{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ShellTokenizer.tokenize (cyclomatic 27): ShellTokenizer.tokenize has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Of this number, 25 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/ShellTokenizer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab43bf5d1530e701ca04c729f7d07329cfb372859b5551162d2c64fb88f49b6c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Tap.validate (cyclomatic 24): Tap.validate has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"682928b15652f4bb44c66d7f6b4098c543310b3a483012a280e4d089488aa908"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AccessibilityFetcher.isTransientPointFallback (cyclomatic 24): AccessibilityFetcher.isTransientPointFallback has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityFetcher.swift"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b054a766feda391162e26e45caa12242ad78a8eab9ff630626c8f16ee5fda260"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.connectToReadyBroker (cyclomatic 20): HIDBroker.connectToReadyBroker has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 19 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0dfc7cd24472ed6e2a01b16c590ee6566c299a7f0a8dfe08e1304c1e01015cb8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Gesture.validate (cyclomatic 19): Gesture.validate has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aab50adb442a8e5dd50bcf84b452a5e01004345afb4ce24c3a2f11c4355a35e0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"generate-github-release-notes.parseArgs (cyclomatic 19): generate-github-release-notes.parseArgs has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/generate-github-release-notes.mjs"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f57bfb41b11468d7bf8989b8d5f215fc20300bd0588db3e64635043a7a9d01b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swipe.validate (cyclomatic 17): Swipe.validate has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Swipe.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fb0381cfce4c01069f9ca606417b7b3ac1d1ef1e3ce107275a793f808adaf01"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StreamVideo.streamCompressedFrames (cyclomatic 16): StreamVideo.streamCompressedFrames has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/StreamVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5eea465ac487f11fb0061b41f9f61f9f876e8b0093ac0182cee0a98fc30e3071"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.ensurePrivateDirectory (cyclomatic 16): HIDBroker.ensurePrivateDirectory has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0868d60c040541a47496128f3a14babf1973beaa10016809043e880f9a65537"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ShellTokenizer.tokenize (cognitive 51): ShellTokenizer.tokenize has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (43 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 27). Of this number, 49 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/ShellTokenizer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db0f8b2b4cf888d7bc7f4433dd5387259c2b8823abb81857a4f217b8fd56e9fd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"generate-github-release-notes.parseArgs (cognitive 40): generate-github-release-notes.parseArgs has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (38 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/generate-github-release-notes.mjs"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f3887c1259d68019a6f3a68873155ca0c3f7c69c3f72132754fa1675dc2b5fa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Tap.validate (cognitive 34): Tap.validate has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (26 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3efaf5925dd74a07300d39ed422c23c56264ffe56047f017dd0984f846b4d50a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.connectToReadyBroker (cognitive 28): HIDBroker.connectToReadyBroker has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (18 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 3 (4 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 8). Of this number, 27 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e485d0e0b5251cdb86dc5752704f5e5a5b618297d40996bf2fb4935d0a077c4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.handle (cognitive 27): HIDBroker.handle has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (9 pts), error handling 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (4 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58c39164181fc96b204fc0920298760a817c6d55f61f330c083f28858927e2eb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AccessibilityFetcher.isTransientPointFallback (cognitive 25): AccessibilityFetcher.isTransientPointFallback has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, if/else 8. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityFetcher.swift"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1db5d6f2be966a12a85f5187729c597192102fdd685edd31d71cb74c8de062a4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"generate-github-release-notes.extractChangelogSection (cognitive 25): generate-github-release-notes.extractChangelogSection has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (20 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/generate-github-release-notes.mjs"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f51cf70da699477263736cba30cbfa64c4d01549f4e6c88d5dcd151c4f03efc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Gesture.validate (cognitive 24): Gesture.validate has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"715fa988a0177ee8a10e9e7f4c0ee7c64bcbbd1bcf7ecaf5feaec512970c3d6a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StreamVideo.streamCompressedFrames (cognitive 23): StreamVideo.streamCompressedFrames has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/StreamVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e93703e29f4530fbe63d2f8fb5c4ba780c778687f60edb4359c11bc0ab8b1374"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swipe.validate (cognitive 20): Swipe.validate has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Swipe.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d4f1f9fb5b5d09ed7a28763719876644a095d57b7bbca4010ef9c296aa9bba2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RecordVideo.recordVideo (cognitive 19): RecordVideo.recordVideo has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2be6edffa0ef3af0d6adb90dcdb4e00e17651126cb814d9872eabd806ff2320f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Tap.run (cognitive 19): Tap.run has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04479aae6a25786217a87387b74b5d33945df22c6e7f364c89628cb8f31db566"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.serve (cognitive 19): HIDBroker.serve has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfa955e2c2c2392d095d08b7650297caae1107c938b06266bc4bfc53262c7a5b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"release-context.buildContext (cognitive 19): release-context.buildContext has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (13 pts), if/else 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scripts/release-context.mjs"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e37f2d1fcad1df8b0d63ecd824d862afdaaf4fedbaaa3a25a66289a0b3839f8a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GesturePresetsView.body (cognitive 17): GesturePresetsView.body has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10, ternaries 4 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/GesturePresetsView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64ed6d3f00cb5fbb11d5d6aff5abb7e805f97757bfa9364c6faa12fa8772333f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Drag.validate (cognitive 16): Drag.validate has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Drag.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a6ea0bcaedd5ec08957c7a2947f8a34baa0c2c997f77cad0029abdd5502b9c7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HIDBroker.ensurePrivateDirectory (cognitive 16): HIDBroker.ensurePrivateDirectory has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c101ddfdba0f93d08a2927d07cf3c025db78b7da66557110fd4c8a91873ac519"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OrientationAwareCoordinates.detectMapping (cognitive 16): OrientationAwareCoordinates.detectMapping has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/OrientationAwareCoordinates.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1cab26cdefa62f3bbc48da291a8aac0d864b7c01c0d66f95c16919604b2ad6a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: GesturePresetsView.body: MethodTooLong \u2014 body runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/GesturePresetsView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98ea8edc95955780d3b07804a36ebd41f8202fd00c9d9fd493541b79ea396f66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201324 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift:203-225 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Swipe.swift:128-151 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift:203\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57eec5d2f1ab01ec4b5a49f181f93d70956c6bd413c9cbb258a26ff4e0640d43"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:192-214 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift:70-92 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:192\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift:68\u0060 calls \u0060formatTimestamp\u0060, \u0060Date\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:190\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2b141f9f75c0bb6372c5d4604128f5e1536d3cf43024b33bb500ff09961c405"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift:88-104 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/KeyPressView.swift:97-113 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift:88\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"645447a3f70b39403e5e86f7b41baaa50ab3522b540312c1ef0f655da2f03537"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:45-60 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift:20-35 | Sources/AXe/Commands/StreamVideo.swift:51-66 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:44\u0060 calls \u0060setup\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift:19\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d238f9b6c5b4b1f7f7d5e515ee22fe528797ef14cdf3a1b93507a90a34da1172"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift:148-163 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift:71-86 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift:148\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Gesture.swift"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"812c2c56a3034e3561ac4807d2f41a7fc874c8959bcacfb54c5d85276186485a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:24-37 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TouchControlView.swift:46-59 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:24\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2d43a1a1baab52b391700e8b649c0243307f5c61e00305e95ee6fee7b71d917"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:49-61 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TouchControlView.swift:98-110 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:49\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55db13e22e806e1d7951e8b968b0d029aa865f14ce822e4c1c8bbf0fe0322b87"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:28-40 | Sources/AXe/Commands/StreamVideo.swift:34-46 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:25\u0060 calls \u0060Option\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/StreamVideo.swift:32\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97c3d4c35fa05913eef88f8294bc7e5b025e3423bdf207a2b5e7bd1aed44e663"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 3): AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift:15-25 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/KeyPressView.swift:17-27 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TextInputView.swift:16-25 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift:15\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/ButtonTestView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7443e515797c03847bbeffe86895e24b6948417d5fcaf1261abae867928f215"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:223-232 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:237-246 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:223\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:233\u0060 calls \u0060sleep\u0060, \u0060seconds\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:247\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5607283522f49711220701af3212ff894224d3cd2346b2a871351b597d364348"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:182-190 | Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift:59-67 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift:182\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/RecordVideo.swift"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2752c7af633ef6c76f1f04cea9aeb944029e8e02d509e6a3b9c425a0f5c937b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:33-40 | Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:82-89 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:33\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2af55ccb91e09b33e372a64b18cd94535a9bfaea17c9e013f8ba78a6fc36dfe6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift:115-120 | Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityTargetResolver.swift:124-129 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2b6e7258af7d44aff17c4cee0e953fb2c8f58904f8c1df564b19c1d8f84351a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:47-51 | AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TouchControlView.swift:88-92 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift:47\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/TapTestView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6be5411b738b3f4014599278b4edec014e7236c4e45d2273b4d0a3b206a944ed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:139-143 | Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:188-192 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift:139\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Types/KeyCode.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e528a3eaf8e3be2c18b136d52ab1616b20e8fde5bd8b31c90a34e091860ef24b"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: KeyCaptureUIView (LCOM4 5): KeyCaptureUIView\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/Views/KeyPressView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30727f2674c3a28fd1618089fae010f5495f82ed3b7f1a8ffae0e07504ef3616"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: fileInputSource: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/BatchTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da080e6b4e6949d260b819f61e7402b184073e493396f44562fef6ad1d8917f5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: homeButtonPress: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/ButtonTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd426ba1337c8ed127788e6a5bc49625c2b3c6e183dfdb585febb3de8d163448"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: lockButtonPress: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/ButtonTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"881f7ce3c8fe1c24069fcd6a217b56402bbcd0ec155b7272ffa46f344822520c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: applePayButtonPress: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/ButtonTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3280e25cdd6c1fae003e7e805f74cd421aaa1f3ee37d7348db537d184355f047"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: siriButtonPress: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/ButtonTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80dc2af18a497fe2feb58a63952805bc00e81fc7e51582852cd991ceed027b03"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: lowLevelDragRecordsRequestedStartAndEndPoints: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/DragTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c1724e2c470a84b1a5dc51df0d31928ed62ee887e5718f9391b17ee09ae4c9d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: brokerCleanupIsSocketSpecific: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/HIDBrokerTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":307}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee9cddfbc84b0c45e15261c6762ae34082d7904473522ab8da9295684a1633c9"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/ContentView.swift: AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/ContentView.swift changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 21 in ContentView.destinationView at line 46. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/ContentView.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AxePlaygroundApp/AxePlayground/ContentView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01fa0855ce30699a00b6d3e6895041c4710a172268a8ce6084deb003979baa5b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 20 in HIDBroker.connectToReadyBroker at line 268. 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01836a5996f1bf05d6878dac21b71064c0fe1ddde2257cae319b6ef0142c77ff"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift: Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in Tap.run at line 99. 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Tap.swift"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71c43e9e730aa7600861380aa7e0460dc18088c5fe9e21472d8fef6a1646bc60"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityTargetResolver.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityTargetResolver.swift changed 8 times in last 90 days and 7 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 11 (its worst body is AccessibilityTargetResolver.sameElement at line 265), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(cli): Render actionable runtime errors\u201D; \u201Cfix(slider): Clamp drag endpoint to application bounds\u201D; \u201Cfix(tap): Address switch activation review feedback\u201D; \u201CFix sibling switch redirection for value queries and extract duplicated polling logic\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityTargetResolver.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityTargetResolver.swift"},"region":{"startLine":265}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4fe107bf588cab3c6096fb2d505a4fcba9f39d145ce795559003d92d8b17b09"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift: Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift changed 5 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 11 (its worst body is Slider.validate at line 42), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(slider): Avoid redundant drag within tolerance\u201D; \u201Cfix(slider): Clamp drag endpoint to application bounds\u201D; \u201Cfix(slider): Preserve in-tolerance value at timeout\u201D; \u201Cfix(slider): Correct slider drag geometry\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Slider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a9a4c1bb898b1e22319172bb711ad0c5d0b0a791828bd0737392ad04262ea41"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/OrientationAwareCoordinates.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/OrientationAwareCoordinates.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 13 (its worst body is OrientationAwareCoordinates.detectMapping at line 139), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(orientation): Preserve letterbox detection in portrait\u201D; \u201Cfix(orientation): Avoid blocking screenshot probe output\u201D; \u201Cfix(orientation): Auto-detect simulator coordinate rotation\u201D; \u201Cfix(commands): handle portrait-hardware landscape-only-app (letterbox case)\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/OrientationAwareCoordinates.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/OrientationAwareCoordinates.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad461e40610c15c7bb1212751c1fdc5da9f94c99d06a62012c53ee094c13c61b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Commands/Touch.swift: Sources/AXe/Commands/Touch.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is Touch.validate at line 40), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(tap): Support switch toggle activation\u201D; \u201Cfix(orientation): Auto-detect simulator coordinate rotation\u201D; \u201Cfix(commands): translate logical coords to physical for non-portrait orientations (#5)\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Commands/Touch.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Touch.swift"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f5a8c8b3a01b4a9330795a2918cddbf888e1b2970513b4fc7a2f964f4b13b9b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/Batch/Command\u002BBatchConvertible.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/Batch/Command\u002BBatchConvertible.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is Tap.toBatchPrimitives at line 78), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201CFix sibling switch redirection for value queries and extract duplicated polling logic\u201D; \u201Cfix(tap): Support switch toggle activation\u201D; \u201Cfix(orientation): Auto-detect simulator coordinate rotation\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/Batch/Command\u002BBatchConvertible.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/Batch/Command\u002BBatchConvertible.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"118e2fc198e4dcd1b36787c48c0eacf5b9da7d3faaf994dc6d8de30a09e31acc"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityElement.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityElement.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 8 (its worst body is AccessibilityElement.isSwitchLikeControl at line 128), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(accessibility): Expose SwiftUI TabView tabs\u201D; \u201Cfix(tap): Address switch activation review feedback\u201D; \u201Cfix(tap): Support switch toggle activation\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityElement.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/AccessibilityElement.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd41230e4d660f7dc8fff7062be48700f244a301373e2d59cbaca03e4db8383c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBrokerReadiness.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBrokerReadiness.swift changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 3 (its worst body is HIDBroker.newestBootIdentity at line 39), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(simulator): Select protocols from target runtime\u201D; \u201Cfix(cli): Render actionable runtime errors\u201D; \u201Cfix(hid): Recover stale brokers before touch dispatch\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBrokerReadiness.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBrokerReadiness.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47a3a8b9c8763ca9ddbbc0fd818c2c740081e630db523dedb025f2b6348a4e9b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker\u002BConnection.swift: Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker\u002BConnection.swift changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is HIDBroker.acquirePrivateLock at line 139), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(hid): Curate broker failure messages\u201D; \u201Cfix(hid): Harden broker startup and liveness recovery\u201D; \u201Cfix(cli): Render actionable runtime errors\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-04-21..2026-07-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-04-21 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-07-20 13:11:04 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker\u002BConnection.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Utilities/HIDBroker\u002BConnection.swift"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c095bab859e7c3fc503570424dc2c0d82b571958173dc9efbbfc01af877f4b8f"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (9649 LoC, 139 module-visible types across 10 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a25060b6854f9cb00c6571233f954eabdf8638c6918ef67ab3c183f58bcabe1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed20d6ee10e95f2a99691be35e55f036f3de2e3c7d2e1263a86c95f13376fb73"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b31d968878b75f74c3539113277d53c1f42d0c762f2ea2963cba0c97b2de18f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93f934fe41fcba5d03e1fa0e014df02f0fe576c3362ae1f9e33ecb9ffde59b2b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"934af013fc7e7d1903605dd6335778f65196ba6f6a98afa8e2d2ee5a09d2db43"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c34a9d9c598d905db3ea3a9c02b60eca33c8f64ce67ea341c21f89fcd6b19b0b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d9eb0a8f01dc4e3aff9d93512623c5b532b79e481c9b54910936ac096ffacc6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49da278d630d5af3d4fc015d3929073c41726a69aeef780545013393c7767ccb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df646b9b8d6ce954f96dffcf6c6a6d36c167610e3cf5e9b4dc9e6f6ed85bc8d9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ae3ed184abbe02edf343b5971e05cda85d6332b3cc4baa4b527bf7271e581df"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f799989c4093e5ed104a5107865c223b2d03dc944a2d2459dc7050314a87fa70"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-214","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-532","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A09:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb7037f0b188dde9981c1798e9de4011a2d78236d1df5cf0a16040765ebcc7e6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2af481556384d63b98cabae2fbc3a0780588a6e3325964f4d91e3a003c6c298e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15b18921667ae8a32d33719fdae7620bf37186cd9f4f127b6ab8b1aa3f2222bd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dde8799d5ba41f7da5910b9f6e265a87be8ac9f19be3b1f414513cb44cfc2c1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1a72d8350a62fb046c53ba824125cbc303a5bdb5b20b1d50e15337860b28b33"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ae8c4d1409de746bf1ca2d3b0c53c651b64005dbe1835b23ac0d985c677daf5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-250","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd34071f0a37397b22950926e6e7d533f19a1ab2e35c80a3ec230eef7195ce4c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-250","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51deb5f11d29da72484d112de68af7e38e0a51818f441a6e0dd487a6031a58d2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38ab646050fbe5df770353937208cb757bd4b718e26c53b48bf8a835707a383b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac47803f16cdcc0e69b6257b9146a15a1fd4eaad52dd1681c89639eae5d5501d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-552","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d1047a04c6983a8f32d9a903749999e4ff242bdd8cf5863a84bf8f211612fb5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 1 of 47 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 47 of the 66 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/Screenshot.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f589d61c328e12ea741a93f75c29659ef19bea11ef32dd433caca44680764b3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eeb6c6b5ace7ba2c4193ff8399f2dbd903701aa14e3dcc912410287cae09ee12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d657599f6f99da1927d3377533dfc0888b34c4d84aa7d5579841fd72d0e39bce"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 27047 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".github/workflows/release-dry-run.yml"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No release approval gate: The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY\u0027S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under \u0060.github/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.forgejo/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.gitea/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.azuredevops/\u0060 and \u0060.azure-pipelines/\u0060, plus \u0060.gitlab-ci*\u0060 and \u0060azure-pipelines*\u0060 \u2014 with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab\u0027s \u0060when: manual\u0060, CircleCI\u0027s \u0060type: approval\u0060, an Azure \u0060ManualValidation@\u0060 task or an \u0060approvals:\u0060 block, a Jenkins \u0060input\u0060 step, a \u0060uses:\u0060 step naming an approval action, an \u0060environment:\u0060 paired with \u0060reviewers\u0060 / \u0060required_reviewers\u0060 / \u0060protection\u0060 / \u0060wait-timer\u0060 / \u0060deployment_branch_policy\u0060, a draft-release step, a \u0060workflow_dispatch\u0060 promotion, or a release-event gate. \u2605 What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy \u2014 all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c11e2dbd483b4b423b95ac61bfcc7af1d55351b28a20d2b1105b31cfe38cc60"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060index \u003C parsedKeycodes.count - 1 \u0026\u0026 keyDelay \u003E 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 Sources/AXe/Commands/KeySequence.swift, Sources/AXe/Utilities/Batch/Command\u002BBatchConvertible.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AXe/Commands/KeySequence.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd6119b7be1cee04df5fcd4f30e48f6833f854e439f682215eb0198cf22a9acb"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-214","guid":"b10ad120-fb22-1351-9348-aa23b453e815","name":"CWE-214","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-214"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/214.html"},{"id":"CWE-250","guid":"52ee12e8-390a-7351-b1e6-388afa694e54","name":"CWE-250","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-250"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/250.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-532","guid":"1cd8877a-76e8-ce54-b40b-779af23364a0","name":"Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File","shortDescription":{"text":"Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/532.html"},{"id":"CWE-552","guid":"3492436b-eca2-9c54-9ba3-5dade427c903","name":"Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties","shortDescription":{"text":"Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/552.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A01:2025","guid":"df693558-c822-0452-8f7b-4d53cb6bcc59","name":"Broken Access Control","shortDescription":{"text":"Broken Access Control"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A01_2025-Broken_Access_Control/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"},{"id":"A09:2025","guid":"78892bc9-3c98-495d-881c-8af1390d643c","name":"Security Logging \u0026 Alerting Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Logging \u0026 Alerting Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A09_2025-Security_Logging_and_Alerting_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":28,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}