Public report — CrazyDaily, published 4 Aug 2026.
Concrete security findings (CVE IDs, secret matches, dependency versions) are hidden in this version;
ask the repo owner for the full report.
100findings with an exact file:lineof 108 — the remainder are repo-wide signals (a dimension-level measurement, not a single line); open any file:line and verify
26/100dimensions across the health lenses27162 LoC — wide & deep
Executive summary
Read through the Production lens — the standard calibration. *Green* means good enough to run in production. The score is absolute and comparable across repos.
crazysunj/CrazyDaily carries serious gaps (43%). Several issues below can materially affect correctness, security, or the cost of changing it — and propagate to everything that depends on it.
It is strongest in Architecture (100%) — the structure is clean and changes stay contained. Domain Modelling (100%) is solid too.
The area that most needs attention is Readiness (15%) — releases are harder to depend on — versioning, release notes and dependency hygiene are thin, so consumers can't easily tell what changed or trust an upgrade. Maturity (41%) is the next concern — onboarding is slow — key decisions and the architecture aren't written down, so contributors have to reverse-engineer the intent.
Leadership focus, highest impact first: CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR (CI/CD gates); Run what this repository's stack ships (Security & performance tooling); 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage (Code Coverage).
For scale: Medium (~27,162 production lines); rebuilding it from scratch would take roughly ~0.2 person-years (~1 engineer). Approximate, ±~30%.
Encouragingly, the gaps are in documentation and release process — not in the code's correctness, structure or security, which are strong. They're low-risk to close, and doing so would lift the grade without re-engineering anything that already works.
How the score is built — each lens's share of the headlineWidth is the lens's weight in the worst-heaviest fold (the weakest area pulls hardest); colour is that lens's own band. A lens fixes the score in proportion to its width.
A full-fidelity diff against the previous run's complete recorded findings — line-move tolerant: a finding that only shifted line counts as unchanged, only genuinely new titles/files surface here.
0.7× (at 43% quality) — the last 20% of quality is most of the work
Size & shape
Medium · effort split not classified (source measured from disk; the effort-tier breakdown is a C#-only syntax walk)
This codebase represents roughly ~0.2 person-years of build effort (about ~€32,000 to rebuild). Its weakest lens is Readiness at 15% — the part of that asset most exposed by the findings below.
How we model this: boilerplate at a scaffolding rate + logic × domain High (×1.4) — CQRS, domain model × a 0.7× quality factor, at €60–95/h; indicative, ±~30% · size measured directly from source · effort from total production LoC as straight-line logic (the tier split is a C#-only syntax walk), a conservative lower bound. Indicative only — most sensitive to the hourly rate and the domain tier (both tunable in config).
Top priorities
The highest-leverage moves; the full ranked list is in the Roadmap below.
1
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
Value concentrated against a weak lens · High · Value at risk
This is a Medium asset (~0.2 person-years to rebuild), and its weakest lens is Readiness at 15%. The operational and business risk on an asset this size concentrates there — that's where remediation buys the most protection.
→ Direct remediation budget at Readiness first — highest risk-reduction per euro on an asset this size.
Highest-leverage move · Medium · Leverage
Of everything flagged, the best return on effort is: Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR. The rest can wait behind it.
Evidence: priority ranking: top of 5 ranked by impact/effort
→ Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
Architecture — module dependency matrix
104 modules, 240 dependencies — 2 dependency cycles, shown as the red cell(s) above the diagonal. Rows and columns are the same modules, ordered so that a module only depends on ones above it. A cell means the row depends on the column, and its number is how many type pairs create that dependency. Read one thing: is anything above the diagonal? A mark there is a dependency cycle. (A cycle is all this shows — an unusual but cycle-free dependency sits below the diagonal like any other.)
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A02:2021 — Cryptographic Failures
2
High / Critical
A03:2021 — Injection
1
Medium
A06:2021 — Vulnerable & Outdated Components
1
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, establish a CI/CD pipeline to automatically build the code and run the test suite on every push or pull request. Next, integrate security scanning tools, such as SpotBugs or Semgrep, into this workflow to ensure security regressions fail the build. Then, address the single missing automated test and the absence of discovered tests to improve code coverage and test distribution. Finally, document significant architectural decisions in a dedicated location to preserve design context and consequences.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
Run what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Resolve the 3 Largest orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with ItemTouchHelperExtension.java, NeihanEntity.java, GaoxiaoEntity.java.
Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree with `NNNN-title.md` names is the most discoverable form).
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 24 of 26 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 2 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.4 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 26 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 100 of 108 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity (jscpd) — it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D8 Code Coverage: Coverage is measured by building and running the test suite inside Watchdog's isolated image — the target repo is never modified, and nothing on your systems runs. So coverage exists only when the suite builds and runs within the inline time budget; one that needs external services, can't build, or exceeds the budget yields no coverage (D8 then degrades to not-measured, not a low score). Line coverage also says nothing about assertion quality.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score (documentation, ADR quality, naming, comment value, onboarding) — D25 sets the ADR-conformance fraction over sampled code, D22 judges API accuracy over a sample. These are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
10 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was JsonUtil.decodeUnicode at 31. A further 1 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being WeatherUtil.getWeatherIcon at 40 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score.
+ 5 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 JsonUtil.decodeUnicode (cyclomatic 31) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with JsonUtil.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB (cyclomatic… finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with PhotoPickerDataRepository.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 NeihanManager.getNetworkType (cyclomatic 25) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with NeihanManager.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Cyclomatic Complexity in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 19 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB (cognitive… finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with PhotoPickerDataRepository.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 NeihanVideoPlayerController.onClick (cognitive 58) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with NeihanVideoPlayerController.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Callback.chooseDropTarget (cognitive 41) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with ItemTouchHelperExtension.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Cognitive Complexity in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes9.1 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
+ 10 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D8 · Code Coverage0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: How much of the code is actually exercised by tests.
Method: Coverage from coverlet runs or committed reports (Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov), computed per-file with structured exclusions for generated, trivial, and glue code. When the suite can't be built/run in-image AND no report is committed, coverage is reported NOT-MEASURED (excluded from the score) with the precondition to make it measurable — never a LoC-ratio proxy folded in as if measured. Deterministic.
No automated tests — no test code was found in this repository.
No automated tests
What to do
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Code Coverage in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d8_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
CrazyDaily's documentation is a strong README that describes the app and its features (homepage, Weex demo, Flutter demo, notes, friends list, anime, and photo), lists an extensive feature set with links to corresponding posts, and states it uses AndroidX AS3.3.4 while emphasizing not using third-party libraries and self-writing code. However there are no architecture or design documents for the project (the only markdown file is a single-flutter README) and the body ends in a clipped marker mid-Getting Started, so the outline beyond that section is unverifiable.
What to do
Improve Documentation Quality — currently 4.0/10. — CrazyDaily's documentation is a strong README that describes the app and its features (homepage, Weex demo, Flutter demo, notes, friends list, anime, and photo), lists an extensive feature set with links to corresponding posts, and states it uses AndroidX AS3.3.4 while emphasizing not using third-party libraries and self-writing code. However there are no architecture or design documents for the project (the only markdown file is a single-flutter README) and the body ends in a clipped marker mid-Getting Started, so the outline beyond that section is unverifiable.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Git-history secret scan via gitleaks detect over full history in an isolated checkout; each match flagged High. Exhaustive; degrades cleanly when tool absent.
1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
Secret: generic-api-keydomain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/weather/WeatherUseCase.java:108detected by gitleaks finding
Rotate the exposed credentials — git history can't be un-committed
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
112 of 112 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java.
Largest orphaned file · ×3presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java
Dormant codebase
What to do
Resolve the 3 Largest orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with ItemTouchHelperExtension.java, NeihanEntity.java, GaoxiaoEntity.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling; coupling through a build step, config, or non-source file isn't seen.
What it measures: Whether dependencies have known published vulnerabilities (CVEs) per the OSV database — read natively from whatever lockfile the repository ships (Cargo, npm, Go, Python, Maven, RubyGems, …). D33 and D30 add ecosystem-specific scanners on top for npm and .NET.
Method: Multi-ecosystem dependency-CVE scan via osv-scanner --recursive (queries the osv.dev database + parses lockfiles natively across ecosystems: npm package-lock/yarn/pnpm/bun, Go go.mod, Rust Cargo.lock, Maven/Gradle pom.xml/gradle.lockfile, PyPI requirements.txt/poetry.lock/Pipfile.lock, Composer composer.lock, RubyGems Gemfile.lock, Hex mix.lock, pub pubspec.lock, Swift Package.resolved); severity tally (Critical/High/Medium/Low) to 0-10 tight normalizer (8.0). NotApplicable only when the repo declares no supported non-.NET dependency lockfile (a NuGet-only repo stays NotApplicable — .NET CVEs are D30's domain); coverage needs a resolved lockfile. Additive to D33 (trivy fs); exhaustive + deterministic, DB kept fresh.
Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.
Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether read (query) handlers stay side-effect-free — a query that writes persistent state or raises events breaks CQS and makes reads unsafe to retry, cache, or route to a read replica.
Method: Roslyn scan: CQRS handlers classified query-vs-command by interface (IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler<TQuery,TResult>) and name convention (*Query/Get*/Find* vs *Command); each query handler's body checked for persistent-state writes (SaveChanges/repository Add-Update) or event publishes by resolved invocation. Deterministic, type-level, exhaustive over the detected handlers.
Coverage: Population: CQRS handlers identified by IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler interface + *Query/Get*/Find*/*Command NAME convention; query purity then checked exhaustively within that set — a query handler using neither convention is invisible, and mutation is a resolved persistence/publish CALL, not full dataflow.
Other · Domain Modelling — Whether entities protect their state (private/init-only setters) instead of exposing public setters that bypass invariants. Softened when a rehydration framework (Marten/EF) is present.
Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): public setters on entities detected; score softened when Marten/EF rehydration frameworks present. Deterministic, framework-aware.
Coverage: Population: entities by convention; encapsulation (setter shape) checked exhaustively within the set.
Other · Domain Modelling — Whether the domain layer stays free of infrastructure dependencies (EF/Marten/HTTP/ASP.NET) — the clean-architecture dependency rule.
Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): domain-layer types scanned for infrastructure usage in member SIGNATURES and inside method/accessor BODIES — resolved calls and object-creations into EF/Marten/HTTP/Mongo/Redis/message-bus types (not just a namespace allowlist). Deterministic, symbol-resolved, exhaustive over domain-layer bodies, DDD-native.
Coverage: Domain layer identified by NAMESPACE heuristic; infrastructure then resolved by symbol in member SIGNATURES and method/accessor BODIES — rename the layer and the check evaporates.
Other · Domain Modelling — Whether clusters of primitives that travel together (a missing value object) are extracted — a low-weight suggestion, LLM-confirmed when configured.
Method: Roslyn (DDD-gated): primitive parameter clusters recurring three or more times across signatures extracted, then confirmed by language model when configured. Advisory, low-weight.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Add a 'Testing' section to the root README — how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 4 of 4 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no `NNNN-title.md` documents and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/PlantUML/Mermaid diagram or architecture.md — the high-level shape isn't documented.
What to do
Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree with `NNNN-title.md` names is the most discoverable form).
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.
Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.
No test surface was found — there are no tests here to separate from production code, so the folder question hasn't been reached yet.
What to do
Start a test surface where your build system looks for one (tests/, test/, spec/, or your ecosystem's test source set) — the separation follows from putting the first tests in the right place.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
claims a 'CrazyDaily' app with a star download link but no project exists in the repository
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: claims a 'CrazyDaily' app with a star download link but no project exists in the repository.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P1 · CI/CD gates0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, …) — changes aren't gated by an automated build/test.
What to do
Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) — this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build.
What to do
Run what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Reference — by lens
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Not included — 74 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
AX10 Code composition — not assessed — code composition is computed by ROLE over a document set that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
AX3 Project dependency cycles — not assessed — project cycles and dependency direction are computed over a project-reference graph that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX4 Dependency direction — not applicable to a CQRS architecture (the inward-dependency rule is for layered/clean styles)
AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — not assessed — test isolation is computed from a project graph (which projects are test projects, and what they reference) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D10 Test Quality — No tests were found in the analyzed repository to assess for quality.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
D14 License Compliance — Not scored — this repository's package manifest is not parsed for licence data yet. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository's licenses are compliant (a Gradle version catalogue and a Dart pubspec.yaml), which this pass does not parse yet — so this dimension asserts nothing about this repository's licensing in either direction.
D16 Bus Factor — dormant codebase — no living knowledge left to concentrate
D17 Explicit Debt — explicit-debt markers are read through a C# workspace today, so they were not read for this repository's language — this asserts nothing about how many markers the code carries. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
D22 Internal API Consistency — No exposed public API
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — Production source is present (.dart, .java, .kt) but bounded contexts are resolved over the C#/VB project set, which exposed none, so context scope could not be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. Declaring the codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed — see the recommendation on this dimension for where. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D26 Project Cohesion — Project cohesion is assessed over the .NET project set; this target exposed no projects, so project size and spread could not be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's reach, not a verdict about this repository.
D27 Navigability — No calls could be sampled, so navigability was not assessed — tracing effort is measured over resolved call sites and this target exposed none. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's reach, not a verdict about this repository.
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Gradle version catalogue and a Dart pubspec.yaml — not scanned yet) — where an OSV-supported manifest exists, dependency vulnerabilities for this repository are reported under D38 instead.
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No PII/GDPR-handling patterns detected (p/gdpr ruleset) — no data-compliance surface to assess.
D33 JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside build output (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.
D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, Jenkinsfile, .circleci); there is no build to attest provenance for.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D5 Coupling — Inter-project coupling could not be assessed — no analyzable project graph was found for this repository. Not scored: a gap in the analyzer's reach, not a verdict about this repository. (Coupling here is Martin afferent/efferent/instability plus reference cycles across a project-reference graph, read today from .NET project files; other ecosystems' module graphs are not read yet.)
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4) — Cohesion (LCOM4) is measured over a C#/VB class graph, and this repository's production source is .dart, .java, .kt, which this pass does not read — so no class could be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
DM1 Aggregate boundaries — no aggregates detected — aggregate-boundary check not applicable
DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no id-bearing domain types detected — strongly-typed-id adoption not assessable
DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
DM4 Rich vs anemic model — no data-bearing entities detected — rich-vs-anemic model not assessable
DM7 Repository granularity — no repository abstraction detected (e.g. uses a document session)
ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, which this analysis does not build from source alone for this language. Reported as guidance rather than measured
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this check looks for
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P12 CI test-gate honesty — no CI workflow found
P2 Observability — Observability was not assessed: this check reads a source model that does not carry this repository's product — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of a logging idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repo lacks structured logging (it may log through its own ecosystem's logger). This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
P6 Release Hygiene — not evidenced — no changelog, version stamp or semver release tag in the repo
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not measured — the application kind could not be determined for this repo
P8 Schema migrations — not assessed — schema-migration practice is read from a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) into the repo working tree before the scan — a CI step is the usual place, since the artefact is commonly gitignored, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X2 Cancellation propagation — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X3 Exception handling — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X5 Nullable reference types — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:90— data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:90-97 | data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:199-206 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:99— data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:99-106 | data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:290-297 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:87— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:87-94 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseHelperAdapter.java:92-99 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1316— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1316-1323 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1345-1352 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1316` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:68— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:68-75 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:98-105 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:68` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:128— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:128-135 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteFragment.java:132-139 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:128` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/StringUtil.java:32— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/StringUtil.java:32-39 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/StringUtil.java:42-49 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/StringUtil.java:32` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:125— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:125-132 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:148-155 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:125` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/web/CrazyDailyWebView.java:158— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/web/CrazyDailyWebView.java:158-165 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/web/CrazyDailyWebView.java:174-181 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/web/CrazyDailyWebView.java:158` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/contact/ContactUseCase.java:87— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/contact/ContactUseCase.java:87-92 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/gaoxiao/GaoxiaoUseCase.java:64-69 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/contact/ContactUseCase.java:87` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:82— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:82-87 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/module/animation/CircularRevealTransition.java:112-117 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:153— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:153-158 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactFragment.java:163-169 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:153` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:213— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:213-218 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactFragment.java:226-231 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:213` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:439— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:439-444 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/MainActivity.java:211-216 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:439` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:159— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:159-164 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:305-310 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:190— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:190-195 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:273-278 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
TooManyMethods: GroupEntity domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanEntity.java:181— TooManyMethods — 129 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: DataEntity domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/gaoxiao/GaoxiaoEntity.java:65— TooManyMethods — 92 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: HomeActivity presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:108— TooManyMethods — 43 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ItemTouchHelperExtension presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:39— TooManyMethods — 42 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Callback presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1464— TooManyMethods — 33 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: HomeFragment presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeFragment.java:90— TooManyMethods — 32 methods. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/HomeAdapter.java:330— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/HomeAdapter.java:330-336 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/HomeAdapter.java:362-368 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/HomeAdapter.java:330` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/NoteAdapter.java:135— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/NoteAdapter.java:135-141 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/NoteAdapter.java:170-176 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/adapter/NoteAdapter.java:135` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:341— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:341-347 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/MainActivity.java:111-117 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:341` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/dialog/NoteEditDialog.java:135— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/dialog/NoteEditDialog.java:135-141 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/photo/dialog/BucketDialog.java:128-134 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/dialog/NoteEditDialog.java:135` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:340— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:340-346 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:396-402 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:340` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:241— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:241-247 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:270-276 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/threed/CubeReversalView.java:241` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:73— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:73-86 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java:67-80 — before extracting anything, compare `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java` and `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:73` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:93— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:93-106 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java:87-100 — before extracting anything, compare `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java` and `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:93` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:113— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:113-126 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java:107-120 — before extracting anything, compare `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java` and `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:113` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:153— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:153-166 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java:127-140 — before extracting anything, compare `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java` and `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:153` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:179— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:179-192 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/MainPresenter.java:57-70 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:179` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:119— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:119-129 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseHelperAdapter.java:124-134 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:119` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1159— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1159-1169 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1206-1216 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1159` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:197— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:197-207 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java:145-155 — before extracting anything, compare `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java` and `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/NewHomePresenter.java` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 67 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/presenter/HomePresenter.java:197` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:88— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:88-98 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactFragment.java:99-109 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:88` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:141— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:141-151 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteFragment.java:145-155 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:141` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1324— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1324-1332 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1353-1361 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1324` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:235— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:235-243 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeFragment.java:291-299 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:235` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:476— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:476-484 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeFragment.java:248-256 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:476` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:94— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:94-102 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteFragment.java:98-106 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:94` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:183— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:183-191 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteFragment.java:187-195 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:105— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:105-114 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseHelperAdapter.java:110-119 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/base/BaseAdapter.java:105` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/service/DownloadService.java:180— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/service/DownloadService.java:180-189 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/service/DownloadService.java:199-208 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/service/DownloadService.java:180` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:160— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:160-169 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteFragment.java:164-173 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory: extract the block into a single shared function in that directory and call it from each site, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/note/NoteActivity.java:160` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:236— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:236-245 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:294-303 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:236` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
FileTooLong: extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:0— FileTooLong — 1172 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 97% of them inside a single declaration: ItemTouchHelperExtension (39-2558). Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: neihan/NeihanEntity.java domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanEntity.java:0— FileTooLong — 578 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 99% of them inside a single declaration: NeihanEntity (27-1224). Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:365— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:365-376 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/MainActivity.java:147-158 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:381— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/home/HomeActivity.java:381-392 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/MainActivity.java:163-174 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 3) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:154— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:154-158 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:161-165 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:174-178 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 3) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:201— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:201-205 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:214-218 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:223-227 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:140— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:140-144 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:149-153 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:224— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:224-228 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/contact/Contact.java:234-238 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
JsonUtil.decodeUnicode (cyclomatic 31) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/util/JsonUtil.java:127— JsonUtil.decodeUnicode has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB (cyclomatic 26) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:111— PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
NeihanManager.getNetworkType (cyclomatic 25) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/util/NeihanManager.java:194— NeihanManager.getNetworkType has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
NeihanVideoPlayerController.onClick (cyclomatic 24) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/video/NeihanVideoPlayerController.java:390— NeihanVideoPlayerController.onClick has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkSelectForSwipe (cyclomatic 19) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1042— ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkSelectForSwipe has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.scrollIfNecessary (cyclomatic 19) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:802— ItemTouchHelperExtension.scrollIfNecessary has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.select (cyclomatic 19) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:639— ItemTouchHelperExtension.select has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Callback.chooseDropTarget (cyclomatic 18) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1877— Callback.chooseDropTarget has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
NeihanItemEntity.get (cyclomatic 16) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:46— NeihanItemEntity.get has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
2.onTouchEvent (cyclomatic 16) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:328— 2.onTouchEvent has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
dormant codebase — no living knowledge left to concentrate — Every one of the 112 significant source file(s) was last meaningfully changed so long ago that no living knowledge remains, so there is no concentration to measure — the bus factor is not scored. This is not a clean bill: nobody currently holds working knowledge of this code (see D34 Knowledge Freshness).
PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB (cognitive 111) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:111— PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageAndVideoMediaListByDB has cognitive complexity 111 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 62, ternaries 39, boolean chains 6, loops 4 (nesting depth added 80). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NeihanVideoPlayerController.onClick (cognitive 58) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/video/NeihanVideoPlayerController.java:390— NeihanVideoPlayerController.onClick has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 45, error handling 9, boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 35). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Callback.chooseDropTarget (cognitive 41) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1877— Callback.chooseDropTarget has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 36, boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.scrollIfNecessary (cognitive 27) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:802— ItemTouchHelperExtension.scrollIfNecessary has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23, boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
2.onInterceptTouchEvent (cognitive 27) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:275— 2.onInterceptTouchEvent has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
JsonUtil.decodeUnicode (cognitive 24) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/util/JsonUtil.java:127— JsonUtil.decodeUnicode has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14, loops 5, match/switch 5 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkSelectForSwipe (cognitive 23) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1042— ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkSelectForSwipe has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16, boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.select (cognitive 23) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:639— ItemTouchHelperExtension.select has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16, match/switch 3, ternaries 3, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NeihanItemEntity.get (cognitive 20) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:46— NeihanItemEntity.get has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15, boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
2.onTouchEvent (cognitive 20) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:328— 2.onTouchEvent has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16, ternaries 3, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CacheUtil.deleteDir (cognitive 20) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:64— CacheUtil.deleteDir has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17, loops 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CacheUtil.deleteFilesInDir (cognitive 20) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:37— CacheUtil.deleteFilesInDir has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17, loops 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DeviceUtil.isFullScreenDisplay (cognitive 19) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/DeviceUtil.java:68— DeviceUtil.isFullScreenDisplay has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
WeatherUseCase.handleData (cognitive 18) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/interactor/weather/WeatherUseCase.java:61— WeatherUseCase.handleData has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12, if/else 5, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.findSwapTargets (cognitive 18) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:865— ItemTouchHelperExtension.findSwapTargets has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, loops 4, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.swipeIfNecessary (cognitive 18) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1267— ItemTouchHelperExtension.swipeIfNecessary has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
StringUtil.handleTimeStringByMilli (cognitive 18) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/StringUtil.java:27— StringUtil.handleTimeStringByMilli has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14, boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
DownloadDataRepository.getFileName (cognitive 17) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/download/DownloadDataRepository.java:99— DownloadDataRepository.getFileName has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7, ternaries 7, error handling 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageBucketList (cognitive 17) data/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/data/repository/photo/PhotoPickerDataRepository.java:462— PhotoPickerDataRepository.handleImageBucketList has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, boolean chains 4, loops 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NeihanManager.getNetworkType (cognitive 17) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/util/NeihanManager.java:194— NeihanManager.getNetworkType has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, match/switch 4, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperGestureListener.onLongPress (cognitive 17) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:2395— ItemTouchHelperGestureListener.onLongPress has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ScannerActivity.onActivityResult (cognitive 17) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/scan/ScannerActivity.java:134— ScannerActivity.onActivityResult has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, error handling 3, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkHorizontalSwipe (cognitive 16) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1313— ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkHorizontalSwipe has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8, ternaries 5, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkVerticalSwipe (cognitive 16) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java:1342— ItemTouchHelperExtension.checkVerticalSwipe has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8, ternaries 5, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Medium: exported_activity presentation/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:56— The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:49— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:49-61 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:76-88 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/util/CacheUtil.java:49` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 4) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:126— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:126-136 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:144-154 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:172-182 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/view/contact/SatelliteMenuView.java:199-209 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 4) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:173— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:173-179 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:188-194 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactFragment.java:184-191 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactFragment.java:200-207 — there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/contact/ContactActivity.java:173` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/me/MeActivity.java:188— presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/me/MeActivity.java:188-194 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/me/MeFragment.java:177-183 | presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/scan/ScannerActivity.java:167-173 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/ui/me/MeActivity.java:188` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 4) domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:61— domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:61-66 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:69-74 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:77-82 | domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:85-90 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanItemEntity.java:61` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Recommendation — 7 finding(s)
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Largest orphaned file · ×3
Largest orphaned file presentation/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/crazydaily/extension/ItemTouchHelperExtension.java— One of the largest files with no living knowledge remaining — a reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Largest orphaned file domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/neihan/NeihanEntity.java— One of the largest files with no living knowledge remaining — a reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Largest orphaned file domain/src/main/java/com/crazysunj/domain/entity/gaoxiao/GaoxiaoEntity.java— One of the largest files with no living knowledge remaining — a reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
D11 · Test Reliability· Test reliability not included · ×1
Test reliability not included — No test suite was found, so reliability couldn't be assessed.
D28 · Secrets (history)· Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
Rotate the exposed credentials — git history can't be un-committed — Some of these secrets are in git HISTORY: deleting the file does not remove them (the commit persists on every clone, fork and backup). The remediation is to ROTATE each historically-exposed credential and treat it as compromised — not to delete the file. Rewriting history is disruptive and unreliable across existing forks. (Working-tree-only secrets — no commit — can instead be removed from the file and moved to a secret store.)
Dormant codebase — 112 of 112 significant files have no living knowledge — the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 112 separate risks. Re-engage owners or document before change.
No tests found — No test suite could be collected — nothing here references a test framework (JUnit (with Kotest or MockK on Kotlin)), so there were no discoverable tests to count. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here.
Info — 2 finding(s)
D12 · Dependency Hygiene· Dependency hygiene not measured · ×1
Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene — This repository's dependency manifests (a Gradle version catalogue and a Dart pubspec.yaml) were found, but this pass cannot parse them for hygiene, so no package was assessed. Zero packages read is NOT a clean dependency tree, so this is NOT SCORED — a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. This row is about dependency HYGIENE — outdated, deprecated or unmaintained direct dependencies; known CVEs in the same dependency graph are a separate question, reported under D38 wherever the manifest is OSV-readable.
D22 · Internal API Consistency· No exposed public API · ×1
No exposed public API — No intentionally-exposed types (IsPackable or .Contracts) to evaluate.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.
trivy: not applicable — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside build output (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.
provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, Jenkinsfile, .circleci); there is no build to attest provenance for.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
0
—
Run 019fcea0-0982-716a-9675-6e32bd1d6ca9 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 3 · Warnings: 96 · Recommendations: 7 · Info: 2 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 04-08-2026 @ 21:13 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.