{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NodeMethods.find_recipient_node_by_text (cyclomatic 37): NodeMethods.find_recipient_node_by_text has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_methods.rb"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0064b4d1f0f06deae2b3073fb9c1c956591311b73963a33b88d692e7d1401446"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceChainer.get_signature_data_at (cyclomatic 36): SourceChainer.get_signature_data_at has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e60f907a31f7363576d7505b9713bb1887f9afd0faf2358846221fea6052b54"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NodeChainer.generate_links (cyclomatic 35): NodeChainer.generate_links has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1abe62d241b9897d0e57870b49b6380113a612fbae16fc7b534e05cc764761a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ComplexType.parse (cyclomatic 33): ComplexType.parse has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":455}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8be9c91714df1682f4dbde326de3f3e3c1ea2f0f5235273294b8b850fe0bbfc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.parameterized_arity_problems_for (cyclomatic 32): TypeChecker.parameterized_arity_problems_for has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fdf371a998d6390867c93f30de00da1142e0fa87b9e595f222ae11dca442b37"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SendNode.process (cyclomatic 29): SendNode.process has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ff10be4c9b64c0ccea2468aa248df438bedb82d7b0b3a5892ee5a2da7468112"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.method_return_type_problems_for (cyclomatic 24): TypeChecker.method_return_type_problems_for has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fe849877cd50dfe83b89cfeb7d07e4e08ccd47436b880442035fd57c5893aba"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Conversions.convert_decl_to_pin (cyclomatic 23): Conversions.convert_decl_to_pin has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df0d62eec786cd5845482e4e6a0a44813be45dcd2bd7ccb6f902958b47d98a58"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Method.documentation (cyclomatic 22): Method.documentation has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10e64b057d02906ea1355ef9c5ef3eb587881a856a2ad51a5f9f1e3a9db6099b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Source.string_at? (cyclomatic 22): Source.string_at? has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source.rb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44c0ab764d1bf1f839ae9aa02c24e8ee6c5d02c78670209c5345a6deb3dbd247"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.signature_argument_problems_for (cyclomatic 22): TypeChecker.signature_argument_problems_for has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":447}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15492a1d0939866d4f1dc43ce2d465c4ce7330855223c58f63bdefb82723bd8c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceToYard.rake_yard (cyclomatic 17): SourceToYard.rake_yard has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map/source_to_yard.rb"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e388519cbab814d3e2dc2cf9e73cd525a19ce5cab5483e7e1d973a52648434c5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Initialize.process (cyclomatic 17): Initialize.process has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbfd62dd93dc1cfd35bce80d722f955516b1eb2d84f46f87e96a08c3062e4717"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RbsTranslator.to_parameter_pins (cyclomatic 17): RbsTranslator.to_parameter_pins has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_translator.rb"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80df6f0e9c57b60e952ea7e53e491511b22f5135cfad665e3c5ae9954d1d4f44"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Shell.profile (cyclomatic 17): Shell.profile has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/shell.rb"},"region":{"startLine":371}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5379a7554052c2c4e554810d0e9c8f7558c618adf017a1357c148637cea3a73"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceChainer.node_from_position (cyclomatic 17): SourceChainer.node_from_position has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"573b9169f1914062f07bdb780b939d11774dc0019582c829487bb07e66e95c21"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Conformance.conforms_to_unique_type? (cyclomatic 16): Conformance.conforms_to_unique_type? has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/conformance.rb"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f028c6c61ca8805abeb107263a76de745f7cebfb4c6ff473a1321980753edd00"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Clip.code_complete (cyclomatic 16): Clip.code_complete has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source_map/clip.rb"},"region":{"startLine":193}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"253bbe4d3212021c81c6318cdf463cc5b19bb75a784d4a534b41b1332cab2b08"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.variable_type_tag_problems (cyclomatic 16): TypeChecker.variable_type_tag_problems has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f21b829b248b1c8ba4759256b74e1d674f4b93de3c96cdf934b52c34499a43ef"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.parameterized_arity_problems_for (cognitive 65): TypeChecker.parameterized_arity_problems_for has cognitive complexity 65 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (55 pts), boolean chains 10 (nesting depth added 32). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":743}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef594bce9ee4fbc516830b9e8e313c97ac58faa0edce9d5f87ad1cb45458b792"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceChainer.get_signature_data_at (cognitive 57): SourceChainer.get_signature_data_at has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (37 pts), boolean chains 16, match/switch 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e18d884f36f3cbdb5ea85207e124361f7c67cc3f10945eee7b0f8b440ef425da"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NodeChainer.generate_links (cognitive 47): NodeChainer.generate_links has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 39 (45 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9280648973c38488cd4a34282322eb1c03af41c9da6a5f93eaa080ec0c986c2d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NodeMethods.find_recipient_node_by_text (cognitive 45): NodeMethods.find_recipient_node_by_text has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), boolean chains 15, loops 7 (10 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_methods.rb"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"614e164bf52650873a7b4c9b66c690a7b08dcab78a3e4a9af274b3baab1f208c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ComplexType.parse (cognitive 43): ComplexType.parse has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (34 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":455}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10847a2e43213e4c651810b89017a13774a8c17b71d8019fd65886ae3ba30d16"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Method.documentation (cognitive 42): Method.documentation has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (35 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3db8aa484777dae9bfb745cb5c8e98b28be107d004cb91951ebe6ba2ebc3ff8f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.signature_argument_problems_for (cognitive 41): TypeChecker.signature_argument_problems_for has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (31 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":447}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29803f5a91e7d51e817292ca5831327a751f997c8121fca694015e2a11003899"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.method_return_type_problems_for (cognitive 40): TypeChecker.method_return_type_problems_for has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (30 pts), boolean chains 10 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93174ba96b3ec1c6658546f7c8205b7b96d906698d6f2cdd3292580394316d8b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.variable_type_tag_problems (cognitive 37): TypeChecker.variable_type_tag_problems has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (34 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8ab71df217afd2cd6289861358f9264f4e058aef29ad64709634ec602ed4533"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Clip.code_complete (cognitive 33): Clip.code_complete has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (24 pts), ternaries 2 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source_map/clip.rb"},"region":{"startLine":193}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57992f946a22a5a8ffe1fc02e4447c2beaf1f6b8f4ace009b8fc4b50a8a5de7c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SendNode.process (cognitive 31): SendNode.process has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (21 pts), boolean chains 10 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16a12579d99e81ec57de8fb8a48636de65fc9855f954cf8e4ec222ef92b9b997"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ApiMap.inner_get_methods (cognitive 28): ApiMap.inner_get_methods has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (25 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map.rb"},"region":{"startLine":801}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0589cb546515917a6842a4c02d40131745be21ef5eb6653f4ee1eb3bd4d2b62"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Constants.inner_qualify (cognitive 25): Constants.inner_qualify has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (22 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map/constants.rb"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a09d11c526e92f48e1e58c3e611e04c05667a0af309bbb03bed97190d79fd71"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Source.string_at? (cognitive 25): Source.string_at? has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), boolean chains 10 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source.rb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cc5a0c123ac5d79893c495cf8ac4f33ef3e9c66429d52a0fde2f7ff8e2bb92f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Conversions.convert_decl_to_pin (cognitive 24): Conversions.convert_decl_to_pin has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28f75a780130872f7f9fb351e4afc0a9efb8267b922fcfa5f38e558a68eb8bd6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceChainer.node_from_position (cognitive 24): SourceChainer.node_from_position has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (18 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d78e0ea369408040fa7b0fc9e2bec662d0be4c98f9bb42f38c9979b40c90a0d5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Shell.pin (cognitive 23): Shell.pin has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/shell.rb"},"region":{"startLine":313}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56dbf02797aa1bb88c0aa28023a155525f562c065387bd5da68fbf22709e7544"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.argument_problems_for (cognitive 22): TypeChecker.argument_problems_for has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":386}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a198f12c6416c4d221496309a18cdd8f107045e3ee22c5a5c868c264b150c21e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Shell.profile (cognitive 21): Shell.profile has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/shell.rb"},"region":{"startLine":371}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73f2c1c7a2dd79f8142a3162e496182b65a2a6e34d7df27b0e9440a8bffeea9f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UniqueType.parse (cognitive 20): UniqueType.parse has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8a17f2a44c2701a102639decd242ce435b2fac859896201adac620ed667afbc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NodeMethods.find_recipient_node (cognitive 20): NodeMethods.find_recipient_node has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_methods.rb"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be1ef55a70d5e7d1c0f5dd41cfe50d32c4afa279645da2d4cd0494109574415f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.call_problems (cognitive 20): TypeChecker.call_problems has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":323}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c3ae27633f26c46bb0121a38b320a9a272e34bac1f0038216b74e5b314ad7b0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ApiMap.get_methods (cognitive 19): ApiMap.get_methods has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map.rb"},"region":{"startLine":425}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"101540627e79fdd82c7e5da6a75f862545ee019cae01d1a975869c7ec68849dd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SourceToYard.rake_yard (cognitive 19): SourceToYard.rake_yard has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (13 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map/source_to_yard.rb"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7806b448a9828e7f832ebc3be5cb0cec642ef4eeb73a05d091cceb89ed69cd00"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Store.get_ancestors (cognitive 18): Store.get_ancestors has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map/store.rb"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d887534182f42471a51ef792db0b34e3271b2ebb1cbb2e75a0564ff4fdd45088"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CheckGemVersion.process (cognitive 18): CheckGemVersion.process has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/extended/check_gem_version.rb"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0af4eeaf976216616986ce1a372bceb1575431d3324083e328a1bc758a7f2ed9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeChecker.kwarg_problems_for (cognitive 18): TypeChecker.kwarg_problems_for has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb holds 7 of the 34 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 138 of the 429 points over it (32%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (lib/solargraph/source/source_chainer.rb at 51). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":525}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baa8fc52edb510d105881e5e4a8a7250cc8230deec6d17024fa13a21e71f0c0a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Shell.cache (cognitive 17): Shell.cache has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/shell.rb"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0e7f72e1ce7c88d2db273ea2320fc5bb72b85c47205b2786bf5ca99e384aac6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Call.inferred_pins (cognitive 17): Call.inferred_pins has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/chain/call.rb"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc50a7a47d4ea383786e2404c9423298ab33fcf2ae1e26f526cb5a0c87a56716"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UniqueType.resolve_generics (cognitive 16): UniqueType.resolve_generics has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":445}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b58557c0de88607bcf267d689470f147b912e1152eb02bbca7f19c4a8d4e3f8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Initialize.process (cognitive 16): Initialize.process has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07fc532cb38e94d2dff515c6d122b46593d4dad73621de8292ae2fabe68e51e2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Chain.infer_from_definitions (cognitive 16): Chain.infer_from_definitions has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/chain.rb"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d3bb6da850b7ca89f76ebd3fc5e1b97567f58899381a0cbcc1b2084390e5da5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Call.match_overload_type (cognitive 16): Call.match_overload_type has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/chain/call.rb"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be272aafe07262bee8d78f92eb6ac194f8b6b9d343ff02ba658f9f027b65c780"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Mapper.generate_pins (cognitive 16): Mapper.generate_pins has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/yard_map/mapper.rb"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2975eefefb8469a5d541c4d07a4cbea3d426ad451380f6af55f85c71dfe1c47c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ApiMap: TooManyMethods \u2014 72 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 42 over it, 2.40\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map.rb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38e80d85b76647ec6ba551a23f33cf6bc8be77c44e0c17e61e0bfdad90619f33"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Base: TooManyMethods \u2014 71 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 41 over it, 2.37\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/base.rb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb03fa6b1080d4b95d454e2a54849e7b51b5ad426bb72304d44464f178c837a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Host: TooManyMethods \u2014 67 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 37 over it, 2.23\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/host.rb"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd22cdb936bd1a77aa2453a12ae1e8384211184457fb633185925db6ad139e9c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Method: TooManyMethods \u2014 54 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 24 over it, 1.80\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbb184e50f1956e4f616c0961205b45ce2e693cc37c2474af1e3cb52f63ac4fe"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ComplexType: TooManyMethods \u2014 52 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 22 over it, 1.73\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6c26d98a8daaef85e38f8a7421c03a41790bac246c1c12f75e88fc117a5e10d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: UniqueType: TooManyMethods \u2014 52 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 22 over it, 1.73\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"673cf9def7c869eb10609fe9473bdbc93f5e2577647a474b9d0ae0ce3d1317b6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Library: TooManyMethods \u2014 50 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 20 over it, 1.67\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/library.rb"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36f549bd64a8bb1aa95ef5bffb4d13592f5035c56072d6a9189be5af8d9b5e60"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Store: TooManyMethods \u2014 47 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 17 over it, 1.57\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map/store.rb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a75ee61ad98622374de142b6ff811fa4530a3fd866e47942e381877c6de493d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: TypeChecker: TooManyMethods \u2014 43 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 13 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"568f34d516c8c4197ebae22a783788f30d451e2637b0424f4e3eeeb133c32da4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Source: TooManyMethods \u2014 40 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 10 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source.rb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37a40ec5b366f0c0fd77e35670b29a619a754845defe560002db77ba1d97055b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: solargraph/type_checker.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 608 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 108 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a168b075e1ee7358f5f02274cd43acd1ed6b0d54d1c7028cb9f5f1abcc09ade3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Conversions: TooManyMethods \u2014 36 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 6 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cba4a81a444252a124d09c2bc2c438293ef00429095bf705cca5855e4366df7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: solargraph/api_map.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 583 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 83 over it, 1.17\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/api_map.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea5a5544bd8c8ae6ee650d2e41aa599c5427648fadd3ae754c0f220d45aae6a0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: pin/method.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 559 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c77f824caa258f680d3f02b18ae20ce9459a15cc83f1734a5e00b64a606f7c0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: rbs_map/conversions.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 532 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 32 over it, 1.06\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f02d39309d013dee4c55e5db5ecf170ccf7658b9c3acd0762481f1ab0151064"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: language_server/host.rb: FileTooLong \u2014 524 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 24 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/host.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e51f7689caa7ef68aa32f0dcb2d28e52c5f417392dd44d28617a6418d0ab36ee"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Parameter: TooManyMethods \u2014 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/parameter.rb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d69be0d7dc5e2cc5bb3dcefc7b26608042963f17552fd85e06aa09bfed63389a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:310-321 | lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:323-334 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82813b527c52657306c4b4f402ebe7b4e88f0f82af98e6346ea1b3dfe3849476"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:336-347 | lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:349-360 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:348\u0060 calls \u0060tags\u0060 and \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb:361\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":336}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df3ae8480228b671ddfa19d6600118f06426fab4af96cc81dfd2d74b50d94374"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:407-415 | lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:673-681 | lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:690-698 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:407\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":407}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d8f59570c15850fce41074051e4ef5e685ac7e61abb2a9477ae90b37a6e83cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/parser/flow_sensitive_typing.rb:28-36 | lib/solargraph/parser/flow_sensitive_typing.rb:54-62 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/flow_sensitive_typing.rb"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13974e1b7eef1e62ed784301e99002b874c6e5b71aee59fbe0cbe5315f21e57b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:564-568 | lib/solargraph/rbs_translator.rb:115-119 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":564}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c69495bf8f61322c05f2273a4502ac260cdf54ecb0ef5b2c94ef640ae1756c50"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb:351-357 | lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb:594-600 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":351}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d29cb8dd86e18ea1e347cfb5073fa09e69e2445a0a1e12e5dc4edc4348e6b01"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb:385-389 | lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb:115-119 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"939d910e7f57f435f778785ab099bc37a2ba36f427440af87d95f9dc280bdb2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb:41-45 | lib/solargraph/convention/struct_definition/struct_assignment_node.rb:42-46 | lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/casgn_node.rb:26-30 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"831b1c2c65aa9a89f5439c1b0efb4302bb9923c9bf8ed041b84f659408d3ccd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb:52-56 | lib/solargraph/convention/struct_definition/struct_assignment_node.rb:53-57 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6f62758db7f3d8beabcf0a15dc5ab85cee3b40df37aa809a0a13e78a83a7362"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb:27-36 | lib/solargraph/convention/struct_definition/struct_assignment_node.rb:28-37 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/convention/data_definition/data_assignment_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89ee59f3c2cf17858e1a228d7c40e35cccc3e833a8eb538ccfd555a719fb9008"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/cvasgn_node.rb:9-18 | lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/gvasgn_node.rb:9-18 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/cvasgn_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf766834329edbae9dff57ff27530aa8a1c12b2443104a7a157ed71075b0a9fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb:786-790 | lib/solargraph/rbs_translator.rb:105-109 | lib/solargraph/rbs_translator.rb:198-202 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efebe610ac8059e9840fd838d769d48d62cb038b2ab9a309e3d5432e10bd5832"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UniqueType (LCOM4 5): UniqueType\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d989bed27f25a571cc8236660f605484932f86425f6f9d15b3f864c21017123"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Method (LCOM4 5): Method\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a405650c6676e93fdd21abf346cfd6eb63149ef6a0ea41b518359bd5f81a859"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb: lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 29 in SendNode.process at line 11. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 3 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-22 10:49:55 -04:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-20 10:49:55 -04:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dae792bdaeb2b8afc9876aaaf8a18d4c7e2a14f8609a1b01c94729789f42743f"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb: lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in TypeChecker.method_return_type_problems_for at line 142. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-22 10:49:55 -04:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-20 10:49:55 -04:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1fd5da3ebab55c89be9d194f8c09677df75e1f38a3bc73b4264361411d18089"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # @param directory [String] TODO: Remove \u0027\u0027 and \u0027*\u0027 special cases \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/workspace.rb"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"402dc5774a695eca056a87d7f514b364003694b2014ca88ecd55b6d9854ebce9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Kernel#raise signature is incorrect in Ruby 2.7 core docs. \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/type_checker.rb"},"region":{"startLine":795}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"903b8dd1c085330a8cea3633bcb7d4d366c505bc133f7e9e2c268acdac6f431f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: # FIXME: unmemoizing the document_symbols in case it was called and memoized from any of conventions above \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source_map.rb"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"908c0af2fab75f0faa6df1d39316328305fd097c90501958b8c8065ca6cfbc1b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Pass a dummy code object to the parser for plugins that \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source.rb"},"region":{"startLine":516}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cbfe38538ad02936e6fdd0c3698fe212e8b89c16a8805788f44e05ce4aa234b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Pass a dummy code object to the parser for plugins that \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/base.rb"},"region":{"startLine":742}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b52ebad8feadd73de182becd1b244446771125fbccc0a2330a2ac2ce893939b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: for language clients that exclude special characters from the start of variable names \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/library.rb"},"region":{"startLine":279}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c11c2484ebbb943249fd614f9c21e799e83af7f999169b1cd4daf9326adc413d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: # FIXME: lsp default is utf-16, may have different position \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30e43e3516f50bf199c0f9cd8cf0ef012a1e87e75be0cefe9e19b23a9638cbc9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Smelly instance variable access \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":472}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92db3cae8a6277db4f269daab3738dc8f04b50c00625e771cee9f6d6c986255c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Smelly instance variable access \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_processors/send_node.rb"},"region":{"startLine":495}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2edb34a3f2db5b9b325444ea07e68bcf0eccda24afd876ede3cf8ea67af9c1fe"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: the \u0060return_type\u0060 of a constant is Class\u003CWhatever\u003E, but looking up a method expects \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/delegated_method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9693483f02558b409bad3c1bab41c01f1f05f3345d173262d0fa37e10f2a51a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Avoid a NoMethodError on nil with empty overload tags \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/base.rb"},"region":{"startLine":736}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7e1108bb09fdcb060fc9c6b2a049dd962547bc47a4251ff4a5cc189ed87d12b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Add Errno exception classes \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/core_fills.rb"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5d40f9eac09b724d041ff49537af6287b846184f9e1029b59ff0f655646197a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Using :hidden to keep interfaces from appearing in \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57456cbc795ec62b2b29f231ede62ff5f4e4f9b809c27ed88db8f497a58744c1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Fix autoload issue \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source/chain.rb"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7781c794fce597b823559db17c9b76771eb87dc2d0926711173aad21040be7f1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: Improve magic word comparsion == \u0027\u003C::Symbol\u003E\u0027, too fragile \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source_map/clip.rb"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cbeb4d55966b88d28eb128ef51d21c050a75416ae1f9f904d1f459be55fa67a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Exception to return BasicObject from Class#new \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/source_map/clip.rb"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c37f9fbb5e5ccffbdfc2c6b2eab66f482c92cd754ac0b9feac1d601e3c477eba"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Evaluating gemspec files violates the goal of not running \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/workspace/require_paths.rb"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7370dfd92b66713efb73dcedb5d44e811ef6c398a00d996a5f87ca19113a7079"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Skip \u0060nil\u0060 and \u0060self\u0060 parameters that are sometimes emitted \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/yard_map/mapper/to_method.rb"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af7849ccca6567a869beac4771b14ace83ac621914e53eec3cbd62cb2b50e8f8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: Give the Host::Sources thread time to work \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/language_server/protocol_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7352f7eb438ae075ff0ddfe6fe03e8829f9f2bb719e62e5495efb4388f5ca5db"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: # HACK: The directive doesn\u0027t work if it\u0027s not attached to code \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/source_map/mapper_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1d8d254238cb6b7a43c7b555ebaea9865e119118901543ebae5e4e46cd7a8ec"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Typo in class name: \u0027Defintion\u0027 instead of \u0027Definition\u0027. This creates an inconsistent naming pattern compared to other classes like \u0027ClassDefinition\u0027 and \u0027DataDefinition\u0027.: Rename \u0027DataDefintionNode\u0027 to \u0027DataDefinitionNode\u0027 and \u0027StructDefintionNode\u0027 to \u0027StructDefinitionNode\u0027 to match the standard spelling used elsewhere in the API. (signatures: Solargraph.Convention.DataDefinition.DataDefintionNode | Solargraph.Convention.StructDefinition.StructDefintionNode)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2f59060b96afdea376b7ef755bfd7152c681d2afe4a2cc4f02a38b24e0f62a5"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Ambiguous naming for method resolution. \u0027get_methods\u0027 and \u0027get_method_stack\u0027 appear to perform similar lookups but with different return structures or depth handling. Without documentation, it is unclear if \u0027stack\u0027 implies inheritance resolution while \u0027methods\u0027 implies direct definition, or if they are redundant.: Clarify the distinction in naming (e.g., \u0027get_method_definitions\u0027 vs \u0027get_method_resolution_chain\u0027) or consolidate if one is a strict subset of the other. (signatures: Solargraph.ApiMap.get_method_stack | Solargraph.ApiMap.get_methods)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5699855315d91b0fb36578bea9a403ff677011855851e47383ecdef7ea300d5a"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Method name collision across related types with potentially different semantics. \u0027get_methods\u0027 exists on ApiMap, its Cache, and its Store. While this might be intentional delegation, it creates a confusing surface where the same name behaves differently depending on the layer (cache miss vs direct store access vs full resolution).: Consider prefixing or renaming to indicate the layer, e.g., \u0027Cache#fetch_methods\u0027 vs \u0027Store#query_methods\u0027, or ensure the signatures are identical and clearly documented as such. (signatures: Solargraph.ApiMap.Cache.get_methods | Solargraph.ApiMap.get_methods | Solargraph.ApiMap.Store.get_methods)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28613b3a822daced8f797799d64c83a9b290405f4fe4d992e566b5cf76c6ca9e"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (23940 LoC, 946 module-visible types across 35 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fc27fcc95231cc95cca3162910d4781fe08a99bf588c87c619619bcde4f2edc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c2333a12548d48cf9311e75685d6ed89423d664b48602ad9b47d1d8695cf461"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25373d4e55da6f758ad4d4f15440cd642701d0837536154ae5939b25bf40b98f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a131ca8c48631ec3d31550860d346647049fe5c95953ee882099bf6a1683fe07"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"555c7add5a470a8e3df879934ac088de61a164bd19c71d68b5c46e4d977f602d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35e5e35ec1c5fb829107f5752720cb8d8a064bf6a80a8d52f25c2f0341b43d58"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54405f19c32b7b72eccb3626a2b131884b85bbc964eec2eec1058808b27b6aa0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb33bf97524ff7c4fbc0964aac916be3aa50f6a044c4fe0151ab7e76722063ef"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f69c984b7ea19fd70d511c536845c9fea04019de152846b2ce104edd7cb4a29b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cda07ecfe2579e7a648750cbf8f78b390decc9d6da286ebbe4b6a7d5f3130d84"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a0faf9310627a800105a9e5e9c8e624789387c23c0acda5409f3e58a3b271af"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d07d1b387d7b9cb0f5a315735a2bd84eefd511e60d460dd3229cdbfd74ecb85b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa12220135029655a74840fb7ed7f10d052483fc9583c8720e9ba6ae4be11dc4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48846a9a1c30799ab931913740637585d38791b4bce1c5a2f145949c14fbf4fb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d84e83e2f240c6b6b569870c2d108c71198cdc21c1b4aef96d0800960e8e67f4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80227450fc9f424108aa11c599852184cecbb807b9185d57d78c6e9472580cc6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1dd264801676836e8887d33d505f896a5a9991b74bcf9740636ea034ba414fc5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c3c5f83c8f56024bd937354a7a9cc669268df12ee0d8fb2f62dad4fe6d908b3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83cd434a5ea9f47f73df98ce22e3b27a8ac3c793b772e5221c6de93bd2db816a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b996090ef4e837818275fbaf1dd410bd12088a7f7600d8276011c383316698dc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba6f6b980caf710dacc67b103d86f01f41df21024d094297cf3c5131873a2386"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c89f76ee629e95f43ab8f303ee8ea3ad6a1ffc6c1f8aaf1618328af1a12e729"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f18c7234c100af63f3ebffd6f0d6a6387f9bc2acc77e4e51d150b2d2b667401"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b39a2c4055c2fef518d78b4490cbf932d70fe310361d39ec0895d3dcba5e80a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fa6aa8464f256eea1c5338d894276f8c702dcf37675ed7743ee54b420d324bd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"531a89b1cc945fd9dfe1b7100ec1357674eabaa604e798bf6d01af00138459c9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6364d39ae92b51e44438baf801e66468d89b5bac74c56e573f3921f149a0d9f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21856ba4952d2ee08868c410ecb7e8a78a81808ae329e560adb63a9ee2eb8072"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92663ad151ad6c106d8b28ecf559059990ba2f06d741426a18e41a9a0143dd1c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7abf36ad8fcf707e080f164a5c41f94a1410e919db5d5183e1b05c4e20d9c89"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c79f759925f9eff4a3aa7c387d560074b530d84037c8cd8e9f3da24722722934"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1265","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: initialize.rb \u2192 initialized.rb, text_document.rb, did_change_configuration.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb\u0060 changes together with 3 other files \u2014 \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialized.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/text_document.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/workspace/did_change_configuration.rb\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f79888426885c5160846522ed0d6d1836316a9846d203e87fbff06fce08267c"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: closure.rb \u2192 complex_type.rb, unique_type.rb, method.rb, parameter.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/closure.rb\u0060 changes together with 4 other files \u2014 \u0060lib/solargraph/complex_type.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/method.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/parameter.rb\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/closure.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f495f27a32c01aaa0211e4f204fe38d5db7cbe394580bb2b03e8eae7a3a012c8"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: base.rb \u2194 constant.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/base.rb\u0060 and \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/constant.rb\u0060 change together 57% of the time (8 of the 14 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module \u2014 a sibling reference still needs an import \u2014 so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u00609b5ecc54\u0060 Linting / type annotation fixes (#999); \u0060e44c0c4a\u0060 Refactoring to reduce frequent allocations.; \u0060ef8f7a2d\u0060 Refactored docstring parsing. \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/base.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4038b7fb3dd76f669eb44910d71f4f6f6a9fc4cd21889383fc6b80738de542ea"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: host.rb \u2192 initialize.rb, initialized.rb, text_document.rb, did_change_configuration.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/host.rb\u0060 changes together with 4 other files \u2014 \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialize.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/initialized.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/text_document.rb\u0060, \u0060lib/solargraph/language_server/message/workspace/did_change_configuration.rb\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/host.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e65f20f984d1c2c10badc0ae8aaccd1f37e1d8b46a1c5c2db6916a7e3d6db009"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: parameter.rb \u2194 signature.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/parameter.rb\u0060 and \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/signature.rb\u0060 change together 50% of the time (7 of the 14 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module \u2014 a sibling reference still needs an import \u2014 so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u00609ddbb716\u0060 GemPins pin merging improvements (#946); \u00606f1c24da\u0060 Ensure \u0027closure\u0027 field is consistently set on pins (#947); \u0060076fba99\u0060 Consolidate parameter handling into Pin::Callable (#844) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/parameter.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09e320c1ddb7e01a5a3d95fa22f262d58979bf083877bb3d09f3f6fd93db5c2c"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: signature.rb \u2194 call.rb: \u0060lib/solargraph/pin/signature.rb\u0060 and \u0060lib/solargraph/source/chain/call.rb\u0060 change together 50% of the time (7 of the 14 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE \u2014 the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import \u2014 and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060076fba99\u0060 Consolidate parameter handling into Pin::Callable (#844); \u0060eadd318d\u0060 Use return type of literal blocks in inference (#818); \u00604045d8ec\u0060 Method generics resolution via argument types (#794) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/pin/signature.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1963cbef6bc3da7b173518aed9a34ceee6ae27e4e8e24235a763606d6c52e9a5"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Chtml\u003E without a lang: The page declares no language, so assistive tech can\u0027t pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang=\u0022en\u0022)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/views/environment.erb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d194b9c5fe173e7cf0d6660c93f8ba5324c0e7ae33d04e9e7e8460b6ff9dfc73"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in \u003Cmain\u003E."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/views/environment.erb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b78280a01f9d7dbf77b78915212f3ea99714a61825fa495e8a407fcd0802721e"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Chtml\u003E without a lang: The page declares no language, so assistive tech can\u0027t pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang=\u0022en\u0022)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/views/layout.erb"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c6c28e72579be2a1b25f16f72f2ca37da49b2242881c6d30061df68bb63cad4"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in \u003Cmain\u003E."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/views/layout.erb"},"region":{"startLine":2}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c40d84d2769eed642902bfe37fd43bfc972fc96baaa601b864634e2e900167b"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no automated accessibility check runs over the HTML your app renders. Assert the accessibility invariants over that HTML in the test suite you already have (parse the output and assert, or drive a browser), and gate that test in CI so a regression blocks the merge. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 6 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/api_map_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a2ea80ce9eea8c82b2f90964eb4b1cf3d658d5a84ce471555f4328ff7b812d4"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/complex_type_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14df2283d5a7fcad3eeec9a27969262e72d7f6e3aeae7fe8f6cc781d0b561139"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/complex_type_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":341}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca9355cced3fad4f713254f0d765a688b6e34db99f7f33f8db7fa6ce4bda4a3b"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/pin/base_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43385be95e028d6ebe529fa9d5f4b76648aaf006d58401963f577c3022914269"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/pin/method_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":553}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7645447ae3cac3033b2bf6a043bd986454483e3e588871712f91a6372fc36c63"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b27e4230fb3925c27b4b6d61d2743b06f3bcfdd765eff49a1e5699c374ba410"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b93f6b197771f01c46d6753b120f5423e51b516a344d401f0be6abfa89cb911b"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69e05b05e977fdd054a81736d3f36988f2bc4da9bfbeb7958c74d93296c84d4d"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60f2613d1491ff5a2db470c85ed1fefea454a8a7b4ce64243354ac558ecdbd9c"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5477e551e5b803a08a7396d5d80dbbc521f3a86ee180e00b03af52268fbaa391"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":130}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdcac6ba4b74c73aa7c824ab84122bea49121785df4615443d3a41ffd2f1e111"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":142}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"804e72f23f02f96342e00aad80570ae2328e46ac401edd0e796bd7d7a58d3ba8"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":302}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33c9f235d438b626e588ee6d8efd16f6521471138d4cd822c2f71e82bd04d728"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/shell_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":313}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef260d9f37ffcedc3570731ed1feb236505f9f767fa5a5324ea75ea08e520f9e"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/source_map/clip_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":2067}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6efa72b981ccc7cffd0141f3ba890caa63445a18aada6fd7703511619e9939fa"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/type_checker/levels/strict_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c4dd782b47a9a0a6ccde7e3cd526033908e90bd31bd42dbf8c6bdd8400b6066"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/type_checker/levels/strict_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":187}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"005463d2cc80fbb1dcbd5a1084518fe45787aa9d83159bbf3363a88b0db51013"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/type_checker/levels/strong_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8471d44d5d5a155e01752d26bdb56a90f37086ef0bd0988295c1b3cfbd68982"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add brakeman for Rails apps, otherwise \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 or CodeQL\u0027s ruby pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 18776 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060Parser.is_ast_node?(node) \u0026\u0026 node.type == :hash\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_chainer.rb, lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_methods.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/parser/parser_gem/node_chainer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d20e922a93bc42beecb90e3794a6497a611fe050a35420994cb55efc0c1fb2de"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060RBS_TO_YARD_TYPE[type_name.relative!.to_s] || type_name.relative!.to_s\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb, lib/solargraph/rbs_translator.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/rbs_map/conversions.rb"},"region":{"startLine":784}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa8f08464257c943d1f4e5b6d1ea349019aa7c0a9d4c7786ace67799ebef90dc"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060closure_at(pins, source_position) || pins.first\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/solargraph/yard_map/directives/method_directive.rb, lib/solargraph/yard_map/directives/visibility_directive.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/yard_map/directives/method_directive.rb"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00d204574dc62221043b2a1144859e360d2e6284461f89fb52882c40f9efa85d"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060name.start_with?(\u0027_\u0027) || name.include?(\u0027::_\u0027)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/solargraph/complex_type/type_methods.rb, lib/solargraph/complex_type/unique_type.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/complex_type/type_methods.rb"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2164abd61847f19aeade485d9724cced4f29d745cc68ec5a4f51991c9e820c9"}},{"ruleId":"X19","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Process-global state is restored only on the happy path: \u0060redirect_stdout\u0060 changes state that belongs to the whole process and changes it back at the end of the same body \u2014 the process\u0027s \u0060$stdout\u0060 (changed at line 63, put back at line 65) \u2014 which says the change was meant to last no longer than this call. But the restore is an ordinary statement on the straight-line path, not an \u0060ensure\u0060, so it is skipped by any exception raised in between: the process then keeps the overwritten value for the rest of its life, and every later relative path, subprocess, write to the standard streams or warning in ANY thread or fiber resolves against it. That failure is silent and remote from its cause \u2014 the method that breaks is not the method that moved the value. The durable fix is not to widen the restore but to stop mutating the global: pass the value to the operation that needs it \u2014 \u0060chdir:\u0060 and an environment hash to \u0060system\u0060/\u0060spawn\u0060/\u0060Open3\u0060 (\u0060system({\u0027K\u0027 =\u003E v}, cmd, chdir: dir)\u0060), an absolute path built with \u0060File.join\u0060/\u0060File.expand_path\u0060, an explicit IO to the code that writes. Where the global genuinely must move, use the block form \u0060Dir.chdir(dir) { \u2026 }\u0060 or wrap it \u0060begin\u0060/\u0060ensure\u0060 so the restore runs on every path."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/diagnostics/rubocop_helpers.rb"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbf332d159ffc6b7d967013cc6e91dde2fc5cadf3fcb89e784df6613a0c65c4b"}},{"ruleId":"X23","level":"note","message":{"text":"Diagnostic log message is built whether or not it is wanted: \u0060debug\u0060 at line 18 is called with an argument built by \u0060backtrace.join(\u0022\\n\u0022)\u0060 (line 18), whose cost grows with the collection it walks. Ruby evaluates a call\u0027s arguments BEFORE entering the method, so that join/projection runs in full every time this line is reached \u2014 and then the level check inside the logger discards the string it produced, because debug is a level a shipped configuration normally leaves off. Nothing here decides beforehand whether the message is wanted: no \u0060debug?\u0060 test, no debug flag, no block the logger calls only when the level is on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/language_server/message/extended/document.rb"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71fbea0dae682ea557b97060423c2f4dd8394c6652e2ef5e199e4951412997ff"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Ruby\u0027s type checker does not check nil everywhere: This repository commits no Sorbet configuration (\u0060sorbet/config\u0060) and no \u0060Steepfile\u0060, so nothing type-checks its 262 Ruby product file(s): a nilable value reaches a method call silently and raises \u0060NoMethodError: undefined method \u2026 for nil\u0060 the first time it is nil. A \u0060# typed:\u0060 sigil does nothing without a \u0060sorbet/config\u0060 beside the code; a Steep run configured only on a command line is not something this check can read."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b27113b1bc22f400935e8620d19eae7fd3ef145cc36018609c445ea8cd4af1"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default on parse failure: \u0060process_directive\u0060 answers \u0060[]\u0060 when \u0060SyntaxError\u0060 is raised, with no log or raise \u2014 a malformed value silently becomes that default. Log the input or fail validation. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the rescue or above the method, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/yard_map/directives/method_directive.rb"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"310503bc61e10a2f68cc2c42101e7ca306969e0dffc8e23eb702b684568b5ea0"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default on parse failure: \u0060process_directive\u0060 answers \u0060[]\u0060 when \u0060SyntaxError\u0060 is raised, with no log or raise \u2014 a malformed value silently becomes that default. Log the input or fail validation. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the rescue or above the method, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/solargraph/yard_map/directives/parse_directive.rb"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef131f399700a01df0c9a3ab03638ccbdd2f85d7c1c71b24da392c1188119bda"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1265","guid":"9bfc5711-f2f2-6252-bd2e-ff21a1e98a6c","name":"CWE-1265","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1265"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1265.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":36,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}