{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coveralls.coveralls_coverage_data (cyclomatic 26): Coveralls.coveralls_coverage_data has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/coveralls.rb"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1962bdab093ed1699e8e7cfc2dcfcdae024a5fc133e1a8a9d5e1387654b158f3"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Project.find_binary_files (cyclomatic 23): Project.find_binary_files has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/project.rb"},"region":{"startLine":528}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee7175f2cd7f6c1bae29fe469d885c26a8e76cc7961e77467ae0f4fa8e086b29"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coveralls.coveralls_coverage_data (cognitive 49): Coveralls.coveralls_coverage_data has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (43 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/coveralls.rb"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a006dea4d388227633d780b64adf6e06cc29e313d2d83332ff602ebd51a233b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Project.find_binary_files (cognitive 42): Project.find_binary_files has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 22 (38 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/project.rb"},"region":{"startLine":528}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3da51e3713cfcd31e0ff5ac3d955660ece3048c1e8dc4039ca25f5bbd4dd2ce8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HtmlOutput.create_html_from_file (cognitive 18): HtmlOutput.create_html_from_file has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d36de2f73d1d15e6c779147ccda7451f7869d4eb1c976ad763b7c3d837ec6fa"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Project: TooManyMethods \u2014 48 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 18 over it, 1.60\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/project.rb"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a05fbdbc28a1f74a8df6ea1123a617c7ebf3ce4e745dddeaa095098ca82725e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: slather/project.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 560 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 60 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/project.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a494a94fb63ab46bf216298728b514e0501b595fffd4cdc358972f229ca516d2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Coveralls: TooManyMethods \u2014 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/coveralls.rb"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6768a90d82bfcbf42a8b719fb3f8289b2c316b58c11b9b3dfa2f34ace5422915"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb:86-95 | lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb:97-106 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f87b0f6de1eb1e8484cf68756694e3630d39a4fb73dda305c61dcb5bfba63b2c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): lib/slather/coverage_service/cobertura_xml_output.rb:23-28 | lib/slather/coverage_service/json_output.rb:29-34 | lib/slather/coverage_service/llvm_cov_output.rb:26-31 | lib/slather/coverage_service/sonarqube_xml_output.rb:23-28 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060lib/slather/coverage_service/json_output.rb\u0060 and \u0060lib/slather/coverage_service/llvm_cov_output.rb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/cobertura_xml_output.rb"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31c9866ed28727fe8a93ad15fdcc04ace6ae381f9368d1cbd5657d1f5cbaca57"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: ProfdataCoverageFile (LCOM4 5): ProfdataCoverageFile\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/profdata_coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a71097a8dd81c169c373a4f1ac525b37872cb35448aff3ea15c7ef56f24995a"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: CoverageFile (LCOM4 4): CoverageFile\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"649cc8031599dee8a7b85d89d1292757d9d8bc9396b22f590f6b0ea222d1faf1"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent naming convention for data retrieval methods. Some methods return a path (pathname), some return raw content (data), and some return processed coverage metrics. However, \u0060source_file()\u0060 vs \u0060source_file_pathname()\u0060 is ambiguous: does one return the string path and the other the file object? Similarly, \u0060raw_data()\u0060 vs \u0060source_data()\u0060 vs \u0060gcov_data()\u0060 suggests overlapping or unclear distinctions between raw file content, parsed GCov format, and internal raw representation.: Standardize naming to clearly indicate return type: \u0060get_path()\u0060, \u0060get_content()\u0060, \u0060get_parsed_data()\u0060. Ensure \u0060source_file()\u0060 and \u0060source_file_pathname()\u0060 are distinct (e.g., one returns String, one returns File object) or merge if redundant. (signatures: Slather.CoverageFile.source_file_pathname() | Slather.CoverageFile.source_file() | Slather.CoverageFile.source_data() | Slather.CoverageFile.raw_data() | Slather.CoverageFile.line_coverage_data() | Slather.CoverageFile.branch_coverage_data())"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a09d019c24a122b2d0e7e4861fe79609136f6eaf9a41ccf14604bde11e37d7a"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicate intent across similar types. \u0060Slather.CoverageFile\u0060 and \u0060Slather.ProfdataCoverageFile\u0060 share identical method signatures for \u0060line_coverage_data\u0060 and \u0060branch_coverage_data\u0060. While they may handle different underlying formats (gcov vs profdata), the public API surface exposes redundant method names for the same logical operation (getting line/branch coverage). Additionally, \u0060ProfdataCoverageFile\u0060 has \u0060branch_region_data\u0060 which has no counterpart in \u0060CoverageFile\u0060, creating an asymmetry.: If these types implement a common interface, ensure the interface is explicit. If not, consider if \u0060ProfdataCoverageFile\u0060 should expose the same base methods for consistency, or if the distinction is necessary. The asymmetry in branch data methods is a minor inconsistency. (signatures: Slather.CoverageFile.line_coverage_data() | Slather.CoverageFile.branch_coverage_data() | Slather.ProfdataCoverageFile.line_coverage_data() | Slather.ProfdataCoverageFile.branch_coverage_data() | Slather.ProfdataCoverageFile.branch_region_data())"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ad79460cd5931c36643c81ad906552b62df0dc6cd3bd39d7be91ddf8846b229"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent method naming for report generation. \u0060CoberturaXmlOutput\u0060 and \u0060SonarqubeXmlOutput\u0060 use \u0060create_xml_report\u0060, while \u0060HtmlOutput\u0060 uses \u0060create_html_reports\u0060 (plural) and \u0060create_html_from_file\u0060 (singular). The naming convention varies between \u0027create_[format]_report\u0027 and \u0027create_[format]s\u0027.: Standardize to \u0060generate_report(coverage_files)\u0060 or \u0060create_[format]_report(coverage_files)\u0060 across all output types. (signatures: Slather.CoverageService.CoberturaXmlOutput.create_xml_report(coverage_files) | Slather.CoverageService.SonarqubeXmlOutput.create_xml_report(coverage_files) | Slather.CoverageService.HtmlOutput.create_html_reports(coverage_files) | Slather.CoverageService.HtmlOutput.create_html_from_file(coverage_file))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21cbc4dd92f1b4886f46c6d80443d3514f1fc6a6022ac93bf3d57db7022db266"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent method naming for storing reports. Some output types use \u0060store_report\u0060, while others (like \u0060HtmlOutput\u0060) do not have this method, instead using \u0060create_html_reports\u0060. This suggests \u0060store_report\u0060 is for saving to disk/cloud, while \u0060create_*\u0060 is for generation. However, the lack of \u0060store_report\u0060 in \u0060HtmlOutput\u0060 and \u0060SimpleOutput\u0060 makes the API inconsistent for the \u0027save\u0027 operation.: Either all output types should have a \u0060store_report\u0060 method (even if it\u0027s a no-op for simple outputs) or the API should clearly distinguish between \u0027generate\u0027 and \u0027store\u0027 operations with consistent naming across all types. (signatures: Slather.CoverageService.CoberturaXmlOutput.store_report(report) | Slather.CoverageService.JsonOutput.store_report(report) | Slather.CoverageService.LlvmCovOutput.store_report(report) | Slather.CoverageService.SonarqubeXmlOutput.store_report(report))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffbb955d36ba47b3777bbf9fa8d5ce10c5aa05737c1ecaae0f2556352dbd84f0"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53428cda7c4d22fd0d39df08eb790b1acf98d7b0bedb94eac28859e35b6df23b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d135b59510654f66fb7d400775f970cf9fda905be0195c40273ac7aee20ac10d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 6 of 8 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 8 of the 20 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb, lib/slather/coverage_service/coveralls.rb, lib/slather/coverage_service/cobertura_xml_output.rb, lib/slather/command/coverage_command.rb, lib/slather/coverage_file.rb, lib/slather/coverage_info.rb. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/html_output.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"deb19abf76ce997779b64a10dc7b3693b19f34b826edb333f8d45c3439131cd7"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/coveralls.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bdfe27a0edc13d5ffe000a22327a4ea9aed6aef8de6db57e8fa3aa0b4cbf65d"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_service/cobertura_xml_output.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bfa21f3dda541ab95cfaf1c3808710397d1a98d7d77e203c945e93145ddc220"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/command/coverage_command.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da62cb5636c94ec8f1e78ee86665968c5fd863e7e2dc2c41c26b376b7132dbf7"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af75961811b7a63749ad121793b759f961021de51afaf055ffc288b311115bed"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_info.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ead757753715398f7d5769851e65f56dbc0e373878f0d1082d968fee123384f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README.md names \u0060.slather.yml\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060.slather.yml\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b85864071a30ab325207b0475304e4f6aa1b79c8e2996b50e4173a6d35a328ea"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CI pipeline targets a decommissioned service: The pipeline is well-formed, but the only CI definition is \u0060.travis.yml\u0060, and its \u0060README.md\u0060 build badge still points at \u0060travis-ci.org\u0060 \u2014 a service shut down in June 2021. No other CI is configured in this repository, so nothing has been building or testing changes here since that shutdown \u2014 the steps below describe a gate that is not running. Porting it is mostly mechanical: the build and test commands already written here are what a replacement pipeline would run."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94fa49939f4e75dfcbfaabad72be66184852fe80bd9db87538e6e15223919a47"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add brakeman for Rails apps, otherwise \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 or CodeQL\u0027s ruby pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 279 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/profdata_coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e9526fa28c8dbe17c768cba0b71c4681b28774a2962cb8c2b82e1afd996f7be"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/profdata_coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cba454fd80959404dc25b5d4d3e6ea628a1e32590299ea8e72f0aa667cf35971"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060xcodeproj_path || Slather::Project.yml[\u0022xcodeproj\u0022]\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/slather/command/coverage_command.rb, lib/slather/command/setup_command.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/command/coverage_command.rb"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c9c470f3258ebbc8bbaba9a27a13caaf9d2b2404e5accc6cabe6c9496e21ce1"}},{"ruleId":"X18","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Disposable created and abandoned in the function that made it: \u0060File.new\u0060 is called here without a block, so it hands back an open descriptor the caller must close \u2014 and its first and only use reads \u0060.read\u0060 through it and drops it. Nothing closes it: it stays open until the garbage collector happens to finalize it, which is one leaked descriptor per call (a child process too, for \u0060IO.popen\u0060), \u0060Errno::EMFILE\u0060 under load, and for a written file data that is not flushed when the program next reads it. Use the block form, which closes on every path including a raise (\u0060File.new(\u2026) { |io| \u2026 }\u0060), or the one-call reader/writer (\u0060File.read\u0060, \u0060File.write\u0060, \u0060File.foreach\u0060)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/slather/coverage_file.rb"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6e74fc6802a3e06d640d9386cceb2ca72c43d9888e8adfa8ded8414a48fc382"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Ruby\u0027s type checker does not check nil everywhere: This repository commits no Sorbet configuration (\u0060sorbet/config\u0060) and no \u0060Steepfile\u0060, so nothing type-checks its 20 Ruby product file(s): a nilable value reaches a method call silently and raises \u0060NoMethodError: undefined method \u2026 for nil\u0060 the first time it is nil. A \u0060# typed:\u0060 sigil does nothing without a \u0060sorbet/config\u0060 beside the code; a Steep run configured only on a command line is not something this check can read."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b27113b1bc22f400935e8620d19eae7fd3ef145cc36018609c445ea8cd4af1"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-328","guid":"f0ffc869-97c3-dc5c-8825-be1159f1fc5f","name":"Reversible One-Way Hash","shortDescription":{"text":"Reversible One-Way Hash"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/328.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":3,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}