Public report of StarkNitish/NexusOS, published 22 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 22 October 2026, 23:06 UTC · Survey ID cd_05d22d0d21104018b79e69b16bb69f90
StarkNitish/NexusOS
Measured 22 October 2026, 23:04 UTC, at code version a012476
No regression since the last survey
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
CAI scoreWeak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 6 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 23,179 lines of product code in 7 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.2 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 35
Findings by how serious they are
56 critical364 serious53 minor
10 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
22 October 2026, 23:04 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
78of 85 dimensions measured by tools. The other 7 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
457of 473 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 16 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
85dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 23,179 lines of product code in 7 projects.
StarkNitish/NexusOS scores 45 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while five of its seven lenses score higher still: Performance at 100 and Architecture at 90, both rated Exemplary, Security and Compliance at 70 and Code Health at 57, both rated Adequate, and Maturity at 49, rated Weak.
The score is lower than those five because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 35 and is rated Weak. Its DR & Backup dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to codify backups + geo-recovery in IaC and document RTO/RPO and the restore procedure — a persistence guard alone is not disaster recovery and to resolve the 1 ADR not followed finding(s) in ADR Conformance, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 45 to about 52.
56 findings are critical: 46 in Static Analysis (SAST), four in IaC & Container Security, two in Dependency Vulnerabilities, two in Forms & labels, one in ADR Conformance and one in Dependency Hygiene.
Watchdog couldn't measure 10 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Dependency Hygiene, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 23,179 lines, which would take an estimated 0.2 person-years, around €29,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 128 findings
These 128 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 8 October 2026, and are gone from this one. The first 100 are listed here.
Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/figma/index.ts
Code Duplication · Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/figma/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/run-with-flags.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/tools/openclaw-tools.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-messages.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestrate-worktrees.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file REDACTED
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-shared.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file dashboard/src/components/LiveFeed.tsx
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-start.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file dashboard/src/components/HITLGate.tsx
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file dashboard/src/components/AuditLog.tsx
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/slack/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/jira/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/auto-tmux-dev.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/insaits-security-wrapper.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/shell-split.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/notion/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestration-status.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-rules.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/suggest-compact.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/reply-prefix.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/posthog/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/figma/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/railway/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/hook-flags.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/account-summary.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/pagerduty/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/check-console-log.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/pairing.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-no-personal-paths.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/supabase/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/message-action-names.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file dashboard/src/components/CommandBar.tsx
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-skills.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/stripe/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/openai/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-compact.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file dashboard/src/app/page.tsx
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/read-only-account-inspect.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/sender-identity.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/resend/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-pr-created.js
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/registry-loader.ts
Test Coverage · No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/bluebubbles-actions.ts
Rebuild cost: about €29,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€9,700 to €49,000, for 161 to 511 hours of work, about 0.2 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 45. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 23,179 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Codify backups + geo-recovery in IaC and document RTO/RPO and the restore procedure — a persistence guard alone is not disaster recovery.
Raises the score by about 5 points · Medium effort · DR & Backup
2
Resolve the 1 ADR not followed finding(s) in ADR Conformance — start with BUILD_LOG.md.
Raises the score by about 2 points · Low effort · ADR Conformance
3
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €29,000 to build again, about 0.2 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 35 (Weak). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Codify backups + geo-recovery in IaC and document RTO/RPO and the restore procedure — a persistence guard alone is not disaster recovery. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 5 points for medium effort. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
94 modules, with 55 dependencies between them. Every module uses only modules listed above it, so there are no loops.
The table shows the 40 modules with the most connections; 54 more are left out to keep it readable.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
dashboard.lib uses dashboard.lib.gateway, so a change to dashboard.lib.gateway can break dashboard.lib, while a change to dashboard.lib can't break dashboard.lib.gateway.
Position
Below the diagonal: dashboard.lib uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
dashboard.src.components uses dashboard.src.components.HITLGate, so a change to dashboard.src.components.HITLGate can break dashboard.src.components, while a change to dashboard.src.components can't break dashboard.src.components.HITLGate.
Position
Below the diagonal: dashboard.src.components uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages, while a change to packages can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps uses packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps.generate, so a change to packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps.generate can break packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps, while a change to packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps can't break packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps.generate.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.agent-harness.scripts.codemaps uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels uses packages.channels.openclaw-gateway, so a change to packages.channels.openclaw-gateway can break packages.channels, while a change to packages.channels can't break packages.channels.openclaw-gateway.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core uses packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core can break packages.channels.core, while a change to packages.channels.core can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core uses packages.channels.core.registry, so a change to packages.channels.core.registry can break packages.channels.core, while a change to packages.channels.core can't break packages.channels.core.registry.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core uses packages.channels.core.targets, so a change to packages.channels.core.targets can break packages.channels.core, while a change to packages.channels.core can't break packages.channels.core.targets.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core uses packages.channels.core.thread-bindings-policy, so a change to packages.channels.core.thread-bindings-policy can break packages.channels.core, while a change to packages.channels.core can't break packages.channels.core.thread-bindings-policy.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins uses packages.channels.core.plugins.config-writes, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.config-writes can break packages.channels.core.plugins, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.config-writes.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins uses packages.channels.core.plugins.group-mentions, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.group-mentions can break packages.channels.core.plugins, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.group-mentions.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins uses packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core can break packages.channels.core.plugins, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding uses packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.channel-access, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.channel-access can break packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.channel-access.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding uses packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.helpers, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.helpers can break packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding.helpers.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins.onboarding uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.core.plugins.outbound uses packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core, so a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core can break packages.channels.core.plugins.outbound, while a change to packages.channels.core.plugins.outbound can't break packages.channels.core.plugins.types_core.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.core.plugins.outbound uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.discord uses packages.channels.types, so a change to packages.channels.types can break packages.channels.discord, while a change to packages.channels.discord can't break packages.channels.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.discord uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.routing uses packages.channels.core.chat-type, so a change to packages.channels.core.chat-type can break packages.channels.routing, while a change to packages.channels.routing can't break packages.channels.core.chat-type.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.routing uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.routing uses packages.channels.routing.resolve-route, so a change to packages.channels.routing.resolve-route can break packages.channels.routing, while a change to packages.channels.routing can't break packages.channels.routing.resolve-route.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.routing uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.routing uses packages.channels.routing.session-key, so a change to packages.channels.routing.session-key can break packages.channels.routing, while a change to packages.channels.routing can't break packages.channels.routing.session-key.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.routing uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.telegram uses packages.channels.types, so a change to packages.channels.types can break packages.channels.telegram, while a change to packages.channels.telegram can't break packages.channels.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.telegram uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.whatsapp uses packages.channels.types, so a change to packages.channels.types can break packages.channels.whatsapp, while a change to packages.channels.whatsapp can't break packages.channels.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.whatsapp uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.channels.whatsapp uses packages.channels.whatsapp.resolve-outbound-target, so a change to packages.channels.whatsapp.resolve-outbound-target can break packages.channels.whatsapp, while a change to packages.channels.whatsapp can't break packages.channels.whatsapp.resolve-outbound-target.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.channels.whatsapp uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors._template uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors._template, while a change to packages.connectors._template can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors._template uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.anthropic-api uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.anthropic-api, while a change to packages.connectors.anthropic-api can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.anthropic-api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.aws-s3 uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.aws-s3, while a change to packages.connectors.aws-s3 can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.aws-s3 uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.cloudflare uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.cloudflare, while a change to packages.connectors.cloudflare can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.cloudflare uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.datadog uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.datadog, while a change to packages.connectors.datadog can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.datadog uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.docker-hub uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.docker-hub, while a change to packages.connectors.docker-hub can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.docker-hub uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
packages.connectors.figma uses packages.connectors.types, so a change to packages.connectors.types can break packages.connectors.figma, while a change to packages.connectors.figma can't break packages.connectors.types.
Position
Below the diagonal: packages.connectors.figma uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
63
High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
13
High / Critical
A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration
12
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, establish a robust disaster recovery strategy by codifying backups and geo-recovery in infrastructure as code, while clearly documenting recovery time and point objectives. Second, enhance accessibility and visual safety by ensuring visible focus styles, respecting reduced motion preferences, and correcting low-contrast color pairs. Third, align all documentation with the actual codebase to eliminate references to non-existent files or environment variables. Fourth, improve outbound HTTP resilience by adding timeouts, retry logic, and circuit breakers to all external calls. Finally, enforce accessibility standards in the development toolchain by integrating linting and automated testing into the continuous integration pipeline.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Codify backups + geo-recovery in IaC and document RTO/RPO and the restore procedure — a persistence guard alone is not disaster recovery.
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Reconcile the README with reality: docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `RUST_LOG`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `JWT_EXPIRY_HOURS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md runs `./install.sh typescript`, but `install.sh` does not exist; packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/golang/`, but no file or folder `rules/golang` exists.
Pass `timeout=` on every `requests`/`httpx` call (requests has no default and will wait forever), mount an `HTTPAdapter(max_retries=Retry(...))` on shared sessions, and wrap calls to flaky dependencies in `tenacity` retries or a `pybreaker` circuit breaker.
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 56
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 364
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 53
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 10
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 78 of 85 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 7 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 85 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 457 of 473 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.ts) and the coverage collector does support this ecosystem — it drives jest, vitest and mocha — but no test command in this repository names a runner the analyzer recognises, so it could not tell what to instrument. Read from the manifests: the root package has a `scripts.test` of `pnpm -r test`. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's reading of test commands, not a missing .ts runner and not a defect in this repository. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — a committed report is read whatever runner produced it.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.ts) and the reliability runner does support this ecosystem — it drives jest, vitest, mocha and egg-bin — but no test command in this repository names a runner the analyzer recognises, so it could not tell what to re-run. Read from the manifests: the root package has a `scripts.test` of `pnpm -r test`. So flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's reading of test commands, not a missing .ts runner and not a finding about this repository.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — 14 direct Cargo declaration(s) were read, but the outdated signal needs crates.io, and no committed Cargo.lock resolves them to versions, so this dimension's own question is only partly answered. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares package.json, but the licence verdict published here was taken over its crate dependencies. Nothing was read about its npm dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable (1 contributor(s) across 43 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). Concentration needs a team to concentrate: with one contributor there is nobody to spread the knowledge to, so there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `packages/channels/core/allowlist-match.ts`, `packages/channels/core/inbound-debounce-policy.ts`, `packages/channels/core/plugins/bluebubbles-actions.ts` produced a parse error, so every rule in this engine's `gdpr.yml` was absent there. That absence is NOT a clean result: these rules detect personal data crossing a boundary into a log sink, a URL or browser storage, and a file that was never parsed cannot report any of the three. The rest of the tree analysed normally and its rows above stand; only these files are unaccounted for. You can widen what we reach: fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover it.
D34 Knowledge Freshness — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Too few commits to judge knowledge freshness (43 commit(s) sampled).
D44 Platform End-of-Life — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This dimension reads a project's own statement about the platform it runs on: a TargetFramework in a .NET project file, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain file or Cargo.toml rust-version, a .go-version, .java-version, .ruby-version, .tool-versions or .sdkmanrc, a go.mod go directive, a Maven or Gradle Java level or toolchain, a Gemfile's ruby directive, a mix.exs elixir requirement, a rebar.config minimum_otp_vsn, a pubspec.yaml SDK constraint, a build.sbt scalaVersion, or a framework major pinned by a dependency constraint. This repository carries none of them, so nothing about its platform was established. That is a gap in this analyzer's coverage, NOT a finding that the platform is supported — a language whose runtime is declared elsewhere (Package.swift, a REDACTED) is simply not read here yet.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DockerCompose (REDACTED). compose up failed (exit 14 — a file the compose project references is missing) — env file packages/connectors/.env not found: stat packages/connectors/.env: no such file or directory; runtime evidence skipped.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'firebase-admin' is imported (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'firebase-admin' is imported (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'firebase-admin' is imported (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 'firebase-admin' is imported (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
R10 Code Duplication — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 32 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 72.
R4 Test Coverage — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 94 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 134.
R7 Dead Code — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 25 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 65.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D7 Architectural Integrity: Layering is checked against detected/declared rules — an architecture whose boundaries live in convention or in code review, not in a rule a scanner can read, is not enforced here.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D22 Internal API Consistency: API-surface coherence is an LLM judgement over a sample of the public surface — consistency of intent across the whole API is approximated, not exhaustively verified.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling: Boundary leakage is detected from type references across detected contexts — leaks that flow through primitives, serialization or shared infrastructure may not surface as a typed reference.
D25 ADR Conformance: ADR conformance is the LLM-scored fraction of sampled code that follows recorded decisions — it checks the decisions that were written down and the slices it sampled, not unrecorded rules or the whole tree.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P5 DR & Backup: Backup/restore and disaster-recovery readiness is judged from in-repo evidence — a config that exists is not a tested restore, so the absence of positive evidence is reported as "not evidenced", never scored as present.
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (7): D19, D20, D21, D22, D25, D26, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 21 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 26 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with validate-hooks.validateHooks (cyclomatic 37), instinct-cli.cmd_import (cyclomatic 36), resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute (cyclomatic 35). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 26 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 7.0 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 34 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 1 body over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with validate-hooks.validateHooks (cognitive 78). — Refactoring it lifts Cognitive Complexity from 5.2 to about 5.6/10.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes8.8 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 4 FunctionTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with status-reactions.ts, resolve-route.ts, claw.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Resolve the 3 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with instinct-cli.py, REDACTED, resolve-route.ts. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
5 duplicated block group(s) detected. Measured on part of this repository only: .ts (85% of production source) was not exposed to THIS dimension's token comparison and is not in this count; duplication there is measured by R10 Code Duplication, the frontend lens's card running the same clone algorithm over the JS/TS token stream.
Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with instinct-cli.py, connector.rs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ws_listener.py. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (7–9 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with instinct-cli.py. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
6 production modules (Cargo+npm), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; 0 module(s) off the main sequence.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 1 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with skill-create-output.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the code respects its intended layering / architecture rules.
Method: Enforcement rung (Prevented/Verified/Documented) per checkable ADR via Roslyn, plus dependency cycles via the engine shared with D5/AX3. Deterministic, exact.
All 1 mechanizable ADR(s) are enforced: 1 by analyzers, 0 by tests. Dependency cycles not checked (no project-reference graph; where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there).
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d7_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
569 test methods: 569 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e. The JavaScript/TypeScript suite contributes 512 `it`/`test` case(s) across 60 test file(s) declaring at least one; its tier split is read from package names and paths only. The Python suite contributes 57 test function(s) across 1 file(s) declaring at least one — every `def test…` in a file pytest or unittest would collect, which is those frameworks' own definition of a case; a parametrize table counts once, so this is a floor. Its tier split is read from file names and paths only.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D10 · Test Quality9.8 / 10Stronggated by 7 serious findings✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.
Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.
0 skipped, 7 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 512 tests.
No assertions: TelegramProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult · ×7packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:358
Mock-dominated test: normalizes mixed-case session keys before recording and route updates · ×5packages/channels/core/session.test.ts:79
What to do
Resolve the 7 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with plugins-core.test.ts (7). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Resolve the 5 Mock-dominated test finding(s) in Test Quality — start with session.test.ts (2), resolve-utils.test.ts (2), slack.test.ts. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 recommendation-level).
Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 199 shipped crate(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from crates.io over the crates a consumer compiles — this repository commits no Cargo.lock, so its graph was resolved here: its manifests' `[dependencies]` and `[build-dependencies]` closed over the crates.io index, each crate at the newest release its requirement admits (what a fresh `cargo generate-lockfile` picks, not a graph the repository has pinned). Crates it asks for ONLY under `[dev-dependencies]` are excluded: they are not compiled by anything that depends on this repository. ★ COVERAGE OF THIS VERDICT: it grades this repository's crate dependencies and nothing else. The repository also declares package.json, and the licences of those dependencies were NOT read by this pass — a gap in this engine's coverage, not a statement about them. So this result says the graded closure carries no banned licence; it does NOT say this repository's licensing is clear.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 3 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with agent.rs, server.ts, index.ts. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
17 deducted task-comment markers across 16855 LoC (0.1/KLoC) → score 9.8. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
Resolve the 17 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with index.ts (9), python-generic.ts (2), langgraph.ts (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (17 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The NexusOS project is well documented with a strong root README covering what the repository does, its P0-P8 mission pipeline, architecture (OpenClaw/gateway, Rust traffic controller, Next.js dashboard), and a one-command quick start. The root README also links to an architecture/Docs markdown collection of 5 architecture/design docs for the project's components (traffic-controller, agent-harness/hooks, rules, visa-doc-translate, OpenClaw integration). Each document is scoped to its directory rather than the repository as a whole, so the missing-overview, missing-installation, and missing-usage findings are confined to the root README. The internal-focused jargon ('HITL', 'SOUL.md') in architecture docs is consistent with an insider-facing design doc set. The NexusOS execution pipeline is documented as a P0–P8 mission-phase model with an exhaustive architecture/phase outline and the Android clean-architecture guide. The README files are complete for their directories: each package's README states what it contains (e.g., 'NexusOS — P0–P8 Execution Pipeline') and gives usage, but no single document covers the project as a whole; the root README would be the one to judge on overview/installation/usage/contributing. The architecture docs are well-structured with ordered phases, gate requirements, output, failure modes, and an outline for each phase (P0–P8 plus BlockerEvent spec, WebSocket event format, HITL approval protocol).
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR QualityStrong◐ Sampled · advisory
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
Evaluated 2 ADR(s) individually; mean quality 8.5/10 (consistently complete and clear). 1 flagged with a specific gap.
Context/problem and consequences/trade-offs are absent; only a decision log with rationale and boundary set sections appear.agent/BUILD_LOG.md
ADR has no Consequences sectionpackages/agent-harness/agents/architect.md:10detected by adr-integrity
What to do
Resolve the 1 Context/problem and consequences/trade-offs are absent; only a decision… finding(s) in ADR Quality — start with BUILD_LOG.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 ADR has no Consequences section finding(s) in ADR Quality — start with architect.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d20_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D22 · Internal API ConsistencyWeak◐ Sampled · advisory
What it measures: Whether the internal API surface is consistent and coherent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature over a sample of the public API surface (IsPackable or .Contracts types). Sampled, advisory; confidence discounted by model uncertainty.
Inconsistent naming and return types for message generation. The methods p2_message, p8_message, blocker_message, and phase_message all appear to generate formatted strings (likely for OpenClaw) but return String. However, notify_via_openclaw takes a session_id and message and returns Result, implying it performs the actual notification/action. The 'message' suffix methods are ambiguous: do they just format text or do they also send it? If they only format, the naming convention is inconsistent with notify_via_openclaw. If they send, they should likely return Result and be named consistently (e.g., notify_phase_change).
Inconsistent type for task identifier. Task.id is defined as Uuid, but the message generation methods accept task_id as String. This forces callers to convert between Uuid and String, which is error-prone and inconsistent with the type system.
What to do
Resolve the 1 Inconsistent naming and return types for message generation. The methods… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Inconsistent type for task identifier. Task.id is defined as Uuid, but… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d22_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether domain types (IDs, enums, value objects) leak across bounded-context boundaries.
Method: Cross-context domain-type leakage via Roslyn structural classification (strongly-typed IDs / value objects) over every public surface. Exhaustive, deterministic, type-level aggregate-boundary check.
Coverage: Bounded contexts derived from NAMESPACE prefix (or graph-inferred where available); cross-boundary domain-type leakage then checked exhaustively over every public member of every type.
No domain types leak across context boundaries (5 contexts).
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d23_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D25 · ADR ConformanceCritical◐ Sampled · advisory
What it measures: Whether the code actually follows the decisions recorded in the project's ADRs.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature against ADRs plus a deterministic structural code summary; findings linked to repo-rooted ADR paths for traceability. Advisory.
Resolve the 1 ADR not followed finding(s) in ADR Conformance — start with BUILD_LOG.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Enforce ADR Conformance in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d25_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
1 of 7 build units (Cargo, npm) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
64 finding(s): 0 critical, 46 high, 18 medium, 0 low. 35 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 8 file(s) — `packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/agents/session-guardian.sh`, `packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/hooks/observe.sh` (line 143), `packages/agent-harness/skills/skill-stocktake/scripts/quick-diff.sh` (line 21), `packages/channels/core/allowlist-match.ts` (lines 108–111), `packages/channels/core/inbound-debounce-policy.test.ts` (line 39), … (+3 more) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 1 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
+ 5 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 35 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (35 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
Resolve the 2 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Resolve the 4 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
Resolve the 6 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
+ 3 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d43_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC2 · Forms & labels4.3 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.
Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label htmlFor>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label. (×2) — dashboard/src/components/CommandBar.tsx:32, dashboard/src/components/HITLGate.tsx:59
What to do
Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
<span> moves — its `animate-ping` utility runs with no motion-safe:/motion-reduce: variant — and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it, so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Gate it on @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) or motion-safe:. — dashboard/src/app/page.tsx:16
<input> takes keyboard focus, and its outline-none utility removes the focus ring with no focus-state ring, shadow, border or outline utility in its place. Add one (e.g. focus-visible:ring-2). — dashboard/src/components/CommandBar.tsx:32
What to do
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 7 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with your test runner's axe binding (jest-axe, vitest-axe, cypress-axe or @axe-core/playwright) in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').
Method: Roslyn scan: public interface declared-member counts (accessors fold into their property/event); fat-interface threshold (over 15 declared members) flagged per type. Each finding also reports the distinct-OPERATION count — members counted by name, so an overload group counts once — which decides whether it states the caller-side ISP harm or the implementer-side burden of an overload set. TypeScript: exported interfaces that declare behaviour, counted over their REQUIRED operations (method signatures and function-typed properties with no `?`, once per signature) — data-shape interfaces and ambient .d.ts declarations are outside the population; JavaScript declares no interfaces and is not applicable. Deterministic, type-level.
Other · Architecture — Whether read (query) handlers stay side-effect-free — a query that writes persistent state or raises events breaks CQS and makes reads unsafe to retry, cache, or route to a read replica.
Method: Roslyn scan: CQRS handlers classified query-vs-command by interface (IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler<TQuery,TResult>) and name convention (*Query/Get*/Find* vs *Command); each query handler's body checked for persistent-state writes (SaveChanges/repository Add-Update) or event publishes by resolved invocation. Deterministic, type-level, exhaustive over the detected handlers.
Coverage: Population: CQRS handlers identified by IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler interface + *Query/Get*/Find*/*Command NAME convention; query purity then checked exhaustively within that set — a query handler using neither convention is invisible, and mutation is a resolved persistence/publish CALL, not full dataflow.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions whose whole body still throws a "not implemented" error, and placeholder text (lorem ipsum, changeme/replace_me…) left in strings and JSX of non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions that only throw a "not implemented" error, functions that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, async functions that never await, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
`main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work. (×5) — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:44, packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-compact.js:22, packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:178, …
`listen` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work. (×3) — packages/channels/discord/index.ts:14, packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:14, packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:18
`send` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work. (×3) — packages/channels/discord/index.ts:22, packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:22, packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:26
What to do
Remove the dead code that still moves this score: delete dead if(false) branches and either do the real async work or drop the async keyword from fake-async functions.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add a README to the 3 of 6 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
2 ADR-shaped document(s) detected by content — `.agent/BUILD_LOG.md`, `packages/agent-harness/agents/architect.md`. They are not under a conventional ADR folder (docs/adr/) and are not named NNNN-title.md, and this check found them by their decision signature rather than by where they live — so a reader who does not already know these paths has no route to them. Detected by content signature only: records kept outside the repository, or written without a Status/Decision/Consequences shape, are not visible to this check and are not counted here.
What to do
Move ADRs under docs/adr/ (or docs/adrs/) and name them NNNN-title.md so they're easy to find.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `RUST_LOG`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/rust-api-reference.md:227
docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `JWT_EXPIRY_HOURS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/rust-api-reference.md:234
docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/rust-api-reference.md:237
packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md runs `./install.sh typescript`, but `install.sh` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:33
packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/golang/`, but no file or folder `rules/golang` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94
packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/python/`, but no file or folder `rules/python` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94
packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/swift/`, but no file or folder `rules/swift` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94
packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/php/`, but no file or folder `rules/php` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `RUST_LOG`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `JWT_EXPIRY_HOURS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it; packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md runs `./install.sh typescript`, but `install.sh` does not exist; packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/golang/`, but no file or folder `rules/golang` exists.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability6.5 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
Only 2/4 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `dashboard`, `packages/connectors`.
What to do
Extend structured logging to the remaining runnable modules so everything you run is diagnosable in production.
Add OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (@opentelemetry/sdk-node) so requests are traceable across the system, not just health-probable.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a `healthcheck:` and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to — the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse.
What to do
Add a `healthcheck:` to the served compose service — probing the endpoint it already answers on where it has one — with `depends_on: condition: service_healthy` on whatever waits for it, and keep the deployed image tag immutable and recorded so rolling back is re-pointing at the previous tag rather than rebuilding.
The pipeline declares a deployment environment, but whether required reviewers / protection rules are attached to it lives in repository settings we cannot read — confirm the gate is enforced before production promotion.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P5 · DR & Backup0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether disaster recovery is planned and codified — backups, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees — from IaC + container manifests + docs, never the live cloud.
Method: Filesystem scan: disaster recovery, backup, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees from IaC, manifests, and docs. Exhaustive, deterministic, never a live environment.
A persistence guard (data volume / purge-protection) was found, but no backup, geo-recovery or RTO/RPO controls were evidenced — a volume that survives a container recreate is not a tested restore from catastrophic loss.
What to do
Codify backups + geo-recovery in IaC and document RTO/RPO and the restore procedure — a persistence guard alone is not disaster recovery.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Stamp a version in your build/package manifest (e.g. csproj <Version>, package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, or a VERSION file) or tag releases with semver so builds and releases are traceable.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether outbound HTTP calls are wrapped in resilience (retry/timeout/circuit-breaker) so a failing dependency doesn't cascade.
Method: Source scan: outbound HTTP clients and what bounds them — resilience handlers (Polly, AddStandardResilienceHandler) on .NET; on Go, the JVM, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Elixir, Swift, Dart and Erlang, a timeout, deadline, retry or breaker beside each call, or a process-wide client default (a framework-wide deadline such as Drupal core's, Laravel's or actix's awc counts). Exhaustive, deterministic.
`urllib.request.urlopen(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout. — packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:442
`reqwest::Client::new(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout. — packages/traffic-controller/src/connector.rs:16
`Client::new()` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout. — packages/traffic-controller/src/lib.rs:55
What to do
Pass `timeout=` on every `requests`/`httpx` call (requests has no default and will wait forever), mount an `HTTPAdapter(max_retries=Retry(...))` on shared sessions, and wrap calls to flaky dependencies in `tenacity` retries or a `pybreaker` circuit breaker.
Give every client a whole-request bound: `reqwest::Client::builder().timeout(Duration::from_secs(10))` (never `reqwest::get` or `Client::new()`, which have none), ureq's `timeout_global`, or wrap the call in `tokio::time::timeout`; add retry with back-off (`reqwest-retry`'s `RetryTransientMiddleware`, `backoff`) around dependencies that fail.
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R1 · Type Safety8.4 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How much of the frontend is typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript.
Method: Frontend file inventory: the share of typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript across the source tree. Deterministic, exhaustive over frontend files.
What to do
Migrate the remaining .js/.jsx files to TypeScript.
React / JS · Code Health — Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm over JS/TS tokens, D-386): a block is reported only where its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or were renamed as they were pasted but kept most of their constants, and where the copies carry enough code to stand on their own or the copied extent reaches 30 lines — so a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are both found and deliberately not reported, and a clean R10 is not a claim that nothing was copied.
Method: Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm run over JS/TS tokens). Masking finds the candidates; a block is reported when its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or when a renamed copy still agrees on most of its constants, AND the copies carry enough code to stand on their own — or when the copied extent reaches 30 lines. So a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are deliberately not counted. Deterministic.
28 duplicated blocks under packages/connectors/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories anthropic-api, aws-s3, cloudflare, datadog, docker-hub, figma (+18 more sibling(s) not listed) — 21 of them are reported below, and 7 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 28 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 28 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 28 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:4
packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/imessage.ts:71 · packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:80 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 206 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/imessage.ts:71
packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:13 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-skills.js:9 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 161 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:13
packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:4
packages/connectors/github/index.ts:6 · packages/connectors/linear/index.ts:6 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — packages/connectors/github/index.ts:6
packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:5 · packages/connectors/slack/index.ts:5 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 109 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:5
packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:19 · packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:10 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:10 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:12 · +1 more site(s) not listed — the 5 copies are spread across 5 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:19
packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:4
packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js:33 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 120 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js:33
REDACTED:213 · REDACTED:275 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — REDACTED:213
packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:4 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-git-push-reminder.js:4 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:4
packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:47 · packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:82 · packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:23 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:47
packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/resend/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:4
packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:5 — the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:5
REDACTED:83 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:145 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — REDACTED:83
packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:111 · packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:131 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:111
packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:19 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:50 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:19
packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:99 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:114 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:99
packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:129 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:144 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:129
packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:195 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:316 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:195
packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61 · packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:83 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61
packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:60 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:57 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:60
packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:22 · packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:18 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:17 · packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:18 · +1 more site(s) not listed — the 5 copies are spread across 5 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:22
packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:19 · packages/connectors/supabase/index.ts:22 · packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts:16 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:19
packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:53 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:50 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:53
packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js:39 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:37 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js:39
packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:40 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:7 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-pr-created.js:7 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:149 · +2 more site(s) not listed — the 6 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. There is one copy in each of 6 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:40
packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:18 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js:20 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:18
packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:241 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:262 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 53 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:241
packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:124 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:142 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:124
packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:30 · packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:44 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:30
packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:57 · packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:75 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 62 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:57
packages/channels/discord/index.ts:3 · packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:3 · packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:7 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — packages/channels/discord/index.ts:3
packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/jira/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/posthog/index.ts:4 — the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:4
packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:9 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:9 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:9 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:9
packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:18 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:30 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:18
packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:26 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:111 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:26
packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestrate-worktrees.js:99 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestration-status.js:70 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestrate-worktrees.js:99
packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:101 · packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:133 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:101
packages/channels/core/session-envelope.ts:5 · packages/channels/core/session-meta.ts:5 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — packages/channels/core/session-envelope.ts:5
What to do
Act on each finding's own remediation rather than one rule: the move depends on what recurs. Where the copies are executable blocks, give the shared part one home and call it from each site; where they are declarations, a listing, a specialisation already delegating to its base, or one shape repeated per entity, there is no call site and the move is a shared type, a generated set or a factory — sometimes there is nothing to extract.
React / JS · Architecture — Conformance to the detected frontend architecture layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules (D-386).
Method: Conformance to the detected frontend layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules, over the module graph. Deterministic.
packages/channels/core/dock.ts:27 reaches into another package with a relative path (../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/dock.ts:27
packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:7 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:7
packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:11 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:11
packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/shared.ts:1 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/shared.ts:1
packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.ts:5 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.ts:5
packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-shared.ts:3 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-shared.ts:3
packages/channels/whatsapp/normalize.ts:1 reaches into another package with a relative path (../utils.js) — import the package by name instead. — packages/channels/whatsapp/normalize.ts:1
What to do
Fix the listed violations: import through public entries (package exports / slice index), never reach into another layer or package's internals.
React / JS · Code Health — Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from the token-level function scanner (D-386) — real branching, not a regex heuristic.
Method: Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from a token-level function scanner (real branching, not a regex heuristic), computed over every frontend function. Deterministic.
validateHooks has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 79; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:127
resolveAgentRoute has cyclomatic complexity 35 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:614
extractSessionSummary has cyclomatic complexity 33 and cognitive complexity 56; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:38
maybeRunQualityGate has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 51; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:57
validateHookEntry has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:50
splitShellSegments has cyclomatic complexity 26 and cognitive complexity 47; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/shell-split.js:8
validateCommands has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 54; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15
initConnectors has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 24; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/connectors/server.ts:19
(anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 35; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:308
detectProjectType has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:325
resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:82
handleAction has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/plugins/actions/signal.ts:102
buildAgentPeerSessionKey has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/routing/session-key.ts:127
configure has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:127
execute has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:28
toChannelMeta has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:127
resolveConversationLabel has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/conversation-label.ts:23
main has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/run-with-flags.js:40
getSessionById has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:301
validateSenderIdentity has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — packages/channels/core/sender-identity.ts:4
What to do
Break down the listed branch-heavy functions; aim P95 cyclomatic ≤ 5.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R3 · Large Files9.4 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How many source files exceed the large-file threshold.
Method: Components/modules exceeding the large-file threshold, counted exhaustively across the frontend source tree. Deterministic.
REDACTED has 759 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts has 745 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:1
packages/channels/core/dock.ts has 616 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — packages/channels/core/dock.ts:1
What to do
Split each oversized file along the responsibilities already in it, into smaller focused modules in the same package.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R4 · Test Coverage3.4 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Static test reachability (D-386): the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything.
Method: Static test reachability: the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything. Deterministic.
packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3 imports '../test-utils/typed-cases.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3
packages/channels/core/channels-misc.test.ts:2 imports '../channel-web.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/channels-misc.test.ts:2
packages/channels/core/dock.test.ts:3 imports '../test-utils/env.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/dock.test.ts:3
packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.security.test.ts:2 imports '../../agents/tools/common.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (2 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.security.test.ts:2
packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.test.ts:3 imports '../../plugins/runtime.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.test.ts:3
packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.sendpayload.test.ts:3 imports '../../../test-utils/send-payload-contract.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.sendpayload.test.ts:3
packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.sendpayload.test.ts:3 imports '../../../test-utils/send-payload-contract.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.sendpayload.test.ts:3
packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.test.ts:12 imports '../../../../extensions/slack/src/send.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.test.ts:12
packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:14 imports '../../plugins/runtime.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (3 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:14
packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.test.ts:13 imports '../../config/sessions.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.test.ts:13
packages/channels/routing/session-key.test.ts:2 imports '../sessions/session-key-utils.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing. — packages/channels/routing/session-key.test.ts:2
No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one. (×29) — packages/channels/core/dock.ts:1, packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/tmux-worktree-orchestrator.js:1, packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:1, …
What to do
Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).
Do you agree with this assessment?
R6 · Tooling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Whether the project wires up test, lint and typecheck — detected from each package.json script's COMMAND (eslint / tsc / vitest / jest / playwright), not just its name, and corroborated against CI-workflow invocations so a tool run only in CI still counts.
Method: package.json scanned for test/lint/typecheck script wiring. Deterministic presence check.
This repository declares test tooling, and the ✓ above records that declaration — but packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts and 10 other test file(s) in this workspace cannot be loaded at all: it imports a module that names no file in this repository, so the runner throws while collecting it and none of its cases execute. The wiring is present and the suite it points at does not run as written, which is why the tooling tick must not be read as a statement that the tests pass. Fix the unloadable file(s) — each one is reported with its failing import under Test Coverage — then the declared script exercises what it claims to. — packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3
Do you agree with this assessment?
R7 · Dead Code7.3 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — Files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point, and exports nothing imports (module-graph reachability, D-386).
Method: Dead code: files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point plus exports nothing imports, via module-graph reachability. Deterministic, exhaustive over the import graph.
1 file(s) (~210 LoC) were excluded from dead-code analysis — declare main/module/exports or a conventional entry (src/index.*, an index.html script) so reachability can see this package.
Unreachable from the 18 application, 44 tooling and 61 test entry point(s) detected in this repo. Gate removals on `pnpm run build` — an undetected custom entry would make these reachable.
no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make (×30) — packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js, packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts, packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-policy.ts, …
no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts) — every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it — packages/channels/core/read-only-account-inspect.ts
Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal. (×6) — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:61, packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61, packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:80, …
Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in packages/channels/core/plugins/allowlist-match.ts, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in packages/channels/core/plugins/allowlist-match.ts in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists. — packages/channels/core/allowlist-match.ts:24
What to do
Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value.
React / JS · Readiness — npm dependency truthfulness (D-386): unused dependencies, imports not declared anywhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps.
Method: npm dependency truthfulness: unused dependencies, imports declared nowhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps — from the manifest + import graph. Deterministic.
Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident. — packages/channels/core/plugins/config-schema.test.ts:2
Every import is type-only — move it to devDependencies. — dashboard/next.config.ts:1
What to do
Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.
React / JS · Architecture — Import cycles in the module graph (D-386) — files that can only be understood and changed together.
Method: Import cycles in the module graph, detected exhaustively over JS/TS imports (the same cycle detection as the .NET coupling dimension). Deterministic.
Other · Security — Read from this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript source: cryptographic hygiene (weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source) and outbound TLS (certificate validation, protocol version) — facts about code that hold whether or not it serves anything itself. The server controls — HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, cookie flags, input validation — are NOT assessed for JavaScript/TypeScript: each is scored as an absence, an absence is only reportable over the production HTTP server, and in this ecosystem the file that opens the port is build output or a framework launcher rather than a file in the source tree. Their absence here is not a finding about this repository. Its Node HTTP listeners were read for HTTPS enforcement alone — TLS served, a redirect to https:// or HSTS, or a TLS-terminating proxy configuration committed beside the server — each judged per server package.
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
`server.listen(…)` serves plain HTTP on a network address, and nothing in its package enforces HTTPS: no TLS served (`https.createServer`, Fastify `https`, Nest `httpsOptions`), no redirect of plain requests to `https://`, no `Strict-Transport-Security` (helmet sends it by default), and no TLS-terminating proxy configuration committed beside it — so a browser may talk to it in clear text. (−2.0 on this card.) — packages/connectors/server.ts:162
What to do
Enforce HTTPS on each listed server: serve TLS itself, or redirect plain requests to `https://` and send `Strict-Transport-Security` (`helmet()` does by default) behind the TLS-terminating proxy — and commit that proxy's configuration beside the service. A server only this machine reaches should bind `127.0.0.1`.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether async functions that make a cancellable request accept or pass on an AbortSignal (adoption curve).
Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.
Only 0/37 async functions that make a cancellable request (fetch, axios, ky, ofetch) accept an AbortSignal or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a page navigated away from, an unmounted component, a timed-out job. Take a `signal` (or an options object that carries one) and hand it to the request; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
`submitMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:45
`listMissions` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:55
`getMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:61
`approveMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:67
`rejectMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:75
`healthCheck` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:83
`openClawHealth` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:114
`listAgents` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:58
`ensureNexusOSAgent` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:70
`injectTask` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:98
`invokeTool` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:144
`gatewayHealthCheck` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:187
`execute` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. (×7) — packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:13, packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:31, packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:26, …
`cf` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:15
`dd` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:17
`connect` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:10
`dh` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:22
`figma` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:14
`gmail` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:13
`gcal` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:13
`hf` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:13
`jira` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/jira/index.ts:17
`notion` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:13
`pd` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/pagerduty/index.ts:13
`ph` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/posthog/index.ts:17
`gql` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/railway/index.ts:13
`sentry` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:15
`slack` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/slack/index.ts:14
`stripe` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/stripe/index.ts:11
`sb` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/supabase/index.ts:15
`vercel` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts:11
What to do
Thread an AbortSignal through async functions that make requests, so the work stops when its caller gives up.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `for` loop leaves the `RefCell` it is walking alone — safe Rust rejects a body that changes the collection its loop borrows at compile time, except through interior mutability: a `RefCell` borrowed in the loop's header stays borrowed until the loop ends, so a `borrow_mut()` of it inside the body panics with `already borrowed: BorrowMutError` and the remaining elements are never seen. Whether a `for` loop leaves the `dict`, `set` or `deque` it is walking alone — CPython's iterators over those check that the collection has not changed size since the loop began, so a body that removes from (or empties) the very collection the loop is walking makes the next step raise `RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration` and the remaining items are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. (×25) — packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:70, packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:47, packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:145, …
`catch` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. (×2) — REDACTED:172, packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:266
What to do
Swallowed exception (empty catch)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal`/`verbose`/`silly`/`http`/`log` call on a receiver named for a logger, in a package whose own or an enclosing `package.json` declares a logger that carries values as fields (pino, pino-http, nestjs-pino, Fastify, winston, bunyan, tslog, LogTape, roarr), whose first deciding argument is a template literal with substitutions; an object-literal fields argument is stepped over, a plain string message clears the call. Python is read the same way: a `debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error`/`exception`/`critical`/`log` call on a logger in a file that imports the standard library’s `logging` or structlog (loguru, which formats at the call, is not judged), whose message is a whole f-string with a non-constant field; a `%`-formatted, `.format()`-ed or concatenated message is not convicted, as in C#. PHP is read the same way: a PSR-3 level call (`emergency`…`debug`, `log`) on a logger (`$logger`, `$this->logger`, Laravel’s `Log::`, `logger()`, `\Drupal::logger()`) in a package whose `composer.json` requires a PSR-3 logger or a framework that hands one out (psr/log, Monolog, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, CakePHP), or a file that imports one, whose message is a double-quoted string interpolating a variable; a single-quoted message clears the call, and `sprintf` or `.` concatenation is not convicted, as in C#. Dart is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on Sentry’s structured logger (`Sentry.logger`) whose message is a whole string literal interpolating a value (`$name`, `${…}`); the `Sentry.logger.fmt` template API clears the call. Dart that logs only through loggers with one message and no fields (package:logging, package:logger, talker, dart:developer) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Ruby is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on the console gem’s `Console` (declared by a Gemfile, gemspec or Gemfile.lock, or required) or, where SemanticLogger, Ougai or dry-logger is declared or required, on a receiver named for a logger (`logger`, `@logger`, `Rails.logger`, `log`), whose first deciding argument is, as the whole argument, a double-quoted string interpolating a non-constant value (`#{…}`, `#@ivar`); a plain literal clears the call, keyword arguments are the fields, and a block, `%`-format or `+` concatenation is not convicted. Ruby that logs only through the standard Logger (Rails.logger) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Deterministic.
`info!` at line 77 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:77
`info!` at line 132 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:132
`info!` at line 136 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`. — packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:136
Other · Code Health — Whether strict null checking is enabled and not undermined by heavy `!` assertion — TypeScript's `strictNullChecks` (which `strict` turns on) is what makes `string` exclude `null` and `undefined`, and the postfix `!` is the operator that silences it.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
~0.2 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 3 assertion(s) across the 16296 source line(s) of the 169 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.ts (3). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
What to do
The findings name the configuration each number was taken from and, for the assertions, the files that hold them. Turn null checking on where it is off — `"strict": true` in the base tsconfig that the others extend switches `strictNullChecks` on with the rest of the family — and then resolve the assertions rather than adding to them. A `!` on a value the checker could show to be null is a promise the author cannot check from where they are standing, and each one is a `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null` waiting for the path that makes it true; where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (narrow it with a test, make the property required, drop the `?`).
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 10 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (18%; ≈20% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 45 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 4 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 5 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — 2 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 9 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 3 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'firebase-admin' (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether its changes need an audit trail could not be established, and the trail's absence is not scored.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'firebase-admin' (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether a retention limit applies here could not be established, and its absence is not scored.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'firebase-admin' (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether data-subject rights apply here could not be established, and their absence is not scored.
Not included — 40 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — No image/media element found in the parsed markup — AC1 not applicable here.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No interactive element found in the parsed markup — AC4 not applicable here.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: Rust with no dependency-injection crate has no container to hand one lifetime's instance to another — every value is owned by the code that builds it, and the borrow checker rejects a longer-lived value keeping a borrow of a shorter-lived one; this repository's TypeScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
AX2 Stateful singletons — No container singleton was found, so there is no shared instance for concurrent requests to race on. No function in this Python code is served by a threaded web framework (a Flask, Bottle or FastAPI route, a Django or Pyramid view), so no module is shared between request threads. Rust's compiler refuses unsynchronised shared mutation — a value shared across threads must be Sync — so the race this check looks for cannot be written. TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — compose up failed (exit 14 — a file the compose project references is missing) — env file packages/connectors/.env not found: stat packages/connectors/.env: no such file or directory; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: this repository stores data through 'firebase-admin' (packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so the absence of a personal-data field here is not evidence that none is stored, and encryption at rest is not scored over a subject that could not be established.
C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — this repository stands up no server (no Express, Fastify, Koa, Hono, NestJS or similar app, no Next.js/SvelteKit/Nuxt server route, no edge function), creates no Supabase tables and talks to no hosted backend. Access control is therefore N/A here — a browser application or library is authorized by the server it calls, not by itself; a client-side route guard hides a page and authorizes nothing. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — the test command names no runner the analyzer recognises
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Not scored — 14 direct Cargo declaration(s) were read, but the outdated signal needs crates.io, and no committed Cargo.lock resolves them to versions, so this dimension's own question is only partly answered. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D16 Bus Factor — single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.js,.ts,.tsx), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — 3 file(s) were not parsed by semgrep — the PII/GDPR ruleset never ran over them
D34 Knowledge Freshness — too few commits to judge knowledge freshness
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D44 Platform End-of-Life — Platform end-of-life not assessed — this repository declares no platform this pass reads
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured — the test command names no runner the analyzer recognises
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, and a call made through an inferred or generic receiver has no resolvable owner in the source. Reported as guidance rather than measured
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for tinybench, mitata, benchmark.js, benny or vitest `bench(...)` calls in files that import them (or `*.bench.*` files), or one of those in a package.json, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript and Python runs on a garbage-collected runtime that gives a program no allocation-control idiom to choose on a hot path — no pools, stack allocation or value types — so allocation awareness is not something this code can be rated on.
R5 Dependency Freshness — uses a pnpm lockfile — dependency freshness not measured here; JS/npm CVEs are scored in D30 (Dependency Vulnerabilities), which answers every ecosystem
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check asks whether an argument guard reports an EMPTY value as a NULL one, which needs a language that throws a null-specific argument exception — .NET's ArgumentNullException, the JVM's NullPointerException, Dart's ArgumentError.notNull. This repository contains none of those languages: the ones it is written in have a single exception for a bad argument, so there is no pair of exceptions to confuse and nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
AC2 · Forms & labels· <input> without a programmatic label · ×1
<input> without a programmatic label dashboard/src/components/CommandBar.tsx:32— This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label htmlFor>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label.
AC2 · Forms & labels· <textarea> without a programmatic label · ×1
<textarea> without a programmatic label dashboard/src/components/HITLGate.tsx:59— This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label htmlFor>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label.
ADR not followed: 📋 NexusOS — Build Log & Decision Record .agent/BUILD_LOG.md— The decision that the channels layer take only Discord/Telegram/WhatsApp adapters from OpenClaw is contradicted by a public type named 'Channels' whose dependency list shows it takes parameters from OpenClaw, not the excluded types. (.agent/BUILD_LOG.md)
Unlisted import 'zod' packages/channels/core/plugins/config-schema.test.ts:2— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
Serious — 364 finding(s)
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Async function without AbortSignal · ×37
Async function without AbortSignal: submitMission dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:45— `submitMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: listMissions dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:55— `listMissions` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: getMission dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:61— `getMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: approveMission dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:67— `approveMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: rejectMission dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:75— `rejectMission` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: healthCheck dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:83— `healthCheck` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: openClawHealth dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:114— `openClawHealth` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: listAgents packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:58— `listAgents` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: ensureNexusOSAgent packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:70— `ensureNexusOSAgent` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: injectTask packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:98— `injectTask` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: invokeTool packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:144— `invokeTool` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: gatewayHealthCheck packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:187— `gatewayHealthCheck` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: execute packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:13— `execute` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: cf packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:15— `cf` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: dd packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:17— `dd` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: execute packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:31— `execute` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: connect packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:10— `connect` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: dh packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:22— `dh` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: figma packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:14— `figma` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: gmail packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:13— `gmail` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: gcal packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:13— `gcal` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: hf packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:13— `hf` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: execute packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:26— `execute` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: jira packages/connectors/jira/index.ts:17— `jira` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: notion packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:13— `notion` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
+ 12 more in this group — see findings.md.
R4 · Test Coverage· No test reaches this file · ×29
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/dock.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/tmux-worktree-orchestrator.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/orchestration-session.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/slack.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/codemaps/generate.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/skill-create-output.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/openclaw-skill/index.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-policy.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/resolve-formatter.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/config-writes.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/connectors/server.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:70— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:47— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:145— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-tmux-reminder.js:28— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-git-push-reminder.js:23— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:182— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js:90— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) REDACTED:79— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) REDACTED:83— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:48— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-pr-created.js:31— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:22— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:58— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js:73— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) REDACTED:188— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) REDACTED:396— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:145— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/resolve-formatter.js:103— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:198— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:220— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:121— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:189— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:131— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts:173— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:120— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
TodoComment packages/channels/discord/index.ts:16— // TODO: Initialise Discord gateway connection and parse slash commands — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/channels/discord/index.ts:24— // TODO: POST to Discord webhooks/API — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:16— // TODO: Initialise Telegram Bot API polling/webhook — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:24— // TODO: POST to https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/sendMessage
TodoComment packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:20— // TODO: Register webhook endpoint and process incoming messages via normalize() — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:28— // TODO: POST to WhatsApp Cloud API — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/connectors/_template/index.ts:16— // TODO: Implement action logic — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/connectors/github/index.ts:18— // TODO: implement using @octokit/rest — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/connectors/linear/index.ts:18— // TODO: implement using @linear/sdk — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:11— // TODO: Call custom Python agent via HTTP or subprocess — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:23— // TODO: ping Python agent service — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:11— // TODO: Integrate with LangGraph state machine — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:23— // TODO: ping LangGraph service — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:11— // TODO: Integrate with LangChain agent executor — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:23— // TODO: ping LangChain service — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:11— // TODO: Integrate with Claude Code CLI — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:25— // TODO: Check claude CLI is installed — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:44— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-compact.js:22— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:178— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-start.js:25— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/suggest-compact.js:24— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/discord/index.ts:14— `listen` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/discord/index.ts:22— `send` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:14— `listen` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:22— `send` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:18— `listen` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:26— `send` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
R4 · Test Coverage· This test file cannot be loaded · ×11
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3— packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3 imports '../test-utils/typed-cases.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/channels-misc.test.ts:2— packages/channels/core/channels-misc.test.ts:2 imports '../channel-web.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/dock.test.ts:3— packages/channels/core/dock.test.ts:3 imports '../test-utils/env.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.security.test.ts:2— packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.security.test.ts:2 imports '../../agents/tools/common.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (2 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.test.ts:3— packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.test.ts:3 imports '../../plugins/runtime.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.sendpayload.test.ts:3— packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.sendpayload.test.ts:3 imports '../../../test-utils/send-payload-contract.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.sendpayload.test.ts:3— packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.sendpayload.test.ts:3 imports '../../../test-utils/send-payload-contract.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.test.ts:12— packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.test.ts:12 imports '../../../../extensions/slack/src/send.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:14— packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:14 imports '../../plugins/runtime.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (3 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.test.ts:13— packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.test.ts:13 imports '../../config/sessions.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either (1 further unresolvable import(s) in the same file). The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
This test file cannot be loaded packages/channels/routing/session-key.test.ts:2— packages/channels/routing/session-key.test.ts:2 imports '../sessions/session-key-utils.js', which names no file in this repository — and no rule in its .gitignore chain could cover one, so no build writes it either. The import throws as the runner collects this file, so none of its test cases run and nothing it was written to verify is verified. Restore the missing module or delete the test. It is excluded from the reachability measured above, because a file that cannot load reaches nothing.
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/agent-tools/whatsapp-login.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/normalize/discord.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/discord.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/whatsapp.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/discord.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/pairing-message.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/discord.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~2 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/whatsapp.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
No assertions: TelegramProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:358— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: DiscordProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:362— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: SlackProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:366— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: SignalProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:370— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: IMessageProbe satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:374— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: LineProbeResult satisfies BaseProbeResult packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:378— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: Telegram and Discord token resolutions satisfy BaseTokenResolution packages/channels/core/plugins/plugins-core.test.ts:384— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/dock.ts:27— packages/channels/core/dock.ts:27 reaches into another package with a relative path (../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:7— packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:7 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:11— packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:11 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/shared.ts:1— packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/shared.ts:1 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.ts:5— packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-heartbeat.ts:5 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-shared.ts:3— packages/channels/core/plugins/whatsapp-shared.ts:3 reaches into another package with a relative path (../../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package] packages/channels/whatsapp/normalize.ts:1— packages/channels/whatsapp/normalize.ts:1 reaches into another package with a relative path (../utils.js) — import the package by name instead.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:83— REDACTED:83 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:145 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:111— packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:111 · packages/channels/core/plugins/directory-config.ts:131 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:19— packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:19 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:50 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:99— packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:99 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:114 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:129— packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:129 · packages/channels/core/plugins/group-policy-warnings.ts:144 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
FunctionTooLong: status-reactions.createStatusReactionController packages/channels/core/status-reactions.ts:127— FunctionTooLong — createStatusReactionController runs 157 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 57 over it, 1.57× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:614— FunctionTooLong — resolveAgentRoute runs 143 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 43 over it, 1.43× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: claw.main packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:278— FunctionTooLong — main runs 112 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 12 over it, 1.12× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: tmux-worktree-orchestrator.buildOrchestrationPlan packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/tmux-worktree-orchestrator.js:181— FunctionTooLong — buildOrchestrationPlan runs 102 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2 over it, 1.02× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:195— packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:195 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-aliases.js:316 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61— packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61 · packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:83 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:60— packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:60 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:57 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:53— packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:53 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:50 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js:39— packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/cost-tracker.js:39 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:37 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:18— packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:18 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js:20 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:124— packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:124 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/setup-package-manager.js:142 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:30— packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:30 · packages/channels/core/plugins/message-actions.ts:44 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:18— packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:18 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/catalog.js:30 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:26— packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:26 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:111 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestrate-worktrees.js:99— packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestrate-worktrees.js:99 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/orchestration-status.js:70 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:101— packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:101 · packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:133 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Dead file (~1 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/actions/discord/handle-action.guild-admin.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~1 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/normalize/telegram.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~1 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/telegram.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~1 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/telegram.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Hotspot: packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs:8— packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 17 in traffic_controller::agent::execute_mission at line 8. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2025-12-15..2026-03-15, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2025-12-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --until='2026-03-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --full-history --no-merges -- packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: packages/connectors/server.ts packages/connectors/server.ts:19— packages/connectors/server.ts changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 25 in server.initConnectors at line 19. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2025-12-15..2026-03-15, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2025-12-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --until='2026-03-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --full-history --no-merges -- packages/connectors/server.ts`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:28— packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 19 in FirebaseConnector.execute at line 28. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2025-12-15..2026-03-15, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2025-12-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --until='2026-03-15 15:02:45 +05:30' --full-history --no-merges -- packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
FileTooLong: scripts/instinct-cli.py packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py— FileTooLong — 785 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 285 over it, 1.57× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: REDACTED REDACTED— FileTooLong — 630 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 130 over it, 1.26× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: routing/resolve-route.ts packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts— FileTooLong — 586 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 86 over it, 1.17× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
Outbound HTTP without resilience packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:442— `urllib.request.urlopen(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout.
Outbound HTTP without resilience packages/traffic-controller/src/connector.rs:16— `reqwest::Client::new(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout.
Outbound HTTP without resilience packages/traffic-controller/src/lib.rs:55— `Client::new()` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:793— packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:793-801 | packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:888-896 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) packages/traffic-controller/src/connector.rs:31— packages/traffic-controller/src/connector.rs:31-39 | packages/traffic-controller/src/connector.rs:54-62 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:4— packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:4 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-git-push-reminder.js:4 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:4— packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/resend/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (12 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×2
Duplicated block with local edits (12 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:241— packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:241 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/package-manager.js:262 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 53 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block with local edits (12 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:57— packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:57 · packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts:75 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 62 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 3 locations) packages/channels/discord/index.ts:3— packages/channels/discord/index.ts:3 · packages/channels/telegram/index.ts:3 · packages/channels/whatsapp/index.ts:7 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 3 locations) packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:9— packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:9 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:9 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:9 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Dead file (~33 LoC) packages/channels/core/logging.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~33 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/media-payload.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) REDACTED:172— `catch` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:266— `catch` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard · ×1
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard dashboard/src/app/page.tsx:16— <span> moves — its `animate-ping` utility runs with no motion-safe:/motion-reduce: variant — and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it, so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Gate it on @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) or motion-safe:.
Focus outline removed inline dashboard/src/components/CommandBar.tsx:32— <input> takes keyboard focus, and its outline-none utility removes the focus ring with no focus-state ring, shadow, border or outline utility in its place. Add one (e.g. focus-visible:ring-2).
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 7 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
validate-hooks.validateHooks (cyclomatic 37) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:127— validate-hooks.validateHooks has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
instinct-cli.cmd_import (cyclomatic 36) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:427— instinct-cli.cmd_import has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute (cyclomatic 35) packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:614— resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
session-end.extractSessionSummary (cyclomatic 34) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:38— session-end.extractSessionSummary has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). Of this number, 32 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
validate-hooks.validateHookEntry (cyclomatic 29) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:50— validate-hooks.validateHookEntry has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
quality-gate.maybeRunQualityGate (cyclomatic 29) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:57— quality-gate.maybeRunQualityGate has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
claw.main (cyclomatic 28) packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:278— claw.main has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 308). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
shell-split.splitShellSegments (cyclomatic 26) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/shell-split.js:8— shell-split.splitShellSegments has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
validate-commands.validateCommands (cyclomatic 25) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15— validate-commands.validateCommands has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
server.initConnectors (cyclomatic 25) packages/connectors/server.ts:19— server.initConnectors has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
instinct-cli.cmd_evolve (cyclomatic 25) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:646— instinct-cli.cmd_evolve has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
project-detect.detectProjectType (cyclomatic 24) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:325— project-detect.detectProjectType has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
FirebaseConnector.execute (cyclomatic 19) packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:28— FirebaseConnector.execute has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
channel-config.resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback (cyclomatic 18) packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:82— channel-config.resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
conversation-label.resolveConversationLabel (cyclomatic 18) packages/channels/core/conversation-label.ts:23— conversation-label.resolveConversationLabel has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
catalog.toChannelMeta (cyclomatic 18) packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:127— catalog.toChannelMeta has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ws_listener.listen_with_retry (cyclomatic 18) packages/agent-harness/skills/videodb/scripts/ws_listener.py:147— ws_listener.listen_with_retry has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
run-with-flags.main (cyclomatic 17) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/run-with-flags.js:40— run-with-flags.main has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
session-manager.getSessionById (cyclomatic 17) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:301— session-manager.getSessionById has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
sender-identity.validateSenderIdentity (cyclomatic 17) packages/channels/core/sender-identity.ts:4— sender-identity.validateSenderIdentity has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
CloudflareConnector.execute (cyclomatic 17) packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:29— CloudflareConnector.execute has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
instinct-cli.cmd_export (cyclomatic 17) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:577— instinct-cli.cmd_export has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
traffic_controller::agent::execute_mission (cyclomatic 17) packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs:8— traffic_controller::agent::execute_mission has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
post-edit-typecheck.process.stdin.on("end") (cyclomatic 16) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js:27— post-edit-typecheck.process.stdin.on("end") has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DatadogConnector.execute (cyclomatic 16) packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:31— DatadogConnector.execute has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
HuggingFaceConnector.execute (cyclomatic 16) packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:26— HuggingFaceConnector.execute has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
validate-hooks.validateHooks (cognitive 78) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:127— validate-hooks.validateHooks has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (47 pts), loops 6 (19 pts), boolean chains 11, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
session-end.extractSessionSummary (cognitive 58) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:38— session-end.extractSessionSummary has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (32 pts), boolean chains 13, ternaries 2 (7 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 28). Of this number, 56 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
instinct-cli.cmd_import (cognitive 56) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:427— instinct-cli.cmd_import has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (38 pts), loops 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
validate-commands.validateCommands (cognitive 54) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15— validate-commands.validateCommands has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (30 pts), loops 9 (19 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
quality-gate.maybeRunQualityGate (cognitive 51) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:57— quality-gate.maybeRunQualityGate has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (40 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
shell-split.splitShellSegments (cognitive 47) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/shell-split.js:8— shell-split.splitShellSegments has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (36 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ws_listener.listen_with_retry (cognitive 45) packages/agent-harness/skills/videodb/scripts/ws_listener.py:147— ws_listener.listen_with_retry has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (28 pts), error handling 5 (13 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute (cognitive 41) packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:614— resolve-route.resolveAgentRoute has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), boolean chains 13, ternaries 9, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 30 points are the body's own statements and 11 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
claw.main (cognitive 39) packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:278— claw.main has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (33 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 39 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 308). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
validate-hooks.validateHookEntry (cognitive 36) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:50— validate-hooks.validateHookEntry has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (22 pts), boolean chains 10, error handling 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
instinct-cli.cmd_evolve (cognitive 36) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:646— instinct-cli.cmd_evolve has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (17 pts), if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
traffic_controller::agent::execute_mission (cognitive 36) packages/traffic-controller/src/agent.rs:8— traffic_controller::agent::execute_mission has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (35 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
post-edit-typecheck.process.stdin.on("end") (cognitive 34) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-typecheck.js:27— post-edit-typecheck.process.stdin.on("end") has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (17 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 19). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
channel-config.resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback (cognitive 34) packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:82— channel-config.resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (22 pts), loops 2 (7 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
instinct-cli.cmd_export (cognitive 27) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:577— instinct-cli.cmd_export has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (22 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
post-edit-format.run (cognitive 26) REDACTED:37— post-edit-format.run has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
session-end.main (cognitive 25) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:178— session-end.main has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (20 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
server.initConnectors (cognitive 24) packages/connectors/server.ts:19— server.initConnectors has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21, boolean chains 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
project-detect.detectProjectType (cognitive 23) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:325— project-detect.detectProjectType has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 1 (3 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
instinct-cli.parse_instinct_file (cognitive 22) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:223— instinct-cli.parse_instinct_file has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (21 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
pre-bash-dev-server-block.readToken (cognitive 21) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:37— pre-bash-dev-server-block.readToken has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
config-helpers.deleteAccountFromConfigSection (cognitive 20) packages/channels/core/plugins/config-helpers.ts:60— config-helpers.deleteAccountFromConfigSection has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), ternaries 4 (7 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
pre-bash-dev-server-block.getLeadingCommandWord (cognitive 19) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:103— pre-bash-dev-server-block.getLeadingCommandWord has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
run-with-flags.main (cognitive 19) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/run-with-flags.js:40— run-with-flags.main has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
session-manager.getSessionById (cognitive 19) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:301— session-manager.getSessionById has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 7, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
utils.findFiles::searchDir (cognitive 18) REDACTED:161— utils.findFiles::searchDir has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
session-manager.getAllSessions (cognitive 18) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:214— session-manager.getAllSessions has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
session-key.buildAgentPeerSessionKey (cognitive 18) packages/channels/routing/session-key.ts:127— session-key.buildAgentPeerSessionKey has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
session-key.resolveLinkedPeerId (cognitive 18) packages/channels/routing/session-key.ts:176— session-key.resolveLinkedPeerId has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
sender-identity.validateSenderIdentity (cognitive 18) packages/channels/core/sender-identity.ts:4— sender-identity.validateSenderIdentity has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
instinct-cli._generate_evolved (cognitive 18) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:1012— instinct-cli._generate_evolved has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (8 pts), loops 5 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
validate-agents.validateAgents (cognitive 17) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js:33— validate-agents.validateAgents has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
orchestration-session.parseWorkerStatus (cognitive 17) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/orchestration-session.js:68— orchestration-session.parseWorkerStatus has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
signal.looksLikeSignalTargetId (cognitive 17) packages/channels/core/plugins/normalize/signal.ts:38— signal.looksLikeSignalTargetId has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
catalog.toChannelMeta (cognitive 17) packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:127— catalog.toChannelMeta has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12, boolean chains 4, if/else 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
session-manager.parseSessionMetadata (cognitive 16) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:83— session-manager.parseSessionMetadata has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
tmux-worktree-orchestrator.normalizeSeedPaths (cognitive 16) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/tmux-worktree-orchestrator.js:49— tmux-worktree-orchestrator.normalizeSeedPaths has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
config-helpers.clearAccountEntryFields (cognitive 16) packages/channels/core/plugins/config-helpers.ts:122— config-helpers.clearAccountEntryFields has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
resolve-route.buildEvaluatedBindingsIndex (cognitive 16) packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:369— resolve-route.buildEvaluatedBindingsIndex has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
D20 · ADR Quality· Context/problem and consequences/trade-offs are absent; only a decision log with rationale and boundary set sections appear · ×1
Context/problem and consequences/trade-offs are absent; only a decision log with rationale and boundary set sections appear .agent/BUILD_LOG.md— Add a Context/Problem section explaining why the decisions (Rust as gateway, OpenClaw as channels-only) matter for system scale and vendor lock-in, then a Consequences section covering trade-offs like Rust's higher memory overhead vs. Node's 3x overhead and ECC's dependency on Anthropic
D22 · Internal API Consistency· Inconsistent naming and return types for message generation. The methods p2_message, p8_message, blocker_message, and phase_message all appear to generate formatted strings (likely for OpenClaw) but return String. However, notify_via_openclaw takes a session_id and message and returns Result, implying it performs the actual notification/action. The 'message' suffix methods are ambiguous · ×1
Inconsistent naming and return types for message generation. The methods p2_message, p8_message, blocker_message, and phase_message all appear to generate formatted strings (likely for OpenClaw) but return String. However, notify_via_openclaw takes a session_id and message and returns Result, implying it performs the actual notification/action. The 'message' suffix methods are ambiguous: do they just format text or do they also send it? If they only format, the naming convention is inconsistent with notify_via_openclaw. If they send, they should likely return Result and be named consistently (e.g., notify_phase_change). — Unify the API by having all methods that perform an action return Result. Rename the formatting-only methods to something like format_p2_message or keep them if they are purely utility functions, but ensure the distinction between 'formatting' and 'sending' is clear. Alternatively, if all these methods send messages, rename them to notify_p2, notify_p8, etc., and return Result. (signatures: models.notify_via_openclaw(session_id: str, message: str): Result | models.p2_message(task_id: str, plan: str): String | models.p8_message(task_id: str, summary: str): String | models.blocker_message(task_id: str, phase: str, reason: str): String | models.phase_message(task_id: str, phase: str, detail: str): String)
D22 · Internal API Consistency· Inconsistent type for task identifier. Task.id is defined as Uuid, but the message generation methods accept task_id as String. This forces callers to convert between Uuid and String, which is error-prone and inconsistent with the type system. · ×1
Inconsistent type for task identifier. Task.id is defined as Uuid, but the message generation methods accept task_id as String. This forces callers to convert between Uuid and String, which is error-prone and inconsistent with the type system. — Standardize task_id to Uuid across all methods and properties. (signatures: Task.id: Uuid | MissionEvent.task_id: Uuid | models.p2_message(task_id: str, ...) | models.p8_message(task_id: str, ...) | models.blocker_message(task_id: str, ...) | models.phase_message(task_id: str, ...))
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) packages/agent-harness/skills/videodb/scripts/ws_listener.py:160— packages/agent-harness/skills/videodb/scripts/ws_listener.py:160-173 | packages/agent-harness/skills/videodb/scripts/ws_listener.py:204-217 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7–9 lines × 2) packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:351— packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:351-359 | packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:654-660 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:180— packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:180-189 | packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:248-257 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Low cohesion: SkillCreateOutput (LCOM4 8) packages/agent-harness/scripts/skill-create-output.js:81— SkillCreateOutput's methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
No DR/backup evidence — A persistence guard (data volume / purge-protection) was found, but no backup, geo-recovery or RTO/RPO controls were evidenced — a volume that survives a container recreate is not a tested restore from catastrophic loss.
Duplication concentrated across 24 sibling directories (28 clone groups) packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:4— 28 duplicated blocks under packages/connectors/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories anthropic-api, aws-s3, cloudflare, datadog, docker-hub, figma (+18 more sibling(s) not listed) — 21 of them are reported below, and 7 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 28 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 28 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 28 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (35 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (35 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/imessage.ts:71— packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/imessage.ts:71 · packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:80 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 206 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (24 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (24 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:13— packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:13 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-skills.js:9 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 161 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:4— packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/github/index.ts:6— packages/connectors/github/index.ts:6 · packages/connectors/linear/index.ts:6 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (21 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (21 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:5— packages/connectors/huggingface/index.ts:5 · packages/connectors/slack/index.ts:5 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 109 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 5 locations) packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:19— packages/connectors/docker-hub/index.ts:19 · packages/connectors/gmail/index.ts:10 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:10 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:12 · +1 more site(s) not listed — the 5 copies are spread across 5 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2 locations) packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:4— packages/connectors/cloudflare/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/sentry/index.ts:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (17 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (17 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js:33— packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-agents.js:33 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 120 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:213— REDACTED:213 · REDACTED:275 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 3 locations) packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:47— packages/connectors/anthropic-api/index.ts:47 · packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:82 · packages/connectors/perplexity-search/index.ts:23 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 4 locations) packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:5— packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/claude-code.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langchain.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/langgraph.ts:5 · packages/sdk-bridge/adapters/python-generic.ts:5 — the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 5 locations) packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:22— packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:22 · packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:18 · packages/connectors/google-calendar/index.ts:17 · packages/connectors/notion/index.ts:18 · +1 more site(s) not listed — the 5 copies are spread across 5 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3 locations) packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:19— packages/connectors/figma/index.ts:19 · packages/connectors/supabase/index.ts:22 · packages/connectors/vercel/index.ts:16 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 6 locations) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:40— packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/doc-file-warning.js:40 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-build-complete.js:7 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-bash-pr-created.js:7 · packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/pre-bash-dev-server-block.js:149 · +2 more site(s) not listed — the 6 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. There is one copy in each of 6 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 4 locations) packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:4— packages/connectors/aws-s3/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/datadog/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/jira/index.ts:4 · packages/connectors/posthog/index.ts:4 — the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines × 2 locations) packages/channels/core/session-envelope.ts:5— packages/channels/core/session-envelope.ts:5 · packages/channels/core/session-meta.ts:5 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Complex function validateHooks (cyclomatic 37, cognitive 79) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:127— validateHooks has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 79; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function resolveAgentRoute (cyclomatic 35, cognitive 37) packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:614— resolveAgentRoute has cyclomatic complexity 35 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function extractSessionSummary (cyclomatic 33, cognitive 56) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/session-end.js:38— extractSessionSummary has cyclomatic complexity 33 and cognitive complexity 56; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function maybeRunQualityGate (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 51) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/quality-gate.js:57— maybeRunQualityGate has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 51; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function validateHookEntry (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 37) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-hooks.js:50— validateHookEntry has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function splitShellSegments (cyclomatic 26, cognitive 47) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/shell-split.js:8— splitShellSegments has cyclomatic complexity 26 and cognitive complexity 47; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function validateCommands (cyclomatic 25, cognitive 54) packages/agent-harness/scripts/ci/validate-commands.js:15— validateCommands has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 54; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function initConnectors (cyclomatic 25, cognitive 24) packages/connectors/server.ts:19— initConnectors has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 24; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 24, cognitive 35) packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:308— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 35; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function detectProjectType (cyclomatic 24, cognitive 23) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:325— detectProjectType has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 37) packages/channels/core/channel-config.ts:82— resolveChannelEntryMatchWithFallback has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function handleAction (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 31) packages/channels/core/plugins/actions/signal.ts:102— handleAction has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function buildAgentPeerSessionKey (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 25) packages/channels/routing/session-key.ts:127— buildAgentPeerSessionKey has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function configure (cyclomatic 19, cognitive 28) packages/channels/core/plugins/onboarding/signal.ts:127— configure has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function execute (cyclomatic 19, cognitive 15) packages/connectors/firebase/index.ts:28— execute has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function toChannelMeta (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 17) packages/channels/core/plugins/catalog.ts:127— toChannelMeta has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function resolveConversationLabel (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 13) packages/channels/core/conversation-label.ts:23— resolveConversationLabel has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity· Complex function main (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 19) · ×1
Complex function main (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 19) packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/run-with-flags.js:40— main has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function getSessionById (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 19) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:301— getSessionById has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function validateSenderIdentity (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 18) packages/channels/core/sender-identity.ts:4— validateSenderIdentity has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 18; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
REDACTED: 759 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 759 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts · ×1
packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts: 745 lines of code packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:1— packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts has 745 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· packages/channels/core/dock.ts · ×1
packages/channels/core/dock.ts: 616 lines of code packages/channels/core/dock.ts:1— packages/channels/core/dock.ts has 616 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R6 · Tooling· The declared test suite includes a file that cannot be loaded · ×1
The declared test suite includes a file that cannot be loaded packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts:3— This repository declares test tooling, and the ✓ above records that declaration — but packages/channels/core/channel-config.test.ts and 10 other test file(s) in this workspace cannot be loaded at all: it imports a module that names no file in this repository, so the runner throws while collecting it and none of its cases execute. The wiring is present and the suite it points at does not run as written, which is why the tooling tick must not be read as a statement that the tests pass. Fix the unloadable file(s) — each one is reported with its failing import under Test Coverage — then the declared script exercises what it claims to.
Dead file (~464 LoC) packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~206 LoC) packages/channels/openclaw-gateway.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~201 LoC) packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-policy.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~122 LoC) packages/agent-harness/security/nexusos-acp-policy.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~114 LoC) packages/agent-harness/tools/openclaw-tools.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~113 LoC) packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-messages.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~90 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~80 LoC) packages/channels/core/reply-prefix.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~74 LoC) packages/channels/core/account-summary.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~69 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/pairing.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~45 LoC) packages/channels/core/read-only-account-inspect.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), but 1 in-repo import(s) from 1 other file(s) do name it (packages/channels/core/plugins/status.ts) — every one of those referrers is itself unreachable, so this file is dead only as a member of that cluster: if any referrer is in fact alive, this row falls with it
Dead file (~34 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/bluebubbles-actions.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~28 LoC) packages/connectors/_template/index.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~24 LoC) packages/channels/core/session-meta.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~21 LoC) packages/channels/core/session-envelope.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~19 LoC) packages/channels/core/plugins/actions/shared.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~17 LoC) packages/channels/routing/default-account-warnings.ts— no import path from any entry point (18 application, 44 tooling, 61 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
SC1 · Supply-chain hygiene· JavaScript dependencies are not locked · ×1
JavaScript dependencies are not locked — No package-lock.json / yarn.lock / REDACTED / bun.lock — JS installs aren't reproducible (SSDF PW.4.4). Commit your package manager's lockfile and install from it (`npm ci`, `yarn --immutable`, `pnpm i --frozen-lockfile` or `bun i --frozen-lockfile`). Advisory — never scored.
README/code drift docs/rust-api-reference.md:227— docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `RUST_LOG`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/rust-api-reference.md:234— docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `JWT_EXPIRY_HOURS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/rust-api-reference.md:237— docs/rust-api-reference.md documents the environment variable `CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:33— packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md runs `./install.sh typescript`, but `install.sh` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94— packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/golang/`, but no file or folder `rules/golang` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94— packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/python/`, but no file or folder `rules/python` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94— packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/swift/`, but no file or folder `rules/swift` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md:94— packages/agent-harness/rules/README.md names `rules/php/`, but no file or folder `rules/php` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/claw.js:43— `loadHistory` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/codemaps/generate.ts:157— `buildTree` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:169— `getPackageJsonDeps` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:249— `getGoDeps` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:278— `getRustDeps` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:294— `getComposerDeps` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/project-detect.js:315— `getElixirDeps` swallows every exception into `return []` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch packages/agent-harness/scripts/lib/session-manager.js:377— `getSessionSize` swallows every exception into `return '0 B'` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Mock-dominated test: normalizes mixed-case session keys before recording and route updates packages/channels/core/session.test.ts:79— This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `vi.fn`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 2 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: skips last-route updates when main DM owner pin mismatches sender packages/channels/core/session.test.ts:107— This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `vi.fn`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 2 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: logs sampled resolved and unresolved entries packages/channels/core/allowlists/resolve-utils.test.ts:101— This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `vi.fn`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 1 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: skips logging when both lists are empty packages/channels/core/allowlists/resolve-utils.test.ts:115— This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `vi.fn`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 1 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: skips hooks when runner has no message_sending hooks packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/slack.test.ts:160— This test sets up 4 test doubles (for example `vi.fn`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 2 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Duplicated predicate packages/channels/core/plugins/account-helpers.ts:30— `!accounts || typeof accounts !== "object"` appears character-identically in 2 files — packages/channels/core/plugins/account-helpers.ts, packages/channels/routing/account-lookup.ts. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js:30— `filePath && /\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$/.test(filePath)` appears character-identically in 2 files — packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/post-edit-console-warn.js, REDACTED. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts:100— `normalizeToken(params.channel) || "unknown"` appears character-identically in 2 files — packages/channels/routing/resolve-route.ts, packages/channels/routing/session-key.ts. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-messages.ts:7— `typeof raw !== "number" || !Number.isFinite(raw)` appears character-identically in 2 files — packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-messages.ts, packages/channels/core/thread-bindings-policy.ts. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:120— `typeof value === "string" && value.trim().length > 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts, packages/channels/core/plugins/status-issues/shared.ts. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:77— `info!` at line 77 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`.
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:132— `info!` at line 132 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`.
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging packages/traffic-controller/src/main.rs:136— `info!` at line 136 is handed a format string with `{…}` values in it, so tracing records one finished `message` field — the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, and every occurrence reads as a different message. Record the values as fields beside a constant message instead: `info!(order_id = %order_id, status = ?status, "order status updated")` (`%` records a value by its `Display`, `?` by its `Debug`, a bare name as itself), which a JSON subscriber, OpenTelemetry or a log store keeps as queryable keys. An error goes in as a field too: `error = %err`.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex packages/agent-harness/scripts/hooks/evaluate-session.js:87— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex packages/agent-harness/security/nexusos-acp-policy.ts:92— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
D20 · ADR Quality· ADR has no Consequences section · ×1
ADR has no Consequences section packages/agent-harness/agents/architect.md:10— packages/agent-harness/agents/architect.md has no Consequences section (a heading such as `## Consequences`, or the MADR equivalent). A decision record states the context that forced it, the decision and its consequences, so a reader can tell later whether it still holds.
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 7 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 7.2/10. The most over is `packages/channels` (11619 LoC, 123 module-visible types across 14 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
M2 · Architecture documentation· ADRs not easily discoverable · ×1
ADRs not easily discoverable — 2 ADR-shaped document(s) detected by content — `.agent/BUILD_LOG.md`, `packages/agent-harness/agents/architect.md`. They are not under a conventional ADR folder (docs/adr/) and are not named NNNN-title.md, and this check found them by their decision signature rather than by where they live — so a reader who does not already know these paths has no route to them. Detected by content signature only: records kept outside the repository, or written without a Status/Decision/Consequences shape, are not visible to this check and are not counted here.
Logging is not universal — Only 2/4 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `dashboard`, `packages/connectors`.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback· No rollback/health safety · ×1
No rollback/health safety — Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a `healthcheck:` and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to — the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse.
Unused export 'getMission' dashboard/lib/gateway.ts:61— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'resolveConfiguredFromCredentialStatuses' · ×1
Unused export 'resolveConfiguredFromCredentialStatuses' packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:61— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'resolveConfiguredFromRequiredCredentialStatuses' · ×1
Unused export 'resolveConfiguredFromRequiredCredentialStatuses' packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:80— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'hasConfiguredUnavailableCredentialStatus' · ×1
Unused export 'hasConfiguredUnavailableCredentialStatus' packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:102— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'hasResolvedCredentialValue' · ×1
Unused export 'hasResolvedCredentialValue' packages/channels/core/account-snapshot-fields.ts:112— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'formatAllowlistMatchMeta' · ×1
Unused export 'formatAllowlistMatchMeta' packages/channels/core/allowlist-match.ts:24— Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in packages/channels/core/plugins/allowlist-match.ts, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in packages/channels/core/plugins/allowlist-match.ts in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'listChannelDocks' · ×1
Unused export 'listChannelDocks' packages/channels/core/dock.ts:604— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R8 · Dependency Hygiene· Type-only dependency 'next' in production deps · ×1
Type-only dependency 'next' in production deps dashboard/next.config.ts:1— Every import is type-only — move it to devDependencies.
No app-layer HTTPS enforcement detected packages/connectors/server.ts:162— `server.listen(…)` serves plain HTTP on a network address, and nothing in its package enforces HTTPS: no TLS served (`https.createServer`, Fastify `https`, Nest `httpsOptions`), no redirect of plain requests to `https://`, no `Strict-Transport-Security` (helmet sends it by default), and no TLS-terminating proxy configuration committed beside it — so a browser may talk to it in clear text. (−2.0 on this card.)
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Not all async functions that make a request accept an AbortSignal · ×1
Not all async functions that make a request accept an AbortSignal — Only 0/37 async functions that make a cancellable request (fetch, axios, ky, ofetch) accept an AbortSignal or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a page navigated away from, an unmounted component, a timed-out job. Take a `signal` (or an options object that carries one) and hand it to the request; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
Null assertions (`!`) reduce the strict null checking score — ~0.2 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 3 assertion(s) across the 16296 source line(s) of the 169 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: packages/channels/core/plugins/outbound/direct-text-media.ts (3). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
Silent fallback default on parse failure packages/agent-harness/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py:215— `load_registry` returns `{}` when `(FileNotFoundError, json.JSONDecodeError)` is raised, with no log or raise — a malformed value silently becomes that default. Log the input or fail validation. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. semgrep could not parse 3 file(s) — `packages/channels/core/allowlist-match.ts`, `packages/channels/core/inbound-debounce-policy.ts`, `packages/channels/core/plugins/bluebubbles-actions.ts` — so the PII/GDPR sweep did not cover the unparsed regions of them; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a165db-a766-79d7-8f10-00a58d3ca333 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 56 · Warnings: 364 · Recommendations: 53 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 22-10-2026 @ 23:04 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.