{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D7","name":"Architectural Integrity","shortDescription":{"text":"Architectural Integrity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D7"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D25","name":"ADR Conformance","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Conformance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D25"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CombineLatestStorage.startTask (cyclomatic 37): CombineLatestStorage.startTask has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51ce6aa1e757db37252aa2d9629f7478c96343365a5e6753b20b7eb7c88579a5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ZipStorage.startTask (cyclomatic 33): ZipStorage.startTask has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1dfdbb408c7a5073cb0cccae75cf565f1e15ec3e9562ff2744dbc18e6cb797af"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CombineLatestStateMachine.upstreamFinished (cyclomatic 28): CombineLatestStateMachine.upstreamFinished has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c19eee4e0898b918e164d067c3e0cf5244ba3551495248f444c4a3078345a2b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DebounceStorage.startTask (cyclomatic 24): DebounceStorage.startTask has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad8e8084007ff49c1111b9ba34b3620cacf0bf59782a0df3be4dd38d9e963f2d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CombineLatestStateMachine.elementProduced (cyclomatic 19): CombineLatestStateMachine.elementProduced has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51d35eb4b0e61daa7323612eebdb1b84535783b230885ff23a96bd54a338d043"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.read (cyclomatic 19): MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.read has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"badd729018de96872b35677683aead565807fc8d03e5b110af9e25e886a2f17f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CombineLatestStorage.startTask (cognitive 48): CombineLatestStorage.startTask has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 10 (30 pts), if/else 7 (11 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05d335b8bd78dc3ac1baba98e0299875aaf3c96c229b1c99d315512c4dbc70e9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ZipStorage.startTask (cognitive 48): ZipStorage.startTask has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 10 (30 pts), if/else 7 (11 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1731c75e9209c50609eed26f534b0f42d14a917df512cf2feb09afa14f0ef18"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.read (cognitive 34): MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.read has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 5 (15 pts), loops 4 (10 pts), match/switch 2 (6 pts), if/else 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53e23b436c03199166fa888d5aed4d95df66fea519bcd1aed81e5a955b315fb6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CombineLatestStateMachine.upstreamFinished (cognitive 32): CombineLatestStateMachine.upstreamFinished has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (19 pts), boolean chains 8, match/switch 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b2033f53ba716a6bbdf0c9095375deacba7493e2fc51ff3f4d65b07c89d731d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"State.drain (cognitive 31): State.drain has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (21 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/WorkQueue.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67d4a8f06221a4e819970f079999a6608ca1a9193fe4c2a5f822ea77842ec8ad"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DebounceStorage.startTask (cognitive 27): DebounceStorage.startTask has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 6 (17 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), if/else 2 (3 pts), loops 3 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c2ceb506578688e52b80dea27b08355e8e25656e4c4ea5f06f926fa82c8253d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BoundedBufferStorage.startTask (cognitive 20): BoundedBufferStorage.startTask has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 4 (11 pts), if/else 2 (6 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80504ed665e933115048645bdf19e6d5f154067ac7cd3301d4217ddc9e910922"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Iteration.unregisterSide (cognitive 19): Iteration.unregisterSide has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncShareSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44a6f20890cb81efee16a23dedf65206775088c6fd9028d1ba61551c4567cb32"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Iteration.iterate (cognitive 19): Iteration.iterate has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (16 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncShareSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":425}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9159b02a219164675da77469b0147b64823e825508c3a3493c42e67a3f157ba7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Iteration.emit (cognitive 19): Iteration.emit has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (16 pts), loops 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncShareSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":489}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db5d5cd5f8354b43915fccb8c0f8dee3ba114a4c4736d89d33dc868df4d86396"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ZipStateMachine.childTaskSuspended (cognitive 16): ZipStateMachine.childTaskSuspended has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), match/switch 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a4406a9917a89e9ab4b28b0e66eb5680bb935eb715f32d2a08527ce85800d6d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AsyncWriterCallerAsyncWriterAdapter.write (cognitive 16): AsyncWriterCallerAsyncWriterAdapter.write has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 2 (7 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriterCallerAsyncWriterAdapter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"828d24882a8af805a20b869aa46d051084f396c01947ed244b39cf28566707ee"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 1067 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 567 over it, 2.13\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92ccffa7b6cc4daee35eeb575bb034226383a7bb446c7f41170e0ff3751646ee"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CombineLatestStorage.startTask: MethodTooLong \u2014 startTask runs 152 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 52 over it, 1.52\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29190e00cc3616264c4359877457336f5043f0660321080be52969073d1bb409"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 733 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 233 over it, 1.47\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e72d105b34f662d6528e121bfbf20d454c3a06b7872e28920665b616fa5e3074"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: AsyncSequence: TooManyMethods \u2014 42 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 12 over it, 1.40\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncAdjacentPairsSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df471f2365c3264e48cd288ebcf21d46e0622c3eeb831ec686c42aea87cd554a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ZipStorage.startTask: MethodTooLong \u2014 startTask runs 134 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 34 over it, 1.34\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91899166e576248ef3fe7ea80f25f97e7fdb5dc9ceb92fe9b5c63c2a9268b1ca"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: DebounceStorage.startTask: MethodTooLong \u2014 startTask runs 112 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 12 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad4d9554777c1b467b3c8b31ba1eb590d4844c10b2ad38b11d6bae0f7f483948"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: CombineLatestStateMachine: ClassTooLong \u2014 442 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 9 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.11\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ebf0d5d1a6584a849338aa9c0cf9dbaa869514b10da98517e0940e7920bcd6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (90 shared lines): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:129-378 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:119-344 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 90 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04d2d0ca73384989f3d44f7786a3d9d237d96ce57d86c0bf239358f010ac654c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (23 corresponding lines): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:221-252 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:259-291 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 23 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2d2248adbd5bea702ff64dbc60d2f2e5cad5246ce523929687d60e7e93c35ff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (35 corresponding lines): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:72-139 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift:67-108 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 35 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4e2279dba5f94cb8b7333492cb3006c6fdc21b98736b7780a5e11ee576608ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:93-102 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:104-115 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:117-130 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:132-147 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"149c85bb6fa26b2a9f322776924c002be39af47205c6ebfcb75bc5fae615bcd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (40 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:88-127 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:78-117 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:88\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:85\u0060 calls \u0060resumeContinuation\u0060, \u0060resume\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:76\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60712f8940b6c123f75d1a63d02b118c0cb7f1dc271ad7fcad72749bb1b5cd24"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (37 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:171-207 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:238-274 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:306-342 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:171\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38942a3c8d52ba83a8e84a76abe1c99ebfb90baaaca275ce8bc642fd3ef2bc7b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (35 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:105-139 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift:74-108 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 71 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:105\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060stateMachine\u0060 to \u0060inout BoundedBufferStateMachine\u003CBase\u003E\u0060 in one and \u0060inout UnboundedBufferStateMachine\u003CBase\u003E\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f81e0ff588a97dacc2e2eebb10d5d1ee1dc6620c0ddd0806e69955865b04f0c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:161-190 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:221-250 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:282-311 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:161\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98e3c8c1c957e0f9ca8124b7ef67bbd97a735747cb4519f24e41b83d50e3f315"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:156-179 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:146-169 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:156\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74d2b39d5487051aa58db3e6a8029fcaefd56ad7f7ebb7fabb88bbe3346c0e86"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201323 lines \u00D7 6): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:149-167 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:216-234 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:284-302 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:135-157 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:195-217 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:256-278 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:149\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f757eb1d09e80b17fe8893896ce3f76198bbcfd27a842842f744711cbe250491"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:23-44 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift:24-43 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 71 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:23\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c59319776d1aedb081b6c3dec682904ddf32f5fda676413fd40cef85b4139c37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:358-378 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:323-344 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:358\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:355\u0060 calls \u0060cancelTaskAndUpstreamContinuations\u0060, \u0060resume\u0060, \u0060CancellationError\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:322\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68d48016494864fd0c831d6e95b529ecd174633fc55290d4c6286ce2dd908653"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:206-225 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:182-202 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:206\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060task\u0060 to \u0060\u0022Internal inconsistency current state \\(self.state) and received upstreamThrew()\u0022) case .waitingForDemand(let\u0060 in one and \u0060\u0022Internal inconsistency current state \\(self.state) and received childTaskSuspended()\u0022) case .waitingForDemand(let\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f727c5fced8ce2369cf85e5fe7a420dc3323101c1be30dda2434af7ddf8c8c59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/FlatMapLatest/FlatMapLatestStateMachine.swift:219-238 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/FlatMapLatest/FlatMapLatestStateMachine.swift:333-352 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/FlatMapLatest/FlatMapLatestStateMachine.swift:219\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/FlatMapLatest/FlatMapLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":219}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe1e850a291082809f2fc985bc4c497542d8c21c1391c48aaba037fbae0edd36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:101-118 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:101-118 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d63a0e48585411b98147d26e438f0c9026be94fb287ffb8ac95d4c6163b13e9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:235-252 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:274-291 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:235\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":235}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f35435b6ec18d43c5c7570574a3e5c61742468223d1b7c197d064c04cdbe0004"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:57-73 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:57-73 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dd4fed6feac043d76b4b4d887e08d957dbe5c541c2fcdfe739a2201c047dccd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:83-99 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:83-99 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fdaae8e59ac30cd18b976c9fa67b69831aadbea7f285abf46b5d0bae2767fc1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStateMachine.swift:301-317 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStateMachine.swift:381-397 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStateMachine.swift:301\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":301}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73261be8584626d583dbbb69b29d8a91eaff7fb78df293feac3d09802c4627ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:34-49 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:30-45 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41c2f67d800323fb1c9a734270f30ae87881a1397ad34165da392d5978d19299"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:52-66 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift:48-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 140 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift:52\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92af37b04d1bcde504b57601e5a7e64699a803f31936af64efe96e6ae7188fa5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:48-61 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift:45-57 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStorage.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 71 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift:48\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5802c35067fc91277a06de6aedcd59601a3205324759bda5f49d98c480f3f61a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:197-209 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:409-422 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:197\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29be5590403a8d08b284095373c402f185ec68ab4bd7b74bb7ffca7e89bae212"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:315-328 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:304-317 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:315\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:303\u0060 calls \u0060precondition\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:314\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbfda2497870f9285064ad02c885a41e0506a50a8929cb426cbbb6d52255587a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:331-344 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:323-336 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:331\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":331}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd0fffc8e1549a3fe1be2ab2d85654adc1914224bf3453a8b1d1be2745f21324"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:386-399 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:430-443 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:386\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace610bbe6d44ac8d67fe0ae7c68f16973a99d2c3651b2cf603b226a343627fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift:335-347 | Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift:359-371 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8aedb8852064d4d6bcbd99cffcaca71f6ee09dfa5d7b4a1971e6828a9948d5dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:439-450 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:453-464 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":439}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2de532d8b643a2750c92e85b533ae3110a88a22b9e698086dcae061cfbe1a76c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:118-127 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:134-143 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:118\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:145\u0060 calls \u0060buildPartialBlock\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:129\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b52c0e5a1bd244339551ad849dae62c2e26f5363b4e62d0ced395d1068d93038"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/WorkQueue.swift:227-236 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/WorkQueue.swift:256-265 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/WorkQueue.swift:227\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/WorkQueue.swift"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41c4ff3a161f53c2bb3fc5b53498c78c7c3e9d301a17b1d1bbfdd23663ce50e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncStreaming/DuplexChannel/DuplexAsyncChannel.swift:92-101 | Sources/AsyncStreaming/DuplexChannel/DuplexAsyncChannel.swift:144-153 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncStreaming/DuplexChannel/DuplexAsyncChannel.swift:92\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/DuplexChannel/DuplexAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baa2bfae25ce750a41656ab4c1aacbe69956b355eedd8ea2308f2be9d31399fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:105-113 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:119-127 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:135-143 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:105\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:128\u0060 calls \u0060buildPartialBlock\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:114\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"561ddaca346c7edfa3b54ebac5a149bfad823551bf39441d030903b6492aba9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:504-512 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:516-524 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:526-537 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:526\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":504}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12a75b06722aa4680f27f99ff5c863f2345c15f430f8267ff8ad985b99e69f4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift:58-65 | Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift:108-116 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift:58\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"482d8654c9bfb2567e0160e9bacd46ef5872e80f0abec2f86b1f56e1b6bad341"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:94-100 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:106-112 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:120-126 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:136-142 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:94\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:113\u0060 calls \u0060buildPartialBlock\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift:101\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/AsyncSequenceValidationDiagram.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b679cf38e2f35a654ca659b99d5b7022cb89304512e95ce02786508a02745301"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStateMachine.swift:171-176 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStateMachine.swift:209-214 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStateMachine.swift:171\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/UnboundedBufferStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e2b87c7971d8abe02be12dbf3c663a7538e697bb40ead0dac4bcfb840821bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:230-234 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:269-273 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift:230\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Buffer/BoundedBufferStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ead33522a5751996f7b01d0cb82bb59c4b53abf6b3b0dfdd153b27028973d8c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncExclusiveReductionsSequence.swift:128-132 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncThrowingExclusiveReductionsSequence.swift:139-143 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncExclusiveReductionsSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ed9d7f77a368703251ffcdd83f424755f4df266bd7a8521bf2bfe84ee3b6b85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncInclusiveReductionsSequence.swift:97-101 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncThrowingInclusiveReductionsSequence.swift:101-105 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncInclusiveReductionsSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76a7e45734ad844ac6935d7436fadfd407817257e093e0ccdbeb804104daa6d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:75-81 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:75-81 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bf534a30fc55af71dca2e1f04d2fb0bc88ff275a744b0ee15eac7dac52e4c3e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:147-153 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:147-153 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also register a scope-exit action (a \u0060defer\u0060-style statement) that runs when the function holding them returns: moved into a called unit it would run when THAT unit returns instead \u2014 before the caller uses what it releases \u2014 so keep the registration at the call site and extract only the work around it, or have the extracted unit hand the resource back for the caller to register."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24045720d811aa7c17c6389873e6a17e025b296a3425e7908fe0105e0dea3152"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:170-175 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:170-175 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cac59723f3d836474114bfc9138b7d1a73a2bcc7eab54b27e402e72d3642b043"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift:177-183 | Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift:177-183 \u2014 \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncSequenceValidation/Locking.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. The matched lines also register a scope-exit action (a \u0060defer\u0060-style statement) that runs when the function holding them returns: moved into a called unit it would run when THAT unit returns instead \u2014 before the caller uses what it releases \u2014 so keep the registration at the call site and extract only the work around it, or have the extracted unit hand the resource back for the caller to register."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Locking.swift"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa2acc35eae5a4d354174501bc839cda692a5b2cb59c2fd7501b76333d5f0d4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest2Sequence.swift:76-82 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/AsyncZip2Sequence.swift:54-60 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060storage\u0060 to \u0060CombineLatestStorage\u003CBase1, Base2, Base2\u003E\u0060 in one and \u0060ZipStorage\u003CBase1, Base2, Base2\u003E\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest2Sequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f173f26a79b6203dec048e3ac6b7245c8956114e678a7c6144d0f248b9cc028"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest3Sequence.swift:62-66 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Merge/AsyncMerge3Sequence.swift:59-67 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/AsyncZip3Sequence.swift:43-47 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest3Sequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15319fa73434ecf9d0de580751ce4f62c11a2df03404cd0fca22c922237a6fe2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest3Sequence.swift:86-93 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/AsyncZip3Sequence.swift:67-74 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060storage\u0060 to \u0060CombineLatestStorage\u003CBase1, Base2, Base3\u003E\u0060 in one and \u0060ZipStorage\u003CBase1, Base2, Base3\u003E\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/AsyncCombineLatest3Sequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0f6f265a61f75cc915263e41e3a9c619dcd709281f008b1adc5088fd259e3c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift:89-105 | Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift:75-91 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Zip/ZipStateMachine.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 66 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40262161186d7863673f89187c9ee3e627a171ab04d02162131cb0783572b7d3"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: AsyncAlgorithms: AsyncAlgorithms: abstractness 0.01, instability 0.00, distance 0.99 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 2 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29a5dfbd722e52b5bdf5431eaf80b28c7318370671f9067ad8b797efcb4cd7eb"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Storage (LCOM4 5): Storage\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncBufferedByteIterator.swift"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dc4d348212f3a8ac23ec44c730ef8641f18278ab88e8965d2b13e4b70390411"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 Swift suite: Coverage NOT MEASURED: the Swift half could not be measured \u2014 the Swift suite in . produced no coverage export. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository\u0027s maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_time_equalChunks: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71d8df5a92cf0665f7b898e715e3ba5f8d7ffc569255a46418414b9efeea9a67"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_time_unequalChunks: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15e9f97b665169cc9ab63dbc52d54a988cf8b07d0ae25b16359031afb27c9585"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_time_emptyChunks: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"023efd82a2be529fa2bfb4d0649fc19ab3a133f76592b144420abb48574ed14f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_time_error: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd7dfb1665d8a3910169529bc12225e9572e4a52f0625f3297472422d072f038"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_time_unsignaledTrailingChunk: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0f728071eb005d5b110fa00baa1a6f0c17c74785c5973f83df471aeb516d582"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_timeAndCount_timeAlwaysPrevails: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6200e799cd0f158f35e7d0440e97d80e96f634bafced40b204fbceb403c259f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_timeAndCount_countAlwaysPrevails: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"539acb1cb9f082388867373941105826ad516677b7f793abdcfaf221446009a9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_timeAndCount_countResetsAfterCount: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ef1bcce17dbcb412dd59138dcb7ef162313e6205dbb62c7ae0f0b110ee2e3be"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_timeAndCount_countResetsAfterSignal: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"073fce7abce78c29ac2db3af3c1e787acb26a855b0ed8435ddaf79c761b59bae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_timeAndCount_error: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77cb623ed6eab75802e42d67eccc1da79f29a717fc3d133259110f7924599ac8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_delayingValues: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"708942823b3c0ef3eb3a5776cbe9ea46e1838307dd9abbe135cea58c60bd62d2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_delayingValues_dangling_last: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82e7f7df98e12ed000fdb973bfa9b6bd9572a3eb869df247cb33278b3668f45f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_finishDoesntDebounce: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c06b99e15348a8fc3c5e9b658a06e8e1d2e917c43f8b25bc64fe12cdf29ec2c5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_throwDoesntDebounce: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ffaadda8be3d1fef7edfd8ab622c6c08e57f328ad60786174b3adbe79e5e726"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_noValues: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30cc2857f8ed13a29e0bae5c4eb197c1958b3b1ffc97986920f5a11214a3d36b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_Rethrows: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94f8515823030b04baf3cbc18351e1ca939eb75bc10f7880654c7a8e6f5ee050"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_debounce_when_cancelled: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestDebounce.swift"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"572e33c7f111701615747e1887f0634ad5d1c3c1da60fe9e0961ea06baea6381"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_0: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6369532bf948ba8f4107872eb470c3568a6f8bd2812f0622b8ee9acae9b4ebdf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_0_leading_edge: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4055961e822786c2889d6ccb4660ef91a1a9d2dddb65b4ae2cf3ae89832ecf97"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_1: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adabd802cc584e53d598eb75f7af052affde7ddfaf374dfb8061d1c02391bb02"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_1_leading_edge: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f87226bb0079a52cbd845dce9087f7174feb9d6a8eb8abe69f661f4429cdaa9f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_2: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43f7352dc03a4203639936a55760c59409fa17f7fbf8ba829de8110675c2d460"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_2_leading_edge: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08273f0f2082542275fce987440c7d23067d92c48d409a09a9b3e34f674bddc8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_3: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"578cae8db0fe8e7ff97c3f32015b917f7cc4277404a1a5ccf6d975d415e0c43a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_rate_3_leading_edge: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3be9d86c951fce32df148aeaf3d7a5b64809add8d87cdd227f9aea00b74930af"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_throwing: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b98a0b0f7427e8fe5afa09091f77071734b6a75ef9585668c93dd0737f432524"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_throwing_leading_edge: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"286a5413d41448876700ecf883d0849604e662e4099684fa35683df65ed8df0f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_emission_2_rate_1: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c2a0b6f539069f079ba35ff5e3cbbeaeed263855bf39fd444229452431cf762"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_emission_2_rate_2: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecb3fa7df78779b0deab362991a327dce085dbb5e1315eaf113d7aeac3251425"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_emission_3_rate_2: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"482aa61628b7114e5b1628c0eea3ad530555533efc590acd442ecef0e766b26b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_emission_2_rate_3: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5893dd26c37394df06e00e4349edb79941e22044a8a351cc60f7c44827feeb0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_trailing_delay_without_latest: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"933d9dfb2860b7a41e2359a10e2d33a1e378d40e2d5ffe51ad0f6cf339154149"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_trailing_delay_with_latest: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestThrottle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a7ce746960164e0ce78b21569f6af689499599e8701e577051086ec8c551975"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_tick1: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestTimer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e02ad52e3bb699618959c5cf2c5c2565c7dc5f2f26000cfc5384f25377097327"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_tick2: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestTimer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcd2927f0c09fdcc2427d4bcc76b789b035b48eb04011c265402629ca5dceeb3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_tick3: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestTimer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2072713f763a3fc80c853febc0623640633e73a778702fd20cb1a48daee982f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_tick2_event_skew3: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestTimer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"befe9b54d90360d985a9666d09c7b5a36f90a5b3fd520c1dafc5c75d7e06033a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Skipped test: test_delayNext_into_emptyTick: Skipped \u2014 throws XCTSkip"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26dc1864c49f438977d441d61c87f731108db0d7f92d5ff1bc04881e3c8cb120"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_adjacentPairs_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestAdjacentPairs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88eed6f88df8ecbd64a269c3eb047df3bf6384e7f6b7f74392f9f404986bb6a1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingOldest_then_the_policy_is_applied: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0ab004002890e59d8ccb1a1ff37e85ab1c815bd58cfbc8065e46ee8e8550f76"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingOldest_with_0_limit_then_the_policy_is_transparent: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fb505f6d0ba66380c9eb64f98078d5c549838474e6586a2baaa3fc06fe0190e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingOldest_at_slow_pace_then_no_element_is_dropped: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a87f7105d7f925a3fd413cad30ab75ce3a49e646eedfa581e98707b26bdc5183"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_failable_base_sequence_when_bufferingOldest_then_the_failure_is_forwarded: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a262e9fc6a9c41f4b5f239db06ab1c1d7074dd1c066811b7f129a0e9b819883"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingNewest_then_the_policy_is_applied: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"295bef03846367d7b2fbf612989c02105fafe53e366e184da1300b0b7e85991b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingNewest_with_limit_0_then_the_policy_is_transparent: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1decc862b5d3c62754ab556e1b60df3d1f34ab37b462e33a6f59360f196ddd6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bufferingNewest_at_slow_pace_then_no_element_is_dropped: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e36ed464cf4bbe5b2ca74b54cccbf89cccfdbb418625ff62b54ea7c83908afb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_failable_base_sequence_when_bufferingNewest_then_the_failure_is_forwarded: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3112e16e85a769008872dedc2ae7ac1301832ad79494501e1b96f034b4b80b28"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_buffered_with_unbounded_sequence_when_cancelling_consumer_then_the_iteration_finishes_and_the_base_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d91e3a091d8eebcf3fd75065a19dac1954bb0b08416accb802a81ab9a022e369"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_buffered_bounded_sequence_when_cancelling_consumer_then_the_iteration_finishes_and_the_base_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":300}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2103ef1d65efb92b3cf56055a775bec2e17f7fc5297119b648f42b3a5f0898be"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_given_a_base_sequence_when_bounded_with_limit_0_then_the_policy_is_transparent: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":331}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccfa62ee10c45ba59480c42d219e07eae015a2344dacb044425e598aaf9534da"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_chain2_finishes_when_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChain.swift"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c57ba2645acdf24e329fb24cdd39ff64eaec10853342cf3de4cd0ecc06124b07"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_chain3_finishes_when_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChain.swift"},"region":{"startLine":176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"449b725744b9e7549a8e8ea4133120858959144d80a546f098dcb394528bed68"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_count_one: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24170c741816a0e3589a0ba9646daafd5fb8a0935c60b666bc4d758f473186ad"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signal_equalChunks: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d584c07ee413a9ef43e47f5cf68e03733ac290c4625b063f5f940a652340b126"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signal_unequalChunks: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ec31cc455bbc20d95eb74601fdcd1a25ba337a40b51c2a08b4c84ce817335ab"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signal_emptyChunks: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0116c7008a49736d5552b599bf468ddd1f42318e378e1f85b893298232041ff8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signal_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40f1e0b03f57e2387fcb88da9f0d6748874a8d4d870a36d47247c0617d5f84e0"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signal_unsignaledTrailingChunk: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df2a5c41fa6d818b19f1f8e01fb6ffb973352071f53666cc43b61921210bcc30"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signalAndCount_signalAlwaysPrevails: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a531d79efaf9ca8f66aab1aabef3aa4619a05e23a182ae808a854246c044141"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signalAndCount_countAlwaysPrevails: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffe09deee5d10f3da0d7825a900f9e42eb26f907349dc3faf6ec47cc2f4b2e08"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signalAndCount_countResetsAfterCount: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43bd02365078201ba39afa1a1827d943e2191989ffe792c8329df431ece48628"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signalAndCount_countResetsAfterSignal: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"428e54c14fdc6ed45379520a22e52b4760f3cbe438abc620e2b0e4876d072ac9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_signalAndCount_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3c75057806abb15bb787ce6aab11a97f6b145c12c9cd7413803c66be25a77f7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_count: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f90c2d239ce9531b3e418cc265ba22613251855d56fe2e55224adb0106fbcd7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_count_nonuniformTiming: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"321e05641fe2d310fa52a7940b484512b6aa6e17c230ed0c541ef6d11983c28f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_count_trailingChunk: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22a0428f673ee614f1a46229fcb6b6b62fd6d0a41eb0ce3d8d0ab504a6c82fb4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_count_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":262}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4f77330503e7087e2ccf9b14a718ad2ac421232ced4fc6f7700899837ef35a5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_group: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18fb916d785fc7579cf83dca04fad96baf2e3e92f0498925c2c3afc10f0325ac"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_group_singleValue: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0c1d0e14fba8668ac10eecac36b46f6c2dc5bec00f006cb04e7342d9142181b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_group_singleGroup: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":286}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"79baa2248421225c018ace0a0e51e35548751b0bd421830474acba0dec2c3b3e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_group_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":294}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74f04065c913acf76d94f2da064ace2016e93f5bfa888928239e5ddce07cbda1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_projection: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":302}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28bfb3ef1af76fc4984cc5d2faab25d7e4e660cd03dabb2d33391ce7f5d12df5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_projection_singleValue: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":312}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a5ef86b95c8f97409e5e38956ab22892987c62cb8e82d3e73a962e94443db88"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_projection_singleGroup: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":322}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b54daaf89c9355b143d8b0a85e9db9f17f3fe081d780ea644be137a067e2ec5e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_projection_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestChunk.swift"},"region":{"startLine":330}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97fb63593fd36a5a3a2296be472699267587cbca102304fb16e37fa2514511c8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_cancellation: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestCombineLatest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2eb4101d4cc487181d9b797c2a0c81526fad9cce65d7fbb458efc6cd72c8bf78"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_combineLatest_when_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestCombineLatest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":322}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16b9ef110bed7f70c619f715437efb73979b3c9f376dd612b623bab77b8f6e27"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_compacted_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestCompacted.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a7686fb8f4ff440b462ca1687bfbbf1b56ecaa9cf2877541f0632b1dab55802"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_concurrency_crash_repro: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestFlatMapLatest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":187}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b57dcaa126545cd4512c93f39bc1c251ba59c02284fc6847fb5df26fe2c8bf64"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_lazy_finishes_when_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestLazy.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a8eaee68f9f71e485c621621d7113e88abc2a704959ab35525c5efd2d31d0cc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge_makes_sequence_with_ordered_elements_when_sources_follow_a_timeline: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestMerge.swift"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6841ec015528a7e6f48b989d8639ce28ea6c8cc0f9a59bc863aee983d805c70a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestMerge.swift"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23229ad1431747aaf1184bf320086b2a4eed04a99fe1073377843d57d96b56c6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge_when_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestMerge.swift"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9449acf5ccc78d0bb859b8a2e502bf23efe07591cfbcab16cc400b089cbd340"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge_makes_sequence_with_ordered_elements_when_sources_follow_a_timeline: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestMerge.swift"},"region":{"startLine":514}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50bc183933548082c8b6837e5bb5da92745b9e800e4654ed716e9ba69fda651b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestMerge.swift"},"region":{"startLine":525}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"785cf49648deb59e6b00bffd2ebe0e385b78293a0e0840b4c8c30e1dabf5c215"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_share_with_no_buffering_multiple: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestShare.swift"},"region":{"startLine":176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f318b61cd1680cf554056d4fa94ec8dbc2149217ce9aa6d94ed7c4a1df5f7f2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_share_cancellation_of_single_consumer: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestShare.swift"},"region":{"startLine":369}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f0feaf9fe5e93c611ab3fdcb8cb10a366642be90b4b20f03743e79416e36aad"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_share_cancellation_with_multiple_consumers: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestShare.swift"},"region":{"startLine":396}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"624f3d7eb693a639768768368252d943d27a24e9d1f3dab9b418dea9512fe817"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_share_cancellation_cancels_source_when_no_consumers: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestShare.swift"},"region":{"startLine":440}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55897e1e571109aae9bec545d3f28c67fa7a9398abc8c34080447f61da21636a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc4dca664e11113c396b02a6b75a17db60bad8fca5fb8cdffc5f663a75888e26"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_space_noop: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"394d33b077ac5c83b9e497447b0a8882319f9b28aa825206457c30ab38567ca9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_string_input: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b18da90e7515d2f462644c7f21aef55fb019ac8da81eb25a747f5e39f7ef9e7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_string_input_expectation: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c60c1fedb473e5f7504070a578125f42e349713385674e7705d4ccf386e04b00"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_string_dsl_contents: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c691e30f1fad5c221694fe822b37aa4733e77f53e3e9a452042b4d8c8df0f21"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_grouping_source: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88690c76d3268c23b42d18ac4aa8b47ba925649c422569e1dca8e027a52612ad"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_groups_of_one: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"707028608778f2689a9a33977c5e5235376250a99a71173fb7c71b7aedc94657"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_emoji: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc348ac0b170963e22acf3a12e99bea710afef1f9d929cfc7c95622e9c1a91c1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_cancel_event: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf10733a35d302cafca84e0028b19da87e6638ab751943d4464c52e7d903fe93"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_mismatch_value: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a240a8e1d92193bdb533363b611fd32af56101a8bc3ef2204ebf09fdca778d9a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_value_for_finish: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19724312c953856219d0c292767de0a889fc207dd2afbbb68f424137f9a73dd2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_finish_for_value: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"342b6897f824965bd30db1a0c06e30ca061a2fbd2627806d80df413be7a04d52"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_finish_for_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3e2f42c27ef86744027de62eae55ff652f1c04b8c7505d148da5b55e4e04885"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_error_for_finish: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22ba6b028998d0fdea6a31e9d67879c244d81e0b0114010e739fa84f4d8ad05c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_value_for_error: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a9201ee1f12a2c0b5fb6f47268fb49e2cb9384fe2b0b19c0dd3f81d2de7044b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_error_for_value: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":181}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d47bcf511ea71744e76ce6d31f963440935c773499cbbbe3b6492ec25449b1ac"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_expected_value: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc9d779e8927f742c86d289be6b566210da70984a821320f4eb51480f102e03a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_expected_failure: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":200}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d58e38b5bc36a6ba52e6a3948a22a7240c6d8d4d5249b42a1f24d1066281c4b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_unexpected_value: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":211}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e6d2341cf13d6aa60567a493de4e480fe0b633ffb45dacf283d03c57a005b4f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_failure_unexpected_failure: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":219}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cda21ad214066c9cc845faca426943d17642350e49810a1ebb40bc3f24bb6ab7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_unbalanced_group: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37d19880e15d664cafd23a34221d25bbf844d4ac222e07b3563d951a17d3e4b9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_unbalanced_group_input: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee7654b3bc2bbd715b7c1ad41f61110d8218de79f5f93d3ba401da33d0ebd24f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_nested_group: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4540f8306200734b9815b0dc1f8de0deaf5c8cfa02cf4561efb1b8a081ebaa08"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_nested_group_input: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"332b6921787b507e3890c079bde0d38d828a8e8490626234060a61f76808ddcb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_step_in_group: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":262}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81bd9ed43cbe8192e3c791d152088ec6f329a52425896db10fcf9f9fd4431243"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_parse_failure_step_in_group_input: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":270}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"279f7f3333efa00b31ef7d5c9e52c98c8d814e99fc8591ca29310fec08b256c5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_specification_produce_past_end: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37c85a187c6bf5de7d58d974c27f4e093dff47385bfff4ef11225b4b814edbae"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_diagram_specification_throw_past_end: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":286}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13c380a373f4c784d12a2a70d08019df70668878f14e8685d52630c980e78848"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_delayNext: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":294}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d45be208455a445e27062beb14b67d1c4531170bcc8ea069616221d31dfa003"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_delayNext_initialDelay: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":302}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5628ffba6126293e64ddc86e52b35682b10b2a7050d2611b95e0590cefa4452"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_values_one_at_a_time_after_delay: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestValidationTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"469e763dda2979a451ff52885fc769083aa2558bd09d8118c63de78fb9d54557"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_zip_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24b3b0c069ea8836e9e2524c89045c8c98428d0915019bd5753ea7c01be8e91b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_zip_when_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7645de4a3f3a48c341a23b1366156b1bca18ebae15fec7288c944ef396545c0f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_zip_finishes_when_iteration_task_is_cancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/TestZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf26524ce9e76902b0ad2d4887fba220d64687453b77ff812945cecdec25e50e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_cancellation: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Interspersed/TestInterspersed.swift"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a64912627799c72897c4d623b9e1b682c88758803ce439e188598d95f8d81875"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testIteratorInitialized_whenInitial: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baf501b16baec561364e7c234b0fe4ac138f99ed628cb29eb7039596a77f89db"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testBackpressure: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":867}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75e283c076659ca366a4e01710dc89587962eebc1366be901fc014df44657ed9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testBackpressureSync: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":905}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8727ba893c8d2e3df7db32d50fff4217f8d4888b1b1ab8c6080ce6badd6eeab"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testWatermarkWithCustomCoount: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":947}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e206ed2ca779e33cc4ebc01ffa87573259c1d52ac1b46a068f85db9cb92767b6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testWatermarkWithLotsOfElements: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":965}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aacaf71bbc5a966980ff009742be3f70b2ab5beaf2dc19c44f79e049d07050b3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNonThrowing: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1047}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c67154cb2305bcd553c8e2024563061ae00909b2de33c02f66165d72be354318"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_channel: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d217a386adb9bcd742ef9e97c15c9571e71a20225a655836a72378a55eca1bc3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_throwingChannel: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e19434be3a07a14564254c64c149001d33fa14d165343b749ee41cb30a0e6583"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_buffer_bounded: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a48d96318c0d679e055b58945e21f3327b30301681ee305e2a9f826c7b9b37c3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_buffer_unbounded: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5c1b67ec99add657fe8903bab13a29484bf18badca1baa5ef4fa8d25c667043"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_buffer_bufferingNewest: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22e88215c862a056a9f14dcb18c70d93a0210a18b719acf746e0aec46f88455d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_buffer_bufferingOldest: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61a9a7f1e69fa0e1cc17015447a699df5c31ebcbb7dc0c58ff603be56b1b6e6e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_chain2: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35d9f926bfcde2c2464931276fd939ef08e50245c1acdc7626811d84d024e7a9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_chain3: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fdfc8ec2607873197204d501cdc36fa7164286e14e5f4dd053027f76b46b6d2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_compacted: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c255a482a221c2cb92c625aefd98f098108e72c06e9af4cf7ef5ddd0730dd60b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_interspersed: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9397c690e6e98e7e139fbeefbf2cc217d801f99253e975e497d1741c11bc666d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_joined: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41b71efb9e072122b6a9c6aba23d76f151552a462f38ee9bf39a5fdbdbdffd60"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge2: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5430c46fa7f0a90fd0d80f02cac0395b2939dfd38af7d48db22ceba9b8621f4d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_merge3: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f936bcf28f36ecbd528f4a181712c7571d4c847b3fa5a5aaf1a015e516792b11"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_removeDuplicates: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"746fc7037814ec5a06c0035b4a51df0d7c0626fbe834f2deb3e5ef5815c68cfd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_zip2: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3759166bacf7d636ca7ff4974ba6b70bd1f1ee291fdac4230e3626cd3960d36"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_zip3: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e68d0d58a8d8bd031f4d95d1f5ad5a20c87a36f78c09e87b4333a4aa23dd6cad"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: test_debounce: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/TestThroughput.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05a905a2f0064cfbfa4aafe51f2c94925d1585950e8633cf3f74aa03c820cf51"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testThroughputTesting: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncAlgorithmsTests/Performance/ThroughputMeasurement.swift"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27814f1c2fc73825981dd4b26465dcfcd82472350d56976580a1e14299478b34"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: finishVoidConvenience: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncStreamingTests/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ee1d68e3b3db47d3e49b0afa324b35ef5670be94428ba287ca79f3eecfa2bb6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: finishDeliversFinalElement: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncStreamingTests/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06efb1a854a6267d0449695ebd362699e016f75947e461b6873ad19dcef0ec31"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: readThrowsCancellationWhenTaskStartsCancelled: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncStreamingTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"838d096194e07fe33eba525fe437874646cfa0cd2c46d8ad57a7a1f3f1709c00"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: writeAfterFinishThrows: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncStreamingTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":501}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e9e08e048deb8bd95a7f9ac154c780baa5d7062257a1dcd78b3f5159a2444a8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: writeSuspendsOnBackpressureAndResumesAfterRead: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AsyncStreamingTests/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":533}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21daeb44b046a94d5c8e82e1fd5f90a7fdee35132510d09a12efbd9a1d9d7e1e"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 2 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift, Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"607f1c90f3439c1e5723b3684df5315a0e2bd8868f6226fe1f6ec37c28620a75"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 2 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (5 single-owned of 73 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 73 of the 87 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #2 (2 file(s)), anonymized user #3 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: remove when this is resolved \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/AsyncShareSequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":642}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3776435b82efdce49fdd58fcfaa1efd58227bfaa5e216ce19b76a391d4cd6e19"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: don\u0027t alloc new array here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Merge/MergeStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":624}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"305f42ca05eb1ee81dda8e0b5557c6955c10d0cc4da144ded6ca89455ffe5dcc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO:  This type is unchecked Sendable since the closure is actually sending \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1777}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be529abfdd5cf23b76df2ab13ceb0920ee283ea880db73c84075f767040ad8dd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This should be replaced with Disconnected once we have a UniqueDeque \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel\u002BInternal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1784}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ff6a6d6c16b60a70ec033b6c761bd51569632655f743e9bbbd7301ad260ac7f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable elements \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a86213bdce9db8b0c24a2ebb820f7ba363b50b5bf9f3d61c885e8706370dfc0b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable elements \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39b632586e927acb7a42251fe852874c75126041498df7f2ec988273fc3ed8ca"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable elements \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncReader/CallerAsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1956b3d6adecbaac5a870cb1f3a529931649e54ff860caa7efb319bfcb6619f1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable elements \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncWriter/CallerAsyncWriter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c63bd17f296e4253abf8f6c42b57eea6082260ff4aba37026d5830fd6fd1a70b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable buffer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab8950b4231577e767b0e23a861e84762bb7898ebefe653562952affa4e2d35e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable buffer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30a71cd91f76da6545d1a87e6a5f600fde19bbdf0c524186c10cd366d8ce1324"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable buffer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncReader/CallerAsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4abf1928f1da231e1d5df57630338e3307d93212d97cfcbf9d4fbff73f9c670b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable final elements \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ed43a47d499c14bb5cee21ae7d5923cbe1ce6b48b0075708f5284bdd648a621"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: The \u0060Writer\u0060 generic parameter on every \u0060pipe\u0060 variant in this file \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncReader/AsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd8d9ccc88d340116d939255191c155db34ec366b7c66adcb4c59f5b2d751034"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: The \u0060Writer\u0060 generic parameter on every \u0060pipe\u0060 variant in this file \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncReader/CallerAsyncReader\u002Bpipe.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a70242151d0566ec88f20af4667d14e5c76f6175af51edd716fc560231c4790"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable final element \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/AsyncWriter/AsyncWriter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"702a7e481500dbfb53293a5b967dfb450e42a86b37fa8e5e3e88dd277848907f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable final element \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncReader/CallerAsyncReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee630af3f254234f7c174100bc97fb31a9a7e58ea03e1bdbf707d9f366d301f6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Check if we should support ~Escapable final element \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/CallerAsyncWriter/CallerAsyncWriter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"503f305b0c45120a04b601da23787927938740ab607912f7448fc19dca90d14c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This should not be necessary \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343cff9574204e570daa8de141a7cf84bbfc8ce49a823c630355ce5c1363f7dd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This should not be necessary \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":342}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c07ee6bfde77c42e5072b45d8c8fd77903f02b868aa94355f968a1d398cf2cc8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This should not be necessary \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":362}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d082875547f64ec30716e13b86e492ea41f03713553e4c7908ca0b3431a6a4a4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This should not be necessary \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncStreaming/MultiProducerSingleConsumerChannel/MultiProducerSingleConsumerAsyncChannel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":366}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f2bc3b1b827c552834b1784d484051d9a2435a9e37c4de3b7b7e304e6ac7cef"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent naming for equivalent operations across related types. \u0060AsyncReader\u0060 uses \u0060pipe\u0060 and \u0060pipe(copyingInto)\u0060, while \u0060CallerAsyncReader\u0060 uses \u0060pipe\u0060 and \u0060pipe(bufferingInto)\u0060. The semantic difference between \u0027copying\u0027 and \u0027buffering\u0027 is not immediately obvious from the names alone, and the verb \u0027pipe\u0027 is used for both, but the secondary action names differ (\u0060copyingInto\u0060 vs \u0060bufferingInto\u0060).: Unify the naming convention for the secondary pipe operation. If \u0027buffering\u0027 is the technical implementation, use \u0060pipe(bufferingInto:)\u0060 consistently across both \u0060AsyncReader\u0060 and \u0060CallerAsyncReader\u0060. If \u0027copying\u0027 is the semantic intent, use \u0060pipe(copyingInto:)\u0060 consistently. (signatures: AsyncReader.pipe(into: consuming Writer) | AsyncReader.pipe(copyingInto: consuming Writer) | CallerAsyncReader.pipe(into: consuming Writer) | CallerAsyncReader.pipe(bufferingInto: consuming Writer, intermediateCapacity: Int))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba89d78a4abfbc986321a3749012714a5ab49754d7679d1a2545d3d0d9683672"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent naming for adapter conversion methods. \u0060AsyncWriter\u0060 converts to a caller-side writer via \u0060asCallerAsyncWriter()\u0060, while \u0060CallerAsyncWriter\u0060 converts to an async writer via \u0060asAsyncWriter()\u0060. The directionality is clear, but the naming pattern is not symmetrical or parallel. \u0060asCallerAsyncWriter\u0060 implies \u0027become a caller async writer\u0027, whereas \u0060asAsyncWriter\u0060 implies \u0027become an async writer\u0027. A more consistent pattern might be \u0060toCallerAsyncWriter\u0060 and \u0060toAsyncWriter\u0060, or ensuring the suffix matches the target type exactly.: Simplify adapter type names to be more symmetric, e.g., \u0060CallerAsyncWriterAdapter\u0060 and \u0060AsyncWriterAdapter\u0060, or ensure the conversion methods explicitly state the directionality if the names are ambiguous. Given the verbosity, the current names are at least descriptive, but the lack of a \u0060AsyncWriter.asAsyncWriter\u0060 (since it is one) and \u0060CallerAsyncWriter.asCallerAsyncWriter\u0060 (since it is one) makes the API surface feel unbalanced. Consider adding \u0060AsyncWriter.asCallerAsyncWriter()\u0060 and \u0060CallerAsyncWriter.asAsyncWriter()\u0060 as the primary conversions, which is done, but ensure the adapter types are named consistently. (signatures: AsyncWriter.asCallerAsyncWriter(): AsyncWriterCallerAsyncWriterAdapter\u003CSelf\u003E | CallerAsyncWriter.asAsyncWriter(initialCapacity: Int): CallerAsyncWriterAsyncWriterAdapter\u003CSelf, UniqueArray\u003CWriteElement\u003E\u003E | CallerAsyncWriter.asAsyncWriter(bufferOf: Type, initialCapacity: Int): CallerAsyncWriterAsyncWriterAdapter\u003CSelf, Buffer\u003E)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fedf906fe4166ac011d9afde5ee409bbd04170324f04d851c0278cfdfdd80357"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent naming strategy for buffer policies. \u0060bounded\u0060 is a general term, while \u0060bufferingLatest\u0060 and \u0060bufferingOldest\u0060 are specific strategies. It is unclear if \u0060bounded\u0060 implies a specific strategy (e.g., oldest) or is a generic factory. If \u0060bounded\u0060 is a specific strategy, it should be named like the others (e.g., \u0060bufferingBounded\u0060 or \u0060bufferingOldest\u0060 if that\u0027s what it does). If it is a generic factory, the other two should perhaps be \u0060bufferingLatest\u0060 and \u0060bufferingOldest\u0060 under a \u0060bounded\u0060 umbrella, or all should be specific strategies.: Rename \u0060bounded\u0060 to a specific strategy name like \u0060bufferingOldest\u0060 or \u0060bufferingNewest\u0060 to match the pattern of \u0060bufferingLatest\u0060 and \u0060bufferingOldest\u0060, or rename all three to a consistent prefix like \u0060policyBounded\u0060, \u0060policyLatest\u0060, \u0060policyOldest\u0060. (signatures: AsyncBufferSequencePolicy.bounded(Int): Self | AsyncBufferSequencePolicy.bufferingLatest(Int): Self | AsyncBufferSequencePolicy.bufferingOldest(Int): Self)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b235f4fe0169066d1002def9039d03d38731c332451e93839a396689d33aec8f"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (16869 LoC, 85 public types across 17 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"403dbfb06de9e3fd6d0bf327730aaa537cf15b02f54b18424ee0eee636a67c6e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f88e70f6c562a98fba0c21a5ee522f04ac782b551b43d701773885040c8bd706"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Concentrated knowledge decay: 48 of 73 significant files have no living knowledge, while the repository is still being changed at a low rate (5 commit(s) in the last 90 days) \u2014 so this is one repo-wide knowledge-decay state, not 48 separate risks. Counted over 73 of the 87 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. The code moved on without the people who understood these files: document them or schedule a read-through before the next change lands in them."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"008bd8d3156a7f5206da709f59f1f87af76671c6b9becea72c8c9cffbcbd4f8e"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Debounce/DebounceStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49fb4dccf9d6de2024c68d72c5631ccef5d4a78f4095b121d1681863094a1f50"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/CombineLatest/CombineLatestStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cb309d248aecec6d470de95e73e105b4a616ec0ae338ab0469d213f2c59ca0a"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AsyncAlgorithms/Merge/MergeStateMachine.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"013624237671d240e23d6cfa52adcfb43e0835ba9a35a3ff71cb5d23b7470640"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 863 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":3,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}