vue/cli-service'
- Unused dependency 'jquery'
- JavaScript dependencies are not locked
Minor — 64 finding(s)
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:1
- Orphaned file wire-transfer-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stockbroker/wireTransfer/impl/transfer/TransferEntity.java:1
- Orphaned file bff/src/main/java/controllers/PortfolioController.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderEntity.java:1
- Orphaned file wire-transfer-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stockbroker/wireTransfer/impl/transfer/TransferProcess.java:1
- Orphaned file wire-transfer-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stockbroker/wireTransfer/impl/WireTransferServiceImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioServiceImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file build.sbt:1
- Orphaned file wire-transfer-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stockbroker/wireTransfer/impl/transfer/TransferEventProcessor.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/BrokerServiceImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file wire-transfer-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stockbroker/wireTransfer/impl/transfer/TransferEvent.java:1
- Orphaned file bff/src/main/java/controllers/WireTransferController.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderRepositoryImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file utils/src/main/java/com/redelastic/CSHelper.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEvent.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioState.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEventProcessor.java:1
- Orphaned file portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioModel.java:1
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderRepositoryImpl.java:50
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:41
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderModelImpl.java:45
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/order/OrderEntity.java:88
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:112
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/quote/IexQuoteServiceImpl.java:118
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:30
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging broker-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/broker/impl/trade/TradeServiceImpl.java:40
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioRepositoryImpl.java:67
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:69
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:186
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:220
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:286
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:290
- Interpolated log message defeats structured logging portfolio-impl/src/main/java/com/redelastic/stocktrader/portfolio/impl/PortfolioEntity.java:294
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- No seccomp profile REDACTED:2
- README/code drift README.md:86
- README/code drift README.md:90
- README/code drift README.md:140
- No ADRs found
- REDACTED
- Dormant codebase
- No network policy
- No ADRs
- No SAST
- No changelog
- Unused module-local declaration 'dummyPortfolioData' ui/src/components/pages/Portfolio.vue:81
- Java packages are not null-marked everywhere
Minor — 3 finding(s)
- Outdated: com.datastax.cassandra:cassandra-driver-extras
- Outdated: org.projectlombok:lombok
- Off the main sequence: commonModels
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-0647cb870f424fdaabe5522bb042a960/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 2 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-0647cb870f424fdaabe5522bb042a960/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 2 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 6 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | trivy | — | trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs **/bin/** --skip-dirs **/obj/** . --skip-db-update | 0 | artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy config --format json --quiet . | 104 | artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing | provenance | — | provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — The repository ships application workloads but no cluster-governance resources (CRDs, admission webhooks, or a committed policy engine). Runtime threat-detection (Falco/Tetragon) and admission control (Kyverno/OPA-Gatekeeper/PodSecurity) are cluster-OPERATOR controls owned by the platform, not shipped by an application repo/chart — nothing for this repo to assess. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | trivy | — | trivy fs --scanners vuln --format json --quiet --severity CRITICAL,HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW --skip-dirs **/bin/** --skip-dirs **/obj/** . --skip-db-update | 0 | artifacts/raw/trivy-fs.json |