{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC5","name":"ARIA correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"ARIA correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC5"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"DM2","name":"Strongly-typed ids","shortDescription":{"text":"Strongly-typed ids"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM2"},{"id":"DM6","name":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary","shortDescription":{"text":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM6"},{"id":"DM8","name":"Value-object opportunities","shortDescription":{"text":"Value-object opportunities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM8"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R5","name":"Dependency Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R5"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SchedulingDecisionMaker.decide (cyclomatic 33): SchedulingDecisionMaker.decide has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/SchedulingDecisionMaker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4cf939a020433f594edb4bede18384ae58e39521a502fc42d07ce92e6e82c437"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionPullingContainerPool.receive (cyclomatic 31): FunctionPullingContainerPool.receive has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40b3606f8edba5fb0a2820f61568b08c84653f0d10f2f46aeb7a7d561a1e9c9a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"QueueManager.receive (cyclomatic 31): QueueManager.receive has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d300bfa56365d5566ee2c515992c4e4dab3b0626a0860f7cfc5c67265b55fd33"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EtcdWorker.receive (cyclomatic 27): EtcdWorker.receive has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dfba2aed86cc3e55813fc8a9365ee6c54b7ae3fec813e7ac06237f585227a15"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"createApi.validateArgs (cyclomatic 27): createApi.validateArgs has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd73435f24333f25ae28d5061b74a52bb1c529ee887d491b856829eacd5800fb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerPool.receive (cyclomatic 26): ContainerPool.receive has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43aaf42fa901f80f4bcb97f3e4a5980df7894452b717afd670ea35dfda7df0e9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerProxy.initializeAndRun (cyclomatic 24): ContainerProxy.initializeAndRun has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":776}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36566e6f93e61d1ef749224ee72cc748d47941e00f4455443cfe93d4bbff5099"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DataManagementService.receive (cyclomatic 23): DataManagementService.receive has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebbee5419b94427bb51e46b15362cce3629a26a4007b6028359a9de5d8786a1c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cyclomatic 22): main has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 11 belong to 10 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b744a7ff858dccdccd25875fc6749d503772b4ccff67b2dc24bccf7fe84f8d52"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.validateFinalSwagger (cyclomatic 21): apigw-utils.validateFinalSwagger has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 97). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bf9176e90e2441efa7ed239d92f28bdf88f966da73a4c5c0a9d9f31b569bf20"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cyclomatic 21): main has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to 13 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6030c5ea080328a75585b6e5ae4cc030b8f41631c17ff8d755d840d84b24c9ab"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionPullingContainerProxy.initializeAndRunActivation (cyclomatic 19): FunctionPullingContainerProxy.initializeAndRunActivation has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1044}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a7d3d666ad584b3a59a46d8931e90422f3b60ee9ebba5b74efd874d888216ec"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cyclomatic 18): main has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 12 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 6 belong to 6 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66b20e063353015249ff5894f2a861050d780769e38e2abddc7e41ed22e89e30"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.getApis (cyclomatic 17): apigw-utils.getApis has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 321). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":290}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84bac212a4ab122630af131b94331b3008212e534f2bf12cd233bc1b285c6111"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Invoker.main (cyclomatic 16): Invoker.main has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/Invoker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94a1996eeb38548d560b49e51cefe7ef966ff76cffb21762eb32458b6da992d4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utils.getApis (cyclomatic 16): utils.getApis has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 306). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f876f482a5ef5e26916422229c358512f9b6f1e9eab7b7d8519027ce8efbd0b6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SchedulingDecisionMaker.decide (cognitive 77): SchedulingDecisionMaker.decide has cognitive complexity 77 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (62 pts), match/switch 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 38). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/SchedulingDecisionMaker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a80b7ce53af98d6e9617e3520bcf40f2cd843bfc122e7391798742f39a5f34f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerPool.receive (cognitive 57): ContainerPool.receive has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (51 pts), match/switch 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 34). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de446907ef058db6a87ce86ee7d598266134be3a02395e9784994b7b7ea1c995"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.validateFinalSwagger (cognitive 56): apigw-utils.validateFinalSwagger has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (37 pts), loops 4 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 36). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 56 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 97). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd45d1a35092f4593d4435e0a114f128cb1a87a98c9b3492d69ba55c4c9b3b64"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"createApi.validateArgs (cognitive 46): createApi.validateArgs has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (40 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"375629da0944c0556c6d612a414f7c4e05e4a36cb32791bc18660e31f1952ad8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"QueueManager.receive (cognitive 38): QueueManager.receive has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (20 pts), match/switch 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 15). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc3b53d3b8b4a043b565912667cafed34c1b18a4f4b80bd1d54a1bdaeef6dfa0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cognitive 37): main has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (29 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 13). Most of this is not in the body itself: 13 of the 37 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function literals inside it that branch (lines 113, 183, 103, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2db0158f8b71ecbea4a796443fe9b3d6abd1638151a84e98e9fac0b6e4112733"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EtcdWorker.receive (cognitive 35): EtcdWorker.receive has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 11 (26 pts), if/else 4 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e690f0e61d64fc65f15ade949910326e795fd68365fba69dfe0598a0f8777d7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CouchDbRestStore.attachToCouch (cognitive 33): CouchDbRestStore.attachToCouch has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (23 pts), match/switch 2 (8 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":378}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d89e0d6ba5aa9cac3ee0eb1bfce1a4b674fc4b12130417cb1e91f1aec2cddf16"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerProxy.initializeAndRun (cognitive 33): ContainerProxy.initializeAndRun has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (21 pts), match/switch 5 (7 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":776}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a82ba3c184472f7f89d0549c16f68732ee7e7387491ec86067cc7c0b5516f78e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cognitive 32): main has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (25 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 20 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 12 belong to 13 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"949b08c0039ac8507c343c7c29941592090d591fc1bdd1e074a3e5a758d88fc0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DataManagementService.receive (cognitive 31): DataManagementService.receive has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (21 pts), match/switch 4 (9 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"799d76c216e2dbbd2151b1dd430d4a23aed981b2db2f84399ec754ff1abcd9c6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionPullingContainerPool.receive (cognitive 31): FunctionPullingContainerPool.receive has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), match/switch 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 12). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b1a94274e37473302375a1fc3b01fcb63c3c69026c6727a7ad8d45fd8b42fbb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CouchDBLauncher.run (cognitive 30): CouchDBLauncher.run has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/standalone/CouchDBLauncher.scala"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e411679ab85dac57bda27167f6b3c93e98134002dd88986fe600f9214ed4375d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utils.getApis (cognitive 29): utils.getApis has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (24 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 9). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 306). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5fbfd79f6af577ac5a0250125d9e6044e8c84a5dd7e9e6a3d8a3197412e2055"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionPullingContainerProxy.initializeAndRunActivation (cognitive 28): FunctionPullingContainerProxy.initializeAndRunActivation has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (18 pts), match/switch 6 (9 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1044}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54c9b55fdab95b211b799b33f853935f942cdf09492f9729aa051f001350f449"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.getApis (cognitive 28): apigw-utils.getApis has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (25 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 321). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":290}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17d8509e66d62702b16cfa9916eca0271c48a48eb423cdce5e76d9019b3bd52e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utils.getTenants (cognitive 25): utils.getTenants has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (20 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 8). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 110). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d7196041dfea8968c72ca88e86afc6fa36966a1961e41fd4b6b9179ef443115"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"owperf.mainLoop (cognitive 25): owperf.mainLoop has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (20 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/owperf/owperf.js"},"region":{"startLine":337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1b2991c5f1dcbefe6c5764a696e85858fc47817d5d0ae8891e72d0d08cae282"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"main (cognitive 25): main has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 14 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 11 belong to 6 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d103d794e47d3193c7eb6955003be3cf9f795d93568586283050297ee2564d41"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"YARNContainerInfoActor.receive (cognitive 24): YARNContainerInfoActor.receive has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 14). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/yarn/YARNContainerInfoActor.scala"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0889a1472427313f62cc30d5345828c848d524ae2006b235ff71add66d9f181"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerManager.schedule (cognitive 24): ContainerManager.schedule has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (22 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":441}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"139d5e8ff9fdfd0b3fa706ad33022fbe1dee64f3fc75cd09fea3d3c4a54b20d4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PrimitiveActions.invokeConductor (cognitive 22): PrimitiveActions.invokeConductor has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 6 (17 pts), if/else 5 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/actions/PrimitiveActions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":329}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a983e6407d6c3e9a01e3880b500a34ec30c1ecbba108797ce4c51d010eaeef0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommonLoadBalancer.processCompletion (cognitive 22): CommonLoadBalancer.processCompletion has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (20 pts), match/switch 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"936c4f19f34c3e64677cb24eb36c1ca3746c879b0d6e2d2248b7e00ab0e333f5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"wskutil.request (cognitive 22): wskutil.request has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts), error handling 3, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/admin/wskutil.py"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5824c98969af9ee222f1a29fe0ee819f0231188d289fe985e05118d36c1d2569"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PackageCollection.checkPackageReadPermission (cognitive 21): PackageCollection.checkPackageReadPermission has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), match/switch 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entitlement/PackageCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"941ae8ab4ed5c45dfd40b34b2d35abbecc244dc85cd124ea579a9a094f0b0a49"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CallbackModule.emit (cognitive 21): CallbackModule.emit has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), ternaries 5 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ansible/callbacks/logformatter.py"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc467ea4f4424762742c3dffe4545b1c43f591a72608274b4fed90ae46108af9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WhiskWebActionsApi.handleMatch (cognitive 19): WhiskWebActionsApi.handleMatch has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/WebActions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":477}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f69b35281c4181b17dcfbd76ddd578abc805732358703858408ee004ec3eacc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WhiskWebActionsApi.extractEntityAndProcessRequest (cognitive 19): WhiskWebActionsApi.extractEntityAndProcessRequest has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), match/switch 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/WebActions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":579}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39dc13fe8c061ac98bd77722bc9b168ff611d5a41db8a591312ea31d89b8ff7a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.addApiToGateway (cognitive 19): apigw-utils.addApiToGateway has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 210). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f55927ba249bb8e03f0d80a0e3dda137ddac46f040051ef6fb7546d379479603"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utils.createTenant (cognitive 19): utils.createTenant has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 56). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"addd0854c8e5c316ad019af1e76e0f90002567e391f58100b5fdc5219fc87fac"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WatcherService.watchBehavior (cognitive 18): WatcherService.watchBehavior has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/WatcherService.scala"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ff8ac883b9e289103297d61685f3597969886fc351137e7ff327134b8c2aca5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ActivationServiceImpl.fetchActivation (cognitive 18): ActivationServiceImpl.fetchActivation has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/grpc/ActivationServiceImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fd9ef6756af080e6b6edbae6601fe85dff57970b357c88ec5a7a71dcf8d0c85"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WhiskConfig.readPropertiesFromFile (cognitive 17): WhiskConfig.readPropertiesFromFile has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/WhiskConfig.scala"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f2c8f662e206b7db5cd51ff80b60324596f50b82a535e96bd70dee3d814224e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AttachmentSupport.attachToExternalStore (cognitive 17): AttachmentSupport.attachToExternalStore has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 4 (10 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/AttachmentSupport.scala"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c262b027d6a5ef1b098d8b6562c1db15d937e50103e56b629375ecb9f4672252"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MongoDBArtifactStore.attachToMongo (cognitive 17): MongoDBArtifactStore.attachToMongo has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 4 (10 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBArtifactStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":375}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"621f03084d927fcb4708869d80993e3bd991d22db83b267af91cfbc76fbd6867"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WhiskWebActionsApi.completeRequest (cognitive 17): WhiskWebActionsApi.completeRequest has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), match/switch 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/WebActions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":661}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f3955431dbd015586cdce44d68d4aba6812a4b1600813562dfb2752f4ae9702"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ShardingContainerPoolBalancer.publish (cognitive 17): ShardingContainerPoolBalancer.publish has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/ShardingContainerPoolBalancer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d9e976ada64c43f51e08d69518045f9ee9353d38e24c1aba4f2fc7bd147c096"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DockerContainer.create (cognitive 17): DockerContainer.create has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (7 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/docker/DockerContainer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4af829b1b96072c95fddaa3e793cc59b5dd0dcd5685d96960d9ed39f562c9d6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionPullingContainerPool.adjustPrewarmedContainer (cognitive 17): FunctionPullingContainerPool.adjustPrewarmedContainer has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), match/switch 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":448}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0717a226a0baa8c5d5c7529cce3ec60ed03ecbbf5a381e4107bd5db73e0f7617"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.deleteApiFromGateway (cognitive 17): apigw-utils.deleteApiFromGateway has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 17 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 263). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac7a91d283688d76287c13ecfbaec23eec3c786b9367ce80ba6e035e75e84b6c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"apigw-utils.removeEndpointFromSwaggerApi (cognitive 17): apigw-utils.removeEndpointFromSwaggerApi has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":623}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0c45cb2f6eb519f35a70b94829e2860d071c7552f7bd83de4849a000385d38c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"utils.addApiToGateway (cognitive 17): utils.addApiToGateway has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 200). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9e1c3f6392a708cca86f7726487a18bf4ed84f753729cf8e438aea8aaa223f7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ActivationResponse.processRunResponseContent (cognitive 16): ActivationResponse.processRunResponseContent has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), match/switch 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 9). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ActivationResult.scala"},"region":{"startLine":199}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a54a1f1659be7f8ebb01050685588e47aebf97e46be7670185d4d222438989a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StandaloneOpenWhisk.main (cognitive 16): StandaloneOpenWhisk.main has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/standalone/StandaloneOpenWhisk.scala"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c98b8ac988c313769d00aa1d07dc35f30bd950edc394f0f01971eb8f08f7f76"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"replicateDbs.replicateDatabases (cognitive 16): replicateDbs.replicateDatabases has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (7 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/db/replicateDbs.py"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a25eff57228de0476f89f1939add8ccc472582e17b875feb72f299a4871366ac"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"owperf.processSample (cognitive 16): owperf.processSample has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (9 pts), ternaries 4, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/owperf/owperf.js"},"region":{"startLine":540}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"491958659803400316fb33252adfb6eb767a9a148165f777fb6598e28c9d36a0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 993 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 78% of them inside a single declaration: FunctionPullingContainerProxy (181-1270). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 493 over it, 1.99\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a310787aba55497326162619e2999e0cd0a54dabc722ad90267ee8432182743"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: queue/MemoryQueue.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 915 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 415 over it, 1.83\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70b9b30984de88eb38e80094f5506ea59e58398d4ea6ce9c3decf677c516d51c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Messages: TooManyMethods \u2014 49 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 19 over it, 1.63\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/http/ErrorResponse.scala"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e35d716808b62c4226052f1380d1cf61cf95d7c35cae87cb2a04845b42785b5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 778 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 63% of them inside a single declaration: ContainerProxy (247-967). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 278 over it, 1.56\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c03a51b264c224c69bb3417feb48bd4014ef7858c8063eea0d72f817fa8db744"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: createApi.main: FunctionTooLong \u2014 main runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"682dac2f1229aabb7c2ffcfdc72570684983bcab91b60542c0ad98228dff8a7a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 596 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 96 over it, 1.19\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f565b9600a45dd18e583ebcab29e917002f78c3569bef48e0ac903eaaa3c3433"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: queue/QueueManager.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 559 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 77% of them inside a single declaration: QueueManager (64-670). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b98e09e7ae462cc674eda9cac9bdb02927f494cc7cc96757414822222c023d6c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: deleteApi.main: FunctionTooLong \u2014 main runs 109 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 9 over it, 1.09\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45112d56bb95d47f2315498d36509ec2b9bda7cbf3443485a4c5918eac6d2fd4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: StandaloneOpenWhisk: TooManyMethods \u2014 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/standalone/StandaloneOpenWhisk.scala"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b90f53c1eacdbeb33b2b34527d57aab88f63107360bdac6a3ecadf9f540aeeff"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: common/apigw-utils.js: FileTooLong \u2014 525 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e374623450d12a93ad84b909a75a72344d56a7324e62f575ea8ee50c3e0a6769"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26\u201327 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:593-619 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:629-654 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:593\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:621\u0060 calls \u0060contains\u0060 and \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:655\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":593}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"064d87acf9c6af7d28168309f78815602ea49a0b3f9774b58b9ba8ddb4741e9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201326 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala:167-189 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/s3/S3AttachmentStore.scala:144-169 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala:167\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6484ad5798e6e670105a1b8071a49994663fee7727faf8c9a08a58248fb74d76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:904-927 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1194-1217 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:904\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":904}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7354a0089c819f9e79af83a1136667379f39c4f87b12bec5d8bcc99875717ae9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:602-621 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:821-840 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:602\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"201d57e1a4cd4e9793985e902acae086f935ddabd61ac9d417a5236365f462d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala:74-89 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala:99-116 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala:74\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala:73\u0060 calls \u0060ElectionResult\u0060 and \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala:98\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdWorker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25a7e5758066ae139697985a111d4860a982c0033db26a9da312923452a54b3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala:107-122 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala:125-141 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala:106\u0060 calls \u0060WatchEndpoint\u0060, \u0060Set\u0060 and \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala:124\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/service/DataManagementService.scala"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aacdb5e55f36a6b412dc0920379424a819f6bf76825294d0e76f8c848ef52719"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:663-678 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:884-900 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:663\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":663}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2622718973af36a3fe004c011baaf90ec6376de9d10d9b7cd18a7e6445b4ab1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:303-319 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:322-338 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":303}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6687f14b52bce06e709bdc96f20866fb1c01c45c1ab39565d1278d57e454b26"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:264-280 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:285-301 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d4c48a215fb0dbe85334ffb6f74f47df2f243773cbf74dbd6abc7384e210852"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdClient.scala:196-210 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdClient.scala:221-235 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdClient.scala:196\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/etcd/EtcdClient.scala"},"region":{"startLine":196}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2b2b021f705655a837913888c0e9c6e8b8180f4d08fa1e57bb1040e673f6bfd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 4): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1252-1264 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/InvokerReactive.scala:278-290 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala:1129-1141 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:646-658 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1252\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala:1125\u0060 calls \u0060Parameters\u0060, \u0060JsString\u0060 and \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1250\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cb1517c536eba938a37b6c01790c9e7b321c91ee0a46645cc8be860b2115fa7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala:315-327 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala:349-361 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala:315\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18f38530a9c740cb67b76601965984d9af9309ecc438b39d08c71c6cde8401cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala:522-534 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala:601-613 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala"},"region":{"startLine":522}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4416a1c50d7cac038ba9bfd9c449a576b80c959f379aa0c7b70e8c920b9ccb1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/http/PoolingRestClient.scala:121-133 | core/standalone/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/standalone/CouchDBLauncher.scala:248-260 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/http/PoolingRestClient.scala:121\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/http/PoolingRestClient.scala"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9b58312e2c6297de5bea79f1238e438cd430e96edd5a862933899ff3ed0a136"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:498-508 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:539-551 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:498\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":498}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4263ebaa49609aec8d1e385bee6e53fd38a0c4e1b98383d6b380cffec8fd2b9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:389-400 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:540-551 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":389}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"953aae52b70387f3d3ff295cb9dedb4cd11f8df1222cf59635bf80dad0592f7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:358-369 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:410-421 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:358\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f68f9a417fa38c1fdd057ff8ae237c6ec22f719a260b027cb13d4c0abc591ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala:875-886 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:621-632 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala"},"region":{"startLine":875}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b8ff626788d88effac0252e9dfdb4f3c403dccba7a3658149843cf81f502d6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:149-159 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:188-198 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:257-267 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:357-367 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:149\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b749d800d8a3f02e93b6f5bdad9da110f4805555c5c7d79830e81a3d4e37a814"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/Container.scala:133-143 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/Container.scala:187-197 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/Container.scala:133\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/Container.scala"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2aa5d0dc9357a1950fa8c40ccf5db7e98570cb8adf694a0d97f2bd08f802768d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala:538-548 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBArtifactStore.scala:592-599 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala:538\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/CouchDbRestStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":538}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3790bd357ab1797db005abe2c99dd489d5988ff5ac09abc1e761da9c8248e007"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBAsyncStreamSink.scala:88-97 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBAsyncStreamSource.scala:78-88 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBAsyncStreamSink.scala:88\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBAsyncStreamSink.scala"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05f422e034fa4bb6b66a0ac8d15c550f8710be345f6bd8dbd6e7520213a185b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala:233-244 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/FPCPoolBalancer.scala:308-318 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":233}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"899ea69d74a5b86bd8d53b4cecff8ef374251029dcc086d1f61f024beb9fc363"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBArtifactStore.scala:320-328 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/memory/MemoryArtifactStore.scala:211-220 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBArtifactStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19cf017965348746b1b6722048f7729af82ad94ab42688093f5428e22a9a9930"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:351-360 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:410-419 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala:351\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/ApiUtils.scala"},"region":{"startLine":351}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2764015aed04c5476c396a28c473545cce541d0b7daca18c57ada9e50b226df2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala:149-163 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/FPCPoolBalancer.scala:235-244 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala:149\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25a8468cec280dce31dfda154f20cedf8626747f9b25d1e8a3ca786af49d5c92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:583-592 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerPool.scala:802-811 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala:583\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerPool.scala"},"region":{"startLine":583}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a98befc2fd346426ee0641788a86cdb5b0fea6204264003c5e96a88d70603e2b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:748-757 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1000-1009 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":748}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26556ac08923e93c58ec359eaeb011e07b61c93c24ecefb4bba263883d480164"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/AttachmentSupport.scala:153-161 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBArtifactStore.scala:382-389 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/AttachmentSupport.scala:153\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/AttachmentSupport.scala"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0404d2e25713f6f48b4ebc37d61b857b473869dfd762fdf38c8ba5d0630d4b96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:802-810 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1075-1081 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:802\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":802}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a97bdebd1cac07f551957b5bf3632368fd068baa91d6ff2b7434d5f90a090cc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala:551-558 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala:630-637 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala:551\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala"},"region":{"startLine":551}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aecf5d4a5107486cf7d2fd2c0319c91a8f162ce5fa9ab1bf019279e7a0ad61f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/InvokerSupervision.scala:191-198 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/InvokerHealthManager.scala:298-305 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/InvokerSupervision.scala"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9aaa9c77f330c09a4b3b1f36fd5fd508e8501acea16643ba9dc2abe0913deb6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1371-1378 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:643-650 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1371\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1371}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f40dc56da2cf64259f3c8a701f3f4c5e702e03d5e84a2acb359e11c787b961bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/DefaultInvokerServer.scala:47-54 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/FPCInvokerServer.scala:55-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/DefaultInvokerServer.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/FPCInvokerServer.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 87% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/DefaultInvokerServer.scala:47\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/DefaultInvokerServer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c041b84531c2d72043a33fd7dff69c295393741fd4acff542100b062eb6f2cab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/PekkoContainerClient.scala:243-249 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/PekkoContainerClient.scala:268-274 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/PekkoContainerClient.scala:243\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/PekkoContainerClient.scala"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"232ed44ba931b6bab8f15c1958789b12704a7ed41fa8391a94faa62fe46a4db5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/ElasticSearchDurationChecker.scala:208-213 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/ElasticSearchDurationChecker.scala:221-226 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/ElasticSearchDurationChecker.scala:208\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/ElasticSearchDurationChecker.scala"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"faf4ab15823f5dd582d7242325c672ca72878458ab02c66b0e27d7f74468ba53"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBViewMapper.scala:154-158 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBViewMapper.scala:308-312 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBViewMapper.scala:154\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/cosmosdb/CosmosDBViewMapper.scala"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d1cd90497294c2d88ec3a2fafb08d8fe1f1051af7e8f896de3de042c51a0521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:191-195 | core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:334-338 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala:191\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/QueueManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e3ff9dc7f42cb3e7378ccfb0eb96e244803ca6ff75097144da9bcb89a470254"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/common/ForcibleSemaphore.scala:63-71 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/common/ResizableSemaphore.scala:63-71 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/common/ForcibleSemaphore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0485f92346edd5e570372ad656f01ec9826f602ebcd4a5a222969e59f66b871e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/DocumentHandler.scala:257-263 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/mongodb/MongoDBViewMapper.scala:162-168 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/DocumentHandler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1453dde74e39e8bb3efea5db9a0dbf1ae5950676a576a0b70b48b31c4c2802c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala:252-258 | core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/FPCPoolBalancer.scala:338-344 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala:252\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/loadBalancer/CommonLoadBalancer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":252}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a33da6725a3c338bb694ba12a5192d00a68372e989a8606fc0a4d11aa1457131"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala:1025-1032 | core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala:1334-1341 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1025}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3cb0a2898411ff73e47afd53adc0c10cc1ce36d5e9a6f5f33070eaf87a3ea89"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/DocumentHandler.scala:151-156 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/DocumentHandler.scala:250-255 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/DocumentHandler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6494a4337f2d08a9ed9db1e1bda2942a5cc6c14dbb2817c659f25afe83750d83"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala:311-315 | common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/s3/S3AttachmentStore.scala:182-186 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala:311\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/azblob/AzureBlobAttachmentStore.scala"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e905688b0d34b40c34933690113227c9304c51e6fe8f0930255c727bf4c11d9"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: FunctionPullingContainerProxy (LCOM4 5): FunctionPullingContainerProxy\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f1c5be592702626199ae69678b6edefc2f54f207c2dabc7c00f6f2816bf16f7"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: InvokerHealthManager (LCOM4 4): InvokerHealthManager\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/InvokerHealthManager.scala"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22d936aa8cc5827488c5e2d3d4fe1cfd39428f46dae9cc42e91d150d80567e5b"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 no coverage collector is wired up: Coverage NOT MEASURED: \u0060--collect:\u0022XPlat Code Coverage\u0022\u0060 names a data collector that ships in the \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 package, and this repository wires up none \u2014 no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, \u0060--collect\u0060 produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9180c6833055898ff2a5d87c5e5ac7a09a1766a3673b1ba4dbc509a3c48214d9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 2 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: core/standalone/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/standalone/LogbackConfigurator.scala, common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/database/s3/CloudFrontSigner.scala. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dadd2119a99b05a09b0137e68696692767179c250b9cf0effa7cfcd7e712b0b"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 1 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (3 single-owned of 193 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 193 of the 295 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #2 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: There are no installation/build or setup instructions for a non-ansible tool like Gradle. Add an Install section covering how to set up Gradle and run the initial build, plus any prerequisites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: Usage examples are sparse: only one test-run command is shown with no explanation of what it does. Expand usage into a \u0027How to run it\u0027 section covering all main commands (build, deploy, invoke) and their parameters."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3be6b1df8dee4d75347df035099abafaded4e14497796424f8a1b9bc588f4e81"},"properties":{"commitSha":"b91a0481d532e08af05b40aedccc8ba7790c18ed"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7734713ae885b234c7b101070013c8f3d9d99c8f06a5bcc29429f545e044ec8"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4601a801e3221edd1a851cbde11c539917af4cd5db459740a19a662842e67fbc"},"properties":{"commitSha":"daeb509bbddd94b7df8ff48f4b96cf821c34dc72"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b8f11381d61a58459ffc7c595fd52d09c03c711894a63a9578043d2338412b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bd82968de01ebaaac28af7c3f921c7e5d3983db350930c1faaf914f405d3f01"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaa52b3abd8c245deafba4369477b7df3bc76863eae24cc3bfa9e2c241c57401"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85b674fd1dbf47b21bac07394176adbc4fa34d6ba510dc5e9df8bcf3a290d0d1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52e28699e929d1c130a7e36d2ce74ef69071295b1f5ad44fd7b3f6d3989dd8ed"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c872813a85d421f981502e4f943d4715780b2116d419546963a87f185006bcb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8bd718138a6d58616ee98e7d900a98e73708051a89261ebd33b83b1adb61c8d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0ea36248e1b8f7a5f368a3e941e606a3168abf7e6bd11eb14362eb129d99162"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dd06502d853fdbbbff77e57266b7ee7dfbac43d1631ae2eab6370f5ec4cbf82"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfcac72c6a0d8bc5c32903b898b686d9e43e44ace4e0b7b363f253b3e11d07a3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52fbfc5521919a95ec0d7e2810b388add936cb3a625fb5b2f817de9ce6fc92f4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16dcc1cbdc62e5d7967653221b4c3c7df6a6df4fb740f4b1187047387fdbb7af"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8232130c0b9f5a3ade5ff0207c089930edf423ec9971274db72c357c95a9003"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0b0c41ec04f8bc959db164aec04eb479fd5e7161f8b0cd8538c0e94fc824575"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"242e411792c841fefe8df0800a00dfb42f2d93e3bc801ec1905e60acbf5053cc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ab72fff3ce2257e5ff385c7adea4da47f96d065d37094051f729d1fce9c70c8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0b45be91ba3f835f6403fbb4aa4ddd437ce12817dcc8fdfd3a2c370b94544c8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd61663591fc8feef3869fc52cc29d7dfaa4918a9c37c028d49d23a057b53d80"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de03f1f4540ddd319a34ad7eb1a66eab0c043f13e379014a00095142d79a5ba3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a408ce72207198b149db190511b6eaedb9ddc2719618f03fa235af13e64a0a5b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af9766831a73574c37a5dc56b097401669d16dcb446c636dbcc835bb92e6d5a0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a462a00addc344c01942ac8e31938813f127ba8fe363c579d27f5d5737373fb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4ba75b4149c7c2fd2fca16399249c22d2359b152b1eba00b70dc818b559fb20"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5fb97e4cdb93acc08eec64afb864fdb3933e9a5427aa0c69a016715a25e6bac"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20b7533273f5e3080dec9a9ef316dcb8a1918e25e743a781daa6d1694693b700"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5e47b7c6e4057e2e7f9b3c94403bc3c8f5a4087c889679de4a1a50ced43f181"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc77593456e270ac38ec11bc64e090899576b2cae350bb3d97ae3c441af560e4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c608518105804d46b3b03d129ba375f9f34fadceda7236114c867a1096d5cb9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e4c4067c0156d760f272c97cf1e1b9bee340104101a786746bf577c0ee7396e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa91e0c2f4c7b18e74d896c2e5f761ef85d5dd60bb4113f72db3db5ed8b98df2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cf21807a3ce6a9ce396ce548a1aa612c029f1b91e53d795855ce02451140edc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff6171ef653b957716b6e5236c3ecaa5ce02aa9664bca206d1a36bce3f659b2a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66c7e3d907d5947a5fd992084aa9be780d509675ab613e7ae084606f5a00a905"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3773b41c59b85cc73d185440713529c1f8ac1f370337ac90091ff270550ae3f8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e60d2b24a28667deda0e5b339df6015cd6212e6bd3c703b215864707b62931b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffb3c32a5bb141efe713370c57921c0281ff095635752708b45ecceddb24abf8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74866415b29269e06d6ef38de23bd1a5c9cf17bf2dfb46f8d8f8d6bc9c3f978a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc6f18b14d46363f9c985e471fd93f6bb95552e980bb1c1ce6f9d7d44580112f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e6b8fa22ba8b76669f90dbfa529864338c10abd2361d8c962e5fda47de33a89"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52a244bf5a94b1a790b9bbd5293dcf8b03bcf00b522b7f91f4a800f4a1f9b9a7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce95f9f5c9a15668ed225026fae46c1d0c2341d137855f1d8c91436fc0d6db5a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1219e169fc55399031197fb171c39fc2eeefd1a41172108115d53e54ce732b65"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18b35a4054d2ed2e56d1cc516c9ee88114230630b7dc7a4a37950f480c991462"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2336f875723629a6c878d4fb63d3e18f158027c8e1a643cd7fdb60d7d7c0184a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6bff70ba2e2875363a173732c29f0d8ec759b527b68fa62ab606edee0ecdcc1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1f0311f279ea78b4b7b76e2e1532baa9de3fe1dfacee8b9b9158ec6e2f6869b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"503b4d5c0a96c37176d0be2d81eab1846184f685eaee9fa0377fe1d5f81cbb04"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f334963056ac6415c843418f2d513d29ac54e1c6f97af9ddae7a709011c50a89"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14b5c055cd77c5419f3d7f81ee6c3eb9667ec28e3133940ea9209204581608d1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3470342b85be5922b72275c3eb95edbaa40d4d862196f0cec71c4f9119876a6b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a3c31c8446a861703200b3e26237c7dd636944d79b36c27ef3fecb14d198118"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2aaeebbf04b56f65cc17524e3b9f0f5bb185563bd025613805847a211a102aca"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b5b8e6d634172672cee90da1ea6379248e64d7d65575970fcdf64e515b8c7cf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4a2a290be9c85db80b56d332a48f8d78886429fd919cf102d48ef0f0add13f7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a57dcf0b566ab67823dd69dce75a7941b70de51ce3bae387488a75bfb4bd6ff9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b549d6c0c33ed1c5f01f7b63ca5b89ad567abb992b4e733a7e56e872efc3822f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-457","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03c5a7b1abc183e461b0aa65cb5727d153cebe68711191159e732730d881910c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-290","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b130e15c861423e7441d198a2c0ff0c5156fcc1dde7213e773733ee88692a03"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8ee20a8b2da190687645b28347d5b977cb69eeae3bac62b19067ae9685fe425"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d27877344e17a6be0a92fc3013db5d053ee747a3a9a486af82abc78921f08d8d"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86b4d7902b2aca0fe058e162d3073aa7184b95c5dbddc89c36a2bc15aa89052e"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d7a865ac833b7250a5a94b1275ca4f742c6949416b3cf837eff7478165f52dd"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c05e4e6b22bbbb8efd753795800b591fd5d06d264a40415764da66267c52e49"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-250","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccb08623bcb75ee0d461075142b0fb36b5635262c38547ce27f5828aaa55f126"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c70b12b7f422c2af580e9e9fdbbcd683f197cb3dcadd3608db380a4b27fc1423"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58e0b942402ef1ff9fa0f9ec3b28fa42a430fdd008ac316da3c512adc914b7b0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3befc5c222d26277370ba6d33ce17b5c305e650149f53c6b221156252ce7177b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-250","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa646df58e1bc0591407c6d4f3a6c284aba2bd0ac006818fdcf5d22465ac4782"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a31037baa479d86b1dc4eedf0ab081c8711b226b73c59cfb541f65267e75e085"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6de3aff9b2ce967944a7ff6b00befcb6fed095b4bc450f6647cd34540eb2a0d7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45306db3c056d119a2366659150c49fe95b3455b5d795cc7f9fa760fe1032178"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b672ae5f4ebc80c4093ddfb2fff5b3488893b9301a5c7edc978134df525f8f0"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"606ec6da4b6cea53ce9fb64adf12c5fd7d1948f3a7259b18007dcb16e995668e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f993520a4ff443bdd181aa11b66ca45c541a9c11ff6924ebb9c0da9808488c80"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2143ce8f97ac575331e0a8f2905629d85e11824d499be2bdfb4a2493465d593"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73a8de33e99d9f02aa59b81d280d1131ff23bfe55ec0646249262c9e599bdffa"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e71034ccdc5ea6d148686fc2d511e4d3e7dd2a5e88e74b3f183e027699c5f582"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34c31d480d1ceda0a722d3c1eba9aa31ae6b33f7b1f37ad51884e03a7ccac810"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f73d68d9bf350ef068677e24aa55a1ff8ef07e67f38e4a864e53e1974fceb80d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bac2a455b371b3dc52a2d389c33d9c2329b1da6bbacc6f804488860a1c34e596"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"302d20d3176db5fb7a2c5784658cd981554a5ec8806108db7a6233d0ea2e199f"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e4038a113248a3ae5878007362f72a88a79f844c3769c74af8e14b4254f5857"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d57c613c4a3032354af2bfe7691b9c5b2bf1ce972f2d85c66fd4081399ecbdf"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f109d3666944bc0421bcd31c1d4b8de94f0c5d7fbeac61a76e3776110b4e3c1c"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48dadf1917af9be7cf55a3d005e1b2fd8055f07ce642ac9a91a542fb7f5f2d8f"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8214d03c73cf1caa56c93973e5c3aef040be573b27a3a6c133c6ce68aa1c3064"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a7ae13b641e21e5cf81584feb35887d9db1ee6e786101051fde2c34f757ef1"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"595b4edcc4a9298ccacfb20717a3297e3b1366510f101bbe7cacb05874ca63ea"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a32b042c064acb95d388230f0b4fb305d7cebd213ebcb5c4df42e6aa68c1e185"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62277f365b7cfad67b2e918e7f3063da6b5f62d0c8e03874605bc9fc3210152e"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce1a5ef5a5ae0d0fc78d620f39c5316e2d23e9fc0cd86be7da83e2932ed9ed29"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e4b1269e9f6d9b9a487353c493e6ebcfcd96b70c2ad05c52dff9ec0429eda5f"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"273b1b3a667203eb1182bd9bd04def151268f0ce4579e5888625be3ed4e53a12"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0070219bc90a94637dc7450291034165516365b54c93a440195619b11ff692f"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eade37726521ae35f684898b671b8ff99887ff1a93065ad0c74ce81bb1241958"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b5b83fe85d424de7387c7cbd14cd1f2663c984c7f72da90561525f89b206d7b"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc17ad7fbfce9034d2417b91a881f9242fccf091668698748e41c4346d2ee14"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c21aeecb4f704bcedae3cbb9e68a73a53a84ad13a93fa999d4a71f8578ea1242"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47d60dd962446ee9b63af77d5b69587804cbb17ac04399fc3e2fb4297c12f7bf"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d395d99cba05831471cdbba1f3c6dbd2979380311e4d8a3746f5f04da782b703"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d40e2aecf4c2e313962cb9e95e356452aff4ae41928f914503dbf439dbf9ae36"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ea0e369d773c8fb989f91c6140559a43a8da6cf429f9398117cdf4795b09fca"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c29f6512fbb90bffef7709176205f09f9f8bc145980d514bf70dffd730fbf6d1"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45e9dd4687e04f322898ad0ec31282514e617653a60f4a396233f50c5425afbf"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9385daea95824683752cedaed9c9ccc3abdfbeab2eee38f1b2c25886cc3a9f74"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"324fadc50f73337262eb908d7b8db9a0998a214e26f1770de1ed829654586494"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaa4b6025c82581ca0c518912d5799e100f52779333d7801e8388f469fac857a"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0c0c0f2fdccda73b9c0ca82439d9c64b3a62a2ded8b4c1f942385cdf4f67f31"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f248136413d9f1ed3818ee404925a45d4ceed06ed3a3d0fdbee7805b7a7d7ea2"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebbe95396193108393f24e08c20a20da33e89e021e0cef91e261479a283c7320"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab588e76e9e0326457db68dead4e0f80f9e8be43b72e0787b2c08c3a8578d893"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072c6f2c981bd89f90666f4d38d616a777d061146553ded64f5e8eedbf587d75"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5553672f33a52a903e540a7dbd16797043bf03d8014becf299f26c71765a38e7"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61ce572e19f3c7dc912f5d5a1cb03014e8a5e37c487f6392f701ffe8bdef2ac1"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21580491523e62c7e56f4b60b0efd3a8216d61bfd2327879514b2567f7b394ed"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff61aa3ad210bd6fa409acdee69d710386437c689a3ab0bb51842354f9bb8ea9"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3d6e631b3ecf03f8d31df5a43e95437c3749d6ed6beb449f7c489184ec69f64"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5378338996d0eb6f1ee07347466d947059c13233602a6a181d06cceeb5ff420b"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"accf5098d0a0a8d5c7ebb61a6c5aa9671d375b29b4fd0a6708fda1c7effeeaf9"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4acafe247503bf87ae12b47ad285bace9de8dcfce33f18bcd3dda6a808058e8"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2edc9a4beb0a814f7697488bd94abeba09fefd638ce92ad17bbc685150e7e90d"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bec94f59ec968025b9993b194868151152124952ad625a6771264da4c65b8bd0"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe6f86844965ca259ceb744e66e6c5cc9c26e4bf9aa1e1c3066e2fce887afc62"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"804097281706f14e8713aab67aef692c7c2423ff0779a22adf2b68c1f0713df0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd0e36bf722b1df62554073a7f22d4c989122b04c79b0cb5e40e3dcd2517fb96"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb7462645de3a69e650f80d842c87e18199cb529c02c00aedcd5cec99f3217bb"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eb4d26b6aa6817d9f4e832ba9cca04297426639484a5b0f7b45f053ee298d78"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19f3e8283b9f058c6e62227a7c7e4ed48f3b1c1fbb17d56d8c650c38825872da"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6567b37ccba6fd178728d891b667b044d8c949043618e130584615f07949a70"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be6b85dc135d38680a479d6a2fcc79eed14c9ae8e79e3b7d6ece6ab13a68b189"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aff90b93667d201b599451818338b437058a7a8d272bd639cd115f5ed0a1c9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"038ac69ea3056930be425dbd8030ec5a7eff3eecdd015018b226b3991f641827"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15a7be6b825baa2de0fa6bd28aa2cc32859ac2756e5ef26b5be4dc0ccf171cf8"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f9b385a591af2daadc0835c9b24974f015762681cef5fc9bcaac31d8ead4819"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"802d9ad7f0ebc1aee47d65497a27130d0e04ab9345ad807273770296bd763b91"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a727fc2e934c9c3a85c12b3bd9bfba6153d6a1c299f4939b04fe8ca0ce499938"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8634594ddef337e9e8e4c89c46591a643d6476ead300ad955d754fcdffe03dad"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8679a51d28ea25f9087235f6536dd3eddf1bde98b86d8a5d48705849e250ea6b"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"730421a230dcd16c3823d6516bb795ca73114e2497b10f3d05a612544f870de8"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9b92e741eccd089f1f5ed29e411c14a50801943ad0a3adbfc97a5e1f19a8e27"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a62603d1c9db6b99a05ae8f1021cf4a610ab36ca488aab22c0576fa73d4ae7c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0de20b535747be92309c1df6addf1e2db67258d7e9bc3be1be896523bfce7160"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7906e37d0528020eb298ca48bac8b9a4569cd6b3c703c27c544b5963bdf3e0d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"961242d89779a823864339c2aadc18a307e7e0f7c4daceb9ef9bf74e7768df9d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"006469bd7eda265ff2e35910d553c3ce45b72b6f4c75001bddb240066e089dc2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c67eb6dc2a90e189ebb47d216efda0e7b351e7b7a0226ac94424a1060159ab40"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"223e5cf3d807fabe69a7834d127909161e22b0f4ebf23283d14f5aceb78a0503"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b44dfa3a9ac16666b579635a8542800bee81e70ffd907fc0b1462681670f237"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0eb6e6968cb4bddc4aed2e6f2b82f1eebfd5821769ab42fe714ba9af5774c15"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98a0de8180700fc6816bfc3b427d63b7de035df8386194bafa7feeced5f9ef68"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3641049d4d696e526f733cbadf90701026c96539ac7e067bf5041db0b0881442"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d13f141e35d9e758869cf3e467ef7130ad7393e71a871afe5e1092087df1020e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-754","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5b0d9a62ebcc185ca058edb22f4faca015fb17bbf7e40862ade08732ae6324a"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f97a189fdabdd33693b96b9c23b9dd9aca97401e68ffe498106a11e7db305339"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-754","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b16e7ad520d2f32581c5c84d40eefe60fb555fbd126f41c6d298bdafde42fb65"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6170e1f734d3ad0d179025a5bc639dd8e76ee06a70130ff8248898afeb0e1c94"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-754","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a9939bf860d950279ed7b8b2603e8a0feb963904af9c15cfa9052ea26561c77"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"742f4bc4e80bb30762e99214274f0ed0278aa49cea7b8e072f33968721cba6a3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-754","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68c81730313a77f68fbaf03f3a9a5e665839c218eae11e9a43198c8dc69bfae6"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0e973b9bb50c1ada64fea100983cf808031d74258becd020ef8ce896794fb92"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd5228778292579725536a24ac516258e2d34a5d21f1abf116d6274b3c0c3a30"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"365efdaa9f1a59a1f7a2ec748bd933df2f89006d20aff0cb23dac7112a15ed60"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a3f2499e0deb040b4669c5262a33faaefdd2f31e01c20b82b847206869a159b"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4efcc28d0ab2ec451eccdb34eb883bfa4070a8aef41e7a7266a3bcf37f7bf095"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a20a6a4d1d5537b06441594cf78460b885e080b8886c051947611569b5906c7"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea78393236c290601f56e1ef34c81292e2144fa3614e8a0da9e25ff397286109"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41ca124ae8859c2fde9ca5ec8894d2d3a5d7bb56012acee3e48d77271fa9b160"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Concentrated knowledge decay: 184 of 228 significant files have no living knowledge, while the repository is still being changed at a low rate (7 commit(s) in the last 90 days) \u2014 so this is one repo-wide knowledge-decay state, not 184 separate risks. Counted over 228 of the 295 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. The code moved on without the people who understood these files: document them or schedule a read-through before the next change lands in them."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"008bd8d3156a7f5206da709f59f1f87af76671c6b9becea72c8c9cffbcbd4f8e"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/v2/FunctionPullingContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d61821bc0e487c3c6efaab26d6a96b3459e07277310803583ccf67174efd48cf"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/queue/MemoryQueue.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3c3efefcb854e837c782e27ec2e1a40d8871d9590f901ba97ef626fd8155036"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7c87aa0e5776b4a1db21b5590d59b946fde453c9ae3322b306fea05e1a8ef22"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: Packages.scala \u2194 PackageCollection.scala: \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/Packages.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entitlement/PackageCollection.scala\u0060 change together 60% of the time (6 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE \u2014 the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import \u2014 and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u006015d8a85b\u0060 handle pekko deprecations (#5555); \u0060cba3b7b3\u0060 Protect Package Bindings from containing circular references (#4122); \u00600296e9bc\u0060 Add package use tests when referencing a non-package or non-existant \u2026 (at that commit the files were still \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/whisk/core/controller/Packages.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/controller/src/main/scala/whisk/core/entitlement/PackageCollection.scala\u0060) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/Packages.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0b55b93f3633feb41beb6724a7a1126523370cc7dc23ff42a78fecbfdf2a144"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe274ba5adebde25ca0b3db842e44cbb1aaeb7cfecfbb7215cd452596ba1f4c2"}},{"ruleId":"D44","level":"warning","message":{"text":"End-of-life runtime: .NET netcoreapp2.2: tests/dat/actions/unicode.tests/src/dotnet2.2/Apache.OpenWhisk.UnicodeTests.Dotnet/Apache.OpenWhisk.UnicodeTests.Dotnet.csproj declares .NET netcoreapp2.2 as this project\u0027s target framework, and .NET Core 2.2, support ended 2019-12-23. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2019-12-23 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bef317989e56f8be015284dd63eb436b1298f1d4a88b4a13bafce49cab2cb8ee"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/playgroundFunctions.js"},"region":{"startLine":786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c0cdc85990bdbfc484af913c8140ebc4c2269b966fcd5932647989b8c9767cc"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cselect\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has no associated label. Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E / wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14f22c9b258ce9eb07565b47f444213cbc5249223fb00eec409696874e411d00"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cselect\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has no associated label. Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E / wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a7d21847940bc4e3508ada13a58ff6e28ae0e0dfaad4f88bfeff5d293b49168"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Ctextarea\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has no associated label. Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E / wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1102e19e255a6353a42c20ef95f5d9a83cc8545f33268671541b535dfbe90578"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Chtml\u003E without a lang: The page declares no language, so assistive tech can\u0027t pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang=\u0022en\u0022)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd7e9185632c0cf487ffb5496b93a968d22386d647d175b6836eebb62d17eba6"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in \u003Cmain\u003E."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"537a254febf049a712fc227b89231045003b24e0857086d7ec85646aa0ad1598"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no accessibility linting at author time and no automated accessibility check in tests or CI. Add your UI toolkit\u0027s own accessibility assertion to the test suite (Flutter \u0060meetsGuideline\u0060, Espresso \u0060AccessibilityChecks\u0060, XCTest \u0060performAccessibilityAudit\u0060), then gate that test in the pipeline. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 3 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"DM2","level":"note","message":{"text":"Primitive id on a domain type: WatchEndpointOperation.watchKey: \u0060WatchEndpointOperation.watchKey\u0060 is a raw \u0060String\u0060 \u2014 give it a strongly-typed id: a dedicated single-field type wrapping the \u0060String\u0060, in whatever form your language spells that."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c9d483a5c10e9a083a72a04a2e342a8aab83b319d57d985cdc942c136f63df5"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims standalone OpenWhisk is a full-featured stack but the evidence shows only the standalone/standalone/README.md project exists \u2014 searched for: \u0060Standalone Stack\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add scalafix or scapegoat (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 30352 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No rollback/health safety: Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a \u0060healthcheck:\u0060 and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to \u2014 the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db6bab8a28a2145f47e5a4e6683cda39d2ba0296c723238e8057da979ae1c706"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 8 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js, core/routemgmt/common/utils.js, core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js, core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js, core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js, tests/dat/actions/zippedaction/index.js (\u002B2 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (89 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js:53 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js:58 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 736 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a0092b72b9a65be809a767416bda41777bd2f2c75b58c0d8718098437be61b5"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (76 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:346 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:334 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":346}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03378846e2e7b3040f1571653de915abd828cdee7e6b704c081abbc916ee1dc9"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (33 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js:102 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js:171 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 292 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"370439be40486421b0f435eeb3865692f76ba6659e8e9b69be131f8b5e13d9b4"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:274 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:261 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f5f308f345702eb043fd63323b7fe8c01e444023cca881ac8269947d11db02a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:121 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:317 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f0c421d7cf68a027360afc06984e90f255ab0871a00e6ac946ea7a36e5e0af6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:149 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:206 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5534874424dea496f9f740170ccda1739d1e2408913fbbffd55f00d1feb39708"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:671 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:631 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":671}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3fee3a7b58250672636453af62b5fa8004527c5daec11c1867a49e421e997b3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:866 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:737 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":866}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03de5124716ca8026f1de0e91783bb54760b5aa8d21da168228765f742844aa2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 5 locations): core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:56 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:110 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:200 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:250 \u00B7 \u002B1 more site(s) not listed \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e16796d7e917e4993dfe1a645f4e9340df39b70b439351064ace1675d16be88"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:221 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:211 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da1656e99ddb6f4512b49d32b900d4a9e02ded1f15d521c3e38ff757cb3f1633"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2 locations): tools/owperf/owperf.js:205 \u00B7 tools/owperf/owperf.js:226 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/owperf/owperf.js"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c454f3dc3023b701c24eae48bdf457121035f84485d490fe2d33992275e079a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:99 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js:66 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d0d3212f3eed1a8f214cfb825d2f78eab640fa2cba9c997604290112ff5d9a5"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:609 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:585 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":609}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50e5ab51212eb6dbc8491e1bfba55e5df91bb618372c628ef1a4e416ae5ec503"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:1037 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:763 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct \u2014 and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal\u0027s entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins \u2014 a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":1037}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"751a607b2a0b716ad53d137e064616bae44d338d83cec9c850326fd1d5f2398a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:639 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:612 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":639}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9134ede9445f3ed4f5bcfc31fe7a2ac5760bd81239c54b37d66475c56c0a1d9a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:311 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:296 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"364c7e1a5271cbfb04a16d96457425caa3db2d4d29baaf78c57ee1ae7e20a219"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:826 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:837 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":826}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a29ea0e6d1992548a745ed2d37f1a5505b21947cf6642cd36acc42e5d1f8a92e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:254 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:47 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"818fc70f8f6cd6fa8e56f27f23d2ab7301c43fa9a1ddd3747ca57d4f32fd24dc"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:334 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:67 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:120 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:316 \u2014 the 4 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f21982011c3f0c72c60334ecdf4dd6b0b9dc36c13abb75169265001f1cb67e8d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:708 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/utils.js:669 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":708}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89ccb1df56ca5d44be9d6799a9219a443af6767d6fa8540da1c5b63c5797ffb2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:230 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js:205 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b56af0a85569af9a24ec9aad316afc33e86a1965ae76f0f0551785db10e4d0a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js:100 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js:136 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12a1c52f6699c45d25cb2e515a61efd5febf30b42ddae807385d2b716aa34af2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:139 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js:194 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e0cea156a15d8549b18b00200c1d63a8f4f3d7137ddc4ee0c741c16e89a324b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/actions/playground-delete.js:21 \u00B7 core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/actions/playground-fetch.js:21 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/actions/playground-delete.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"646aa7dc8e480a53a35f2c6d32def1560252b9e3349a383c6c6f550fd062ca14"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3 locations): core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:210 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:263 \u00B7 core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js:321 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18db80e436bf4a683eb336bf9fa7b1ea48bfe9278f910869a38fc4644a44333d"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function validateArgs (cyclomatic 27, cognitive 46): validateArgs has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 46; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6608eda7111d333ac31e3779f826ca3b41e3b6606fbf41d40bd256da6190af44"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 56): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 56; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8e25cbc638593749bdc92629185b989b8bbba899c1e66e928da2215f0fc9826"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function main (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 20): main has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/createApi/createApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15de2d30b8cf9675829bd6410538367ae54c1394efd96f4a276a041f5a5a2c0d"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function processSample (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 16): processSample has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 16; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/owperf/owperf.js"},"region":{"startLine":540}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64eea17431e208e8d1e59457942bc8ad20f074accdd456b21889e37ab3df36b0"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function mainLoop (cyclomatic 14, cognitive 25): mainLoop has cyclomatic complexity 14 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/owperf/owperf.js"},"region":{"startLine":337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"439bdd2dd22847f03192c4ac3d5928afcf185e8cf7235f99805452be895ccbd5"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 22): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 22; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baf4f4183a1c746d1d8edbd03bb307b37130efa109a8a051905195300803893b"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 23): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1baa149fd483d79473d20e74f8b0123041d2292af38e4a680509392d03d8a5bb"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 23): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c3263ba087e2761ba73ecb726a8414ec18dd30a158d9d7c5a624c0d61053bc2"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 16): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 16; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb3b4a2c15f31066b9609c9936c41e0069400e7d40210d52f6adb704ce6444d6"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 16): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 16; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a09fce5b48dcda3260d6eebf23f2a419af51a007a3d4d0cc48077b41e2c7d29a"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function main (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 14): main has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/getApi/getApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c4a89bcbe63f0b18ad527eb1fce7ed6a8d1938104930c2ed5f0b0c0c0a57493"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 17): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/common/utils.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9763dcbca4f7b2d34fa3e78e975d1a2190b3ab3ac1b7198d61c47864d513563"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function main (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 13): main has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/routemgmt/deleteApi/deleteApi.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b12c0669f09e5020f642a4ab9eb978d88eb9c7f615a1086593c39d67eb5e2b89"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Large Files: 3 file(s) over 400 lines (counted as significant lines \u2014 blank lines excluded \u2014 over production source only, tests excluded), largest first: core/routemgmt/common/apigw-utils.js (997), core/routemgmt/common/utils.js (734), tools/owperf/owperf.js (713)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cecee31b569df4f07e06db732f1ca037af27b5afef9023da51f9673d931a142f"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No lint script: test \u2713 \u00B7 lint \u2717 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc8e67e81453cf5399dd04786d18b232180426b135169175fee670bdd83ccb03"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027btoa\u0027: Declared in tools/owperf/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"193ba59ae7fd2ef127efec65b660c49bb60ca6f62d1aab6c39a3ddd6828d3049"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027child-process-promise\u0027: Declared in tools/owperf/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8280e1e83e392609d9478174d04ac4fc605c36ba6fadac7ed3df3053a0b8fd5f"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027cluster\u0027: Declared in tools/owperf/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f96f6f3dc9d103c7fadbd4f83664d16c407a5756592aa0af1f3e1fe4e4510dbf"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Third-party script without Subresource Integrity: \u0060https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ace/1.4.2/ace.js\u0060 is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request \u2014 the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path \u2014 runs arbitrary script in this page\u0027s origin, with its session. 3 such include(s) across the repository\u0027s markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/standalone/src/main/resources/playground/ui/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f705eb7ea9d14f0271fef26a458355a53828b1f38194f3e74fbed483519d2f03"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"note","message":{"text":"No security response headers detected: No Content-Security-Policy / X-Frame-Options / X-Content-Type-Options configuration found \u2014 defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because \u0060application.conf\u0060 is committed to this repository and declares the server that serves it, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (\u22122.0 on this card.)"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"common/scala/src/main/resources/application.conf"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49aa2bbd2e28b828cae0674b227e5f8f6a46e0a786bb8c698d0ebdb7fc7b48e9"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NuGet dependencies are not locked: No packages.lock.json and no central package management \u2014 restores aren\u0027t reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable \u003CRestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003Etrue\u003C/RestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003E (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a97b4f69ccac509400ece7eedefb06d3ede0522cd4d8bcb5c068bea719545a6"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-250","guid":"52ee12e8-390a-7351-b1e6-388afa694e54","name":"CWE-250","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-250"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/250.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-290","guid":"379b1e66-a292-7b59-aa1e-a5bb4a6a99e9","name":"CWE-290","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-290"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-457","guid":"b62874fe-6222-8b5b-8ade-9527ad1cbb4a","name":"CWE-457","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-457"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/457.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"CWE-522","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-522"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-754","guid":"d9239381-f467-405a-862b-02e65c819273","name":"CWE-754","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-754"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/754.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"CWE-829","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-829"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":174,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}