{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D38","name":"OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D38","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixPasswordKt.FixPassword (cyclomatic 21): FixPasswordKt.FixPassword has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-mypage/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_mypage/screen/fix/password/FixPassword.kt"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c59dfb060d52ec9605386d96143c5c9d07df26c27b5a42dc92ae030b02b1a992"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimTongApiCallKt.simTongApiCall (cyclomatic 19): SimTongApiCallKt.simTongApiCall has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"data/src/main/java/com/comit/data/util/SimTongApiCall.kt"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1839a4bd1fcfd4ab1f62abf189441f5b47a9fcd1566b2fbafa0b53e23f92a259"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimTongCalendarGetListKt.organizeList (cyclomatic 19): SimTongCalendarGetListKt.organizeList has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendarGetList.kt"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6469aec2de0e3bb09c199a5c27409e007cf530db6866b411792abb297c3fb83f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimTongCalendarGetListKt.organizeList (cognitive 31): SimTongCalendarGetListKt.organizeList has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18, loops 11, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendarGetList.kt"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2442c45cb2a03d05317719affc4cb07d53a620c0397d641711cf0496aaca582"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimTongCalendarKt.SimTongCalendarItem (cognitive 17): SimTongCalendarKt.SimTongCalendarItem has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendar.kt"},"region":{"startLine":368}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64b0686017ce7cf10d4937f12247f422afdbb7b08671a0189e67c375b1b5856d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: typography/typography.kt: FileTooLong \u2014 515 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/typography/typography.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5338c8dcdd354f3cf4a41d7801ecb96700f88669c8990edc03e8d569aa93739d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt:104-122 | core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/component/TextField.kt:183-201 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt:104\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c160bab419c9fbe677a7f74f5020f8ba0974bd0a94b4de38da637c48c07a150f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/component/Vote.kt:329-347 | core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/component/Vote.kt:352-370 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/component/Vote.kt"},"region":{"startLine":329}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2c0eb0f030dc0724c8f8820b8fa331c3b7249423a29fe963f123ec83de9cc6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt:74-90 | core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/component/TextField.kt:128-144 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt:74\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/BtnField.kt"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdb863b76d3561ac210b2b7b39bdc3dc14ed73206e0ec30118c03de261199929"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/1_SignUpNameScreen.kt:311-326 | feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt:59-74 | feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt:152-167 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/1_SignUpNameScreen.kt:311\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/1_SignUpNameScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"327db7b89e1cc16ce9f5068114e840feda95aa3fb0ece77d6b8dd8a861254729"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/typography/typography.kt:456-471 | core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/typography/typography.kt:563-578 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/typography/typography.kt:456\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/typography/typography.kt"},"region":{"startLine":456}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26bdb8af65958b41cc3c9b157811c6199a3cdd16d2174e41107fd679a61511c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/WriteClosedDayScreen.kt:259-273 | feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/alarm/AlarmScreen.kt:33-47 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/WriteClosedDayScreen.kt:259\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/WriteClosedDayScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a56e7f1d77ceccb6dd2c925782c62e736f7494e48b33318ae757fcce72fc8468"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/schedule/ShowScheduleScreen.kt:200-213 | feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/schedule/ShowScheduleScreen.kt:267-280 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/schedule/ShowScheduleScreen.kt:200\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/schedule/ShowScheduleScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78420000752e2def623477ab53aa0499effac7e9c77ee514aa26a1fdeefed027"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/SimImageUploadLayout.kt:53-63 | feature/feature-mypage/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_mypage/screen/MyPageScreen.kt:214-224 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/SimImageUploadLayout.kt:53\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/SimImageUploadLayout.kt"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c8f18cf1e945060a9c847b37c98657847b4d580d4aee19565419ce4c9e0556"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:97-106 | feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendar.kt:101-110 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967efaf40fde12254388f9766f847f302b71a560457a0dba43c661f6fe8120fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): common-util/src/main/java/com/comit/common/unit/bitmap.kt:13-21 | core-design-system/src/main/java/com/comit/core_design_system/util/bitmap.kt:13-21 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-util/src/main/java/com/comit/common/unit/bitmap.kt:13\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-util/src/main/java/com/comit/common/unit/bitmap.kt"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e36f3bf2592b25ae2cca12803c6e2496bade34314b9f872c8644c064d975ea5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:147-154 | common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:168-175 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:147\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45d1b0a35167c10da2a5d33f3e167ee9085d7446a23d92100351bb2be88e8e09"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:342-348 | feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendarGetList.kt:35-40 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt:342\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt"},"region":{"startLine":342}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fdff9d6f8af6094d09b4add8a691a30717ca05e983ae14e4b1a9e9982c8f8ef"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"warning","message":{"text":"dormant codebase \u2014 no living knowledge left to concentrate: All 79 significant source file(s) were last meaningfully changed so long ago that no living knowledge remains \u2014 nothing since has been substantial enough to re-establish ownership (a broad, mechanical sweep that touches many files shallowly does not count, and neither does no activity at all). There is no concentration to measure, so the bus factor is not scored. This is not a clean bill: nobody currently holds working knowledge of this code (see D34 Knowledge Freshness)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"569d55ea5cb0330f13c125b289d07e5abdfcceac947a2c2645277937942e7d5f"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8012c42d297dc9578a0981eaaa3ed7c6e73ed5aa3dc41882e27c10ca099fea5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e539cb0740dea86a7df86b7287bb271d3368d49d45f29340e134af4dad7d9c2f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 79 of 79 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 79 separate risks. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"error","message":{"text":"Boundary-crossing change coupling: GetHolidayViewModel.kt \u2194 RemoteHolidayDataSourceImpl.kt: \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/vm/GetHolidayViewModel.kt\u0060 (context feature) and \u0060remote/src/main/java/com/comit/remote/datasource/RemoteHolidayDataSourceImpl.kt\u0060 (context remote) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 64% of the time (7 of the 11 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed) \u2014 the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can\u0027t see."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/vm/GetHolidayViewModel.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0073df40b9fb2315f02bc4b3bd827b21e380e3e3c7104466b9df2fd931e9dbe6"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"error","message":{"text":"Boundary-crossing change coupling: SimTongCalendar.kt \u2194 HolidayAPI.kt: \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendar.kt\u0060 (context feature) and \u0060remote/src/main/java/com/comit/remote/api/HolidayAPI.kt\u0060 (context remote) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed) \u2014 the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can\u0027t see."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendar.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0df42b2135b37da7b6c3d7a338607881932779dcc989111742c9711ac30e84e4"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"error","message":{"text":"Boundary-crossing change coupling: SimTongCalendarDialog.kt \u2194 WriteScheduleScreen.kt: \u0060common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt\u0060 (context common-compose) and \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/schedule/WriteScheduleScreen.kt\u0060 (context feature) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (5 of the 10 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed) \u2014 the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can\u0027t see."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common-compose/src/main/java/com/comit/common/dialog/SimTongCalendarDialog.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28b57e9a6fc26f9e01bf396a0b6499c81be03faaecdab37f1c8f622e6bf61ff2"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: 2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt \u2194 3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt: \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt\u0060 change together 90% of the time (9 of the 10 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c3850afd67d371784b5bd4de4542ec98ba1064c8fad2ef2b3c205d7640e080f"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: 1_SignUpNameScreen.kt \u2194 2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt: \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/1_SignUpNameScreen.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt\u0060 change together 90% of the time (9 of the 10 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/1_SignUpNameScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb889f4d1cc89c65f1aecead17dd12eb1447985c6d66b60d49206033671895c"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: 2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt \u2194 4_SignUpNicknameScreen.kt: \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/4_SignUpNicknameScreen.kt\u0060 change together 90% of the time (9 of the 10 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/2_SignUpVerifyScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17686c908f74a447c7f8ebbbda6ed54e70030aed7de7e6b9d448c85d2f9eccf5"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: SimTongCalendarGetList.kt \u2194 GetHolidayViewModel.kt: \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendarGetList.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/vm/GetHolidayViewModel.kt\u0060 change together 73% of the time (8 of the 11 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE (that is what the inversion buys) and the thing to add is a comment saying so, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/calendar/SimTongCalendarGetList.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3681746fcab7fd9060bc24636585df6d951d81dffbf3eefc7fcbbf70d85e6ba9"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling clique: AuthFindScreen.kt, FindPasswordEmailCodeScreen.kt, FindPasswordFixPasswordScreen.kt: 3 files \u2014 \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/find/AuthFindScreen.kt\u0060, \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/find/password/FindPasswordEmailCodeScreen.kt\u0060, \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/find/password/FindPasswordFixPasswordScreen.kt\u0060 \u2014 all change together with no explicit dependency: a fully-connected co-change clique, not 3 separate couplings. They share one concern (thin parallel siblings over a common abstraction), so extract the shared part into ONE unit and the whole clique\u0027s coupling clears at once \u2014 you do not need to break each pair individually."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/find/AuthFindScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eec08a2b9e24cf3ed15642418a2acfd052474a64b2016aca42b546512779f5ff"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: WriteClosedDayScreen.kt \u2194 GetHolidayViewModel.kt: \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/WriteClosedDayScreen.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/vm/GetHolidayViewModel.kt\u0060 change together 64% of the time (7 of the 11 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE (that is what the inversion buys) and the thing to add is a comment saying so, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-home/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_home/screen/WriteClosedDayScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b1334ba258273f8d8dac8fc00338f25b994d33213168074112a7f6e92be1f84"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: 3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt \u2194 4_SignUpNicknameScreen.kt: \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt\u0060 and \u0060feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/4_SignUpNicknameScreen.kt\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched the less-changed of the two, renames followed). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"feature/feature-onboarding/src/main/java/com/comit/feature_auth/screen/signUp/3_SignUpPasswordScreen.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efed414dff3257196914a7d60f6a5e4f9036d3c45159e773e68303d5955cc5ab"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66e9b3863d140081a6811fd618ff9dcb16dc73144e98379ce1b3cc2f4a1d32f6"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97c91613da2483edd9897926766ba3a72e588c2995170e6ed1aec497400841a9"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d328a1973cbf2ec0819c8d4811147b3910ed5f8c6ca34d93d15e29c701a8c6ac"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b1df960ae2257f1530306965ce68ca42b1adcfe83a9f0027ac4628be20dd74b"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"526b47c4306343f45258714806100cced3095e29e6c9d922166b7a2f8c434b04"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"552d1c4569930a4495677b2f024fcdfc192403dd2682e649c4b2cba0b307a631"}},{"ruleId":"D38","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fd0c751cd597b8c48c31fad661c121a5fc9d0da38b089827a0f88d1c870869c"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":9,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}