{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"v_cookie (cyclomatic 118): v_cookie has cyclomatic complexity 118 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 118 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 106 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::p::v, (anonymous)::g, (anonymous)::U, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afb74f80c04c1c199eafd04a8121085d67c46cc63e9f36e2ac7e71a25e970760"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"v_cookie (cyclomatic 118): v_cookie has cyclomatic complexity 118 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 118 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 106 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::p::v, (anonymous)::g, (anonymous)::U, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"615af67dc7f72ca03287565daa38f55e5b0532c24a04bde3ee8c587cca28a710"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"outcrypto.encode_param (cyclomatic 74): outcrypto.encode_param has cyclomatic complexity 74 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 58 belong to 30 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5cbcbe147ed977bcca7296f4f4e948e8fb821e01e2a7e79102260a674f3c40b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_number (cyclomatic 70): JSON.decode_number has cyclomatic complexity 70 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4075}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c066eb2f9795113cc81ae951e525a228dea3f5ad4a546b4ee7714944e548964c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 61): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 61 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 61 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 90 function items inside it that branch (reset, _doFinalize, encrypt, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":796}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cff7cc2c7a6516b704e69dd3ed9727aa4a8a7b9e3994ee51013663f365589bd1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_composite (cyclomatic 52): JSON.encode_composite has cyclomatic complexity 52 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5855}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d459367a9e7a3063c37826ebf21233a6fccf5c90e19dce460678dce6785a7dd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsonlint.main (cyclomatic 52): jsonlint.main has cyclomatic complexity 52 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6697}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"985f838fff1fa6d9fdd540e00322d2bdbcd03eccb094eae87a6d807e1460b147"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_string (cyclomatic 48): JSON.decode_string has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4474}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"775def82e953a8ce92aa46bde46b3a8c0341279a11f8a9dbe3df1d0310efc2dc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_composite (cyclomatic 46): JSON.decode_composite has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3f2949562cde15405f3c5fb88d33a408fe713df16e5da1ac3efcf53efb632a8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"json_options.__init__ (cyclomatic 40): json_options.__init__ has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":3265}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d65415f66c9da8bb0c37dd70f5cd9f24342cc888105e473ac37f55273701c994"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"helpers.auto_detect_encoding (cyclomatic 36): helpers.auto_detect_encoding has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":1270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd20dac913e0578ed8f291f1120968af380ff7adf4a5d5f0514c619c2a4ee18a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_string (cyclomatic 35): JSON.encode_string has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4844}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"697761fefed3d9d174a221a784f0f3c001270ec936eb37abcc1c11a1c33f3f98"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"json_options.make_int (cyclomatic 31): json_options.make_int has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":3521}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52dfc57b5d6f6b5b022e783a37bc0c09ffadf381ec41c990330fea78245f183f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON._classify_for_encoding (cyclomatic 30): JSON._classify_for_encoding has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5582}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95fdcf36c6409b0a037f6b70030334af6bd23f287aacce388c975cb938b1741f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cot.get_rank_sum (cyclomatic 28): cot.get_rank_sum has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17c3f7ce532489e4b44187051138d1ef5c7a82cdbc8e169195201cc083ab78b2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_daily_bar.get_czce_daily (cyclomatic 27): futures_daily_bar.get_czce_daily has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":341}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"125928e65027c31dd633013ded3d1c3a50d35ba2de898f89cdbe585a75060b72"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"demjson.determine_float_limits (cyclomatic 27): demjson.determine_float_limits has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e5a2feab49ef73cdc9556cc802268deca999826cda72bbae51e0d4fa4ac948d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 27): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 36 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::extend, (anonymous)::mixIn, concat, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b93993562cd91bc22e4fc58ae27ac8e6566e88c4f40c625173e2297842cf930c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"option_commodity.option_hist_czce (cyclomatic 26): option_commodity.option_hist_czce has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":187}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de65e07e0397642905ab310c0aa77bcb3bc9fddf0d1cce0adb4e57e21e5f120d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_receipt (cyclomatic 24): receipt.get_receipt has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":571}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52855d0840f2aae41e335c605cf9924febe71a5e387ecc5b8f3ede734d385d9d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 24): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 24 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 31 function items inside it that branch (concat, mixIn, _3, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":266}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1939a2b5604deeaa0aa119ba5bbdc7b4712c2368b681b7e4c934d2eaaade1c03"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 24): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 24 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 31 function items inside it that branch (concat, mixIn, _3, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3625}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"488d5495c67c5ebb927960a51f8f64870e75394d9b2e8342a233724f4da47de8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"macro_china_nbs._build_nbs_dts (cyclomatic 23): macro_china_nbs._build_nbs_dts has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e35ac897e5dfcc007f5a403ff16b76d23269463cadb9d020b92f796d082d4aa6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_number (cyclomatic 23): JSON.encode_number has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4406}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1927f2f2295aaa7d11e216ca008e5a9ca81ed13fe77adb2e6b56cf338eec4f4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_doProcessBlock (cyclomatic 21): _doProcessBlock has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2978}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b0064fbf2980b9f13ec229b3a9640d638f19fcdd18f85cbee83512ee34e425e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"air_hebei.air_quality_hebei (cyclomatic 20): air_hebei.air_quality_hebei has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/air_hebei.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f33f09832dd7e9314f408f28ae0c20c71b1504b4b4e4083d0cddd15504ebaaf"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_czce_receipt_3 (cyclomatic 20): receipt.get_czce_receipt_3 has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5773406ffbaab0927efccfaefba4e01cba1e724c20f0d25dae6dd6ad0cb7b5f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_taptap.game_hot_rank_taptap (cyclomatic 20): other_taptap.game_hot_rank_taptap has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_taptap.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cf0c149a09de161a2eb0a08b23fdcde512733a740a84f3f9ef765bb0e0600a8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSONError.pretty_description (cyclomatic 20): JSONError.pretty_description has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":2282}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a137d324c93e1392588da30595f03ee6943f10f67e2e93d39ee935183e9c8e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON._do_encode (cyclomatic 20): JSON._do_encode has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"032916a3d00df23278e124dc6287f42980bee55e9f1e0ed65e2964493b8cdcb9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utf32.decode (cyclomatic 19): utf32.decode has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":943}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87c107079d64c4e7bd07312d19e9d53267ce2a2de365ce6c978ccee64ca9c7cf"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fortune_hurun.hurun_rank (cyclomatic 18): fortune_hurun.hurun_rank has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fortune/fortune_hurun.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c2763a290159e4ec7236a5bba9f646e263b3e2810cc3dd25995beb1f355170d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_em.fund_open_fund_info_em (cyclomatic 18): fund_em.fund_open_fund_info_em has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":452}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb33093d16d3710a4e278dfd7257bd5cebcdac0e5cdb12cf452b71905dde3183"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_punctuation.warnings_for (cyclomatic 18): check_punctuation.warnings_for has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"764f6f0966f0b131b8d3f6472f4bffe98d0f5e95c4fee472036e20ce653dcc8e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"webDES (cyclomatic 18): webDES has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 18 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 2174, _0x9843d3, _0x2a2af9, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":2161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"038927f3b1f7dd7fd84b161014118dffa6408a721df898169d19623ab81d1dc7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 18): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 18 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 34 function items inside it that branch (reset, (anonymous)::xorBlock, parse, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":3272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f988742eb03faed41d2a99cd9a1c03246437e76ff5b20c0c399dd84abc773922"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"registry._score (cyclomatic 17): registry._score has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/registry.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f45f206af48383b6865353213de2b6d0b2e8cd1655dfe1a8d3a50a4891b440cf"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths (cyclomatic 17): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be3733eef152539f37d3937ca166603110e47c3a9ab94c9680916fef3ce12866"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths (cyclomatic 17): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":291}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0df97ac8e49bf702652171d05d0906395da03e52dadf3244aa785ef06ff0c557"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths (cyclomatic 17): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":388}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c1779c95edcb0ad9c24df5021d772b9357593b2600c9d53acf421a309b6ba1e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths (cyclomatic 17): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":485}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c49b9391966ddb5be0cc153dc59d7c8ff95c378961dbdc1298abd8022e439e4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_identifier (cyclomatic 17): JSON.decode_identifier has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4989}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5e0ca4beec828e7cec3db9066b5a053140a56597d632424271697662bcfd6e8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jm._0x2246 (cyclomatic 17): jm._0x2246 has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 16, _0x9bf5c5, a function literal at line 19). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: jm.webDES (cyclomatic 18) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"514c754e2a1245dc00cc1bb1ecb6f4a6f812aefe8ef2a3eeee87943da0de4270"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::(anonymous)::clone (cyclomatic 17): (anonymous)::(anonymous)::clone has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77bd417c792aab2267ebe5c8ef88804594ac7ce0a2e4568c01b0106c6d7f1584"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"macro_china_nbs.macro_china_nbs_region (cyclomatic 16): macro_china_nbs.macro_china_nbs_region has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":566}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7899329a80ae7988962b2d34254eecf124699dd6c063b1099e8e734bd14adfca"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_fee_em.fund_fee_em (cyclomatic 16): fund_fee_em.fund_fee_em has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_fee_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"607e75de1bea4c32012ebf5baf8791ca722315a7e7e63606af6b48f9337b1b78"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_init_ths.fund_new_found_ths (cyclomatic 16): fund_init_ths.fund_new_found_ths has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ba3ee9179bc85a62a6ce289fbccae2d5cdea9bb13029d50ec7b0d9a9e53be02"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_warehouse_receipt.__futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt_html (cyclomatic 16): futures_warehouse_receipt.__futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt_html has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f50dfee554c368f19ca65088fe29bc9a59083c56789dcf7c21d6c33d6c495eb0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode (cyclomatic 16): JSON.encode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5637}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91b8eb8e93d7c7043492fe64e69774276555d0770ea849289abd0dc76cddd1ea"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsonlint._lintcheck (cyclomatic 16): jsonlint._lintcheck has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6629}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e2532936c97736c0a61e74c33627b4f2b61a2eede6332cf0e72f07ce0e0d5a7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"demjson.decode (cyclomatic 16): demjson.decode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c1fbd78ea6af2bd598ac393ebaf30e52f80e10404983168ee443553dd2d1ddb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_punctuation.main (cyclomatic 16): check_punctuation.main has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":419}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cef27199252202a397d92a34228354439361a40b313ed3f4d657a24e81b7ab50"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 16): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 31 function items inside it that branch (t, reset, parse, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":494}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d304dd40f06cc49250f443e73c2c231ee1aaaffbed43eb356389f365c9c29c2f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 16): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 31 function items inside it that branch (t, reset, parse, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3834}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96daee77d61e2607cac87a7339f9bdb46b6e1e115c3e0a2bc54635e4449f1e6a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_composite (cognitive 134): JSON.decode_composite has cognitive complexity 134 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 48 (118 pts), error handling 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 79). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f1edf617534b90b47cba9ef1d345f463662649537b58b7493b226444bfeab03"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"v_cookie (cognitive 134): v_cookie has cognitive complexity 134 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 31 (41 pts), boolean chains 34, loops 22 (28 pts), ternaries 11 (15 pts), error handling 13, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 21). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 134 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 106 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::p::v, (anonymous)::k, (anonymous)::L, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e2b7c3c6417cdce0ee668588ff3839ec7d6171b39a0f3f157fdf5cd625a9cb0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"v_cookie (cognitive 134): v_cookie has cognitive complexity 134 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 31 (41 pts), boolean chains 34, loops 22 (28 pts), ternaries 11 (15 pts), error handling 13, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 21). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 134 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 106 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::p::v, (anonymous)::k, (anonymous)::L, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31fa38d8b877ff681ff2b35c377fe102a301b2295b2d936f1b96d31bab1dbada"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_number (cognitive 115): JSON.decode_number has cognitive complexity 115 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 37 (77 pts), boolean chains 18, error handling 5 (17 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 53). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4075}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2a0c9f2f0be8451bc0174617b095e1681795f1dec9b61107933ec8885df1357"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_composite (cognitive 115): JSON.encode_composite has cognitive complexity 115 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 38 (86 pts), error handling 7 (20 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 63). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5855}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1150aca4a9efb67841aa87ae2c0818028ff584e401f6406589409897f1b4f0d4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_string (cognitive 114): JSON.decode_string has cognitive complexity 114 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 41 (97 pts), error handling 4 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 65). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4474}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc4c0a24c166dc54871cfad1f9394fc7b2f80fbc25187e06903db96b07cb78e3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"encode_param (cognitive 91): encode_param has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 30 (38 pts), boolean chains 20, ternaries 12 (17 pts), if/else 13 (15 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 91 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 95 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::_5, (anonymous)::concat, (anonymous)::stringify, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19e5799d2851c46a8f93e85d8092be11505baf5c2327dee88e74c9858cff9928"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 85): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 85 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (33 pts), ternaries 9 (17 pts), loops 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 11, match/switch 3 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 26). None of this is in the body itself: all 85 points belong to 90 function items inside it that branch (parse, reset, _doFinalize, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":796}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d97806ca954d7354ef00c70293dee9fe1ce3bed1cd3d7dd8a95a9dcc385e48b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_string (cognitive 70): JSON.encode_string has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (54 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 3 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 34). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4844}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df8a19e22ee1fa34bb954a9838c178d80cb20d7dc2704a3fa25a918464cc7aa4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"json_options.__init__ (cognitive 65): json_options.__init__ has cognitive complexity 65 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (56 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 35). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":3265}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55d3e63d91643a6b4b277368487b993b7e054ff4df8858a5d8df101623063158"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsonlint.main (cognitive 62): jsonlint.main has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (40 pts), error handling 6 (16 pts), loops 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 33). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6697}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9bfd47c7c39d423212b7a95220c5cb97f5faaa10e84b9148926b2d46a407218"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"json_options.make_int (cognitive 61): json_options.make_int has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (49 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 29). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":3521}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7c5d3a5c4fd6755354b457be1e12b9e1c2c9ec03a6b20c9464311e84e583005"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_daily_bar.get_czce_daily (cognitive 59): futures_daily_bar.get_czce_daily has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (40 pts), loops 4 (14 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 34). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":341}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"776a00c1feefbd49af9223affbb044ba97c80c7eb42ab80d64137e833833a688"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cot.get_rank_sum (cognitive 53): cot.get_rank_sum has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (36 pts), loops 4 (10 pts), ternaries 2 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4addf36ee0112a277a2855d24ee8dc5bfeefcf92b192a313edbcc17088d063d8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_receipt (cognitive 53): receipt.get_receipt has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (46 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 32). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":571}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"516f31f6956da01b2150d9d202ba88751b3ff8fdfdc108e21f0b2891ee15a943"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"demjson.determine_float_limits (cognitive 53): demjson.determine_float_limits has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (34 pts), loops 5 (8 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cf8cd8d74569aad5b592d9e9e242817ebac045732e3f62adbdadbaba8ee6ce4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"air_hebei.air_quality_hebei (cognitive 49): air_hebei.air_quality_hebei has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12 (39 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), if/else 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/air_hebei.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"028d3e41e8937db86a3b34730d33c6bdb8eb2271655e9ece47e5b5f1c05db70e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_punctuation.warnings_for (cognitive 40): check_punctuation.warnings_for has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (19 pts), loops 7 (17 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9024ee10b11aef28beb3a7228eba96b1edd18dbae6e3d87fc058a34c0d029041"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSONError.pretty_description (cognitive 36): JSONError.pretty_description has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (30 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":2282}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17b25249998c312a440b92292766de601b408e91cfeb85c7733912dfb06f02cd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_warehouse_receipt.__futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt_html (cognitive 35): futures_warehouse_receipt.__futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt_html has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (26 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"223269148382bfcc043ac9224bfaf1794e07bd21c80a7072fdf288e78561a267"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_doProcessBlock (cognitive 35): _doProcessBlock has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 18 (31 pts), if/else 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2978}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"205c110859dde64e163451d3c9e791674a08a3909e78559948c907b45a2420a3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utf32.decode (cognitive 34): utf32.decode has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (22 pts), loops 3 (9 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":943}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e1278acfc3bfdf2d466d802a88df1289389b2cac2429395556aadf9bf6f9aad"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_czce_receipt_3 (cognitive 33): receipt.get_czce_receipt_3 has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 5 (14 pts), if/else 10 (13 pts), ternaries 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b232ef441a2beb5d1a19ec5e8af72793fcfc404ff9ddabd3da52fa4883560c8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 33): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (14 pts), loops 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, error handling 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 33 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 36 function items inside it that branch (concat, _process, (anonymous)::mixIn, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d4b61e6017963844f27232955fd926e1432eeed3b48d02d725945e80e89da74"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"macro_china_nbs._build_nbs_dts (cognitive 31): macro_china_nbs._build_nbs_dts has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (20 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"070e4bb786fe0484d014de1f7b86aaa5801da82b73943622fc0951535b36919c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_em.fund_open_fund_info_em (cognitive 29): fund_em.fund_open_fund_info_em has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (29 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":452}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc809dd37cfbbfc88baaf9bd4764ac2f91f55344aaaebea070120600108e462b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths (cognitive 29): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), loops 6 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0341d0d061a661a5618c9153e3864420a24e6f370fbf7fbd829a751ce7aac938"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths (cognitive 29): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), loops 6 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":291}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd609536e0788d585e8a2f1d229081a0a5aa0821de40bc2f7287d4c0139ba615"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths (cognitive 29): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), loops 6 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":388}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e76cb0952d385d76288eafe211168ca9890491e38a897e28c43702d56024ce3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths (cognitive 29): stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_cash_new_ths has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), loops 6 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_abstract_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_debt_new_ths, stock_finance_ths.stock_financial_benefit_new_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":485}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24d29d4f4b3a460599a05827f75fb693adf58ab5801effa9e87e63dd3a1be8dd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_0x2246 (cognitive 29): _0x2246 has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 5 (10 pts), ternaries 4 (10 pts), if/else 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 12). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 19, a function literal at line 16, _0x9bf5c5). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80ca22b7cde5a1447de8c85844c75e7ad6c8c24584ea36da722093700ce77c11"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xzjp_ths (cognitive 28): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xzjp_ths has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8 (24 pts), if/else 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":870}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0ade5f4aa76df4424893fb257ebf593fa45fdb6f34df1530cab53e0f7423ecf"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"helpers.auto_detect_encoding (cognitive 28): helpers.auto_detect_encoding has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 14, if/else 12 (13 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":1270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38d4a235f878bf80a6b63504462b5ef53b54948a8ca9f6a4468905bc7b71fb3f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"demjson._nonnumber_float_constants (cognitive 28): demjson._nonnumber_float_constants has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (22 pts), error handling 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03f9537f0e55c8ecc8a5c1790184923b8656db0162f9b6459ed775e1950e1dc6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode_number (cognitive 27): JSON.encode_number has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (21 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4406}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85005e9dd7f548f1526c03902fc113887c9e3531362eb8c7db5af8f5a42212e3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 27): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 8, if/else 4, ternaries 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 3). None of this is in the body itself: all 27 points belong to 31 function items inside it that branch (concat, _3, mixIn, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":266}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71a16f0150d41081239b886ac0b817d9d749bd1e4c8d057cd8e72ae69e9899aa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 27): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 8, if/else 4, ternaries 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 3). None of this is in the body itself: all 27 points belong to 31 function items inside it that branch (concat, _3, mixIn, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3625}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d874b78a4faba5156877b4343239db94ef3455066754c004865092070ac0aed0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_roll_yield.get_roll_yield_bar (cognitive 26): futures_roll_yield.get_roll_yield_bar has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), ternaries 3 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_roll_yield.py"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"691ffd3deb63ba594b83e63dd5aee9fed0d05ebe7503f5e3bc73d469b8f60ebb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_punctuation.selftest (cognitive 26): check_punctuation.selftest has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":697}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55e1f77a481c661e9b015e09f9fab94d3b7c2d6cc2f119496bfd78bdd0322f1d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"macro_china_nbs.macro_china_nbs_region (cognitive 25): macro_china_nbs.macro_china_nbs_region has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":566}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a103369d41833f9634b87889fe679b5595764b0d549365c306c0bcaf883aba8d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"news_baidu._baidu_finance_calendar (cognitive 25): news_baidu._baidu_finance_calendar has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_baidu.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5297d70f3e71f98f69234f5b3e95c9494fdd4fbf859f8bbf6000d2618125d5b5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_taptap.game_hot_rank_taptap (cognitive 25): other_taptap.game_hot_rank_taptap has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_taptap.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92814108821a1934a264a6e198b6cb744afa83cbd6d6bed31af7ce701e36f3d1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"news_cctv.news_cctv (cognitive 24): news_cctv.news_cctv has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 3 (9 pts), if/else 5 (9 pts), loops 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31a25a3bf684ce1197fc9d709e89786aa0f6552cebc50beed3c463505dd64a0b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"check_punctuation.main (cognitive 24): check_punctuation.main has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":419}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f3a3686a202685448b62cb1385f8e454c2b4f3420a140fdc6e1f4997634d336"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 24): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17, boolean chains 5, loops 2. None of this is in the body itself: all 24 points belong to 34 function items inside it that branch (reset, (anonymous)::xorBlock, (anonymous)::selectCipherStrategy, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":3272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"748b2ba4c3424c01fbcdece28ab1ad1c15d67bb8026d9386306d95fc8ff60cf0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_doProcessBlock (cognitive 23): _doProcessBlock has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (19 pts), if/else 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2690}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa566007015d9fe91061fee565d68f24fc9bb8933a7ecac6d49ba111d6a06b1d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode_identifier (cognitive 22): JSON.decode_identifier has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (12 pts), if/else 6 (9 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":4989}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"524f29ef54e76496d69e0045a1958dde799f0df4d73f2514233dafda6d87ec9f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_basis.futures_spot_price (cognitive 21): futures_basis.futures_spot_price has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_basis.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8101457a6307e8371d568dfe18238c3c4bb5169eec45af7292e59cbef4b7f8d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_pifa (cognitive 21): other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_pifa has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (12 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_lingshou, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_pifa, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_lingshou) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2321432665b3f3b8f7c3e68a8c26fc615ee476195b86f15bc79737eda5314005"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_lingshou (cognitive 21): other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_lingshou has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (12 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_pifa, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_pifa, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_lingshou) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":276}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed7204c7e5c4a8c26db5f78016cb6352754f6d80fa177e2e51327b18694921b9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_pifa (cognitive 21): other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_pifa has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (12 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_pifa, other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_lingshou, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_lingshou) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":412}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc70884735b739940ff50b63b25824dbf25126c4313c6d965a6c78f072559cbf"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_lingshou (cognitive 21): other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_lingshou has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (12 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_pifa, other_car_cpca.__car_market_man_rank_cpca_lingshou, other_car_cpca.__car_market_cate_cpca_pifa) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":528}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3abd3fcc2055cacbc89fd835261590d7da60675ad0ef2ed517f8b8ce22dda786"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"registry._score (cognitive 21): registry._score has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/registry.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2285aa2fe5bb3847e3addb857a285b60c7eee5f27c4c6da854dc264e24f2c1db"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"request.make_request_with_retry_json (cognitive 21): request.make_request_with_retry_json has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (request.make_request_with_retry_text) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/request.py"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47d0e12bb3cd2c620487ae25214087dd86f52cc8564caeacc6b45d37183177fe"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"request.make_request_with_retry_text (cognitive 21): request.make_request_with_retry_text has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (request.make_request_with_retry_json) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/request.py"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6457fee0d8130a28c3bb21ddce8f127ffba4b8c730226d93072b2aa231a12ff5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxfl_ths (cognitive 21): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxfl_ths has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxsl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqs_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqd_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df773bc901c2f70d70224f9f2984a6ccf9b42200ac4b99116165f6cf3976a321"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxsl_ths (cognitive 21): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxsl_ths has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxfl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqs_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqd_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":401}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f041c17cedd85cd54ab1abb89d8e80268f035bfc9b0792a2ae6381535fbc7360"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqs_ths (cognitive 21): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqs_ths has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxfl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxsl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqd_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":694}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff29f0a1d886455181bdb581de6abad6038aa8f2937efa12553877f4289a322a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqd_ths (cognitive 21): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqd_ths has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: 3 other methods here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxfl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_cxsl_ths, stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_ljqs_ths) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 4 times rather than 4 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 3 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 4 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":782}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76ea09276eb3d70bcfc5abc3be1dd3e145595d8ebbced0106daf3ba610190f3a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_notice._stock_notice_report (cognitive 21): stock_notice._stock_notice_report has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_notice.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967118eaf98433b8844704f99d51a1f950305ae7baa25372dc264e65c8586343"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON._do_encode (cognitive 21): JSON._do_encode has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 3 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf3d813df11db75ef1e6c9563e38031cf72b2ddbf5a9d4a7f88ab5da60888d56"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cot.futures_dce_position_rank (cognitive 20): cot.futures_dce_position_rank has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), loops 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":818}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89a178b06cd4cbfe40d0f5cb82075819baf5f4fd6590e58a30f95fbb84b32629"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"index_zh_em.index_zh_a_hist_min_em (cognitive 20): index_zh_em.index_zh_a_hist_min_em has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc8cbdf023b98a8f203dda2a7bd8f8c361118cd42a2bf8434e614f074d9f67fe"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_sns_sseinfo.stock_sns_sseinfo (cognitive 20): stock_sns_sseinfo.stock_sns_sseinfo has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (19 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_sns_sseinfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"098f419a77111a31fd3176e2ac080aae82a14727b690e23258b1373a9ce3fec5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.decode (cognitive 20): JSON.decode has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5442}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a7b1544f332b9415563801156a0cd055e8dc790ae49155e4dfab86068b71794"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_settle._normalize_settle_columns (cognitive 19): futures_settle._normalize_settle_columns has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_settle.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a129550467f72bd2a69daadf94645d2ff7bb0d2ab723eed7150ae09ca11f66cc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_czce_receipt_2 (cognitive 19): receipt.get_czce_receipt_2 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":328}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"808ae0626d293a7182501e23379db0ff441ffead72eea9f672e44d4c6e701109"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fx_quote_baidu.fx_quote_baidu (cognitive 19): fx_quote_baidu.fx_quote_baidu has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fx/fx_quote_baidu.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"000102c438dcfc3bbb24d61dfaca1d143b3f52ee319ad8a089d2b385518e02d0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utf32.encode (cognitive 19): utf32.encode has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":853}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0779897b156da4cf8f6972c3c288a2e26ba59bd0bd6ad6053f012264283146a4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsonlint._lintcheck (cognitive 19): jsonlint._lintcheck has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6629}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d5af9f0e83463dea4cf1a67b489a07df4415a1230534fde55827eb340af6d85"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::_process (cognitive 19): (anonymous)::_process has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (8 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":584}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"597a012542a5618fd7df01e20a27dad4618598063203c0d7186c8860c4603b43"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 19): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (12 pts), loops 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2609}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67e2d86b6b959736809bda99e37792efbf6eeb4422130e88059554fdd457fe9c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_doReset (cognitive 19): _doReset has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":4466}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35928e143c97944c5e49a9edf94b19db88847a330c30809d758fc3495404aa1f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Base64 (cognitive 19): Base64 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 4 (nesting depth added 5). None of this is in the body itself: all 19 points belong to 4 function items inside it that branch (_utf8_encode, _utf8_decode, encode, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb4d9269bc08f3e6be8db3597e67fcba0ac6a4865ced8a214d2466c071584040"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Base64 (cognitive 19): Base64 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 4 (nesting depth added 5). None of this is in the body itself: all 19 points belong to 4 function items inside it that branch (_utf8_encode, _utf8_decode, encode, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/crypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbcce838ce28f0de55affa30467bb703f740527384deb34ecee117a402308ad4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_fee_em.fund_fee_em (cognitive 18): fund_fee_em.fund_fee_em has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_fee_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c15f001abd1c0edfe9c53c982c1a24cbfaf71a806cdb604da9caebff792757ed"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_shfe_receipt_1 (cognitive 18): receipt.get_shfe_receipt_1 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ca82644652e54d917aa583c85c9d880c6da7f3b8fb2b9a655f9d77bc448a438"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"receipt.get_czce_receipt_1 (cognitive 18): receipt.get_czce_receipt_1 has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00a8612046b37d8c61b082da2ded6cc2252b84ac3959cebffad7218d496a9a4f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_zh_ah_tx.stock_zh_ah_daily (cognitive 18): stock_zh_ah_tx.stock_zh_ah_daily has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41e05c50855032fe11d8ce625e55fadebdf285ec7284fd34c1ce912fc48bfcba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_zh_kcb_sina.stock_zh_kcb_daily (cognitive 18): stock_zh_kcb_sina.stock_zh_kcb_daily has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 6 (13 pts), if/else 5 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1e12339d9626091e4ab6fa58981f26df604616eb24c8b4791b2b9c0bd06a442"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_finance_sina.stock_financial_analysis_indicator (cognitive 18): stock_finance_sina.stock_financial_analysis_indicator has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b32cc98802d6dddf976613f1ba208da16d06e6b5a5adbcf4efdbeebdf8aa3e8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"webDES (cognitive 18): webDES has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). None of this is in the body itself: all 18 points belong to 11 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 2174, _0x9843d3, _0x2a2af9, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":2161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca939f7715d276cf0b585100414a3284085640b08cfe3c9339cf345a32b378a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"macro_china_nbs._encode_nbs_period_token (cognitive 17): macro_china_nbs._encode_nbs_period_token has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":300}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37cd2a1a76bad7de3c733fa5ecf3fbe0d9a7f264d3482384fab763c0cea5afca"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"cot.get_cffex_rank_table (cognitive 17): cot.get_cffex_rank_table has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":716}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1da2a01fc6a6da4d33f1405692a6c5d24532e78ae8015217ef4d47ffef7db29e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.car_market_segment_cpca (cognitive 17): other_car_cpca.car_market_segment_cpca has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (15 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":685}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ff6b6ad3332f765c30a222c9829a866177441498dcb47c502d79e854befa7c9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.car_market_fuel_cpca (cognitive 17): other_car_cpca.car_market_fuel_cpca has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 3 (9 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":722}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcf446873224a6f81b94f0b43d03bb2e1f865b111711e101a9404a7399f3a548"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_us_sina.stock_us_daily (cognitive 17): stock_us_sina.stock_us_daily has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (10 pts), if/else 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6d74f0246532aeef8b928e71da5650b3340dece6d1b217facffe5510c5e23f3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_hsgt_em.stock_hsgt_stock_statistics_em (cognitive 17): stock_hsgt_em.stock_hsgt_stock_statistics_em has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), loops 4 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":336}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e28e74edc3232e95d3b255d8eb4a5154b5d6da3ae194fb66279baaccc2beabd3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xstp_ths (cognitive 17): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xstp_ths has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 2 (8 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xxtp_ths) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":493}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b224f50d90ab98619724436bee0c9d47e1bbc743e741b16a7685f742a4f0b86"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xxtp_ths (cognitive 17): stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xxtp_ths has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 2 (8 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (stock_technology_ths.stock_rank_xstp_ths) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7848ba7f14818f68699041c512d596f3946d6f0c7acce825e419712d930c8ae"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON._classify_for_encoding (cognitive 17): JSON._classify_for_encoding has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 12, if/else 4 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5582}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a9e66897615088c270b93ffa2c16ed86553c5e74119aec238a60ed33d1d51be"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSON.encode (cognitive 17): JSON.encode has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5637}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6198f405192e2c9e2e310a5793e7589aa8ceb99b8b1c300857e49641bff6a8bd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::(anonymous)::clone (cognitive 17): (anonymous)::(anonymous)::clone has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dea58c43991b45ecdc87155cd17e8c5871203f781ea9569df313a14f92ea93af"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 17): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). None of this is in the body itself: all 17 points belong to 3 function items inside it that branch (incWord, processBlock, incCounter). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5481}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc63433fe8c87b46f66a6f49910b14620e03a58b0130e0bee9e6cef51585c685"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 17): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 5, if/else 5, ternaries 5, loops 2. None of this is in the body itself: all 17 points belong to 31 function items inside it that branch (reset, t, _9, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":494}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71598f6d85c5f72414ead71afba5c547aed782100bd159dd64b0191565fce5de"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 17): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 5, if/else 5, ternaries 5, loops 2. None of this is in the body itself: all 17 points belong to 31 function items inside it that branch (reset, t, _9, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3834}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"820b46434b5df0d5e525fd31567e6e3664fadbfd3811a7f49bf5d08df2bbd9dc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fund_init_ths.fund_new_found_ths (cognitive 16): fund_init_ths.fund_new_found_ths has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98053f860444b8b8ce32d8efff4aa16e0be8db6b3e9d61ebb22e8e2271261920"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"futures_warehouse_receipt.futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt (cognitive 16): futures_warehouse_receipt.futures_shfe_warehouse_receipt has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11a122c57d5e65b0b9b81f2d90c6e7d46f7a28f8f9584a0ba589ded5073f666f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"other_car_cpca.car_market_total_cpca (cognitive 16): other_car_cpca.car_market_total_cpca has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 2 (6 pts), if/else 4 (6 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51cbcff01e3d1c899396eea4af44260d3cc8b0827c15502382380e655991c63b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsonlint._lintcheck_data (cognitive 16): jsonlint._lintcheck_data has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), error handling 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6565}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4321f1919831b9131b627f4fdbf2b871017fdc3344e619c03caa509a89222d1b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"demjson.decode (cognitive 16): demjson.decode has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: akshare/utils/demjson.py holds 23 of the 101 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 764 of the 1800 points over it (42%), 6.4\u00D7 the next-largest file (akshare/data/ths.js at 119). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":6182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbdda36c2a80d02fb6e7e90a8eaa1ab305239b29d3951e6b0f7ee2b6f40abc87"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: utils/demjson.py: FileTooLong \u2014 4686 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 4186 over it, 9.37\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06ab37bfeab50c1009c43191525bd551e89d1854393c585915d83c4ef8699615"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: air/outcrypto.js: FileTooLong \u2014 4287 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 3787 over it, 8.57\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a4701a5cb58a643ee7aeb4e97bd5acaf279f40381a16ab277a2327b8685977e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: ths.v_cookie: FunctionTooLong \u2014 v_cookie runs 797 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 697 over it, 7.97\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"499962a3b452eb00bc5ba4ba79afe8b94b96943e29abb37a18e1e82a53a0e0b1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: ths.v_cookie: FunctionTooLong \u2014 v_cookie runs 797 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 697 over it, 7.97\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"854fa0abea2f0ef141db640d0a99df244858a7b1600c53304629bbed9fa3e3b0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: outcrypto.encode_param: FunctionTooLong \u2014 encode_param runs 646 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 546 over it, 6.46\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c852eb912261c7bfb1083b3bf69f402459696f00738d276f4e59adf4a9fe67b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: economic/macro_china.py: FileTooLong \u2014 2849 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 2349 over it, 5.70\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb109a580a195a34ec584ddc0537239bc887320ff33b7cdac2082ea3c801df46"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: data/cninfo.js: FileTooLong \u2014 2679 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 1500 significant lines; this is 1179 over it, 1.79\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c9e35b52a3f89c2fe9e4b2a7b1a5f0b36a14344ca491a1adc637e2111da9270"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: movie/jm.js: FileTooLong \u2014 1823 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 1500 significant lines; this is 323 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1dd331096253ccfcdd0e5b857293930080f063284beae9ca020d0d2b9376d319"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1577 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1077 over it, 3.15\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5beb2f794cf99b099ac32b2cff6c2225c9080a5db5961288d4e4df2ab05b030e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1379 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 879 over it, 2.76\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e99243778a35fa2f89965d75c443aab3223c8300351e115a9a83b3233e5e1e6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: fund/fund_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1060 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 560 over it, 2.12\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c350d51b3d4df5977c1c2b78650edfde8aa1e99e964e32beeb51ce84152eeea5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock/stock_fund_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 1049 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 549 over it, 2.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ef444ca129754867dbfa7d58f0bd9905409e87219c33d8c2513da70b17b1be7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: futures/cot.py: FileTooLong \u2014 977 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 477 over it, 1.95\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2e78805e053a5296807b8643bfa1a6b625e1f34e1bd8cbe7e2dbca87e8da4f9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 819 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 319 over it, 1.64\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee97120db322a4cd4246fc359595081542a5aecdb8ea05ae0672cc42ba8cc1fb"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py: FileTooLong \u2014 814 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 314 over it, 1.63\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bba57535eea953580183f0202a39a7df27e22ed43715f18cf1ba1edcb558717e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: data/ths.js: FileTooLong \u2014 807 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 99% of them inside a single declaration: v_cookie (2-978). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 307 over it, 1.61\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44b9284740a1e52803d442c7427e8ff3ed9075afa4f7134b4114510c14d5a9d3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/ths.js: FileTooLong \u2014 807 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 99% of them inside a single declaration: v_cookie (2-978). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 307 over it, 1.61\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1439a5370651f7df478f15bf8198e4bdfff0bbf505a7b0e65b8f30b86006b925"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py: FileTooLong \u2014 788 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 288 over it, 1.58\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72d00877db6c4087c5ef1a1de4735b637c24452971e25a132b1b8cb829dc6be5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: other/other_car_cpca.py: FileTooLong \u2014 692 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 192 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"892d0102a899d69c88e877003a889ec152acf88145175b2d083295da50c6a148"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: economic/macro_usa.py: FileTooLong \u2014 688 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 188 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_usa.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26ae7d2a684b105824379ae55f4e5dd0633aa481cd135e5790ba006eeea8fc10"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: option/option_finance_sina.py: FileTooLong \u2014 679 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 179 over it, 1.36\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9796060ce9f4a2b9676d09f6df0f0a6f32e41b130b92f85494fe6b6502ff418a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: economic/macro_euro.py: FileTooLong \u2014 670 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 170 over it, 1.34\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_euro.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bea678fe7bde55b9afe0a04eed84dc194cd55fde68024e8c5432378d364be3ba"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: fund/fund_amac.py: FileTooLong \u2014 665 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 165 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4246cffc8160e6b5da8e74ac5433c673c8090610cb451035ab8bc58b7a40db9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: JSON: TooManyMethods \u2014 39 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 9 over it, 1.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":3711}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a26736baf825580bc09de14dba5ebc219a6c12add5c6fcddb795926e1a7109"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py: FileTooLong \u2014 600 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 100 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fefa54de03460f9b9e6af7957f139e5535cd5725b12ecca67044bce5b0f5be83"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: futures/futures_daily_bar.py: FileTooLong \u2014 588 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 88 over it, 1.18\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2eb90585fec16fa6c3df330361ac185d1f09beaf392c918d277c822ec15d9c8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: option/option_commodity.py: FileTooLong \u2014 522 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9957fd32e76291957b8828b6165c88b65edbb514986ec2a8af02e833b461da6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: futures/cons.py: FileTooLong \u2014 513 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 13 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cons.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ce93944ae33ac4e6a969a9cb443396f32f8cf08e7edbf912ade245d927c9c54"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: futures/receipt.py: FileTooLong \u2014 504 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 4 over it, 1.01\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9a8eb18fd77087abbcbe6dd3a921be353750e222255b59d189c03c16799adad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (14 members, 18 shared lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1242-1284 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1288-1330 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1334-1377 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1381-1432 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1436-1487 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1491-1542 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1546-1597 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1601-1652 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1656-1707 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1711-1762 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1824-1875 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1879-1930 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1934-1985 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1989-2040 \u2014 These 14 members are variants of one another: a block of 18 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 14 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 14 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"040ad7eb940cfff8bb34c868506fc0f4d38678c1b3380e2a87e9c97cbedae447"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (12 members, 24 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:17-93 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:17-86 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:90-160 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:164-234 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:238-308 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:312-382 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:386-456 \u2014 These 12 members are variants of one another: a block of 24 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 12 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 12 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":598}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8933da1c23cd0f1f0acc11d3b257d42a022f9a129f4bd0d2917170c77e089692"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (10 members, 21 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These 10 members are variants of one another: a block of 21 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 10 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 10 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":485}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fea1879a997997908251d3b3b2d002bb48a50ecf023af2e48f6c8f6743c50f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (9 members, 51 shared lines): akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:14-74 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1062-1134 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1139-1202 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2422 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These 9 members are variants of one another: a block of 51 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"043ccffd5d187b9b6c61fda228594aaef7abf0a51b6395171ba6ed8a902e20a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (9 members, 27 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:16-102 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:17-93 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:17-86 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:90-160 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:164-234 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:238-308 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:312-382 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:386-456 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:460-506 \u2014 These 9 members are variants of one another: a block of 27 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9b3910800fef81dae44bc41084d6530137646eee7605fa39351525cf26b7dc8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (9 members, 23 shared lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3237-3286 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3382-3412 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3416-3446 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3450-3478 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3527-3557 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3561-3591 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3595-3625 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3629-3660 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3664-3696 \u2014 These 9 members are variants of one another: a block of 23 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02b61c6a250184fc4ba10e4ab0ff0aaf86bf2285c9d397f93f248a374177ec30"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (8 members, 29 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:16-127 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:19-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:100-193 \u2014 These 8 members are variants of one another: a block of 29 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82bd26d274f2bc8bc87679e36e2252dd24a0f2ffb094a57a3afd90e295299566"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (8 members, 25 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These 8 members are variants of one another: a block of 25 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8a553ac8e3969a437e6384ab7e731c7982c26e4867fd44f49109594d4bba589"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (8 members, 16 shared lines): akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:69-88 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:109-128 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:149-168 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:189-208 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:229-248 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:269-288 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:309-328 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:349-368 \u2014 These 8 members are variants of one another: a block of 16 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e7a2a4e64161303574e23382194ef1c51c8985dc888ac4ea4819bf96951d945"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (7 members, 41 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These 7 members are variants of one another: a block of 41 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 7 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 7 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f62069e19864c70511be20355855d12425076a914b3f703fd7d92d7458488b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (7 members, 32 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:893-952 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:956-1015 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These 7 members are variants of one another: a block of 32 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 7 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 7 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d28440ce41410345b4f22426a5253bc47c931249afaff9ef477bcbd608cf4ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (6 members, 37 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:188-245 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:249-306 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:310-398 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:402-490 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:695-779 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:783-867 \u2014 These 6 members are variants of one another: a block of 37 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d832f1a455542d3ad3576d29b983f2541f0880041b69453e2b78577b9c2a3ee1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (6 members, 31 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:15-142 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:790-889 \u2014 These 6 members are variants of one another: a block of 31 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c905e53a2bed629c11c5286d8198ff3acee129bd31846cd5da1f53b65f509575"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (6 members, 5 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:138-261 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:327-456 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:197-315 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:184-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1049-1167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1474-1590 \u2014 These 6 members are variants of one another: a block of 5 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29d1cf3e105fa1b7393d4d22b39ce1095661cef6148f843733a82964ba28e3f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 63 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:138-261 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:327-456 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:197-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1049-1167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1474-1590 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 63 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c824f661e4c0521023765eba49f4d4b1f1d3896f07f29ba68a3fa1b80240463"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 46 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:310-462 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 46 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef98937f7a327115c4ea3fc14da42d742a16e0c39b072dc5c5d5cb254eae1b8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 45 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:33-123 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:129-219 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:225-319 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:325-478 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:77-162 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 45 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e70a5eb08289bc383a891540c44222c59b07799363ed6b0ed106fb73a24ada8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 43 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:15-95 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-120 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 43 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5670d23c29345712687cb0b99f36e570233c2282a652751bc28a5d164f2d1ef2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (5 members, 24 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-399 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:229-332 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:136-220 \u2014 These 5 members are variants of one another: a block of 24 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":296}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c74d5b1b96326378d0977a98ca2139cfa897c4cc84168d67626e5b7cab5fb7fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 52 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:310-462 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:16-127 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:16-128 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 52 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d3e5afe2ee7968b3689d4fbe58030fadf2cf6daec154304197c3f946e9be80b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 51 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 51 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c72dfdb8c5528b9705a5ca3d9b572e135b261d161d8055be7da2858bab8be0e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 46 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 46 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3133834e47165ae0c686798a49c382732868334b46b666b45866955b12e07c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 33 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:295-383 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:387-451 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 33 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"522c8609ee979d3bd9df059d1e2391992455e83c83d81e0a420de0f077a12bbf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 31 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:15-83 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:87-155 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:15-73 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:77-143 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 31 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"513b808aae77754d2ed100dad5c123cea5f8f3885e63bd8f3f462d00fbc68d91"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 29 shared lines): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:325-478 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:31-99 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:33-109 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 29 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cc6961a3022941b2fb91eea3ab9543938a4d1f6260bd02fd52391630ccbdba8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 24 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-219 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:17-134 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 24 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f174bcd626394fdf222911ed6456294dadef62c1792fea2dac5e78c9e4784e9a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 23 shared lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3290-3344 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3348-3378 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3629-3660 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3664-3696 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 23 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3290}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97649e15bd10ffe5de8c81fbde5790fec7ec2b1802e7c3dcba288838230b8719"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 22 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:229-332 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:109-206 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 22 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37735a5abcb3c192eb2a0596836d4c8eec771dfbb983e3935b91cd6ad4186359"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 9 shared lines): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:26-118 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:124-217 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:224-316 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:322-408 \u2014 These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 9 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"356cd5ad26e9bb139411a8677e3c78a4199be130fbfe8b787776642bdaf913b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (3 members, 57 shared lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:78-147 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:151-220 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:224-293 \u2014 These 3 members are variants of one another: a block of 57 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 3 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b11fd7d2b8a5bf0d874e266e1f172d7a1907d04b0d08be394c9595d567c517b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (3 members, 50 shared lines): akshare/index/index_sw.py:39-93 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:97-155 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:159-217 \u2014 These 3 members are variants of one another: a block of 50 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 3 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a9f25a34981327ad7d96ec593be9bb1a015a23fec6acbc9708f90cdb263db45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (95 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-219 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 95 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8fc891f23bb81cd5066e7e3a7125c0de623b108c1fee241f61284a86c699910"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (57 shared lines): akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:18-253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:783-1067 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 57 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e632dca34949311ab76df1d369a0e50f2695e34c710194a3c763c4a702c9b6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (45 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 45 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"543f056549a26ec780e8af2881729882cb7cbd16f9e9debc54283f6080f763c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (45 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 45 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"414b744f0734bafe5c690c5e14f84398f2721a4577c93b13dd2cd61ca7f68df1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (39 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 39 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b5097c9f88abe7a45c7332ff9ea176bf1334593fd212bf65740916923872f98"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (39 shared lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:353-453 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:284-365 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 39 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":353}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15f601e5beb4e485dec83a92f712b255d8ea13531bd0fa26c09a1e5cbba2111a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (30 shared lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:783-1067 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 30 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":783}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c78a25b3b2b0993c7426ab584b4d5179ca805074b9067fa70a6542bab4523087"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:659-700 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:705-746 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":659}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cd3cd4c554f477008b62cb3eb84ebc942dab159f0aa2fac38808ed810a12fc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (105 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 105 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2385e2b5f0f93dd50b25b29e820414bfaecdde58c583e25651ebe8beed5d919"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (105 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 105 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab776de60959c4366419361f4c850be7d1431c6b867be55987758f3a9b01feab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (104 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 104 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e57913561478eccb2f88760c94e71480f8dc924f5f221eb908d94162f9af71e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02a80b6ccfed5bbb13dd7ed1f8f74df1c955627041dea8240534388ec6c0171f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"951cd351d3747bf84ad367d23f29fa598a41228593150532644b0d90b5906ae9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56112ecae3112d9aeda9b153f1196a6dbf4b5dbd40ead2a1a06df2d037af4d99"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31f4425ed106856e2d4469596fd4a150d7a24a821db7a584f1f65c2c0e665325"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba7f57a5e4db6891a702973dd5db6106bb3f371bf622c25a89a0945998468c25"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"611cf44a7f2bd52cefee43c3f09e6dbe5dbac77eb8eb96c789e3f996f12fd282"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90be192c3d5bbfc3ef21ad38dd7ef94411109aeb3703ce625e174c10f7fa22dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93a5226d0e323b9c7996ad1a523090731b6b305866d79e4c0c634a0c3ae7f09e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (83 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 83 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe1273374abc6f48848f1f2a78986de560613ddedbe482bec13e8745b7e76148"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (86 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 86 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"034a315c5fb1fcfd788809a688bf8caa072509bd63d2c3be8900f46b2f40103a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (93 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 93 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d47607f3fab1de0cc66a55f1f3aa947c0f8aed58a0eebd3c19ef941d4a6a3881"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58e340ee0c4d95f4d42c3ab8df1a25fa69af8f5ed4b53674f9cce6108e0aa871"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e61de51c08fcab87ec37819153b0607d3fdde81dc3286d5d56cae3b23750aa75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c52f25d4bcda5291b4a24ebc4cf59ebcc46eeaa8eea743b3a9d5e659a02ceb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b477f1483a616bec1255cda07962f2fa6070f930aaa64a379ccff73345792978"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a1c61b1c2b1487693927bad26ab1ef57fecbc51a74f5b5b1005b338bcf5a8af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e24e9e3a0e5f13a621439dde649ea905a405787c76a0a6dbc5e41078ef63f0c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b5a9d5505b05fb79a7ea1952ad669a170b6addd0446851efae88d215dde0db6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f27475841e7125feab65b9d6e7c0b827b42ee6f4de0b6898528737c6597098a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"681378a6a8198178d1974620903fcf77457ece4525bcdaaa42d04a7e5a2f961d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"066234b199521bd7b5a7d7c393f7c0d52363d007e02aba5b70ab034a8eb84688"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1d07cfefcf190e41ad3309195409f15b5f9af665d71b19ebed6a3570625415a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b1e02783970a8842bdb9e66fb3f24fce67889cf8e895d5a4ae9f07149a58509"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c779704ad486d36d63cc5b50f9a09050f53194f635494dc3ff02b6b67eeaf05"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be3ed21d4e5cc281d7acfeb552b7b822a5b1b4910245d858eb2e5c5bef653e3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a6a553e7031e78d0c4a0912b3861ead70f52fad06c297708f6a62f334881d9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91e5ced2581a0b1c048d40c6b0efab2160b0d6f41936ab51c311a85359f366c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e438207ff9538c2daf6d0c875c276fd3e8f360119662f1cb6f58b532a6b94cf8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a57d42aaec7b893ecb1ab64c8c1dae3e5668915897a555853d2a7c8f4ad16185"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5483064bd69874b97541f185a388f82adddf0aa8693bd10fe013fbc300168475"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43d46d3374694b17de22cc6b4eefbbd75292eb9f23dd079c605b24da150cfa34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3b3661909deee9d22bf116686c40ca172dd4fe938660ef1a3f60d6ba2c5ad6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (83 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 83 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0619209cc5731b7943b5bc59570735ef26b055406c783db3e0d46f2262f4818"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (83 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 83 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d8164f26453a5b345b5697a9b0c89459052fca2eaaf9796f22f0a09a97642a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddaa2c7157db30da259538b24ae4c0957e7b1924e4a046abbc2367a3a656fb59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c2f65ae7817d66eecbb4af5e155307c895b10e224610a45b521c31723584cc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"744d2ffff05b4ad0d2a0a078be5a1642e8447e890f437a1b5f59fed7c119ba33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90a2c2e43ea824a4a8f50a7f2615e48bb5e468d28cab18a0d159f304fee1c497"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-399 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14e33cc6f691d30aa3f57c99069e899b000c80ebdc0064aaeeb64aa645248508"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:142-265 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16b45d7bc543a8f5d47ae691b2c8b7e342e6751e7b16ed7dff85c2a25faac439"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:48-175 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1695-1755 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f67267c6a26a11eb3268ee107737574f526567dc4ad7049e15e684c2d3cb103e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"817d7455ab59e99be5853f7b0f902e6afec3f6b92e35c2205acd65aff0456b09"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cce49215649621dede95d3cd89fcffe5c6b2c7ee35897a6bd642917cf7527cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a9873e35c89b0c872cb83af701039de06958bb601251799ace1558fd4ed063a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (88 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 88 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aee8abfdc106ca2f28f2b7c52932f7f3fe808f48e0e2e5c74cb4202573d25aba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e973403de9083c8c2d181f73bd85cd91da6d165ba505f964c733a0b6f9810b74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9c39f6b1c23971365aced29f670e59330db26034f37835c061b31944c50a4e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5b512423eb38570fde17df09132e9021d067c26c3cfc13d65935c364dcb2bf3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd1bac0f6410cdb69d2a4a9567af84fec39d8628510cf686bdd95970c7ad8ebb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3ce26816a6d2a83673c65f221603c1d3fec5f1e7e7057280087fb36543a4455"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e75c03521c3691823607e50c5d543dc032a3bf991994a59b09877bb939af296d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c3745d33197ff8224b473e6009ba494c0f62572fbb25f23a850f54163ed6c41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1ad42a29753dc355b9f0d765d01596b1f2aa6f9915b2307856f0fc158164f06"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e283a11873e263c3a1ed665c40d8ee8642e92d54a25e60029dc01d64a01ac3ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6d2e7f4a1d8b82d99480cf730dc59603e7526419f0495141116e56723f1868b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac857f74f446d700daaa9be4ba629f6169a23401e4d73a057eba4f58a6881c0f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2256669cb4afd1c2f957b81d657ee7a57b1edabcad0836cdef1a3250b9496623"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e5d8ef37e38e248c4b485e60e12accc9cb6c8520c18dedf8eb908c6283225cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (79 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 79 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f18b74b152640502970597b2784755be6c04726531ab5f02aef76df669620e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3696039affbe3bf50558773039ea32b05ed7d6c2ef22c67c82b394a15510d8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b68327561f51a29e3775d9cad6886040cce58e757bcfb7ea7078ff5d0589287"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1faecf8d71c9ca61c0725793b0118eee7efcaa5b57e8dea551144807703dbc79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f120ff349e3b270caf632dde2241422f1b803d5acf7dc48c27a1b3f1fc3b6d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c04cb950a86b3eaa7be42f65a98b54ca9181cdd77071a0354a045af62c02639"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76410502787e9f78bce8cd93879437679f848462c396b63039e83caf2eae41d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3508fc2f96ce7c2bc0291413c205bdc68dc95b6dba2f0ab6c766ad9111092dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fbc93d6addb42591aebcf989aee71bd60b1f5b5722688e3d84f874ed09f760e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c0ea8fdde183f64fbfd42738bd11b453ed60a4d01efd36054747095f0bc6073"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f856d6551acf815aa3c1064f9acd15199e83bad1c35dae8cce03a19f64a946fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8f71cd51652860b62dd7482b1b2e3a4f59153bd2bd85043444ec8d3c31a38d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08953a79dd24431a18ca1227f229b1acf7505a484e82af6cbc1b31f0079d3ed6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75c53ac2175c5c27fa9a82867b2c9dcc2376d884dc215399e71bb8840cdb8622"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccfdba1ac3407897e2309c70e60e9bb86dde6edb783e120cf96d27e755a81b3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b32dda2f800e3f8c23269af1bcecb936bfa268d838d0fac88d63ef06ec552d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d35357e6b3cb3d5ee2d711435a05624de5c7024c360c8acac05ef17991778ed5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de10fd750a16051eb555fd1862fc7ed79651c0c4e021c7348e73378e8883e971"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b375578e5d37533c58a03fb13cb593269bb079afb67fe6ba1ec39752cdbd5cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e02c11fc7f162a8a3b38725a1202ad051d42c45f84ba82214a7d38e885641477"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (70 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 70 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19d445c44c93774fbe2824e7804ae8bedbef0ff640807b74e9ca3723752c6772"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:229-332 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56f271298cbd50cfccf276c06f6d1db7ade7b970626625ac26595c90a5215fb0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e17e64998df64bf9cbfd874b681fdeae2a6b4892b9c12c4a69102ee01a027dbd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4e2e6f31f6dbe580f5f9862d705e05e3bcad886ceca4c76888c8f546698c05d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d68ac2006989aa9c0fbc85c27af75dbda817e463d0c5371c3067a071fa01f962"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0a75121ccb5df0651cbdac1a0d942adb3dd3a539313bcc116aebff3ed82587f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa255f4c6d40c09181b95a673ab8ef074f5568faa102efaa45bb550200784b15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33a46d67f9e2c3827e5084be76e07148eedb5d455be536683b36445da5cdc114"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e3a13f131720dcdf4816ed6fb2c093af60a0a6d27844bd2af7cc1c111a5bff1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22f6efe47a376909bb5af613ae76edd59b87d27358e1a9aac897fef5d0e1e126"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5961fb791432550a3f838cfd589b551d98fc853a487ed2c2a56cdf9402dd4a15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b1e92710f1171f3c9872669cb4f63885d3986016bdd5c95e02cb5ffeafb8496"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaa32a254ae7bafe5e4e1f02a248150d6c0932e8eb7c6909496565f665cd89cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03d5a5f4d0b682f28f65808a410f9424d073937938ea4dc897df1cabfca0e616"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f440e64ce305170878402adeb37156c832c6b68f7c65f70d2d486ef4ef9b32f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44eb3747bdd615598c95fef40acc90e0ae83ddcb81394210230770e46358dc7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9b763d58183b512eeb9fb4cafe4d066964f9e6254e60ea259a0fac010979641"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c647a357dfd0a30d6bcbc6791c08bcfba157851b886a03800bab498495f0e852"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc8368c6cf011b49afc832a12811fefdb3e3392d355c961a6126f3103862bc96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aecad40a3d4f28f5c28aea23cf689792b4577a03df74ce547fd86f6d9fac529a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23ccfaad4609ae75fed3283b68035922e255908e6fa702efe94136c4bdaa7a37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01d1098e405af6c7579c34f0a069dfdc8ea3a3d28f0d8bdb728d4ff41fd8db52"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c562d752e9cde4764a3a83efcca6ee263b35e2ea5e63178bb3ccd5aba1e6148"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2af4b3307c97c43cf78e5eb0d18fbe5fadccd047e2a8c7c5f52b9cdf403675a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f231f1465f5fa37f67e761ba80b929d6bfb84e73dcb26dfa63dcd7d8b2dcbc5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (58 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 58 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34352f49d835cc059b49e9799c268644744feaa570cd776a09eb11ffdbf6e024"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41da9c98441a209fdb0e6a2fc97422d949ec465fba5a7d8517509418f56f49f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63e98560677205709aead50ce2debcba3d58453845e0a983a2e183a00f28b584"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b8aa9b3e6a8118a7cddd2e802f377cabffed659241ecfb2abd2356a9f9bd24c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14a548a3dacaeb9f7b0a9c9c664feee52d8f31a95baa24c0627a2b7fe3024e3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6758136eb2a65e9590449793bdfc0d1ae65d9e7816d9b1d975b0f20f2d14d2f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa610e263f5e46437ff9f12e1cf8ce353615d67e5337042688d11e727191effd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c7a2424d8aed4636bd08acffecfeface7c62c872e84151e1ce61300384ddce2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a8cf5d5ee8bfb2261abb9beadd7e249e479daf4bf737353f2d6e02ae8812b5b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd5e40a83fe6b7ee76881d231b886ce60af20df4054997402733025d905f5a85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a25fafb552c019f5e7baa4ba341c9249502d233e9b28beda08e120aaa64bcfe1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17055e1970d5f0e78f2c84da3869f72e4f70e5a1a657c746152d4b9eec4b248e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83c255047c3e9998a016b6186a618a28816800a4c170c72429cfc4f4623d7774"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33af44ea4260912bcd6a4b1b8e89559e462adf0dcd8212d112649533798e9462"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bca2bda4da9dcd5672fe0e5440d698183f478c182d5ace05ca1e9fd6aa474ee1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"daf956226afd01fafaf27ce75fb1e82606251aab1d3b50acfda6fbe4aa6a8d1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c341db285e7288c443ab8be5e1dbd724682905fd5de4d3558dea2bbe859090ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d3f849c755328b17533ca14ff8895b11d0a59d04b89090d42f450726a6087a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"634fa52f8ee9f48e383d7a8d73683390b7f2221f0ffcb78dd9cb9f69f5f19875"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d0a46aa5061dacf9eb27283b765d0097632fccbe5c88ea68d2aee54ae70fce7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"415d7897ada7ea3ddcb9f65273e0233669834a86e1c6d782cd9c7a1806973d59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4430372935a9c82d1098725b5e1cff728d58b4c213778e28b2ed1a2fed74fc90"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c03b2d32fdc0ec3e499ba7e483e743b84315d06aa0437e65d9b18ddf9642b76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"456ff922f3b45d5f199606c07c08a3072e154c46d49097bd61a29996afbc65cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fd14744b12b6a6969049ee72b6bc456ed7386661637d1fe333ccb96dfd6fb08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8da899d0a425a9713c73c9ce6596147868563c24f167dbddcd82a8ecd54adba2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edf8a6241d1ba3bd3407e18ddf8bb775f1f7831b6b01f09f482e4a87adf82ac6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d0495e7d83809e927ac37531542b1952827598c1162d00de5b6c4528deeae86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9f99cbf143d9420955fd4bed3bdec3cd84b3eed6bc38886f94a43f747710591"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e14e1f8fb8c34d7d6bb02ef46ada27bb8577613b569817b52019aec10d1f0681"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a7390e92533f1db616e01deb60fe7b3b9752d086ffe66ee234fec58b7852d56"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6734069e0d09d25aa4d0c20770cc19c4d6277e2c8d6aca5957ea1113e2ea4c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (86 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 86 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77182a649f58bd4a3db93d84cd33b9eed07f39b124ddc51df6e90e17ed487f2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (86 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 86 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ee34cddb5435acd2fba248e9d7fe6e348680cb63b9cc74c1cd6f7b75375290b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (86 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 86 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbf3c8788ac8f90ee85b67614b0b03cdce36b44bad0e685927021816b365a9bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e756dad6692d9edc9d09014b224f4947ff35b015890fb5c774999715babe33d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b1af58392270552a4e7507ec892f19f624a50a6603ffbb3466d9597755cf688"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93d32f8b6db559857bc37e368cd35744e7ef4396664fd7efed832ab0ee6ad47f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d636e128e546913dc1f1165162cbe2f266fc9108a8440963407c271411d9ea34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (79 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 79 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ecd25791ec5638cc8f0df1617c626d3bce6a6d0d5690d8dae9b22c510985747"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (86 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 86 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dfa88eb5087038b0576682866a508b844b01b8e8c18153a21a1fb7cfc412ef4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77c10c424886568e15dee9dd39152e6dcb90a829198fb15ff3b25babca86091d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e68ad71682cebd0916b6b7db49cab7f937fddeb7677e996a75d020eb699c7a33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ee0217ed132486a830ad8cef04163784a02ddcc9a193747c3f115326bc049e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6defb5a4c44d8352ee7d4d87f962f3ec30df3a7eadb12f065409213fd0ddb3d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331aec524e9e6624fe88eab464f14c288f8af251c399739ad31207e6cddeab0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60982158f5eaf4238cc2189546f47c55bbc2a44798e84addfb168df44e0e6a3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5858c120a6d59b49b3ba619142b24f5e23c4d7fe5be895f7185ef35dd472638"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb74272a25b336aa030292c2d689e61c69138de68da5cdb47390102f7908ef7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b47dfe09746952a064adf7274ef2469da5860d4d17d2d0a3ed5b7accba05f840"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e2833457bce7129060d603abcbb478915cfe589d09e97e442490cbbb3cfaa36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51af88165fbf52619da6601312ee9776ee753aa83534921c40f343af37835cf5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75c4d86e7c6fac35179c79337bb0a7bf50f03f6176dc0026ad69734fc8f2a211"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc164500ad3cfd74252901f4848f6ef150052fc25b19ae72b789713bf6dfd9b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90712867d755b488fbe7cce08a95053254ee6150f0348114ded96c7a756d86e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffe5790270b5c23a7bae1b75986b2c7d801248549f093c42752fdf01d9de908a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6cb1fc4de31983e2111d1da157148828de8d1bb79d0879c6be1bff115d47fe4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2956a9b114d8186ceb65ca5060b71ead6daeefff3090c5ba45e0b39ad54211a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8e2db15922bef8502502564bf5ce855eb79027143444406a730805fc2156a95"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21f6e2d02f0a1fd0909c7d049e81d4378f30480a25149a0c8b581a0226abd31c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29a11b96a3f3af95d5f28b27fc07c3fc886147ddeb8e9233b2041a7a40c2df7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2eb020e64291ae4141b4841bd0379ff6619f5e82c06ccce957b8c00f58d9710"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87bae7e695c5940fef39892d02e5b78ec6a03a07f2b5ba82b9448b7f94b4d5d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"095e9a7f39e62a4d20aeffb54422a4dd55b86e38a6c0be8d91c1ddcc788bcdb6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8108cfb44eebdd36f1281a5bef3d63f52bca12292d1b5ffca943f1ee1c109b17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"418843fa6ef98713559b203730acea9a4acee8ee4ee6cf70c4622fe3c8c2c289"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"512b77f56f17a78b9929e8716f05e8734011842737f96d7dc25c4fde62b025c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e02002b2a10b8cda959f4b8150b5b2bec71472965398619a97c3898a6fda4a93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b78908878b763e05892ecf9dcfd48f37ff9ebcc0669c1837bc8fe92b819e1e79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbe061d5d57381c8dfb915200ff6fc10f8ef4da8c6e66ba21ad160dbcbc90555"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac9b4e217b5ace42e8d8e3de332221bd53e67b38eabbfd9505c8b1125afb211e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96283dafeeac87cbfef964536acc96e134577b09440377087a692b7342414522"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10ac56a49f53c7edc80d1bd08483d4b78b2501551c3b6eb02adec5835a80b6d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4113adac1b9b69a076b5bb0a53b6c8dd294a5abbecbb0c05767a625a26f8bf82"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac6ff2511b7845e19f9eeab08935340b0b0ee40ad3e1d4a98381da2c475726dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"515c9072f84542712298cdcd297ad29037944390fcd23eee56d079fd2a7f5a21"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f36b202014d38e64ac15d52b983c7cf92c1017f114eb8ba920d9ecff80b78b85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56e7da35a1aaa07acc34cb37901d9d97ea50242d3622cdb33022b0a0ca0968dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3552169e41907f893264aec98a19c4a10d6061aa64869a23686e3ee01c4d193"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b40b8ba7902a5eac3de4f3fd6322289a793b534cf84a2ae6037e65fdbc545ce3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ed88a43e5758a557ed6ca4cfa021251388fd7ab26ac09db9b3da151d339ea47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78711040860c54be61d7a99f41bba350cf4c206c9b25687b3e9273d95d18e645"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddb49c926be2eaa0897a0cfeed0855fdda123a76d52986dca0867d526933834c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3290-3344 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"122b25f8e5674767ee45d2862311c989cbe86cf5b9d6cb8e3c8baf8294448ad3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:161-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ede54976a28954729c0e8a8563e558a3be793a70ce569b4f3192c3e92d2f1d37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5442dcfa2aec51d4c84641c156ad79678da9fd769b7f3d1a17258302dd2f507"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaf823ae303f112f4e864bef16383425d6c581e26d799f144d285c49d3a59e35"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"807c0b57591af1e7bf25fea5c15acb063ed974520d0095bda2916c9ec43e91fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76e0963e6fdaf3b7d9b26528c979ce08da24d554dae453ebfd34020063e5f322"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31f4acce6beffc08036bc56c63263ff1757b2926675d1436e3506c7eb7aa9b87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e31555224b76e0c0802a4de2c20d08f7a4b167c566b0739845e753a5fd34c497"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b0f7ff68164c3e062387ac69fc10ad50c2bead3241c97b855baea6960e54797"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b6b74f816a6150ce98d574e1ade64153623d4a3095254a3ddda8c460c2b8448"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b989b8481b45e556982c04e5a79398a90f94d45d13253eb8cb1d66b20159c1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7e9ddc60be025e6542273136c24a715199f16e1b746673b61ac8db9241d8ff6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3538705b7f5bbd2eb92a16ac7b61023a1c19f5355acaac8d1ccfd351fc4189a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc3427febad312497360a0aa81d4c48324a356b4e0b3ba5cc899727d8333d3f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc876d1e6409aff91e3f49bd050fdf6b177173dc2f96687c28b4011f8d56227b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bde9cfbd4d794c59168470ee6ba49db4357d701710c9814447a156c1692c5e36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2865aec79436eee5cf37568c38a26ba9dca09e644d9d8cb1ae5e6470496c6cd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (75 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 75 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f54fb5ee1ee67f9a9d75be309889f8ab15133c585f63a47007db65f1abb407d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c6d570634112be3271a1508828f43044a5f7b2d3240630fa074d2e180739999"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"756f67ffafb2aaefc73c8ef75e624768d930437307fde3776ead578974decce4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abc8a2031619d074936f942da336cbd195b78c34abdee1ccd9f13b04c53b348e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa9547909f7f4e3e5edb2c3d492701943a14b74c5a5e713affa4ad040eba3597"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ae610b5a62ded11858ffe7d37683c9031e8d2cfe83a9938443bc3e8996505e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:467-492 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:962-993 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_usa.py"},"region":{"startLine":467}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"177871021f0b54b1a8889b5d809f0c3bf18cfeadf86793cee777029c5eb7f330"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14c942ee7556dbbd7fc8b8899e2280a88963530de9516ab414ba4e390ba35f98"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (79 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 79 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba1e790ba16570e4306974ccb80de2362daedee708f6d827680a3bdf16d759cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f764c60f13f7e435969825e7fbb14c65920b0eeabe1682d4a1ac53c350baf73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"febfeb7b2ecee08ec507a63c1df63d1f5261252d511fdd441c719745e1db0757"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d76de76734de4e6264d77cb6bf17738cf7d865b835b10b32fe499ced61b1fbc6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b361d4085cd59a5728cff97e207bbd674c28cca47a9d3293c1f2d209d1beaff3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34734b47310d51384f352ef601f540a89d9d8f5b070751638955cdaef7da2512"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11f3087c0443bc0115300e9765e07bffd7a9ecec980d30e19180945efeed9536"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c2a5ff281f0229ae7fba3d7eeb996d456d2d831ce3dfb56e61a77c9d1a6f22d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc9e7ce7a59568451cf947a5a36afbe614b19a9f1ddd00433df1fd8e4fa2b8f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f715bb232ef5fe6a0deacb8dfc8d3cfe7edfebd317df7ec61047af71c661bb4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0d7782fb60c4f2da5fefdf9020452a8ad5ff0f665abc889ed22ceeb3c5864e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3319100e91a39e7c3689385015e551f4256370ff07e285ca6f20c12a188cba33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b87f18e8dae85f78a7453aa75d569f82d311c1d989fb5c87795b2f90559b4656"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8590ae40b2572e2495b46caa42c9ea14684f49a076d3bb4415487a652a5e4ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47d4938cb48b22ea69de01df56cc71341a3015753fbd8f5d40a83939791ead24"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1924131c4fd818b715bc5326f432c62eb19324ed0e519c937d4b5ba7e1930b61"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f08649f2f587976437d1b366d69824d00ae3e014ad03c86369cb50bc64c966e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ba0d5c34e042277bbde4fa7d6fd82e7502aee75373ec8d589a6d6f0f0f4e71a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dc47ddc3dec0c4edca9fe5d6bdfc95385304a60639afb3c6c96e6b774390084"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6097ec0c800aa3a4c135fd40f493af71e39a078fdae8c6c8d7a129bc57670cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ad407cfe117e412abee793f14a96625962931cf1163ea12be8a5a90f458081c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00c5faecf0ba621d73116f01d2cc5ba0df501dc600ca7a1e8cad374ba8310411"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d62949666c81bc5a1a32bfa5129e1a0f60b7d28eff8a3f6d17463f54240a10ca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66b7f0e5627a2281d690d41e64d21d6922bfeca094006fb21142edb06fbb741a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5fd4cb5f597ec98f111d60e8df591068fe8061e89b6095cf10de709755c65f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"442cd93b7c3059347cc9aecdeec6c3ec7826d736df5000e011e20be84dfe497e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"799d4d2fecf2c2f858892b82455d12c75bff9a7c5f7669a674b0b47798d5b3a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa454c6a77f9cb489cf2fe55aa93474d33e8d1d66d011df49bfbf0cb20bec65f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"befbb0a044fa62267ed862ff79d2cbbc97b1c319b6d9346bc7cbb7ab155f6f3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"622e2864245b4c30f294a2de781e7b86a938685edceddb1cdc75e18ff701e1b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bd065ab6ef5ebf6b3f9e68f0f53b7badc0132023cbe0744ef1df5d4a468c1de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1a0a02bb7c70dc59b12533d3e493a187a971efa5bcfc79fe54f17923d8e144b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8aa08c75d92a2773663187fb067449c431cdc25f9adfcdddfb4e3c0ba62b7f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53199aef4c2cd6bc7140f912091778d52cf04479ae11ef58b9c5ecdcf8bb8f4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ca857b01377f22e1529e0b266e6a0d1f49e866a8bdffc1b655000daf98864b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfd09a61828bb9b55f9b6a57f84d27b25db959ec72be85cd6cde62429515ff6e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b7d7f9c386226277e7b0bdec16fa72287d9e58c607f926763277158fd66718c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4ccf94c60e347e47468fe74f8b1e180fa2d13dc3789af26def7076ad6cd770a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"298c458330452a976ce3d1f28d2d1a2f3bf8d34bb7db448bd06531a77995937e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b78b0b0e5bb0da4825b772ad0ef01c2100ab47a8e321de71c2812efa161d6c2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0f980ac0b71ca12b1a6cc2c30edf93323fbd4a2e98c25dab5c7477c973e9422"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8315a6497b5539b493d476bc65e17065a3632ce4c0d04668c1a4ad0512f6b47e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"383202a72778fe9bbf763f54f5564ae660539bd2887efff7bff8774606bca9a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6acd099f9db6927580545ec0cb07895d996bd1fb4b237fa81550e3967fe91f3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28e6a09d69b67877c9c05e33ecd044b34b564d9699c06d435ae2fe03e0dac19e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"576bd02b72496892907e5c33fea8aaa147b0cc1dbaacefd23373e50dcb25f7af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca8d63d57c88a46d6fe8c7db9c7138bc7e480572af65a289276dfdf530e00dc5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88f6f560b6e57ef420357175f6f6449ed52754c46f09c766748fa8936a4efd16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4176d246751a1b86b632aad4f31bc3b80d35b0ea8b06d16cf85a09b83ec708e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f4f61e603fea8cc94abf02a4b15cc3fe86316854e18a354989d926e794b681"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ced1661d86020087546a2208db382f224b0b3adf11d828bf2d6eba284e4956ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad878ed31a970f7e9a28ea284e38c4155365f59829a2545b8889f084acb1411c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40d9af7db7d216fd5a596373917af55c34a2cb445afb53ad35a10f27eab04de4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffcdd762428f14c566d1ef0af4b0cd2b9dbbab7b140bacae7766e4328c8eeaed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09800c7700de9a97dce029790f278282bb238905a339a6f2521aff8061b49e7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f415d568d2f7b4acb972bc6866acc41e1c77e172ff6882023a8a866f756caf95"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bdb762ac918984f516276eb32c5b728013315b5ec86892fc2a126b5079bd4cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"197539c217faf4ffcfae0528f7a6754eaf71e88eeddc187e7e7ba4b6362df5e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (58 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 58 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072d2669f3fbbc2019e2f4960759328cff67316e44b41b20edc732f928c6b7d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29a70233f7a3c7ac653f929eb47e63c82e34d954556587633a3d9df750141f99"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e280cd87a486563c50973bca557de71e63add1c41e8707fd236e97e70b00819"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"980b024abf0a54cc8fc5c593de9f55bbc968eb244dd13b218a5da442e48ccd03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c89fc51d913bf6352d81ba01e0ff2d688aba33eb8ba68d9446f276f4715635b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3f66b1707eadd5cb23d51db396b6bf69ce6de311b9b5820c145dc47e525b546"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2552dd4865c6b852f9a52265221f2ccfba7103a183bc7c2e0b52552876b76bbe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b6a833194633965ed3d9d3b25629371330e6aab8341c1aa140a948bdcd3507f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b014eeebb8afde8b269472d7860ad171963423e18aeb2febe06021e95a934e96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acb397beae909b592f33f6edc9720c2383cf133023c31a56fb85b1a36466e259"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55f3638559fcaadf1a8a39a2cbd302eaef4c5922905b8dff24da9589f9ee5b1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6e0355f42e247050acde6c6be67d106fe6be746c13fd05da5b2005379cc4259"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f671aca2ae5529159830ce906ad00c7c6367ac90eafff31549e0a98eda68d22c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"871419b94eea87b8c73a3927ad88437a253617177060761d42675647543af9e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d38ec61ab0c8ac4c3e5ae64b53aac63cb22adef0ef3f048d1f54af07161e687e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de4f690b73431b86224cd0fbfa84bbf6155468efe1a46ab99291a2f461493b4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ea7e89285d306da5d520e08529e94ea00adb3331d247aca965dde4ac9182fe3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f89be261ff61c0d9c172cc4d93538a0e04cb5b675813ec466223ae58e8bf0f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"105f503dac837ea7b52d329b6de53ef9228c63468217c91986e71d6dce2cb36b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dba5cb730d3a20b21cb629bc4cbec72268f28f97bdcb5f9783906938332b379"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a70539c6603da79cf8c6177eff57d33ba663eb9ebcfa4993d0cb9d39d8751d2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f5d8d3415c885bd0eab40eb4a5c1ff31c5e47cb65d64ef227df3d782b3a1c0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d04df512d9073e7d10faa80d91572e34ed1a5cc3d3c756bc3e512e854b6392f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"275c55ea0ecc748f172b8b5ed71a99d54a93bc7f01459463301ede1a39063bd1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05df7ead1797eabe4fbc18e4ddf97e44a4b59f03ea28fcc9d38c46251c5bd905"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a004ad2a9244bedbc1056e6afb37bd609ac28dc40b576295025733b0547ab4a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f9e846cc78eac0ac83628165947a50c16b458d91df9d16bcc5fcd24f8067545"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3542ceeb190ee1b7e82199fac2fcabdda1cbcb664994e70728c09f1742c0525"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"848b7d44c2ec95cb03ea5b82b7f4b9dfb3edbf257c174c00e4bb307689305636"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75197b9ec768f84a8a6e9d43c42954ea1d029d4dbb820c88ac840edb73de9279"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df39469e95474cd11622be0f5a54e8a41bd9107159a96c048c6b304d81d53729"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e2c7cc914d9856792f3de0245538260875b17b2605fd0e4a0b928256d916e47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c62c68c12fa490b5fc418cbb3b69bf48931cc9afedf3dd16b961b44ade2f6557"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fd1ca15adde337c2183c6326cdea53f45de63cb175a9938dcfc0f912366d7c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6328f09328c464ac48f0faca9099fc2ce78441308ed495d9b5bdb5fb72afd769"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa382f8e6d401884d6809aabcd941290ecc05f03cebf6f840d12ada82bf58f41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb98c5e300e14d03b12a30ac506e677ea9d12851427a0906497f0bfb6b687c7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f4ab30e2f72c7c333c7c30a0fbb3c3ed94b651f925f1831266b66bff505823e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99c9dfc1f199581f3fd9483a4b2b25710f90b38ad83370515760dc75b049d979"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffdce05ca2123c031647d7db6ec7416763b6fadafb965eed2e022a950bc497d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5280d518c49a0672f10db5693da9f335c705b54502b86f69d7b09b042f899423"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d8a37f81b8699bee5ce892551b8d6964901829e253e5995bc69636b8a65e4c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73a4eedba30f6636dd6f5db51e0d52b854ad70ea615ba5a0a6f1bd1f0a9c4b77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70508d7641c61f49ae65f98bc19f3a74cf995ff2f793c4d9a06c46aa8c274940"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96cf20fe5c79e62611af2d17ae3170c59f7750648e9083321a26d0bdea8dcfd0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ce6eb3497c1b694d30e0f9bd48443f52727215177c2fb7288f913019f66d74a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a4bcd8d58d34d8dea17c9291053d5ee5018f86fe16eb7089c12e232705fdb6e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af0c7f131e3b31c362b41e52a9b95389f5101fcf6c28d152ab5d0e217288238d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbfb07345dadb1d1c798e81eb297dfb1086f3dc62487932202f9b880ca7ef44c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31b9a6957f48da7362f83e477ef46f7609af00e29350eb0c61dca7dca3b2b915"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b93d99be6695a56c581387609ceaf50e359c5d636f991d5855a7534b7a573b1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3a41381ef80b7d4fc463830bed75753abdd5d1c13e4dcd446d0910b167dd0a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1073864a65ed87d5d0a493d493b1cfb440aaacb6f75860735ccd8f983e37e52e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f9839992d3d2aa887b8707bb1e0c42932e50639000f3317f732a6c74eac9071"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8789c07f0344765fddf4fa8db5067255d0030ffd93f04e976a96c72d8d159c48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4130e27975d6aa30d9eab884a95aab2ddcebb6bb11f17c3514e76c1f157c585"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a489116f5cd585acef5c7758acbcfb13ac2f2f28aff4fddc697d484d167d642d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83a0aacb2612c31a3b5bab2bd8762775514ad4c0b109512b47f65657d1e1a2d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c6fa5cb30857a041eafe7ecddee5b49722fe3308d2acb9f075faee0f2fec0d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c8ba0c5ba703421150f1c8a5476b52d9fd2c84d132c523e2f969cf426a21b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af0eba31ce1e26099169b5e9d65dcbcd1f3f5e036f85ce95983ff7e3bf9e91f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7204c5ac94e43b967a8420eff056bffbcc126d10608d4e1adb1a1b4193e01c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"852edf7bdfdb0929f2a453efafb82ee5a0d3da3afb480eb7154328993be47697"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2688e34581cf6e281d5d7d9e21dd0272ce4a7c7b7782c9865c42226a89877e04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c7ead7018a682eecef843facff41593cd5bb273ee158fb773be9c4476569c48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc44d66fdbc2301912a4393a81d1667460bddec9f54d6ccd0920276e71f07866"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b876775de83d01db81057410db54b6a2ef239c9389db63295225c18ae0b174ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e935073061af07b780c372ec409062d16625ffe4a2352d6458f72b96de2e9101"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a016f1ac4d07d40b6a3088c2675fe7a3fafd11b3de52d5d0ab89b022dddc8097"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be7053cbda7d63c59b77f26dc2e2bb90819a4c8181705f8cad679b3aeccbe82c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b980fcb3ce1bbc9526328ef78308902db2a9a4e8873cf419ab058ce2650d20b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"052e3bda527651703e9008fdd9f8ea52ef902ae759b46fc974b3c797b37907ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70ba6ffa0c65d1d33574d01ba64dfe550daa551bbeaae7c0ab732debee4e4312"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ed8016af110dae3a6a376d5f5b236bdc483385ea4aaeb7b8c1c9868c11c7014"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (82 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 82 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f63c1a7ca30b0c0b274961ee099e2b924b7b404c18ca9c30deebfabfb0241a9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (76 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 76 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c6e009d00289745009f15fd060ce4e0f3d537828a0313d4c950d78315d0d327"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (76 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 76 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68ce4f234de07f1bf9f00c87ed11d848312998ae7a70d539c19903709a9e3078"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (76 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 76 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c53926ab73f0d575773e9bbde9197cc356796a76ed72f1ea7177ef632e755130"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (76 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 76 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16eb39906a1289a546f2680ad5d4e094687da543a69fa2682cc63669b2f87c8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f457a8df1621f489b1d861ae99a51490518b50ffa0e43bfc0b158b350b177a96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (81 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 81 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9002f6e930563c79722d71f339294c4d63ab44cdd07e9b7f5576fbaf28547be7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87bb7e7d01de93aae144434b3823e1fc38610f325888ebf33aec6acb73edaf36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11d2345077ea4e7fe75ce6ea02508bd6c427ad5b9e6fbe619dbe2a5179f6ec86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7061c43a91fd6ef839fa57647cceaa94df72c3e05b9f79031858774d6e9cec8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d1df384304e0cd29f411149532f6ea8c13bbc8a49cc2b0e4699323a2e3e4868"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:18-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:960-1039 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a970e908eb7c978f375b3b3b851d53f79cc91946285704ded21952a32d5d56ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"111ab55e6cc497b41a6f3ae050394447ce8849866bd864872d7b28cd405629a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2fc2257c7a9dbc396f258bc09d4897a0e7a5beed74d3a2a9d8da06ca86d08b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8aa8e55383b1773467107ddf55acd3af0200d851a4449b19bb2d947a6e1fb179"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c75be7dc7e1a4ddfbedab3b7081b2b35e73b1928935482096977ca582ab31755"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4324ca8ec680ba4335c6a96dbc653c00f11bf05006fdd16d432860ac2b48a61"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f405a39a8f3266e8087ec9b49431e745b8080a5a961b098563635f4fdf13536"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba45d6231f48e3f9441c05d47aab03bcba2b7d8f7c04d9bfadc3bf89c26fb00d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12dd80b35545eb22f97d9610ac3c54e7723ce62fce364b8b965ef5f1ec67d521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9929e7a0c2e3ba70b9257123f9a0c92ea38ea7d31dc431c22aa5c2d7972dbf3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81c0e34ebf336c5fb9a44ead1df9f4156c326456f192263f1904b8b22a246d35"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c4e97f3a8719f923e55e2f1c8a0c1a1010ccae73ffbd2a98f0c4b01b8a30647"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"971dbea425e61abe5a7b75cb3151ce065a17dbe4a08ce586ea16b8e7795fc1a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2b30f1facb65b7ddeb3c4b7ee5c8b37cb7a2541f1d15d0e95ade2f88c594479"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cc737b4206832abaa595922803dc4de3d174418db6226d2f8d5a58521829308"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03cb51ce08cc6580f44d380b7226770f32e7d2e3a99243dac0d31bdf6e04f93e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3efa411043229490af4ad4a373d48c3e7ef2c2ec98468a890ac235826ebd22a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f6bc285f03a7edd8110259283fea79647767c30a8f436baa5d84b7694d4bd05"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc32b30110c37564c0ef0b7532b3a0f3ab813d95d16699845c4b908a20a6039e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5be4bc6df90357bab2b3e59a3e7dd9a552c7a3a2700d353f50df8c36ee65eaab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fed3cc5f42bbd5fa576a2ffe5c27e497721b4817ece023948735a6e39db42834"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b700dd07898eb3212f3fdd61f99a61d23548e2f7026ea91d23305a5b7833d535"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e243a6ec783a3190dddaa50194e6811f755224b074805296aa2e6a8d16a793f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26c15691393fcd8b7331a295b089383bb4be947db32588de89c97fb1f14aeec3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac476ef3c31ed4e4ec026f9965221008ddbed373e7e4f548ea1890dcce39343b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a3c90e346db29d3a61a93e637b3d58dd74f67df02ab5fb4d6e124e1017a65b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d99d9a55cd9a25297211cd3dc6afbfdbb084297f8eb9629e4dd473c43ebcdc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a748d81c50fd8b925d12c5ec6c8be92c4d41cb83d534fa96d219e4e8f884d0e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0556587ee3d0d333444d972662a48b4a8ee7324ccb7cde33cbefbac9304a1bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea4fa3d7105c4f7e543031074492d7a30f6336e7749e6232900046bc933acb8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcd3fee0058a9d9e1260be9b7abd3f564d39e91a34850d5c65edb43aaa91955a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f4de8dcd92040b551c1227137a01fd6785d1427a9fc38d8e8dd7df66a9abf92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c238568b470652271eba70856cfdc95edce7bae298574285c5c396adc73c30ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2610ec0801901ef79ff7ae52e7f7fc96337292a178cc5571f40ad6e9e7a04ebd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17662d1260e4dc6dc0900ff69afda6dc34d6f1a93582393137c7bcf4c9e576ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48da173d848aae137bc60844c6eb3bb491da959e8dec11db1f3d22004d87014e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"465af8182046c0152c06cc6a12b2a1cc7221cb0fd3ef90ec991e702d5c3b9573"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d889a712a09babb0ebc6b3fa606116ca58012cf99963c62e96690a4d29a8c15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5a493177048eb2d46b83f5478eb9b3bf23c398c61c157fbbfaabf671a602211"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbf04e3e73cfdcb056507980b01626485917d83ff5cad186b945616d2f97ed7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"066d752a3b32d99b83e3bc20bd3307e55ffc60a9f85d3a093265594482ce2d22"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d3a86ff4392e58f56b6bdcf735a4054928144361c9aea1db66e629484dafb3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac637ab8fcc2f0b53f1567cc0d099eb48e778dde3e045f6d1116baaa2b7d51b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06006254f11d8e2a5411d35fe0ca49f17b6098502abf55fee20d69fe7266aa73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64c8e750df80294161040cb8833dee94939008cf426a30019e266e5a35e23cbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99678a203090d2b062987957e4e58261ee883c72f23760eec803608aea837490"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"563c30d7f585b1e35c9620f2c4b5016f1e7e71fe366a695dd33d2ca16f97f596"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74ba072575d77b2b51cd1f7e3fe2c1ddb43cc403b8c56966bdce929112449cbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cbbceda8053cd58bf12e8b49190092ac68c986eb4c056e8a8058193f1c254c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94a40b971ace57f87d2ba232e6a813a0da6b4552aca7aa5227dac982dd726829"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0da3278d177345bb41e911a06d196d9939c3124e580ba4272dab8de3c7d7cf45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"648ca8d9a2cbfd48a3eaab9880261467d1444ddb0f4f1600889066eeb18ceecb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c073999d51ff1bb9282c144cff9a4113567a384694635ae10d628682163f7681"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4efc125b0aa0259b9c3f39b5ab2c927639d477badabdd42e85263e25633083a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cdca0f580f3b0dec84773b815d317ab12de79738188fa6dcd828dc63933723b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63b01ec06756e0dc3844de1140572c4f0c1eda8f0cf6f618c2bbef9fa9d1fe84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95d42414cbf7ebcc96f8b5ef795459eee21c0060b99dbd2abc5b04ca3e53191d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9584aa5da155d437e51f6361f927014cd6ffd05d52d30c97cf147fc2a17fef40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abafa2c481fa599d1510f9b7850a610b59576b7359bbfa7016814e85ec35285f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"989651bcc64ea8100ed489e51fd6fe8b51bdf3658f241d78bc4125d5bd4107c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c0f745311edca2031833784fab4ebf2bec73fa34d664c56db5bcfa7413c32c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76422fa83876849c6455ae049d1a7528a9bc0e158d767a239badc396873c083f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"184d6fee6140e52252445fe676c045a0afbeebddb99d0bdee4f8ab19269a3783"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"285e8038feeb1366e88e25dc98a185c58f5ad78ef00d407916a899d8f207e856"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d727f36c70914d8d3caa451e02d869c2bf91a4642ca42843ea7490b774b662e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15c85ba8585bd6e84c095721092e957c3e8df2f4b011ac12e6afd6826049bb33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07e7f10e0bea193917d45c3fc1f0b13b85b3e2dde38467cc366578f0b0e3485e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f636b6188f73bb13117f8a40fce165f7591df03e5af5b725e1f1eba790073faa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8943eb5573b81e834f8060f246c1c5d7234fbe07d2da67a1fd1a538e2d8e92a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e234006a847fa1ee65a49f5001e1bb2a969b70a54da95e0539f96bca898d197"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e0b39f164841fd55eb5849b7b364aae3c54988df4a8848b4d6c39986840d0b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b6653bc38a06fda6af6e7e97baf0b19644ccfcbb9c55a0c11e7fd9f00b1f3d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6dbfac40d5c8551a1a4a14bb11f0fd88ecfeb596c9ee9695966e70e4fc47efde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0278e80951332de9a319181197eff0134da0ee05db88d473ca2df3434bc377db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0d262ab475c5bb4b3d3bd7d33da5c5f59a723d4af161d338d9d0a678b8b2bb6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0246329bf42b84c9128b46109af9a2ba938558a33dba9a80ea15b875af11f720"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8675f8043376ba81cf50cccbd1184b4fe4457ef90b9ff8d90c71400d148c4d44"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acaacbfface850ef4dd099d85ae5227f075bdbfef6cba34f4bc308ee2d44af1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09d386517e70bddd8fde4f34d034edf7eb2c97511e140b71af5cce1f890692da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1b37a8520e2057b9b3f01995a2ca70e90aab6db959275ce485fbfa24d08fdd0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81a63e83464fb76f555cd63df8475f23ef30fd9a4b1028b2617f12a493e584e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7bb9b38f2a22243303cdd6c4748aa42f64fa73d11df27ff75aae6a0b277cd2e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"490275abbfeb9ccf40ebe179a5692acf891b4dcc1d3efa62eb51f18662be7d74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ac9dc2d485255bd71e306d4ed78381cdfaed831baf4669643a2142ca54c54d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"471721971bc0df2062aefb233b570dbf1cab26bc4a0c26550aa77f2c565afdc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cd6afb48c8c6ee7dbbdc8dfcacf0df1ca6cd73d3644291fc16ef0a1a1074ca5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c59b5f4d1d05b8b4cf26bdaa79c0fbcdee71362de05b7632c5fb063f7f17a938"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55bc26a3069ccf33a8deb6bc00d3c3b840f5f4f0f932e6aae80039ce2431cb8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9287d852071fa908491e63ec01f5e9cbb417bc24c2e5bdaaa0ca4ac197a7160a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"462ef05cc5128bba9cc08af76a02cd34025ebd8f9b0fe7400ec442409ba3cea0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"684f707ee8a7201d2510cddd136b7c77ead16f5b8741e11b81057e7a83c95ee6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ae54ca9120080842a7513f916328dae0da9bd288e0f0055b6697c68b70d16d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70b3538d169d29d171537c0d8bf1951ed503561621bd4e47a39932719c15fe1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a97bb55b85c90f72f0413a6c37e8e8d5b742399367536434201f635495a7fe9a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a89b734388f0b5de8be3b9804bb27f410f96c96de883f6c4841350d03f7f78db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"562bc758bb820e547acca1897e1bfbd8af127e71356b8c68d81f7d794cb196f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (87 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 87 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"166924194a6dcd65771d95d59579dd1a7e59340b5e1bcb4f0d1f27f9b03a3e8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"248bcc48b207c4f5dea4386b1ef71c480e0d3d68d05d945a737aaf52db1716a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7eae0c34ec58e0ae1e27cfc5577a490885bc1167996c3744a9f00588a80cf7cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d7f775c800b61f7e8aac48d085523f37dc98f92996512f2edbb7f980d4d619b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8001b4089e03c61da766e21df75e790e5f2e2a08884894b6957c0d30d95acbf6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf8cb9a0219d15e418ba6804422ea7a8e72aac28fdacc66252f87ed68fcb5ef4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb255307b605d709cd21964d5d4408bfe23ccc7f20968568ecda49731325a09e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eee9fa6ebc597a54c6ecf161b9889df87201c0557aaec5761189015ff31c03fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d24a1157b2125707a375b232a76ccffda9c855f595475e81f26b605b63028147"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9593f33b0d1d9aa9f470caf10907537c03290611baa5d62e0e13467b00eff16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da570af5a22445df1678d0deafad379803e17ed62c53a2d85c4d4c2754e730a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81886e5aa335c7b8b61849104dc06ad2868b1a0803a8a8702a14c41ec115d906"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e754c479564d024cb52da0294a538b80c84ea09b3dedb72cbf50899efbd77ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55d495eb2c6d9e2e892c8d9748081ed31365e2a765149ba2a610e47b7c18c94c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967c0611960ebdaec18e327c2eaccd2a89aab544c1c8ec4a2c10dda95418ef02"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c46274131a9409eac875e1ced1fc16b0d2d481ceb088c764aec3bab68cf9077"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:96-163 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:167-234 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c24e797bd913060bdada67474a8b2a24778729422be4f90a7b569c43bef71f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7c857704ef8173ced42c8341e907a2a34cbd44bab51f473986150ac43067b1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc75b7c6e7d8b86fc72a35e99837283bcf70c8a5fb80f0a1a4ded811f979927f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3ed340d538c46c4d0113c8d6d27b1820a1974302e316020d5bc85beb2d96058"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1124a9cbc2d214a27dad9a80a243aa57789fab8c5c724feb992ccf3f34f3580d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cbaa359673222ab3e538bb0fe354eaf8c4e820bfa1d6aeb163eb834ff06e1d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"950bd98560d7842adc6e59da6903f127569f32c9dbac2092ee53c1413477e11e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6a5be2622bd84a8a6e943348b54bc342a288441a06377bac18a4d55176819c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48dda7b977b8f6e7db00650bb3b0476f19935ec3da7cb93a7f087f0044982ebf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f4d5aa78e714c8811b91e79e334c54873f05568f884bed57b72f15456b50376"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b938aacebe06e942463229a1cb34b5e1383663cd7d518beab9a50aee0526d7e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bc6a22dcdd2d7acc8eb0ccbf146544303978652853c84905a1bf6593f69bc1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e2b9101c137a8857a8a4b535b201b053840ea12d75f0819e3585455d9e6adfa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1b647ad379aa5c10cb6b8e8fc9eaca71f23028077cdde8a50c5ccb55300b6a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f89f52a4ddaa941866ad583eea4d18d09ac624b3abbb5ba66d567300f4f2061f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca99566c57a60a817e4b4ea3bf7f12fc78771dbf54ab3195346953a716e83e15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"316c62733c5aca55bb489a638e4fded90b0505c7dcd4bd9462a40382d78a9346"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4d28febd325caa25d0204988fae1395c64c8842b88e3eb03c89cf7a349a5b77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"499dda422b1cfefb4646213cae5c2a30154c87e7923c6775a3919b8afd1c7592"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py:15-78 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py:82-130 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91bb32d4862ebac070ee9c64e24b9da059fd8376e0fd846612175512324b8588"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7bf35023bb62190744c5c215ecd810e6dedc974f5569b4bcca06219712ef11c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2422 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d61673754c9924a5184cce1fb31ff75814b91d2e281504cd403b18c783e58949"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2455f82ff1a7bc8451b5017f84ebaca4f75a269508e1016e4367e52e38359b70"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6d80e2a23f7bcc6489d5dacd64c672ed8f0bf45723c28a7a22bbc89b48358b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44160153c2e2467c666dd02ac54aa2d556e5545b1a24a4fa22cf285df3398b4b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e7991d6facfdcbe7ea62f8e5412fb021f991f7de4421bb53f53a75187a64cc3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"facf462432b004172ea59863fdc5a17b36dc6583b988d928522d7e62b004e24d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:16-92 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:96-163 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1773d687e01a53fb997d216b8392d442e189202bfc44e2eb9736d748753e1fda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:16-92 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:167-234 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb534837fba1983e956880533958f9f0f923b65aa50119214c4d2bdb57df74ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:107-195 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1e6d74a4e20d2ea244b9e4e7bb1f6fb53caf2166670c262c83e6ddd6307708b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23620bf13804c918a357ba6f46a3f88e6a62ab6c1517c8d6d37c69b887e1dba8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e30ea0e8bf56d6d4486cfad859526bf12ca8890d75d60d5b99e685378415a54c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eaea35d3fbd33a92cc5bb2a64df6bdf964c912c98560d8af5eba6d067a2b87e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0304d1589926975f8a5d9cf8474766474ec30f9b54e74c2a5c04dc3db9420d4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"996e3955aebc30ce7079abe0dd8bc19462182165f2863f0591730340acc6385b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02dd57b36c8b2859da907834f4e2a93d499f3e631ad48b0a588477030f11541e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82d399d7e426d29ab92b01188d7087c324efe987eee632679e81d13c0ea3d27e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28fbf2fd7e61951a6fb3a3e32d41abeb6a4d4fe894f3a6758b02e8b602613ed4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"438503154cd83a93fb1f3b21c8d61526ffabdc2d61ee660d7a5b27ad78172113"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f05e14e76a7f918bbe06a385eb68cf45f0d434e5a63f0cdc1f318e7bd6530e95"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c276b352e0570b663d6e4a322b44a22295f24b13ed4f0076b5868c0487af24ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccc2110a6d402afe5dffdd1ff7f3c7c951685c83f9d84bb2e4ddc07713ab8032"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3761429f62fb0d3c6c68e0f42eaed51af71dab47a5e2a34d50563a3cabc37ac4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0d8d05837be276e3bb835b0705d2a44f316b2bd3077b51b569a7c1537f78e81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73edd58ec8385d844c2909a7497d54b182a5677bccfc21100a44d7821a2a0ded"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e69c38ec90d2b219eab5aece694b7b724f2e31408e86e964c79cce5c0513688"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"917ee3e7e1f29ea4b4b772c86413abcb6c6fab3350d5f3c113d075c681faa2e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c1101a216592a9870b07d55629ae43fd965ed80cc27dc2aa0e80d42ac52ceae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e7d6b48ea653725fb6bbe6d75c5126377e16c493e3865e8a329600674ac9808"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b7c93bdf42bbf1f4787d5f9e96c7471fce57bb3f54272e7bbee94c09b560c99"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb8b05510b53b64d157ba13774782c84b64f459d5c68d60bd3f8a76b6c860607"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"405c3380a50328ebee9cdacb9c41623f1ccd11d63404f399599f7cababe23f52"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e0c137fc038c16cddaf8d14cbfe85837c82fed0f73a9a90adf42378f651b5bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ac0a306060d2ee93c786b49fb38593109f6a084d216ef91c1fd55a6f7fdecad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"769f4c395984e4e4e050b6c0f818a338fc09c7046bf92f06b0e55f4a1e1e5c43"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e216059df9dcca6d83447095020b1f411de237524492547d5b47a724a8ae33e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a516cdee155209351a249e9e199516b58f4512fd037167a107a85fcaa5264521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6422c7209fa6d9790a0f342435e6b04fcabe67f34d14eddecf96a187eafab7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04caff7af5c7d2943aa3c85dbb8c3573a81274ad39d73a13d1204fa7e7e4252b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d54e181dde8eb7b766b724b6528825c9b50b61e4e7d52d8a2c9ccbaac562cd03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2473340f6370663f64985fa11db07cea169a5ce937176055b493bdbf7a9697f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebbb4082b16056e24e4246c1b829422640b22fde2dcbd9bb52b4e98b0b439d4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a80c26d9612ffc4842115d06f0f2419ccfcc34bc7b19f4a5aa49f8b742afd5d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"007d69d922e47ef697ef777c9f2a5ce6047805e59c94b0bc61e021c2c57875b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f1f248385453f7de240ea4cc025bdb8de9904b0af52580ebda2276ee4fa1e6d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd5b60d62095eda72a76bf434d8003481b761365f44f28fe54acd184e95b33ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f005a430b6b0821b67124d4aa86c9e5903bc88f9ba7234da90694999b2a0c8eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acfaeb769e6636fffe8318678f81b8ad62acbecd39e6ec2df0947d43e0b537f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f22134ff948ade91e0aabe196eb48eda3d6f477d9905e555b504dd61328de919"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"539b72c69f2f392c7c1f5fba68f5669b16ef7a453efed5052129d45f8054de27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb9fcd3e74e1fcacc2f27b87edfb8079ed3f9e4f8a9e819722f4d39d2a8830be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77c7c0e51232861af08e1bec25192e771a9d020ee70aab88b1d027beabd0e5ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71f3a27d57fd275a6d60b16ae23ab8ba400bd4ac1014389bef2d902a436008a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acef84a40e56d870265cb7ba5e3fb2c6be31d2634332ea4bdf1d655758eb00cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59bd19b16890c07fca6d459e71ef8f0d2bf50d0792d98adcc6bf9b87bc94593e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"666c7c016a8cb5be328288d4c4e0013710c66081f3e259af41ac05d0090ce610"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0ecc479a220094f31f04c8a49d4f17eba6d8d12e55ba2b840e8b453094b29d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (72 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 72 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d892fb2828e6c89bf127c9eaae948016f0c244604d41ae34869b7e23602b5d68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2156f3edfb27261b3a578ea051611714fd1c4eaef2d06554821eaa98b6a124c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bf3276d4b84f480520923c8c183e6c761a697ad533c39d403ef58e15c51f7b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a4c3cc97a072b6b32e9b68e2fa3767bdde6aa427990c29bc823f89961723685"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"411311cb980a4407bc35d21840b9e8d3cf5d6fce3f53f0e5c60a1ff35298d3a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bde4e79134154788db66e9213f457cbde33c39aa45df7d12f1923da628acaac9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45df6b6d2965d58e8d041a7418baac5c013742e9913fde52ae69f97de78468e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e34e983a3307426e9f6d74eaea32c901cc475fe3bbe92a4a22a2b40d4b427f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b78bcf632c91680383cb4661f7d042c7cb556581d89d9f7aa0c95a1c08c2d48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a291ccca9f6778b8b70209f5fc805ca208e8d7c6578a09164a9ae310c223875"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4af454c41ab227df18fb81c205dcb4d7a7485245fee6d0faaeed349683157a00"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7160b962760d66f9e1c048501e233275155107a4e1518c69ad68038c863af75c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0efcd9340f4691f4cc2a15c7011ed20856f84db92259325227b5a4bb32b669d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09aeafe617e3e079506b1a5769b450c414b1cd02a0cf62c6869692b3ba9f0aea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e84e6765d460a12d75e8d6b11c944f04a2d3bc148c1bfc70724b618dd21510e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49b3ce6613a12ceda4774b40e270189aed4315fff0ae2340665d83333030e23e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f45f68fea298cbf84c70241252f2670feb8e645285bb543c3e22e1f1fc0be08a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97cda620ed7dbb5abe62e321298c6d635aa1f71fe75165bd76d0fc8f851eb8cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"043a261025e9dcace9fbc93d5ba23d54d060e667190d1c9bad59fd1c4dee8023"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6dc35e20b00f444da05960677af71503565c6d22071c7e445b6ebb89140e1f8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1733560f985a3ded2d52b3df64dc230127fa5636cf19c9a185f523ff164ed1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4973e1d8a26af1792fdc46d0a28516daf7897b6f1561cb470e4becc794567578"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6436311e27438c269149d9220ea7b8ca11425d198d8a87b403761fc6d90249d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-399 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a6fd92e97b6ad632600beb2dd18f96d69152c7fc0f26809bbc1b3c7dcd41308"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a316c1b8244aeb511e16310f863b8e3b96f9d916572392c1489f177ddd3f2266"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d36aa378854ebb3e659b8333a8eec12b24b990954ae58da0487d3f294a0b0be2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"203d856537f03211c1e31d5f0d69cb6ddb33136d7cdfed46046483d1e3959983"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fa609a448b2bcc3a1c5061658e8e01b76fefef59050048ba40a521ea1fe7f71"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fec560cedb083e985ce60794d417e2a450100b3dd4295c4bd48bc59d82c09200"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f788789455659162e6ba28508976313ca947500bd913293166ac18b126b47523"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcdec3dbecb61a0c60079e5dfdefe5af2cf65dcdba13db21d988bf1e87ee899c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb992167eb89513fd4e117e11e43f8f2e7c458bea37c741d624d27175322e2f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"230f83559108dd964c6e127542018bc8a1f6f438fd8ccf4d4c3f4e3b96285bef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"209ca84180261a50b943de424c177313585a87887c540834293a8fe5bb863876"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"866d39b48530e224f131ea5aaef750580c5054df866a2919cbdf0c47022a7098"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"181bd1944182eaa5848b724c4fd31ffc33cb0e9e4e620f1e34b0b99fd0f6be51"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b16f22b75fdd889f24fa24f34dfc638f935b0e03ae02b205c1e7f814b18cdb9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f357f0a9a5a7945ec5efb7f40816a5f94fa4a4311ae5bfea56dcba71ce1d2ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63cf957d3ace1289b941a028b74e781a668d2a239f4d0a6bc20b4859753cc4b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e93bc5b4eb055de47e22bf9f17af54033a5ddbea4a2744d744eeba69f2e2110"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3cc7beecb443ab6834825f8b958b7d65c67be671546e4aef378244fceb0ed81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4c01620efeec76c73452c07d3f06b5ad2bc329719659e8c1b45eb370b811cf5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dae2dd3c74dc359ddb7d6528364e3bed1130c92d2ed045844929c847d3cc49b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:161-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07971d809c961b4cd8d3fee757f3da0b79c096a7b9652185200f2d505f2bc1a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b38fb3f03d85dddc5bfa7f441392baa5667d55916fbd0281fc96d4488af6739d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f185421fd122b7f7d9ec8f41688390d91ba87948af94e5cbe92a2cb50eb645b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abf7a8b650856f7bb95cd3afc8aee933b3fd1f60d3bbd60d78dd7120c8dca5d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"591e166ef744a5444de43db91e8fd10195b46a68521a1757d089fc9dc5a210ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8a906ebe4b14b40d7c6e7cb2293c2cc4b81d6f7dcf2a5adafb89a3590e14313"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"619dc8718d3257658d1aa3754a1f5d12cb96c3328a04af977934a22e7c49fdd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19e36f5246e3b7116a1d664df599a275d0e5e655feb27aeb41408c263e3c9589"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"171679c98765640836eb65b66e76a8f76e1d4a44b08b39b572ddd1643c2b8dd1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4303f8f0bed99918229d4a1383cb863e0bc8ba8b4c4307b6299e9c7854399125"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a01533ae2491f4275468c1d680bbcf22025c5ba0e08bfebfb1f0d4ef6cd92926"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d27253813ca809a134678416de6155de256e3467afa23985ef3375a58f1c066"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8443c8f9521ce8a9ad42509f9a3c445c7c7dde58629d0d7135a95f5feb130a93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3df90e2d2caa2cb023a71b29fc8d747cd3bc03e86b805867758a95027e661f0e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3bd1b172375d69a63d3c62c3a1590d3e23470b4b401f8f2aa8a158dde6e5d84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52ff239faa7738a9ea92030b3e89dc5ee20e1d6cfc4d5ce55ff354aa294262bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab5fba765557edcff975738ea717ee8b3ba01254540d82c3502ec7c6e2ac6217"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6251088db1d9aee1844ddbbd562e8dcb9926877b8291d4e73f116aa0c6a3ece"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8568e98ac117ba7b2ad208e3255a3ec4119fb5772e22edf23ffb7d31e62910ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"918a9c2cc111e98c50ac7afc803e9b60ee93058e65a0bac82568bbcf59eba320"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c86322b8ca1c4ddac3c924ad49888519d0dc5fb02fbd3ac1368ebe962414f4fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"352756b4b23eb29369ade34ec590554cfb7b2e203c582e67fd215558e97eecfd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84a87bf6535b1239f62d2a837e040197746f24fd3bb5f9193c3192b4001ed3a0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53590bbdbcb3e07b9378b9734c6573cdfcc72dd3390f3a724075467805aabc04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb871604b12e5aedc97b051162ee24ab8c37e498a0050bc869b22b74baf43c9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66a490641c3f072a81a8301fc5b01db96c83b7512429b1d4020d53ea050d389e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1dbdecc3d59e5439c41bafb824ca39d056cbdaffed771e1ee02c17194e580462"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd5d89ea70c237b2a8ec9c59cdcf42615faefa4bf31163cfd28a132799aa7ab3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"707489142a6a5f26ffee3f73f7259b32cff8765df4fc7193b4ba2ad7a858f18d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99e21bd06f4d328da27f48bc1732ec7df76bfd761f6f8a1df078884d601f3644"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"854130ec4a2894204967b366979c75806215613524d1f105965bbe536d89e922"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b9fb87487c9c08ceefbd5224d14a2834915ae5474b4911907095777e852585a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b3ea22f5cba6f27f79aa7aa43a4aa6b011122c2322c3727640c4937edb84152"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5103b3cb7635eb2f570ca5669bb11fbd901933eaa5e407ce2597c0ae5894f0f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa72f36015631d65b4a1ebc62c850ba8295f0a5002197bc5b52ae7e50df9d347"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84fbf89456710c1b0f76aa48af3a3040817d33c9b65f612582bee0008e864bc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92345cb32f7d08a7e042d6b8216bf0b17b3f90e63fe96be532eb4416b626a9cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fc4cc87f251ffa6037eada8e0985a0a2157e712a93826683816f4816e2790e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19a88af7bf6cd386afb898811496edb03b57a13a0f09f11c1d7d24f5d2dc191e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"091dacab13a4854fd7f745bdf7fbc4fda5302270f91b3061fc3f4866a748272a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e0cb8f2bb9a628b253bf1f8664d9861df9ae7cd07d7aedee69a95553b5c2dd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12c9c25901cfdfcfad221033a5ffb1715f27d58df684bb076d2cff2eff6a2531"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2052b5694f3211823a472561e473037ae058c75ffa0583aba9bd8ec7e3d941a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd80e77df9c0adb186887577f5e61615b7c80241c7100d128e5aeaec20adafc8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c142d78bba57e3f24771d66a14dd38159b145da9d77db15251ca155d25944986"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec1c7e72df9278316b6ece490c10b3f0f4ff034472b10c3830da17870e669f54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5167d8356858833ef353866469be44d3ee135aef54dbb7a27df4604ffee786cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44472ca33c660032da886d5cb2eb8d334c7eb511f01642ad3f0ab16e1f0610ea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecd07f0279e5f9a992feb39a6f83bfd9eb65603daceb58a367be1aba3db16982"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"380e91fcdf326b1da0d581815ac76aa097c74cf3c91ad769a965aa619edce85b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5377381e03b9813857528eeb79eecd0dd5e31aef4f67acf1e2ea6b0549203cd2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"828e91b3ab27de3a14c64a998b09fd9f436b9729343015b11f18b030daae077a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"768c0b290aefd47d6c3276c35ef4de78780629855f7ab915b4e4d8cbf64ed757"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"825c9a73732ed8cd46ce4f01432a302dc9b9042676b8105485ae0369dcc3e175"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3d6b0916dc1be5d508d43fe5ccc3e9a1d2ca20e21cbb1300299b7cbf2893aa2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82a9e0e44e90117106c2ec695f918d8427116a92f3f9ef34867e83f6c8c3c802"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35d494347891f50c74595796f9763955486f3330bfe32815f9ee77dd4857ad81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d8b91c150d2b10e8f966584c0c68613da79630e2ccecd5ebaea64fc1088b197"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac49f38698b40afbb54d598f6c5f7f2e01dede3692c12fb69e1de770282710dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"972fd114310ab62be40d6c2c0cba2e3acaca38d8d2fdf6cbd8c57377d6070551"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8563cd17c1af1075a4492e720951a0d2ef6c4701d388fcc8dd7a229a57ff5593"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b865d4ed0bb2214be218313d4352108ebb00d38be6b126cc50427db915e81b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3aa837f0525f978417dc9f92a46ce0c0bb72e223c01b4a9790ee87e69cba51ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6c47ab8028b14bf048725f52ba2b84b3ad5ffbac9ec815d1b663113b5a0e51d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d42e200684cad587561c9eae212adebd1d70c8e207d8d2d054db909cdafa620a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de024a01baa570aad60721f6b23c0eb14bcc65a41708f68b687d28d333243402"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e88c3ca58af44c0c19edc2f29f287c79416559510b40874d333da4d953cc329"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b5d56cf9bad6527c3660f54ed0722db17f5f2de17b7864fa9be33ab5ac43b31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dceac8136093df135c837d1ed349614786973dd90399844098405c5eb09bc92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"399bc9b1e33a2e4671a3601f553e3adff4c16eb182dac001b0d5d3e94b8282b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c53e5b7c73d08642e854ae9605158a6c707056f0a2be2ebbe4d4e27a364c422"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"029dc9ba824090785e3e965dcce82ee3d69850638926bb9c07ed15b1fc93f9d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e12f78c7c7805ca9a6962172266a316aa07d38ecfa4cdc1dc27756c96899eda3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a1b2a9cea11b064a2fdcbded46e492196bfd764526538f44f718271b3031546"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25361a224282e4366712534e679d0fdfa7a98d36049fb996d51bf71a48bead0a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a4221488c90d4d006db13dbfc86a0d58bae4e14d0899a541c790ac19de3412c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68713c28836d326dba1818f5b08490536790f39385eb27c0a1c975c7d1edd926"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4d78e4348a47576e9f77c59ac4c76c573342f3637e0dbd7eb057d63bc0c9e3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a8095de8bff052dccb33d7b06788a619b21579b8915f68166e4eab69bacf567"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"befb5c0e9f060fabe2508b839b66da113ad44a2f09937b98755984d275e2e630"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4695b42340767ecd88468b482b02e688ee174f69c17fff289e1c78719a6788f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"caeb88f0f66c72023bfe16c504e7a0a2687eaab589f80b5214f95fcad2f0aec5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d7afb79102ff628821dafc3d6a5b601777d7a1357f47d04019e058142dfdc4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a3d6589b615bc2bd5b10f6f5c714e72906060925588f1f5af0508882b146424"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86644567e93fda0bdb2d0c895b978be91170877d27487ceafcb0f6bf01d6fc93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7faf38c1729b6bf2f19073efc4ba8a6aee071a4ec80250326330a9d347e9c030"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65b9e4771fdf96d916a3ed3688e3f05499b04b553bb9b8f18b0cd65258fe8dd3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f2560a8f8f108a2331d2545a2146945f7e878ead1c47e1e265211d50fd752a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6504e61b34f084e8088f88b5482430e0207c251a9f0a52b762fd5ce3fb4e338"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"991cf6583bd939da95d4073743f1ff224e63dd6f3d1bb2e6c0bddfcb826a0528"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68b8a2289c8d73c1c03d24c0af4900967798e5576f76a667a4a35c9ee1e4af2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05e1ab239ec7e9b2a5306514ffbf4f9626bc8c24cd54823ca182a5e542201b4f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3157b7dd4ea5efa9ff41637d0df8caa4d298102e1eb1576c91f7bc6f872a66ea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b22e652db7d6a7b08640e9f598ffa90d84741907c6d9c33660fac8574e53d4a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9400d1a5b548c9faf3926b08a3f58b04727559be6314d5ddeaee130b8dfdbb3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b02bbee71af0ee2da206b690265d99979f95070108e0f3d4f983884de4cb9dec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2feb58554200adf691fa47d660f6d7e0adb99bdbb77abe4fbc0da4b0fbdac3c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9d87e66692054054f36698eaebb67da3faf06a3ebbfa32f2ff7ac9a7dc4d768"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"960d37e8282cce62fc4e18f9e16d334cca7e301fb22d874a25be76c93856435d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"249f5cc8e38ca0cb947bcb847804875557ad9e5195f986996287ab783c2b4232"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37cdfc4e7fb6ad5fd7b287750a106ef3a4e11bf36767140917242d05d9ee845a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4d8b5c4d330fa874a519fc979fe20087eb9528447aa7f02d76d36f246b1511f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8853b07e1d65336eb6278cced32469211d3a3107e0bf7e52b49ee5eec622a4d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1c6f3ddaedc56d75373acdbce2b8955fff42998e19cd85c416501c9f6881689"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73a7790992f869e0dcbf81326ff041e1cc7933733c82a7abf369121214b6085e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"714730cea2ed9cccaf045926625aca3f8ea811e36d517a409d114e6ee682566f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a75665d1fb4719f6b34e50bb36ae1c0655ec9c0e16b71a71f7e1703a1cc5c28"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75fa1c0e20aeab17c1c0ad542ccf785b7810349a56c975514d2a618c7979b4e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f44061abe75f4ab5237210500119f9314e3a9e9614c4410939dd16f42e82c78d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a94b72eabda770972975dbb6c6a8413f3d29cd4998f774f3726e4f83386e9d03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08adfecfddb96054f515bba86ef73a736b964e5e7787c0774304a3e8bd0edff8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:16-97 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:16-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"483ef0d8d465987f3ef6a47183bb2b31fe163ee26791ac4b7caf34032f6216e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66e59bec6c5260d725a70ae3ddfd960dc4fcaacda4576469c1db12d21c4db713"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a051d95e99c34b9e993de9651a1097d9cb895c32e0f96fdf2ee90e19e6b52ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc546408baeead00764153321c65bffc9ae43d35bb6d36857ee0600ee63ba344"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1432850075391f517ce9d7b6afd193b2deccd6b4c641e829aa19c0eab498bc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dbf5917c02a0aadd4535cbd8a3f13a6d14cb9324bdba66a6026cd9bb97fad41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6ffb9870e332558fa303e14af68fd26898840b72c06d15e7c5d556daec9ec38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5f2be6e3378308ff927220334dd58c61baa089e46ac69f424e6b18dd7f53284"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6acc338e614131df900506efcfd0ec737a0411d91cb711a7c6c94b6de492ee9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"956d26e60aec4216ad27d5dc3aae6bab88cd59ed1cfe6df1f40f1bc51faac832"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5b53839503a18aacb368423d1163c45ee8952f1f98a43c9ce13f3dcf05bade3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"727fc4dfc6dbf1b143b5b3594204deb132fc6893d9a7d926946be92bf811d305"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"913b50ff0ac218bbc2b62b09b5180df9f3b1d7951ea161d9d26e09840e92e8db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d64748fd38e95fbcd9d5b02cf3fd5b4716c28a0dd4f7fe6c97fe9b0e70d0668c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"485dfc5e4683fbbdedbb759dbc042a81bc2a3ea16604933fc4b50d15f61a60bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73118d218d01134687af1434914e1ef6cf8631db8f23e6a2e2e4d22d100924da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35172f60560b84d131c8e01126ef22f51e8628ec682543a7bf3f0d8ef2de48e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60332495ff9f70086ffb212bf4e62f3bfd6e18cab87437292343cfca4ed4c800"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fed757ea977b4b35164a40a318afc32e41906990109659ed3f4a184385076876"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f50772f72b595fe037907391eb7e28a4222be578edd8e2e655c5ae019afead85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b28f219956a28cb735e7c0fb296406864f9eff3eb15d2dc65ead5f4fbcedf525"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47bdb51ffde6bfa47eb041116ce2e33b6fb20edc6d9d569467d573ee4e9f9665"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce801a96e24476095b77dcf7e49801b76e0be1183263f2d21d90e5500a104ad8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8171fa4379396773d624fcf588cc772fb401c6a47e586d7584576f273974338"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55b8ffba3ce08b335fe8abee71206997bfca1b078cbe5707950fb37d17273e31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6e50b38690986e976aceab19dfe75970721c1e55b3c9c19549738436db58858"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2543eb32609240f91deda80156c0e359407f55bd9463833b7345aad253005f73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db13ca4d843568bb509b7cd317e61b601e9a45a24c2ab390eac67dd3b7598a8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae4f4ec16f63eb2d01239ed9646f9aa8275a3395408e1c5129ce53ae8735612c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91c4aaef1b8be5d3e6eccb26323d0b2a8c26326e4d12b473f3664f78c57732ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e729d49f1518a8f98ce6c7017cf758bf19575103dbffa578f410788124666062"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ab74d4a0da1411866c377c664567efffb5d20c70e43dc823e6e70bebd6a5f2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"838fd7c2395fe3e29d772698527dfb60c977a68d8155efe15117db8467bdac7b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc266ae2ac5a4d090f2041408e23813ac697a808efba97032b960c493628ec8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94e597abdf374369260ecac53d699bb283f92fac528eb74294cf5f1f46c7df11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b950d03c40fd73700b440c1fde48045c8629ed90f953673c3fe26895bf42fa72"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6771ef806c3b6d64dc99c864f5cd2a8623815ab97227265ea23c599d66be2896"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"662d6fa73e7e4eaa6f101320d4118e917d93082bd2a5ff4f7b90755574ba56e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14f1566c02cc3c0671b378e56f85e96e7f28a9f6af36d741a7aa4ee45047c336"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8faa400e29451ba059168e94a3d154b9d7744fc8fea8ad32b6abdd38698fd995"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"157b005296bd4a4eb7ba224ecbcfc186ec9c12778b2ddd202c8a32e3d8b442c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7b755a40580ddc45c62d49bc271a572612ee8448024e86b31be283f5f3ea320"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05721f8ab1b42eb06c9c33e9edc96ff76cfef0d0c3e658d30b7a7a135053c40e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5620956e9196b890749e1afc325150e24a027ae82d86ea9ebb726c5825f6de1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91fb1388542bd20731e5e47509880dcceb36535237fee8901ad115901b42e31c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aba1e855e9c3c23dd4ee7a90c25ed61cc5d3b3b3233dc80a582ff05c7096855a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7465f66e7e156b63ce7b67bf24cdce1ee2f8a71fbf1c678398352a4c5accd506"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd3d7113f07037934a33ccec70db9d49ae5f107c018bc35e97f6f246bfb43ccf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6858900401903356cb6d989ce2ed2edf4d88dac4a9fe48681496b4b43225c3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3864b0bed56b997d4860e82824f00827e94981142f29aac527dc57408f3a9216"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"444fbeb681a8d8c7603fb6b1411371e2d06682899c685acbc0abbbe9e75d14c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f673f8c6d8b46a34b390b4ed594f0bb05998209c492fdb2e4e38f3b3dd105573"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"075349879f2e4539c0cfc70be9bdfe5f126cba3b21ff66294c1c09513ca22ed0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfdfbadf07f7c9b073810e5c11bb862afb949cc0f8cdd9ab317e87faf17a2a10"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d418c55a1456a4de084829e1f84ab9c620a3748967b0a7974d51579b053253aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f813731bf8e5509d87333c3473d0591cd13e05f77c24631167cadb41bfefe4b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4694fb3a8530c0811833ade9bc77472c82af96d460a76f32d8504530d7e0947"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e56666df4083047311bdd10e47d895ca48136faf4b43746e859af70e2ab932b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f95c616615a453b1ca5e7b827945546e39d3532dee26d9fceb2030bd87d0f7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cedac041fc7e271d48d65bd5f721b9c4eb7ae51446a48cb8bd1b532e2c841584"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"223b8672e621fe487b4baf38b2fcc54d169dbcb76dffed42ca0ff7f8728f86a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c33105989ef559f31278bacf61a86c7e7490d6b00c4c987a664b7d18dad6265"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5156d64e0f8ee01c3cf28c8938f08abcb6da1dcc2fc0b2e0b96534662662489a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0fbbae16d1456908f1f3db325f935f61c30345f5460f16758bb68f1ac0f25ea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9523fe9468b72397c2655c645e166a1496e04bf8f4c6acb5fe76bb4d43746666"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a447c2c4c7a0bcc2b111dbd1526a63bcff3b4a12ae65cefc6d3c5104820d879"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ec9389677511a3b3b366d4b7f7d581d504a991703e4040220c5fe593cd2c5b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24b114710d5a1875c3c3b38e23b7b042be84ff9ae03eaf260512793b45074b1f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbf4b1371cea34872ea65cc552b5176eb47028d4667bb85d908daab5170d4a27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6d868d464f779bfea252f85791b0a0c55ee5f64a35d1a8578234ac312edc6fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d7c1143d3ed6e323f9b3a7ede7538bff07763b758a502358eef33ca4e55f2e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ae489b34b93299f9318910cf08983d69b956a0c957787160a5b6a9e8d8814e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85e501f958bc6f02c5b73c3c0df59bc7d609d7ed217ce837fa5c76f77bd14e62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72e2d0a2a1a471dc118d2895ee85b6746e74c4bd689f4c23a82bacc7221665a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"640a2b7126f87e4f7114f28f16dcd62938da7ef11412d2d27817faeb60d76972"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5f77774cc2df281be2c82659a3c706229c3577bbef356680140110ccde9fb64"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d461725382ac3bf1eb306b3ccb474c75e72892ef53a49d628a16f96bee55f0cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e9832a7d42175ccc360de20af80a62f992aa0c8f26e874d8719ea2705f9504e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26d42790c5e955fc505e7f106cbc0caa465f7ded1b034fd2d2d22a5ffd2d2792"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd9eba1ecffbf89b6d4c77c7436cd5ccf82ab7296bb65cfd2c6ff0605f647278"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ced2c6dd184b138e5fd2cf88e06f970531adeb776c7cdb9f53eb95d7eaeb2bd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91393680d32952c769e136b75a7aaa208fd2527c891761bcd63be44f1da3eabe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e79489c417710a6366780cdb763a1770758a394b3bd9ed3da5fd37e036d213e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4638f63326c69102038fec898fcb27c92a468c4fd15d37dcc2b0c6cc9ab18423"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b9d68a1eb60670dcae672688e85fd2543174337bfc2aef6a177df9676435c4f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2951ae6f2cfac2bf1cf0fe6d94a14a0b181222d395fe021a25f9e0d9c9f17e36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a85d892072275b9f1e7c0c04b7b4b75d249617186fd9a3ac966b84b7459b21c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b0936bde5b0f7b30a18d349eea2904814e8ba8719f985d0cf24b347505e9edb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f64a58747e42a2178982912d98cea33e0d4449e3625fd53b662c3b63aef35030"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"474a74a44972e4a9401a1a297e33b1777d50ef301b996203dcefb6af351f57d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e9f3704eb0712e6b0792faca76888d0f6b04986a3cc01d180a53555f36da7a0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b96b9c1dd719f2b0829db305b20716d49e2f874f152a9bd890c2847a6ce247e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8704cda2d9683df1cdcf03e710b5a65b4aeada4e48a38ec212ef833a50db575"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53d4bdf1403d37460b127823d0172c98210e861f3e0158b36fd7315197e90535"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b792a2d40a7ff82f8a7e6046071ac2d54308bdf02542a62f365e75752bd5423"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35bd4bf3b20211dca3c2fff63953d94e66eca0b7124882a3f026a73d8401a702"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b29d7d03292fcb0ea92cc3d6be2575edef30148936b2380092e9609d33b1f5b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3543496f6108370b59c5855c03ad399885c9d13ec1382195ec9663a667734fbf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb8681a2d4547c7947e5b811a5f4e74a56a6c318628672f15348513c8c78ee2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a269c63445b85ba409fb6943217edbc949b18ee4bd2478e41363bb67bf9ecaac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09956ab0650204ec92ca31133bcd6ad1712c60575f1ba2113a009e611b57a521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0393e19f131b7e7c536b56b5cd05f67ea8decbc57e3b04df6a9049da48f0df7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"648d47e0d5fb9f33b843fa54ffb99a9267627f79e012b49fc2b74d4cc42981c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63b380a6311c93755aa52a277ba69d491a9572999b26d0cf2f0171b24e1da4c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0a1bd226d6623878ff3cece7bbf812297e5ea14a2db32f6a28217f36a800de7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"066e660f924c03c1af34e391080c9b622d3285bcdebe879e2243fce255d325de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1479b31c8ab32419606e398178791a4782cd558a15faea46e6e845488e252a51"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4208f338f68060965c323d55457e66c977012e3d321262880ef4f658fa43b69d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"239cdd24de34678eaebe0c5a8545b0b436e999ce3144f974d759543e44572679"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fadd712f1325c76241a4f193e6c86ce51fc654fda576bdcece15c6e9a77d896"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a2dcb19f01589ae16e0c83e890a56238cc3a14fbbb30ede486e0b208884a009"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c734c8339863a0cb5749d4aabb94aaa7a64058e2756658a6c968bec92d85f8df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72c561d1839474f71108fe94bb73bc05f72c248b30b65bbcbb71d5708bd03b37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"067264bfffc64377b396adc33cad617bc10f5013996c4b9f810704a32e117b59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"499731e00a4c019723566b46f71878d9297d8804c7e6860dc9528b209202b04b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54b3e3669277b06f27a501afa25e60e873e6db59048aca0f545c64c7da940436"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d61b8324cb307a581c8e9ab206a231e68735208a404725f251cb5732847f48f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4b2bd9f24afbd8a37aa857758406c22b5f154bd5866f3e58df12ca12ea8abeb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c66e3e3769b05cd9781e0d4c63d4b5905bc2c98b2cc4040638489fc343c30d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0d42cc762e1515fa9f79dff675ce30095caace970b6de9d86b87b0daed68e18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"195f8469a1db6cfea3e0ebc93da6dd8d20a301ec3a5dedd103482a844f43bed1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4650d32de04528d087fb6135f2d52a7e14d84afc91619c71a131b5f94ea4fcb4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:43-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:14-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00b3741f2b95e25306c6c7aa69654f30f52923e3238a5ae1a89f50d74f1b8a40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e009bf8f28c1e87c3e4107a19b0c8b55ce7a75fddef8489a50e2597f9059191"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf2d242d76cafdd3ff99f326f4179cecc5794999283c45f33a30a0dfc5b0bb00"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69eb4d5ea2698f5385d210e1a176a51808368749fc2272ddfe06114c2d4c1320"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"713aa5e8f3e0f7405b04e7048e5e4dbfe2d44e2feaade78430b85ca086e13d3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"888b7d61cf33cf62e52d6a94b06bf8f46f12f581549d9e2a993510f3a50b62ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85cc029f0b4cd62f35cfd4c03c6a3ebcdd722a8c7dbee38d7d954b3e8611b3d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"078c2268f1f79ce4e4c6b90c3d57fbca87f557dbef6a1509c7ae654102032971"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3275cd9d36f67aa5416f0bd1e2ffda8e56e73a70d6df04253f27edfee227a039"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef2ebaac168d37cbeb650251dffae7c608fd0e1e867df2a109f8dd5839702ee6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be3cb90f8ebd429e266c0c9eaa9a8e246c4b0f53a7592dc014ca712b6b103ceb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a926e116d82601abb4eaf5f72e326f8cbf0a061ace3fafca3d30da15703a40c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6236f69381396e37dd0ab8ddaab25e92b9063d392002b7788122d9e2237a2867"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25168f2a10f487d78242d6770d685997a08ba86133abf64adc108962189f55af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24f80466da458094d7328ee6a6075cea70584677d1a8c88c899fa826d5e3f502"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63968c381685c26b663b55e136a717a01d39fe36309278afb0956c3db89f412c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eb047b8cd207b10bdd535d51435191477d09458454c56644118f4945ad54216"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"246e7b482ca49ca1eb8cddd6914f0c9f1a74a8261b1d5ffe2c1a2f4b9134bf12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26c4c395625b8c3f56e5a07e207a64d17d1374264d49cd72d35f2d97d109cad8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a46b0850b5e7a1024553caea0fb8355e2e6a1732733dec2aecf671b26b26b8bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd9813784e004ec298368d261e3e99ad76269b6880fa7f1bb6ee54331d330fe5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85d5b4549b1bfee925abf4339eeaf4cd7d448c021d35ccc90495d86ed4c2b28c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d6ad9fac737ba6ea28bf1a2154ea9eab9568b0f3b80ad563a385919ec998eb0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7bac23433a6aa1b52d433d4a6e7e31c85a080d29f9def549b0ef698314e16167"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c850e9201564a85085f9debc03df395f7a181a6d3a570f282244c2ecf2cc11e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb525926f0f008e59e5d85c62472447954233c35cf4439acfbc64e36ef5556c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d2f23790d462281b2bcc5e43c9f8a9d071ccb60216a2d00552ad942f45a2858"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85cf9ed294fc7cdc81759d15cd091f9fd56141b36cd079a8bc9a4b57a17bebc9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02fa3c619cf913e7a2da7f2e23495dc228b95c4adcdb2d54b73c26708eee84a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a82bb114b995d7a32f84e72d1150197d2f09660b7c80870fe08d4937da3d7bfa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48910d254414524d597934dba907f56f86449183592410f3cc68d89a4bd1aed5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74a930fc8e5ab87f56ce085d0ca251e257b422880d4fc1d7bbbebd587a4256f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_current_szse.py:15-95 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:16-127 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_current_szse.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e8461a558e1e4ba77359fd9a4eededfa6feb182454d3cdaf4cb4c0c5d7a5442"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90902f7a353a0262db4ed8fde2811a234f6119ac7ea11d9267b823ff53e301fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"260810112bcfe2ed04521be378bde4b16d690704723086432810951a21e8c73b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6305ff4ed4dde0048d5a8a3407f77e44e855cc8c64a3aec5a22ee9b78fde94c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8a2a3cc1854ccabf1a73858cc2f6e11493bf3adaa6459dba869b1b7c1dbac14"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f376c387f4154bc1f60cc1ccbd61521fe44bc50487fef5ac01a93ffea9d18341"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cc41cf21a5913382b93e353fafff3dd1580e44b444b1f78033de87d8abc8b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e9499abce875219739ed2037eae5e1f2ef3b71c1dde2c3edb0f84b30392a5eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7bb3d4869c57c5a077e0b329d9b0a13e29e8e6df9865e2acb247e743688d344"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb5c633f54839e63ff1e7aa6c97dac884fab74dab171db19e84f6bb17b691f20"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dce24ae4750a133f4f3f9d0e0529a5cfd3d15afdec5ac72ee4b3aa8f8aeda8fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c291131a349b72af78fd58916c4e5d1444e5638743c7d8df1b6d4b924b96c40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8551f36ba7af156cfc858c7eede24ba05bef39b74eecd5d8d75661a8eaf6bd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d32c69a2e399e63012f78708374a5f7c85b562c94c6dca435fefac07e72d2c5c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1515291aa8631449fadc7b476374e1ab526844a22d3ea30fddc17e4b0addb4b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3343439efd9915a98627028400a73f73d5806386faef2667b038fadd2006c26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5656d1c2148163ec18f843247a32ec2fc4a25940993e9c7461661c5660bdbfbb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"560c579a41f1d3f2f76693a921e21a625fff712a1074f0576b6670eb337aacc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (13 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_current_szse.py:15-95 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 13 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_current_szse.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16bd20545bb06f996556d3b69700e6dbd305edead7ca495210edb02ae50880b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6f6f4d3786075f8087f5dfe54c80c10ae7852cf99728ca80e22546b49b42ebb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (84 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 84 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdc1282e28196d85007297f1fd8daf8aaa0ee01624a02f557c0fa1a2d641fc43"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63107f27bc8e9cf37fbedf055572b8decbc6849675a5660e067b3e2fc3d49907"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7949f60581ac895b4a95ac831733ad2b51f651b5580484934750e38e30b6aaf2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f35b76cb8a48f9203789b18dae577d394bc2d743bf5f8ae5d06af7c181154f74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:142-265 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"505e109979a200ced89cd9e661fccca9506db9e588453011e77d429c49c9f3b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:14-64 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:14-66 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87b1762697d2eeb79a41f1a6c9c031a65c3f71c11849428d8eff307cb6b0a0ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e80046b50413c88f249023ca3191a68bd3d5da5dea24b91a6b537b82bcb7127"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"590087ed4945a8862e95354d909ef382086da07a89a11db96280f73ed00ed935"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66caff11a2a1172930d7574165264f52588b67614d3490d43f2deb4a0cab77de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ebf52a58db7984ddd142d031a735805707da5dc3c8b6af88fb14392a03d77bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d1bd616fb06e0e24d9fd93acb2a70f3c86edcad2944468b88e883a2349dfe81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb6ccb96494f3818c8fdf3f8f294bd806ad7624661610e8626d45a63e16af057"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8838ac32b16433f33910a887ff59bd38d055b5c736518ac68b806c5ca85a1d8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e54fdd83ca4c2db7ee41897b1737d19567347c652c1a72baf1161f047838d23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a9741b7b18b3dcfe8a93c67e6d907cb7bc6e9b3197a5643df586c76c9eee2df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ecea0bec61154f35c9de57b84b8d74ca8e4d957f0fad13738398c3bb0571f19"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0874b2b5a98c93936f11df5245098e55d6ab1f6739f7aa81a0bb43b4c4ff2c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1682c0118e1be2a80e524cefbc5b9700a5a57663f03c09573d8b358d10ad751f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fd5e5fba8f20550f40880a7e61691c8835e34aaa88515685a8032595fbeae3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38af36c49b440f9caf9e1e8935aebd965b710f421c71c2baa8f8d0cdb4bfe77d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c7e7adfa5e49c3da2382d8ea2d67f632ff451f245174730ad010da30d7a29f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"832ef8a9df2288c991fc76245d90a6737ecc8e50539bc2bfa28709bf9be8e597"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1524b211215d95067ad47791ef76b7e37d4069a3b28fb57ee6ffff7baeff836a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fa2eca256cc0debef4a23264fb6898c0d94aaef13ebbd2bdb37ea103186ee6d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f91c8304ef9690f9e82256f6c5266dee5f570382fd84f5e1f8418e5296e90c2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe830c0808b7a59763d4593b6d068e95e63a5ba1b40ae02706e885e963f262b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b26a19e97b8f0410bc05fffb4e28f2dd4dd73ae4fb72a7a7e8d254ea3a4d2bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ca5da4cadb8b45e356e0287740fc1b17226c817a7f8611c0e6c1be5a3abcb10"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ee5ab9b0ff48db06c21070acb50744bc90311e49cb3b66fc7cb3fa7782f8da0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e4ba3b831b5da147a3c4ec068f999229ca6d25283f59aa21b0dadc62ec580b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e181f97b0054480173c6d7744eb980bed3149538ac14692cc516333d5c0d9cbe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c89ab4362e85d6bf1811b4db46605318c2b2c7af1af2d0b529ec5c0fed6a4dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331bca57269e9db6e5a8a4644f42e0e711a74fa7ca16e4eb9bb2e68540bd54c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e75d04f939a1de9ec13dda5dd968db855034de55d3c149d2020ba54cd7223f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9ae51108c35827258fecccb98af7c9fb3c293b346400dc7d98a0001764aea6d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (71 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 71 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f4b5c7837abf839f9305d1fab88ad8b0a48e21b6dd2d703bf9a989fe93c794e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3049567f6bdae7d8063bf57f65af8c1ef187d4c08f9bb782612ba9566fe52137"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"734ab9375597891ab61a4aee5732e2e772276b1a8cc9fc982090a3ed2bf4cd70"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58a36b2c632caf0654cf6b1383a166aad1cef310dd20bec78b696e2ef3be10b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8deb43988047bf84e44a9f851fc81d6f2dd47aec8cce4326344e1650b8a8eb4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"866ec8a0ee91beb61c0d59b470bd8be142e07d74e5fb37ae47389d31ad23fa8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c39ed40dc7dfe437db4cf00868effab19e232ccd62d9a26796d29589a70d36af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"277f3424e12455e70bc07e56afdb769def9c9b4ba96a0161c3bfc786fc036ee7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87ce0113f2f859b8a1c8a8db7ef6163a59e9a7337276b39b559090970138896a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7bf13b460c108e954a22147cebb962acf3cc5204350fc7b80953d443a8dd172a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13be317ec1729112005ae0ba9bb420a7863dcc7dffcd2073a9ed66ac950a2a2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81a3f25d6e0160744974141ce57eb13af703431a139fecb26ee2c45e0e83e48a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1de446ecfefbf0de8f374f32c8dae1d07b82622424a584669e6967d23e257e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe7280c54a76d8511bed002e3eb732cc73cc5caec0e7d7981eb34c6705758a53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30801d98f20a9fd79664e39f0c0f1f5ae3b924d9a3f813e6dd2db87bfa1dde26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbfc23d240d81cfb758634b20102a00287a3ec5ae023b1c5b931fdb72215071e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c98689574d81dbe24c5b14517456fec4287141bbd8caa6673c4e2e8d70353dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90ffaec80c6783a493eab4f40e488274567d1f5a58f52a3e9b9274839f1fcd13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ec6e2d477d6673f2ae3ab5f96b79b706eb6bce517453938ad735b8763a65ebc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77a2696118881943e644bc0ca8a9271d2c297ef846edb830b86a2065c34dcc47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9968f5cd8497d0c9573296d97ab7037eed3877ad2593574540e0d05849e7cd83"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a60521d9d9a65936aabec286e4d943389b62c957099941399fcf5e508abcfa75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ab1cddfce701d084709e19f5a513176d148a3b876a1740c9ba97eb9744cac75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c170555aab99120f8d03793f1a6eefbe1bdd40cd8377a125535b2f310d8c65bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1024c97d4b19999027c2122b367f998cc098410f1001a8781ebdab7074329a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81996377f9d07b890c44c061985f383a06d73eb11cc29a40eee4375e9f7db21c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"095938138e628aa42747551c72be9bfcc0ff8e3bda2680f6f3a118a061d27ba0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dca69cb1a1508e128202d09fa916c2c35de0f53614b10b2cdaddc5f156289db8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd5710cae39d99ba113c5a41d3b8101c648960d72b9628046597a0b1ced1c527"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88a6afa95f4c734ed0d6dc891890519657788aa5835d53a75d4262c17221eabf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a6406b73289dcf206856f316d71d0e37cc226103879aa2ca2ba0e2f1aab5bc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b0fb922b4284b29ac55fb9fc962ca9740db9123d92164465b69b37deb19ff1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f527b6a4ba539a026b8b419cf4a5179a4e0524135f6742a778bfffc7e54fa04e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b76a3acc451f6f51e6005ae56bb616180035c72231909de5d8992d303e382268"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e8b65d3acd1c4de8beed44eed902f1e14a7a652658194036ae106e24c542bf2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-382 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89d23afb99889e6fe53a6de8c333d4895766b0bc0e54df271b9ee209f6f97320"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81ca250d8e1e9d00b07f4e8414b4e01f72db8dedde59793669ff2cc71da74535"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e646bfb12bdd20fbbd197798870b772f100fd639c040ef2f3eb2db23edff000"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ec9ccbf4a4005f90213f9de0ee879a0dae0f14ba937e3beabaf2ac1648d8904"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"174c136fc646886e24ff612f2350d9d947d0267ab14b11c7ad70d0cdff31db93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb9e01c0528fac4af9c778fe8d52330b08a08b142d4446bf6d53b479f2c5f95c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c328b20d951853b1fbea8225310ea48b605909110e59d2001a03818c16dbeb8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"091b5e3ebb4f31e92f8619fae936b0810c8ad5969f2ee6fc4a1bb6a0cb7d3ee6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d267b544e55952415730af2a2da7cece4ec0419a1dded8df130eb3f85b9d7c17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"858988748ffc5135ace68c49378b64f3e4302ce6069ed6a9e5097fa246e8a860"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d320aac9a3990fb26ece1c612b515e2f331a62c8d0b3c21af2d0b066a99f00c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09b65086da356868fd4c0b0cda54ec09cde2c2e755cd5d610ba054d45590a724"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0d4e113400741ac6bf69e72cfb363f14c5c9d3d89976eb82601922e10d4663f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39f8f8a4e3d8be7b4eea0bbb3f4bb33141781e5479b9cf1d0ec58453ebb19787"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a972b0846134b7252063ec1a05d9f3981742a052b8c9f0dc2f1ba87299d3dae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f2eae362a6a3a52b507a01124a21fad9bfa0ec531f5d04ca177440566c5e001"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d92105ebb6a7e64d1960d597775f8ba7e8f73c2e2a11a78c4efb125e49422f2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63bf0c2f661da7f2645841168caceccf900440f4a44f64ed9bdf04f7bbcbaaa5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cec3769df281782e72e6ad163cbc50a84cd16f4a29b1bd127e08c7dd2e8e017"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b1143bc279263f9cf97e3253f020c0e1fec2f63a083a02b8c757fbaf44d0e6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"464c56e4c6807d23e67354913e2bd390a8f498eb2b186635d09152e305178cf7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bca475b80c1d427d4802203d2b2e40fe4d9b48101579ada737c814602aff712c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"490c0b2cb51c12987fe68bd4e0f41384233b52c22f0487e682990c460211be65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb9a5970684c822ce1680ba791e7c6e6a8aed2fc9bb2102b44d98dda6705a9f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc9752c5a67fa9c4f14b78ebfbe746eece3f5f0df30b15a2f9c76d31f0e1ef17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11e815daebf27b21409c8c5e9e65b6790136a4e917f305d234c4f5d6300bd3aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3be2e90fab0ee2470905bd18bd6c5ed29b479e7edbdd246dc131f95bd6873cb5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"107a3910f065cf0fd773fdd3926b5a1d3177ee6bddc5e28fc6b2ea8561599279"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1532-1634 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1532}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aeb316675ec4d19e0773bfccca13c65dd890e979a89d054d8d2aaadc30268b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba52be9af59f958559d0a41b6d79507dae7976266faf85d6168c417048fc1058"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad5828ce9c4c01e6e131487ee1c6b041e6785352ba99c3bd4befc2848fd6c395"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c971d6e8888db29dcdffe09bfe73921aa38d96ba4e842dcc9cc1beba14f7a85d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8dfa46b0c5280aca87659ee3bbcd3a7045aa75e336d2452834961068034b9f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4437f9d71907aa6b1774b4515ab044e6b5aa86eaa0bd0232435e2fcdda2be6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de29c0fba925dd1e5cb392cd1c400bc39d5ab361a58d149065465cb5099a553c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8b170ced0d244f5b178071ef51229e3b5cb4694868b858fdb9524820f9884d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54032bdc2fa0757e956df6e50129d6a7e3e1e084bbe9e9b2afcf0ef1437554b0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a982458ce1320c351037f7fb0131efa178954cd055920eaa895226a97807357"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa36eb7bd0396e7c8e2144df006133f2a60e8be0c0bbdefdafe62bbaa112a33c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83ed5fcb243d5731fdd30bbc2617028ba8a7ec5a3847b69ab68890380023890e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec7f42ff4c5870e99728d6b9f1a79dd9a314e4978e520342f589126a883c4485"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3379393a86aa08a340dc884ec8bd722d5339dce101bb469fc7ad13d0a261cca1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59ab4aaa2753246f66076da8cf83fc7ebdce6eb2bb0edbd17cb6aa7c65649a86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9445308302bd5d18e9b0cfc2195301ce6f5a7005b40739a27ddbe0e298ca3940"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fdeea34662039b60c67f7fe65eb624e4a287bfb27eac0fb32a2affef796c31d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"043a324b63ac4cd1047579089349cfb7edf1b36f2d00b784a8c33a1815a9ebee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c58c695b5da00a31534b1265edd3b85b82e7f71ebf556eaa80985ff2f40f37c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45bc01e7f5685cc485f42eaf693845eb93a63bbfef51ab51de4baa30a1e36d21"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63c689c13223714b38192a79ee19190ad35c9be789c4423911f820e48c65536d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87000bdf219d70bc371abb28ddcce4bcb36b6fe705269ad04459a51f21de0b6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc07e62520a6220c77b14e4ff573ac93ae70323c9788090e177aa34fe0d638df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9338c2c467c6bb60a6e5a40336fefcdfcdb5ba9a024f7be84151930c1dd3d4ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e675b64a62507ee4eed5b6b14e17770c24e90a34d33803437e504f72bdfbdc6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd8388bbe3b38230bb9ada94bede4bed24ef5bc57c310431e91934b3a59cf7da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e72af0c5c31f28cdc98ef42a4240c9b9ae3b7f911280a68d0c9ec0c65c7df40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d68dde407045e1a34f2d0f955340ff478a1f6e79fa71bf10116bc941296f577f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a911425c5b0b85d663d86c2132394210b1e0f57f7f39f388bf3b4dd0befbbcec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d624280a06d684c34e8eb63ffcdee0c01cf415df708c86967e37299f14bed638"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eae9cff362f09274e0760c7dd621c3a9d1d5c3a2e620553988a7529fcf917348"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff2667c6462db2ea9be6845f9674f1202d4958466c6b40c6d293dd45e873bf36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6bbae10b684cffa117b8f24d0f0997d1936172cd0e639c9b30f6f5241759fcb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ac30280c02a3ff0aa27dde26f4de48395c615a69fcce9ae664cf4411ab0b61c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98c7e9ee17a6405deab4ed93cf848f8f7c2d199c7e9791311eba9e5004c930d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (66 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 66 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ef80835e0e2948d0400ca7412fb55232be8ed8cb766f0e6d73fb59e67b8c949"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a860d6a4c775bf3c23cc294fbcbc8a471fe2e911ccfe7b44606188606ca85113"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fde9e373becbc8bbc74a8f7791f81004773fd1e447effee72fa5a62b09270b29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0c6c40be704b47d7491ecddc4712cf0d8685ab5f69fea0dcd4b9c1fb90e7afa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8cfe25ae2fd4b339368e439b1d6779fd3cadc47fde45dff2bb08e60970bcd9da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"675c8ccd7e660374038cff37359e2550b5e3c970911f040abae530a45b9df810"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19b0d5c056dd1c2ff687f0c8fc39cc4e86373c5a4c21ddd7d812736c85958cdd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d18102bb581c83134436ed3ba396d4b679c994d188272b616e2c56eca435b1d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88407655483dd9b2ce0785fffd7e049d6fc43c030fde43ceeee33a9bb36cf919"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66be0840c73392a04fad17cd82f4693f9c01e73eb397dec0909233292f4b4b91"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"428cb88a61acefeb37803ed2eacc0eb15ed45db55cc1d91eb65c4f317a75adc3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (15 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 15 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a824b14cd265c0113ca90a63441459ea23b39d496ec888af2841305f9746f67"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:14-51 | akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:55-96 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45bfcc7240e3299dec4b86ed3aaee22fec1a6fef97799677c9443ded53019e04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7c1fe271561b5080ba523f4b5beac4848d0f88d3960666f2d0365570ca29e04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50caf365152c61437b1011469de9928861fdae70b05dcddbb2ff8b7c649e9506"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4621019bc9fb6b87628a502089f62327606289e1ddd335c55486b19c3d05b7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37ee91e02facc3a6db2601f2866a818a600500ef6a5e3874b13346ca7d2c1d84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77a832c869b37d8e009d1f2caa7846535b5abbb277de26af1d7181cf03c23e0a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b065ec2c2f029adcc9c4f466adac6804deb77e5cb9893274a77e6cb0efd47f84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2444633bd27ff0a3641657864c03e220ba3f4630fc7bfa5143017b5fe9b572fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3923b664d1b59476e18b72010c2fbc7354c5a82bbf6c332e04b57b888ce8b46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22056e6277b5f19bc3d956ac3071fd245105dee5b6c484a9e9fb908a6753eec6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4fda354e0f884e8d54d21197c4abe1ba0efb6ac8446e5208194166d8571ad87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35b6222003288e9949de1a9094dbd283fa43a4a607a3d699f681965528766856"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:140-168 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_index_sina.py:23-51 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6cb8f02b2b5246ca2f6366e1cf3ec7a9b46eddd97155f04c0474c2aaa560298"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d73113219cd20641529f74e40197d13a8b0434384a084ac4f1ad7fe18238cbe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2203ab79d09cdc0ca956a3538db4d19d41f6319272954e61786d9aec8d212534"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (65 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 65 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e629412c21fdc05b7942dc069e0c7739ac58235d25251fa78a6ecddf4625bce5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f3429939a25fbbc542bcd14a72d53e68ab0658ace955fa842e3de4c853fad0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f63938b9b71ba4d2be3c5e938e145822f1ed1e6fb4a3fcef57263a7d2b7e12c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b09914d8d26344b4538e7e4edcab71c46017edc074efb0c3e26a225dca2a26a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc41d06bc6ad662501fb365937d07657dfa306d5da4b500f3c787e06cb3850d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f8898670557bc4ae0cb15e7205c9de3e2674aaed54eff7daee3c7f15460eeea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2696b20f1149bb633e2699d0f648941b69673d3fda61c79565e2573e1cd5fb8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c3306041c1b27d989b8f29c78bffd96ce6a9b27a82b51c92b5254a7d99d4628"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (60 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 60 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e87118fd8e32cec9f87f2e3cfcf61f7567bc2e6d1332e5b7c83c7144461e9c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a3e6436835d48bfd762c94bc315fd167883f7aa888cb24a56ca930837095385"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82db444f1e5a6ed69a48b0004fc7af6e7446a99bf99f37ded5274bcb102b73e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-399 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbe962f659d1b2c4ea2cd0497aed00560d22a459804a4a4fab2d7cba793c223a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-399 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0aa272ecd6ffcba9c28a3af81b54f68629245b0daf63b100927793aa89b81d08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:616-648 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:652-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":616}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1999b3348033c27631b8c213c3b699f4029434dd4632811c01b693a0eb40f1c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:34-148 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39e9a527cf1d85c206bbda32c23e0f8012998ea61ff5d5e414e6da86b47a41b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de2a4ca02f27a468bf14258f991f8cb255c62c9985e327a4e1922a1a5ef9e848"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a744ddc3d8a79525b7d31f7f6ec0b3439681f7747156baa353047e122b4ce73f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a28349c2b93796c6346983e4af3129ee3c4e03966d68517a7680e21b7c99a349"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6a5c5f5c7625d72ea1c16c7b3889af25bc8e23a7e64e7378ef81892cf8399d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36b07cd1005fac91f0e29f5046db3fad39b25553b50ddac1a8209bfeaa7a702f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5c1a847a7e78b52a0c6cc710ff32b96d685a77a35045748705855468fad6aa7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c00deebde62b21b5339c425ca92f4884a4e77f8ad1e3b6a0c12aca35108fa8b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cabb8451a3ca795f409ae1fcd2b0403fc900f1f3a9246f013802cf5bd3cff8d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a57e518e3017589d20b83d6d1a3ac7d0c4debe40d13fad5bac11b35069e3bd15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7db7af675343d4db3582dd93f1c682f8ba2d982f68398dddce8313345fb97618"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"291a2ac91b5d0418620f4043efc0bfcc0ac0cb5df0a5b989de9224ba86674c12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2e4d32ddf1de25f879323fc2d06406a224424b938daa51065176654ebcb499d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92d1df0b643a372896ca35ccdf408f87bd1c63bbb96c6e87232f23c024725def"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e5ee85219eb9faf4acd1e4fa8c7b372eb7be52c08fe6a10238caddc3a18e19e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"106afdcf7544487d121beb5c9413903be532df5f8f27ac0441951747e17a2c40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c0ff9393bd1ebe4dab5b502fc88ed1d4dfe49eb7c1f261fce95a57c5945af48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25e2d2900c8071401d17110197f027382862d69e44d2695fba31f12e9a8e1541"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cecd7dcf31361a4ce2cc5172c8e2481174c34e78e2c80794e0412d2554cd114a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b927ce66133db1a913650e8f3edd70672ee2f5b6ed17da8ba288b6ba94f08d8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d38b98d14a017a37083acedd4683d99a4cdef0d30fff5063952af6c805a6eb78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c74234d8228046642d7d64f50ea4c9bdeaca5033f72189f9c6e980d563e30c73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10e3f671754a8b63a3a29923ca1724ff782443cbc9cb842774da91be2fad612b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cb36045bf079648c75762e3e9bf68709a424dd999316ae9290acd4b9e8f5486"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c212f45eeb185079164522087ed0355633fd4b2f9490186faf7b873f79ea590"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab414bc7ba26e747d83fdbf4e285c76da7d8c5fc4750cf44a3db69be837cbc31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343efbf04579f1843046d0b5543c76c616b08d8c1dcbf48eea43e9912dab29aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b56bae8bd79013c98e4f44ae7bc7f2cd4f754e34b693f6849a5294c86667d144"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c18fd70e46bb572fad3756acd0aa0ed5e9db283df8f6560d9ebe0310f63bcefb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc1c194e98e9c619bab37597c5a2967e50a51d58812fa696ce3de9e3f13bf639"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1346403125e07651975676e0b3671657f6347f79db8c9b24d24d098ba327f09c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c509071780458dce9d5ecca205f03f9126b18fb2da918a39f483644b0c74831c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"141b68d03931196d879e72373b988995eb32f9f02596b1f468e16a1c05322274"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331f355bdb5a8140f741303a630f1c981371a525533b1d55d94b1c687ca52b4b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfc14e466ef928375759eb35fc8a4124287a85c51001287b3a8a46725eccf515"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14bb261d7d2e0821674768bb51c1a191f2d3788a1fe13a94120481a04d4b1be9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04f9ad37686bf59f8661a7837b35e924be4c2911f1dc0ad6d0483b3fe44247cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"376f3cd95a8ce589318789d397b04b9c4838ed006de4fbcd644c9d63f4209cf3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc2bf08ba5aafe621b7c5de5f2d6c789f3bccae8bebb12097f2ac443cc6cbd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a8d214628d5e240b8276b444e1501f8dbc4166e89ec774783eb77563d6e3d43"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ccc081ee86c2c1edb7e032df5a82e908320e869d7f295c9428f4c413352ec26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7526e0376a57b12139f1c452633b055c11ee6ffb391285932c8b464c3bb0cc50"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c5e8135b05608b3f507089fb711b653cc4e0d1bc2a4e34bcfcc0da05e5df94f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4a870aae9643e2e07d6074aa28b278493aa7a03c1de579ed516672f937c1489"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a2ca617dfa088221a29e53e148af2c84ca241f3ecaa5fdb82cca70a37366817"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9ef6f742fcc1c3837bda54888353809451431c72594f3bfeeb0164d32f9bb79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d2a36da2c116225462cf2dec41df508339eac2277ea19b7f177cf0dfad95a0d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (61 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 61 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fd0b8577087d126aaaf42b6119ba9f7f5ebac4c3bedba15920c76d0e8478a8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:107-195 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dfaf909278b2ef995b59f01daed9fd5d629f0c4d1a150361d6e3d4f5ffa5fd0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:107-195 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba223a881db6bb7e9e1ff3eee313192fffce1966f4319ddee8e3ed7454ef4f2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"466e5ad9a57227ec6c0853a06c66964001d3674b7e6e8dd3c955bbcf6376d524"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3911077cae7c63eb489898bbc2b6764482c3fa6f25d026203bc0f74a8cec7bbf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef4f090802faff64f2d044b31653a3dd9926af93323065557469c725e9571fdf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"318b1724b7a7d838e0216aef7071cfce0418e705e032c3d0d4a713cc7f490875"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"479b3d9ff1c46214c90df4a50a5035e959a7b94369e65c4ec618560ff6fa0a1f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bddad31b3d467d8b61700fd5d0541329cbb5a9cf52fa804f7e475de154c19f89"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"969e8f4170d6d4732009d376cf3d076f5a232ba331247d3971d9036d8d2882fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bcfcfcd6fd3fd598420a4941dcd76fa930cfda79a2e04cfbb3423ad42bf7174"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"559d0f363db8e14f1781d01eaad63c1615bf3bc48d0ef225aed2f7240efa1f1f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a29bdd936b51cb7ece55ec1bcb8a6c4a9336a8995844db89eec25c5eb9517c6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf94b53a5626592886c3719ca9bc50c4cbc255c3969d2c5508c8d8844362c9ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4be3b43aa4ecbbd598ec4f5a6831a962c9ed22771e479c5967a343d9e4520a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5efa597031b7e21242757d62f0fd2a6b41c2129129c39f286c8ef7906587f14b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b709d4712c3c1bf7e2c1072a93ccfd55e9ed148a6c9efec72a5334b48fa71b39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db8de458861764251b7704529c9ca009e47a7a1f027eda735eb70ec120a84d0f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"837c673bde2bf5b747a99bebb9bdc86ae2328b907feeefee7ac8df131a92b055"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14202ac6593ab70e47f0064f3e473b250f496fb555d8870772a98901eca06447"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a67b3e7dd09aad4fefe62a9137de342a0e009b163a5858ec920743ecda1a838"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"418ecb4632c1601ac7165abbcc5903cee4533eeedaac25fd91603660d3f1f465"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39038da0ef48cb35c43601eb45512fd8f30b1b20f656e3659e4a36ca0050e101"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab998a98b45cf642aaeb5dd483702feea576b8f9c04b4fd67bab8bdb68748f01"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a52746587ad55163e186f60300e79dd73220e544a41610c5538388887042f45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea974f5c404897aec5b892094fb5af2c5ecf87ca63d578859f2173a16a55d7f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3e067789279479b8a0dbbdb0819cf92ce08d8c7afc4b353a1854c61934f0b30"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ef0979f4ef3ab79c82a983088e4fe560fb3dbee32c5348b67fe0c4fe632ce86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffa9425c5f43cd72390f205a337598dbc13f508dbd602e7b96a3f4e46db7495d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8376a933b223e2935d9e5125957055497539c3c2099ce24f35fa3567957fa00c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51500f0cf3bc48e98c701adc80a7f48dfb1fecaf8b0da2c738b2ab3acad972ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"489f0f358f0a8b3fb81ff89bb6c2beea7829cd55c50443d66a3e6251e5a1431e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd0d5bfd2133c5dfcb9c394f5db2bc52c134088d47d311a985e64f8ab23f78c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7393033b98676cf625a18e2cbd500576950302fb2ea20fec8775872ccabee397"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cbf211af865d421a792031ce8d23345790c85f700fe9ab2af91436d03618ddf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d0e31a9ceba007fa8820e8c8c6fa80fe9f9d025fe9b916f0f201ed3a8e6fe5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"144de36553cb5a6e94add49d095d27626bc0c11e6795fee607604b2870eb8e26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4d76606453e40ce4ea6235996c33c145d1fd1dc1c5e3da1160dec0f9f3aa1c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"920f34a2fdf77ac0a9150e75c9717db4eb13ad11454afc8646601ed6a026770a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e57bf52ffdd9bbc192e4c6670b0db537e5eed9a8491e747a91ec33f2b6d363fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3aabd817205dc617b12a2f969b024953dbe6fffed2f4631dfdd32b0811a84781"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ec2ce8a1762f730061849015e568be1df9d35de4e512926ff69a9088341555e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdc441230da85a234c5428711798d87dfa9e49be6ad7173b3da12b44c9c7979f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0a79c5ef60fd17ab7560f6692ed2de6daf09828a67ea99bcb16e1a22ecc5181"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2d5e069e54e714d6e23cd89294f1ff4319d73391b4aa4590fea72cf19b8f6e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"624e3a44399e7532ba1a10a06544a3f890955c65b19af57377d6759fd3e0308e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (52 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 52 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d53b78bf094afa0e7a2b0f5adc308293cd7e7eae437089a4b4685296881b4f64"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7fc9987093582cc8318da468c0fc93b37711960560e4166832d8f514c188531"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (57 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 57 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13b7f9fed69493f470ea43df71ce2495d4c6582e3bf073ef98bf34a9b076937d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62622befb8025beccd49eda4116798c82b69374b6002c4c62cc09938646e9556"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98d6f8099cb3b9fad193cd7bbe289290601e19e6ebe1c83fa2bddeca85bf6a65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bdce62a43bcd42aab5548c94f570d0beea54405ccb29b023b66b7ab6df26ed1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d78720fdb8a2a0e546ca7af9c5989722b77ca30ccba244d2ef90ef559bf529d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"047632a4a1dff63acfe7dc3de570deb963028edecab2ba64a8aaac300548c245"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d9532f2b4352d02b1a588512c883c7ada9c47eeb203476be8f35f5bbdeb1078"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5eb4b51262430de6163c7791c491ff0d854491070b0211e5fa45e4696bf4b54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f1853636e6fa1d787ec70ab36758be49445cb80252fb0ee2907aae279a0d0a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c4ab042f52ea9c4a1a3033a87c3be113e34af11ffcddd4d39f4231798baf32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf2bed19c684f600df327b452fb6318b27e8209dcc134eb8a10708d1848c5842"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6591f8b29dd2e8d0af84608d695bf898d1c8d0d5ca65d8d4b92e7a8327a2d98c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a483eb1df7721b7acdee2a21f114bc9f0be933401d901c7b2e16583457e9998d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:92-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:89-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ca823b33a079bce25d1b5f8742b9841581ef0668bdf6a0e66c57bf343d22f03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00ad8d300e347e2128c0b596ae93a35fd14f7a93ef276f771a56352d2213fe88"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2422 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"006bb0e97a05a55a8d236adf4aa6c233df37d196f98777aa15d766ae3acc38b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"955236c418703ef842d65a618bf107c09ca9fd0a1edf6b2b8b40253f34fa5780"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffa4f7b86a995a8fdbc4436be7b9c7f22b7c3051481f961d3f404fc654faaabd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0040dbf4cd16147a6ed0f68cd8b0d019ac5f999dd099a55235234e2b79036edc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c36a32317a470a574cb2ae48d07bfedb858de0991b7a8c8c027b98ad55b1bd95"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a2104b2fa065dc3d4f3b4d913b862bfff7d256b70058266ff9fc2cfa2e009f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c68824e9bc07b844eba46fd4019c28bde33b81df3823f3fe22add0830c0ca700"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf0b2200a40c4b686f880d967fbc04f1bc71279f4b678d58c3166b973ca4ce8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab99d6306d4a4b2c57fcf4532d5702bbb06a89327079275fb88a29a0f536970c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e0c89700d912e3d2e9d5d981e74e29760be42be878fc08711412ace6c3b6303"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c783a1be2f149cdc28a048bb2d1c12ef85caae42008981677fce4dfda66a6f69"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8db558bd02226cc0f72e6ee479e0dc353b5d6d2d1d70f6b40620b78591e3a206"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fac64d744f9c4c75e2fc55357e83babf58b17bb2a1c57c7818a88d8e43fd751"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f1e1c1fa2cf10cbfaf41789c0c7843f7bc79433f8655c5d8ab360d3cc115736"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"434ce745952d0d83f5a84130267fc702549b853fd94e3a1be0f0cda097cf2cd9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c829ffdbcb4073f12976807799f1640dfa0c3452222f007f4f3a0be8254ef772"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b777961aa01672b9377634fa8559637e33286298002b3523f8175a6c7c8524e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a52fb29b026baf737ce824b70e54e504f07a92a853ba58666fea89c7d3beb480"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f47668152bdd80a442540b9eeb82aa34f2854128e730add95649aa7f369bd5d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b78537a5e858d643cc0eabe4f73d976090d6d4d2ad318074fcd4653d2c081db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eb68c4942dcea380f37a6f05c7d76901b7b7df38efed579f3fd68bb9c7a8761"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fff30652e89abe7d9db060fa23fac45bc06ea6275f2b572df224d58a97177d20"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"239b6eea8b0a87bdd8f1841f336fe03cc6bfca8a06d0ce5169f91db436835062"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 | akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0590378c100b17dc08e382107614886b65168fbcba830da04c0e0250b896dddd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5301e69c25bc115f3d6a1dfc293b7538e256e3e5564a4128d5fdb8f1e088dc3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (69 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 69 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"088742e5eab399b9f8e2a1c457f1a69cad8a365532eaf01ee2a81dc4dcc50837"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"358e057e48d6d69cd52871bddd6519579af6cda516b8c856d33308b87b69cc8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d0e5af6bbf075ae4bdbc22b8a3dc01770be9f3eadefd7d9587478f8ff7dce9c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d42c30f5f76df4af115a54bf9555ae87dc2dcca9f60128c5bc2b89dbee4a6262"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e80c81226c4d5106f577ebf184ad0c622e20959341ae811a40bf057581c8373"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"735d3049dcfbe2c8af7a7e6d168988ca5bdbd7a3511fcfdf65d2bfecddb101f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c1dd9b818cfb280727df729fddea3ecaa4908c40248d180c8006c19649abf10"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e3954c19ac72e28129eb39af0a84fba2cc172e049b3e7f5c37e3476fd02bb9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c4e4b72ff772a66d6999ba3c2f17a1c914d27974cd85260ea2e4b6a674d027a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48190cd5030a3f4e26ef483ec51092304bcb241eb85ccd0ddd3220bfeea15268"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8050e540643b3c89d61a2a09620689f1dbc7ec48f95a24c7dc72f7d7b859cd54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71c01c96980d46ba87631b10a52155cd736ccac152a8a1d155602a32d6092916"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab23f3833f990367e2438d16c88535f8b136c551875932dc71b6784d68f9a2fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c441aa80de7fc862e2bb6bd77786dce0d2efcfd4700af87d71c095c6e910fbf7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"402ed2ac764e3c500707d429ae99e043b29e80165e1085b11f861f6522a1f07a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"459002139ebfcbd0346c97b28fdf5957d2bd2de9f3df87a95b0ab7e0da33672b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32a28d107d450ec6d412b1888075332175e987a336c87c4ca47142a0a61c4488"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d97621c1dd205090ea23b2e385f68161ae48de700188f0d17b7e2f366bdf21b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51a9dbdd910c7b0f7898e37f5da560b36d6393a121813b138e8dfc3454a0446e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e3dfe01dded837cd8adb9b4389875b4909e9a4ef5f71edbc3bd4d146b3e097a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98ab4e5936887027b3181192256cf0696ec1e5801c7081b1d73056ed379e668b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d7cb61316f28eb3b1cb87c68fed1258da63cd3a7e699c67028a0c0f5a94ac22"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b67b132dc6b17dc2a1bbe584982f1ee544cb864b2b49900bd61cc628920f4cce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fda94ad014380637a619cfaa64d3314ca41fc5d2e4181e19bb5b80ca3b85248"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57990fe8a1a153ffcc147573fc8a567e540815bf48d8b678259ea52041ee24e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ffacd75e194d5013c01e6aff5dd703a8cc2e74efb016c9cd9fef9d2a57580f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79642781c099c43a758917b57f41abb4c6be2c68d6a602ca64be175913ec29d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6df6bf1edb1c97bd68878c22468f3b47e2b268137a114f98d5ab9e96bec8a75c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"770e46a86eb0c1e4bee2ff4f02785618eff783fcb1a2bb939e1010c197d0970d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"446efa7a57fbc9475b6bce690f3ae4f83f1e991054729ac639b1106729b25da5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25f0771cb57ea8faed0cd5cd252cfbaaa0ec6861e59e23d1239f5c11c5b67f2c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (56 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 56 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35b7cee19df5841edd36d790675f679624fdd5648e0db56b22b056b2e77d7d7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"261309d66a794e0ff4c3a61e1964fb2b50d01211c0cf29fc45389c241b9f58f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54c6541088dd1cbaf3606c4086ab6acbaf629714af11232315829efd049fcab0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abf0c5bc5f1765ebfc18b1b81cdf00a9a9805e698d2fe8f54bddae4c726d6723"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:247-343 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6e164d3b6281d9e5ea239e98e4296adf206b70903dfadf8cc13d35ebf23c432"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8998f4efefd1d9a894829a4b3ecf20683abf7d3666060537e9bee4e67196096c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb954680f33db669bbb1434d880abf4186945d40880594667bc7393388b198fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bd80b4d38baddb8b96608583f12a2cbb7029aa7100c4387af17bbebd338e836"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e14a0304c5855ca6164763f241bfa57a15792f07cb453fe7cbc23d6325e4884"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3156cb80ee96beff5fde9c76c2f2b38ecab38ece567e80328caa07b46c5b92fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2aaa836521ed045c2a8acae0a42a26c0361e07fd5409e71418d904859398ba39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (50 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 50 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a77a88d88467397ca046f0ccb61f16b47ec129b2c66a0682569899ca0888e655"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17155f1b73263dacb2766b5a8a69951ca97a3b7d54970c73b37922792440633b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cecfff623dd870e2a16f87e2a877e0dfb4ab3058d64b4d4f219a2e5dcae8c24e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08771019bb63e502eb773b8b688ebda2d1e90e9fd3e03080d7c09e8c7aadc1d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdb0fb63cd41158d58dcb0351d23ddefc31477b5279fb4f55b8bdbb1c16c4373"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75078bdd80eb42718bbc6988b323f06cb14bd05b801bb2ab926238a13c2bdda2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d838696c8a27fd565545469484e345f995613fb9ba392b9e84f0d65c3a520476"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4118fbb156d1042a23b4b7547c90c3c916079373cf35519f5a638a6cb3333140"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eaa3911c0da7d83a085109425589614fde4b323be1d11f66734dca135088c231"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1820 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:960-1039 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1766}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3c97e444f542571ed2b8334ffb568204cebaf6a48210507173662fefad54a57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2044-2095 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:960-1039 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2044}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fb4cce30b7de77e699c6f7a4aa19e7ec2bd84b543099d931b90c17b2e5d2b45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3700-3755 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_cyq_em.py:17-308 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3700}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"caeb4d4fa9e53798f2fb5de20f329b7625da15f960adabce5947ad6730e4f6a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1820 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_tx.py:47-122 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1766}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df1114474b96fb3b0b10fe5d4b6cf158a1df003deccc455c467c4169aa7ead17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7da3174b3ff758bb33c04c3fb6bfc4488d3e446f1effcd43e884a6e842b8193e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"001b16f20831f9f36650bbc5ce4277cfa0255bbd1f5e37e613066feccad1fe57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"119ebfa287a5d9e878bdf23063f1da350cf69090c5261988af9834887c4d08b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:62-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b2d34d45475e62288f76177a45851a87f68f7bf4cf7d29581ca229163f02ec0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:30-90 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e195c2db8f6dbed1bb95e5a9604b5304aa1e9f480389c0d822fcc6f79fad0847"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:62-111 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:30-90 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a259580a14fba2bf80ade7d6e7e00299a16bda2e2c989d3382c557538cb48ac8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:18-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_tx.py:47-122 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b697d27724f5221c246bcac49d7274f6f052eba1ac30cbf550e181866641930"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef866f3f042c13a26febb9b370dec74063539ae12dab41e4b3ac9fab42642aee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f97aa6edc33f1708a4e7706af70b7675fef0c4e34a3a74dc2b9feead4cf038c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"363cca2714a2a2a536a42ea66466d94178a36fa877b25954ff5a11064766d31d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:960-1039 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10531cc68d206edf7e7a8fdfeb844c1ce36f2dcfa3d24de8266db2d065d01f69"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_tx.py:47-122 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74d7d5b22d4021a328a145ebfdbdd25d629eee0b8ab20256f521d10dc78cc19f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c2575c3948c61f2c62d453be316e1233e9a2181c691db114b064e7e7d9be94c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_cyq_em.py:17-308 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_tx.py:47-122 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_cyq_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e2f19a7f3d523e4aa7320ff21b3bbdf8301d9ce144b3d0d174e29ea0683d142"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca1706b29b2f9e22fabf3f32aa88927fb8acbf5b1691816cb54f18b568bef662"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b814e7452e02c61f0c680dddf5b314fbfdf6476543f5f08b4b128b73e0e0c08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2c821feb6b9f245da7cbd53c61f16c4bcdcf98a7d2aee8b849f1e1ecc616c00"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f6e4b32a19489e48360db1f47803d5443c40217d6b06b338e4c7a55034bf388"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6b58849d6813b61bf1e52b38b38c82d07d9b0a644dc58d956962e6d12c45dc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7df131610c1382087ef4ed169d360fa4f2790cde5990e1e999bab12ef9a76da7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b79f9b5dfff6119eebc10ebb86a01f2393cb9731600e0c4e38d5cb1b748879b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe33e2fc17ec7cfcd09582d76f3824d682468d9c9c3734302bb9b65656710892"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3991436d58209bd533f20733a565f9c7ecdb482211c035a374351d00d229619"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51ebb500932e09d7cb6f114c384488b3ef0e35414ba9361934d1f7a2f88f30c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5790d07c74a3e44e0acfd38286eca15f93ce2495f179ce1d38360577e14c5b2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd2d3bd135791bd96e187919065eb1088a2dc514a9ae3dd721080ccb9244bae9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e7c79fe219539e773deb1ed8b0d1435130b9bf8e850c4a869170f3df38197e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c44960c85b30fe5b595fd9f541d00cf28100e5121297cc20f5ddcc2089144a9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d1183bb9e093de3fb0cced3c736db0afe70bea907743cfc40f2f2505de2afa4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca499bcf28664b1c472f05725510d48dded404dde5fb149e51080606830a4090"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36218441100a923e8d9149e9279b2e0e1a9ac40e3854d0dd891208cc8e1fdc7f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95c64a6ecdc7710ce34028466ee116e28f4c53193b1a392cb1c5631d51a8de6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2e7a63dc517671e1c15588dc8039c1a18e87c8929b29e6f3054e791fada6bb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31ca0288190b18e6afc9968e9088061c711b48754b4631da610d9ffdf8b4ef57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc025f9c21f6e7a9bce5b2177d6813be6dc18c69b24c78a6913cd358c51d633a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25ee5c68444191ae94b12c723749f96415283ceac94112e86b657813be49274d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22381263dbabdcff19b3b8c75b9acfe408b336896d6806b9f7c0f9da2ade1eea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0be16a9a958db31d957379358154e5ce20007779b0cd7f6b76fba5e6d80da526"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ce5274f4a0d9424964b1803284c810e929b00c707df42ae560fb8a37d7b64f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d5dbd42b1448a528ef2f0ee2b27e8e7bdb9cfa61bc185bf3e9d154c661212fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea3b1aae49d2b0107f757b934208f567cedd2b5e59c378c6a8d743b48e2d569"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb7750f2f900965e3f2c92d8a791516c4a1145dd78dc64d3972b8a677f4f64d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32c8278429c553081388dda7441650a69a5d06835310e639d3bdc06c06446625"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cc9a7c67c4c43e515f4c75675364a8789121cf71c55a19cbcdb5bdc4a01151c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0932e78a68f4ea54fbd9eb21158595458c5591e7ffcea3478666d691b85decde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8be709f88424e3f2167a8d299addec76a9e80f1d8edb70a69ebf53ce1374a8ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"402ad36997d48fec1ecd51dfe5f1f61c7329c1884f1aa83a663ecb29eff7fd11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06b0e12979c7f9233b68958c9efd9cb324d4f3f85abc7d3dceb368b31062cdc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4da1d99c96ba483e5c87baaa09ae6212143d7c75ca8e89275ef8920bb0ccc4e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccd7e4ab0ae50d7e8349a92fba8844ba3ae54a2053c58a7cca168a16556f4119"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8178324762292970a104f014eaa3f3cdcead54e18412bfcfb5a911688c0ed5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e66504b1e2bd630a17cbc57d8685738937ce3cc4149ea13b9e275f70fdb23cd9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b7442abf66c967da0f04bcd5b35c03390ca3064c19a30d98483cae7f79a8c66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4bdd91651390539c0d7f609f6e6661bc75eb6bb3e7db8bc88dcaa41d874f988"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fb661e58755c896f16d7fc9c8d1635e5c2dd1c653ca5972a8c150a22b2becd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fb518ab2e6c447648ea0dbb8e237a0d8d9148c0e5d8f6066b585110997bd592"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2cdb1123b1e04c07081801cb5e82609fb45d0575b451f6c4ec58f7298f1444a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d884dea5cab3af875c67dcf5f04b4ccd61cbb1eb26ead6b4b977a4e3119a96f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66db60c5f15418da3be1d56239d7314b97f0f73f914e0b088ae85799a6fef392"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b8218fbd552eba91f96645b5feec2467d224adf1cc19c9394e330d91332e0c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"705bcd0b09e164d8cf7af6c854b6f02bbbbb8b5203cffc1ebdfda5a285a29506"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac5e05ad59a32f317eb753428671086d1af5a6fb442a2bef7915b51fb9fc6691"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"669d2e0edd91edd9ffb02a3209924ed7bfb4f01d94f1d393d0fea91ee63575c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b56ecc12cbac1c1139048402c603f9c1392b0003589d2f02d7056a46b230c0d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36e887d049676a961e96159e6b2ce55bce6c79b51f032b27bded8612dd3fef81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b17534016af59eb095c4f80f7dd6db98450b751d7b0917e5354452eef8832787"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29251bc15f2f225c92d65bb1d584f285e349cbe86f2a9f68f0018ebe2d6b56b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89b46382e11d1ef02fe9d37d64b8409d77569493ea557eb6c9dde6dfc82840a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e7b47f4b4e93ffe6740e5ba3efcc99b56544c8a3d325ce23bfd7a5dbb5de3a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7027203fac5a69f800d6e3a63e879bed6b59794f73b251f3ed458e64ad62766e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed1725dc931ff019bba645160a2f14baa25ebe8858233a51092a67d765cdec8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"011f9c6adf0f39b508f2f2d643a20795d2883a7549d251c63674058feb58d30e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"581aaa1704ceda8f3616623587bda4d87626f3a21fd2ab82eb32026cd2659db6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddd8ebdb56276d92de5ee49947c450acafba4d7af9d94ba15fa326cdf021ace8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c01fbe8b8711938dd5a1cd19cff014ec88c6ff3dde9b086c1e3b63916270a4f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0b022f247e74b7ba1fafaeec022f3bf5f38e44fcab2a57f5b40422fd31dbeed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9e8cacce55afcf4e9aa40b533790e9209e61e41335675624336b14825b87ba3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2d6abfef1263054a8e16685a641eaab69cdccfcae04666df48eb099d25c10f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fbcd346e7374dd271af940307dc1613032047d295bf312d8c93cbe874a06112"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2d4c5c62c4268467aadbb11884b7d96100a3767ba375f8a120a651cfe27f7bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a224fc8aee382d2461a8b0c765534a1d27555205ee641b3bf7c58a23d80a105"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d2ddec57183d2eaf19a986e90d2c0030584e361f2f9d92a75b5970bf02e12f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7313d38e203575993d3539bd21ffe3d0d8391465af1276afaf4a0def8560da3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3a99bd1b862f063be4ce622a44ec83c0d6d2a9897f42d7a082145c092d29d4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5975460f17c877996f39c9333a0036072d85e49375b0b6b0e0aa65213a38b23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d8de1a7350f0f79463aa9470f9a475a6149cc19295eba8b01eb9d626d27928b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:16-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c44819707f584ade43561e66881a73d9ec2c812e495ead25031949361ba3c14"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9a2fab1fe29df10b4a39a3f32273d7f227aa71e47ec60f572fa933a0cd25e52"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52ebbc0109c106f02e11a3db47bafb22a7f322190cb9e6aebd19b0ca9bb58d18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3605d6233ed91800b9f427ee2b872963f7197bec4cf87106d4d45074a678efd1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5faf1c79149d4cdc603ee18670fa107e25b9ab32fe6b53db94e68a2995e91989"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6d3a5ae4d5c57069f1ed25d12c7adeaa4e309a68e2d4422fc650912edaca9e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c901a9c70d4b137cd1b861ca3698e0992d419e8b7990c45104f9201535e80935"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"912753cdf6b458571a32073d32456801cd75973db62b85130712250d9d1ba4b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc9d3ab7532a5580416598b9c08180bbde388b48747c63eb4c30466516413e13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58da9481722706a73c18086446be561a86c582215242aba28958717f976afd19"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50ae69d18ab109032a2230bd330831ed3c77ca6b84816b7825face601bd1c140"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"677084b543a0abea574816e0562100d90f895ff9b9d52bcd15f452e47f33fb62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94ae108d6ac20ab205b3eb73d3ac9b3d7fc03d5311d54aff908964c3efc037e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd0234e505ed807d003b7032c6d61e76065dbeeaf01ba81e4d90cd8e3e48aa77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4f9fdddac1fccbfdfdc2835293c0978f483dae52cfe4193bb9bf4c8c92efc49"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c8491c31e542214616d32ac8724adb2b8fe3bb39abef449f507bdad665fdfc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1bfb7d8f6d53aef51f1afb80b5c605580ddd33ec3246b4c04d38fc1bbf4cdf7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80eeea442b024cc866ef4108962cdb222fee7318a326cfa8262b50a5c92ecff1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb1185aa0ab602ccc916b6c12fd8325e3190896598aa5f6d791351d76ac7cfe7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b1de2c441034569d5fabdd02b6f9b05a325a5e251cd2da4e341fff3addfa00b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaaed03f55dd86b4e4c05c227953ad97a1bd35cea02addecface87188cd2dad6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8364fd6649b117ccf364067eb37fa4fc404d1b75a19f50fe6dece1b4030666b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"717d63ae9a40a0a819b0c5b20cac563fca6e44836e4e919ddfb51a776e565b4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0b4a81873b74ce11bf75a6753a9a59908f089286df8a126460be951db2b955c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9f042018172d0b1a75140ac8555bebb30d90da9525ff8d002c32b19aa92db77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (16 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 16 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"994b8542a7ff0172526761324378e20d479e3f0a9d277d4af5938721b0d703ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a521cf72b0001eed1c18a6016dda0ce2f3dc65b8c8cf4aefb9fbdd41a953b762"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0a6f77666e8d2d23954ea47ee68ecb08d9d2576d61e542a1b5872d8d04d6b9c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"231135f922925e3b3c5e330f3a9b465d54d954e6f0dcc95742b43c0701a1ae34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25eea9ef17a74906d35327c4df5a9ec1a0e644f8cda8626a92c5bb99c66b1c78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f33b0f22d760b0be4b70cd7e5e610289e0b8efe1ff37c91e2992604e578969d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (16 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 16 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf4e9e4a6f894ff076f5b5d6cb3cb9e7870ffbda076af730971bebf739ad504a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (16 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 16 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b967f71a3be63e00d54627d6ca3ff600071fceeedd50741c424857729b86debd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26c1c642bc861e3f41fbc1f6ee6af0a189c9bb4e26195b2152b2d6f6221d6d4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9adfdcb895b28f36b25dac9554f26102b8df88823cba21d74272c6da7f5f28e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea2af77340667002dada1329fd0c42317a47be2d8f2d015c88a0c0fe42954d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99c3508e061ec009ac9b2da82b76a70215718c4fb9f1fd3e7b59f54f9ebd124a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"995b8a7692814e357a11ac0034f652a3a7b2e73f9898a4ad244a829ce13061d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (13 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 13 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca128d273ebd6458f457409245c8da3896f4d302280ae5e8b995544c7a6db7b0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (13 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 13 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de7910f6d162ce8da9ffcd6ce071f8801a4e6609a14811f8f35bce0fa2ec3e1b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (13 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 13 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca5c7348a8fa157423f12d71e559c094638c1b6974ab1c492fe050613f12c06e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (13 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 13 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83d56d7d6931d123a30929be93bc26bd2bdea254a479de44b925fbaebd468c17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89c6f4ec285092014b408f4e127ace135588a3e293cbe9c23ddf5fd34e1f34cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5d3a1f1a63c1399b7bd5b7bfcdf4c7faba2dcf5f6b0fa0d8ddd4a6dcbe1887c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-190 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a18d9244f785b47abe377b00e97468cddf1d0d340d9f939b105aef72d4c9683"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:348-444 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b23cd8ecc16a51bb4b681f33eb20dccac107c01a7eae9273fbe900248b37b6a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c84a61bd946b193328387f4adf0dcbb754fb68e7f19b26fbcd271daf853f2ac5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2422 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfa63b2ddcf054e53625d0c0a346bd69b3705b00e02b89f61843ec6d1013e4f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4233c4af888bb9e2401ccd4442a9eca87c938ec5af786bd7ed877b04deef167d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59495456eb2b3a1301c592999142693d0a36e167fc3f0a2e13220febc832672e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0adc404e666c965788535cb16a44c95b61bfd31b54bd4d8d012c32408c62a04f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"388f6b204f3856d7a9dc19cee38373a26722f8a9757823ae315223648e11314b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cde6ed36395722d7c3dcfd154e3153338a1c48dda8de535a6851e94725c2e23e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60eecb94ff2089b4b912d3caec48d805f25556c16c2d6d59cef6869caf9495f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5294e1124a21fb2d12ffb2eb8b48d8432e676c2685482730658f6cde47e1605b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a44ad2cc4139e37505062f8d726b74284592744dbc25c23e0bc0f241a346acc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (14 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 14 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50fd8c32faea0f6df36d018e6a1b5bfc272b1676e218e12cb95e432cc0f65760"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3baafd3070b818512e9a781980153672bb81d78ebd86154579463ab84fb75b9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5dd7fde366bca038a0c030f903f15ae92b763fc6371df1e9db3210129c6cecca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"179951e03e48573890bf46575ccabf37975bef78659633eec023de2ef17285a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9faf06c18829a68e3727bf0932a9546bae0dc8dfc710907971b4cb36d62d1182"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e005bdf87749183287b55b2913673e326a32f58c79aeaaa3ed09534b1b1d54d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-786 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f26965a67792be52c57eaf5aa70a88b5160266b3bf5295732db0d5141e63d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:23-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31450adbd133bf7825657aa55270a36a7445c4e9aa3c9b15641b1e2dbbb79083"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8eade58592a84dc3f3179c8fcd2b25aa1e4f5f759ca7343d02bfffcc6f39e8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b579b33e8e15f7f003f887200eafe8bca738daa0a97aa04199c734c3cf0d549"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33f937e9940cac0099b99be694e7b2f23c4f0fe25ab3669ce259210fbef1dd29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3290-3344 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"870da7db9ede3edb447678f414cb9165622c4b1a8d8da82f48cd37c24bea57e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b13718f835a128da6c8218341d3f6dd28a109c263cbd7f3a81f724d464a06ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e99af68aed2e4cd51f62a2713c3d6e7060be900b1d67acbb37d500a686ff7407"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2c8cad79737f5cc46530c16436820196175de2ed44d93206bb6595651136af9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"618a216939074ce9b024d0d06e023d4b9207c79a28f1deb5cbf70bc99db33d0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09dbec319c79170d4b6f4e20a0836b94711e05e5da192d3c7de5f19259b54488"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ecc7e49659558952be84589ea5b268b39a112384cc67c9eed7198f72b9cd9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b62414b4b1db0c972c89b9d7cb7099c37df64e5d13605c8c0256173d33851412"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa078d7dba2ec871683f9774fc11f9d0a9f7ec853a3d9cf69943a321f608ea73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9028cc73b05f654c4c442d557aa62145601fbda44360628958ec4ed52273be13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66c06307cd1a553864667b95bbd0b6ae0ffe46a038dfc65e4a24fde859117556"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (12 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 12 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"623680c56f5caa36fa45331c29e80ec459411c9974c1d20ec1f1449ff75a299a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (12 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 12 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c790d0ea54b4eb942bea844cc2ff59e5247fa823fa8af83af8281c8e64e5677"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (12 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 12 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9387e93d32f76de7c755cacdb5329d6a2d4192bd850848ac70eb1b75023f3604"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e5e54c9b4ba1f218a6e2f8b4235db8e73027d7ec97ba5a964bf5274ad1bb69d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d350afd48a0daccfef799a8e0d1379c2abd7c16255ebe5d7a0e9e08960701f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40264285e3907cf904a72aaa50aa8a994afa2ce83a66d05d4fe047d2b3052496"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"729a28bd057337ffa9c7bc1a8397ab7bce7a00e9401bcfef24fc9df419864772"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa4c1552ecde8211f5097ec63ea24d134a7e94864221eb4967bbcea9c50b6f95"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12be3f338b7f74bb392acfd679569fc638be6a31633d63d1047326ee6eafb13d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"394cecee97c3a7f6f6302299780316af5d85c9bfd29017b6d14710640862df73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4931812ddea30c67777ac965e2507efe627c77defde12a9d887ab05c9b655eae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"791aba371f367b8fb07fd177ed174c3d398532f3b24adaf7504afc55c41bbe79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e14c5fbd5ee6550b78341d69e2ca2079c7112c6ef7230c0c8686a94e27759f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"091721dcfa364fd9bda5e10906899f21f4e03d6fb732f2b472c78de21790a058"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23ae274e69190c0810e511f1ae28a07517bd3129db935f0c42bfe8e4f09a1ceb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5031123fbdef2641c101a011bfbcce9f5977c26e3e6c2018853540f0cb690221"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02586b3c5e982d8c7bacb70cd49b7639f6fb0adcea0a68bb2d1ed1b1fe56df15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a79bc85ae96e8caff44ab805acf3beb2a16eb62aa735adeb39858691ecab78b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74e084aada23eb9c214e8cc64192b7ac6748cdad57435475a4362fb85480f896"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c58cd3781a1d19e73470c56d7f797fd2f65d0c2fb3e70cf05cb2ad76771723e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e78883c85294b19faec673f210798fd96d014a72525c73b7cbb5f0c471c5130"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fa34e4e2d52dfe21e998da4ce5d45144d7d917aa2bb17522b27ddd87fbb640f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a0d909527e3ea42caa0c73ee7b78ddf1ddbda9c7b212e32ffb3a30a27beff48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3599975b691dc3dc6618acb784e635632ed2f4e4a309c58c0ab2bed724a53667"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a458024882e0b02edb2899c67b63217c1ce9df9c201d37b19196dd3da90b6c68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eeccdaee1bb9be6c69b49414644f08a4aac4080bbcc3d4b67c442db451994ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (15 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 15 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4beef2f8c98c4d63a7d02a2d7a0a9aec263029c33f508d94b920a1f39adf5830"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76ca81d22493372d5a36a37bc4067db1d9366303942fe1bced550d856a37e4c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e7b478542a0ed27b2e1dcb6615794e6185c3eaac69b3335026589f6897b755e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (45 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 45 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1591db2c0d732df00374fd2d9620bf239b45b57ae9af4a6746cb34b7c8f9e6fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd92893ce3c97c136af109538660586fe02c114555390a3bf340555ffa0f0529"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62a82038c8a4e0b1e3d6c98f18b2d59692451454241638b4ce4fba901ad52b05"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf9faed8e2b43f5a0930d0180f79f922e7ae5d1f15a397c2812d63ce547af1cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2f87f19368dbd3ceab7a7c03437305dfa5c441269a4b5a662bcc5f932c311a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4580d6ce97c9ca80e3d4fede3b92b1a37c88933008fd70f237f2f734efe20e1f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"321a69b1e281fc2669f53c8bfd89d5f2fe7eaa4412e27c4a1c131fa710ee9df5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fff40c47871a734fbccea9a87a2b6cb4e54ac1437923dc2067226cbe361f2737"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f5754846c5012ea6318430fe7a7ea9d4f4fe71d9cd64dac6c1dc617a1832005"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41e4e4889238c2649c59f6cfaf42d3bc473419a8ffcf4bf50644355767cbb70b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48fe30345abbd30ac3c87b8203943b478c3d9c24d1d932241635e29ab481c550"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57eba7033629a88ca5b4bfe48c4fe38244dc79bdbbb3e5834dbbdbede4124472"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46d97516591c925dfdfb25c10ec828d81b726dc6d8820d9337026a1913ab4a31"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa81a708828dd637d81b18307120bfdd22618501acbdb42420609af04514762e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e926376a1d65afbeb62bd36491b5e1989163df9a3eae865acb1a8a3ab51b5eb4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33dd533fc31002d011834236c1004d62e02e9331b8fa32884a5a3269cd230bc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2325c19232fdf20b6bff2731d01028dd77accaf2f9c6205da39ca548d10b9c49"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3afcb0d46e1dce418deaaf1233a878d1e98980e25a93b131b569cd2a3d021a9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd94f4ef50c7feafc7d9e0b882e4d1c54349d6337baa3ef945cac53cd2b9d4f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa006db04e3ff15b6b1d4f51a4d941da4c7645d40fdf9a642988e9ae80810d13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d11477cf17fdb9ee7cfa3a1b376134fa1625e0749ed835f6198e19168ee1d7f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"915acbe8a462611cf784df07fa3e4d85d66d026f17c0959e1b8c1c5262d65f6e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b4f3c3809b54459cbb92390fca073a8c6ae78dd9e518073b89ee1c30f600283"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f35093fa558105264ffbfd98cb2c4011c0f8fb16f54e2f871d6c65d3a5ff7e7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3f2c0f7b8ab13b2b2ad742e57c2e72d47bfe41ab1767de785991728972ca0db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41bb2e27ac8a6a0e463c8df1e27422d08b0ec885a4435f260b1b02def7d570e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06828e3db7087937c878d1b6275ee997968d29076acd5ad5bd8caaa10785fc51"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51878d2f11e07bbac0c9ff45b3dbd02d7463217322517003f6249620c8e0a90b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8cea4f104b4d7e215c40bb1a1cb756ddaa1331ef0de7bc5ca73af6695a7d2f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24eacefb0838278831310b8895dc2124f42029a0c7f6d201dae1446cd18dfdc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06fdd44e9b1bf774c3091228840425f38572cc358b44c3914d097bda55190339"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2422 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b6b84122c6d3d5c8e88b6e2790f572f8a7cc28031f426e2b0ac733be35f209a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2975bc4b12e89000b269c5cf223c6f56e13c8dfd85a3e547cc8387b9cbd5c4d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2574 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"756e72a2f200e4c49e048475d004eedffda4f8e82738f934aede0279d6308c1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3048 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bbb601a7db8518a26cf5284b06f6e295f8596dfceb7a082dda715df0de16950"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3177 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff58f81860ccc9fbeac3d424b6df79c54ea847e4122766ecc0a429d2be6ee526"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a4a5db262a14eaf72fe4a56f72d20010d67307591fa9ad1c6854a91487af6be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17caba1343df4ac0463a84dd003f3266179b129da23b09be42fe962702c67acd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0cb8563a1265a6ae723a1fda9a93aabc0c7e5a2f0f561f2309122ad287ba127"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"862782f4ddd6c00c5a1ad06937c468a30edef9f083a097458a408df2b33d4d16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b817d46c27a0f19afdb2305990adfa7f0aafa130c7fc4946f018c457879b14f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8271dc5ef1ce96d571c06524b8f8064551c2d30aaf928b23954022495c95f86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5886dcdf1a09492efa13a2c1a6d59497d78c7315ff30dc56eb4889304cc49e9c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"921c0c573788a9f14402929f97f7a8a4c52f01e33c43c7d53445882679acada0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ed2b2483cd1276856cf91bbe165ba151407d5aa508504004332ec3e784c35bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d03dc082a487432e4abbc6636d2de73cf519d0bede5ec38c498a347da2f1559f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecb7fedf4a3475f78db8e51c1d41ebc71ccb484283e6e17fef5f9a311f781f63"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45448bf31a4f47d02bb83e765e2a121cc4ef110bca9e85d21ab9217c5d2d9fb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcc8a43fe418f25f6cddf6b6553c6a59fa604f293b5a9d89e39ab17a28d283ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31e8a18d4cac5b095ff6b35477b03acb7f5c0e47b131ea286a86ea05252ea324"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"023c2d7403114e24408b25ea21b1942bf6b821ba42943cc7f1ebcf36a16346b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f549adebae9a2abf2c391a7e1b8588d815f1681554cffb016f35a2d0234e1e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87a266ebc9d7314d057b3987f953179b829fd8583bbbcfd82b7086502a510926"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27f0ccd0463536c4539a71a262952cf0950d52af4ecfb47e7521c7f8ad4384f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fcb39b91b7ec4dd621e63c72044330e8d4ca07452f647046cf839479023ff70"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eba57e10f58166147eb398940ada9eb479c35fc03330bc1b1efbd7b40afeaddc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acb76774d4416765efa9bb46ad4860db8660ad53bacd829773cd4296c3846270"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea93344a646ce2b22dc3db119c9b7f97e89bf981801e4a10e1eb540a22f2111e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05c73238d9f502148d96ebf3d8edad37337e94b02062d7b3860851f708bb60cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"959212ae5204aae807af1cb04b4efbd3c362541c0a6363174cebd8ce4e83c329"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcf6a9ae7336e6d3626528801b41d71020c96fd476d641d779981bcc91d90be5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7463cb3fc24534b8eb7f0ea7e713ab10a3e4fcf619ca83a2ae3a86e243f59236"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b36cb9ce2c6e78354c4dd8e650e2a8e9505f7eba64efcb1b2580f93f81079b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c7a6f036a4e9669f7f866d26828b06f12752f28e1e0c865285fe4abca0fa77d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3039823150a625642689860db1590be951cc890b8e7db5bdde6ed760f7c67018"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d69acf7106d3cb454f0bfea67dbbac3e8185b692e60600ef1e969689f9be9856"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc82cdfa440f0a68ef1e898bd03a189453e79191610208c7cd5cf9648cfa07a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d0e8ed29c4f3ec1f6c1688ce5b1a5659fe41693d9abd4f4b8f65d97cd436d97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4d382752de8fec9baa8221a157b0d5d2f0ae7a0e4d5dff38304351a024ca8bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73e498db54c6da0324b47c300a944df51c99a92d4f5a4dc4b14a342c5c57000f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f69bb72a5fcf48d945af98227caae6cb14d747e5df441a5389aa57d18cb2ddf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37540a8dfe35c2cc8d6475c4c883a037905021e66e084c137ff4cf2101d03d23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b96f1d0bc1bafdbea8f3019d36578232f4fda4e61f9d53ad67c6d329df4b7aa2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6029216165b30bb2fbb37835174c69ee6e2567c02f23b1d6989747245ece0f75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9a21d865871be90018cc119ef888d37b63c26c17c50c3e331dd067ad1d5eeff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"886f24ffdeba9b8fc47e3136e5cc8759a1ee19a68ef5de218ed4625d08f120f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6695eb2029a71a7eecc2179b49e0b54732e60c9876d42fe0b10a49653ef68d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adddabfb7f58093f0d5d6ee80d3ee237be7ad6995ee31ddf6830a14658c0de40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:236-288 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:117-170 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"009f34f82e4f31c75115339606d1bcdde3ab39e7de5addd078a6a991fe75f3dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:790-889 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f14c4ad0bf1abfe811e26397efdaa0143f3b5acb41c97b2d5efc84cc7026bf08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:790-889 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cd04c086df06dcc677f142c6ef8073b57b808126348389d30f45a8ed10141ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bce07627279169faf437735bb5a0644e1795681c06f254a6338192397ec214bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1afab2407912abbef9c96b31a6931fa7cb324e53bc124c86f9d34f941f7bac2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1f91a9fc1bf14771af9e297ba7958fc68ccf7718870aad3093b0aea73336578"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f8be29f66f26441b3dde89f59fe088cc9c1871c9e55eb3c207019952ee89f0d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f29c533afbbf29c5dbf276de8dab854e132deec37912eb3569ced249e97c8dda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f4874a50806bdd55a2c052989f749738efa356c44fe2e36492806145313f4b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab57a859e487ab38864468c956b15bb3efa7b8b756acafe3f5202f28122fdffa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b47958686803af2320958b825bd91f9f4021d0661b190726156af32412b1b921"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c73f98467c46fe8cd7a9dec3d7adc32cbc7e2de379f86647d38d0ba0c258794f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3448a0d0c0c13240ed6f15185c78496f59c748b9fd44eb8e51346d0b4e486f80"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18105e3018831970a40ca1234bfa09355b5f2f8780b423b54f8442d18833df29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7ec77c55b237310da97c2d864759abc17df67faa887b59d17c6350afa286cda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:14-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"432fea82e37d6695ce8500c5d27d4c4b76b014ab372f7894ff7fb42c83f03ddc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53ac932f2e1e2ab3789d8afd4801b981fd9ce81a3d3263fbf2c4a9fe0c67cfae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0efb90e3bd15673b67799a5ebe99d16b4263805a0052873c5a2043f65045c2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fb8417bd2337bb86db3ca79e82d9753ec46c545544f1c204552d3cf1a11b669"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"131c033f50d5d15bcc953ebf37c82869ba318c535ad72d17d57827be1364e165"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31faf7943000902adc5882c85ba0cf3a4ba4c0bd92a2fc65aaa13bae0b8c0b11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52141e1e57131fbf29b5f51ebc0659bceb356e05b94cc7b9d0cd9f48f61c8cfb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10de58b837095d26aaacdeba1fc17fd26533e7402b527795e6ecc5fbf930fe20"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"339e291f82dfc2f89363f033836e4f18a88f58337e3bcc115d9e355781b12c04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2f488ff9c187e484a224c296166c48ca2521c1709bfc4d16a7f005e4328a391"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6f967c816d0e28ee9ed00f9033e08cdd53316db8a05de35c689a266533d6325"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2e525640bff7c67c3f77ae46e76b6ddf547388ebc099cc84c4095cc5eb0aa92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9be073556cf3dc169450e1f61cf67ca850eee80f3ef611b838ef7810de0911d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"418d2df449f07360197e4b3efbcf553d0f8ba1e5d17a8c8f4cef0f6378d40c49"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7726ca52874dde2ab091e93e1717979b3153ace3bf273e5361d30c52daed8f45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"346a232bba440980e6462fd25f251576ac4b9177f4f6a7cb556fb33048c11d86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8c21e4b6fc65991cf77e19a90c7b8d009d02683ab8702244bbedb0323ae5949"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24452260db28548e56194994fdcc7232388daec1f6ac9c983a6ead4368e2d8b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3779a8878574be030d5e795a65a144a2e883144c3965dda42e2ddbd328f0b713"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"975ea13532a84ed78ae2d5fc16c0be787c304a1ef623d7f5631d60c9ebc028cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef12928fc0094e2060c26dc32168cf1521c4ea856f3c48b90521a769724459f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0898c67f75b9ebdd9dbe30fd60f66d5a7639c7d5d7e6082612152d49dac6833"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65cd53c5c3972b86e501f7a6d18292b9e06f77f9975601a44d39dcc0f17c9159"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ea7334ace9cbef1d3ba1a8b18376575b1463270fceff8e7cfd5e61596b68ea7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c1b8e667c15524c53d00461944a16aabfe439614a787b4b07a4d1d9aa980bb7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ce50e97a613d11f819537d7e3cd825a121c1553f7c6427d612385ed51b397ca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"591f908bdeca6fff25eaafad2729dea9769d9881007e8c0aea1821bb818fa9fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fab6151b4b82b5a31977ee02b1165512c09a91df36350d09328127c67dfb131e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bbb9fd6b9f90263a549bcaf4d393855dc745d0eb47ddafae34b0b7bf38599d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f65b48b091e4fadba7053b1fcb3c175f96f5363e7a698b197e94bd31fb9b8105"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cbf1f3381413895d40e90e94002ba7958032bc36135e728e2598a83b4bb5024"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bca5cac31e1813a0892a38eeb4641b47e2d63d1f83970af8297fe0efcaf6112a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba2d8e114da6d1b6b88ed6400b6ccbc696c64e07ef53531602475738a7f96af4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"374179a34a23c12e3cb655c1026c45d86e991085500b68db54e3e560a85fee6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a885858a53c8568b280938a1b3bd470609b98979d98415ce044442ab43b529b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"224098273c2e177c47786f8dc6c415db22c0ebd38056d0cc52cc3ca530b3268c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62bd6f104d03982a1cecc3ba09591dac9f58564d3bc84c2afc5803b31acb1611"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfa6ab8fc5a3e2b56a7c4a7d3abb37b3665d513a4b942bee4d7b8d6db73b28a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18d7b9166a558db81883f8d7a32f1d2201c86258b3f2087fb1b4f76aa0215355"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82915a97ae24fdad7af83a15a54feaf05b6e68838ee689ef3cb16780a09badc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"192c00cc5910b1aa029d7bee7982442f48cea58926e960858ebcaf41362023c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c5bc217fcc2af5f8e5a6ce99697d25030d4ca41ce7f79013e56f1ff3b7fc681"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"039e7916042f2e9f99b61a697d89ff729002da54eaa2b8f5859d1517e0d3efd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"529f86468c1d907bbff2cc5e62b3be5ab65f000437e0cd53512115b10465136b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c18eeabbe6f1cb8388cd5b560ccc4e9340de030e014f373b66ab52abc1da50a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d869142279fb3ec62c91d080183eeed516aad79849b5566d71d3bc5689f53574"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fa81eea40e0ec65a1437b5bedab9fa6d42144131c081848511553ab398fedd2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d66c25a854dc23dbfe18525d13915f2ce1f9c5727a27a7d0f9cea756ec8542fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b39c71736465310dd1030800eb8e7cbcae2208f10d9585b5de4cee5c7474bbd1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c1f4de3610581e83d732fb2f071eb9cfc69c5d30d4a3741c3001cf2c5129e4f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fee07087496a466d62dd46729899d28e42e72f2085eef0cea9b1573b2de8d2a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e52b532dcd727884acace2197b93696ca4c35ba9e8ca87421f14127a3d59d5b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py:13-68 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d47326da540bc60e2887a15f5ffab4d91555cfc7ecc3263867d71a5cc7d40abb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f153f13afa1e4ef1d0f7d880a48fdda69c645717f71579d252bea837a8cdfb66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da103675683c7b76b512ced9e83241515003f47980331de7c1c95ecf68ea5b89"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37b66e4f0a9334e3212b5c418a36cefa316afdaf9972b8d1e2673520b939ba53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06cea1a734cb3fab5f2d9732daf96990e8e868cf8c976fd89206c3fe3be7cc85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c812166d2b5f15a0df46e65d1ab5710b5672796a1ad3262223e5de44d86626f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-645 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c9a19199e9267d084df244eebdc1fbf238cf0b583639ce59f7a386a3888bdd8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8a44f0591480984b42af5e65ed9af901ab49cc2917d70877f2254878893900c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (49 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 49 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a180dced46b83bb0f4f406fd5365ff0436c03fda1639890deb09ed95cc3c5cb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecba3acce0f0d80292935219fed537d3d1fd2040a79ec35bf1a8254dc14f9ba0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52042d66b1cc6525432742f1b8c00cda3084ceacfd2e3dd12ad7eec60619a5c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ce49cb3ba7ad8825dc25fd61f6bbda35e57157b3b3f16885a8fd78e781a18eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4db4e06d7ab7035f97583729b468ee1a33477882a41a7d7fe2bc3382b1163288"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:62-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34e5acba73330c1d62a41b5689109da8815b912273725dda6d2bd232b80eae56"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:30-90 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb69d274f379efbf867b57cbfe647f4149a6cd58941c8e81f2b306e5575ec38a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:62-111 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f2886b9024efce716c15f5c60e92db4f1e078e45f23403b0a40aa87a6bc86c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:30-90 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfdf713483fc60b26c774e1d58e250e3216b427c9f9ac2c60ec781038e2c70b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6c9b188fb63c4420f73cc33216d28e94cb2c5fc4ecd4e38bdcaa27fdc662936"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6b67db859bf7b3accf9c590e81b4187791c9f1826c26564fa3d8862f3ed08d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e056ad529a7041872786f69a80a727468498a7880fe012857b706267fb8e0138"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4cc11c2a83b91e38c945485107e1b8963687c1612578a49e7c1c45ccadb9778"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"232aa85e3449ad30a19b82acab36172ec6a5a6fc7beacf48a91bdf569397d6f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad5bef65b77ddc2ee690925cac4d6794840d97724f2db54ec1be0bd31d99835d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"811d32e5896ce0c15601d3ac9db02f1a6b41564780613d409223d79f8b58dc53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a36c23e7be9f0a31105e133931b7b65b940ae79ac8281da55b6ce84ac8de015c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e68751d6a402cfc0af51c806b30714388f5c4e14ca1c0ba1cec3f88a2ad72f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4eb739287b1b978810ba8b0142a654655985cc76c1794cbd5665558ba538a0cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (55 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 55 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4dcb73d5deabd4d21e5665e55d8e14fece35e0b5ef032ac9814059995b79d7c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed1150ba19dfe1bba65c58048ee01fcadb338edc9ebaf32e89a4cb55e74784e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py:65-95 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da0b04433b17b1ee05bc03a81396c38e2d3cb4c94120db0ca5205cdc27355eaf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:108-251 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10ac9bc89b25cde39b0aee06014771ac93a0dea6a0a95070d29e9d64c83b9bf8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cce13b3a0e48e68459102eb10643f4350558c07203f6d7df11187f1812bf2fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18e600894a3b638c831e5d92941d3f59cb7ad5ce78a18640b37293d400f4eb29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c53dd81932fc3db6e38ee03e294e82ff048cbbe9afd2cecedc54d5028087a589"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50f2525447bb3f3ef1916c98a3092ad890a22114968e57c6d1376085d5036135"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e5aa25d568792146736efdc29243571c7de8f53c402ed249e1072b766f0c6c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"434b4da86b9dfb997f7563a245a77807eccc056dd1eeff8c480779919417c4d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (15 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 15 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04ab45fa001528a1ccc21772df0609803331968b77747f248dfe45b49f772972"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"688f0900d00288747086d98e3369fdbc3477d124b873e0560a4ecc3278a4cfa7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1dc66bab98adf8360f33499643b2d7e6079c4fee20fae97e5d5c6a11d40f8f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2904aeeaa18d1375ab80583288f10f7c6671eb06ecaceab67457cba5e4e63e0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:16-97 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py:14-67 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fe0a23f74f17e7f5d0ff88b44ad3440cea6d75e8c1e805706d3885164ce74a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9326d6c090c8baf16c4e469259889b36e7e2626661b6813349e34f7613d02f9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a0c5a30d2a0ed04ecf83b0901ed2e08bc2b2c95ad015ac244066ff28589f86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c12db4d9907469a9d3699e315abe56abf36e6b01e7e449a3b1ed42e80c529ec4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1dcddc9d77b5f1066e1f4cd90aae8e944228e3b6b1c86ac251a7e939861ae25"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43e209b4f732ac1bf4369f19b16a87dc2d0b77ff4f5f1fcd485b944b23c23985"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52be25666d8b2849a647c8d53adb4f7573f6813238599bc14739d8516df6bf67"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"431ae94edc7088254c35cdd468b52399cd7922943fbf6c2414fbcd079fc6c634"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db8d28031ef12e345cd6776a17faed8b9d456e5332b47067caab6e4d87ee43d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32cef17b7420d2156866260e58d14e484d62428721fb47354052cbee0a958cc2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e9d8a0fa95942ea1a419f3ce26987fa1e4df694df50265923cd52e5581c2314"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3414368e334268fdce61ce452032dd4b63110790f87aee722a6874706142c75a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb43ed20170a7c38511addba6cb6f6d8c84e62dc2eaad2b7a9aa19395580f0b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dff6f094507b55d6c9490a23095467e9c21a7a197a9a524e492393924c76df6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0df0944f58120089e9d2b9081b50c6c24de10fb5d46d5072e739b0a745b59a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13fd764d9ddf024d4ded517087a729d1fea552dc32a557b7734a75445eb4faa0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47162e10c9066dbc3683f82c74d80a8b0b5dee064d02f27bcc9bf31f680514f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbf2617e3914a632b9e6b2bbdbe1f545c9c4db7a5846ab482ae18cf6c33274ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ccafa1b51d64dd180816cd8d4cdefe265846caafbdb792edfda9fe696eec577"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2497 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"587da213183f3aab24e90aebf390930de21fe3690f176ce667b24b8d304e3ea5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e678bf2e76d4aca04fd7719b645dec4769bd7da631532314bb2ab2b6bc45cf65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c3cab3a948834940238805df4d435c9873ed909437aff7f3b589ed7c47e7c8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6567aaa1ed63d4691ef76acfeb172fe6effde049793a07ce18b721a8285dc527"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c01b4fcb1992aadf633c5af69b72241d22d25d97f35caa444d33255db085ac1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a68a58cdeb7a84d40e702bd14742230215f70192e027dd85d2b3322fde74070"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5070c12f2c942ae3a85a5b27f3493f68ecd4facb7dcd85748d5dcf3b8bf67f58"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ca19b24543bb11dd9ba618c5ff27a04d93d7b8e7326c1a3c62d580859d991fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27fd52af49a3488f60eaec4a55811751d88423185761eac190a0d687b9bac5c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a03f4510094c0c8e19697e3e0e570e517483592a7158a445b2d5dd40748787f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe68502e11721203de42f26954afeff39817c44f81dd8d508eb6f6e3b297d777"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abc114030dcc966cf0ca4434f738e918a9360ce2eca96e7d101b8a72e9036e6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"336fbb5d6641b3b5976bd3305cfa95b5ad23ba92ba603ec60ae8052f4b62123d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"131f7a72ad560510dd53bb5e91b98b6e3335034492b027778dd200c0286b4251"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f288029e4888ab29455e423ed1448670c30581d97c5241b2f0c7dcd84692544"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-600 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97ee5e6c0f3c471edeb1ef928160dbd5dfd13a04f582fdb3594e5b816e3f9d6d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a7589003821471b45c4e4069f39e2d353ac4d3df4a91f45676077311b69b90a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b65e158a50a6fbf2d7b462b508ff7908779e1c57a61f4f5568e762c68a6f1289"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:14-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d6fbc9d6c617661b35087443cdc299d3bda6d4a203d2fc02c7cce6c50755d2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:16-114 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0dc9ea1ebf573f186cb00cf8a4d7a6270e9a8f39164946c6364ddc136cafd1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a69982b6287cc718fceab448b2d9437086f60027d62d3f9413fe0eca49c0d319"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55c086cb0414c1925ad319d3522f092a8f9b901582a4c95aa1654e7d6474fbc5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1fedbf2cb0314866f8af760816670dc3786182b64bb77b811e3002c4bc16b6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19f990537287eb94411d8aedcc38f9773b55a4e840a510e8a18e37f38e567695"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e2571447a9ba83f6297b9b786c921a1e9b8bcdda9fbfcd51e3ee1038e8e02f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d693d514da63cdbdf06627f66726d99a288048eb82da4e179ebd2b6d9bd41bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"298c4b5d860dc41c1644a223c07ed3578242ed7e825c22cda117a242bbcef450"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (22 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1594-1685 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 22 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6476f0d9e67a44cafb72af38be78d263cb22b4aede7861abdcadadc9e2a630d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4974d51905aa8bc67f426de7538d6f3a442dbb6d3b6bccb5e9f0663070a2d26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"466388c6ffc64229f97a7dcdc703094450d341982f9e4f3b9345825b349971c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:63-155 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b31c129e26623fbe139ff72b27abedf119c47d55d3b13084ed7dc7e7a48f4436"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:88-168 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510c167d7443e0b128f157b757f694ba9c401e15969c4f7083bf0de3e43fe0ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:652-688 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-382 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":652}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e11829e810b6e6d6526d9df884f41627f7a619226cab14e7467d912decc86c1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:14-64 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:104-164 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c70039edf022543080da098764a69521c0215c008faa3e43a54f2b413b7073e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:14-66 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:104-164 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa8e552afd5b61859ed23d1823f8dcd65b59b55e7d43e02c473e257bd81a6dfe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3625b92c3a0580dc502b55c550661e630854264d9a4e8f6f6a36fb2ff8988637"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"236cf4ce1452774aa01dcab58e4adf4a3607e5af8244941588e3f038d48be667"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adbcd099bc3edbbbbe8574d6a10b993b166938d6f1b33a33d5a52c82dec2c668"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"205a97468103d0d91af9056d2692cfc73634a814712cb97541cf9ff8445379ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21f2bd30430d47b42a2ec767f7c8c081dea01f880fff9561fdade5a8034b9ad1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:130-205 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09c9de0482d2c30225af1dece18b37d06f918a1c7e7a09e04d7b5390b0b165a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78e49472e43ed6408efe06a71bdd1755feef9eb2de32d41c0c5f5601e61135d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/option/option_em.py:113-180 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cfe6fc23d60e2fb5e885ba878736e619be9ec3fc327718ecd78951763dfaf2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:46-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6465d7615cdbeedd2792d9538dabbac6e2222c2407dae6de9eb7f0fec45dfc97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:216-292 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e67f99610f783cf2cc525ad41e4c41a61386243e7c2dcf303185f3cd4a5def40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1aec144bb3350edf28f9b1eb1dc34115c0ce9919df56ecc67f8509533a2eb3c6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:14-102 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0075281966456b5f3f11ccc6367a3c755d6233550599e4e898def5c9cebc8915"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-430 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"676283e744a691930459f340b6a8889ee901175f5f68aa7c9bbe4b26dd80af5a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4ecbb9766773cfc52f2842e886fa2a44cb7071d84ec6db5fc200c61d97b85f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:166-294 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7bc86e884353c9d5e92a6b1df8130f538c1328e48c9b7dafa828cccdd094be0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"460d9d6fe4a94ff2c6660fad49be33f48ffac1dff706efe3a04e814522924910"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py:65-95 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:652-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d037d563540341144c4943f450e231aeb9acfd767d255b7a99e3db57c12873d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:17-169 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:43-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c701ade266f0ad8d32440e2d963f91f9c995f5742b10ac358835582e4c1f2b86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:17-169 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a185dbacc696b2b9ccef645de8893447b341b8efac772c2a8951f3d249d9d143"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:17-169 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-219 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c82b73a2eba3cebc73323319f9d97527fe899be091d19f9edeba687bd26a2b10"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:17-169 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:14-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12eef25f16e065048392371a27d91d4373d9001f88868d74afb842d82c800da9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:652-688 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":652}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59845b0490fcb6a93f9f5c379f8f8388868c5fdc39ceca28897ce777ce5e9dce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"326ec89c1ae544600ac94941179ba51eaef0bef78f7b5bf640f0deae7ee11231"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6aa1efb3a520c8cbd95f4d201c5e83bf75fc0a1f8033cb860bd77650b1faf138"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-382 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"859f1e10ec4ae5e23aa21aecb67a4deb7db0e226736fc6df861b179a7ebb54c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ead44330af8ebe4fb7e58619ddd36e52e4120b6489bd4b0610f28c177ed4ac6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:60-110 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:19-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b7b39862bc57cf6ed3985e93e59fd59aa4522ca452d1b7870d78ac8d5ccd3fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f13dc5b13efb8f9e9d19ba9edcdca46256c0989bdc5421d5f6957dfe9e82173"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cc4770a882286d22ccf493562530cc1a0898ea26b9db30717c7a233c6336594"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"530ef615bad8c0ecaaf05f644124579a4b63d78f25ae40b6dd2dadbdab8b6410"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0a4ecb9c4f1406d493c3bb3b15065d5b888a785fa8fb9f0cd1dac025a3f9cad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b2e8b3963a4c3aec7278c2d47e06d6325f98a5301395fc6d160ee6b53d15693"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"508398d3b3013445de1c091c1e526920133e501133c5ec49dff106b3f0510e26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f3c87e962aaa4c236d5ca81c332793efa457d60fa0c2f640cd44d04bc2a1147"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"596e45d1d54c3b720e0e6c78287390b9f52650cbce4d27d35154bc74578cf0d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-117 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffa245f271c53ad57572091ac518b2c954d1c4280121ea8d10984342f687967e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6dcc17be871e125a9e5a13c882c2e51df6774b66e63c30acccc6802af9611d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afb87da51d152747f953eb2c416a5ee6a6d1308a8b5b9499a3dcda49b84712ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:89-167 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de2ec350e10f6b66cb7b43ab1ea0f2e25a8075cedbfe2ab406cd67414f8efddb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13ede8649af898e62eccc807fc7a39ff350edfcb58ba7b4759b5a6864fa9cdb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a9a1db674df6c43cc54c267c5dff4282e5e3b12868b4782132657aceff30602"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-158 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f1aae9a5b13c7d5a1be9f78d81930c295ab03512157eeb2bd51cb406814244f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-299 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0d4c637c305bf8433f29cca6b0f1a5e573e5f772ead78fca7e22af885958ab2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-435 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef0c182ae0a81602099f358132fa2bff296cb07c302366be56d25c9de03d0f7b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06cbcae9ef3c4be58c6e719ff13d3bf776d6849fd22ad96cf5ce3e329765d3a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b194cb4f35f9c0fcd0597f87a4737bd5f0fef3afe8ac135808c65341a5f846a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba774c49104060b159c9793b7390e0b97ea1ce3dd659f7b86bac0f59371b5e81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:242-316 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb46c1f94661f94110d0ab9ecc20be51e5149f534b6f09dfb8b7b74b1c381792"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"310b62112ba93426c88641f40c8bff8c215b8eb1a703b3d019169fab231db353"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (20 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 20 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"425dcf43515998a0bbd41cd1311cbe393e5cfb811876d95907e0a41dd3dd5e84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:790-889 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbe60c8694637a042be9a8a00c1b7de1d40d98247d0b4fc3e621ac3cbf87b855"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:482-549 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:14-64 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"965d6bbab091012324e43ef122899a607a20b117a187adc4ca61848d5097709f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b4f1af97763874bec1277231e26c079bf44327a822aa189151f4cccb4d1d0da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38257ff079da8eab84ecd62e7394ae03071dc6aaaac0a75c5a681993c2206184"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fa8ee080b740aeab53eea2d29e2eefedb4be41dad5e5bbe7f335984c868b0c6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2c23a4b153199b2aba4fe63a96657c7c3f30a6d0f3ed939b22af6f3d06d7ce4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"984c7326bc34f733382b30975e1cec716cca0b094dd6e92c66bb4957e001e8ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2815}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b6aa660e3a0fd13ccdb8ba07b25d4504da7ea2996bb42e2f3255d2366d4e3cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2815}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"252b045455977e0826cea96e0c317e3c7a86a367ae01dc7e2e62c789f02b9b77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2815}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3af8d9aa54ea71561578f41370ff2a2932c5a8394dbe81e9846c7d6e6374a069"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"375f0eac855e6036bdca698f2ea1c9b0664dc85add8d1b8f8a2410b2ba5b00d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97f5c85380aa8feca820f6e5ceb60d8a3c094e5709713f63a7e716320d32e61c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3e8cb82faa4c7b504e36ec747439b71ac3aae689f4a746691ed2849d22a49e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f73e5cacf40b60142dc74fcca12cc5c3a493fd4ac8e307340b0c517b9a5eadce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25eca0e6b2a7ff70294269f098ff93ca24ecad4045b16bc17d63aef91800625a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:482-549 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:14-66 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a9b3c682043c4e418eb58cd31f79bccc6b43e7c7de94fef7fd149ecbc4a40b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-682 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b8e9dd9dc3818c14417a78a314f68bf0c7db9fffcb3624bfd8b22f4a7b19ea6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-254 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e4d8c376e236ff27278a0bac69c2c1269d29b1634a629afbb60b332d24b908f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2864 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2815}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6346640695b55eebc83623f458d8065c612a1556b0aa51bdfb40a16cb880d1b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3233 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e778bb3ad3f1bb5da88a88a021834007cf323cd28081af83c5d434a5af1b8c2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (9 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:77-162 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 9 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48358cc75814df7ca8357c76ff9f7eebadc2bf4e7b69becdb06a38c1c364c15b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (12 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:16-107 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 12 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96e3062266baf803235a2d19874b74699742fbb209d5e5a272e7f842bb5098de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-199 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e2b8ee79546c36e0cf6db0d8e6d61a95e39c056e49740c683c3cc722a3b6e58"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1820 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1766}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1689908826f1963a6b2a3cc82d66e89e3c25f677d1967bd3e972a161106bf842"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1820 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1766}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9113ff7f7cf416138912c4a9a55c666ae07a40e4ee4fcb93f5ebe95c87242f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2339 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33e7a5dd18424e521fd137e27ac2d59883f6d9b823df3ae52ee655232c075634"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2811 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e5d0cb85f40fa408e05ce3def44374f243b357a36c81af9a11d79fa2d88ffaf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (32 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-217 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-720 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 32 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4945e9158a3676002b4f3550eee7f409a420db5b10254a861b191ab20db9910"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (12 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 12 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfd4c9ef9dc96cdcddc42600dcc98fbc4e4eb0157a7092b047a405f989085b4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bcee81af60d46b920f29bcec9835c3d92c67f5a87dcd7b2bbefcb6445f96b66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:20-74 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:43-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f9f0356df6ddb71ce3b60a4269b52aef90d410d40129edf7bb97354c1635136"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:20-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7168f141b33dfd934dbfdf8f1f10402f1dcca5053c4ea8121bc838381511ba7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:20-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-219 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"108fb2eff3449679595dc7ce570780b73fbe691672cf95178d8076baa5b1fd34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:20-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:14-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddd3ec070a7caff78f40f39766c928ed0fff739b6345c5a33bc91b329902da56"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f267b3d9c10e4b72657f0e06976a414960cb31fb76ac1882a966cb439876dee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be054a48c507098da9f586f5dffbc866fc9675337001ab88f06880f0bb3b0ccc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (24 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1013-1055 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 24 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1013}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df47de6789ce88ab4c2e4b569a7888259ab6a4174888efc026a1584bc93983c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1013-1055 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1013}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0276f6f27a4d53d8c633b7be5e538fadd0d469dfe61344709baf3adc6a263985"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:31-94 | akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b49e1b63cb1e9a715ec373b3912d168b2df85aaa843bdc8fbf739c41023339ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be07efeec459f4f152d04634cb776457808c7e230a80f92de586895eee2504cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (67 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 67 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c220d643562d78acef4e2a9916f8775382c0430720fe17e72c05a15e65ab56ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3f052e5a34aeaddcb9d50eea61db6c61742edb3af3865cdef15b37329b479a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"255662ec642e63634e2e837bb572a9674efe06879d12f09920c4fd83ceeb7ca5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e791125071b2c0100026db4c1b66f037c3843de6653babc971f004d9baded78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d72abdbd99ef4900f0715926a1db5052dddf36ef28a40e05c42917fa0ba180ca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331f14eecb3b7871cceb784af35e84f2ef3b2b806c79b915081bff8bf895d7ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (62 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 62 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35ed069dda5ff223158d91a8d9122adaca40cb9ed2576932c26a68093812bd36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (47 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 47 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a3a75bb4b09b5a32a010f52c73f81fe1834f0aa9304a314a832843f77636d71"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:166-294 | akshare/option/option_current_szse.py:15-95 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31dac143dc4506b2632c59742a0accf5a78102ebc4f3123756140de4e72b0b92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (11 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:166-294 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:100-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 11 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c94ac0650b36cb847b63b07dc28f7cf298658afc6e96bfbe656ea9ccd317ed51"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"896ef2675eaf8f59ed9eb9dd4ccfb4d98e111223cc28d921c75b0eb47e14434b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13b75867daea3455636ec8aa213a228b9eabdc89760fd8d9f54175e97ec782f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b601270ab4f82726a7359061627df7cb710d55cb0dfd1ef9097a5d6816855ca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5485f38c4e9c0d97a71eda898192e61086c058294318f5b717084364c9c24c59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28dc8e042299771e3521cf099cc5bb9d0ee72387490a32b234148fbdb3ada0bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd42d0f4a066788e4ac839d16a8548f325bf638553025407708b446626ceb4fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5df8728bbd3da61a83947312739b8623f19a29276da36ca4f5501cb78e04d8ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"417b7c999bbe5bd574d22b22c268c996505cf4fd977c13b640e9a46ad357a010"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3b28416ee50308f6a367cf8c802a665b701f8017aeeecb74f31d0d8d3a85dff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70e544c1452fb8878b7364c27fcbd551c08d8e35838fa6ce57b0d7a7e4714fa2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22303e947847def46881521de55256dd97e0fa138ffb79630c5bbafdec34558a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6bade7f72ed4bdc1e0912c175aa35717af6672aee9bd9d7c30619575e3d89d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c82a72a07473f27dcfbaa0dc090886e6fffe7f333daa15589e839d091682d002"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3a8ba765cfb6d37e15bdc6915e39f3d7ca110351fa6c06f124026057a10af5c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (10 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:17-169 | akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:20-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 10 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b3280646196a9e67e72688ab5626a329264d6b97d212d7558bd3acc4b9b42da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"542cb284598610c0625295129327691a589a059400d283c1a060aa66ac8ebd9c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da0ac567e8a28948a22c9f685027c944b6fb58749c77c9056e7988437750c2d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (37 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 37 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3d092d1a7894644d2517429f929a894db3be61aa4aaf06ba4cf777ee6bcf31c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19362ee1faf3562700da7dd0d43687673cea7ec6d992af3f28d8d1143ae0bcf9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6e32df796b306e627193b7025fd57d85f5e5a96c669459a75de0da7849a97b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-92 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdb73cdc1911ae2f27a5fdb8a5ebf384ee9a8496ddafdf6f011321fcb7a46ce0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-125 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a71171a5a4a5096d25e0f4e3405062c54dc6120d3d21a0411662a3aa7d2cf4d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:16-138 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"321668ae442a5393179df1f43409a7dcb1d2026c079d03b095426ec6a0d0ae07"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1193-1327 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cce9249308b77fbc4bc70fa0dd9d5cc669e3fe2d1f5f4a2529ed27e9d3eabef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-572 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7989fd22a184c8bd0b442284e500a83c11e7044c5011f17406eb97bdb7740ba3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:17-143 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4558ad7d853b2bc9ce9f32b9fa95de199c520fa841b8d07f7b353ba32bfab5e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:113-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-132 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"879baf92a3ce41ea3da4be2655caf06a649dfb999ff16e1fe99541b23e8a4e3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"914b22726b21d4d8ff28fa59b3959ddc2efe481dab414c08fdd9414ff3e660c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:31-94 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-193 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bf9f66477e549e2b791b19019072cd91a4e0257facfe3a991c242eb4bfc1a0e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:129-409 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-116 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c93ddca886bd0a8f0fa6dc403e20188a0f64bf14bedc81f56bafb3a4871888f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:129-409 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-390 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c2d108d711abc7576db8f7c047c3b3219cb18205fee92054c81c809b03127ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9b3b7410a97d2ebc1772ac6dadd8fb7f18bcf8671e6ff411cf9488ba7a08d22"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2044-2095 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-219 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2044}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc437dba17e1ef9720860dbaa54572aeb3bcff29f19ec1c8ac1fafd5f83f15fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32faad5ff7a041c59de899e2676fd6d217c39c2d34864641a76331a977ceffb9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f77c79cc20bf8a1f37d4c3e25522c32a78602aa11b490abcf03e15335bb7d0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1942a2cde2e3560cd9dd08cf3e04a17e638808cbe1cfc658efc1d2b02691a89b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bd0f8d02ae48d1b52682a1696a0b759aa19526eb2e3d81906b54b6f30b71889"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afbbfe8dd9d3bda192e559cd070e84fe8b00a24b8fc6884e080a35b5ee7c3837"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-592 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e9110ec2172a513f9112aae8863c1a4edf843b32c1520ddc6158657959f4173"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (30 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-120 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 30 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6c4cff9ff8c32b01f50e7fc97c14191a75c8adb6a0176bd8046e10065ca5d65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:98-158 | akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-74 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8ce5140a0c0a04908d4730a061f6617c872cc3b848b37dcb3ca7b371c62279c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:16-95 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:16-128 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5376869b7f2e941720d0094dabb13a26af649a16710aa01fbba6c0be7769478d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (29 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 29 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d02050d095d23513298c1e32291a21e6a117bd9a197321c485671d1f108431eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa7b5ba8299156a0f8ca40904eb34aeec7c7701e40da7fb7ebce057a45687a2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"192b244cda04731df3fa19b6d6653d1210b4e1f8cb2f9904653776931612c2e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"183dcf1932e3f83bf59b8dec49e76b21b2e629b57275f774a60dd9013bc3f3ca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (68 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 68 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0628fc0dcf8f8bb3f479a83f9c134ed6e023e77bda206047ae630ca6b282cbf8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:15-85 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:199-274 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"531afd780115e595f8c0a7bae471a88c3de0456b99e64aec96628ec2c47ce6ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-157 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:199-274 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f02611bd545acaf633173d4d466ab8c9ab5eee16b853b635977245d18071902"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b98fcdcbaf62e573aa1f03c7af635f39d120e918bac5497522d20bde34590114"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75f9f56cd58104832f0e1231b0ce03c383992e2d81c0d5012274990ca9eb036a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dd5ed77b2a2aac571ec90bad80b40d8ebd20213744634a8cba9ff1516ec1565"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af5879476761bcf026815fc46c5ffd34947c31b1e43d29a85e6927d7a7a44124"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59bb4b9ba9377f7f8393802797667f2985948d2ba03c64fa076edaf919f614cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f8f879581541be8792726256708bfa6ded6963dd7c824de196d4337e25c0c24"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b5aff65d743b0ae24e4ddd4367a17b0ab2d9c1d7e07cf9caf811118a5022dcb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccf22665cc1912589f7e2eb02f277f6aef997c971f9383557b00cb832dddc211"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (64 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 64 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":462}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fb3ed14c86d7ffde21fb9316921194bc3292afee9cfa35d8a93302da1d41323"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1887b0da56c8f5e4da4d7b2566757faa5f149692f02f6100eb028beea2e6bdef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"413a80b11d70264813b21cae35476694d506cebc35071376ca2845fda03ad9cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (63 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 63 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f9cefb6b6dd782fae608b0a16c4d4d73f6e7daa444f42ee176ae36c46a53d9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (48 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 48 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"573bf1ef86b6d9bbcf7a8f1c5f711eb8e38f2c1f77f483f7e00b0307e289df23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8316be5c009fb3a4b4593f60294af6db1facd8d64c72fdfd5674c8f8f23460e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (59 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:174-333 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 59 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3e6f63b66ef76ec993c29642edb0ac0b3368daa8815f784ecf8194f29557e60"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (43 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:85-139 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:33-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 43 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81c8d3709a47b69045f38f96398c9f3b7e68d2dcf6c2ce4e1e533c0db1ffc09d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:85-139 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83ef3ebffdf3e97ce5b586bbeeb725e8c1c79bf74f6837e2259e4d4d399b4d9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (38 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:85-139 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 38 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cfcf2e58ed3be12ff3609652b9ae1c7cf9b5ad03687522149d98ca5dcb3ef75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (16 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:14-51 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:18-69 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 16 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ade112188a426a86c25fe17559dcd678d5e90a42304772a765d1910b08c2cf39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (16 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:55-96 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:18-69 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 16 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1e3f8339fdfdfaaacd30f96dd2220ff24559baee7f1c8b49314b4a531439e5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1139-1202 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44310e011ad0c3ae3ecefecf748a86c9874d266c0d88c9df70417b366a35caa7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fe6254b2832aef31b8cddd57d1b16031c029b25fc6abc6a258b9ac95cafd0d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86ebba9acb2ea802bdf2bba5fa094e1988a96de1f9911e0d8a10ac55145cb5c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:304-407 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb459b1ecec19c0fa2b0f89d443a06b70b7c4e6327e398ad242dacb071dd3811"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:268-348 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2da20747e509d1a5443eb265352a6aae9849d3bc11c3246fbcdd8cac86ff0980"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:354-458 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f44dc9986c2cc640f92cd679a8df360d22afda499dc5b24a8849f706ffdd0dc5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5004b9126ce3c0ba70f14ac2e86237ff116a85d039739d869739878c081250da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"509dd26cb046e10a90a65c292872684ae4b29753f2f5f99ec1a867d1fa1ec158"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8cd15c901cf42450c7c87370252f87f1c4b2cce1f2ed70cd752e6e5060481df4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8c4f856367b54f994d7b92b9815eda62fb75897afa34ba724eaee2cc11f92b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c8fdb00bd37854f5998a2deaf27abdab7819fd7e60fbd1352cf352b17aa2960"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5672d5e2c501914e52996ccc108bf48139a708bda0cd7d33a765d20792b750a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b268d38065eae8979461a2d46150653faa4f01c4b3d1ee189ebd7fd9f9bd393"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d30a716fe2c95cfcccd4e3c48ce8ead6efd92e630c7459492121b945e7a3d7b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:532-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dd412874b4fb0a5cdd2f374719f9aca2bba524b2f443c7cd56ab923305e257f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9396d1a5c3651f5b547fbe00face6bf20438d49e83a33ce35c8eb8f93e2e7fae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7b6e1a4523616a4e10c4ce7371e5f8cfb947c9e0a617eea7bfd87a1e4024e59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6dd4ffc992ab33677213a524fd37489a0327e018ed10456b382e407770e213bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a86c5f7933c15af06349c7fc7fde4f6b7624c96f30360e014e2e91d3d9c5665"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"806979a216ce7bab9350d69672bc61abb0099baea9e04c1f9c30e4f27a362f78"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85d68e61480a7c3941637634bfd74843d8a69ec418f25effef662769b852d24f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a56bc2eb836c2c17051636ff4b5b168f35241ffa1671616970e9bae3ebb18d6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a10103ee4d4b7dd1bc753f0798b21aea71a009610a5efacff26bc2f66f151c5b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ac7278a660d672bb021c1c9f849417edbc1d5eba485522363a578838f9e8b30"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f077884dd144a44062ecc96ff89b89b055865251fe6d13c57daf13f89a6a2cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0403dfe55deabc7121eb454481a89b5f47c93c8b979f3e5c5f8b84cbe115194"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ac00ccfc4f523fda3f11f4a7fc61b61002409d6b06e36b2809f6cf8171464d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2ae4e16095282fc88319b0268205382059d121181739143bfe14387df4fa51e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c143d27dd1aa56dad43effd46b2446053720cf11251df69051fb24c536cdf4c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f913db8b375b6b6f5f812623b66a143d61c5aa1b7d6945f1b703ee0f6fb3b93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (36 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 36 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dd50f28e7106e91ea9e72642e385346870179601283590e6a8494ed8a879f6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8c7dce0f0d8a50d46af077e31c1879722d302d5e0b1b0fbcc04989a8bbc8af1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb80919afd413274701cbdbb308487bb0208d0175161cd8883f43c7b5db5a25d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:46-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b8b17e80cf8478a6ae777b70ea785dfc22ab22be66ed4dffe7cba2237a1787a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1068792518f6acee4b8875e025918f70e44dd1689ec3e6667e4cec987073e0ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1174506ffbe8e41749a26e85f83126e46d15b9d079e66ec2ec65d911cad9d8aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76c553b8f0901f2b61859e043decfb490fbfd74ba57b9a7d23bd179858c2bb73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94dece94252ea78fcd376a20f709504ce2c98f956480be646f611d3af5c42c87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc6cda35b3d49811a64876b583b9d0ce94c65767535091efa6ea8264811a0882"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2704053db4b2d4b42fd61c6e923565474f02a6549e147c88868dedc1fa3a823"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5f8a7ac7bceb25c82fd309b721c1c1948d4c61d2166304907f6c626994132d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:411-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1612295e78c1aa9a8359233ae09b384063f609152af754ac20f18b0d33bfda7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:20-112 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e10f1780d26a2a56faeaa07205dee4ce241d87873fe23b8c94c944f59f19794"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:116-208 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b716ba0bcab1992ee8730cea1601faac0749589b9fd478956f9d99a57b570f76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:462-560 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ee792ee3c727cf4664093b447833e89b79d97996f5c09bb0d784fd08f172afd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cabed96fb761c0a751db2db81d6fdcf54cad65149f0138dafc5a447a35dc39ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f8c59abd8b7e10d52ba806a7640265c8fb0761107615e52914c0e963ec9644a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6435db1655fab91ea03de80a54e4183b41268155faf76068d34db71b7845076b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"145f0ddfed2d7dd7f08025ec27446900ce542cc936f933700c4e3b62f643d626"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59a93f256b9ed66e4069d3c9cab6efd2affe8a2ab325d41a848c41e1e3ff48a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53bbeec2a5e1c6b60b793bf60cac3b54613329bb388553ed6ceac550545a029f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-229 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12a8c43276634439e8ff04c4b2e1457104302861d937076cbc7ad8e5258caf7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-337 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bafec0b1b2468b36e7104cd964ad2ac8252e15bc9038d84d6921665afa34bf0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-445 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db494be08fc43eae14072f16fdbe212853a61b5083b9bba4233055e82dca37ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c9a80e020a5d04db7a3c4136324e36d6f637ad92a47bc9c999082a97fa33079"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-667 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a242f86c8a4b551ca81be75978b24a75ed22ffec6488394057e6bc507747138"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-776 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c854198648536a598c5ababe64affac669edf234a0c9107d91aacc39a94c11b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-949 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cfe6ea1da134adbec26bb57fbc5ebbbe8321fd288480ae9a29d346f4e43db5c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1226-1307 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97bbb1a6056a106026c8660c04bfe0beb46a98d50fd60c57d85d5b49dd0f38e4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1311-1392 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a23f635259996b6c176266ed4e5a492b938ef2ef63b27347373ce35448d24671"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ce998a7f27089c3043654c072c1307eb094362f4922a9715feac857d2670526"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d5c0dd9d924e89ec2a5ea45a2164564b298d5a39bf04ab11196b5af1ce98714"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3710e312e7ae9ca467759ead22f3ea160076a59f15bf19d9fb9b256016cc4ff6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"148139ed261a75e65287023e7de376e092cc27b53b200dad64aff91637531e18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:55-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b8b96f48994a9d5db0314fd9024aef279d8d36d3a9972f13563f8efe7b68cfc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08ac386f5142f7612376bed0468dd859336ac6b18c1f69b3169ebb10efa35f15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:59-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2629f073aed03054b3a2731437ace235f102ab59dac953417a42bb1554480925"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5267e93d931be9ca3fe68f439fbefe7711ad2adefda57551b88967a6911dadbd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6df2d42f4370a82098a2d3cb5481f3428caa1a11454094c9086cf294f49531cf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:57-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29a78d70b1d0b317d0f7d9eabf57077b6785c6f207630053ea2df156a9c84985"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5b250e057cc9e71295236ee446fd40fb8a3c7b8824f6b25be87a2b30960a398"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1025-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a624c9a1494edff1ea859dfb3eb17e29feb7e6c33a6eab494233ab1842979eda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24f2ea1021b68362e86e64c15068ed5a8576dece4eb1b65b5ef443459a61b4b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1137-1220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8dc8dedfd8e6a311534251f71071ddb6f1d50cae3f7198998f4bfbeb1371fc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13ae2752b75d0f16ee19b971ab370ceac393abaf5bfa526d07dff5b7bb84a524"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:23-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dc56add53d96875a0ef2fb568e62b0a3ee701a8c1f7132750672fce67dcd78f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81d9e9264bf30c594f5e5f5bbfcf4eff15ad067e050660067b476ccd713d7a6d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd81a92b3a159f44ad77b2ad09bdc4a1e1d820814eab4f648f98bece9fd2bbbe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:21-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03de41583b7bf5fda97fbf09c970286219107e3faccbc17ba9301a08afdd3e72"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04d0eb6a5a1b1992f7a9073a55eaa48e2f25cdaf6c20230db230a49a52d0685b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ba6f318966f990849f354a39e96c29a20ab8f405aa43d30ed8f0d4db50bc099"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:111-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75d5c6209a6a15a7724b5f1ce9da7cd64f6d50346d62d340c3fbacee18f7ab7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (54 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 54 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29d796478e1615dd83434246ff27813d64e3e0fe608941bf958003eadc4495da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7eaa64b556dc25a4bb3ac70c61c32edfc651a987bc79a370c6c65deb597afeff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:201-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb35dbcdebb1525ebf95f2d81edef42c429adb79d7f72e86e2298240510741f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa88d7e561ad45146026981a5f35d0f71f9625b6fe488ff6f43f8fe465e1aee3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:41-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7d8f56f987ab1d5c471245191d37b1263d992af44a147511d0924085a96f5cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (51 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 51 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4091a87cfdb67c35fa3ed04174f6bf91dc207efc9d5de49b99d533cd07dbf5ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4a781794b2399f614c733363b6cbe277d8cd582a9040348c0daf92cab7d7bfd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:49-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a21b4cd889cd4ec870d0a6e5827ea0cfb621c38085eef6007629aa14297780b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbe5e4b2e4d99befa77620e71f57cbfcd9057a430af1afa79dc6e646252d9c1d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f13e72739c56f86190f5c9bd130b8ba0d3118ba239d5b83192877ecd0f36482"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:159-220 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f1e5f8ab77fb6e23875b87c4b1d5d7b134030953f20d6914444c35f99463066"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (40 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1139-1202 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 40 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69072ceb2397293c52a6ed5fc94765deb53477b2ad18e8b37eb34c3875cf4d79"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"234e96bc2a68d76cf21c938b291bf316c119572efe07524a0b44a0abed2be28c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27ffaf646a1972de273cc0b5a07a4f7bf75858898e3e4df0ebb6c089a11e175f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2868-2914 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a27fc566983a5ecaa1bddfb424af1f5b3510e4d25f815352bcfe87e8c809a33f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (34 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2253 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-113 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 34 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95be73f09312047bb5bed8b95b198d6af338a881decd5bd5db192d708fafc64f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (21 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 21 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dd8615dbee476f49596fd9aaa5b6e0d86e1bbd715915f4f1ab3fa0b7c93e08b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7c626abd4d9928ab986daa97e5e201cb1083ada3dbb2f808cbb5c84544d20d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb37f208d91e6ed6522314ae1cf65df3e8b4fc47b26388f2ab23014001e523ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:78-141 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a7e602738eae2d8582989593c1b6543943f22c5e9856a169e94c188494ac2d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (15 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:708-738 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1059-1088 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 15 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":708}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ed237a485b9472e7b376a5ea179db476ab33c982b67c14aaea19459b34473af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8930a3596c0037f1d04575b5d97640ec7354a81509f593be613372860586b35a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2374f046be607ccd201467e378aea1c0bbc7e267ac81101af982cfe30dcd10fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28e68547a18d9cf148cb6ddfcfca5d36584e5ddac448949391359345c99cf352"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1494535fcbb2bff1b6f2ec24f27207413c65200eab4d7d6454af8e1f7229e9aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"352d307ba6d5f4f138659629ab3468ca2e4cd9288b7cc284f7e3231aa02fa1f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"018181ad48f263c894d4569cd6f7c9e7af6b27e4b7468896e1bba9e11be8ec45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44ee5d08d9fb3a9454ca63b8f4493c3ca01ba088678a260382cddccf803876f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39facf4a5028dfe8979ed39f68fa070fd023ab4968d61a7b3c82f115eab93b26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1131b34dd056671673d5dad07286d5fae0d5db883645f1e509519fcb4e347820"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a029725b2fd171d6c0cc31b57a1f44e294a51ab4aa0814c1831fc3e40295112d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:16-92 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db7c43ead3696206e7e41dd21ce3aeee9f462d035697c8a17f9f68dce682f0f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:96-163 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"925db4b23e158aec472f9732dba17d37e99c8b301795feaa8330d4efc403234a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (44 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:167-234 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:22-115 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 44 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95f84c4400baa0564d656a937c8bdeac887e085f110286d8f810dbe1f12a4b8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c16b328d2c6283520bbc175543e14f35c8497cbedc2114a9b6bfe08acf9d34eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43eb03b63dc9a5668cd45cf0b1770bb2d369b39cfa97f97a1d3d2e2ea3e5f3e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:96-159 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4be3f2c7009cf8539d19aeb54737e3f5c328f30026e19f6d1c6cd2df72f86e28"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-215 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e5c7aebf44b572bda46e5378538a429f40c105e9ce9134d784d2fe7cbceb0cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (26 corresponding lines): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:209-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 26 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe93c0d47a1022f83147fa4a894e3dc749cd35c56b79c49cbcd8a80ce7c9b5a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:17-52 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-136 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cee6a0ccae4bbe12020266d502eeea9e331e98d49521b93f2102234192bf1679"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4aa3014fb0400bb7b02436411e5239d6f81dc4542c7024f0b4dd649d525ab70b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"378e296829ca2c865210dfdae391719369e09b5b69109bcbd95baa9d36711ecc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af8593baafc287c9d27deaaa5ce2a5ed1d19d5d36008fd74343970d528346a54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4da7a80ac4782998687e1d0df5b8f257d7bfc3ae9e0774d8a0c00fe283114a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f88e0b5c2160f09d44044e0af3590b8c806955f0fbc0c95c59723ed600ae9bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a219e4185d03b4ccaf0a3423eb29537c199030bb55eb637f0e3a8eae8f8cc1f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"210332bb61d88d4a39dcb2542d751fbd4648ea45d7d8e46fdd14cee8b063d302"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8caef30d209660d574c888cb02e37163f96712e909a98aa51a9f9e1a2c7047b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f392b7b730e35d18118503208c85b174163ba4a0acfaca990b1443db0cb8d8c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"427aec50ecc1a1b5744df03b5e3a3c49b0ebfd79b34942e7b799c9b4dc56422f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-481 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"661b9b16af30ca0730b2f6346ad531a58f8d0f54d2e3b9d6de9c3fef617a9b84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:31-103 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f50cd69a11682c42039ead6b4ce406a711fde4a4e63d6267d64c82913321f1f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:451-503 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfc24039d96fdc83daa0d87bfaa09149c3bf84f6ae4c46c9463c1d79b8b44a50"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-509 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d4e8ac2328aec9a5dd61c0699d3c25945546163d1adbedb8207b3d75e7b6c83"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e59905182c2a8a93c6911159de61a9e738a2ea55a31d10348018b4084c004f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e039146c03f6a039c53526cac3ddc843ee6209155a2c41212342d6602d6f0e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1301a1cd266a61350ca3841c30ae0764f3b08ea9e7ea52cb9108c3f7cd0aa039"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a11ea9d0775d01f730e9d37bbb97ebb74e72a478d02160e8bb4c3b144a129919"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b2af8e126041bea46355e8a91a865315c360a90a314ce3d32427be1226350b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ef9a876d8cad6f6a56bdc883519145d87bc4e2a88c8e9b71be57a865ba5253d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (27 corresponding lines): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1224-1321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:196-301 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 27 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07351a57a58e2c76573ddb0505c835f696de751b99221b0570627a7663007116"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-134 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06ee832f7b1982cfaa0a81130d539faf4dce337407d3964f31e509ce5530d8fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-203 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35d1493b770356cf85bd9183eb3fd47313f8ce7a998405e404ddbc8271fcdfee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50ae14133b10505f497d3b393e413721cecd1ae536fcb504b443220eb5a2432b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fa520464f57eacff8dbf89ac3f304034f8611d07fdf83ad5e6c3950d3b8b500"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (39 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:259-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 39 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c97c49c36412e4aaf56d97b256e86e8afe77c42564f7488ad5356c6a93bdeaca"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d785f66538bb6f87f6135ef8a2e3a6cb2033a5990c2456524684f0fe77f58bd9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55e7d7bb561fee7a32d2644750fc6e2ea048345473233ff03a727a592776f3e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (25 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-227 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 25 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9565ec1887bd621aec184277c90950adae64440b2374368abf775ba44bc4507c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:31-94 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:62-111 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91f2e66b0c201d31d5d01f60982234149d8fa44877de2156cdb3b4089e380fc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (31 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:31-94 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:30-90 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 31 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f68ae1052598d7cefefb9a658d9c519e80c12e250d14e387aec0aba7d180e81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (9 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_current_szse.py:15-95 | akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:31-108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 9 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_current_szse.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ed1a29d55fc6b771d231d2c797f103f1a278d6207d1aaf8a60d2c95f827db5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (53 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 53 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"256d30ac3aa0e630dbde7c9cefd382ae37ffd572bd2b630d4a94ea058f5994f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65e3080679e86a1a8c522f222c3a872ef895244edf608178241f3e7619ed2dd9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_em.py:15-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f21d6ee2b334a795f4cc585652315ca1243ae80aa0e33f85ba334c3faf36a92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9612ae6c9d40076f56596d32dca5e0c0edb7df5e834890c17722909a0b158037"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a43ef36c20ccd2b2a8abcb7bca75af1d5afeb995db852582525686fe68a70433"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74ca406155cdc14c0501fc0a1afa03f3c9e912c8ffb7d6bb4fb7003bced96c6b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (42 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 42 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"356c5204ddd7968b67e6ae0c87ec6c0d08189d768e32f80edf1fba33db3a3547"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adf0e9a5d1636f280fea5b30ccad2d5158f07c454561418c11290a9faf4dbf4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-82 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc0501871fe3e6f41370b96a64d123a320cac17cfa5ab0901f559cb1702fcdee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (46 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-310 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 46 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b90d2ac06f6242246d38e89a321559f6cdb034bbab068312894dd959212db8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3687efbdcba7f4c747e0736a48e2cf5d8b0d1ac41efc2dfb749c4506cfaecbb6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:15-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad05960730b9811a0509a01c99a304ccd6e63114eddcb9d17eee5811d50c8ce8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:396-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:313-378 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":396}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fc8c8132b9a10890d8a4b70ef1c4acc67c4054ce5402809acfc9f37504fea27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (41 corresponding lines): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:396-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:382-447 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 41 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":396}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94e124c7e42614d4ed68773b79d57d8a71534a1306ceb2211ac882a1edfa753f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (18 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_other.py:15-50 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:652-688 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 18 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_other.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef2f5f1d5e618c2d1acbbc6ef8f524e01ea4639913ed3a4ec60bd0cc36e68b62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (19 corresponding lines): akshare/economic/macro_other.py:15-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-382 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 19 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_other.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09a04c77673d5d3ca5f57f7032c92c6bcdba283f0b5353bea2728b8113d9c0dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"215ae303fb089b68f50b525baeb3874233ceef448777730a6e1a1fe0aa2c5226"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f4c9eb0bb8c92fe4622dd5024d0f9564d5642015c9ec34a557725c24ff953db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:428-520 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bc0b4922cc3419ce0859321c35ca3c27583d1d5a215e3174514d64a6bb0283c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3006b87d9c27aaaca7309da12215b6edb5a3329e428d803505f0eb5180bb5f68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f27ea90473f427948acb6acf5caaf527f85fdcf00b6ca59efafbabc08b2188a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:172-244 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e101b948546053bf6394104b22a18e2530c7bee57a2195d5dbd28cfa8b98c2a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8e7d63a7df023f6a4a17dd33276b6abe6e1192f369d3e77ff6a7cec64e26eba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c42a65319489ee198b98f5dc94a2148feec25bcdf5462c4edbaea5046e3abb5d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-334 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01af0c554829ba764bb56e99d277ec448dc896dd8a049d61aeecbb2d024633eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20625201b7fc0e21b6ade54fd84050a4896a5497cc26e223a108ce5a010d5af4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97c4e3d86d8df7c0586d258b722aca9af3966ff72806f12c67ed1d95e59622b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d4493d7a6026c253ecc6dd24e4c616605d7fe55c0b7b19ff028ca2fceb43a02"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-85 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5a4a4f3bb7269c64e04ae02bf89c96fcfdb7364601475eeb7fd4868fa78f0ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-91 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94782ba539b4128c2e7b2a243cdf6101dabf553a756cf48756c91ab3c5efcd2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (17 corresponding lines): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-81 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 17 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a448bff9257f6b072a5c8a8ac5e359718d44283f3e889f7036b1a194c6baaa3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (19 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/index/index_cx.py:14-38 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:42-66 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:70-94 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:98-122 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:126-150 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:154-178 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:182-206 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:210-234 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:238-262 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:266-290 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:294-318 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:322-346 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:350-374 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:378-402 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:406-434 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:438-466 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:470-498 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:502-530 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:534-562 \u2014 These 19 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 19 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 19 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cx.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4869469305dd782d8894f368adc88cfa1f291d9b5b7dc52dfeb44a821ae4b60e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (15 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/bond/bond_summary.py:16-47 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:25-77 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:82-133 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:138-192 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:197-250 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:255-309 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:314-365 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:370-424 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:429-483 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:488-542 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:547-601 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:606-660 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:665-719 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:724-777 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:782-835 \u2014 These 15 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 15 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 15 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7224b47846be1b8d0faa3bd357612cb66f01452e32d3064bf1dbbcbb3fbe6b47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (12 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:45-91 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:97-194 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:241-290 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:295-361 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:366-410 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:477-526 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:531-573 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:578-625 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:630-674 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:679-733 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:738-787 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:793-842 \u2014 These 12 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 12 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 12 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3724ad2eeaa172010650f2d79b7684cb74028591dc4623f25d276f6223d185b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (10 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:145-179 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:14-45 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:49-104 | akshare/index/index_cflp.py:14-60 | akshare/index/index_cflp.py:64-109 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:359-425 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:19-85 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:777-813 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:13-42 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_high_low.py:16-38 \u2014 These 10 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 10 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 10 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7018f9903eff239ec0c69aa893cb93335d52a13fa1bc96996fc8b0da1c9cc1cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (9 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:15-142 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:36-81 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:85-139 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:143-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:192-237 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:243-288 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:294-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:345-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:396-441 \u2014 These 9 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29674945d9885c02f16be583df6f0158c779c706dee1e54c843abd037c5cf1ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (9 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:40-68 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:236-270 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:274-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:39-65 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:223-271 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:275-328 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-382 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:42-134 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:350-418 \u2014 These 9 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"303fceeade67156d3028fa8fbd6b4886fb4340f8d2b478af1a136bef58fc20c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (8 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:15-38 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:42-62 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:66-86 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:90-110 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:114-134 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:138-158 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:162-182 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:186-206 \u2014 These 8 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 8 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 8 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e225b2fc5f2605184b361d8bae8624aa71db0b80ec062f84c5983ef08dec5769"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (7 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:310-398 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:402-490 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:494-591 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:595-691 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:695-779 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:783-867 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:871-966 \u2014 These 7 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 7 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 7 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"616259837074cf352cbab21ef42dcb02eccadba04949c682331ff8f2fb6a6eea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (6 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:840-866 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:871-894 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:998-1022 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1027-1051 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1056-1080 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1085-1109 \u2014 These 6 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_euro.py"},"region":{"startLine":840}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d311472a3e12ebf596d1f7334524e33ccedbc77f8ae1d10d52c9fdae1b1a26b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (6 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:16-160 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:164-273 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:279-388 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:413-525 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:531-643 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:723-807 \u2014 These 6 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d986ca180c69f67bdb74a9b45358b4e3acbef6d753989d8e713cd7e5c192a5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (6 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:14-58 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:62-115 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:119-164 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:14-69 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:163-216 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:220-267 \u2014 These 6 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3a64f4c83208b75ec064b300a151b2c554d2e9a55874b913d2ecd805bd7ec11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (6 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:25-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:111-184 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:188-273 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:277-354 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:358-436 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:440-522 \u2014 These 6 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c9d01fc7a438435965bb6755a025cdc2044a7f320c0ac722555ff2972fa10e7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:66-86 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:119-143 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:122-145 | akshare/index/index_stock_us_sina.py:19-40 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:294-316 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"744e74959b6f83fb6f985bdbee19846f3e6d94673811ea38e7ac6ab5a9489b5b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1013-1055 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1820 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2044-2095 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:14-45 | akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py:14-50 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1013}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79bc21b1e5e76bd80facdaaa8044bdefcc25a11f3af4157ab5276bc1bc8db004"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py:14-50 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:324-394 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:427-495 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:502-569 | akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:31-108 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee8c28c0e6e9baab1cc6c9d7aa76d5e8a21fab2791f139e698ae42c5a6d77980"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:323-395 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:399-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:462-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:508-561 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_all_pb.py:16-38 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py"},"region":{"startLine":323}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa3967459875ea09dcfd898424b9e6465f11dcec5e039156d18910c1a4160521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:14-88 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:243-283 | akshare/index/index_spot.py:14-42 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:73-105 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2103835217bb1a382eb8226a7b098bdcbede48be04dba9bff8ae2af78534826"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:46-104 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:18-79 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:83-144 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:17-75 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7acf2043d15293ed0881445474bec98c52670acbfc2e8bb8108572fa2e793b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:15-88 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-186 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-273 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-361 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f295a5f1dcdfc654a86fc7583ec4263ccda5793b0b12bb9d45b16c42fc3ab505"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/futures/receipt.py:38-79 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:85-153 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:270-325 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:329-383 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc344f18d5c7cba9a921184ce853e3be6928ea2cee0a7cfecbf1d039a61f9ef0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:110-252 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:139-310 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:318-347 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:130-278 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da3cd029f8d7d86abff3c7550aed758856d67c8f91de3fb8854c6dc63a3d88cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:14-76 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:80-150 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:154-234 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:73-159 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"049e424a46cace3d96ea9b919a6ec841e7d5ca0415f919ba29251062b082a675"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:19-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:48-73 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:77-131 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:135-189 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16e602c46100202d8a87236b3e24679f23fec085d1e34e970c8a90fdac91975f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:92-125 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:129-163 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:167-205 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:209-247 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efdb3e7de9c727b86c55c0698476d1c6670ff310273f453093a8886b782359f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:21-55 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:61-89 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:95-127 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:133-165 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"169d94f9852e1b4edacf9a147ffe58bf3c02db5c5d3321e3aaceaa347536393e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:197-288 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:294-385 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:391-482 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:488-579 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e2c55b8c92280afddc9f28d2d78d577bb5229c8f4e76ae8a943e79b939e4319"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (92 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:197-288 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:294-385 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:391-482 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:488-579 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"874ceb555fe7adf0a020812217f35026c45a1194716ea70aad6c96529f838b0a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (81\u201389 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py:19-107 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_tutor.py:19-99 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cabc3ceaf9686c1242f23df21f39250f2a333f381d2dd64fc9d79060a219bab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (77\u201381 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:124-201 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:224-300 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:322-402 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060url\u0060 to \u0060AnyStr = QHKC_FUND_POSITION_URL\u0060 in one and \u0060AnyStr = QHKC_FUND_POSITION_CHANGE_URL\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbe15ef1169b56bc7f2c8b4dad7104e68e746b29a8b6d5b5f4bdb189dd40fe72"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (72 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1331-1402 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1424-1495 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002200700\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022002008\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1331}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28c103e339710d8700c9602814f30fc609b8c4e203febdb4d2358733e6063eb8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (46\u201371 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:109-170 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2724-2780 | akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py:14-61 | akshare/economic/macro_germany.py:13-60 | akshare/economic/macro_japan.py:14-61 | akshare/economic/macro_swiss.py:14-61 | akshare/economic/macro_uk.py:14-61 | akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:86-131 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:114-184 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 213 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022EMG00341602\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022EMG00179154\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:171\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2781\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24954f0c2b37c19f0d4a70d5a471319c9ffa322a7fbd9d13bd9b8979a9019ad2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (67\u201371 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py:133-203 | akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py:217-283 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0581c2b4283e8e6bf4451f4e20a1fc4a46bc06c61820a80dacfef9ede46f0c16"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25\u201370 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:14-75 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:80-149 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:154-184 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:73-97 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py:154\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002203900\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SZ000895\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_profile_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb435fd6bc8ca7606dfd4829a4cadd8132fbfa48f0008aa6aa88c461f609d10f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (64\u201369 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:36-99 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:199-267 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:269\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:101\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9f2f12cde81231b888185068135e26ae449239bf17ece965e53b709ee980c96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201368 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:46-109 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:142-205 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:238-305 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:338-364 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:42-88 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:109-153 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:338\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220211109\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220211110\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:306\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:110\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9b24f01035bc20ef346bfffc77a431b5809ae09b2e2005f83ee3745221f7aa0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (65 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cot.py:875-939 | akshare/futures/cot.py:969-1033 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":875}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff13ed31d10f88c97ad143211975f06631d467962c3e757d74052df3ff183be3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (65 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:160-224 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:148-212 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220250228\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240108\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cdecae8fb204efb1cf7cbf79075f4d0d3aa18397d3e21f5a962da040ac2a8f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (46\u201364 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:42-91 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:55-100 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:123-186 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:42-89 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:86-142 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 101 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220210930\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220210630\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:92\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:101\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"001777c5bf4121a43923d5b7b533c5bc509c81e550d0a4e7de2bd637523f5f18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (58\u201359 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:89-147 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:161-218 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:149\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:220\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a9ba424a43a657e1cdb2233717dcc1d6ab61445c987f708b50a1d4d1a54db69"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (47\u201358 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2191-2239 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2257-2314 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3181-3227 | akshare/stock/stock_us_js.py:14-71 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_js.py:72\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3228\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"702923eb73ae3819bd33f451b3041c9fc58c5f6a5633ae2dfe752b45279385b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (58 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_settle.py:360-417 | akshare/futures/futures_settle.py:421-478 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_settle.py"},"region":{"startLine":360}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"149f5447cdd5c99519ed5570b881a5d1122668a4b394b517abc30f36401fec8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (57 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:31-87 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:102-158 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:173-229 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a82b3e6f8e1a9e1ed5aaa965847fe66eb478b409f272cebd9aa1fe3722c07120"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (54\u201357 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:274-327 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:370-426 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240219\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240218\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:328\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:427\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/movie_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7426f40f9291c9e43dab2d7894ae57b63b87d505c5615895037fdb540ab7274a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (56\u201357 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:34-89 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:354-410 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"180ae0f70a9b6bdc07170f45fc04f17365e01518132afcb61a6c3656ee940cde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (57 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:591-647 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:650-706 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:591\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":591}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30ae4a717a5909ff06410a520bd61881a1940a8899df9893f87d3e5595408f37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (57 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:71-127 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:138-196 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ba608bb196a072c632320273212c64236e31fc827a63d3d9a72bac6d0e32c74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (56 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:753-808 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:842-897 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:931-986 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":753}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31756924d6e9a240ed2a5cdfcfaacbbf2c065d051962d92bae8274f571d6516a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (38\u201353 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:23-61 | akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:24-76 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:300-346 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:84-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:142-179 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:23\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:22\u0060 calls \u0060join\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:22\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1469d4075111f6d5841520b148e612c09a746bddb1cdca2f00b960a626c69b86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201352 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:50-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:373-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:550-601 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:686-715 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 332 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:96\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:601\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20f14002d7bef08493d0cff2986cc9c5145bb2c33389cf0504f878bf77b0eca2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201351 lines \u00D7 36): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:637-675 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:21-63 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:22-56 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:73-107 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:124-158 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:175-209 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:226-260 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:277-311 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:328-362 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:22-57 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:73-108 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:124-159 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:175-210 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:226-261 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:277-312 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:328-363 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:379-414 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:430-465 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:481-516 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:211-247 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1146-1184 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2350-2395 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2433-2483 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2508-2550 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2585-2615 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2630-2662 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2682-2715 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2822-2857 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2875-2908 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2925-2958 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2974-3021 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3059-3088 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3104-3150 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:87-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:22-67 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:23-71 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 264 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1146\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:64\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1184\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":637}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d65166efcb3c4535600a0e006fa652dc85b9eeae2b1a42514e14552dee0cae9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (51 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:78-128 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:151-201 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:224-274 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022ho2303\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022io2204\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c8bc9c95a326514bea9ad86133f528eeefd680e912b47624dbe96588b0dd660"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28\u201351 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_index.py:22-49 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_index.py:78-128 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_index.py:155-186 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060url\u0060 to \u0060AnyStr = QHKC_INDEX_URL\u0060 in one and \u0060AnyStr = QHKC_INDEX_TREND_URL\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_index.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d252c13b6accf102062ccdc8894ece9f835acf39b2e83426a0504f8159fa0bde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43\u201351 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:490-540 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:170-212 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":490}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8490b552b4a28d47dc41ea499cf8a39aec744714846426dbbabc19ac17c30151"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (49\u201351 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:51-101 | akshare/stock/stock_rank_forecast.py:43-91 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38a4bdbd29a337e80a7149817e900fca0b1b39b3b5b62975d31efd97af6b1934"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (48\u201351 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:120-170 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:178-225 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"521cb947faeb6667db67089de1cb4bf693eebdf0fdeb2480fd127991082d1aa9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (48\u201350 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:47-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:133-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:210-258 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:297-346 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:385-432 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:45\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:295\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77be3fb768f74d4d9dffb28bd9f28721a139e17959c86af1779d206dbd5e1c2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u201349 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/bond/bond_info_cm.py:148-178 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:51-99 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:138-164 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:301-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1578-1616 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_em.py:52-90 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:53-87 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 72 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:301\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:100\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:165\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_info_cm.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c5a63947a7472afa21db634481117ea66aaffbd5c42aa3e2b2c021f5e2d22e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201348 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:25-72 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:29-54 | akshare/index/index_kq_ss.py:43-66 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_zygc.py:24-59 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:25\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baeb708f9f800ff9cfb480434b62b05167209841b351a84b0aeb739d954222dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201348 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:327-374 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1066-1085 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1474-1508 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 211 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":327}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"927fb877aeadb4cef62c9dd572bdf162e93effc1355b45226434586720f4245b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u201348 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:47-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:536-579 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:56-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 244 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"013bdb980e9b872fcc55746cb66dc231f1a96869b7921de4a514eadd8b237f12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201348 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:45-68 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:138-185 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52e46e79e38924760cd529f89ce161e24dfa6163fe2e204b9949b3cf50209af3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32\u201348 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:395-442 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:470-501 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity.py:395\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":395}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e533c4d954922efbdf03e94decb68ac78d515fc4cb866723dbf6226bb4b279e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (48 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:139-186 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:130-177 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:139\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b7124eec722e2bf35a6fd575bdeca417635961f4ef22d5794dd95d81db7e4d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201347 lines \u00D7 21): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:71-115 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:167-211 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:263-309 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:432-437 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:512-544 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:50-88 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:121-159 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:192-230 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:31-55 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:32-56 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:31-77 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:103-149 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:331-351 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:68-105 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:114-154 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:50-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:542-581 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:639-676 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:726-766 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:306-335 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:88-111 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:432\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220241129\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240513\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:116\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:88\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60d67638777ad1ec51fc08cb5b9c6a1e6f0209089175e8d5cb822bd901d7cc8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201346 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:140-176 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:49-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:152-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:369-386 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:473-501 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:369\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:48\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:139\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d76aafe0a1b8fc243d318d014f5af7b439f6d39af890b3817b42ec6c811a5b81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201345 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py:255-286 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:525-569 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:86-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:279-299 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:416-447 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:123-160 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:267-289 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:335-367 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:404-436 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1276-1301 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:120-142 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:261-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:391-413 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:529-552 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 155 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:86\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:523\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:334\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f778e1b408122e37550f9c9cef81ba90aa68ef2e101103d3443fe896ed0665b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201345 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:142-176 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:79-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:51-95 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:154-198 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:369-386 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:37-75 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:79\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:48\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:139\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa623f7ba2916d78c8767b0b3f322d5c6ec79bff897cba1326669a2c6c2fecb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (45 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:30-75 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:102-147 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:174-218 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:77\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:220\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65a9d0287a769d787172c55c9db83ed21987c1c1c6ea24d38c0b51038d08d8f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43\u201345 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_tool.py:18-62 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_tool.py:66-108 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_tool.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2c7c1842a11e0163f38ba9035f97e31696f40cf377f5d2c4632350deafaa67a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (45 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:583-627 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:631-675 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":583}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea0d75cef0fa592bd7b56685c4ff81313506dc2850a0df455e442aa9c2b643e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (41\u201344 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:172-212 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:355-396 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:296-337 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:404-447 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1035-1076 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1147-1188 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022204001\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u6C7D\u8F66\u670D\u52A1\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:213\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:397\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c43036ac6fe42ea311e8f3dc097104344fb3b6cf80763ec77154c89923773ccc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201344 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:169-208 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:334-377 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:441-470 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:472-498 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:297-319 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:471-504 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:297\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:333\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:471\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a69ea64f6c894c6355fa0c777adc4d0a0fc91a283e0f82a795cd477e8fde4269"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (44 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:56-99 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:220-267 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:82-127 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:147-196 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:269\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:101\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47b0485dc23f78d1b0330c7afde491c2f00e13712e9c3bbcfa42a358878e9444"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (39\u201344 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:15-58 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:87-130 | akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py:14-52 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 102 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:15\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b3852c0c2a0e2f428069d5e695087e99649fbfff03087caabc024abd246ebcd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43\u201344 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:116-158 | akshare/option/option_em.py:127-170 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:115\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_em.py:126\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7a654d0d00f71edc898a2d4a1e9a6fe4cf8482c49f73661ff882c974b2a6eeb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u201344 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:168-170 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:38-40 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:91-93 | akshare/index/index_cflp.py:14-57 | akshare/index/index_cflp.py:64-106 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:415-417 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:46-47 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:807-809 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:25-27 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:36-38 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_high_low.py:29-31 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_yw.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 97 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5468\u6307\u6570\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u6708\u6307\u6570\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"592e810ffb2e3a835ea5a21b920367ec2a6d1928a4ac6f22e45f81df0e72c487"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201344 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:215-251 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:447-490 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/movie_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d23890069d8fc1b66fa6efd191c22705ba50c1c883c3ea396501ce4b3569da21"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (41\u201344 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:56-96 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:236-279 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:235\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:55\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92b2d74ba45521b44617ca5441f49528cbf11278bac42c1c7e3ae6f046451cf2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201343 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/index/index_global_em.py:43-79 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:766-808 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:855-897 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:944-986 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_global_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 111 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c0336c12261a8965ba36bfed449d7029d62edd4a6b345b7285d7a77ff158b3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36\u201343 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:38-73 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:110-145 | akshare/option/option_em.py:127-169 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db7b7d6db23e832e943d0037be333753813e708f48e2e289b9b059a5a49ad056"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/article/ff_factor.py:26-68 | akshare/article/ff_factor.py:71-113 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/article/ff_factor.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6e6c2995141b7e0476c21a0f5099c714065c2f8ceb15440a0cd9758d8b20e2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201342 lines \u00D7 45): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:186-214 | akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:168-185 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1091-1118 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:51-70 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:105-136 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:171-208 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:486-502 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:627-645 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111-135 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:302-326 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:481-505 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:147-172 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:243-265 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:330-353 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:199-233 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:33-52 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:123-154 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:107-127 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:74-92 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:129-147 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:184-202 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:66-93 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:336-377 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:443-470 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:52-90 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:373-410 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:78-101 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:66-93 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:51-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:474-498 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:44-81 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:418-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:527-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:634-651 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:742-759 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:817-851 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:888-920 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:956-988 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1024-1056 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:297-319 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:473-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:41-67 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:200-217 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:59-91 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:239-274 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1091\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220230630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:265\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:214\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5b68cc607415c8a00fac6df17fda0e8b47005d7a1689a8a36a3b5ab85bdf25f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201342 lines \u00D7 38): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:649-677 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:26-67 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:37-58 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:88-109 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:139-160 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:190-211 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:241-262 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:292-313 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:343-364 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:37-59 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:88-110 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:139-161 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:190-212 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:241-263 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:292-314 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:343-365 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:394-416 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:445-467 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:496-518 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:226-249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1161-1189 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2217-2245 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2280-2320 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2365-2400 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2449-2485 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2523-2555 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2599-2617 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2644-2666 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2696-2717 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2836-2859 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2889-2910 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2939-2960 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2990-3026 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3073-3090 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3119-3155 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3207-3229 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:102-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:36-72 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 264 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:678\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:124\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":649}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8323f58915b652530558ff35c45d567be96289e40ea99a7d82b31aca3e258339"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201342 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:345-374 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:417-443 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:90-109 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:284-310 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:74-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:86-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:68-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:168-209 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:84-107 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 129 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:417\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:111\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:212\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b706e92933e58c1682165a177ea5ac432a64b21ac1a7d819f3c29638bdf8167c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (42 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:45-86 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:119-160 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:193-234 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:267-308 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:341-382 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:415-456 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dca96c9a9a384a103a7c6ad5a4800cb81a275bc489773c3d0d54a5f0f0bd7ee3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u201342 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:115-156 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:820-825 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:114-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:223-227 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:324-328 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:820\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe54dd26f0309bf20956b7bab9fb44a22aa74cb3697281e8b7d0ac69558d0037"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201342 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:155-194 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:768-809 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:857-898 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:946-987 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:36-66 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b91bf129314a5e92cae61b86c928b30e0d1d14d94b9a264d35fe9152041151b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (41\u201342 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_allotment_cninfo.py:33-74 | akshare/stock/stock_share_changes_cninfo.py:36-76 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002222220222\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220241021\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_allotment_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f36e65e6643ad9d06148b93a077c31b45d980ee2b7cc63ccff502f67be09957"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (42 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py:37-78 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py:89-130 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c614d6184b66e5e22058ff38d3bbc619bd4892da9ce9a8cb40fef8187d7b7b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201341 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:417-443 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:90-109 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:285-310 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:74-96 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:92-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:86-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:69-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:169-209 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:84-107 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 129 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:417\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:209\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:115\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":417}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2adbae19f6dd206875a7bc3421f558979a96d33f3136f057d727f0b4e6ea61a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26\u201341 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:148-188 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:241-269 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:110-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_cninfo.py:58-83 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 282 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80364c8ec821733efaf7bbb67d3c9eca38bee2d71cef22f107003b5be8b04d11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32\u201341 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:220-251 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:291-331 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfd57184dd0594162c05d7cd753ebb451e2308b7cb102e5d0c32d7c014ade916"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201341 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:117-157 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:174-204 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5020572a365498ead2f9d1bdcb69318a275107fa247ee40ecbe3136483b03d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201340 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:133-172 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2748-2784 | akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py:39-62 | akshare/economic/macro_japan.py:39-62 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:35-55 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:214-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:45-63 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 213 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:133\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52e548853cb2edbbb3b31f79e03db3ffcf4c718565a874bf68e29f90c9e22ee1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201339 lines \u00D7 15): akshare/bond/bond_summary.py:43-46 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:34-72 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:92-128 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:151-187 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:210-245 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:268-304 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:324-360 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:383-419 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:442-478 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:501-537 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:560-596 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:619-655 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:678-714 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:737-772 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:795-830 \u2014 there are 15 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 15 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a90d5c4eccb6f2824afa1f173981e073faca6a18c084ede2c6fe2e0dcee883ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201339 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:226-264 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:124-162 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:319-353 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:388-422 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:456-484 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1221-1239 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:152-169 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:732-754 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 367 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1221\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022008286\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5317\u5411\u8D44\u91D1\u589E\u6301\u884C\u4E1A\u677F\u5757\u6392\u884C\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:265\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:163\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bca1e6cb7cdc32a2c1f4b378fb89af68335cbee5a0a4371d5cbcd58357364f8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201339 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:543-572 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:624-647 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:687-725 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:543\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002210003720\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022sh510300\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":543}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e65d855fc75ef6aaee0d38bf773f27a57c4ec08a3b943774dded0851a6e27f7a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (39 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cot.py:618-656 | akshare/futures/cot.py:674-712 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":618}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fe9072a0bf9f09a5f61e255cfbf5b5988e0d5062505fd10c88b33006e7ab922"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (38\u201339 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_em.py:56-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_value_em.py:39-76 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cc6f08937944768bf94691a071106b9d4db6c86baf2a95c9b6baaaabc402874"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201338 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:354-391 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:446-483 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:554-585 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:654-685 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:739-772 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:827-860 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:931-951 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:931\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d9e718d29c7195e485b5eebe3656294785d9763141bfc5ed2f478ebd3d14e33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201338 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:36-73 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:108-145 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:155-177 | akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py:35-61 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 102 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbb7eb1f738d3a64dbb4c6b39ea61f9684882a26dcb8dee3a4af2aa3f22e83df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35\u201338 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:67-104 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:153-187 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:238-272 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:49-83 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1259d5df731b5dddfdc4656543fa2bf7269a823ec7cb559366f3762d25b102b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201338 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_announcement_em.py:16-53 | akshare/fund/fund_announcement_em.py:57-94 | akshare/fund/fund_announcement_em.py:98-134 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_announcement_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4695daf6c6f22e6c7ab5772b27607c971d56247291e1353507e875565ad932c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201338 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:77-114 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:210-238 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:278-315 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b32cad729eaa916c7d865fb94fc29ff01b3e2955f8a689c438a14f875fe941b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201338 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:138-160 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:190-208 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:246-283 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:138\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d717de25498b0d3ce68fc9a81457a7ea8827b3c5331c36c06c19a8cc37b7650"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37\u201338 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:296-332 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:403-439 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:485-522 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u8FD1\u4E09\u6708\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u8FD13\u65E5\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":296}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac0c1e368385781da97d86cde16a57341528778d00d699c217703c7202daf335"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35\u201338 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:57-91 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:150-185 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:237-274 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:148\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:56\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ae04de0613220d5a251e75b0d5ec2a0eead7a511d8e921cf85ca9543e747a32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (38 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:16-53 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:72-109 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d3eabcbfe2d1877df1d0d9f0dde18d8a928b515fdfac1d5d40be91118ef8586"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201338 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:46-83 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:105-133 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022801030\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022801001\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3e2392e47a8eb62c6626e406fd837c9ea20e11e095b63ac41da4262cb3e1cee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u201338 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:36-42 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:283-320 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:36\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16e6d5ca9c01c4114496b23422f87c760459dc5e47c10c5f82642f42275bc67f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37 lines \u00D7 39): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:628-675 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:14-63 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:15-56 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:66-107 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:117-158 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:168-209 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:219-260 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:270-311 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:321-362 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:15-57 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:66-108 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:117-159 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:168-210 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:219-261 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:270-312 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:321-363 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:372-414 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:423-465 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:474-516 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:204-247 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1062-1113 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1139-1183 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2343-2393 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2426-2483 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2501-2549 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2578-2615 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2623-2662 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2675-2715 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2815-2857 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2868-2908 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2918-2958 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2967-3019 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3052-3088 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3097-3149 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:80-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:15-66 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:19-79 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:14-71 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:20-65 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 264 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:80\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:676\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":628}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2ae88a43b037a3471883880e238dedaf1cd1239feeb31273975791cf45173ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33\u201337 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:14-46 | akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:55-91 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u4E2D\u56FD10\u5E74\u671F\u56FD\u503A\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u7F8E\u56FD10\u5E74\u671F\u56FD\u503A\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2cd52b059c2aa9dfa91c343b7f4baf3e54a22ca12a0d4272395525dcd28bca3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33\u201337 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py:539-571 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:70-106 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity.py:70\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":539}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fee01c006e343a7eeffa4835fe650eda4f72db72d26a020c1a25678d48f5048"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:204-240 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:310-346 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4762d062f0ff52c173ba6a84c65723869ed928705497b05cb9b2c56732e65858"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hk_valuation_baidu.py:17-53 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zh_valuation_baidu.py:16-52 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002206969\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022002044\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hk_valuation_baidu.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"812be74a9c5cc2137acd3b1316265fe06a34c0fb2dfda378de5c6bf58ee8a6a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201336 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:40-75 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:112-147 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:38-68 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:98-131 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:36\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060, \u0060astype\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:97\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"501b7db3536b94f3c63595b3b400f2659be6b6f05b0354aad1d336ebf607c3e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22\u201336 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:264-289 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:318-353 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:601-624 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:819-840 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34ebc4e3d5ac8e6fd793200d0b7af4eada7d497b36f933eff31bb31e413de8b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201336 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:28-63 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:32-51 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:32\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"babb10167005f36ec687185b9fa75965c91b5511295a2b68ad4d3c5227ffbe8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:490-525 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:608-643 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022MPV\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66-\u7D2F\u8BA1\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":490}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17955c817ecc0c79a17533eed6b1eda74e8dd3cf049d28f247ae0733e5ba2a46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201336 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:84-101 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:143-178 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:84\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:102\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:179\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db3d294d21896c0dc71e9f7418e28bb600ba433769f86e6a81f6f38275cfab14"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28\u201336 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:40-75 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:316-343 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:40\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5168\u90E8\u80A1\u7968\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022600000\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bbd723ab2bbcfee1af2f1d42211978b5e130334321070f07b8a72e5daa27c07"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201335 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:66-90 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:262-286 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:316-350 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:387-409 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:552-572 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:599-621 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:655-673 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:817-837 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8fa2f716cd7eac71cfa1afc1e2581503db2bd2cf6613fa8c4444a2e4c3faf65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:188-222 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:249-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:310-344 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:402-436 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:695-729 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:783-817 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a7aa91213fee4f0974b78dff558cb6d5c973e35ad21c31611aa7a0c307a060f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34\u201335 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:90-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:188-222 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:294-328 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd7d0c67a7c54c585daa183c6a5aa51883fdbb3439a418ea20b5059979d33fdb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34\u201335 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:441-475 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:550-583 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:657-691 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:441\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":441}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddeed6073abc09f34b5eb49369ed45e38eeabbc5895810951168bd95b645d432"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1242-1276 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1288-1322 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46c42eaec1cdefe625b37655d30fbdce2ef883a1dfef076c8846c0f2559a5c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/artist_yien.py:66-100 | akshare/movie/artist_yien.py:104-138 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/artist_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e8ecdd22600cd24e080177dda5c76e3f0c00f4060a48f98dc403b1cddaccb97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:399-433 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:508-542 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:399\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u6CAA\u6DF1300\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u4E0A\u8BC150\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py"},"region":{"startLine":399}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2e1078e89e80553b8517b0ba0df20cfe176e3ee2cc4b4398616c9caf4ccf3a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33\u201335 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:409-443 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:466-498 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240930\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220210630\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":409}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcc2348a55227e70d8b9e3ef4dd1eeac9a662b106db7027eea58e414e96f230c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:494-528 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:595-629 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":494}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e77b34d3801d2e457e6c08f4ecabdc99786822c54677e3677faad6b9ad50723"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201334 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123-135 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:286-307 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:79-102 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:70-103 | akshare/stock/stock_rank_forecast.py:62-93 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:100-129 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:167-198 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:104\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:136\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6c480d6e98c4fe5491b58b2966f6d5f87f1b64363b0986b11780b4b55861fae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:524-587 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:616-649 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa1be2852c0391d280b4438346aa6e17a519bf37a60b7395aba8cf0dc54a6844"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:14-47 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py:14-47 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f35fcc05e519401f9eeb592c13b20ec734da82191a45d66dde941985b5c0596"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:36-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:112-145 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u9AD8\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u4F4E\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"110f7a5582117f62a8b7cad47ac5fa7818043ffdd775c010ee7f63c933766ef7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201333 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:345-377 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:437-469 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:545-573 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:645-673 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:730-760 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:818-848 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:889-901 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:889\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:544\u0060 calls \u0060read_html\u0060, \u0060StringIO\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:644\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed156b34d19a7130812c60f5a381cdcac301fdd14073b5cfc1c5909bd6460b8d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201333 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:16-46 | akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:52-84 | akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:90-122 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"983729d7462009c229bbad2407de1ff91e2c7ded52e9bcfff9539962295d7448"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201333 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:208-230 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:136-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:194-223 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:208\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19700ef8c577aef0e4995656235a70b8bedadc257bc0b39e34900e7d39b51f11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92-124 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:190-222 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:277-309 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:92\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220230630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2af6c06afbf3616c822863f0da48cfca100b5c94c6bf8448e5295b7c0c80d248"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201333 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:324-356 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:427-456 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:502-531 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220221104\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221031\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":324}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7658abb2cf7e00b6f8e5eb725cc714ffbb09dbf8d5a057e7715228d1d3f39ae0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:297-329 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:338-370 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:381-413 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022ho2303P2350\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022io2202P4350\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c458067bffe0ae0822b1f5ef4390e2e99bef1b0f64e3f6326ef7eca85a716aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:36-68 | akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:52-84 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cd65ce292eb67f4281fff2616b5ad198a9bb0e165614085d262b4776a98d9ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:138-170 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:244-276 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19da9022855b2988968ac16a309ca5476ca9d603de640bdc449e3eb1e8a8f5d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201332 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1013-1040 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1766-1792 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:598-629 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:21-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:162-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:303-329 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:439-465 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:17-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:19-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:100-126 \u2014 there are 10 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 10 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220230331\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1013}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e37581456a2b97a02fadec472c8fb2f8800aaaecf5d3e8310a3565e987d0108c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201332 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:171-202 | akshare/futures/futures_settlement_price_sgx.py:27-58 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:251-282 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:354-382 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:295-323 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:403-433 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1034-1062 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1146-1174 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:171\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022204001\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u6C7D\u8F66\u670D\u52A1\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afef9587d130e21038b49f312e85ae6b7671f2ffc38c2036e9b275df50593ade"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:33-68 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:129-164 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:225-260 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:325-360 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:31-63 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:98-130 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:77-108 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220211109\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220211110\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b5e59fa9a5ac6d00ecb04ebdc460608246ad28aae4d3c306977cb3094fd77f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201332 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:39-58 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:88-115 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:145-164 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:61-69 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:185-216 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:245-267 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:61\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:39\u0060 calls \u0060get\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:61\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 5 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2772d7e0bf855af215df166f1bba9dbb5bb75bdf59243de3b3bce5de5c1c75cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201332 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:156-181 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:201-232 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:274-296 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:220-244 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:257-286 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 170 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06a3865da6f532c16010b9e0745f9214a46c19a7e0b5bba059ece87eacc8f0c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201332 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:742-773 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:868-898 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1003-1033 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022000009\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022000134\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":742}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"256488b15413f235fc0a1a06e7fb3a87a67384639d2a4ffba47b558485f9f969"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30\u201332 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:255-285 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:352-381 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:401-432 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:254\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060, \u0060astype\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:351\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ed31abcecadf9776c30936ebe3f3fa3e642e6a62361cc03cdb35b834923cf13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201332 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:51-77 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:83-114 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf51d7f6da5d153f035eb6f119c3a7f5220f25bf0b730c918cac23a10d7fea46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31\u201332 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:18-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:136-166 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220211231\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220200331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6f45461577c32083dc4fac374c8d3f796c7f69bda98386470a0448b12a49009"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/utils/demjson.py:408-439 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:539-570 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52db557d134c1bfbc73fe4bb5839cee78bd5737b7e021b0a54f78aba65db0b82"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201331 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:16-46 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:17-44 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:17-43 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:90-117 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:164-191 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:238-265 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:312-339 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:386-413 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:460-486 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcfe651ede3bbe020210f0be015c3ea062375ab462e2f75d7d948f19f1c0a9fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:110-149 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:31-61 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_cninfo.py:31-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 90 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022002594\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022600030\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5abba0d6a6fbc5642626bb5b29b4c16cad75a741b81795b3a2ad5e0d2275f8ea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (31 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:252-282 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:127-158 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:127\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d37805751bfc6bd74444ed5b1dd2cbfa4d0655728c4aa7025b41e0ac315fa950"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u201331 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/index/index_sugar.py:69-71 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:429-430 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:74-104 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:150-180 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u9AD8\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u4F4E\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sugar.py"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfc08b932f2f549a7d43a5bc6429de1e89c1552ee02c1e7cc01ba2d6b80a2ef0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201330 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:361-385 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:398-427 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1072-1096 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1109-1138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1188-1210 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1496-1519 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1532-1561 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 211 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e509c3cde5ba84298f28a3cab32be3ff1ec17010b9a6a0e7d6fb4578cb1a07fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:16-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:16-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:336-366 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:513-543 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:649-679 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 117 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u9EC4\u91D1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5168\u90E8\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6675d4ce7819917a653f2ae82b31570efe67827c5135adba6673466c2341b1bc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:17-67 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45-74 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:46-105 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:149-206 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/forex/forex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:45\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c75784073484e342105de85042d9b00788bb704519ef1ac1cd7743469df92947"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:482-511 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:162-191 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:31-60 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43785a4c184abcae9784f3e1fe7ab976001c6c918604c6a0fa5244f14b278e66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201330 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:134-163 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:230-253 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:304-333 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"230a60cc2bffb7948530c30ea35801f44d262f6bba53e82f53ae592a2e743dac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:112-141 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:175-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:238-267 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d31197a0fc8939b85afb4a857002adef64cc9da21b4232776537e7c102040d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:475-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:508-537 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:543-572 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":475}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e87f2748638502fd4fa6bbc2d957f404f132562d3c64c07b99415513f15bac5a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201330 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/event/migration.py:19-48 | akshare/event/migration.py:60-83 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060area\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u91CD\u5E86\u5E02\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5E7F\u5DDE\u5E02\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/event/migration.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92b29cffb3bae196c140b15044457bd1c57152f515654a068dfab23bee1eeab0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201330 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_cons.py:127-155 | akshare/index/index_cons.py:161-190 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cons.py"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbffb36292babda18d0899d6ee46819962dbd9cbd2f9c34141453c307efe745a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1402-1431 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1695-1724 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1402}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"711ef2d501462d21c5eb304cec279307dec25d4fa879101c22e6cfd782d1d62d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201329 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:43-70 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:139-166 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:235-262 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:335-362 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:39-65 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:106-132 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:120-148 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:83-110 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220211109\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220211110\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef0782cb0d906db186318c42d1af35ed908974cd06339b19fa13099d72fbccb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201329 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:348-367 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:375-395 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:430-458 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:483-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:539-561 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:375\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22d6cec911491cd8d33206ff01f946309c77f7d46422fae2449a20af284cbac8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28\u201329 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31-59 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:152-179 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:189-217 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:31\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022OMX\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022600000\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_global_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03ac0f8c56e3e48b8e2cf0f5e217b32135b1c272c7ed7ea08300722c7e0e63f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:82-110 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:145-173 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:208-236 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eba311d4c3820d7af2d774895bb88702d15f16f9ba2ff687527dcb43b12ee129"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:498-526 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:759-787 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":498}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed01659c416d474ac9f3aa7da444464aaccc104a863c519d610d4c0b7a437cd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201329 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:51-79 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:52-60 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 114 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:51\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c113f022956cccc8ad3992bfe8ab12852bfded47ef97173a2d3797bfdf43a004"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/request.py:34-62 | akshare/request.py:89-117 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/request.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79414181a049c129b8b85943bd457e2934a5575e6471793960238bd5a5258503"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_disclosure_cninfo.py:174-202 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_disclosure_cninfo.py:239-267 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_disclosure_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"519e208099cddfa03935601a7546190c9b14d7d01940d6e1b54bb8d2c01f3552"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:118-158 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:157-195 | akshare/option/option_em.py:129-170 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:770-810 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:859-899 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:948-988 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:52-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:375-418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:552-601 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:688-715 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:115\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_em.py:126\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccce6911ff8684bdab399112fb15dda5a0219df8e03b553660d756da368cdf9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201328 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:106-132 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:163-177 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:80-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:70-97 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:173-200 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:370-387 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:54-77 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33eb13a1a4cbd1d3fc012f950faa885fba400cafc60c5c315f19d543007be1c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:635-674 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:722-764 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:372-415 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:549-594 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:685-712 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:675\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060, \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:596\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":635}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1490e7bf55dc55ca67d216da7686fccbe6e8170e17df8244bfb3d40d9352dd92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201328 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:123-150 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:44-70 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:39-62 | akshare/stock/stock_profile_cninfo.py:40-63 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022002594\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u8BC1\u76D1\u4F1A\u884C\u4E1A\u5206\u7C7B\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb576d24b75a78dcc7f54c6883c9b24f465608d84d7238d37fafad1d52db27c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:85-112 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:194-221 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:295-322 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:387-414 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220231231\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea37e68d798780a4bf7bf650516a07d7e8dab5e37199f2ba25de2092a8eb8645"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201328 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:854-881 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:923-949 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:991-1017 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:854\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":854}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de204ee591f135e9b0ec48225d1c1cce0db0778e603b43384da2f49dcda2ed18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:18-45 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:83-110 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cc7bdad8f521e87d7724ddfc6cde82856d62efe7fa201c9beee77bf39364a2e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:18-45 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:16-46 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022LOF\u57FA\u91D1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u80A1\u7968\u578B\u57FA\u91D1\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02b6f1c44317f8d012816efd882ad9883c9b1562ca112b4ea52455fe8968c13a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/video_yien.py:66-93 | akshare/movie/video_yien.py:97-124 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/video_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25a85df9e8a9c0c777deb0910bc9642b2c5a4d1eb79935feaf4b2c30b6fabfeb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/spot/spot_sge.py:164-191 | akshare/spot/spot_sge.py:195-222 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/spot/spot_sge.py"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ae0bcbf825a6d6e0a3d7ebf41473cbf4fbd5b2c7fff4a79d7b674f1bf5bb683"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:56-82 | akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:87-114 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4897d3b5aa226bfbddccd4e3623a215bf67e0cc1b61e9f83af051ea160a61d33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:46-77 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 131 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:236\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:78\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4aa098383ba1e6700e05e2a7e2402d8ecede304deb4a0b25e11fb6c6423a1cdc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:22-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:14-41 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:45\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:51\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9d5c0ce316aff2a381e3a4549b5408789ea5a6ba485f0dfd551205672c13491"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:38-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:132-159 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:38\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77cb08e36cb886c9ea04e5a0468768ffedf1ad0eec68b3ac4870cc525b9ba3b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_szse.py:16-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_szse.py:96-123 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220221129\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230925\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_szse.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ce2edaa534f8314b29cba7e9dc00911a315a4eba88c4ab94a775c7c8f1df647"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:418-445 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:57-89 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 96 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:417\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:55\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":418}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c559bd2c90fce306d6c070dfd3cb4c1b3f1fb9a508904d0c0074febbaad5dd60"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201327 lines \u00D7 12): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:633-656 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:720-745 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:370-395 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:547-573 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:683-700 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:44-64 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:43-64 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:117-138 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:191-212 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:265-286 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:339-360 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:413-434 \u2014 there are 12 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 12 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":633}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c484f4ffae4348f4cdfe636f718a568d75fad315065febca5a13666a913f1e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:34-62 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:24-53 | akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:30-77 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:313-347 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:96-122 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:154-180 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:55\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:349\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fc8e14ec3e2a6d8c1717052544e10a0f94cc58bafae44690facfc9284d4b2c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201327 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1212-1238 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:146-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:785-805 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5317\u5411\u8D44\u91D1\u589E\u6301\u884C\u4E1A\u677F\u5757\u6392\u884C\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u8FD1\u4E00\u6708\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4216e6a6515e8f0e02a6c905128039fedb352b94fddb7c5e3e5771fd665a0d06"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201327 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:145-171 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:254-275 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:355-375 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:145\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220231231\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:277\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:377\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5117829a3ab55a9d5467d5d7489396b2517b60d2b3be5bf7090b0a0a9d7183e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py:43-69 | akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py:101-127 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060indicator\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5168\u4EF7\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u8D22\u5BCC\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cbond.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc6c2996eab3f4284367d450c74306d8eacbb162a0a832bdbea832000efe3651"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:73-99 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:44-70 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e92b7ccbd06be07cf4f15e767f69ed0a20124d19debd7d643944212e44d0ad74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:48-74 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:113-139 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bb24fdd23a7149c7999487330c6b0a2bf0be09e1984023cc1c0c7119307d9ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201327 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_basis.py:82-108 | akshare/futures/futures_basis.py:301-316 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_basis.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e91cfafe137fd0f252fb71745e4d94d004788bff8696732000334194993a4c38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201327 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_info.py:268-281 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208-234 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:268\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_info.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ba699d7a9750df402be3075a95a3d1e577f772eb1cebcc53b81bbba397faef6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_us_js.py:45-71 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:814-848 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:814\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_js.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92c186fcbdcfb8596cf27fd776f4d97dd4c033b9839a5f5764417e8c49420ca4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:893-919 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:956-982 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":893}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f813abf161124b29bc93c7b63fedc0ba3765cec5c527ef738a8095f2bfc8af0c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:926-952 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:989-1015 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":926}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a82fc5381a85bc90c4de302ba431c723d670f3e95872ca14cc4ccd86cff1d5d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201326 lines \u00D7 15): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:331-356 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:438-456 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:521-546 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:47-53 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:46-70 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:251-257 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:342-348 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:922-940 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:985-1003 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:119-142 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:219-224 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:265-270 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:468-488 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:337-343 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:473-479 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 155 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:331\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":331}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6624248f71d5c1f03fb9ce4410e81d746e601a8f24d1e563fa8198525e71776"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:14-54 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:62-111 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py:119-160 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:14-39 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:163-211 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:220-262 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_comparison_em.py:14\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002203900\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SZ000895\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_comparison_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30abd292e08aa394fd991fdf30e5be0fa791ea6a89462b6a2e42cf5e62e9a529"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201326 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:46-69 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:132-155 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:209-233 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:296-321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:384-407 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:464-487 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:45\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:295\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e5be80fe9af235bad45a9801a06da787a3aafcaf19166fbaae438a6487427f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201326 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:155-180 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:219-243 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:321-344 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:369-392 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 170 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:181\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060, \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:345\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10db80e8a6028b9b595ef124cfa505fcaa6e0126d4e53938f79ae301688eae86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:162-187 | akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:225-250 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e87ce34fd4049667948562af2baeade0abb5c057488b0716518b47ac20d9ac36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201326 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:289-314 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:386-404 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:289\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":289}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f280969a11e6a6a0776086efce13309fec5769ec54865c0b5e160a914b8b215"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25\u201326 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/news/news_baidu.py:300-325 | akshare/news/news_baidu.py:374-398 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_baidu.py"},"region":{"startLine":300}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f6680c0eab9755e4da3c28ddf73dc55506b5c5b1c22e968efb7ac2383908867"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_us_em.py:61-86 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_us_em.py:129-154 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_us_em.py:129\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u7EFC\u5408\u635F\u76CA\u8868\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u8D44\u4EA7\u8D1F\u503A\u8868\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_us_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"170970ee0df973d3e7027de8dd346a5943fbe7a880b05b12846007beb5e5a4a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:149-188 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:242-269 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:111-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:136-170 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:194-225 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:46-77 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_cninfo.py:59-83 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 282 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:237\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:150\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86be47e36296719d855bd9f1a18b8744418e8d67fdce0079ad56c99a4800fa48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:57-81 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:115-139 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:164-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:213-237 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:264-288 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:315-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:366-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:417-441 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022SH600519\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SH600036\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9598e24280d6158259fd97b4f9b7cc0b8999e6a0dd9947aa736c0b951f9933c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:64-92 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:76-100 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:147-187 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:240-268 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:64-90 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:109-145 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 240 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220210930\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220210630\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:188\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:93\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05c3126591fb159c4ee64f18aedbc9cf780e34244c15b60bdc312cf4dd28b89e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201325 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:102-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:64-86 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:164-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:53-59 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:132-137 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 147 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:102\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c2721f0e9b0cfe3dd1f5119959ab163b36eaf5c787b1f3120b6a1c1a67421e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201325 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:512-534 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:539-561 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:566-590 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:654-678 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:511\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:653\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":512}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1fdc6a106c93fc473d9150dbfa4f35c209b0a1e6abd1eac9646e1a5472e89ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111-135 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:302-326 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:481-505 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:52-94 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:95\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:136\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50bbc248e448db81f26be20bbdb0f6144c7f333bece8da18e8cd2dade3e522b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:82-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:180-204 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:286-310 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:379-403 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82b0ff4b73437e48e59edbe7a1bbb550605198fee8e2ab202f6fd1fee510b37e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24\u201325 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:184-207 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:323-346 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:371-395 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/reits/reits_basic.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 116 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/reits/reits_basic.py"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28a40c82255d15a6a2f4563ec402182b787a612881c27316fe44b4565602126d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:15-40 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:17-41 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:109-135 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220220101\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220241211\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da50197ff34e0326ca944c50bfccfc811f4ef7d652d5ebda8f67881b8b708b97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:142-166 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:418-445 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:57-89 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 96 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:417\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:140\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eab80167870f75c3bac68e3f9a4969275efcb870f8c9bb0d62696ba7b9bcf2e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:46-70 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:17-41 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8e3260a1ea2b302e8ce460ab4b46094d774534f5f5bb0b6e134272b1f47cd0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201325 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_other.py:72-96 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:22-40 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py:71\u0060 calls \u0060join\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:20\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_other.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a74523a138deab1be282a8806bad4c28f6159bf407afe959ed955377f3b0c90"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:68-94 | akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:222-246 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:68\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81960c9711c5f13f4ee50f0fb6498d2f6ea7c77fba0f6ddc9c8dabb356f7e663"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201325 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:253-273 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:435-459 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:253\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:434\u0060 calls \u0060now\u0060, \u0060date\u0060, \u0060isoformat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:251\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bda0a757e7443b4a654c036bc4333c842d2499d0c2b3f6502792ebbe1ab09f46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22\u201325 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:17-38 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:58-82 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:17\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u7389\u7C73\u671F\u6743\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u9EC4\u91D1\u671F\u6743\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c33be9abb8b5ca253523885a0c68184da57b46435ef22e3cf7832a8421747e76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 25): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:15-39 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:310-336 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1381-1404 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1436-1459 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1491-1514 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1546-1569 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1601-1624 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1656-1679 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1711-1734 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1824-1847 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1879-1902 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1934-1957 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1989-2012 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:20-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:19-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:15-39 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:18-42 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:120-144 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:223-247 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:314-338 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:506-532 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:692-716 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:790-814 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:131-158 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:905-929 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 57 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220210630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220210930\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50000c4d2da227bcabbe7d5e25cd649c4d805284c7945985fe706e449dcd76da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:46-70 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:142-166 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:238-262 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:338-362 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:42-65 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:109-132 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:42-65 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:55-80 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:123-148 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:42-65 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:86-110 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220211109\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220211110\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04ccbf395ee6081ba1e995791b62b711f649a599d24e9f4d2337b68b334a064a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:23-67 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:51-74 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:52-105 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:155-206 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1242-1293 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/forex/forex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:51\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a320577cb1e5936513b8df41cf2842f0ee6477413195ad59cf82a0ca2be0bb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/index/index_cx.py:406-429 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:438-461 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:470-493 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:502-525 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:534-557 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_cx.py:406\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cx.py"},"region":{"startLine":406}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91f249122847b3a9693d8c2709afafd74eb581175b74623f28edd5a0613d236b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:64-87 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:39-62 | akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py:104-127 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:35-58 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c06b2268d9754bf21e33b7934ec3ed3439d29b4f1a2e9bc3ce8378a3012d2dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:359-382 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:459-482 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:534-557 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220221104\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221031\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9750acdc76d8a83f4ff505147cca26490cbb2cf75b0532f04e90323a73240572"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cons.py:591-614 | akshare/option/cons.py:107-130 \u2014 \u0060akshare/futures/cons.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/cons.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cons.py"},"region":{"startLine":591}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55d4e5a5617571fe42deb93f2fa2792145aa0a0c5778fa8a23621d329d64afbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:140-163 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_index_sina.py:23-46 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022cffex\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022dce\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"009b6d8ef7fe8c1be2f93f9a3094998fe8202721d5975d1d0e7d97dc29aa3dda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:358-381 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:440-463 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:383\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py:464\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_ztb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a90ae0169f1fca8acefc25cd4aad2b9d67ebf72b7c8ce923b28ff88a27ef7b13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201324 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_eri.py:50-52 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:376-397 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:423-446 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_eri.py"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee297e8cdd93cc99adb3c73a6d021c098e230799cf8c47dca625321ca38c002f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201323 lines \u00D7 49): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:24-40 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:317-337 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1024-1041 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1388-1405 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1443-1460 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1498-1515 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1553-1570 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1608-1625 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1663-1680 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1718-1735 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1776-1793 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1831-1848 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1886-1903 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1941-1958 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1996-2013 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2051-2068 | akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:29-46 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:72-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:27-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:26-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:282-298 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:22-40 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:27-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:129-145 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:232-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:323-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:515-533 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:614-630 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:701-717 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:799-815 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:40-59 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:140-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:30-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:99-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:216-232 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:30-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:242-258 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:351-367 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:449-465 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:528-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:664-680 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:914-930 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:33-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:174-189 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:315-330 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:451-466 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:31-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:29-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:110-127 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 57 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u9EC4\u91D1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022Shibor\u4EBA\u6C11\u5E01\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1021\u0060 calls \u0060filterwarnings\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:21\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"611c4f2781235aad85c591406a0f2068bf7b3de00bc67d8d873595c68ac54186"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111-134 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:208-230 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:302-325 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:481-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:51-93 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:135-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:193-222 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 119 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:231\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:135\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf410e0d9f9300973b2d1d0420beea6f79e148b685c40fd49ef4bd42d76ca605"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:26-72 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:510-540 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:190-212 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:30-54 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_zygc.py:25-59 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:26\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:56\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:542\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68af86cc5c275e8c6f411d14f7335a71da30f85bde71887fb795df38968291b1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:85-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:286-308 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:96-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:84-109 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 117 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:286\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:308\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:121\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3318bdcb4167ae4a32ffae6bfa699019be7704cb78629f35062e3cbdc0264fd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201323 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:21-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:25-42 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:117-136 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:121-141 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 74 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:21\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220220101\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220241211\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:119\u0060 calls \u0060join\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:19\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"505381e4c851525d61d6ef4741379b27c90bb242fd1f20c354ebe2bf653861ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:41-63 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:129-151 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:49-71 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 75 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:64\u0060 calls \u0060rename\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:152\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"297745c701f204c41dc750eb00eff0e4c79de65994bcd100fa8da2658947fea7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201323 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:85-103 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:88-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1651-1673 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 75 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:82\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060, \u0060rename\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1650\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2e666d72282f4b6e4f27a70a7556768bdd5731359df8932b1b61d99d1110ccd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:49-71 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:113-138 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220220517\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220220331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0604ff4103a415c1098aad20d7fe93c114f9c94c8624a5064e46dde4cd74ba39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:81-103 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:227-250 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_xq.py"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e26d45f153f855e4c701659955c79b92a78e7bc84843c8a1a5be42cffd358cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201323 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:73-95 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py:49-66 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:73\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:96\u0060 calls \u0060sort_values\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py:67\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1aadf1405b5da0cd194d3d8cf8e768fea95b4f7e25b62beb79c12972548a397e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_rank_forecast.py:41-63 | akshare/stock/stock_share_changes_cninfo.py:55-77 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_rank_forecast.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74819c6e94f188958c2180b24c835612c814e27ee431650adce7fc6988a235de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:28-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:150-172 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:26\u0060 calls \u0060simplefilter\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:148\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf971bfdf2f51911e618bb6b875fdab619a83f32eb50483992df951a2fecc573"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:19-41 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:48-70 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:19\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e286438ae8a5474bc8a6ecd64998c7b4cfc7ca10ca8e5a2cc7ecd5ebb4cd654d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201323 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_bse.py:149-171 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_bse.py:210-229 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_bse.py:149\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_bse.py"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5c66e523a30823fe8f243592a7d848b7bc464f33951f3b29d61e51704d55fe2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201322 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:482-502 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:513-530 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:540-557 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:567-586 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:623-644 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:655-674 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:503\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:531\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e14ba546c42707d12c96115a481f535827236c461672d8d4ef11bdebce231385"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:16-37 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:164-183 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:279-298 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:413-432 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:531-550 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66-\u7D2F\u8BA1\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1a40b2795f78c6070a845fb913eaccdf4bab37e924706e22c6cd24d773323e7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201322 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:236-241 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:49-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:166-171 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yzxdr_em.py:58-79 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 12 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 243 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:236\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f31120dae97ae594cdfb84f77ddaefe662deecef24d13b23a007bb72e13744a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:40-63 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:27-54 | akshare/fx/fx_c_swap_cm.py:39-60 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75cceb019c0bb10548c7a6612b5150d5b29f5759d16f89553bd0164e55e1bd07"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u201322 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:46-65 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:92-98 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:52-73 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:92\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0e8ebc290d6291d5c2a527ba4bdc0698ce19d18da82a008d3ee34722d3c46ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:97-118 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:196-217 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:295-316 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68f60a8350e9a9b1d36451f79b23aacbe3b685ff93f4c7c3e81b2180c6f62cc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/utils/demjson.py:330-351 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:418-439 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:549-570 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":330}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a5723de5ab03d23140c3b28491e5b554c2459253568ba04778d02c81ee04b83"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:274-295 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:295-322 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cd40847da659f54a300d056a44369bd969380f37ea8b39226235a130e1b3bd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:47-68 | akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py:138-159 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_fhsp_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aba4accf8da3fb5c42ae74adec2f0e54a11f7c0cf132d0c0ca99c00cdecb0216"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:38-59 | akshare/spot/spot_sge.py:145-156 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/spot/spot_sge.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 62 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c390af484b92571b587768277428af41c88dbc8450c90a1db2c66e71098d5020"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:475-496 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:526-547 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 428 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:475\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":475}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a23f8459699405c7df7a5926378648342a5158ed1e0826b5a83ca6cc4f7c9eb3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py:61-81 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:68-89 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 77 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002200700\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SZ000665\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d19e9293f7239b95ab25217035bdc57b2717e858490af7b82fd304e964812be6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:131-165 | akshare/stock/stock_share_changes_cninfo.py:57-78 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_share_changes_cninfo.py:57\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cae78db291cb9ea5068c797dcb89981955144ab796d7513590af5fe1cad5992b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:206-227 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:190-210 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:206\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81d86cf41ba505fcbf91e9918864f73dbd880bd79a74dedb5aa3da2997e7b85d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201321 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:167-184 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:215-235 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:371-388 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:410-430 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:230-247 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:269-289 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1082-1099 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1121-1141 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1505-1522 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1544-1564 \u2014 there are 10 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 10 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ff7c8eeea488a9ff6327f789f879e0390dc1a70468cb2831aeaeaffa2806658"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:239-266 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:134-174 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2749-2786 | akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py:40-63 | akshare/economic/macro_japan.py:40-63 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:29-55 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:36-56 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:216-236 \u2014 there are 8 copies across 7 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 8 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:239\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0bf5019f15e296772a0722eca7bf40a1988c9477b8202429189438b3b9b6cd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:157-180 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:202-231 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:275-295 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:221-243 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:258-285 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:134-161 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:230-251 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:304-331 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 170 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3097ab5869495304608895ced79cd56db119c39e704c07a55059b174b8ee1d53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:31-51 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:64-92 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:76-100 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:147-187 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:240-268 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:64-90 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:109-145 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_cninfo.py:57-82 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 120 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022202312\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220210930\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:188\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:52\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eee8e216048e04bbe028f486b1771545dd496905549caee736e9b608b32a4f3e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201321 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:243-253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:281-291 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:230-241 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:282-293 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:339-349 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:51-71 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:357-377 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d32adfa6282dcf653f523abcb3e1fa330b953f53d188b49bf75fb7a160914bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201321 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:96-116 | akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py:77-89 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:177-194 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:43-54 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:37-48 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_summary.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 98 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:96\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:196\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:118\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07026824cc27bed33d15df011fdc286e1519b141fdaabbb571f3c5b16c3f12ac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/option/option_finance.py:95-115 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:118-138 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:141-161 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:164-184 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:187-207 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_finance.py:95\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73919793508d4e3f356e9ac49f8d806175c602ddd681199b906fbf5115e4a618"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:158-178 | akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py:38-62 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:88-110 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:88\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1033b9501a0f7deeae2b3776529c1bc06a0e69e32ad0c0bfafe5af18136ef632"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:55-80 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:159-179 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9f6d1391c788f82db936b9f4f692a51c4829585fefd2ca22c215732bf1b55c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:116-136 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:160-180 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:116\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de5cbf143291df9a7427a216f833ff28cadd3c2e3ca524554c414c0af98cc049"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/news/news_cctv.py:84-105 | akshare/news/news_cctv.py:130-150 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/news/news_cctv.py:84\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3dce49289b6f734475254374e56004140a15c62d8ac7e872d320120eae93dfe4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:368-388 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:448-468 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":368}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8797875c19581b6236bb328f4e22a8fbafefca4909a4a194424575d56ab279e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py:109-129 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:151-171 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 77 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002200700\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SZ000665\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"469c12156045d63c023d0ec63e4a9199e3e9b48c08d23b729f7bfe7851462ebb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:101-121 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:98-118 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u963F\u91CC\u5DF4\u5DF4\u6982\u5FF5\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u534A\u5BFC\u4F53\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d68eb4638fde6abe377f09491aa6cb8a0e5c00adf873ec654246cb62942ea519"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:402-421 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:460-480 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:402\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":402}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2f3b2dc015f4d758ee5938630be80aeedf5efdb027d045fe103db26a7db56c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/index/index_cx.py:14-33 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:42-61 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:70-89 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:98-117 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:126-145 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:154-173 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:182-201 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:210-229 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:238-257 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:266-285 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:294-313 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:322-341 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:350-369 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:378-397 \u2014 all 14 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_cx.py:14\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cx.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2d3a639830da70ebc4650363fd1e66714ea00987d23fb19cc422777e476e291"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201320 lines \u00D7 12): akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:49-59 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:100-110 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:151-161 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:202-212 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:253-263 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:304-314 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:355-365 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3081-3091 | akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py:54-64 | akshare/economic/macro_japan.py:54-64 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:114-124 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:160-179 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_australia.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 249 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_australia.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f93ec785b8eb8653b9179d7202164b66b9d1018f7f21d7e86fa7a345a51423a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:66-89 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:133-154 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:192-213 | akshare/index/index_global_sina.py:47-68 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:82-105 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:57-84 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:115-134 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:140-185 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_research_sw.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 215 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a488a889e57a2ebf8eefb915eb7b92816917829f34d48bf9c5244805392b3548"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201320 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:97-114 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:28-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:240-256 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:447-463 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:120-138 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 21 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 373 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220230417\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240430\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:27\u0060 calls \u0060join\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:95\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bdff47d0f977971e97c676dc144fa071f1b542ce2c3064c9869cfd8a5e340c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:41-62 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:129-150 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:49-70 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:43-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 75 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:64\u0060 calls \u0060rename\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_cninfo.py:152\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"127f01cfa04ecd85492cc6a8b1d0bacb9e55ac2c81590b99016e007e906819f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fx/fx_c_swap_cm.py:41-62 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:142-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:46-65 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_concept_futu.py:140\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:45\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fx/fx_c_swap_cm.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2a33ecef4aad6934df9b8dcd5dacdcc2cbbfbf8734f859718b28e2962dc58fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_lh_yybpm.py:20-39 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lh_yybpm.py:43-62 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lh_yybpm.py:66-85 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lh_yybpm.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8237b4dd78d1428a542df30088f571019f1b44b929d8c2b630da7ad47388d7a8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:92-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:129-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:167-186 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac73dffe7504b9f1f3cc4ef5ec4d3ecb26d23a17e4bec31855294960fc85fcb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/receipt.py:159-178 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:221-240 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a6fd98eb357cd2a83ed923c394172d1c8bb885942f08d2398b8196acf7eec9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_info.py:356-375 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:385-404 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u7EC8\u6B62\u4E0A\u5E02\u516C\u53F8\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5168\u79F0\u53D8\u66F4\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:377\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:405\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_info.py"},"region":{"startLine":356}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abaecad599952e7e22920c6862d7d60a8b5ec34f877b7e809719c81f8158db77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:46-65 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:45-64 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26dd3568ab5d7f0621dd95d6a3f1931c1867a8ead909782ea6567dd90c8fa035"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:134-174 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2749-2786 | akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py:40-63 | akshare/economic/macro_japan.py:40-63 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:29-55 | akshare/fx/fx_c_swap_cm.py:41-61 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:36-56 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:216-236 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:46-64 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china_hk.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 213 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05aa3887835cc17de32cc2f3071b56b6403b94d7285101986cbe28f9063a033b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:36-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:143-161 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:192-210 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:243-261 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:345-363 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:396-414 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e427edd3b92e1206e52aa84eb4e129b2aab8a7844a91fdf0b036cb3ab1ab8d37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:243-261 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:438-456 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:297-315 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1149-1167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1572-1590 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32a57b28e00413e2c2f927514422e9405d840cad1b707dfdf85b7dcf0c1a69cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201319 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:57-71 | akshare/index/index_cni.py:83-93 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:123-139 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38-56 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220220517\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220220331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_hold.py:140\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_cni.py:94\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95b9034133c4828a2c7ec89c53e5d4532271b2f8a2021c3b3bf1a88f672f2f1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201319 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_summary.py:71-82 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:177-192 | akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:50-68 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f7e4302cb7d4bf0bdd1b227ee39c52dfb7ccb920bf8238af90c528bc216aaab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_sw.py:39-57 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:97-115 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:159-177 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cbecd3da8e7f0e9395826bb22dd95b6becfed2aa24be36e29041d1f36968f00"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201319 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:240-255 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:317-335 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1788-1801 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_zh_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:240\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24dec9c703342e762f9a9a0e32a776705880c7db430c3d670e54c50a4417114e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:61-79 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:95-113 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:133-151 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:61\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c83fe00c55e2e15dfa8fe66e31fde26948e1abe3ad66ea8db5abc33c47cca649"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:172-190 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_index_sina.py:55-73 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_index_sina.py:55\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022cffex\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022shfe\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"230da7d2c20cd8ca4176964402947071407de78b17c9544826f5028eb4d22988"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_sw.py:131-149 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:193-211 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_sw.py:131\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de3398dab5d3ff9f70198b3a463e780321f56db5634d3dd9218cb32e5225eb8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201319 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:306-308 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:176-178 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:147-165 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1452-1454 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1728-1744 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 270 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:147\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1451\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:305\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3065c7eeee1bc3f066550967a5d4c8c8652fb604e9cc9decc0a99f8bf70b2639"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:159-177 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:238-256 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 428 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u53EF\u71C3\u51B0\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5C0F\u91D1\u5C5E\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab4942c54f15fd8947da60744a03e9846b8966c5989683e414b0fa7b1b110787"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:423-441 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:474-492 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 428 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:423\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u878D\u8D44\u878D\u5238\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u5C0F\u91D1\u5C5E\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb6368c3fcff11dddab3fafd92b2ae286f0f3eb139ee87997f33862371c14e5d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201319 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_info.py:48-66 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:68-86 | akshare/stock/stock_info.py:87-96 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:87\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_info.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"024ecc30e8963185c854a3686661257f7f4f42d606dcd1e4734b66ef09e463b6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1724-1742 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1784-1799 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1724}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be23ac0669810f29dfc76bb22657b8af6be591deb9af2fd1e8d2e0574f2cdb74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3237-3254 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3290-3307 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3348-3365 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3382-3399 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3416-3433 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3450-3467 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3527-3544 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3561-3578 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3595-3612 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3629-3646 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3664-3681 \u2014 all 11 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35063d33a8c90cdb1528679e1321b04656c3f8568ad58c43057929ba4f498fa9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:525-566 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:86-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:279-296 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:926-951 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:989-1014 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:123-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:267-288 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:391-412 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:529-549 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 155 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:86\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":525}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea8a2e85480eb2002062e8bc4166e61f17e4b89c94b584ba89f86b1dcc0b716e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:67-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:143-160 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:526-543 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:627-644 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:67\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u9AD8\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u521B\u6708\u65B0\u4F4E\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:544\u0060 calls \u0060read_html\u0060, \u0060StringIO\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:645\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7481e5ff0122a4f05a0585eba7e7afa156358993164021f234d0d350ce4420c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:270-300 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:64-81 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:76-112 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 197 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:64\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62beedf9b96bc690b280f71251bb4047e210fef907af55edd14583a3b89eb168"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:38-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:203-220 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 91 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d382c1e9b6f572c98fea4802fc45628762a2cfde4992a0700814e45e17de223d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:659-676 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:705-722 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":659}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26ce513e225a50c5f02fac29d0f8905383989498298c92f6a6fdb91a89680e35"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:627-643 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:665-682 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022IF2008\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022RB0\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":627}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b59b5b435178cc859bbd7e2a01732729d1f7fb06d733fe12827b2acb7b42eab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:84-101 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:772-789 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:84\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb881f15e44d12b9cbbe779055492599b5b06149beb787e57a06e5f30969a792"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:20-39 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:30-47 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:20\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5476f683d9783704808e33935d7bfe163c75ab34dd14be48f8940cd1733b288"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/utils/demjson.py:476-493 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:607-624 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":476}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97756e8831b4dcaacdfe187b0117b7e7b27ddfb0c22ecda247af2498234b7d1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 19): akshare/index/index_cx.py:22-38 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:50-66 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:78-94 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:106-122 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:134-150 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:162-178 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:190-206 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:218-234 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:246-262 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:274-290 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:302-318 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:330-346 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:358-374 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:386-402 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:418-434 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:450-466 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:482-498 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:514-530 | akshare/index/index_cx.py:546-562 \u2014 all 19 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cx.py"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58955e14d970cbfd0bdf413cc21bd257d71c63d4de0548290661fc60b2e8abc9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 17): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:15-70 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:15-70 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:56-72 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:85-102 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:181-198 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:74-96 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:164-186 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:254-276 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:125-146 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:233-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:341-362 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:449-471 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:562-584 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:671-693 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:845-866 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1280-1297 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1365-1382 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:56\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68acbdd4dd9669c5ceca85da647b1dc198768d2904a54c78f092211bc33ad66f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:65-87 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:261-283 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:315-347 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:386-406 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:497-525 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:551-569 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:598-618 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:654-670 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:758-786 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:816-834 \u2014 all 10 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bf96596965d3d5f707176a4b82fb99a500d0258f8bf62db223ba80fd376dff2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:106-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208-232 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:49-73 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:418-434 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:527-543 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:634-650 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:742-758 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:887-919 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:955-987 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1023-1055 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 162 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b822a14aba26a869b46a519f4b3957be8704ddb03d8de25c709d8a2e0c460b87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:63-79 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:139-155 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:204-220 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:265-281 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:326-342 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:418-434 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:522-538 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:623-639 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:711-727 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:799-815 \u2014 all 10 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3da25252e82a239d24b61a00e39a1ca553c4d664cfa8dff89bda9e92183f80bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:241-257 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:295-311 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:366-382 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:477-493 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:531-547 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:578-594 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:679-695 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:738-754 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:793-812 \u2014 all 9 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41ad080cb7c81f5a99cb31808ee2f759030eb447fb5c587c467124f3e70a457d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:40-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:236-253 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:274-291 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:39-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:223-241 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:275-293 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:332-349 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:42-70 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:350-376 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3630ffbaa58ac32d641818f7b63233eae1b018b2148f168b97a648dfc9b91f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:21-39 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:93-111 | akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py:22-38 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:39-58 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_gsrl_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 102 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:39\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f1aaa080a5aafd7956a3cef59471548d25e3bb84b72a142606679fc6d486bed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201317 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:771-785 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:896-912 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1031-1046 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1128-1143 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1047\u0060 calls \u0060sort_values\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1144\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":771}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9c85e04012c9ba9cc4d041045532776a63f833c48d12712fa0c7cfefff2abef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:172-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:854-875 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:923-943 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:991-1011 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:172\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd480fc443efc65869509459d32150ee8365c044bf37cf157bf06cacd081ffad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/news/news_cctv.py:57-72 | akshare/news/news_cctv.py:108-123 | akshare/news/news_cctv.py:160-176 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/news/news_cctv.py:160\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92ab0de524f5c702e001f144050721732041580bc43dd9b63dc15138cc323a11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201317 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:288-304 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:158-174 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:993-996 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 270 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":288}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"279bb70adde5b07d3f42848365b1d87cc7f93fd0fe0888665de76cb18f21dd3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:98-116 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:129-145 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:98\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6b9cca2e06e468134e14fad5ffcd4d3d5a3c98934a81e9e67df2d74f355aae8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/receipt.py:199-215 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:250-266 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":199}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d4d6a9c1a5096f9a77fab0307dc8424130c1160b724343c044f42caa1922edc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:127-143 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:212-228 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d21a8b41116a203194b49e2473abb986815e169cc07da9133a83554b2fe69fe3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:243-259 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:279-295 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:243\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f14ec327ac092761a7740f2c06e407ebc41ff9fd1c49c23076fceeb55f173a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:175-191 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:226-240 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb6fc67b085e2be8e70d5f863f89358cb9c6b759cabf668dec0a30134bf42278"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 20): akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:39-58 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:90-109 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:141-160 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:192-211 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:243-262 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:294-313 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:345-364 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:39-59 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:90-110 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:141-161 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:192-212 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:243-263 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:294-314 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:345-365 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:396-416 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:447-467 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:498-518 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3075-3090 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:104-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:144-178 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_australia.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_canada.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 229 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:141\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060, \u0060reset_index\u0060, \u0060list\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:38\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_australia.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7086f7620d91cf8f686831e5544fa1e3ed677630f1bc8a01d6f52ff545c2a20"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 19): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:21-70 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:21-70 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:56-72 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:475-496 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:85-102 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:181-198 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:526-547 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:74-96 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:164-186 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:254-276 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:131-146 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:239-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:347-362 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:455-471 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:568-584 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:677-693 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:851-866 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1280-1297 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1365-1382 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 136 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:56\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1524304f914a40aa79f396ad1d986f48b5793e7c5aeece8cdfd632c36c2c932e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:69-84 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:109-124 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:149-164 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:189-204 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:229-244 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:269-284 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:309-324 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:349-364 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d8cf97c9997ba47a8bcfac1e5a5efdc3af4a7328dbf8b15e9e8f5e39e1949f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:58-75 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:130-147 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:53-68 | akshare/stock/stock_hsgt_em.py:115-131 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:822-837 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b584feff30ddfa3498fc189b860317301f45a23f4cd3c4ca2bb34c67692fde5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:66-103 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:494-516 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:588-603 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:830-846 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:877-893 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:494\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d74cbbbc2fcf11b914e7ebb7492328491e01b188d0f54e79e682a1ffe7b9888d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201316 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:42-56 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:98-111 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:41-56 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:42\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f3d4892d23bc9b82a2abfb38deed65169ec98e76181018a76d2fb7c25e87691"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201316 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:313-327 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:328-330 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:412-427 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:555-570 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:328\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:331\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/movie_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":313}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c66443fd804718e2c05ca0a674b2f7ee2f7f6666c76d6cb5a9386cd6408b20b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201316 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:37-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:289-301 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:135-147 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:304\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060, \u0060insert\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:55\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f295756ede6850f0c38c2685efc89e2530b9333f44d9a1338cca5164c61a01a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:148-162 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:188-203 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:219-234 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f4c9bc849d99bf4c26cbda1f84488b35562413e27247ad6fd0954c4b8062d68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:278-298 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yzxdr_em.py:83-98 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py"},"region":{"startLine":278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25c53f924a27cdf102a25d25f59257b9ac0bd3bc1f6192ccde40b34adb3c795d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:215-234 | akshare/index/index_zh_a_scope.py:25-40 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd71ff42ca6f1a4f2a8cab6555279aa3319fa3dc40fea36c22c126a247de1c94"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201316 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:81-84 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:257-272 | akshare/index/index_spot.py:35-38 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:86-101 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc01bb6980dcc2b6c60a0f9be21679c2643b503d56ff918629b33e46d67c30b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u201316 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/forex/forex_em.py:88-103 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:182-197 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:118-122 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/forex/forex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 114 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022USDCNH\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022HG00Y\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/forex/forex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66abfdb21e3107aaf18d0a5eeac297e395ffaa3f823a19ccdda8bf408ed7e12a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:700-715 | akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:48-66 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":700}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ee04648a89f87568eeae9035c5f3c8634f6e70cd7fc327475f97ad9cad9fd63"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_finance.py:257-272 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:276-291 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_finance.py:257\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance.py"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87e57dfc063efe3d0af7a6bf47923f76f848a28a936f88674cdfa1198f177c1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:74-88 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:145-159 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py:216-230 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:54-77 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:126-149 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:167-188 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:254-269 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:87-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:152-171 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:208-225 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:564-581 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:658-676 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:746-766 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:91-111 \u2014 there are 14 copies across 7 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 14 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:87\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220210930\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:581\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060, \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:107\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_scale_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"061ed04562ac37b68ff06c01e164f10c506a2a2d185a7b7ae62157ddc2cea59e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 12): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1407-1421 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1462-1476 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1517-1531 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1572-1586 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1627-1641 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1682-1696 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1737-1751 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1850-1864 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1905-1919 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1960-1974 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2015-2029 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2070-2084 \u2014 all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1407}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"664425e9d53c7d4f84938091ffa506743871ac3c245de7fe05d92dfd25178b8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:193-207 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:217-231 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:241-255 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:308-322 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:332-346 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:356-370 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:442-456 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:466-480 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:560-574 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:584-598 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:751-765 \u2014 all 11 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66-\u7D2F\u8BA1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022MPV\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":193}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2ef7a225c876e224859738a18ad3984272afdc47a68f3278fedfd8d1700cac4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u201315 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:339-344 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:46-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:50-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:172-177 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:46-60 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:383-388 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:478-483 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:586-590 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:694-698 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 70 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:339\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c616b8fb1131601dc3c3cd5263acb78474c560a1d9d42697b98a2a6912b8c292"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:55-100 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:154-187 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:239-272 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:82-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:288-321 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1581-1617 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:82\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ed18ce6ba5064d1233dbf5837734fe8f3c08f2d580fae2b33956d775d7eaf65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:394-408 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:253-267 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1105-1119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1528-1542 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 270 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":394}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe640ff16398d4ef4b108b1c438c7725f38dfbddbd66054d408dbe83fde1474b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u201315 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:277-279 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:210-225 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fund_flow.py:316-331 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:225-239 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:286-300 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:394-395 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:486-487 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:588-589 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:688-689 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:775-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:863-864 \u2014 there are 11 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 11 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"407a94ce35a6a1860756e69b9c8fc6b583eba0fc5648dfe314cddfd3ff24b1cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_info.py:268-282 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:208-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:46-77 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 131 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_info.py:268\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:236\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:78\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_info.py"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0d999af50e9c9e88a574a9c61a343770b270cbfcfedd317a33d4011c15e5fe5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_info_ws.py:73-88 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_pankou_em.py:122-136 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_info_ws.py:73\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_info_ws.py"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c3b559bbc063190210b45d6a00e3bd4a8eac5b8ce341cd7d7cb68c36674de57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:701-715 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yzxdr_em.py:59-79 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":701}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abb797142afd849676371b6206856dd3061719364f919345a818a04f0def5f7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cons.py:523-537 | akshare/option/cons.py:66-79 \u2014 \u0060akshare/futures/cons.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/cons.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/cons.py:523\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cons.py"},"region":{"startLine":523}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fcba2091770b45d61a95f12dd07594f25c69b5a2046953a99722adedaf47600"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cons.py:618-632 | akshare/option/cons.py:134-148 \u2014 \u0060akshare/futures/cons.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/cons.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cons.py"},"region":{"startLine":618}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73fc431e4de22111b48f3ad3af190866a69181ef3b0977b3c8556f6c62bb271e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:40-54 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:147-168 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 160 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a540e2d72a39e9b41c33a942bcdbba4fae15500b25422656da222372f424fe7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:396-410 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:310-324 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":396}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b73051af6940b0bfcb201394c923cfeb9f819cab558efe7117f559c46ca4ac4a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:299-313 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_classify_sina.py:62-76 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py"},"region":{"startLine":299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73c482bbd35a8044874683aee72a5a9aec69b4cd0602e496541c756ca865cb25"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:64-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_inner_trade_xq.py:55-69 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ff1c94f29acfcbc700aa824630c9e60e9699f18f4fb92ef5d504d416910a784"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_info.py:145-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_info.py:178-192 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_info.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1244ab74dfbecb7ba52d93bf1ffd6ed5d5021e6584f79016727c0d4f6de068d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 13): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:191-204 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:215-228 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:239-252 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:306-319 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:330-343 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:354-367 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:440-453 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:464-477 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:488-501 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:558-571 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:582-595 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:606-619 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:749-762 \u2014 all 13 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:191\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66-\u7D2F\u8BA1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022MPV\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfe2dcdcfae3f0dd442a9ee5af9dc16cc4fd38197c6fbe0bbd0d2176f146a24a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 12): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1356-1369 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1411-1424 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1466-1479 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1521-1534 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1576-1589 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1631-1644 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1686-1699 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1741-1754 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1854-1867 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1909-1922 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1964-1977 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2019-2032 \u2014 all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1410\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1355\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1356}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"772f7642b52ec402fb7f33f9263bb0af5c9cb3e8590a3681a3818ada143ebaa8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py:31-44 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:362-382 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:462-482 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:537-557 | akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:64-84 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220221104\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221031\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5525b05c365aee76e5c0a1e72fa1194482f23babd6ff2c95c4d36049e73e178"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201314 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:38-48 | akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:76-86 | akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py:114-124 | akshare/stock/stock_us_js.py:62-75 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_position_lg.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50d7a396c67c9620051f8b8e49e550316eb4af314a74e62e0911e3a708c28c45"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:165-178 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:182-191 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:198-205 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:165\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:197\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:165\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de83195ca0cd5d65d686c30e12592de80635b67ab4c0a3c229c02f5fe6d97d32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py:32-43 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:34-47 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py:34-47 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 77 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:34\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0622865fb655ccb5ce7354e343a2642043c9be22a8f65e0954837ac38ca18437"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:62-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_inner_trade_xq.py:53-65 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_basic_info_xq.py:47-60 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py:62\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hot_xq.py"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53f26bc0137f993975d39c82fb9107add4e28a5ebf533c8b2c4222ff539d2295"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:92-102 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:187-199 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:275-288 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:89\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:185\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c886a9f8be876136f51b0b5f95ad1ab040de77164c59326c5b8821cae82b381"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:467-480 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:962-975 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_usa.py"},"region":{"startLine":467}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e15f7d9d579878694318713efde611a2ffe7f9d09a6c8e4456742e330735f1b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cot.py:1066-1079 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1084-1098 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/cot.py:1066\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":1066}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0878377e442b2efabe4dc5a9ea9dfe8720927db411b65b8d2b11a9f8c513b58a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:14-27 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:58-71 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5916\u4E09\u5143\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u7389\u7C73\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12d1c3a51d95b606989b36f234263bb1554031f5a391ae244743fded4d412e0c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:59-70 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:71-84 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd643570775a5373c7492e16b608a5c3ab3f4b1f4d3c67b7dd70f4e786459312"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:243-256 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:295-308 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e8f4852ca0ce43fa8cdb3944c135cf6c430754586ae3188978efd69daa59474"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_irm_cninfo.py:117-128 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_irm_cninfo.py:177-190 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_irm_cninfo.py:177\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_irm_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84db901fef21ed0a42be5c1a0602b4cdece5e1251f0338af8802196d61bd6478"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 44): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123-135 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:651-677 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:28-67 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:39-58 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:90-109 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:141-160 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:192-211 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:243-262 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:294-313 | akshare/economic/macro_australia.py:345-364 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:39-59 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:90-110 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:141-161 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:192-212 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:243-263 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:294-314 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:345-365 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:396-416 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:447-467 | akshare/economic/macro_canada.py:498-518 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:229-249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1163-1189 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2219-2245 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2282-2320 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2367-2400 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2451-2485 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2525-2555 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2601-2617 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2646-2666 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2699-2717 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2839-2859 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2892-2910 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2942-2960 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2993-3026 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3075-3090 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3121-3155 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3209-3229 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:104-123 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:288-307 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:81-102 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:72-103 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:38-72 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:102-129 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:169-198 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:104\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:136\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e62800703ee01c89209a8ff8170b9a33935dca907f484ed258e7bdd830f48464"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 30): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123-135 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:651-677 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:28-67 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:229-249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1163-1190 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2219-2246 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2282-2320 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2367-2401 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2451-2485 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2525-2556 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2601-2617 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2646-2666 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2699-2717 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2839-2859 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2892-2910 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2942-2960 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2993-3027 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3121-3156 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3209-3229 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:288-308 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:368-398 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:310-339 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:419-449 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:81-103 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1045-1083 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1157-1195 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:72-104 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:38-73 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:102-129 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:169-198 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:123\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2246\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:135\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2c9cdad410e992c6a9258a70a58b5baad7c3c7fb548cd172516f06518ef4e41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 19): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:45-57 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:58-70 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:71-83 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:109-121 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:122-134 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:135-147 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:190-201 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:214-225 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:238-249 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:305-316 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:329-340 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:353-364 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:439-450 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:463-474 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:487-498 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:557-568 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:581-592 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:605-616 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:748-759 \u2014 all 19 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:45\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u72ED\u4E49\u4E58\u7528\u8F66-\u7D2F\u8BA1\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022MPV\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f73a96a41940b5e0b3985caa8c6337bd77c7e7ac3decd6049bea45f6c3a03613"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1264-1276 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1310-1322 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1357-1369 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1412-1424 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1467-1479 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1522-1534 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1577-1589 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1632-1644 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1687-1699 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1742-1754 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1855-1867 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1910-1922 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1965-1977 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2020-2032 \u2014 all 14 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1356\u0060 calls \u0060drop_duplicates\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1263\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0e11107dc5b9b0c1477db40080066906a7010dd70c5829667007b23838c7a64"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/air/air_zhenqi.py:102-117 | akshare/air/air_zhenqi.py:148-164 | akshare/economic/macro_other.py:56-73 | akshare/index/index_cni.py:70-84 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:48-60 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:17-29 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:229-241 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:436-448 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:109-121 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/rate/repo_rate.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220220409\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221017\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/air_zhenqi.py"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e16d2bfaaa262161829816cd1a9781d746d7402668230a8217f00141b7962d26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:840-853 | akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:871-884 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:998-1010 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1027-1039 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1056-1068 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1085-1097 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:854\u0060 calls \u0060fillna\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:885\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_euro.py"},"region":{"startLine":840}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"379a38744cde3a21dd8f2c535cbd11573f126c58f5db18c2993f3bb7b104c572"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:146-163 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:239-253 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:316-333 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1727-1742 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1787-1799 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/index/index_zh_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_zh_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"095eb614c2321a010373f614a6b1d0d94e71f2ea7a24e7456b04f3e0ca04e012"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:400-412 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:426-437 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:314-326 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:340-351 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":400}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7df33924c13e867e04fb5cbc8434319112c8a980ec5758eddc1da923b695459"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_sw.py:77-89 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:138-151 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:200-213 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_sw.py:77\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f6f08f6e74154c71b6339c9a8286f8a4bb6cd2c38e25fc300498f899bb1faed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1799-1811 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2074-2086 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1799}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e26fba211d0ca11827a625d78328e97e8f4dfdeabe52f7fcabb37b6c80ea03a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3731-3743 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:229-242 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3731}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967ab3745dbacfde644851e9a885a09d67afee534f0e9c1bd36721dd85075e7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:85-97 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:98-110 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a14135957e2753a0af8a72bad6fa10a5167981b48b530da6bdf053e7e490186a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fx/fx_quote.py:33-45 | akshare/fx/fx_quote.py:90-102 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fx/fx_quote.py"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cae1bc7a567d9dc1b849244300ea22a3ab502d27d2abea14ee6927c49413f75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_cni.py:146-158 | akshare/index/index_cni.py:173-185 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/index/index_cni.py:145\u0060 calls \u0060simplefilter\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_cni.py:171\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cni.py"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"410f43ff00d1a591063c45febcf540ee2d18d3c677018ca536dfa92cba539f00"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py:43-60 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:73-85 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:72\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060, \u0060to_list\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py:42\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"860ffb8a8949525983bf9d116c69bd6ab5eb966f1804cc0822b9bea95c51b202"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1009-1021 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:114-123 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1009\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1009}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"434891522cecd620b242d831f63cbe5a63e8dc8ff5cd1275b7bc53cacaa5e828"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:138-149 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:186-198 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f38d9c0cff56f443d735355f4876bdb3c1d88a0d27c0da9aa689a49c2dfb921e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:49-61 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:190-202 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:49\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d10818c76116c9b0e5c75c52b677bf6b830fb4a885b64f362d4daf16df3d91ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:594-606 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:664-676 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":594}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fefe5a40749576c7379f1e17d38eee0e6635d793d12e56a5843149c1ef17b37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:639-651 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:697-710 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":639}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"695296ca0eb9b565ab773868217aa4cd3f96052d9bf7c11688ebdc0c8016679f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:39-51 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:72-83 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:39\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a28c186e1a01599b6f0305eb6641ce85a1ff7dce36f35428b1a915f0d6910981"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 25): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:44-55 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:57-68 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:70-81 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:83-94 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:108-119 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:121-132 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:134-145 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:147-158 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:189-200 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:213-224 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:237-248 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:261-272 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:304-315 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:328-339 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:352-363 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:376-387 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:438-449 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:462-473 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:486-497 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:556-567 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:580-591 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:604-615 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:747-758 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:771-782 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:795-806 \u2014 all 25 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3dfebbc3950d54e494a2e764918a873c07452a32b30e9db17175495a46da2f34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:247-258 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:301-312 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:372-383 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:483-494 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:537-548 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:584-595 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:640-651 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:685-696 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:744-755 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:802-813 \u2014 all 10 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:638\u0060 calls \u0060filterwarnings\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:245\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcc831b77877ba02407d2b7d441ebbacf485cd6eb91348c1ad27aba0505dee04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:15-26 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:42-53 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:66-77 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:90-101 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:114-125 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:138-149 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:162-173 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:186-197 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd87de6accf7238891ccf89179b625f7e1d88b1318d300cef151fdd35392824d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201312 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3507-3516 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:188-193 | akshare/stock/stock_repurchase_em.py:106-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:89-100 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:192-203 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:109-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:73-80 \u2014 there are 7 copies across 6 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 7 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3507\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3516\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_repurchase_em.py:111\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3507}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb07e59eca6ed8fe109923e2b451160c99833c2e010a5e3cf51687fc5c160789"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/economic/macro_other.py:32-44 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:196-207 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:334-346 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:382-395 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/reits/reits_basic.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:334\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_other.py"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5afc6f648d39e12a45984b28aea6bd3488f7ae906a00ca26a421bed508c026b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:25-36 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:113-124 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:211-222 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:298-309 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:25\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78fc6a3bb9fea15849c8f5ad805ae570fd6d8fc488db1795d5f8aa3b59ec0450"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:168-179 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:150-161 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:191-202 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:222-233 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94923087ca9ba3087867aba2188ddb864de7274223cc8ed0ee47d160a80625c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201312 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:371-382 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:426-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py:535-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_all_pb.py:27-36 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py"},"region":{"startLine":371}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6f179d39ef780b9a650580a3bf04172d476278efb085307af6cf5eb515562e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:47-58 | akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:64-75 | akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:81-92 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e75e149c7806dbc6ee7b88441041d8646e40d0d007212f9d27db12c3f0689087"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:37-48 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:110-121 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:148-159 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:37\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a570925de11fe3665f3731345225eb12f2bdfe344590bbf961b6c24142b082a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py:53-64 | akshare/fund/fund_init_em.py:56-73 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_init_em.py:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"340b673eccf46390768879b018275cc13d51aa67079ced6c4c8c4ea36306ddb2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cot.py:84-93 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:589-600 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e203e9e2b0cfd768feed22a50f9d700ec73ccf201ba09bd2874096b45ca13c58"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_stock_us_sina.py:19-30 | akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:118-134 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022.INX\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022FB\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_us_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9783861db79177c16bd4325f9b0ec9058186b35610feac81856e5e7824391908"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:151-162 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:200-210 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d6868871ed4db07d4be210d07ed9f60f9188afe4e3f5e711c398f4367c8683b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:225-236 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:254-265 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f5dbbf29c984470cf27742ade691b63a2f724ac00339ae9fc88f9acc83a95c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gxl_lg.py:40-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gxl_lg.py:71-82 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gxl_lg.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a52e19c0a43c7fea0704f5dcef79cd68d1ccac513433e823ec1e06c15929bc7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u201311 lines \u00D7 84): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:105-113 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:65-69 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:103-107 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:172-178 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297-304 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1117-1126 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1186-1195 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2242-2249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2317-2322 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2397-2406 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2552-2561 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2783-2792 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3023-3032 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3152-3161 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3319-3323 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:112-120 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:55-59 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:93-99 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:327-333 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:171-180 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:264-269 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:352-357 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:215-223 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:175-180 | akshare/futures/cot.py:935-942 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1029-1036 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1276-1282 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:314-318 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:404-408 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:516-520 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:603-607 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:87-91 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:149-153 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:211-215 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:72-80 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:114-118 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:124-129 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:197-202 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:270-275 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:57-61 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:471-477 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:566-575 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:89-98 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:810-816 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:899-905 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:988-994 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1079-1088 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1191-1200 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1294-1302 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:103-107 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:92-98 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:155-159 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:190-196 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:69-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:96-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:240-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:390-394 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:111-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:245-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:296-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:678-686 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:768-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:871-879 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:367-371 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:436-440 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:852-858 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:921-927 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:989-995 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1057-1063 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1299-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:598-608 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:549-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:68-72 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:174-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:277-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:377-381 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:445-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:118-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:106-114 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:447-451 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:143-149 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:122-130 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:70-76 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:286-294 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:178\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:113\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faa4cf5defc26d7c0fafac6bd61b7e15537b91a91382274e30364d57b1a0a9e7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 19): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:32-42 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:96-106 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:178-188 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:202-212 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:226-236 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:250-260 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:293-303 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:317-327 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:341-351 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:365-375 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:427-437 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:451-461 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:475-485 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:545-555 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:569-579 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:593-603 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:736-746 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:760-770 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:784-794 \u2014 all 19 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:176\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:734\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98e4e048eb768d23bd7123b49304365ad6a2618f701fa18071f633dc7cd3b8a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/economic/macro_other.py:32-44 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:633-643 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:671-682 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:94-116 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:196-207 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:334-346 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:382-395 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:359-374 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:151-161 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:679-689 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/reits/reits_basic.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:94\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_other.py"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47eda4370aeb52d7e5079a3d189d53d7c52fb9300116870f65b39df40224e4f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2609-2619 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:47-58 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:227-238 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:195-210 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:433-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_pankou_em.py:123-139 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 169 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2609\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":2609}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52ad298b3cb8ffbe3767c52da81b83621dd492f9654d22aaed01762c4b2ba635"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:85-90 | akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:195-205 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:85\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cea44fe8d3c1f6da16d50c2df95e56be114ee6c817a87161a88698a2c90f8b80"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py:548-558 | akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py:677-687 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":548}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"019daec3daf54cc4865a9502ac90b9ca4fd74c517cc2c2136545c06037dbbcea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py:184-194 | akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py:314-324 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py:184\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_portfolio_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"988a7bc3d3c774621c6e2eae118f9323702d284a4e60e5e9d5d7c7a8e2eee4a2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:325-335 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:527-537 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:325\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ba6ba9b57a2d8de14dbfb094f6359dbeb660dae1250bff4b3b341fcf0517801"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/receipt.py:312-322 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:370-380 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":312}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce67041bcaa04568577e72a095c8fd73b1ddca7bb42ddf0675d6b9f0af5a9f2f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:38-58 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:59-69 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88e445ce2bdfb90897ab7ef94d4b46d4eb5900afe2ce144c801db5e4f3ec165d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:52-62 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:122-131 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:122\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42c9aab9b90635bcce6bac68c28f9d45a9bcd2ed618e341901969bb948b9a19b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:178-188 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:240-250 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfce759e0cb64e5d2e5473fb8d8b336d3bc7d96480f0015299b9bc5ba78d6ebd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:209-219 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:252-262 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00e2f8012754475f7e6ff4b8645fb1099d7552e7694fda338b7e99685ed52e98"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:543-553 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:618-630 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:618\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":543}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2868ef4c08074ecadb13bbbf00267e4084296ad3694ca5af858e4a2645a31a9c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/utils/demjson.py:463-473 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:594-604 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":463}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a2f67b783b55bcb043f683bd5ed0c8600b7fd5389ccd8ad5a81da442ba8a18e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/utils/demjson.py:5820-5830 | akshare/utils/demjson.py:5833-5843 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/utils/demjson.py"},"region":{"startLine":5820}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee5c34a3b1df619986d298b9e21ece19696a17ac2acf364bdc2dafe8eb12c39b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 48): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:201-214 | akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:174-185 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1101-1118 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:59-70 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:122-136 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:186-208 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:491-502 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:631-645 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:111-135 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:302-326 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:481-505 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:147-172 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:243-265 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:330-353 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:216-233 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:42-52 | akshare/index/index_global_em.py:140-154 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:118-127 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:318-329 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:359-370 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:402-413 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:74-92 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:129-147 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:184-202 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:77-93 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:355-377 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:455-470 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:68-90 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:389-410 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_cninfo.py:87-101 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:76-93 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:60-74 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:484-498 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:62-81 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:418-435 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:527-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:634-651 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:742-759 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:836-851 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:907-920 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:975-988 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1043-1056 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:297-319 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:487-504 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:53-67 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:200-217 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:75-91 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:255-274 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 144 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:201\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220230630\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230331\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:265\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:214\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fcdc9009e726c4271360253d709c9d55105d80535f8cf49e10002e48950d395"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 21): akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:96-117 | akshare/economic/macro_other.py:32-45 | akshare/fund/fund_aum_em.py:77-90 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:633-644 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:671-683 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:62-71 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:74-85 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:77-90 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:138-152 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:200-214 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:94-117 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:196-208 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:335-347 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:383-396 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:177-195 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:359-375 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:43-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:151-162 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:679-690 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:37-49 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:333-346 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 78 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:118\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:118\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32c61b7c0cde46cc0a8423cfffc2fd9818729895d6922f3bec79afed0c5ed5b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 17): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:44-53 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:92-104 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:38-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:57-66 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:157-166 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:46-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:47-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:256-265 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:46-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:187-196 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:328-337 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:464-473 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_research_report_em.py:48-60 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:45-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:44-53 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:125-134 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:42-54 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"298833ec385090216cc85a762a16a79db7d88a498f5dd8040ea4e0a5e7123305"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 16): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:43-52 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:91-103 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:37-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:56-65 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:156-165 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:45-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:46-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:255-264 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:45-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:186-195 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:327-336 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:463-472 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yzxdr_em.py:45-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:44-53 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:43-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:124-133 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a3b6386cd3bd19e17d950997c037cea7a2cad186da238f1026ede1509502017"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201310 lines \u00D7 12): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:58-63 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:147-156 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:254-259 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:308-313 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:379-384 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:490-495 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:544-549 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:591-596 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:647-652 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:692-697 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:751-756 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:809-814 \u2014 all 12 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:147\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67fee054dcb5fa8399b2e586e6a58723c52733481f264659e0327d0217f4b5f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:37-46 | akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:82-91 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:93-102 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1800-1811 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2075-2086 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3734-3745 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:40-59 | akshare/spot/spot_sge.py:147-156 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:339-351 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 112 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1798\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060, \u0060drop_duplicates\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:36\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f17a9c9b5698ed6fd03445f7e87522fc4f45812580fb80adc6f47ef5f953caff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:135-142 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:145-152 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:170-179 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:185-192 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:199-206 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:209-216 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:220-227 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:197\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:183\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dab7204e5a3257e5fc7fab22cc37b71c6af17b3f36eaa6c561382db8ae92b453"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/index/index_cni.py:83-92 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:28-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:240-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:447-461 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38-55 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:120-136 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240114\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230417\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:57\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_cni.py:94\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_cni.py"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30eec4df2a6b589fcdd818b6d340db1305c0849236fe5676300ffb1aed550158"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:44-53 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:79-88 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:117-126 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:155-164 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01dd988b67824673e28723ba290f5f2fbda9015d251e152f837ced7c1eaeff6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:207-240 | akshare/economic/macro_other.py:72-94 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:59-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/rate/repo_rate.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220231204\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221017\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:205\u0060 calls \u0060bond_china_close_return_map\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py:69\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"347d27926b8cdfa7fb71f7caadcaf8a754008cb9296782e8cecd1b27d67f3a03"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:527-536 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:554-563 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:615-622 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:538\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:623\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":527}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0b567302e8a5f9702f0519d54031d548425b325da5a327776eda601b45f922f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures/receipt.py:67-77 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:314-323 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:372-381 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b6d1538dcbdecea502eb60866eae1fdcec4a90f555196b126d890db313950ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/option/option_finance.py:255-264 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:274-283 | akshare/option/option_finance.py:293-302 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance.py"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05ec3180dc3f7994beb33a81e1abc98dd84bd7f46511c7be138008a6b487e978"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:29-38 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:46-55 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:62-71 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1aab2ec42660910a57caf28b47f9515767cff208b3aff5219c1d41f93dde8ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:152-161 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:201-209 | akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:154-161 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4f1cbe431c7b708ef6f9a28edf0d8faa7a37cf2df2d5bd1539832c889bed020"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:37-46 | akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:70-79 | akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:101-110 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py:37\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_us_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a23e3d96df443cb458cdeadce7ecd0e9b0d535f36c0ff64b67a3d66fd86424e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:28-62 | akshare/bond/bond_china.py:91-100 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:91\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:27\u0060 calls \u0060bond_china_close_return_map\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:89\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69022e990c09212da685be68c5ec01a977775309c87a164b4776863c68a4007b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:135-144 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:167-176 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py"},"region":{"startLine":135}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"874cf1151d49c94ea8e6332af681f57b17fcb933a509e4fc7a2abbfddd34e1b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:708-717 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1059-1068 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":708}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39bab7422a5fb79a5f4db9aa4e5596bbb889157c5b80a414701a279780c04cef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:163-172 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:499-508 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea7b5b75a81ba326e5835c830aa8c133e891111dbb92ec2d59b1267829a37ac9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1411-1420 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1504-1509 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1411\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1503\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1411\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":1411}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5d3e49f1c22d2202c9aeb53876a1e98f07228763460706710bba6347c35200c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:53-62 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:85-93 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py:53\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e2cb48995047f6048f5704b5a0b3b98e409157e5f48071ee4724b2794fe74bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 23): akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:37-46 | akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:82-91 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:93-102 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1800-1811 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2075-2086 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3734-3745 | akshare/fund/fund_scale_em.py:101-111 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:36-44 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:76-84 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:116-124 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:156-164 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:196-204 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:236-244 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:276-284 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:316-324 | akshare/index/index_option_qvix.py:356-364 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh_csindex.py:40-59 | akshare/spot/spot_sge.py:147-156 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:44-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_cyq_em.py:286-298 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:998-1013 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_tx.py:94-105 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:339-351 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 112 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1798\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060, \u0060drop_duplicates\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py:36\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_gb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a2aeba3e4a2fbf5ebe0f264eabf5981c834010999e31057db34f8b56dea7668"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 17): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:46-54 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:94-105 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:40-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:59-67 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:159-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:48-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:49-57 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:258-266 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:48-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:189-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:330-338 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:466-474 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:44-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:47-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:46-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:127-135 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:44-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:57\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:50\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"020c063c5369c42141e00630efe602becc5bd6ce9082eee84a663feccfbd549a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 15): akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:95-106 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:42-53 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:60-68 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:160-168 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:49-57 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:259-267 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:331-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:467-475 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:42-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:159-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:294-302 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:47-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:128-136 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:45-56 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:140-148 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 10 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 147 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:93\u0060 calls \u0060get_tqdm\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:40\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29893df5d94521d6b3767a90c704826c4d146734db790b02d52f9523640df37e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 10): akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:261-272 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:315-331 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:386-396 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:444-455 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:497-511 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:551-560 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:598-608 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:654-662 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:758-772 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:816-825 \u2014 all 10 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_amac.py"},"region":{"startLine":261}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ea2b6072811e9905659f56776d808f7afa0fd6b7d2f6246a2e116f179bdfc57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 8): akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:72-80 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:68-76 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:56-64 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py:47-55 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_fhpx_ths.py:46-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_ths.py:33-41 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:400-408 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:452-460 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240228\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:54\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py:71\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c8f7fc21864da678cee83fecda044e7df514b2d905bdd4cf513e791487a230e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20139 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:322-329 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_cffex.py:66-73 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:55-61 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_gfex.py:46-52 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:399-405 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:449-457 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:322\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240228\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_dce.py:62\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:330\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":322}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88c66ec95c51d92cfef0ea2c64be323e4c611353fb7f23e1a3e8050917c4273d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:376-384 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:471-479 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:579-587 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:687-695 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1570-1578 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":376}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ada24f48dff30fa1fdc077d3a5e39429be405a38bbbef68f26b0eef9955b6f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3723-3731 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:877-885 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:945-953 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1013-1021 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3723}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c666640f13f86534cae02996a5cc6adb44dd87252bb10bd2f8a309cc0ae54cc0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:38-49 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:53-63 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:290-298 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:136-144 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a80d327531dbe57d44ab5640fb40434fa9b7bf62e0bf3f04312c22028332b6aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:104-112 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:141-149 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:179-187 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py:227-234 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac43e65102e8de28ef0b723bf1c047c91d211079e47b20e3910f3c5145af69d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py:553-561 | akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py:637-645 | akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py:682-690 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":553}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68254224de95df621a7a6d14f4bf79207b05443f984e73b51bad69a4a262ba28"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_sw.py:60-68 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:121-129 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:183-191 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_sw.py:60\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f68fe74023266405bc4fa06d7b834ce89fc2610757ccd5109713b310d1bac56"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:76-84 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:129-137 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 129 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:76\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"716807d8cbd6849235efed5e10c99f4c3337b0f717417715419f4b34f367723e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:46-54 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:72-80 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82f782b8a5fcecfbf8da03c308cb2323725703c6113eb81d90032c0fd2f00c85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:164-171 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:212-220 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"922c7cfb0c69eda0f3ec33b63002fc93f4e0a5b1460312fcefb4999e57cc4f58"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:55-65 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:143-151 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef5ada38db1d6f217a421c7656b493b700c35df6e27c6e8daab5ce3d08b4e0c8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hk_valuation_baidu.py:48-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_us_valuation_baidu.py:51-59 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hk_valuation_baidu.py"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75bd291f44732e1223d658d909eae6c2706a18d8d79653e618c664f426ece958"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 21): akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:47-54 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:95-105 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:42-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:41-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:60-67 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:160-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:49-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:50-57 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:259-266 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:49-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:190-197 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:331-338 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:467-474 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:42-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:159-166 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:294-301 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:48-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:47-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:128-135 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:45-55 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:140-147 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:45\u0060 calls \u0060get_tqdm\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hold_control_em.py:40\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9c93f5fe5d3bac03176473fa2d7f68aeeaf332271f61e475c217df2a97e7c9e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:23-30 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:34-41 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:45-52 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:67-74 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:78-85 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b1a9ae59b575682d03edb856a6dfbd3db43396a2181b689bf615d1c350a0dd3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:96-103 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:195-202 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:294-301 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:396-403 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d03d280de2572ab17dbef2c194b2119f926126795c3c933ff4d38adce39a733b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:152-159 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:543-553 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:619-630 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_usa.py"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6fbd02f97ea51a10dcea8c2c990c6b20727676471952dc373d3fae9263519f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:205-212 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:225-232 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:254-261 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2d30b7a4019869a442959977a3386d7361e34182f01db3e6e2ebfac02a98d6e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20138 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:43-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:165-170 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:39-46 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:39\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a7a907ed4526f09c47e44afc3f742fa915497f210be52a291095e6b3b35bf73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:574-581 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:647-654 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:706-713 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022600000\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022600004\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:573\u0060 calls \u0060set_option\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:645\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":574}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ee0d6311c3a3cbd3ebecb13384b632741cba705bdad35a9a284f1511ca8388c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:961-968 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1122-1129 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":961}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9b5b1c73b7e128efe83e6a11a2040f33558dd9acf1d50b1f3744b37a2cf412c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:675-682 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:689-696 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":675}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b87f52ee50b9a48b12922b4368e5fd2fd5db487aed2409bea7e8639830193a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:36-43 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:44-51 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b62228ecf183460c2092cdf7078609a50e0fc325975dcbbc193ebbaa01e83d36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:96-103 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:151-158 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:96\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aafdd5dc78aced6b53570db5ea716cc091f528f9515acf86322fa454f4468c5e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20137 lines \u00D7 50): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:333-337 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1037-1041 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1401-1405 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1456-1460 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1511-1515 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1566-1570 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1621-1625 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1676-1680 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1731-1735 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1789-1793 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1844-1848 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1899-1903 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1954-1958 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2009-2013 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2064-2068 | akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:42-48 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:90-96 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:40-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:40-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:294-298 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:36-42 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:39-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:141-145 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:244-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:335-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:529-533 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:626-630 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:713-717 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:811-815 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:915-919 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:978-982 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:55-61 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:155-161 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:44-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:112-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:228-232 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:45-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:254-260 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:363-367 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:461-465 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:540-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:676-680 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:926-930 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:44-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:185-191 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:326-332 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:462-468 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:43-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:42-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:123-129 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 13 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:42\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:39\u0060 calls \u0060f\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:330\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":333}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9255350ce6305215060433871c503711538d726d83c3df5d77297164daeea313"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:91-115 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:187-211 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:285-310 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:432-438 | akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:527-545 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:43-56 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_shfe.py:44-57 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:126-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:132-155 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:209-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:67-84 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:61-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_cninfo.py:71-83 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:318-336 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:285\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220241129\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220240513\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:149\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:310\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"324aa5306e1b550b350a5df2f69d674230f4803f4aae0807957d4b8d24e783da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:55-61 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:74-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:132-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:181-187 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:230-236 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:281-287 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:332-338 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:383-389 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:434-440 \u2014 there are 9 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 9 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ca207df4c578bd72b2c845850e2d5da4a14ba8f4d5f1ca69e73605eb2478f7c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:29-34 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:40-45 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:73-78 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:84-90 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:207-212 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:84\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5916\u4E09\u5143\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u7389\u7C73\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eefca548249256a4e40eea09f7647f8a0fdf9756362f7e0bd2ca88e291d6885f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py:54-68 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:86-103 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:89-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:237-243 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1652-1673 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:237\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1651\u0060 calls \u0060astype\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:237\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab07b162cabefb966e4e4799063ccb6d68402fb444124d00973dc3a8d65e7ad7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:274-280 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:352-357 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:452-457 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:527-532 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:274\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_research_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"494fb404b0bbaf9faec762abdcb90733dd3259fd5c5b1836be8de3cbf41509d3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:94-100 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:149-155 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:204-210 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:247-253 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfce713596dc40a6d2b022208361b8a105eb343d1c002d8fb7ae3bd2e33929e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:104-110 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:203-209 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:302-308 | akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:398-404 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:111\u0060 calls \u0060DataFrame\u0060 and \u0060akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py:405\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/qhkc_web/qhkc_fund.py"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38637c98d874fc6afba2e77c52dba2c600f876fae9db9d6fceb84f114561cba6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:46-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:147-153 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:535-541 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:54-60 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 244 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:54\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14f836574b0748b65125ee434c47ec872e6802af9c3cacfb7ef7c6c1cce7fc6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:36-42 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:75-81 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:109-115 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py:147-153 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3e89f261f8710c24ada54b3f12cf99c8e6e2c74b04020208159293bf328d8b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u20137 lines \u00D7 13): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:280-281 | akshare/economic/macro_other.py:47-48 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:275-276 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:206-212 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:143-144 | akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:85-91 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:515-516 | akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py:253-254 | akshare/futures/futures_hq_sina.py:212-213 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:189-190 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:79-80 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:86-87 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:128-136 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 13 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 13 times. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d757e252f407c0cf960d9d0e05bfa4dba4abef3519548629f11c8f3363e5bc4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:183-189 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:330-336 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:174-180 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35f83b0e10630b7668c03bb9e7d2e6a57b9cb9f31d7009afe0a1dedf5fd8cc36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:596-602 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:666-672 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:736-742 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:743\u0060 calls \u0060fillna\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:603\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":596}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3acc45f6da8ce931000193eac58c2381185701dd7fd2b154146fbe1cc54b4b02"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/cot.py:592-598 | akshare/futures/cot.py:742-748 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":592}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87013eeebdf07d41b659a16a7a03c1936a3506c17fff05194ab0b17b0ee688fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:163-169 | akshare/option/option_comm_qihuo.py:72-78 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce2ffd65281853bbca0145796a18fcbf8952d1aa64c457f7a988af11625e9b77"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u20137 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py:323-329 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_spot_sys.py:52-60 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:632-633 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":323}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffd2a8f26c81e63080fe8bbfddd22a256d6eba97aa24678a95af839960c3f1f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:97-103 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:143-148 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:97\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u7389\u7C73\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u732A\u8089\u6279\u53D1\u4EF7\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab9b0a6b8850791a7306994e9d7bdd9c4abeb6f48a8ba12b8ad4810e3daeb103"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:254-260 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:331-337 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/movie_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e7d1ba866e501fd1fc4a79941cd7385432ce312587c2603cc05f6ee64da5698"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:178-184 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:226-232 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf1f3790b4e81787dcc438e02b91aca2ab76c53b45ade699024b44f58265f502"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:236-242 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:250-256 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b42648fd42a7e8e2c804cd9274eb4192a102bfcdf654f65c4e6c40cd3cea885"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:267-273 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:303-309 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":267}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6728d3df81721dfea3d090bee682f1f056758e5472d9d48353e1d46b426dec59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 51): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:35-40 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:332-337 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1036-1041 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1400-1405 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1455-1460 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1510-1515 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1565-1570 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1620-1625 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1675-1680 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1730-1735 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1788-1793 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1843-1848 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1898-1903 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1953-1958 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2008-2013 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2063-2068 | akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:41-46 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:89-94 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:39-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:39-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:293-298 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gddh_em.py:35-40 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:38-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:140-145 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:243-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:334-339 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:528-533 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:625-630 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:712-717 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:810-815 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:914-919 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:977-982 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:54-59 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:154-159 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:43-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:111-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:227-232 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:44-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:253-258 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:362-367 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:460-465 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:539-544 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:675-680 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:925-930 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:43-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:184-189 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:325-330 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:461-466 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:42-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:41-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:122-127 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 57 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_comex_em.py:39\u0060 calls \u0060f\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:33\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d68e1c12c2af8990e0f069ca43ee839633ef7273956ba5109ac37667960bf4a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 49): akshare/bond/bond_info_cm.py:141-146 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:333-338 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1037-1042 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1401-1406 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1456-1461 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1511-1516 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1566-1571 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1621-1626 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1676-1681 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1731-1736 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1789-1794 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1844-1849 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1899-1904 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1954-1959 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2009-2014 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2064-2069 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3724-3729 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:39-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:40-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:40-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:294-299 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:39-44 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:141-146 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:244-249 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:335-340 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:529-534 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:626-631 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:713-718 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:811-816 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:915-920 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:978-983 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:112-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:228-233 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:878-883 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:946-951 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1014-1019 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:363-368 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:461-466 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:540-545 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:676-681 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:926-931 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:37-42 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:36-41 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:110-115 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:184-189 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:258-263 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:332-337 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:406-411 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:479-484 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 13 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:913\u0060 calls \u0060update\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:331\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_info_cm.py"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0abaa8cf5575ee949ce918ecfce302e6c013038036bba098748938e92fd0629"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 37): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:335-340 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1039-1044 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1403-1408 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1458-1463 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1513-1518 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1568-1573 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1623-1628 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1678-1683 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1733-1738 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1791-1796 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1846-1851 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1901-1906 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1956-1961 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2011-2016 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2066-2071 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:42-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:42-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:296-301 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:46-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:168-173 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:41-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:143-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:246-251 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:337-342 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:531-536 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:628-633 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:715-720 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:813-818 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:917-922 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:980-985 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:114-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:230-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:365-370 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:463-468 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:542-547 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:678-683 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:928-933 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 13 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1799\u0060 calls \u0060drop_duplicates\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:344\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f074d171385640f57e01efae3b7ad56b9a1f22463c5bdc2ca3b55cf22efab3ea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 20): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:232-237 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:238-243 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:244-249 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:250-255 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:256-261 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:262-267 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:268-273 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:274-279 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:280-285 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:286-291 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:292-297 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:298-303 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:304-309 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:310-315 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:316-321 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:322-327 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:328-333 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:334-339 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:340-345 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:346-351 \u2014 all 20 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":232}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48dfe7a2cab5a79a9a26ea2bd78487434b49b6e204867e4598aaa2cc6c3ce7f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:129-136 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1409-1418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1502-1507 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:844-850 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:891-897 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 102 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:129\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00b1fd1bab312ac3314618d9e49d726ce14017242987470c8f3ac335a4fb22f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3514-3522 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:188-193 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:103-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:206-218 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:84-91 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3514\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:84\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:188\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3514}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b0822357ad5783c19d1ccced101ffaa98db73e92ec82bbf602841f62b60a924"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:114-119 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:31-75 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:103-147 | akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:175-218 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:114\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:77\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/qdii/qdii_jsl.py:220\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace03f14498042da5ee1cdcbb3ccb61679debf3dfe0ef4c0aad9cbd2a7b8ba43"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u20136 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:78-84 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:131-137 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:133-138 | akshare/index/index_stock_us_sina.py:31-32 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:304-309 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 129 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:78\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdf6ef0e0907d62a568fa18f7e19615a6819cafcd3f31cd6e5fa5ae452c5e7f8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:676-681 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:699-704 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:706-711 | akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py:713-718 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ced1b14e44b6634231c9b967470b727f10e4a1ef8166499d370cae691f2f529"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:225-230 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:254-259 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:186-193 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:217-224 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:186\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc4713499260dca814e51e02be650956ff4f933cb2585db7a0493a8e321fb6d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:672-677 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:718-723 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:792-797 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:672\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":672}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53bdd99c5e69d0a9120def45b2973f81ea0b8f517c4fa7155f762a2361332ebd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:36-41 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:44-49 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:52-57 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8c01f030df95185e52a26dc4273d68833dd619980d071d0041f7c78f6c402ce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:36-41 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:44-49 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:181-186 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fbeecec9a226e7aaf60f1ba1e1fac870654fda0ec99635e5273a25552cf8738"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:37-42 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:45-50 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:75-80 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:75\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b987fed50b8c55013034301dc3152d18b6c2f2044c53b300f4ffc0fbb546f47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/index/index_sw.py:70-75 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:131-136 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:193-198 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/index/index_sw.py:70\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_sw.py"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9efcddc31629d99f7819d317857c59008411d81d11e7b0987005101f62643f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:35-40 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:43-48 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:37-42 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 367 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:42\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:51\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06ca01c225cc991a34d99a3696cf0de23dbbbe346a8a30d2be6bd0e8d1461fb8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:245-250 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:248-254 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:260-266 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:248\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":245}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e197a6c6c47fff6e704db7afd1a2ea961486896c72a0cd86162815d467ee03a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:695-700 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:741-746 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":695}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d82a33742fab0728db163777948cd195b9b14cd03ce428807a1e45e4351a3a8b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3647-3652 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3682-3687 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3647}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b74ded891c170dc7cef06021ba8f34453d223c26ba97a8c2b7a4f656f64c5d42"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py:127-133 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py:116-121 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py:127\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3460806023f055a4cc17e7c12d50ee1d26c0f327eaada17287b855f5de25ea0d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:494-499 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:573-578 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/movie_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":494}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8489c4c9e2874b00200ce643d9a2a2794bcdc070d02c7bc79d81d6c296e26e9e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:66-72 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:517-522 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity.py:66\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060trade_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220251016\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220230724\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity.py:523\u0060 calls \u0060strftime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_commodity.py:72\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"770d377932095a96b39dff0edd5b119224ddb47e1b8b4d727e44d14f63631177"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:174-179 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:51-56 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 89 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f30bca647a70cf90f79c70451b44f8381bdfa82825024d85d025884d4b4c8634"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:123-128 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:177-182 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b44399f7a90872751dfbac9a24607788770ead01756d587dc7c7445802b8273"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:231-236 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:214-219 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:237\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:220\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a409dbc9da7cda160a3bad4666bb8962b728a755ca485c494d4df13b1895695"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:189-194 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:147-152 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de873d921b3b15aaaa93d35075c9f9f7d2dc616375d22fb2511459bf6b78b12d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:244-249 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:273-278 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e166406fbdef0a091f16466b038a3ad254b9c60c2a23f9c6879b7001e302abe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u20135 lines \u00D7 135): akshare/bond/bond_china.py:125-136 | akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:244-267 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:419-444 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:450-455 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:667-678 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_sina.py:92-110 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:47-68 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:155-177 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:239-250 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:283-303 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1174-1192 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2230-2248 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2299-2321 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2381-2403 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2468-2486 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2538-2558 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2609-2618 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2655-2667 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2708-2718 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2767-2789 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2849-2860 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2901-2911 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2951-2961 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3007-3029 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3136-3158 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3219-3230 | akshare/economic/macro_info_ws.py:75-89 | akshare/forex/forex_em.py:54-69 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:154-158 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_sina.py:86-104 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:88-107 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:66-82 | akshare/futures/futures_hf_em.py:140-159 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:298-310 | akshare/futures/futures_warehouse_receipt.py:315-329 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:496-517 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:590-604 | akshare/index/index_research_fund_sw.py:47-57 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:227-237 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:297-311 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:99-113 | akshare/index/index_stock_hk.py:190-208 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:103-119 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:177-196 | akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:262-281 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:428-429 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:491-492 | akshare/option/option_current_szse.py:48-55 | akshare/option/option_em.py:77-97 | akshare/option/option_em.py:151-171 | akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:56-72 | akshare/option/option_risk_analysis_em.py:55-72 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:58-74 | akshare/reits/reits_basic.py:89-106 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:94-111 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:383-399 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:477-498 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:87-104 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:183-200 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:324-340 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:434-450 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:528-549 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:91-105 | akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py:85-89 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:143-161 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:195-209 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:267-284 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:547-572 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:791-813 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:880-902 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:969-991 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1063-1085 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1175-1197 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1276-1299 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_famous.py:78-95 | akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:76-97 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py:55-69 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:87-106 | akshare/stock/stock_us_famous.py:87-104 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:90-107 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:76-98 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:166-188 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_special.py:256-278 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py:80-98 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:94-112 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:53-75 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:88-108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:75-99 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:237-245 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:274-276 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:88-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:128-131 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:281-302 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:433-448 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:88-109 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:112-118 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:190-210 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:218-222 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:143-161 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:269-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:292-294 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:355-368 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:424-437 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:97-101 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:205-209 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:313-317 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:421-425 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:532-536 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:643-647 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:752-756 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:925-929 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1282-1299 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1367-1384 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1653-1674 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:288-309 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1278-1304 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_jgdy_em.py:86-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:397-419 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:575-604 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:702-716 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:832-847 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:879-894 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:118-130 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_margin_sse.py:185-199 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_pankou_em.py:123-138 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:122-143 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:263-284 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:393-414 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:531-555 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:435-446 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:98-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:86-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:74-90 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:183-185 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:761-762 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:125\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220240218\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220231231\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:518\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china.py:137\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9752f8c04fc69c332002e167b2567e25007db099c665ac160bb8ca4afd4cdde7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 92): akshare/bond/bond_convert.py:317-323 | akshare/bond/bond_em.py:105-113 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:64-68 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:102-106 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:171-177 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:295-303 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1115-1123 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1184-1192 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2240-2248 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2315-2321 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2395-2403 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2550-2558 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2663-2667 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2781-2789 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3021-3029 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3150-3158 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:111-117 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:54-58 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:92-96 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:326-330 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:169-177 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:262-268 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:350-356 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:214-220 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:173-179 | akshare/futures/cot.py:933-939 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1027-1033 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1275-1279 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:306-310 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:161-169 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:194-198 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:81-85 | akshare/index/index_sugar.py:107-115 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:86-90 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:148-152 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:210-214 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:71-77 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:113-117 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:124-128 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:197-201 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:270-274 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:101-105 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:56-60 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:470-474 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:564-572 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:87-95 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:809-813 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:898-902 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:987-991 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1077-1085 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1189-1197 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1293-1299 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:91-95 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_up_em.py:65-69 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:102-106 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:91-95 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:154-158 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:107-113 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:189-195 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:67-75 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:95-99 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:239-245 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:389-393 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:109-117 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:243-251 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:294-302 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:582-588 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:677-683 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:767-773 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:870-876 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:851-855 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:920-924 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:988-992 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1056-1060 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1298-1304 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:596-604 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:843-847 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:890-894 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:547-555 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:173-177 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:276-280 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:376-380 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:956-960 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:117-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:105-111 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:112-116 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:554-558 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:142-146 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:121-127 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:69-73 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:194-202 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:285-291 \u2014 there are 92 copies across 48 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 92 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:178\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:114\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_convert.py"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08b91a96509734cea02d837efff5400f1ada580947d307a595a66d5516ff7b08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 89): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:105-113 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:65-69 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:103-107 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:172-178 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297-304 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1117-1126 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1186-1195 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2242-2249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2317-2322 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2397-2406 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2552-2561 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2783-2792 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3023-3032 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3152-3161 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3319-3323 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:112-120 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:54-58 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:93-99 | akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:84-91 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:327-333 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:171-180 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:264-269 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:352-357 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:215-223 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:175-180 | akshare/futures/cot.py:933-939 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1027-1033 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1276-1282 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:314-318 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:404-408 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:516-520 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:603-607 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_czce.py:94-98 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:161-169 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:87-91 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:149-153 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:211-215 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:72-80 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:114-118 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:124-128 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:197-201 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:270-274 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:57-61 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:471-477 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:566-575 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:89-98 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:810-816 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:899-905 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:988-994 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1079-1088 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1191-1200 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1294-1302 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:103-107 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:92-98 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:155-159 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:190-196 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:69-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:96-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:240-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:390-394 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:111-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:245-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:296-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:678-686 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:768-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:871-879 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:367-371 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:436-440 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:852-858 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:921-927 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:989-995 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1057-1063 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1299-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:598-608 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:549-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:68-72 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:174-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:277-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:377-381 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:445-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:956-960 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:118-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:106-114 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:447-451 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:143-149 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:121-127 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:68-73 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:193-202 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:284-291 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:178\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:113\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42a2f51e843f36308961edbeae861dbd99b859f33962398f3fe443c6132f95de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 88): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:105-113 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:65-69 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:103-107 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:172-178 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297-304 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1117-1126 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1186-1195 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2242-2249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2317-2322 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2397-2406 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2552-2561 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2783-2792 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3023-3032 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3152-3161 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3319-3323 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:112-120 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:55-59 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:93-99 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:327-333 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:171-180 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:264-269 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:352-357 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:215-223 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:175-180 | akshare/futures/cot.py:935-942 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1029-1036 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1276-1282 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:314-318 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:404-408 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:516-520 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:603-607 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:82-88 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:87-91 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:149-153 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:211-215 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:48-52 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:72-80 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:114-118 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:125-129 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:198-202 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:271-275 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:57-61 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:471-477 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:566-575 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:89-98 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:810-816 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:899-905 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:988-994 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1079-1088 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1191-1200 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1294-1302 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:103-107 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:92-98 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:155-159 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:190-196 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:69-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:96-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:240-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:390-394 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:111-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:245-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:296-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:678-686 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:768-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:871-879 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:367-371 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:436-440 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:852-858 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:921-927 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:989-995 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1057-1063 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1299-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:598-608 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:844-850 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:891-897 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:549-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:68-72 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:174-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:277-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:377-381 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:445-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:118-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:106-114 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:447-451 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:143-149 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:122-130 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:70-76 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:286-294 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:178\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:113\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c1d5aaa3d09d737326e016ea09e148d82936125e8f9c6f34f745b98979929a1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 87): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:105-113 | akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py:65-69 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:103-107 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:172-178 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297-304 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1117-1126 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1186-1195 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2242-2249 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2317-2322 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2397-2406 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2552-2561 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2783-2792 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3023-3032 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3152-3161 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3319-3323 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:112-120 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:55-59 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:93-99 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:327-333 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:171-180 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:264-269 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:352-357 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:215-223 | akshare/fund/fund_xq.py:175-180 | akshare/futures/cot.py:935-942 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1029-1036 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1276-1282 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:314-318 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:404-408 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:516-520 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:603-607 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:87-91 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:149-153 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:211-215 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:72-80 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:631-635 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:114-118 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:124-128 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:197-201 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:270-274 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:57-61 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:471-477 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:566-575 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:89-98 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:810-816 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:899-905 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:988-994 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1079-1088 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1191-1200 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1294-1302 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:103-107 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:92-98 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:155-159 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:190-196 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:69-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:96-102 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:240-248 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:390-394 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:111-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:245-254 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:296-305 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:678-686 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:768-776 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:871-879 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:367-371 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:436-440 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:852-858 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:921-927 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:989-995 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1057-1063 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1299-1307 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:598-608 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:549-558 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:68-72 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:174-180 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:277-283 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:377-381 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:445-449 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py:956-960 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjbb_em.py:118-126 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:106-114 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:447-451 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:143-149 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:121-127 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:70-76 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:193-202 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:284-291 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/crypto/crypto_hold.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:297\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:178\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:113\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26a3eec38a4e8bc3d49aa60e124f4f4489449148871542edead0dee5be03f605"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 83): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:472-477 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:191-198 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1192-1201 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2329-2338 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2412-2421 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2564-2573 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2664-2670 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2801-2810 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3038-3047 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3167-3176 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3338-3343 | akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:61-67 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:217-226 | akshare/futures/cot.py:1279-1288 | akshare/futures/futures_rule.py:35-39 | akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py:307-313 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:131-135 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:163-172 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:88-92 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:150-154 | akshare/index/index_sw.py:212-216 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:131-135 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:142-146 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:215-219 | akshare/option/option_finance_sina.py:288-292 | akshare/option/option_margin.py:61-65 | akshare/option/option_risk_indicator_sse.py:63-67 | akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:114-118 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:107-111 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:203-207 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_equity_mortgage.py:94-98 | akshare/stock/stock_cg_guarantee.py:102-108 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:62-68 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:287-291 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:389-398 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:472-480 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:590-599 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:113-118 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:434-443 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:831-840 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:920-929 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1009-1018 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1311-1320 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:96-102 | akshare/stock/stock_industry_pe_cninfo.py:109-117 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:101-107 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:109-114 | akshare/stock/stock_summary.py:197-203 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:403-408 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:302-309 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:583-591 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:680-687 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:776-785 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:879-888 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:369-377 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:438-446 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:116-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:224-228 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:332-336 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:440-444 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:662-666 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:771-775 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:944-948 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:765-774 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:853-861 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:922-930 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:990-998 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1058-1066 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1624-1633 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:327-331 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:634-644 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:180-189 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:283-290 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:446-450 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:113-119 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:555-559 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:149-154 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:50-54 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:114-120 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:74-78 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:196-205 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:288-297 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:347-353 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 298 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:472\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:470\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/marco_cnbs.py:61\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":472}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a3caa4495bccf8df27b6b6f6763abf671763e52571ffc99dc57a12d82dacc55"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 41): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:336-340 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1040-1044 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1404-1408 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1459-1463 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1514-1518 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1569-1573 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1624-1628 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1679-1683 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1734-1738 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1792-1796 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1847-1851 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1902-1906 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1957-1961 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2012-2016 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2067-2071 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:43-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:43-47 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:297-301 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:47-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:169-173 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:42-46 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:144-148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:247-251 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:338-342 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:532-536 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:629-633 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:716-720 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:814-818 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:918-922 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:981-985 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:115-119 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:231-235 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:366-370 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:464-468 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:543-547 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:679-683 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:929-933 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:108-112 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:217-221 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:318-322 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:410-414 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 13 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 345 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1799\u0060 calls \u0060drop_duplicates\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:344\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":336}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51ff1712a497ace8c33a304299d95a83fc0bc1c202c9f619ca993bcdce88b891"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 34): akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:102-106 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1115-1123 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:206-212 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:92-96 | akshare/fund/fund_rank_em.py:326-330 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:169-177 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:262-268 | akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:350-356 | akshare/fund/fund_report_cninfo.py:214-220 | akshare/index/index_sugar.py:107-115 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:71-77 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:56-60 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:470-474 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:87-95 | akshare/stock/stock_hold_num_cninfo.py:91-95 | akshare/stock/stock_ipo_summary_cninfo.py:91-95 | akshare/stock/stock_new_cninfo.py:154-158 | akshare/stock/stock_share_hold.py:107-113 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:389-393 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:243-251 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:582-588 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:677-683 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:767-773 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:870-876 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:851-855 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:920-924 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:988-992 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1056-1060 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:173-177 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:276-280 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:376-380 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zdhtmx_em.py:112-116 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:554-558 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_gbjg_em.py:142-146 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 112 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_ths.py:97\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:107\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bedddee0286ede38d7837dd5733b260d9a0961489274fa143ec8d9a02170895b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 31): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:38-42 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:330-334 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:437-441 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:520-525 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:46-51 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:45-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:250-255 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:341-346 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:632-637 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:719-724 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:817-822 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:921-926 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:984-989 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:118-123 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:218-222 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:234-239 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:264-268 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:369-373 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:467-471 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:546-550 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:682-686 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:336-341 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:472-477 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:111-115 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:220-224 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:321-325 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_tfp_em.py:40-45 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:47-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:164-169 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_em.py:53-58 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:145-150 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 155 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4dd6cf8450a8a2cb2c5c68181086c7215a459ccedce4c3165cb42f89475d233"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 27): akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:331-335 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:438-442 | akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py:521-526 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py:47-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:46-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:251-256 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:342-347 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:633-638 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:720-725 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:922-927 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:985-990 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:119-124 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:219-223 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:265-269 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:370-374 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:468-472 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:547-551 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:683-687 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:337-342 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_report_em.py:473-478 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_declare.py:44-48 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:43-47 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:117-121 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:191-195 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:265-269 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:339-343 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_register_em.py:413-417 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_comment_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 155 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_dzjy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":331}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d9d1c609a8eff0aed9fd574c693db6848c0e5314dc6a48b11dc98bad00df8a0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 21): akshare/option/option_commodity.py:232-236 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:238-242 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:244-248 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:250-254 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:256-260 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:262-266 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:268-272 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:274-278 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:280-284 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:286-290 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:292-296 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:298-302 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:304-308 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:310-314 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:316-320 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:322-326 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:328-332 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:334-338 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:340-344 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:346-350 | akshare/option/option_commodity.py:352-356 \u2014 all 21 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":232}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34c8ca6ba4af6d31a3cb01286c09d6aa7640f60d7cf486abe821e3b8a517c68b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 20): akshare/bond/bond_em.py:129-136 | akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py:104-108 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:306-312 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1123-1132 | akshare/economic/macro_finance_ths.py:114-123 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:325-331 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:527-533 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:82-88 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:48-52 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:74-83 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:94-98 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:149-153 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:204-208 | akshare/option/option_lhb_em.py:247-251 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:86-90 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1409-1418 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1502-1507 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:844-850 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:891-897 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:72-79 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/currency/currency_china_bank_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:129\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:304\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/bond/bond_em.py:129\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81f9114874e820423d0c05a8f34ca6d1061c57d124cd9911126483d471554e71"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 17): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1406-1410 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1461-1465 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1516-1520 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1571-1575 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1626-1630 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1681-1685 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1736-1740 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1849-1853 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1904-1908 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1959-1963 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2014-2018 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2069-2073 | akshare/stock/stock_repurchase_em.py:36-40 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:45-49 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:163-167 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:146-150 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:534-538 \u2014 there are 17 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 17 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:50\u0060 calls \u0060reset_index\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_dxsyl_em.py:169\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1406}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83460a2be36536617319048c5fce30bec29e0a74e0a1fa5cf24a59f9b02ed88e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:339-344 | akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py:102-118 | akshare/stock/stock_us_pink.py:46-50 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:50-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:172-177 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:64-86 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:164-188 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:53-59 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:46-60 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:383-388 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:478-483 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:586-590 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:694-698 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_zf_pg.py:132-137 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/interest_rate/interbank_rate_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:339\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3afb4438cf924e7575e2850dc9b5d6ab004202adb3c103d29b7aca02a1578867"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 14): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1280-1284 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1326-1330 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1373-1377 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1428-1432 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1483-1487 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1538-1542 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1593-1597 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1648-1652 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1703-1707 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1758-1762 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1871-1875 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1926-1930 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1981-1985 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2036-2040 \u2014 all 14 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"985ad64ebdbdc6390559615c8e1de13f06fb3d5578b611ac9a062a3b8f8ea128"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:180-184 | akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:231-235 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:384-388 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:426-430 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:243-247 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:285-289 | akshare/futures/futures_hist_em.py:170-174 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1095-1099 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1137-1141 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1518-1522 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1560-1564 \u2014 there are 11 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 11 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:180\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff720abb15ba3207a47c8789704facc5db58a963650f4dff99bdce1b8a408fdf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 11): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3514-3523 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:188-194 | akshare/hf/hf_sp500.py:27-31 | akshare/option/option_commodity_sina.py:158-162 | akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:70-74 | akshare/stock/stock_repurchase_em.py:117-121 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:116-120 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:103-116 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:206-219 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:386-390 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:84-92 \u2014 there are 11 copies across 9 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 11 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3514\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_repurchase_em.py:115\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3514\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3514}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f861d46eba34c288a0a05b780d44cc1255290c818f8bf0110ff8a6d8d031c7c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:207-219 | akshare/economic/macro_other.py:72-78 | akshare/index/index_cni.py:83-90 | akshare/rate/repo_rate.py:59-63 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:28-43 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:240-252 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:447-459 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38-53 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:120-134 \u2014 there are 9 copies across 6 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 9 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_restricted_em.py:38\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060end_date\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002220231204\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u002220221017\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py:205\u0060 calls \u0060bond_china_close_return_map\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_other.py:69\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_china_money.py"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd404cdc8ffd56da813e335752a2d2e6e148b34f5bbb15da683dd971c47271b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/bond/bond_summary.py:78-82 | akshare/fund/fund_amac.py:186-192 | akshare/futures/futures_comm_qihuo.py:128-132 | akshare/stock/stock_industry.py:64-68 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:102-107 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:87-97 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:190-200 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdfx_em.py:383-387 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_qsjy_em.py:71-77 \u2014 there are 9 copies across 7 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 9 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_summary.py:78\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_summary.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac3da1d5d59f748a523310306dbef8ff85e3891a464a7e85ceed25341623bc47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 9): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3257-3261 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3403-3407 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3437-3441 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3471-3475 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3548-3552 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3582-3586 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3616-3620 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3650-3654 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3685-3689 \u2014 all 9 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3657\u0060 calls \u0060sort_values\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3444\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a8854347fad4e39f0481bc2b6aebf7d4847d49ae5db85d99c26e762e2c08b87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:306-312 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1124-1132 | akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py:82-88 | akshare/index/index_yw.py:48-52 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_below_net_asset_statistics.py:59-65 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_account_em.py:86-90 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_sy_em.py:73-79 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/index/index_kq_fz.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 39 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:304\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1123\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3d2ffcd790bd7df59c3a96cd83a3fd71b359819f53571a08d3e7f90aab0a537"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:30-34 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:41-45 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:74-78 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:134-138 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:144-148 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:208-212 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:219-223 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u0022\u5916\u4E09\u5143\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u7389\u7C73\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba4fdd989fedca5394c5bf419ea55c9af6a85c8688081b2b064a3155551358bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:52-56 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:159-163 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:208-212 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:259-263 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:310-314 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:361-365 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py:412-416 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_three_report_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a662bf98e6e99e607027bcbba42b4bb1c03251cf89c3535a2d9fdef1d3d5850"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:189-195 | akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:393-397 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:252-256 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:260-264 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1104-1108 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py:1527-1531 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e9198db2e93de6b2c308415f6bea0cd69081b8ad628a4bf6250a2ac4465cb3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:340-344 | akshare/index/index_research_sw.py:282-308 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_fhps_em.py:51-55 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:66-106 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdhs.py:166-207 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_gdzjc_em.py:55-59 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 5 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py:340\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_zh_cov.py"},"region":{"startLine":340}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9adb40ab740d9793fd7a94ace818575c9d4a6d514af39cd236c4ec63d6e7a53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:163-173 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:196-200 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:853-862 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:922-931 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:990-999 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:74-79 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:163\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_profit_forecast_hk_etnet.py:73\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py:163\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_hog.py"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f71ed7612353cdc1329538c33b71e50e4d0ae6669f955fad1bf164315d9a2fe0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:243-251 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:279-287 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:225-229 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:254-258 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:186-192 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:217-223 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:243\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccf545d0c32170e1932a8eff7e042c7191f6e23292934f1ef2f977bdbf81d2ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 6): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:380-384 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:475-479 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:583-587 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:691-695 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1106-1110 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1574-1578 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":380}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fb5346961443768425f64e8d9bb95a29a124503e56af54ff73c8263c7e7e625"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3727-3731 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1126-1130 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:881-885 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:949-953 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:1017-1021 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3727}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89256835111908a2afeb834dbfbd7c0084e68f44023e2241b3cf8f6a11ac8150"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3309-3313 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3367-3371 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3648-3652 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:3683-3687 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":3309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72ec8efadb9bbb350bbb763349291bfda455728d4ba92e8150c2786f1aa9a952"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u20135 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:859-861 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1018-1022 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1047-1051 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1076-1080 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1105-1109 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1017\u0060 calls \u0060concat\u0060, \u0060astype\u0060 and \u0060akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:859\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_euro.py"},"region":{"startLine":859}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96e619e3a943e8c1a02e635d6b61d59624e07d83c0b4cdf783e886120eb9a100"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:49-78 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:237-241 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:50-54 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_yjyg_em.py:167-171 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_manager.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 50 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_em.py:237\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_manager.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1c90c98724dcad7a3ac95b2999a3d13bd61f7884737206ee744cce2edbbe335"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/futures/cot.py:1275-1279 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:36-40 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:44-48 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_cot_sina.py:52-56 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":1275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17e7d0970280118fd496140039f9c027b4af4b9d6b60b6628ccd34e1138e5f1e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/futures/receipt.py:75-79 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:149-153 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:321-325 | akshare/futures/receipt.py:379-383 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b147804c4f017a6d3257a7ab02fa176ce31c3225d749dd1a602d2b9b5f013288"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:349-353 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:398-402 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1009-1020 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:114-122 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 428 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1009\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_hold.py:114\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:349\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 5 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fe89fe38eae4d3a3c398d2ed0d9dd0e361fb6d9216e399cb7d9a359b9f895ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py:122-126 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:185-189 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:332-336 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:176-180 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac15050718714445997f322b05a2aecc2888cb6385f01f611dbb320f2494b6c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:267-271 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:303-307 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:244-248 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:273-277 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:272\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:249\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":267}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb182b3807752f38ed1a5a4bd74c30093579e894d5fcfba06378697e5d660c57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:414-418 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:439-443 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:328-332 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:353-357 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":414}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6042a55984d55aaa02dd624ecbe54e86ee6451d24b1cefec8c2f907fece5da59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:37-41 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:66-70 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:124-128 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:182-186 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py:37\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_exchange_rate.py"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce123f4e8cfc19f51281851765d420aab05f1d04ebadb17fd2f60066512d3e21"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:543-549 | akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py:60-64 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:221-227 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/futures_derivative/futures_contract_info_ine.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:543\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py:541\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_analyst_em.py:219\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_issue_cninfo.py"},"region":{"startLine":543}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f69c2638dd66ae3bc9aa753465d3bebd7932d5f29c9dcc3264e62d865a027e53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:326-334 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:410-414 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:528-536 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48af62bf2544be631ad5c2e174e7d2fa0635b8942d3fefd72d7bec9b8bab33ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py:349-353 | akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py:398-402 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_min_em.py:40-44 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 17 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 428 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_board_concept_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d19eae040ae5b37c383ea7dc7e91dee0fb575f2e32615186f5e0ff2b2034a29e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:121-125 | akshare/fund/fund_manager.py:84-88 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:121\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58ffe0617fa8d56221dd1aae9ed7cd7ab998a428e17635e5ac4c38cdeffa827a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:145-149 | akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py:177-181 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/energy/energy_carbon.py"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ff7c41bceb8af17c97c233db8bec9fae3896553312b95d089ce08876a945dcb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (2\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): akshare/fund/fund_em.py:788-789 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1048-1052 | akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1143-1148 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_hsgt_min_em.py:51-52 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1143\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:786\u0060 calls \u0060sort_values\u0060, \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_em.py:1143\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":788}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"171acc9b22c1ad7c1dc061521377b2c80b3c150757f5930e5db7ae908d65c25a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_contract_detail.py:28-32 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_market_legu.py:27-31 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_contract_detail.py"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8907c02ae9934a637299baab9b8eff45aaa606d3f5c729edee8891a66468f187"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:76-80 | akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:78-84 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 143 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/option/option_value_analysis_em.py:78\u0060 calls \u0060to_numeric\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py:76\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 5 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_premium_analysis_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4384f018fd4b02b80a11e9b664d6179950a512c628330f1e79c52ab222a0d554"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:586-590 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:645-649 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:586\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":586}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5356fbaf4ef2b63626e24a056f7509aa4ef8a075b2236ac26ea269ae514efaed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:238-243 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:220-224 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:237\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:219\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a179a4f680e604fb988c72c35042119faf6128956677c06486558b063b19f253"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:259-263 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:236-240 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:205-208 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:259\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":259}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8f74ed8ab851fa36abd6d0e6c52150f4878dd71566befadf827d3f7a97bebbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:273-279 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:249-253 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:272\u0060 calls \u0060to_datetime\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:248\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":273}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5868b66123c2344bfcae36ad9fd30f70a5e304b71b7b0c966328d67af1375a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:295-299 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py:265-269 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:236-239 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 15 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 166 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py:295\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":295}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9f90846c14eff972e1ebeb4f7711205754fffa2c975b942ac72f9d4c351911a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:293-297 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:351-355 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":293}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69e17cb166afff8b370762eedf2214cbc0178233edcce47f077f0ceebd7741c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:25-29 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py:277-281 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_esg_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ac6a5b0ade37a24dda16725e71c369b430028cb5717512082dd9c11e7833c68"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py:472-497 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:218-222 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 21 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 373 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_em.py:218\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_gpzy_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":472}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a172e06854d6af162b57494d3766805f43135cc9778158fe8344a83a87ef14d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/air/air_zhenqi.py:24-35 | akshare/futures/cons.py:544-552 | akshare/futures/cons.py:556-564 | akshare/movie/artist_yien.py:21-32 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:21-32 | akshare/movie/video_yien.py:21-32 | akshare/option/cons.py:85-93 \u2014 \u0060akshare/futures/cons.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/cons.py\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060module_file\u0060 to \u0060str = None\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/air_zhenqi.py"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5502e1e9202cebd9cec896f861a8e1959ae5d8bd5fe4a97bdfa7c2a5d53a0441"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_cb_sina.py:16-28 | akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_sina.py:484-496 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_cb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86e5dbe145f9f19b89a204afa085e9d56eceafad896bf03dc4163703a143303f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py:19-41 | akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py:20-42 | akshare/index/index_zh_em.py:18-39 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:714-735 | akshare/stock/stock_fund_em.py:1113-1133 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 270 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccaeb0e9be1cd0d6693281368f487d3b446fc42e2652e85718a14d42a3c3054b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/movie/artist_yien.py:51-62 | akshare/movie/movie_yien.py:66-77 | akshare/movie/video_yien.py:51-62 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/artist_yien.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d82a4386d5d7f3d49e825fbc18e5675834cd88cb0c4dcf7cdc921252a22b7ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py:86-105 | akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py:105-124 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock/stock_hot_rank_em.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 77 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060symbol\u0060 to \u0060str = \u002200700\u0022\u0060 in one and \u0060str = \u0022SZ000665\u0022\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_hk_hot_rank_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0221d35a5c3239f6d4485e7c8d6153bd38ee5b186b3a9f36f29be53c9cb76ce0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py:44-55 | akshare/stock/stock_zh_kcb_sina.py:28-39 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/index/index_stock_zh.py"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"570bf6e81ed979d2a814b66750f08ebd76f7e2aec96f1d9c47c588497940845d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py:72-88 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:69-85 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py\u0060 and \u0060akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 178 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43ef6dec18343efb95dc9570e316ee94f7649d430ece5b961ca81c6221e526df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:79-83 | akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py:151-155 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/bond/bond_buy_back_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f70da60994f2d83f18aa05dddf6d19ba062152c47cacca0ac6a5b7baefa8fdda"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1051-1055 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:1816-1820 | akshare/economic/macro_china.py:2091-2095 | akshare/energy/energy_oil_em.py:41-45 | akshare/futures/futures_index_ccidx.py:46-50 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china.py"},"region":{"startLine":1051}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea5b08ee3b1c2ace0fb9999e5267ed0c54b93d2d5f80171e9727fd54557a29e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 5): akshare/economic/macro_euro.py:854-858 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1011-1015 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1040-1044 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1069-1073 | akshare/economic/macro_usa.py:1098-1102 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_euro.py"},"region":{"startLine":854}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6864f643557fb0c2434dd6f27aa11cc3b849458ea2ee8706d12f07e8f1fb0f29"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): akshare/fund/fund_rating.py:83-87 | akshare/fx/fx_quote_baidu.py:71-75 | akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py:265-269 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_rating.py"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"015e8d2e130f413ad541c946a2c0bff710c7ad94443d828af69db2fda35d3891"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py:134-142 | akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py:708-716 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1edcce15eca94b936ae8340891e15b20d353127c2ab0a539601ddc8e4a0002e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/futures/futures_hq_sina.py:142-146 | akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py:244-248 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060akshare/futures/futures_hq_sina.py:142\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_hq_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35e4f58c6567bc870f6f3547a9f3f8f82b5882916e608fdfb88b8fb9348c7572"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:78-82 | akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:133-137 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:132\u0060 calls \u0060join\u0060 and \u0060akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py:77\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_daily_stats_sse_szse.py"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5f32b24584be4bae2ba92055eff228ac2ac61366a125a18c1f5f25b315461db"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 7): akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:55-62 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:79-86 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:103-110 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:127-134 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:151-158 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:175-182 | akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py:199-206 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/spot/spot_hog_soozhu.py"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b6bf4c13ace253f476a5bf6b196f80b1f252b4bb2b14750cb20f89389b96d59"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b79a7201a648b294992c40802e4ef742cdc3b5b76f59aa8bb5d00632175bfca"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"803735df4820b509dcd892ec6d6b9b8460fe73002eadfadbd9814cd859c66274"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cbbf54deb47126d296826ca01de4f4a5aa56aa9414815adb58765b416073a95"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5864ce210f72325ebdf4e1c447d1bb4e42d5113accc9cce00b6783ac5dc1000"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"627ce2314943a97b79fc83cdaadccca10d99980297a0c1a3f78b798acbdd5b61"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a8f6ac42c8a0bcd65e5e0f2cd238960c5d0995b90d2d9716a284a84b75307b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e28f88a978caef9e0b4b5b14e97f26d046972045dc4253c7880bdbfc61f72e6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90034698b6a17b36a315146ed7fbc951d3a68496043e1da3fcfffe4ad2f834cd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4eb44b0a2a0fd7a9f1ec030bd89c1d17fb524ea321873e34b147b22438611b31"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23374ceebaa18ac65cdf09282877e5d4ffcfa92146554b663842261c6c9543d9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e911fa21caf75b44bd90fed80b5f732d4e6c73511bb28cf209dd062bd59f8c8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7eacb7816b4fda55f6768a6155be1b4df41af48bba57677150cd3fc90e45ad4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1358ade6b0992fc51f355bad55bdca2fe29853984159ee4e63ddc3591a95322b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ed0b96e8958bbbd8e5c9ee045bcd0058082029d344b12b13e7bf63a0799d844"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34326d6d1a6ca5f93ff4a9d7b328e96bed0e35159263dda9db548228b6ac36db"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8a30f4446db5b9e33323ea447c30f9a0f127b90e78d26fe2ae0a41de48081a2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5de20b3023e532abdb822d379a3c31883d911cd389520bca221a11529ace9ca1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12317f24ccd94837997679ff44f27e66e50bec599a1d54389aee0ed737515c1a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py: akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 23 in macro_china_nbs._build_nbs_dts at line 385. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-15 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-13 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8fcd05cab65b5f1071eb3e91ba7b9b6a5da54e98eb897a6fee7a886fc993460"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: akshare/other/other_taptap.py: akshare/other/other_taptap.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 20 in other_taptap.game_hot_rank_taptap at line 72. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-15 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-13 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- akshare/other/other_taptap.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_taptap.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3611d311852756f38ff16db7046c7aa230d968e2c5bf42214155f4470f2a5a54"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: scripts/check_punctuation.py: scripts/check_punctuation.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in check_punctuation.main at line 419. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-15 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-13 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- scripts/check_punctuation.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/check_punctuation.py"},"region":{"startLine":419}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"077d2e2b16e3c9592215d0d5764efdf3a3cd88925053898c450299a5135ed29b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py: akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in fund_init_ths.fund_new_found_ths at line 15. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-15 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-13 12:08:53 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_init_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"854751f6485be95d2a216f4a5fd5f37f73d34afbbd24e465d3b59fda82c93468"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 39 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: akshare/stock_feature/stock_technology_ths.py, akshare/fund/fund_amac.py, scripts/check_punctuation.py, akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_ths.py, akshare/economic/macro_china_nbs.py, akshare/index/index_research_sw.py, akshare/stock_feature/stock_a_pe_and_pb.py, akshare/stock/stock_board_industry_em.py (\u002B31 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c37899373d4274858904d7fc3ff80010514a847060f1fb6fbd0a21551af67ac1"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2: If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 4 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: akshare/stock_feature/stock_cyq_em.py, akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_finance_us_em.py, akshare/stock/stock_dividend_cninfo.py, akshare/futures/futures_contract_detail.py. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d33ea66ee348dee783789c94e2a11e818c63b38b1daeb3ec4dac5c397298d098"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_kcb_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b53ff3e8dfbbfc9120cfdf2764394d2a895b4a5deff9e7ad2c8e6351dd3e55c9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_kcb_detail_sse.py"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5ab308fc3a1a41e1ba19499b2e6b85f28d4a3389973795eda903b1ef1e54383"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 2 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (111627 LoC, 392 module-visible types across 38 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d681850f647871d19f6230f09cf14304b1603d95a99b027740f42dbd0786c68"},"properties":{"commitSha":"15487206552b8e21e404cf8557e5537b6c0e4758"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18f218fabbcf3d1b492b52bf84e9cd46471f4ee34755a3ebc473fdb0994c5e11"},"properties":{"commitSha":"15487206552b8e21e404cf8557e5537b6c0e4758"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2103c1aff1e5800438d00625e8d2d6577d1d453ebba7b710b4ba8b292ecb7a1"},"properties":{"commitSha":"15487206552b8e21e404cf8557e5537b6c0e4758"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f15da878d32453d358627d873b4c4ec3f076e13aa5f113f823f69fe4af7ea68a"},"properties":{"commitSha":"15487206552b8e21e404cf8557e5537b6c0e4758"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96018d490452d760baed4fc4cb713544900967a497c67f99ddee0b22aa0e95d0"},"properties":{"commitSha":"8623219ee91a4c4ed8ffa983cdc0f5bb7db7a264"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b73070966ba37803355dae91fca2e1075ba52170a07f20c5033d63672f5b050"},"properties":{"commitSha":"81915072cfeb50198342fc55b162bec88f605908"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f18576eb5c1cf619d19a77557a9ccde7bc1b3e7aa3d8ff6d7fb57ed4190c260f"},"properties":{"commitSha":"dd3c5332ec80750d1435e282820bcfd79c05cd5f"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56f8f0d9fe8aff5c711b99e28eee734962ebb3946c9680e6b2f853af802b6f07"},"properties":{"commitSha":"c56a5fd3c2351e8d32a289f1b01fc7385bb0d1fc"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b57ea4a1e58bff04144348364a9f326c5c0c00a5d0dbbd4c5562856fbc8fe879"},"properties":{"commitSha":"19c47bdb76247404c496e13037faa52c666b5356"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b46383bf643fa80789d3f8d63f8fbb1d6852692fc264b4e05303225d2a49166"},"properties":{"commitSha":"1a05ebb91c1840599b01560a218c8c9f847d71f0"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8117eae3a230896f88f84d5348020fbc381e0c3bfa0e75f6f01cfbe271e866aa"},"properties":{"commitSha":"f05f8f3dfc340981b3be6ace9b9f357aa1572735"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fee2b4ef132839dae0909528c939c0afb61cf28a7fc71ba00c3f2fac1b20d21"},"properties":{"commitSha":"20541bc7949bbd748e5b2178e560e4018d5c0cea"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4662e3c01c9f10f6239685e3ff266af6af05a9e348c5549e7128cecb4972da8e"},"properties":{"commitSha":"c52a737a868d74841eb00e10f7907c4199787073"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40bbe9808f73fa60bb64b2722840529239c8df59fbb048ba2f63713a3df6f2e3"},"properties":{"commitSha":"fb2245fb8c9b6a8e22ea2cbe4260e654ca84d9b2"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6c34c18df23a9f1834e15c5993c28de99e95e451c96f46bb9b1dcf521cfe0c8"},"properties":{"commitSha":"c659924a82721fc6ffa27cc6ccd38e08bfba4317"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67762ba5df7a92682021b1eaead2a07ee882c0eb6508879615164ec13db0daf8"},"properties":{"commitSha":"bfe80a54b337c7ad7fb506df6fcea6440dc61f46"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8368bcfddf1a2aab51e8df0f1473b66b5c8820f62eb0f132430294c6f9ef9287"},"properties":{"commitSha":"62f590d201980d4480264c0cf566f1012d208be3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7b430fbf9e3072cb18308070c5bd2645ff0e5243a3f89abe75548c57c78d063"},"properties":{"commitSha":"670f4756c149351ad93965af3be254461db34f07"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df01de1d73c809db36a1e47452a3b72d7240388a56b56dd426d8c50f691b10a9"},"properties":{"commitSha":"b5ac0589ca7ab42730cf6d122ad0401c02b00033"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"738b91dd3977eb77abe8c8bc9bd888b751e56470a99720b765a1051bc403e795"},"properties":{"commitSha":"f758900537c09cc9713ced7cd53ba5554a7963a7"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"378ef603d5600a52a88ab7e98a404764c26846f89318343c1da5bec1a87038a0"},"properties":{"commitSha":"fd4c6b6eba865609d287475d87ffe774d65715a4"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78f226dfc2a81061d9cc7ba67b53d22c204012a96db0368df849bf853021302c"},"properties":{"commitSha":"6bb161f5b025b4cba2b16c29a9eaf493fb5ba27d"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e20acdfbec3ddfc02ebcc18c6ed4f9cf2bbeb85b13543bd6775f2ee8413a5834"},"properties":{"commitSha":"4616d804124b59985de5fbdbb8aafa3bfdaf9aba"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"156b1a71c6dcf409dc4c6793e552491882ddf0e9a47ca7c8b892a121c8b5b99f"},"properties":{"commitSha":"d22f3e0b06b5f1c5ba87ad141310286ef7486a1a"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"285bab25c37306d57d5e22b836b61e3c5f024f86b097c632a8c14db70b5be113"},"properties":{"commitSha":"cdcc50b52ba8086161a414685780b1fea90488f1"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c23785b5b0d34174b5989487f7d52d339975138a6862afa1246c5d1657ba511"},"properties":{"commitSha":"8bcfce5c9662e6647cb087ddb706740f48f066a3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"533af507fe1ce4b2ce175180e85ce7f48fb9b1ae4119074526dd9d278ab12dbc"},"properties":{"commitSha":"4e37ae8248b0f75fbce2ee307a66cef75fe5d7a7"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a32f9b0cc3900ea8785c69922de9723de6a2cef09a051eb4424ea2609298cd41"},"properties":{"commitSha":"86030a8e6decd978add6ed2cbbb6b58a90de6a57"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b6acbff94a7ef3e8fcb3457521e3e8930092cb6a50f99e81f13aad2fa7a201f"},"properties":{"commitSha":"e525bb1c8d23e55a6eea484cfc1d3eb3d83030d0"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79c163ee5e0c03078a7644098cdba2592ad80ab9724cdb9770e53887a2b85eae"},"properties":{"commitSha":"e644955d03eaf078b2526b2128f48a0589db2819"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b989beef7f3add0f64f45ce5f758497c231713611d8b765e9bf697ba1503186"},"properties":{"commitSha":"9d30782c87e182d42f2bf46417afe2d896b507b1"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"453a8dee5465f407892f9ea1b295b1a252ef12b58f580d548b7e6d0f7464586d"},"properties":{"commitSha":"b7f360730a4f42e2b1153d2d4e1742ef277d8c6b"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"105887d7fdfa06ddfcc44697b4c1d49238a5a3deddfe6a2247bbc401d5b727e4"},"properties":{"commitSha":"a42a44a643d7ad0becfd65ef1d60b8501857347f"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39d21b7825bca9d83619444b92ec9e5460fe1153b4bcfcfdad171e1b193a85aa"},"properties":{"commitSha":"a0c056802a5960103cabab8d73d3bfcf81f26c44"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b8f11381d61a58459ffc7c595fd52d09c03c711894a63a9578043d2338412b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd200642771b8ada7e105c4ba31d4c034cc6284638beafd139460f65b6617477"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"954db4df634776985bc0b42034c8333c7e4837aefc62654dc26b466719824aec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e801e0eb6037f78521c005adb1b231a0ad5588e94ddeb66e4a5a245ea9445113"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9413aa1f4e7f65c750654b877fb331d1dc5eae164d59ac6bcfbdee2ca11d7563"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60d5dd8d672863feffa512ead2a03de0a4e29804d99e85babbab80d0d786db87"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28e1fc459df9b75bea09e5e5418489972d920ce04ac290a809bbcae705f4fadd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c17bc98a84c4763b4d8f3d7f99b94260bcf4ff94a3b75a7b2aa3f60d5abb3a76"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b82de6c6bfddd02900f95e8083651073d5c8c048fcdd649d793d0c5f11adf2fc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6564705812c0783c29459b75371fcc911dacf0802948c65bfe56efb6d88c074c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09e9df5a4a0d1960a6b753948f3d3547737b098ea6c66724594dca9d46675942"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79e2512e79f8d23072c961a8397bc9710f0fef259e029b36508ac1b7289e4356"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f84741ccb573f64dbbda37e14b56130fde3d89bf0a200af97dd934dd424777d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4737df8cdfe80771b0e98eee6cec085d7624ff3627a23b0d2b06ccfaf000e90"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"683cbd2660ea7a301030ca8134b43973a4e6374315ad8444810a451c66db6a30"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7acf54451824bd0314bcd0eb5a04a275f87c5630be384a5baf2dc97b9a276022"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5af23277c647f751604750340ac45477c94db37e16f7183a84b2c1c8747b5def"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5dfc0ba24f3ea8533a0ff970db782817d2942da2113468983aecd7b568379e51"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c8980952b1b94f99718eccacc5344cd2e0c3854d6c290cab4687f21874a93dd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"452004863d1eb548910f8f9539419d4e0747e0194db15014702d3003b16a813d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f75a40a03f2cf21275b8422b52115bd54f0617664aa74fe1a37c5e6412670761"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1617e78b916babf905471a4b88a27e0c37728f817a959c3f9126b9538751b502"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c326c2e6e02b648487f31bcc9a627474baeddb34b2a7029fdd2590043c77ef1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb37e0f3a166578253c5bae37e8fe7403d7abc92d09a5770ad8a0fdb6321f94b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e65dcf67daf87c4df31eca504b63f21465abb6ab520cc0f41698718b35e1e4f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfb25814a445493a76f69ff3e73ced5b7bd58fc35d6d61ca3ffe64add9d25e1e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b816e4665754492d1d6295ee2e6000c9f8c58ad46387d712d1b6ac6199c9b43"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6d216c0675f44aace125e202928a9535f1c98d0f1dcd91df893a41df80d2833"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff05532298ab622a83ac7bbe9db6eafcecd0e7d75b769e05b003fff71fc62d72"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4c729e036d1151186a2afaa01d43099e61e367c2fed1b1110ea8869f498710c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7c2098814e18cdadf707f759b160d729e72942e110f0e0a68848e1395aac7e0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c59ea8b63135d9304b0f774a8633accbdd5e69370f567fe41aad13c3fb27e0d4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb8bafff142a9ad0592e23918262ad5b58610337fbc42664b81fa2c25b82340e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"586237a3e52fc66d11b49dffaa662e5088afa0aeab81ae04c4f1040f6f09ea5b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81cf222eddf8ecead9dbab8d0bbb12f493d1ae4b73998b580e793e9513130bf1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0acd7ac9d8d30ddaeb3ea7b12af8d0380a7a60e2d99023a0bfd7e9b46767fa3e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27892de55b034dd74b6875271ba12fe3edda3e8a7e9f282006f58d947492d411"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba23f26cd7b4850974cd085582cf7608e03d0924972d8f801804380755b57d11"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36269eb437f632e57f3ffee068c6bdad7133075b6c82beb18dcb1405ffe10228"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d878e9edc543ab9212423326a511be3c5fae56e2d61c4d2f609f299d96493c1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaae6ea46874e599e5734b3cd06bf1a410de72c63e10feab0d9c1d6dc11f41b5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0944b07d8285dcea9e36240720d705ced04660c0a6bd914edd37ee6cf2a55d4a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbd5d2390bddff6d48fd9f21243ab58799b4cd8d9c4799c24d94bcfc06c883d0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"571d34b6997e581190e5d49782495caa1d86f0c390adc92e5f3f7c07cd9b36d4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da3a86eb86a096f888c891acbfa7cb7b10dfbdcfcfa482faa1af28c6e5e05ee1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30c8a5624ed65e33d209a581b027d45d3169e632cc3b60b38ee569458ebbe698"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-95","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d8d7ae2f66223d26026675d95267b8ffe94ed97b553f74c5107a12647248478"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfe24db536db4b9dcea5a8728b88e44029053b7238ebdefec121d55469ee641d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36e96a16083ee88e65628176018740db5d94d318928be57095398895c14d6bd8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4356e4683b36dbf6d7a40faa57c7544ad0f33f091fa275dc158f5dffdf069f7f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66dc25faa87a6406948b90e4d6b82294967328dc5b8dbc5a0d930007f01e711c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"296421deb2407710241d50d8468253d8b94ad7929f920da88b0e1a1b31943621"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d9b4cb462b3a4bedea93b23254e40c04623ceb57d949a5efdb5ba3cc2522fa5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d03dbdaf6fa1153c6c6fcafbd4a34aade97bd5425a916cbc8148d7c373039aa9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b170950d970f969a1584d8492747ab669b1b0fbd236c3dcc49bab30041651b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3734bed19def359c8c62e9b61ca2124fc8faf0088cd8304c2ac13dad388f5729"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"474e84d711d9114c0a920230bddc46489c62cd0c70e1b1ae2764968d41323bc5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da0edfdec6bd1052e8b89b8c91c7aa1dd640f150541018753c7d843f6431259a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a96a53dbaabb6f722b2cc3b9a584bda5963d1bc66a35f7d26206b8ec7d94f5c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac62d4b7d858b7212373671f796c283b0e60c488cb1ed6c2a3c0f4d04fc2b308"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04b435851c4a0db15b58ba7ff5ad9636eb55347ce425b54f8c3164d7e443d576"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1c1734032feb1775df30169aac97006812a6a3a324111a1ee3d30bb39d0a5b4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a18af9c411b7e5d8aee0e2a5035a86b9bd09b2a920f1ed17b1736093bd429e47"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"949769ebeb667cd7c534788bbaab5baf369256b043333e4873756b5e2ec4265e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8bf259d04404052c93b869d8676f222a001875f8acbac2adefa521b1d4e74f0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9d9e0f5d2276020320550a496592cdb0d856e6a2161b8b6a6ba04c70d0c53ae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41d5e2717e6f6d72b1f5c837e9f05e6277ca1042b1a2bedb3d14a87a4df1302b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-502","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d76d50c8142d2f78faed7a2319fd55da4d21a01197053332cef7d3916ec6ae0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-611","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c775a17881df611a1d539622f64afb50178a061ef8f6cbb954306ec9ce85fda"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-611","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"930ed20996c2a943aa91eebd04ace626d8a365efd12a34c806ccaf184fcff887"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-327","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a1b0210125a791ae6aa182e43cd5c247bb08c9d7257975bdc41d9f3f0dad67c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-327","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb28bff3cbdf812f05a50ab5e14cd388355462925980404721e5759c3392ab3f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-327","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ac8d370584f4e0251c2691efda0a2183c519771a3e31d47f530ea1618928699"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e042f811e1c92db7fbe9f64b23cf363cc9cb5df43cc538a848a878f1ec9c7c86"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63dee78cdb0bab0ebc95fff05bf7bd12dbb556ad841d8a71fefbd08955155f14"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a526840e391c0b8ee3703448066800bca3f40e24929f148f0651d2706ef6c08"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89ce471432b42d5e997895fcd006c49a5292be060c0a522d14ccd19f89bc64c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4fe424ec9a746d3ba3effa183b816fd348c457123b01325b703cb0745d01155"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b5b325be321b042d37d71cdd6255554604f4a1b382531a75178519998c4174a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b6d235fedd5758c81fc88cb49218251110f2b743383756aba6ff7648750c1a1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a02aabf9b03497aa945822d859415d327837b7904017a0a7c9f9a4c87a39d332"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca7f3b31358c842230a201d68089673814312f2db3afcb741313e9788dfc8b21"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"518a56df123cc611ad1ab5cb44fb7237e347b15971b4366479b1c96ea7d8d024"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e84f16c5b4ba8f21e7e760a0dbdeb41f02339de557eebcc5db95341f9685593"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0020fa50c63f9a9941058ac8e099f24c14cb0a2a8cfcfce9d9efa9ad1dbe2db"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ae20f17f6938cf593182aa0e805c6d568a218bd50bd1fa466809c3c905c1dfa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0d8b1eec7473367f83115d2483775e5bff62687f596db51fe2fc70ed46ec981"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"600e47ae935e3cee2da877cde6b97ba2f2a5eaa381e32a571129c88102e34c1f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfb3faa52c4a8ea008e2e4644e685530cc4cedbb79d0a016fc9b99b1c98b9748"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2a86d91484dd03bc3e7604b867676ff243961f2054a82e20dca997b18a4205b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f54ea9ee0c74f3435795685989e07ff213dfd9676cb6f67223259be437784007"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6dfc37edf9352dcfabb458ef57dd55dabe60abde033259b96685e6bb60c85104"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"275dfa75f7df08bf81777290fb2cd3b3c2c952d9898ec128c39a1c7406d8ee02"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8fd3ed8abae7a7384cc777ebb3985877e8fb79ad83d593cbb5e8d7c74943806"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a21fbe08f1f53fdbeb51644d70f83d93de7adf199cf307044d671779b79d1067"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcfb77a950f4bf9663cab9436f51a46ac27fe21652704a9df8b39cb9c8a8fc11"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56c264418420652cc7297a6372f720e425d90ad23b846216f911e5a9b86560db"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84efe4547cdee82c939a7868ea108d26846430fa64a17a8f23464a8394c4a16c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba2515ab827a0ee541148bbf0f740b5ff48e533d9c8809db706bdcd27a79dae1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fc47c0295d65e2693ab3105960b04f717b3d4c027a709c947e439e1dcb29e8b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd580932d1f515a2d7c163a87911711c7b3a193a89f89150ae043500728c2d80"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8673b42c2d1a3a9fcc8767db7ff2e63f2162b5633a62adc50f382c69b90994b2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d1284d6e5d818af6e8f8d2a7d9faa50042a55cde3b4cfcb9e649cadf964073a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5eb20f935cd4775f4428afccf85f084495c289fb49190a74c1be6aebb59ad4ad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f20d8b4afa76d827e5b1ee398a6127cae8c10282e8d18001dcdeb91625fd41e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd2a2ba802a9ba4e9ad6db579866fdb53dd4fb0bad1a5a9ffe95972008368611"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39b081b5bf98cce8da6655f1d9f013bf14911bfb76e019a90cf32629ef1ed98f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"932c5066b3cad7e3a2bbe78be0ac524bfaf504363406e17cfbe37107f2ca1a43"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d90dd3a966c59cee402a2bcbd4accf8d359a7877345562d48c5298e8571b10b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e495026629d1940d7b7fb255826408a452b90daf25f455152f3a0b79c60b05b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea606e0241e4be691752c8c15e57029b6961e56736ee8d0292902995c559b875"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43e5b0ae5dc49bc946f69ce8b1189723a2be79aade8f9d8d2eadb7641bc7c89b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72d851584d1dfc9a191806d2237c176fe5e2daa0e2d0cf368370b683d3f7c0ef"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a16472c902c548db37d9c6366f95a467174461e63a7a7992908af38c8f1b344b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"560aa19f2c57963f685fe6cc5e836f9de3f9a301cc253ea3c3803f1833e7f891"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00ee24f33b07b74e9fb5953b575301099f32956a9333f9d76ad0bc11842a2b15"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9797d02794d6d30f07447e962216fc5d4942459d52e324322ee434d6c60a39a1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53c039106649ac0a0a8f48424f9ea5fef16159ca3cd3f0dd21934edc34d32b08"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"166ae0ca921a8b4286c74243f8f1f09cf29c684036cfab91e93d5db10fbe9013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7e229e703b26d9e26fd546f0ae887344745f3c294d8e18d267d8076000756a4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad3c19c2366e487affaf40f584127d7c0697a773a80e72be31be71c0fe3dc267"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e948f3af614bd2808f914e06c93eefec7ba11b3d99b8fdf29334a581fee2e59b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16d4cf641dc1878eb6402362a2884b5b7cc3f043c8255c0715b6018212eda033"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1ae4e80d2ba217100929ac312082edbcd1b83fc956faabc120d903e14350ad5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"140dd974d64b905d137cde4a0de86d206ac30d682603eeac8ab36689e1ebb7fd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a0c2951c374d6e847df9d057bd48262897e6c1c61ac5315b4150fdf118c946f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03fe4e0ff3646f5fa3de2dc8176c6103d37b285aeac22c756d98616f093aaae9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b6bee58472600fba1b0f6d4f325d3038b16eda8e51941ca48f7e56991ff69e9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2c25fc7b7bbf222161a0398d1cba453129514b586400a55cff3d08f65f93711"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6e8c4588db6f80d95ec7d6ed5bb401ebcc5e586f0386f167778c0f5be5f4707"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa14b7f8a470db9e333ca03a3afaa44f1af82b731a7be1924e6f871038dff2c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eccb9741b77e5275c724d16c9ee6d525755fcfb5c680d4e153f8f295f6480b51"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb2f8e36be4c6f04000e4ec6d4878a1bcd51fb55cb3cac4a12e66ce437fbc22d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93bcfd5a6d5b82b1724c649bf07cee8c879d2b62588b4e05ce79eefb9ca65ca3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6afa8c70b0ae0bbe7e3f9d961732b94e5b80c74f3b6ebddb9ac8ff4cdfbf7c33"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa22adc1df36a753cf4c54b643f4baf58e59c2700808bcc4165867cc28605fba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c578fc7732467a8d3ae1e0d1e7280a65c1197fe67bd3e44a1533f16c193f277"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab34061d2b77955ee75bedadb7436b78b4e67673ae0f9c09af5258c4cb5f75f3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b137db3c89515037d8791d607246483c3e648d1afddcff0b385171b8eb6a8538"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b08acd8bfe5debec5a34398fecb6fd92cacff9e732ad517b6da25aa5e2829d2f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2b6ead2e33915949cdc35895c82c71132e52c2eb92f2a0bafd77753f57d6447"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66d58441f2a18511cf8ffa5e92c610ef163741637a23cd83400b50ecb2cfebac"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5c9276fd700e4a8cf87b0e0b41a3c403c7e6c0897830aefbe285d821a92ccd9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15cd9620e0b75624ce875a39daefa5e63c5ea8c05f9ebad25abf2aa217b679ed"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8958875acf50f9842c0a1ec23d6004d3fd5fc0a9feb27c9ac905c979eebd8d36"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb7d930d92e997fda2766b8083e619a7b5b1576d568035f77575de1bcfc7ddb0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b44d438707be85cb90cbde159c9a4d9c18f09164eff175e8adfd96597a4531af"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93b04d4e4d2d1f1ee74e9117dc8f805379316e5a2551e65b2a89ad314c0704b5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5eef97cbcb911d3875169abb6e1c197e8b8f911b06122eaf078426f8e3c5eb73"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c71f2cb6662262ad7eee190e5c9437e10bb12efd0df6d90cb54a32a0915db688"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5094cdb887a20c70e0abbdac2c3b12fb80177a43db94363b538467997eaa4a47"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c7928433135f001eb5f5c4d3dcbab8e380a76650135039b21cbe4a9b8c8ff22"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f36baacff48eb859144c9e9dd8936f2b12d75444beb683e48fa4b9d76e672fa5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"235ccb96065f7496f000ce4fc033e3515fa18f37e9d781b9f850ed3e605c20b5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7c927b2a7970f53e6215bbc021efb83e0adc0f2606018c872abe0da351551fe"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8d1e2a355314457e31e20cbcf35ebe01ce1743781e781f6be73246a62168647"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41bc1f1ef4df2a7dc020a36e137581cb9fcd985df938103013e89603197b5855"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"181b1c45725548277d9c4816eafe710f604a0f677c1884dd963cda673c5a7a96"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d845d27db7b4ee5def880f650c13aa52e0521f9ad463a92553f808114ffa51d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aeb7e5828a729b25f317c6fb36d6eca524b76bb72ea1423bca571a4a66368637"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52186cbc88dc7e9a948ac17e88305674a6347717b4d26f5d1e28585170c0b76e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510fc38fa352ea8100b3f211b46eca94eca2428516dd1bf7bdc1c1774e557a29"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"741240de26dbf1780fe47ca71bce69fda829dac1b39b7cd4c18266fb78330d4a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9f116582d0b195b56a534ba0f64bc6e3900834b2249de436e7661014998f602"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fae796cba20b280a5bacd83330d4bec2ed9484ad5e94d55cc75c382afd278f9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61cf5e7f83f32e2e144c7e416ea21d1d7470b9bcc6df4c573feb7e63841064b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b81b0fd3a58216ca2084b468dc238eec2a6f68256c2e7fba564c66dc40b9d4eb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b77ec2ada3a81a32a25e398500aad2bc81bbe2d4ddab8a4eb34ea12ee254ed34"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3c5bb2230cddb116ef3fe11e99c1087ef8a17f8b88bb40a828f956a37415c96"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18eaa651d9cd33ddc775773b639cf7037e51707110dd8aa97b960761ba17a448"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c491e413b805897dcc816e8cb02694cec13aa88e466dbcbe4a033034b9c4628f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"453bacc529657103146b6be4a0ef4ae3ebec904115a17167c324cf3f4dfa8b3f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cae6515ceb0c113164bfadba4014a97eb53c84d87840f78dc19da4296a83c80"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8974ed64e4dccc05a2a8b3f662a5da3d46f59f690ec7a7dc01f151a06a585ede"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2626f3afa6ce93695e5998317edcd211c4cf2480a2f914aaa5007d50dfadfcda"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fa66d7ab499f3ad8594e91bd1ff3142b27dbaad05a12abb878b93656a6f5bab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85999f320ecf38d80d822a7fb850a119bc839de0425e8aabd1c8a432774957a7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"399b9070c9754f76528e9864849b63141ace0ca1c93b37f4fe0b0d017110739b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7e1d58881b4c47aba360fd10faefe35d13ff66eb2c90495d42cb0997f843e45"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b420f4af968f9b09eb492d80c4436cf9aac3404854fff6a6cd60efac87e2d8c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b65e3b896dd2865931ca31678fdefb53a87d368527d5c03e398c143ed5a1da5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea63aedfe8de51433462b7b346f8c611548c44e35124ca7535ecbcdfa68f0918"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7387f701b3f32f37cf481d7af1b7fa862980d29b19605a5c24b6c1a5a1cd366c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f00b2febe1d5d64e2eed624ed6c0c65dbf06f352cfa592aee2af1b43bb0d66a3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bfae9a0b9f5931714d3a700dce601776ef43c477f989b7713d788737406cadf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f5cea59cf937f634b2aabec964df429524a6d334df0fd9931a510f5687ae57d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7535169e612d725b8c8369b6a30f0d03ce9d421cb0017d8c40bfb7525644b428"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca234473ca654492b41fec2aad76956820d65d921a0126cef681df8d9e7275ec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4606b5b76602e206226d614e46908cefad3d552877133f10604cd9f1538eebc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0efd521299752adb9a09f93f313536a1959968921566eefa34b506cab2d97600"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3672b39d71065bab8e1aece03759c360ba294d236fd8e19d15671d4cbb7069c6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6009b479f383523f775ba6ff017ffd944a98ceadaeeabc45ad90eaacbdf813d6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"770d330bcf5467e7c37c83d7bf49f2c95a091b35814b32596904978c878a5547"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"095ff577fb839d002bf027ee6fb2e56838a49e16025018fca5b4400756660eac"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95d68955b41a88783ae617434e1ec0e4b7303120614f02fa3bac2f4242f22674"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0d453e1279a246ab9b6d2bfb51be6153cae7194891b06029c06fec3a6b2acde"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98c6f6b26babef525ac4678beecbc3568e267a1aa381e5b833ad6a360aab9b4b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f04e52f35d7f7a83718533e265ad3d4bd8cb5e3beb00601a40536b3291226b2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3be2191fb431757aa63a99b4bf7d8dd4b65e0bcc1c3cd701d7e82262a51a602"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1117a50bb259c2306e5a00a607b977767788363d03cf6a59200a47bbe3c64995"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da2684fc2e160612373a8c8ba0747115efb031a07fae003f45090db95d1a6e6e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40088d2cb4a91eda977b15f8df982d1cbbcf9a3b224a31c4dbcbe807067214b5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5bc11b8821c5e8f36ae77b563c519f2bb9947ae3dc01ccee598c227f08aedb3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f36974916c91deb6865a50bf9e4a1161c280d10094293d82e7268d92ac1a6449"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb8abf69987dc0874599dfe3cad80a22d854031c53c447a23ff6b8e45fb1efe1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33fa75be4cc51964c52f4bafb203e35162f2b27f66f73fce805b79da1e9d884e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eca4a31927a0b219f0cfd919012785b22c59ccab89ebeda57ef8eb8b264ba31a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b1b93b3601d71ef58f80f63e6a8db96d5b5e073342387be5ba896f69ad478b7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eec17d4c39327022d2e2b53a952301d45f0a78740e2eb7989938f8a8f637c65e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"009f90b01d6a28dbb4eb57b0962c82f84177ec162f11b3d419169363766c4f1e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"058e5a438ad3dff7a1a94e7da5624c4306d20a0a20d634d6516bf228bb884798"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"533df722d1d2c463415098720aea2dd8dac2605b56ca81b0613101325b1ad184"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2848706c0e096d29f4e970ee463b1199e9b2eb6cd2977da4be1282b89a93b59f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbf3a83e2d28b9c8b1eded11f8a7e4e5eda50c0a440dcfc85911010985199dc0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a53045335616555fea635ca4c7f7776d0c90de9930f9bc72352d9d29da93fb1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e53914dd630ae6fda1ea60fb8f62b12986c55a40db628716387c22fbb0bd0268"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10f963d7cff41d762ba3ea39925b8b16167091326952e57839f5529fb955c4a6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8269d127a45a32c0629cee141588f6254d22397484b77a0b7076ab33fbae6fcb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad77487e14d5aeb1556c5c85ad3c19f0c8a7a5d47ddc16d29b88ed10cf52a959"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e814ebaacd912a8216d29ca0c6fd41bbd72be8af6015c50f09402f63ff093c0f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7b48d180a818430bc1eb77c038237d69a00d1079a7565ea5b245cdf0870a833"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4db8bfda9de9b9ab122056ec2b284728bf944c5b9a15bcbf23beb81ec4575aec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26b2ba47b49db747d11a3bd9f78f0492fbde0754fe3ae243aec44e504b9d333e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c5a3755c84a2f7490e332173c865ed0a0c16a29912569c0f3933d1244ba3b10"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"646209386ac4cd709dfa68bbf8a44236a2459826ae9bf7d971267661aa3f45f4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eb5eb8f7b9902de4fedb7e37656c9fbf754da8d53d66d2ae93948468f21b327"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d418e57af84cec1d1f1941293fb66c4a13a69462fd285dfcca719e7f0c6998b7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c6d94140d5799ebe2c0778e0218ce86e09f20b597716c6418671561dfd489ba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaa740f076bafa01f221d00a2b3271908e0a4f6d2b702de74e595ff4fb89f16a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22e5b07e07e8f8952132b00560aa6e38b9483ffceeab8192c643babf6e03b73a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c531aba88d89d8b38ec92672a8d2c534024c0e626357aab20b8bc61d1636d6f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42b4765fd3461d1e6c4da24b5c96660f88f3bf55d6dafecb0b55ae44eceb5f6f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5a51b6f5c74ac3ced6b9f5c376bd88b8b94a612a626dc041f2ec94716778a0a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54bf9b7886abc134cd5d94763225dddb36b7f3d8b844daf77c51ccd22c507d8f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37dfe40b32d9df45b4b2d6ade68b1d98b5179923ac8cc93194dce3c47c4f9a05"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac532fee691df2865dc0866e909795c480df45b66d19413fa4eb62d5591ca30d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85950e977b29dfb2af19db7ea0f3e2655e528af47e60347c93b6ccc558c833cb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d75a8f6004639cc5ba0318bf5c5b2bf681c139dfb83d95b4748100bb190908ec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce8e2a568c064027f219d74d1595d5ed006b86349be9e07e65ba29eb76fbedbc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"555604062bbc1a78b13d40a8f4ef070e496eba76ae163b1c1ffa3edeaead3bad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fe5eecc17f707cbbb51705aca6df3b508841a3a60af90894760c8a53f7eccba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"762832663328c94875ee09d40ba3405afbf0b26c032f0fa6fc6777fc9c1f8e9c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8282071e21e3cce47b7577b5fdd53c7e75bf7049210849999a61bfe43af68379"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5a6fd1dead1d70f8b5bea7d83faf1cd306caac398cb6a615c80d9ffb37011ae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abfef2cfc3282e403e17ed74407b2c25dee09c33f11ee56b5502588bc3759585"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd202b90e2ab42b64cafa0a9ce86b40203b201edc41c2c66a3a86c0e24192a6d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90fc66480f9a3cd0c5bce2b0c795de5cda0a0813e3138409aa36288929fd9639"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab76c14b692e4f44f672ba16ffda9c085fa7e25326fb15041bdb7ff88f4d48a1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97245b755af9df9b6a408d7dd915cf55fa4c451d2ae07fdc99f4109a5f5f5355"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11a535606204bfe57ccc1a2b2348d7915a54b0b38ed6a6912b02f90f8cc7a680"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab0560ba6ed72cefa00a26cde2fa291a76b35077d1e9dee14b4e2556a2567709"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db848999ca34b0a20f2477d680dd16cfddd9d57365be1d15989b3a1d93bf84c0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81fe5985d3ba32c32988bc7ef58b94d329c1a757626833ce556cc57be3d1b331"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"166c58ec469027f10f9da610daf570af7742ae6bb9592f6fd7b25400e8a89660"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"316b931b9cbd9fe12ca0872c50b8b402ee04f3b70ca070ae43ca752a29d43eaa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08f428b726dfed06034e8ac276d95d36c0de3f2fc2860e4245993b7a23cb600a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e2a8c79f3c7b0cffbfdfebbcbb347f6aec84661574b5fdb7486e9c7a7c63003"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2410edfcc493cd394143af5acce1d763e8429159c30fb9cb9a621af24bfec47d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4be7ffdc98c664758b05769e9c662abfac37ac6e12ec81acd1ac0ad28c298fae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c80ec63b61f2517467df2559190b85bea84e5fe3ef6b0fb700ff189bf6c9b75"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a9e4bb115eabc613a68a89cf9a5ecefd48d0cf8127c05f853868e942e7fd07f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5200af8219243033b7db3c3d1695634fdf64d6b35752691185da6f8d8d9ab500"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de42db00739f91d44260e66bc4fa3224aeb7debbcc7333652f8861e9cd813087"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a8c83f02d58b7eeff3f02e7a0901c0defae60c3d19609a6af8729e49218645c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b76ab38ffc6784adf19b63d9b3209691373002d5b26eb1bc7b1c48e53eef2b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b16e723b23dd9cb8cffcaf072befb3b91d513d1cc72c040b61eab79bcf0ae82a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95faf39553847a338d4bbf7bd7ff63e4c7e9fab05650abe44e8afc23e51ae091"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b4ec5de3fe2184c825ec1efe419049dfd251f6ff76a28cbf088d42b175834db"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52756ecd412ba66a5d3075fcbd4a14b2fe7e6b5da341760dde67378b77b8365d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4759c4fd65d37d8b384e53baf3ed18769e61a228ec17915b815d2965028424c0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c45986bd29a680ff79312aa771ea8518e67f1e7e5f20630f74239ce06ef03601"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faa96d6f1506f123b6e7c9277e4408b38bbd574950508176a3ce46727052d598"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b121e5e571c839832ef388bde1f368df8c994c6ab367938306b5f2e8a4d22d9b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a97db7aae2e9f8269917b6e6cccdc2a1b370673999a6195303867371dcb84d0f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e05792e424d101543696cf0f14bd68f4f2dc7ab47ab7f3517ba8f1cc9ce7d5f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08bea7bd8b92e020dbcc20316c674e6dd007bf1ccb6b42c44d326f2bcca628a4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"021ee5b8b49749674fd4cc77ecf4c5f670f28cab3e5f05d5c046e7e1b4c3fc61"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41bf2d81fe0d3db4929a26fb8d61700905ae8fbd59a54b0e75581728afae2f3d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4c205a4262a5c19852b5b8ad8a58185dcea01e5173f3b510d3ca3597430ef75"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"virtualenv","version":"21.7.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["BIT-virtualenv-2026-102925","BIT-virtualenv-2026-102930","BIT-virtualenv-2026-102937","BIT-virtualenv-2026-102938","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","PYSEC-2026-4011","PYSEC-2026-4012","PYSEC-2026-4013","PYSEC-2026-4014"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe2d688610b51e0a5a02c7c5dd1724a4986e40f2689fb84510e2ec0164c27d6a"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7947c9095bdec1e5615d7ac4e17395aaff5d453247c6994532bf7cf968af69b8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cfed0ee4e80785ce23c7083cffdead9acc6c64f9dce56a00ca7178bd3d7bee5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03400874d601518163011eed910f9aa5e00eb019cf0566ef4de3c1acc82a453a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dfb844c6ad857f58cf25b622e68de3e40a6eb426c35b256f2e3dfab2d2572e4"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2212fd4774cbe4942eab25101b5f7aad923734e903e99f5714e8306b40e13f5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd9c491883651f45de4b176c957a7f881657eafca25d31e233125f1fd1b41fd7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0b71d81637b78f9d79907a047e504d2a87e609de2555638f8233e478e0e1dbc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cb8fb4be76777ba38b2dfadb0dbe4720d658d33b60cdb966ee54c3c5ba7953d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"759dca709f1a032fb6f624ce672e6afb5558fce53ecf01fb73618c4d33923164"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7526cdf3d47b669e280e193d8eab5c1a7504a6de0bad50c1188cbf2aad99a214"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74bc393b0a6dce809af8a5e60d0b436def9d4278be8b4b93343378d1c931340d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5928b81075799790cb18fed2980a6b6e8aa5072772041c9951633efe8eb3542"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-1","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/uv.md runs \u0060powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -c \u0022irm https://astral.sh/uv/install.ps1\u0060, but \u0060https:/astral.sh/uv/install.ps1\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/uv.md"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"503aaa1976cb70a614a04c5af24f5dddeead40c4d8aa79955c925fd2f10b5290"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/uv.md documents the environment variable \u0060UV_DEFAULT_INDEX\u0060, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/uv.md"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fd60eaee9b13b00e1e111fa1e63ea464ecb94b73b14fe5cb387e81ac3dc5a7c"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add bandit, \u0060semgrep --config=p/python\u0060, or CodeQL\u0027s python pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 4227 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No release approval gate: The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY\u0027S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under \u0060.github/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.forgejo/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.gitea/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.azuredevops/\u0060 and \u0060.azure-pipelines/\u0060, plus \u0060.gitlab-ci*\u0060 and \u0060azure-pipelines*\u0060 \u2014 with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab\u0027s \u0060when: manual\u0060, CircleCI\u0027s \u0060type: approval\u0060, an Azure \u0060ManualValidation@\u0060 task or an \u0060approvals:\u0060 block, a Jenkins \u0060input\u0060 step, a \u0060uses:\u0060 step naming an approval action, an \u0060environment:\u0060 paired with \u0060reviewers\u0060 / \u0060required_reviewers\u0060 / \u0060protection\u0060 / \u0060wait-timer\u0060 / \u0060deployment_branch_policy\u0060, a draft-release step, a \u0060workflow_dispatch\u0060 promotion, or a release-event gate. \u2605 What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy \u2014 all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c11e2dbd483b4b423b95ac61bfcc7af1d55351b28a20d2b1105b31cfe38cc60"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 6 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are akshare/air/crypto.js, akshare/air/outcrypto.js, akshare/data/cninfo.js, akshare/data/ths.js, akshare/movie/jm.js, akshare/stock_feature/ths.js."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (17 clone groups): 17 duplicated blocks under akshare/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories air, data, stock_feature \u2014 9 of them are reported below, and 8 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10\u0027s bar for an individually reported row \u2014 either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 17 and which does not depend on how exactly each block\u0027s copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 17 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module \u2014 a common library every sibling imports \u2014 rather than 17 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"901416bdd1b4f71192a956b828ca6e91f2ab1ccb8bf5171f1486933030919b73"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (757 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): akshare/data/ths.js:1 \u00B7 akshare/stock_feature/ths.js:1 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 757 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f65341afe845e513620ab0414afae04c4c7bc0f645ca1964bf6ef86f3e950dc7"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (174 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2506 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3825 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2506}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03e2f67b38d10539b928e4f13a2ca664724dfdb49ba1ffcd233ad6fafef93dab"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (126 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2306 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3625 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe2e76da535f163a8e90e6e338c21461f001ef4a88a7a5006a7c32ed17671fea"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (104 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2682 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4001 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2682}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8832684b572d6dc6c013e22ae486f8c73d44a2bc029c7dbf35703dad6b3f2ba8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (101 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:130 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2188 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f86e441f7f6d6ef34d8045812e1f7e884f6380082abde23121878a88502df579"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (80 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2867 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4186 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2867}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a53462536d3d3b4d66d472579b47f3644fc0b78f71b3730ec59be86fe04b15a9"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (71 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2433 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3752 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9ee00ad3cb0e19de0de2043119bc09a4c9c64cc3631c50af2a04483be1d742e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (51 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1765 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5224 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 483 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1765}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"782f30a9cb5c78822322e5a3df5384a1de0843308c4ef909a0021e8521662137"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3539 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4858 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3539}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8078d8ebf8266dc7d588831364d0c99352fc8bf45c15b0de327073cfd4ca5d91"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:5590 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5802 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5590}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"facfe41d174fdf04dc72f957da6b8e1a2ec77244b1cce8312d4b66a9de04dec2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (43 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/movie/jm.js:76 \u00B7 akshare/movie/jm.js:1439 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 217 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"483d065ca5e74d0da16b5632b8871441c8b06f5d65343ba34f47579d440ba023"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (40 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:20 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2080 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14004409c11f307e86a2d10844e79da07b43081830de9b10361b1b0498ef2064"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3499 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4818 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":3499}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"704aaaf2228827d979c199672abf3e94f937317bd314a56dde8d53133092d683"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (27 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2956 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4275 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2956}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b51bd877802e802666f54ac46078bb17226d6e9c11f9dc4f7ecb487081f6a8ff"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:788 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2782 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4101 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":788}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6e0eae1c24ba07c0ce82c9bad9afbf1dcc3a61f2338116b90e09da22452233a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:668 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2674 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3993 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":668}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e9cab46d51baa29c4184a22a4fab8bdb7941d14cead901e4327f0f5c82f6f9e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1033 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1780 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1033}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c170b62f7800cd3016993df50f310d0967af8de39697df68a0057ab467d1fe1"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1719 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1740 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1719}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00913ee7acadb12468ff1a7d9bb1c142a8d919f3d6dbb2b6af151dcf9db63b80"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:5548 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5762 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5548}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9006389a92e2b7f7a3ac1414ab52b2edf74f5e7199eec390d8be15f2fe0322d8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:565 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2586 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3905 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":565}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfc84cf562be9e10b1ae81f9e7c18ad824c640f04e12ef2280adc8f45314ce8b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1723 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3494 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4813 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1723}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"126626477bf4cefc7bb79b08a1b137689ccf80ceb0c425fb435978a96ea22f9f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:713 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2717 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4036 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":713}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"412db2542bac727b15282cc94226599c2b17a1b81c37c1fc8c3103b68d237da5"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:2008 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:2134 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2008}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"219d237c046678bd6d4e36197188cde4dfcf296db49f71afd8dd967a4f487544"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:2100 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:2214 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4d72f708b78cdd49819db2f4cd9d09f18079822bd19e2aab923cc47358ebcb7"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:5661 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5873 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5661}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d008b8fa63030a25810de4e01d10f79c2bf6636a7bcc03d407367c7f5ef5aa6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1853 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2015 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2050 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1853}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c10adeca30817823263b10f6ef3b9b26c0a2477fc7f77ad075d4104ee4424c53"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1888 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1980 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1888}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a12e4b6d22de2218e7c36e78847dd7a85dcd770399ad9ee05728071e3f17c10b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1205 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1386 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8626e0d1839e33d8a1b8b0a3e91d89990e34bc01e62f19b0b43de6969b5de29f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/crypto.js:1 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/crypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62a848a06da4c1adf313b3f3caea9008dbd3d4bfef7da3a061e883a40fc9194d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:394 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2424 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3743 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":394}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"773b9a294db3cee417beceb0b53ef026d65ecb84c6645e72c88ac014a42f107b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:604 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2616 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3935 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":604}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b7311f0d7d9c7b8a237852058ab1c1dc1d8fd19f97ff7a3623aa2e9d0ef4e4f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:451 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2481 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3800 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":451}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"317f582830a0f49191d276c92a0166b6de75ff468cafb0f78913d362efa44ce0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:641 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2653 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3972 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":641}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6665d4a7e5d309823b7e53f7b8b52b33d43ddf662793ceabb9560104f6fc5e7f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:696 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2702 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4021 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":696}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70377105851173763791b24651a91dfececcdf2d9b91ffbf855317b635ccc6da"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:900 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1681 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":900}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f65ae9b13c954cfc83318f5465ed8547a838c302ebdafa8876874e0efaa8d45e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:901 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1213 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1394 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":901}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510a39fe695869ea109f0fe488917165c60834feb56c5636563b68b160e944e1"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1841 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2037 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1841}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eaaf4738dc657b7e48d90e173e2ff365b91ea66960fbf3dbb760d62ad1d659a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1931 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1957 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1931}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a31ce2fa5d7ab7cdd71e51ab460f896771401e780a8a478fa5a70a02c3307077"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:171 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:2502 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"348ffba8ec5233232075d05dc2b50a4e8217a34a3a4c13a7988246be4e81760d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:4385 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5556 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5770 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":4385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a384251a8a4f2dfa1c4261636058c09c0ff7b99c895195eddb7a9d9d126cfd3b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:244 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3596 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74aa7b71631831c6e3a3d221b41df22ee2c8f5628e9b7da403209eeaa19cf0fa"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1786 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3543 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4862 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5263 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bc03f314def4b9f29f998ae5ccc120eece6b8fa7c31cbe41aface14e65d3ebd"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:424 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1471 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1530 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":424}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d32e7693024d27b7028f672ca82f4c2474fee351dbd9e2333bd269deef15a5d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1015 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1190 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1371 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1015}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"638cd1437002732982166a2ad40dad9daf8c3fefa49c032db56c74c58a33d1a4"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:4299 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5526 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5740 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":4299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8912e7d9078a274f5dbb85effea2a5fe0f3d48a4251aebd608b09ed20d38f0d0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:5693 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5905 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5693}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eaa033759f449e04663a1e9dc63ea60cc41e8a887f39dac4a42cbdc8d4193341"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:304 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2343 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3662 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0b93de95b2cc678631ebd8ce246d63e4842ab3805bb790b83f4c268f953371c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:325 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:272 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"360e9115c3f909b893419ef67590993301136da5e1542aa5297ecefa23f1aa27"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:997 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:4527 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":997}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fa54b59be83d10aafde9bad78294e40146d908800950cd2a496530f9c3510cd"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1869 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2031 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2066 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1869}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d069a26bc61b5a465a7ee4ee2e9fe1b2a584c3e05f2e53f29ea4e9e9ba4da83"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:337 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:397 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad1ec5d1897376fc0d83581c88dfed22585e8f671aae8b199a20fcea1561f6e8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:2699 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:2832 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2699}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a32e145d530f03aefac7db27adc02d24810af6c00c9a884d646abe9e044d223"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:3055 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:3081 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":3055}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0055299178f4c8decc304b72f3d6cd6ffd0e3dba12553158db18bdd71a8eec0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:4314 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5545 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":4314}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59ba4af4caab4cbc86b0ec8a762c47fd87880549eff496d6542865d3dfe20ec8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:873 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1011 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1188 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1366 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":873}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e3678bf3b32a0b560c96acf0b5a994de3888cde957c6590fafaacde3dfd1b12"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1943 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1969 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1943}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63ae82d6c72f90da8f30efb952ce3d09a296664f21dde7b2e939a2d8d7311fce"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:3099 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:3107 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":3099}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36a6b048dfcbe8998eff1f72cb021826fd5fcc9ff95c73ea818f0c96ee900a6b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:345 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:364 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2bc0ccbde248ba03b464dabfbdb75e7635062e569f64a4a0fc58d350a48cd7e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:1070 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:4579 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1070}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1773d455b4b3b0c1bfb20bd21c5dc9be69dc2c257f8f5a475ba65be1e1a3472"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1316 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:2980 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1316}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da1810f134e766f0f40b3c994767a2924545c939f207c1c309c9faa4bdedc6c0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1449 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1508 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"628b29db7efbd2297c76f462a2420c966c5a9f51bee09757e0750376542ecc09"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/crypto.js:17 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:17 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/crypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b56ed1af0e8e3d514ba354bdc7575b2086da31ef14756164bf0d5203e617d7d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2948 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4267 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":2948}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7d54ce33b3f4f04a5429b16f52e42dcd36df2e2d19d3d1e7935a5a80b431a62"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1184 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1362 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"057757a1166bb38c22309b9c27e14624d16d3a182af74f8e63e02c2820802619"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/crypto.js:90 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:187 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2245 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/crypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe9291b3611ddf970c48e0e73936abe755fa3b2fe5992973bcc434fa870d5d04"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:357 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2391 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:3710 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":357}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b5f495e61202363034f9e321c5611ba2d8351c65b3f4b5aa610c06efc0146f6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:750 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:758 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":750}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb28ceaa047ef051c74588c72254b92c12aa01e1612bc59044084a4b34df029f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:942 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:947 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":942}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e54b46ee3b7fb0c7f770f18ac2bb7c3aa3fcd4cac9f63fb5e4a7b5dbfa6cadc6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3 locations): akshare/air/outcrypto.js:961 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:2923 \u00B7 akshare/air/outcrypto.js:4242 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":961}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae9bb66bfa1bbf544195f0064684d69178ca99285c49cbc8b4d5037f054b519e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:1073 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:1083 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1073}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bc31eb1a883076e43de1978b9754305250ba95d62eb195692fc7d4657f5ae5b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): akshare/data/cninfo.js:5719 \u00B7 akshare/data/cninfo.js:5931 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5719}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91df722435e3667bd9b75458e9d309df226401c3b1c675a73a0f11ebccfff9b8"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _doProcessBlock (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 35): _doProcessBlock has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 35; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2978}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af307266df8be41b50b704963e255305b3e1a85cd481ba3ecf4b13cdcd850cd4"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function clone (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 17): clone has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0495900461589a322d215f0824f29ced6e4b756bb0f42e3e419d0bff09922284"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 17): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":2174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6372ef48f554e44d1ebef3b5ae6a9e69b2f43567254d98191f1f685e02729c48"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function init (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 14): init has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1585}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7132140a8b7971b0a21e4dd5ed743332992e4a7cd298d3743fe449e7d14c068"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _doReset (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 19): _doReset has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":4466}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7d13d9fca27c1ec66cb60651810890d1359f6ea43ac76d8e87f23591444a3e4"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _doProcessBlock (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 23): _doProcessBlock has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":2690}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3276add8d698f243e3621e30edb332dca98b69ef364f89f44c0e5e77141d2d9"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _process (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 19): _process has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":584}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3e2cc1079ae15f64030458b912e35f68c3f6e5370688d93f802057a37adc8be"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function concat (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 15): concat has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bab931f5f16ba2b423b04c894920c11aaab00090a3c704e3f8fb09e27f53996"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _doProcessBlock (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 14): _doProcessBlock has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1684}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ac234d3a9b965cfb63cfe85a4175142088efed3ac2c061043f9a3a2bebf9118"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function nextState (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 10): nextState has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 10; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5674}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22b1b6941e1c56c91688a3474dfb8c680665fa0b54168718201110016665f12c"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function nextState (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 10): nextState has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 10; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5886}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a7b70c868e497ef97b1d95c43328484c8c8376754094138a9cf9123b61d959e"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"akshare/data/cninfo.js: 5262 lines of code: akshare/data/cninfo.js has 5262 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05e0a8020122035e90b1637a88ee42980504988da1eb2dc1ed7aa488697a2b42"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js: 4831 lines of code: akshare/air/outcrypto.js has 4831 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/air/outcrypto.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8f26f996391ccd60d7c6e607c203dd85a97af86e2d30b4562b568d0845b018c"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"akshare/movie/jm.js: 2256 lines of code: akshare/movie/jm.js has 2256 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/movie/jm.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1f488ec82c886e7aadfe48388d514802b607e1d08fb870f4bf21ca6051eb684"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"akshare/data/ths.js: 978 lines of code: akshare/data/ths.js has 978 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072b10d12ebc112022f0a7f9849012c15dacf215af468e1f0b2b1a2c5856ef41"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js: 978 lines of code: akshare/stock_feature/ths.js has 978 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec6a80bb14b222a4036019f7a1b27e34cb5fb4a6ac633294a82016b8375778bd"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~989 LoC): no import path from any entry point (5 application, 0 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8aa1e3c1d93ea425b518aa565d154aeb173b34bf57a39ad741434c799fae7b36"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused module-local declaration \u0027getResCode1\u0027: This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module \u2014 not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5977}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5781ef04efe823a8476d5731c0e3d249c142b431323a16e6d3f0a01158a782b"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused module-local declaration \u0027my_decode\u0027: This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module \u2014 not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":5990}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1510c73777038634d9edb51fe0cbc7f7485469724c08c9a3be6186adebcdfca"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused module-local declaration \u0027new_my_decode\u0027: This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module \u2014 not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/cninfo.js"},"region":{"startLine":6003}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c567f6e1627b172cdb5b420661f8285bfb672ade45241eef55d131871169d9bf"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060\u0022result\u0022 not in data_json or \u0022pages\u0022 not in data_json[\u0022result\u0022]\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py, akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_tutor.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d8e836d5eb53ee436fee0e167c03a4993d7e030499ccfd1ecd74a53c19d7aa2"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060data_json[\u0022data\u0022] and data_json[\u0022data\u0022][\u0022klines\u0022]\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py, akshare/fund/fund_lof_em.py, akshare/stock_feature/stock_hist_em.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/fund/fund_etf_em.py"},"region":{"startLine":289}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4569c06626f3faf71805490f8b1a65b60965fd94285d70cea0ea59c48386445d"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060start == -1 or end == -1 or end \u003C= start\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py, akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_tutor.py. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_ipo_review.py"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"853c88d730b1877eaa60427368b70b9053974d81295e5ea6e2f3dbbbea74f7c4"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":235}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"188cae405fb57de651258c22dbf30507f3407da12bc6929165220b14885ea251"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"449e2b7f8a53ebb400f22a571dc3d427f9d0caa196b512089efd2e80c02d82bb"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4bbf2ad423f21b3492aa64bef5a529f4c4b2a598799c9808e191a9a50d09974"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":445}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b856383cae51d559b1e788c2983a5b64a177ba4ac21587ec3ceadcee5eff629"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/data/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":712}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"129d27c8ccee9e88b7dc5c69cafe0134960add71016cb32b19460b00fad44932"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/economic/macro_constitute.py"},"region":{"startLine":211}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64fb0f6a58a1f2f1fa14839969377556300e80d3d4b7eaa75766dffa40591efa"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/receipt.py"},"region":{"startLine":453}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5f105eabb56d9823008f17ef3d9b989f2bfc30a43189ce286202b1b40d19531"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_zh_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":448}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bffb1db38a1f3f48ac0273e9134dd92348928970c745dbd1861b5ddb1fb1b01"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_to_spot.py"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25b1c12f4731b3e71ada4f21eb3c82b7d3158fd317b80d302d05e6194f00343f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_roll_yield.py"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ad9c049a698d56ca7bf572e6a741603284a74181ff9d6a373bbb9f4de510831"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca1fae50e2a71d8ac01b040bd26f3748b2e4243091c63eb436a02863a84031df"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/futures_daily_bar.py"},"region":{"startLine":322}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e3b33f5581be61a96e8d7311345fc6c2a259d5e11f22ac88732fe0e83aa4dee"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d0ba0e0a5b1c883e807d391a935dd6f71ff2b72b681ceeb8e594b5b9a6dfeef"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":352}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"325f89823bc0d85393ab05a15786c14f722cfdca590cf01b5d367a29ac8c112a"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":770}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7dddd8edd42f5da6f072b0e32b9fa14f9d877a465a0344702bdfda52d4fab24"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":1318}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e284437c4b1a9a58823ac67b6bdae69f861328700e86d7fccc2aeaadaf7cf99a"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures/cot.py"},"region":{"startLine":1326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c15f22e072d509c50b81230d708ec549655e6afbf51bbbc30e0c8533d853da6"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/futures_derivative/futures_index_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bc291939b3bbadf7ba5f095d872da20149ffd2c6caef954de68ceb729ae7e8"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a7f839752f2b867d9fc340a30934b04b6bcf4cde24674758c9fc752c0467e24"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4c1dae9b16ddb260bf733d8cdc6c4b801fdf051cecf4902da032896ac96709c"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/news/news_cctv.py"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adaf3e7395f5f30fc5638e29692cbc7e042f1d78d6bcaa2793156623e3c90b15"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/option/option_commodity.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"096a5a501ba51e029577ea7fb9af7f8d3d843c70f7ccc351b71f44640fad9e9d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a55480a373c4aa7a0387b3f3e4dc35cc7fe0d04db71cfbadd5d8c0fcb52773e7"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99dc49064a9b25b23fc476a2de589ecbfced5df124ab5ac957a4ee3257bcb814"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4db96d0ef808badf3c8d4533fc508d480a2e2b9c720ac681dc6cf34f64f8b9ed"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0731a6a880418a6decfc100227802b72a702c4cf29754710dc053f84f634dc2"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":233}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d802ef465274e86768d6e64a31e71ff51ebeabd59fc54cb4621336d2eed5c68"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c0cbbb631a9dc8640e7e7e508935549f67427331b0dd9ad7cfc1162ed6b9d80"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":300}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7479c9b06da11835ec18322c4a0aec02a87a4e2705b3a8c642ed4f57a83565ca"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":324}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74593d502e8a5f8698368ef07a8f300599ab85bb1b09988bfb1de1f6403073ce"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c352d89e9877a3820995833fba7496042765882169a88a05fbf79e9e1d87da23"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":372}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f5914830c430c29f44c590369ba88848028316f15f57576182507f3d084ed7e"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":434}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73494697d6382814e98ca46168fde472dc12d54c7edce7e6b0559ec4c12d9f24"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71e09e2a5370f3a506d45d214c597aae53b2f8c1c614fbadf0b4ec2a7b7d2b84"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51e142798fdc5bf6692686a0b4e718a1e54b22f7d922741e598baef42870fbee"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":508}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ea6872cc198e8a38b7c37f1cc467e17d4b9237a47ea096ea434cd57d389a25d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":552}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d5225beec805b2582363f8fefa67b37c2be204b8cc343a7ffceec0a62dcfb80"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":576}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5da58961b8b8383d9d0122773981139b54932629c4f9f6d331ebc565e1697916"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":600}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5067ed59893767b7279e36d5158fd3c6dda2a2e540e23e9d4acca4f1d46762bd"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":626}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61d9e39c863c6b9109aab90085dabd386de2a7733df3d1158d907bbc3e639eb4"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"330f89abba151f18abdf4b661d2d9b9f1382f428a2ff37404954f788ac4c9550"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":767}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b661cc117cb8b62e08e5f560276aa02def9cbbba9b1eeef9a21ddd81a848129"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/other/other_car_cpca.py"},"region":{"startLine":791}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7760aa99f0fb2dda839c50ef8a8d4b735301548f1386049b1cc1d9294556a873"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_b_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b7b81cc44c2cf241a59af358a557ef0647972260919a1abefd282d5d9e2e842"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16ed788f643ed36a1a2ddf0742b3c0b5321c823c56f8d49b739c1d0adf5d90f8"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_ah_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe1d1ed118f026e7801a611fd678f7df8168355dbbfc7d0c428eee86e0a95e2b"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_tick_tx.py"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1baccbfbfa58f0dc1527c800833af701c97141ee25cf533913af80f3d713217e"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84c1eb4f8c97ebac914e2688bd3345bca2d298623695edad0048a35202e1da0b"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":199}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d14efb89a4a4a1c3ed9480576c25c4dab293272fb87035fc2b35fd530bbd621d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock/stock_zh_a_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":396}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cd616dd30d2eef963656515f7244322dd51b31ad6865cca3e76def2e963695d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ff86f9127a75b1d379d6480d968b2177f21532432bd2fb83e4eea10a708ccfb"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_lhb_sina.py"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"feef57e994fd964222fe906d0824077c26a0f110713f7f953611f25a7060157f"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_industry_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dca6ec1b2c6bd80d912da1450cd85e9801dae4de9adcfc04286f5099e9873c8"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/stock_board_concept_ths.py"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9deda1307e174e85031aae0b7c97ddafc47f316448ac53b4e0d2bfb266ba3eb4"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":235}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dce04868dadd7ee6d99494ee870c8ecab047e55d8e038ac9c0b59654e5758383"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":249}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c904d20cd7a2f7e0a6f9dc31ba274f4403d33afbfaa1a3828da697e42bfa02c"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05e17fcbac729d7b1a8308e22ff783e77ead032b37d1be011e5e5d10419607dc"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":445}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40d216e82933303081697a64212013c50a8926349d94ab23114e50d4ff2e3b68"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_feature/ths.js"},"region":{"startLine":712}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d265981f915bfc192688fe31656146536b1ae9601ec8496265d5fdd8c13a2bb"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060except\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"akshare/stock_fundamental/stock_notice.py"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec5865716dec0afca77bd5e578a0f47ae7b18ec3c456a47cea031942a387cabc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-295","guid":"a706c4e2-1232-8859-ae2e-17aa2d41f8e2","name":"Improper Certificate Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Certificate Validation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/295.html"},{"id":"CWE-319","guid":"7af97476-9f0d-4458-9163-3d2043918a1a","name":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information","shortDescription":{"text":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html"},{"id":"CWE-327","guid":"e51910ff-67b5-3c51-aa3d-92837d9eab90","name":"Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-457","guid":"b62874fe-6222-8b5b-8ade-9527ad1cbb4a","name":"CWE-457","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-457"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/457.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-502","guid":"f7d3b296-aac0-5c5a-b706-e07faba26c36","name":"Deserialization of Untrusted Data","shortDescription":{"text":"Deserialization of Untrusted Data"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/502.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-611","guid":"1afbae66-ea29-2d59-aaa2-134e3ae2e85a","name":"Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/611.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"},{"id":"CWE-95","guid":"400bba4e-483c-5c50-a695-114fa9168003","name":"Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code (\u0027Eval Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code (\u0027Eval Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/95.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-1","guid":"a40d9a4c-89f5-4b5d-b2dc-32dc9cbfe814","name":"Insufficient Flow Control Mechanisms","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Flow Control Mechanisms"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-01-Insufficient-Flow-Control-Mechanisms"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","guid":"cc7f4610-8859-e654-9029-d5f97d992220","name":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-05-Insufficient-PBAC"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":349,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}