Public report of cloudnative-netcore/netcorekit, published 22 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive report Measured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey → Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 22 October 2026, 01:18 UTC · Survey ID cd_fec0d6994ed84c37a68e7d834b2fcfcf

cloudnative-netcore/netcorekit

Measured 22 October 2026, 01:15 UTC, at code version d07dc23

Code coverage is not measured: No coverage collector is wired up.

CAI score 44out of 100 At risk Down 1 since the last survey

The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.

A small codebase: 9,792 lines of product code in 28 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.1 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 29

Findings by how serious they are

36 critical 307 serious 152 minor

6 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.

This survey was produced by

Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
22 October 2026, 01:15 UTC

A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.

A critical security finding is open, such as a library with a known critical vulnerability or a password or key found in the code. The score itself is unchanged, but its band shows At risk until the finding is fixed. See the Security and Compliance lens.

The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸

82of 87 dimensions measured by tools. The other 5 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
429of 495 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 66 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
87dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 9,792 lines of product code in 28 projects.
Chapters

Executive summary

cloudnative-netcore/netcorekit scores 44 out of 100, but it is rated At risk while a critical security finding is open; the score itself is unchanged. The project hasn't declared a stable release yet, so its lenses are rated against a lower bar than a released product's, while the score itself is worked out as for any repository.

The weakest lens counts most in the score, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 29 and is rated Weak. Its Dependency Hygiene dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 3 Leaked secret finding(s) in Secret Scanning and to resolve the 9 Vulnerable finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 44 to about 55.

36 findings are critical: 17 in Dependency Vulnerabilities, nine in Dependency Hygiene, four in Explicit Debt, three in Secret Scanning, two in Static Analysis (SAST) and one in Secrets (history).

Watchdog couldn't measure Test Reliability, IL Efficiency and Runtime accessibility in this code, so those dimensions are left out of the score. The product code is 9,792 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €19,000, to rebuild.

A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.

How the score is built: what each lens counts for The lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Production Readiness 29 · counts for 46%Security and Compliance 44 · counts for 25%Maturity 62 · counts for 14%Performance 62 · counts for 8%Code Health 63 · counts for 4%Architecture 89 · counts for 2%Event-Driven 100 · counts for 1%

If Production Readiness rose from 29 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 44 to about 55.

Code composition: what the lines of code are
Business logic 30%Supporting code 67%Tests 1%Generated by tools 2%
New since the last survey: 187 findings

These 187 critical or serious findings weren't in the previous survey, on 7 October 2026. The first 100 are listed here, and the findings file in the download package lists them all.

  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.IdentityModel.Logging REDACTED
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.IdentityModel.Logging REDACTED

Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.

Fixed since the last survey: 32 findings

These 32 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 7 October 2026, and are gone from this one.

  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.IdentityModel.Logging
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLine
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Configuration
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.App
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.PlatformAbstractions
  • Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCompression
  • Async & latency hygiene · Awaits without ConfigureAwait(false)
Rebuild cost: about €19,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild€6,300 to €32,000, for 105 to 339 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problemVery high, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor×0.7 at a score of 44. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
SizeSmall: 9,792 lines of product code
Comment linesThe estimate prices 9,415 lines. Comment lines count towards the size of 9,792 lines but aren't priced as work.

How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty.

Top priorities

The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.

1
Resolve the 3 Leaked secret finding(s) in Secret Scanning — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED.
Raises the score by about 12 points · Low effort · Secret Scanning
2
Resolve the 9 Vulnerable finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene.
Raises the score by about 8 points · Low effort · Dependency Hygiene
3
Resolve the 2 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with REDACTED, NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests.csproj.
Raises the score by about 3 points · Low effort · Platform End-of-Life

Diagnosis: what the measurements show together

Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.

Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €19,000 to build again, about 0.1 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 29 (Weak). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 3 Leaked secret finding(s) in Secret Scanning. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 12 points for low effort, because it clears the 3 Secret Scanning findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort

Architecture — bounded-context dependency graph

Each box is a bounded context (its layer projects grouped, or a project count when large); arrows show dependencies between contexts. A shared kernel is where many arrows converge.

arch NetCoreKit.Domain Domain NetCoreKit.Utils Utils NetCoreKit.Domain->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore EfCore NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure Infrastructure NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore EfCore NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb MongoDb NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo Mongo NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard Standard NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore AspNetCore NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All All NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi OpenApi NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch CleanArch NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus Bus NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka Kafka NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis Redis NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql MySql NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost GrpcHost NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore EfCore NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Domain NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore->NetCoreKit.Utils NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb MongoDb NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard Standard NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard->NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch __more__ +1 more projects

Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which

The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.

38 modules, with 18 dependencies between them. Every module uses only modules listed above it, so there are no loops.

Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
uses →1 NetCoreKit.Domain2 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore3 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb4 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard5 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure6 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All7 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All.Controllers8 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Authz9 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Middlewares10 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Rest11 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Validation12 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Migration13 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.Options14 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Features15 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost16 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mappers17 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore18 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb19 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard20 NetCoreKit.Utils21 NetCoreKit.Utils.Attributes22 NetCoreKit.Utils.Extensions23 src.NetCoreKit_Infrastructure_AspNetCore_All.Swagger24 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore25 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch26 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Configuration27 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi28 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus29 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Db30 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Extensions31 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo32 NetCoreKit.Utils.Helpers33 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.HATEOAS34 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka35 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis36 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore37 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql38 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer
1 NetCoreKit.Domain
2 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore
3 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb
4 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard
5 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure
6 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All
7 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All.Controllers
8 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Authz
9 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Middlewares
10 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Rest
11 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Validation
12 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Migration
13 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.Options
14 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Features
15 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost
16 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mappers
17 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore
18 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb
19 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard
20 NetCoreKit.Utils
21 NetCoreKit.Utils.Attributes
22 NetCoreKit.Utils.Extensions
23 src.NetCoreKit_Infrastructure_AspNetCore_All.Swagger
24 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore61
25 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch6
26 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Configuration1
27 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi1
28 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus3
29 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Db1
30 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Extensions7
31 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo13
32 NetCoreKit.Utils.Helpers1
33 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.HATEOAS21
34 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka1
35 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis1
36 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore93
37 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql3
38 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer3
Uses a module listed above itPart of a loopThe module itself
1 NetCoreKit.Domain2 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore3 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb4 NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard5 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure6 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All7 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All.Controllers8 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Authz9 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Middlewares10 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Rest11 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Validation12 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Migration13 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.Options14 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Features15 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost16 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mappers17 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore18 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb19 NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard20 NetCoreKit.Utils21 NetCoreKit.Utils.Attributes22 NetCoreKit.Utils.Extensions23 src.NetCoreKit_Infrastructure_AspNetCore_All.Swagger24 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore25 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch26 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Configuration27 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi28 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus29 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Db30 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Extensions31 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo32 NetCoreKit.Utils.Helpers33 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.HATEOAS34 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka35 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis36 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore37 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql38 NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServerNetCoreKit.Domain1NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore2NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb3NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard4NetCoreKit.Infrastructure5NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All6NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All.Controllers7NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Authz8NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Middlewares9NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Rest10NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Validation11NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Migration12NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.Options13NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Features14NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost15NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mappers16NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore17NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb18NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard19NetCoreKit.Utils20NetCoreKit.Utils.Attributes21NetCoreKit.Utils.Extensions22src.NetCoreKit_Infrastructure_AspNetCore_All.Swagger23NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore24NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch25NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.Configuration26NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi27NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus28NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Db29NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Extensions30NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo31NetCoreKit.Utils.Helpers32NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.HATEOAS33NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka34NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis35NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore36NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql37NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer386161131713121119333

At a glance — Code Health · 63% · Adequate · gated by X4 ·

At a glance — Architecture · 89% · Exemplary ·

At a glance — Maturity · 62% · Adequate · gated by D34 ·

At a glance — Readiness · 29% · Weak · gated by D12, D13, P3, P7 ·

At a glance — Security · 44% · Weak · gated by D30, D36, D44, C1, C2 ·

At a glance — Event-Driven · 100% · Exemplary ·

At a glance — Performance · 62% · Adequate ·

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).

OWASP categoryFindingsSeverity
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures31High / Critical
A05:2025 — Injection9High / Critical
A07:2025 — Authentication Failures4High / Critical

Roadmap

Immediately address the 182 deprecated dependencies, prioritizing the NetCoreKit.RestTemplate projects, and fix the three leaked secrets in the YAML files. Next, resolve the nine vulnerable dependencies and update the two end-of-life runtime references in the Notifier and EfCore test projects. Finally, integrate a SAST step into the CI pipeline to automatically block security regressions on every build.

Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.

Do thisHelpsEffortDimension
Resolve the 3 Leaked secret finding(s) in Secret Scanning — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED.+11.9 ptsLowSecret Scanning
Resolve the 9 Vulnerable finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene.+8.0 ptsLowDependency Hygiene
Resolve the 2 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with REDACTED, NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests.csproj.+3.4 ptsLowPlatform End-of-Life
Resolve the 182 Deprecated finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene — start with NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj (20), NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj (20), NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj (20).+12.6 ptsHighDependency Hygiene
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.+5.1 ptsMediumSecurity & performance tooling
Encrypt sensitive data at rest (ASP.NET Core Data Protection / column encryption) and manage keys in a vault. Skip if delegated to infra (Postgres TDE, KMS, etc.).+3.0 ptsMediumData Protection
Enforce authorization at every handler — call the guard method (throw-on-violation) from each one, or adopt [Authorize] so protected-by-default is demonstrable.+3.0 ptsMediumAccess Controls
Give every outbound call a bound the caller can rely on: set an explicit `HttpClient.Timeout` (or pass a `CancellationToken` from a `CancellationTokenSource` with a deadline) and flow the caller's own `CancellationToken` through, so a slow endpoint fails fast instead of hanging.+2.5 ptsMediumOutbound HTTP resilience

File quality

Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 56 files carrying findings, judged against the Preview bar: 7% slop · 45% mixed · 48% near-clean.

FileScoreBandWorst signal
REDACTED0.0SlopDependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED0.0SlopDependency Vulnerabilities: Critical CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED0.5SlopDependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED1.9SlopDependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED3.5MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: Critical CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED3.7MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED4.0MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: Medium CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED4.0MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: Medium CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED4.0MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: Medium CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED4.2MixedDependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj4.5MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console
src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj4.8MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore
src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.csproj4.8MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching
src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs4.9MixedExplicit Debt: WriteOnlyPrivateField
src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql.csproj5.1MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions
src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.csproj5.4MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions
templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj5.5MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer
templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj5.5MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer
templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj5.5MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer
templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore.csproj5.5MixedDependency Hygiene: Deprecated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console

How the grades work

Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.

Critical — 36

A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.

Serious — 307

Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.

Minor — 152

Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.

Could not be resolved — 6

Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.

Methodology & how to trust this report

Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 82 of 87 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 5 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.

Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.

What we checked — 87 dimensions across the health lenses
D1D2D3D4D5D6D9D10D12D13D14D15D17D18D19D21D24D26D27D28D29D30D31D34D35D36D44AX1AX10AX2AX3AX4AX5AX6AX7AX8AX9C1C2C3ED1ED2ED3ED4ED5GD1IC1M1M2M3M4P1P10P2P3P4P6P7P8PF1PF2PF3S1X1X12X13X14X15X16X17X18X19X2X20X21X22X23X24X25X26X27X28X29X3X30X32X4

Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.

How to trust any code-health report — three questions
  1. Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 429 of 495 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
  2. Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
  3. Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.

This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.

Tools & methods

The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.

MethodBacksVersionEvaluator
Roslyn static analysisComplexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering5.3.0✓ deterministic
Native secret scannerHardcoded secrets / credentials1.0.0✓ deterministic
Watchdog duplication detector (in-process)Code duplication1.0.0✓ deterministic
Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage)Line & branch coverage10.0.400✓ deterministic
NuGet / dotnetOutdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies10.0.400✓ deterministic
git / LibGit2SharpChurn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history2.43.0 · 0.31.0✓ deterministic
gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkovSecrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533✓ deterministic
LLM (sampled · advisory)Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurementLocal LLM◐ LLM · sampled · advisory

Every finding is locatable in findings.md. Run 01a1612d-b43a-7af1-96c6-2be04687ee84.

The exact command behind every deep-scan dimension — tool, version, invocation and retained raw output — is in Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail.

Run transparency — what happened this run

What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.

  • D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability not scored — the test tier(s) ran but surfaced none of this repository's 2 test method(s) to the runner, so flakiness couldn't be exercised. This is an analysis-environment limitation, not a finding about the tests.
  • D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (3 contributor(s) across 147 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 98% of the history; the other 2 hold 1% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
  • D17 Explicit Debt — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The C# workspace loaded this repository's projects but reported a load failure, and the dead-code reference search is unreliable over a graph that did not load cleanly, so it was skipped. The other debt markers on this row were read; dead symbols were not, and their absence from the score is not a finding that the code has none. First load diagnostic: Failure: Msbuild failed when processing the file 'samples/WebNotifier/NetCoreKit.Samples.WebNotifier.csproj' with message: rzc generate exited with code 150.
  • D18 Solution Shape — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. `dotnet build` reported 1 error(s). None of them is a .NET compiler diagnostic, which is the only signal this check reads as "the code does not compile", so the failure is recorded as a build-environment gap rather than a code defect. The usual causes are a project that targets a platform this run cannot build (a Windows-only target framework on a Linux worker) or a build step that shells out to a tool the image does not carry. Solution Shape is scored on structure and is NOT capped. Semantic analysis is independent of this build and covers every project that loaded — but a project whose restore did not complete has no resolved references, so treat its results as absent rather than clean. ★ The reach of that test, stated so this classification can be checked rather than taken on trust: it reads the C# (CS), Visual Basic (BC) and F# (FS) compiler series, and treats SDK, NuGet-restore and MSBuild codes (NETSDK, NU, MSB) as evidence that the build did not run rather than that the code is broken — read the diagnostics named above and judge for yourself. You can widen what we reach: if this build is meant to run off its own platform, without host tooling we do not carry, the diagnostics named above are what stopped it. If it is deliberately platform-bound — a Windows-only desktop product, say — there is nothing to do here: the note records our reach, not a defect in your build.
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. The loaded project set declares no packable project and no `.Contracts` project, so there is no intentionally-exposed surface for API consistency to be judged over.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. IL NOT MEASURED: the analyzer's build of this repository exited 1 and the cause could not be attributed, so no assemblies were produced and there was no IL to read. We do not read it as a defect in the repository: an unattributed failure leans OURS. D18 owns the question of whether this repository builds; it was not answered here.
  • AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via Dockerfile (samples/BiMonetaryApi/Dockerfile). docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit: https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped.
  • X2 Cancellation propagation — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 3 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 43.

Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.

Limitations & what we did not check

Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.

Per-dimension blind spots

For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.

  • D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
  • D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
  • D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
  • D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
  • D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
  • D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
  • D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
  • D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
  • D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
  • D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
  • D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
  • D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
  • D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
  • D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
  • D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
  • D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
  • D24 Comment Value: Comment value (WHY vs WHAT) is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it is advisory and cannot weigh a comment against the precise code change it was written to explain.
  • D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
  • D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
  • D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
  • D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
  • D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
  • D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
  • D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
  • D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
  • D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
  • AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
  • AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
  • C3 Audit Trail: This control is scored from in-repo evidence only — a working control configured outside the repository leaves no signal a static scan can credit.
  • ED5 Idempotency: Idempotency is judged from the handler body's visible writes and guards — a guard enforced by a database unique constraint, a broker's exactly-once delivery, or a domain method whose no-op-when-applied logic the scan can't follow may read as at-risk; the at-risk candidates are confirmed by a SAMPLED LLM verdict (advisory, not exhaustive) and degrade to heuristic-only when no model is configured. It flags the at-least-once double-apply SHAPE, not a runtime proof of a duplicate effect.
  • M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
  • P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
  • P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.

The LLM boundary

LLM-set scores this run (5): D19, D21, D24, ED5, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.

Dimensions

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.

Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity9.6 / 10Stronggated by 3 serious findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.

Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.6 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

3 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate at 17.

AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate (cognitive 17)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19
AppBuilderExtensions.UseMongoDbTemplate (cognitive 17)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19
AppBuilderExtensions.UseStandardTemplate (cognitive 17)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19

What to do

  1. Bring the 3 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate (cognitive 17), AppBuilderExtensions.UseMongoDbTemplate (cognitive 17), AppBuilderExtensions.UseStandardTemplate (cognitive 17). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 3 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 9.6 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
  2. Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D3 · God Classes10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").

Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 god class(es) detected.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md.

D4 · Code Duplication9.8 / 10Stronggated by 5 serious findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.

Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.8 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

5 duplicated block group(s) detected. 1 of the 5 are in trees this repository does not ship — vendored, example/demo, fixture and benchmark code — and are ranked below the shipped groups rather than excluded from them: the duplication there is real and is still counted in this dimension's score. The dimensions that publish a production-file census leave those trees out of theirs, so this count is deliberately drawn over the wider population.

Duplicated block (104 lines × 3)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:21
Duplicated block (53 lines × 2)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:57
Duplicated block (29–31 lines × 2)src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:99
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2)templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:30
Duplicated block (8–10 lines × 3)samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/ClearTasks/RequestHandler.cs:21

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (104 lines × 3) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with AppBuilderExtensions.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (53 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (29–31 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with RepositoryExtensions.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D5 · Coupling9.7 / 10Stronggated by 1 serious finding✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.

Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.7 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

28 projects, 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on project(s).

Off the main sequence: NetCoreKit.UtilsREDACTED:1

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Off the main sequence finding(s) in Coupling — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Enforce Coupling in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.

Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 15 classes have LCOM4 above 3.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md.

D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.

Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

2 test methods: 2 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.

D10 · Test Quality10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.

Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

0 skipped, 0 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 2 tests.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md.

D12 · Dependency Hygiene0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.

Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

70 outdated, 9 vulnerable, 48 deprecated, 2 prerelease packages.

Vulnerable: Newtonsoft.Json · ×9
Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity · ×182REDACTED:17
Prerelease dependency: System.Reactive · ×2
Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyModel · ×39REDACTED:16
Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity · ×31

What to do

  1. Resolve the 182 Deprecated finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene — start with NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj (20), NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj (20), NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj (20). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (182 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 9 Vulnerable finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 2 Prerelease dependency finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Dependency Hygiene in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D13 · Secret Scanning0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.

Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

2 secret(s) detected.

REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 3 Leaked secret finding(s) in Secret Scanning — start with REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
  2. Enforce Secret Scanning in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d13_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D14 · License Compliance10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.

Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 of 454 packages use a banned license. ★ DEPTH: this repository's MSBuild projects declare 77 direct `PackageReference`(s), and 173 further package(s) were reached beyond them by closing the graph over nuget.org's own nuspec dependency graph — so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is inside this verdict. A package whose licence nuget.org could not be asked for is not graded, and version ranges are taken at their lower bound, so this is the closure as that graph states it rather than a restored consumer's exact resolution.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d14_recommendation.md.

D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.

Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md.

D17 · Explicit Debt9.0 / 10Adequategated by 4 critical findings✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.

Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

14 deducted debt markers + unmeasured dead symbols across 9773 LoC in the .NET projects (0.5/KLoC) → score 9.0. Dead code not measured: the solution did not load cleanly, so the reference search was skipped.

WriteOnlyPrivateField · ×3samples/TodoApi/v1/ProjectController.cs:23
NoWarnInCsprojbuild/common.props:4
TodoComment · ×5samples/ExchangeService/v1/Services/ExchangeServiceImpl.cs:25
CommentedOutCode · ×2src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:15
Whole file has no live code — 2 debt markers inside itsamples/TodoApi/v1/PubSub/KafkaNotifPublisher.cs:1

+ 1 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 3 WriteOnlyPrivateField finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with ProjectController.cs, RestClient.cs, AuthInterceptor.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 NoWarnInCsproj finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with common.props. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 5 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with AuthInterceptor.cs (2), ExchangeServiceImpl.cs, AppBuilderExtensions.cs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D18 · Solution Shape10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.

Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

28 projects, 185 source files, 9861 hand-written lines of code (9773 production / 88 test — the split is derived per file: test is what its project, its own path, or a compile-guarded region marks as test, and a file carrying no test signal counts as production), plus 174 generated (machine-written code — designer, scaffolded and tool-emitted files — excluded from quality), 91 inter-project edges (build NOT measured — `dotnet build` did not complete in the analyzer, so the build half of this dimension is unmeasured rather than failed: the score above rests on structure alone and is not capped. The diagnostics that stopped it are named under Limitations.)

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d18_recommendation.md.

D19 · Documentation QualityAdequate◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Adequate / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

The repository is well documented with a strong README covering the project goal and features (cloud-native .NET Core Kit), an enthusiastic Give-a-Star section, and a detailed Features list. The root README also links to a blog and Twitter presence. A focused samples directory documents each of its own subdirectories (MySQL, Redis, Kafka, gRPC generation) with installation commands and notes, but the samples/README.md is clipped mid-sentence and no usage examples appear for any of the shown projects. There are no architecture or design docs and only one XML-doc coverage figure under 20% across modules.

Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Utils · ×27REDACTED
Documentation: no installation or build instructions · ×2README.md

What to do

  1. Resolve the 27 Low XML-doc coverage finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (27 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 2 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D21 · Naming ConsistencyExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

1 naming inconsistencies across 200 sampled symbols.

Typo in property name 'Volumn24HUsd' (missing 'u' in Volume). While 'TotalSupply' and 'AvailableSupply' are semantically distinct concepts (total vs available), the typo in 'Volumn' is a clear spelling error inconsistent with standard English and the likely intended 'Volume'.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D24 · Comment ValueExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether comments are worth it — explaining WHY (valuable) rather than WHAT (redundant).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on deterministically sampled inline comments with surrounding code; findings verified back to sampled comments by substring match. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

43 valuable / 0 redundant across 110 sampled comments.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d24_recommendation.md.

D26 · Project Cohesion10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether each project is a focused, coherent unit rather than an oversized grab-bag.

Method: Project size overshoot penalties (LoC / public-type count / namespace count, 2-of-3 flag) weighted by log magnitude. Exhaustive across projects, deterministic, LLM-independent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0 of 28 projects flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md.

D27 · Navigability9.5 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How far you must trace to follow a call — low indirection and co-located slices read easier.

Method: Call indirection (interface hops, cross-namespace calls, slice-locality scaled) over a sampled set of method invocations, size-aware baseline. Sampled; confidence discounted by symbol-resolution gaps. C# also names each pass-through layer (a class whose every public method only forwards its own parameters to one collaborator) as a located finding; the score is not affected.

Coverage: Slice locality from the first namespace segments, SAMPLED (≤400 methods) — not exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.5 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

89 % of calls cross a namespace and 8 % go through an interface, but 98 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d27_recommendation.md.

D28 · Secrets (history)9.0 / 10Adequategated by 1 critical finding✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.

Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low.

REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 High secret finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).

Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)4.9 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.

Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.

Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 4.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

9 finding(s): 0 critical, 2 high, 7 medium, 0 low.

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 4 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.

Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

27 finding(s): 2 critical, 15 high, 10 medium, 0 low.

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 15 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (6), REDACTED (3), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (15 issue-level).
  2. Resolve the 10 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (6), REDACTED (2), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 2 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).

Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D31 · IaC & Container Security10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether Dockerfiles / Terraform / Kubernetes config follow security best practices.

Method: IaC/container misconfiguration scan via trivy config (Dockerfile/Terraform/K8s/Helm/CloudFormation); severity rules to 0-10 moderate normalizer. NotApplicable without manifests. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

trivy and checkov found no infrastructure-as-code or container misconfigurations.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md.

D34 · Knowledge Freshness0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.

Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

31 of 31 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Guard.cs. Counted over 31 of the 124 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.

Orphaned file · ×31src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Guard.cs:1
Dormant codebase

What to do

  1. Resolve the 31 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (5), AppBuilderExtensions.cs (4), HostBuilderExtensions.cs (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (31 recommendation-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D35 · Change Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.

Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.

Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md.

D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.

Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

0/3 supply-chain integrity signals present (provenance, signing, SBOM).

REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D44 · Platform End-of-Life2.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.

Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

2 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 28 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.

End-of-life runtime: .NET netcoreapp2.1 · ×2REDACTED:6

What to do

  1. Resolve the 2 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with REDACTED, NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests.csproj. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.

AX1 · Captive dependencies10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether any singleton service captures a scoped/transient dependency — a silent lifetime/threading bug.

Method: Roslyn scan: DI registrations parsed from AddSingleton/Scoped/Transient; each singleton checked for captured shorter-lifetime dependencies. Exhaustive, deterministic.

AX10 · Code composition6.1 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does.

Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.

Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.

What to do

  • The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
AX2 · Stateful singletons10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether singleton services avoid mutable shared instance state that concurrent callers would race on.

Method: Roslyn scan: singleton field mutations unguarded by lock or Interlocked, per type; syntax-based guard detection. Deterministic, traceable per field.

AX3 · Project dependency cycles10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).

Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.

AX4 · Dependency direction10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.

Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.

AX5 · Architecture & structure10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.

Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.

AX6 · Interface segregation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').

Method: Roslyn scan: public interface declared-member counts (accessors fold into their property/event); fat-interface threshold (over 15 declared members) flagged per type. Each finding also reports the distinct-OPERATION count — members counted by name, so an overload group counts once — which decides whether it states the caller-side ISP harm or the implementer-side burden of an overload set. TypeScript: exported interfaces that declare behaviour, counted over their REQUIRED operations (method signatures and function-typed properties with no `?`, once per signature) — data-shape interfaces and ambient .d.ts declarations are outside the population; JavaScript declares no interfaces and is not applicable. Deterministic, type-level.

AX7 · Slice cohesion10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether feature slices stay independent (no direct cross-slice references) — the discipline that makes vertical-slice architecture pay off.

Method: Roslyn scan (vertical-slice gated): feature slices resolved from namespaces (.Features.*, .Slices.*) or project names; cross-slice type references detected. Deterministic, traceable.

AX8 · Test isolation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether production projects stay free of references to test projects — tests may depend on production, never the reverse.

Method: Csproj graph: each production project checked for references to test projects (identified by test-framework presence, not name). Zero violations is clean. Deterministic.

AX9 · CQS / query purity10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether read (query) handlers stay side-effect-free — a query that writes persistent state or raises events breaks CQS and makes reads unsafe to retry, cache, or route to a read replica.

Method: Roslyn scan: CQRS handlers classified query-vs-command by interface (IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler<TQuery,TResult>) and name convention (*Query/Get*/Find* vs *Command); each query handler's body checked for persistent-state writes (SaveChanges/repository Add-Update) or event publishes by resolved invocation. Deterministic, type-level, exhaustive over the detected handlers.

Coverage: Population: CQRS handlers identified by IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler interface + *Query/Get*/Find*/*Command NAME convention; query purity then checked exhaustively within that set — a query handler using neither convention is invisible, and mutation is a resolved persistence/publish CALL, not full dataflow.

C1 · Data Protection3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Whether sensitive data is encrypted at rest and in transit and keys are vaulted.

Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: encryption presence (EF ColumnEncryption, key-vault references, HTTPS enforcement) and key-derivation KDF detection. Deterministic.

  • No data-protection or encryption usage (ASP.NET Data Protection, AES, column encryption, PBKDF2) was found — sensitive data at rest may be unprotected. If TDE/KMS/vault is delegated to infrastructure, ignore.
  • No in-app HTTPS enforcement, but ForwardedHeaders / 127.0.0.1 binding indicates a reverse-proxy topology — adding UseHttpsRedirection in the app would be wrong in this layout. Verify the reverse proxy enforces TLS. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:162

What to do

  • Encrypt sensitive data at rest (ASP.NET Core Data Protection / column encryption) and manage keys in a vault. Skip if delegated to infra (Postgres TDE, KMS, etc.).
C2 · Access Controls3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Whether access is authorized by default — a framework authorization attribute/decorator or policy, or imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) called from handlers.

Method: Roslyn scan: [Authorize] usage and authorization policies, plus imperative throw-on-violation guard methods detected via syntax. Deterministic.

  • Authorization machinery exists but no [Authorize] usage and no imperative guard calls were found at handlers.

What to do

  • Enforce authorization at every handler — call the guard method (throw-on-violation) from each one, or adopt [Authorize] so protected-by-default is demonstrable.
C3 · Audit Trail7.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Whether changes to sensitive data are recorded (who, what, when) for compliance + incident response.

Method: Roslyn scan: audit-trail mechanism graded (SaveChanges interceptor/immutable AuditLog/[Audited] strong; bare IAuditable/AddAuditing weak). Deterministic.

  • An audit mechanism is present, but the trail is not yet complete — missing: an immutable audit-log / audit-trail type to write to, [Audited] per-entity coverage.

What to do

  • Back the audit convention with a structural mechanism: an EF SaveChanges interceptor (or equivalent) writing every sensitive change to an immutable audit log, and apply [Audited] to the entities that need a who-changed-what trail.
ED1 · Handler temporal coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Event-Driven — Whether event handlers stay asynchronous (no blocking remote HTTP/gRPC calls awaited inside a handler).

Method: Roslyn semantic scan (event-driven gated): event-handler bodies scanned for HTTP/gRPC invocations by resolved symbol type, not substring. Deterministic, semantic-resolved.

ED2 · Event/command shape10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Event-Driven — Whether commands have a single handler (one owner of the decision) and fan-out is modelled with events.

Method: Roslyn scan (event-driven gated): command-shaped messages identified by convention; handler count per command checked for the exactly-one rule. Deterministic, hard fact.

ED3 · Event naming8.9 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Event-Driven — Whether events are named in the past tense (a clarity nudge — low weight).

Method: Roslyn scan (event-driven gated): domain and integration events checked for past-tense naming (-ed/-en suffix or irregular set). Naming nudge, low-weight advisory.

  • `EventEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear. — src/NetCoreKit.Domain/Event.cs:34
  • `NotificationEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/Envelopes.cs:12
  • `MessageEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/Envelopes.cs:27

What to do

  • Name events in the past tense — they record facts that already happened.
ED4 · Outbox / dual-write10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Event-Driven — Whether state changes and message publishes are atomic (a transactional outbox) rather than a crash-unsafe dual write.

Method: Roslyn semantic scan (event-driven gated): event-handler methods scanned for DB-save plus bus-publish without a transactional outbox reference. Deterministic, semantic-resolved.

ED5 · Idempotency8.0 / 10Strong◐ Sampled · advisory

Other · Readiness — Whether retry-prone mutations (command handlers + message/event consumers) are idempotent so an at-least-once redelivery or client retry doesn't double-apply the effect — heuristic at-risk detection confirmed by language model, advisory.

Method: Roslyn heuristic (any mutation, ungated): command handlers and message/event consumers that mutate persistent state without a visible idempotency guard (exists/dedup check, upsert, idempotency-key/inbox, conditional/versioned write, fixed-value set) flagged as at-risk; each at-risk candidate then confirmed or cleared by a language model as genuinely non-idempotent versus naturally-idempotent. Advisory without a model (heuristic-only, degraded), per-candidate judged with one.

Coverage: Population: retry-prone mutations — command handlers (CQRS write side) + message/event consumers (IConsumer/I*EventHandler) — that mutate persistent state; runs on any repo with mutations, not only event-driven ones. The at-risk subset (no obvious guard) is a HEURISTIC candidate set, each then LLM-JUDGED non-idempotent vs safe; a handler outside those conventions, or a guard the LLM can't confirm, is bounded by the sample. Degrades to heuristic-only when no model is configured.

  • `CreateProject.RequestHandler.Handle` mutates persistent state (a repository write) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write. — samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/CreateProject/RequestHandler.cs:18
  • `PubSub.RedisNotifPublisher.Handle` mutates persistent state (an event publish) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write. — samples/TodoApi/v1/PubSub/RedisNotifPublisher.cs:23

What to do

  • Make retry-prone mutations idempotent — guard each write with an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write, so a re-run doesn't double-apply.
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.

  • A shipped member still throws NotImplementedException — generated scaffolding that was never completed. Implement it or remove the dead surface. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/UnitOfWorkAsync.cs:31

What to do

  • Finish or delete NotImplementedException stubs and replace placeholder literals before shipping.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs8.8 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords: members that only throw a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant, async methods that never await, dead `if (false)` / `#if false` branches, and skeleton types most of whose members are holes. A real, objective slice of technical debt.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.

  • `RepositoryAsync` is a shipped member whose whole body throws NotImplementedException — scaffolding that was never completed. Implement it or remove the dead surface. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/UnitOfWorkAsync.cs:31
  • A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers). (×9) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:29, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:96, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:35, …
  • 4 consecutive lines of code sit inside a `/* … */` block — a block of code switched off rather than removed, which rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers). — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:15

What to do

  • Finish or delete the unfinished stubs (NotImplementedException / empty / constant-returning bodies) — they are dead surface that looks live.
  • Clear the softer debt: remove commented-out code and dead branches, re-enable or delete skipped tests, and replace blanket warning suppressions with targeted ones.
M1 · Documentation (README)6.9 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.

Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.

What to do

  • Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
  • Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
  • Add a README to the 25 of 28 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1.8 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation5.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.

Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.

What to do

  • Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
M3 · Folder & project structure10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.

Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.

M4 · Documentation accuracy10.0 / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.

P1 · CI/CD gates10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.

Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.

P10 · Library API & versioning6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.

Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • 13/13 types (100%) are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — make internal-by-default and expose only the intended API.

What to do

  • Make types internal by default; expose only the deliberate public API so internals can change without breaking consumers.
P2 · Observability5.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: structured-logging frameworks (Serilog, NLog), OpenTelemetry, and health-check endpoint patterns. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • Only 16/25 service-like projects use logging (pure contract/DTO projects are excluded — they have nothing to log). Of those 25, 6 ship a process this repository operates; the rest are libraries their consumer hosts, where the logging decision belongs to the host.

What to do

  • Extend structured logging across the projects you operate, and give the library ones a diagnostics seam instead — an `EventSource`/`ActivitySource` the host can subscribe to, or an optional logger on your options object — rather than taking a logging dependency on your consumers' behalf.
  • Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics and a health-check endpoint for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).

Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 870 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.

What to do

  • Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
  • Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
  • Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.

Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • Deployment is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever reaches the release trigger goes to production unreviewed, so a mistaken merge or tag is live before anyone can stop it.

What to do

  • Add an approval/environment gate (required reviewers / protection rules) before production promotion.
P6 · Release Hygiene5.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.

Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)

What to do

  • Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether outbound HTTP calls are wrapped in resilience (retry/timeout/circuit-breaker) so a failing dependency doesn't cascade.

Method: Source scan: outbound HTTP clients and what bounds them — resilience handlers (Polly, AddStandardResilienceHandler) on .NET; on Go, the JVM, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, PHP, Rust, Elixir, Swift, Dart and Erlang, a timeout, deadline, retry or breaker beside each call, or a process-wide client default (a framework-wide deadline such as Drupal core's, Laravel's or actix's awc counts). Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • `new HttpClient()` builds an outbound HTTP client and nothing bounds it: no timeout is set on it and no retry or resilience policy wraps its calls in the type that owns it. This codebase ships libraries/tools rather than a service it operates, so the failure lands as a hung caller — a build step, a CLI run, a UI thread — with no way out. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:57

What to do

  • Give every outbound call a bound the caller can rely on: set an explicit `HttpClient.Timeout` (or pass a `CancellationToken` from a `CancellationTokenSource` with a deadline) and flow the caller's own `CancellationToken` through, so a slow endpoint fails fast instead of hanging.
P8 · Schema migrations10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Readiness · Readiness — Whether EF Core schema changes go through versioned migrations rather than the un-evolvable EnsureCreated().

Method: Roslyn scan: EF Core DbContext for a versioned migrations directory versus bare EnsureCreated usage; off .NET, a file scan of dependency manifests, migration histories (Flyway, Liquibase, Alembic, Django, Rails, Prisma, TypeORM, Knex/Sequelize, golang-migrate, goose, Laravel, Doctrine, Diesel/sqlx) and schema auto-create in production source or config. Exhaustive, deterministic.

PF1 · Benchmark discipline6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Performance — Whether the code protects its performance with benchmarks — a benchmark suite, allocation/memory measurement, and (ideally) a CI gate. Presence is credited as a bonus, never a deduction.

Method: Repo + source scan: BenchmarkDotNet referenced (csproj/source), [Benchmark]/[MemoryDiagnoser] attribute counts, and a benchmark step in CI; off .NET, the same ladder over Go testing.B, Rust criterion/#[bench]/divan, JMH/kotlinx-benchmark, pytest-benchmark/asv/pyperf, tinybench/mitata/vitest bench/benchmark.js and Swift package-benchmark — scored as a bonus ladder (absence is neutral, never a deduction). Deterministic, presence detection.

  • No benchmark suite was found by the two searches this check runs. FIRST, a BenchmarkDotNet package reference in any project file — every project the workspace loaded, plus a walk of project files on disk that never loaded, because a benchmark suite is exactly the project a partial load drops. SECOND, a script harness: a file whose name contains `benchmark` and ends `.py`, `.sh`, `.ps1`, `.bash`, `.rb`, `.js` or `.mjs`, credited ONLY when this repository's CI text also mentions benchmarks — a harness no pipeline runs is read as a fixture, deliberately. Neither search can see a benchmark suite in another ecosystem's idiom (a Go `testing.B` file, a JMH or criterion project, a pytest-benchmark run), so this is 'no benchmark found by those two searches', not a verdict that the repository has none. Where code is performance-sensitive, a benchmark guards against silent regressions — but it's a bonus here, not a deduction.

What to do

  • Add a benchmarking harness for the hot paths and run it in CI to catch regressions (for .NET, a BenchmarkDotNet project with [MemoryDiagnoser] to track allocations).
PF2 · Allocation hygiene6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Performance — Whether the code is written to minimise allocations so it doesn't pressure its host's memory manager — buffer/slice views over copies, object pooling, stack or value-type allocation, and buffer writers. Reward-only: credited where present, never penalised where a simpler style is fine.

Method: Production-source scan: density (per 1k LoC) of allocation-aware APIs — in .NET Span/Memory, ArrayPool/ObjectPool, stackalloc, ValueTask, value-type structs, IBufferWriter, string.Create, SkipLocalsInit; off .NET, with comments and strings blanked, Go's sync.Pool, preallocated slices/maps, Grow, strconv.Append* and buf[:0] reuse; the JVM's NIO buffer views, MemorySegment, primitive collections, pools and literal presizes (plus Kotlin primitive arrays and value classes, Scala AnyVal and @specialized); Swift's reserveCapacity, ContiguousArray, withUnsafe* access and ~Copyable. Activated off .NET on the same floor (400 lines, and benchmarks or 8 uses); Rust and garbage-collected scripting languages are not applicable. Reward-only. Deterministic, syntax/text detection.

  • No Span/Memory, pooling (ArrayPool/ObjectPool), stackalloc, ValueTask or buffer-writer usage was found. If this code sits on a hot path, these reduce the GC pressure it creates — a bonus, not a requirement.

What to do

  • On hot paths, prefer Span<T>/ReadOnlySpan<T>, ArrayPool<T>, stackalloc and ValueTask to cut the allocations those paths would otherwise make.
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene7.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.

Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.

  • 2 blocking call(s) on async work (.Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult()) — these waste a thread and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one). (×2) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:58, samples/Notifier/EventsHostedService.cs:47

What to do

  • Make the call chain async end-to-end and await it — never block on a Task with .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult().
S1 · Cryptographic Hygiene8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Other · Security — Cryptographic hygiene (weak hash/cipher, password key-derivation). This codebase has no web surface, so transport/header/cookie/CSRF controls are N/A and only crypto is scored.

Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.

  • MD5/SHA1 is constructed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ for content integrity, or a KDF (PBKDF2/Argon2/BCrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, a file or mutex name), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as `System.IO.Hashing.XxHash64`/`Crc32` says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. (×3) — src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:28, src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:38, src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:59
  • `RequireHttpsMetadata = false` allows the OIDC discovery doc to be fetched over plain HTTP. Safe for loopback-only fetches (Aspire / on-host); risky for any other path. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:130

What to do

  • Review each MD5/SHA1 use by what it protects: replace it with SHA-256+ (or a KDF for passwords) where the digest is security-relevant, and switch it to a non-cryptographic hash (`System.IO.Hashing.XxHash64`/`Crc32`) where it only derives an identifier such as a cache key or a mutex name. This repository constructs a collision-broken hash (MD5/SHA1) at 3 sites, not one: `src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:28` (MD5), `src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:38` (MD5), `src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:59` (SHA1). Each is a separate decision — fixing only the line this row cites leaves the others in place.
  • Set RequireHttpsMetadata = true in prod (or pin MetadataAddress to a localhost URL the API can hit directly).
X1 · Async correctness5.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.

  • Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process. (×2) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:58, samples/Notifier/EventsHostedService.cs:47
  • Reading `.Result` of a task that has not completed blocks this thread until it does — the same block as `.Wait()`: under a synchronization context (Blazor, a UI thread, classic ASP.NET) it deadlocks, and on the thread pool it parks a thread for as long as the work runs. `await` the task instead (make the caller `async`); where a synchronous entry point must stay, keep the block in ONE documented bridge with a timeout. (×2) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:56, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/Repository.cs:30
  • `Task.WaitAll` blocks this thread until the tasks complete — sync-over-async: it can deadlock under a synchronization context and it parks a thread for as long as the work runs. `await Task.WhenAll(…)` instead. — samples/SignalRNotifier/Services/Hubs/ProjectHub.cs:58

What to do

  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk)
X12 · Unreachable branch10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X14 · Bypassable address classification10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X16 · Unfloored truncation loop10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness6.1 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

  • `client` is a `HttpClient`, which implements `IDisposable`, and it is created here (line 57). Every use of it in `UnaryServerHandler` reads a member through it — it is never returned, never stored, never handed to anything else, and never disposed — so this method both creates the value and is the last thing that can release it, and does not. Nothing announces the leak: the object holds its resource until finalization if its type has a finalizer, and until the process ends if it does not, so the cost accumulates once per CALL rather than showing up as a failure. Declare it with `using` (`using var client = …;`), which releases it at the end of the scope on every path including a throw. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:57

What to do

  • Each finding names the value and the span that decides who owns it — the `new` that created it, or the constructor parameter that handed it over. Confirm ownership from that span, then make the disposal match it: release what this type created, leave what it was injected with to whoever created THAT, and drop a finalizer whose type holds nothing unmanaged to release.
X19 · Unrestored process-global state10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X2 · Cancellation propagation6.2 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether async methods accept a CancellationToken so work can be cancelled (adoption curve).

Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.

  • Only 24/64 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can't be stopped early when the caller gives up — whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against your hosting model.
  • No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started. (×38) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:49, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:56, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:62, …
  • No CancellationToken parameter, and the token `context.RequestAborted` carries reaches none of the calls here that take one — this work can't be stopped early once started. Pass `context.RequestAborted` on, or take a CancellationToken. — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.cs:32

What to do

  • Thread a CancellationToken through async methods so work stops promptly on cancellation.
X20 · Mistyped argument guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `ArgumentNullException` tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X22 · Contradicted release guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.

Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.

Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.

Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X25 · Inert configuration knob10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.

Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.

Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a `foreach` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is enumerating invalidates the enumerator it is holding, so the next `MoveNext` throws `InvalidOperationException` and the remaining items are never seen.

Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X3 · Exception handling10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.

X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X32 · Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether a plugin lookup names the type it means — searching every assembly loaded into the process for a candidate whose SIMPLE name equals a string supplied at runtime, and taking the first one found, is decided by assembly LOAD ORDER rather than by this source, so the same name can resolve to a different type on the next run.

Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every invocation of `First`/`FirstOrDefault`/`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` whose OWN expression subtree contains both a `GetAssemblies()` call and a `GetTypes()`/`GetExportedTypes()` call — a single-element pick out of every type loaded into the process. A nested selector in the same chain sees no `GetAssemblies()` in its own subtree and is outside the population, so one lookup counts once however many links its chain has. A finding additionally needs both remaining halves: the selector must be `First`/`FirstOrDefault` (`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` reports the ambiguity rather than resolving it, and is counted and never reported), and the chain must carry an `==` comparison of `<lambda parameter>.Name` against something that is not a literal. The receiver must be a plain identifier bound by one of the chain’s own lambdas, which places `assembly.GetName().Name == "X"` outside the rule by construction. One exemption: a `.Name` test joined by `&&` to a `FullName`/`AssemblyQualifiedName` test on the same identifier is spared; joined by `||` it is not. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.

X4 · Structured logging3.1 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal`/`verbose`/`silly`/`http`/`log` call on a receiver named for a logger, in a package whose own or an enclosing `package.json` declares a logger that carries values as fields (pino, pino-http, nestjs-pino, Fastify, winston, bunyan, tslog, LogTape, roarr), whose first deciding argument is a template literal with substitutions; an object-literal fields argument is stepped over, a plain string message clears the call. Python is read the same way: a `debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error`/`exception`/`critical`/`log` call on a logger in a file that imports the standard library’s `logging` or structlog (loguru, which formats at the call, is not judged), whose message is a whole f-string with a non-constant field; a `%`-formatted, `.format()`-ed or concatenated message is not convicted, as in C#. PHP is read the same way: a PSR-3 level call (`emergency`…`debug`, `log`) on a logger (`$logger`, `$this->logger`, Laravel’s `Log::`, `logger()`, `\Drupal::logger()`) in a package whose `composer.json` requires a PSR-3 logger or a framework that hands one out (psr/log, Monolog, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, CakePHP), or a file that imports one, whose message is a double-quoted string interpolating a variable; a single-quoted message clears the call, and `sprintf` or `.` concatenation is not convicted, as in C#. Dart is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on Sentry’s structured logger (`Sentry.logger`) whose message is a whole string literal interpolating a value (`$name`, `${…}`); the `Sentry.logger.fmt` template API clears the call. Dart that logs only through loggers with one message and no fields (package:logging, package:logger, talker, dart:developer) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Ruby is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on the console gem’s `Console` (declared by a Gemfile, gemspec or Gemfile.lock, or required) or, where SemanticLogger, Ougai or dry-logger is declared or required, on a receiver named for a logger (`logger`, `@logger`, `Rails.logger`, `log`), whose first deciding argument is, as the whole argument, a double-quoted string interpolating a non-constant value (`#{…}`, `#@ivar`); a plain literal clears the call, keyword arguments are the fields, and a block, `%`-format or `+` concatenation is not convicted. Ruby that logs only through the standard Logger (Rails.logger) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Deterministic.

  • Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it. (×17) — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/LogHandlerMiddleware.cs:23, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/LogHandlerMiddleware.cs:28, src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:77, …

What to do

  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging

Reference — by lens

The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.

LensScoreRatingImpact
Code Health63%Adequate — gated by X4Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Architecture89%ExemplarySolid.
Maturity62%Adequate — gated by D34Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Readiness29%Weak — gated by D12, D13, P3, P7Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Security44%Weak — gated by D30, D36, D44, C1, C2Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Event-Driven100%ExemplaryStrongest area.
Performance62%AdequateAcceptable, with room to improve.
Unscored — 2 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score

These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.

  • SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X7 Silent fallback defaults — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 3 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for

These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.

  • C4 Data Retention — Repo shows no data-retention / TTL / cleanup mechanism for personal data — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Define retention periods and a purge/cleanup job (or TTL) in code, or document where retention is enforced, so this dimension can be scored.
  • C5 Data-Subject Rights — Repo shows no corroborated data-subject-rights mechanism (erasure / export-portability / consent) tied to a subject id or GDPR vocabulary — absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control. Implement erasure, data export/portability and consent tracking over the subject's records.
  • P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 32 check(s) not relevant to this codebase

These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.

  • AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • AXR1 Runtime accessibility — docker build failed (exit 1) — DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit: https://docs.docker.com/go/bui…; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
  • D11 Test Reliability — Test runner surfaced no tests
  • D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
  • D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — No intentionally-exposed public API to evaluate for consistency.
  • D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — small single-context codebase (9,773 production LoC in the .NET projects) — bounded contexts are not needed at this size No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Aggregate roots were found in only one source directory (samples), which is a layered codebase, not two contexts. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
  • D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — IL not measured — the analyzer's build of the target did not succeed
  • D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
  • D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
  • D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
  • D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
  • D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
  • D8 Code Coverage — Coverage NOT MEASURED: `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` names a data collector that ships in the `coverlet.collector` package, and this repository wires up none — no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, `--collect` produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect.
  • DM1 Domain Modelling — applicable but not scored (4 signals for this style, 3 needed — the count is met but a required primary signal is absent): 4 aggregate root(s) (AggregateRoot/IAggregateRoot); 9 domain event(s); its 4 aggregate(s) are building blocks, test types or a library's examples — not the repository's own domain; a Domain/Aggregates/ValueObjects layer; 11 aggregate-constrained repository/repositories (IRepository<T> where T : IAggregateRoot); a top-level samples/ tree: a library or framework whose examples are its consumers — these types are building blocks, not a domain
  • ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
  • P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
  • P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Cobertura — `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` with a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
  • X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X5 Nullable reference types — no NRT-eligible projects
  • X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
  • X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.

Critical — 36 finding(s)
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · High CVE · ×15
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Vulnerable · ×9
  • Vulnerable: Newtonsoft.Json — REDACTED — High severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: IdentityServer4 — REDACTED — Moderate severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core — REDACTED — Critical severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI — REDACTED — Moderate severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: AutoMapper — REDACTED — High severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: Microsoft.NETCore.App — Microsoft.NETCore.App [2.1.0, — ) severity. 2.1.0
  • Vulnerable: Microsoft.AspNetCore.App — Microsoft.AspNetCore.App [2.2.0, — ) severity. 2.2.0
  • Vulnerable: MongoDB.Driver — REDACTED — High severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
  • Vulnerable: System.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt — REDACTED — Moderate severity. https://github.com/advisories/[GHSA redacted]
D13 · Secret Scanning · Leaked secret · ×3
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D17 · Explicit Debt · WriteOnlyPrivateField · ×3
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField samples/TodoApi/v1/ProjectController.cs:23 — private ILogger<ProjectController> _logger — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:14 — private ILogger<RestClient> _logger — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
  • WriteOnlyPrivateField src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:24 — private IHostingEnvironment _env — assigned 1 time(s), read never — this field is written and never read anywhere its type can be reached from, so the state it keeps answers no question: every assignment to it computes a value that nothing observes, on every instance, for the lifetime of each one. It reads as a flag the code branches on, and nothing branches on it. Delete the field and its assignments — or, if the value was MEANT to be consulted, the missing read is the defect this row is pointing at, and the branch that should have depended on it is not there.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Critical CVE · ×2
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D17 · Explicit Debt · NoWarnInCsproj · ×1
  • NoWarnInCsproj build/common.props:4 — CS1591 — this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or — if some occurrences really are legitimate — narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project.
D28 · Secrets (history) · High secret · ×1
  • REDACTED
Serious — 307 finding(s)
D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Deprecated · ×182
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity REDACTED:17 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: IdentityServer4 REDACTED:15 — REDACTED — Legacy,CriticalBugs — the publisher's replacement is `Duende.IdentityServer`; migrate the reference to it.
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer REDACTED:16 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:21 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:21 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj:21 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization REDACTED:36 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:43 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:42 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj:43 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics REDACTED:17 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:22 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:22 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj:22 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore REDACTED:18 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:23 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:23 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj:23 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions REDACTED:19 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:24 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:24 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard.csproj:24 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides REDACTED:20 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj:25 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • Deprecated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb.csproj:25 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides 2.2.0 — Other,Legacy
  • + 157 more in this group — see findings.md.
X2 · Cancellation propagation · Async method without CancellationToken · ×39
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetAllItems src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:49 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetItem src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:56 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PostItem src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:62 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PutItem src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:68 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: DeleteItem src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:74 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: HandleErrorAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.cs:32 — No CancellationToken parameter, and the token `context.RequestAborted` carries reaches none of the calls here that take one — this work can't be stopped early once started. Pass `context.RequestAborted` on, or take a CancellationToken.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:28 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PostAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:43 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PutAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:59 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: DeleteAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:74 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByIdAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:14 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: FindOneAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:31 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: ListAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:48 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: QueryAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:64 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: FindAllAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:76 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetDataAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:89 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetByIdAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:14 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: FindOneAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:31 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: ListAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:48 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: QueryAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:64 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: FindAllAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:76 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: GetDataAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:89 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: ExecuteSqlCommandAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/UnitOfWorkExtensions.cs:27 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: AddAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/UnitOfWork.cs:87 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • Async method without CancellationToken: PublishAsync src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:39 — No CancellationToken parameter — this work can't be stopped early once started.
  • + 14 more in this group — see findings.md.
D19 · Documentation Quality · Low XML-doc coverage · ×27
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Utils REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Utils: 27 % XML-doc coverage (18/66).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Domain REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Domain: 11 % XML-doc coverage (8/73).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore: 4 % XML-doc coverage (3/75).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch: 6 % XML-doc coverage (1/18).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi: 11 % XML-doc coverage (2/19).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore: 3 % XML-doc coverage (2/71).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/13).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure: 5 % XML-doc coverage (1/20).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/19).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka: 6 % XML-doc coverage (1/17).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus: 15 % XML-doc coverage (2/13).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.Notifier REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Samples.Notifier: 17 % XML-doc coverage (11/63).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.SignalRNotifier REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Samples.SignalRNotifier: 16 % XML-doc coverage (12/73).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.WebNotifier samples/WebNotifier/NetCoreKit.Samples.WebNotifier.csproj — NetCoreKit.Samples.WebNotifier: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/29).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis.csproj — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/13).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/34).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi: 17 % XML-doc coverage (21/120).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.TodoApi samples/TodoApi/NetCoreKit.Samples.TodoApi.csproj — NetCoreKit.Samples.TodoApi: 6 % XML-doc coverage (11/185).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/25).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj — NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService: 22 % XML-doc coverage (21/96).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost REDACTED — NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/11).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore.csproj — NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/2).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb.csproj — NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/2).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard.csproj — NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.Standard: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/2).
  • Low XML-doc coverage: NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore.csproj — NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore: 0 % XML-doc coverage (0/4).
  • + 2 more in this group — see findings.md.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities · Medium CVE · ×10
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
D17 · Explicit Debt · TodoComment · ×5
  • TodoComment samples/ExchangeService/v1/Services/ExchangeServiceImpl.cs:25 — // TODO: just for demo — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • TodoComment src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:47 — // TODO: log the exception etc.. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • TodoComment src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Db/AppDbContext.cs:85 — //todo: need a better code to avoid dynamic — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • TodoComment src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:66 — // TODO: for demo only — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • TodoComment src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:67 — // TODO: for demo only — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene · Sync-over-async blocking · ×3
  • Sync-over-async blocking — 2 blocking call(s) on async work (.Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult()) — these waste a thread and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • Sync-over-async blocking src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:58 — `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
  • Sync-over-async blocking samples/Notifier/EventsHostedService.cs:47 — `.Wait()` blocks this thread until the async work completes — it wastes a thread-pool thread for as long as the work runs and can deadlock wherever a synchronization context is in play (a UI thread, or a caller that has one).
S1 · Cryptographic Hygiene · Weak hash algorithm · ×3
  • Weak hash algorithm src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:28 — MD5/SHA1 is constructed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ for content integrity, or a KDF (PBKDF2/Argon2/BCrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, a file or mutex name), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as `System.IO.Hashing.XxHash64`/`Crc32` says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses.
  • Weak hash algorithm src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:38 — MD5/SHA1 is constructed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ for content integrity, or a KDF (PBKDF2/Argon2/BCrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, a file or mutex name), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as `System.IO.Hashing.XxHash64`/`Crc32` says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses.
  • Weak hash algorithm src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/HashExtensions.cs:59 — MD5/SHA1 is constructed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ for content integrity, or a KDF (PBKDF2/Argon2/BCrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, a file or mutex name), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as `System.IO.Hashing.XxHash64`/`Crc32` says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses.
D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Prerelease dependency · ×2
  • Prerelease dependency: System.Reactive — System.Reactive resolves to 4.2.0-preview.63, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted — pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required.
  • Prerelease dependency: Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk — Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk resolves to 16.0.0-preview-20181205-02, a prerelease build. Prerelease packages carry no support policy, may change breaking between previews and can be unlisted — pin a stable release before shipping, or record the reason this preview is required.
D17 · Explicit Debt · CommentedOutCode · ×2
  • CommentedOutCode src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:15 — 4 consecutive commented-code lines
  • CommentedOutCode src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/RepositoryFactory.cs:28 — 3 consecutive commented-code lines
D44 · Platform End-of-Life · End-of-life runtime · ×2
  • End-of-life runtime: .NET netcoreapp2.1 REDACTED:6 — REDACTED declares .NET netcoreapp2.1 as this project's target framework, and .NET Core 2.1, support ended 2021-08-21. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2021-08-21 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended.
  • End-of-life runtime: .NET netcoreapp2.2 src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests.csproj:4 — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.Tests.csproj declares .NET netcoreapp2.2 as this project's target framework, and .NET Core 2.2, support ended 2019-12-23. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2019-12-23 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended.
ED5 · Idempotency · Non-idempotent mutation · ×2
  • Non-idempotent mutation: CreateProject.RequestHandler.Handle samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/CreateProject/RequestHandler.cs:18 — `CreateProject.RequestHandler.Handle` mutates persistent state (a repository write) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write.
  • Non-idempotent mutation: PubSub.RedisNotifPublisher.Handle samples/TodoApi/v1/PubSub/RedisNotifPublisher.cs:23 — `PubSub.RedisNotifPublisher.Handle` mutates persistent state (an event publish) with no idempotency guard, and the model confirms a re-run would double-apply it. A retry or at-least-once redelivery means it can run twice — add an exists/dedup check, an upsert, an idempotency-key/inbox, or a versioned write.
X1 · Async correctness · Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) · ×2
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:58 — Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process.
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) samples/Notifier/EventsHostedService.cs:47 — Blocking on a Task with `.Wait()`/`.GetAwaiter().GetResult()` can deadlock (and wastes a thread). Prefer awaiting it: make the caller `async` and `await` instead. Where a synchronous entry point must stay — a public sync API you cannot break, or a process entry point that must not return until the work finishes — the block belongs in ONE documented bridge and never inside code that is already async; and where it already is that bridge, give the wait a TIMEOUT so a hung task fails the call instead of hanging the process.
X1 · Async correctness · Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) through `.Result` · ×2
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) through `.Result` src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:56 — Reading `.Result` of a task that has not completed blocks this thread until it does — the same block as `.Wait()`: under a synchronization context (Blazor, a UI thread, classic ASP.NET) it deadlocks, and on the thread pool it parks a thread for as long as the work runs. `await` the task instead (make the caller `async`); where a synchronous entry point must stay, keep the block in ONE documented bridge with a timeout.
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) through `.Result` src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/Repository.cs:30 — Reading `.Result` of a task that has not completed blocks this thread until it does — the same block as `.Wait()`: under a synchronization context (Blazor, a UI thread, classic ASP.NET) it deadlocks, and on the thread pool it parks a thread for as long as the work runs. `await` the task instead (make the caller `async`); where a synchronous entry point must stay, keep the block in ONE documented bridge with a timeout.
C1 · Data Protection · No data-protection/encryption · ×1
  • No data-protection/encryption — No data-protection or encryption usage (ASP.NET Data Protection, AES, column encryption, PBKDF2) was found — sensitive data at rest may be unprotected. If TDE/KMS/vault is delegated to infrastructure, ignore.
D17 · Explicit Debt · Whole file has no live code · ×1
  • Whole file has no live code — 2 debt markers inside it samples/TodoApi/v1/PubSub/KafkaNotifPublisher.cs:1 — Every line in this file is a comment or blank — it declares no type, member, using or attribute, so nothing in it reaches the build. Its 2 debt markers (2 CommentedOutCode) all sit inside that dead text: one decision to leave the whole file switched off, not 2 independent debts. It records no note anywhere: the file is switched off with nothing in it saying why, so a reader cannot tell whether it is waiting on something or was simply abandoned — which is the harder of the two to bring back. Decide the FILE rather than its lines — restore it, or delete it and let version control hold the history. (Every occurrence still counts toward the score and metrics.)
D17 · Explicit Debt · BarePragmaDisable · ×1
  • BarePragmaDisable src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:18 — #pragma warning disable CS1998 — the disable is closed again below, so its scope is not the problem; what it records is no reason: there is nothing on the directive line, and no ordinary comment attached to it either side. A suppression is a decision somebody made, and without the reason the next reader cannot tell a considered exception from an unexamined one, so it is never revisited and it outlives the code it was written for. Put the reason on the directive line — what makes this site legitimately different — or fix what the rule is pointing at and delete the pair. A rationale in the member's documentation comment does not clear this row and is not meant to: it explains the member to its callers, and the next person to touch the suppression is not reading it for that.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate (cognitive 17) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19 — AppBuilderExtensions.UseEfCoreTemplate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level. Note what this body is, though: it works in explicit hardware vector and instruction-set types. A kernel divided across a call boundary passes its vectors between the parts and depends on the runtime putting them back together, so the division can cost more than the complexity it removes. The measurement stands — a hot path is not a licence to be unreadable — but the move that pays here is to lift the COLD parts out first (argument validation, fallback and error paths, one-off setup) and leave the kernel whole. Where the kernel itself has to be divided, ask for the extracted parts to be inlined as well, and measure the result rather than assuming the division is free.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AppBuilderExtensions.UseMongoDbTemplate (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • AppBuilderExtensions.UseMongoDbTemplate (cognitive 17) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19 — AppBuilderExtensions.UseMongoDbTemplate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level. Note what this body is, though: it works in explicit hardware vector and instruction-set types. A kernel divided across a call boundary passes its vectors between the parts and depends on the runtime putting them back together, so the division can cost more than the complexity it removes. The measurement stands — a hot path is not a licence to be unreadable — but the move that pays here is to lift the COLD parts out first (argument validation, fallback and error paths, one-off setup) and leave the kernel whole. Where the kernel itself has to be divided, ask for the extracted parts to be inlined as well, and measure the result rather than assuming the division is free.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · AppBuilderExtensions.UseStandardTemplate (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • AppBuilderExtensions.UseStandardTemplate (cognitive 17) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:19 — AppBuilderExtensions.UseStandardTemplate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level. Note what this body is, though: it works in explicit hardware vector and instruction-set types. A kernel divided across a call boundary passes its vectors between the parts and depends on the runtime putting them back together, so the division can cost more than the complexity it removes. The measurement stands — a hot path is not a licence to be unreadable — but the move that pays here is to lift the COLD parts out first (argument validation, fallback and error paths, one-off setup) and leave the kernel whole. Where the kernel itself has to be divided, ask for the extracted parts to be inlined as well, and measure the result rather than assuming the division is free.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (104 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (104 lines × 3) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:21 — templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:21-124 | templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:21-124 | templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:21-124 — `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs` and `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs` are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other — this scan matched 1 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 104 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (53 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (53 lines × 2) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:57 — templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:57-109 | templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:44-96 — `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs` and `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs` are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other — this scan matched 2 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:57` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (29–31 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (29–31 lines × 2) src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:99 — src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:99-127 | src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:99-129 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:30 — templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:30-39 | templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:26-35 — `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs` and `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs` are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other — this scan matched 2 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 63 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:30` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8–10 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (8–10 lines × 3) samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/ClearTasks/RequestHandler.cs:21 — samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/ClearTasks/RequestHandler.cs:21-30 | samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/DeleteTask/RequestHandler.cs:21-28 | samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/UpdateTask/RequestHandler.cs:22-29 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `samples/TodoApi/v1/UseCases/ClearTasks/RequestHandler.cs:21` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind `request` to `ClearTasksRequest` in one and `DeleteTaskRequest` in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH — their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not — and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract.
D5 · Coupling · Off the main sequence · ×1
  • Off the main sequence: NetCoreKit.Utils REDACTED:1 — NetCoreKit.Utils: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 12 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
D8 · Code Coverage · Coverage not measured · ×1
  • Coverage not measured — no coverage collector is wired up — Coverage NOT MEASURED: `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` names a data collector that ships in the `coverlet.collector` package, and this repository wires up none — no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, `--collect` produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect.
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code · Unfinished stub · ×1
  • Unfinished stub — throws NotImplementedException src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/UnitOfWorkAsync.cs:31 — A shipped member still throws NotImplementedException — generated scaffolding that was never completed. Implement it or remove the dead surface.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs · Unfinished stub · ×1
  • Unfinished stub — throws NotImplementedException src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/UnitOfWorkAsync.cs:31 — `RepositoryAsync` is a shipped member whose whole body throws NotImplementedException — scaffolding that was never completed. Implement it or remove the dead surface.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience · Outbound HTTP without resilience · ×1
  • Outbound HTTP without resilience src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:57 — `new HttpClient()` builds an outbound HTTP client and nothing bounds it: no timeout is set on it and no retry or resilience policy wraps its calls in the type that owns it. This codebase ships libraries/tools rather than a service it operates, so the failure lands as a hung caller — a build step, a CLI run, a UI thread — with no way out.
SC1 · Supply-chain hygiene · NuGet dependencies are not locked · ×1
  • NuGet dependencies are not locked — No packages.lock.json and no central package management — restores aren't reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable <RestorePackagesWithLockFile>true</RestorePackagesWithLockFile> (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory — never scored.
X1 · Async correctness · Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) through `Task.WaitAll` · ×1
  • Sync-over-async (deadlock risk) through `Task.WaitAll` samples/SignalRNotifier/Services/Hubs/ProjectHub.cs:58 — `Task.WaitAll` blocks this thread until the tasks complete — sync-over-async: it can deadlock under a synchronization context and it parks a thread for as long as the work runs. `await Task.WhenAll(…)` instead.
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness · Disposable created and abandoned in the method that made it · ×1
  • Disposable created and abandoned in the method that made it src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:57 — `client` is a `HttpClient`, which implements `IDisposable`, and it is created here (line 57). Every use of it in `UnaryServerHandler` reads a member through it — it is never returned, never stored, never handed to anything else, and never disposed — so this method both creates the value and is the last thing that can release it, and does not. Nothing announces the leak: the object holds its resource until finalization if its type has a finalizer, and until the process ends if it does not, so the cost accumulates once per CALL rather than showing up as a failure. Declare it with `using` (`using var client = …;`), which releases it at the end of the scope on every path including a throw.
Minor — 121 finding(s)
D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Outdated · ×39
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyModel REDACTED:16 — Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyModel 2.1.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Utils).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer REDACTED:16 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization REDACTED:36 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore REDACTED:18 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection REDACTED:27 — Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http REDACTED:28 — Microsoft.Extensions.Http 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly REDACTED:29 — Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj:37 — Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug samples/ExchangeService/NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService.csproj:38 — Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions REDACTED:31 — Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.IdentityModel.Logging REDACTED:32 — Microsoft.IdentityModel.Logging 5.3.0 → 8.23.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Scrutor REDACTED:37 — Scrutor 3.0.2 → 7.0.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Annotations REDACTED:14 — Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Annotations 4.0.1 → 10.3.1 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerGen REDACTED:15 — Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerGen 4.0.1 → 10.3.1 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI REDACTED:16 — REDACTED → 10.3.1 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: System.Reactive src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch.csproj:18 — System.Reactive 4.2.0-preview.63 → 7.0.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: AutoMapper REDACTED:11 — REDACTED → 16.2.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch).
  • Outdated: MediatR REDACTED:21 — MediatR 6.0.0 → 14.2.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch).
  • Outdated: MediatR.Extensions.Microsoft.DependencyInjection REDACTED:22 — MediatR.Extensions.Microsoft.DependencyInjection 6.0.1 → 11.1.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.CleanArch).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj:15 — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj:16 — Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory 2.2.1 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj:17 — Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite 2.2.1 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.csproj:18 — Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.MySql.csproj:15 — Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore 2.2.1 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer.csproj:16 — Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer 2.2.0 → 10.0.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore.SqlServer).
  • + 14 more in this group — see findings.md.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness · Orphaned file · ×31
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Guard.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/QueryRepositoryExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Db/AppDbContext.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/RepositoryFactory.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.EfCore/HostBuilderExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Helpers/TotpHelper.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/UnitOfWork.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/HATEOAS/ApiExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file templates/NetCoreKit.GrpcTemplate.MongoDb/HostBuilderExtensions.cs:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file REDACTED:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • Orphaned file REDACTED:1 — No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
  • + 6 more in this group — see findings.md.
X4 · Structured logging · Interpolated log message defeats structured logging · ×17
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/LogHandlerMiddleware.cs:23 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Middlewares/LogHandlerMiddleware.cs:28 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:77 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:81 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:84 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:93 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/WebHostExtensions.cs:98 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging samples/Notifier/EventsHostedService.cs:91 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging samples/SignalRNotifier/Startup.cs:57 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis/DispatchedEventBus.cs:31 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis/DispatchedEventBus.cs:44 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging samples/ExchangeService/Program.cs:55 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging samples/ExchangeService/v1/Services/ExchangeServiceImpl.cs:21 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.GrpcHost/AuthInterceptor.cs:134 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.EfCore/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:74 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.MongoDb/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:74 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
  • Interpolated log message defeats structured logging templates/NetCoreKit.RestTemplate.Standard/AppBuilderExtensions.cs:74 — Logging an interpolated string (`$"..."`) collapses the event to plain text — you lose the named, queryable properties structured logging exists for. Use a message template with placeholders: `LogInformation("User {UserId} did {Action}", id, action)`. If these calls go through a logging wrapper that only accepts a pre-formatted string, give the wrapper a template+args overload that forwards to the underlying logger, then migrate call sites to it.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs · Commented-out code · ×10
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:29 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/ControllerBase.cs:15 — 4 consecutive lines of code sit inside a `/* … */` block — a block of code switched off rather than removed, which rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore/Rest/RestClient.cs:96 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka/DispatchedEventBus.cs:35 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryExtensions.cs:123 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/Extensions/RepositoryWithTypeExtensions.cs:125 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/RepositoryFactory.cs:28 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/RepositoryFactory.cs:29 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore/RepositoryFactory.cs:30 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
  • Commented-out code src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo/QueryRepositoryExtensions.cs:100 — A line of code has been commented out rather than removed — dead weight that rots and confuses. Delete it (version control remembers).
ED3 · Event naming · Event not named in past tense · ×3
  • Event not named in past tense: EventEnvelope src/NetCoreKit.Domain/Event.cs:34 — `EventEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear.
  • Event not named in past tense: NotificationEnvelope src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/Envelopes.cs:12 — `NotificationEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear.
  • Event not named in past tense: MessageEnvelope src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus/Envelopes.cs:27 — `MessageEnvelope` reads as an instruction, not a fact that happened. Events describe something that already occurred — name them in the past tense (e.g. `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentCaptured`) so the ubiquitous language stays clear.
D19 · Documentation Quality · Documentation · ×2
  • Documentation: no installation or build instructions README.md — The samples/README.md shows installation commands for MySQL, Redis, Kafka, and gRPC generation but no usage examples. Add a short 'Look how simple we can start as below:' section showing the first runnable sample (e.g. running NetCoreKit.Samples.TodoApi) with its invocation.
  • Documentation: no architecture or design documentation README.md — No architecture or design documentation is present among the visible files. Add an architecture section describing the cloud-native tech stack (container orchestration, Helm charts, Kafka ecosystem) and how it ties together.
C2 · Access Controls · Thin authorization enforcement · ×1
  • Thin authorization enforcement — Authorization machinery exists but no [Authorize] usage and no imperative guard calls were found at handlers.
C3 · Audit Trail · Partial audit-trail evidence · ×1
  • Partial audit-trail evidence — An audit mechanism is present, but the trail is not yet complete — missing: an immutable audit-log / audit-trail type to write to, [Audited] per-entity coverage.
D21 · Naming Consistency · Typo in property name 'Volumn24HUsd' (missing 'u' in Volume). While 'TotalSupply' and 'AvailableSupply' are semantically distinct concepts (total vs available), the typo in 'Volumn' is a clear spelling error inconsistent with standard English and the likely intended 'Volume'. · ×1
  • Typo in property name 'Volumn24HUsd' (missing 'u' in Volume). While 'TotalSupply' and 'AvailableSupply' are semantically distinct concepts (total vs available), the typo in 'Volumn' is a clear spelling error inconsistent with standard English and the likely intended 'Volume'. — Rename 'Volumn24HUsd' to 'Volume24HUsd'. (symbols: NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi.Rpc.TokenResponse.Volumn24HUsd, NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi.Rpc.TokenResponse.TotalSupply, NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi.v1.Controllers.Ticker.AvailableSupply)
D34 · Knowledge Freshness · Dormant codebase · ×1
  • Dormant codebase — 31 of 31 significant files have no living knowledge — the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 31 separate risks. Counted over 31 of the 124 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change.
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED · ×1
  • REDACTED
M2 · Architecture documentation · No ADRs · ×1
  • No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
P10 · Library API & versioning · Large public API surface · ×1
  • Large public API surface — 13/13 types (100%) are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — make internal-by-default and expose only the intended API.
P2 · Observability · Logging is not universal · ×1
  • Logging is not universal — Only 16/25 service-like projects use logging (pure contract/DTO projects are excluded — they have nothing to log). Of those 25, 6 ship a process this repository operates; the rest are libraries their consumer hosts, where the logging decision belongs to the host.
P3 · Security & performance tooling · No SAST · ×1
  • No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's csharp pack, or a .NET security analyzer package (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 870 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback · No release approval gate · ×1
  • No release approval gate — Deployment is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever reaches the release trigger goes to production unreviewed, so a mistaken merge or tag is live before anyone can stop it.
P6 · Release Hygiene · No changelog · ×1
  • No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
PF1 · Benchmark discipline · No performance benchmarks · ×1
  • No performance benchmarks — No benchmark suite was found by the two searches this check runs. FIRST, a BenchmarkDotNet package reference in any project file — every project the workspace loaded, plus a walk of project files on disk that never loaded, because a benchmark suite is exactly the project a partial load drops. SECOND, a script harness: a file whose name contains `benchmark` and ends `.py`, `.sh`, `.ps1`, `.bash`, `.rb`, `.js` or `.mjs`, credited ONLY when this repository's CI text also mentions benchmarks — a harness no pipeline runs is read as a fixture, deliberately. Neither search can see a benchmark suite in another ecosystem's idiom (a Go `testing.B` file, a JMH or criterion project, a pytest-benchmark run), so this is 'no benchmark found by those two searches', not a verdict that the repository has none. Where code is performance-sensitive, a benchmark guards against silent regressions — but it's a bonus here, not a deduction.
PF2 · Allocation hygiene · No allocation-aware APIs detected · ×1
  • No allocation-aware APIs detected — No Span/Memory, pooling (ArrayPool/ObjectPool), stackalloc, ValueTask or buffer-writer usage was found. If this code sits on a hot path, these reduce the GC pressure it creates — a bonus, not a requirement.
S1 · Cryptographic Hygiene · OIDC metadata fetched over HTTP · ×1
  • OIDC metadata fetched over HTTP src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:130 — `RequireHttpsMetadata = false` allows the OIDC discovery doc to be fetched over plain HTTP. Safe for loopback-only fetches (Aspire / on-host); risky for any other path.
X2 · Cancellation propagation · Not all async methods take a CancellationToken · ×1
  • Not all async methods take a CancellationToken — Only 24/64 async methods accept a CancellationToken, so in-flight work can't be stopped early when the caller gives up — whatever ends it in your host (shutdown signal, timeout, abandoned request, user cancel). Thread a token through the call chain and honour it at each await and loop; where a method genuinely cannot be interrupted, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against your hosting model.
X7 · Silent fallback defaults · Silent fallback default in catch · ×1
  • Silent fallback default in catch src/NetCoreKit.Utils/Extensions/TypeConversionExtensions.cs:15 — `ConvertTo` swallows `NotSupportedException` into `return default(T);` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let validation throw.
Minor — 31 finding(s)
D12 · Dependency Hygiene · Outdated · ×31
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Domain).
  • Outdated: Newtonsoft.Json — REDACTED → 13.0.4 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Domain).
  • Outdated: Ben.Demystifier — Ben.Demystifier 0.1.3 → 0.4.1 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides — Microsoft.AspNetCore.HttpOverrides 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning 3.1.1 → 5.1.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer — Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning.ApiExplorer 3.1.0 → 5.1.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching — Microsoft.AspNetCore.ResponseCaching 2.2.0 → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core — REDACTED → 2.3.13 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: MiniProfiler.AspNetCore.Mvc — MiniProfiler.AspNetCore.Mvc 4.0.138 → 4.5.4 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: MiniProfiler.EntityFrameworkCore — MiniProfiler.EntityFrameworkCore 4.0.138 → 4.5.4 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore).
  • Outdated: Humanizer.Core — Humanizer.Core 2.5.16 → 3.0.10 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Polly — Polly 6.1.2 → 8.8.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.EfCore).
  • Outdated: Confluent.Kafka — Confluent.Kafka 0.11.6 → 2.16.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka).
  • Outdated: Google.Protobuf — Google.Protobuf 3.6.1 → 3.36.2 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka).
  • Outdated: librdkafka.redist — librdkafka.redist 0.11.6 → 2.16.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Kafka).
  • Outdated: Blazor.Extensions.SignalR — Blazor.Extensions.SignalR 0.1.8 → 1.0.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Samples.WebNotifier).
  • Outdated: StackExchange.Redis — StackExchange.Redis 2.0.519 → 3.4.5 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Bus.Redis).
  • Outdated: MongoDB.Driver — REDACTED → 3.12.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.Mongo).
  • Outdated: Grpc — Grpc 1.17.1 → 2.46.6 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi).
  • Outdated: Grpc.Tools — Grpc.Tools 1.17.1 → 2.84.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Samples.BiMonetaryApi).
  • Outdated: MessagePack.AspNetCoreMvcFormatter — MessagePack.AspNetCoreMvcFormatter 1.7.3.4 → 3.1.12 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.All).
  • Outdated: Grpc.HealthCheck — Grpc.HealthCheck 1.19.0 → 2.84.0 available (referenced by NetCoreKit.Samples.ExchangeService).
  • + 6 more in this group — see findings.md.

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.

DimensionToolVersionCommandFindingsRaw output
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-8dd24b15afbf42bf946cdafeabee01ed/history.json --exit-code 0 --source .0artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-8dd24b15afbf42bf946cdafeabee01ed/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source .0artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)semgrep—semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off .9artifacts/raw/semgrep.json
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilitiesdotnet—dotnet list netcorekit.sln package --vulnerable --include-transitive --format json27artifacts/raw/dotnet-vulnerable.json
D31 · IaC & Container Securitytrivy—trivy config --format json --quiet .0artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json
D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR)semgrep—semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.0—
D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policydisclosure—disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.0—
D40 · Network Egress Confinementruntime-hardening—runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.0—
D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinementruntime-hardening—runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.0—
D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcementruntime-hardening—runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.0—
D43 · Malicious Dependenciesnone (no readable dependency manifest)—none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).0—

Run 01a1612d-b43a-7af1-96c6-2be04687ee84 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.

Appendix C — Personal-data map

Every field, property and record parameter whose name is conventional personal data — 3 field(s) across 2 categories, each with an exact repo-relative file:line. This is the data inventory a compliance review starts from — right-to-erasure, retention, minimisation. Detected by NAME, from the C# syntax tree, with a deliberately specific identifier classifier — the same one the C1–C5 compliance cards use to decide whether personal data is present, so CardDefinition or FileName don't trip. Two caveats stated rather than glossed: those cards additionally require corroboration (a persistence/account signal, or two distinct PII categories) that this inventory deliberately does not, so it lists more than they gate on; and D32 Data Compliance shares nothing with it — that dimension is a separate semgrep ruleset for personal data leaking into logs, URLs and browser storage, and a clean D32 result says nothing about this list. Informational — it feeds no score.

Name — 2 field(s)
  • AuthorDto.FirstName samples/TodoApi/Dtos/AuthorDto.cs:8
  • AuthorDto.LastName samples/TodoApi/Dtos/AuthorDto.cs:9
Email — 1 field(s)
  • OpenApiOptions.ContactEmail src/NetCoreKit.Infrastructure.AspNetCore.OpenApi/OpenApiOptions.cs:8

Downloadable artifacts

Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.

⬇ Findings, MITRE CWE-tagged .sarif⬇ Health changelog .md