{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D24","name":"Comment Value","shortDescription":{"text":"Comment Value"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D24"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D39","name":"IL Efficiency","shortDescription":{"text":"IL Efficiency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D39"},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"S1","name":"Cryptographic Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X2","name":"Cancellation propagation","shortDescription":{"text":"Cancellation propagation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X2"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TaskPerfCSharp.perf2_AsyncEnumerable (cognitive 21): TaskPerfCSharp.perf2_AsyncEnumerable has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce0c68ab08ab8db9802f83f16c54b91366208c457bb29e622e85eacea68d1e06"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BackgroundCancellableTaskBuilder.Run (cognitive 20): BackgroundCancellableTaskBuilder.Run has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e65bc0651bf7a4f09873cc9b750d4b2ed4037465275f3b4408d27d464c179e91"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (7 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:12-579 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:12-494 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:12-897 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:12-247 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:1-243 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:1-320 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:1-157 \u2014 These 7 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 7 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 7 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09151d459e8c43459664b71791cf055c238ccb9ac3fdd905cb49a6e19ff4d1ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:12-579 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:1-863 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:12-494 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:12-897 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fd280958a2f49ec7be0ca74da967a21229af9b4cfec650ba497f6deccee1ab6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:559-594 | src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs:392-427 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":559}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a1b7853b1eb3421187c06071be6ec0c14b87a26390ea016ae50d8614b0c3922"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201330 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:277-306 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:512-540 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:277\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b7afce4712475cd57453aac93e158b8baa39bfc5e3f39c6323dc3b9ecd4fec8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28\u201329 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:229-256 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:406-434 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:229\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f072299312fa6043531684a098fa901b35f6ef289150d74865214c2b96756bd3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201324 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:57-80 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:59-81 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 138 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"908ce052813d76817593118702a621ffbd0f987ee0acc5f5c596d8520d1536e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:342-364 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:401-423 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":342}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"969b903c10c1e113327ca802cecf6dd7124b3c7dba6ad6dad3bc6c97d308c8d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 4): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:271-292 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:448-469 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:506-527 | src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs:219-238 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:267\u0060 calls \u0060ThrowIfCancellationRequested\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs:216\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30f1ed065e088f62d786514892380558857b55d6d3bb4b272c70a5d7c4fc3db8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:824-845 | src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs:323-342 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskBuilderBase.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:824\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":824}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0460a1c61e30eed422aec0cf1d3661e474c0e728fca4df1df2a2e55c21f1067"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201320 lines \u00D7 6): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:72-90 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:73-91 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:71-89 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:70-88 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:132-150 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:71-90 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:72\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60eadfc11f02e01f21547f7adf118596557ee67a97588aa79363b3b3c367eff7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:99-118 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:169-188 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:101-120 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 138 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:99\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9a10df79f5a233bd29d9f02c1e1a6451a61ec232dc14e067487d1e4ed7476e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 5): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:108-126 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:108-126 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:100-118 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:170-188 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:161-179 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:108\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51a986e086c17d40643a2a2a9ea7437592a79e208e609705f7248933ea75e009"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 4): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:229-256 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:371-389 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:406-434 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:488-516 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:229\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61baa692ad7630d1814e5ed71eb6ffc0880bb97064d614fb549f93005f4016ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:186-204 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:189-207 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:186\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"605cc5fbae537328046461c938969f707bb6773a07f6f4f99190e7e38fd99eb6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:166-183 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:169-186 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:166\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b966d12cce4db4d8ad393936c08b040fe14ad5f9eba2608c03e899a8b42690f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 7): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:69-85 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:70-86 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:311-326 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:68-84 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:67-83 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:129-145 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:68-84 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:69\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40642c417a1076dce12162220d63c22fd25957d6ade53ad5c45ea5ebd87b3078"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:207-222 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:210-225 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:207\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73a9cdb725632a68f9abc0a9517f395a80b17272f74333bf117ad818740a33a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:52-66 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:50-64 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:113-127 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:52-66 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/Task.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:52\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/Task.fs"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ae976d04c4740b6370852cc02bd7949a7489928907f5a56bb56d7b74d307b70"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:127-139 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:214-227 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:127\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/Task.fs"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a2ae8e849d1a4829a582ad6b1e0ce3f083f3d0772b72f99626e88b295edcee4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:55-67 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:56-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:55\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b4065204a374fdcbc1b52d47759630891caef8f187313355990ecad0893e8c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:151-163 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:154-166 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:151\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d70bd32ef9aae28c251c343b79acc677c041182f340abb6af0016ceb97aa89e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:220-232 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:134-146 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 138 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26665353c7b661512c22f73073f7394ac95a9c61cde36281507412fecc32a136"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 8): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:118-129 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:118-129 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:110-121 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:180-191 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:110-121 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:180-191 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:171-182 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:112-123 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:118\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9b0f06f6408c99be07f5467dec18fc71328243bbd18ad5d37dddc4edb5ef057"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 4): src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:98-108 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:168-178 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:97-108 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:167-178 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/Task.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:98\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/Task.fs"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8694db0b4cf33c4a4685a36ee2f105095a9a54a2c501283c751ea6fe17c8e3ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:130-140 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:285-293 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d60b910539572a8d0bd693bd029e82d9214aaaf10d2e0172d9820a885752c17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:127-137 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:214-225 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:127\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fbaaa78d9ffdf75bed358c62003a746a9a49d82884f312a854a1732bd3bb34d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 6): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:60-67 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:61-68 | src/IcedTasks/Task.fs:59-66 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:57-65 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTask.fs:120-127 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:59-67 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b870f435925cf5c9fcb2b70b4c1356089d765bb4a50e8ee90d1bfb13c95ec37a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:21-29 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:10-18 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a6107afdb65f0360fdde33e1060f4476697ed111a7bc76ccadb6ef3e9387020"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:21-29 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:10-18 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs:23-30 | src/IcedTasks/ColdTask.fs:22-29 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableValueTask.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 165 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee2d440add7822a8fb9671513c2b32f378cbfeeaf94b0c0d410e4475e2f84c9a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:132-139 | src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:220-227 | src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs:134-141 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/IcedTasks/ValueTaskUnit.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 138 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs:132\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/TaskUnit.fs"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63ee4ad7a385d9c6559ff410051e3f94cfeb663eea72a713e5bdff364a8db688"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:260-267 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:495-502 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs:260\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTaskBuilderBase.fs"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38da0be74cb90d66bb0e9205d0b1b798dbe17ac578ec801c8a89b0635a90c1ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:106-110 | src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:253-257 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs:106\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/IcedTasks/CancellableTask.fs"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7ba2a20d685f4364aeb004086cbf06cbd9c3faea27d1fe181bc7d6d920383f9"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: FileWriteBenchmarks (LCOM4 11): FileWriteBenchmarks\u0027s methods fall into 11 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 11 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/FSharpBenchmarks/FileWritingBenchmarks.fs"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06c9e6119727a9d9e50c82cd743801c21cae3d936b412dfd76bef3635f714ce6"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 no coverage collector is wired up: Coverage NOT MEASURED: \u0060--collect:\u0022XPlat Code Coverage\u0022\u0060 names a data collector that ships in the \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 package, and this repository wires up none \u2014 no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, \u0060--collect\u0060 produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Outdated: Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces: Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces 6.0.0 \u2192 10.0.13 available (referenced by IcedTasks)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Directory.Packages.props"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edf612fa2ff80c6b8c57e13b20e9394dd079724619a13aff96891db5fd5fd88f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"FileScopedPragmaDisable: #pragma warning disable 1998 \u2014 the disable has no matching restore anywhere in this file, so it does not end with the construct that needed it: it runs to the end of the file and silences the rule for everything written below, including code added years later that nobody weighed against it. Close it with the matching restore directive immediately after the construct it covers \u2014 that alone turns a standing exemption into a scoped one \u2014 or fix the cause and drop the directive entirely."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e85b3b7a6c5d8c8e1161149e88f3d4bfb2eae312fed2a50a658ad282a4d9aaea"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: FS0057 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or \u2014 if some occurrences really are legitimate \u2014 narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Directory.Build.props"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d35f9fc4bec2115c12f84671542b81b521472f2449e79093b910b5562c56a8d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: NU5104 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, including builds years from now. It is raised by the build itself \u2014 the packaging, restore or SDK step \u2014 about the project as a whole, not by the compiler or an analyzer at a line of code, so there is no call site to narrow it to and no per-site directive that could carry a reason: this element is the only place the decision can be recorded. Say WHY here, in a comment on the entry, or fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Directory.Build.props"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0472f599130e5a076288858c9dd190791bd476a16ac8831fcdcf95db9b9fd34"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: FS0044 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or \u2014 if some occurrences really are legitimate \u2014 narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tests/Directory.Build.props"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"452ceaf7a0cb4c7bdb650ebded2bc8ac0490096e55599125d9cefd7aa6f06dd8"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no project overview: The What is IcedTasks? heading begins a paragraph but the document never explains what the project is or does beyond linking to Microsoft docs (computation expressions, Resumable Code). Expand the overview so every reader can say \u0027IcedTasks is an F# computation expression library that uses ValueTask/cold-cancellable tasks.\u0027 rather than just citing links."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66dbf18d06aa983c06246108610908ba99aae6784280b3aacd1a6655733d71be"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low XML-doc coverage: CSharpTaskBenchmarks(net8.0): CSharpTaskBenchmarks(net8.0): 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/16)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks.csproj"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c145bbbb9d9b015322a6538dbb4f883b46d1685884c1e03612df821c905426d"}},{"ruleId":"D24","level":"note","message":{"text":"redundant comment: \u0022public const int BufferSize = 128; public const int ManyIterations = 10000;\u0022 \u2014 delete - restates the fixed constants on the method signature"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f10c3a2d5860d852527d509098d5801babe2f09962454975c5e7b66c603353d"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f3e3a96386d3cf2a09fa1b2ee086568b14149ffbb176c4b92b8ecf6af2fa512"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa8ee490371acdad2b62b958843583a0e94f30a79a22194bc3bc46d8eab253e9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d94ab1779ed67822a258b29e354be53f5e839fcc5466c685bcbd11cade805625"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a378eb575e3f20eca26f26f9af5fcfc839b4b37f9977c04073aa58942c61cd4f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ffd903834675a1532a30dfcc03e42472467ce1ea17da41e2c9dc19b0591234c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3efd444477d38adf42f8194a7346b13f0277872f078764cf46af99ca8a230378"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06876e3f3c55120213037e0fe6b42a3fd9a14dc74d00433cd5e3ff098e2f87b0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ff5df1d68d711a3e0035f669d2aef4c38c2367757ff9252ebf122cbb397e8bd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"779cd99de17469f6ceef87900880ab7cbcecf09cc1bd0e2c9cbe88aa162f1681"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a678034c28ad0e6a07e43ab89fb3d51901ee5a297d7778d59b41fd8ab9780efa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90a5c8d04c929534a610553c02fe9715ffa84c7173f09f5b44913b3cf33e9ebf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0368062220b7d03a1fa9e9d2bccb854d86c67fc9ecc0cc9ff48703e4ad75233a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4605d90208aa912f686365b6f14debdbcc499c88d697f0cbfb5b0cc49f87e4d2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcc53031fa987d6bc5a5b08489e3381c86035392521a66ecd56088c20fcbe155"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47377aa8659f8aadcdd7c9ce0cea201eb0d99596c65fcff940d7ef089d615860"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"beb7c3eaf9de5b4b83049539b3b715890a51340bbe0b6ca767159faee652b43a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc40f036b17275ff536363608abfe89563e35646b51bed5ad66e429392b87adf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fa0db91b1fdade05c3ee7b011caa14994291041df3d9e874b71f2cb06b46c95"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98e4720c82daf458185ec0b68e63e1655c5da3805c6332b8879e6ee075d3ff19"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80be2362a0aacfe00a8164aedf008cc9b3c5563cc99639b97baf91859f2b9485"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"System.Formats.Asn1","version":"6.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"build/build.fsproj"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b1568673c97a5ce9b1ec5a08dba083d705b7ca92047378b6f33333438b27491"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0752d0df7434000fcabf1048e2de30a7a1a8b982b3db9a19898c4dec199856b4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D39","level":"note","message":{"text":"IL efficiency: 2 authored method(s) exceed the IL budget: 2 of 2093 first-party methods compile to oversized IL bodies (\u003E 250 instructions); worst: Fake.DotNet.Fsdocs.buildBuildCommandParams @ build/FsDocs.fs:144, 464 IL instructions; that pulled this dimension to 10.0/10. These bodies are far past the JIT\u0027s inline budget, so splitting them does not make them inlinable \u2014 what moves the number is emitting less: collapsing LINQ chains and closures on hot paths, and interpolation built eagerly where it is only sometimes used."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"build/FsDocs.fs"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1f99f17fa7a3ca5742256b1c360a043c9f8436365de513159c1e82f3121d0ad"}},{"ruleId":"D44","level":"warning","message":{"text":"End-of-life runtime: .NET net9.0: build/build.fsproj declares .NET net9.0 as this project\u0027s target framework, and .NET 9 STS, support ended 2026-05-12. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2026-05-12 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf833dd2e60d7abeaab60bf3ef76eff2806e8ec26408f1f9382eb19e6e5923da"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: CancellableValueTask alias for CancellationToken -\u003E ValueTask is claimed but there is no CancellableValueTask type \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd18ab64d8f8518d0aaab24930fd70ba0491c1fb591a289df5eb61dd89af6990"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: ParallelAsync computation expression is claimed but IcedTasks contains neither ParallelAsync nor AsyncEx \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d77df8e88ea341793988c2e549251c2ea08ad31709f2fdecade0e1214e2be3f0"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: For Cold \u0026 CancellableTasks the PR reference points to a GitHub pull request (fsharp#14755) which does not exist \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d84c9fe2e4bb0bf0d19ac69781e350caeb91796c451d28550ceada43b8e0940"}},{"ruleId":"P10","level":"note","message":{"text":"No explicit versioning: No explicit version was found by any of the six routes this check reads: a \u0060\u003CVersion\u003E\u0060 or \u0060\u003CVersionPrefix\u003E\u0060 property; a \u0060GitVersion\u0060 or \u0060MinVer\u0060 reference; the split Arcade spelling (\u0060\u003CMajorVersion\u003E\u0060 AND \u0060\u003CMinorVersion\u003E\u0060 together); a hand-written \u0060[assembly: AssemblyVersion]\u0060 in source, with \u0060bin/\u0060 and \u0060obj/\u0060 excluded so the SDK\u0027s generated AssemblyInfo cannot satisfy it; or a version handed to MSBuild by the pipeline, as \u0060-p:Version=\u0060 / \u0060-p:PackageVersion=\u0060 on a \u0060dotnet build\u0060 or \u0060dotnet pack\u0060 line. Only project files, first-party source and CI files are read, so a version computed somewhere none of those can see is invisible here. A published library needs explicit semantic versioning so consumers can reason about breaking changes."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f25ed74033b9d9b8444441f8dacb71f30e7bc88fc4c32bea7aeaebd4fda20968"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 plus gitleaks for committed secrets (F# is not a CodeQL language and has no language-specific SAST engine) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 5199 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Third-party script without Subresource Integrity: \u0060https://code.iconify.design/iconify-icon/1.0.7/iconify-icon.min.js\u0060 is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request \u2014 the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path \u2014 runs arbitrary script in this page\u0027s origin, with its session."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docsSrc/_template.html"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5a3b8c0937daaa043888fd68e298a212bebcd666576c0dab8446233e978ba2c"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"note","message":{"text":"Not all async methods take a CancellationToken: Only 0/12 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can\u0027t be stopped early when the caller gives up \u2014 whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice \u2014 judge against your hosting model."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf623a92fb752b336427856888a9b386c434e686662a2cdc1bba21832c0a048c"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: ManyWriteFileAsync: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58d39b8c9b24f9a8eafbdaac9848779267b09d4d40e00a2f1b3312f063a0fe59"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: ManyWriteFileAsync_ValueTask: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"030bf209c06b5da23534e52c524208f34044392b36ed9d626a976abd49cf274a"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsSync_TaskBuilder_BindTask: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6beffd3fc0fc3a56c337b46cbc023488cf2e4e0e4389726bfe9970def83b5012"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsSync_TaskBuilder_BindValueTask: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9774de7233d72191d1481b9457345bbb99c052cd9987b29fcab5ced18d5249cb"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsSync_ValueTaskBuilder_BindTask: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"976eeaa733beb0d2a04938db01ed42975eaa7ab68d5315db135cd057e7087d78"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsSync_ValueTaskBuilder_BindValueTask: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffb2acd31a20345379101fe9b06ccdce6e92f1791d893ba9753fbf1f9d9036c1"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsAsync_TaskBuilder: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"695cd97a868426dff6521f6c69e53e71e32d6d048f16a6e148c80cf94998fc35"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: CSharp_TenBindsAsync_ValueTaskBuilder: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66a86bca9d0570ccb5d0f23254505022b31e25cd97e8168f40ec5fa3ff5f0914"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: SingleSyncTask_CSharp: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cb42f58ba5ac25d403ffcb6bfca8afb67b2404de68a8f9313291643bffd8bf2"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: SingleSyncExceptionTask_CSharp: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abebde253f5ab69f5d43440fa0eb4916e1e1d4aad8fd017ef6219daf01d6037c"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: perf1_AsyncEnumerable: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"746ed81bd7f3ba7e980c011e79fec87ab3d8a56b70c69696a8d52af7522679e9"}},{"ruleId":"X2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Async method without CancellationToken: perf2_AsyncEnumerable: No CancellationToken parameter \u2014 this work can\u0027t be stopped early once started."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"benchmarks/CSharpTaskBenchmarks/Class1.cs"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77c5992c43a6c455afd878514d4effc225b8c2f1cffcad28dbb199dadcce810e"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-319","guid":"7af97476-9f0d-4458-9163-3d2043918a1a","name":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information","shortDescription":{"text":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","guid":"c859d8ea-8b24-a157-9406-94929c10397a","name":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)","shortDescription":{"text":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-04-Poisoned-Pipeline-Execution"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":27,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}