{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMDevice.getPropertyData (cyclomatic 42): EQMDevice.getPropertyData has cyclomatic complexity 42 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6259366e00b6b763071b1e76be4c918afa37bb233d7dfde2ca175a781a6adcfd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMControl.getPropertyData (cyclomatic 40): EQMControl.getPropertyData has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82893bce1d1fe81e7d97f48c4bca91d260d9f2e6c7639a500817ed2491daf818"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMControl.getPropertyDataSize (cyclomatic 31): EQMControl.getPropertyDataSize has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"160da89d5fe37a409438a6bce983d4b72d11525d1acff82ccd9e1ccf86e0d268"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.init (cyclomatic 19): AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.init has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/Advanced/AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"259390c79d82be7c2896123e252c47720d0472b96d1ac366470675a34717d8be"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ApplicationDataBus.init (cyclomatic 17): ApplicationDataBus.init has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/ApplicationDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb822a555ac0ffa36ad899eae0cf099e3d6cf4cf2b6f9aa4c430777384fbb517"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UIDataBus.init (cyclomatic 17): UIDataBus.init has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5dd821e780a89355586c18c4d89b9f1f848c7d6e7ad2c5d76476c2520fa132b8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMStream.getPropertyData (cyclomatic 17): EQMStream.getPropertyData has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMStream.swift"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61e03b45f9ae2053fe73ffccead91ca758430ff25012bd6bd22ec453f6d837cc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMControl.getPropertyData (cognitive 44): EQMControl.getPropertyData has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 10 (25 pts), if/else 12 (16 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":141}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"739973f0b5266e2484a97489cf867ad8e51644c23e74554c9c2f18dbe205a3d2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.init (cognitive 37): AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.init has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (31 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/Advanced/AdvancedEqualizerDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e091c786f95063384aa64954e7d4ad76b738ad6e6582d2b14ac2a6f5db3e6da0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"KnobComponent.mousemove (cognitive 30): KnobComponent.mousemove has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (23 pts), match/switch 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 18). Of this number, 26 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 4 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bec5372e0a92dde669a558a6eee2a8e11998456ee5cd7b916ab1a646087a6d3c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMDevice.doIO (cognitive 26): EQMDevice.doIO has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), loops 4 (10 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":584}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36fda11b0f2d841b3480888aa12757fa7399fd1c85c36c9dd8a7fbaa1c64c549"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMDevice.getPropertyData (cognitive 22): EQMDevice.getPropertyData has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), match/switch 3 (5 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0fd6d54463f3eb3a59228f8aac4f4a943bba278b30b12486bc3c84230e5d9d3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Application.volumeChangeButtonPressed (cognitive 21): Application.volumeChangeButtonPressed has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f42ce89b092031313d244f542c12537165ad6bb9bffc5354205807c8147b7a99"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMDevice.setPropertyData (cognitive 21): EQMDevice.setPropertyData has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (20 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":417}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c1ae9bf5c5a9084770f9f1b4cfa371bc6494fa383a803e83b6141514bd98be8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Application.setupDeviceEvents (cognitive 20): Application.setupDeviceEvents has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (18 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7b17dea1159cbeff9548cc9b6112a344398b2dd9304932e6c65044e36d29810"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EQMControl.setPropertyData (cognitive 20): EQMControl.setPropertyData has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), match/switch 4 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 9). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":305}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d9a065d9805e7585543e12f6a2a2a9fdea744fa8f933d690fb84aab405197e9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ApplicationDataBus.init (cognitive 19): ApplicationDataBus.init has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12, boolean chains 7. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/ApplicationDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83ab85d09fb973bd1de6c1e9cfa0de025bcaab457c88281d6df126e2ef296d26"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventInterceptor.sendEvent (cognitive 17): EventInterceptor.sendEvent has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (9 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/EventInterceptor.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"299b7833b05227acda92a334dbf2118871f55f5654cdda9127e862ab983ab9db"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Volume.gain (cognitive 17): Volume.gain has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (17 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/Volume.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9bfb736a855ab9e04a18f8e6bea2096c7e8bd9c6e3279d72fcff79545ef5bdd7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UIDataBus.init (cognitive 17): UIDataBus.init has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b4a5d1c22ff02419f4b36d1f558f57c193e5909b50fe32e49aa79c42d24b60d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FlatSliderComponent.mouseWheel (cognitive 17): FlatSliderComponent.mouseWheel has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). Of this number, 12 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/flat-slider/flat-slider.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7985da64882134310ddc3d40e3cab8d015dab6a550b5b2f47e6defbfbfdfd674"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Volume.newState (cognitive 16): Volume.newState has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/Volume.swift"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b38dbbff4941ecf78688603b0f7b305c97343ff12d696a60658e7aba03b2daf"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EQMDevice.getPropertyData: MethodTooLong \u2014 getPropertyData runs 133 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 33 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07ec0e0642c86643afead87fa0de94752c927c3ea737a0cf005c9739ba5aee54"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: UIDataBus.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 114 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 14 over it, 1.14\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77632a1b3839196d312c5aa47858b7e0bb6c8106293ecf6470fa7fa14515663e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: UIService: TooManyMethods \u2014 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7449fef9061645dac4cfbf2f485cb8b54f54a21baa4f1363c118d58549206b8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Application: TooManyMethods \u2014 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c46fc430750ec82a2a7fd1301208af69efec3777e92c5909fdfe96352677da1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: Application: ClassTooLong \u2014 413 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 31 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 13 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b832c1081dec7335176f158c132735e20b9d1dc6fe068c568d3072ace25b9fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22\u201323 lines \u00D7 2): native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:315-336 | native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:346-368 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c4aa56dc1d3aee001745a5c82b07b5185129e54cd1373e41afab57a2dd5ee2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): native/shared/Source/CircularBuffer.swift:109-122 | native/shared/Source/CircularBuffer.swift:215-228 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060native/shared/Source/CircularBuffer.swift:230\u0060 calls \u0060advanced\u0060, \u0060Int\u0060 and \u0060native/shared/Source/CircularBuffer.swift:123\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/shared/Source/CircularBuffer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d867133e234d6ce09e8ac25f1b835b99f257b81065eb5c7dc624af1eefcfbc4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 4): native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift:46-57 | native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift:60-71 | native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift:74-85 | native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift:88-99 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift:46\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Settings/SettingsDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ad339af1422a536aca55ad2c7c3e6e7a7efd8ca6b5fa55dba27da1dc03067f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:34-44 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:56-66 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:34\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f88a2fff6ded0cd57730c9e7221fb910548c352de7bae1e4ce6c344d924a83bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:41-49 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:117-125 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:41\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46b9d60830a058e1785380c648cd8bc5d6f34a8358d81a91a25735e238e0b24f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift:23-31 | native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:71-79 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift:23\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9de208e62da8697a2d9835f39764e9c17c1d3ef6d4a37ee6bed917659071955d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:166-174 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:176-184 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:166\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cffe11e10a61d5a0640659d0d69b81ce0b46b81094ff3fa9e7e2ab351e81052"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 6): native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:38-45 | native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:52-59 | native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:68-75 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:114-121 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:166-173 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:176-183 \u2014 there are 6 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 6 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:38\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba8bc4a052bdeaa083579c74253bc3b9896e77adbf580e96a24995278550e540"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift:20-27 | native/app/Source/Audio/Volume/VolumeDataBus.swift:22-29 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift:20\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Audio/Effects/Equalizers/EqualizersDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"741f062c14bd82fbbf28e715d4019625415b54f35c648f2ea4eb3e8c1848b9c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:143-150 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:156-163 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:143\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:152\u0060 calls \u0060dispatchAction\u0060, \u0060setMinHeight\u0060 and \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:139\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99686d76149d2bc519b25ab4e10e23cef88c765b5334dbff87c7fc494cd8eb3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:153-160 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:186-194 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:153\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54177a8f47f44059bb590038215c94c29b019ab906864dae0379dc9a7f89bc97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:143-147 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:156-160 | native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:190-194 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:143\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:152\u0060 calls \u0060dispatchAction\u0060, \u0060setMinHeight\u0060 and \u0060native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift:139\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/UIDataBus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a2fa229763eee50620fbaea99bee33f54688904803473d20f2bb59c251eb6d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:95-99 | native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:111-115 | native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:123-127 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift:95\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"133cee3483b0a30beb3dc5915ac8e427f38ab80975a0cab0531984210c9da0d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift:108-112 | native/driver/Source/EQMPlugIn.swift:37-41 | native/driver/Source/EQMStream.swift:49-53 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift:108\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c341b3108fb4f1123b7f4a0a8cdc24a42707b92836890b098d9b99747b22435"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: AppDelegate (LCOM4 8): AppDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/AppDelegate.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab0dc7b1b2fad633d8af8819552e0b72a8c62ba9b34efa6e36f5ffd5544f106c"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Window (LCOM4 6): Window\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/UI/Window.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5646a6ebc120a2873ef96f924cc0fbea87d071a7e1f5143178332c0a2c778f57"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: String (LCOM4 4): String\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/shared/Source/StringExtensions.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e0b6903a332fe8fe72b1c27235f2d5b7d73eaae3bc826e0aed53bd12dbb4d0b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Tell the user eqMac doesn\u0027t support this device \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":170}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7284c47a091f81378fb0072556c7c717bc36a21cefbd083e4cc8e8e32a19758"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out a better way \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72c2494c4220a7cd99be481dede6405b47c2cbd3dc28ff8fa7e54d55b9849190"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement uninstaller \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/app/Source/Application.swift"},"region":{"startLine":626}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7446de8324250ae8344d0864037d1ae898207098732b2be190f27dedafecb4e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Refactor this bollocks \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c4ee7d7d578718cd6aeb889b868d239d2e4d40343a448bd92068e4a5286b016"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Refactor this bollocks \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/basic-equalizer/basic-equalizer.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c3068264a4c5771a10dec200b29381332ea4ba808374230c11187e21ff51425"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 2 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 2.8/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (8120 LoC, 15 public types across 11 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 64 of 64 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 64 separate risks. Counted over 64 of the 192 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/icon/icons.ts"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfa751b98a9f4d4b138b544ec4ea90ab2ea2742e1fbb9039f73e0fa1b9f7139d"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMDevice.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40558d99b9f1a828f08e0216a480898b66c0e0f84efbfcbb5016642dbd323869"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"native/driver/Source/EQMInterface.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14a57a75f5e98eadb5a2fbf8b9226c4731f0ebcf884b7421aab218c32f37d5b8"}},{"ruleId":"D44","level":"warning","message":{"text":"End-of-life runtime: Node.js 14: .nvmrc declares Node.js 14 as this project\u0027s version file, and Node.js 14, support ended 2023-04-30. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2023-04-30 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9b1ab02cd13b776ab93f6ab09cbd470bfb4c9780f06e947bfa3f4a0bc6ede14"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cinput\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has only a placeholder \u2014 a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E, a wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E, or aria-label."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/input-field/input-field.component.html"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"116395151c12d5acf0cf02875ee80f16c4de22d1ba92e0d17dbc996350e311da"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in \u003Cmain\u003E."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca40d3a9bd0c21fea20f60fcb8b3dcb1891f417ade229c7a99fb7d2d661edb6a"}},{"ruleId":"AC6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard: This stylesheet animates but never checks prefers-reduced-motion, so motion-sensitive users can\u0027t opt out. Wrap motion in @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b1af1572d3964f86490fe4760df00f7e34d8cf0fc44e5f6c70fa02b4f5d2dee"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no a11y linter (@angular-eslint/eslint-plugin-template (a11y rules)) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 41 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P2","level":"note","message":{"text":"Logging is not universal: Only 1/2 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded \u2014 they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: \u0060native/app\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91a94e21d6d4d0e6a2003f94505b0b02b157176f0b24c4820f3f82b4447a97fe"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (5 clone groups): 5 duplicated blocks under ui/src/app/sections/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories effects, outputs, source \u2014 3 of them are reported below, and 2 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10\u0027s bar for an individually reported row \u2014 either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 5 and which does not depend on how exactly each block\u0027s copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 5 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module \u2014 a common library every sibling imports \u2014 rather than 5 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3c803a1a66e32cf4f978a848c31cefde85f2409564dba02420f79271529cccb"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (110 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): modules/components/src/components/flat-slider/flat-slider.component.ts:103 \u00B7 modules/components/src/components/skeuomorph-slider/skeuomorph-slider.component.ts:63 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 678 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/flat-slider/flat-slider.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eeff29f404e7b0cd2f5ebbe7d3fcbce8749417409e2643a12b03c9bc29bdbb8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (39 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.component.ts:63 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/basic-equalizer/basic-equalizer.component.ts:31 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 285 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52f723e5b28bc9a898eb3af95a598d9bc537daaf5b834225949f28a045ed18cf"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (38 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.service.ts:22 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/basic-equalizer/basic-equalizer.service.ts:28 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 264 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e0a7c62bfd451d04ef510a6657fc283090ddb59d1b5de0db166646dd37ed1e2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/app.component.ts:76 \u00B7 ui/src/app/app.component.ts:104 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/app.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2cbc7362c6e74e85574d881b57b7faab23b6aeb993618ffa1b65ef1a2cb0d9a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/source/input/input.service.ts:14 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/source/source.service.ts:12 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/source/input/input.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6521766f5be579d5842c6f7e885c7d758c0319fb0e893da4f7ad596bad5e2ee2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.component.ts:254 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.component.ts:272 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c971eb6b4e203ed8ace4b344829325f55de73308fe660d26a5dea5db5410b06"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/effects/effect.service.ts:4 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/source/file/file.service.ts:4 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/effect.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"615bc15d20e88c14473039b0355e1c7948abd4b65ecee29ac7031f98df391c3d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/components/confirm-dialog/confirm-dialog.component.ts:21 \u00B7 ui/src/app/components/options-dialog/options-dialog.component.ts:18 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/components/confirm-dialog/confirm-dialog.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9333fb11175792a68808a74b34404592e9c968848ee3da39e6539953e8b761d"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/sections/outputs/outputs.service.ts:25 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/source/input/input.service.ts:4 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/outputs/outputs.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2b4a77acf7e6f043b42c161aaeb17e87e4e7a9b890071579528d6eb9225ca9a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts:223 \u00B7 modules/components/src/components/skeuomorph-slider/skeuomorph-slider.component.ts:188 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4241eb092f1663577e99478f37d6733009ab6098700d7d2a4ff6e13f676e60ae"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): modules/components/src/services/utilities.service.ts:67 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/utilities.service.ts:67 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct \u2014 and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal\u0027s entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins \u2014 a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/services/utilities.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c53a9e59cc2b44e56e73d78790c3897515d1f6a61aada7213846e34eec5eaf41"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3 locations): ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.service.ts:19 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/source/input/input.service.ts:14 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/source/source.service.ts:12 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape \u2014 one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values \u2014 and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b35146625a170d0890f29536d54415a457b91d7bb063cca1b4afe9e7d22bc94c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4 locations): ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts:23 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/volume/booster-balance/booster/booster.service.ts:15 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:112 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:153 \u2014 the 4 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07273d4c7848857af4aa7d176c76781e2a879d183739ca25beb4a1bbb71bbf8b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:106 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:121 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d540dcf5a32dbef70887f95f6ec07efdf4ef5eab4ebed86c46f44c6e52569c34"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4 locations): ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts:33 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts:42 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts:51 \u00B7 ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts:60 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/settings/settings.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d9470d7c12271739a28c830e5100ee4c4aa2dcf743717a7df61ae638e1aabdf"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:218 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts:227 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/ui.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c74ebb41699984866da42906f2862e8674ad193705d21f3f95b98c0e3d53eae"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts:305 \u00B7 modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts:313 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":305}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"879cfe1c51b41270e7b677c23bf6965094f8b1b74c6d8316e476b91275b7f963"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): ui/src/app/services/data.service.ts:44 \u00B7 ui/src/app/services/data.service.ts:51 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/data.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a982761166e83cad64383afb65a0cd8de0254ac5f251da972133101caed16898"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function mousemove (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 26): mousemove has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 26; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"modules/components/src/components/knob/knob.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"284e55a12c5dfcf5615e69ad1b878b9e19ceac8b318d5c91026a18e632824220"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Test Coverage: 0% of 88 production file(s) reachable from 0 test file(s) via the import graph \u2014 \u0027production\u0027 here is the RESIDUE: every source file left once tests, tooling, generated output, config, declarations and declaration-only modules, fixture corpora, type fixtures, behaviour-free data modules, re-export barrels, registration/constant data modules and service workers are set aside, so the percentage is taken over a smaller denominator than the workspace\u0027s file count"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64e0e3511eb969fb4720b196e7d3799e1714077217351c3c56a27b50e3e21220"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test or typecheck script: test \u2717 \u00B7 lint \u2713 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53484d7d02bbf1aa1fb3d1163371a5b52fa0aa7301d11eed5ec2dc836c72924b"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~26 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 5 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/context.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"269a7fc57daf21e07d07ce70ee82532737675f3015b25d839a3307906f762b1c"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~13 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 5 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/logger.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d64ae7cf5aa24e25f8375cc95766712d22d01d653727f5efc259e6a06810ca9d"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~6 LoC): no import path from any entry point (2 application, 5 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/services/types.service.ts"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcad0309eb433b4c0ba5b71b552ba4ae0bdc4728e0f0398e48e98edf7ffd28a1"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@angular-devkit/core\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f822514a30111e42a2f4cb28eed51a8147a5a578f9378830bd998d1135eedaa"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@angular/cli\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13b30afc31701ef619d4cc3e9528586135c33f25ec499c37023bbc1c9cc40977"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@angular/compiler\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa1dca2a7734b4d0b6d20b1ce104b4ac966c7e38aa4f6e373428228e80607de9"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (4 files): ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.component.ts \u2192 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.component.ts \u2192 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/advanced-equalizer/advanced-equalizer.service.ts \u2192 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.service.ts \u2192 ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.component.ts (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 11 files)"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ui/src/app/sections/effects/equalizers/equalizers.component.ts"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"310e7c20f37ca811e12938203db73aacc1f703a5b61d85d8549aad2d0222e61d"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}