{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click (cyclomatic 67): HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click has cyclomatic complexity 67 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c6ff61673fe17e1fac05264cdf7cc1bd3e2ef318652cd8029b969c754fd28d9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync (cyclomatic 48): HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dfd55e21be2d391d4c29de7dc12c3fdfbf97a7521029f60c883f7a73c8af3b1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.ShowRender (cyclomatic 47): HomePage.ShowRender has cyclomatic complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b072c3e8b7f7872a7b27fc4a11c4467911aaf721dd491ed5818c35e9d626e60e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync (cyclomatic 39): HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"258d70bf224645f657b0520abec23e1ccd11a3bc09e4d96c2f095774494b4956"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Draw_opencv.ProcessAsync (cyclomatic 36): Draw_opencv.ProcessAsync has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49b744c7ccfa0389f87ff47624a779f8a069b82bf5adedc1aaf067445d0f3586"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateMatcher.MatchCore (cyclomatic 27): TemplateMatcher.MatchCore has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78d8c90da77c51952a687bf7c2ad883fdbc82119da5b306a24cad284717ac50b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync (cyclomatic 24): HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cc78f9fe6f48f3223ce18b9d6d5b0f300e6a0f7d8fa19e8c601507c2b2ae264"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CameraLink.LoopCapture (cyclomatic 24): CameraLink.LoopCapture has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed645e4bee7af7f6d3d1abc6f4c0a7607346b92d91fc81dd11b47893a0ca6c07"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PaddleOcrService.RunRoi (cyclomatic 23): PaddleOcrService.RunRoi has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c61faf4daa6210b90231fba9799faf2013dd1836e43a9120f59200e74916133"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CameraManager.GetCameras (cyclomatic 22): CameraManager.GetCameras has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e319d56db4b5df5092bfa7632ca7444aebe231438354ad6f6e066d494176d67"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ProcessPage.ExecuteTask (cyclomatic 17): ProcessPage.ExecuteTask has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Process/ProcessPage.Task.vb"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6413a29cea77b56bd79a8be96a436e5bab994dd06e835d6ea64633334c6b697c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateTrainDialog.BtnCaptureFromCamera_Click (cyclomatic 16): TemplateTrainDialog.BtnCaptureFromCamera_Click has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"738a7362c94469aa229df615e72276d5358dca7a55d9f2dfe8604b9948317f40"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync (cognitive 163): HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync has cognitive complexity 163 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e1ea4a072f59968201352234001a81f310d7fa6d9de76ca51e5037f125fca1d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync (cognitive 76): HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync has cognitive complexity 76 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1af98c7063ea387435876643e434a6dc3b0ee99d63050e9a1eeee1c7ca9bbbc4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click (cognitive 74): HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click has cognitive complexity 74 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bee281a5b2ceab1f44ca4103052ae353c98ab2964454eb4ef2183f86363093c3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.ShowRender (cognitive 74): HomePage.ShowRender has cognitive complexity 74 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb077ea220526b38726ab79b44408e344ae1882f68f9415633979538d3d4d91d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateMatcher.MatchCore (cognitive 36): TemplateMatcher.MatchCore has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faca91b539b508375f3974e031406d50c291ddcfb6903e1cce87df5dd3ff2059"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CameraManager.GetCameras (cognitive 34): CameraManager.GetCameras has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de16b4afdae0db2141613df88e0c496dac7df0c8054e92e961c3330daffc344b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Draw_opencv.ProcessAsync (cognitive 34): Draw_opencv.ProcessAsync has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"371529ad531f8670cdebaf9532af2cba99aea0fbecd692779c59a8a16d70c1f5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync (cognitive 31): HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e32a785adf59be01a2df9bc1dbacd77c1be668e1f949fef05cced0097bf2c7b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ProcessPage.ExecuteTask (cognitive 26): ProcessPage.ExecuteTask has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Process/ProcessPage.Task.vb"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de9b5b1b4e95b3afe24307d238d9f48ea2f84a0d7650b60fc34e4bc63f00cded"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.UpdateFrame (cognitive 24): HomePage.UpdateFrame has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":405}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d15ae58bdb7c157466b89a4e5dca15c025a426d842ac7c5bd92a911be3e9547"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateManager.FindGroupBySupplierCode (cognitive 21): TemplateManager.FindGroupBySupplierCode has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7f6c8697df818b0b6e9718839a04102b688d7ffe5b60ee68e9c063b72a153d1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PaddleOcrService.RunRoi (cognitive 21): PaddleOcrService.RunRoi has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80fbdd37d213fa6355ba0de065c5887b3dd0cf338f97d4335d75a6f95bce7737"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CameraLink.LoopCapture (cognitive 21): CameraLink.LoopCapture has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b1e92e8c9a6a9d3fb0df0f44f31540f5a17bd4a7d7642e52bef739e48176fdb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateTrainingStore.SoftenCropBoundary (cognitive 20): TemplateTrainingStore.SoftenCropBoundary has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4536ac15490f11bcc42b69dc7dbabcba92682fe442c2cab76db26505de0c7df4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateCache.LoadAll (cognitive 20): TemplateCache.LoadAll has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/TemplateCache.vb"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15df4b4a8b1e5a5b0d507859ad55be34f0f85d4b4c7d9c5fd4ac18865f805ffd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TemplateTrainDialog.BtnCaptureFromCamera_Click (cognitive 19): TemplateTrainDialog.BtnCaptureFromCamera_Click has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0746fd86928ae17624ce2279e1cad96996025a9599c9139a7412b5d256661845"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ProcessPage.SendDetectionResult (cognitive 19): ProcessPage.SendDetectionResult has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Process/ProcessPage.Task.vb"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5464be09b4ccf3332fc4106c155b330eaa41d833e07fc5f68fe049461aeccb2c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SettingPage.LoadCameraRows (cognitive 18): SettingPage.LoadCameraRows has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/SettingPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"333dcbb2c3e255e7baa21034a55adb1bf97d119d0c718d37185492c5a2d8e01c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageConvertHelper.ToMat (cognitive 18): ImageConvertHelper.ToMat has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Helpers/ImageConvertHelper.vb"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f7dce6e7b80c3c50da2db9aeb60fb5674d029bdc7ecad5378dabed2e901067d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DirectShowDeviceEnumerator.GetDevices (cognitive 18): DirectShowDeviceEnumerator.GetDevices has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/DirectShowDeviceEnumerator.vb"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e1723727263f50847f2c760cd14e1a1ad04adac0df7b3454e4aaac261c18815"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TaskVideoRecorder.RecordLoopAsync (cognitive 18): TaskVideoRecorder.RecordLoopAsync has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/TaskVideoRecorder.vb"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04e322ed49bc78eb1a74260662cbfc9b683b9d82155760553a85a5a19d92b69b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CameraPickDialog.New.ctor (cognitive 17): CameraPickDialog.New.ctor has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/CameraPickDialog.vb"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a8cda761fb53aba5fccb7567a1635d38def84fb07971e84842afa9f7244a5cb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.IsFuzzyMatch (cognitive 16): HomePage.IsFuzzyMatch has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d33a056c8a01710a01862c930d83c64551dcb3fbf6fc502d91d66eb53531737e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HomePage.Page_Loaded (cognitive 16): HomePage.Page_Loaded has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb9a90640320f0500349a47ebfbbfc50498928eb4acb238bd2165f6863a6054b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: TemplateEditDialog.New(\u2026): MethodTooLong \u2014 New(\u2026) runs 209 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 109 over it, 2.09\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateEditDialog.vb"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"864df1d9980e7d8fd0bb1d7f035ddb998e64d9485fc776a1a343fab7bdf4831e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 BtnGetImg_Click runs 185 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 85 over it, 1.85\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e13fa11a9e47ce75babf1ace175bcd3457945d5c11cc3b02e9fa53cd2d678ed2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync: MethodTooLong \u2014 WaitOcrResultAsync runs 185 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 85 over it, 1.85\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4acc13ae13cab63e96fb775dd90126e9da31e7414323db36bb5bd557152fcdad"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: AlgorithmPage: ClassTooLong \u2014 631 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 30 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 231 over it, 1.58\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/AlgorithmPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8df6be4123860cb9a17e7244e4b51974c74333e8a30e413eb1515f4122b826e9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: HomePage: TooManyMethods \u2014 1700 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 47 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 17 over it, 1.57\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d7cdcd6607bf301a249dc2f0eaa802985b355c787e3796f11ba04d9c3eeb1de"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync: MethodTooLong \u2014 WaitMultipleMatchAsync runs 143 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 43 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"817210d5680512e478d65c82c048ca0dcd0018581f3003bfb28b995be9c93691"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 663 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 163 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d18a6cffa2e0c32b3795fdea39f17103abc5585c23750835f0ddb146063ede7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ProcessPage: TooManyMethods \u2014 591 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 39 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 9 over it, 1.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Process/ProcessPage.Realtime.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b005701db699eaee33fa24c32e08e65dd9a3507d8b26cac3eb4ca6324900439e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Pages/AlgorithmPage.xaml.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 641 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 141 over it, 1.28\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/AlgorithmPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba035c0dd341ff787a8ea3c22d3b6624c73ca8add7f803321b8f435c5044f0bf"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: TemplateTrainDialog: TooManyMethods \u2014 653 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 37 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 7 over it, 1.23\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"085bc655560cc1512f1c4d8b8c9c0569e4225c6f1046b4cc7c13bed6bcbc41a1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync: MethodTooLong \u2014 WaitBarcodeResultAsync runs 112 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 12 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbc5af32d4e388ddec4383c493eaf0e90546c780d45c4abe46048cf39393dfa3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: HomePage.ShowRender: MethodTooLong \u2014 ShowRender runs 109 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 9 over it, 1.09\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21bf10b56ec750a45aea1c058a3f2199da9482c56dbe8b173afef73e579681c5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: TemplateMatcher.MatchCore: MethodTooLong \u2014 MatchCore runs 108 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 8 over it, 1.08\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cba7ef0c5cb9ca61436b41aef7a1b0e925cca4d4dfea424a54450d39d5411591"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: TemplateTrainingStore: ClassTooLong \u2014 427 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 18 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 27 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07d586849d126228b764c45bc0c8e4be03941bc4292d37637f2d256ecd791e61"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (38\u201341 lines \u00D7 2): Pages/Home/HomeButtonHandlers.vb:242-282 | Pages/Home/HomeButtonHandlers.vb:369-406 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Pages/Home/HomeButtonHandlers.vb:242\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeButtonHandlers.vb"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25e85ef45efac9520002d068f7655f1edb4f57d1ddd3f81158ac683abcf4a298"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31 lines \u00D7 2): Pages/AlgorithmPage.xaml.vb:850-880 | Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb:249-279 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/AlgorithmPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":850}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072e9c64b6198720dbd1c1e4de7c7034f11b1e27551a4bb18c26bfb9d42c08ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:141-170 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:218-247 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:141\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:139\u0060 calls \u0060GetDirectoryName\u0060 and \u0060Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:216\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2870fd933a622e1f5ec6571c9f1bd8e16f6049cd1250b9e0f66ceeefac90a1d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:45-56 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb:91-118 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b87b458e17195552045336ca8a746e39f93dd7e702440ae6e8bb1b55e5f07dea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketClient.vb:32-53 | Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb:229-256 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb:229\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketClient.vb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3659f3a730ca8d193c2dfeeb2d5798610f865cf927cc8dbd05ed77521380938f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb:46-60 | Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb:71-85 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb:46\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60c11d1b80724be16f49314da97d7714d396410d9d9178094bf09dad623ff11f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Algorithm/Services/DecodeService.vb:301-310 | Sys/Algorithm/Services/DecodeService.vb:326-335 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/DecodeService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8c609e512686b86d2faccc3dc0c4250b92e98f16d73b180e69b00a9605a8159"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Pages/Dialogs/TemplateEditDialog.vb:118-128 | Pages/Dialogs/TemplateEditDialog.vb:191-201 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateEditDialog.vb"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"503206898acb0d29af28fc7b4897ee7b212b2ce5f3e0f3fbf3ebba8acbc5f831"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:98-103 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:110-115 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:122-127 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fac59ed90b92166a097b1b4b8a8f37373e2ee035f2401203931bb6d44d7a5100"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:97-103 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:109-115 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:121-127 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb:133-139 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cf6b6481c23f529560d7903f1a8042b3131be6a8bf7dfc25c88a7e3790c1165"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb:205-209 | Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb:214-218 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49a5482cfc2a82fc2c71f9c39f6244ea26f3c34457630d878622309463508dc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketClient.vb:64-74 | Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb:271-283 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketClient.vb"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c703361a32a618727eed2c8e942a85cd196669a2c768a7209dd2197c75d9630d"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: ModelEditPage (LCOM4 4): ModelEditPage\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/ModelEditPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b48cd1b664558e7e21daeb3af59cbf353baa8d893bb603d0a86c1972329bbf0d"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: BarcodeDecodeService (LCOM4 4): BarcodeDecodeService\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/DecodeService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4900f99a37f2dcaf49b23782a1bf9e0551bafac09e69ccea07ae87195f8dcf7"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Prerelease dependency: Microsoft.Web.WebView2: Microsoft.Web.WebView2 resolves to 1.0.4071-prerelease, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted \u2014 pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31b585e4d6ce108b7a3e70a305fd3a98c0b0f44a9f90c53f707519663f365aff"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Prerelease dependency: Newtonsoft.Json: Newtonsoft.Json resolves to 13.0.5-beta1, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted \u2014 pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bae1ff3bcde5ec1302a291a2bfb31a3a43d62d8ef3f05f8a4a5776e515325340"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Prerelease dependency: NModbus: NModbus resolves to 4.0.0-alpha010, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted \u2014 pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcd6447f44572c56ae0eaf5cfffad92018b12964eb3a5289d39092a3ad17c1cf"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Prerelease dependency: NModbus4: NModbus4 resolves to 3.0.0-alpha2, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted \u2014 pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a67703629a377b2bfb3befafaec34a911e2273a71b620426d5997a610f5fe2c"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Prerelease dependency: System.Management: System.Management resolves to 11.0.0-preview.5.26302.115, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted \u2014 pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fda405421c59612d80b3b5261f63c0410d4f563f19c27bbeae1c1b2065e5609"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb: Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb changed 61 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 47 in HomePage.ShowRender at line 272. 14 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 47 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/HomePage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e956dc7d3d67212572e7ebf823564ead94b2908d83fd0c612ff0151973cb7a71"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb: Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb changed 16 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 39 in HomePage.WaitOcrResultAsync at line 15. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 11 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6ac21b50c27e3105355dc9d56af676307aa4da73362039d1948bc6e784f6b2c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb: Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb changed 8 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 67 in HomePage.BtnGetImg_Click at line 59. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 5 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeDetectionMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49eedeac3f12965a8f84b12603423c4d028a4dae2078264d06d53a9162f1598d"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb: Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb changed 11 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 48 in HomePage.WaitMultipleMatchAsync at line 31. 7 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeMatchingStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01ffbb922c505a673501fdf2dea9949a813bf177d47a440456471eb26bfdec48"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb: Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb changed 16 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in CameraLink.LoopCapture at line 40. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 14 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6acec055f74a8a28bf8d7285e500191f1454927b2147b7b8e91d0fa09e8cdf39"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/SettingPage.xaml.vb: Pages/SettingPage.xaml.vb changed 24 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in SettingPage.LoadCameraRows at line 252. 7 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 17 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/SettingPage.xaml.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/SettingPage.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3748c9e09b1037b26216b3d6bf9692ae8a7667bbb9f9355f9dd06df93299503"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb: Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb changed 12 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 27 in TemplateMatcher.MatchCore at line 215. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 7 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateMatcher.vb"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"356e4022204e50be055a14fd26191fba1a9a03054ec4e4ca37c1d8c4bc9d7839"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb: UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 36 in Draw_opencv.ProcessAsync at line 59. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 7 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UI/Algorithm/Draw_opencv.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d62371d149cbdb375c63b1df51baa379f23ca0751b8525e64ba3d6646179be9"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb: Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb changed 13 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in HomePage.WaitBarcodeResultAsync at line 15. 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 9 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e427544aa0f59ddf7ad40c1066942422c4f3dd05d234422d900bf076d89cf74c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb: Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb changed 8 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in CameraManager.GetCameras at line 29. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 5 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc70eb05e40116057178b9dd2560c5385c1211d7c9c1bb020aadccdec1e2745c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb: Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb changed 10 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in TemplateTrainDialog.BtnCaptureFromCamera_Click at line 114. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Dialogs/TemplateTrainDialog.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"635aa9415b3b7ea3e0c73532a03b31a7c0e1ecaae2f857751fb3ca7f4a082a6e"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb: Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 23 in PaddleOcrService.RunRoi at line 37. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/PaddleOcrService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b58250b955dc50b84976e4ca1c5b3598c2294a491dbe9e6e022ebf7e2f920270"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Pages/Home/HomeDetectionFlow.vb: Pages/Home/HomeDetectionFlow.vb changed 5 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is HomePage.PreWarmMatchCamera at line 97), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cbugs fix.\u201D; \u201Cbugs fix.\u201D; \u201Cbugs fix.\u201D; \u201Cbugs fix.\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-23..2026-07-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-23 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-22 18:04:11 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Pages/Home/HomeDetectionFlow.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeDetectionFlow.vb"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9057fa7c68a3ea7ab46bf44d91bf489fb8a348c19388669907547f0fd5fd5c2b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Application.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb343aecd6a2bbf3e0cf773e8d1c20ea28fdf2db47f74f49e64d4b6460733b9f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bf672c60676d2c52f42808ed75e4b01a5e232421e98d092edf6960c3b619647"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeBarcodeStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"233440df387747e18b4a56e182ddc84973dca6b48445bfff801479e5675b63a1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c2b3385acfa3915000f0d5e483dcef3b5e35f5895a94bb19cfd1c82cfe1d2eb"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06367134ba892f25e19e3b92cd84c5130c6578d87dc48ba26af8882160f6c51c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Home/HomeOcrStage.vb"},"region":{"startLine":237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d719fb107a217674dec96b7030bd941ef9e31acae7cb2a04c8c5e3a98094b097"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Pages/Process/ProcessPage.WebSocket.vb"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"745bd820785c8f5ae6130eab137c4c5d35262eb08e0eec0e22f542104094e1da"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Core/Matching/TemplateTrainingStore.vb"},"region":{"startLine":473}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af77310eaeb558219f4acae489038ef977ba44e7828a7f67cb4e7538db8a379b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Helpers/ExceptionHelper.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28287b9f03274974cf1064fdaf8d53e984e6739b96f7cf7c54ad9c68e61d92c5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Helpers/ImageConvertHelper.vb"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef47b8fff2029b9fbc6fece5f03e70013c29ffae69ccbadf4fb83f3076cd3954"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Algorithm/Services/DecodeService.vb"},"region":{"startLine":250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a8bc9944a0e742bb4307dca89abc5d0da98e4bd1231a0272822f3e0a265485d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/IOController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":343}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4df07496db1070327872e16d57219e8631a188c8408f151610b34f3d9142574d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/IOController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d8a3ef18a0f0871902ddf2b450270a9219feac37cdc5f8e8f47b54d2e29d9a6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/IOController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":366}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51aabacf0135a1d29ad313fb985c2c37d3950e80945aaef5f23480ce535f675d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c969644ad8b018a49c18e5ee33848098b5fc8c4e4ca702372e538c37920fb8c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d67c737207c037b1742adfe4a5ce0447a9d1ee75a85f41855fb07b66c53902dc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3216f94ab2dde7b1bb735b51baef321f36028e01fd62dd9e517b687c3f94ab5c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a9c8d671811afb694aacf81237bf16dd1798d09918bc3f1fb28acbf51dee4d2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9380ae4c4a4728a6c391b3d0e19bac6e9340d8e6873269294f73e028ddc85da8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/BuzzerController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04a5aece697aedf651df3628b0aa7eed34a0bcff5c47fba1c22e713e26a7ab52"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/DIScanf.vb"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63455d2ea81c2a65f5b3e8c729e678e99c16e641b3e8c9609763d8ad27d54f49"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/DIScanf.vb"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d51b3e6a75a49f587a715b699a2ce6d85d29d01d5a44d85d3cbbce97ee81a19"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/ModbusBuzzer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07757cfbe0615890e9f467708b97b6840197f3085985f653c02be98265b50dd4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/ModbusBuzzer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62cd2095468a23f251d9e3286848d65d70b96e1567d5eaebd5a97399a47fce1a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/ModbusBuzzer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe8efbd646fab6e9fc61016621dd75ab49582001bdcf0e62996060074c34db20"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/ModbusBuzzer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f77805cd8f343608f54567d37b4be4b3c2b60855c23c4d5b450c48fbb726b2c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/Modbus/ModbusBuzzer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0be6753b82befae8c329255906bea2701a5d97ccc451ad88a1f47c08e629c414"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketClient.vb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc414b584a50def6847920a07b490c52aafe3a00d57e74ea45954301c958f405"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f1048f796ad95cd6fbc877b30f3b8d261877373b0af1f75297e5d6b5821c51f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"418359d6978ed166cf7c45406d4dd31cc64fbc07d9291fea9a82255d20a01f7e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3307af8a03dcb2f6c61ee1bb14f9d316b9369fe762cf4d1ee7f9d9afdc9d2274"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dae512c6d631bce482bba63cc7e62d1562df7152537600ed89448fccb2724795"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a6f16a7b0c9e197982e12a29e41c6ce04043807db9cc5c487acce2e5e0109f4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketManager.vb"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f17b6d2f2a1cbbff9feea37589a5df395d53e2b6ee9d6c3759b710222e8f41cb"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketServer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82d190718ab63214103cd08d53a2535d6e23f919e6a06939d3c45c4b6f57db85"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketServer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eee956369a09b09b60580712b44afd245170fa1c193d79f8e0e43eecdb7d9266"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketServer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24037f770a744fd147d59553b7f0fac6523debe2ae218c1cea9d809f0544bac3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketServer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22a13888a06ee7090bc822f3cea806ea730831902cf63c88183b0da6569c84b2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/Data/WebSocket/WebSocketServer.vb"},"region":{"startLine":202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b0d803033e39be182876dc012a606c0a2a2476709eac01ae6cb972b3aca87b7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b6b439aa908502a0f8b40eb21158b2d228bfd25a04841a6385519294b37dc20"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52071c4b81bb435f6d059139df0149c4ea1d692b40be2b09d337e8ffcd825f40"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99f8a68253b9634d67df6a2785b6dc2cb1bf0b5d8a611f86b2efa1def3bd5279"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/CameraLink.vb"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3eb1c5c1516dbe6b6b7cff90e7180aa6a370a270e77e15bc25a42263e388a776"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sys/UVC/DirectShowDeviceEnumerator.vb"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"959a0c0e4b31ba687e9e13060e618ed9d872cf6ce76704ca424b14294d4b5e51"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct \u2014 as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UI/MeteorMessageBox.xaml.vb"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"979c71bf000d7e419659570cb00dcc4adffe8a3e72cc42da6ecd9a2415a761b1"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NuGet dependencies are not locked: No packages.lock.json and no central package management \u2014 restores aren\u0027t reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable \u003CRestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003Etrue\u003C/RestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003E (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a97b4f69ccac509400ece7eedefb06d3ede0522cd4d8bcb5c068bea719545a6"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}