Public report of ZenWave360/zenwave-sdk, published 22 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 22 October 2026, 08:38 UTC · Survey ID cd_bd52e628a38b4ca19c755e4c460a6f16
ZenWave360/zenwave-sdk
Measured 22 October 2026, 08:33 UTC, at code version adfd6f0
Code coverage is not measured: JavaScript/TypeScript suite (CouldNotMeasureNoCollector).
CAI scoreAt riskDown 8 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 25,405 lines of product code in 32 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.3 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 49
Findings by how serious they are
18 critical308 serious72 minor
15 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
22 October 2026, 08:33 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
A critical security finding is open, such as a library with a known critical vulnerability or a password or key found in the code. The score itself is unchanged, but its band shows At risk until the finding is fixed. See the Security and Compliance lens.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
69of 73 dimensions measured by tools. The other 4 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
372of 398 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 26 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
73dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 25,405 lines of product code in 32 projects.
ZenWave360/zenwave-sdk scores 56 out of 100, but it is rated At risk while a critical security finding is open; the score itself is unchanged.
The weakest lens counts most in the score, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 49 and is rated Weak. Its Security & performance tooling dimension scores 3 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality and to reconcile the README with reality: docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 56 to about 61.
18 findings are critical: seven in Dependency Vulnerabilities, five in Static Analysis (SAST), two in Dependency direction, two in IaC & Container Security and two in Secrets (history).
Watchdog couldn't measure 15 dimensions in this code, among them Test Reliability, Dependency Hygiene and Internal API Consistency, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 25,405 lines, which would take an estimated 0.3 person-years, around €45,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Outbound HTTP resilience · Outbound HTTP without resilience zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/parsers/SpecResourceLoader.java
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 3 findings
These 3 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 8 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE: REDACTED REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €45,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€15,000 to €75,000, for 249 to 791 hours of work, about 0.3 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.8 at a score of 56. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 25,405 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Raises the score by about 5 points · Low effort · ADR Quality
2
Reconcile the README with reality: docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists.
Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €45,000 to build again, about 0.3 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 49 (Weak). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 5 points for low effort, because it clears the 1 ADR Quality findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
Architecture — module dependency graph
Project dependencies, layered top-to-bottom; arrows show direction. Any dashed red edge points upward or sideways — a layering smell or cycle. A clean layered graph has none.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
34 modules, with 56 dependencies between them. 2 loops run through 8 of the modules, marked above the diagonal.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→21 io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.modelpart of a loop✕
Connections
15 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
2 pairs of types, where a type in plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib uses a type in plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib.remote-specification-schema.
plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib uses plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib.remote-specification-schema, so a change to plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib.remote-specification-schema can break plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib, while a change to plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib can't break plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib.remote-specification-schema.
Position
Below the diagonal: plugins.event-catalog-generator.event-catalog-project.components.lib uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→21 io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.modelpart of a loop✕
Connections
8 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.annotators.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.templating uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model can break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.model.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.templating uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk uses io.zenwave360.sdk.doc, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.doc can break io.zenwave360.sdk, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.doc.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.writers uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.writers, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.writers can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.writers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→26 io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses io.zenwave360.sdk.generatorspart of a loop✕
Connections
1 pair of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.generators.
io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl uses io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→28 io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parserspart of a loop✕
Connections
2 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
io.zenwave360.sdk.generators uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.options, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.options can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.options.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.options.asyncapi.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.frontmatter, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.frontmatter can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.frontmatter.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.support, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.support can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.support.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.templating. Showing 25 of them; the rest are in namespace-graph.json in this report's bundle.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.writers, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.writers can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.writers.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.generators. Showing 25 of them; the rest are in namespace-graph.json in this report's bundle.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→28 io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parserspart of a loop✕
Connections
9 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
27→31 io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.processorspart of a loop✕
Connections
17 pairs of types, where a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses a type in io.zenwave360.sdk.processors.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins uses io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers uses io.zenwave360.sdk, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk can break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers uses io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.options, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.options can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.options.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.kotlin uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses io.zenwave360.sdk.generators, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.generators can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.generators.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins can break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.plugins.templates uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts can break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.layouts.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils can break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.utils.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses io.zenwave360.sdk.templating, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.templating can break io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.templating.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl can break io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.zdl.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can break io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.formatters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.lint uses io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers can break io.zenwave360.sdk.lint, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.lint can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.parsers.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.lint uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.lint uses io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can break io.zenwave360.sdk.lint, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.lint can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.lint uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
io.zenwave360.sdk.utils uses io.zenwave360.sdk.processors, so a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.processors can break io.zenwave360.sdk.utils, while a change to io.zenwave360.sdk.utils can't break io.zenwave360.sdk.processors.
Position
Below the diagonal: io.zenwave360.sdk.utils uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health · 60% · Adequate · gated by X5 ·
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
14
High / Critical
A05:2025 — Injection
10
High / Critical
A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration
7
High / Critical
A07:2025 — Authentication Failures
3
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, resolve the missing architectural decision records and reconcile the documentation to ensure it accurately reflects the current codebase. Next, integrate a static application security testing step into the CI pipeline to prevent security regressions from being merged. Finally, enforce timeouts on all outbound HTTP clients and implement resilience patterns to protect against dependency failures.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Reconcile the README with reality: docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists.
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Set connect and read timeouts on every client (`RestTemplateBuilder.connectTimeout/readTimeout`, WebClient `responseTimeout`, `HttpRequest.Builder.timeout`, `HttpURLConnection.setReadTimeout`, Feign `connectTimeout`/`readTimeout` in configuration), and wrap calls to dependencies in resilience4j `@Retry`/`@CircuitBreaker`/`@TimeLimiter` (or Spring Retry).
The findings name the configuration each number was taken from and, for the assertions, the files that hold them. Turn null checking on where it is off — `"strict": true` in the base tsconfig that the others extend switches `strictNullChecks` on with the rest of the family — and then resolve the assertions rather than adding to them. A `!` on a value the checker could show to be null is a promise the author cannot check from where they are standing, and each one is a `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null` waiting for the path that makes it true; where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (narrow it with a test, make the property required, drop the `?`).
Resolve the 44 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java (8), HelpTest.java (6), MainGeneratorTest.java (6).
Test Quality: No assertions: testDiscoverAvailablePlugins
How the grades work
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 18
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 308
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 72
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 15
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 69 of 73 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 73 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 372 of 398 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D10 Test Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The 674 test(s) behind this row are the ones the code-model census could read, and this repository also carries at least 13 test source file(s) (.kt, .ts) that it cannot: it reads the test types the .java frontend declared, so a suite in any other language is invisible to it. Skipped tests, zero-assertion tests and the other quality signals on this row are UNMEASURED in that suite — their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's language coverage, not a finding that those tests are sound.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability NOT SCORED: this repository's production source includes .java, and the jvm executor ran against the .java half and did not finish re-running within its tier budget — so reliability was not measured for the repository as a whole. The JavaScript/TypeScript (vitest via `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --ignore-scripts` in plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/ (23 tests)): measured (0 flaky) suite(s) did re-run, and came back with 0 flaky across 1 measured tier(s) — but that is a figure for one half of the product, and we do not publish a partial one as if it were complete. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo — test reliability is excluded from the score rather than counted. The half was driven by a runner we ship, so this is not a missing-runner gap.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — 42 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) were read, stating a version for 106 dependency(ies) and leaving 206 to a parent or an imported BOM, but no build resolved the dependency graph, so the outdated signal was not established. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (4 contributor(s) across 1196 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 91% of the history; the other 3 hold 3% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (REDACTED), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict. For npm the surface is what a published package.json's entry points (exports, main, module, types) export, followed through the source; an entry that names build output the tree does not commit (dist/, build/) is not followed back to source, because only a tsconfig outDir/rootDir pair states that mapping and a bundler's input lives in executable configuration this engine does not evaluate.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
AC1 Text alternatives — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AC2 Forms & labels — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AC3 Page structure — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AC5 ARIA correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository renders user interface from a TEMPLATE LANGUAGE — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — and the accessibility cards on this run were measured over the 24 parsed markup document(s) ONLY. The markup model reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs; the file(s) above were REFUSED rather than unsupported — a template whose element NAME comes from an expression, or an Astro component whose frontmatter fence is never closed, leaves the element's identity unknown, and every accessibility rule is a statement about a NAMED element — so those views were not merely unparsed but unenumerated: not one of their elements entered the population any card scored. Their absence from the counts above is a gap in this analyzer's frontend coverage — not a finding that they carry text alternatives, labels, keyboard semantics or correct ARIA.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via REDACTED (REDACTED). docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.
Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit:
https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Java is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
P8 Schema migrations — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The schema may be created by a runner, a deploy script or a config file outside what this check reads, so an absence here is our blind spot rather than a missing migration strategy. The card abstains instead of scoring. You can widen what we reach: if the schema is created and evolved by a tool this check does not name, naming it lets us teach the detector to read it.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 223 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 263.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P5 DR & Backup: Backup/restore and disaster-recovery readiness is judged from in-repo evidence — a config that exists is not a tested restore, so the absence of positive evidence is reported as "not evidenced", never scored as present.
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (4): D19, D21, D26, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 23 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 3 bodies over 30 down to 30 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles (cyclomatic 50), ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.planEntityMethodBody (cyclomatic 45), EntitiesToAvroConverter.convertEntityToAvro (cyclomatic 33). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 3 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 6.7 to about 7.3/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 30; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 49 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 2 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles (cognitive 83), AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles (cognitive 73). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 6.2 to about 6.5/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes8.7 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 6 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.java, BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java, EventCatalogGenerator.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with EventCatalogGenerator.java, AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with EventCatalogGenerator.java, AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
74 duplicated block group(s) detected. A further 4 rows report members as variants of one another; they aggregate block groups already counted above and are not themselves counted. 1 of the 78 are in trees this repository does not ship — vendored, example/demo, fixture and benchmark code — and are ranked below the shipped groups rather than excluded from them: the duplication there is real and is still counted in this dimension's score. The dimensions that publish a production-file census leave those trees out of theirs, so this count is deliberately drawn over the wider population.
+ 27 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 14 Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java (2), EventCatalogGenerator.java (2), JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java (2), EventCatalogGenerator.java, EventCatalogImporterGenerator.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Resolve the 7 Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with EventCatalogGenerator.java (2), JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java (2), SpringCloudStreams3AdaptersGenerator.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
32 production modules (Maven+npm), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; 8 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 23 of the 32 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
Off the main sequence: asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo · ×8
What to do
Resolve the 8 Off the main sequence finding(s) in Coupling. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
Enforce Coupling in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 7 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java, BackendApplicationKotlinHelpers.java, JavaZdlModel.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution9.6 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
697 test methods: 677 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 20 e2e. The JavaScript/TypeScript suite contributes 23 `it`/`test` case(s) across 1 test file(s) declaring at least one beside 674 .NET test method(s); its tier split is read from package names and paths only.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D10 · Test Quality9.0 / 10Stronggated by 46 serious findings✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.
Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.
0 skipped, 44 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 674 tests. Measured on the .java suite only — at least 13 test source file(s) (.kt, .ts) went unread, so its test quality is unmeasured and is not in these counts.
No assertions: testGenerateBackendModules · ×44e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:88
Test project verifies nothing: java-to-asyncapi · ×2plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGeneratorTest.java:10
What to do
Resolve the 44 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java (8), HelpTest.java (6), MainGeneratorTest.java (6). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (44 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 Test project verifies nothing finding(s) in Test Quality — start with JavaToAsyncAPIGeneratorTest.java, JavaToJDLGeneratorTest.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 34 declared JVM dependency artifact(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from the POMs Maven Central publishes, over the coordinates this repository's 42 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) declare with a version resolvable from the manifest itself — the same declaration-site closure this analysis reads for dependency currency. The JVM has no lockfile a checkout is guaranteed to carry, so this is deliberately NOT the transitive closure. 206 further coordinate(s) are declared with no version at the declaration site — inherited from a parent POM, a BOM or an unresolved Gradle version reference — and are NOT graded: this verdict covers what the checkout pins, not the full transitive graph. A further 2 coordinate(s) are not published to Maven Central — another repository (Google's Maven hosts androidx), a SNAPSHOT, or a private artifact — so their licences are not readable from here and they are outside this verdict.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 5 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java, EventCatalogGenerator.java, AvroSchemaLoader.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
7 deducted task-comment markers across 25405 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 9.9. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
Resolve the 5 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java (2), EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java, EntitiesToAvroConverter.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 FixmeComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with ZDLProcessor.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 XxxComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository's root README and the zenwave-sdk-maven-plugin/README.md are complete for their respective directories: the root one explains what ZenWave SDK is (a DDD/API-First toolkit generating ZDL, AsyncAPI, OpenAPI models), its Maven Central badge, a changelog, features roadmap, and links to previous releases documentation; the plugin README covers Maven/Gradle usage with an example. The architecture/design docs are thin but present: zenwave-sdk-maven-plugin/README.md lists JBang installation, available plugins, Changelog, Features / Roadmap, Building from source, Usage, Lint ZDL models, and Generate documentation (all visible in the body). Each document is well-structured with a table of contents and an opening overview. The ZenWave360 SDK plugin READMEs are well written for their directories — each one documents the directory it lives in and gives usage examples (e.g. jbang commands), an architecture manifest, configuration options, a live pipeline example, and a Getting Help section. The repository-level documentation is thin: only the root README mentions installation, build, or contribution guidance. The repository's READMEs are strong: each plugin-level README (e.g. the ZenWave MCP Server, EventCatalog, and online-food-delivery-mongo projects) is focused on its own directory and clearly documents what it contains (installation, usage examples, a catalog editor guide). The central architecture/design document docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md is a settled design doc that explains the ZDL annotator framework's problem, core concept of artifact types, and a full outline; it is well written and complete. All visible content is present and clear.
What to do
Improve Documentation Quality — currently 8.6/10. — The repository's root README and the zenwave-sdk-maven-plugin/README.md are complete for their respective directories: the root one explains what ZenWave SDK is (a DDD/API-First toolkit generating ZDL, AsyncAPI, OpenAPI models), its Maven Central badge, a changelog, features roadmap, and links to previous releases documentation; the plugin README covers Maven/Gradle usage with an example. The architecture/design docs are thin but present: zenwave-sdk-maven-plugin/README.md lists JBang installation, available plugins, Changelog, Features / Roadmap, Building from source, Usage, Lint ZDL models, and Generate documentation (all visible in the body). Each document is well-structured with a table of contents and an opening overview. The ZenWave360 SDK plugin READMEs are well written for their directories — each one documents the directory it lives in and gives usage examples (e.g. jbang commands), an architecture manifest, configuration options, a live pipeline example, and a Getting Help section. The repository-level documentation is thin: only the root README mentions installation, build, or contribution guidance. The repository's READMEs are strong: each plugin-level README (e.g. the ZenWave MCP Server, EventCatalog, and online-food-delivery-mongo projects) is focused on its own directory and clearly documents what it contains (installation, usage examples, a catalog editor guide). The central architecture/design document docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md is a settled design doc that explains the ZDL annotator framework's problem, core concept of artifact types, and a full outline; it is well written and complete. All visible content is present and clear.
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: REDACTED scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
2 finding(s): 0 critical, 2 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
10 finding(s): 0 critical, 5 high, 5 medium, 0 low. 3 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 3 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
Resolve the 6 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 issue-level).
Resolve the 4 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Resolve the 2 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked. Counted over 125 of the 233 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 12 platform declaration(s) and 170 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC1 · Text alternatives10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 24 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have, then assert with vitest-axe in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Other · Architecture — Whether any singleton service captures a scoped/transient dependency — a silent lifetime/threading bug.
Method: Roslyn scan: DI registrations parsed from AddSingleton/Scoped/Transient; each singleton checked for captured shorter-lifetime dependencies. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether singleton services avoid mutable shared instance state that concurrent callers would race on.
Method: Roslyn scan: singleton field mutations unguarded by lock or Interlocked, per type; syntax-based guard detection. Deterministic, traceable per field.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
`kotlin-backend-application` is a Application project but references `openapi-controllers`, a Web project. The clean-architecture rule is that dependencies point INWARD — the domain/application core must not depend on outer layers (infrastructure/web). Invert it: define the abstraction in the inner layer and implement it in the outer one.
`kotlin-backend-application` is a Application project but references `openapi-spring-webtestclient`, a Web project. The clean-architecture rule is that dependencies point INWARD — the domain/application core must not depend on outer layers (infrastructure/web). Invert it: define the abstraction in the inner layer and implement it in the outer one.
Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').
Method: Roslyn scan: public interface declared-member counts (accessors fold into their property/event); fat-interface threshold (over 15 declared members) flagged per type. Each finding also reports the distinct-OPERATION count — members counted by name, so an overload group counts once — which decides whether it states the caller-side ISP harm or the implementer-side burden of an overload set. TypeScript: exported interfaces that declare behaviour, counted over their REQUIRED operations (method signatures and function-typed properties with no `?`, once per signature) — data-shape interfaces and ambient .d.ts declarations are outside the population; JavaScript declares no interfaces and is not applicable. Deterministic, type-level.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's Java: methods that only throw a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something. (×5) — e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:98, e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithKlinicalProject.java:98, e2e/src/test/resources/projects/monolith-clinical-project/src/test/java/com/example/clinical/KarateAPIIntegrationTest.java:26, …
What to do
Clear the softer debt: re-enable or delete @Disabled/@Ignore tests, decide whether each empty method or UnsupportedOperationException is deliberate (and say so in a comment), and replace @SuppressWarnings("all") with targeted, justified suppressions.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 4 of 25 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 0.3 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md:483
plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:118
plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:119
plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:120
plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:121
plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `asyncapi_client.yml`, but no file or folder `asyncapi_client.yml` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:129
plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md documents the setting `specFiles`, but no code or configuration file names `specFiles`. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md:454
plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md documents the setting `servicePrefix`, but no code or configuration file names `servicePrefix`. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md:481
plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md names `.mdx.hbs`, but no file or folder `.mdx.hbs` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md:168
plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md names `.github/workflows/update-catalog.yml`, but no file or folder `.github/workflows/update-catalog.yml` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md:175
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:33
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:34
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:35
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:36
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:40
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:41
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:42
e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:43
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists; plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P1 · CI/CD gates8.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
305/353 types (86%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API.
What to do
Keep implementation types off the public surface (Java: package-private (no modifier), or leave its package out of `module-info` exports) so internals can change without breaking consumers.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability6.8 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
Only 12/13 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `plugins/zenwave-mcp-server`.
What to do
Extend structured logging to the remaining runnable modules so everything you run is diagnosable in production.
Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (opentelemetry-java or Micrometer) and a health-check endpoint (Spring Boot Actuator's /actuator/health, or a /health route) for operability.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 4429 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Dependabot is configured but does not watch `npm` — add that `package-ecosystem` entry to REDACTED so those dependencies get the same automatic update and advisory pressure as the ones it already covers.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Nothing pauses a release for a human: publish as a draft release (or gate the release job on a protected tag/manual dispatch) so a bad build can be stopped before users can download it.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P5 · DR & Backup4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether disaster recovery is planned and codified — backups, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees — from IaC + container manifests + docs, never the live cloud.
Method: Filesystem scan: disaster recovery, backup, geo-recovery, RTO/RPO, persistence guarantees from IaC, manifests, and docs. Exhaustive, deterministic, never a live environment.
What to do
Document RTO/RPO and a tested restore procedure (a backup config alone isn't disaster recovery).
Enable purge protection / soft-delete (and prevent_destroy on critical resources) so data stores can't be lost to an accidental or malicious delete.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether outbound HTTP calls are wrapped in resilience (retry/timeout/circuit-breaker) so a failing dependency doesn't cascade.
Method: Source scan: outbound HTTP clients and what bounds them — resilience handlers (Polly, AddStandardResilienceHandler) on .NET; on Go, the JVM, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Elixir, Swift, Dart and Erlang, a timeout, deadline, retry or breaker beside each call, or a process-wide client default (a framework-wide deadline such as Drupal core's, Laravel's or actix's awc counts). Exhaustive, deterministic.
`.openConnection(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout. — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/parsers/SpecResourceLoader.java:131
What to do
Set connect and read timeouts on every client (`RestTemplateBuilder.connectTimeout/readTimeout`, WebClient `responseTimeout`, `HttpRequest.Builder.timeout`, `HttpURLConnection.setReadTimeout`, Feign `connectTimeout`/`readTimeout` in configuration), and wrap calls to dependencies in resilience4j `@Retry`/`@CircuitBreaker`/`@TimeLimiter` (or Spring Retry).
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
Other · Security — Only what this repository's own non-C# files could be read for was assessed — and because this repository commits the configuration that serves its own HTTP surface, that configuration could be read in full for the security response headers it sets. Nothing else in this dimension was assessed: the transport, cookie, input-validation and crypto controls are read from a source model that was not loaded for this repository’s language, so their absence here is not a finding about this repository.
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because `REDACTED` builds the web-server image that serves this application, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (−2.0 on this card.) — REDACTED:20
What to do
Set security response headers on the surface this repository serves: an `add_header` directive per header in the nginx/Caddy/Apache config, a `_headers` / `vercel.json` / `netlify.toml` entry for a static host, or `helmet()` in the HTTP server. `Content-Security-Policy` is the one that pays for itself first — it is what contains an injected script once one reaches the page — followed by `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` and a frame policy (`X-Frame-Options: DENY`, or CSP `frame-ancestors`). Where the app is served from a build container, the header configuration belongs in the image beside the built assets, so it ships with them rather than depending on where it lands.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `NullPointerException` (Java, Kotlin, Scala), `ArgumentError.notNull` (Dart) or `ArgumentNullException` (F#'s `nullArg`) tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`debug` at line 286 is called with an argument built by `schemas.stream()` (line 286), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on. — plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:286
`debug` at line 288 is called with an argument built by `schemas.stream()` (line 288), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on. — plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:288
`debug` at line 38 is called with an argument built by `chain.stream()` (line 38), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on. — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/MainGenerator.java:38
What to do
In Java, put the construction behind the logger's own check (`if (log.isDebugEnabled())` for SLF4J and Log4j, `if (logger.isLoggable(Level.FINE))` for java.util.logging), or hand the logger a lambda it calls only when the level is on (Log4j 2's `Supplier` overloads, SLF4J 2's `log.atDebug().addArgument(() -> …)`). A `{}` placeholder alone is not the fix: it defers the formatting, not the stream, join or serialisation in the argument.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×13) — plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/kafka/producer/outbox/none/Producer.java.hbs:64, plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/scs/producer/outbox/none/Producer.java.hbs:54, plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/consumer/imperative/IService.java.hbs:20, …
`runtimeHeadersMap message` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×2) — plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/common/Headers.hbs:5, plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/common/Headers.hbs:5
`header.description` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×2) — plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/common/Headers.hbs:10, plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/common/Headers.hbs:10
`roleBinding.crnPattern` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator/TerraformConfluent/acls.tf.hbs:41
`transitionNaturalIdExpression _rootEntity` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/AggregateTransitions.java.hbs:28
`fieldValidationAnnotations field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×3) — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:27, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:58, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/mongodb/Entity.java.hbs:49
`fieldType field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×8) — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:28, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:43, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:47, …
`transitionNaturalIdExpression entity` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/EntityTransitions.java.hbs:27
`field.javadoc` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×2) — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:55, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/mongodb/Entity.java.hbs:45
`fieldValidationAnnotations relationship` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:98
`relationshipFieldType relationship` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×6) — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:100, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:122, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:155, …
What to do
Each finding names the expression, the attribute it lands in and the line. Confirm the value's origin from the read this analyzer traced, then escape it at the sink or validate it against the shape the attribute accepts before interpolating.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether an enhanced `for` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is iterating invalidates the fail-fast iterator it is holding, so the next `next()` throws `ConcurrentModificationException` and the remaining elements are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. — plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:708
`catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. (×6) — plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogFileWriter.java:288, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Help.java:231, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:81, …
What to do
Swallowed exception (empty catch)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal`/`verbose`/`silly`/`http`/`log` call on a receiver named for a logger, in a package whose own or an enclosing `package.json` declares a logger that carries values as fields (pino, pino-http, nestjs-pino, Fastify, winston, bunyan, tslog, LogTape, roarr), whose first deciding argument is a template literal with substitutions; an object-literal fields argument is stepped over, a plain string message clears the call. Python is read the same way: a `debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error`/`exception`/`critical`/`log` call on a logger in a file that imports the standard library’s `logging` or structlog (loguru, which formats at the call, is not judged), whose message is a whole f-string with a non-constant field; a `%`-formatted, `.format()`-ed or concatenated message is not convicted, as in C#. PHP is read the same way: a PSR-3 level call (`emergency`…`debug`, `log`) on a logger (`$logger`, `$this->logger`, Laravel’s `Log::`, `logger()`, `\Drupal::logger()`) in a package whose `composer.json` requires a PSR-3 logger or a framework that hands one out (psr/log, Monolog, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, CakePHP), or a file that imports one, whose message is a double-quoted string interpolating a variable; a single-quoted message clears the call, and `sprintf` or `.` concatenation is not convicted, as in C#. Dart is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on Sentry’s structured logger (`Sentry.logger`) whose message is a whole string literal interpolating a value (`$name`, `${…}`); the `Sentry.logger.fmt` template API clears the call. Dart that logs only through loggers with one message and no fields (package:logging, package:logger, talker, dart:developer) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Ruby is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on the console gem’s `Console` (declared by a Gemfile, gemspec or Gemfile.lock, or required) or, where SemanticLogger, Ougai or dry-logger is declared or required, on a receiver named for a logger (`logger`, `@logger`, `Rails.logger`, `log`), whose first deciding argument is, as the whole argument, a double-quoted string interpolating a non-constant value (`#{…}`, `#@ivar`); a plain literal clears the call, keyword arguments are the fields, and a block, `%`-format or `+` concatenation is not convicted. Ruby that logs only through the standard Logger (Rails.logger) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Deterministic.
`info` at line 126 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:126
`info` at line 128 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text. — plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:128
Other · Code Health — Whether strict null checking is enabled and not undermined by heavy `!` assertion — TypeScript's `strictNullChecks` (which `strict` turns on) is what makes `string` exclude `null` and `undefined`, and the postfix `!` is the operator that silences it.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
This repository commits no tsconfig, so whatever type-checks it uses tsc's own defaults, in which `strict` and `strictNullChecks` are OFF: `string` admits `null` and `undefined`, and a value that is null is compiled through to the property access that throws. If the build passes `--strict` on a command line instead, put it in a committed tsconfig — this check reads configuration, and configuration is all it can read.
~23.6 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 11 assertion(s) across the 466 source line(s) of the 1 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts (11). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
What to do
The findings name the configuration each number was taken from and, for the assertions, the files that hold them. Turn null checking on where it is off — `"strict": true` in the base tsconfig that the others extend switches `strictNullChecks` on with the rest of the family — and then resolve the assertions rather than adding to them. A `!` on a value the checker could show to be null is a promise the author cannot check from where they are standing, and each one is a `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null` waiting for the path that makes it true; where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (narrow it with a test, make the property required, drop the `?`).
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 11 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (20%; ≈22% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 44 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 3 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
P12 CI test-gate honesty — 1 observation(s) recorded · Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 25 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 4 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 3 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
Not included — 42 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC2 Forms & labels — AC2 could not be measured here. This repository renders user interface from a template language — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — which this analyzer's markup model does not read (it reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs), so no form control/button from it could enter the population. The parsed markup carried none either, but that is a gap in our frontend coverage, NOT a statement that this repository has no form control/button.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — AC4 could not be measured here. This repository renders user interface from a template language — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — which this analyzer's markup model does not read (it reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs), so no interactive element from it could enter the population. The parsed markup carried none either, but that is a gap in our frontend coverage, NOT a statement that this repository has no interactive element.
AC5 ARIA correctness — AC5 could not be measured here. This repository renders user interface from a template language — 17 Handlebars/Ember template file(s) carrying 92 markup element(s) (e.g. plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/java/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.java.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersGenerator/src/main/kotlin/web/mvc/ServiceApiController.kt.hbs, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/test/kotlin/infrastructure/jpa/imperative/inmemory/EntityRepositoryInMemory.kt.hbs) — which this analyzer's markup model does not read (it reads .html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx, html`…` templates and DOM-assigned HTML strings in .ts/.js, the .erb/.ejs/.eex/.heex/.leex/.twig/.jinja/.j2/.liquid/.njk/.hbs/.mustache/.blade.php/.gohtml template languages, .astro/.templ/.pug/.jade/.haml/.slim, and the kotlinx.html/Compose HTML/kotlin-react, Giraffe/Falco/Fable.React/Feliz/Bolero and Jaspr builder DSLs), so no ARIA usage from it could enter the population. The parsed markup carried none either, but that is a gap in our frontend coverage, NOT a statement that this repository has no ARIA usage.
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.
Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit:
https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not scored — polyglot repository, one half's runner produced no measurement
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Not scored — 42 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) were read, stating a version for 106 dependency(ies) and leaving 206 to a parent or an imported BOM, but no build resolved the dependency graph, so the outdated signal was not established. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.java), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/ runs vitest but declares no coverage provider, so the suite can run and still produce no lcov — add `@vitest/coverage-v8` (or `@vitest/coverage-istanbul`) as a devDependency. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows only 1 of the 3 signals this lens looks for (84 value object(s))
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
P8 Schema migrations — Hibernate is declared, but the schema-migration mechanism could not be identified. Our limit, not a verdict on this repository.
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a REDACTED, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Java code has 27,737 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Java was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Java request off Android takes no token: it is cancelled through the handle it returns (Future.cancel, Call.cancel, a Disposable), ambiently (io.grpc.Context) or by interrupting its thread, not through a parameter
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Dependency-rule violation: kotlin-backend-application (Application) → openapi-controllers (Web) — `kotlin-backend-application` is a Application project but references `openapi-controllers`, a Web project. The clean-architecture rule is that dependencies point INWARD — the domain/application core must not depend on outer layers (infrastructure/web). Invert it: define the abstraction in the inner layer and implement it in the outer one.
Dependency-rule violation: kotlin-backend-application (Application) → openapi-spring-webtestclient (Web) — `kotlin-backend-application` is a Application project but references `openapi-spring-webtestclient`, a Web project. The clean-architecture rule is that dependencies point INWARD — the domain/application core must not depend on outer layers (infrastructure/web). Invert it: define the abstraction in the inner layer and implement it in the outer one.
No assertions: testGenerateBackendModules e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:88— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testGenerateControllers e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:115— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testGenerateOpenAPIs e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:65— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testGenerateBackendModules e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithKlinicalProject.java:87— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testGenerateControllers e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithKlinicalProject.java:115— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testGenerateOpenAPIs e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithKlinicalProject.java:64— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: generateApis e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestOnlineFoodDeliveryProject.java:65— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_generator_asyncapi_v2 plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3GeneratorTest.java:38— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: generatesDomainSubdomainAndServicePages plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGeneratorTest.java:44— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_event_producer_to_asyncapi plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGeneratorTest.java:10— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_event_producer_to_asyncapi_avro plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGeneratorTest.java:21— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_jpa_to_jdl plugins/java-to-jdl/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGeneratorTest.java:8— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_mongodb_to_jdl plugins/java-to-jdl/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGeneratorTest.java:17— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_duplicate_consumed_channel_generates_method_operations plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIClientGeneratorTest.java:78— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_aggregates_zdl_to_plantuml plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:41— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_relational_zdl_to_entity plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:69— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_relational_zdl_to_entity_with_aggregate plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:76— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_relational_zdl_to_markdown plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:48— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_relational_zdl_to_markdown_with_aggregates plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:55— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_customer_address_zdl_to_glossary plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:34— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_order_faults_zdl_to_markdown plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:84— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_orders_with_aggregate_zdl_to_plantuml plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGeneratorTest.java:62— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test_process_inline_parameters plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/PathsProcessorTest.java:26— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testConfigurationProvider zenwave-sdk-cli/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ConfigurationProviderTest.java:12— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testZdlToJsonPlugin zenwave-sdk-cli/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToJsonPluginTest.java:13— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
+ 19 more in this group — see findings.md.
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped· Untrusted text written into markup unescaped · ×40
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/kafka/producer/outbox/none/Producer.java.hbs:64— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/scs/producer/outbox/none/Producer.java.hbs:54— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/common/Headers.hbs:5— `runtimeHeadersMap message` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/common/Headers.hbs:10— `header.description` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/consumer/imperative/IService.java.hbs:20— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/consumer/imperative/IServiceByChannel.java.hbs:21— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/producer/IProducer.java.hbs:20— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator/shared/producer/outbox/modulith/Producer.java.hbs:54— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator/TerraformConfluent/acls.tf.hbs:41— `roleBinding.crnPattern` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/adapters/imperative/ConsumerService.java.hbs:29— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/common/Headers.hbs:5— `runtimeHeadersMap message` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/common/Headers.hbs:10— `header.description` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/consumer/imperative/IService.java.hbs:20— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/producer/IProducer.java.hbs:20— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/producer/outbox/jdbc/Producer.java.hbs:72— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/producer/outbox/modulith/Producer.java.hbs:55— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/producer/outbox/mongodb/Producer.java.hbs:108— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStream3Generator/producer/outbox/none/Producer.java.hbs:54— `operation.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/AggregateTransitions.java.hbs:28— `transitionNaturalIdExpression _rootEntity` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:27— `fieldValidationAnnotations field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:28— `fieldType field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:43— `fieldType field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/DomainEvent.java.hbs:47— `fieldType field` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/common/EntityTransitions.java.hbs:27— `transitionNaturalIdExpression entity` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/resources/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultGenerator/src/main/java/core/domain/jpa/Entity.java.hbs:55— `field.javadoc` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through Handlebars' raw `{{{ }}}` output with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:96— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:96-100 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:85-90 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:96` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:101` calls `get` and `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:91` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:103— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:103-107 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:92-96 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:100` calls `get` and `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:88` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:184— plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:184-188 | plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:253-257 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:184` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ServiceHelperFormatter.java:70— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ServiceHelperFormatter.java:70-74 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ServiceHelperFormatter.java:85-89 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ServiceHelperFormatter.java:70` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:135— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:135-139 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:137-141 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:135` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:52— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:52-56 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:64-68 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/HandlebarsEngine.java:68— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/HandlebarsEngine.java:68-72 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/HandlebarsEngine.java:96-100 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/HandlebarsEngine.java:68` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/LintProcessor.java:121— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/LintProcessor.java:121-125 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/parsers/ZDLParser.java:177-181 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:124— plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:124-128 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:28-32 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:124` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:33` calls `hash` and `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:129` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:355— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:355-359 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:112-116 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:865— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:865-869 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:870-874 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:88— plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:88-92 | plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:119-123 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:88` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:122— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:122-126 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:132-136 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:122` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:137` calls `equals`, `get` and `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:127` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlCallsLinter.java:14— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlCallsLinter.java:14-18 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlListenerLinter.java:21-25 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlCallsLinter.java:14` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:119— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:119-124 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:134-139 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:197— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:197-202 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:186-191 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:197` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:171— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:171-176 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:182-187 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:171` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogImporterGenerator.java:121— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogImporterGenerator.java:121-126 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogImporterGenerator.java:128-133 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator.java:204— plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator.java:204-209 | plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator.java:278-283 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:21— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:21-26 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:32-37 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:59— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:59-64 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:86-91 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:59` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGeneratorPlugin.java:51— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGeneratorPlugin.java:51-56 | plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3Plugin.java:24-29 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIPlugin.java:20— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIPlugin.java:20-25 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownPlugin.java:58-63 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Off the main sequence: asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo — asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: avro-schema-compiler — avro-schema-compiler: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 2 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: backend-application-default — backend-application-default: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: openapi-controllers — openapi-controllers: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: openapi-spring-webtestclient — openapi-spring-webtestclient: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: zdl-to-asyncapi — zdl-to-asyncapi: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: zdl-to-openapi — zdl-to-openapi: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
Off the main sequence: zenwave-sdk-cli — zenwave-sdk-cli: abstractness 0.18, instability 0.00, distance 0.82 — an application entry point, so it is concrete by design — the distance is expected; what is worth checking is that other projects depend on it at all, since a host should be a leaf of the graph.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3AdaptersGenerator.java:112— plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3AdaptersGenerator.java:112-118 | plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3AdaptersGenerator.java:121-127 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceEventPlanner.java:23— plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceEventPlanner.java:23-29 | plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceEventPlanner.java:35-41 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:770— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:770-776 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:790-796 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:770` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:814— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:814-820 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:903-909 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:814` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:178— plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:178-184 | plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:366-372 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:31— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:31-37 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:44-50 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:148— plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:148-154 | plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:352-358 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Low cohesion: BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers (LCOM4 38) plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java:30— BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers's methods fall into 38 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 38 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: BackendApplicationKotlinHelpers (LCOM4 11) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinHelpers.java:12— BackendApplicationKotlinHelpers's methods fall into 11 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 11 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: JavaZdlModel (LCOM4 10) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:18— JavaZdlModel's methods fall into 10 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 10 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers (LCOM4 6) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:13— AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: TemplateInput (LCOM4 5) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/TemplateInput.java:6— TemplateInput's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: Plugin (LCOM4 4) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Plugin.java:22— Plugin's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: AsyncAPIOpsIntent (LCOM4 4) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntent.java:10— AsyncAPIOpsIntent's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
TooManyMethods: JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration plugins/asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.java:28— TooManyMethods — 137 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 107 over it, 4.57× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java:30— TooManyMethods — 76 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 46 over it, 2.53× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: EventCatalogGenerator plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:49— TooManyMethods — 66 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 36 over it, 2.20× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:35— TooManyMethods — 49 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 19 over it, 1.63× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Plugin zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Plugin.java:22— TooManyMethods — 42 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 12 over it, 1.40× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ZDLJavaSignatureUtils zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:13— TooManyMethods — 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:750— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:750-758 | plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:766-774 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:301— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:301-309 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:214-222 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:301` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:223` calls `add`, `get` and `plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:310` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:115— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:115-123 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:221-229 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:115` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:177— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:177-185 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:39-47 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:177` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:184— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:184-192 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:340-348 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:78— plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:78-86 | plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:109-117 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:78` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogFileWriter.java:288— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Help.java:231— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:81— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java:75— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:68— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/HandlebarsEngine.java:35— `catch (Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Hotspot: plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:71— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java changed 6 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 21 in EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.processPublicArtifact at line 71. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 5 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-22 18:53:45 +02:00' --until='2026-10-20 18:53:45 +02:00' --full-history --no-merges -- plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:80— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in EventCatalogGenerator.generate at line 80. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 4 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-22 18:53:45 +02:00' --until='2026-10-20 18:53:45 +02:00' --full-history --no-merges -- plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:161— plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 28 in AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles at line 161. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-22 18:53:45 +02:00' --until='2026-10-20 18:53:45 +02:00' --full-history --no-merges -- plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:67— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.processOpenApiArtifacts at line 67. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-22 18:53:45 +02:00' --until='2026-10-20 18:53:45 +02:00' --full-history --no-merges -- plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:215— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processOperation at line 215. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-22 18:53:45 +02:00' --until='2026-10-20 18:53:45 +02:00' --full-history --no-merges -- plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
TodoComment plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java:64— // TODO: return Map.of("templateFile", "aggregates-crud-methodBody", "aggregatesCommandsForMethod", aggregatesCommandsForMethod); — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationDefaultHelpers.java:224— // TODO review usages — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:156— // // TODO desc+$ref: property.put("description", readOnlyWarning + relationship.getOrDefault("comment", "")); — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:108— // TODO consider embedding — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlProblemsLinter.java:40— // TODO derive from a stable problem code once the ZDL parser emits one; messages are not a contract — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:153— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:153-160 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:306-313 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:153` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:71— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:71-78 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:56-63 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:71` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:181— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:181-188 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:171-178 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinTemplates.java:44— plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinTemplates.java:44-51 | plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/SpringWebTestClientKotlinTemplates.java:22-29 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:193— plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:193-200 | plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:203-210 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/jdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:193` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:184— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:184-193 | plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:198-207 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:778— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:778-787 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:798-807 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:778` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:49— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:49-58 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:35-44 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:49` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:54— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:54-63 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java:61-70 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:54` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
D10 · Test Quality· Test project verifies nothing · ×2
Test project verifies nothing: java-to-asyncapi plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGeneratorTest.java:10— No conventional assertion call was detected in 2 of 2 tests in `java-to-asyncapi` — the project as a whole, not one method. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a suite that genuinely checks nothing. If it is the latter, this project passes unconditionally and cannot fail.
Test project verifies nothing: java-to-jdl plugins/java-to-jdl/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGeneratorTest.java:8— No conventional assertion call was detected in 2 of 2 tests in `java-to-jdl` — the project as a whole, not one method. Two things look like this: verification that happens indirectly (an approval/verifier harness or BDD step methods), or a suite that genuinely checks nothing. If it is the latter, this project passes unconditionally and cannot fail.
ClassTooLong: EventCatalogGenerator plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:49— ClassTooLong — 741 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 66 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 341 over it, 1.85× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:35— ClassTooLong — 532 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 49 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 132 over it, 1.33× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
FileTooLong: plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java— FileTooLong — 780 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 95% of them inside a single declaration: EventCatalogGenerator (49-1055). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 280 over it, 1.56× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java— FileTooLong — 552 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 96% of them inside a single declaration: AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor (35-947). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 52 over it, 1.10× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:223— plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:223-242 | plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:298-317 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:223` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:310— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:310-329 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:224-243 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:310` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:223` calls `add`, `get` and `plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:309` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:154— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:154-169 | plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3Generator.java:217-232 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:154` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:251— plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:251-266 | plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:339-354 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:60— plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:60-71 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:63-74 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:60` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:323— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:323-334 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:347-358 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:323` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7–8 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:108— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:108-115 | plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:250-256 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:108` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (7–8 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLListenerUtils.java:328— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLListenerUtils.java:328-335 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLListenerUtils.java:345-351 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLListenerUtils.java:328` calls `trimToNull`, `get` and `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLListenerUtils.java:345` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:249— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:249-255 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:261-267 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:273-279 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:249` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIClientGenerator.java:183— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIClientGenerator.java:183-189 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZdlToMarkdownGenerator.java:228-234 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:160-166 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:134— plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:134-139 | plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:141-146 | plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:152-157 — there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:158` calls `size`, `put`, `get` and `plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java:147` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:145— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:145-150 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:156-161 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:167-172 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:145` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 3) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/TerraformConfluentHybridTemplates.java:9— plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/TerraformConfluentHybridTemplates.java:9-13 | plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/TerraformConfluentTemplates.java:9-13 | plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/TerraformKafkaTemplates.java:9-15 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 3) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:55— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:55-59 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:63-67 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:95-99 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:55` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI — no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 24 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles (cyclomatic 50) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/ZDLProjectGenerator.java:49— ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles has cyclomatic complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.planEntityMethodBody (cyclomatic 45) plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.java:13— ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.planEntityMethodBody has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
EntitiesToAvroConverter.convertEntityToAvro (cyclomatic 33) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:43— EntitiesToAvroConverter.convertEntityToAvro has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles (cyclomatic 28) plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:161— AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
remote-specification-schema.select (cyclomatic 28) plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts:328— remote-specification-schema.select has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EntitiesToSchemasConverter.convertEntityToSchema (cyclomatic 27) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:62— EntitiesToSchemasConverter.convertEntityToSchema has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
JavaToJDLGenerator.generateJPA2Jdl (cyclomatic 24) plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:133— JavaToJDLGenerator.generateJPA2Jdl has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EventCatalogGenerator.generate (cyclomatic 24) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:80— EventCatalogGenerator.generate has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.registerHelpers (cyclomatic 24) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:171— AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.registerHelpers has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.randomString (cyclomatic 23) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.java:124— JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.randomString has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.populateField (cyclomatic 22) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:337— ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.populateField has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
OpenAPIControllersGenerator.generate (cyclomatic 22) plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator.java:71— OpenAPIControllersGenerator.generate has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EntitiesToSchemasConverter.schemaTypeAndFormat (cyclomatic 21) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:173— EntitiesToSchemasConverter.schemaTypeAndFormat has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.processPublicArtifact (cyclomatic 21) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:71— EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.processPublicArtifact has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AsyncApiProcessor.process (cyclomatic 20) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/AsyncApiProcessor.java:89— AsyncApiProcessor.process has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildAggregateLifecyclePlantUml (cyclomatic 20) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:36— LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildAggregateLifecyclePlantUml has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
EventCatalogOperationProcessor.reconcile (cyclomatic 20) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOperationProcessor.java:51— EventCatalogOperationProcessor.reconcile has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildEntityServiceLifecyclePlantUml (cyclomatic 19) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:134— LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildEntityServiceLifecyclePlantUml has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.instantiateVar (cyclomatic 19) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:57— OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.instantiateVar has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.set (cyclomatic 19) plugins/asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.java:134— JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.set has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ZdlProblemsLinter.ruleId (cyclomatic 17) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlProblemsLinter.java:36— ZdlProblemsLinter.ruleId has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ZDLAnnotator.annotate (cyclomatic 17) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:30— ZDLAnnotator.annotate has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
NodeReference.segmentStarts (cyclomatic 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:468— NodeReference.segmentStarts has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EventCatalogZdlProcessor.buildProperties (cyclomatic 16) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:200— EventCatalogZdlProcessor.buildProperties has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
EventCatalogZflProcessor.projectSteps (cyclomatic 16) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZflProcessor.java:88— EventCatalogZflProcessor.projectSteps has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processOperation (cyclomatic 16) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:215— AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processOperation has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
remote-specification-schema.selectionMode (cyclomatic 16) plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts:275— remote-specification-schema.selectionMode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
remote-specification-schema.detectSchemaFormat (cyclomatic 16) plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts:410— remote-specification-schema.detectSchemaFormat has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
FixmeComment zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/ZDLProcessor.java:48— // FIXME: why here in the middle of the process? — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
XxxComment zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:25— // XXX: solo se esta usando en tests — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles (cognitive 83) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/ZDLProjectGenerator.java:49— ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles has cognitive complexity 83 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 30 (53 pts), if/else 17 (25 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 32). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles (cognitive 73) plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:161— AvroSchemaLoader.collectAvscFiles has cognitive complexity 73 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (50 pts), boolean chains 8, error handling 2 (8 pts), loops 2 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
JavaToJDLGenerator.generateJPA2Jdl (cognitive 55) plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:133— JavaToJDLGenerator.generateJPA2Jdl has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (45 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
EntitiesToSchemasConverter.convertEntityToSchema (cognitive 48) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:62— EntitiesToSchemasConverter.convertEntityToSchema has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (41 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OpenAPIControllersGenerator.generate (cognitive 47) plugins/openapi-controllers/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIControllersGenerator.java:71— OpenAPIControllersGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8 (23 pts), if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.planEntityMethodBody (cognitive 45) plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.java:13— ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.planEntityMethodBody has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 23, if/else 20, ternaries 2. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.processPublicArtifact (cognitive 42) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:71— EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.processPublicArtifact has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 9 (24 pts), if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogGenerator.generate (cognitive 42) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:80— EventCatalogGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (18 pts), loops 9 (15 pts), ternaries 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EntitiesToAvroConverter.convertEntityToAvro (cognitive 41) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:43— EntitiesToAvroConverter.convertEntityToAvro has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (32 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
remote-specification-schema.select (cognitive 41) plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts:328— remote-specification-schema.select has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (26 pts), ternaries 4 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.processOpenApiArtifacts (cognitive 38) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java:67— EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.processOpenApiArtifacts has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (20 pts), ternaries 2 (8 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogOperationProcessor.reconcile (cognitive 32) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOperationProcessor.java:51— EventCatalogOperationProcessor.reconcile has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (19 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AsyncApiProcessor.process (cognitive 28) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/AsyncApiProcessor.java:89— AsyncApiProcessor.process has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), loops 7 (9 pts), ternaries 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZDLAnnotator.annotate (cognitive 27) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLAnnotator.java:30— ZDLAnnotator.annotate has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 14 (22 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
NodeReference.segmentStarts (cognitive 26) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:468— NodeReference.segmentStarts has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.registerHelpers (cognitive 26) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:171— AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.registerHelpers has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 4 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.populateField (cognitive 25) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:337— ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.populateField has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (23 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildEntityServiceLifecyclePlantUml (cognitive 25) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:134— LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildEntityServiceLifecyclePlantUml has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.set (cognitive 25) plugins/asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.java:134— JsonSchema2PojoConfiguration.set has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (14 pts), if/else 9, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.randomString (cognitive 24) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.java:124— JsonSchemaToJsonFaker.randomString has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15, boolean chains 5, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildAggregateLifecyclePlantUml (cognitive 24) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:36— LifecycleDiagramBuilder.buildAggregateLifecyclePlantUml has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.generate (cognitive 24) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:96— ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogZflProcessor.projectSteps (cognitive 24) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZflProcessor.java:88— EventCatalogZflProcessor.projectSteps has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), loops 5, boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogZdlProcessor.buildProperties (cognitive 23) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:200— EventCatalogZdlProcessor.buildProperties has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogZdlProcessor.processZdlArtifacts (cognitive 22) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:53— EventCatalogZdlProcessor.processZdlArtifacts has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EntitiesToSchemasConverter.schemaTypeAndFormat (cognitive 21) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java:173— EntitiesToSchemasConverter.schemaTypeAndFormat has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15, boolean chains 6. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ZDLProcessor.processMethodEntity (cognitive 21) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/ZDLProcessor.java:88— ZDLProcessor.processMethodEntity has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Help.buildHelpModel (cognitive 21) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Help.java:35— Help.buildHelpModel has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OverlayApplicator.validateActions (cognitive 20) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:90— OverlayApplicator.validateActions has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.generate (cognitive 20) plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:47— OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (15 pts), loops 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AvroSchemaLoader.extractDependencies (cognitive 20) plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:326— AvroSchemaLoader.extractDependencies has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processOperation (cognitive 20) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:215— AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processOperation has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
SpringJavaFormatter.format (cognitive 19) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:44— SpringJavaFormatter.format has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Plugin.withOption (cognitive 19) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Plugin.java:209— Plugin.withOption has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.filterSchemasToInclude (cognitive 19) plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:193— ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.filterSchemasToInclude has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZdlListenerLinter.lint (cognitive 18) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlListenerLinter.java:20— ZdlListenerLinter.lint has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 2 (8 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), error handling 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZDLHttpUtils.getHttpOption (cognitive 18) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:194— ZDLHttpUtils.getHttpOption has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (15 pts), if/else 3 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.getJDLType (cognitive 18) plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:109— OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.getJDLType has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
JavaToJDLGenerator.generateMongodb2Jdl (cognitive 18) plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:244— JavaToJDLGenerator.generateMongodb2Jdl has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
EventCatalogZdlProcessor.collectLogicalOperations (cognitive 18) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java:107— EventCatalogZdlProcessor.collectLogicalOperations has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (8 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.instantiateVar (cognitive 18) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:57— OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.instantiateVar has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, boolean chains 5. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Generator.asConfigurationMap (cognitive 17) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/Generator.java:61— Generator.asConfigurationMap has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OverlayApplicator.applyUpdate (cognitive 17) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OverlayApplicator.java:176— OverlayApplicator.applyUpdate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MainGenerator.generate (cognitive 17) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/MainGenerator.java:31— MainGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.generateEventsZdl (cognitive 17) plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:170— JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.generateEventsZdl has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), loops 2, boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.validateNoNamespaceCollisions (cognitive 17) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:633— AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.validateNoNamespaceCollisions has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZdlProblemsLinter.ruleId (cognitive 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/lint/ZdlProblemsLinter.java:36— ZdlProblemsLinter.ruleId has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, boolean chains 5. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ZDLParser.loadReferencedApiModels (cognitive 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/parsers/ZDLParser.java:125— ZDLParser.loadReferencedApiModels has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 2 (7 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OpenApiProcessor.process (cognitive 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/processors/OpenApiProcessor.java:16— OpenApiProcessor.process has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 8 (11 pts), if/else 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
JavaZdlModel.createServiceMethodParameters (cognitive 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:223— JavaZdlModel.createServiceMethodParameters has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.inputSignature (cognitive 16) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java:240— ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.inputSignature has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AssociationCollector.collectEntityAssociations (cognitive 16) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AssociationCollector.java:63— AssociationCollector.collectEntityAssociations has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processStreamsApplications (cognitive 16) plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.java:453— AsyncAPIOpsIntentProcessor.processStreamsApplications has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 4 (11 pts), if/else 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
AsyncApiJsonSchema2PojoGenerator.generate (cognitive 16) plugins/asyncapi-jsonschema2pojo/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncApiJsonSchema2PojoGenerator.java:106— AsyncApiJsonSchema2PojoGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (12 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MethodTooLong: ZDLProjectGenerator.generateProjectFiles zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/ZDLProjectGenerator.java:49— MethodTooLong — generateProjectFiles runs 114 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 14 over it, 1.14× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
Near-duplicate member pair (61 shared lines) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:36— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:36-132 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:134-236 — These two members are variants of one another: 61 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice.
D4 · Code Duplication· Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines) · ×1
Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:149— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:149-169 | plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3Generator.java:212-232 — These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below — the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (7 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×1
Members sharing a duplicated core (7 members, 50+ identical tokens) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:117— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:117-143 | plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:171-290 | plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:57-107 | plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:123-164 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:109-158 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:27-70 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:48-84 — These 7 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 7 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 7 times.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×1
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:331— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:331-340 | plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:342-350 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:245-254 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:256-264 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Duplicated block (32 lines × 2) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:129— plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:129-160 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:34-65 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:129` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:33` calls `hash` and `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:128` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:90— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:90-113 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:195-218 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:90` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 3) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:119— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:119-136 | plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:261-278 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:110-127 — there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:119` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/SpringCloudStreamTemplates.java:10— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/SpringCloudStreamTemplates.java:10-27 | plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/SpringKafkaTemplates.java:10-27 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (15–16 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:56— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:56-70 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:161-176 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:56` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:71` calls `get` and `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:177` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator.java:94— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator.java:94-108 | plugins/asyncapi-ops/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIOpsGenerator.java:130-144 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AsyncAPIGenerator.java:94` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:72— plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:72-84 | plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:177-189 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:71` calls `get` and `plugins/zdl-to-markdown/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/LifecycleDiagramBuilder.java:176` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 6) plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:128— plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:128-139 | plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:270-281 | plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:141-152 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java:119-130 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java:46-57 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLHttpUtils.java:60-71 — there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:128` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:153` calls `get` and `plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:140` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:37— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:37-47 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java:44-54 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:45-55 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:37` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:213— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:213-222 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:228-237 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractOpenAPIGenerator.java:89-98 — there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/AbstractAsyncapiGenerator.java:213` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (7–8 lines × 3) zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:53— zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:53-60 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java:60-67 | zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:61-67 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:53` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 4) plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:334— plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:334-340 | plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:344-350 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:248-254 | plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java:258-264 — there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:334` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 4) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:165— plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:165-169 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:176-180 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:187-191 | plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:198-202 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:165` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/SpringWebTestClientKotlinHelpers.java:19— plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/SpringWebTestClientKotlinHelpers.java:19-39 | plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientHelpers.java:18-73 — before extracting anything, compare `plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/SpringWebTestClientKotlinHelpers.java` and `plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientHelpers.java` as WHOLE FILES: 86% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (67 lines × 2) zenwave-sdk-test-resources/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/jpa2jdl/AbstractAuditingEntity.java:1— zenwave-sdk-test-resources/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/jpa2jdl/AbstractAuditingEntity.java:1-77 | zenwave-sdk-test-resources/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/mongodb2jdl/AbstractAuditingEntity.java:1-67 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `zenwave-sdk-test-resources/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/jpa2jdl/AbstractAuditingEntity.java:1` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Coverage not measured — JavaScript/TypeScript suite — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/ runs vitest but declares no coverage provider, so the suite can run and still produce no lcov — add `@vitest/coverage-v8` (or `@vitest/coverage-istanbul`) as a devDependency. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
P12 · CI test-gate honesty· Coverage collected but not gated · ×1
Coverage collected but not gated — CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum — coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool's minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository's CI files AND its coverage configuration — the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited — matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service's web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
Outbound HTTP without resilience zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/parsers/SpecResourceLoader.java:131— `.openConnection(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogGenerator.java:708— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:90— `!useSpringModulith || layout.commonPackage.equals(layout.moduleBasePackage)` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:164— `"entities".equals(entity.get("type")) && !JSONPath.get(entity, "options.embedded", false)` appears character-identically in 2 files — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:216— `"http".equalsIgnoreCase(scheme) || "https".equalsIgnoreCase(scheme)` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java, plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:127— `"integer".equals(type) && "int32".equals(format)` appears character-identically in 3 files — plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java, plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3Generator.java, plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java:130— `"integer".equals(type) && "int64".equals(format)` appears character-identically in 6 files — plugins/asyncapi-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/templates/AsyncAPIHandlebarsHelpers.java, plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringCloudStreams3Generator.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java, plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIToJDLGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java:140— `"integer".equals(type) && (StringUtils.isEmpty(format) || "int32".equals(format))` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/OpenAPIControllersKotlinHelpers.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/templating/CustomHandlebarsHelpers.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java:140— `(relationship.get("fieldName") != null) && (boolean) relationship.getOrDefault("ownerSide", false)` appears character-identically in 2 files — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToAvroConverter.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/generators/EntitiesToSchemasConverter.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/LifecycleSupport.java:134— `JSONPath.get(method, "$.transition.from") != null || JSONPath.get(method, "$.transition.to") != null` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/LifecycleSupport.java, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:50— `aggregate == null && model.get("aggregateRoot") != null` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogFileWriter.java:295— `content == null || !content.startsWith("---")` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogFileWriter.java, plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogImporterGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:52— `e.diagnostics() != null && e.diagnostics().size() > 0` appears character-identically in 3 files — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:335— `entitiesMap.containsKey(fieldType) && !includeNames.contains(fieldType)` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/zdl-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToAsyncAPIGenerator.java, plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/LifecycleSupport.java:86— `entity != null && JSONPath.get(entity, "lifecycle") != null` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/LifecycleSupport.java, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/ServiceMethodBodyPlanner.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:62— `entity == null || zdl == null || JSONPath.get(entity, "lifecycle") == null` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:70— `entityName.equals(method.get("entity")) && JSONPath.get(method, "$.transition.from") != null` appears character-identically in 3 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/support/LifecycleSupport.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:229— `f.isSynthetic() || !Modifier.isStatic(f.getModifiers()) || !Modifier.isFinal(f.getModifiers())` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java, plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java:186— `f.isSynthetic() || Modifier.isStatic(f.getModifiers()) || Modifier.isTransient(f.getModifiers())` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/java-to-asyncapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToAsyncAPIGenerator.java, plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java:78— `groupBy == GroupByType.service || groupBy == GroupByType.operation` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKarateGenerator.java, plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKaratePlugin.java:26— `hasOption("groupBy", businessFlow) && !hasOption("businessFlowTestName")` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/openapi-karate/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/OpenAPIKaratePlugin.java, plugins/openapi-spring-webtestclient/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/SpringWebTestClientPlugin.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:45— `is(model, "embedded") || !(is(model, "aggregate") || is(model, "lifecycle") || ZDLFindUtils.isAggregateRoot(JSONPath.get(model, "zdl"), JSON…` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java:40— `is(model, "persistence") || !(is(model, "aggregate") || is(model, "lifecycle") || ZDLFindUtils.isAggregateRoot(JSONPath.get(model, "zdl"), J…` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/backend-application-default/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationProjectTemplates.java, plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinTemplates.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java:242— `isInline && fields != null && !fields.isEmpty()` appears character-identically in 2 files — zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/model/JavaZdlModel.java, zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/zdl/utils/ZDLJavaSignatureUtils.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java:53— `manifest == null || eventCatalog == null || manifestRuntime == null` appears character-identically in 3 files — plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogAsyncApiProcessor.java, plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogOpenApiProcessor.java, plugins/event-catalog-generator/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/EventCatalogZdlProcessor.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/PathsProcessor.java:102— `operationIdsToExclude != null && !operationIdsToExclude.isEmpty()` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/PathsProcessor.java, plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/PathsProcessor.java:97— `operationIdsToInclude != null && !operationIdsToInclude.isEmpty()` appears character-identically in 2 files — plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/PathsProcessor.java, plugins/zdl-to-openapi/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/ZDLToOpenAPIGenerator.java. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
README/code drift docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md:483— docs/zdl-annotators-framework.md names `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java`, but no file or folder `src/test/java/JMoleculesArchitectureTest.java` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:118— plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `versions.tf`, but no file or folder `versions.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:119— plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `topics.tf`, but no file or folder `topics.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:120— plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `schemas.tf`, but no file or folder `schemas.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:121— plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `acls.tf`, but no file or folder `acls.tf` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md:129— plugins/asyncapi-ops/README.md names `asyncapi_client.yml`, but no file or folder `asyncapi_client.yml` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md:454— plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md documents the setting `specFiles`, but no code or configuration file names `specFiles`. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md:481— plugins/asyncapi-spring-cloud-streams3/README.md documents the setting `servicePrefix`, but no code or configuration file names `servicePrefix`. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md:168— plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md names `.mdx.hbs`, but no file or folder `.mdx.hbs` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md:175— plugins/event-catalog-generator/README.md names `.github/workflows/update-catalog.yml`, but no file or folder `.github/workflows/update-catalog.yml` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:33— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:34— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:35— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:36— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/asyncapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:40— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/customers/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:41— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/orders/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:42— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/restaurants/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md:43— e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/README.md links to `modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml`, but `e2e/src/test/resources/projects/online-food-delivery-mongo/modules/delivery/src/main/resources/apis/openapi.yml` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
Disabled test e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithClinicalProject.java:98— A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something.
Disabled test e2e/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/e2e/TestMonolithKlinicalProject.java:98— A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something.
Disabled test e2e/src/test/resources/projects/monolith-clinical-project/src/test/java/com/example/clinical/KarateAPIIntegrationTest.java:26— A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something.
Disabled test plugins/backend-application-default/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/BackendApplicationMongoImperativeGeneratorTest.java:77— A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something.
Disabled test plugins/customizations/kotlin-backend-application/src/test/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/kotlin/BackendApplicationKotlinGeneratorTest.java:113— A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something.
Silent fallback default in catch zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/GoogleJavaFormatter.java:68— `getLine` swallows every exception into `return ""` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it propagate. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment in the catch or in the Javadoc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/PalantirJavaFormatter.java:75— `getLine` swallows every exception into `return ""` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it propagate. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment in the catch or in the Javadoc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/formatters/SpringJavaFormatter.java:81— `getLine` swallows every exception into `return ""` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it propagate. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment in the catch or in the Javadoc, and the row stops firing.
Silent fallback default in catch zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/Help.java:231— `getJarVersion` swallows every exception into `return "UNKNOWN"` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it propagate. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment in the catch or in the Javadoc, and the row stops firing.
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation· Diagnostic log message is built whether or not it is wanted · ×3
Diagnostic log message is built whether or not it is wanted plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:286— `debug` at line 286 is called with an argument built by `schemas.stream()` (line 286), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on.
Diagnostic log message is built whether or not it is wanted plugins/avro-schema-compiler/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/AvroSchemaLoader.java:288— `debug` at line 288 is called with an argument built by `schemas.stream()` (line 288), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on.
Diagnostic log message is built whether or not it is wanted zenwave-sdk-cli/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/MainGenerator.java:38— `debug` at line 38 is called with an argument built by `chain.stream()` (line 38), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Java evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached — and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no `isDebugEnabled`/`isTraceEnabled` test, no debug flag, no lambda or `Supplier` the logger calls only when the level is on.
Split zenwave-sdk-cli — A CLI tool whose namespaces are all utilities, generators, linters, processors, parsers, formatters, templating, and plugins under a single 'sdk' catch-all is an sprawling grab-bag. Suggested: split into domain-specific sub-projects for each of the listed utilities
Split zenwave-sdk-cli — The 18 namespaces are all utility packages (generators, linters, processors) under a single catch-all 'sdk', so it is large and spread across unrelated namespaces. Suggested: split into generators, linters, processors, parsers, formatters, templating, plugins
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:126— `info` at line 126 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text.
Interpolated log message defeats structured logging plugins/java-to-jdl/src/main/java/io/zenwave360/sdk/plugins/JavaToJDLGenerator.java:128— `info` at line 128 is handed a message assembled at the call — a string concatenated with a value, or `String.format` — through SLF4J or log4j 2, so the logger receives one finished string: the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: `log.info("Order {} moved to {}", orderId, status)`, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, log4j 2's JsonTemplateLayout, OpenTelemetry), or `log.atInfo().addKeyValue("order_id", orderId).log("order moved")` with SLF4J 2's fluent API. An exception goes last, as the throwable argument, not into the text.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
D28 · Secrets (history)· Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
P10 · Library API & versioning· Large public API surface · ×1
Large public API surface — 305/353 types (86%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API.
Logging is not universal — Only 12/13 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded — they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: `plugins/zenwave-mcp-server`.
No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 4429 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
No security response headers detected REDACTED:20— None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because `REDACTED` builds the web-server image that serves this application, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (−2.0 on this card.)
X5 · Nullable reference types· Strict null checking is not enabled everywhere the repository type-checks · ×1
Strict null checking is not enabled everywhere the repository type-checks — This repository commits no tsconfig, so whatever type-checks it uses tsc's own defaults, in which `strict` and `strictNullChecks` are OFF: `string` admits `null` and `undefined`, and a value that is null is compiled through to the property access that throws. If the build passes `--strict` on a command line instead, put it in a committed tsconfig — this check reads configuration, and configuration is all it can read.
Null assertions (`!`) reduce the strict null checking score — ~23.6 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 11 assertion(s) across the 466 source line(s) of the 1 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: plugins/event-catalog-generator/event-catalog-project/components/lib/remote-specification-schema.ts (11). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a162be-63de-792f-bc4a-5b4eb6ac8446 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 18 · Warnings: 308 · Recommendations: 72 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 22-10-2026 @ 08:33 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.