{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"ES1","name":"Fold determinism","shortDescription":{"text":"Fold determinism"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ES1"},{"id":"ES2","name":"Immutable events","shortDescription":{"text":"Immutable events"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ES2"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P5","name":"DR \u0026 Backup","shortDescription":{"text":"DR \u0026 Backup"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P5"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.deploy (cyclomatic 28): Deployer.deploy has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47b944f8146bfe928aa09bf6dddeb3a08628d5ba8884aec94bd003d2d0e91848"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LambdaRuntimeClient.channelClosed (cyclomatic 25): LambdaRuntimeClient.channelClosed has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c88c515d566a232bcd2b84637b8c651efda34de887433c1e0e7765cf0846a998"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BuilderConfiguration.init (cyclomatic 17): BuilderConfiguration.init has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72f677ca66c67327b993b3adae31c348d965c1b11334d900f5b4e416cf3bf465"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Utils.execute (cyclomatic 16): Utils.execute has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"995f45e0952daa842bccc99fed9a68687ad58743a984b25c639757f6a4f57f7a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LambdaRequestID.== (cyclomatic 16): LambdaRequestID.== has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/LambdaRequestID.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80c52fa534649ca7b302539b4fe516a20625394da3542f9dfc2e40503996a941"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.deploy (cognitive 71): Deployer.deploy has cognitive complexity 71 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (55 pts), error handling 3 (8 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 39). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea629a6e99ff11eb309d8660cd52ee72c000548dd978af6d2ae037a220a547fe"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LambdaRuntimeClient.channelClosed (cognitive 40): LambdaRuntimeClient.channelClosed has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (35 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71a5856a44edde5245c03e58508bf52bf11dea209cdc78fe964e6fd302ffe8ad"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ZipArchiveBackend.archive (cognitive 27): ZipArchiveBackend.archive has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (16 pts), error handling 1 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d555218fc98f0634d830aa4fbf832cd937d2b59e55309cfd96b54e1afdbfbcd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.deployZip (cognitive 22): Deployer.deployZip has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (17 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fb167b87a8aeeec3de9592f66030ba461a8b28012156643a0f38ef9d7e70367"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LambdaHTTPServer.handleConnection (cognitive 21): LambdaHTTPServer.handleConnection has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), error handling 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":245}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"539619b5cf21c2290bb11e153dd1c9eaaa245064a0a124afecc70f5658db86b4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LambdaHTTPServer.processRequestAndSendResponse (cognitive 21): LambdaHTTPServer.processRequestAndSendResponse has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9caea33a0a9f7edeceaeb4827475595919916ffce10415aaeb540b3f026932fa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContainerBuildBackend.build (cognitive 20): ContainerBuildBackend.build has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), ternaries 4 (9 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9d9d4273ec3eb6a8776a150adcd40ea75e58bc0dfa680cd3f465a42cfa771a5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.ensureECRRepositoryExists (cognitive 19): Deployer.ensureECRRepositoryExists has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), error handling 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BECR.swift"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b0f702dbc592908b2dcb958268c4195bd2bab9251ce650c38d76a4f928096fd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.createFunction (cognitive 19): Deployer.createFunction has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5845441afffd7c6b3e7ef2a6390f71c939a3af777e4e09b212fa180a43e7b309"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BuilderConfiguration.init (cognitive 18): BuilderConfiguration.init has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15, boolean chains 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"123e37a37eddb9141115d547a8c6a820a400b0572ffa98e4875066c6864cc4c0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deployer.detectFunctionURLUsage (cognitive 18): Deployer.detectFunctionURLUsage has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BFunctionUrl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70df3d8260f830459549702c495856e0886afe942713f5d184c4e1972c7b0f87"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Initializer.findEntryPoint (cognitive 18): Initializer.findEntryPoint has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-init/Initializer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8efe48766312de5b847ea0e8550d96e8b59f76834d4bdeaba68eb07d5d92fdaa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Utils.execute (cognitive 17): Utils.execute has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a97273f94e8ef78ff8212ee245c2f66c89023ec77e2d08639b1d65116b5e97d4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HttpServer.handleConnection (cognitive 16): HttpServer.handleConnection has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (13 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/MockServer/MockHTTPServer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f78eabd5f6320dcecc62cf7838dcd0e3771e98415772df23bde56b550910c11"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Deployer.deploy: MethodTooLong \u2014 deploy runs 158 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 58 over it, 1.58\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b12b54279c3ca13e5de17827f23e0242f5327c51fd607ba8cde9717961386368"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Deployer: TooManyMethods \u2014 43 methods, declared across 7 files: lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BECR.swift (11), lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift (10), lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift (7), lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BIAM.swift (6), \u002B3 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 13 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08aeb6a7106425fa4b9cb61900b1f8288acd9c56fc2dddcbbf43a34d157a8066"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Deployer.deployZip: MethodTooLong \u2014 deployZip runs 110 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 10 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48d5e8117cecec72a3016f8018d4bb63dbe18d8039e198f2dbb5cb450fc07370"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:67-88 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:195-216 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:67\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3797941ad71dcf214a6c7679f9666659a583075bcd8946f63def48141320b292"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:129-148 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:226-245 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:129\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8db77e661ff1409d0e637336b7f01107e89192c2b36ec5b2dc70c8afab3422a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:98-116 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:195-213 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift:98\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/FoundationSupport/LambdaManagedRuntime\u002BJSON.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cf7946905f18fb0f6486fff0b7c33f14daf6a244d72477f3083e9e0a67ca757"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/ManagedRuntime/LambdaManagedRuntime.swift:43-60 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/Runtime/LambdaRuntime.swift:59-76 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/ManagedRuntime/LambdaManagedRuntime.swift:43\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/ManagedRuntime/LambdaManagedRuntime.swift"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6171385ed88ea0753ae1d6073301e73e77e980859d45b20748282b3dd4113aa9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:146-161 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:229-243 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift:146\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BLambdaFunction.swift"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9bf9f007c902aa83198e398f8224197d4182aaab1fb598f9f6da4d137d5b8a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/Tutorial/Sources/main.swift:37-49 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/Docs.docc/Resources/code/03-03-07-main.swift:22-35 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Examples/Tutorial/Sources/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/Docs.docc/Resources/code/03-03-07-main.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 95% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Tutorial/Sources/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61bbcaa98163a4e7ff98be412455eaece1e0b40043c87e56a18a1dec0dc2c8d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:62-75 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift:38-51 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:62\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift:52\u0060 calls \u0060appending\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:76\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4ce730c5bf7a73454d5355beb907463ee1cf48c83842da0cacab8755cf184fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift:453-465 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift:484-496 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift:453\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":453}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af501f39b9e83f2642ac38e20d3fb900adc0286c68edbadc9001d95862209835"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/AppleContainerCLI.swift:49-59 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/DockerCLI.swift:45-55 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/AppleContainerCLI.swift:49\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/AppleContainerCLI.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83ef9b3f7ffa61f85d198c52522ef42beeaa569e12de783a42e6a318c6e00384"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift:257-267 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift:279-289 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf36584ae4e98c6c68715d265826390ce682ba2aede5ce9f8fa0d5ffdc0bd22d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:77-86 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift:54-60 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:77\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift:52\u0060 calls \u0060appending\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:75\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3f016adaa19c7dabb777cb079251587ac8ddb3172c5aba09e21a50ce236ad75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:162-170 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift:79-88 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift:162\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59624aea197eed8ec0dc3a9a6fe73a9258c99a955f9e81220de8a51bc42be663"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift:75-83 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift:122-131 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift:122\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1185da5b55bbd1b80d9620c6acec5b15e9522216bab004a534e095e0bb7578a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/NativeBuildBackend.swift:39-47 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/StaticLinuxSDKBuildBackend.swift:95-102 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/NativeBuildBackend.swift:39\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/StaticLinuxSDKBuildBackend.swift:104\u0060 calls \u0060path\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/NativeBuildBackend.swift:47\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/NativeBuildBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc7a7b9e80e20648eeb49097671d0abbd29811e06f0505a572b4f4b88d5e4f74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift:137-144 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/NativeBuildBackend.swift:67-74 | Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/StaticLinuxSDKBuildBackend.swift:118-125 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift:137\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/BuildBackends/ContainerBuildBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aef6235e7b19aa98570a94286cb11f070e8a23821204f3b6ed6d1c7abe39dd36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequestEncoder.swift:63-70 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequestEncoder.swift:75-82 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequestEncoder.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb1c8a740e681ad2b7debf3cc5279855c7b700180c14ac1c936220762cb993da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift:128-132 | Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift:211-215 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift:128\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1061c04e3fe5d1e5cca799c926a819747dbccefc78da80ce879325a927e821f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 3): Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/Streaming/main.swift:38-65 | Examples/Streaming\u002BAPIGateway/Sources/main.swift:36-63 | Examples/Streaming\u002BFunctionUrl/Sources/main.swift:36-63 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/Streaming/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Examples/Streaming\u002BAPIGateway/Sources/main.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 88% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/Streaming/main.swift:38\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/Streaming/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad8d7d09b3695cd7f3b451db4064da179595599e79b69b11124774cb4736c106"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/BackgroundTasks/Sources/main.swift:36-53 | Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/BackgroundTasks/main.swift:38-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Examples/BackgroundTasks/Sources/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/BackgroundTasks/main.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 93% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/BackgroundTasks/Sources/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"389ad84c8d5f7ab049493cf0f5911b0461dd9e0dc8fbf0c5088571633a10e124"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/APIGatewayV2\u002BLambdaAuthorizer/Sources/APIGatewayLambda/main.swift:19-31 | Examples/APIGatewayV2/Sources/main.swift:19-31 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Examples/APIGatewayV2\u002BLambdaAuthorizer/Sources/APIGatewayLambda/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Examples/APIGatewayV2/Sources/main.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 100% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/APIGatewayV2\u002BLambdaAuthorizer/Sources/APIGatewayLambda/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d0789a38fed32018de132d1613941b35ae4faafd93684b83ab8dc657cc1e33e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/S3_AWSSDK/Sources/main.swift:32-37 | Examples/S3_Soto/Sources/main.swift:33-38 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Examples/S3_AWSSDK/Sources/main.swift:32\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/S3_AWSSDK/Sources/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6c1245b59ebec444205ac35a8d1d40a9f1c94ede71ca5cc0d6cec03247cf927"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/HelloWorld/Sources/main.swift:20-25 | Examples/OCIImage/Sources/main.swift:21-25 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/HelloWorld/Sources/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74e72d8d04577bf37ec03fd015885289ce034812a501b1c8794d7eaf21d8418e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenant/main.swift:73-80 | Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenantLocal/main.swift:82-89 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenant/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4908adb7c31eb50517dbdbfd2a0217c8ec8c6c3a294bd09bb41c8983ba0e176"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenant/main.swift:96-106 | Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenantLocal/main.swift:106-116 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/MultiTenant/Sources/MultiTenant/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffd8edf24257a374e1be81062171a0537ac8ea2ac9be8b299432252c708b1f59"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/HelloJSON/Sources/main.swift:32-41 | Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/HelloJSON/main.swift:32-41 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Examples/HelloJSON/Sources/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Examples/ManagedInstances/Sources/HelloJSON/main.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 96% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/HelloJSON/Sources/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"549e1f735361be7d1cde474c6a97cb1d06411d9d983e6574a7a904fe77d18114"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: missingRequiredCLIThrows: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaPluginHelperTests/DeployerECRTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d084db2fdad8fd4ac88573a5a6759f12e22c01fd40f20b890f161c2ab409e436"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: flatManifestThrowsNotAnIndex: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaPluginHelperTests/DeployerECRTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":213}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"965f35aa1e2127e98bb657f43f8763568c6aa82087c4256bfe887b980eccb040"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testSendableHandlerRequirement: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaManagedRuntimeTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7267c0bbc80fcd16abf6b9b23abfc911ca95288b5114ab3eeccc7edd7d275d39"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testOldChannelCleanupDuringShutdown: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientChannelLifecycleTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"823c6e877873bba26c2aaec284be1886cfbc3ca70d28afbaaeddb08504a4a3c9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testShutdownWithMultipleOldChannels: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientChannelLifecycleTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f35ab610646bdeaf8fbe2e9e738e28c25e480b5373fcbde2ac38a9db42e8495b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testRapidReconnections: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientChannelLifecycleTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":374}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"defc7f10f7bbe70628c0c6b7388072fa0efe9d17a73b4796fdbc3877d5ccdf91"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testConcurrentOperationsDuringTransitions: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientChannelLifecycleTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":437}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4d4125090fa18dbd096b2f29b8e88f7c5a93fae600ce77b2d795999ffa682f8"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testStreamingResponseHeaders: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4446777f3c2d2e63d74031e3e7d0a80a6090558e54b1b7052a56a23965226f6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testStreamingResponseHeadersWithCustomStatus: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntimeClientTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da0dc2eaf42437c8996a39365652137c8efec5d22065bae34cb47fdd80377acf"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testLambdaRuntimeGracefulShutdown: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRuntime\u002BServiceLifeCycle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77dffca0a8fef5ff27075d984d2887954e626e9e2fa3037eae3ee82bb5c179de"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testPoolCancellation: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/PoolTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5de0c7725de6882f5a3c4ef4b954b6fe2ed732864fce679116b6233bd00551b2"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/APIGatewayV1/Package.swift): Examples/APIGatewayV1/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c97dfb5d90bc894fa8fc07e8cf0d50899c315b329bdc69817dc8380051c1a88"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/APIGatewayV2\u002BLambdaAuthorizer/Package.swift): Examples/APIGatewayV2\u002BLambdaAuthorizer/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2836d42dc699d9b774e8be917c2aac3997be786aad882acb386438d26123f6ac"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/APIGatewayV2/Package.swift): Examples/APIGatewayV2/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"357d6fbd8bc10c776abc84bf41e68779f2e685083458905141af6a2eb0a71271"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/BackgroundTasks/Package.swift): Examples/BackgroundTasks/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a94dafa78382d841f2b508df34e1e72e0b1179cee50d2b5f2b3101d73c53407b"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/CDK/Package.swift): Examples/CDK/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"430f1b34e22320b11a1c6f3cfe694d78d38752b44e1b52b58ee25b2567300b23"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/HelloJSON/Package.swift): Examples/HelloJSON/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f5c46acc53ec2e0883c7c2ba55345d3b0042a9ae02ad9f2487bb6d97bd0fca8"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/HelloWorld/Package.swift): Examples/HelloWorld/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bcee1dc56a6c50381170823af7b960c1d4cac3b65c3cff10cdbe33da15fc0ad"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/HelloWorldNoTraits/Package.swift): Examples/HelloWorldNoTraits/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e815dc34e4630a070eaabcfa2b722cea53cc1e8a3b143dd264f9db5e1e764638"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/HummingbirdLambda/Package.swift): Examples/HummingbirdLambda/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4fc3e90fce4c92c8366b2c325b42bb91daeb810c3bdc6557da6dfd7aedfe2a4"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/JSONLogging/Package.swift): Examples/JSONLogging/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62ceb02b3d5ec096b0e6c898d31c798d1ec7c3a23fe2976f83d321299444ee0d"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/ManagedInstances/Package.swift): Examples/ManagedInstances/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3fc397b7b7a1c7d5d9d0ac72f7c6bdcfaa395227d8e4b4d05bd11213776cecd"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/MultiSourceAPI/Package.swift): Examples/MultiSourceAPI/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"314ddd10ca40a2b1d07c33ee04ac6da658ecb8eb84e5fbe679af9e63bb17080e"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/MultiTenant/Package.swift): Examples/MultiTenant/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdcc8f670014327fe62089ea3ff454c80606fdb3d81349a367feaa5a45e53de9"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/OCIImage/Package.swift): Examples/OCIImage/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cad73482ec5154bb265dee93c803d4c7757e5e4ce7ec4aee2e439926385feee"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/ResourcesPackaging/Package.swift): Examples/ResourcesPackaging/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c739201aad74771fd8232f7ed28d973e7b670ab7374484b64bdb0292c6f92fc"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/S3EventNotifier/Package.swift): Examples/S3EventNotifier/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fca0d44d5cf187b3ac0b1287d4f0d09ee195627e79c74eef74a9914f90ae4ba2"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/S3_AWSSDK/Package.swift): Examples/S3_AWSSDK/Package.swift declares 3 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46876b35920fa4b8d49964c5e91252194ebd717038a7c15d180b2c223ee427c6"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/S3_Soto/Package.swift): Examples/S3_Soto/Package.swift declares 3 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf143dade158dc72840905132a5f97e4bcd1971533974ae0b5ce1181cc9fe045"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/ServiceLifecycle\u002BPostgres/Package.swift): Examples/ServiceLifecycle\u002BPostgres/Package.swift declares 4 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80007377e5ed82eaffcf3ee75637c54f8380d53204c4114b7e0e297f8e7fa242"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/Streaming\u002BAPIGateway/Package.swift): Examples/Streaming\u002BAPIGateway/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d5807f394e23fc6eba3bbb95b0bd25da1f77336ff4f75a17e937eba26d36e86"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/Streaming\u002BCodable/Package.swift): Examples/Streaming\u002BCodable/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12aae6fef50e66fe0eca50bc8e598a1837e2340041879d3e47ef6f2b9cfd5a6d"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/Streaming\u002BFunctionUrl/Package.swift): Examples/Streaming\u002BFunctionUrl/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27d75f528f7432309c89638ee11a361bdc265813e8ee53b4b6c73c7e89cdea4c"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/Testing/Package.swift): Examples/Testing/Package.swift declares 2 dependencies and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"090bf439b2d069e34a6d1acc714caa543b3273af786f39bf7e3f866f55e379f6"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No Package.resolved committed (Examples/Tutorial/Package.swift): Examples/Tutorial/Package.swift declares 1 dependency and no \u0060.library\u0060 product, so it is an APPLICATION \u2014 but no \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 is committed beside it. Nothing records the versions a working build resolved to, so \u0060swift build\u0060 re-resolves against whatever each dependency\u0027s git host serves today and two builds of this commit are not guaranteed to be the same build. Build once and commit the resulting \u0060Package.resolved\u0060. (A published LIBRARY correctly omits its resolution \u2014 SwiftPM ignores a library\u0027s \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 when the package is consumed \u2014 which is why this is asked only of a package that ships no \u0060.library\u0060 product.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3951898bdc3d487067c5d78a211f5c611aa3ad5976acbc8e4e81e15e71479cbf"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 17 in BuilderConfiguration.init at line 207. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 7 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-24..2026-09-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-24 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-22 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb63d92b33c102a62df32c2955ac017e754308649ec661b9cf805d7833310b67"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 28 in Deployer.deploy at line 109. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-24..2026-09-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-24 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-22 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7680d6ba8f9a144de472025fb5104d68d60113753c5cc891e29a9e8238f8c48f"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in Utils.execute at line 22. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-24..2026-09-22, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-24 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-22 08:42:54 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/Process.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdd0c33e7117392ce837b39d880e9524ffc8b614ef33bc0ff7856b46f425c391"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 19 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/Builder.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BECR.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-init/Initializer.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer\u002BPool.swift, Plugins/AWSLambdaBuilder/Plugin.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BZip.swift (\u002B11 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaae745063171031d93a883b2dc9129c06c4cce28feecdfb5a34d67a421c11f2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: I would love to enforce that the nsstring is not contiguous \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/LambdaRequestIDTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80d2f4b1c3bc36897884893addf9948f85692aafa7858de6fe483f9d66c3739c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: use Deque \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/AWSLambdaRuntimeTests/MockLambdaClient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed251d319bc05d9246c817a37bf76483c349874447791f4958d53eeae4823177"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: investigate and solve the root cause \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPServer/Lambda\u002BLocalServer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a9a463636ff69ad303e511c912ee56bdc75469b03a7a754f8fc14b5315755ae"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: the eror handling should inject these headers in the streamed response to report mid-stream errors \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a65791ffcbff63353a0b658d524d91d7dab0b85d4d3f7716e75d900ec0b1955"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This feels super expensive. We should be able to make this cheaper. requestIDs are fixed length. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb23f477a7f4b52abc94b6f41d854842a773dd656cf6f2c858ec5b381e02a112"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This feels quite expensive. We should be able to make this cheaper. requestIDs are fixed length. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":273}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63584ca2a5ed6eb939867049b2e6ca40f7d346266c64e95e235ae73349f0c530"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This feels quite expensive. We should be able to make this cheaper. requestIDs are fixed length \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dac0e9b08fa455df27c57f4d1cef17736ff652ba487710ba5f4aedb735d1828a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Write this directly into our ByteBuffer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/LambdaRuntimeClient\u002BChannelHandler.swift"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9384e35f9f18bb5d488d230afa3bf878e8a4949be82239c32fcd6bd89aa952a4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: remove this fallback when the AWSLambdaPackager plugin is retired \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-deploy/Deployer\u002BZip.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19baad0e0a4cd2e60c0d5296aec8b18cde82a235fbf4bfc88376df7128b5c3b7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: explore using ziplib or similar instead of shelling out \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83e2f091d8d0180cbf653769811d6155ddcca78fc184d2af66645b4da49e429c"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (9978 LoC, 136 module-visible types across 21 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e34e1f24f204a763a1ac19ce826d2b4dc277e369c4bc3e66e86b11d0d79f41d8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b848168ca289aeb10a6daa53b04e3164dba25ce0e55fa73c096bc2a9938dc603"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"692ba1f4bfec6692af3a1f152b8db001249e342e4742d393ff711be416c86141"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd9797b038392666e3316d3c980064d43f6ef34476adcf1e110d45b6f032aeee"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb85e8bc3c9b3c278e84597b0bbbed8771e5a8219fc0ee3a0539ef78feffab3b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8acd401b2ff9842f42a00a9bcd6554511530534d4ff2a3f887573d4fa978d268"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f88e70f6c562a98fba0c21a5ee522f04ac782b551b43d701773885040c8bd706"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"403dbfb06de9e3fd6d0bf327730aaa537cf15b02f54b18424ee0eee636a67c6e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09c73dc0ab4ef79abeb2428d351bdd42c86871563aaa369d32b44d5dfdd2ae8b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99aa266e1e832536c3b9e618770066a9b39cc394cded3a578a453e84d70ef91c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 4 of 50 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 50 of the 79 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/LambdaRequestID.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/Runtime/LambdaRuntime\u002BCodable.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequestEncoder.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequest.swift. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/LambdaRequestID.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc0378a855efb73b061c2ed9e706f474d22d1ed78e62b8705b733c3c27239707"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/Runtime/LambdaRuntime\u002BCodable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18e9f142e80b22a662ee1e1b9b1b702698797bf4d95bc6d000806f43a30cbf4f"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequestEncoder.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1f4aced4fbe2b828866575ee8cd59c442ba7ae7c0902b4f74c496a1ecd17f02"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/HTTPClient/ControlPlaneRequest.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e493ff645e9e4372d634151b26165c6a628a0d3018ce5af06d3d7380b5c8b58"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 8548 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".github/workflows/pull_request.yml"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No dependency-update automation: \u0060Examples/CDK/infra/package.json\u0060 declares packages, and nothing in the repository keeps them current: no Dependabot or Renovate configuration that schedules updates, and no dependency-review gate on pull requests. A pinned dependency stays at the version it was added at until someone notices \u2014 including after an advisory is published against it. Add a \u0060.github/dependabot.yml\u0060 with one \u0060package-ecosystem\u0060 entry per ecosystem the tree uses (or an enabled \u0060renovate.json\u0060), and gate pull requests with \u0060actions/dependency-review-action\u0060."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/CDK/infra/package.json"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dcf517091a90bffeeb2ea0277bdf5977fa3010005fe20c568d9f577310dd953"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"PF3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Sync-over-async blocking: \u0060sleep\u0060 is async and calls sleep \u2014 a blocking call inside async code stalls the cooperative pool\u0027s thread \u2014 one per core \u2014 and every task scheduled on it for as long as it runs."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaRuntime/LambdaClock.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a109a434e5bd237c3b69ef3f0478dc6fdbc21cadd6be8715b99ee1a6970612a0"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060error.code == CocoaError.Code.fileWriteNoPermission \u0026\u0026 FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: relocatedResourcesDirectory.path())\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift, Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/ZipArchiveBackend.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AWSLambdaPluginHelper/lambda-build/ArchiveBackends/OCIArchiveBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a08d480cd63673e6d068068166b1986ef58fad10acaa47a1d93418c98de6f5eb"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060process.terminationReason == .exit \u0026\u0026 process.terminationStatus == 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 Plugins/AWSLambdaBuilder/Plugin.swift, Plugins/AWSLambdaDeployer/Plugin.swift, Plugins/AWSLambdaInitializer/Plugin.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Plugins/AWSLambdaBuilder/Plugin.swift"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad2961abde7d6ce1fc1a0d75dfbbfe042a315f4c382a22601d7967f894d61101"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":11,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}